ML052440329: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
{{#Wiki_filter:L.
{{#Wiki_filter:L.
EXHIBIT 1 A
EXHIBIT 1 A
iniormatilonl in this record was deleted inaccordance witY         j Freedom of Inf ortmUOfl Act. ex W n                     ,,
iniormatilonl in this record was deleted in accordance witY j Freedom of Inf ortmUOfl Act. ex W n  
4y Case No. 1-2003-010                                                     Exhibit I IULf-2VY0
4y Case No. 1-2003-010 IULf-2VY0 Exhibit I


I;
I;
                                        .VESTIGATION STATUS RECORD Facility:               SALEM/HOPE CREEK                                     Case Agent           MONROE, KRISTIN L (KLM)
.VESTIGATION STATUS RECORD Facility:
Case Number.           1-2003-010                                           Date Opened:         01/0912003 Docket Number(s):       05000272, 05000311, 05000354                         ECD:.                 4/2003 Priority:             Normal Case Type:             Reactor Power                                         Status:               Field Work In Progress Primary Alleg Source:   Alleger Allegation Number(s):   RI-2002-A-01 13 SubjectlAllegation:     DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A SENIOR ENGINEER FOR RAISING CONCERNS THROUGH THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM Monthly Status Report:
SALEM/HOPE CREEK Case Agent MONROE, KRISTIN L (KLM)
01/09/2003: In a letter to the NRC dated December 20, 2002                     _              Senlgr.Engineer, Salem/Hope Creek Generating Stations (Salem/Hope Cee), advised thaWvas concerned that Public Service Electric & Gas Nuclear (PSE&G) had created a hostie work environment where nuclear safety Issues could not be prop             resolved                   aims that     as discriminated against for raising a concern on                           v     G s Corrective Action Program, Notification       o       regarding procedural hon-compliance l thi T                   ent Assessment Response Plan (TARP). As a result of                                         w as theconcernraising              vd of duty (suspension of employZ d and remov ram plant access from                               through August 19,2002. In addition                 claims ceived threats of aor performance appraisal and termination of employment on August19, 2002.                         reviously raised this discrimination concern to the NRC on August 23, 2002, and                   ep     er 4, 02, a Region I Allegation Review Board (ARB) was held and Itwas determined tha _ ad articulated a prima facie showing oj discri4ijption which warranted the initiation of 06Case No. 1-2002-
Case Number.
: 3. H ver, when                 as contlced by Ol in an effort to schedule aformal interview, IJ.               O ha jose          ad shareqlbotential discrimination concerns with the PSED ucear Em       ee Concerns Program, desired that the ECP investigate, and Indicated thaik did not want to be Interviewed by 01 at that time. Therefore, the 01 case was closed (unsubstantiated) on September 27, 2002.
1-2003-010 Date Opened:
On January 8, 2003, a Region I ARB was held where Itwas determined that_                           ad again articulated a prima facie showing of discrimination based on the same fact pattern. The ARB agreed that 01 would Initiate an investigation into the potential discrimination.
01/0912003 Docket Number(s):
05000272, 05000311, 05000354 ECD:.
4/2003 Priority:
Normal Case Type:
Reactor Power Status:
Field Work In Progress Primary Alleg Source: Alleger Allegation Number(s): RI-2002-A-01 13 SubjectlAllegation:
DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A SENIOR ENGINEER FOR RAISING CONCERNS THROUGH THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM Monthly Status Report:
01/09/2003: In a letter to the NRC dated December 20, 2002 Senlgr.Engineer, Salem/Hope Creek Generating Stations (Salem/Hope Cee), advised thaWvas concerned that Public Service Electric & Gas Nuclear (PSE&G) had created a hostie work environment where nuclear safety Issues could not be prop resolved aims that as discriminated against for raising a concern on v
G s Corrective Action Program, Notification o
regarding procedural hon-compliance l i
th T ent Assessment Response Plan (TARP). As a result of raising the concern w
as vd of duty (suspension of employZ d and remov ram plant access from through August 19,2002. In addition claims ceived threats of aor performance appraisal and termination of employment on August19, 2002.
reviously raised this discrimination concern to the NRC on August 23, 2002, and ep er 4, 02, a Region I Allegation Review Board (ARB) was held and It was determined tha _ ad articulated a prima facie showing oj discri4ijption which warranted the initiation of 06 Case No. 1-2002-H
: 3. H ver, when as contlced by Ol in an effort to schedule a formal interview, IJ.
jose O
ha ad shareqlbotential discrimination concerns with the PSED ucear Em ee Concerns Program, desired that the ECP investigate, and Indicated thaik did not want to be Interviewed by 01 at that time. Therefore, the 01 case was closed (unsubstantiated) on September 27, 2002.
On January 8, 2003, a Region I ARB was held where It was determined that_
ad again articulated a prima facie showing of discrimination based on the same fact pattern. The ARB agreed that 01 would Initiate an investigation into the potential discrimination.
Potential violations Include 10 CFR 50.5 (Deliberate misconduct) and 10 CFR 50.7 (Employee protection). The statute of limitations tolls on, or about, August 9, 2007. Status: FWP ECD (90 days): 04/03.
Potential violations Include 10 CFR 50.5 (Deliberate misconduct) and 10 CFR 50.7 (Employee protection). The statute of limitations tolls on, or about, August 9, 2007. Status: FWP ECD (90 days): 04/03.
lnt~tlfll~l n tisreOrd in accordance viaS deleted Te, eed Ot 'Orltin EXHIBIT_         _
lnt~tlfll~l n tisreOrd viaS deleted in accordance Te, eed Ot 'Orltin EXHIBIT_
2 003 -O 1 0                                                           PAGE~i OF               .. PAGE(/)}}
2 003 -O 1 0 PAGE~i OF.. PAGE(/)}}

Latest revision as of 15:40, 15 January 2025

Exhibit 1: Investigation Status Record Discrimination Against a Senior Engineer for Raising Concerns Through the Corrective Action Program
ML052440329
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/09/2003
From: Monroe K
NRC/OI
To:
References
1-2003-010, FOIA/PA-2004-0191 RI-2002-A-0113
Download: ML052440329 (2)


Text

L.

EXHIBIT 1 A

iniormatilonl in this record was deleted in accordance witY j Freedom of Inf ortmUOfl Act. ex W n

4y Case No. 1-2003-010 IULf-2VY0 Exhibit I

I;

.VESTIGATION STATUS RECORD Facility:

SALEM/HOPE CREEK Case Agent MONROE, KRISTIN L (KLM)

Case Number.

1-2003-010 Date Opened:

01/0912003 Docket Number(s):

05000272, 05000311, 05000354 ECD:.

4/2003 Priority:

Normal Case Type:

Reactor Power Status:

Field Work In Progress Primary Alleg Source: Alleger Allegation Number(s): RI-2002-A-01 13 SubjectlAllegation:

DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A SENIOR ENGINEER FOR RAISING CONCERNS THROUGH THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM Monthly Status Report:

01/09/2003: In a letter to the NRC dated December 20, 2002 Senlgr.Engineer, Salem/Hope Creek Generating Stations (Salem/Hope Cee), advised thaWvas concerned that Public Service Electric & Gas Nuclear (PSE&G) had created a hostie work environment where nuclear safety Issues could not be prop resolved aims that as discriminated against for raising a concern on v

G s Corrective Action Program, Notification o

regarding procedural hon-compliance l i

th T ent Assessment Response Plan (TARP). As a result of raising the concern w

as vd of duty (suspension of employZ d and remov ram plant access from through August 19,2002. In addition claims ceived threats of aor performance appraisal and termination of employment on August19, 2002.

reviously raised this discrimination concern to the NRC on August 23, 2002, and ep er 4, 02, a Region I Allegation Review Board (ARB) was held and It was determined tha _ ad articulated a prima facie showing oj discri4ijption which warranted the initiation of 06 Case No. 1-2002-H

3. H ver, when as contlced by Ol in an effort to schedule a formal interview, IJ.

jose O

ha ad shareqlbotential discrimination concerns with the PSED ucear Em ee Concerns Program, desired that the ECP investigate, and Indicated thaik did not want to be Interviewed by 01 at that time. Therefore, the 01 case was closed (unsubstantiated) on September 27, 2002.

On January 8, 2003, a Region I ARB was held where It was determined that_

ad again articulated a prima facie showing of discrimination based on the same fact pattern. The ARB agreed that 01 would Initiate an investigation into the potential discrimination.

Potential violations Include 10 CFR 50.5 (Deliberate misconduct) and 10 CFR 50.7 (Employee protection). The statute of limitations tolls on, or about, August 9, 2007. Status: FWP ECD (90 days): 04/03.

lnt~tlfll~l n tisreOrd viaS deleted in accordance Te, eed Ot 'Orltin EXHIBIT_

2 003 -O 1 0 PAGE~i OF.. PAGE(/)