ML16337A008: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Poole, Justin Sent:Thursday, December 01, 2016 3:30 PM To:'Browne, Kenneth' Cc:'Thomas, Christine'
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Poole, Justin Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 3:30 PM To:'Browne, Kenneth' Cc:'Thomas, Christine'


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 25: Line 25:
The last sentence of the response to EMCB-RAI-2 states, "since the corrosion allowance for the base mat is less than the cylindrical liner plate, the corrosion analysis is bounded by the base mat analysis and further justified in the response to EMCB RAI-3." Earlier in the response the licensee states the corrosion allowance for the cylinder is 0.094" in general with a 0.1875" allowance for localized areas and the allowance for the base mat area is 0.125."
The last sentence of the response to EMCB-RAI-2 states, "since the corrosion allowance for the base mat is less than the cylindrical liner plate, the corrosion analysis is bounded by the base mat analysis and further justified in the response to EMCB RAI-3." Earlier in the response the licensee states the corrosion allowance for the cylinder is 0.094" in general with a 0.1875" allowance for localized areas and the allowance for the base mat area is 0.125."
It is not clear the quoted statement is accurate unless the licensee is referring to the localized corrosion allowance for the cylinder. The licensee should clarify the statement and if the localized allowance is being used a technical justification should be provided for use of the localized allowance instead of the general allowance.
It is not clear the quoted statement is accurate unless the licensee is referring to the localized corrosion allowance for the cylinder. The licensee should clarify the statement and if the localized allowance is being used a technical justification should be provided for use of the localized allowance instead of the general allowance.
Thanks.
Thanks. Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048
Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048


Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  3194  Mail Envelope Properties  (d32077e05e30428fbc34853240f1998a)   
Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  3194  Mail Envelope Properties  (d32077e05e30428fbc34853240f1998a)   

Revision as of 02:57, 8 July 2018

2016/12/01 NRR E-mail Capture - Need for Supplement to ILRT License Amendment Seabrook Station, License Amendment Request 16-01, Request to Extend Containment Leakage Test Frequency
ML16337A008
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/01/2016
From: Justin Poole
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Browne K
Nextera Energy
References
SBK-L-16165
Download: ML16337A008 (2)


Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Poole, Justin Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 3:30 PM To:'Browne, Kenneth' Cc:'Thomas, Christine'

Subject:

Need for Supplement to IL RT license amendment Ken, On October 27, 2016, NextEra provided responses to t he NRC staff's request for additional information (RAI) related to the license amendment request regarding extending containment leakage testing frequency. On November 28, we held a call with your staff to clarify the response to EMCB-RAI-2. As discussed during the call, the NRC staff would like you to clarify the fo llowing on the docket in a supplemental response.

EMCB-RAI-2:

The last sentence of the response to EMCB-RAI-2 states, "since the corrosion allowance for the base mat is less than the cylindrical liner plate, the corrosion analysis is bounded by the base mat analysis and further justified in the response to EMCB RAI-3." Earlier in the response the licensee states the corrosion allowance for the cylinder is 0.094" in general with a 0.1875" allowance for localized areas and the allowance for the base mat area is 0.125."

It is not clear the quoted statement is accurate unless the licensee is referring to the localized corrosion allowance for the cylinder. The licensee should clarify the statement and if the localized allowance is being used a technical justification should be provided for use of the localized allowance instead of the general allowance.

Thanks. Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3194 Mail Envelope Properties (d32077e05e30428fbc34853240f1998a)

Subject:

Need for Supplement to ILRT license amendment Sent Date: 12/1/2016 3:30:22 PM Received Date: 12/1/2016 3:30:22 PM From: Poole, Justin Created By: Justin.Poole@nrc.gov Recipients: "'Thomas, Christine'" <Christine.Thomas@nexteraenergy.com>

Tracking Status: None "'Browne, Kenneth'" <Kenneth.J.Browne@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1374 12/1/2016 3:30:22 PM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: