ML17059C192: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Document Control Desk Page4 identified example and was entered into NSPM's corrective action program. To resolve the 2014 NCV, NSPM completed its corrective action, which included revising the definition of SCAQ in the Fleet procedure to the current definition and development of an audit function considering regulatory compliance and requirements to preclude reoccurrence. This corrective action was inspected without an adverse outcome or comment during the 2016 Prairie Island PI&R inspection (Reference 3) which occurred prior to the 2016 Monticello PI&R inspection. In summary, NSPM maintains this non-cited violation was inconsistent with the Principles of Good Regulation and the principles of the Significance Determination Process. This subjectivity is apparent in the two distinctly different inspection outcomes only months apart at Prairie Island and Monticello relying upon the same Fleet CAP SCAQ definition. NSPM is identifying its perspective for NRC and Industry awareness. NSPM would be pleased to discuss this further if that would be helpful. Summary of Commitments This letter makes no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments. )J_OJ;)iv C Martin C. Murphy /1 Director, Nuclear Licensing\Jnd Regulatory Services Northern States Power Company-Minnesota cc: Kenneth Riemer, Chief, Branch 2, Division of Reactor Projects, Region Ill, USNRC Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Monticello, USNRC Project Manager, Prairie Island, USNRC Resident Inspector, Monticello, USNRC Resident Inspector, Prairie Island, USNRC Christopher Miller, Director, Division Inspection and Regional Support, USNRC William Dean, Director, Office Nuclear Reactor Regulation, USNRC}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Document Control Desk Page4 identified example and was entered into NSPM's corrective action program. | ||
To resolve the 2014 NCV, NSPM completed its corrective action, which included revising the definition of SCAQ in the Fleet procedure to the current definition and development of an audit function considering regulatory compliance and requirements to preclude reoccurrence. | |||
This corrective action was inspected without an adverse outcome or comment during the 2016 Prairie Island PI&R inspection (Reference | |||
: 3) which occurred prior to the 2016 Monticello PI&R inspection. | |||
In summary, NSPM maintains this non-cited violation was inconsistent with the Principles of Good Regulation and the principles of the Significance Determination Process. | |||
This subjectivity is apparent in the two distinctly different inspection outcomes only months apart at Prairie Island and Monticello relying upon the same Fleet CAP SCAQ definition. | |||
NSPM is identifying its perspective for NRC and Industry awareness. | |||
NSPM would be pleased to discuss this further if that would be helpful. | |||
Summary of Commitments This letter makes no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments. | |||
)J_OJ;)iv C | |||
Martin C. Murphy /1 Director, Nuclear Licensing\Jnd Regulatory Services Northern States Power Company-Minnesota cc: Kenneth Riemer, Chief, Branch 2, Division of Reactor Projects, Region Ill, USNRC Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Monticello, USNRC Project Manager, Prairie Island, USNRC Resident Inspector, Monticello, USNRC Resident Inspector, Prairie Island, USNRC Christopher Miller, Director, Division Inspection and Regional | |||
: Support, USNRC William Dean, Director, Office Nuclear Reactor Regulation, USNRC}} | |||
Revision as of 21:50, 29 June 2018
| ML17059C192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello, Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 02/28/2017 |
| From: | Murphy M C Northern States Power Company, Minnesota, Xcel Energy |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-XE-17-002 | |
| Download: ML17059C192 (4) | |
Text
Document Control Desk Page4 identified example and was entered into NSPM's corrective action program.
To resolve the 2014 NCV, NSPM completed its corrective action, which included revising the definition of SCAQ in the Fleet procedure to the current definition and development of an audit function considering regulatory compliance and requirements to preclude reoccurrence.
This corrective action was inspected without an adverse outcome or comment during the 2016 Prairie Island PI&R inspection (Reference
- 3) which occurred prior to the 2016 Monticello PI&R inspection.
In summary, NSPM maintains this non-cited violation was inconsistent with the Principles of Good Regulation and the principles of the Significance Determination Process.
This subjectivity is apparent in the two distinctly different inspection outcomes only months apart at Prairie Island and Monticello relying upon the same Fleet CAP SCAQ definition.
NSPM is identifying its perspective for NRC and Industry awareness.
NSPM would be pleased to discuss this further if that would be helpful.
Summary of Commitments This letter makes no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.
)J_OJ;)iv C
Martin C. Murphy /1 Director, Nuclear Licensing\Jnd Regulatory Services Northern States Power Company-Minnesota cc: Kenneth Riemer, Chief, Branch 2, Division of Reactor Projects, Region Ill, USNRC Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Monticello, USNRC Project Manager, Prairie Island, USNRC Resident Inspector, Monticello, USNRC Resident Inspector, Prairie Island, USNRC Christopher Miller, Director, Division Inspection and Regional
- Support, USNRC William Dean, Director, Office Nuclear Reactor Regulation, USNRC