ML12164A832: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/11/2012
| issue date = 06/11/2012
| title = IR 05000361-12-403 and 05000362-12-403, 5/16/2012, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3, NRC Special Inspection Report, Preliminary Greater than Green Finding
| title = IR 05000361-12-403 and 05000362-12-403, 5/16/2012, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3, NRC Special Inspection Report, Preliminary Greater than Green Finding
| author name = Blount T B
| author name = Blount T
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS
| addressee name = Dietrich P
| addressee name = Dietrich P
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000361, 05000362
| docket = 05000361, 05000362
| license number = NPF-010, NPF-015
| license number = NPF-010, NPF-015
| contact person = dah/vlmBrooks M K
| contact person = dah/vlmBrooks M
| case reference number = EA-11-067, EA-12-083
| case reference number = EA-11-067, EA-12-083
| document report number = IR-12-403
| document report number = IR-12-403
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000361/2012403]]
See also: [[see also::IR 05000361/2012403]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI.  When separated from enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled." OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION June 11, 2012   
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
EA-12-083  EA-11-067  Mr. Peter Dietrich Senior Vice President and   
   
   Chief Nuclear Officer Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P. O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA  92674-0128  
Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI.  When separated from enclosure, this  
  SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -   NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2012403; 05000362/2012403;   PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING   
transmittal document is decontrolled.  
Dear Mr. Dietrich:  On May 16, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3.  The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on  
   
May 16, 2012, with Mr. Doug Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members of your staff.  The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.  
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
  The attached report documents one finding that has preliminarily been determined to be Greater than Green (i.e., finding of greater than very low security significance) that may result in the need for further evaluation to determine the significance and, therefore, the need for additional UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV1600 EAST LAMAR BLVDARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511  
June 11, 2012  
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION     OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION   
   
EA-12-083   
EA-11-067  
   
Mr. Peter Dietrich  
Senior Vice President and   
   Chief Nuclear Officer  
Southern California Edison Company  
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station  
P. O. Box 128  
San Clemente, CA  92674-0128  
   
SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -
NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2012403; 05000362/2012403;
PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING  
   
Dear Mr. Dietrich:  
   
On May 16, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security  
baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3.  The  
enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on  
May 16, 2012, with Mr. Doug Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members  
of your staff.  
   
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and  
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.  
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed  
personnel.  
   
The attached report documents one finding that has preliminarily been determined to be Greater  
than Green (i.e., finding of greater than very low security significance) that may result in the  
need for further evaluation to determine the significance and, therefore, the need for additional  
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
RE GIO N I V
1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511
 
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
   
NRC action.  The finding is described in the enclosed inspection report.  The finding was  
NRC action.  The finding is described in the enclosed inspection report.  The finding was  
assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process (PPSDP).  The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors arrived on site.  The finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for escalated  
assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical Protection Significance  
enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, which can be found on the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement.   In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, we intend to complete our evaluation using the best available information and issue our final determination of security  
Determination Process (PPSDP).  The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated  
significance within 90 days of the date of this letter.  The significance determination process encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and the licensee; however, the dialogue should not impact the timeliness of the staff's final determination.  Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to  
for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security  
(1) attend a Regulatory Conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or (2) submit your position of the finding to the NRC in writing.  If you request a Regulatory Conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter and we encourage you to submit supporting documentation at least one week prior to the conference in an effort to make the conference more efficient and effective.  If a Regulatory Conference is held, it will not be open for public observation.  If you decide to submit only a written response, such submittal  
requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors arrived on site.  The  
should be sent to the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter.  If you decline to request a Regulatory Conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the final SDP determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements stated in the Prerequisite and Limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609.   
finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for escalated  
Please contact Mr. Michael C. Hay, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1, Division of Reactor Safety, at (817) 200-1527 and in writing within 10 days from the issue date of this letter to notify the NRC of your intentions.  If we have not heard from you within 10 business days, we will continue with our significance determination and enforcement decision.  The final resolution of this matter will be conveyed in separate correspondence.  
enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, which can be found on the  
  Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no Notice of Violation is being issued for this inspection finding at this time.  In addition, please be advised that the number and characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection report may change as a result of further NRC review.   
NRCs Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement.  
  Additionally, one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the PPSDP) was identified during this inspection.  The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical    
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION     OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors  
In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, we intend to complete our  
evaluation using the best available information and issue our final determination of security  
significance within 90 days of the date of this letter.  The significance determination process  
encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and the licensee; however, the dialogue  
should not impact the timeliness of the staffs final determination.  
   
Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to  
(1) attend a Regulatory Conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the  
facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or  
(2) submit your position of the finding to the NRC in writing.  If you request a Regulatory  
Conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter and we encourage you  
to submit supporting documentation at least one week prior to the conference in an effort to  
make the conference more efficient and effective.  If a Regulatory Conference is held, it will not  
be open for public observation.  If you decide to submit only a written response, such submittal  
should be sent to the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter.  If you decline to request  
a Regulatory Conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the  
final SDP determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements  
stated in the Prerequisite and Limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609.  
   
Please contact Mr. Michael C. Hay, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1, Division of Reactor Safety,  
at (817) 200-1527 and in writing within 10 days from the issue date of this letter to notify the  
NRC of your intentions.  If we have not heard from you within 10 business days, we will continue  
with our significance determination and enforcement decision.  The final resolution of this matter  
will be conveyed in separate correspondence.  
   
Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no Notice of Violation is  
being issued for this inspection finding at this time.  In addition, please be advised that the  
number and characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection  
report may change as a result of further NRC review.   
   
Additionally, one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as  
determined by the PPSDP) was identified during this inspection.  The deficiency was promptly  
corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical
 
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors  
arrived on site.  
arrived on site.  
  This finding was determined to involve a violation of NRC requirements.   You should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk,  
   
Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to (1) the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas 76011-4511; (2) the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.   
This finding was determined to involve a violation of NRC requirements.  
One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to each finding.  The cross-cutting aspects were both related to human performance.  The first involved the failure to develop a site procedure which addressed the need to conduct a cyber security analysis of electronic devices designated for Safeguards Information (SGI) use and the second involved the failure of personnel to follow procedural guidance, [H.2.(c)] and [H.4.(b)], respectively.  If you disagree with a cross-cutting  
aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.   Further, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred involving the failure to maintain complete and accurate information.  Specifically, a licensee employee failed to promptly report an August 27, 2007, arrest for public intoxication, which was information  
You should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis  
required to be maintained by 10 CFR 73.56(h) (2007).  This violation would normally be categorized at Severity Level IV.  However, in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Enforcement Policy, the NRC will exercise discretion and not issue a violation.  In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," once separated from the  
for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk,  
enclosure, a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).   
Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to (1) the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear  
However, the material enclosed within contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability.  Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's ADAMS, accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.  Because this issue involves Security-Related Information, if you choose to respond, your response will not be made available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's ADAMS.  If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the    
Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas 76011-4511; (2) the  
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION     OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.  Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-
Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555-
0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.  
   
One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to each finding.  The cross-cutting aspects were both  
related to human performance.  The first involved the failure to develop a site procedure which  
addressed the need to conduct a cyber security analysis of electronic devices designated for  
Safeguards Information (SGI) use and the second involved the failure of personnel to follow  
procedural guidance, [H.2.(c)] and [H.4.(b)], respectively.  If you disagree with a cross-cutting  
aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of  
this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator,  
Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
Further, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred involving the  
failure to maintain complete and accurate information.  Specifically, a licensee employee failed  
to promptly report an August 27, 2007, arrest for public intoxication, which was information  
required to be maintained by 10 CFR 73.56(h) (2007).  This violation would normally be  
categorized at Severity Level IV.  However, in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Enforcement  
Policy, the NRC will exercise discretion and not issue a violation.  
   
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," once separated from the  
enclosure, a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the  
NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access Management  
System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
   
However, the material enclosed within contains Security-Related Information in accordance with  
10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security  
vulnerability.  Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically  
for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible  
from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.  Because this issue  
involves Security-Related Information, if you choose to respond, your response will not be made  
available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS.  If  
Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the
 
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.  Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-
Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for  
Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for  
withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).  In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.  Sincerely,   
withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).  In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is  
waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.  
   
Sincerely,  
   
/RA/
Thomas Blount, Acting Director
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket:  50-361, 50-362
License: NPF-10, NPF-15
Nonpublic Enclosure: 
NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2012403;
  05000362/2012403 w/attachments 
Distribution made electronically
 
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
Distribution w/enclosure:
Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch
Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M
Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43
Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6
Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov) 
Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Binoy.Desai@nrc.gov
Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov)
Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)
Electronic distribution by RIV:
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)
SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)
Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov)
Chief, ACES (Heather.Gepford@nrc.gov) 
Senior Enforcement Specialist (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov)
Enforcement Specialist (Christi.Maier@nrc.gov)
Allegations Coordinator (Judith.Weaver@nrc.gov)
RidsOeMailCenter
Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
OEMail Resource
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)
 
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
   
   
/RA/  Thomas Blount, Acting Director Division of Reactor Safety  Docket:  50-361, 50-362 License: NPF-10, NPF-15  Nonpublic Enclosure: 
NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2012403;    05000362/2012403 w/attachments    Distribution made electronically   
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION    OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION Distribution w/enclosure:
Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43 Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6 Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov)  Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Binoy.Desai@nrc.gov Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)  Electronic distribution by RIV: Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov) DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov) Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov) SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov) Chief, ACES (Heather.Gepford@nrc.gov)  Senior Enforcement Specialist (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov) Enforcement Specialist (Christi.Maier@nrc.gov) Allegations Coordinator (Judith.Weaver@nrc.gov) RidsOeMailCenter Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov) RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov) Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov) Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) OEMail Resource RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov) 
   
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION    OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION 
Security Related Complete Report - OUO:                         
Security Related Complete Report - OUO:                         
SUNSI Review Completed:  MKB    ADAMS:   Yes Initials:  MKB     Non-Publicly Available       Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required  Letter Only: SUNSI Review Completed:    MKB ADAMS:   Yes Initials:    MKB     Publicly Available         Non-Sensitive ADAMS No. ML12164A832 PSI:PSB1 PSI:PSB1 C:PSB1 C:PBB MBrooks JCherubini MHay RLantz /RA/ /RA/  E /RA//RA  05/31/12 5 /29/12 06/11/12 06/04/12 ACES C: ACES C: PSB1 AD: DRS CMaier HGepford MHay TBlount /RA/ /RA/ /RA//RA/ 06/11/2012 06/11/2012 06/11/2012 06/11/2012 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                        T=Telephone          E=E-mail        F=Fax
SUNSI Review Completed:  MKB  
 
     ADAMS:   : Yes  
Initials:  MKB
:  Non-Publicly Available     :  Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required  
   
Letter Only:  
SUNSI Review Completed:    MKB ADAMS: : Yes  
Initials:    MKB
:  Publicly Available    
:  Non-Sensitive  
ADAMS No. ML12164A832  
PSI:PSB1  
PSI:PSB1  
C:PSB1  
C:PBB  
MBrooks  
JCherubini  
MHay  
RLantz  
/RA/  
/RA/  E  
/RA/
/RA  
  05/31/12  
5 /29/12  
06/11/12  
06/04/12  
ACES  
C: ACES  
C: PSB1  
AD: DRS  
CMaier  
HGepford  
MHay  
TBlount  
/RA/  
/RA/  
/RA/
/RA/  
06/11/2012  
06/11/2012  
06/11/2012  
06/11/2012  
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                        T=Telephone          E=E-mail        F=Fax
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 01:38, 12 January 2025

IR 05000361-12-403 and 05000362-12-403, 5/16/2012, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3, NRC Special Inspection Report, Preliminary Greater than Green Finding
ML12164A832
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/2012
From: Blount T
Division of Reactor Safety IV
To: Peter Dietrich
Southern California Edison Co
dah/vlmBrooks M
References
EA-11-067, EA-12-083 IR-12-403
Download: ML12164A832 (6)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000361/2012403

Text

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI. When separated from enclosure, this

transmittal document is decontrolled.

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

June 11, 2012

EA-12-083

EA-11-067

Mr. Peter Dietrich

Senior Vice President and

Chief Nuclear Officer

Southern California Edison Company

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

P. O. Box 128

San Clemente, CA 92674-0128

SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2012403; 05000362/2012403;

PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING

Dear Mr. Dietrich:

On May 16, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security

baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The

enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on

May 16, 2012, with Mr. Doug Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members

of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and

compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed

personnel.

The attached report documents one finding that has preliminarily been determined to be Greater

than Green (i.e., finding of greater than very low security significance) that may result in the

need for further evaluation to determine the significance and, therefore, the need for additional

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

RE GIO N I V

1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD

ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

NRC action. The finding is described in the enclosed inspection report. The finding was

assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical Protection Significance

Determination Process (PPSDP). The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated

for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security

requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors arrived on site. The

finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for escalated

enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, which can be found on the

NRCs Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement.

In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, we intend to complete our

evaluation using the best available information and issue our final determination of security

significance within 90 days of the date of this letter. The significance determination process

encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and the licensee; however, the dialogue

should not impact the timeliness of the staffs final determination.

Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to

(1) attend a Regulatory Conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the

facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or

(2) submit your position of the finding to the NRC in writing. If you request a Regulatory

Conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter and we encourage you

to submit supporting documentation at least one week prior to the conference in an effort to

make the conference more efficient and effective. If a Regulatory Conference is held, it will not

be open for public observation. If you decide to submit only a written response, such submittal

should be sent to the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. If you decline to request

a Regulatory Conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the

final SDP determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements

stated in the Prerequisite and Limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609.

Please contact Mr. Michael C. Hay, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1, Division of Reactor Safety,

at (817) 200-1527 and in writing within 10 days from the issue date of this letter to notify the

NRC of your intentions. If we have not heard from you within 10 business days, we will continue

with our significance determination and enforcement decision. The final resolution of this matter

will be conveyed in separate correspondence.

Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no Notice of Violation is

being issued for this inspection finding at this time. In addition, please be advised that the

number and characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection

report may change as a result of further NRC review.

Additionally, one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as

determined by the PPSDP) was identified during this inspection. The deficiency was promptly

corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors

arrived on site.

This finding was determined to involve a violation of NRC requirements.

You should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis

for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk,

Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to (1) the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas 76011-4511; (2) the

Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555-

0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to each finding. The cross-cutting aspects were both

related to human performance. The first involved the failure to develop a site procedure which

addressed the need to conduct a cyber security analysis of electronic devices designated for

Safeguards Information (SGI) use and the second involved the failure of personnel to follow

procedural guidance, [H.2.(c)] and [H.4.(b)], respectively. If you disagree with a cross-cutting

aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of

this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator,

Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

Further, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred involving the

failure to maintain complete and accurate information. Specifically, a licensee employee failed

to promptly report an August 27, 2007, arrest for public intoxication, which was information

required to be maintained by 10 CFR 73.56(h) (2007). This violation would normally be

categorized at Severity Level IV. However, in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Enforcement

Policy, the NRC will exercise discretion and not issue a violation.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," once separated from the

enclosure, a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access Management

System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

However, the material enclosed within contains Security-Related Information in accordance with

10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security

vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically

for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible

from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Because this issue

involves Security-Related Information, if you choose to respond, your response will not be made

available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS. If

Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-

Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for

withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is

waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Thomas Blount, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket: 50-361, 50-362

License: NPF-10, NPF-15

Nonpublic Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2012403;

05000362/2012403 w/attachments

Distribution made electronically

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

Distribution w/enclosure:

Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch

Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M

Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43

Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6

Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Binoy.Desai@nrc.gov

Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov)

Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)

Electronic distribution by RIV:

Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)

Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)

DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)

DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)

Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)

Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)

Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)

SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov)

Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)

Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)

Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)

Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov)

Chief, ACES (Heather.Gepford@nrc.gov)

Senior Enforcement Specialist (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov)

Enforcement Specialist (Christi.Maier@nrc.gov)

Allegations Coordinator (Judith.Weaver@nrc.gov)

RidsOeMailCenter

Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)

RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)

Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)

Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)

Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)

OEMail Resource

RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

Security Related Complete Report - OUO:

SUNSI Review Completed: MKB

ADAMS:  : Yes

Initials: MKB

Non-Publicly Available  : Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required

Letter Only:

SUNSI Review Completed: MKB ADAMS:  : Yes

Initials: MKB

Publicly Available
Non-Sensitive

ADAMS No. ML12164A832

PSI:PSB1

PSI:PSB1

C:PSB1

C:PBB

MBrooks

JCherubini

MHay

RLantz

/RA/

/RA/ E

/RA/

/RA

05/31/12

5 /29/12

06/11/12

06/04/12

ACES

C: ACES

C: PSB1

AD: DRS

CMaier

HGepford

MHay

TBlount

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

06/11/2012

06/11/2012

06/11/2012

06/11/2012

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12164A832&oldid=5257281"