IR 05000220/2013503: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:July 31, 2013
[[Issue date::July 31, 2013]]


Mr. Christopher Costanzo, Site Vice President Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, NY 13093-0063
==SUBJECT:==
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, LLC - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT NO.


SUBJECT: NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, LLC - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000220/2013503 AND 05000410/2013503
05000220/2013503 AND 05000410/2013503


==Dear Mr. Costanzo:==
==Dear Mr. Costanzo:==
On June 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the June 19, 2013, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise (EP) at your Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station. The enclosed Inspection Report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on June 21, 2013, with you and other members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of thDocuments Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
On June 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the June 19, 2013, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise (EP) at your Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station. The enclosed Inspection Report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on June 21, 2013, with you and other members of your staff.


Sincerely,/RA/ Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-220, 50-410 License Nos. DPR-63, NPF-69 C. Constanzo 2
The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
 
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.
 
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
 
Sincerely,
/RA/  
 
Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief  
 
Plant Support Branch 1  
 
Division of Reactor Safety  
 
Docket Nos.
 
50-220, 50-410 License Nos. DPR-63, NPF-69  
 
C. Constanzo  


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
NRC Inspection Report Nos. 05000220/2013503 and 05000410/2013503 cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ R. Thomson, RAC Chair, FEMA, Region II
NRC Inspection Report Nos. 05000220/2013503 and 05000410/2013503  
 
REGION I==
Docket No:  
 
50-220, 50-410


ML13212A219 SUNSI Review Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRS RI/DRP RI/DRS NAME SBarr DSchroeder ADimitriadis DATE 07/31/2013 07/29/2013 07/31/2013 cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ R. Thomson, RAC Chair, FEMA, Region II Distribution w/encl: (via E-mail) W. Dean, RA D. Lew, DRA D. Roberts, DRP A. Burritt, DRP R. Lorson, DRS J. Rogge, DRS D. Schroeder, DRP A. Rosebrook, DRP B. Scrabeck, DRP K. Kolaczyk, DRP, SRI E. Miller, DRP, RI V. Campbell, RI OEDO RidsNrrPMNineMilePoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource ROPReports Resource S. Barr, DRS A. Dimitriadis, DRS R. Kahler, NSIR/EPD S. LaVie, NSIR/EPD i Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I Docket No: 50-220, 50-410 License No: DPR-63, NPF-69 Report No: 05000220/2013503 and 05000410/2013503 Licensee: Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC Facility: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Units 1 and 2 Location: Oswego, New York Dates: June 17-21, 2013 Inspectors: S. Barr, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I (Lead) E. Burket, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I T. Fish, Senior Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I J. DeMarshall, Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I S. LaVie, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist, NSIR Approved By: Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety ii Enclosure  
License No:  
 
DPR-63, NPF-69  
 
Report No:  
 
05000220/2013503 and 05000410/2013503  
 
Licensee:  
 
Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC  
 
Facility:  
 
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Units 1 and 2  
 
Location:  
 
Oswego, New York  
 
Dates:  
 
June 17-21, 2013  
 
Inspectors:  
 
S. Barr, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I (Lead)  
 
E. Burket, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I  
 
T. Fish, Senior Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I  
 
J. DeMarshall, Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I  
 
S. LaVie, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist, NSIR  
 
Approved By:
Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief  
 
Plant Support Branch 1  
 
Division of Reactor Safety  
 
ii Enclosure  


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
IR 05000220/2013503, 05000410/2013503; 6/17/2013-6/21/2013; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station; Exercise Evaluation; Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification. This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors and one headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-
IR 05000220/2013503, 05000410/2013503; 6/17/2013-6/21/2013; Nine Mile Point Nuclear  
 
Station; Exercise Evaluation; Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification.
 
This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors and one headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.


===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings===
No findings were identified.
B.
Licensee-Identified Findings


===A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings===
None.
No findings were identified. B. Licensee-Identified Findings  None.


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=


==REACTOR SAFETY==
==REACTOR SAFETY==
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness (EP)===
1EP7 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01 - 1 Sample)
====a. Inspection Scope====
On June 19, 2013, Constellation conducted a Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station biennial emergency preparedness exercise. The NRC inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the licensees conduct of the exercise and its capability to assess Constellation staff performance via a formal critique process, as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.


===Cornerstone:===
The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:  
Emergency Preparedness (EP)  1EP7 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01  1 Sample)


====a. Inspection Scope====
The adequacy of Constellations performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are: emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively.
On June 19, 2013, Constellation conducted a Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station biennial emergency preparedness exercise. The NRC inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the performance via a formal critique process, as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.


The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:  The adequacy of Constellations performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are:  emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively.
The overall adequacy of Constellations emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, the offsite alternative facility, the incident command post, and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).


The overall adequacy of Constellation emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, the offsite alternative facility, the incident command post, and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
A review of other performance areas, such as the licensees ERO recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.


A review of other performance areas, such as the licenseeERO recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.
A review of past performance issues from the last NRC NMP exercise inspection report and Constellations EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the June 19, 2013, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14)


A review of past performance issues from the last NRC NMP exercise inspection report and Constellation EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the June 19, 2013, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14)  -exercise critiques, to evaluate Constellation-assessment of its ERO performance during the June 19, 2013, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.
The licensees post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Constellations self-assessment of its ERO performance during the June 19, 2013, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.


The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified. 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review (71114.08 1 Sample)
No findings were identified.
 
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Prior to the June 19, 2013, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Constellation had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.
Prior to the June 19, 2013, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Constellation had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.
 
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 74: Line 157:
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)==
{{a|4OA1}}
{{a|4OA1}}
==4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification (71151==
3 Samples)


==4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification (71151 - 3 Samples)==
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed data for the NMP EP PIs, which are: (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP); (2) Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation; and, (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability. The last EP inspection at NMP was conducted in the third calendar quarter of 2012, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the third calendar quarter of 2012 through the first calendar quarter of 2013, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99- This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.
The inspectors reviewed data for the NMP EP PIs, which are:
: (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP);
: (2) Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation; and,
: (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability. The last EP inspection at NMP was conducted in the third calendar quarter of 2012, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the third calendar quarter of 2012 through the first calendar quarter of 2013, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, Revision 6.
 
This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
{{a|4OA6}}


{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit==
==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit==
On June 21, 2013, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. C. Costanzo, NMP Site Vice President, and other members of the Constellation staff.
On June 21, 2013, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. C. Costanzo, NMP Site Vice President, and other members of the Constellation staff.
Line 89: Line 176:
The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.
The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.


ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT  


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=


==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
===Licensee Personnel===
===Licensee Personnel===
: [[contact::C. Costanzo]], NMP Site Vice President  
: [[contact::C. Costanzo]], NMP Site Vice President  
: [[contact::A. Verno]], NMP Emergency Planning Manager  
: [[contact::A. Verno]], NMP Emergency Planning Manager  
 
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
None.  
None.  
 
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==Section 1EP1: Exercise Evaluation==
: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Site Emergency Plan (Revision 59) Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Nine Mile Point June 19, 2013, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package
: CNG-EP-1.01-1006, Drill and Exercise Scheduling and Preparation (Revision 3)
: CNG-EP-1.01-1007, Evaluation and Documentation of Drills, Exercises and Classified Events  (Revision 1) Nine Mile Point Emergency Preparedness Drill Reports, July 2012
: June 2013
===Condition Reports===
generated from the June 19, 2013, Exercise (As documented in Nine Mile
: Point Graded Exercise Evaluation Report
: NMP-EP-EX-13-3, dated July 15, 2013)
==Section 1EP8: Exercise Evaluation==
: Scenario Review Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Nine Mile Point June 19, 2013, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package
: CNG-EP-1.01-1006, Drill and Exercise Scheduling and Preparation (Revision 1)


==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification==
: CNG-EP-1.01-1001, Emergency Preparedness Program Responsibilities
: And Oversight (Revision 1) CNG-
: FS-1.01-1000, Key Performance Indicator and Measurement Process (Revision 3)
: EPMP-EPP-05, Emergency Planning Self-Assessment (Revision 18) Alert Notification System PI data, July 2012
: March 2013 DEP PI data, July 2012
: March 2013 ERO Drill Participation PI data, July 2012
: March 2013 
: Attachment
==LIST OF ACRONYMS==
: [[ADAMS]] [[Agencywide Documents Access and Management System]]
: [[ANS]] [[Alert Notification System]]
: [[AR]] [[Action Request]]
: [[DEP]] [[Drill and Exercise Performance]]
: [[EOF]] [[Emergency Operations Facility]]
: [[EP]] [[Emergency Preparedness]]
: [[ERO]] [[Emergency Response Organization]]
: [[NMP]] [[Nine Mile Point]]
: [[NRC]] [[Nuclear Regulatory Commission]]
: [[PAR]] [[Protective Action Recommendation]]
: [[PI]] [[Performance Indicator]]
: [[RSPS]] [[Risk Significant Planning Standard]]
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 06:24, 11 January 2025

IR 05000220-13-503 and 05000410-13-503, June 17-21, 2013, Nine Mile Point NRC Evaluated Emergency Preparedness Exercise
ML13212A219
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/2013
From: Dimitriadis T
Plant Support Branch 1
To: Costanzo C
Nine Mile Point
Dimitriadis A
References
IR-13-503
Download: ML13212A219 (11)


Text

July 31, 2013

SUBJECT:

NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, LLC - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT NO.

05000220/2013503 AND 05000410/2013503

Dear Mr. Costanzo:

On June 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the June 19, 2013, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise (EP) at your Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station. The enclosed Inspection Report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on June 21, 2013, with you and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief

Plant Support Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.

50-220, 50-410 License Nos. DPR-63, NPF-69

C. Constanzo

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report Nos. 05000220/2013503 and 05000410/2013503

REGION I==

Docket No:

50-220, 50-410

License No:

DPR-63, NPF-69

Report No:

05000220/2013503 and 05000410/2013503

Licensee:

Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC

Facility:

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Units 1 and 2

Location:

Oswego, New York

Dates:

June 17-21, 2013

Inspectors:

S. Barr, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I (Lead)

E. Burket, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I

T. Fish, Senior Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I

J. DeMarshall, Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I

S. LaVie, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist, NSIR

Approved By:

Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief

Plant Support Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

ii Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000220/2013503, 05000410/2013503; 6/17/2013-6/21/2013; Nine Mile Point Nuclear

Station; Exercise Evaluation; Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification.

This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors and one headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

No findings were identified.

B.

Licensee-Identified Findings

None.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness (EP)

1EP7 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01 - 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

On June 19, 2013, Constellation conducted a Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station biennial emergency preparedness exercise. The NRC inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the licensees conduct of the exercise and its capability to assess Constellation staff performance via a formal critique process, as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.

The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:

The adequacy of Constellations performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are: emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively.

The overall adequacy of Constellations emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, the offsite alternative facility, the incident command post, and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).

A review of other performance areas, such as the licensees ERO recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.

A review of past performance issues from the last NRC NMP exercise inspection report and Constellations EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the June 19, 2013, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14)

The licensees post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Constellations self-assessment of its ERO performance during the June 19, 2013, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.

The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the June 19, 2013, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Constellation had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.

The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification (71151 - 3 Samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed data for the NMP EP PIs, which are:

(1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP);
(2) Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation; and,
(3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability. The last EP inspection at NMP was conducted in the third calendar quarter of 2012, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the third calendar quarter of 2012 through the first calendar quarter of 2013, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, Revision 6.

This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, including Exit

On June 21, 2013, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. C. Costanzo, NMP Site Vice President, and other members of the Constellation staff.

The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.

ATTACHMENT

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

C. Costanzo, NMP Site Vice President
A. Verno, NMP Emergency Planning Manager

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

None.

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED