|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | number = ML13074A038 | | | number = ML13074A038 |
| | issue date = 03/12/2013 | | | issue date = 03/12/2013 |
| | title = Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review | | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review |
| | author name = Beltz T A | | | author name = Beltz T |
| | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1 | | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1 |
| | addressee name = Fields J S | | | addressee name = Fields J |
| | addressee affiliation = Northern States Power Co | | | addressee affiliation = Northern States Power Co |
| | docket = 05000263 | | | docket = 05000263 |
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Beltz, Terry Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:12 AM To: Fields, John S. | | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: |
| Cc: gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com; McConnell, Ma tthew; Mathew, Roy; Carlson, Robert | | Beltz, Terry Sent: |
| | Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:12 AM To: |
| | Fields, John S. |
| | Cc: |
| | gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com; McConnell, Matthew; Mathew, Roy; Carlson, Robert |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Reques ts for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Ext ended Power Uprate Review (TAC No. MD9990) | | Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review (TAC No. MD9990) |
| Attachments: | | Attachments: |
| Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information Regarding the EPU Gap Analysis Review (EEEB).docx | | Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information Regarding the EPU Gap Analysis Review (EEEB).docx |
|
| |
|
| ==Dear Mr. Fields:== | | ==Dear Mr. Fields:== |
| | | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff in the Electrical Engineering Branch of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is currently supporting the review of the Extended Power Uprate (EPU) license amendment request for the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. The staff has reviewed your supplemental response associated with the EPU Gap Analysis and determined that additional information is required to complete its review. Draft requests for additional information (RAI) are attached. |
| The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff in the Electrical Engineering Branch of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is currently supporting the review of the Extended Power Uprate (EPU) license amendment request for the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. The staff has reviewed your supplemental response associated with the EPU Gap Analysis and determined that additional information is required to complete its review. Draft requests for additional information (RAI) are attached. | | You may accept these draft RAIs as a formal Requests for Additional Information and respond to the questions by April 12, 2013. Alternatively, you may request to discuss the contents of the RAIs with the NRC staff in a conference call, including any change to the proposed response date. |
| | |
| You may accept these draft RAIs as a formal Requests for Additional Information and respond to the questions by April 12, 2013. Alternatively, you may request to discuss the contents of the RAIs with the NRC staff in a conference call, including any change to the proposed response date. | |
| | |
| Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. | | Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. |
| Sincerely, Terry A. Beltz, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing | | Sincerely, Terry A. Beltz, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-3049 Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov |
|
| |
|
| Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-3049 Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov
| | Hearing Identifier: |
| | | NRR_PMDA Email Number: |
| Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 628 Mail Envelope Properties (7E9EA9BB82325E46B07B0F04F99B40D87C560368BF) | | 628 Mail Envelope Properties (7E9EA9BB82325E46B07B0F04F99B40D87C560368BF) |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review (TAC No. MD9990) Sent Date: 3/12/2013 6:12:08 AM Received Date: 3/12/2013 6:12:00 AM From: Beltz, Terry Created By: Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov Recipients: "gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com" <gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com> Tracking Status: None "McConnell, Matthew" <Matthew.McConnell@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Mathew, Roy" <Roy.Mathew@nrc.gov> | | Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review (TAC No. MD9990) |
| Tracking Status: None "Carlson, Robert" <Robert.Carlson@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Fields, John S." <John.Fields@xenuclear.com> Tracking Status: None | | Sent Date: |
| | 3/12/2013 6:12:08 AM Received Date: |
| | 3/12/2013 6:12:00 AM From: |
| | Beltz, Terry Created By: |
| | Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov Recipients: |
| | "gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com" <gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com> |
| | Tracking Status: None "McConnell, Matthew" <Matthew.McConnell@nrc.gov> |
| | Tracking Status: None "Mathew, Roy" <Roy.Mathew@nrc.gov> |
| | Tracking Status: None "Carlson, Robert" <Robert.Carlson@nrc.gov> |
| | Tracking Status: None "Fields, John S." <John.Fields@xenuclear.com> |
| | Tracking Status: None Post Office: |
| | HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1126 3/12/2013 6:12:00 AM Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information Regarding the EPU Gap Analysis Review (EEEB).docx 16819 Options Priority: |
| | Standard Return Notification: |
| | No Reply Requested: |
| | No Sensitivity: |
| | Normal Expiration Date: |
| | Recipients Received: |
|
| |
|
| Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1126 3/12/2013 6:12:00 AM Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information Regarding the EPU Gap Analysis Review (EEEB).docx 16819 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
| |
| REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH EXTENDED POWER UPRATE REVIEW NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY - MINNESOTA (NSPM) | | REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH EXTENDED POWER UPRATE REVIEW NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY - MINNESOTA (NSPM) |
| MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-263 | | MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-263 |
| : 1) Please explain what is meant by "Equipment Qualification Program Reconstitution." | | : 1) Please explain what is meant by Equipment Qualification Program Reconstitution. |
| : 2) Please provide the normal and accident levels for radiation, temperature, pressure, submergence, chemical spray effects, and humidity for all areas in which environmentally qualified equipment is installed in tabular form showing the Pre-EPU and EPU conditions, as well as the qualified values of EQ equipment in those areas. | | : 2) Please provide the normal and accident levels for radiation, temperature, pressure, submergence, chemical spray effects, and humidity for all areas in which environmentally qualified equipment is installed in tabular form showing the Pre-EPU and EPU conditions, as well as the qualified values of EQ equipment in those areas. |
| : 3) Please modify Figures 27-1 and 27-2 to include the profile of the qualification level of EQ equipment to show that the EQ equipment will remain bounding under EPU conditions. | | : 3) Please modify Figures 27-1 and 27-2 to include the profile of the qualification level of EQ equipment to show that the EQ equipment will remain bounding under EPU conditions. |
| : 4) In response to Item 27, NSPM states the following: | | : 4) In response to Item 27, NSPM states the following: |
| | | As indicated above the full EQ analysis is now completed with only minor exceptions. |
| "As indicated above the full EQ analysis is now completed with only minor exceptions." Please identify the "minor exceptions" and provide a discussion on each exception for its acceptability. 5) Provide the worst-case Design Basis loading under EPU conditions for the Class 1E station batteries and the capacity ratings for the Class 1E station batteries.}}
| | Please identify the minor exceptions and provide a discussion on each exception for its acceptability. |
| | : 5) Provide the worst-case Design Basis loading under EPU conditions for the Class 1E station batteries and the capacity ratings for the Class 1E station batteries.}} |
Letter Sequence RAI |
|---|
TAC:MD9990, Clarify Application of Setpoint Methodology for LSSS Functions (Approved, Closed) |
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance
- Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement
Administration
- Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance
- Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting
Results
Other: L-MT-08-091, Calculation 0801040.301, Steam Dryer Outer Hood Submodel Analysis, L-MT-09-002, Response to NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 5, 2008, L-MT-09-003, Response to NRC Environmental Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 18, 2008, L-MT-09-004, Enclosures 2 - 4: NSPM Response to Containment & Ventilation Branch RAI Numbers 2, 3 and 4 Dated December 18, 2008, L-MT-09-026, Calculation 0000-0081-6958 MNGP-PRNMS-APRM Calc-2008-NP, Rev. 1, Average Power Range Monitor Selected Prnm Licensing Setpoints - EPU Operation (Numac), L-MT-09-027, Extended Power Uprate: Response to Instrumentation and Controls Branch RAI No. 3 Dated April 6, 2009, L-MT-09-044, Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Mechanical and Civil Engineering Review Branch (Emcb) Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated March 28, 2009, L-MT-09-049, Drawing C.5-2007, Revision 15, Failure to Scram, L-MT-09-073, Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Containment and Ventilation Review Branch (Scvb) Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated July 2, 2009 and July 14, 2009, L-MT-09-083, Extended Power Uprate: Limit Curves Requested by the Mechanical and Civil Review Branch (Emcb) Associated with Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated March 20, 2009, L-MT-09-088, Extended Power Uprate: Revision to Clarify Text in Enclosures 5 and 7 of L-MT-08-052, L-MT-09-097, Extended Power Uprate: Acknowledgement of NRC Review Delay, L-MT-10-025, Extended Power Uprate (Epu): Response to NRC-NSPM February 25, 2010 Conference Call, L-MT-10-072, Extended Power Uprate: Updates to Docketed Information, L-MT-11-044, Uprate (Epu): Update on EPU Commitments, L-MT-12-056, WCAP-17549-NP, Rev. 0, Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer Structural Evaluation for High-Cycle Acoustic Loads Using ACE, L-MT-12-090, Westinghouse, LTR-A&SA-12-8, Rev. 1, Attachment B, Recommendations for Inspections of the Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer, L-MT-12-114, Drawing C.5-2007, Rev. 17, Failure to Scram, L-MT-13-020, Enclosure 1 - Responses to the Gap Analysis, L-MT-13-029, Enclosure 14 to L-MT-13-029 - WCAP-17716-NP, Revision 0, Benchmarking of the Acoustic Circuit Enhanced Revision 2.0 for the Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement Project, L-MT-13-091, WCAP-17716-NP, Revision 1 - Benchmarking of the Acoustic Circuit Enhanced Revision 2.0 for the Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement Project, Enclosure 14, L-MT-13-092, Extended Power Uprate (Epu): Completion of EPU Commitments, Proposed License Conditions and Revised Power Ascension Test Plan, L-MT-15-074, Enclosure 7, WCAP-18604-NP, Revision 0, Monticello EPU Main Steam Line Strain Data Evaluation Report, L-MT-16-017, Revised Commitment to Reconcile Analysis of Bypass Voiding for Transition to Areva Analysis Methodology, L-MT-16-071, Submittal of 2016 Annual Report of Changes in Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Models Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.46, ML083400402, ML083500575, ML083570610, ML083590127, ML090710680, ML090710682, ML090710683, ML091120578, ML091140470, ML091410121, ML091410122, ML091410123, ML091410124, ML091760769, ML092090321, ML092290250, ML092790191, ML092810554, ML093160816, ML093220925, ML093220964, ML093620024, ML100980009, ML101890915, ML102010461... further results
|
MONTHYEARML0920903212003-10-15015 October 2003
Drawing NX-7831-197-1, Rev D, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Reactor Vessel & Internals, Monticello, Unit 1
Project stage: Other
ML0907106832008-02-17017 February 2008
Enclosure 1 (Continued) to L-MT-09-004, NSPM Response to Containment & Ventilation Branch RAI Number 2, Attachment 1-1g Through End of Encl. 1
Project stage: Other
ML13064A4352008-03-20020 March 2008
CA-95-075, Main Steam Line High Flow Setpoint, Attachment 4
Project stage: Other
05000263/LER-2008-001, Re Non-Conservative High Energy Line Break Analysis Discovered During Extended Power Uprate Review2008-03-31031 March 2008
Re Non-Conservative High Energy Line Break Analysis Discovered During Extended Power Uprate Review
Project stage: Request
ML0914101242008-08-11011 August 2008
Calculation CA-08-050, Rev. 0, Instrument Setpoint Calculation - Average Power Range Monitor (APRM) Non-Flow Eiased Prnm Setpoints for Cl Tp and EPU
Project stage: Other
ML0826310122008-09-18018 September 2008
Special Inspection Charter for Loss of Normal Offsite Power to Non-Safety Buses and Resultant Reactor Scram on 9/11/2008
Project stage: Request
ML0832301122008-10-31031 October 2008
NEDC-33322-NP, Revision 3, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, Safety Analysis Report, Constant Pressure Power Uprate
Project stage: Request
L-MT-08-091, Calculation 0801040.301, Steam Dryer Outer Hood Submodel Analysis2008-10-31031 October 2008
Calculation 0801040.301, Steam Dryer Outer Hood Submodel Analysis
Project stage: Other
ML0832301112008-11-0505 November 2008
License Amendment Request: Extended Power Uprate
Project stage: Request
ML0832301142008-11-0505 November 2008
Steam Dryer Dynamic Stress Evaluation
Project stage: Request
ML0831106732008-11-0707 November 2008
Notice of Meeting with Nuclear Management Company to Discuss the November 05, 2008, License Amendment Application for Extended Power Uprate for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant
Project stage: Meeting
ML0832507042008-11-26026 November 2008
Meeting Summary, Meeting with Northern States Power Company to Discuss the November 5, 2008, Application for an Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Meeting
ML0834003662008-12-0202 December 2008
Extended Power Uprate Acceptance Review Questions on Probabilistic Risk Assessment Issues
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML0834004022008-12-0505 December 2008
Extended Power Uprate - Monticello - Request to Supplement the Application in the Probabilistic Risk Assessment Area
Project stage: Other
ML0835000992008-12-11011 December 2008
Extended Power Uprate (USNRC TAC MD9990): Acceptance Review Supplement Regarding Steam Dryer Outer Hood Submodel Analysis
Project stage: Supplement
ML0835303022008-12-16016 December 2008
Draft Request for Additional Information, Environmental Issues of EPU Application
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0936200242008-12-18018 December 2008
Report 0800760.401, Rev. 1, Flaw Evaluation and Vibration Assessment of Existing Monticello Steam Dryer Flaws for Extended Power Uprate
Project stage: Other
ML0914101222008-12-18018 December 2008
Calculation CA-95-075, Revision 1, Main Steam Line High Flow Setpoint
Project stage: Other
ML0835309982008-12-18018 December 2008
EPU Application - Additional RAI Question Regarding an Environmental Issue
Project stage: RAI
ML0835005752008-12-18018 December 2008
Letter Finding 11/5/08 Application for Amendment Acceptable for Review
Project stage: Other
ML0835310022008-12-18018 December 2008
Proposed Eou Amendment - Revised RAI Re. Containment Analysis
Project stage: RAI
ML0914101212008-12-19019 December 2008
Calculation CA-95-073, Revision 4, Reactor Low Water Level Scram Setpoint
Project stage: Other
ML0835901272009-01-14014 January 2009
Letter Conveying Determination That Enclosure 5 of 11/5/08 Application for EPU Amendment Contains Proprietary Information and Withheld from Public Disclosure
Project stage: Other
ML0835706102009-01-26026 January 2009
Letter Conveying Determination That Enclosure 11 of 11/5/08 Application for EPU Amendment Contains Proprietary Information and Is Withheld from Public Disclosure
Project stage: Other
L-MT-09-003, Response to NRC Environmental Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 18, 20082009-01-29029 January 2009
Response to NRC Environmental Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 18, 2008
Project stage: Other
L-MT-09-002, Response to NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 5, 20082009-02-0404 February 2009
Response to NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 5, 2008
Project stage: Other
L-MT-09-005, Revision to Attachment 1 of Enclosure 17 of MNGP License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate2009-02-0404 February 2009
Revision to Attachment 1 of Enclosure 17 of MNGP License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate
Project stage: Request
ML0904204852009-02-11011 February 2009
Draft RAI from Materials Engineering Re. Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0907106792009-02-17017 February 2009
Response to NRC Containment & Ventilation Branch Request for Additional Information (Rals) Dated December 18, 2008
Project stage: Request
ML0907106802009-02-17017 February 2009
Enclosure 1 to L-MT-09-004, NSPM Response to Containment & Ventilation Branch RAI Number 1 Dated December 18, 2008, Cover Through Copy of MNGP Appr T0406 Data Transmittal Page 424 of 424
Project stage: Other
ML0907106822009-02-17017 February 2009
Enclosure 1 (Continued) to L-MT-09-004, NSPM Response to Containment & Ventilation Branch RAI Number 2, Copy of MNGP Appr T0406 Data Transmittal Pages 1 of 538 Through Pages 538 of 538
Project stage: Other
L-MT-09-004, Enclosures 2 - 4: NSPM Response to Containment & Ventilation Branch RAI Numbers 2, 3 and 4 Dated December 18, 20082009-02-17017 February 2009
Enclosures 2 - 4: NSPM Response to Containment & Ventilation Branch RAI Numbers 2, 3 and 4 Dated December 18, 2008
Project stage: Other
L-MT-09-018, Response to NRC Steam Generator Tube Integrity & Chemical Engineering Branch Request for Additional Information (RAI) Dated February 11, 20092009-02-24024 February 2009
Response to NRC Steam Generator Tube Integrity & Chemical Engineering Branch Request for Additional Information (RAI) Dated February 11, 2009
Project stage: Request
ML0907100912009-03-11011 March 2009
Conveying Draft RAI Questions from the Instrumentation and Controls Branch Regarding the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0907200572009-03-12012 March 2009
Conveys Draft RAI Regarding Fire Protection for the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0907800062009-03-18018 March 2009
Draft RAI from Probabilistic Risk Assessment Licensing Branch on the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0907800042009-03-18018 March 2009
Conveys Draft RAI by the PRA Licensing Branch on the Proposed EPU Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0907809032009-03-19019 March 2009
Conveys Draft RAI Provided by the Containment and Ventilation Branch on the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0907809092009-03-19019 March 2009
RAI from the Containment and Ventilation Branch the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: RAI
L-MT-09-017, Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Reactor Systems Branch & Nuclear Performance & Code Review Branch Request for Additional Information (RAI) Dated January 16, 20092009-03-19019 March 2009
Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Reactor Systems Branch & Nuclear Performance & Code Review Branch Request for Additional Information (RAI) Dated January 16, 2009
Project stage: Request
ML0908200312009-03-20020 March 2009
Draft RAI Re. Health Physics Issues for the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0908200992009-03-23023 March 2009
Draft RAI from the Balance of Plant Branch Re the Proposed Amendment on Extended Power Uprate
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0908800022009-03-28028 March 2009
Second Portion of Draft RAI from the Mechanical and Civil Engineering Branch Regarding the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0908800032009-03-28028 March 2009
Draft RAI from the Electrical Engineering Branch Re. the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment for Monticello
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0908800012009-03-29029 March 2009
Additional Draft RAI Questions from the Containment and Ventilation Branch Proposed EPU Amendment for Monticello
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0910300172009-04-0606 April 2009
Conveys an Additional EPU Draft RAI Question from Instrumentation and Controls Branch
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0910300212009-04-0606 April 2009
Draft RAI Question from Instrumentation and Controls Branch Re. Proposed EPU Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0911205782009-04-22022 April 2009
Request for Audit of Implementation of Long-Term Stability Solution
Project stage: Other
L-MT-09-025, Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Reactor Systems Branch and Nuclear Performance & Code Review Branch Request for Additional Information (RAI) Dated February 23, 20092009-04-22022 April 2009
Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Reactor Systems Branch and Nuclear Performance & Code Review Branch Request for Additional Information (RAI) Dated February 23, 2009
Project stage: Request
ML0911902092009-04-29029 April 2009
Transmit Revised Draft RAI from the Probabilistic Risk Assessment Licensing Branch on the Proposed Extended Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
2009-01-14
[Table View] |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Beltz, Terry Sent:
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:12 AM To:
Fields, John S.
Cc:
gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com; McConnell, Matthew; Mathew, Roy; Carlson, Robert
Subject:
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review (TAC No. MD9990)
Attachments:
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information Regarding the EPU Gap Analysis Review (EEEB).docx
Dear Mr. Fields:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff in the Electrical Engineering Branch of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is currently supporting the review of the Extended Power Uprate (EPU) license amendment request for the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. The staff has reviewed your supplemental response associated with the EPU Gap Analysis and determined that additional information is required to complete its review. Draft requests for additional information (RAI) are attached.
You may accept these draft RAIs as a formal Requests for Additional Information and respond to the questions by April 12, 2013. Alternatively, you may request to discuss the contents of the RAIs with the NRC staff in a conference call, including any change to the proposed response date.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely, Terry A. Beltz, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-3049 Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
628 Mail Envelope Properties (7E9EA9BB82325E46B07B0F04F99B40D87C560368BF)
Subject:
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review (TAC No. MD9990)
Sent Date:
3/12/2013 6:12:08 AM Received Date:
3/12/2013 6:12:00 AM From:
Beltz, Terry Created By:
Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov Recipients:
"gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com" <gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com>
Tracking Status: None "McConnell, Matthew" <Matthew.McConnell@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Mathew, Roy" <Roy.Mathew@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Carlson, Robert" <Robert.Carlson@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Fields, John S." <John.Fields@xenuclear.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1126 3/12/2013 6:12:00 AM Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information Regarding the EPU Gap Analysis Review (EEEB).docx 16819 Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH EXTENDED POWER UPRATE REVIEW NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY - MINNESOTA (NSPM)
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-263
- 1) Please explain what is meant by Equipment Qualification Program Reconstitution.
- 2) Please provide the normal and accident levels for radiation, temperature, pressure, submergence, chemical spray effects, and humidity for all areas in which environmentally qualified equipment is installed in tabular form showing the Pre-EPU and EPU conditions, as well as the qualified values of EQ equipment in those areas.
- 3) Please modify Figures 27-1 and 27-2 to include the profile of the qualification level of EQ equipment to show that the EQ equipment will remain bounding under EPU conditions.
- 4) In response to Item 27, NSPM states the following:
As indicated above the full EQ analysis is now completed with only minor exceptions.
Please identify the minor exceptions and provide a discussion on each exception for its acceptability.
- 5) Provide the worst-case Design Basis loading under EPU conditions for the Class 1E station batteries and the capacity ratings for the Class 1E station batteries.
