ML052440483: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:t- S RECG                                                                       -  1
{{#Wiki_filter:t-S RECG 1
+             0 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS FIELD OFFICE. REGION I
+
        *'S
0 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS FIELD OFFICE. REGION I
        >  toe                             475 ALLENDALE ROAD
*'S toe 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 19406 September 27,2002 MEMORANDUM TO:
    ** *
Hubert J. Miller, Regional Admistrator Region I 7
* KING OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 19406 September 27,2002 MEMORANDUM TO:                   Hubert J. Miller, Regional Admistrator Region I                     7         X FROM:                           Barry R. Letts, Director Office of Investigations Fie( Office, Region I
X FROM:
Barry R. Letts, Director Office of Investigations Fie( Office, Region I


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SALEMIHOPE CREEK: DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A SENIOR REACTOR ENGINEER FOR RAISING CONCERNS THROUGH THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCESS (CASE NO. 1-2002-033)
SALEMIHOPE CREEK: DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A SENIOR REACTOR ENGINEER FOR RAISING CONCERNS THROUGH THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCESS (CASE NO. 1-2002-033)
Qp September 4, 2002, an Allegation Review Board (ARB) convened to consider allegations that senior engineer at S m/Hoereek, had beep chilled/discri inated against for raising c               ecifcall     y           laimed thatiquestionedisupervisor regarding wheth                       as suffintly qu ied to be placed on the Transient\
Qp September 4, 2002, an Allegation Review Board (ARB) convened to consider allegations that senior engineer at S m/Hoereek, had beep chilled/discri inated against for raising c
Reso. s                    When?                   not receive satisfaction fro'         ..
ecifcall y
immediate su rviso           se         nem to the next level of management, where It was requested tha I         ocurne             issue via the corrective action process (CAP).W claimed that     en     umente         atter through he above channels trnediate supervisor threw the evaluation o                         desk, e               "t's it, you're out of here,"ad escortthe alleger offsite.               gust , 2002 Returned to work after beig                   d discovered that         ould not access       protected area and had been adrnimtively removed from the site y Security, which was later rectified.
laimed thatiquestionedisupervisor regarding wheth as suffintly qu ied to be placed on the Transient\\
Onet         er 11, 2002, OlIcntacte                 in effort to schedule a formal interview.
s Reso.
_,idvised           OI that has share             otential di mina         concerns with the PSEG Nuclear Employee Concers Program               ). Althougl                 " :tected a potential bias held by the ECP toward plant manageme t                     that a s tim would like to allow the ECP to complete their investigation.                 aintamed that it would not be healthy for_
When?
from a stress perspewe to bjnterviewe                 at tis time and was unsure of the NRC allegation process._-stated that w d to achieve a better                               art le or feeLfor the NRC process before following througlorwllegation. OI advisedcthat:ould speak to Dave VITO, RI Seriior Allegations Coordinator, regarding                         on process and was advised that the investigation would not move forward withou operation. On
not receive satisfaction fro' immediate su rviso se nem to the next level of management, where It was requested tha I ocurne issue via the corrective action process (CAP).W claimed that en umente atter through he above channels trnediate supervisor threw the evaluation o desk, e "t's it, you're out of here,"ad escortthe alleger offsite.
_this                           record was deleted       f in accordance wit       Freedom of lnformatio(
gust  
, 2002 Returned to work after beig d discovered that ould not access protected area and had been adrnimtively removed from the site y Security, which was later rectified.
Onet er 11, 2002, OlIcntacte in effort to schedule a formal interview.
_,idvised OI that has share otential di mina concerns with the PSEG Nuclear Employee Concers Program  
). Althougl
:tected a potential bias held by the ECP toward plant manageme t that a s tim would like to allow the ECP to complete their investigation.
aintamed that it would not be healthy for_
from a stress perspewe to bjnterviewe at tis time and was unsure of the NRC allegation process._-stated that w d to achieve a better art le or feeLfor the NRC process before following througlorwllegation. OI advisedcthat:ould speak to Dave VITO, RI Seriior Allegations Coordinator, regarding on process and was advised that the investigation would not move forward withou operation. On
_this record was deleted f
in accordance wit Freedom of lnformatio(
FOIA.
FOIA.


C.)
C.) September 12, 2002, OI provid VITO, as of September 23, 20C vith VITO's office phone number. According to lad not contacted him for further information.
September 12, 2002, OI provid                 vith VITO's office phone number. According to VITO, as of September 23, 20C                lad not contacted him for further information.
Ltact wi n effort to agaipdetermine i aation.Jnaintained thafioes not ly de c o
On September 23, 2iL 01 re-established cor Ltact wi          _      n effort to agaipdetermine iif
the pursuit ofmllegation c On September 23, 2iL 01 re-established cor
  *,aesiredto pursuewllegation of discrimi aation.Jnaintained thafioes not esire to be formally interviewed, has present]ly de c o              the pursuit ofmllegation c discrimination, and has chosen the ECP to adc Absent any further requests for OI assistance in this matter, this investigation is closed as unsubstantiated by this memorandum.
*,aesired to pursuewllegation of discrimi esire to be formally interviewed, has present]
discrimination, and has chosen the ECP to adc if Absent any further requests for OI assistance in this matter, this investigation is closed as unsubstantiated by this memorandum.
cc: F. Congel, OE L. Chandler, OGC S. Collins, NRR (Attn: G. Cwalina)
cc: F. Congel, OE L. Chandler, OGC S. Collins, NRR (Attn: G. Cwalina)
WARNING NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS, REGION I 7C}}
WARNING NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS, REGION I 7C}}

Latest revision as of 15:40, 15 January 2025

Memo from Letts to Miller Salem/Hope Creek: Discrimination Against a Senior Reactor Engineer for Raising Concerns Through the Corrective Action Process
ML052440483
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 09/27/2002
From: Letts B
NRC/OI/RGN-I/FO
To: Miller H
Region 1 Administrator
References
1-2002-033, FOIA/PA-2004-0191
Download: ML052440483 (2)


Text

t-S RECG 1

+

0 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS FIELD OFFICE. REGION I

  • 'S toe 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 19406 September 27,2002 MEMORANDUM TO:

Hubert J. Miller, Regional Admistrator Region I 7

X FROM:

Barry R. Letts, Director Office of Investigations Fie( Office, Region I

SUBJECT:

SALEMIHOPE CREEK: DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A SENIOR REACTOR ENGINEER FOR RAISING CONCERNS THROUGH THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCESS (CASE NO. 1-2002-033)

Qp September 4, 2002, an Allegation Review Board (ARB) convened to consider allegations that senior engineer at S m/Hoereek, had beep chilled/discri inated against for raising c

ecifcall y

laimed thatiquestionedisupervisor regarding wheth as suffintly qu ied to be placed on the Transient\\

s Reso.

When?

not receive satisfaction fro' immediate su rviso se nem to the next level of management, where It was requested tha I ocurne issue via the corrective action process (CAP).W claimed that en umente atter through he above channels trnediate supervisor threw the evaluation o desk, e "t's it, you're out of here,"ad escortthe alleger offsite.

gust

, 2002 Returned to work after beig d discovered that ould not access protected area and had been adrnimtively removed from the site y Security, which was later rectified.

Onet er 11, 2002, OlIcntacte in effort to schedule a formal interview.

_,idvised OI that has share otential di mina concerns with the PSEG Nuclear Employee Concers Program

). Althougl

tected a potential bias held by the ECP toward plant manageme t that a s tim would like to allow the ECP to complete their investigation.

aintamed that it would not be healthy for_

from a stress perspewe to bjnterviewe at tis time and was unsure of the NRC allegation process._-stated that w d to achieve a better art le or feeLfor the NRC process before following througlorwllegation. OI advisedcthat:ould speak to Dave VITO, RI Seriior Allegations Coordinator, regarding on process and was advised that the investigation would not move forward withou operation. On

_this record was deleted f

in accordance wit Freedom of lnformatio(

FOIA.

C.) September 12, 2002, OI provid VITO, as of September 23, 20C vith VITO's office phone number. According to lad not contacted him for further information.

Ltact wi n effort to agaipdetermine i aation.Jnaintained thafioes not ly de c o

the pursuit ofmllegation c On September 23, 2iL 01 re-established cor

  • ,aesired to pursuewllegation of discrimi esire to be formally interviewed, has present]

discrimination, and has chosen the ECP to adc if Absent any further requests for OI assistance in this matter, this investigation is closed as unsubstantiated by this memorandum.

cc: F. Congel, OE L. Chandler, OGC S. Collins, NRR (Attn: G. Cwalina)

WARNING NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS, REGION I 7C