ML073390239: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 11/21/2007 | | issue date = 11/21/2007 | ||
| title = (PA-LR) E-mail the Question Is (Draft) | | title = (PA-LR) E-mail the Question Is (Draft) | ||
| author name = Rowley J | | author name = Rowley J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 Jonathan Rowley - The question is From: | ||
To: | |||
Date: | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Jonathan Rowley dmannai@entergy.com; hmetell@entergy.com 11/21/2007 11:59 AM The question is Per our discussion today: | |||
Your response to Question 387 in your {{letter dated|date=November 14, 2007|text=November 14, 2007, letter}} states that "In most cases the maximum component stress difference with time matched the maximum stress intensity calculated by ANSYS. This shows that shearing stresses are negligible for the thermal transient at that location and the maximum component stress difference is the maximum stress intensity." Please justify these statements based on qualitative/theoretical results or quantitative values for the blend radius locations, with geometrical discontinuities, of the thermal transients analyzed? | |||
P.S. | |||
SIA document QA-2000-102 was referenced to show that stresses are may not be negligible. | |||
file://C :\\temp\\GW} 00004.HTM 12/03/2007 | |||
Ic:\\temp\\GW}00004.TMP Page]_!I Mail Envelope Properties (47446402.40C: 12: 35182) | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Creation Date From: | |||
Created By: | |||
The question is 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM Jonathan Rowley JGR@nrc.gov Recipients entergy.com PM dmannai (dmannai@entergy.com) hmetell (hmetell@entergy.com) | |||
Action Transferred Date & Time 11/21/2007 12:00:22 Post Office Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Delivered Route entergy.com Size 1305 1042 Date & Time 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM Options Auto Delete: | |||
No Expiration Date: | |||
None Notify Recipients: | |||
Yes Priority: | |||
Standard ReplyRequested: | |||
No Return Notification: | |||
Send Notification when Opened Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | |||
No Security: | |||
Standard To Be Delivered: | |||
Immediate Status Tracking: | |||
Delivered & Opened}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:42, 14 January 2025
| ML073390239 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/21/2007 |
| From: | Rowley J NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR |
| To: | Entergy Corp |
| References | |
| TAC MD2297 | |
| Download: ML073390239 (2) | |
Text
Page 1 of 1 Jonathan Rowley - The question is From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Jonathan Rowley dmannai@entergy.com; hmetell@entergy.com 11/21/2007 11:59 AM The question is Per our discussion today:
Your response to Question 387 in your November 14, 2007, letter states that "In most cases the maximum component stress difference with time matched the maximum stress intensity calculated by ANSYS. This shows that shearing stresses are negligible for the thermal transient at that location and the maximum component stress difference is the maximum stress intensity." Please justify these statements based on qualitative/theoretical results or quantitative values for the blend radius locations, with geometrical discontinuities, of the thermal transients analyzed?
P.S.
SIA document QA-2000-102 was referenced to show that stresses are may not be negligible.
file://C :\\temp\\GW} 00004.HTM 12/03/2007
Ic:\\temp\\GW}00004.TMP Page]_!I Mail Envelope Properties (47446402.40C: 12: 35182)
Subject:
Creation Date From:
Created By:
The question is 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM Jonathan Rowley JGR@nrc.gov Recipients entergy.com PM dmannai (dmannai@entergy.com) hmetell (hmetell@entergy.com)
Action Transferred Date & Time 11/21/2007 12:00:22 Post Office Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Delivered Route entergy.com Size 1305 1042 Date & Time 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM Options Auto Delete:
No Expiration Date:
None Notify Recipients:
Yes Priority:
Standard ReplyRequested:
No Return Notification:
Send Notification when Opened Concealed
Subject:
No Security:
Standard To Be Delivered:
Immediate Status Tracking:
Delivered & Opened