ML16099A305: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES  
                            NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
                                                REGION III
REGION III  
                                    2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210
2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210  
                                          LISLE, IL 60532-4352
LISLE, IL 60532-4352  
                                            April 8, 2016
April 8, 2016  
Mr. Paul Fessler
Mr. Paul Fessler  
Chief Nuclear Officer
Chief Nuclear Officer  
DTE Energy Company
DTE Energy Company  
Fermi 2 - 210 NOC
Fermi 2 - 210 NOC  
6400 North Dixie Highway
6400 North Dixie Highway  
Newport, MI 48166
Newport, MI 48166  
SUBJECT: FERMI POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN
SUBJECT: FERMI POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN  
              NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION;
NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION;  
              INSPECTION REPORT 05000341/2016007
INSPECTION REPORT 05000341/2016007  
Dear Mr. Fessler:
Dear Mr. Fessler:  
On August 1, 2016, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial
On August 1, 2016, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial  
baseline Component Design Bases Inspection at Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2. This inspection
baseline Component Design Bases Inspection at Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2. This inspection  
will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21.
will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21.  
The Component Design Bases Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation
The Component Design Bases Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation  
of risk-significant components associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The
of risk-significant components associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The  
components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office
components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office  
preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating
preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating  
experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review.
experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review.
The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request
The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request  
would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew
would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew  
to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team
to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team  
will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can
will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can  
be accomplished with minimal impact.
be accomplished with minimal impact.  
The inspection will include 3 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of 6 NRC
The inspection will include 3 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of 6 NRC  
inspectors, of which 5 will focus on engineering/maintenance and 1 on operations. The
inspectors, of which 5 will focus on engineering/maintenance and 1 on operations. The  
current inspection schedule is as follows:
current inspection schedule is as follows:  
    Onsite weeks:     August 1 - 5, 2016;
Onsite weeks:  
                        August 15 - 19, 2016; and
August 1 - 5, 2016;  
                        August 29 - September 2, 2016.
August 15 - 19, 2016; and
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016,
August 29 - September 2, 2016.  
as discussed in the enclosure.
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016,  
as discussed in the enclosure.  


P. Fessler                                       -2-
P. Fessler  
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown
-2-  
that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown  
licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive
that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the  
inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the
licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive  
inspection.
inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the  
It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the
inspection.  
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of
It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the  
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of  
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead  
        The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:  
        This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 13, 2016.
        By June 24, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of
The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
        approximately 20 components.
This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 13, 2016.
        The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our
By June 24, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of  
        in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations
approximately 20 components.
        associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead
        inspector at the Regional Office no later than July 18, 2016. During the in-office
The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our  
        preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support
in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations  
        the inspection.
associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead  
        The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific
inspector at the Regional Office no later than July 18, 2016. During the in-office  
        reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on
preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support  
        August 1, 2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or
the inspection.  
        questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as
        the documents are generated.
The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific  
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor J. Féliz Adorno. We understand that our
reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on  
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. Jason Haas of your organization. If there are any
August 1, 2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or  
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the
questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as  
lead inspector at 630-829-9739 or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.
the documents are generated.  
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor J. Féliz Adorno. We understand that our  
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. Jason Haas of your organization. If there are any  
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the  
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
lead inspector at 630-829-9739 or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.  
to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject  
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information  
Number.
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control  
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required  
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the  
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control  
Number.  
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public  
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy  
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public  


P. Fessler                               -3-
P. Fessler  
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
-3-  
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)  
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html  
                                          Sincerely,
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
                                          /RA/
Sincerely,  
                                          Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector
                                          Engineering Branch 2
/RA/  
                                          Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-341
License No. NPF-43
Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector  
Enclosure:
Engineering Branch 2  
   Information Request for Component Design
Division of Reactor Safety
     Bases Inspection
Docket No. 50-341  
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
License No. NPF-43  
Enclosure:  
   Information Request for Component Design
     Bases Inspection
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV  


      REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION  
Inspection Report:             05000341/2016007
Enclosure
Inspection Dates:               August 1 - 5, 2016;
Inspection Report:  
                                August 15 - 19, 2016; and
05000341/2016007  
                                August 29 - September 2, 2016.
Inspection Dates:  
Inspection Procedure:           IP 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection
August 1 - 5, 2016;  
Lead Inspector:                 Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS
August 15 - 19, 2016; and
                                630-829-9739
August 29 - September 2, 2016.  
                                Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov
Inspection Procedure:  
  I.   Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week
IP 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection  
      The following information is requested by June 13, 2016, or sooner, to facilitate
Lead Inspector:  
      inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call
Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS
      the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in
630-829-9739  
      pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic
Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov  
      media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD). The portable electronic media should contain descriptive
I.  
      names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in lists
Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week  
      should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has
The following information is requested by June 13, 2016, or sooner, to facilitate  
      knowledge of light water reactor technology.
inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call  
          1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety
the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in  
                Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. Include values for Birnbaum
pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic  
                Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).
media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD). The portable electronic media should contain descriptive  
          2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e., Large Early
names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in lists  
                Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by Risk-Achievement
should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has  
                Worth.
knowledge of light water reactor technology.  
          3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.
1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety  
          4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that
Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. Include values for Birnbaum  
                contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.
Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).  
          5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.
2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e., Large Early  
          6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job
Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by Risk-Achievement  
                performance measures.
Worth.  
          7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.
3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.  
          8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information
4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that  
                requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative
contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.  
                description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.  
                                                                                          Enclosure
6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job  
performance measures.  
7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.  
8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information  
requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative  
description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).  


REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION  
  9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, if
2
      available.
9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, if  
  10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations
available.  
      with low design margins, (e.g., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or
10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations  
      pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers
with low design margins, (e.g., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or  
      close to rated design heat removal).
pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers  
  11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction
close to rated design heat removal).  
      (identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and
11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction  
      Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was
(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and  
      determined.
Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was  
  12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering
determined.  
      or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the
12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering  
      PSA).
or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the  
  13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category
PSA).  
      for the last 3 years.
13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category  
  14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).
for the last 3 years.  
  15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.
14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).  
  16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the
15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.  
      last 5 years at your facility.
16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the  
  17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design
last 5 years at your facility.  
      issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years.
17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design  
  18. List of open operability evaluations.
issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years.  
  19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/non-conforming.
18. List of open operability evaluations.  
  20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.
19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/non-conforming.  
  21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical
20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.  
      Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements
21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical  
      Manual.
Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements  
  22. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (electronic
Manual.  
      copies are preferred).
22. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (electronic  
  23. Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (electronic copies are preferred).
copies are preferred).  
                                          2
23. Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (electronic copies are preferred).  


    REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION  
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 20 selected components) to be
3
    Available by July 18, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office
II.  
    during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016).
Information Requested (for the approximate 20 selected components) to be  
    This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if
Available by July 18, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office  
    provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,
during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016).  
    condition reports, and maintenance history).
This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if  
        1. List of condition reports (i.e., corrective action documents) associated with each
provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,  
            of the selected components for the last 6 years.
condition reports, and maintenance history).  
        2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with
1. List of condition reports (i.e., corrective action documents) associated with each  
            each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of
of the selected components for the last 6 years.  
            preventive maintenance activities.
2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with  
        3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not
each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of  
            previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and
preventive maintenance activities.  
            also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not  
            engineering requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations are excluded
previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and  
            from this request]
also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,  
        4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or
engineering requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations are excluded  
            Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
from this request]  
        5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,
4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or  
            associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a
Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.  
            descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list
5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,  
            only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a  
        6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with
descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list  
            each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.  
        7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with  
            selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.  
        8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected
7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the  
            components, if applicable.
selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.  
        9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for
8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected  
            last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other
components, if applicable.  
            vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate
9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for  
            results, etc.).
last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other  
        10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with
vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate  
            the selected components and selected scenarios.
results, etc.).  
        11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective
10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with  
            action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
the selected components and selected scenarios.  
        12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for
11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective  
            example:
action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.  
                                                3
12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for  
example:  


        REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION  
                  Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
4
                  Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.
                  Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan
Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
                    flows, etc.
                Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.  
            13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
  III. Additional Information to be Provided on August 1, 2016, Onsite (for final selected
Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan  
        components)
flows, etc.  
            1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections
Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.  
                and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The
13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.  
                lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the
III.  
                week of July 25 - 29, 2016.
Additional Information to be Provided on August 1, 2016, Onsite (for final selected  
            2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected
components)
                components during the three on-site inspection weeks.
1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections  
            3. One complete set of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (paper copies).
and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The  
            4. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (paper copies).
lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the  
  IV.   Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
week of July 25 - 29, 2016.  
            1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams
2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected  
                questions or queries during this inspection.
components during the three on-site inspection weeks.  
            2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
3. One complete set of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (paper copies).  
                status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the
4. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (paper copies).  
                inspection to each team member).
IV.  
            3. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all onsite weeks):
Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection  
                  Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report;
1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams  
                  Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
questions or queries during this inspection.  
                  Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the  
                  Vendor manuals.
status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the  
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
inspection to each team member).  
                                                    4
3. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all onsite weeks):  
Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report;  
Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);  
Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and  
Vendor manuals.  
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.  


P. Fessler                                                                 -3-
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
P. Fessler  
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
-3-  
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)  
                                                                          Sincerely,
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
                                                                          /RA/
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html  
                                                                          Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
                                                                          Engineering Branch 2
Sincerely,  
                                                                          Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-341
/RA/  
License No. NPF-43
Enclosure:
   Information Request for Component Design
Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector  
     Bases Inspection
Engineering Branch 2  
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
Division of Reactor Safety
DISTRIBUTION:
Docket No. 50-341  
Kimyata MorganButler
License No. NPF-43  
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource
Enclosure:  
RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource
   Information Request for Component Design
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
     Bases Inspection
Cynthia Pederson
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV  
Darrell Roberts
DISTRIBUTION:  
Richard Skokowski
Kimyata MorganButler  
Allan Barker
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource  
Carole Ariano
RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource  
Linda Linn
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource  
DRPIII
Cynthia Pederson  
DRSIII
Darrell Roberts  
Jim Clay
Richard Skokowski  
Carmen Olteanu
Allan Barker  
ADAMS Accession Number ML16099A305
Carole Ariano  
    Publicly Available                       Non-Publicly Available                       Sensitive                 Non-Sensitive
Linda Linn  
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
DRPIII  
  OFFICE             RIII                                 RIII                           RIII                               RIII
DRSIII  
  NAME               NFeliz-Adorno:cl
Jim Clay  
  DATE               04/08/16
Carmen Olteanu  
                                                          OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
ADAMS Accession Number ML16099A305  
Publicly Available  
Non-Publicly Available  
Sensitive  
Non-Sensitive  
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy  
OFFICE  
RIII  
RIII  
RIII  
RIII  
NAME  
NFeliz-Adorno:cl  
DATE  
04/08/16  
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 01:13, 10 January 2025

Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection; Inspection Report 05000341/2016007
ML16099A305
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2016
From: Nestor Feliz-Adorno
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
To: Fessler P
DTE Energy
References
IR 2016007
Download: ML16099A305 (8)


See also: IR 05000341/2016007

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

April 8, 2016

Mr. Paul Fessler

Chief Nuclear Officer

DTE Energy Company

Fermi 2 - 210 NOC

6400 North Dixie Highway

Newport, MI 48166

SUBJECT: FERMI POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN

NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION;

INSPECTION REPORT 05000341/2016007

Dear Mr. Fessler:

On August 1, 2016, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial

baseline Component Design Bases Inspection at Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2. This inspection

will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21.

The Component Design Bases Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation

of risk-significant components associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The

components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office

preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating

experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review.

The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request

would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew

to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team

will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can

be accomplished with minimal impact.

The inspection will include 3 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of 6 NRC

inspectors, of which 5 will focus on engineering/maintenance and 1 on operations. The

current inspection schedule is as follows:

Onsite weeks:

August 1 - 5, 2016;

August 15 - 19, 2016; and

August 29 - September 2, 2016.

The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016,

as discussed in the enclosure.

P. Fessler

-2-

Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown

that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the

licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive

inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the

inspection.

It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the

number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of

the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead

inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:

The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.

This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 13, 2016.

By June 24, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of

approximately 20 components.

The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our

in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations

associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead

inspector at the Regional Office no later than July 18, 2016. During the in-office

preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support

the inspection.

The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific

reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on

August 1, 2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or

questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as

the documents are generated.

The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor J. Féliz Adorno. We understand that our

licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. Jason Haas of your organization. If there are any

questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the

lead inspector at 630-829-9739 or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required

to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

P. Fessler

-3-

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 50-341

License No. NPF-43

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design

Bases Inspection

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

Enclosure

Inspection Report: 05000341/2016007

Inspection Dates:

August 1 - 5, 2016;

August 15 - 19, 2016; and

August 29 - September 2, 2016.

Inspection Procedure:

IP 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection

Lead Inspector:

Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS

630-829-9739

Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov

I.

Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week

The following information is requested by June 13, 2016, or sooner, to facilitate

inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call

the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in

pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic

media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD). The portable electronic media should contain descriptive

names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in lists

should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has

knowledge of light water reactor technology.

1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety

Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. Include values for Birnbaum

Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).

2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e., Large Early

Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by Risk-Achievement

Worth.

3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.

4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that

contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.

5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.

6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job

performance measures.

7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.

8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information

requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative

description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).

REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

2

9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, if

available.

10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations

with low design margins, (e.g., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or

pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers

close to rated design heat removal).

11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction

(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and

Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was

determined.

12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering

or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the

PSA).

13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category

for the last 3 years.

14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).

15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.

16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the

last 5 years at your facility.

17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design

issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years.

18. List of open operability evaluations.

19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/non-conforming.

20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.

21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical

Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements

Manual.

22. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (electronic

copies are preferred).

23. Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (electronic copies are preferred).

REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

3

II.

Information Requested (for the approximate 20 selected components) to be

Available by July 18, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office

during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016).

This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if

provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,

condition reports, and maintenance history).

1. List of condition reports (i.e., corrective action documents) associated with each

of the selected components for the last 6 years.

2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with

each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of

preventive maintenance activities.

3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not

previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and

also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,

engineering requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations are excluded

from this request]

4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or

Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.

5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,

associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a

descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list

only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.

6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with

each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.

7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the

selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.

8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected

components, if applicable.

9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for

last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other

vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate

results, etc.).

10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with

the selected components and selected scenarios.

11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective

action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.

12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for

example:

REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

4

Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.

Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.

Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan

flows, etc.

Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.

13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.

III.

Additional Information to be Provided on August 1, 2016, Onsite (for final selected

components)

1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections

and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The

lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the

week of July 25 - 29, 2016.

2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected

components during the three on-site inspection weeks.

3. One complete set of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (paper copies).

4. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (paper copies).

IV.

Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection

1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams

questions or queries during this inspection.

2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the

status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the

inspection to each team member).

3. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all onsite weeks):

Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report;

Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);

Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and

Vendor manuals.

If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.

P. Fessler

-3-

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 50-341

License No. NPF-43

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design

Bases Inspection

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

DISTRIBUTION:

Kimyata MorganButler

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource

RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Cynthia Pederson

Darrell Roberts

Richard Skokowski

Allan Barker

Carole Ariano

Linda Linn

DRPIII

DRSIII

Jim Clay

Carmen Olteanu

ADAMS Accession Number ML16099A305

Publicly Available

Non-Publicly Available

Sensitive

Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE

RIII

RIII

RIII

RIII

NAME

NFeliz-Adorno:cl

DATE

04/08/16

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY