Regulatory Guide 9.4: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:6mpember 1978 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                            REGULATORY GUIDE
6mpember 1978 REGULATORY GUIDE  
                            OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT
OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT  
                                                          REGULATORY GUIDE 9.4 SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
REGULATORY GUIDE 9.4 SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR CASH FLOW STATEMENTS  
                                          SUBMITTED AS GUARANTEES OF PAYMENT:
SUBMITTED AS GUARANTEES OF PAYMENT:
                                                    OF RETROSPEC1 IVE PREMIUMS
OF RETROSPEC1  


==A. INTRODUCTION==
==A. INTRODUCTION==
statements of changes i n h al position' (sources and~ uses of funds) t ~arc ni~ ally prepared by In December 1975. Congress extended and mod-                         utilities and other                 ce     as one of a number of ified the Price-Anderson Act. One modification was                       conventional fina                             ts.
IVE PREMIUMS
statements of changes i n h al position' (sources and~ uses of funds) t  
~arc ni~ ally prepared by In December 1975. Congress extended and mod- utilities and other ce as one of a number of ified the Price-Anderson Act. One modification was conventional fina ts.


to establish retrospective premiums as the second layer of financial protection in the three-layered                         B. SUGO               T             MAT FOR CASH FLOW
to establish retrospective premiums as the second layer of financial protection in the three-layered B. SUGO  
Price-Anderson system. To implement this modifi-                         STA                                 ITED AS GUARANTEES
T  
cation, the Commission promulgated in August 1977                                               Y           OF RETROSPECTIVE
MAT FOR CASH FLOW  
a regulation (10 CFR § 140.21)_that requires each                                                       PREMIUMS.I
Price-Anderson system. To implement this modifi- STA  
licensee to provide evidence that it maintains, any                                 e           preparing cash flow statements should one or a combination of six guarantees of payment                             lb       he guidelines presented below. A sample of deferred or retrospective premiums. Such a                                    i        sicue sTbe1 guarantee would be in an amount of $10 million                                              stcue sTbeI                                I
ITED AS GUARANTEES  
nurally for each licensed operating reactor rate~                                ' The statement title should indicate that the
cation, the Commission promulgated in August 1977 Y  
100 MW(e) or more.                                                        icensee's cash flow statement refers to a particular Since implementation of § 140.21, th 01 s-                          plant or plants and is projected over the appropriate sion has found that most licensees prefer t uara                        year. Licensees should use either the calendar year or payment of retrospective premiu i                    'g                the corporate fiscal year for which they'have the certified financial statement shiit                        t      c'ash latest projections.
OF RETROSPECTIVE  
a regulation (10 CFR § 140.21)_that requires each PREMIUMS.I  
licensee to provide evidence that it maintains, any e  
preparing cash flow statements should one or a combination of six guarantees of payment lb he guidelines presented below. A sample of deferred or retrospective premium


flow    can    be generated    and  wou    t    ea        lable  for       2. The components or line items of cash flow payment of retrospective premi                                in three  against which licensees should report should be lim months after submission of the state nt. In para-                        ited to (a) net income after taxes. (b) dividends paid.
====s. Such a i ====
sicue sTbe1 guarantee would be in an amount of $10 million I
stcue sTbeI
nurally for each licensed operating reactor rate~
' The statement title should indicate that the  
100 MW(e) or more.


graph 140.2I1(e),;cash fw is defined as "cash avail-                    (c) retained earnings, (d) depreciation and amortiza able to a compan a                  operating expenses, taxes,          tion adjustments, (e) allowance for funds used during interest charges,                      nds have been paid."            construction, and (f) deferred income taxes and in Licensee a                e          ly owed this definition            vestment tax credits. Other categorieb are not neces when sumsttmn.                                        However, the        sary and should be included only if documented and irequired n mt                          submitted in somewhat          defined. Negative values should be indicated either in differe        0      S      some licensees have included              parentheses or by minus signs. If a cash flow line unu                        ,  "other sour~es- or "external              item is not applicable to a particular utility or plant finan                    eht appropriate or require further mnot                                            (e.g., allowance for funds used during construction),
icensee's cash flow statement refers to a particular Since implementation of § 140.21, th
clarifica          . These non-standardized submissions                  the licensee should explain why.I
01 s-  
add to the ime required by the NRC staff to analyze                            3. If a particular plant has multiple owners. the them. This guide suggests a simplified format that,                      cash flow of each owner should be included unless if used, should reduce the burden to licensees of                      the principal licensee states that its cash flow state preparing cash flow statements and to the staff of                      ment covers all or some other owners. If certain own analyzing them. This simplified format is based oni                    ers ari providing guarantees in forms other! than cash WSNNC REGUL.ATORY GUIDES                                            oid be am w to SweW'v or "w cm'sua U.Sd shmua~
plant or plants and is projected over the appropriate sion has found that most licensees prefer t uara year. Licensees should use either the calendar year or payment of retrospective premiu i
  Rep*Wry Guido am heaaed    0 deabe w4d woe we h" ID 00 Publc          SmomUr=h Uaeedi -ws-              NAC Mff Of S O1w00                meApef 10      pwo of Was Cwwrg*eianecisgdiomw ID I a-eIIb                    go MR in gwu-    Thes    -d  w Issued ki tos *AowbVg sonWood dimiorw~
'g the corporate fiscal year for which they'have the certified financial statement shiit t  
          eI
c'ash latest projections.
      - spaeena          ar odwW~    ecde          padaid D~        gulkno ID
  a-im        Segamry Ciaddew am M                NPmA~daftb Wad m f~wme                      . Nomw Raama                            41.Uroxacb atlah oambar uuqahed. Meowdi wad e0AWSdiew  tiwWm  *--. =.    ZResawhdNOsMReecs'                       7. ?Wupofle on-XI *wjrn m be awwobb K6ws pwwW a bohb fa t OWN                      2I Fuck wad Muterh Fecltat                &2=            eed
                                                                                                                                0=elml AaL LVacaciea MW  wa1                                          eAesW
      C  a 0im"o            www      of aba Own ora ManDVa*ij        LWI.eih wad PluMPecdo                    I


====t. Gener====
flow can be generated and wou t ea lable for
      -4w Conw.nean                              Imnwe Orosai 1has Eale    a~ewe waAmnge                      ehagie sopie of beAed iudueluid way be o.eprod) wafr foe~tr
2. The components or line items of cash flow payment of retrospective premi in three against which licensees should report should be lim months after submission of the state nt. In para- ited to (a) net income after taxes. (b) dividends paid.
  *ataws. enbd  @;:    I einý e        m~uW          mmdtaer.              wmm aneuwnuetc ftvaudan bet fo drb~              meop ofn    gau s
  Mis gAde. I -ne wmilh        &Aatiwo rnaiuet        beb      An.  be  Canuydulan.      Wab0*vWoC.CZ.1M          Amrialn: Direcow.        ofla pwoaafti UNUaInuekaf "wfewedf            i 1 saa.Tcanim taw softawla                                                              Caal


flow statements. these should be enclosed with the          pleted annual period. Thus, it would be help~ul to guarantee of the principal licensee. Also. the owner's      have both years juxtaposed, on the cash flow state total contingent liability for retrospective premiums      ment as shown in Table I. Also, any significant de for all licensed nuclear plants in which it has owner      viations between the two years in either total cash ship shares should be indicated on one statement.          flow or its components should be explained b. the
graph 140.2I1(e),;cash fw is defined as "cash avail- (c) retained earnings, (d) depreciation and amortiza able to a compan a operating expenses, taxes, tion adjustments, (e) allowance for funds used during interest charges, nds have been paid."
  4. Total cash flow projected for the year should be      licensee.
construction, and (f) deferred income taxes and in Licensee a
e ly owed this definition vestment tax credits. Other categorieb are not neces when sumsttmn.


divided by four to indicate that cash how can be gen erated and would be available for payment of retro spective premiums within three months after submis                        
However, the sary and should be included only if documented and irequired n mt submitted in somewhat defined. Negative values should be indicated either in differe
0
S
some licensees have included parentheses or by minus signs. If a cash flow line unu
, "other sour~es- or "external item is not applicable to a particular utility or plant finan eht mnot appropriate or require further (e.g., allowance for funds used during construction),
clarifica
. These non-standardized submissions the licensee should explain why.I
add to the ime required by the NRC staff to analyze
3. If a particular plant has multiple owners. the them. This guide suggests a simplified format that, cash flow of each owner should be included unless if used, should reduce the burden to licensees of the principal licensee states that its cash flow state preparing cash flow statements and to the staff of ment covers all or some other owners. If certain own analyzing them. This simplified format is based oni ers ari providing guarantees in forms other! than cash WSNNC REGUL.ATORY GUIDES
shmua~
oid be am w to SweW'v or "w cm'sua U.Sd Rep*Wry Guido am heaaed
0 deabe w4d woe we h" ID 00 Publc SmomUr= h Uaeedi -ws S
-
O1w00
NAC Mff Of
10
meApef pwo of Was Cwwrg*eianecisgdiomw ID I a-eIIb go MR in gwu- Thes -d w Issued ki tos *AowbVg sonWood dimiorw~
-
eI
spaeena ar odwW~
ecde D~
padaid gulkno ID
a-im Segamry Ciaddew am M
f~wme NPmA~daftb Wad m
.Nomw Raama
41. Uroxacb atla h oam bar uuqahed. Meowdi wad e0AWSdiew tiwWm *--. =.
ZResawhd NOs MReecs'
7. ?Wupofle on-XI *wjrn m be awwobb K 6ws pwwW a bohb fa t OWN
2I Fuck wad Muterh Fecltat
&2=
0=elml eed C a 0im"o www of aba Own ora wa1 Man DV a*ij AaL
LVacaciea MW
e AesW
-4w LWI. eih wad PluMPecdo It. Gener Con
 
====w. nean Orosai Imnwe ====
1has Eale a~e we waAmnge foe~tr ehagie sopie of beAed iudue luid way be o.eprod) wa fr
*at aws.
 
enbd
@;:
I
einý e m~uW
mmdtaer.
 
wmm an euwnuetc ftvaudan bet fo drb~
meop ofn gau s
Mis gAde. I
-ne wmilh
&Aa tiwo rnaiuet be b An.
 
be Canuydulan.
 
Wab0*vWoC.CZ.1M
Amrialn: Direcow.
 
ofla pwoaafti UNUa In uekaf
"w fewedf taw i 1 sa
 
====a. Tcanim softawla Caal====
 
flow statements. these should be enclosed with the guarantee of the principal licensee. Also. the owner's total contingent liability for retrospective premiums for all licensed nuclear plants in which it has owner ship shares should be indicated on one statement.
 
4. Total cash flow projected for the year should be divided by four to indicate that cash how can be gen erated and would be available for payment of retro spective premiums within three months after submis sion of the statement. The staff, of course, recognizes that this calculation may not reflect the licensee's aclual quarterly cash flow position.
 
5. An important pan of the staff's analyses of cash flow statements is a comparison of projected cash flow with actual cash flow for the most recent com- pleted annual period. Thus, it would be help~ul to have both years juxtaposed, on the cash flow state ment as shown in Table I. Also, any significant de viations between the two years in either total cash flow or its components should be explained b. the licensee.


==C. IMPLEMENTATION==
==C. IMPLEMENTATION==
sion of the statement. The staff, of course, recognizes that this calculation may not reflect the licensee's          Because the format suggested in this guide is a aclual quarterly cash flow position.                        simplified format based on financial statements nor
Because the format suggested in this guide is a simplified format based on financial statements nor mally prepared by utilities, it may be used in mediately by licensees in developimg annual submit tals required in 10 CFR § 140.21.
  5. An important pan of the staff's analyses of cash      mally prepared by utilities, it may be used in flow statements is a comparison of projected cash          mediately by licensees in developimg annual submit flow with actual cash flow for the most recent com-        tals required in 10 CFR § 140.21.


K
K
                                                                                                        ,I
9.4-2
                                                      9.4-2
,I


Table 1 Suggested Format for a Cash Flow Statement
Table 1 Suggested Format for a Cash Flow Statement  
                                19XX Internal Cash Flow Projection for (Name) Nuclear Power Station (Dollars In Thousands)
19XX Internal Cash Flow Projection for (Name) Nuclear Power Station (Dollars In Thousands)
                                                                Prior Year          Projecion Year Actual Total                Total Net Income After Taxes                                         SXXXXXX                  SXXXXXX
Net Income After Taxes Less Dividends Paid Retained Earnings Adjustments:
Less Dividends Paid                                             (XXX.XXX)              (XXX.XXX)
Depreciation and Amortization Deferred Income Taxes and Investment Tax Credits Allowance for Funds Used During Construction Total Adjustments Internal Cash Flow Average Quarterly Cash Flow Percentage Ownership in All Operating Nuclear Units Maximum Total Contingent Liability Prior Year Actual Total SXXXXXX
Retained Earnings                                              $ XX.XXX                 $ XX,XXX
(XXX.XXX)  
Adjustments:
$ XX.XXX  
  Depreciation and Amortization                              $XXXXXX                $XXX.XXX
$XXXXXX
  Deferred Income Taxes and Investment Tax Credits                                      XX,XXX                 XX.XXX
XX,XXX  
  Allowance for Funds Used During Construction                                  (XXXXXX)
(XXXXXX)
Total Adjustments (XXX.XXX)
$XXX,XXX  
                                                              $XXX,XXX               SXXX ,XXX
$XXX.XXX  
Internal Cash Flow                                            $XXX.XXX               SXXX.XXX
S XXMXXX
Average Quarterly Cash Flow                                                            $ XXXXX
Projecion Year Total SXXXXXX
                                                              S XXMXXX
(XXX.XXX)  
Percentage Ownership                                                    Unit name XXX.XX%
$ XX,XXX
  in All Operating                                                      Unit name XX.XX%
$XXX.XXX  
  Nuclear Units                                                        Unit name XX.XX%
XX.XXX  
Maximum Total Contingent Liability                                                                      $ XX.XXX
(XXX.XXX)
                                                9.4-3 I
SXXX ,XXX
SXXX.XXX  
$ XXXXX
Unit name XXX.XX%  
Unit name XX.XX%  
Unit name XX.XX%
$ XX.XXX
9.4-3 I


UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES  
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
    WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555     POSTAGE ANO PECS PAI*O
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 OFFICIAL BUSINESS
                                U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE. $300
      OFFICIAL BUSINESS                COM oISSION
POSTAGE ANO PECS PAI*O  
  PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE. $300
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
                                                          K
COM oISSION
                                                        r i
K
                                                        i}}
r i  
i}}


{{RG-Nav}}
{{RG-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 02:06, 17 January 2025

Suggested Format for Cash Flow Statements Submitted as Guarantees of Payment of Retrospective Premiums
ML003740179
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/30/1978
From:
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
References
RG-9.4
Download: ML003740179 (4)


U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

6mpember 1978 REGULATORY GUIDE

OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT

REGULATORY GUIDE 9.4 SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR CASH FLOW STATEMENTS

SUBMITTED AS GUARANTEES OF PAYMENT:

OF RETROSPEC1

A. INTRODUCTION

IVE PREMIUMS

statements of changes i n h al position' (sources and~ uses of funds) t

~arc ni~ ally prepared by In December 1975. Congress extended and mod- utilities and other ce as one of a number of ified the Price-Anderson Act. One modification was conventional fina ts.

to establish retrospective premiums as the second layer of financial protection in the three-layered B. SUGO

T

MAT FOR CASH FLOW

Price-Anderson system. To implement this modifi- STA

ITED AS GUARANTEES

cation, the Commission promulgated in August 1977 Y

OF RETROSPECTIVE

a regulation (10 CFR § 140.21)_that requires each PREMIUMS.I

licensee to provide evidence that it maintains, any e

preparing cash flow statements should one or a combination of six guarantees of payment lb he guidelines presented below. A sample of deferred or retrospective premium

s. Such a i

sicue sTbe1 guarantee would be in an amount of $10 million I

stcue sTbeI

nurally for each licensed operating reactor rate~

' The statement title should indicate that the

100 MW(e) or more.

icensee's cash flow statement refers to a particular Since implementation of § 140.21, th

01 s-

plant or plants and is projected over the appropriate sion has found that most licensees prefer t uara year. Licensees should use either the calendar year or payment of retrospective premiu i

'g the corporate fiscal year for which they'have the certified financial statement shiit t

c'ash latest projections.

flow can be generated and wou t ea lable for

2. The components or line items of cash flow payment of retrospective premi in three against which licensees should report should be lim months after submission of the state nt. In para- ited to (a) net income after taxes. (b) dividends paid.

graph 140.2I1(e),;cash fw is defined as "cash avail- (c) retained earnings, (d) depreciation and amortiza able to a compan a operating expenses, taxes, tion adjustments, (e) allowance for funds used during interest charges, nds have been paid."

construction, and (f) deferred income taxes and in Licensee a

e ly owed this definition vestment tax credits. Other categorieb are not neces when sumsttmn.

However, the sary and should be included only if documented and irequired n mt submitted in somewhat defined. Negative values should be indicated either in differe

0

S

some licensees have included parentheses or by minus signs. If a cash flow line unu

, "other sour~es- or "external item is not applicable to a particular utility or plant finan eht mnot appropriate or require further (e.g., allowance for funds used during construction),

clarifica

. These non-standardized submissions the licensee should explain why.I

add to the ime required by the NRC staff to analyze

3. If a particular plant has multiple owners. the them. This guide suggests a simplified format that, cash flow of each owner should be included unless if used, should reduce the burden to licensees of the principal licensee states that its cash flow state preparing cash flow statements and to the staff of ment covers all or some other owners. If certain own analyzing them. This simplified format is based oni ers ari providing guarantees in forms other! than cash WSNNC REGUL.ATORY GUIDES

shmua~

oid be am w to SweW'v or "w cm'sua U.Sd Rep*Wry Guido am heaaed

0 deabe w4d woe we h" ID 00 Publc SmomUr= h Uaeedi -ws S

-

O1w00

NAC Mff Of

10

meApef pwo of Was Cwwrg*eianecisgdiomw ID I a-eIIb go MR in gwu- Thes -d w Issued ki tos *AowbVg sonWood dimiorw~

-

eI

spaeena ar odwW~

ecde D~

padaid gulkno ID

a-im Segamry Ciaddew am M

f~wme NPmA~daftb Wad m

.Nomw Raama

41. Uroxacb atla h oam bar uuqahed. Meowdi wad e0AWSdiew tiwWm *--. =.

ZResawhd NOs MReecs'

7. ?Wupofle on-XI *wjrn m be awwobb K 6ws pwwW a bohb fa t OWN

2I Fuck wad Muterh Fecltat

&2=

0=elml eed C a 0im"o www of aba Own ora wa1 Man DV a*ij AaL

LVacaciea MW

e AesW

-4w LWI. eih wad PluMPecdo It. Gener Con

w. nean Orosai Imnwe

1has Eale a~e we waAmnge foe~tr ehagie sopie of beAed iudue luid way be o.eprod) wa fr

  • at aws.

enbd

@;:

I

einý e m~uW

mmdtaer.

wmm an euwnuetc ftvaudan bet fo drb~

meop ofn gau s

Mis gAde. I

-ne wmilh

&Aa tiwo rnaiuet be b An.

be Canuydulan.

Wab0*vWoC.CZ.1M

Amrialn: Direcow.

ofla pwoaafti UNUa In uekaf

"w fewedf taw i 1 sa

a. Tcanim softawla Caal

flow statements. these should be enclosed with the guarantee of the principal licensee. Also. the owner's total contingent liability for retrospective premiums for all licensed nuclear plants in which it has owner ship shares should be indicated on one statement.

4. Total cash flow projected for the year should be divided by four to indicate that cash how can be gen erated and would be available for payment of retro spective premiums within three months after submis sion of the statement. The staff, of course, recognizes that this calculation may not reflect the licensee's aclual quarterly cash flow position.

5. An important pan of the staff's analyses of cash flow statements is a comparison of projected cash flow with actual cash flow for the most recent com- pleted annual period. Thus, it would be help~ul to have both years juxtaposed, on the cash flow state ment as shown in Table I. Also, any significant de viations between the two years in either total cash flow or its components should be explained b. the licensee.

C. IMPLEMENTATION

Because the format suggested in this guide is a simplified format based on financial statements nor mally prepared by utilities, it may be used in mediately by licensees in developimg annual submit tals required in 10 CFR § 140.21.

K

9.4-2

,I

Table 1 Suggested Format for a Cash Flow Statement

19XX Internal Cash Flow Projection for (Name) Nuclear Power Station (Dollars In Thousands)

Net Income After Taxes Less Dividends Paid Retained Earnings Adjustments:

Depreciation and Amortization Deferred Income Taxes and Investment Tax Credits Allowance for Funds Used During Construction Total Adjustments Internal Cash Flow Average Quarterly Cash Flow Percentage Ownership in All Operating Nuclear Units Maximum Total Contingent Liability Prior Year Actual Total SXXXXXX

(XXX.XXX)

$ XX.XXX

$XXXXXX

XX,XXX

(XXXXXX)

$XXX,XXX

$XXX.XXX

S XXMXXX

Projecion Year Total SXXXXXX

(XXX.XXX)

$ XX,XXX

$XXX.XXX

XX.XXX

(XXX.XXX)

SXXX ,XXX

SXXX.XXX

$ XXXXX

Unit name XXX.XX%

Unit name XX.XX%

Unit name XX.XX%

$ XX.XXX

9.4-3 I

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 OFFICIAL BUSINESS

PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE. $300

POSTAGE ANO PECS PAI*O

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COM oISSION

K

r i

i