|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 04/24/2000 | | | issue date = 04/24/2000 |
| | title = IR 05000325-06-001, and IR 05000324-06-001, Carolina Power & Light Company, Errata Letter for Annual Assessment | | | title = IR 05000325-06-001, and IR 05000324-06-001, Carolina Power & Light Company, Errata Letter for Annual Assessment |
| | author name = Fredrickson P E | | | author name = Fredrickson P |
| | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB4 | | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB4 |
| | addressee name = Scarola J | | | addressee name = Scarola J |
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter: | | {{#Wiki_filter:April 24, 2006 |
| [[Issue date::April 24, 2006]]
| |
|
| |
|
| Carolina Power & Light CompanyATTN:Mr. James ScarolaVice PresidentBrunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461
| | ==SUBJECT:== |
| | | ERRATA LETTER FOR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2006001 AND 05000324/2006001) |
| SUBJECT: ERRATA LETTER FOR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - BRUNSWICKSTEAM ELECTRIC PLANT (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2006001AND 05000324/2006001)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Dear Mr. Scarola:== | | ==Dear Mr. Scarola:== |
| We have become aware that our Annual Assessment Letter - Brunswick Steam Electric Plantletter, dated March 2, 2006, is in error and referenced an incorrect NRC Performance Indicator. The last sentence on the first page of the letter should have included "Unplanned Power Changes" instead of "Unplanned Scrams". Please replace the enclosed amended page into all copies of the March 2, 2006, Annual Assessment Letter - Brunswick Steam Electric Plant. The ADAMS Accession Number for that document is ML 060610382. We apologize for any inconvenience caused by this error. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Paul E. Fredrickson at (404) 562-4530.
| | March 2, 2006 |
|
| |
|
| Sincerely,/RA/Paul E. Fredrickson, ChiefReactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor ProjectsDocket Nos.: 50-325, 50-324 License Nos:DPR-71, DPR-62
| | ==SUBJECT:== |
| | ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2006001 AND 05000324/2006001) |
|
| |
|
| ===Enclosures:=== | | ==Dear Mr. Scarola:== |
| 1. Errata Sheet 2. Annual Assessment Letter Amended Page 2cc w/encl:T. P. Cleary, Director Site Operations Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
| | February 8, 2006 |
|
| |
|
| Electronic Mail DistributionBenjamin C. WaldrepPlant Manager Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Carolina Power & Light Company Electronic Mail DistributionJames W. Holt, ManagerPerformance Evaluation and Regulatory Affairs PEB 7 Carolina Power & Light Company Electronic Mail DistributionEdward T. O'Neil, ManagerTraining Carolina Power & Light Company Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Electronic Mail DistributionRandy C. Ivey, ManagerSupport Services Carolina Power & Light Company Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Electronic Mail DistributionGarry D. Miller, M anagerLicense Renewal Progress Energy Electronic Mail DistributionLenny Beller, SupervisorLicensing/Regulatory Programs Carolina Power and Light Company Electronic Mail DistributionDavid T. ConleyAssociate General Counsel - Legal Dept.
| | ==SUBJECT:== |
| | ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2006001 AND 05000324/2006001) |
|
| |
|
| Progress Energy Service Company, LLC Electronic Mail DistributionJames RossNuclear Energy Institute Electronic Mail DistributionJohn H. O'Neill, Jr.Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N. Street, NW Washington, DC 20037-1128Beverly Hall, Acting DirectorDivision of Radiation Protection N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution Chairman of the North Carolina Utilities Commission c/o Sam Watson, Staff Attorney Electronic Mail DistributionRobert P. GruberExecutive Director Public Staff NCUC 4326 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-4326Public Service CommissionState of South Carolina P. O. Box 11649 Columbia, SC 29211David R. SandiferBrunswick County Board of Commissioners
| | ==Dear Mr. Scarola:== |
| | | On February 8, 2006, the NRC staff completed its performance review of the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant. Our technical staff reviewed performance indicators (PIs) for the most recent quarter and inspection results for the period from January 1 through December 31, 2005 (CY 2005). The purpose of this letter is to inform you of our assessment of your safety performance during this period and our plans for future inspections at your facility. |
| P. O. Box 249 Bolivia, NC 28422Warren LeeEmergency Management Director New Hanover County Department of Emergency Management P. O. Box 1525 Wilmington, NC 28402-1525Distribution (See page 3)
| |
| | |
| _________________________OFFICEDRP:RIIDRP:RIISIGNATUREPEFNAMEPFredrickson:rcmDATE04/24/2006E-MAIL COPY? YESNO YESNO YESNO YESNO YESNO YESNO YESNO March 2, 2006Carolina Power & Light CompanyATTN:Mr. James ScarolaVice PresidentBrunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461
| |
| | |
| SUBJECT: ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2006001 AND 05000324/2006001)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Dear Mr. Scarola:==
| | This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include physical protection information. A separate letter, designated and marked as Official Use Only - Security-Related Information, will include the physical protection review and resultant inspection plan. |
| On February 8, 2006, the NRC staff completed its performance review of the Brunswick SteamElectric Plant. Our technical staff reviewed performance indicators (PIs) for the most recentquarter and inspection results for the period from January 1 through December 31, 2005 (CY2005). The purpose of this letter is to inform you of our assessment of your safety performance during this period and our plans for future inspections at your facility.This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include physical protectioninformation. A separate letter, designated and marked as "Official Use Only - Security-Related Information", will include the physical protection review and resultant inspection plan.Overall, Brunswick Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved public health and safetyand fully met all cornerstone objectives. Brunswick Unit 1 performance for the most recent quarter, and Units 1 and 2, for the first three quarters of the assessment cycle, were within theLicensee Response column of the NRC's Action Matrix. We based this conclusion on the factthat all inspection findings were classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all PIs indicated performance at a level requiring no additional NRC oversight (Green). However,Brunswick Unit 2 performance for the most recent quarter was within the Regulatory Response column of the NRC's Action Matrix. We based this conclusion on the fact that the Unit crossed the threshold from Green to White for the Unplanned Scrams per 7000 Critical Hours PI during the fourth quarter of CY 2005. Enclosure 1 March 2, 2006Carolina Power & Light CompanyATTN:Mr. James ScarolaVice PresidentBrunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461
| |
|
| |
|
| SUBJECT: ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2006001 AND 05000324/2006001)
| | Overall, Brunswick Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully met all cornerstone objectives. Brunswick Unit 1 performance for the most recent quarter, and Units 1 and 2, for the first three quarters of the assessment cycle, were within the Licensee Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. We based this conclusion on the fact that all inspection findings were classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all PIs indicated performance at a level requiring no additional NRC oversight (Green). However, Brunswick Unit 2 performance for the most recent quarter was within the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. We based this conclusion on the fact that the Unit crossed the threshold from Green to White for the Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours PI during the fourth quarter of CY 2005. |
|
| |
|
| ==Dear Mr. Scarola:==
| | Enclosure 2 |
| On February 8, 2006, the NRC staff completed its performance review of the Brunswick SteamElectric Plant. Our technical staff reviewed performance indicators (PIs) for the most recentquarter and inspection results for the period from January 1 through December 31, 2005 (CY2005). The purpose of this letter is to inform you of our assessment of your safety performance during this period and our plans for future inspections at your facility.This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include physical protectioninformation. A separate letter, designated and marked as "Official Use Only - Security-Related Information", will include the physical protection review and resultant inspection plan.Overall, Brunswick Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved public health and safetyand fully met all cornerstone objectives. Brunswick Unit 1 performance for the most recent quarter, and Units 1 and 2, for the first three quarters of the assessment cycle, were within theLicensee Response column of the NRC's Action Matrix. We based this conclusion on the factthat all inspection findings were classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all PIs indicated performance at a level requiring no additional NRC oversight (Green). However,Brunswick Unit 2 performance for the most recent quarter was within the Regulatory Response column of the NRC's Action Matrix. We based this conclusion on the fact that the Unit crossed the threshold from Green to White for the Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours PI during the fourth quarter of CY 2005. Enclosure 2
| |
| }} | | }} |
Text
April 24, 2006
SUBJECT:
ERRATA LETTER FOR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2006001 AND 05000324/2006001)
Dear Mr. Scarola:
March 2, 2006
SUBJECT:
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2006001 AND 05000324/2006001)
Dear Mr. Scarola:
February 8, 2006
SUBJECT:
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2006001 AND 05000324/2006001)
Dear Mr. Scarola:
On February 8, 2006, the NRC staff completed its performance review of the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant. Our technical staff reviewed performance indicators (PIs) for the most recent quarter and inspection results for the period from January 1 through December 31, 2005 (CY 2005). The purpose of this letter is to inform you of our assessment of your safety performance during this period and our plans for future inspections at your facility.
This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include physical protection information. A separate letter, designated and marked as Official Use Only - Security-Related Information, will include the physical protection review and resultant inspection plan.
Overall, Brunswick Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully met all cornerstone objectives. Brunswick Unit 1 performance for the most recent quarter, and Units 1 and 2, for the first three quarters of the assessment cycle, were within the Licensee Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. We based this conclusion on the fact that all inspection findings were classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all PIs indicated performance at a level requiring no additional NRC oversight (Green). However, Brunswick Unit 2 performance for the most recent quarter was within the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. We based this conclusion on the fact that the Unit crossed the threshold from Green to White for the Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours PI during the fourth quarter of CY 2005.
Enclosure 2
