IR 05000454/2011502: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name = Peterson H
| author name = Peterson H
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OB
| addressee name = Pacilio M J
| addressee name = Pacilio M
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear
| docket = 05000454, 05000455
| docket = 05000454, 05000455
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532
{{#Wiki_filter:August 16, 2011
-4352 August 16, 2011 Mr. Michael Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville IL 60555


SUBJECT: BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000454/20 11502(DRS); 05000455/20 11502(DRS)
==SUBJECT:==
BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000454/2011502(DRS); 05000455/2011502(DRS)


==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
On July 29, 2011, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspection at your Byron Station, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection findings which were discussed on July 29, 2011, with Mr. T. Tulon and other members of your staff.
On July 29, 2011, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspection at your Byron Station, Units 1 and 2.


The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection findings which were discussed on July 29, 2011, with Mr. T. Tulon and other members of your staff.
 
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
 
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.


Based on the results of this inspection, there were no findings of significance identified during this inspection.
Based on the results of this inspection, there were no findings of significance identified during this inspection.


In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.


Sincerely,/RA/ Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50
Sincerely,
-454; 50-455 License Nos.
/RA/  


NPF-37; NPF-66  
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455 License Nos. NPF-37; NPF-66  


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
Inspection Report No. 05000454/
Inspection Report No. 05000454/2011502(DRS);
20 11502(DRS); 05000455/20 11502(DRS)  
05000455/2011502(DRS)  


===w/Attachment:===
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information  
Supplemental Information cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ


Enclosure U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III Docket Nos:
REGION III==
5 0-454; 50-455 License Nos:
Docket Nos:
50-454; 50-455 License Nos:
NPF-37; NPF-66 Report Nos:
NPF-37; NPF-66 Report Nos:
05000454/20 11502(DRS); 05000455/20 11502(DRS) Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Location: Byron, Illinois Dates: July 25 through 29, 2011 Inspectors:
05000454/2011502(DRS); 05000455/2011502(DRS)
Robert Jickling, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector James Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector Jeff Laughlin, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Specialist Nicholas Valos, Sr. Risk Analyst Alex Garmoe, Resident Inspector Approved by:
Licensee:
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety 1 Enclosure
Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility:
Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Location:
Byron, Illinois Dates:
July 25 through 29, 2011 Inspectors:
Robert Jickling, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector
 
James Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector  
 
Jeff Laughlin, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Specialist  
 
Nicholas Valos, Sr. Risk Analyst  


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
Alex Garmoe, Resident Inspector
IR 05000454/2011502(DRS), 05000455/2011502(DRS); 07/25/2011


- 07/29/2011
Approved by:
; Byron Station, Units 1 and 2; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection.
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety


This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by three regional inspectors, one emergency preparedness specialist and one resident inspector.
Enclosure


The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, "Significance Determination Process" (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review.
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
IR 05000454/2011502(DRS), 05000455/2011502(DRS); 07/25/2011 - 07/29/2011;


The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG
Byron Station, Units 1 and 2; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection.
-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.


===A. NRC-Identified===
This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by three regional inspectors, one emergency preparedness specialist and one resident inspector. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.
and Self-Revealed Findings
 
===NRC-Identified===
and Self-Revealed Findings  


===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


===B. Licensee-Identified Violations===
===Licensee-Identified Violations===
 
No violations were identified.
No violations were identified.


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=


1. R EACTOR SAFETY
==REACTOR SAFETY==
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
{{a|1EP1}}


===Cornerstone:===
==1EP1 Exercise Evaluation==
Emergency Preparedness 1EP1 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01)
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71114.01}}


===.1 Exercise Evaluation===
===.1 Exercise Evaluation===
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the July 27, 2011, biennial emergency preparedness exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2009, 2010, and 2011, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the July 27, 2011, exercise.


====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:
The inspectors reviewed the July 27, 2011, biennial emergency preparedness exercise's objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensee's emergency plan and to verify that the exercise's simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensee's capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2009, 2010, and 2011, to verify that those drills' scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the July 27, 2011, exercise.
* Control Room Simulator (CRS);
* Technical Support Center (TSC);
* Operations Support Center (OSC);
* Emergency Operations Facility (EOF); and
* Joint Information Center (JIC).
 
The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees emergency plan.


The inspectors evaluated the licensee's exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:
The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, OSC, TSC and EOF to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances.
Control Room Simulator (CRS);
Technical Support Center (TSC);
Operations Support Center (OSC);
Emergency Operations Facility (EOF); and  Joint Information Center (JIC)
. The inspectors also assessed the licensee's recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensee's emergency plan.


The inspectors attended post
These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
-exercise critiques in the CRS, OSC, TSC and EOF to evaluate the licensee's initial self
-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensee's lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensee's findings and assessments of its exercise participants' performances. These self
-assessments were then compared with the inspectors' independent observations and assessments to assess the licensee's ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.


This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01-05.
-05.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 107: Line 120:


==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
{{a|4OA1}}


===Cornerstone:===
Emergency Preparedness
{{a|4OA1}}
==4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification==
==4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification==
 
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71151}}
(71151)


===.1 Drill/Exercise Performance===
===.1 Drill/Exercise Performance===
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance PI for the period from the second quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance PI for the period from the second quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.
-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, assessments of PI opportunities during pre
-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.


This inspection constituted one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
This inspection constituted one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
Line 129: Line 136:


===.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation===
===.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation===
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the second quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used.


====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2010 and 2011 drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the second quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99
-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2010 and 2011 drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.


This inspection constituted one ERO drill participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
This inspection constituted one ERO drill participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
Line 140: Line 147:


===.3 Alert and Notification System===
===.3 Alert and Notification System===
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) PI for the period from the second quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS)
PI for the period from the second quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.


This inspection constituted one alert and notification system sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
This inspection constituted one alert and notification system sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
Line 148: Line 155:
====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
{{a|4OA6}}


{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Management Meetings==
==4OA6 Management Meetings==
 
===.1===
===.1 Exit Meeting Summary===
===Exit Meeting Summary===
 
On July 29, 2011, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. T. Tulon and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.
O n July 29, 2011, the inspector s presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. T. Tulon and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.


===.2 Public and Media Briefing===
===.2 Public and Media Briefing===
On July 29, 2011, the inspector summarized the NRC's preliminary exercise inspection conclusions at a public and media briefings hosted by Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency Region V Field Office staff at the Ogle County Building in Oregon, Illinois.
On July 29, 2011, the inspector summarized the NRC's preliminary exercise inspection conclusions at a public and media briefings hosted by Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency Region V Field Office staff at the Ogle County Building in Oregon, Illinois.


ATTACHMENT:
ATTACHMENT:  


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=


Attachment
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION KEY POINTS OF CONTAC
Licensee  
T Licensee  
: [[contact::T. Tulon]], Site Vice President  
: [[contact::T. Tulon]], Site Vice President
: [[contact::B. Adams]], Plant Manager  
: [[contact::B. Adams]], Plant Manager
: [[contact::J. Bottomley]], Outage Manager  
: [[contact::J. Bottomley]], Outage Manager
: [[contact::A. Daniels]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager  
: [[contact::A. Daniels]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager
: [[contact::P. Dempsey]], Site Communications  
: [[contact::P. Dempsey]], Site Communications
: [[contact::D. Drawbaugh]], Emergency Preparedness Manager  
: [[contact::D. Drawbaugh]], Emergency Preparedness Manager
: [[contact::T. Hulbert]], NRC Coordinator  
: [[contact::T. Hulbert]], NRC Coordinator
: [[contact::B. Kartheiser]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator  
: [[contact::B. Kartheiser]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
: [[contact::S. Merrell]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness  
: [[contact::S. Merrell]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness
: [[contact::B. Spahr]], Maintenance Director  
: [[contact::B. Spahr]], Maintenance Director
: [[contact::D. Spitzer]], Regulatory Assurance Manager (Acting)  
: [[contact::D. Spitzer]], Regulatory Assurance Manager (Acting)
: [[contact::S. Swanson]], Nuclear Oversight Manager  
: [[contact::S. Swanson]], Nuclear Oversight Manager
: [[contact::M. Wolfe]], Reactor Services Manager  
: [[contact::M. Wolfe]], Reactor Services Manager
: [[contact::B. Youman]], Operations Director
: [[contact::B. Youman]], Operations
Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
Director  Nuclear Regulatory Commission
: [[contact::B. Bartlett]], Senior Resident Inspector  
: [[contact::B. Bartlett]], Senior Resident Inspector
: [[contact::J. Robbins]], Resident Inspector  
: [[contact::J. Robbins]], Resident Inspector
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSS
ED Opened, Closed and Discussed
None
Attachment
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
The following is a list of documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion on this list does not imply that the NRC inspectors reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather, that selected sections of portions of the documents
were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort. Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or
any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
Byron Station 2011 NRC Graded Exercise Manual July 27, 2011, July 21, 2011
Exelon Nuclear Radiological Emergency Plan Annex for Byron Station; Revision 28
List of Two Years of Corrective Action Program Items; July 2009
- July 2011 List of Two Years of Scenario Timelines; July 2009
- July 2011 EP-AA-112; Emergency Response Organization/Emergency Response Facility
Activation and Operation; Revision 15
EP-AA-112-200; TSC Activation
and Operation; Revision 7
EP-AA-112-300; OSC Activation
and Operation; Revision 7
EP-AA-112-400; EOF Activation
and Operation; Revision10
EP-AA-113; Personnel Protective Actions; Revision 10
EP-AA-114; Notifications; Revision 9
EP-AA-110-302; Core Damage Assessment; Revision 4
EP-AA-111; Emergency Classification and Protective Action Recommendations; Revision16
EP-AA-122; Drills & Exercises; Revision 11
EP-MA/MW-114-100; Notifications; Revision 9
EP-MA/MW-110-200; Dose Assessment; Revision 8
AR 01247327; Exercise
-Evaluate OSC Debrief Adequacy and Team Dose Tracking; August 3, 2011
AR 01247325; Exercise
-Evaluate TSC Release Mitigation Priorities; August 3, 2011
AR 01247318; Exercise
-Evaluate CRS Clear Communications to the Shift Manager; August 3, 2011
AR 01245187; Exercise
-EOF Failed Demonstration Criteria Prioritizing Release Mitigation; July 28, 2011
AR 01217080; Off Year Exercise
-Evaluate Guidance For Classification Change Notification on NRC Open Bridge Line; May 17, 2011


Attachment
==LIST OF ITEMS==
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
===OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED===
EP-AA-1000; Standardized Radiological Emergency Plan; Revision 20
Opened, Closed and  
EP-AA-1002; Radiological Emergency Plan Annex for Byron Station; Revision 28
Off-Site Emergency Plan Alert and Notification System Addendum for the Byron Nuclear Power Station; November 2009
EP-AA-125-1001; EP Performance Indicator Guidance; Revision 6
EP-AA-125-1002; ERO Performance
- Performance Indicators Guidance; Revision 6
EP-AA-125-1003; ERO Readiness
- Performance Indicators Guidance; Revision 7
EP-AA-125-1004; Emergency Response Facilities & Equipment Performance Indicators Guidance; Revision 5
Quarterly Drill and Exercise Performance Summaries; April 2010 - June 2011 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation Quarterly Reports; April 2010 - June 2011 Quarterly Key ERO Personnel and Drill Participation Dates; April 2010 - June 2011 AR 01244176; ERO Drill Participation Performance Indicator Opportunity Issue; July 26, 2011 AR 01243746; ERO Participation Performance Indicator Data Question; July 25, 2011
Attachment
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED
ADAMS Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System
ANS Alert and Notification System
AR Action Request
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CRS Control Room Simulator
DRS Division of Reactor Safety
EOF Emergency Operations Facility
EP Emergency Preparedness
ERO Emergency Response Organization
IMC Inspection Manual Chapter
IP Inspection Procedure
IR Inspection
Report JIC Joint Information Center
NEI Nuclear Energy Institute
NRC U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
O SC Operations Support Center
PARS Publicly Available Records
PI Performance Indicator
SDP Significance Determination Process
TSC Technical Support Center


M. Pacilio
===Discussed===
    -2- Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
None
Sincerely,  /RA/  Hironori Peterson, Chief
 
Operations Branch
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50
-454; 50-455 License Nos. NPF
-37; NPF-66  Enclosure:
Inspection Report No. 05000454/2011502(DRS);
05000455/2011502(DRS)
w/Attachment:  Supplemental Information
cc w/encl:  Distribution via ListServ
DISTRIBUTION
: Daniel Merzke
RidsNrrDorlLpl3
-2 Resource
RidsNrrPMByron Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Cynthia Pederson
Steven Orth
Jared Heck
Allan Barker
Carole Ariano
Linda Linn
DRPIII DRSIII Patricia Buckley
Tammy Tomczak
ROPreports Resource


DOCUMENT NAME:  G:\DRSIII\DRS\Work in Progress
\BYR 2011 502 DRS OL.docx
  -Publicly Available  -Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl  "N" = No copy
OFFICE RIII  RIII        NAME RJickling:co
HPeterson    DATE 08/16/2011 08/19/2011    OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 04:31, 13 January 2025

IR 05000454-11-502 & 05000455-11-502, on 07/25/2011 - 07/29/2011, Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection
ML11230A354
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/16/2011
From: Hironori Peterson
Operations Branch III
To: Pacilio M
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
IR-11-502
Download: ML11230A354 (12)
v • d • e


Text

August 16, 2011

SUBJECT:

BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000454/2011502(DRS); 05000455/2011502(DRS)

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

On July 29, 2011, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspection at your Byron Station, Units 1 and 2.

The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection findings which were discussed on July 29, 2011, with Mr. T. Tulon and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, there were no findings of significance identified during this inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455 License Nos. NPF-37; NPF-66

Enclosure:

Inspection Report No. 05000454/2011502(DRS);

05000455/2011502(DRS)

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

REGION III==

Docket Nos:

50-454; 50-455 License Nos:

NPF-37; NPF-66 Report Nos:

05000454/2011502(DRS); 05000455/2011502(DRS)

Licensee:

Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility:

Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Location:

Byron, Illinois Dates:

July 25 through 29, 2011 Inspectors:

Robert Jickling, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector

James Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector

Jeff Laughlin, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Specialist

Nicholas Valos, Sr. Risk Analyst

Alex Garmoe, Resident Inspector

Approved by:

Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000454/2011502(DRS), 05000455/2011502(DRS); 07/25/2011 - 07/29/2011;

Byron Station, Units 1 and 2; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection.

This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by three regional inspectors, one emergency preparedness specialist and one resident inspector. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.

NRC-Identified

and Self-Revealed Findings

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

No findings were identified.

Licensee-Identified Violations

No violations were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

1EP1 Exercise Evaluation

Main article: IP 71114.01

.1 Exercise Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the July 27, 2011, biennial emergency preparedness exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2009, 2010, and 2011, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the July 27, 2011, exercise.

The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:

  • Control Room Simulator (CRS);
  • Operations Support Center (OSC);

The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees emergency plan.

The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, OSC, TSC and EOF to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances.

These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.

This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01-05.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

Main article: IP 71151

.1 Drill/Exercise Performance

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance PI for the period from the second quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.

This inspection constituted one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in IP 71151-05.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the second quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used.

The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2010 and 2011 drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.

This inspection constituted one ERO drill participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.3 Alert and Notification System

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS)

PI for the period from the second quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.

This inspection constituted one alert and notification system sample as defined in IP 71151-05.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Management Meetings

.1

Exit Meeting Summary

On July 29, 2011, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. T. Tulon and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.

.2 Public and Media Briefing

On July 29, 2011, the inspector summarized the NRC's preliminary exercise inspection conclusions at a public and media briefings hosted by Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency Region V Field Office staff at the Ogle County Building in Oregon, Illinois.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

T. Tulon, Site Vice President
B. Adams, Plant Manager
J. Bottomley, Outage Manager
A. Daniels, Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager
P. Dempsey, Site Communications
D. Drawbaugh, Emergency Preparedness Manager
T. Hulbert, NRC Coordinator
B. Kartheiser, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
S. Merrell, Corporate Emergency Preparedness
B. Spahr, Maintenance Director
D. Spitzer, Regulatory Assurance Manager (Acting)
S. Swanson, Nuclear Oversight Manager
M. Wolfe, Reactor Services Manager
B. Youman, Operations Director

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

B. Bartlett, Senior Resident Inspector
J. Robbins, Resident Inspector

LIST OF ITEMS

OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED

Opened, Closed and

Discussed

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000454/2011502&oldid=5274441"