ML15349A841: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name = Gurdziel T
| author name = Gurdziel T
| author affiliation = Public Commenter
| author affiliation = Public Commenter
| addressee name = Burns S G
| addressee name = Burns S
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Chairman
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Chairman
| docket = 05000003, 05000247, 05000286
| docket = 05000003, 05000247, 05000286
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Cc:  
{{#Wiki_filter:CHAIRMAN Resource From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com> Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com [External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www .avast.com 1 CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Cc:  
Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel @twcny.rr.com >
Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com
[External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants.
Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com 1  
 
CHAIRMAN Resource From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com> Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com [External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www .avast.com 1}}
Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel @twcny.rr.com >
Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com
[External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants.
Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com 1}}

Latest revision as of 06:05, 10 January 2025

LTR-15-0620 Tom Gurdziel, E-mail Suggestion to Have Somebody Without Preconceived Bias to Take a Look at the Total Indian Point Site and Determine If It Is Safe to Continue to Operate
ML15349A841
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/2015
From: Tom Gurdziel
Public Commenter
To: Stephen Burns
NRC/Chairman
References
LTR-15-0620
Download: ML15349A841 (1)


Text

CHAIRMAN Resource From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel @twcny.rr.com >

Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com

[External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants.

Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.

www.avast.com 1

CHAIRMAN Resource From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel @twcny.rr.com >

Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com

[External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants.

Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.

www.avast.com 1