ML120110028: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML120110028
| number = ML120110028
| issue date = 01/03/2012
| issue date = 01/03/2012
| title = Part 26 Question
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Kewaunee Part 26 Question
| author name = Boggi M A
| author name = Boggi M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRA
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRA
| addressee name = Feintuch K D
| addressee name = Feintuch K
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| docket = 05000305
| docket = 05000305
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Boggi, Michael To:Feintuch, Karl
{{#Wiki_filter:From:
Boggi, Michael To:
Feintuch, Karl


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response <ae>
RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response <ae>
Date:Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:13:40 AM
Date:
: Karl, Thanks for the information.
Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:13:40 AM
This is the exact level of detail I was interested in. Much appreciated!
: Karl, Thanks for the information. This is the exact level of detail I was interested in. Much appreciated!
 
Mike From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:10 AM To: Boggi, Michael
Mike From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:10 AM To: Boggi, Michael


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response Reacting to your message of 12/30/11, I sent:=========From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 9:14 AM To: Jack Gadzala
RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response
 
Reacting to your message of 12/30/11, I sent:
 
=========
From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 9:14 AM To: Jack Gadzala


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Kewaunee: question concerning personnel fatigue management
Kewaunee: question concerning personnel fatigue management


Jack, I received a question concerning fatigue management (human performance).
Jack, I received a question concerning fatigue management (human performance). Can you confirm if you have implemented a MDO alternative (otherwise known as the 54 maximum average) on January 1, 2012?
Canyou confirm if you have implemented a "MDO alternative" (otherwise known as the "54maximum average") on January 1, 2012?


Karl Feintuch
Karl Feintuch
Line 41: Line 46:
=========
=========
On 1/3/2012, Jack Gadzala called and provided the following information:
On 1/3/2012, Jack Gadzala called and provided the following information:
1 - Kewaunee did not start the "54 Average" process on 1/1/12 due to lack of operational software ("EmpCenter")
1 - Kewaunee did not start the 54 Average process on 1/1/12 due to lack of operational software (EmpCenter) from the vendor to support the 54 Average calculations.
from the vendor to support the 54 Average calculations.
2 - EmpCenter is widely used in industry (I did not ask for details). However, the 54 Average calculation appears not to be ready for anyone. Thus, a Kewaunee deployment date is not yet determined.
2 - EmpCenter is widely used in industry (I did not ask for details).
3 - Kewaunees primary POC for the 54 Average process is MaryJo Haese (who I know).
However, the 54 Average calculation appears not to be ready for anyone. Thus, a Kewaunee deployment date is not yet determined.
She is to advise me when a forecasted date for adoption is provided by the vendor.
3 - Kewaunee's primary POC for the 54 Average process is MaryJo Haese (who I know). She is to advise me when a forecasted date for adoption is provided by the vendor.
Questions for you (Mike) a - Do you need more detail or a conference call for direct contact?
Questions for you (Mike)a - Do you need more detail or a conference call for direct contact?b - Is this message from me adequate or do you need the licensee to provide this information in an email message (I discussed this contingency with Jack in case it would be necessary)?
b - Is this message from me adequate or do you need the licensee to provide this information in an email message (I discussed this contingency with Jack in case it would be necessary)?
c - Noting the large distribution on Undine's original message below, is my response just to you adequate?  
c - Noting the large distribution on Undines original message below, is my response just to you adequate?
Karl From: Boggi, Michael


Karl From: Boggi, Michael Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 10:46 AM To: Feintuch, Karl
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 10:46 AM To: Feintuch, Karl


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Kewaunee Part 26 question Karl, Can you confirm that Kewaunee is implementing the alternative cumulative fatigue management provision called the MDO alternative, otherwise known as the 54 maximum average. Thanks Karl, it is good that I can finally ask you a Kewaunee question!
Kewaunee Part 26 question
Mike Boggi x5309
: Karl, Can you confirm that Kewaunee is implementing the alternative cumulative fatigue management provision called the MDO alternative, otherwise known as the 54 maximum average. Thanks Karl, it is good that I can finally ask you a Kewaunee question!
Mike Boggi x5309 From: Shoop, Undine Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:27 PM To: Desaulniers, David; Boggi, Michael; Martin, Kamishan; Smith, Will; Harris, Paul; Benowitz, Howard; Barnes, Valerie


From: Shoop, Undine Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:27 PM To: Desaulniers, David; Boggi, Michael; Martin, Kamishan; Smith, Will; Harris, Paul; Benowitz, Howard;Barnes, Valerie
==Subject:==
FYI


==Subject:==
The Resident Inspector at Kewaunee has reported that Dominion has decided that they will implement the 10 CFR Part 26 alternative 54 hours per week average (versus MDOs) on January 1, 2012.
FYI  The Resident Inspector at Kewaunee has reported that Dominion has decided that they will implement the 10 CFR Part 26 alternative 54 hours per week average (versus MDO's) on January 1, 2012. Undine Shoop Chief, Health Physics and Human Performance Branch Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation301-415-2063}}
Undine Shoop Chief, Health Physics and Human Performance Branch Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-2063}}

Latest revision as of 21:09, 12 January 2025

NRR E-mail Capture - Kewaunee Part 26 Question
ML120110028
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/03/2012
From: Boggi M
NRC/NRR/DRA
To: Feintuch K
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
TAC MD7112
Download: ML120110028 (2)


Text

From:

Boggi, Michael To:

Feintuch, Karl

Subject:

RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response <ae>

Date:

Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:13:40 AM

Karl, Thanks for the information. This is the exact level of detail I was interested in. Much appreciated!

Mike From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:10 AM To: Boggi, Michael

Subject:

RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response

Reacting to your message of 12/30/11, I sent:

=

From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 9:14 AM To: Jack Gadzala

Subject:

Kewaunee: question concerning personnel fatigue management

Jack, I received a question concerning fatigue management (human performance). Can you confirm if you have implemented a MDO alternative (otherwise known as the 54 maximum average) on January 1, 2012?

Karl Feintuch

=

On 1/3/2012, Jack Gadzala called and provided the following information:

1 - Kewaunee did not start the 54 Average process on 1/1/12 due to lack of operational software (EmpCenter) from the vendor to support the 54 Average calculations.

2 - EmpCenter is widely used in industry (I did not ask for details). However, the 54 Average calculation appears not to be ready for anyone. Thus, a Kewaunee deployment date is not yet determined.

3 - Kewaunees primary POC for the 54 Average process is MaryJo Haese (who I know).

She is to advise me when a forecasted date for adoption is provided by the vendor.

Questions for you (Mike) a - Do you need more detail or a conference call for direct contact?

b - Is this message from me adequate or do you need the licensee to provide this information in an email message (I discussed this contingency with Jack in case it would be necessary)?

c - Noting the large distribution on Undines original message below, is my response just to you adequate?

Karl From: Boggi, Michael

Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 10:46 AM To: Feintuch, Karl

Subject:

Kewaunee Part 26 question

Karl, Can you confirm that Kewaunee is implementing the alternative cumulative fatigue management provision called the MDO alternative, otherwise known as the 54 maximum average. Thanks Karl, it is good that I can finally ask you a Kewaunee question!

Mike Boggi x5309 From: Shoop, Undine Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:27 PM To: Desaulniers, David; Boggi, Michael; Martin, Kamishan; Smith, Will; Harris, Paul; Benowitz, Howard; Barnes, Valerie

Subject:

FYI

The Resident Inspector at Kewaunee has reported that Dominion has decided that they will implement the 10 CFR Part 26 alternative 54 hours6.25e-4 days <br />0.015 hours <br />8.928571e-5 weeks <br />2.0547e-5 months <br /> per week average (versus MDOs) on January 1, 2012.

Undine Shoop Chief, Health Physics and Human Performance Branch Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-2063