ML060690186: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML060690186
| number = ML060690186
| issue date = 03/10/2006
| issue date = 03/10/2006
| title = 03/10/06 - Memorandum to S. Richards from L. Reyes Liquid Radioactive Release Lessons-Learned Task Force and Charter
| title = Memorandum to S. Richards from L. Reyes Liquid Radioactive Release Lessons-Learned Task Force and Charter
| author name = Reyes L
| author name = Reyes L
| author affiliation = NRC/EDO
| author affiliation = NRC/EDO
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:March 10, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO:           Stuart Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:                     Luis A. Reyes /RA/
{{#Wiki_filter:March 10, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO:
Stuart Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Luis A. Reyes /RA/
Executive Director for Operations
Executive Director for Operations


Line 28: Line 30:
J. Dixon-Herrity, OEDO (301) 415-1733
J. Dixon-Herrity, OEDO (301) 415-1733


March 10, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO:           Stuart Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:                     Luis A. Reyes /RA/
March 10, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO:
Stuart Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Luis A. Reyes /RA/
Executive Director for Operations
Executive Director for Operations


Line 39: Line 43:
==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
As stated DISTRIBUTION:
As stated DISTRIBUTION:
SCollins, RI             WTravers, RII               JCaldwell, RIII       BMallett, RIV JDyer, NRR               JStrosnider, NMSS           JDunnLee, OIP         DMatthews, NRR CPaperiello, RES         HBell, OIG                 EBrenner, OPA         KCyr, OGC SRichards, NRR           JDixon-Herrity, EDO         TFrye, NRR           SKlementowicz, NRR CLi, NRR                 JShepherd, NMSS             TNicholson, RES       SSakai, NRR RNimitz, RI               GKuzo, RII                 SOrth, RIII           MShannon, RIV ADAMS                     EDO r/f (Complete list to be added)
SCollins, RI WTravers, RII JCaldwell, RIII BMallett, RIV JDyer, NRR JStrosnider, NMSS JDunnLee, OIP DMatthews, NRR CPaperiello, RES HBell, OIG EBrenner, OPA KCyr, OGC SRichards, NRR JDixon-Herrity, EDO TFrye, NRR SKlementowicz, NRR CLi, NRR JShepherd, NMSS TNicholson, RES SSakai, NRR RNimitz, RI GKuzo, RII SOrth, RIII MShannon, RIV ADAMS EDO r/f (Complete list to be added)
ML060690186 OFFICE: EDO/TRPS                 NRR:DIRS             EDO/DEDR             EDO NAME:     JDixon-Herrity:mlw     SRichards           WKane                 LReyes DATE:     03/10/06               03/10/06                 /   /06           03/10/06
ML060690186 OFFICE: EDO/TRPS NRR:DIRS EDO/DEDR EDO NAME:
JDixon-Herrity:mlw SRichards WKane LReyes DATE:
03/10/06 03/10/06
/ /06 03/10/06


CHARTER FOR THE LIQUID RADIOACTIVE RELEASE LESSONS-LEARNED TASK FORCE Objective The objective of this Lessons-Learned Task Force is to conduct an evaluation of the NRCs regulatory processes related to the inadvertent unmonitored release of radioactive liquids to the environment (onsite or offsite) in order to identify and recommend areas for improvement applicable to the NRC and/or the industry.
CHARTER FOR THE LIQUID RADIOACTIVE RELEASE LESSONS-LEARNED TASK FORCE Objective The objective of this Lessons-Learned Task Force is to conduct an evaluation of the NRCs regulatory processes related to the inadvertent unmonitored release of radioactive liquids to the environment (onsite or offsite) in order to identify and recommend areas for improvement applicable to the NRC and/or the industry.
Scope The task force should address the following areas:
Scope The task force should address the following areas:
: a.       An historical review (1996 to present) of known inadvertent releases of significant quantities of radioactive liquid to the environment at power reactor sites, including power reactors in decommissioning.
a.
: b.       A general assessment of the public health impact of these releases based on existing related guidance and studies.
An historical review (1996 to present) of known inadvertent releases of significant quantities of radioactive liquid to the environment at power reactor sites, including power reactors in decommissioning.
: c.       The existing regulatory framework, including both the health physics aspects, the licensee reporting requirements (including making reports to state and local officials), and the regulatory requirements associated with the structures and systems from which the releases have originated.
b.
: d.       The NRC inspection program requirements, including enforcement. The review should consider these areas both after implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP), and prior to the ROP.
A general assessment of the public health impact of these releases based on existing related guidance and studies.
: e.       Industry actions in response to these events, including the timing of remediation activities.
c.
: f.       Implications for decommissioning.
The existing regulatory framework, including both the health physics aspects, the licensee reporting requirements (including making reports to state and local officials), and the regulatory requirements associated with the structures and systems from which the releases have originated.
: g.       International perspectives on this issue.
d.
: h.       Communications with external stakeholders, including state and local officials, and other federal agencies.
The NRC inspection program requirements, including enforcement. The review should consider these areas both after implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP), and prior to the ROP.
e.
Industry actions in response to these events, including the timing of remediation activities.
f.
Implications for decommissioning.
g.
International perspectives on this issue.
h.
Communications with external stakeholders, including state and local officials, and other federal agencies.
The scope of subjects considered by the task force should not necessarily be limited to those noted above. Should the task force decide to expand or otherwise revise the scope of the charter, the Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs should be informed of any significant changes to the charter or the topics of review. The task force may decide to recommend specific issues for consideration by the staff in the longer term.
The scope of subjects considered by the task force should not necessarily be limited to those noted above. Should the task force decide to expand or otherwise revise the scope of the charter, the Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs should be informed of any significant changes to the charter or the topics of review. The task force may decide to recommend specific issues for consideration by the staff in the longer term.
This charter recognizes that the staff assigned to the Lessons-Learned Task Force will likely also be active participants in the agencys response to the recent events. The task force activities should not interfere with the agencys immediate response to these events.
This charter recognizes that the staff assigned to the Lessons-Learned Task Force will likely also be active participants in the agencys response to the recent events. The task force activities should not interfere with the agencys immediate response to these events.
Expected Product and Schedule The task force will provide its observations, conclusions, and recommendations in the form of a written report to the Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs. The task force review activities should be completed by August 31, 2006.
Expected Product and Schedule The task force will provide its observations, conclusions, and recommendations in the form of a written report to the Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs. The task force review activities should be completed by August 31, 2006.
Staffing The task force will consist of the following members. All members will serve on a part-time basis (participation on the team can be via teleconference):
Staffing The task force will consist of the following members. All members will serve on a part-time basis (participation on the team can be via teleconference):
Team Leader:                 Stuart Richards, NRR Assistant Team Leader:       Timothy Frye, NRR Team Members:               Stephen Klementowicz, NRR Stacie Sakai, NRR Chang Li, NRR James Shepherd, NMSS Thomas Nicholson, RES Ronald Nimitz, Region I George Kuzo, Region II Steven Orth, Region III Michael Shannon, Region IV State Representative (to be identified later)
Team Leader:
Stuart Richards, NRR Assistant Team Leader:
Timothy Frye, NRR Team Members:
Stephen Klementowicz, NRR Stacie Sakai, NRR Chang Li, NRR James Shepherd, NMSS Thomas Nicholson, RES Ronald Nimitz, Region I George Kuzo, Region II Steven Orth, Region III Michael Shannon, Region IV State Representative (to be identified later)
Other staff members may be consulted on an as needed basis.
Other staff members may be consulted on an as needed basis.
Senior Management Interface The task force will keep senior management informed on the status of the effort and provide early identification of significant findings. In addition, the task force will regularly interface with the cognizant OEDO staff to keep them abreast of progress.}}
Senior Management Interface The task force will keep senior management informed on the status of the effort and provide early identification of significant findings. In addition, the task force will regularly interface with the cognizant OEDO staff to keep them abreast of progress.}}

Latest revision as of 10:57, 15 January 2025

Memorandum to S. Richards from L. Reyes Liquid Radioactive Release Lessons-Learned Task Force and Charter
ML060690186
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Indian Point, Byron, Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/10/2006
From: Reyes L
NRC/EDO
To: Richards S
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DIRS
Dixon-Herrity, J, 415-1733
References
Download: ML060690186 (4)


Text

March 10, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO:

Stuart Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:

Luis A. Reyes /RA/

Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

LIQUID RADIOACTIVE RELEASE LESSONS-LEARNED TASK FORCE AND CHARTER The purpose of this memorandum is to assign you to lead an inter-office task force to assess the lessons-learned related to the inadvertent release of radioactive liquid to the environment at power reactor sites. Specifically, recently identified incidents at Braidwood, Indian Point, Byron, and Dresden have highlighted tritium contamination of groundwater as a result of unplanned releases due to equipment failure or structural degradation. Although the measured levels of tritium thus far do not appear to present a health hazard to the public, I believe it is necessary to do a broad review to determine whether this is a generic issue for NRC licensees and to recommend possible agency actions to be taken in this area.

The attached charter has been developed to define the objective, scope, expected product, schedule, staffing, and senior management interface. The scope of the task force effort will include the following areas: industry experience; health impacts; the regulatory framework; NRC inspection, enforcement and reporting aspects; industry actions; international perspectives; and communications with external stakeholders.

You will report to the Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs.

Personnel selected as team members are identified in the attachment. The task force will maintain the Deputy Executive Director and other senior managers informed of the progress of the task force. The task force will provide its observations, conclusions, and recommendations in the form of a written report consistent with the guidance provided in the attached charter.

Attachment:

As stated CONTACT:

J. Dixon-Herrity, OEDO (301) 415-1733

March 10, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO:

Stuart Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:

Luis A. Reyes /RA/

Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

LIQUID RADIOACTIVE RELEASE LESSONS-LEARNED TASK FORCE AND CHARTER The purpose of this memorandum is to assign you to lead an inter-office task force to assess the lessons-learned related to the inadvertent release of radioactive liquid to the environment at power reactor sites. Specifically, recently identified incidents at Braidwood, Indian Point, Byron, and Dresden have highlighted tritium contamination of groundwater as a result of unplanned releases due to equipment failure or structural degradation. Although the measured levels of tritium thus far do not appear to present a health hazard to the public, I believe it is necessary to do a broad review to determine whether this is a generic issue for NRC licensees and to recommend possible agency actions to be taken in this area.

The attached charter has been developed to define the objective, scope, expected product, schedule, staffing, and senior management interface. The scope of the task force effort will include the following areas: industry experience; health impacts; the regulatory framework; NRC inspection, enforcement and reporting aspects; industry actions; international perspectives; and communications with external stakeholders.

You will report to the Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs.

Personnel selected as team members are identified in the attachment. The task force will maintain the Deputy Executive Director and other senior managers informed of the progress of the task force. The task force will provide its observations, conclusions, and recommendations in the form of a written report consistent with the guidance provided in the attached charter.

Attachment:

As stated DISTRIBUTION:

SCollins, RI WTravers, RII JCaldwell, RIII BMallett, RIV JDyer, NRR JStrosnider, NMSS JDunnLee, OIP DMatthews, NRR CPaperiello, RES HBell, OIG EBrenner, OPA KCyr, OGC SRichards, NRR JDixon-Herrity, EDO TFrye, NRR SKlementowicz, NRR CLi, NRR JShepherd, NMSS TNicholson, RES SSakai, NRR RNimitz, RI GKuzo, RII SOrth, RIII MShannon, RIV ADAMS EDO r/f (Complete list to be added)

ML060690186 OFFICE: EDO/TRPS NRR:DIRS EDO/DEDR EDO NAME:

JDixon-Herrity:mlw SRichards WKane LReyes DATE:

03/10/06 03/10/06

/ /06 03/10/06

CHARTER FOR THE LIQUID RADIOACTIVE RELEASE LESSONS-LEARNED TASK FORCE Objective The objective of this Lessons-Learned Task Force is to conduct an evaluation of the NRCs regulatory processes related to the inadvertent unmonitored release of radioactive liquids to the environment (onsite or offsite) in order to identify and recommend areas for improvement applicable to the NRC and/or the industry.

Scope The task force should address the following areas:

a.

An historical review (1996 to present) of known inadvertent releases of significant quantities of radioactive liquid to the environment at power reactor sites, including power reactors in decommissioning.

b.

A general assessment of the public health impact of these releases based on existing related guidance and studies.

c.

The existing regulatory framework, including both the health physics aspects, the licensee reporting requirements (including making reports to state and local officials), and the regulatory requirements associated with the structures and systems from which the releases have originated.

d.

The NRC inspection program requirements, including enforcement. The review should consider these areas both after implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP), and prior to the ROP.

e.

Industry actions in response to these events, including the timing of remediation activities.

f.

Implications for decommissioning.

g.

International perspectives on this issue.

h.

Communications with external stakeholders, including state and local officials, and other federal agencies.

The scope of subjects considered by the task force should not necessarily be limited to those noted above. Should the task force decide to expand or otherwise revise the scope of the charter, the Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs should be informed of any significant changes to the charter or the topics of review. The task force may decide to recommend specific issues for consideration by the staff in the longer term.

This charter recognizes that the staff assigned to the Lessons-Learned Task Force will likely also be active participants in the agencys response to the recent events. The task force activities should not interfere with the agencys immediate response to these events.

Expected Product and Schedule The task force will provide its observations, conclusions, and recommendations in the form of a written report to the Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs. The task force review activities should be completed by August 31, 2006.

Staffing The task force will consist of the following members. All members will serve on a part-time basis (participation on the team can be via teleconference):

Team Leader:

Stuart Richards, NRR Assistant Team Leader:

Timothy Frye, NRR Team Members:

Stephen Klementowicz, NRR Stacie Sakai, NRR Chang Li, NRR James Shepherd, NMSS Thomas Nicholson, RES Ronald Nimitz, Region I George Kuzo, Region II Steven Orth, Region III Michael Shannon, Region IV State Representative (to be identified later)

Other staff members may be consulted on an as needed basis.

Senior Management Interface The task force will keep senior management informed on the status of the effort and provide early identification of significant findings. In addition, the task force will regularly interface with the cognizant OEDO staff to keep them abreast of progress.