ML062220523: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/02/2005
| issue date = 06/02/2005
| title = Letter from J. T. Munday, Rii, to J. A. Stall, FP&L Re Allegation No. RII-2005-A-0056
| title = Letter from J. T. Munday, Rii, to J. A. Stall, FP&L Re Allegation No. RII-2005-A-0056
| author name = Munday J T
| author name = Munday J
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
| addressee name = Stall J A
| addressee name = Stall J
| addressee affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co
| addressee affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co
| docket = 05000335, 05000389
| docket = 05000335, 05000389
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:R 0UNITED STATES
ýp A NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II SAM NUNN ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER S1.*
61 FORSYTH STREET. SW, SUITE 23T85 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8931 June 2, 2005 Florida Power and Light Company ATTN:
Mr. J. A. Stall Senior Vice President - Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer P. O. Box 14000 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420
 
==SUBJECT:==
ALLEGATION NO. RII-2005-A-0056
 
==Dear Mr. Stall:==
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) recently received information concerning activities at the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant. A description of the concerns is enclosed.
We request that you conduct inspections and/or investigations as appropriate to prove or disprove the concerns and that you inform us within 30 days of the date of this letter of the resolution of this matter and make the records of your completed action available for NRC inspection.
NRC's evaluation of your response will include a determination that: 1) the individuals conducting the investigation were independent of the organization affected by the concerns,
: 2) the evaluator was competent in the specific functional area, 3) the evaluation was of sufficient depth and scope to substantively address the concerns, 4) appropriate root causes and generic implications were considered if the concerns were substantiated, and 5) the corrective actions, if necessary, were sufficient.
Please send your response to Ms. Carolyn Evans, Enforcement Officer, Enforcement and Investigations Coordination Staff, Region II, with no other copies to the NRC. Please do not submit your response to the Document Control Desk. Because your response may be provided to individuals expressing the concern, to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be released without redaction. If your response contains personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information, such information shall be contained in a separate attachment, appropriately marked, so that It will not be subject to public disclosure. The affidavit required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) must accompany your response if proprietary information is included.
Should you be unable to complete your review within the time requested, please contact us so that we can discuss this matter and make appropriate arrangements.
NOS CO Al INFR T
N FR U LIC Dl SURT
 
0 FPL 2
RII-2005-A-0056 The enclosure to this letter must be controlled as sensitive information and distribution limited to personnel with a legitimate "need-to-know."
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Oscar DeMiranda, Senior Allegation Coordinator, at (404) 562-4424.
Sincerely, Joel T. Munday, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 License Nos. DPR-67, NPF-1 6
 
==Enclosure:==
As stated NC U TA INL SR ON NO P
IC DI L
WU
 
ST LUCIE UNITS 1 & 2 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY SPENT FUEL POOL ISSUES ALLEGATION NUMBER RII-2005-A-0056 The NRC received information regarding the spent fuel pool at the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant.
From the information received, the NRC believes these concerns are applicable to Unit 2, and the most recent refueling outage. However, this information may be referring to either the Unit I or Unit 2 spent fuel pools. The following information was provided:
: 1.
The spent fuel pool level appeared below that of the heat exchanger nozzle and this may be a Technical Specifications violation.
: 2.
There is a lack of emergency egress out of the spent fuel pool building during fuel movement given that the vital door is known to be frequently inoperable and required plant security assistance to unlock.
: 3.
There was an audible alarm going-off in spent fuel pool building (possibly due to low water level in the pool).
: 4.
There is a lack of emergency lighting in the spent fuel pool building.
---- UNFýUýC ISCO0R Ecosr Enclosure
 
q FPL 3
RII-2005-A-0056 Distribution:
Oscar de Miranda, EICS Allegation Documents not Placed in ADAMS Non-Publicly Available - Sensitive SIGNATURE oDA TE
_e__"/
/
__-d R 9 1
_.W II NAME O;iranda REvaud*'
/
4/2~
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY NDI UR}}

Latest revision as of 07:26, 15 January 2025

Letter from J. T. Munday, Rii, to J. A. Stall, FP&L Re Allegation No. RII-2005-A-0056
ML062220523
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/2005
From: Joel Munday
NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
To: Stall J
Florida Power & Light Co
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0187, RII-2005-A-0056
Download: ML062220523 (4)


Text

R 0UNITED STATES

ýp A NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II SAM NUNN ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER S1.*

61 FORSYTH STREET. SW, SUITE 23T85 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8931 June 2, 2005 Florida Power and Light Company ATTN:

Mr. J. A. Stall Senior Vice President - Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer P. O. Box 14000 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420

SUBJECT:

ALLEGATION NO. RII-2005-A-0056

Dear Mr. Stall:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) recently received information concerning activities at the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant. A description of the concerns is enclosed.

We request that you conduct inspections and/or investigations as appropriate to prove or disprove the concerns and that you inform us within 30 days of the date of this letter of the resolution of this matter and make the records of your completed action available for NRC inspection.

NRC's evaluation of your response will include a determination that: 1) the individuals conducting the investigation were independent of the organization affected by the concerns,

2) the evaluator was competent in the specific functional area, 3) the evaluation was of sufficient depth and scope to substantively address the concerns, 4) appropriate root causes and generic implications were considered if the concerns were substantiated, and 5) the corrective actions, if necessary, were sufficient.

Please send your response to Ms. Carolyn Evans, Enforcement Officer, Enforcement and Investigations Coordination Staff, Region II, with no other copies to the NRC. Please do not submit your response to the Document Control Desk. Because your response may be provided to individuals expressing the concern, to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be released without redaction. If your response contains personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information, such information shall be contained in a separate attachment, appropriately marked, so that It will not be subject to public disclosure. The affidavit required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) must accompany your response if proprietary information is included.

Should you be unable to complete your review within the time requested, please contact us so that we can discuss this matter and make appropriate arrangements.

NOS CO Al INFR T

N FR U LIC Dl SURT

0 FPL 2

RII-2005-A-0056 The enclosure to this letter must be controlled as sensitive information and distribution limited to personnel with a legitimate "need-to-know."

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Oscar DeMiranda, Senior Allegation Coordinator, at (404) 562-4424.

Sincerely, Joel T. Munday, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 License Nos. DPR-67, NPF-1 6

Enclosure:

As stated NC U TA INL SR ON NO P

IC DI L

WU

ST LUCIE UNITS 1 & 2 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY SPENT FUEL POOL ISSUES ALLEGATION NUMBER RII-2005-A-0056 The NRC received information regarding the spent fuel pool at the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant.

From the information received, the NRC believes these concerns are applicable to Unit 2, and the most recent refueling outage. However, this information may be referring to either the Unit I or Unit 2 spent fuel pools. The following information was provided:

1.

The spent fuel pool level appeared below that of the heat exchanger nozzle and this may be a Technical Specifications violation.

2.

There is a lack of emergency egress out of the spent fuel pool building during fuel movement given that the vital door is known to be frequently inoperable and required plant security assistance to unlock.

3.

There was an audible alarm going-off in spent fuel pool building (possibly due to low water level in the pool).

4.

There is a lack of emergency lighting in the spent fuel pool building.


UNFýUýC ISCO0R Ecosr Enclosure

q FPL 3

RII-2005-A-0056 Distribution:

Oscar de Miranda, EICS Allegation Documents not Placed in ADAMS Non-Publicly Available - Sensitive SIGNATURE oDA TE

_e__"/

/

__-d R 9 1

_.W II NAME O;iranda REvaud*'

/

4/2~

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY NDI UR