ML11192A251: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:IPRenewal NPEmails From:                     Kuntz, Robert Sent:                     Monday, July 11, 2011 2:21 PM To:                       MSTROUD@entergy.com
{{#Wiki_filter:1 IPRenewal NPEmails From:
Kuntz, Robert Sent:
Monday, July 11, 2011 2:21 PM To:
MSTROUD@entergy.com


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Attachments:               Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx
Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Attachments:
Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx
: Mike, Attached is the draft telecon summary from the call on June 9, 2011. Please let me know if any corrections/changes are necessary.
: Mike, Attached is the draft telecon summary from the call on June 9, 2011. Please let me know if any corrections/changes are necessary.
Robert Kuntz Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB2 (301) 415-3733 robert.kuntz@nrc.gov 1
Robert Kuntz Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB2 (301) 415-3733 robert.kuntz@nrc.gov  


Hearing Identifier:   IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:         2741 Mail Envelope Properties   (Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov20110711142100)
Hearing Identifier:
IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:
2741 Mail Envelope Properties (Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov20110711142100)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Sent Date:           7/11/2011 2:21:02 PM Received Date:       7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM From:                 Kuntz, Robert Created By:           Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:
Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Sent Date:
7/11/2011 2:21:02 PM Received Date:
7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM From:
Kuntz, Robert Created By:
Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:  
"MSTROUD@entergy.com" <MSTROUD@entergy.com>
"MSTROUD@entergy.com" <MSTROUD@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                         Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                       257                     7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx                   32397 Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:         No Reply Requested:             No Sensitivity:                 Normal Expiration Date:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 257 7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx 32397 Options Priority:
Recipients Received:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:  


LICENSEE:       Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
LICENSEE:
FACILITY:       Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
FACILITY:
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on June 9, 2011, to discuss the applicants methodology for the inspection of small bore piping and steam generator components, and the proposed (UFSAR) .
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on June 9, 2011, to discuss the applicants methodology for the inspection of small bore piping and steam generator components, and the proposed (UFSAR).
The main issues discussed during the teleconference are summarized below.
The main issues discussed during the teleconference are summarized below.
: 1. Inspection of small bore piping:
: 1. Inspection of small bore piping:
The staff required clarification of the applicants letter dated March 28, 2011, in response to requests for additional information (RAIs) 3.0.3.1.10-1 and 3.0.3.1.10-2. The staff requested clarification of the number of socket welds that will be inspected in 2012 for Indian Point Unit 2 (IP-2). The March 28, 2011, letter did not clearly identify the number of samples planned for each 10-year interval. On page 15 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that at least 10 welds will be inspected. On page 16 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that 10 welds will be inspected. The staff sought clarification if there will be 10 welds inspected, or possibly more than 10 welds will be inspected.
The staff required clarification of the applicants {{letter dated|date=March 28, 2011|text=letter dated March 28, 2011}}, in response to requests for additional information (RAIs) 3.0.3.1.10-1 and 3.0.3.1.10-2. The staff requested clarification of the number of socket welds that will be inspected in 2012 for Indian Point Unit 2 (IP-2). The {{letter dated|date=March 28, 2011|text=March 28, 2011, letter}} did not clearly identify the number of samples planned for each 10-year interval. On page 15 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the {{letter dated|date=March 28, 2011|text=March 28, 2011, letter}}, Entergy states that at least 10 welds will be inspected. On page 16 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the {{letter dated|date=March 28, 2011|text=March 28, 2011, letter}}, Entergy states that 10 welds will be inspected. The staff sought clarification if there will be 10 welds inspected, or possibly more than 10 welds will be inspected.
The staff also sought clarification on how the number of socket welds that will be inspected for IP-2 during the period of extended operation was determined. The staff sought clarification on how 10 welds per interval ensured the integrity of the components.
The staff also sought clarification on how the number of socket welds that will be inspected for IP-2 during the period of extended operation was determined. The staff sought clarification on how 10 welds per interval ensured the integrity of the components.
In response to the staffs questions, the applicant indicated that it would review its proposed aging management of socket welds for IP-2 and provide clarification as necessary.
In response to the staffs questions, the applicant indicated that it would review its proposed aging management of socket welds for IP-2 and provide clarification as necessary.
: 2. Inspection of steam generator components:
: 2. Inspection of steam generator components:
By letter dated March 28, 2011, the applicant provided Commitment 41 related to the aging management of steam generator divider plates. The staff requested clarification of why the commitment only related to inspection of the welds and did not include inspection of the base metal. The applicant stated that the weld areas were most likely to experience age related degradation. The staff stated that international experience showed cracking in the
By {{letter dated|date=March 28, 2011|text=letter dated March 28, 2011}}, the applicant provided Commitment 41 related to the aging management of steam generator divider plates. The staff requested clarification of why the commitment only related to inspection of the welds and did not include inspection of the base metal. The applicant stated that the weld areas were most likely to experience age related degradation. The staff stated that international experience showed cracking in the  


Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc                   base metal. The applicant said it would review the commitment and revise the commitment as necessary.
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc base metal. The applicant said it would review the commitment and revise the commitment as necessary.
The NRC also questioned the inspection timing for the two IP units. The staff questioned why the inspections were planned so that Unit 2 steam generator would be inspected with less than 20 years of service and Unit 3 steam generator with greater than 30 years of service. The staff also questioned the applicant on why the timing in Commitments 41 and 42 did not appear to align with the response to RAIs 3.1.2.2.13 and 3.1.2.2.16-1. The applicant stated that it planned the inspections for the first available outages in the respective periods of extended operation. The applicant also stated that it would review the RAI response and commitments and correct any discrepancies.
The NRC also questioned the inspection timing for the two IP units. The staff questioned why the inspections were planned so that Unit 2 steam generator would be inspected with less than 20 years of service and Unit 3 steam generator with greater than 30 years of service. The staff also questioned the applicant on why the timing in Commitments 41 and 42 did not appear to align with the response to RAIs 3.1.2.2.13 and 3.1.2.2.16-1. The applicant stated that it planned the inspections for the first available outages in the respective periods of extended operation. The applicant also stated that it would review the RAI response and commitments and correct any discrepancies.
: 3. Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program:
: 3. Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program:
The applicants letter dated March 28, 2011, included a revision to the planned UFSAR supplement for IP-2 to revise the Medium Voltage Cable Program description. However, a similar UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The staff questioned the applicant on why the planned UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The applicant stated that they would provide the UFSAR revision for IP-3 in its next correspondence.
The applicants {{letter dated|date=March 28, 2011|text=letter dated March 28, 2011}}, included a revision to the planned UFSAR supplement for IP-2 to revise the Medium Voltage Cable Program description. However, a similar UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The staff questioned the applicant on why the planned UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The applicant stated that they would provide the UFSAR revision for IP-3 in its next correspondence.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 cc w/encl: Listserv
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 cc w/encl: Listserv  


ML11178A335                                       *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE     LA: DLR/RPB1       PM: DLR/RPB1     BC: DLR/RPB1         PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME       SFigueroa           RKuntz           DMorey               RKuntz DATE       06/28/2011         07/   /2011       07/ /2011             07/   /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated July XX, 2011
ML11178A335  
*concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME SFigueroa RKuntz DMorey RKuntz DATE 06/28/2011 07/ /2011 07/ /2011 07/ /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated July XX, 2011  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION:
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION:
HARD COPY:
HARD COPY:
DLR R/F E-MAIL:
DLR R/F E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource DMorey                 GMeyer, RI KGreen                 RConte, RI AStuyvenberg           JBoska RAuluck                 DScrenci, RI OPA ADias                   NSheehan, RI OPA DPelton                 PCataldo, RI MKowal                 NMcNamara, RI DJackson, RI           BWelling, RI BMizuno, OGC           OAvegbusi, RI STurk, OGC             MCatts, RI SBurnell, OPA           MHalter, RI DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA             I
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource DMorey GMeyer, RI KGreen RConte, RI AStuyvenberg JBoska RAuluck DScrenci, RI OPA ADias NSheehan, RI OPA DPelton PCataldo, RI MKowal NMcNamara, RI DJackson, RI BWelling, RI BMizuno, OGC OAvegbusi, RI STurk, OGC MCatts, RI SBurnell, OPA MHalter, RI DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA I  


TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JUNE 9, 2011 PARTICIPANTS:                             AFFILIATIONS:
ENCLOSURE TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JUNE 9, 2011 PARTICIPANTS:
Robert F. Kuntz                           U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
AFFILIATIONS:
Cliff K. Doutt                           NRC Allen L. Hiser                           NRC Bart Z. Fu                               NRC Rachel Vaucher                           NRC Mike Stroud                               Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Alan Cox                                 Entergy Ted Ivy                                   Entergy Reza Ahrabli                             Entergy Charlie Caputo                           Entergy Rich Drake                               Entergy Nelson Azevedo                           Entergy Bob Lee                                   Entergy ENCLOSURE}}
Cliff K. Doutt NRC Allen L. Hiser NRC Bart Z. Fu NRC Rachel Vaucher NRC Mike Stroud Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Alan Cox Entergy Ted Ivy Entergy Reza Ahrabli Entergy Charlie Caputo Entergy Rich Drake Entergy Nelson Azevedo Entergy Bob Lee Entergy}}

Latest revision as of 05:28, 13 January 2025

Lr Hearing - Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 Call
ML11192A251
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/2011
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
Download: ML11192A251 (7)


Text

1 IPRenewal NPEmails From:

Kuntz, Robert Sent:

Monday, July 11, 2011 2:21 PM To:

MSTROUD@entergy.com

Subject:

Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Attachments:

Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx

Mike, Attached is the draft telecon summary from the call on June 9, 2011. Please let me know if any corrections/changes are necessary.

Robert Kuntz Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB2 (301) 415-3733 robert.kuntz@nrc.gov

Hearing Identifier:

IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:

2741 Mail Envelope Properties (Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov20110711142100)

Subject:

Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Sent Date:

7/11/2011 2:21:02 PM Received Date:

7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM From:

Kuntz, Robert Created By:

Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:

"MSTROUD@entergy.com" <MSTROUD@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 257 7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx 32397 Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

LICENSEE:

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY:

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on June 9, 2011, to discuss the applicants methodology for the inspection of small bore piping and steam generator components, and the proposed (UFSAR).

The main issues discussed during the teleconference are summarized below.

1. Inspection of small bore piping:

The staff required clarification of the applicants letter dated March 28, 2011, in response to requests for additional information (RAIs) 3.0.3.1.10-1 and 3.0.3.1.10-2. The staff requested clarification of the number of socket welds that will be inspected in 2012 for Indian Point Unit 2 (IP-2). The March 28, 2011, letter did not clearly identify the number of samples planned for each 10-year interval. On page 15 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that at least 10 welds will be inspected. On page 16 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that 10 welds will be inspected. The staff sought clarification if there will be 10 welds inspected, or possibly more than 10 welds will be inspected.

The staff also sought clarification on how the number of socket welds that will be inspected for IP-2 during the period of extended operation was determined. The staff sought clarification on how 10 welds per interval ensured the integrity of the components.

In response to the staffs questions, the applicant indicated that it would review its proposed aging management of socket welds for IP-2 and provide clarification as necessary.

2. Inspection of steam generator components:

By letter dated March 28, 2011, the applicant provided Commitment 41 related to the aging management of steam generator divider plates. The staff requested clarification of why the commitment only related to inspection of the welds and did not include inspection of the base metal. The applicant stated that the weld areas were most likely to experience age related degradation. The staff stated that international experience showed cracking in the

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc base metal. The applicant said it would review the commitment and revise the commitment as necessary.

The NRC also questioned the inspection timing for the two IP units. The staff questioned why the inspections were planned so that Unit 2 steam generator would be inspected with less than 20 years of service and Unit 3 steam generator with greater than 30 years of service. The staff also questioned the applicant on why the timing in Commitments 41 and 42 did not appear to align with the response to RAIs 3.1.2.2.13 and 3.1.2.2.16-1. The applicant stated that it planned the inspections for the first available outages in the respective periods of extended operation. The applicant also stated that it would review the RAI response and commitments and correct any discrepancies.

3. Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program:

The applicants letter dated March 28, 2011, included a revision to the planned UFSAR supplement for IP-2 to revise the Medium Voltage Cable Program description. However, a similar UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The staff questioned the applicant on why the planned UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The applicant stated that they would provide the UFSAR revision for IP-3 in its next correspondence.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 cc w/encl: Listserv

ML11178A335

  • concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME SFigueroa RKuntz DMorey RKuntz DATE 06/28/2011 07/ /2011 07/ /2011 07/ /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated July XX, 2011

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR R/F E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource DMorey GMeyer, RI KGreen RConte, RI AStuyvenberg JBoska RAuluck DScrenci, RI OPA ADias NSheehan, RI OPA DPelton PCataldo, RI MKowal NMcNamara, RI DJackson, RI BWelling, RI BMizuno, OGC OAvegbusi, RI STurk, OGC MCatts, RI SBurnell, OPA MHalter, RI DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA I

ENCLOSURE TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JUNE 9, 2011 PARTICIPANTS:

AFFILIATIONS:

Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Cliff K. Doutt NRC Allen L. Hiser NRC Bart Z. Fu NRC Rachel Vaucher NRC Mike Stroud Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)

Alan Cox Entergy Ted Ivy Entergy Reza Ahrabli Entergy Charlie Caputo Entergy Rich Drake Entergy Nelson Azevedo Entergy Bob Lee Entergy