IR 05000277/2014502: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name = Dimitriadis A
| author name = Dimitriadis A
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB1
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB1
| addressee name = Pacilio M J
| addressee name = Pacilio M
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear
| docket = 05000277, 05000278
| docket = 05000277, 05000278
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES  NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION    REGION I  2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD  KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406 May 21, 2014 Mr. Michael Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
{{#Wiki_filter:May 21, 2014


SUBJECT: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION: NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT 05000277/2014502 AND 05000278/2014502
==SUBJECT:==
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION: NRC EVALUATED  
 
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT  
 
05000277/2014502 AND 05000278/2014502


==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
On April 10, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the April 8, 2014, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS). The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on April 10, 2014, with Mr. Michael Massaro, Peach Bottom Site Vice President, and other members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.
On April 10, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the April 8, 2014, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS). The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on April 10, 2014, with Mr. Michael Massaro, Peach Bottom Site Vice President, and other members of your staff.
 
The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
 
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.


In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).


Sincerely,/RA/ Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-277, 50-278 License Nos.: DPR-44, DPR-56  
Sincerely,
/RA/  
 
Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief  
 
Plant Support Branch 1  
 
Division of Reactor Safety  
 
Docket Nos.: 50-277, 50-278 License Nos.: DPR-44, DPR-56  


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
NRC Inspection Report No. 05000277/2014502 and 05000278/2014502 cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ G. Cannon, Director, PA Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) and Office of Homeland Security Advisor J. Price, RAC Chair (Acting), FEMA Region III R. Ayers, Deputy Mgr, Harford County Div of Emergency Operations S. Ayers, Emergency Planner, Harford County Div of Emergency Operations R. Brooks, Director, Cecil County Dept of Emergency Services Mr. Michael
NRC Inspection Report No. 05000277/2014502 and 05000278/2014502  
 
REGION I==
Docket Nos.:
50-277, 50-278
 
License Nos.: DPR-44, DPR-56
 
Report No.: 05000277/2014502 and 05000278/2014502
 
Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC
 
Facility: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3
 
Location: Delta, Pennsylvania
 
Dates:  
 
April 7-11, 2014
 
Inspectors:
 
S. Barr, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), Region I (Lead)  
 
E. Burket, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I J. Cherubini, Senior Physical Security Inspector, DRS, Region I S. McCarver, Physical Security Inspector, DRS, Region I
 
T. Fish, Senior Operations Inspector, DRS, Region I
 
S. Hansell, Senior Resident Inspector, Peach Bottom, DRP, Region I
 
B. Smith, Resident Inspector, Peach Bottom, DRP, Region I
 
Approved By:
Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief
 
Plant Support Branch 1
 
Division of Reactor Safety
 
ii Enclosure


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
Inspection Report 05000277/2014502; 05000278/2014502; 4/7-11, 2014; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action (HA) Event; Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification. This was an announced inspection conducted by five Region I-based inspectors and two resident inspectors. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.
Inspection Report 05000277/2014502; 05000278/2014502; 4/7-11, 2014; Peach Bottom Atomic  
 
Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action (HA) Event; Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification.
 
This was an announced inspection conducted by five Region I-based inspectors and two resident inspectors. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.


===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
Line 41: Line 102:


==REACTOR SAFETY==
==REACTOR SAFETY==
 
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness (EP)===
===Cornerstone:===
1EP7 Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event (71114.07 - 1 Sample)
Emergency Preparedness (EP) 1EP7 Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event (71114.07 - 1 Sample)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, requires in part that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each eight calendar year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their emergency response organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a hostile action (HA) directed at the plant site. Exelon designed the April 8, 2014, Peach Bottom EP exercise to satisfy that requirement, and the NRC inspected the Peach Bottom HA event exercise to assess Exelon's ability to effectively implement the Peach Bottom Emergency Plan during an HA event. This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:  The adequacy of Exelon ERO's performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are:  emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively.
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, requires in part that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each eight calendar year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their emergency response organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a hostile action (HA) directed at the plant site. Exelon designed the April 8, 2014, Peach Bottom EP exercise to satisfy that requirement, and the NRC inspected the Peach Bottom HA event exercise to assess Exelons ability to effectively implement the Peach Bottom Emergency Plan during an HA event. This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.


The overall adequacy of Exelon's emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, the Alternative Facility, the Central Alarm Station (CAS), the local county Incident Command Post (ICP), and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:
* The adequacy of Exelon EROs performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are: emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively.
* The overall adequacy of Exelons emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, the Alternative Facility, the Central Alarm Station (CAS), the local county Incident Command Post (ICP), and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
* A review of other performance areas, such as the Exelon EROs: recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.
* A review of past performance issues from the last NRC Peach Bottom exercise inspection report and recent Exelon Peach Bottom EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the April 8, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
* The licensees post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Exelons self-assessment of its Peach Bottom ERO performance during the April 8, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.


A review of other performance areas, such as the Exelon ERO's:  recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.


A review of past performance issues from the last NRC Peach Bottom exercise inspection report and recent Exelon Peach Bottom EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the April 8, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.


The licensee's post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Exelon's self-assessment of its Peach Bottom ERO performance during the April 8, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g. The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample)


====b. Findings====
====a. Inspection Scope====
No findings were identified. 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample)
Prior to the April 8, 2014, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Exelon had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Peach Bottom Emergency Plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.


====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.
Prior to the April 8, 2014, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Exelon had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Peach Bottom Emergency Plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 67: Line 132:
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)==
{{a|4OA1}}
{{a|4OA1}}
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151 - 3 Samples)==
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151 - 3 Samples)==
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed data for the Peach Bottom EP Performance Indicators (PI),which are:
: (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP) (EP01);
: (2) ERO Drill Participation (EP02); and
: (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability (EP03). The last NRC EP inspection at Peach Bottom was conducted in the first calendar quarter of 2013, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the first calendar quarter of 2013 through the first calendar quarter of 2014, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, Revision 7.


====a. Inspection Scope====
This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.
The inspectors reviewed data for the Peach Bottom EP Performance Indicators (PI), which are:  (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP) (EP01); (2) ERO Drill Participation (EP02); and (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability (EP03). The last NRC EP inspection at Peach Bottom was conducted in the first calendar quarter of 2013, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the first calendar quarter of 2013 through the first calendar quarter of 2014, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines," Revision 7. This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
{{a|4OA6}}


{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit==
==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit==
On April 10, 2014, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. M. Massaro, Peach Bottom Site Vice President, and other members of the Exelon staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.
On April 10, 2014, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. M. Massaro, Peach Bottom Site Vice President, and other members of the Exelon staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.


ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT  


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=


==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
===Licensee Personnel===
===Licensee Personnel===
: [[contact::M. Massaro]], Peach Bottom Site Vice President  
: [[contact::M. Massaro]], Peach Bottom Site Vice President  
: [[contact::V. Cwietniewicz]], Exelon Mid-Atlantic Emergency Planning Manager  
: [[contact::V. Cwietniewicz]], Exelon Mid-Atlantic Emergency Planning Manager  
: [[contact::N. Alexakos]], Peach Bottom Emergency Planning Manager  
: [[contact::N. Alexakos]], Peach Bottom Emergency Planning Manager  
 
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
None.  
None.  
 
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==Section 1EP7: Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action (HA) Event==
: EP-AA-1000, Exelon Nuclear Standardized Emergency Plan (Revision 24)
: EP-AA-1007, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Emergency Plan Annex (Revision 28)
: EP-AA-122, Drill and Exercise Program (Revision 15)
: EP-AA-122-200, Drill and Exercise Execution (Revision 0)
: EP-AA-122-300, Drill and Exercise Evaluation (Revision 0)
: SE-23, Response to Security Threats - Procedure (Revision 18) Peach Bottom Emergency Plan lmplementing Procedures Peach Bottom April 8, 2014, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package Peach Bottom Emergency Preparedness Drill Reports, January 2013 - March 2014 Condition Reports generated as a result of the April 8, 2014, exercise  (As documented in Peach Bottom Graded Exercise Evaluation Report, dated May 7, 2014)
==Section 1EP8: Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review==
: EP-AA-1000, Exelon Nuclear Standardized Emergency Plan (Revision 24)
: EP-AA-1007, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Emergency Plan Annex (Revision 28)
: EP-AA-122, Drill and Exercise Program (Revision 15)
: EP-AA-122-100, Drill and Exercise Planning and Scheduling (Revision 0) Peach Bottom April 8, 2014, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package Attachment


==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification==
: LS-AA-2110, Monthly Data Elements for NRC Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation (Revision 6)
: LS-AA-2120, Monthly Data Elements for NRC Drill/Exercise Performance (Revision 4)
: LS-AA-2130, Monthly Data Elements for NRC Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability  (Revision 5)
: EP-AA-125-1001, EP Performance Indicator Guidance (Revision 7) DEP PI data, January 2013 - March 2014 ERO Drill Participation PI data, January 2013 - March 2014 ANS Reliability PI data, January 2013 - March 2014
==LIST OF ACRONYMS==
: [[ADAMS]] [[Agencywide Documents Access and Management System]]
: [[ANS]] [[Alert Notification System]]
: [[CAS]] [[Central Alarm Station]]
: [[CFR]] [[Code of Federal Regulations]]
: [[DEP]] [[Drill and Exercise Performance]]
: [[EOF]] [[Emergency Operations Facility]]
: [[EP]] [[Emergency Preparedness]]
: [[ERO]] [[Emergency Response Organization]]
: [[HA]] [[Hostile Action]]
: [[ICP]] [[Incident Command Post]]
: [[NEI]] [[Nuclear Energy Institute]]
: [[NRC]] [[Nuclear Regulatory Commission]]
: [[PAR]] [[Protective Action Recommendation]]
: [[PBAPS]] [[Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station]]
: [[PI]] [[Performance Indicator]]
: [[RSPS]] [[Risk Significant Planning Standard]]
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 20:36, 10 January 2025

IR 05000277-14-502 & 05000278-14-502; 4/7-11/2014; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Exercise Evaluation, Hostile Action (Ha) Event; Exercise Evaluation, Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification
ML14142A024
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/21/2014
From: Anthony Dimitriadis
Plant Support Branch 1
To: Pacilio M
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
IR-14-502
Download: ML14142A024 (10)


Text

May 21, 2014

SUBJECT:

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION: NRC EVALUATED

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT

05000277/2014502 AND 05000278/2014502

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

On April 10, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the April 8, 2014, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS). The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on April 10, 2014, with Mr. Michael Massaro, Peach Bottom Site Vice President, and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief

Plant Support Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.: 50-277, 50-278 License Nos.: DPR-44, DPR-56

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report No. 05000277/2014502 and 05000278/2014502

REGION I==

Docket Nos.:

50-277, 50-278

License Nos.: DPR-44, DPR-56

Report No.: 05000277/2014502 and 05000278/2014502

Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC

Facility: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3

Location: Delta, Pennsylvania

Dates:

April 7-11, 2014

Inspectors:

S. Barr, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), Region I (Lead)

E. Burket, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I J. Cherubini, Senior Physical Security Inspector, DRS, Region I S. McCarver, Physical Security Inspector, DRS, Region I

T. Fish, Senior Operations Inspector, DRS, Region I

S. Hansell, Senior Resident Inspector, Peach Bottom, DRP, Region I

B. Smith, Resident Inspector, Peach Bottom, DRP, Region I

Approved By:

Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief

Plant Support Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

ii Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Inspection Report 05000277/2014502; 05000278/2014502; 4/7-11, 2014; Peach Bottom Atomic

Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action (HA) Event; Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification.

This was an announced inspection conducted by five Region I-based inspectors and two resident inspectors. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

No findings were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness (EP)

1EP7 Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event (71114.07 - 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Appendix E,Section IV.F.2.j, requires in part that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each eight calendar year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their emergency response organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a hostile action (HA) directed at the plant site. Exelon designed the April 8, 2014, Peach Bottom EP exercise to satisfy that requirement, and the NRC inspected the Peach Bottom HA event exercise to assess Exelons ability to effectively implement the Peach Bottom Emergency Plan during an HA event. This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.

The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:

  • The adequacy of Exelon EROs performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are: emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively.
  • The overall adequacy of Exelons emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, the Alternative Facility, the Central Alarm Station (CAS), the local county Incident Command Post (ICP), and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
  • A review of other performance areas, such as the Exelon EROs: recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.
  • A review of past performance issues from the last NRC Peach Bottom exercise inspection report and recent Exelon Peach Bottom EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the April 8, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
  • The licensees post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Exelons self-assessment of its Peach Bottom ERO performance during the April 8, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.

The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the April 8, 2014, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Exelon had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Peach Bottom Emergency Plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.

The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151 - 3 Samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed data for the Peach Bottom EP Performance Indicators (PI),which are:

(1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP) (EP01);
(2) ERO Drill Participation (EP02); and
(3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability (EP03). The last NRC EP inspection at Peach Bottom was conducted in the first calendar quarter of 2013, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the first calendar quarter of 2013 through the first calendar quarter of 2014, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, Revision 7.

This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, including Exit

On April 10, 2014, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. M. Massaro, Peach Bottom Site Vice President, and other members of the Exelon staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.

ATTACHMENT

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

M. Massaro, Peach Bottom Site Vice President
V. Cwietniewicz, Exelon Mid-Atlantic Emergency Planning Manager
N. Alexakos, Peach Bottom Emergency Planning Manager

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

None.

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED