ML16069A206: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:* ~United States Department of the Interior , FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE/ 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re: Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632  
{{#Wiki_filter:*  
~United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
* /
176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200
~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 M.*
kd'/cJ/A'*
Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re:
Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632


==Dear Ms. Sampson:==
==Dear Ms. Sampson:==
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina. Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.
Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity.
Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.
Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action.
Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity. Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.
Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.
Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action.
 
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632.
Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC  
Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC
* ~United States Department of the Interior , FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE/ 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re: Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632  
 
~United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
* /
176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200
~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 M.*
kd'/cJ/A'*
Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re:
Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632


==Dear Ms. Sampson:==
==Dear Ms. Sampson:==
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina. Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.
Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity.
Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.
Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action.
Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity. Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.
Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.
Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action.
 
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632.
Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC}}
Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC}}

Latest revision as of 02:28, 10 January 2025

Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina
ML16069A206
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/04/2015
From: Mccoy T
US Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service
To: Michele Sampson
NRC/EDO/AO
References
FWS Log 2015-I-0632
Download: ML16069A206 (2)


Text

~United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

  • /

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 M.*

kd'/cJ/A'*

Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re:

Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632

Dear Ms. Sampson:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina. Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.

Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.

Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity. Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.

Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.

Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632.

Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC

~United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

  • /

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 M.*

kd'/cJ/A'*

Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re:

Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632

Dear Ms. Sampson:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina. Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.

Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.

Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity. Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.

Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.

Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632.

Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC