IR 05000334/2010201: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:rch 18, 2010
{{#Wiki_filter:March 18, 2010


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Line 24: Line 24:


==Dear Mr. Harden:==
==Dear Mr. Harden:==
On February 5, 2010, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security  
On February 5, 2010, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on February 12, 2010, with you and members of the site staff.


baseline inspection at the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered
The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.


one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight
This report documents one finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. The finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Human Performance [H4(a)],
 
because the licensee failed to use human error prevention techniques. If you disagree with the characterization of any findings in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Director, Nuclear Security Incident Response, and the Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch.
Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were
 
discussed on February 12, 2010, with you and members of the site staff.
 
The inspection examined activities conducted under y our licenses as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your
 
licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and
 
interviewed personnel.
 
This report documents one finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined  
 
by the Physical Protection Significance Determ ination Process). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical  
 
protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors  
 
left the site. The finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Human Performance [H4(a)],
because the licensee failed to use human error prevention techniques. If you disagree with the  
 
characterization of any findings in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of  
 
the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Director, Nuclear  
 
Security Incident Response, and the Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch.


The information you provide will be considered in accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0305  
The information you provide will be considered in accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0305  


If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date  
If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region I, the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Beaver Valley Power Station.


of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional
Enclosure(s) transmitted herewith contain(s) SGI. When separated from enclosure(s), this transmittal document is decontrolled. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs Agency-wide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (The Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosures will not be available for public inspection.


Administrator Region I, the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Regulatory
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).


Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Beaver
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us. Your cooperation is appreciated.


Valley Power Station.
Sincerely,
 
/RA/  
Enclosure(s) transmitted herewi th contain(s) SGI. When separ ated from enclosure(s), this transmittal document is decontrolled. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be
 
available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) com ponent of NRC's Agency-wide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (The Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10
 
CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter's enclosures will not be available for public inspection.


In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for
Robert C. Johnson, Chief


your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's
Security Performance Evaluation Branch


document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Inform ation is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark
Division of Security Operations Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response


your entire response "Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390" and follow
Docket Nos.: 50-334, 50-412 License Nos.: DPR-66, NPF-73


the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).
Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000334/2010201 and 05000412/2010201 w/ Attachments: Supplemental Information, Table of Security Personnel, Exercise One, Exercise Two, Exercise Three (SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION) In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs Agency-wide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (The Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosures will not be available for public inspection.


Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us. Your cooperation is
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).


appreciated.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us. Your cooperation is appreciated.


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/ Robert C. Johnson, Chief Security Performance Evaluation Branch Division of Security Operations Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
/RA/  
 
Docket Nos.: 50-334, 50-412
 
License Nos.: DPR-66, NPF-73
 
Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000334/2010201 and 05000412/2010201 w/ Attachments: Supplemental Information, Table of Security Personnel, Exercise One, Exercise Two, Exercise Three (SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION) In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be
 
available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) com ponent of NRC's Agency-wide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (The Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10
 
CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter's enclosures will not be available for public inspection.
 
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for
 
your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's
 
document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Inform ation is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark


your entire response "Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390" and follow
Robert C. Johnson, Chief


the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).
Security Performance Evaluation Branch


Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us. Your cooperation is
Division of Security Operations


appreciated.
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response  
 
Sincerely,
/RA/ Robert C. Johnson, Chief Security Performance Evaluation Branch Division of Security Operations Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response  


Docket Nos.: 50-334, 50-412  
Docket Nos.: 50-334, 50-412 License Nos.: DPR-66, NPF-73


License Nos.: DPR-66, NPF-73
Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000334/2010201 and 05000412/2010201 w/ Attachments: Supplemental Information, Table of Security Personnel, Exercise One, Exercise Two, Exercise Three (SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)


Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000334/2010201 and 05000412/2010201 w/ Attachments: Supplemental Information, Table of Security Personnel, Exercise One, Exercise Two, Exercise Three (SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)
Distribution See Next Page  
Distribution See Next Page  


Accession No.:ML100680579    
Accession No.:ML100680579  


OFFICIAL RECORD COPY OFC SS:DSO/SPEB TL:DSO/SPEB BC:RI/DRS BC:DSO/SPEB NAM E J. Clark R. Felts J. Trapp R. Johnson DATE /22/2010 / /2010 2/25/2010 3/19/2010 BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION 05000334/2010201 AND 05000412/2010201
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY OFC SS:DSO/SPEB TL:DSO/SPEB BC:RI/DRS BC:DSO/SPEB NAM E
J. Clark R. Felts J. Trapp R. Johnson DATE /22/2010  
/ /2010 2/25/2010 3/19/2010 BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION 05000334/2010201 AND 05000412/2010201  


cc w/encl: D. Craine, Site Security Manager, Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2  
cc w/encl:
D. Craine, Site Security Manager, Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 C. OClaire, Chief, Radiological Branch, OH Emergency Management Agency B. Vedra, Deputy Director, OH Homeland Security D. Allard, Director, Pennsylvania Bureau of Radiation Protection J. Powers, Director, Office of Homeland Security R. Curtis, Division Director, State Liaison Officer, State of West Virginia


C. O'Claire, Chief, Radiological Branch, OH Emergency Management Agency
cc w/o encl:


B. Vedra, Deputy Director, OH Homeland Security
B. Sepelak, Licensing Manager, Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 R. Janati, Chief, Nuclear Safety Division, Pennsylvania DEP D. Jenkins, Attorney, FENOC C. Keller, FENOC, Licensing/Regulatory Affairs Mayor, Borough of Shippingport  
 
D. Allard, Director, Pennsylvania Bureau of Radiation Protection
 
J. Powers, Director, Office of Homeland Security
 
R. Curtis, Division Director, State Liaison Officer, State of West Virginia cc w/o encl
: B. Sepelak, Licensing Manager, Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2  
 
R. Janati, Chief, Nuclear Safety Division, Pennsylvania DEP  
 
D. Jenkins, Attorney, FENOC  
 
C. Keller, FENOC, Licensing/Regulatory Affairs  
 
Mayor, Borough of Shippingport  


cc w/encl:
cc w/encl:
cc w/encl: D. Brady, STSB J. Trapp, R-I  
cc w/encl:
D. Brady, STSB J. Trapp, R-I J. Curry, DDSO/DSO


J. Curry, DDSO/DSO
Distribution w/o encl:
 
S. Collins, RA (R1ORAMail Resource)
Distribution w/o encl
: S. Collins, RA (R1ORAMail Resource)
M. Dapas, DRA (R1ORAMAIL Resource)
M. Dapas, DRA (R1ORAMAIL Resource)
D. Lew, DRP (R1DRPMail Resource)
D. Lew, DRP (R1DRPMail Resource)
Line 161: Line 99:
D. Roberts, DRS (R1DRSMail Resource)
D. Roberts, DRS (R1DRSMail Resource)
P. Wilson, DRS (R1DRSMail Resource)
P. Wilson, DRS (R1DRSMail Resource)
R. Bellamy, DRP  
R. Bellamy, DRP S. Barber, DRP C. Newport, DRP J. Greives, DRP D. Werkheiser, SRI D. Spindler, RI P. Garrett, Resident OA L. Trocine, RI OEDO RidsNRRPMBeaver Valley Resource T. Howard, PMDA ROPReportsResources@nrc.gov RI Docket Room (with concurrences)
 
S. Barber, DRP  
 
C. Newport, DRP J. Greives, DRP  
 
D. Werkheiser, SRI  
 
D. Spindler, RI  
 
P. Garrett, Resident OA  
 
L. Trocine, RI OEDO  
 
RidsNRRPMBeaver Valley Resource  
 
T. Howard, PMDA  
 
ROPReportsResources@nrc.gov RI Docket Room (with concurrences)  
 
A. Huffert, NSIR (Security Correspondence Issues - Communication)
A. Huffert, NSIR (Security Correspondence Issues - Communication)
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 06:12, 14 January 2025

IR 05000334-10-201, & IR 05000412-10-201, on 02/05/2010, for Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 & 2, NRC Security
ML100680579
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 03/02/2010
From: Rachel Johnson
NRC/NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB
To: Harden P
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
References
IR-10-201
Download: ML100680579 (4)
v • d • e


Text

March 18, 2010

SUBJECT:

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION 05000334/2010201 AND 05000412/2010201

Dear Mr. Harden:

On February 5, 2010, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on February 12, 2010, with you and members of the site staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

This report documents one finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. The finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Human Performance H4(a),

because the licensee failed to use human error prevention techniques. If you disagree with the characterization of any findings in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Director, Nuclear Security Incident Response, and the Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch.

The information you provide will be considered in accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0305

If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region I, the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Beaver Valley Power Station.

Enclosure(s) transmitted herewith contain(s) SGI. When separated from enclosure(s), this transmittal document is decontrolled. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs Agency-wide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (The Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosures will not be available for public inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us. Your cooperation is appreciated.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Robert C. Johnson, Chief

Security Performance Evaluation Branch

Division of Security Operations Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

Docket Nos.: 50-334, 50-412 License Nos.: DPR-66, NPF-73

Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000334/2010201 and 05000412/2010201 w/ Attachments: Supplemental Information, Table of Security Personnel, Exercise One, Exercise Two, Exercise Three (SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION) In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs Agency-wide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (The Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosures will not be available for public inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us. Your cooperation is appreciated.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Robert C. Johnson, Chief

Security Performance Evaluation Branch

Division of Security Operations

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

Docket Nos.: 50-334, 50-412 License Nos.: DPR-66, NPF-73

Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000334/2010201 and 05000412/2010201 w/ Attachments: Supplemental Information, Table of Security Personnel, Exercise One, Exercise Two, Exercise Three (SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)

Distribution See Next Page

Accession No.:ML100680579

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY OFC SS:DSO/SPEB TL:DSO/SPEB BC:RI/DRS BC:DSO/SPEB NAM E

J. Clark R. Felts J. Trapp R. Johnson DATE /22/2010

/ /2010 2/25/2010 3/19/2010 BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION 05000334/2010201 AND 05000412/2010201

cc w/encl:

D. Craine, Site Security Manager, Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 C. OClaire, Chief, Radiological Branch, OH Emergency Management Agency B. Vedra, Deputy Director, OH Homeland Security D. Allard, Director, Pennsylvania Bureau of Radiation Protection J. Powers, Director, Office of Homeland Security R. Curtis, Division Director, State Liaison Officer, State of West Virginia

cc w/o encl:

B. Sepelak, Licensing Manager, Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 R. Janati, Chief, Nuclear Safety Division, Pennsylvania DEP D. Jenkins, Attorney, FENOC C. Keller, FENOC, Licensing/Regulatory Affairs Mayor, Borough of Shippingport

cc w/encl:

cc w/encl:

D. Brady, STSB J. Trapp, R-I J. Curry, DDSO/DSO

Distribution w/o encl:

S. Collins, RA (R1ORAMail Resource)

M. Dapas, DRA (R1ORAMAIL Resource)

D. Lew, DRP (R1DRPMail Resource)

J. Clifford, DRP (R1DRPMail Resource)

D. Roberts, DRS (R1DRSMail Resource)

P. Wilson, DRS (R1DRSMail Resource)

R. Bellamy, DRP S. Barber, DRP C. Newport, DRP J. Greives, DRP D. Werkheiser, SRI D. Spindler, RI P. Garrett, Resident OA L. Trocine, RI OEDO RidsNRRPMBeaver Valley Resource T. Howard, PMDA ROPReportsResources@nrc.gov RI Docket Room (with concurrences)

A. Huffert, NSIR (Security Correspondence Issues - Communication)

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000334/2010201&oldid=5302940"