ML093080581: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Harmon. Curren. Spielberg | {{#Wiki_filter:Harmon. Curren. Spielberg + EI_nberg LLP 1726 M Street NW. Suite 600 202.328.3500 I office Washington DC 20036-4523 202.328.691B I fax HarmooCurran.com October 29,2009 Joel S. Wiebe, Senior Project Manager Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Bye-mail to: RidsNrrPMWattsBar2.Resource@nrc.gov | ||
+ EI_nberg 1726 M Street NW. Suite 600 202.328.3500 I office Washington DC 20036-4523 202.328.691B I fax HarmooCurran.com October 29,2009 Joel S. Wiebe, Senior Project Manager Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
==Dear Mr. Wiebe:== | ==Dear Mr. Wiebe:== | ||
On behalf of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, the Sierra Club, Blue Ridge Defense League, Tennessee Environmental Council, and We the People ("Organizations"), I submitting comments on the scope | On behalf of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, the Sierra Club, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Tennessee Environmental Council, and We the People ("Organizations"), I am submitting comments on the scope ofthe environmental impact statement ("EIS") for the proposed Watts Bar Unit 2 nuclear reactor. The Organizations respectfully submit that the EIS should consider, at a minimum, the environmental concerns raised in their hearing request to the NRC, which is now pending before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. See Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing (July 13,2009), as supplemented by Amended Contention 7 (September 3,2009). Copies ofthose documents are attached. | ||
("EIS") for proposed Watts Bar Unit 2 nuclear reactor. The Organizations respectfully submit that the should consider, at a minimum, the environmental concerns raised in their hearing request to NRC, which is now pending before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. See Petition Intervene and Request for Hearing (July 13,2009), as supplemented by Amended Contention (September 3,2009). Copies | These comments are in addition to any scoping comments that may be submitted by individual Organizations or their members. | ||
Sincerely, lsi Diane Attorney for Encls.: As stated}} | Thank you for your consideration. | ||
Sincerely, lsi Diane Curran Attorney for Organizations Encls.: As stated}} | |||
Latest revision as of 08:27, 14 January 2025
| ML093080581 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Watts Bar  |
| Issue date: | 10/29/2009 |
| From: | Curran D Harmon, Curran, Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP |
| To: | Joel Wiebe Watts Bar Special Projects Branch |
| Wiebe, Joel NRR/DORL/WBSP, 415-6606 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML093080503 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML093080581 (1) | |
Text
Harmon. Curren. Spielberg + EI_nberg LLP 1726 M Street NW. Suite 600 202.328.3500 I office Washington DC 20036-4523 202.328.691B I fax HarmooCurran.com October 29,2009 Joel S. Wiebe, Senior Project Manager Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Bye-mail to: RidsNrrPMWattsBar2.Resource@nrc.gov
SUBJECT:
Scoping Commentsfor Watts Bar Unit 2 Environmental Impact Statement
Dear Mr. Wiebe:
On behalf of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, the Sierra Club, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Tennessee Environmental Council, and We the People ("Organizations"), I am submitting comments on the scope ofthe environmental impact statement ("EIS") for the proposed Watts Bar Unit 2 nuclear reactor. The Organizations respectfully submit that the EIS should consider, at a minimum, the environmental concerns raised in their hearing request to the NRC, which is now pending before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. See Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing (July 13,2009), as supplemented by Amended Contention 7 (September 3,2009). Copies ofthose documents are attached.
These comments are in addition to any scoping comments that may be submitted by individual Organizations or their members.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, lsi Diane Curran Attorney for Organizations Encls.: As stated