ML16337A008: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Poole, Justin Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 3:30 PM To:'Browne, Kenneth' Cc:'Thomas, Christine' | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
The last sentence of the response to EMCB-RAI-2 states, "since the corrosion allowance for the base mat is less than the cylindrical liner plate, the corrosion analysis is bounded by the base mat analysis and further justified in the response to EMCB RAI-3." Earlier in the response the licensee states the corrosion allowance for the cylinder is 0.094" in general with a 0.1875" allowance for localized areas and the allowance for the base mat area is 0.125." | The last sentence of the response to EMCB-RAI-2 states, "since the corrosion allowance for the base mat is less than the cylindrical liner plate, the corrosion analysis is bounded by the base mat analysis and further justified in the response to EMCB RAI-3." Earlier in the response the licensee states the corrosion allowance for the cylinder is 0.094" in general with a 0.1875" allowance for localized areas and the allowance for the base mat area is 0.125." | ||
It is not clear the quoted statement is accurate unless the licensee is referring to the localized corrosion allowance for the cylinder. The licensee should clarify the statement and if the localized allowance is being used a technical justification should be provided for use of the localized allowance instead of the general allowance. | It is not clear the quoted statement is accurate unless the licensee is referring to the localized corrosion allowance for the cylinder. The licensee should clarify the statement and if the localized allowance is being used a technical justification should be provided for use of the localized allowance instead of the general allowance. | ||
Thanks. | Thanks. Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048 | ||
Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3194 Mail Envelope Properties (d32077e05e30428fbc34853240f1998a) | Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3194 Mail Envelope Properties (d32077e05e30428fbc34853240f1998a) | ||
Revision as of 02:57, 8 July 2018
| ML16337A008 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook |
| Issue date: | 12/01/2016 |
| From: | Justin Poole Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Browne K Nextera Energy |
| References | |
| SBK-L-16165 | |
| Download: ML16337A008 (2) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Poole, Justin Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 3:30 PM To:'Browne, Kenneth' Cc:'Thomas, Christine'
Subject:
Need for Supplement to IL RT license amendment Ken, On October 27, 2016, NextEra provided responses to t he NRC staff's request for additional information (RAI) related to the license amendment request regarding extending containment leakage testing frequency. On November 28, we held a call with your staff to clarify the response to EMCB-RAI-2. As discussed during the call, the NRC staff would like you to clarify the fo llowing on the docket in a supplemental response.
EMCB-RAI-2:
The last sentence of the response to EMCB-RAI-2 states, "since the corrosion allowance for the base mat is less than the cylindrical liner plate, the corrosion analysis is bounded by the base mat analysis and further justified in the response to EMCB RAI-3." Earlier in the response the licensee states the corrosion allowance for the cylinder is 0.094" in general with a 0.1875" allowance for localized areas and the allowance for the base mat area is 0.125."
It is not clear the quoted statement is accurate unless the licensee is referring to the localized corrosion allowance for the cylinder. The licensee should clarify the statement and if the localized allowance is being used a technical justification should be provided for use of the localized allowance instead of the general allowance.
Thanks. Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3194 Mail Envelope Properties (d32077e05e30428fbc34853240f1998a)
Subject:
Need for Supplement to ILRT license amendment Sent Date: 12/1/2016 3:30:22 PM Received Date: 12/1/2016 3:30:22 PM From: Poole, Justin Created By: Justin.Poole@nrc.gov Recipients: "'Thomas, Christine'" <Christine.Thomas@nexteraenergy.com>
Tracking Status: None "'Browne, Kenneth'" <Kenneth.J.Browne@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1374 12/1/2016 3:30:22 PM
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: