IR 05000305/2011502: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==Dear Mr. Heacock:== | ==Dear Mr. Heacock:== | ||
On October 7, 2011, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspection at your Kewaunee Power Station. The enclosed report documents the inspection findings, which were discussed on October 7, 2011, with Mr. S. Scace and other members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the | On October 7, 2011, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspection at your Kewaunee Power Station. The enclosed report documents the inspection findings, which were discussed on October 7, 2011, with Mr. S. Scace and other members of your staff. | ||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. | |||
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. | |||
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ Richard A. Skokowski, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-305 License No. DPR-43 | /RA/ | ||
Richard A. Skokowski, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-305 License No. DPR-43 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
Inspection Report 05000305/2011502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information | Inspection Report 05000305/2011502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information | ||
REGION III Docket No: 50-305 License No: DPR-43 Report No: 05000305/20011502 Licensee: Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. | REGION III== | ||
Docket No: | |||
50-305 License No: | |||
DPR-43 Report No: | |||
05000305/20011502 Licensee: | |||
Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. | |||
Facility: | |||
Kewaunee Power Station Location: | |||
Kewaunee, WI Dates: | |||
October 3 through 7, 2011 Inspectors: | |||
R. Jickling, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector | |||
J. Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector | |||
K. Barclay, Resident Inspector Approved by: | |||
Richard A. Skokowski, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Enclosure | |||
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | =SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | ||
IR 05000305/2011502(DRS); 10/03/2011 - 10/07/2011; Kewaunee Power Station; Baseline | IR 05000305/2011502(DRS); 10/03/2011 - 10/07/2011; Kewaunee Power Station; Baseline | ||
Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection. | |||
=== | This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by two regional inspectors and one resident inspector. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006. | ||
and Self-Revealed Findings | |||
===NRC-Identified=== | |||
and Self-Revealed Findings | |||
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
=== | ===Licensee-Identified Violations=== | ||
No violations were identified. | No violations were identified. | ||
| Line 55: | Line 81: | ||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | |||
{{a|1EP1}} | |||
==1EP1 Exercise Evaluation== | ==1EP1 Exercise Evaluation== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71114.01}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71114.01}} | ||
===.1 Exercise Evaluation=== | ===.1 Exercise Evaluation=== | ||
=== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors reviewed the October 4, 2011, biennial emergency preparedness exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2009, 2010, and 2011, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the October 4, 2011, exercise. | |||
The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities: | |||
* Control Room Simulator (CRS); | * Control Room Simulator (CRS); | ||
* Technical Support Center (TSC); | * Technical Support Center (TSC); | ||
* Operations Support Facility (OSF); | * Operations Support Facility (OSF); | ||
* Emergency Operations Facility (EOF); and | * Emergency Operations Facility (EOF); and | ||
* Joint Information Center (JIC) The inspectors also assessed the | * Joint Information Center (JIC) | ||
The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees emergency plan. | |||
The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, and EOF to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. | |||
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ||
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | |||
{{a|4OA1}} | |||
==4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification== | ==4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71151}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71151}} | ||
===.1 Drill/Exercise Performance=== | ===.1 Drill/Exercise Performance=== | ||
=== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance PI for the period from the fourth quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report. | |||
This inspection constituted one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 92: | Line 123: | ||
===.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation=== | ===.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation=== | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | |||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the fourth quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. | |||
The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2010 and 2011 drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report. | |||
This inspection constituted one ERO drill participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
===.3 Alert and Notification System=== | ===.3 Alert and Notification System=== | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | |||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) | |||
PI for the period from the fourth quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. | |||
This inspection constituted one alert and notification system sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|4OA6}} | {{a|4OA6}} | ||
==4OA6 Management Meetings== | ==4OA6 Management Meetings== | ||
===.1=== | |||
===.1 Exit Meeting Summary=== | ===Exit Meeting Summary=== | ||
On October 7, 2011, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. S. Scace and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary. | On October 7, 2011, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. S. Scace and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary. | ||
===.2 Public and Media Briefing=== | ===.2 Public and Media Briefing=== | ||
On October 7, 2011, the inspector summarized the NRC's preliminary exercise inspection conclusions at a public and media briefings hosted by Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency Region V Field Office staff in Algoma, Wisconsin. | |||
ATTACHMENT: | |||
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | ||
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | ==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | ||
Licensee | Licensee | ||
: [[contact::S. Scace]], Site Vice President | : [[contact::S. Scace]], Site Vice President | ||
| Line 137: | Line 171: | ||
: [[contact::L. Walesh]], Protection Services Supervisor | : [[contact::L. Walesh]], Protection Services Supervisor | ||
: [[contact::S. Yuen]], Engineering Director | : [[contact::S. Yuen]], Engineering Director | ||
Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
: [[contact::K. Barclay]], Resident Inspector | : [[contact::K. Barclay]], Resident Inspector | ||
==LIST OF ITEMS== | ==LIST OF ITEMS== | ||
OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED Opened, Closed and | ===OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED=== | ||
Opened, Closed and | |||
===Discussed=== | ===Discussed=== | ||
None | |||
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:33, 12 January 2025
| ML11306A150 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Kewaunee  |
| Issue date: | 10/28/2011 |
| From: | Richard Skokowski Plant Support Branch II |
| To: | Heacock D Dominion Energy Kewaunee |
| References | |
| IR-11-502 | |
| Download: ML11306A150 (11) | |
Text
October 28, 2011
SUBJECT:
KEWAUNEE POWER STATION BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000305/2011502
Dear Mr. Heacock:
On October 7, 2011, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspection at your Kewaunee Power Station. The enclosed report documents the inspection findings, which were discussed on October 7, 2011, with Mr. S. Scace and other members of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Richard A. Skokowski, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-305 License No. DPR-43
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000305/2011502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
REGION III==
Docket No:
50-305 License No:
DPR-43 Report No:
05000305/20011502 Licensee:
Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.
Facility:
Kewaunee Power Station Location:
Kewaunee, WI Dates:
October 3 through 7, 2011 Inspectors:
R. Jickling, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector
J. Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector
K. Barclay, Resident Inspector Approved by:
Richard A. Skokowski, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosure
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000305/2011502(DRS); 10/03/2011 - 10/07/2011; Kewaunee Power Station; Baseline
Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection.
This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by two regional inspectors and one resident inspector. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.
NRC-Identified
and Self-Revealed Findings
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
No findings were identified.
Licensee-Identified Violations
No violations were identified.
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
.1 Exercise Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the October 4, 2011, biennial emergency preparedness exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2009, 2010, and 2011, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the October 4, 2011, exercise.
The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:
- Control Room Simulator (CRS);
- Operations Support Facility (OSF);
- Emergency Operations Facility (EOF); and
The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees emergency plan.
The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, and EOF to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01-05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification
.1 Drill/Exercise Performance
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance PI for the period from the fourth quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.
This inspection constituted one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the fourth quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used.
The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2010 and 2011 drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.
This inspection constituted one ERO drill participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.3 Alert and Notification System
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS)
PI for the period from the fourth quarter 2010 through second quarter 2011. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
This inspection constituted one alert and notification system sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Management Meetings
.1
Exit Meeting Summary
On October 7, 2011, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. S. Scace and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.
.2 Public and Media Briefing
On October 7, 2011, the inspector summarized the NRC's preliminary exercise inspection conclusions at a public and media briefings hosted by Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency Region V Field Office staff in Algoma, Wisconsin.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee
- S. Scace, Site Vice President
- T. Breene, Licensing Manager
- J. Egdorf, Emergency Preparedness Supervisor
- M. Haese, Licensing
- M. Hale, Radiation Protection Manager
- B. Harris, Emergency Preparedness Manager
- J. Helbing, Maintenance Assistant Manager
- W. Hoffner, Fleet Emergency Preparedness Manager
- J. Langan, Nuclear Oversight Manager
- T. Olson, Engineering Programs Manager
- J. Stafford, Safety and Licensing Manager
- L. Walesh, Protection Services Supervisor
- S. Yuen, Engineering Director
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- K. Barclay, Resident Inspector
LIST OF ITEMS
OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED
Opened, Closed and
Discussed
None