ML073390239: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 Jonathan Rowley - The question is From:         Jonathan Rowley To:           dmannai@entergy.com;    hmetell@entergy.com Date:         11/21/2007 11:59 AM
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 Jonathan Rowley - The question is From:
To:
Date:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
The question is Per our discussion today:
Jonathan Rowley dmannai@entergy.com; hmetell@entergy.com 11/21/2007 11:59 AM The question is Per our discussion today:
Your response to Question 387 in your November 14, 2007,letter states that "In most cases the maximum component stress difference with time matched the maximum stressintensity calculatedby ANSYS. This shows that shearingstresses are negligible for the thermal transientat that location and the maximum component stress difference is the maximum stress intensity." Pleasejustify these statementsbased on qualitative/theoreticalresults or quantitative values for the blend radius locations, with geometrical discontinuities,of the thermal transientsanalyzed?
Your response to Question 387 in your {{letter dated|date=November 14, 2007|text=November 14, 2007, letter}} states that "In most cases the maximum component stress difference with time matched the maximum stress intensity calculated by ANSYS. This shows that shearing stresses are negligible for the thermal transient at that location and the maximum component stress difference is the maximum stress intensity." Please justify these statements based on qualitative/theoretical results or quantitative values for the blend radius locations, with geometrical discontinuities, of the thermal transients analyzed?
P.S.
P.S.
SIA document QA-2000-102 was referenced to show that stresses are may not be negligible.
SIA document QA-2000-102 was referenced to show that stresses are may not be negligible.
file://C :\temp\GW} 00004.HTM                                                                   12/03/2007
file://C :\\temp\\GW} 00004.HTM 12/03/2007


Ic:\temp\GW}00004.TMP                                                                                 Page]_!I Mail Envelope Properties     (47446402.40C: 12: 35182)
Ic:\\temp\\GW}00004.TMP Page]_!I Mail Envelope Properties (47446402.40C: 12: 35182)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
The question is Creation Date          11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM From:                  Jonathan Rowley Created By:            JGR@nrc.gov Recipients                                       Action                Date & Time entergy.com                                     Transferred          11/21/2007 12:00:22 PM dmannai (dmannai@entergy.com) hmetell (hmetell@entergy.com)
Creation Date From:
Post Office                                       Delivered           Route entergy.com Files                          Size               Date & Time MESSAGE                        1305              11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM TEXT.htm                      1042 Options Auto Delete:                   No Expiration Date:               None Notify Recipients:             Yes Priority:                     Standard ReplyRequested:               No Return Notification:
Created By:
The question is 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM Jonathan Rowley JGR@nrc.gov Recipients entergy.com PM dmannai (dmannai@entergy.com) hmetell (hmetell@entergy.com)
Action Transferred Date & Time 11/21/2007 12:00:22 Post Office Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Delivered Route entergy.com Size 1305 1042 Date & Time 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM Options Auto Delete:
No Expiration Date:
None Notify Recipients:
Yes Priority:
Standard ReplyRequested:
No Return Notification:
Send Notification when Opened Concealed  
Send Notification when Opened Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:                     Standard To Be Delivered:               Immediate Status Tracking:               Delivered & Opened}}
No Security:
Standard To Be Delivered:
Immediate Status Tracking:
Delivered & Opened}}

Latest revision as of 19:42, 14 January 2025

(PA-LR) E-mail the Question Is (Draft)
ML073390239
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 11/21/2007
From: Rowley J
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR
To:
Entergy Corp
References
TAC MD2297
Download: ML073390239 (2)


Text

Page 1 of 1 Jonathan Rowley - The question is From:

To:

Date:

Subject:

Jonathan Rowley dmannai@entergy.com; hmetell@entergy.com 11/21/2007 11:59 AM The question is Per our discussion today:

Your response to Question 387 in your November 14, 2007, letter states that "In most cases the maximum component stress difference with time matched the maximum stress intensity calculated by ANSYS. This shows that shearing stresses are negligible for the thermal transient at that location and the maximum component stress difference is the maximum stress intensity." Please justify these statements based on qualitative/theoretical results or quantitative values for the blend radius locations, with geometrical discontinuities, of the thermal transients analyzed?

P.S.

SIA document QA-2000-102 was referenced to show that stresses are may not be negligible.

file://C :\\temp\\GW} 00004.HTM 12/03/2007

Ic:\\temp\\GW}00004.TMP Page]_!I Mail Envelope Properties (47446402.40C: 12: 35182)

Subject:

Creation Date From:

Created By:

The question is 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM Jonathan Rowley JGR@nrc.gov Recipients entergy.com PM dmannai (dmannai@entergy.com) hmetell (hmetell@entergy.com)

Action Transferred Date & Time 11/21/2007 12:00:22 Post Office Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Delivered Route entergy.com Size 1305 1042 Date & Time 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM Options Auto Delete:

No Expiration Date:

None Notify Recipients:

Yes Priority:

Standard ReplyRequested:

No Return Notification:

Send Notification when Opened Concealed

Subject:

No Security:

Standard To Be Delivered:

Immediate Status Tracking:

Delivered & Opened