ML17110A499: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 26: Line 26:
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Steve Frantz, Esquire Paul Bessette U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa M. Regner
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Steve Frantz, Esquire Paul Bessette U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa M. Regner


NRG South Texas LP Mark Walker Jim von Suskil Skip Zahn
NRG South Texas LP Mark Walker Jim von Suskil Skip Zahn CPS Energy Kevin Pollo Cris Eugster L. D. Blaylock City of Austin Elaina Ball John Wester Texas Dept. of State Health Services Helen Watkins Robert Free
 
CPS Energy Kevin Pollo Cris Eugster L. D. Blaylock City of Austin Elaina Ball John Wester Texas Dept. of State Health Services Helen Watkins Robert Free


Attachment 1 South Texas Project Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report; Revision 0
Attachment 1 South Texas Project Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report; Revision 0
Line 34: Line 32:
Core Operating Limits Report Page 1 of 8   
Core Operating Limits Report Page 1 of 8   


SOUTH  TEXAS  PROJECT Unit 1 Cycle 21 CORE  OPERATING  LIMITS  REPORT Revision 0 MODES  3,  4  and 5
SOUTH  TEXAS  PROJECT Unit 1 Cycle 2 1 CORE  OPERATING  LIMITS  REPORT Revision 0 MODES  3,  4  and 5
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 2 of 8  1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report for STPEGS Unit 1 Cycle 21 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.6. The core operating limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 2 of 8  1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report for STPEGS Unit 1 Cycle 21 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.6. The core operating limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.
The Technical Specifications affected by this report are:
The Technical Specifications affected by this report are:
Line 46: Line 44:
: 8) 3/4.2.2 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
: 8) 3/4.2.2 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
: 9) 3/4.2.3 NUCLEAR ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
: 9) 3/4.2.3 NUCLEAR ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
: 10) 3/4.2.5 DNB PARAMETERS 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle
: 10) 3/4.2.5 DNB PARAMETERS 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented below.
-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented below.
2.1 SAFETY LIMITS  (Specification 2.1):
2.1 SAFETY LIMITS  (Specification 2.1):
2.1.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
2.1.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
Line 91: Line 88:
==3.0 REFERENCES==
==3.0 REFERENCES==


3.1 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to R. F. Dunn (STPNOC), "Confirmation of Mode 3, 4, and 5 RSAC Limits for South Texas Unit 1 Cycle 21 Redesig n," NF-TG-09-26 (ST-UB-NOC-17003590), April 6, 2017. 3.2 NUREG-1346, Technical Specifications, South Texas Project Unit Nos. 1 and 2.
3.1 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to R. F. Dunn (STPNOC), "Confirmation of Mode 3, 4, and 5 RSAC Limits for South Texas Unit 1 Cycle 21 Redesig n," NF-TG-09-26 (ST-UB-NOC-17 00 3590), April 6 , 20 17. 3.2 NUREG-1346, Technical Specifications, South Texas Project Unit Nos. 1 and 2.
3.3 Document RSE
3.3 Document RSE
-U1, Rev. 6, "Unit 1 Cycle 21 Reload Safety Evaluation and Core Operating Limits Report." (CR Action 16
-U1, Rev. 6, "Unit 1 Cycle 21 Reload Safety Evaluation and Core Operating Limits Report." (CR Action 16
-454-70).
-454-70).
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 5 of 8    FIGURE  1 Reactor Core Safety Limits  
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 5 of 8    FIGURE  1 Reactor Core Safety Limits  
- Four Loops in Operation Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
- Four Loops in Operation Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
.
.
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 6 of 8  Figure 2Required Shutdown Margin for Modes 3 & 40.01.02.03.04.05.0 6.0 7.004008001200160020002400RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)Required Shutdown Margin (% Delta Rho)UnacceptableAcceptable
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 6 of 8  Figure 2Required Shutdown Margin for Modes 3 & 40.01.02.03.04.05.0 6.0 7.0 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)Required Shutdown Margin (% Delta Rho)UnacceptableAcceptable ( 0 , 1.30 )( 2400 , 5.15 )( 600 , 1.30 )
( 0 , 1.30 )
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 7 of 8    Figure 3Required Shutdown Margin for Mode 50.01.02.03.0 4.05.06.07.0 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)Required Shutdown Margin (% Delta Rho)UnacceptableAcceptable ( 0 , 1.30 )( 2400 , 4.50 )( 650 , 1.30 )
( 2400 , 5.15 )
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 8 of 8    FIGURE  4 MTC versus Power Level Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
( 600 , 1.30 )
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 7 of 8    Figure 3Required Shutdown Margin for Mode 50.01.02.03.0 4.05.06.07.004008001200160020002400RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)Required Shutdown Margin (% Delta Rho)UnacceptableAcceptable
( 0 , 1.30 )
( 2400 , 4.50 )
( 650 , 1.30 )
Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 8 of 8    FIGURE  4 MTC versus Power Level Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
.  -----------------------------------------
.  -----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGURE  5 Control Rod Insertion Limits versus Power Level
FIGURE  5 Control Rod Insertion Limits versus Power Level


Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
.  ---------------------------------------------------
.  ---------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGURE  6 AFD Limits versus Power Level
FIGURE  6 AFD Limits versus Power Level


Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
.  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
FIGURE  7 K(Z) - Normalized F Q(Z) versus Core Height
FIGURE  7 K(Z) - Normalized F Q(Z) versus Core Height


Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry
Line 145: Line 136:
: 8) 3/4.2.2 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
: 8) 3/4.2.2 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
: 9) 3/4.2.3 NUCLEAR ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
: 9) 3/4.2.3 NUCLEAR ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
: 10) 3/4.2.5 DNB PARAMETERS 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle
: 10) 3/4.2.5 DNB PARAMETERS 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented below.
-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented below.
2.1 SAFETY LIMITS  (Specification 2.1):
2.1 SAFETY LIMITS  (Specification 2.1):
2.1.1 The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure
2.1.1 The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure
Line 154: Line 144:


Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 3 of 16  2.2.2 The Over-temperature T and Over
Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 3 of 16  2.2.2 The Over-temperature T and Over
-power T setpoint parameter values are listed below: Over-temperature T Setpoint Parameter Values 1 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 1 = 8 sec 2 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 2 = 3 sec 3 measured reactor vessel T lag time constant
-power T setpoint parameter values are listed below: Over-temperature T Setpoint Parameter Values 1 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 1 = 8 sec 2 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 2 = 3 sec 3 measured reactor vessel T lag time constant , 3 = 2 sec 4 measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant , 4 = 28 sec 5 measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant , 5 = 4 sec 6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant , 6 = 2 sec K 1 Overtemperature T reactor trip setpoint, K 1 = 1.14 K 2 Overtemperature T reactor trip setpoint Tavg coefficient, K 2 = 0.028/°F K3  Overtemperature T reactor trip setpoint pressure coefficient, K 3 = 0.00143/psi T' Nominal full power Tavg, T' 592.0 °F P' Nominal RCS pressure, P' = 2235 psig f 1 (I) is a function of the indicated difference between top and bottom detectors of the power-range neutron ion chambers; with gains to be selected based on measured instrument response during plant startup tests such that:
, 3 = 2 sec 4 measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant
  (1) For q t - q b between -70% and +8%, f 1 (I)  =  0, where q t and q b are percent RATED THERMAL POWER in the top and bottom halves of the core respectively, a nd q t + q b is total THERMAL POWER in percent of RATED THERMAL POWER; (2) For each percent that q t - q b is more negative than -70%, the T Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 0.0% of its value at RATED THERMAL POWER; and (3) For each percent that q t - q b is more positive than
, 4 = 28 sec 5 measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant
, 5 = 4 sec 6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant
, 6 = 2 sec K1 Overtemperature T reactor trip setpoint, K 1 = 1.14 K2 Overtemperature T reactor trip setpoint Tavg coefficient, K 2 = 0.028/°F K3  Overtemperature T reactor trip setpoint pressure coefficient, K 3 = 0.00143/psi T' Nominal full power Tavg, T' 592.0 °F P' Nominal RCS pressure, P' = 2235 psig f1(I) is a function of the indicated difference between top and bottom detectors of the power-range neutron ion chambers; with gains to be selected based on measured instrument response during plant startup tests such that:
  (1) For qt - qb between -70% and +8%, f 1(I)  =  0, where q t and qb are percent RATED THERMAL POWER in the top and bottom halves of the core respectively, a nd qt + qb is total THERMAL POWER in percent of RATED THERMAL POWER; (2) For each percent that q t - qb is more negative than -70%, the T Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 0.0% of its value at RATED THERMAL POWER; and (3) For each percent that q t - qb is more positive than
  +8%, the T Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 2.65% of its value at RATED THERMAL POWER.
  +8%, the T Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 2.65% of its value at RATED THERMAL POWER.
   (Reference 3.6 and Section 4.4.1.2 of Reference 3.7)  Over-power T Setpoint Parameter Values 1 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 1 = 8 sec 2 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 2 = 3 sec 3  measured reactor vessel T lag time constant
   (Reference 3.6 and Section 4.4.1.2 of Reference 3.7)  Over-power T Setpoint Parameter Values 1 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 1 = 8 sec 2 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 2 = 3 sec 3  measured reactor vessel T lag time constant , 3 = 2 sec 6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant , 6 = 2 sec 7 Time constant utilized in the rate
, 3 = 2 sec 6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant
-lag compensator for Tavg , 7 = 10 sec K 4 Overpower T reactor trip setpoint, K 4 = 1.08 K 5 Overpower T reactor trip setpoint Tavg rate/lag coefficient,   K 5 = 0.02/°F for increasing average temperature, and K5  = 0 for decreasing average temperature K 6 Overpower T reactor trip setpoint Tavg heatup coefficient K 6 = 0.002/°F for T > T", and  K 6 =  0 for T  T" T" Indicated full power Tavg, T"  592.0 °F f 2 (I) = 0 for all (I)
, 6 = 2 sec 7 Time constant utilized in the rate
-lag compensator for Tavg, 7 = 10 sec K4 Overpower T reactor trip setpoint, K 4 = 1.08 K5 Overpower T reactor trip setpoint Tavg rate/lag coefficient, K5 = 0.02/°F for increasing average temperature, and K5  = 0 for decreasing average temperature K6 Overpower T reactor trip setpoint Tavg heatup coefficient K6 = 0.002/°F for T > T", and  K6 =  0 for T  T" T" Indicated full power Tavg, T"  592.0 °F f2(I) = 0 for all (I)
Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 4 of 16  2.3 SHUTDOWN MARGIN 1 (Specification 3.1.1.1): The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be:
Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 4 of 16  2.3 SHUTDOWN MARGIN 1 (Specification 3.1.1.1): The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be:
2.3.1 Greater than 1.3%  for MODES 1 and 2*
2.3.1 Greater than 1.3%  for MODES 1 and 2*
Line 172: Line 156:
2.4.1 The BOL, ARO, MTC shall be less positive than the limits shown in Figure 4.
2.4.1 The BOL, ARO, MTC shall be less positive than the limits shown in Figure 4.
2.4.2 The EOL, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than  
2.4.2 The EOL, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than  
-62.6 pcm/F. 2.4.3 The 300 ppm, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than  
-62.6 pcm/ F. 2.4.3 The 300 ppm, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than  
-53.6 pcm/F  (300 ppm Surveillance Limit).
-53.6 pcm/ F  (300 ppm Surveillance Limit).
Where: BOL stands for Beginning
Where: BOL stands for Beginning
-of-Cycle Life, EOL stands for End
-of-Cycle Life, EOL stands for End
-of-Cycle Life, ARO stands for All Rods Out, HFP stands for Hot Full Power (100% RATED THERMAL POWER),
-of-Cycle Life, ARO stands for All Rods Out, HFP stands for Hot Full Power (100% RATED THERMAL POWER), HFP vessel average temperature is 592 F. 2.4.4 The Revised Predicted near
HFP vessel average temperature is 592 F. 2.4.4 The Revised Predicted near
-EOL 300 ppm MTC shall be calculated using the algorithm from the document referenced by Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.b.10:
-EOL 300 ppm MTC shall be calculated using the algorithm from the document referenced by Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.b.10:
Revised Predicted MTC = Predicted MTC
Revised Predicted MTC = Predicted MTC
Line 188: Line 171:
1 The Shutdown Margin and Rod Insertion limits account for the removal of RCCA D6 in Shutdown Bank A.
1 The Shutdown Margin and Rod Insertion limits account for the removal of RCCA D6 in Shutdown Bank A.
Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 5 of 16  2.6 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE  (Specification 3.2.1):
Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 5 of 16  2.6 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE  (Specification 3.2.1):
2.6.1 AFD limits as required by Technical Specification 3.2.1 are determined by Constant Axial Offset Control (CAOC) Operations with an AFD target band of +5,  
2.6.1 AFD limits as required by Technical Specification 3.2.1 are determined by Constant Axial Offset Control (CAOC) Operations with an AFD target band of +5, -10%. 2.6.2 The AFD shall be maintained within the ACCEPTABLE OPERATION portion of Figure 6, as required by Technical Specifications.
-10%. 2.6.2 The AFD shall be maintained within the ACCEPTABLE OPERATION portion of Figure 6, as required by Technical Specifications.
2.7 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR  (Specification 3.2.2):
2.7 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR  (Specification 3.2.2):
2.7.1 FQRTP = 2.55. 2.7.2 K(Z) is provided in Figure
2.7.1 F QRTP = 2.55. 2.7.2 K(Z) is provided in Figure
: 7. 2.7.3 The Fxy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER (Fxy RTP)  within specific core planes shall be:
: 7. 2.7.3 The F xy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER (Fxy RTP)  within specific core planes shall be: 2.7.3.1 Less than or equal to 2.102 for all cycle burnups for all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods, and 2.7.3.2 Less than or equal to the appropriate core height
2.7.3.1 Less than or equal to 2.102 for all cycle burnups for all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods, and 2.7.3.2 Less than or equal to the appropriate core height
-dependent value from Table 1 for all unrodded core planes.
-dependent value from Table 1 for all unrodded core planes.
2.7.3.3 PFxy = 0.2. These Fxy limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot channel factor F Q(Z) will be limited by Technical Specification 3.2.2 assuming the most
2.7.3.3 PF xy = 0.2. These F xy limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot channel factor F Q(Z) will be limited by Technical Specification 3.2.2 assuming the most
-limiting axial power distributions expected to result for the insertion and removal of Control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions, as described in WCAP
-limiting axial power distributions expected to result for the insertion and removal of Control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions, as described in WCAP
-8385. Therefore, these F xy limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10 CFR 50.46. 2.7.4 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor 2.7.4.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FQ) to be applied to the FQ(Z) and F xy(Z) using the PDMS shall be calculated by:
-8385. Therefore, these F xy limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10 CFR 50.46. 2.7.4 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor 2.7.4.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FQ) to be applied to the F Q(Z) and F xy(Z) using the PDMS shall be calculated by:
UFQ = (1.0 + (U Q/100))*UE Where: UQ = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5
U FQ = (1.0 + (U Q/100))*U E Where: U Q = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5
-19 from the document referenced by Technical Specification  
-19 from the document referenced by Technical Specification  


6.9.1.6.b.11 UE = Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.
6.9.1.6.b.11 U E = Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.
This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS).
This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS).
Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 6 of 16  2.7.4.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UFQ) to be applied to the F Q(Z) and F xy(Z) shall be calculated by:
Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 6 of 16  2.7.4.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FQ) to be applied to the F Q(Z) and F xy(Z) shall be calculated by:
UFQ = UQU*UE Where: UQU = Base FQ measurement uncertainty of 1.05.
U FQ = U QU*U E Where: UQU = Base F Q measurement uncertainty of 1.05.
UE = Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.
U E = Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.
2.8 ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR  (Specification 3.2.3):
2.8 ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR  (Specification 3.2.3):
2.8.1 FHRTP  =  1.62 2.8.2 PFH  =  0.3 2.8.3 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor 2.8.3.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FH) to be applied to the FHN using the PDMS shall be the greater of:
2.8.1 FHRTP  =  1.62 2.8.2 PFH  =  0.3 2.8.3 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor 2.8.3.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FH) to be applied to the FH N using the PDMS shall be the greater of:
UFH = 1.04    OR UFH = 1.0 + (UH/100) Where: UH = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5
U FH = 1.04    OR U FH = 1.0 + (UH/100) Where: UH = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5
-19 from the document referenced in Technical Specification   
-19 from the document referenced in Technical Specification   


6.9.1.6.b.11.
6.9.1.6.b.11.
This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System. 2.8.3.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UFH) shall be: UFH = 1.04 Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 7 of 16  2.9 DNB PARAMETERS  (Specification 3.2.5):
This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System. 2.8.3.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FH) shall be: U FH = 1.0 4 Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 7 of 16  2.9 DNB PARAMETERS  (Specification 3.2.5):
2.9.1 The following DNB
2.9.1 The following DNB
-related parameters shall be maintained within the following limits: 1 2.9.1.1 Reactor Coolant System Tavg    595 °F 2, 2.9.1.2 Pressurizer Pressure  >  2200 psig 3, 2.9.1.3 Minimum Measured Reactor Coolant System Flow  >  403,000 gpm
-related parameters shall be maintained within the following limits: 1 2.9.1.1 Reactor Coolant System Tavg    595 °F 2, 2.9.1.2 Pressurizer Pressure  >  2200 psig 3, 2.9.1.3 Minimum Measured Reactor Coolant System Flow  >  403,000 gpm
Line 219: Line 200:
==3.0 REFERENCES==
==3.0 REFERENCES==


3.1 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to R. F. Dunn (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Unit 1 Cycle 21 Redesign Final Reload Evaluation" NF-TG-17-7, Rev. 1 (ST-UB-NOC-17003573, Rev. 1) dated April 12, 2017. 3.2 NUREG-1346, Technical Specifications, South Texas Project Unit Nos. 1 and 2.
3.1 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to R. F. Dunn (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Unit 1 Cycle 21 Redesign Final Reload Evaluation" NF-TG-17-7, Rev. 1 (ST-UB-NOC-17 00 3 573, Rev. 1) dated April 12, 2017. 3.2 NUREG-1346, Technical Specifications, South Texas Project Unit Nos. 1 and 2.
3.3 STPNOC Calculation ZC
3.3 STPNOC Calculation ZC
-7035, Rev. 2, "Loop Uncertainty Calculation for RCS Tavg Instrumentation," Section 10.1.
-7035, Rev. 2, "Loop Uncertainty Calculation for RCS Tavg Instrumentation," Section 10.1.
Line 227: Line 208:
3.5 Letter from J. S Wyble (Westinghouse) to T. J. Jordan (STPNOC), "STP Nuclear Operating Company Units 1 & 2 Power Uprate PCWG Parameters," ST
3.5 Letter from J. S Wyble (Westinghouse) to T. J. Jordan (STPNOC), "STP Nuclear Operating Company Units 1 & 2 Power Uprate PCWG Parameters," ST
-WN-NOC-00-000072 dated December 15, 2000, STI 31218644
-WN-NOC-00-000072 dated December 15, 2000, STI 31218644
. 3.6 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to D. F. Hoppes (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Documentation of the f 1(Calculation," NF
. 3.6 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to D. F. Hoppes (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Documentation of the f 1 (Calculation," NF
-TG-11-93 (ST-UB-NOC-11003215) dated November 10, 2011.
-TG-11-93 (ST-UB-NOC-11003215) dated November 10, 2011.
3.7 Document RSE
3.7 Document RSE
Line 234: Line 215:
3 Limit not applicable during either a Thermal Power ramp in excess of 5% of RTP per minute or a Thermal Power step in excess of 10% RTP. Per Technical Specification 3.2.5 Bases, this includes a 10.7 psi measurement uncertainty as read on the QDPS display, which is bounded by the 9.6 psi averaged measurement calculated in Reference 3.4. 4 Includes the flow measurement uncertainty of 2.8% from Reference 3.5.   
3 Limit not applicable during either a Thermal Power ramp in excess of 5% of RTP per minute or a Thermal Power step in excess of 10% RTP. Per Technical Specification 3.2.5 Bases, this includes a 10.7 psi measurement uncertainty as read on the QDPS display, which is bounded by the 9.6 psi averaged measurement calculated in Reference 3.4. 4 Includes the flow measurement uncertainty of 2.8% from Reference 3.5.   


Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 11 of 16    -3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.00102030405060708090100Moderator Temperature Coefficient (pcm/
Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 11 of 16    -3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Moderator Temperature Coefficient (pcm/
°F)Rated Thermal Power (%)Figure 4MTC versus Power LevelUnacceptableAcceptable Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 12 of 16 Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 13 of 16  0102030405060708090100110120-50-40-30-20-1001020304050Rated Thermal Power (%)Axial Flux Difference (% Delta
°F)Rated Thermal Power (%)Figure 4MTC versus Power LevelUnacceptableAcceptable Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 12 of 16 Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 13 of 16  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90100110120-50-40-30-20-10 0 10 20 30 40 50Rated Thermal Power (%)Axial Flux Difference (% Delta
-I)Figure 6AFD Limits versus Power LevelUnacceptableAcceptableUnacceptable
-I)Figure 6AFD Limits versus Power LevelUnacceptableAcceptableUnacceptable ( -31 , 50 )( 11 , 90 )( -11 , 90 )( 31 , 50 )
( -31 , 50 )( 11 , 90 )
( -11 , 90 )( 31 , 50 )


Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 14 of 16 Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 15 of 16    Table 1 (Part 1 of 2)
Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 14 of 16 Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 15 of 16    Table 1 (Part 1 of 2)
Unrodded F xy for Each Core Height for Cycle Burnups Less Than 10,000 MWD/MTU  Core Height Axial Unrodded Core Height Axial Unrodded (Ft.) Point Fxy (Ft.) Point Fxy 14.0 1 7.401 6.8 37 1.982 13.8 2 5.801 6.6 38 2.031 13.6 3 4.200 6.4 39 2.008 13.4 4 2.815 6.2 40 1.953 13.2 5 2.534 6.0 41 1.924 13.0 6 2.276 5.8 42 1.956 12.8 7 2.204 5.6 43 1.967 12.6 8 2.186 5.4 44 1.973 12.4 9 2.120 5.2 45 2.019 12.2 10 2.066 5.0 46 2.083 12.0 11 2.039 4.8 47 2.096 11.8 12 2.048 4.6 48 2.042 11.6 13 2.075 4.4 49 1.975 11.4 14 2.061 4.2 50 1.985 11.2 15 2.017 4.0 51 1.984 11.0 16 1.984 3.8 52 1.973 10.8 17 1.972 3.6 53 1.981 10.6 18 1.964 3.4 54 2.024 10.4 19 1.934 3.2 55 2.050 10.2 20 1.950 3.0 56 1.992 10.0 21 1.994 2.8 57 1.939 9.8 22 2.004 2.6 58 1.943 9.6 23 1.934 2.4 59 1.947 9.4 24 1.913 2.2 60 1.955 9.2 25 1.908 2.0 61 1.988 9.0 26 1.903 1.8 62 2.048 8.8 27 1.909 1.6 63 2.049 8.6 28 1.929 1.4 64 1.957 8.4 29 1.987 1.2 65 1.895 8.2 30 2.038 1.0 66 1.937 8.0 31 1.999 0.8 67 2.254 7.8 32 1.937 0.6 68 3.025 7.6 33 1.934 0.4 69 4.318 7.4 34 1.955 0.2 70 6.145 7.2 35 1.950 0.0 71 9.182 7.0 36 1.940 Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 16 of 16  Table 1 (Part 2 of 2) Unrodded Fxy for Each Core Height for Cycle Burnups Greater Than or Equal to 10,000 MWD/MTU  Core Height Axial Unrodded Core Height Axial Unrodded (Ft.) Point Fxy (Ft.) Point Fxy 14.0 1 6.408 6.8 37 2.210 13.8 2 5.134 6.6 38 2.246 13.6 3 3.860 6.4 39 2.213 13.4 4 2.756 6.2 40 2.155 13.2 5 2.530 6.0 41 2.121 13.0 6 2.280 5.8 42 2.113 12.8 7 2.139 5.6 43 2.101 12.6 8 2.070 5.4 44 2.088 12.4 9 2.002 5.2 45 2.105 12.2 10 1.991 5.0 46 2.139 12.0 11 2.001 4.8 47 2.133 11.8 12 2.029 4.6 48 2.075 11.6 13 2.061 4.4 49 2.027 11.4 14 2.055 4.2 50 2.022 11.2 15 2.029 4.0 51 2.009 11.0 16 2.015 3.8 52 1.993 10.8 17 2.026 3.6 53 1.994 10.6 18 2.033 3.4 54 2.028 10.4 19 2.043 3.2 55 2.050 10.2 20 2.073 3.0 56 1.992 10.0 21 2.119 2.8 57 1.939 9.8 22 2.137 2.6 58 1.925 9.6 23 2.104 2.4 59 1.907 9.4 24 2.076 2.2 60 1.879 9.2 25 2.088 2.0 61 1.889 9.0 26 2.099 1.8 62 1.936 8.8 27 2.110 1.6 63 1.965 8.6 28 2.127 1.4 64 1.943 8.4 29 2.166 1.2 65 1.956 8.2 30 2.201 1.0 66 2.067 8.0 31 2.166 0.8 67 2.434 7.8 32 2.133 0.6 68 3.163 7.6 33 2.134 0.4 69 4.275 7.4 34 2.146 0.2 70 5.814 7.2 35 2.157 0.0 71 8.515 7.0 36 2.169}}
Unrodded F xy for Each Core Height for Cycle Burnups Less Than 10 , 000 MWD/MTU  Core Height Axial Unrodded Core Height Axial Unrodded (Ft.) Point Fxy (Ft.) Point Fxy 14.0 1 7.401 6.8 37 1.982 13.8 2 5.801 6.6 38 2.031 13.6 3 4.200 6.4 39 2.008 13.4 4 2.815 6.2 40 1.953 13.2 5 2.534 6.0 41 1.924 13.0 6 2.276 5.8 42 1.956 12.8 7 2.204 5.6 43 1.967 12.6 8 2.186 5.4 44 1.973 12.4 9 2.120 5.2 45 2.019 12.2 10 2.066 5.0 46 2.083 12.0 11 2.039 4.8 47 2.096 11.8 12 2.048 4.6 48 2.042 11.6 13 2.075 4.4 49 1.975 11.4 14 2.061 4.2 50 1.985 11.2 15 2.017 4.0 51 1.984 11.0 16 1.984 3.8 52 1.973 10.8 17 1.97 2 3.6 53 1.981 10.6 18 1.964 3.4 54 2.024 10.4 19 1.934 3.2 55 2.050 10.2 20 1.950 3.0 56 1.992 10.0 21 1.994 2.8 57 1.939 9.8 22 2.004 2.6 58 1.943 9.6 23 1.934 2.4 59 1.947 9.4 24 1.913 2.2 60 1.955 9.2 25 1.908 2.0 61 1.988 9.0 26 1.903 1.8 62 2.048 8.8 27 1.909 1.6 63 2.049 8.6 28 1.929 1.4 64 1.957 8.4 29 1.987 1.2 65 1.895 8.2 30 2.038 1.0 66 1.937 8.0 31 1.999 0.8 67 2.254 7.8 32 1.937 0.6 68 3.025 7.6 33 1.934 0.4 69 4.318 7.4 34 1.955 0.2 70 6.145 7.2 35 1.950 0.0 71 9.182 7.0 36 1.940 Unit 1 Cycle 21  Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1  Page 16 of 16  Table 1 (Part 2 of 2) Unrodded Fxy for Each Core Height for Cycle Burnups Greater Than or Equal to 10,000 MWD/MTU  Core Height Axial Unrodded Core Height Axial Unrodded (Ft.) Point Fxy (Ft.) Point Fxy 14.0 1 6.408 6.8 37 2.210 13.8 2 5.134 6.6 38 2.246 13.6 3 3.860 6.4 39 2.213 13.4 4 2.756 6.2 40 2.155 13.2 5 2.530 6.0 41 2.121 13.0 6 2.280 5.8 42 2.113 12.8 7 2.139 5.6 43 2.101 12.6 8 2.070 5.4 44 2.088 12.4 9 2.002 5.2 45 2.105 12.2 10 1.991 5.0 46 2.139 12.0 11 2.001 4.8 47 2.13 3 11.8 12 2.029 4.6 48 2.075 11.6 13 2.061 4.4 49 2.027 11.4 14 2.055 4.2 50 2.022 11.2 15 2.029 4.0 51 2.009 11.0 16 2.015 3.8 52 1.993 10.8 17 2.026 3.6 53 1.994 10.6 18 2.033 3.4 54 2.028 10.4 19 2.043 3.2 55 2.050 10.2 20 2.073 3.0 56 1.992 1 0.0 21 2.119 2.8 57 1.939 9.8 22 2.137 2.6 58 1.925 9.6 23 2.104 2.4 59 1.907 9.4 24 2.076 2.2 60 1.879 9.2 25 2.088 2.0 61 1.889 9.0 26 2.099 1.8 62 1.936 8.8 27 2.110 1.6 63 1.965 8.6 28 2.127 1.4 64 1.943 8.4 29 2.166 1.2 65 1.956 8.2 30 2.201 1.0 66 2.067 8.0 31 2.166 0.8 67 2.434 7.8 32 2.133 0.6 68 3.163 7.6 33 2.134 0.4 69 4.275 7.4 34 2.146 0.2 70 5.814 7.2 35 2.157 0.0 71 8.515 7.0 36 2.169}}

Revision as of 21:54, 7 July 2018

South Texas, Unit 1 - Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report; Revisions 0 and 1
ML17110A499
Person / Time
Site: South Texas STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 04/20/2017
From: Dunn R F
South Texas
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NOC-AE-17003464, STI: 34479791
Download: ML17110A499 (28)


Text

NOC-AE-17003464 Page 2 of 2 cc: (paper copy

) Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1600 East Lamar Boulevard Arlington, TX 76011

-4511 Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North (O8H04) 11555 Rockville Pike

Rockville, MD 20852 NRC Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 289, Mail Code: MN116 Wadsworth, TX 77483

(electronic copy)

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Steve Frantz, Esquire Paul Bessette U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa M. Regner

NRG South Texas LP Mark Walker Jim von Suskil Skip Zahn CPS Energy Kevin Pollo Cris Eugster L. D. Blaylock City of Austin Elaina Ball John Wester Texas Dept. of State Health Services Helen Watkins Robert Free

Attachment 1 South Texas Project Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report; Revision 0

Core Operating Limits Report Page 1 of 8

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT Unit 1 Cycle 2 1 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT Revision 0 MODES 3, 4 and 5

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 2 of 8 1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report for STPEGS Unit 1 Cycle 21 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.6. The core operating limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.

The Technical Specifications affected by this report are:

1) 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS
2) 2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS
3) 3/4.1.1.1 SHUTDOWN MARGIN
4) 3/4.1.1.3 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT LIMITS
5) 3/4.1.3.5 SHUTDOWN ROD INSERTION LIMITS
6) 3/4.1.3.6 CONTROL ROD INSERTION LIMITS
7) 3/4.2.1 AFD LIMITS
8) 3/4.2.2 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
9) 3/4.2.3 NUCLEAR ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
10) 3/4.2.5 DNB PARAMETERS 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented below.

2.1 SAFETY LIMITS (Specification 2.1):

2.1.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS (Specification 2.2):

2.2.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.2.2 The Over-temperature T and Over

-power T setpoint parameter values are listed below: Over-temperature T Setpoint Parameter Values

Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. Over-power T Setpoint Parameter Values Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

.

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 3 of 8 2.3 SHUTDOWN MARGIN (Specification 3.1.1.1):

The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be:

2.3.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.3.2 Greater than the limits in Figure 2 for MODES 3 and 4.

2.3.3 Greater than the limits in Figure 3 for MODE 5.

2.4 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT (Specification 3.1.1.3):

2.4.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.4.2 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.4.3 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.4.4 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.5 ROD INSERTION LIMITS (Specification 3.1.3.5 and 3.1.3.6):

2.5.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.5.2 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.5.3 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.6 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE (Specification 3.2.1):

2.6.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.6.2 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.7 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR (Specification 3.2.2):

2.7.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.7.2 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.7.3 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.7.4 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.8 ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR (Specification 3.2.3):

2.8.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.8.2 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. 2.8.3 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

.

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 4 of 8 2.9 DNB PARAMETERS (Specification 3.2.5):

2.9.1 Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

.

3.0 REFERENCES

3.1 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to R. F. Dunn (STPNOC), "Confirmation of Mode 3, 4, and 5 RSAC Limits for South Texas Unit 1 Cycle 21 Redesig n," NF-TG-09-26 (ST-UB-NOC-17 00 3590), April 6 , 20 17. 3.2 NUREG-1346, Technical Specifications, South Texas Project Unit Nos. 1 and 2.

3.3 Document RSE

-U1, Rev. 6, "Unit 1 Cycle 21 Reload Safety Evaluation and Core Operating Limits Report." (CR Action 16

-454-70).

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 5 of 8 FIGURE 1 Reactor Core Safety Limits

- Four Loops in Operation Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

.

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 6 of 8 Figure 2Required Shutdown Margin for Modes 3 & 40.01.02.03.04.05.0 6.0 7.0 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)Required Shutdown Margin (% Delta Rho)UnacceptableAcceptable ( 0 , 1.30 )( 2400 , 5.15 )( 600 , 1.30 )

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 7 of 8 Figure 3Required Shutdown Margin for Mode 50.01.02.03.0 4.05.06.07.0 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)Required Shutdown Margin (% Delta Rho)UnacceptableAcceptable ( 0 , 1.30 )( 2400 , 4.50 )( 650 , 1.30 )

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Modes 3, 4 and 5 Page 8 of 8 FIGURE 4 MTC versus Power Level Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. -----------------------------------------


FIGURE 5 Control Rod Insertion Limits versus Power Level

Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. ---------------------------------------------------


FIGURE 6 AFD Limits versus Power Level

Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


FIGURE 7 K(Z) - Normalized F Q(Z) versus Core Height

Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


TABLE 1 Unrodded FXY for Each Core Height

Will be added prior to initial U1C21 Mode 2 entry

.

Attachment 2 South Texas Project Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report; Revision 1

Core Operating Limits Report Page 1 of 16

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT Unit 1 Cycle 21 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT Revision 1

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 2 of 16 1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report for STPEGS Unit 1 Cycle 21 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.6. The core operating limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.

The Technical Specifications affected by this report are:

1) 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS
2) 2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS
3) 3/4.1.1.1 SHUTDOWN MARGIN
4) 3/4.1.1.3 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT LIMITS
5) 3/4.1.3.5 SHUTDOWN ROD INSERTION LIMITS
6) 3/4.1.3.6 CONTROL ROD INSERTION LIMITS
7) 3/4.2.1 AFD LIMITS
8) 3/4.2.2 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
9) 3/4.2.3 NUCLEAR ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR
10) 3/4.2.5 DNB PARAMETERS 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented below.

2.1 SAFETY LIMITS (Specification 2.1):

2.1.1 The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure

1. 2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS (Specification 2.2):

2.2.1 The Loop design flow for Reactor Coolant Flow

-Low is 98,000 gpm.

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 3 of 16 2.2.2 The Over-temperature T and Over

-power T setpoint parameter values are listed below: Over-temperature T Setpoint Parameter Values 1 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 1 = 8 sec 2 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 2 = 3 sec 3 measured reactor vessel T lag time constant , 3 = 2 sec 4 measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant , 4 = 28 sec 5 measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant , 5 = 4 sec 6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant , 6 = 2 sec K 1 Overtemperature T reactor trip setpoint, K 1 = 1.14 K 2 Overtemperature T reactor trip setpoint Tavg coefficient, K 2 = 0.028/°F K3 Overtemperature T reactor trip setpoint pressure coefficient, K 3 = 0.00143/psi T' Nominal full power Tavg, T' 592.0 °F P' Nominal RCS pressure, P' = 2235 psig f 1 (I) is a function of the indicated difference between top and bottom detectors of the power-range neutron ion chambers; with gains to be selected based on measured instrument response during plant startup tests such that:

(1) For q t - q b between -70% and +8%, f 1 (I) = 0, where q t and q b are percent RATED THERMAL POWER in the top and bottom halves of the core respectively, a nd q t + q b is total THERMAL POWER in percent of RATED THERMAL POWER; (2) For each percent that q t - q b is more negative than -70%, the T Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 0.0% of its value at RATED THERMAL POWER; and (3) For each percent that q t - q b is more positive than

+8%, the T Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 2.65% of its value at RATED THERMAL POWER.

(Reference 3.6 and Section 4.4.1.2 of Reference 3.7) Over-power T Setpoint Parameter Values 1 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 1 = 8 sec 2 measured reactor vessel T lead/lag time constant, 2 = 3 sec 3 measured reactor vessel T lag time constant , 3 = 2 sec 6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant , 6 = 2 sec 7 Time constant utilized in the rate

-lag compensator for Tavg , 7 = 10 sec K 4 Overpower T reactor trip setpoint, K 4 = 1.08 K 5 Overpower T reactor trip setpoint Tavg rate/lag coefficient, K 5 = 0.02/°F for increasing average temperature, and K5 = 0 for decreasing average temperature K 6 Overpower T reactor trip setpoint Tavg heatup coefficient K 6 = 0.002/°F for T > T", and K 6 = 0 for T T" T" Indicated full power Tavg, T" 592.0 °F f 2 (I) = 0 for all (I)

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 4 of 16 2.3 SHUTDOWN MARGIN 1 (Specification 3.1.1.1): The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be:

2.3.1 Greater than 1.3% for MODES 1 and 2*

  • See Special Test Exception 3.10.1 2.3.2 Greater than the limits in Figure 2 for MODES 3 and 4.

2.3.3 Greater than the limits in Figure 3 for MODE 5.

2.4 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT (Specification 3.1.1.3):

2.4.1 The BOL, ARO, MTC shall be less positive than the limits shown in Figure 4.

2.4.2 The EOL, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than

-62.6 pcm/ F. 2.4.3 The 300 ppm, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than

-53.6 pcm/ F (300 ppm Surveillance Limit).

Where: BOL stands for Beginning

-of-Cycle Life, EOL stands for End

-of-Cycle Life, ARO stands for All Rods Out, HFP stands for Hot Full Power (100% RATED THERMAL POWER), HFP vessel average temperature is 592 F. 2.4.4 The Revised Predicted near

-EOL 300 ppm MTC shall be calculated using the algorithm from the document referenced by Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.b.10:

Revised Predicted MTC = Predicted MTC

+ AFD Correction - 3 pcm/F If the Revised Predicted MTC is less negative than the COLR Section 2.4.3 limit and all of the benchmark data contained in the surveillance procedure are met, then an MTC measurement in accordance with S.R. 4.1.1.3b is not required.

2.5 ROD INSERTION LIMITS 1 (Specification 3.1.3.5 and 3.1.3.6):

2.5.1 All banks shall have the same Full Out Position (FOP) of either 256 or 259 steps withdrawn.

2.5.2 The Control Banks shall be limited in physical insertion as specified in Figure 5.

2.5.3 Individual Shutdown bank rods are fully withdrawn when the Bank Demand Indication is at the FOP and the Rod Group Height Limiting Condition for Operation is satisfied (T.S. 3.1.3.1).

1 The Shutdown Margin and Rod Insertion limits account for the removal of RCCA D6 in Shutdown Bank A.

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 5 of 16 2.6 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE (Specification 3.2.1):

2.6.1 AFD limits as required by Technical Specification 3.2.1 are determined by Constant Axial Offset Control (CAOC) Operations with an AFD target band of +5, -10%. 2.6.2 The AFD shall be maintained within the ACCEPTABLE OPERATION portion of Figure 6, as required by Technical Specifications.

2.7 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR (Specification 3.2.2):

2.7.1 F QRTP = 2.55. 2.7.2 K(Z) is provided in Figure

7. 2.7.3 The F xy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER (Fxy RTP) within specific core planes shall be: 2.7.3.1 Less than or equal to 2.102 for all cycle burnups for all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods, and 2.7.3.2 Less than or equal to the appropriate core height

-dependent value from Table 1 for all unrodded core planes.

2.7.3.3 PF xy = 0.2. These F xy limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot channel factor F Q(Z) will be limited by Technical Specification 3.2.2 assuming the most

-limiting axial power distributions expected to result for the insertion and removal of Control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions, as described in WCAP

-8385. Therefore, these F xy limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10 CFR 50.46. 2.7.4 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor 2.7.4.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FQ) to be applied to the F Q(Z) and F xy(Z) using the PDMS shall be calculated by:

U FQ = (1.0 + (U Q/100))*U E Where: U Q = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5

-19 from the document referenced by Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.b.11 U E = Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.

This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS).

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 6 of 16 2.7.4.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FQ) to be applied to the F Q(Z) and F xy(Z) shall be calculated by:

U FQ = U QU*U E Where: UQU = Base F Q measurement uncertainty of 1.05.

U E = Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.

2.8 ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR (Specification 3.2.3):

2.8.1 FHRTP = 1.62 2.8.2 PFH = 0.3 2.8.3 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor 2.8.3.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FH) to be applied to the FH N using the PDMS shall be the greater of:

U FH = 1.04 OR U FH = 1.0 + (UH/100) Where: UH = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5

-19 from the document referenced in Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.b.11.

This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System. 2.8.3.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (U FH) shall be: U FH = 1.0 4 Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 7 of 16 2.9 DNB PARAMETERS (Specification 3.2.5):

2.9.1 The following DNB

-related parameters shall be maintained within the following limits: 1 2.9.1.1 Reactor Coolant System Tavg 595 °F 2, 2.9.1.2 Pressurizer Pressure > 2200 psig 3, 2.9.1.3 Minimum Measured Reactor Coolant System Flow > 403,000 gpm

4.

3.0 REFERENCES

3.1 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to R. F. Dunn (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Unit 1 Cycle 21 Redesign Final Reload Evaluation" NF-TG-17-7, Rev. 1 (ST-UB-NOC-17 00 3 573, Rev. 1) dated April 12, 2017. 3.2 NUREG-1346, Technical Specifications, South Texas Project Unit Nos. 1 and 2.

3.3 STPNOC Calculation ZC

-7035, Rev. 2, "Loop Uncertainty Calculation for RCS Tavg Instrumentation," Section 10.1.

3.4 STPNOC Calculation ZC

-7032, Rev.

6, "Loop Uncertainty Calculation for Narrow Range Pressurizer Pressure Monitoring Instrumentation," Section 2.3, Page 9.

3.5 Letter from J. S Wyble (Westinghouse) to T. J. Jordan (STPNOC), "STP Nuclear Operating Company Units 1 & 2 Power Uprate PCWG Parameters," ST

-WN-NOC-00-000072 dated December 15, 2000, STI 31218644

. 3.6 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to D. F. Hoppes (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Documentation of the f 1 (Calculation," NF

-TG-11-93 (ST-UB-NOC-11003215) dated November 10, 2011.

3.7 Document RSE

-U1, Rev. 7, "Unit 1 Cycle 21 Reload Safety Evaluation and Core Operating Limits Report

." (CR Action 16-454-9) 1 A discussion of the processes to be used to take these readings is provided in the basis for Technical Specification 3.2.5. 2 Includes a 1.9 F measurement uncertainty per Reference 3.3, Page 37.

3 Limit not applicable during either a Thermal Power ramp in excess of 5% of RTP per minute or a Thermal Power step in excess of 10% RTP. Per Technical Specification 3.2.5 Bases, this includes a 10.7 psi measurement uncertainty as read on the QDPS display, which is bounded by the 9.6 psi averaged measurement calculated in Reference 3.4. 4 Includes the flow measurement uncertainty of 2.8% from Reference 3.5.

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 11 of 16 -3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Moderator Temperature Coefficient (pcm/

°F)Rated Thermal Power (%)Figure 4MTC versus Power LevelUnacceptableAcceptable Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 12 of 16 Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 13 of 16 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90100110120-50-40-30-20-10 0 10 20 30 40 50Rated Thermal Power (%)Axial Flux Difference (% Delta

-I)Figure 6AFD Limits versus Power LevelUnacceptableAcceptableUnacceptable ( -31 , 50 )( 11 , 90 )( -11 , 90 )( 31 , 50 )

Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 14 of 16 Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 15 of 16 Table 1 (Part 1 of 2)

Unrodded F xy for Each Core Height for Cycle Burnups Less Than 10 , 000 MWD/MTU Core Height Axial Unrodded Core Height Axial Unrodded (Ft.) Point Fxy (Ft.) Point Fxy 14.0 1 7.401 6.8 37 1.982 13.8 2 5.801 6.6 38 2.031 13.6 3 4.200 6.4 39 2.008 13.4 4 2.815 6.2 40 1.953 13.2 5 2.534 6.0 41 1.924 13.0 6 2.276 5.8 42 1.956 12.8 7 2.204 5.6 43 1.967 12.6 8 2.186 5.4 44 1.973 12.4 9 2.120 5.2 45 2.019 12.2 10 2.066 5.0 46 2.083 12.0 11 2.039 4.8 47 2.096 11.8 12 2.048 4.6 48 2.042 11.6 13 2.075 4.4 49 1.975 11.4 14 2.061 4.2 50 1.985 11.2 15 2.017 4.0 51 1.984 11.0 16 1.984 3.8 52 1.973 10.8 17 1.97 2 3.6 53 1.981 10.6 18 1.964 3.4 54 2.024 10.4 19 1.934 3.2 55 2.050 10.2 20 1.950 3.0 56 1.992 10.0 21 1.994 2.8 57 1.939 9.8 22 2.004 2.6 58 1.943 9.6 23 1.934 2.4 59 1.947 9.4 24 1.913 2.2 60 1.955 9.2 25 1.908 2.0 61 1.988 9.0 26 1.903 1.8 62 2.048 8.8 27 1.909 1.6 63 2.049 8.6 28 1.929 1.4 64 1.957 8.4 29 1.987 1.2 65 1.895 8.2 30 2.038 1.0 66 1.937 8.0 31 1.999 0.8 67 2.254 7.8 32 1.937 0.6 68 3.025 7.6 33 1.934 0.4 69 4.318 7.4 34 1.955 0.2 70 6.145 7.2 35 1.950 0.0 71 9.182 7.0 36 1.940 Unit 1 Cycle 21 Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 1 Page 16 of 16 Table 1 (Part 2 of 2) Unrodded Fxy for Each Core Height for Cycle Burnups Greater Than or Equal to 10,000 MWD/MTU Core Height Axial Unrodded Core Height Axial Unrodded (Ft.) Point Fxy (Ft.) Point Fxy 14.0 1 6.408 6.8 37 2.210 13.8 2 5.134 6.6 38 2.246 13.6 3 3.860 6.4 39 2.213 13.4 4 2.756 6.2 40 2.155 13.2 5 2.530 6.0 41 2.121 13.0 6 2.280 5.8 42 2.113 12.8 7 2.139 5.6 43 2.101 12.6 8 2.070 5.4 44 2.088 12.4 9 2.002 5.2 45 2.105 12.2 10 1.991 5.0 46 2.139 12.0 11 2.001 4.8 47 2.13 3 11.8 12 2.029 4.6 48 2.075 11.6 13 2.061 4.4 49 2.027 11.4 14 2.055 4.2 50 2.022 11.2 15 2.029 4.0 51 2.009 11.0 16 2.015 3.8 52 1.993 10.8 17 2.026 3.6 53 1.994 10.6 18 2.033 3.4 54 2.028 10.4 19 2.043 3.2 55 2.050 10.2 20 2.073 3.0 56 1.992 1 0.0 21 2.119 2.8 57 1.939 9.8 22 2.137 2.6 58 1.925 9.6 23 2.104 2.4 59 1.907 9.4 24 2.076 2.2 60 1.879 9.2 25 2.088 2.0 61 1.889 9.0 26 2.099 1.8 62 1.936 8.8 27 2.110 1.6 63 1.965 8.6 28 2.127 1.4 64 1.943 8.4 29 2.166 1.2 65 1.956 8.2 30 2.201 1.0 66 2.067 8.0 31 2.166 0.8 67 2.434 7.8 32 2.133 0.6 68 3.163 7.6 33 2.134 0.4 69 4.275 7.4 34 2.146 0.2 70 5.814 7.2 35 2.157 0.0 71 8.515 7.0 36 2.169