ML050630070: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:`                                           March 2, 2005 MEMORANDUM TO: James E. Lyons, Deputy Director Division of Licensing Project Management THRU:                   Cornelius Holden, Project Director /RA/
{{#Wiki_filter:`
Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management FROM:                   Stephen Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1         /RA/
March 2, 2005 MEMORANDUM TO: James E. Lyons, Deputy Director Division of Licensing Project Management THRU:
Cornelius Holden, Project Director
/RA/
Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management FROM:
Stephen Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1
/RA/
Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management
Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management


Line 24: Line 29:
Since the last status report, no draft TIAs were sent to the Regions, one TIA (Hope Creek) was closed, and no new TIAs were opened. Of the three open TIAs (Turkey Point, Surry, and Salem), the following divisions are the current action holders: DIPM - 1, DE - 1 and DSSA - 1.
Since the last status report, no draft TIAs were sent to the Regions, one TIA (Hope Creek) was closed, and no new TIAs were opened. Of the three open TIAs (Turkey Point, Surry, and Salem), the following divisions are the current action holders: DIPM - 1, DE - 1 and DSSA - 1.
On January 10, 2005, Region I and NRR participated in a conference call to discuss the Regions proposal to submit a TIA in order to address an issue regarding TS operability of the offsite power system at FitzPatrick. The main issue concerned the manner in which the licensee was interpreting the Limiting Condition for Operation requirements for operability of the offsite power sources. The licensee considered the offsite power sources operable if there was sufficient voltage at the two reserve station transformers. The NRR staff informed the Region that the TS and TS Bases were clear in that both offsite power lines had to be operable, even though the 115 kV lines are cross-connected on site. Because of the licensee's incorrect interpretation, it had developed a TRM requirement that allowed one line (source) to be out of service for 14 days. Proper interpretation of the TS would only have allowed a 7 day allowed outage time. In addition, a second issue was discussed about the inability of one of the sources (i.e., line 3) to handle full accident loads during certain periods of high load on the offsite power grid. Based on these discussions, NRR and Region I DRP agreed that the TS requirements were clear and adequate and that the issue was really one of enforcement of the TS requirements. As a result, there was no need for NRR to evaluate or interpret the requirements through the TIA process. Therefore, the TIA was not submitted and the TS operability issue was deferred to the inspection process.
On January 10, 2005, Region I and NRR participated in a conference call to discuss the Regions proposal to submit a TIA in order to address an issue regarding TS operability of the offsite power system at FitzPatrick. The main issue concerned the manner in which the licensee was interpreting the Limiting Condition for Operation requirements for operability of the offsite power sources. The licensee considered the offsite power sources operable if there was sufficient voltage at the two reserve station transformers. The NRR staff informed the Region that the TS and TS Bases were clear in that both offsite power lines had to be operable, even though the 115 kV lines are cross-connected on site. Because of the licensee's incorrect interpretation, it had developed a TRM requirement that allowed one line (source) to be out of service for 14 days. Proper interpretation of the TS would only have allowed a 7 day allowed outage time. In addition, a second issue was discussed about the inability of one of the sources (i.e., line 3) to handle full accident loads during certain periods of high load on the offsite power grid. Based on these discussions, NRR and Region I DRP agreed that the TS requirements were clear and adequate and that the issue was really one of enforcement of the TS requirements. As a result, there was no need for NRR to evaluate or interpret the requirements through the TIA process. Therefore, the TIA was not submitted and the TS operability issue was deferred to the inspection process.
There are no draft responses due for the month of February 2005.
There are no draft responses due for the month of February 2005.
Attachments: 1. Graph of TIA Status - FY 2005
Attachments: 1. Graph of TIA Status - FY 2005
: 2. Table 1 - Summary Data FY 2005
: 2. Table 1 - Summary Data FY 2005
: 3. Table 2 - Open TIAs Assigned to NRR (by plant name)
: 3. Table 2 - Open TIAs Assigned to NRR (by plant name)
: 4. Table 3 - Closed TIAs Assigned to NRR - FY05 YTD (by TIA Number) cc w/atts: See next page
: 4. Table 3 - Closed TIAs Assigned to NRR - FY05 YTD (by TIA Number) cc w/atts: See next page There are no draft responses due for the month of February 2005.
 
There are no draft responses due for the month of February 2005.
Attachments: 1. Graph of TIA Status - FY 2005
Attachments: 1. Graph of TIA Status - FY 2005
: 2. Table 1 - Summary Data FY 2005
: 2. Table 1 - Summary Data FY 2005
: 3. Table 2 - Open TIAs Assigned to NRR (by plant name)
: 3. Table 2 - Open TIAs Assigned to NRR (by plant name)
: 4. Table 3 - Closed TIAs Assigned to NRR - FY05 YTD (by TIA Number) cc w/atts: See next page ADAMS Accession Number: ML050630070                                             NRR-106 OFFICE     LPM                       PDI-1/SC                   PDI/PD NAME       SMonarque                 RLaufer                   CHolden DATE       02/ 24 /05               03/ 02 /05                 03/ 02 /05 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
: 4. Table 3 - Closed TIAs Assigned to NRR - FY05 YTD (by TIA Number) cc w/atts: See next page ADAMS Accession Number: ML050630070 NRR-106 OFFICE LPM PDI-1/SC PDI/PD NAME SMonarque RLaufer CHolden DATE 02/ 24 /05 03/ 02 /05 03/ 02 /05 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Date: March 2, 2005  
 
Date: March 2, 2005


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
REPORT ON THE STATUS OF OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR DISTRIBUTION:
REPORT ON THE STATUS OF OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC PDI-2 R/F J. Wiggins, RI G. Matakas, RI R. Blough, RI W. Lanning, RI J. Barnes, RII V. McCree, RII L. Plisco, RII J. Caldwell, RIII R. Lanksbury, RIII G. Grant, RIII J. Grobe, RIII C. Pederson, RIII D. Chamberlain, RIV T. P. Gwynn, RIV A. Howell, RIV NRR BCs, SCs and PDs (by e-mail)
PUBLIC PDI-2 R/F J. Wiggins, RI G. Matakas, RI R. Blough, RI W. Lanning, RI J. Barnes, RII V. McCree, RII L. Plisco, RII J. Caldwell, RIII R. Lanksbury, RIII G. Grant, RIII J. Grobe, RIII C. Pederson, RIII D. Chamberlain, RIV T. P. Gwynn, RIV A. Howell, RIV NRR BCs, SCs and PDs (by e-mail)
B. Boger D. Matthews M. Johnson C. Carpenter C. Grimes L. Marsh M. Kotzalas B. Sheron C. Holden E. Brown D. Roberts J. Lamb C. Lyons S. Monarque E. Hackett P. Milano D. Collins F.Tobler TABLE 1 -  
B. Boger D. Matthews M. Johnson C. Carpenter C. Grimes L. Marsh M. Kotzalas B. Sheron C. Holden E. Brown D. Roberts J. Lamb C. Lyons S. Monarque E. Hackett P. Milano D. Collins F.Tobler
 
TABLE 1 -  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
DATA FY2005 New TIAs         Closed TIAs         Closed TIAs          Open      Draft TIAs    Late*      % by (Final response     (Draft response       TIAs     Scheduled     TIAs    Due Date*
DATA FY2005 New TIAs Closed TIAs (Final response issued)
issued)            issued)                      to meet        (B)   A/(A+B)
Closed TIAs (Draft response issued)
Due Date
Open TIAs Draft TIAs Scheduled to meet Due Date
                                                                                        **(A)
**(A)
Jan 05   FY-05     Jan 05     FY-05   Jan 05     FY-05     Jan 05       Jan 05     Jan 05     Jan 05 Region       0       2         1         1         0         1         1           1           0 I
Late*
Region       0       0         0         0         0         0         2           2           0 II Region       0       0         0         0         0         0         0           0           0 III Region       0       0         0         0         0         0         0           0           0 IV Total       0       2         1         1         0         1         3           3           0     100%
TIAs (B)
% by Due Date*
A/(A+B)
Jan 05 FY-05 Jan 05 FY-05 Jan 05 FY-05 Jan 05 Jan 05 Jan 05 Jan 05 Region I
0 2
1 1
0 1
1 1
0 Region II 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
2 0
Region III 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Region IV 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total 0
2 1
1 0
1 3
3 0
100%
* An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.
* An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.
** (A) This number includes: a) TIAs currently under review but not late b) TIAs closed this month c) Draft TIAs sent to region this month by latest agreed upon due date.
** (A) This number includes: a) TIAs currently under review but not late b) TIAs closed this month c) Draft TIAs sent to region this month by latest agreed upon due date.  
Attachment 2


TABLE 2 - OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR (by Plant Name)
TABLE 2 - OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR (by Plant Name)
PLANT               TIA # -     TAC No. And       INITIAL     CURRENT         ACTION           AGE         SE        STATUS/                          BILLED MEMO        TITLE            AGREED      AGREED        HOLDER            (mo's)     EVAL. OTHER REMARKS                     TO DATE                         COMPL.      COMPL          (DIVISION)                    INPUT                                      DATE DATE        DATE*                                                                                    (HRS)
PLANT TIA # -
TURKEY POINT         2003-03     MB8728/29 -       12/31/03     12/31/03       DSSA               21         EEIB     On 11/16/03 staff sent RAI.       295.3 3&4              04/30/03    Review of                      04/30/04                                      SRXB      Response received 11/19/04.
MEMO DATE TAC No. And TITLE INITIAL AGREED COMPL.
Region II                        SBO strategy/                  10/30/04                                                SRXB is reviewing licensees analysis                      03/31/2005                                              response. EEIBs evaluation will depend on outcome of SRXBs review.
DATE CURRENT AGREED COMPL DATE*
Surry 1&2           2004-04     MC4331/32         12/31/04     12/31/04       DIPM               5           IROB     Under review by IROB             47.5 Region II            08/26/04    50.54X                        03/31/05 Clarification Salem Unit 1         2004-05     MC4985           03/31/05     03/31/05       DE                 4           EMEB     Review in progress               1 Region 1             10/31/04    SFP Boric                                                                    EMCB Acid Leakage a
ACTION HOLDER (DIVISION)
D.C. Cook 1&2       2004-02     MC3428/29         09/07/04     09/07/04       DE/DLPM           N/A         EEIB     Draft TIA issued 09/02/04,       N/A Region III          06/07/04    Degraded                      12/31/04                                                DLPM received response from Voltage                                                                                Region III Protection Indian Point 2 a     2004-03     MC3372           07/30/04     07/30/04       DE/DLPM           N/A         EEIB     Draft TIA issued 08/20/04,       N/A Region 1            06/17/04    Electrical                    08/30/04                                                DLPM Received response from Cable                                                                                  Region 1 Separation Average Age       10                           Average Hours             114.60 (Months)                                            Billed
AGE (mo's)
SE EVAL.
INPUT STATUS/
OTHER REMARKS BILLED TO DATE (HRS)
TURKEY POINT 3 & 4 Region II 2003-03 04/30/03 MB8728/29 -
Review of SBO strategy/
analysis 12/31/03 12/31/03 04/30/04 10/30/04 03/31/2005 DSSA 21 EEIB SRXB On 11/16/03 staff sent RAI.
Response received 11/19/04.
SRXB is reviewing licensees response. EEIBs evaluation will depend on outcome of SRXBs review.
295.3 Surry 1&2 Region II 2004-04 08/26/04 MC4331/32 50.54X Clarification 12/31/04 12/31/04 03/31/05 DIPM 5
IROB Under review by IROB 47.5 Salem Unit 1 Region 1 2004-05 10/31/04 MC4985 SFP Boric Acid Leakage 03/31/05 03/31/05 DE 4
EMEB EMCB Review in progress 1
D.C. Cook 1&2 a Region III 2004-02 06/07/04 MC3428/29 Degraded Voltage Protection 09/07/04 09/07/04 12/31/04 DE/DLPM N/A EEIB Draft TIA issued 09/02/04, DLPM received response from Region III N/A Indian Point 2 a Region 1 2004-03 06/17/04 MC3372 Electrical Cable Separation 07/30/04 07/30/04 08/30/04 DE/DLPM N/A EEIB Draft TIA issued 08/20/04, DLPM Received response from Region 1 N/A Average Age (Months) 10 Average Hours Billed 114.60
* An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.
* An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.
a Not part of completion goal because draft TIA response issued. However, TIA is still considered open until final response is issued.
a Not part of completion goal because draft TIA response issued. However, TIA is still considered open until final response is issued.  
Attachment 3


TABLE 3 - CLOSED TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR - FY05 YTD (By TIA Number)
TABLE 3 - CLOSED TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR - FY05 YTD (By TIA Number)
DATE OF      DATE
TIA NO.
* TIA NO. TAC NO. INITIAL       COMPLETED       AGE             PLANT                      HOURS REQUEST                        (Months)                                   BILLED 2004-006   MC5111     12/13/200   01/12/2005             1       Hope Creek                 428.00 4
TAC NO.
Average Age     1.00           Average Hours Billed       428.00 (Months)
DATE OF INITIAL REQUEST DATE
Note: Completion dates are within the original agreed-upon date unless otherwise noted.
* COMPLETED AGE (Months)
* An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.
PLANT HOURS BILLED 2004-006 MC5111 12/13/200 4
Attachment 4}}
01/12/2005 1
Hope Creek 428.00 Average Age (Months) 1.00 Average Hours Billed 428.00 Note: Completion dates are within the original agreed-upon date unless otherwise noted.
* An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization. }}

Latest revision as of 21:45, 15 January 2025

January Monthly Report on the Status of Open TIAs Assigned to NRR
ML050630070
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek, Surry, Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/2005
From: Stephen Monarque
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2
To: Holden C, Lyons J
NRC/NRR/DLPM, NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD1
Monarque, S R, NRR/DLPM, 415-1544
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0134
Download: ML050630070 (11)
v • d • e


Text

`

March 2, 2005 MEMORANDUM TO: James E. Lyons, Deputy Director Division of Licensing Project Management THRU:

Cornelius Holden, Project Director

/RA/

Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management FROM:

Stephen Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1

/RA/

Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management

SUBJECT:

JANUARY MONTHLY REPORT ON THE STATUS OF OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR The attached graph and tables give the status of open TIAs assigned to NRR as of January 31, 2005.

Since the last status report, no draft TIAs were sent to the Regions, one TIA (Hope Creek) was closed, and no new TIAs were opened. Of the three open TIAs (Turkey Point, Surry, and Salem), the following divisions are the current action holders: DIPM - 1, DE - 1 and DSSA - 1.

On January 10, 2005, Region I and NRR participated in a conference call to discuss the Regions proposal to submit a TIA in order to address an issue regarding TS operability of the offsite power system at FitzPatrick. The main issue concerned the manner in which the licensee was interpreting the Limiting Condition for Operation requirements for operability of the offsite power sources. The licensee considered the offsite power sources operable if there was sufficient voltage at the two reserve station transformers. The NRR staff informed the Region that the TS and TS Bases were clear in that both offsite power lines had to be operable, even though the 115 kV lines are cross-connected on site. Because of the licensee's incorrect interpretation, it had developed a TRM requirement that allowed one line (source) to be out of service for 14 days. Proper interpretation of the TS would only have allowed a 7 day allowed outage time. In addition, a second issue was discussed about the inability of one of the sources (i.e., line 3) to handle full accident loads during certain periods of high load on the offsite power grid. Based on these discussions, NRR and Region I DRP agreed that the TS requirements were clear and adequate and that the issue was really one of enforcement of the TS requirements. As a result, there was no need for NRR to evaluate or interpret the requirements through the TIA process. Therefore, the TIA was not submitted and the TS operability issue was deferred to the inspection process.

There are no draft responses due for the month of February 2005.

Attachments: 1. Graph of TIA Status - FY 2005

2. Table 1 - Summary Data FY 2005
3. Table 2 - Open TIAs Assigned to NRR (by plant name)
4. Table 3 - Closed TIAs Assigned to NRR - FY05 YTD (by TIA Number) cc w/atts: See next page There are no draft responses due for the month of February 2005.

Attachments: 1. Graph of TIA Status - FY 2005

2. Table 1 - Summary Data FY 2005
3. Table 2 - Open TIAs Assigned to NRR (by plant name)
4. Table 3 - Closed TIAs Assigned to NRR - FY05 YTD (by TIA Number) cc w/atts: See next page ADAMS Accession Number: ML050630070 NRR-106 OFFICE LPM PDI-1/SC PDI/PD NAME SMonarque RLaufer CHolden DATE 02/ 24 /05 03/ 02 /05 03/ 02 /05 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Date: March 2, 2005

SUBJECT:

REPORT ON THE STATUS OF OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC PDI-2 R/F J. Wiggins, RI G. Matakas, RI R. Blough, RI W. Lanning, RI J. Barnes, RII V. McCree, RII L. Plisco, RII J. Caldwell, RIII R. Lanksbury, RIII G. Grant, RIII J. Grobe, RIII C. Pederson, RIII D. Chamberlain, RIV T. P. Gwynn, RIV A. Howell, RIV NRR BCs, SCs and PDs (by e-mail)

B. Boger D. Matthews M. Johnson C. Carpenter C. Grimes L. Marsh M. Kotzalas B. Sheron C. Holden E. Brown D. Roberts J. Lamb C. Lyons S. Monarque E. Hackett P. Milano D. Collins F.Tobler

TABLE 1 -

SUMMARY

DATA FY2005 New TIAs Closed TIAs (Final response issued)

Closed TIAs (Draft response issued)

Open TIAs Draft TIAs Scheduled to meet Due Date

    • (A)

Late*

TIAs (B)

% by Due Date*

A/(A+B)

Jan 05 FY-05 Jan 05 FY-05 Jan 05 FY-05 Jan 05 Jan 05 Jan 05 Jan 05 Region I

0 2

1 1

0 1

1 1

0 Region II 0

0 0

0 0

0 2

2 0

Region III 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

Region IV 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

Total 0

2 1

1 0

1 3

3 0

100%

  • An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.
    • (A) This number includes: a) TIAs currently under review but not late b) TIAs closed this month c) Draft TIAs sent to region this month by latest agreed upon due date.

TABLE 2 - OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR (by Plant Name)

PLANT TIA # -

MEMO DATE TAC No. And TITLE INITIAL AGREED COMPL.

DATE CURRENT AGREED COMPL DATE*

ACTION HOLDER (DIVISION)

AGE (mo's)

SE EVAL.

INPUT STATUS/

OTHER REMARKS BILLED TO DATE (HRS)

TURKEY POINT 3 & 4 Region II 2003-03 04/30/03 MB8728/29 -

Review of SBO strategy/

analysis 12/31/03 12/31/03 04/30/04 10/30/04 03/31/2005 DSSA 21 EEIB SRXB On 11/16/03 staff sent RAI.

Response received 11/19/04.

SRXB is reviewing licensees response. EEIBs evaluation will depend on outcome of SRXBs review.

295.3 Surry 1&2 Region II 2004-04 08/26/04 MC4331/32 50.54X Clarification 12/31/04 12/31/04 03/31/05 DIPM 5

IROB Under review by IROB 47.5 Salem Unit 1 Region 1 2004-05 10/31/04 MC4985 SFP Boric Acid Leakage 03/31/05 03/31/05 DE 4

EMEB EMCB Review in progress 1

D.C. Cook 1&2 a Region III 2004-02 06/07/04 MC3428/29 Degraded Voltage Protection 09/07/04 09/07/04 12/31/04 DE/DLPM N/A EEIB Draft TIA issued 09/02/04, DLPM received response from Region III N/A Indian Point 2 a Region 1 2004-03 06/17/04 MC3372 Electrical Cable Separation 07/30/04 07/30/04 08/30/04 DE/DLPM N/A EEIB Draft TIA issued 08/20/04, DLPM Received response from Region 1 N/A Average Age (Months) 10 Average Hours Billed 114.60

  • An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.

a Not part of completion goal because draft TIA response issued. However, TIA is still considered open until final response is issued.

TABLE 3 - CLOSED TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR - FY05 YTD (By TIA Number)

TIA NO.

TAC NO.

DATE OF INITIAL REQUEST DATE

  • COMPLETED AGE (Months)

PLANT HOURS BILLED 2004-006 MC5111 12/13/200 4

01/12/2005 1

Hope Creek 428.00 Average Age (Months) 1.00 Average Hours Billed 428.00 Note: Completion dates are within the original agreed-upon date unless otherwise noted.

  • An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML050630070&oldid=5387655"