ML13254A049: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:         September 11, 2013   
{{#Wiki_filter:September 11, 2013  
    
   
   
Mr. Oscar A. Limpias, Vice President-Nuclear  
Mr. Oscar A. Limpias, Vice President-Nuclear  
and Chief Nuclear Officer Nebraska Public Power District Cooper Nuclear Station  
 
and Chief Nuclear Officer Nebraska Public Power District  
Cooper Nuclear Station  
72676 648A Avenue  
72676 648A Avenue  
Brownville, NE 68321  
Brownville, NE 68321  
   SUBJECT: COOPER NUCLEAR STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000298/2013005) AND REQUEST FOR  
   SUBJECT: COOPER NUCLEAR STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000298/2013005) AND REQUEST FOR  
INFORMATION   
INFORMATION  
Dear Mr. Limpias:  From October 21 through 25, 2013, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's  
   
Dear Mr. Limpias:  
  From October 21 through 25, 2013, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's  
(NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification inspection at Cooper  
(NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification inspection at Cooper  
Nuclear Station, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.11B, "Licensed Operator  
Nuclear Station, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.11B, "Licensed Operator  
Requalification Program."  Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your staff.  In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for  
Requalification Program."  Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive  
inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your st
aff.  In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for  
documents needed for this inspection.  These documents have been divided into three groups.   
documents needed for this inspection.  These documents have been divided into three groups.   
The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the  
The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the  
inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately prepared.  The second group (Section B  
inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately prepared.  The second group (Section B  
of the enclosure) identifies the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site.  The third group (Section C of this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site.  It is important  
of the enclosure) identifies the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site.  The third group (Section C of this enclosure) identifie
s the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site.  It is important  
that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of  
that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of  
additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the  
additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the  
inspection.  We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand  
inspection.  
  We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand  
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Jodie Olberding of your licensing  
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Jodie Olberding of your licensing  
organization.  Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of  
organization.  Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of  
examination activities.  If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. Steve Garchow at (817) 200-1426 (Steve.Garchow@nrc.gov) or Mr. Duane Strickland at (817) 200-1570 (Duane.Strickland@NRC.gov).  UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV1600 EAST LAMAR BLVDARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511  
examination activities.  If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. Steve Garchow at (817) 200-1426  
O. Limpias - 2 -   
(Steve.Garchow@nrc.gov) or Mr. Duane Strickland at (817) 200-1570  
(Duane.Strickland@NRC.gov
).  UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV1600 EAST LAMAR BLVDARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511  
O. Limpias - 2 -  
   
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).  Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control  
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).  Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control  
number 3150-0018.  The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to  
number 3150-0018.  The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to  
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the  
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the  
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control  
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control  
number.   In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its  
 
number.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its  
 
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide  
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide  
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).  ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).   
Documents Access and Management  
System (ADAMS).  ADAMS  
is accessible from the NRC  
web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
   
  Sincerely,  
  Sincerely,  
   /RA/  Vince Gaddy, Chief  
   /RA/  Vince Gaddy, Chief  
  Operations Branch   
  Operations Branch   
  Division of Reactor Safety  
  Division of Reactor Safety  
Docket:  50-298 License:  DPR-46
   
   
Docket:  50-298 License:  DPR-46 
Enclosure:  
Enclosure:  
Inservice Inspection Document Request  
Inservice Inspection Document Request  
  cc:  Electronic Distribution for Cooper Nuclear Station
 
  cc:  Electronic Distribution for Cooper Nuclear Station  
   
   
 
    
    
O. Limpias - 3 - 
ML13254A049
 
  ADAMS:    No    Yes  SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials: SMG  
ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML13254A049 ADAMS:    No    Yes  SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials: SMG    Publicly Available  Non-Sensitive    Non-publicly Available  Sensitive SOE:OB C:OB    SGarchow VGaddy    /RA/ /RA/    9/11/13 9/11/13   OFFICIAL RECORD COPY  T=Telephone          E=E-mail        F=Fax 
   Publicly Available  Non-Sensitive  
   - 1 - Enclosure BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST   
   Non-publicly Available  Sensitive SOE:OB C:OB    SGarchow VGaddy    /RA/ /RA/    9/11/13 9/11/13    
   - 1 - Enclosure BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST  
   
  FROM: Steve Garchow Senior Operations Engineer, NRC RIV  
  FROM: Steve Garchow Senior Operations Engineer, NRC RIV  
817-200-1426  TO: Scott DeRosier Operator Training Superintendent, Cooper Nuclear Station 402-825-5573   
 
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT OCTOBER 21-25, 2013, LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM INSPECTION (IP 71111.11B)  A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation activities.  These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module  
817-200-1426  
  TO: Scott DeRosier Operator Training Superintendent, Cooper Nuclear Station  
402-825-5573  
   
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT OCTOBER 21-25, 2013, LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM INSPECTION (IP 71111.11B)  
  A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation activities.  These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module  
(i.e., 2.02, 2.04, etc).  Requested materials should be sent either electronically or  
(i.e., 2.02, 2.04, etc).  Requested materials should be sent either electronically or  
hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than June 15, 2012.  * Electronically:  TO:  E-mail address  Steve.Garchow@NRC.Gov CC:  Duane.Strickland@NRC.Gov )  * Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 E. Lamar Blvd Arlington, TX 76011  
hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than June 15, 2012.  
ATTN:  Steve Garchow  General Requests: * List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff) * Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR evaluators identified) * Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training program up to date * List of outstanding LOR program changes * List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR program since last BRQ * Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator requalification training program * Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes * Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes * Licensed operator training schedule for the week of October 21, 2013  B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection activities.  Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either  
  * Electronically:  TO:  E-mail address   
electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on October 21, 2013.  Note that it is not required to make copies of all the materials, but to have them available.   
Steve.Garchow@NRC.Gov
   - 2 -  02.02:  Exam Results * All results up to the day the team leaves the site.   02.03:  Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality * The current and approved biennial written examination schedule  * The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite * All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and including the week before the inspection team is onsite * The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)  02.04:  Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality * Any changes to the schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite). * The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite). * Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite. * Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan) * A listing of licensed operator response times for time critical operator actions  02.05:  Licensee Admin of Requal Exams * All procedures used to administer the annual operating test * All procedures used to assess operator performance * All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training * All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator  02.06:  Requalification Examination Security * Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a periodic basis * Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions (including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a  
  CC:  Duane.Strickland@NRC.Gov )  * Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 E. Lamar Blvd Arlington, TX 76011  
periodic basis * All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations * List of all condition reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to examination security and overlap     
 
   - 3 -  02.07:  Licensee Remedial Training Program * List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam cycle) * Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance documentation)  02.08:  Conformance with Operator License Conditions * Access to licensed operators' records (operating and staff crews) * Access to licensed operators' training attendance records * Access to licensed operators' medical records * All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses, tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators * All Procedures and associated documentation that support reactivation of any SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection  02.09:  Simulator Performance * Simulator discrepancies (DR's) from October 1, 2011, through October 1, 2013.  This should include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the documentation/justification for closure.  * Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at the time of acceptance (as available). * Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and neutronics models, to the actual plant.  * All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator (any documentation on this) * Summary list of modifications from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012. * Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due date from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.  * Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 1, 2010). * The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests.  This should also include  
ATTN:  Steve Garchow  
  General Requests:
* List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)  
* Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR evaluators identified)  
* Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training  
program up to date  
* List of outstanding LOR program changes  
* List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR  
program since last BRQ  
* Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator requalification training program  
* Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes  
* Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes  
* Licensed operator training schedule for the week of October 21, 2013  
  B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection activities.  Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either  
electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on October 21, 2013.  Note that it is not  
required to make copies of all the materials, but to have them available.  
    
   - 2 -  02.02:  Exam Results
* All results up to the day the team leaves the site.
02.03:  Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality
* The current and approved biennial written examination schedule   
* The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite * All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and including the week before the inspection team is onsite  
* The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)  
  02.04:  Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality
* Any changes to the schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given  
the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite).  
* The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite).  
* Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.  
* Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)  
* A listing of licensed operator response times for time critical operator actions  
  02.05:  Licensee Admin of Requal Exams
* All procedures used to administer the annual operating test  
* All procedures used to assess operator performance  
* All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training  
* All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator  
  02.06:  Requalification Examination Security
* Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a  
periodic basis  
* Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions (including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a  
 
periodic basis  
* All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations  
in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations  
* List of all condition reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to examination security and overlap  
    
   - 3 -  02.07:  Licensee Remedial Training Program
* List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam cycle) * Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance  
documentation)  
  02.08:  Conformance with Operator License Conditions
* Access to licensed operators' records (operating and staff crews)  
* Access to licensed operators' training attendance records  
* Access to licensed operators' medical records  
* All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses, tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators  
* All Procedures and associated documentation that support reactivation of any SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection  
  02.09:  Simulator Performance
* Simulator discrepancies (DR's) from October 1, 2011, through October 1, 2013.  This should include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the documentation/justification for closure.   
* Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at the time of acceptance (as available).  
* Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and neutronics models, to the actual plant.   
* All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator (any documentation on this)  
* Summary list of modifications from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.  
* Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due date from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.   
* Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 1, 2010).  
* The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests.  This should also include  
the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results.  For each  
the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results.  For each  
transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the ANSI standard requirements. * All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and  
transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond  
the acceptance criteria with results. * All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages, simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc. * Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.   
the ANSI standard requirements.  
* All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and  
the acceptance criteria with results.  
* All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,  
simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.  
* Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.   
   - 4 -  * For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results.  For each transient  
   - 4 -  * For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results.  For each transient  
test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.  
test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the  
ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.  
 
   
   
o Transient test 1, Manual Rx trip  o Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip) o  Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV o  Steady State tests for low power  * All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for section 02.05 above. * Simulator Discrepancy Report summary list for all open DR's.  For closed DR's, summary list for those items closed between June 1, 2010, and June 1, 2012.   02.10:  Problem Identification and Resolution * A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room * Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance issues * All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room  C. Cooper Nuclear Station is required to send the final results summary and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison against the  
o Transient test 1, Manual Rx trip   
o Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip)  
o  Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV  
o  Steady State tests for low power  
  * All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for section 02.05 above.  
* Simulator Discrepancy Report  
summary list for all open DR's.  For closed DR's,  
summary list for those items closed between June 1, 2010, and June 1, 2012.
02.10:  Problem Identification and Resolution
* A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the  
control room  
* Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance  
issues * All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room  
  C. Cooper Nuclear Station is required to send the final results summary and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison against the  
Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results for the  
Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results for the  
inspection. 


inspection.
}}
}}

Revision as of 06:42, 4 July 2018

Cooper Nuclear Station - Notification of Inspection (NRC Inspection Report 05000298/2013005) and Request for Information
ML13254A049
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/11/2013
From: Vincent Gaddy
Division of Reactor Safety IV
To: Limpias O A
Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
References
IR-13-005
Download: ML13254A049 (7)


See also: IR 05000298/2013005

Text

September 11, 2013

Mr. Oscar A. Limpias, Vice President-Nuclear

and Chief Nuclear Officer Nebraska Public Power District

Cooper Nuclear Station

72676 648A Avenue

Brownville, NE 68321

SUBJECT: COOPER NUCLEAR STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000298/2013005) AND REQUEST FOR

INFORMATION

Dear Mr. Limpias:

From October 21 through 25, 2013, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

(NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification inspection at Cooper

Nuclear Station, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.11B, "Licensed Operator

Requalification Program." Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive

inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your st

aff. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for

documents needed for this inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups.

The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the

inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B

of the enclosure) identifies the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group (Section C of this enclosure) identifie

s the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important

that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of

additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the

inspection.

We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand

that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Jodie Olberding of your licensing

organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of

examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. Steve Garchow at (817) 200-1426

(Steve.Garchow@nrc.gov) or Mr. Duane Strickland at (817) 200-1570

(Duane.Strickland@NRC.gov

). UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV1600 EAST LAMAR BLVDARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511

O. Limpias - 2 -

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control

number 3150-0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control

number.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide

Documents Access and Management

System (ADAMS). ADAMS

is accessible from the NRC

web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/ Vince Gaddy, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket: 50-298 License: DPR-46

Enclosure:

Inservice Inspection Document Request

cc: Electronic Distribution for Cooper Nuclear Station

ML13254A049

ADAMS: No Yes SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials: SMG

Publicly Available Non-Sensitive

Non-publicly Available Sensitive SOE:OB C:OB SGarchow VGaddy /RA/ /RA/ 9/11/13 9/11/13

- 1 - Enclosure BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

FROM: Steve Garchow Senior Operations Engineer, NRC RIV

817-200-1426

TO: Scott DeRosier Operator Training Superintendent, Cooper Nuclear Station

402-825-5573

SUBJECT: INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT OCTOBER 21-25, 2013, LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM INSPECTION (IP 71111.11B)

A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation activities. These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module

(i.e., 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or

hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than June 15, 2012.

  • Electronically: TO: E-mail address

Steve.Garchow@NRC.Gov

CC: Duane.Strickland@NRC.Gov ) * Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 E. Lamar Blvd Arlington, TX 76011

ATTN: Steve Garchow

General Requests:

  • List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)
  • Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR evaluators identified)
  • Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training

program up to date

  • List of outstanding LOR program changes
  • List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR

program since last BRQ

  • Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator requalification training program
  • Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
  • Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes
  • Licensed operator training schedule for the week of October 21, 2013

B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either

electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on October 21, 2013. Note that it is not

required to make copies of all the materials, but to have them available.

- 2 - 02.02: Exam Results

  • All results up to the day the team leaves the site.

02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality

  • The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
  • The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite * All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and including the week before the inspection team is onsite
  • The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)

02.04: Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality

  • Any changes to the schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given

the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite).

  • The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite).
  • Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.
  • Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)

02.05: Licensee Admin of Requal Exams

  • All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
  • All procedures used to assess operator performance
  • All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
  • All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator

02.06: Requalification Examination Security

  • Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a

periodic basis

  • Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions (including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a

periodic basis

  • All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations

in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations

  • List of all condition reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to examination security and overlap

- 3 - 02.07: Licensee Remedial Training Program

  • List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam cycle) * Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance

documentation)

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • Access to licensed operators' records (operating and staff crews)
  • Access to licensed operators' training attendance records
  • Access to licensed operators' medical records
  • All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses, tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators
  • All Procedures and associated documentation that support reactivation of any SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • Simulator discrepancies (DR's) from October 1, 2011, through October 1, 2013. This should include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the documentation/justification for closure.
  • Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at the time of acceptance (as available).
  • Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and neutronics models, to the actual plant.
  • All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator (any documentation on this)
  • Summary list of modifications from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.
  • Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due date from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.
  • Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 1, 2010).
  • The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include

the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each

transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond

the ANSI standard requirements.

  • All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and

the acceptance criteria with results.

  • All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,

simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.

  • Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.

- 4 - * For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient

test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the

ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.

o Transient test 1, Manual Rx trip

o Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip)

o Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV

o Steady State tests for low power

  • All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for section 02.05 above.
  • Simulator Discrepancy Report

summary list for all open DR's. For closed DR's,

summary list for those items closed between June 1, 2010, and June 1, 2012.

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the

control room

  • Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance

issues * All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room

C. Cooper Nuclear Station is required to send the final results summary and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison against the

Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results for the

inspection.