IR 05000247/2013013: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ber 19, 2013
{{#Wiki_filter:November 19, 2013


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
NRC INVESTIGATION REPORT NO. 1-2013-003 AND NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000247/2013013 AND 05000286/2013013
NRC INVESTIGATION REPORT NO. 1-2013-003 AND NRC INSPECTION  
 
REPORT NO. 05000247/2013013 AND 05000286/2013013


==Dear Mr. Ventosa:==
==Dear Mr. Ventosa:==
Line 29: Line 31:
Based on the evidence gathered during the OI investigation, including the Coordinators admission to the Access and Fitness for Duty Supervisor at IPEC, the NRC concluded that on three separate occasions while processing access authorization applications, the Coordinator deliberately created false records maintained in the access authorization files regarding his contact with three individuals who were seeking site access. Specifically, the Coordinator recorded in the files that he had spoken to one individual regarding a financial matter disclosed on the personnel history questionnaire (PHQ); a second individual regarding the response to two questions on the PHQ; and to a third individual regarding the failure to report an arrest; when in fact, the Coordinator had not spoken to any of these three individuals.
Based on the evidence gathered during the OI investigation, including the Coordinators admission to the Access and Fitness for Duty Supervisor at IPEC, the NRC concluded that on three separate occasions while processing access authorization applications, the Coordinator deliberately created false records maintained in the access authorization files regarding his contact with three individuals who were seeking site access. Specifically, the Coordinator recorded in the files that he had spoken to one individual regarding a financial matter disclosed on the personnel history questionnaire (PHQ); a second individual regarding the response to two questions on the PHQ; and to a third individual regarding the failure to report an arrest; when in fact, the Coordinator had not spoken to any of these three individuals.


In the first two cases, the information was disclosed by the individuals and would not have likely triggered an interview of the individuals in accordance with regulatory requirements and the specific circumstance of the cases. Therefore, these facts did not cause Entergy to be in violation of any NRC requirements. In the third case, the Coordinator did not follow-up with the individual after discovering a discrepancy between the results of a FBI criminal history check and the criminal history submitted by the individual on the PHQ. This type of discrepancy would have triggered an interview with the individual for clarification, per regulatory requirements in 10 CFR 73.56(d)(7), which state, in part, that the licensees reviewing official shall evaluate the entire criminal history record of an individual who is applying for unescorted access or unescorted access authorization so as to determine whether the individual has a record of criminal activity that may adversely impact his or her trustworthiness and reliability.
In the first two cases, the information was disclosed by the individuals and would not have likely triggered an interview of the individuals in accordance with regulatory requirements and the specific circumstance of the cases. Therefore, these facts did not cause Entergy to be in violation of any NRC requirements. In the third case, the Coordinator did not follow-up with the individual after discovering a discrepancy between the results of a FBI criminal history check and the criminal history submitted by the individual on the PHQ. This type of discrepancy would have triggered an interview with the individual for clarification, per regulatory requirements in 10 CFR 73.56(d)(7), which state, in part, that the licensees reviewing official shall evaluate the  
 
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
==REGION I==
2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406-2713 entire criminal history record of an individual who is applying for unescorted access or unescorted access authorization so as to determine whether the individual has a record of criminal activity that may adversely impact his or her trustworthiness and reliability.


If the Access and Fitness for Duty Supervisor (Supervisor) had not detected the criminal history discrepancy, completed the second review of the application, and conducted an interview with the individual, the Coordinators actions would have caused a violation by Entergy. In this case, the Supervisor served as the reviewing official and a violation was prevented. Therefore, the NRC did not determine IPEC to be in violation.
If the Access and Fitness for Duty Supervisor (Supervisor) had not detected the criminal history discrepancy, completed the second review of the application, and conducted an interview with the individual, the Coordinators actions would have caused a violation by Entergy. In this case, the Supervisor served as the reviewing official and a violation was prevented. Therefore, the NRC did not determine IPEC to be in violation.
Line 40: Line 47:


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/
/RA/  
Darrell J. Roberts Director Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 cc: Distribution via ListServ entire criminal history record of an individual who is applying for unescorted access or unescorted access authorization so as to determine whether the individual has a record of criminal activity that may adversely impact his or her trustworthiness and reliability.
 
Darrell J. Roberts Director  
 
Division of Reactor Projects  
 
Docket Nos.
 
50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64  
 
cc: Distribution via ListServ entire criminal history record of an individual who is applying for unescorted access or unescorted access authorization so as to determine whether the individual has a record of criminal activity that may adversely impact his or her trustworthiness and reliability.


If the Access and Fitness for Duty Supervisor (Supervisor) had not detected the criminal history discrepancy, completed the second review of the application, and conducted an interview with the individual, the Coordinators actions would have caused a violation by Entergy. In this case, the Supervisor served as the reviewing official and a violation was prevented. Therefore, the NRC did not determine IPEC to be in violation.
If the Access and Fitness for Duty Supervisor (Supervisor) had not detected the criminal history discrepancy, completed the second review of the application, and conducted an interview with the individual, the Coordinators actions would have caused a violation by Entergy. In this case, the Supervisor served as the reviewing official and a violation was prevented. Therefore, the NRC did not determine IPEC to be in violation.
Line 52: Line 68:


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/
/RA/  
Darrell J. Roberts Director Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 cc: Distribution via ListServ Distribution: (via email)
 
See next page DOC NAME: S:\Enf-allg\Enforcement\Proposed-Actions\Region1\Indian Point Falsification of Rec. Clst Ltr EA-13-172.docx ADAMS Accession No. ML13325A969 X Non-Sensitive   X Publicly Available X SUNSI Review/ CJC Sensitive    Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/ORA RI/DRP RI\DRS RI\DRS RI\OI RI/RC NAME C Crisden/CJC* A Burritt/TCS for* A Dimitriadis/AD* R Lorson/RL* J Teator/JAT* L Clark DATE 10/31/2013 11/4/2013 11/5/13 11/5/13 11/6/13 11/14/13 OFFICE RI\ORA OE OGC RI/DRP NAME D Holody/DJH* D Furst via email J Gilman via email D Roberts/DJR DATE 11/7/13 10/31/13 10/31/13 11/19/13
Darrell J. Roberts Director  
  *See previous concurrence Distribution: (via email)
 
Division of Reactor Projects  
 
Docket Nos.
 
50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64  
 
cc: Distribution via ListServ  
 
Distribution: (via email)
See next page  
 
DOC NAME: S:\\Enf-allg\\Enforcement\\Proposed-Actions\\Region1\\Indian Point Falsification of Rec. Clst Ltr EA-13-172.docx ADAMS Accession No. ML13325A969  
 
X SUNSI Review/ CJC
 
X Non-Sensitive  
 
Sensitive
 
X Publicly Available  
 
Non-Publicly Available  
 
OFFICE RI/ORA RI/DRP RI\\DRS RI\\DRS RI\\OI RI/RC NAME C Crisden/CJC*
A Burritt/TCS for*
A Dimitriadis/AD*
R Lorson/RL*
J Teator/JAT*
L Clark DATE 10/31/2013 11/4/2013 11/5/13 11/5/13 11/6/13 11/14/13 OFFICE RI\\ORA OE OGC RI/DRP  
 
NAME D Holody/DJH*
D Furst via email J Gilman via email D Roberts/DJR  
 
DATE 11/7/13 10/31/13 10/31/13 11/19/13  
* See previous concurrence Distribution: (via email)
W. Dean, RI, RA D. Lew, DRA D. Roberts, DRP M. Scott, DRP R. Lorson, DRS J. Trapp, DRS A. Dimitriadis, DRS D. Screnci / N. Sheehan, OPA N. McNamara/ D. Tifft, RI E. Monteith, RI D. Holody, RI R. Urban, RI M. McLaughlin, RI C. Crisden, RI A. Burritt, DRP T. Setzer, DRP L. McKown, DRP J. Petch, DRP J. S. Stewart, SRI A. Patel, RI T. Lamb, RI D. Hochmuth, AA C. ODaniell, RI Enforcement Coordinators RII, RIII, RIV (C. Evans, S. Orth, H. Gepford)
W. Dean, RI, RA D. Lew, DRA D. Roberts, DRP M. Scott, DRP R. Lorson, DRS J. Trapp, DRS A. Dimitriadis, DRS D. Screnci / N. Sheehan, OPA N. McNamara/ D. Tifft, RI E. Monteith, RI D. Holody, RI R. Urban, RI M. McLaughlin, RI C. Crisden, RI A. Burritt, DRP T. Setzer, DRP L. McKown, DRP J. Petch, DRP J. S. Stewart, SRI A. Patel, RI T. Lamb, RI D. Hochmuth, AA C. ODaniell, RI Enforcement Coordinators RII, RIII, RIV (C. Evans, S. Orth, H. Gepford)
D. Furst, OE J. Gilman, OGC M. Halter, NRR S. Coker, NSIR J. Teator, OI S. Coughlin, OI M. Holmes, OI R1DRPMailResource R1 OE Files (with concurrences)
D. Furst, OE J. Gilman, OGC M. Halter, NRR S. Coker, NSIR J. Teator, OI S. Coughlin, OI M. Holmes, OI R1DRPMailResource R1 OE Files (with concurrences)
ROPreportsResource@nrc.gov RidsNrrPMIndianPoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource
ROPreportsResource@nrc.gov RidsNrrPMIndianPoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 01:57, 11 January 2025

IR 05000247-13-013 and 05000286-13-013, July 5, 2013, and Investigation Report 1-2013-003, Indian Point
ML13325A969
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/19/2013
From: Darrell Roberts
Division Reactor Projects I
To: Ventosa J
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Burritt A
References
1-2013-003, EA-13-172 IR 13-013, IR-1-2013-003
Download: ML13325A969 (4)


Text

November 19, 2013

SUBJECT:

NRC INVESTIGATION REPORT NO. 1-2013-003 AND NRC INSPECTION

REPORT NO. 05000247/2013013 AND 05000286/2013013

Dear Mr. Ventosa:

This letter refers to the investigation conducted by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (OI) at Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC). The OI investigation, which was completed on July 5, 2013, was conducted to determine whether a Security Coordinator for Access and Fitness for Duty (Coordinator) deliberately falsified access authorization records. The investigation was initiated after Entergy informed the NRC on September 13, 2012, that the Coordinator in question had potentially falsified information on possibly three access authorization forms related to workers being processed at IPEC to support a refueling outage at the James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Station (JAF). Entergy also informed the NRC at that time that Entergy conducted an investigation and terminated the Coordinators employment with Entergy at IPEC.

Based on the evidence gathered during the OI investigation, including the Coordinators admission to the Access and Fitness for Duty Supervisor at IPEC, the NRC concluded that on three separate occasions while processing access authorization applications, the Coordinator deliberately created false records maintained in the access authorization files regarding his contact with three individuals who were seeking site access. Specifically, the Coordinator recorded in the files that he had spoken to one individual regarding a financial matter disclosed on the personnel history questionnaire (PHQ); a second individual regarding the response to two questions on the PHQ; and to a third individual regarding the failure to report an arrest; when in fact, the Coordinator had not spoken to any of these three individuals.

In the first two cases, the information was disclosed by the individuals and would not have likely triggered an interview of the individuals in accordance with regulatory requirements and the specific circumstance of the cases. Therefore, these facts did not cause Entergy to be in violation of any NRC requirements. In the third case, the Coordinator did not follow-up with the individual after discovering a discrepancy between the results of a FBI criminal history check and the criminal history submitted by the individual on the PHQ. This type of discrepancy would have triggered an interview with the individual for clarification, per regulatory requirements in 10 CFR 73.56(d)(7), which state, in part, that the licensees reviewing official shall evaluate the

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406-2713 entire criminal history record of an individual who is applying for unescorted access or unescorted access authorization so as to determine whether the individual has a record of criminal activity that may adversely impact his or her trustworthiness and reliability.

If the Access and Fitness for Duty Supervisor (Supervisor) had not detected the criminal history discrepancy, completed the second review of the application, and conducted an interview with the individual, the Coordinators actions would have caused a violation by Entergy. In this case, the Supervisor served as the reviewing official and a violation was prevented. Therefore, the NRC did not determine IPEC to be in violation.

You are not required to respond to this letter. However, should you chose to respond, your response should be sent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region I, 2100 Renaissance Boulevard, Suite 100, King of Prussia, PA 19406, and marked Open by Addressee Only, within 30 days of the date of this letter, with a copy to the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at IPEC.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, and your response if you choose to provide one, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room and from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Arthur Burritt at (610) 337-5069.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Darrell J. Roberts Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.

50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64

cc: Distribution via ListServ entire criminal history record of an individual who is applying for unescorted access or unescorted access authorization so as to determine whether the individual has a record of criminal activity that may adversely impact his or her trustworthiness and reliability.

If the Access and Fitness for Duty Supervisor (Supervisor) had not detected the criminal history discrepancy, completed the second review of the application, and conducted an interview with the individual, the Coordinators actions would have caused a violation by Entergy. In this case, the Supervisor served as the reviewing official and a violation was prevented. Therefore, the NRC did not determine IPEC to be in violation.

You are not required to respond to this letter. However, should you chose to respond, your response should be sent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region I, 2100 Renaissance Boulevard, Suite 100, King of Prussia, PA 19406, and marked Open by Addressee Only, within 30 days of the date of this letter, with a copy to the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at IPEC.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, and your response if you choose to provide one, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room and from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Arthur Burritt at (610) 337-5069.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Darrell J. Roberts Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.

50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64

cc: Distribution via ListServ

Distribution: (via email)

See next page

DOC NAME: S:\\Enf-allg\\Enforcement\\Proposed-Actions\\Region1\\Indian Point Falsification of Rec. Clst Ltr EA-13-172.docx ADAMS Accession No. ML13325A969

X SUNSI Review/ CJC

X Non-Sensitive

Sensitive

X Publicly Available

Non-Publicly Available

OFFICE RI/ORA RI/DRP RI\\DRS RI\\DRS RI\\OI RI/RC NAME C Crisden/CJC*

A Burritt/TCS for*

A Dimitriadis/AD*

R Lorson/RL*

J Teator/JAT*

L Clark DATE 10/31/2013 11/4/2013 11/5/13 11/5/13 11/6/13 11/14/13 OFFICE RI\\ORA OE OGC RI/DRP

NAME D Holody/DJH*

D Furst via email J Gilman via email D Roberts/DJR

DATE 11/7/13 10/31/13 10/31/13 11/19/13

  • See previous concurrence Distribution: (via email)

W. Dean, RI, RA D. Lew, DRA D. Roberts, DRP M. Scott, DRP R. Lorson, DRS J. Trapp, DRS A. Dimitriadis, DRS D. Screnci / N. Sheehan, OPA N. McNamara/ D. Tifft, RI E. Monteith, RI D. Holody, RI R. Urban, RI M. McLaughlin, RI C. Crisden, RI A. Burritt, DRP T. Setzer, DRP L. McKown, DRP J. Petch, DRP J. S. Stewart, SRI A. Patel, RI T. Lamb, RI D. Hochmuth, AA C. ODaniell, RI Enforcement Coordinators RII, RIII, RIV (C. Evans, S. Orth, H. Gepford)

D. Furst, OE J. Gilman, OGC M. Halter, NRR S. Coker, NSIR J. Teator, OI S. Coughlin, OI M. Holmes, OI R1DRPMailResource R1 OE Files (with concurrences)

ROPreportsResource@nrc.gov RidsNrrPMIndianPoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource