ML16053A207: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/03/2015
| issue date = 02/03/2015
| title = Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC - NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Revision 0, Appendix B, EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment
| title = Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC - NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Revision 0, Appendix B, EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment
| author name = McManus G
| author name = Mcmanus G
| author affiliation = Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC, Portage, Inc
| author affiliation = Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC, Portage, Inc
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NWMI-201 6-RAI-001 Rev. 0Appendix B -EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive DustDuring Construction Activities from Construction Equipment B-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0004 Revision ID: 1Effective Date: February 3, 2015Engineering Design FileCalculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Construction Activities From Construction Equipment Portage Project No.: 3124Title: NWMI Environmental ReportProject4PortageTEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0 TEM-9(X02 09I29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 1 of 52. ProjectfTask:
{{#Wiki_filter:No*WMI*ac. s~,*
NWMI Environmental Report1. Portage Project No.: 31243. DCN #4. Title: Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities
NWMI-201 6-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix B -
: 5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A *16. SSC Safety Category:
EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment B-i
N/A7 Summary:
 
To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, timeoperated, and material moved was estimated.
Document ID: EDF-3124-0004 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: February 3, 2015 Engineering Design File Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Construction Activities From Construction Equipment Portage Project No.: 3124
Using these estimates and equations developed in theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission  
 
: Factors, theamount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project.
==Title:==
The results are presented in this document.
NWMI Environmental Report Project 4Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0
8 Distribution:  
 
(Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval (A) Signaures aPrinte Naniel:Author/Design Agent A Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__
TEM-9(X02 09I29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 5
Independent Review RProject Manager R/A John Belier /////2/3/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) N/A TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0004 09/29109 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5Introduction and PurposeTo determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production  
: 2.
: Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material movedwas estimated.
ProjectfTask:
Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission  
NWMI Environmental Report
: Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5was estimated for the RPF project.
: 1. Portage Project No.:
The results are presented in this document.
3124
Methodology Earthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methodsfor calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5(updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.
: 3. DCN #
E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100) where:E = Emissions (pound [lb])A = Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)
4.
EF = Emission factor (lb/hour  
 
[hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)
==Title:==
ER = Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)Assumptions Table I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations.
Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities
The assumptions include the type ofactivities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities, and the amount of material moved.Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust Calculations Bulldozing 1 100 N/IA' N/IA'Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120: 1o,8...Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1 60 10,886 b 12,000 bCompacting 1 80 N/A' N/A'Moto grading 1 80N/Ac /Aa Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.
: 5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A  
b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIRadioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm3).SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.
*1
N/A = not applicable.
: 6. SSC Safety Category: N/A 7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.
8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)
: 9. Review (R) and Approval (A) Signaures aPrinte Naniel:
Author/Design Agent A
Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__
Independent Review R
Project Manager R/A John Belier  
/////2/3/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)  
*[]
N/A
 
TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0004 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5 Introduction and Purpose To determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)
Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.
Methodology Earthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methods for calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5 (updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.
E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100) where:
E  
=
Emissions (pound [lb])
A  
= Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)
EF  
=
Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)
ER  
=
Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)
Assumptions Table I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations. The assumptions include the type of activities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities, and the amount of material moved.
Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust Calculations Bulldozing 1
100 N/IA' N/IA' Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120:
1o,8...
Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1
60 10,886 b 12,000 b Compacting 1
80 N/A' N/A' Moto grading 1
80N/Ac  
/A a Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.
b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm 3).
SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.
N/A  
=
not applicable.
Other assumptions include the following.
Other assumptions include the following.
* Silt content:
Silt content: 25 percent Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42 Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour [hr]): 8.86 mi/hr Material moisture content: 20 percent Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hr Vehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles
25 percent* Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42* Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour  
 
[hr]): 8.86 mi/hr* Material moisture content:
TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 3 of 5 Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 and Section 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote. The equations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying the results of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.
20 percent* Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hrVehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles TEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 3 of 5Emission factors:
Table 2. Emission Factors Equations 9
Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 andSection 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote.
9 S.
Theequations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying theresults of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.Table 2. Emission Factors Equations
: 9.
-.9 9 ---S. -9. -.* -S ~* S -S0.- * -- SBulldozing 8c2ompacting 8:Motor grading8excavatorsb' Loading earth haulers fromfront loadersbUlanglf tralfrom0i.3 (Mj)1.40.040 (s)25 0.051 (s)2°k(0.0032).*(U/5)l.
S  
3/(M/2)1.4(0 0032Y'(U/5) 10.75
~*
* EF<_IS0.75 EF5,0.6
S S
* E<0.350.105* EFTsp0.031
0.-
* EFTn,0.053Ib/lirlb/VMTlb/toni!03!5,:0.053lb/toni i r .....i I'i *n ............
S Bulldozing8 c2ompacting 8 &#xb8;-*
EFkMsa AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.
Motor grading8 excavatorsb' Loading earth haulers from front loadersb Ulanglf tralfrom 0i.3 (Mj)1.4 0.040 (s) 25 0.051 (s)2&deg; k(0.0032).*(U/5)l. 3/(M/2)1.4 (0 0032Y'(U/5)1*(/2' 0.75
b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation  
* EF<_IS 0.75 EF 5, 0.6
#1.cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.= emission factor. S =mean vehicle speed (mi/br).= scaling factor for particle size. TSP = total suspended particulate.
* E<
=material moisture content (%) U = mean wind spe (mi/br).= silt content (%). VMT =vehicle miles traveled.
0.35 0.105* EFTsp 0.031
Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown inTable 3 through Table 8.Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours)EF_<i0um  
* EFTn, 0.053 Ib/lir lb/VMT lb/ton i!03!5,
= 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)(0.20)'48.92E-_ l/hTotal =EF<zi0um
:0.053 lb/ton i i r
* 100 hrEFTotemission factor.9.19E-01 lb/hr9.19E+01 lbEF = emission factor.
i I'i  
TEM-900209129109Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 4 of 5Table 4. Compacting (80 hours)EF_<ioum  
*n EF k
= 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)(0.20)' "9.19E-01 lb/hr: Tolal 1b05~ = EFi7~ *80'/1V~
M s
hr ff.35E+0l lbEF = emission factor.Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours at 2.5 miles/hour)
a AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.
I~b iEF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)
b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.
Total Ib_<1o0= EF<1oum(2.5)(80) 1E.01lb/V-MT:3.8Ea ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)
cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.
Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80) 1 .23E-022.45E+00Ib/VMTlbEF = emission factor. VMT = vehicle miles traveled.
=
Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I 3s lb/ton(M/2)' 45.2-2l/ton Total lb<l~n =  
emission factor.
*IEF = emission factor.8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal ...... E~25~m1 .08E+02 lbEF emission factor.
S  
TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-000409I/29/9 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)
=mean vehicle speed (mi/br).
EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton(M/2)14~5.92E,02 lb/tonTotal lb.1= EF_<iopx  
=
*12,000I II I= 0.53 '0. O 2)(I3). l ..... ...8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal EF~2.=
scaling factor for particle size.
* 12,00001.08E+02 lbEF =emission factor.Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton(M/2)'.4Total = EF_<io
TSP  
* 24,0008.96E-03 lb/ton2.15E+02 lbEF = emission factor.The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction Activities Bulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01 ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators  
=
: 7. lE+02 l.IE-+02Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)
total suspended particulate.
Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.References EDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production  
=material moisture content (%)
: Facility, Rev. 3,Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission  
U  
: Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and AreaSources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.
=
NWMI-201 6-RAI-001 Rev. 0Appendix B -EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive DustDuring Construction Activities from Construction Equipment B-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0004 Revision ID: 1Effective Date: February 3, 2015Engineering Design FileCalculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Construction Activities From Construction Equipment Portage Project No.: 3124Title: NWMI Environmental ReportProject4PortageTEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0 TEM-9(X02 09I29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 1 of 52. ProjectfTask:
mean wind spe (mi/br).
NWMI Environmental Report1. Portage Project No.: 31243. DCN #4. Title: Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities
= silt content (%).
: 5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A *16. SSC Safety Category:
VMT  
N/A7 Summary:
=vehicle miles traveled.
To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, timeoperated, and material moved was estimated.
Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown in Table 3 through Table 8.
Using these estimates and equations developed in theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission  
Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours)
: Factors, theamount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project.
EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)
The results are presented in this document.
(0.20)'4 8.92E-_
8 Distribution:  
l/h Total lb_<i0* =EF<zi0um
(Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval (A) Signaures aPrinte Naniel:Author/Design Agent A Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__
* 100 hr EFTotemission factor.
Independent Review RProject Manager R/A John Belier /////2/3/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) N/A TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0004 09/29109 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5Introduction and PurposeTo determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production  
9.19E-01 lb/hr 9.19E+01 lb EF
: Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material movedwas estimated.
= emission factor.
Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission  
 
: Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5was estimated for the RPF project.
TEM-9002 09129109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 5 Table 4. Compacting (80 hours)
The results are presented in this document.
EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)
Methodology Earthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methodsfor calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5(updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.
(0.20)' "
E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100) where:E = Emissions (pound [lb])A = Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)
9.19E-01 lb/hr Tolal  
EF = Emission factor (lb/hour  
*Tota 1b05~  
[hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)
= EFi7~ *80'/1V~
ER = Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)Assumptions Table I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations.
hr ff.35E+0l lb EF
The assumptions include the type ofactivities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities, and the amount of material moved.Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust Calculations Bulldozing 1 100 N/IA' N/IA'Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120: 1o,8...Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1 60 10,886 b 12,000 bCompacting 1 80 N/A' N/A'Moto grading 1 80N/Ac /Aa Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.
=
b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIRadioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm3).SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.
emission factor.
N/A = not applicable.
Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours at 2.5 miles/hour)
I~b i
EF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)
Total Ib_<1o0
= EF<1oum(2.5)(80) 1E.01 lb/V-MT
:3.8E a ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)
Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80) 1.23E-02 2.45E+00 Ib/VMT lb EF
=
emission factor.
VMT  
=
vehicle miles traveled.
Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)
F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I3s lb/ton (M/2)' 4 5.2-2l/ton Total lb<l~n = EF<ic*w.
* I EF
=
emission factor.
8.96E-03 lb/ton Total E~25~m 1.08E+02 lb EF emission factor.
 
TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 09I/29/9 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5 Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)
EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton (M/2)14
~5.92E,02 lb/ton Total lb.1 co* = EF_<iopx *12,000 I II I=
0.53 '0. O 2)(I3).
l 8.96E-03 lb/ton Total lb*:sm EF~2.=
* 12,0000 1.08E+02 lb EF
=emission factor.
Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)
EF1*= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton (M/2)'.4 Total lb_<io* = EF_<io
* 24,000 8.96E-03 lb/ton 2.15E+02 lb EF
=
emission factor.
The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.
Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction Activities Bulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01 Lodigof* ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators
: 7. lE+02 l.IE-+02 Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02 Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0 Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01 otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)
Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02 a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.
References EDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.
EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.
 
No*WMI*ac. s~,*
NWMI-201 6-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix B -
EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment B-i
 
Document ID: EDF-3124-0004 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: February 3, 2015 Engineering Design File Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Construction Activities From Construction Equipment Portage Project No.: 3124
 
==Title:==
NWMI Environmental Report Project 4Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0
 
TEM-9(X02 09I29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 5
: 2.
ProjectfTask:
NWMI Environmental Report
: 1. Portage Project No.:
3124
: 3. DCN #
4.
 
==Title:==
Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities
: 5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A  
*1
: 6. SSC Safety Category: N/A 7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.
8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)
: 9. Review (R) and Approval (A) Signaures aPrinte Naniel:
Author/Design Agent A
Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__
Independent Review R
Project Manager R/A John Belier  
/////2/3/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)  
*[]
N/A
 
TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0004 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5 Introduction and Purpose To determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)
Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.
Methodology Earthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methods for calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5 (updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.
E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100) where:
E  
=
Emissions (pound [lb])
A  
= Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)
EF  
=
Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)
ER  
=
Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)
Assumptions Table I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations. The assumptions include the type of activities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities, and the amount of material moved.
Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust Calculations Bulldozing 1
100 N/IA' N/IA' Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120:
1o,8...
Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1
60 10,886 b 12,000 b Compacting 1
80 N/A' N/A' Moto grading 1
80N/Ac  
/A a Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.
b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm 3).
SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.
N/A  
=
not applicable.
Other assumptions include the following.
Other assumptions include the following.
* Silt content:
Silt content: 25 percent Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42 Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour [hr]): 8.86 mi/hr Material moisture content: 20 percent Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hr Vehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles
25 percent* Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42* Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour  
 
[hr]): 8.86 mi/hr* Material moisture content:
TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 3 of 5 Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 and Section 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote. The equations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying the results of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.
20 percent* Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hrVehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles TEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 3 of 5Emission factors:
Table 2. Emission Factors Equations 9
Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 andSection 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote.
9 S.
Theequations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying theresults of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.Table 2. Emission Factors Equations
: 9.
-.9 9 ---S. -9. -.* -S ~* S -S0.- * -- SBulldozing 8c2ompacting 8:Motor grading8excavatorsb' Loading earth haulers fromfront loadersbUlanglf tralfrom0i.3 (Mj)1.40.040 (s)25 0.051 (s)2&deg;k(0.0032).*(U/5)l.
S  
3/(M/2)1.4(0 0032Y'(U/5) 10.75
~*
* EF<_IS0.75 EF5,0.6
S S
* E<0.350.105* EFTsp0.031
0.-
* EFTn,0.053Ib/lirlb/VMTlb/toni!03!5,:0.053lb/toni i r .....i I'i *n ............
S Bulldozing8 c2ompacting 8 &#xb8;-*
EFkMsa AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.
Motor grading8 excavatorsb' Loading earth haulers from front loadersb Ulanglf tralfrom 0i.3 (Mj)1.4 0.040 (s) 25 0.051 (s)2&deg; k(0.0032).*(U/5)l. 3/(M/2)1.4 (0 0032Y'(U/5)1*(/2' 0.75
b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation  
* EF<_IS 0.75 EF 5, 0.6
#1.cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.= emission factor. S =mean vehicle speed (mi/br).= scaling factor for particle size. TSP = total suspended particulate.
* E<
=material moisture content (%) U = mean wind spe (mi/br).= silt content (%). VMT =vehicle miles traveled.
0.35 0.105* EFTsp 0.031
Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown inTable 3 through Table 8.Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours)EF_<i0um  
* EFTn, 0.053 Ib/lir lb/VMT lb/ton i!03!5,
= 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)(0.20)'48.92E-_ l/hTotal =EF<zi0um
:0.053 lb/ton i i r
* 100 hrEFTotemission factor.9.19E-01 lb/hr9.19E+01 lbEF = emission factor.
i I'i  
TEM-900209129109Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 4 of 5Table 4. Compacting (80 hours)EF_<ioum  
*n EF k
= 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)(0.20)' "9.19E-01 lb/hr: Tolal 1b05~ = EFi7~ *80'/1V~
M s
hr ff.35E+0l lbEF = emission factor.Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours at 2.5 miles/hour)
a AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.
I~b iEF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)
b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.
Total Ib_<1o0= EF<1oum(2.5)(80) 1E.01lb/V-MT:3.8Ea ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)
cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.
Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80) 1 .23E-022.45E+00Ib/VMTlbEF = emission factor. VMT = vehicle miles traveled.
=
Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I 3s lb/ton(M/2)' 45.2-2l/ton Total lb<l~n =  
emission factor.
*IEF = emission factor.8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal ...... E~25~m1 .08E+02 lbEF emission factor.
S  
TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-000409I/29/9 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)
=mean vehicle speed (mi/br).
EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton(M/2)14~5.92E,02 lb/tonTotal lb.1= EF_<iopx  
=
*12,000I II I= 0.53 '0. O 2)(I3). l ..... ...8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal EF~2.=
scaling factor for particle size.
* 12,00001.08E+02 lbEF =emission factor.Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton(M/2)'.4Total = EF_<io
TSP  
* 24,0008.96E-03 lb/ton2.15E+02 lbEF = emission factor.The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction Activities Bulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01 ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators  
=
: 7. lE+02 l.IE-+02Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)
total suspended particulate.
Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.References EDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production  
=material moisture content (%)
: Facility, Rev. 3,Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission  
U  
: Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and AreaSources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.}}
=
mean wind spe (mi/br).
= silt content (%).
VMT  
=vehicle miles traveled.
Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown in Table 3 through Table 8.
Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours)
EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)
(0.20)'4 8.92E-_
l/h Total lb_<i0* =EF<zi0um
* 100 hr EFTotemission factor.
9.19E-01 lb/hr 9.19E+01 lb EF
= emission factor.
 
TEM-9002 09129109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 5 Table 4. Compacting (80 hours)
EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)
(0.20)' "
9.19E-01 lb/hr Tolal  
*Tota 1b05~  
= EFi7~ *80'/1V~
hr ff.35E+0l lb EF
=
emission factor.
Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours at 2.5 miles/hour)
I~b i
EF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)
Total Ib_<1o0
= EF<1oum(2.5)(80) 1E.01 lb/V-MT
:3.8E a ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)
Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80) 1.23E-02 2.45E+00 Ib/VMT lb EF
=
emission factor.
VMT  
=
vehicle miles traveled.
Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)
F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I3s lb/ton (M/2)' 4 5.2-2l/ton Total lb<l~n = EF<ic*w.
* I EF
=
emission factor.
8.96E-03 lb/ton Total E~25~m 1.08E+02 lb EF emission factor.
 
TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 09I/29/9 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5 Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)
EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton (M/2)14
~5.92E,02 lb/ton Total lb.1 co* = EF_<iopx *12,000 I II I=
0.53 '0. O 2)(I3).
l 8.96E-03 lb/ton Total lb*:sm EF~2.=
* 12,0000 1.08E+02 lb EF
=emission factor.
Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)
EF1*= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton (M/2)'.4 Total lb_<io* = EF_<io
* 24,000 8.96E-03 lb/ton 2.15E+02 lb EF
=
emission factor.
The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.
Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction Activities Bulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01 Lodigof* ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators
: 7. lE+02 l.IE-+02 Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02 Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0 Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01 otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)
Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02 a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.
References EDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.
EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.}}

Latest revision as of 03:11, 10 January 2025

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC - NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Revision 0, Appendix B, EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment
ML16053A207
Person / Time
Site: Northwest Medical Isotopes
Issue date: 02/03/2015
From: Mcmanus G
Northwest Medical Isotopes, Portage
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16053A221 List:
References
NWMI-LTR-2016-002 EDF-3124-0004, NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Rev. 0
Download: ML16053A207 (7)


Text

No*WMI*ac. s~,*

NWMI-201 6-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix B -

EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment B-i

Document ID: EDF-3124-0004 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: February 3, 2015 Engineering Design File Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Construction Activities From Construction Equipment Portage Project No.: 3124

Title:

NWMI Environmental Report Project 4Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0

TEM-9(X02 09I29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 5

2.

ProjectfTask:

NWMI Environmental Report

1. Portage Project No.:

3124

3. DCN #

4.

Title:

Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities

5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A
  • 1
6. SSC Safety Category: N/A 7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.

8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)

9. Review (R) and Approval (A) Signaures aPrinte Naniel:

Author/Design Agent A

Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__

Independent Review R

Project Manager R/A John Belier

/////2/3/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)

  • []

N/A

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0004 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5 Introduction and Purpose To determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)

Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.

Methodology Earthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methods for calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5 (updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.

E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100) where:

E

=

Emissions (pound [lb])

A

= Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)

EF

=

Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)

ER

=

Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)

Assumptions Table I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations. The assumptions include the type of activities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities, and the amount of material moved.

Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust Calculations Bulldozing 1

100 N/IA' N/IA' Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120:

1o,8...

Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1

60 10,886 b 12,000 b Compacting 1

80 N/A' N/A' Moto grading 1

80N/Ac

/A a Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.

b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm 3).

SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.

N/A

=

not applicable.

Other assumptions include the following.

Silt content: 25 percent Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42 Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour [hr]): 8.86 mi/hr Material moisture content: 20 percent Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hr Vehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles

TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 3 of 5 Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 and Section 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote. The equations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying the results of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.

Table 2. Emission Factors Equations 9

9 S.

9.

S

~*

S S

0.-

S Bulldozing8 c2ompacting 8 ¸-*

Motor grading8 excavatorsb' Loading earth haulers from front loadersb Ulanglf tralfrom 0i.3 (Mj)1.4 0.040 (s) 25 0.051 (s)2° k(0.0032).*(U/5)l. 3/(M/2)1.4 (0 0032Y'(U/5)1*(/2' 0.75

  • EF<_IS 0.75 EF 5, 0.6
  • E<

0.35 0.105* EFTsp 0.031

  • EFTn, 0.053 Ib/lir lb/VMT lb/ton i!03!5,
0.053 lb/ton i i r

i I'i

  • n EF k

M s

a AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.

b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.

cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.

=

emission factor.

S

=mean vehicle speed (mi/br).

=

scaling factor for particle size.

TSP

=

total suspended particulate.

=material moisture content (%)

U

=

mean wind spe (mi/br).

= silt content (%).

VMT

=vehicle miles traveled.

Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown in Table 3 through Table 8.

Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />)

EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)

(0.20)'4 8.92E-_

l/h Total lb_<i0* =EF<zi0um

  • 100 hr EFTotemission factor.

9.19E-01 lb/hr 9.19E+01 lb EF

= emission factor.

TEM-9002 09129109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 5 Table 4. Compacting (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />)

EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)

(0.20)' "

9.19E-01 lb/hr Tolal

  • Tota 1b05~

= EFi7~ *80'/1V~

hr ff.35E+0l lb EF

=

emission factor.

Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> at 2.5 miles/hour)

I~b i

EF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)

Total Ib_<1o0

= EF<1oum(2.5)(80) 1E.01 lb/V-MT

3.8E a ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)

Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80) 1.23E-02 2.45E+00 Ib/VMT lb EF

=

emission factor.

VMT

=

vehicle miles traveled.

Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)

F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I3s lb/ton (M/2)' 4 5.2-2l/ton Total lb<l~n = EF<ic*w.

  • I EF

=

emission factor.

8.96E-03 lb/ton Total E~25~m 1.08E+02 lb EF emission factor.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 09I/29/9 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5 Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)

EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton (M/2)14

~5.92E,02 lb/ton Total lb.1 co* = EF_<iopx *12,000 I II I=

0.53 '0. O 2)(I3).

l 8.96E-03 lb/ton Total lb*:sm EF~2.=

  • 12,0000 1.08E+02 lb EF

=emission factor.

Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)

EF1*= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton (M/2)'.4 Total lb_<io* = EF_<io

  • 24,000 8.96E-03 lb/ton 2.15E+02 lb EF

=

emission factor.

The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.

Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction Activities Bulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01 Lodigof* ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators

7. lE+02 l.IE-+02 Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02 Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0 Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01 otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)

Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02 a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.

References EDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.

EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.

No*WMI*ac. s~,*

NWMI-201 6-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix B -

EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment B-i

Document ID: EDF-3124-0004 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: February 3, 2015 Engineering Design File Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Construction Activities From Construction Equipment Portage Project No.: 3124

Title:

NWMI Environmental Report Project 4Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0

TEM-9(X02 09I29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 5

2.

ProjectfTask:

NWMI Environmental Report

1. Portage Project No.:

3124

3. DCN #

4.

Title:

Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities

5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A
  • 1
6. SSC Safety Category: N/A 7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.

8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)

9. Review (R) and Approval (A) Signaures aPrinte Naniel:

Author/Design Agent A

Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__

Independent Review R

Project Manager R/A John Belier

/////2/3/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)

  • []

N/A

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0004 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5 Introduction and Purpose To determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)

Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.

Methodology Earthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methods for calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5 (updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.

E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100) where:

E

=

Emissions (pound [lb])

A

= Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)

EF

=

Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)

ER

=

Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)

Assumptions Table I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations. The assumptions include the type of activities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities, and the amount of material moved.

Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust Calculations Bulldozing 1

100 N/IA' N/IA' Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120:

1o,8...

Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1

60 10,886 b 12,000 b Compacting 1

80 N/A' N/A' Moto grading 1

80N/Ac

/A a Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.

b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm 3).

SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.

N/A

=

not applicable.

Other assumptions include the following.

Silt content: 25 percent Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42 Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour [hr]): 8.86 mi/hr Material moisture content: 20 percent Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hr Vehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles

TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 3 of 5 Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 and Section 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote. The equations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying the results of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.

Table 2. Emission Factors Equations 9

9 S.

9.

S

~*

S S

0.-

S Bulldozing8 c2ompacting 8 ¸-*

Motor grading8 excavatorsb' Loading earth haulers from front loadersb Ulanglf tralfrom 0i.3 (Mj)1.4 0.040 (s) 25 0.051 (s)2° k(0.0032).*(U/5)l. 3/(M/2)1.4 (0 0032Y'(U/5)1*(/2' 0.75

  • EF<_IS 0.75 EF 5, 0.6
  • E<

0.35 0.105* EFTsp 0.031

  • EFTn, 0.053 Ib/lir lb/VMT lb/ton i!03!5,
0.053 lb/ton i i r

i I'i

  • n EF k

M s

a AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.

b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.

cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.

=

emission factor.

S

=mean vehicle speed (mi/br).

=

scaling factor for particle size.

TSP

=

total suspended particulate.

=material moisture content (%)

U

=

mean wind spe (mi/br).

= silt content (%).

VMT

=vehicle miles traveled.

Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown in Table 3 through Table 8.

Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />)

EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)

(0.20)'4 8.92E-_

l/h Total lb_<i0* =EF<zi0um

  • 100 hr EFTotemission factor.

9.19E-01 lb/hr 9.19E+01 lb EF

= emission factor.

TEM-9002 09129109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 5 Table 4. Compacting (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />)

EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)

(0.20)' "

9.19E-01 lb/hr Tolal

  • Tota 1b05~

= EFi7~ *80'/1V~

hr ff.35E+0l lb EF

=

emission factor.

Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> at 2.5 miles/hour)

I~b i

EF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)

Total Ib_<1o0

= EF<1oum(2.5)(80) 1E.01 lb/V-MT

3.8E a ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)

Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80) 1.23E-02 2.45E+00 Ib/VMT lb EF

=

emission factor.

VMT

=

vehicle miles traveled.

Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)

F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I3s lb/ton (M/2)' 4 5.2-2l/ton Total lb<l~n = EF<ic*w.

  • I EF

=

emission factor.

8.96E-03 lb/ton Total E~25~m 1.08E+02 lb EF emission factor.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 09I/29/9 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5 Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)

EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton (M/2)14

~5.92E,02 lb/ton Total lb.1 co* = EF_<iopx *12,000 I II I=

0.53 '0. O 2)(I3).

l 8.96E-03 lb/ton Total lb*:sm EF~2.=

  • 12,0000 1.08E+02 lb EF

=emission factor.

Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)

EF1*= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton (M/2)'.4 Total lb_<io* = EF_<io

  • 24,000 8.96E-03 lb/ton 2.15E+02 lb EF

=

emission factor.

The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.

Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction Activities Bulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01 Lodigof* ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators

7. lE+02 l.IE-+02 Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02 Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0 Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01 otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)

Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02 a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.

References EDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.

EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.