ML11255A308: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 04/12/2010 | | issue date = 04/12/2010 | ||
| title = Email from R. Guzman, NRR/DORL/LPL1-1 to J. Yerokun, Res/Dsa/Spb, Et. Al, Subject: FW: Soarca Documents for Review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station | | title = Email from R. Guzman, NRR/DORL/LPL1-1 to J. Yerokun, Res/Dsa/Spb, Et. Al, Subject: FW: Soarca Documents for Review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station | ||
| author name = Guzman R | | author name = Guzman R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1 | ||
| addressee name = Yerokun J | | addressee name = Yerokun J | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RES/DSA/SPB | | addressee affiliation = NRC/RES/DSA/SPB | ||
| docket = 05000277, 05000278 | | docket = 05000277, 05000278 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Guzman. Richard To: Elkins. Scott Cc: Hughey, John; Cotton, Karen | {{#Wiki_filter:From: | ||
Guzman. Richard *,-PR( | |||
To: | |||
Elkins. Scott Cc: | |||
Hughey, John; Cotton, Karen | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FV: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Date: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:13:00 AM Scott, For your awareness, PB is now targeting 4/30 for completion of their fact-check review.Also, they indicate the product would be a mark-up in pdf writer. Is that format ok for you guys?For Surry, I have the understanding at this time that they plan to complete their review by 4/16.Rich From: Hughey, John Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 3:34 PM To: Guzman, Richard | FV: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Date: | ||
Monday, April 12, 2010 7:13:00 AM | |||
: Scott, For your awareness, PB is now targeting 4/30 for completion of their fact-check review. | |||
Also, they indicate the product would be a mark-up in pdf writer. Is that format ok for you guys? | |||
For Surry, I have the understanding at this time that they plan to complete their review by 4/16. | |||
Rich From: Hughey, John Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 3:34 PM To: Guzman, Richard | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Rich, Just talked with Frank and he says that he won't have the Peach Bottom SOARCA review finished until 04/30/2010. | RE: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station | ||
New staff, outages, drill ,etc John From: Hughey, John Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:41 PM To: Guzman, Richard | : Rich, Just talked with Frank and he says that he won't have the Peach Bottom SOARCA review finished until 04/30/2010. | ||
New staff, outages, drill,etc John From: Hughey, John Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:41 PM To: Guzman, Richard | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Rich, Exelon got the SOARCA info. However, in talking with Frank, he said that he isn't sure that they will be able to have the review done by 04/16 as requested. | FW: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station | ||
Frank is going to let me know what date they can support.John From: Frank. Mascitelli@exeloncorp.com | : Rich, Exelon got the SOARCA info. However, in talking with Frank, he said that he isn't sure that they will be able to have the review done by 04/16 as requested. Frank is going to let me know what date they can support. | ||
[mailto: Frank. Mascitelli@exeloncorp.com] | John From: Frank. Mascitelli@exeloncorp.com [mailto: Frank. Mascitelli@exeloncorp.com] | ||
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:28 PM To: Hughey, John Cc: david.helker@exeloncorp.com; Pamela.Cowan@exeloncorp.com | Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:28 PM To: Hughey, John Cc: david.helker@exeloncorp.com; Pamela.Cowan@exeloncorp.com | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station John, Exelon has received the SOARCA documents and is able to open the files.From: Hughey, John. [mailto:John.Hughey@nrc.gov] | RE: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station | ||
: John, Exelon has received the SOARCA documents and is able to open the files. | |||
From: Hughey, John. [mailto:John.Hughey@nrc.gov] | |||
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 12:04 PM To: Mascitelli, Frank J:(GenCo-Nuc) | Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 12:04 PM To: Mascitelli, Frank J:(GenCo-Nuc) | ||
Cc: Guzman, Richard | Cc: Guzman, Richard | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Frank, Please find attached two SOARCA documents. | SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station | ||
These attachments include sections of the SOARCA NUREG for purposes of performing a fact check/error check as we discussed last week. The first document is a compiled collection of 13 pages extracted from the SOARCA Summary document which contains individual pages with Peach Bottom specific information to be checked for accuracy. | : Frank, Please find attached two SOARCA documents. These attachments include sections of the SOARCA NUREG for purposes of performing a fact check/error check as we discussed last week. The first document is a compiled collection of 13 pages extracted from the SOARCA Summary document which contains individual pages with Peach Bottom specific information to be checked for accuracy. The second attachment is the Peach Bottom Integrated Analysis document (Appendix A, 179 pages) in its entirety to be fact checked/error checked. | ||
The second attachment is the Peach Bottom Integrated Analysis document (Appendix A, 179 pages) in its entirety to be fact checked/error checked.As we discussed in our teleconference last week we are requesting that Exelon check the document for accuracy of facts and statements that pertain to plant specific information as stated in the documents. | As we discussed in our teleconference last week we are requesting that Exelon check the document for accuracy of facts and statements that pertain to plant specific information as stated in the documents. Consistent with the informal agreement RES made with SOARCA licensee participants, we are requesting a review the draft NUREG for any plant-specific factual errors.aLy. | ||
Consistent with the informal agreement RES made with SOARCA licensee participants, we are requesting a review the draft NUREG for any plant-specific factual errors .aLy. Additionally, as a SOARCA participating licensee, you are receiving this information in its pre-decisional state which is not ready for release to the public. These documents are DRAFT and will be edited further and may include changes to how results are reported, before they are released by the NRC. Therefore, I would like to emphasize that this document should be controlled in such a manner as to limit its distribution to only those personnel necessary to complete the fact check/error check, as discussed in our teleconference with you last week. Under no circumstances is any information in these attachments to be released to the public.We are asking that you complete your fact check/error review by April 16, 2010. RES personnel are available throughout the review period for discussions/questions regarding this request. Please contact me at 415-3204 with any questions. | Additionally, as a SOARCA participating licensee, you are receiving this information in its pre-decisional state which is not ready for release to the public. These documents are DRAFT and will be edited further and may include changes to how results are reported, before they are released by the NRC. Therefore, I would like to emphasize that this document should be controlled in such a manner as to limit its distribution to only those personnel necessary to complete the fact check/error check, as discussed in our teleconference with you last week. Under no circumstances is any information in these attachments to be released to the public. | ||
In addition, I would also appreciate a response indicating that you received and were able to open the attachments. | We are asking that you complete your fact check/error review by April 16, 2010. RES personnel are available throughout the review period for discussions/questions regarding this request. Please contact me at 415-3204 with any questions. In addition, I would also appreciate a response indicating that you received and were able to open the attachments. | ||
Best. Regards, John Hughey NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2 Peach Bottom Project Manager 301-415-3204 | Best. Regards, John Hughey NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2 Peach Bottom Project Manager 301-415-3204 | ||
~ | |||
~~~"""' | |||
T e-mail dany of* | |||
a hme may co in Exelo | |||
: orporat, propri ry info tion, wh* i is privil ed, onfide al, or su ect to cop ight belo ing to t Exelon rporatio family of C | |||
Comp es. This -mail is i nded sol y for t - use of th dividu or entity t hich i s addrej ed. If y are not t intende ecipie f this e-ail, you a, hereby n fled that any issemin ion, distr*tion, co ng, or tion take n relati to the co nts of a at hment o this e-i1 is stric prohi ed and be un,ful. | |||
If yo ave rece* ed s e-ma in error, ease not-the se er imme tely an ermanentlylelete the riginal d any opy oft e-mail d any ntout. T k You. | |||
****** f*** | |||
,}} | |||
Latest revision as of 02:07, 13 January 2025
| ML11255A308 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/2010 |
| From: | Richard Guzman Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Jimi Yerokun NRC/RES/DSA/SPB |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2011-0083 | |
| Download: ML11255A308 (2) | |
Text
From:
Guzman. Richard *,-PR(
To:
Elkins. Scott Cc:
Hughey, John; Cotton, Karen
Subject:
FV: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Date:
Monday, April 12, 2010 7:13:00 AM
- Scott, For your awareness, PB is now targeting 4/30 for completion of their fact-check review.
Also, they indicate the product would be a mark-up in pdf writer. Is that format ok for you guys?
For Surry, I have the understanding at this time that they plan to complete their review by 4/16.
Rich From: Hughey, John Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 3:34 PM To: Guzman, Richard
Subject:
RE: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
- Rich, Just talked with Frank and he says that he won't have the Peach Bottom SOARCA review finished until 04/30/2010.
New staff, outages, drill,etc John From: Hughey, John Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:41 PM To: Guzman, Richard
Subject:
FW: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
- Rich, Exelon got the SOARCA info. However, in talking with Frank, he said that he isn't sure that they will be able to have the review done by 04/16 as requested. Frank is going to let me know what date they can support.
John From: Frank. Mascitelli@exeloncorp.com [mailto: Frank. Mascitelli@exeloncorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:28 PM To: Hughey, John Cc: david.helker@exeloncorp.com; Pamela.Cowan@exeloncorp.com
Subject:
RE: SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
- John, Exelon has received the SOARCA documents and is able to open the files.
From: Hughey, John. [1]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 12:04 PM To: Mascitelli, Frank J:(GenCo-Nuc)
Cc: Guzman, Richard
Subject:
SOARCA documents for review by Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
- Frank, Please find attached two SOARCA documents. These attachments include sections of the SOARCA NUREG for purposes of performing a fact check/error check as we discussed last week. The first document is a compiled collection of 13 pages extracted from the SOARCA Summary document which contains individual pages with Peach Bottom specific information to be checked for accuracy. The second attachment is the Peach Bottom Integrated Analysis document (Appendix A, 179 pages) in its entirety to be fact checked/error checked.
As we discussed in our teleconference last week we are requesting that Exelon check the document for accuracy of facts and statements that pertain to plant specific information as stated in the documents. Consistent with the informal agreement RES made with SOARCA licensee participants, we are requesting a review the draft NUREG for any plant-specific factual errors.aLy.
Additionally, as a SOARCA participating licensee, you are receiving this information in its pre-decisional state which is not ready for release to the public. These documents are DRAFT and will be edited further and may include changes to how results are reported, before they are released by the NRC. Therefore, I would like to emphasize that this document should be controlled in such a manner as to limit its distribution to only those personnel necessary to complete the fact check/error check, as discussed in our teleconference with you last week. Under no circumstances is any information in these attachments to be released to the public.
We are asking that you complete your fact check/error review by April 16, 2010. RES personnel are available throughout the review period for discussions/questions regarding this request. Please contact me at 415-3204 with any questions. In addition, I would also appreciate a response indicating that you received and were able to open the attachments.
Best. Regards, John Hughey NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2 Peach Bottom Project Manager 301-415-3204
~
~~~"""'
T e-mail dany of*
a hme may co in Exelo
- orporat, propri ry info tion, wh* i is privil ed, onfide al, or su ect to cop ight belo ing to t Exelon rporatio family of C
Comp es. This -mail is i nded sol y for t - use of th dividu or entity t hich i s addrej ed. If y are not t intende ecipie f this e-ail, you a, hereby n fled that any issemin ion, distr*tion, co ng, or tion take n relati to the co nts of a at hment o this e-i1 is stric prohi ed and be un,ful.
If yo ave rece* ed s e-ma in error, ease not-the se er imme tely an ermanentlylelete the riginal d any opy oft e-mail d any ntout. T k You.
- f***
,