ML14247A043: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:QF-0739, Revision 1 (FP-R-LIC-06) | {{#Wiki_filter:QF-0739, Revision 1 (FP-R-LIC-06) | ||
Initiated By (individual taking the request): | Page 1 of 4 Use of this form as a procedural aid does not require retention as a quality record. | ||
CAP / Work Order Issued? Yes / No (circle one) Number: | NRC Question Response Form Request Number: | ||
Response (include a list of documents provided): | Status: | ||
Requested By (Inspector name): | |||
Jean Trefethen Date Requested: | |||
Question / Document Request: Q / D (circle one) System: | |||
Detailed Question or Request: | |||
1-Confirm that the generators were placed back in service in December 2013. | |||
2-How many days (approximate) did the steam generator replacement activities take to complete (e.g. 80 days)? | |||
3-How many additional workers were used to complete the combined maintenance and refueling outage? | |||
4-Confirm that the steam generators were moved from the barge via a self-propelled transporter to a temporary building, which housed the replacement steam generators until they were ready for installation. | |||
5-Confirm that in addition to temporary warehouses, that a large crane and transfer cart that was set up outside the containment equipment hatch were used during the steam generator replacement. | |||
6-Confirm that no construction activities took place on previously-undisturbed land. | |||
7-What mitigations did you use to reduce environmental impacts (e.g. used best management practices, such as seeding and wetting disturbed areas, using multi-person vehicles for the workforce to reduce the total passenger vehicles miles.)? | |||
Initiated By (individual taking the request): Gene Eckholt Assigned To (Person responding to request): Scott Marty Date Assigned: | |||
CAP / Work Order Issued? Yes / No (circle one) Number: 01443632__ | |||
CAP 01443632 was written to document that the need for an additional archeological survey was not evaluated/documented when the Steam Generator Replacement (SGR) Parking Lot storm water retention basin size was increased during construction. Work activities did not identify any cultural resources and subsequent surveys in the surrounding areas did not identify any cultural resources. | |||
Response (include a list of documents provided): | |||
1-Confirm that the generators were placed back in service in December 2013. | |||
The Replacement Steam Generators (RSGs) were in-serviced on December 16, 2013 when they were accepted by Operations as being available for decay heat removal per shutdown safety assessment and Technical Specifications. Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Unit 2 was placed back in service with the RSGs on January 3, 2014.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 17:08, 10 January 2025
| ML14247A043 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 08/28/2014 |
| From: | Xcel Energy |
| To: | NRC/FSME/DWMEP |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14247A044 | List: |
| References | |
| QF-0739, Rev. 1 | |
| Download: ML14247A043 (4) | |
Text
QF-0739, Revision 1 (FP-R-LIC-06)
Page 1 of 4 Use of this form as a procedural aid does not require retention as a quality record.
NRC Question Response Form Request Number:
Status:
Requested By (Inspector name):
Jean Trefethen Date Requested:
Question / Document Request: Q / D (circle one) System:
Detailed Question or Request:
1-Confirm that the generators were placed back in service in December 2013.
2-How many days (approximate) did the steam generator replacement activities take to complete (e.g. 80 days)?
3-How many additional workers were used to complete the combined maintenance and refueling outage?
4-Confirm that the steam generators were moved from the barge via a self-propelled transporter to a temporary building, which housed the replacement steam generators until they were ready for installation.
5-Confirm that in addition to temporary warehouses, that a large crane and transfer cart that was set up outside the containment equipment hatch were used during the steam generator replacement.
6-Confirm that no construction activities took place on previously-undisturbed land.
7-What mitigations did you use to reduce environmental impacts (e.g. used best management practices, such as seeding and wetting disturbed areas, using multi-person vehicles for the workforce to reduce the total passenger vehicles miles.)?
Initiated By (individual taking the request): Gene Eckholt Assigned To (Person responding to request): Scott Marty Date Assigned:
CAP / Work Order Issued? Yes / No (circle one) Number: 01443632__
CAP 01443632 was written to document that the need for an additional archeological survey was not evaluated/documented when the Steam Generator Replacement (SGR) Parking Lot storm water retention basin size was increased during construction. Work activities did not identify any cultural resources and subsequent surveys in the surrounding areas did not identify any cultural resources.
Response (include a list of documents provided):
1-Confirm that the generators were placed back in service in December 2013.
The Replacement Steam Generators (RSGs) were in-serviced on December 16, 2013 when they were accepted by Operations as being available for decay heat removal per shutdown safety assessment and Technical Specifications. Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Unit 2 was placed back in service with the RSGs on January 3, 2014.