ML16200A086: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16200A086
| number = ML16200A086
| issue date = 06/27/2016
| issue date = 06/27/2016
| title = Boiling Water Reactor License Termination Plan - Chapter 2 - Site Characterization, Rev. 0
| title = License Termination Plan - Chapter 2 - Site Characterization, Rev. 0
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = LaCrosseSolutions, LLC
| author affiliation = LaCrosseSolutions, LLC
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:LA CROSSE BOILIN G WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION  
{{#Wiki_filter:LA CROSSE BOILING WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION  


La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.Sit e 2.1.2.1.2.1.2 2 2 2
La Cross License T Revision 2.
Site 2.1.
2.1.
2.1.
2 2
2 2
2 2.1.
2.1.4 2
2 2.1.
2 2.1.
2.1.4 2 2 2.1.
2.1.
2.1.2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2.2.
2.2.
2.2.
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2 2.2.2.2.
2.2.
2.2.2 2
2 2
2 2 2.2.2 2 2.2.4 2.2.2.3.2.3.
2.2.4 2.2.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.4 2 2 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Characteri z Historical S 1.Object i 2.Metho d.1.2.1.Pr e.1.2.2.Do c.1.2.3.Li c.1.2.4.Pe r.1.2.5.Pr o 3.Operat i 4.Incide n.1.4.1.Ra d.1.4.2.Ch e 5.Findin g 6.Initial S.1.6.1.Su r.1.6.2.Su r.1.6.3.Cl a.1.6.4.Cl a.1.6.5.Cl a.1.6.6.No n.1.6.7.Cl a.1.6.8.Cl a Characteriz 1.Data Q 2.Surve y.2.2.1.Nu m.2.2.2.De t.2.2.3.Sc a.2.2.4.Ty p 3.Instru m Conce n.2.3.1.Ca l.2.3.2.Ins t 4.Labor a 5.Qualit ySummary o 1.Backg r 2.Potent i 3.Non-I m 4.Impact.3.4.1.Cl a.3.4.2.Cl a W ater Reacto r Plan z ation ..........
2.3.4 2
S ite Assess m i ves ............
2 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Characteriz Historical S 1.
d ology ........liminary Cl a cument Rev i enses, Per m r sonnel Inte r o perty Inspe c i onal Histor y n ts ...............
Objecti 2.
diological S p emical Spill s g s and Conc S urvey Are a rvey Areas ..
Method
r vey Units...
.1.2.1. Pre
a ss 1 Open L a ss 2 Open L a ss 3 Open L n-Impacted O ass 1 Structu r a ss 2 and 3 S ation Appro Q uality Obje c y Design ......
.1.2.2. Doc
m ber of Sta t termination o a n Coverage p es of Meas u m entation Se n trations (M l ibration......
.1.2.3. Lic
trument Us e atory Instru m y Assurance f Characteri r ound Study i al Radionu c m pacted Op e ed Open La n a ss 1 Open L a ss 2 Open L r TABLE O...................
.1.2.4. Per
.m ent .............
.1.2.5. Pro 3.
....................
Operati 4.
....................
Inciden
.assification .
.1.4.1. Rad
.i ew .............
.1.4.2. Che 5.
.m its and Aut h r views .........
Finding 6.
.c tions ..........
Initial S
.y .................
.1.6.1. Sur
....................
.1.6.2. Sur
.p ills ............
.1.6.3. Cla
.s .................
.1.6.4. Cla
.lusions .......
.1.6.5. Cla
.a s/Units and  
.1.6.6. Non
...................
.1.6.7. Cla
....................
.1.6.8. Cla Characteriz 1.
.Land Areas ..
Data Q 2.
.Land Areas ..
Survey
.Land Areas ..
.2.2.1. Num
.O pen Land A r es ..............
.2.2.2. Det
.S tructures ....
.2.2.3. Sca
.ach .............
.2.2.4. Typ 3.
.c tives ..........
Instrum Concen
....................
.2.3.1. Cal
.tic Measure m of Static M e..................
.2.3.2. Inst 4.
.urements an dlection, Use M DCs) .........
Labora 5.
....................
Quality Summary o 1.
.e and Contro m ent Metho d...................
Backgr 2.
.z ation Surv e...................
Potenti 3.
.c lides of Co n e n Land Are a nd Areas ....
Non-Im 4.
.Land Areas ..
Impact
.Land Areas ..
.3.4.1. Cla
.2-i OF CONT E...................
.3.4.2. Cla Water Reactor Plan zation..........
....................
Site Assessm ives............
....................
dology........
....................
liminary Cla cument Revi enses, Perm rsonnel Inter operty Inspec ional History nts...............
....................
diological Sp emical Spills gs and Conc Survey Area rvey Areas..
....................
rvey Units...
.horizations ..
ass 1 Open L ass 2 Open L ass 3 Open L n-Impacted O ass 1 Structur ass 2 and 3 S ation Appro Quality Objec y Design......
....................
mber of Stat termination o an Coverage pes of Measu mentation Se ntrations (M libration......
....................
trument Use atory Instrum y Assurance f Characteri round Study ial Radionuc mpacted Ope ed Open Lan ass 1 Open L ass 2 Open L r
....................
TABLE O ment..............
....................
assification..
....................
iew..............
....................
mits and Auth rviews..........
....................
ctions...........
.Classificati o...................
y..................
....................
pills.............
....................
s..................
....................
lusions........
....................
as/Units and Land Areas...
.A reas .........
Land Areas...
....................
Land Areas...
....................
Open Land A res...............
....................
Structures.....
....................
ach..............
....................
ctives...........
.m ents and/o r easurement a...................
tic Measurem of Static Me urements and lection, Use MDCs)..........
.d Samples ..
e and Contro ment Method zation Surve clides of Con en Land Area nd Areas.....
. and Minim u...................
Land Areas...
....................
Land Areas...
.l .................
2-i OF CONTE horizations...
.d s and Sensi t...................
Classificatio Areas..........
.ey Results ..
ments and/or easurement a d Samples...
....................
and Minimu l..................
.n cern ...........
ds and Sensit ey Results...
.a s ...............
ncern............
....................
as................
....................
ENTS on................
....................
r Samples....
.E NTS ...................
and Sample L um Detectab tivities.........
....................
Locations....
....................
ble
....................
... 2-1
....................
... 2-2
....................
... 2-2
....................
... 2-3
....................
... 2-3
....................
... 2-4
....................
... 2-5
....................
... 2-5
....................
... 2-5
....................
... 2-6
....................
... 2-6
.o n ...............
... 2-7
....................
... 2-8
....................
... 2-8
....................
... 2-9
....................
... 2-9
....................
... 2-9
....................
. 2-10
....................
. 2-10
....................
. 2-10
....................
. 2-11
....................
. 2-11
....................
. 2-12
.r Samples ...
. 2-12
.and Sample L...................
. 2-14
....................
. 2-14
.um Detecta b...................
. 2-15
....................
. 2-16
....................
. 2-16
.t ivities ........
. 2-16
....................
. 2-18
....................
. 2-18
....................
. 2-19
....................
. 2-19
....................
. 2-19
....................
. 2-20
....................
. 2-21
....................
. 2-22
....................
. 2-22
....................
. 2-24
....................
. 2-25
....................
. 2-26
....................
 
....................
La Cross License T Revision 2
....................
2.3.
....................
2.3.
....................
2 2
....................
2 2.3.
....................
2 2
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.L ocations ...
....................
....................
.b le  ...................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.... 2-1... 2-2... 2-2... 2-3... 2-3... 2-4... 2-5... 2-5... 2-5... 2-6... 2-6... 2-7... 2-8... 2-8... 2-9... 2-9... 2-9. 2-10. 2-10. 2-10. 2-11. 2-11. 2-12. 2-12. 2-14. 2-14. 2-15. 2-16. 2-16. 2-16. 2-18. 2-18. 2-19. 2-19. 2-19. 2-20. 2-21. 2-22. 2-22. 2-24. 2-25. 2-26 La Cros s License T Revisio n 2 2.3.2.3.2 2
2 2.3.2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2.4.2.5. s e Boiling W Termination n 0 .3.4.3.Cl a 5.Non-I m 6.Impact.3.6.1.Ba s.3.6.2.Tu r.3.6.3.L A 7.Surfac e.3.7.1.Ar e.3.7.2.Gr o.3.7.3.Pr e.3.7.4.On-.3.7.5.Su m Continuing References W ater Reacto r Plan a ss 3 Open L m pacted Str u ed Structur e sement Stru c r bine Buildi n A CBWR Ad m e and Groun e a Groundw a o undwater F vious Inves t-Going Inve mmary of G r Characteriz a...................
2 2.4.
r Land Areas ..
2.5.
.u ctures ........
se Boiling W Termination n 0  
.es and Syste m ctures Belo w n g Tunnel...
.3.4.3. Cla 5.
.ministration dwate r ........ater Use .....
Non-Im 6.
.low ............
Impact
.t igations .....
.3.6.1. Bas
.stigations ...
.3.6.2. Tur
.r oundwater A a tion ..........
.3.6.3. LA 7.
....................
Surface
.2-ii ...................
.3.7.1. Are
....................
.3.7.2. Gro
.ms ..............
.3.7.3. Pre
.w 636 foot E l...................
.3.7.4. On-
.Building ....
.3.7.5. Sum Continuing References Water Reactor Plan ass 3 Open L mpacted Stru ed Structure sement Struc rbine Buildin ACBWR Adm e and Groun ea Groundwa oundwater F vious Invest
....................
-Going Inve mmary of Gr Characteriza r
....................
Land Areas...
....................
uctures.........
....................
es and System ctures Below ng Tunnel....
....................
ministration dwater........
.Analytical R...................
ater Use......
....................
low.............
....................
tigations......
....................
stigations....
....................
roundwater A ation...........
.levation .....
2-ii ms...............
....................
w 636 foot El Building.....
....................
Analytical R levation......
....................
Results.........
....................
. 2-27
....................
. 2-29
....................
. 2-30
....................
. 2-30
.R esults ........
. 2-31
....................
. 2-31
....................
. 2-32
....................
. 2-32
....................
. 2-33
....................
. 2-34
....................
. 2-35
....................
. 2-35
....................
. 2-36
....................
. 2-37
....................
 
....................
La Cross License T Revision Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 2-4 Table 2-5 Table 2-6 Table 2-7 Table 2-8 Table 2-9 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-se Boiling W Termination n 0 1
....................
LACBW 2
....................
LACBW 3
....................
Instrum 4
....................
Off-Sit 5
....................
2005 D 6
....................
Investig 7
....................
Initial S 8
....................
Non-Im Survey 9
....................
Non Im Labora 10 Impact Summa 11 Class 1 Labora 12 Impact Survey 13 Class 2 Labora 14 Impact Survey 15 Class 3 Labora 16 Concre 17 1983 G Buildin 18 2013 G 19 2014 G
....................
-1 LACBW
....................
-2 LACBW
....................
-3 LACBW
....................
-4 LACBW
....................
-5 Non Im
....................
-6 Class 1
....................
-7 Class 2
....................
-8 Class 3
....................
-9 Concre
....................
-10 LACB
.. 2-27. 2-29. 2-30. 2-30. 2-31. 2-31. 2-32. 2-32. 2-33. 2-34. 2-35. 2-35. 2-36. 2-37 La Cros s License T Revisio n Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 2-4 Table 2-5 Table 2-6 Table 2-7 Table 2-8 Table 2-9 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2- s e Boiling W Termination n 0 1LACB W 2LACB W 3Instru m 4Off-Si t 52005 D 6Investi g 7Initial S 8Non-I m Surve y 9Non I m Labor a 1 0ImpactSumm a 1 1Class 1 Labor a 1 2Impact Surve y 1 3Class 2 Labor a 1 4Impact Surve y 1 5Class 3 Labor a 1 6Concr e 1 71983 G Buildi n 1 82013 G 1 92014 G-1LACB W-2LACB W-3LACB W-4LACB W-5Non I m-6Class 1-7Class 2-8Class 3-9Concr e-10LACB-11Groun d W ater Reacto r Plan WR Open L WR Structu r m ent Types a te Laborator y D airyland B a gative Leve l Suite of LA C m pacted Op e y Summary .
-11 Ground Water Reactor Plan WR Open L WR Structur ment Types a te Laboratory Dairyland Ba gative Level Suite of LAC mpacted Ope y Summary.
m pacted Coa atory Analy s ed Class 1 O ary .............
mpacted Coa atory Analys ed Class 1 O ary.............
Concrete, A atory Analy s ed Class 2 O y Summary .
Concrete, A atory Analys ed Class 2 O y Summary.
2 Asphalt, S e atory Analy s ed Class 3 O y Summary .
2 Asphalt, Se atory Analys ed Class 3 O y Summary.
3 Asphalt, S e atory Analy s ete Core Isot G roundwater n g ...............
3 Asphalt, Se atory Analys ete Core Isot Groundwater ng...............
G roundwater G roundwater W R Site M a W R Site M a W R Site Dr a W R LCE E x m pacted Op e Open Lan d 2 Open Lan d 3 Open Lan d ete Core Sa m W R Site - T d water Sam p r LIST and Survey ral Survey U and Nomina l y Analytica l a ckground S t l s for Cs-13 7 C BWR Site-e n Land Sur v...................
Groundwater Groundwater WR Site Ma WR Site Ma WR Site Dra WR LCE Ex mpacted Ope Open Land 2 Open Land 3 Open Land ete Core Sam WR Site - T dwater Samp r
.l Pile and S o sis (pCi/g) ...
LIST and Survey ral Survey U and Nominal y Analytical ackground St ls for Cs-137 CBWR Site-en Land Surv l Pile and So sis (pCi/g)....
.O pen Land S...................
Open Land S Asphalt, Sed sis (pCi/g)....
.A sphalt, Se d sis (pCi/g) ...
Open Land S ediment and sis................
.O pen Land S...................
Open Land S ediment and sis (pCi/g)....
.ediment and s is ...............
opic Analys Analysis fro Monitoring Monitoring LIST O ap - Open La ap - Building ainage and S xclusion Are en Land Sam d Sampling L d Sampling L d Sampling L mpling Locat Typical Geolo pling Wells -
.O pen Land S...................
2-iii OF TABLE Units...........
.ediment and sis (pCi/g) ...
Units.............
.opic Analys Analysis fr o...................
l MDCs.......
.Monitoring Monitoring LIST O a p - Open L a a p - Buildin g a inage and S x clusion Ar e e n Land Sa m d Sampling L d Sampling L d Sampling L m pling Loca t T ypical Geol o p ling Wells  iii OF TABL E U nits..........
l Methods an tudy for Soil 7 Based on B
.U nits ............
-Specific Ra vey Units - C oil Samples -
.l MDCs ......
Survey Units diment and S Survey Units Soil Sample Survey Units Soil Sample is Results....
.l Methods a n t udy for Soi l 7 Based on B-Specific Ra v ey Units -
om Tempora Results......
C...................
Results (pC OF FIGURE and Survey U gs Identifica Sewer Map..
.oil Samples
ea (Class 1)..
-...................
mpling Locati Locations.....
.S urvey Units
Locations.....
...................
Locations.....
.diment and S...................
tions............
.S urvey Units
ogical Cross
...................
- LACBWR ES nd Typical M ls.................
.Soil Sampl e...................
.S urvey Units
...................
.Soil Sampl e...................
.is Results ...
.om Tempor a...................
.Results .....
.Results (p C O F FIGUR E a nd Survey U gs Identific a Sewer Map .
.ea (Class 1) .
.m pling Locat i L ocations ....
.L ocations ....
.L ocations ....
.t ions ...........
.o gical Cros s- LACBW R E S ...................
....................
....................
.n d Typical M l s ................
.B ackground dionuclides
.C haracteriz a...................
.- Test Ame r...................
. - Characte r...................
.Soil Samples
...................
. - Characte r...................
.e s - Test A m...................
. - Characte r...................
.e s - Test A m...................
....................
.a ry  Well-P o...................
....................
.C i/L) ...........
.RES U nits and C l a tion ............
....................
....................
.i ons ............
....................
....................
....................
....................
.s-Section ....
.R Site ..........
....................
....................
....................
.M DCs .........
....................
.Studies ......
....................
.a tion  ...................
.r ica  ...................
.rization Sur v...................
. - Test Am e...................
.rization  ...................
.m erica  ...................
.rization  ...................
.m erica  ...................
....................
.oint South o f...................
....................
....................
.lassification
...................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.v ey  ...................
.e rica  ...................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.f Turbine ...................
....................
....................
. ..................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.. 2-39. 2-40. 2-42. 2-43. 2-44. 2-45. 2-46. 2-47. 2-49. 2-50. 2-51. 2-52. 2-53. 2-54. 2-55. 2-56. 2-60. 2-61. 2-62. 2-64. 2-65. 2-66. 2-67. 2-68. 2-69. 2-70. 2-71. 2-72. 2-75. 2-76 La Cros s License T Revisio nAEC ALARA bgs CRD DCGL DQO EPA FCP FESW FRS FSS G-1 G-3 HSA HTD IR ISFSI LACB W LER LSA LSE LTP MARL A MARS A MARSS I MDC MDCR MWe NIST s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Unite d As L o Belo w Contr Deriv Data Q Unite d Force Fuel E Final Final Geno a Geno a Histo r Hard-Incid e Indep WR La C r Licen Low S LAC B Licen A P Multi-A ME Multi-Man u I M Multi-Mini m Mini m Mega w Natio n W ater Reacto r Plan LIST OF d States At o o w As Reas o w Ground S u ol Rod Driv


ed Concent r Q uality Obj e d States En v d Circulatio n Element Sto r Radiation S u Status Surv e a 1 Coal/Oil a 3 Fossil S t rical Site A s to-Detect e nt Reports endent Spe n r osse Boilin gsee Event R S pecific Act B WR Site E nse Terminat i-Agency Ra d-Agency Ra d u al -Agency Ra d m al Detecta b mum Detect a watt Electri c nal Institute r ACRONY Mmic Energy o nably Achi e u rface e r ation Guide ective vironmental P n Pump rage Well urvey e y Station tation sessment n t Fuel Stor a g Water Rea c eports ivity n closure i on Plan diological L diation Sur v diation Sur v ble Concent r a ble Count R c of Standar d 2-iv M S AND A BCommissio n e vable line Levels P rotection A age Installati o c to r Laboratory A v ey and Ass e v ey and Site rations R ate d s and Tech n B BREVIA T n A gency on Analytical Pr o essment of MInvestigatio n ology TIONS otocols Ma n M aterials an d n Manual n ual d Equipmen t t La Cros s License T Revisio nNRC ORC PSDAR QA QAPP QC RCA REMP ROC RPV SRC STS TSD WDNR WGTV WTB ZNPS s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Unite d Oper a Post-S Quali t Quali t Quali t Radi o Radi o Radi o React Safet y Sour c Tech nWisc o Wast e Wast e Zion N W ater Reacto r Plan d States Nu c ational Revi e S hutdown D t y Assuranc e t y Assuranc e t y Control o logically C o o active Effl u o nuclides of or Pressure V y Review C o e Term Sur v n ical Suppo r o nsin Depar t e Gas Tank V e Treatment N uclear Po w r clear Regul a e w Committecommissio e e Project Pl a o ntrolled Ar e ent Monitor Concern V essel ommittee v ey rt Document tment of Na t V ault Building w er Station 2-v atory Comm i ee ning Activi t a n e a ing Reports t ural Resou r i ssion ties Report rces La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 W ater Reacto r Plan r Page Inten t 2-vi t ionally Le ft ft Blank La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.S In acco r Regulat o Nuclear characte r The pur p conduct eremain.
===Background===
License Tof comp l Survey (1575, Mu Source Tterminat i The site quantify characte rsite that classific a The ch aNUREG-Decomm Criteria, PG-EO-3 Reactor Charact e the Data informat iremediat at conce nremoved The dec o waste o f LACB W None o f radiolog i planned a G-3 po wminor st rThe maj o basemen t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 S ite Char a rdance wit h ory Guide 1
dionuclides.
.Power R e r ization per fo p ose of site e d in all ar eThe term "
Characteriza
F Terminatio n liance surve y FSS) for o p u lti-Agency T erm Surv e i on. See LT Pcharacterizthe extent a rization sur vwill require a tion and vo l a racterizatio n-1575 (M A issioning G Final Repo r 3 13196-SV-P(4), and G P e rization Pr o Quality Ob j i on obtaine d i on plannin g ntrations gr e and proper l ommissioni n f all LAC B WR Adminis t fthe buildi n ically impa c and these st r w er operatio n r uctures wil l o r sub-grad e t s of the R e W ater Reacto r Plan acterizatio n h the requi
- Test Amer
.179, Stand a e actors (1), fo rmed at th e characteriz a e as where c o F inal Radia t n Plan (LTP
- Character Soil Samples
)y s that will b p en land ar e Radiation S e y (STS) f o P Chapte r 5 ation incor p a nd nature o v eys and an a remediatio n l umes, and e n survey w A RSSIM) G uidance -
- Character es - Test Am
C r t, (3). In a d P L-001, C h P-EO-3131 9 oject (QAP P j ective (DQ O d from the
  - Character es - Test Am ary Well-Po Ci/L)............
: g. Materials e ater than t h ly packaged n g approach B WR b uild i t ration buil d n gs and str u c ted such t h ructures, in c n s. The pu b l also remai n e structures t e actor Build i r n rements o f a rd Format
RES Units and Cl ation.............
, this cha p e La Crosse B ation is to e n ontaminatio n tion Survey
ions.............
") in order to be performe d e as and buri S urvey and S o r below g r for a descri p p orates the r of contamin a lyses have b n , as well a s estimate cos t w as designe d and NUR E C haracteriz a d dition, sur v haracterizati o 9 6-QA-PL-0 0 P) (5) which O) process, a characteri z which wer e he unrestrict efor shipme n for LACB W i ngs, struct u d ing and Cr i uctures ass o hat they req u c luding the G blic roads a n n. that will b e i ng, Waste T 2-1 f 10 CFR 5 0 and Cont e p ter provid e Boiling Wa t nsure that t h n existed, r e" is from 1 0 acknowled g d at LACB W ed piping b Site Investi g r ound struc t p tion of the r esults of i nation at L A b een and co n s to plan re m t s. d and exe c E G-1757, a tion, Surv e veys were d e o n Survey P 0 1, Quality describes p and measur e z ation provi e shown to b e d release c r n t and dispo s WR requires u res and c o ib House) t o ociated with uire remedi G-3 Crib Ho u nd railways backfilled a Treatment B 0.82 (a)(9)(i i e nts for Lic e s a desc r t er Reactor (he Final Ra d emains, or h 0 CFR 50.82 g e the disti n W R. These ased on gu i g ation Manu t ures to be FRS. n vestigatio n A CBWR. I n ntinue to be mediation m c uted using Volume 2, e y, and De esigned and Plan for thAssurance p olicy, orga n e s necessary des guidan c be contamin a r iteri a have sal. the demoli t omponents o a depth o f h the Geno a al actions; use, will re mthat traver s and remain a B uilding (W i)(A) and tense Termi n r iption of (LACBWR) diation Surv h as the pot e (9)(ii)(D) a n n ction betw esurveys are; i dance prov i al (MARS Sbackfilled ns and surv e n addition, t h e used to ide m ethodologi e the guida n Revision 1 termination executed i n e La Cros s Project Pl a nization, fu n to achieve q c e for dec o a ted with ra dbeen and w i tion, remov a (with the e f at least 3 f a 3 Fossil Stherefore, n main intact a se the site a a t license te r W TB), Waste t he guidan c nation Pla n the radiol osite. ey (FRS) w ential to ex i n d is used i n e en the two  1) a Final S i ded in NU R S IM) (2) an dprior to li c e ys conduct he results o ntify areas o es, develop w n ce provid e 1 , Consoli d of Radiol o n accordanc e s e Boiling W a n LACBW R n ctional acti v quality data.
s-Section.....
ontaminatio n dioactive m a ill continue al and dispo s e xception o feet below g S tation (G-3 no remediati and function as well as s e rmination a r Gas Tank V ce of ns for ogical will be i st or n this types Status R EG-d 2) a c ense ed to of site of the waste ed in  dated o gical e with Water R Site vities,  The n and a terial to be s al as f the grade. 3) are ion is al for e veral r e the Vault La Cros s License T Revisio n (WGTV)(3 feet b Reactor/Gsump an d In the Rremovedremoved elevatio n WTB, t h concrete the rema cap and pfollowin g covered bremaini n LTP Ch a Indepen d shown i n 2.1.H In acco r Assessm informat i reports, marine f Environ mcompile d 2.1.1.O The HS A LACB W surroun d resulted Radiolo g subsurfa c the 1.5 ainformat imay als o The sco p hazardo u The objeI d b s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ) and the r eelow grade
R Site...........
)Generator P d the Turbi n R eactor Bui. All inter n , leaving o n n (i.e., conc r h e only porti footers bel oining struct u p iles below t g the termin a by at least 3 n g backfille d a pter 1, se c dent Spent F n Figure 2-1
MDCs..........
)Historical Si rdance wit h ent (HSA) i on, includi n pre-operati o f auna and s m ental Rep o d for this in v O b jectives A was a d WR activities dings. The in contami n gically Cont r ce soils out s a cre fenced ion compile o be used as p e of the us materials. ctives of th e d entify pote ased on exi s W ater Reacto r Plan emainder o f ). These re Plant, the o ne pit. lding, all i n n al concrete n ly the rem a r ete "bowl" on of the st r ow the 636 f o u re will con s t he 636 foot ation of the l feet of soil d structures t o c tion 1.3.1 d F uel Storage
Studies.......
) is exclude d te Assessm e h the guid a (6) was p n g any 10 C o nal survey sediment s u orts to the vestigation.
ation rica rization Surv
detailed inv erelated to rHSA focus e n ation of pl a r olled Area (ide of the R LACBWR d by the H Sinput into t hHSA inclu  e HSA were ntial, likely s ting or deri v r fthe basem emaining str u ne foot thic k nternal str uwill be re m a ining struc t below 636 ructure that o ot elevatio n sist of the f l elevation.
- Test Ame rization merica rization merica oint South of lassification vey erica f Turbine
T l icense are c and physic a o be plausib l d escribes thInstallatio n d from the s c e nt a nce provi d performed a C FR 50.75(g data, spill u rveys), ope Nuclear R e e stigation t o radioactive m e d on histo r ant systems
. 2-39
, (RCA). It a l R CA but wit h Site Enclo s S A was use d he develop m ded potent i to: , or known ved informa t 2-2 e nt structur e uctures incl u k portion o f uctural surf a moved to e x t ural concr e foot elevati o will remain
. 2-40
: n. In the W G l oors and fo u T he structu r c onstructed o ally altered t l y occupied
. 2-42
.e site lice n (ISFSI) Fa c c ope of the L d ed in MA R a nd docum e g) files, em preports, sp erational su r e gulatory C o collect e x materials or r ical events
. 2-43
, buildings, l so addresse h in the own e sure (LSE) d to establi s m ent of rem e ial contami n sources of tion, es located b l ude the Pi p f the Chim n a ces, syste m xpose the st e e te outside t o n, concret e is the 630 a G TV and th e u ndation w a ral surfaces t o f steel rein f t o a conditi
. 2-44
: o. n se boundar y c ility as loc a L TP. R SSIM, se c e nted in A u p loyee inte r e cial surve y rvey record s Commission x isting inf o other cont a and routi n surface an d d support st r er controlle darea  shar e sh initial su r e diation pla n n ation fro m radioactive below the 6 3 p ing and V e n ey Founda t m s and co m eel liner, w h t he liner be e pile cap a n and 635 foo t e other rem a alls as well a that will re m f orce d conc r o n which w o y. The fe n a ted in Lot 7 ction 3.0, a u gust of 1 9 r views, radi y s (e.g., sit e s , and An n (NRC) we r ormation (f r aminants) f o ne operation a d subsurfac e r uctures, op e d area. The e the same r vey units.
. 2-45
ns and the d e m radioacti vand chemi 36 foot ele v entilation T u t ion, the T u mponents w i hich will al s low the 63 6 n d piles.)
. 2-46
I t floor, sum p aining base m as concrete p m ain at LAC B r ete which w o uld not allo w n ced area o 7 of the sit e a Historical 9 99. Hist o ological in c e aerial su r n ual Radiol o r e reviewe d rom the st a or the site a n al processe s e soils withi e n land are acurrent RC A boundary. This infor m e sign of the v e material s cal contam i v ation unnel, urbine ill be so be 6 foot I n the p and m ents, piling B WR will be w the of the e (and Site orical c ident r veys, ogical d and a rt of n d its s that in the as and A and  The m ation FRS. s and i nants La Cros s License T Revisio nD nPPPP MD 2.1.2.M The obj emay hav e land are afailures rmaterial.contami n deconta m their pot e Each inc was furt hanalysis, samplin g location.
. 2-47
Relevan tremediat Also inc lRP p S i dInformat data, ev aUnits. 2.1.2.1.The HS Aclassific a have a p s e Boiling W Termination n 0 D istinguish po threat to h rovide an a s rovide info r rovide an i n rovide a gr a M ARSSIM g Delineate ini t M ethodolo gy ective of the e significan t a s and struc t resulting in Dependi n n ation varie s mination act i ential for co nident identi f h er investig aany reme d g , survey, a n Historical r t informati o i on phases o luded in the Relevant exc e ersonnel in t l ant person nite inspecti o d entify, loca t ion from th i a luation of r Preli m A investig a a tion of the potential for W ater Reacto r Plan p ortions of t human healt h ssessment o f rmation use fu nitial classifi c aded initial c g uidance, an d t ial survey u y HSA recor d t ly impacte d t ures. Thes e airborne rel n g upon p a s by area. I n i vities and F ntamination
. 2-49
.fied that po s a ted. This i n dial actions nd analysis i records pro v o n that be c of the licens e research as s erpts from w terviews, in c n el to confi r o n, utilizin g te, confirm, i s research w results, doc u m inary Clas s a tion was dsite land ar econtaminat i r h e site that m h , f the likeliho fu l to subseq u c ation of ar elassificatio n d u nit boundar i ds search an d d the hazard o e included s y eases, liqui d a st site op e n order to fa cRS plannin
. 2-50
: g. sed a realist i nvestigatio n taken to m i n an attem p vided the so u comes avai l e terminatio n sociated wit h written repor t c luding the u rm docume n g historic si and docum e w as used in umentation o sification d esigned t o e as and stru c ion (based o 2-3 m ay need fu r od of conta m u ent contin u e as and stru c n for impact e i es and area s d interview ous materia l ystem, stru c d spills or r e e rations an d c ilitate effe c g, land area s ic potential t n focused o n m itigate the s p t to identi fy urce of a vas t lable durin g n plan will b h the develo p t s and corre s u se of ques t nted inciden tte drawing s e nt areas of c the HSA d e o f findings, o obtain su ctures as im p o n historica l rther action minant migr a u ing charact e c tures as no n e d soils and s s based upo nprocess wa s l or radiolo g cture, or are a eleases, or t d processes
. 2-51
, c tive charact s and struct u t o impact t h n the scope osituation, a n f y the "as l et majority o f g any add i be evaluated
. 2-52
.pment of th e s pondences, t ionnaires, o t s and iden t s , photogra p concern. evelopment, and the id e u fficient in fo p acted or n o l data) or c ofrom those ation, erization su r n-impacted o structures i n n the initial c s to identify g ical status o a contamina t he loss of c , the pote n terization, a n u res are clas s he character i of contamin a n d any pos t e ft" conditio f the docum e itional cha
. 2-53
: r. e HSA were: o f current, f o t ify undocu m phs, prints, including t h entification formation t o on-impacted o ntain kno w that pose li t rveys, or impacte d , n accordanc e c lassificatio nthose event of LACBW R ation from s y c ontrol over ntial for re s n d to guide f s ified based i zation of th ant samplin g t-remedial a n of the in c e nts inspect e racterizatio n: ormer and r e m ented inci d and diagra m he compilatiof initial S u o provide i. Impacted wn contami n ttle or e with n. s that R site ystem solid sidual f uture upon e site g and action cident ed. n and e tired dents, ms to on of u rvey initial areas nation La Cros s License T Revisio n (based o through k is no re aimpacte d controll e If a land area cla swas ma d Initial c l historica l initial cl aat the ti m prepared FRS des iclassific acontinui n surveilla nclassific aof com m 2.1.2.2.Records source o f for LAC B include: OSLSOAERDHSR s e Boiling W Termination n 0 on past or p k nowledge o a sonable po d from a r a d areas wer e area or stru c s sification (e e based upo n lassification l radiologic a assification a me of identif
. 2-54
: i. Final cla s i gn. The c h a tions indic a n g character i nce, and a n a tions (for e x mencement o f Docu mmaintained f document a B WR, man y Operational R afety Revie w L icensee Ev eite Initiated O perator Lo g A nnual Envi r Environment a R egulatory a c Documentati o Health Physi cite inspecti o Radiological W ater Reacto r Plan preliminary o f site histor yssibility for a diological p e also docu m cture was cl a e.g. Class 1, n the infor m of LACB W a l survey da t and (2) fina l i cation of th e ssification i s haracterizati o ated in the H i zation surv e n y other a p xample, fro m f the FRS.
. 2-55
m ent Revie wto satisfy t ation for th e y record typ e R eview Co m w Committ e e nt Reports (Incident Re p gs including ronmental M a l investiga t ctions conc e on from int e cs surveys a n o n and surve i and enviro n r radiologica l y or previo u residual r a perspective.
. 2-56
mented. assified as i mClass 2 or C m ation obtai n W R areas w t a. Classif y l classificat i e survey are s performed o n data was H SA as desc r eys, operati o p plicable su r m Class 3 t o w t he require m e HSA reco r es were eva l mmittee (OR C e e (SRC) M eLER) Sum m ports (IR), Reactor Op e M onitoring R t ions perfor m e rning the si t rviews con d nd samplin g illance type nmental surv 2-4 l surveillan c us survey in f adioactive c o Potential m pacted, th e Class 3) in a ned. w as based o ying a surve y i on. Initial c a using the i and verifie d used to va l ribed in this o nal survey s r vey data m o Class 2 an d m ents of 10 r ds review p l uated. A s u C) Meeting M e eting Minu t m aries, erator and H Reports, m ed by inde p te, d ucted with r g results ass odocuments a ey docume n c e). Non-i m formation a n ontaminatio nchemical h en a determi accordance w o n historic a y area has a classificatio n information d as a DQ O l idate or up d Chapter.
. 2-60
R s in suppo r t m ay cause d from Cla sCFR Part 5 0 process. Du r u mmary of t Minutes, tes, Health Physi c p endent enti t retired/sepa r o ciated with a ssociated w nts, m pacted ar e n d are those a n. Areas w h azards inci d ination of th ewith MAR S al informati ominimum o n of most a r available w h O during ch a date, as nec e R adiological of decomm i an increas e ss 2 to Class 0.75(g)(1) p r ing the co n t he types of cs entries, ties, rated site pe ridentified e v with identifi e eas are ide n a reas where were classifi e d ents on o w e initial imp SSIM, secti o o n and ava i of two stage r eas is perf o h en the HS A a racterizatio n e ssary, the i survey data i ssioning, r o e in survey s 1) until th e p rovided a m n duct of the records rev i rsonnel, vents, ed events, ntified there ed as w ne r-p acted o n 2.2 ilable s: (1) ormed A was n an d initial from o utine area e time m ajor HSA i ewed La Cros s License T Revisio nQ 2.1.2.3.LACB Wpermits. allowed D the site, activitie s Several glicensin gUUUWLFrom A u This per i 1987, an d 2.1.2.4.Intervie w about th e The per sthe parti c personn eterms be site kno w Between individu a standard isite pers othe pers omemori e operatio n 2.1.2.5.Several Several s s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Quality Cont r Licen WR was oper a The NRC D airyland P t o support o s. government g , constructi o United State s United State s United State s W isconsin D e L ocal/Count y ugust 28, 19 7 i od include s d ISFSI con s Perso n ws with curr e e site and to onnel inter v cipants as w e l were cho s i ng investig wledge and e 2010 and a ls contact e ized person n o nnel who w o nnel obser v s of other q n al period e x Prop e on-site pro p s ite events o f W ater Reacto r Plan r ol (QC) /Q uses, Permits a ted in acco r Operating L ower Coop e o perations d u and regulat o on, operatio n s Atomic En e s Nuclear R e s Environme n epartment o f y Governme n 73 to the pr e s power op e s truction an d nnel Intervi e e nt or previ o verify or cl views inclu d well as indiv i s en due to t hated for the e xperience t h 2011, app r e d as part nel survey w w orked at th v ations docu m q uestionnair e xperience, o rrty Inspecti o p erty inspe c f interest w e r u ality Assur a and Author r dance with License for erative (Dai r uring its op e o ry agencies ns, and deco m e rgy Comm i e gulatory C o ntal Protect i f Natural R e nts. esent, the fa c e rations to 1 d spent fuel e ws ous employ earify infor m ded a combi n i dual and gr o h eir knowle dassessment
. 2-61
.h at ranged f r roximately 4 of the H S w hich was c e LACBW R mented on t h e completer s r by docum e o ns c tions were ere identifie d 2-5 a nce (QA) f iizations several Fe d LACBWR a r ylan d) to u s erating lifet i have provi d mmissionin g i ssion (AEC ommission (N i on Agency (e sources (W D c ility has be e 1 987, perm aoff-load wh i e es were pe r m ation gathe r n ation of q u oup intervie w d ge of and
. 2-62
: a. A numbe r rom the site c 4 0 recollect i S A questio n completed v R during its o h e question n s, current o n ntation disc omade over d which wer e fi nding type d d eral and St a and support s e any quan t ime, and to ded oversig h g. These ag e C), NRC), (EPA), DNR), en operated u anent shutd o i ch was co m rformed to c red from th e uestionnaire s ws with se vassociation r of the per s constructio n i ons of int e n naire prog r voluntarily b operational n aire were c n-site work i o vered duri n r the cours e e subsequen t documents.
. 2-64
ate of Wisc o t ing Techni c t ity of radio aimplement d ht at LACB Wencies inclu d u nder NRC o wn for de c m pleted in 2 0 collect first-h e records th a s completed veral of the pwith the sy s s onnel inter v n period to s h e rest were l r a m. This by retired/se pyears. Wit h corroborate d i ng staff th a ng the recor d e of the H S tly docume n o nsin licens e c al Specific a active mate r d ecommissi o WR during s de: License DP R commissioni n 0 12. hand infor m at were revi eby a major i participants.
. 2-65
stems and s o v iewed poss h utdown. l ogged fro m consisted parated sta f h few excep t d either by l o a t had LAC B d s search.
. 2-66
SA develop m n ted in the H es and a tions r ial at o ning siting, R-45. n g in m ation e wed. ity of  Key ource essed m the of a ff and tions, o gged BWR m ent. H SA.
. 2-67
La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.1.3.O LACB W Dairylan Mississi p b ordere d Mississi p LSE co m served a s confirm e road on tt h f oa n 1t ha l i The pla nChalmer s provide d LACB W 19 years defuelin g Operatin No. 56, d 333 irra dinto five Limited d ongoing shipped internals
. 2-68
. 2-69
. 2-70
. 2-71
. 2-72
. 2-75
. 2-76


Building removed undergr o Condens Water S y Building 2.1.4.I n Based o nnotificat i s e Boiling W Termination n 0 O perational WR was a 5 d. This sin g ppi River s o d on the n o ppi River a
La Cross License T Revision AEC ALARA bgs CRD DCGL DQO EPA FCP FESW FRS FSS G-1 G-3 HSA HTD IR ISFSI LACBW LER LSA LSE LTP MARLA MARSA MARSSI MDC MDCR MWe NIST se Boiling W Termination n 0 United As Lo Below Contr Deriv Data Q United Force Fuel E Final Final Genoa Genoa Histor Hard-Incide Indep WR La Cr Licen Low S LACB Licen AP Multi-AME Multi-Manu IM Multi-Minim Minim Megaw Nation Water Reactor Plan LIST OF d States Ato ow As Reaso w Ground Su ol Rod Driv ed Concentr Quality Obje d States Env d Circulation Element Stor Radiation Su Status Surve a 1 Coal/Oil a 3 Fossil St rical Site As to-Detect ent Reports endent Spen rosse Boiling see Event R Specific Act BWR Site En se Terminati
-Agency Rad
-Agency Rad ual
-Agency Rad mal Detectab mum Detecta watt Electric nal Institute r
ACRONYM mic Energy onably Achie urface e
ration Guide ective vironmental P n Pump rage Well urvey ey Station tation sessment nt Fuel Stora g Water Reac eports ivity nclosure ion Plan diological L diation Surv diation Surv ble Concentr able Count R c
of Standard 2-iv MS AND AB Commission evable line Levels Protection A age Installatio ctor Laboratory A vey and Asse vey and Site rations Rate ds and Techn BBREVIAT n
Agency on Analytical Pro essment of M Investigatio nology TIONS otocols Man Materials and n Manual nual d Equipmentt
 
La Cross License T Revision NRC ORC PSDAR QA QAPP QC RCA REMP ROC RPV SRC STS TSD WDNR WGTV WTB ZNPS se Boiling W Termination n 0 United Opera Post-S Qualit Qualit Qualit Radio Radio Radio React Safety Sourc Techn Wisco Waste Waste Zion N Water Reactor Plan d States Nuc ational Revie Shutdown D ty Assurance ty Assurance ty Control ologically
g operations.
g operations.
u t were us e H ouse and B o nsidered C l of the LAC B o n Switch H n d disposal o portion of s sion Sub-S t be surveye f NUREG-s and Equi pfor buildin g ts as docum summariz e a ble potenti a station, incl u w as perfor m on Survey p acted  The   The e d by B arge l ass 3 B WR H ouse, of all these t ation d for 1575, p ment g s are ented ed in al for u ding med in Plan La Cros s License T Revisio n incorpor adocume n develop e executin g procedu r safely a n Charact e objectiv eProv iDev eSupp volu m The dec o b uilding s characte r subjecte dremoved 1757, A p The cha r subsurfa c structura surveys w structure used to m above g r of the e x planned, planning A signif i unit is cl a design f o result in unit mee terrors. As site-s LACB W selected.
ut were use House and B onsidered Cl of the LACB on Switch H nd disposal o portion of ssion Sub-St be surveye f NUREG-s and Equip for building ts as docum summarize able potentia station, inclu was perform on Survey pacted The The ed by Barge lass 3 BWR
in NUR E Paramet e assess th e s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ated the pr e n ted in the s u e d to provid e g characteri z r es and sur v n d effectivel y rization dat a e s: i de radiolog i e lop the req uort the ev a m es. ommissioni n s, structures
: House, of all these tation d for
, rization eff o d to FRS.
: 1575, pment gs are ented ed in al for uding med in Plan  
E prior to th e p pendix O.
 
racterizatio n ce soils, pa v l basement s w ere perfor ms. Upon co m m ake deter m r ade or subg x pected en d-executed a
La Cross License T Revision incorpora documen develope executing procedur safely an Characte objective Provi Deve Supp volum The deco buildings character subjected removed 1757, Ap The char subsurfac structura surveys w structure used to m above gr of the ex
: n. icant questi o assified cor r o r FRS. A a survey de s ts the releas e pecific Der i WR at the ti m The scree n EG/CR-551 2 e r Analysis e correct cl a W ater Reacto r Plan evious hist o urvey areas e guidance a zation surve y ey unit spe c y acquire th e a acquired t h ical inputs n uired inputs f aluation of r n g approach  
: planned, planning A signifi unit is cla design fo result in unit meet errors.
, and comp o orts focuse d E xtensive c h e performan c n surveys f o ved surfaces
As site-s LACBW selected.
, s that will r e m ed in the L m pletion, th e m inations on wrade struct u-state struct u nd docume n on that must r ectly. The a classificati o s ign that do e e criteria. I n i ved Conce n m e the char a n ing DCGL s 2 Volume 3(9), Table 6 a ssification o r or ical oper afrom the H S a nd directio n y activities.
in NURE Paramete assess the se Boiling W Termination n 0 ated the pre nted in the su ed to provide g characteriz res and surv nd effectively rization data es:
cific survey e requisite c h h rough the e necessary fo r f or LTP, an d remediation for LACB W onents to a d d on open h aracterizati o c e of final s o cused on g , and concre t emain in th e LACBWR A d e data was a w hether ad d u res, surface ures at LA C n ted with th e be answer e a ppropriate c o n which u n e s not obtai n n some case s n tration Gui d a cterization s presented i , Residual R.91 (P crit = 0 of impacted o 2-13 a tional and S A and pre v n to the per s The Plan winstruction s h aracterizati e xecution of r the design o d alternative s WR calls for t d epth of at lland areas o n of equip m s urveys is n o g eneral ope n t e pads. Co e en d-state dministratio n ssessed for q ditional char a and subsur f C BWR. Co n e same data e d by the ch a classificatio n nderestimat e n adequate i n s, this can i n deline Leve lsurvey was i n NUREG-1 R adioactive 0.10) for soi l o pen land o rradiologica l vious site ch s onnel resp o w orked in co s (sample p lon data. the Plan w a of FRS, s and tech nthe demolit i least 3 feet band remai nment, syste m ot required i n land area s o ncrete core condition.
ide radiologi elop the requ ort the eva mes.
n Building a q uality and a a cterization face soils, o r n tinuing ch a quality an d aracterizati o n of a surve y e s the pote n nformation t o n crease the p l s (DCGLs)performe d , 1757 and th Contamin a l s were use d r soil survey l informati o aracterizati o onsible for i m njunction w l ans) that w as used to m n ologies an d i on and rem o below grad e n ing struct u ms or struc t in accordan c s including: samples we rIn addition
ommissionin s, structures, rization effo d to FRS. E prior to the ppendix O.
, a nd several o adequacy.
racterization ce soils, pav l basements were perform
T data is req u r beneath t h aracterizatio n d the results on is wheth e y unit is cri t n tial for con o demonstr a potential for m were not y e alternate a ce concentra t ation from D d as alternat units. o n collecte d on efforts. I mplementin g with implem e were develo p meet three pr i d estimate w oval of all o n e. Consequ e u res that w i tures that w c e with NU R site surfac e re taken fro m , characteri z of the G-3 s t T he data wa s uired, primar h e concrete f n surveys wincluded i n er or not a s u tical to the s u tamination c ate that the s u m aking dec i et establish e c tion levels tion values f D ecommissi o e action lev e d and t was g and e nting ped to imary w aste n-site e ntly, ill be ill be R EG-e and m the zation tation s then ily of f loors will be n FRS u rvey urvey c ould urvey isions e d for were f ound oning els to La Cros s License T Revisio n For stru c to eval u 7,100 dp m Appendi x radionuc the cons e for Cs-1 3 2.2.1.D DQOs w FRS. H oto deter m unrestric tinspecti onature, e applicab l Charact eoutlined 1)State 2)Iden t 3)Iden t 4)Defi n 5)Dev e 6)Spec i 7)Opti m The DQ O collect.
: s. Upon com make determ rade or subg xpected end-executed an icant questio assified corr or FRS. A a survey des ts the release pecific Deri WR at the tim The screen EG/CR-5512 er Analysis e correct cla Water Reactor Plan evious histo urvey areas e guidance a zation survey ey unit spec y acquire the a acquired th ical inputs n uired inputs f aluation of r ng approach  
N and will assessm e obtainin g obtained Direct mMinimal that exh i Detect (H 2.2.2.S Charact e approve d approac h s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ctures, the g r ate the cla s m/100c m 2 t o x H. Use o f lide distrib u e rvative app r 3 7 is signifi c D ata Qualit y were implem e owever, the m ine the ra d ted use cri t o ns and sur v xtent and r a le structures rization sur v in MARSSI Mthe proble m t ify the deci s t ify inputs t o n e the study elop a decisi o ify limits o n m ize the des O s for site N o structur e therefore n o e nt of concr e g core sam pto determi n measurement Detectable i bited the h i H TD) radio n urve y Desi g rization su r d procedure s h based upo n W ater Reacto r Plan r oss screeni n ssification o o tal gross b e f the Co-60 ution for sur f r oach was t o c antly great e y Ob j ective s e nted for c h goal of cha rionuclide m teria to de m veys of su ff a nge of radi o , residues, s o veys were d e M , Append i m , sion, o the decisio nboundaries, on rule, n decision er r ign for obta i characteriz a es located a b o t b e subject e te in base m p les. Soils ne the mean s and scan sConcentrati ighest activ i nuclide(s).
, and compo orts focused Extensive ch e performanc n surveys fo ved surfaces, s that will re med in the L mpletion, the minations on w rade structu
g n rveys were s and the Ch a n the DQOs f r n g level tha t o f survey u e t a-gamma sscreening v f ace conta m o assume a d er. s h aracterizati o r acterizatio n mixture, whe r monstrate c o ff icient qual i o active con t o ils and sur f e signed to g i x D. The s e n , r ors, an d ining data.
-state structu nd documen on that must rectly. The a classificatio sign that doe e criteria. In ived Concen me the chara ning DCGLs 2 Volume 3 (9), Table 6 assification o r
a tion includ e bove 3 feet b ed to FRS.
orical opera from the HS and direction y activities.
m ents and s uwere samp land maxim u s of surfaceons (MDC) i ty were se n designed a a racterizati o f or each sur v 2-14 t was used d u nits was t h s urface acti v value was c o m ination wo u distribution o on surveys i n n is to quant i r eas the FR S ompliance w i ty and qu a tamination i n face water.
cific survey e requisite ch hrough the e necessary for for LTP, and remediation for LACBW onents to a d d on open haracterizatio ce of final s ocused on g
g ather the ap e ven steps i n ed identifyi n below grade Consequen t u rrounding s o led volume t um activity asoils were as will be e nt to an off
, and concret emain in the LACBWR Ad e data was a whether add ures, surface ures at LAC nted with the be answere appropriate c on which un es not obtain n some cases ntration Guid acterization s presented i
-a nd perfor m o n Survey Pl vey unit. F o during char a he nuclide-vity based o n o nservative a u ld be princ i o f 100% Co n a similar m ify and deli n S goal is co with 10 CF R antity were n each appl i propriate d a n the DQO d ng the type swill remai n tly, sample coils. Build i t rically. S u a s well as t hmade usin g employed f o-site labora t med in acc oan. Survey o r example, acterization a specific sc r n Co-60 fro m a s it was a n i pally Co-6 0-60 since th e manner as a n n eate conta m omparison o f R 20.1402. performed ticable surv e a ta using th e development s and quant i n following d c ollection w a i ng concret e ufficient me h e sample st a g the same o r FSS. Vo t ory for ana ordance wi t design inco ran open lan d as an action r eening val u m NUREG-nticipated th a 0 and Cs-13 7 e screening v n ticipated f o m inated are a f data again s Characteri z to determin ey unit, incl u e DQO proc e process are
, Residual R
: ities of me d decommissi o a s focused o e was sampl easurements a ndard devi ainstrument slumetric sa mlysis of Ha r t h all appl i r porated a g r d survey un i level u e of 1757, a t the 7 and v alue or the as and s t the zation e the u ding e ss as : d ia to o ning o n the ed by were a tion. s and mples rd-to-icable raded it was La Cros s License T Revisio n designat e the unre s Class 1 s present.
.91 (Pcrit = 0 of impacted o 2-13 ational and SA and prev n to the pers The Plan w instructions haracterizati execution of r the design o d
to identi f Class 2 o survey mselect lo cmeasure m b iased s u unit. Adelineat e warrante survey u n The are a characte rS a l s uB s y FR a dS ASS a rSC PA L 2.2.2.1.The nu m b y asses s s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e d as Class stricted rele a s urvey unit f The survey fy the latera l or Class 3 r e measurement c ations for s ment and/or urvey desig n A biased ap p e the extent od if the cha r n it. as and mate r rization sur v urface scan s ll Class 1, 2 u rvey unit L B iased subsu r ystems of cigure 2-3.
alternatives WR calls for t depth of at l land areas on of equipm surveys is no general open te pads. Co e end-state dministration ssessed for q ditional chara and subsurf CBWR. Con e same data ed by the cha classification nderestimate n adequate in s, this can in deline Level survey was in NUREG-1 Radioactive 0.10) for soil open land or radiological vious site ch sonnel respo worked in co s (sample pl on data.
Random sa m d dition, soil cans and s Administrati oamples wer ecans and sa m reas. cans and sa m C oncrete sa m iping and V A b ackgrou n LACBWR i nNum b mber of meas u sing the sa m W ater Reacto r Plan 1 because i t a se criteria.
the Plan wa of FRS, s and techn the demoliti least 3 feet b and remain ment, system ot required i n land areas oncrete core condition.
f ocused on b design was l and vertic a e ceived sur vlocations a n static meas usample lo c n or a rando m proach was o f an area t h racterization ials survey e v ey included s and r ando m 2 , 3, and n o L 3012102 (i.
n Building a quality and a acterization face soils, or ntinuing cha quality and aracterizatio n of a survey es the poten nformation to ncrease the p ls (DCGLs) performed, 1757 and th Contamina ls were used r soil survey l informatio aracterizatio onsible for im njunction w lans) that w as used to m nologies and ion and remo below grade ning structu ms or struct in accordanc s including:
e r face soil s a oncern in C m ples were t asamples w eamples we r o n Building e taken fro m m ples were m ples were t m ples were t entillation t u nd radiation cluding: as p b er of Static urements a n p le size nec e r t may cont a Therefore, t b ounding th e based upo n al extent of t h v eys develo p nd scan area u rements an d cations at ra n m approach warranted h at requires effort was d e d and/or sa m: m and biase d on-impacted e., the switc h amples were Class 1 and a ken from a e re obtaine d re taken o n and the G-3 m the septic t a taken on L A t aken on G-3aken in the unnels. study was phalt, concre tMeasureme n nd/or sample e ssary to sa t 2-15 ain levels o f the characte r e contamina t n the numbe r he contami n ped to inclu d s. Biased s u d/or sample s n dom. The was addres s when the c remediatio n d esigned to v m pled in an d d surface an d open land a h yar d). taken alon g 2 areas inc l a sphalt and c directly bel o n accessible Coal Plant.
samples wer In addition, and several o adequacy. T data is requ r beneath th aracterization d the results on is whethe y unit is crit ntial for con o demonstra potential for m were not ye alternate ac e concentrat ation from D d as alternat units.
anks. A CBWR A d 3 Building abasement a rperformed te, and soil.
on collected on efforts. I mplementing with impleme were develop meet three pri d estimate w oval of all on
n ts and/or Ss that were t tisfy the DQ O f radiologic a rization sur v t ion where c r of measur e nation. Are a de a combi n urvey desig n s. Random e decision o f sed by the D c haracteriza t n. Alternati v verify the b a d around th e d subsurfac earea survey g side and un l uding the p c oncrete fro m o w the asph a e roof surf a dministratio n a ccess and h e reas of the Ron materia lamples t aken in eac h O s. al contamin a veys that we rontaminatio ements and a s classified n ation of ra n n s used kno w survey desi g f whether t o D QO proces s t ion effort w v ely, a rand o a sis for the c e licensed a r e soils sam p units with derneath un d p iping syste m pads and a lt to a one m a ce areas o f n Building s u eavily trave l R eactor Bui ls similar t o h survey un i a tion greate r re performe d n was pote nsamples re qas non-imp a ndom and b wn informat i g n selected o use prima r s for each s u w as design e om approac h classificatio n r ea as part o p les were ta k the excepti o d erground pms as sho w paved area m eter depth.
: e. Conseque ures that wi tures that w ce with NUR site surface re taken from
f the LAC B u rfaces and led surfaces.lding, WT B o those fou n it was deter m r than d in a n tially q uired a cted, b iased ion to static rily a urvey e d to h was n of a of the k en in o n of piping wn on s. In BWR drain B , and n d at m ined La Cros s License T Revisio n For the c that will and/or s a of resid u For the sample s vertical e For non-validate measure mtrivial le v generate d 2.2.2.2.For the c survey uSample l to speci fi that we r responsi b survey d radioacti v potential from the 2.2.2.3.Survey u area to b area sca n Supervis was giv e survey u n 2.2.2.4.The cha r (beta an d survey o f FRS co n and vol usamplin gfollowin g s e Boiling W Termination n 0 c haracteriza t be subject e amples take n al radioacti v characteriz a s ize was ba s e xtent of the impacted a nthe basis m ents and/o vels of lice n d radionucli d Deter m c haracteriza t n its that wi l l ocations w e ic locations w r e taken in b le Radiolo g d esign pro c v ity, depresspill locati oHSA aided Scan C u nits were s c b e scanned i n ned was c or and/or t h en to infor m n it. Type s r acterizatio n d gamma); s t f any concr e n sisted of a c umetric sam p g of surface g is a descri p W ater Reacto r Plan tion of imp a e d to FSS, t h n in the surv e ve contamin a a tion of Cla s ed upon th econtaminat i nd Class 3 o p of the cla s o r samples w n see-genera t d es are pres e m ination of t ion of non
, characteriz of the G-3 st The data was uired, primar he concrete f n surveys w included in er or not a su tical to the su tamination c ate that the su making deci et establishe ction levels tion values f Decommissio e action leve d and t was g and enting ped to imary waste n-site
-l l be subjec t ere determin w ithin the s u each surve g ical Protec t cess. Consions, disc o ons, or area sin the selec t C overage c anned to t h n each surv ontingent u pe Project H e mation from s of Measur e n survey of tatic beta m e e te and/or as combinatio n p les. The s u and subsur f p tion of the d r a cted Class 1 he minimu m ey units we r ation in the sss 1 structu r e necessary n ion. p en land su r s sification.
: ently, ill be ill be REG-e and m the zation tation s then ily of floors will be n FRS urvey urvey could urvey isions ed for were found oning els to  
w as suffici e t ed radionu c e nt in non-i m Static Meas u-impacted a n t ed to FRS, e d by gener urvey unit.
 
Ty unit was t ion Super v sideration w olored areas
La Cross License T Revision For struc to evalu 7,100 dpm Appendix radionuc the conse for Cs-13 2.2.1. D DQOs w FRS. Ho to determ unrestrict inspectio nature, e applicabl Characte outlined
, s where the t ion of biase d h e extent pr ey unit was p on the pr o ealth Physic the initial w ements and S building su r easurement s phalt-paved n of surface urvey of th e face soil, se d d ifferent ty p 2-16 1 and Class m number o f re commens u survey unit.
: 1) State
res that wil n umber of s r vey units, t h Conseque n e nt to ensur e c lides are p r m pacted are a urement an d n d impacte d sample loc aating rando m T he locatio ndetermine d v isor and/or w as given , cracks, lo w ground ha s d locations.actical in a cdetermine d o fessional j uist during t h w alk downs Samples r faces cons i s , m aterial s a open land ascans (beta e open land diment and s pes of meas u 2 open lan d f random o r urate with t h  l remain a n samples ne e he primary c n tly, the n u e with reas o resent in C l a s. d Sample L o d open land a tions were m pairs of c n of biased m d by the p r the Project to locatio n w point gra v s been distu r ccordance w d during the udgment of he survey d e and the a m i sted of a c o amples and s a reas that w i and gamm aareas consi ssurface wat e u rements an d d areas (pa v r biased dir e h e probabili t n d be subje c e ded to asse s c haracteriza tumber of sonable con f lass 3 areas ocations areas and C primarily c h oordinates t measuremen t r ofessional j Health Ph y ns that ex h v ity drain p rbed. Hist o w ith their cl asurvey des i the Radiol o e sign proces m bient radia t o mbination smears. Th e i ll remain a n a), static be t sted of gam m e r for isoto p d samples th a ved and unp a e ct measure m t y of the pre s cted to FR S ss the later a t ion DQO w systematic fidence that and no lic e Class 2 stru c hosen at ra nhat corresp o t s and/or sa m judgment o y sicist duri n hibit meas u p oints, actu a orical infor m a ssification.
: 2) Ident
i gn process.
: 3) Ident
o gical Prot es. Conside r t ion levels i of surface e characteri z nd be subjec t ta measure m m a scans a n pic analysis. at were utili z a ved) ments sence S , the al and w as to static only e nsee-ctural ndom. o nded m ples of the n g the u rable a l and m ation  The The e ction r ation i n the scans zation ted to ments, n d the The zed.
: 4) Defin
La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.2.2.4.1Gamma activity.  
: 5) Deve
: 6) Speci
: 7) Optim The DQO collect. N and will assessme obtaining obtained Direct m Minimal that exhi Detect (H 2.2.2. S Characte approved approach se Boiling W Termination n 0 ctures, the gr ate the clas m/100cm2 to x H. Use of lide distribu ervative appr 37 is signific Data Quality were impleme owever, the mine the rad ted use crit ons and surv xtent and ra le structures rization surv in MARSSIM the problem tify the decis tify inputs to ne the study elop a decisio ify limits on mize the des Os for site No structure therefore no ent of concre g core samp to determin measurement Detectable ibited the hi HTD) radion urvey Desig rization sur d procedures h based upon Water Reactor Plan ross screenin ssification o otal gross be f the Co-60 ution for surf roach was to cantly greate y Objectives ented for ch goal of char ionuclide m teria to dem veys of suff ange of radio
, residues, so veys were de M, Appendi m,
: sion, o the decision boundaries, on rule, n decision err ign for obtai characteriza es located ab ot be subject ete in basem ples. Soils ne the mean s and scans Concentrati ighest activi nuclide(s).
gn rveys were s and the Cha n the DQOs f r
ng level that of survey u eta-gamma s screening v face contam o assume a d er.
s haracterizatio racterization mixture, wher monstrate co fficient quali oactive cont oils and surf esigned to g ix D. The se n,
rors, and ining data.
ation include bove 3 feet b ed to FRS.
ments and su were sampl and maximu s of surface ons (MDC) ity were sen designed a aracterizatio for each surv 2-14 t was used d units was th surface activ value was co mination wou distribution o on surveys in n is to quanti reas the FRS ompliance w ity and qua tamination in face water.
gather the ap even steps in ed identifyin below grade Consequent urrounding so led volumet um activity a soils were as will be e nt to an off-and perform on Survey Pl vey unit. Fo during chara he nuclide-vity based on onservative a uld be princi of 100% Co n a similar m ify and delin S goal is co with 10 CFR antity were n each appli propriate da n the DQO d ng the types will remain tly, sample c oils. Buildi trically. Su as well as th made using employed fo
-site laborat med in acco an. Survey or example, acterization a specific scr n Co-60 from as it was an ipally Co-60
-60 since the manner as an neate contam omparison of R 20.1402.
performed t icable surve ata using the development s and quanti n following d collection wa ing concrete ufficient me he sample sta g the same or FSS. Vo tory for ana ordance wit design incor an open land as an action reening valu m NUREG-nticipated tha 0 and Cs-137 e screening v nticipated fo minated area f data agains Characteriz to determin ey unit, inclu e DQO proce process are:
ities of med decommissio as focused o e was sample asurements andard devia instruments lumetric sam lysis of Har th all appli rporated a gr d survey uni level ue of
: 1757, at the 7 and value or the as and st the zation e the uding ess as dia to oning on the ed by were ation.
s and mples rd-to-icable raded it was  
 
La Cross License T Revision designate the unres Class 1 s present.
to identif Class 2 o survey m select loc measurem biased su unit. A delineate warrante survey un The area character S
al su B
sy F
R ad S
A S
S ar S
C P
A L
2.2.2.1.
The num by assess se Boiling W Termination n 0 ed as Class stricted relea survey unit f The survey fy the lateral or Class 3 re measurement cations for s ment and/or urvey design A biased app e the extent o d if the char nit.
as and mater rization surv urface scans ll Class 1, 2 urvey unit L Biased subsur ystems of c igure 2-3.
Random sam ddition, soil cans and s Administratio amples were cans and sam reas.
cans and sam Concrete sam iping and V A backgroun LACBWR in Numb mber of measu sing the sam Water Reactor Plan 1 because it ase criteria.
focused on b design was l and vertica eceived surv locations an static measu sample loc n or a random proach was of an area th racterization ials surveye vey included s and random 2, 3, and no L3012102 (i.e rface soil sa oncern in C mples were ta samples we amples wer on Building e taken from mples were mples were t mples were t entillation tu nd radiation cluding: asp ber of Static urements an ple size nece r
t may conta Therefore, t bounding the based upon al extent of th veys develop nd scan area urements and cations at ran m approach warranted hat requires effort was d ed and/or sam m and biased on-impacted e., the switch amples were Class 1 and aken from a ere obtained re taken on and the G-3 m the septic ta taken on LA taken on G-3 aken in the unnels.
study was phalt, concret Measuremen nd/or sample essary to sat 2-15 ain levels of the character e contaminat n the number he contamin ped to includ
: s. Biased su d/or samples ndom. The was address when the c remediation designed to v mpled in and d surface and open land a hyard).
taken along 2 areas incl asphalt and c directly belo n accessible Coal Plant.
anks.
ACBWR Ad 3 Building a basement ar performed te, and soil.
nts and/or S s that were t tisfy the DQO f radiologica rization surv tion where c r of measure nation. Area de a combin urvey design
: s. Random e decision of sed by the D characterizat
: n. Alternativ verify the ba d around the d subsurface area survey gside and un luding the p concrete from ow the aspha e roof surfa dministration access and he reas of the R on material amples taken in each Os.
al contamina veys that wer ontaminatio ements and as classified nation of ran ns used know survey desig f whether to DQO process tion effort w vely, a rando asis for the c e licensed ar e soils samp units with derneath und piping syste m pads and alt to a one m ace areas of n Building su eavily travel Reactor Bui ls similar to h survey uni ation greater re performed n was poten samples req as non-impa ndom and b wn informati gn selected o use primar s for each su was designe om approach classification rea as part o ples were tak the exceptio derground p ms as show paved area meter depth.
f the LACB urfaces and led surfaces.
lding, WTB o those foun it was determ r than d in a ntially quired
: acted, biased ion to static rily a urvey ed to h was n of a of the ken in on of piping wn on
: s. In BWR drain B, and nd at mined
 
La Cross License T Revision For the c that will and/or sa of residu For the sample s vertical e For non-validate measurem trivial lev generated 2.2.2.2.
For the c survey u Sample l to specifi that wer responsib survey d radioactiv potential from the 2.2.2.3.
Survey u area to b area scan Supervis was give survey un 2.2.2.4.
The char (beta and survey of FRS con and volu sampling following se Boiling W Termination n 0 characterizat be subjecte amples taken al radioactiv characteriza size was bas extent of the impacted an the basis ments and/o vels of licen d radionuclid Determ characterizat nits that wil locations we ic locations w re taken in ble Radiolog design proc vity, depres spill locatio HSA aided Scan C units were sc be scanned i nned was c or and/or th en to inform nit.
Types racterization d gamma); st f any concre nsisted of a c umetric samp g of surface g is a descrip Water Reactor Plan tion of impa ed to FSS, th n in the surve ve contamina ation of Cla sed upon the contaminati nd Class 3 op of the clas or samples w nsee-generat des are prese mination of tion of non-ll be subject ere determin within the su each surve gical Protect cess. Con sions, disco ons, or areas in the select Coverage canned to th n each surv ontingent up e Project He mation from s of Measure n survey of tatic beta me ete and/or as combination ples. The su and subsurf ption of the d r
acted Class 1 he minimum ey units wer ation in the s ss 1 structur e necessary n ion.
pen land sur ssification.
was sufficie ted radionuc ent in non-im Static Measu
-impacted an ted to FRS, ed by gener urvey unit. T y unit was tion Superv sideration w olored areas, s where the tion of biased he extent pr ey unit was pon the pro ealth Physic the initial w ements and S building sur easurements phalt-paved n of surface urvey of the face soil, sed different typ 2-16 1 and Class m number of re commensu survey unit.
res that wil number of s rvey units, th Consequen ent to ensure clides are pr mpacted area urement and nd impacted sample loca ating random The location determined visor and/or was given  
, cracks, low ground has d locations.
actical in ac determined ofessional ju ist during th walk downs Samples rfaces consi s, material sa open land a scans (beta e open land diment and s pes of measu 2 open land f random or urate with th l remain an samples nee he primary c ntly, the nu e with reaso resent in Cl as.
d Sample Lo d open land ations were m pairs of c n of biased m d by the pr the Project to location w point grav s been distur ccordance w d during the udgment of he survey de and the am isted of a co amples and s areas that wi and gamma areas consis surface wate urements and d areas (pav r biased dire he probabilit nd be subjec eded to asses characterizat umber of s onable conf lass 3 areas ocations areas and C primarily ch oordinates t measurement rofessional j Health Phy ns that exh vity drain p rbed. Histo with their cla survey desi the Radiolo esign proces mbient radiat ombination smears. The ill remain an a), static bet sted of gamm er for isotop d samples tha ved and unpa ect measurem ty of the pres cted to FRS ss the latera tion DQO w systematic fidence that and no lice Class 2 struc hosen at ran hat correspo ts and/or sam judgment o ysicist durin hibit measu points, actua orical inform assification.
ign process.
ogical Prote
: s. Consider tion levels i of surface e characteriz nd be subject ta measurem ma scans an pic analysis.
at were utiliz aved) ments sence S, the al and was to static only ensee-ctural ndom.
onded mples of the ng the urable al and mation The The ection ration in the scans zation ted to
: ments, nd the The zed.  
 
La Cross License T Revision 2.2.2.4.1 Gamma activity.
used for Ludlum M Ludlum M Scanning rate not t was main and, loca 2.2.2.4.2 Scanning 7,100 dpm including Hand-hel used.
Beta scan and with prevented was dete calculate of the sur If not im instrumen evaluatio investiga 2.2.2.4.3 Direct m surfaces typically detectors Direct m acquiring typically designate adjusted 2.2.2.4.4 If applic verify lo se Boiling W Termination n 0 Gamm scans were Sodium io these scans.
Model 44-10 Model 44-10 g was perfor to exceed 0.
ntained with ations of elev Beta S g was per m/100cm2 a g, but not li ld beta scin nning was p h a scanning d scanning a ermined, an d a priori to rvey.
mpacted by h nt to identi on. Any ide ation and pot Direct measurement of the build performed
: s.
measurements g data over used for su ed investigat as appropria Remo able, remov oose surface Water Reactor Plan ma Surface S performed o dide (NaI) g EnergySol 0 Detector 0 NaI detecto rmed by mo
.5 m (20 in) hin 15 cm (6 vated direct l Surface Scan rformed in action level.
imited to; fl ntillation and performed w g speed of o at the specif nd the scan o ensure that high ambient fy locations entified areas tential decon t Measureme ts were per dings or on using ~10 s were condu a pre-determ urface measu tion level or ate to achiev ovable Surfac vable beta an e contamina r
Scans over open la gamma scin utions Techn Sensitivity (
ors to Co-60 oving the de per second.
in) of the s levels were f ns order to Beta scans loors, walls, d/or gas-flo with the dete one detector fied distance nning techni t the MDC f t noise level s of elevate s of elevated ntamination.
ents rformed to n concrete o 00 cm2 or l ucted by pla mined coun urements and r MDC und ve an accepta ce Contamin nd/or alpha ation is less 2-17 and surfaces ntillation det nical Suppor (10) examin 0 and Cs-137 etector in a s The distan urface if po flagged for f locate ar s were perfo
, ceilings, ro ow proportio ctor position r active win e, the detect ique adjuste for scanning s, technician d activity th d contamina detect total or asphalt pa arger sized acing the det nt time. A d generally p er considera able MDC fo nation contaminati s than the to identify tectors (typic rt Document nes the resp 7 when used serpentine p nce between ssible. Aud further inves reas of res ormed over a oofs, asphal onal detecto n maintained ndow per se tion sensitiv ed accordin g was approp ns monitored that require ation were m levels of aved areas.
scintillatio tector near t count time provided det ation. The i or direct mea on or smear applicable locations of cally 2 x 2 t (TSD) RS-onse and sc d for scanning pattern, whil n the detecto dible signals stigation and sidual activ accessible st lt and concr ors (typically d within 1 c econd. If su vity for the a ngly. Scan priate for the d the audibl further inv marked or fla contaminati These me on or gas-fl the surface to of one to t tection level instrument c asurements.
r surveys w action level f residual su
) were typi
-TD-313196 can MDC o g surface soi le advancing or and the su were monit d/or sampling vity above tructural sur rete paved a y 126 cm2) cm of the su urface condi alternate dis nning speed e stated obje e response o estigation a agged for fu ion on struc asurements low proport o be counted two minutes ls well below count times were perform
: l. A smea urface ically 6-006, of the ils.
g at a urface tored;
: g.
the rfaces areas.
were urface itions stance was ective of the and/or urther ctural were tional d and s was w the were med to ar for


used for Ludlum MLudlum M Scannin g rate not twas mai n and, loc a 2.2.2.4.2 Scannin g 7,100 dp mincludin g Hand-he l used.
La Cross License T Revision removab surfaces.
Beta sca n and wit h prevente d was det ecalculat e of the su r If not i minstrume n evaluati o investig a 2.2.2.4.3 Direct m surfaces typically  
moderate activity a 2.2.2.4.5 Concrete contamin will rema diamond 1/2-inch w pulverize 2.2.2.4.6 Samples locations scanning defined a split spoo tools.
Subsurfa hand aug survey un 2.2.3. In The radi provide b identified action le and expe static me Concern Commer perform
: 3) analys Instrume in Table 2.2.3.1.
All data character se Boiling W Termination n 0 le activity w A 100 cm e pressure. S as appropriat Concr e core boring nation and th ain and be su bit core dri wide pucks ed and analy Mater of soil, sed s as well as
: g. Surface so as soil below on sampling ace soil was gers. Subsur nit.
nstrumenta ation detect both reliable d for the de evels. Detec ected perform easurements (ROC) at a cially availa the three ba sis of materia ntation and 2-3.
Calibr loggers, ass rization wer Water Reactor Plan was usually m2 surface a Smears were te.
rete and Asp g and the sa he presence ubjected to F ill. The con s, represen yzed for isoto rial Sampling iment, and s other locatio oil is defined w the top 15 g system or, b sampled by rface soil sam ation Selectio tion and me e operation a ecommission ctor selectio mance in th and scanni MDC of 50%
able portable asic survey m al samples.
nominal MD ration sociated dete re calibrated r
taken at eac area was sa e then analyz phalt Core Sa ampling of of volumet FRS. Core b ncrete samp nting a certa opic content.
g sludge were ons in areas d as the top cm layer in by using han y direct push mpling was on, Use and asurement i and adequate ning of LAC on was based e field. In ng were cap
% of the app e and laborat measuremen DC values th ectors, and a d on an annu 2-18 ch direct me ampled with zed for the p ampling concrete we tric contami bore samplin le produced ain depth in obtained fr s exhibiting 15 cm (6-in n 1 m increm nd trowels, b h sampling s performed a d Minimum nstrumentat e sensitivity t CBWR at le d on detecti all cases, th pable of det plicable actio tory instrum ts: 1) surfac hat were em all other por ual basis us easurement l h a circular presence of g ere used to nation in co ng of concre d by the cori nto the surf rom designed elevated act nch) layer of ments. Surfa bucket auger systems (e.g as necessary Detectable tion for char to detect the evels suffici ion sensitivi he instrumen tecting the a on level.
ments and det ce scanning; mployed durin rtable instrum sing Nationa location on cloth or pa gross beta an assess the d oncrete wall ete was acco ing was typ face. Conc d biased and tivity that w f soil while s ace soil was rs, or other s
: g. GeoProbe y to address t Concentrat racterization e initial suite iently below ity, operatin nts and detec anticipated R tectors were
: 2) static me ng character mentation th al Institute o non-asphalt aper filter, u nd/or gross depth of sur ls and floors omplished us pically sliced crete pucks d random sa were identifie subsurface s collected us suitable sam
) or by m the DQOs fo tions (MDC n was select e of radionuc w the establ ng characteri ctors selecte Radionuclid typically us easurements rization are hat were use of Standards t type using alpha rficial s that sing a d into were ample ed by soil is sing a mpling anual or the Cs) ted to clides lished
: istics, ed for des of sed to s; and listed ed for s and


detector s Direct m acquirin gtypically
La Cross License T Revision Technolo addressed 2.2.3.2.
The recei used for portable character 2.2.4. L Gamma proportio laborator quality p preparati site labor In all ca achieved accepted analytica laborator 2.2.5. Q MARSSI used to quality fo 1576, Mu Regulato through (12). Fu may be achieved The QAP used duri functiona All chara approved audit a
Characte prescribe applied contracto se Boiling W Termination n 0 ogy (NIST) t d in the QAP Instru ipt, inspectio characteriza radiologica rization is ad Laboratory I spectroscop onal countin ry in accorda programs of ion and analy ratory under ases, analyti
: d. The anal methodolog al methods ries used for Quality Assu IM, section demonstrate for sample an ulti-Agency R ory Guide 4.
Normal Op urther, MAR used in add
: d.
PP was prep ing the site c al activities, acterization d procedures and surveil rization staf ed, impleme to any app ors.
Water Reactor Plan traceable sou PP.
ument Use an on, issue, co ation was p al instrumen ddressed in th Instrument py was prim ng and liquid ance with ap the contrac ysis of chara the QAPP.
ical methods lysis of rad gies or othe employed characteriza urance 2.2 discusse e that site c nalysis taken Radiologica
.15, Quality erations to RSSIM and dition to, or pared and im characterizat the DQO pr activities es
: s. The effe llance activ ff and progr ented, and v plicable serv r
urces. The c nd Control ntrol, and ac performed in ntation. T he QAPP.
Methods an marily perfor d scintillatio pproved labo cted off-site acterization s s were estab diological co er comparab and the la ation.
es the need f conditions ar n to support al Laboratory y Assurance License Ter MARLAP b r in lieu of, mplemented t tion and FRS rocess, and m ssential to d ective imple
: vities, incl ram self-ass verified wh vices provid 2-19 calibration o ccountability n accordance The issue a nd Sensitivi rmed by th on analysis oratory proce vendor labo samples prov blished to e ontaminants ble methodo aboratory M for a quality re acceptabl t characteriz y Analytical of Radiolo rmination) -
both indicate existing qu to ensure th S process. T measures nec data quality w mentation o luding fiel sessments, a hen deficienc ded by off-of instrument y of portable e with issue and control ities he on-site ra was perform edures. Ener oratories tha vided the sam ensure that used stand ologies. Ta MDC achiev y system to le for unres zation and F l Protocols M ogical Moni
- Effluent St e that a Qua uality system e adequacy The QAPP de cessary to ac were implem of characteri ld walk-do as appropriat cies were i
-site vendor ts used for c e radiologica e and contro l of instru adiological med by an rgySolutions at were used me level of required M dard approve able 2-4 prov ved by the ensure the a stricted rele FRS is discu Manual (MA itoring Prog treams and ality Assura ms to ensur of data bein escribes poli chieve qualit mented and ization was owns by te. Correct identified.
rs, as well characterizati al instrument ol procedure uments used laboratory.
approved ve s ensured tha d for the rec quality as th MDC values ed and gene vides the ty off-site ve adequacy of ase. Labor ssed in NUR ARLAP) (11 grams (Incep the Environ ance Project re data qual ng developed icy, organiza ty data.
performed u verified thr EnergySolu tive actions These mea as on-site ion is tation es for d for Gas endor at the
: ceipt, he on-were erally ypical endor f data ratory REG-
) and eption nment Plan ity is d and
: ation, using rough utions were asures sub-


designat e adjusted 2.2.2.4.4If applic verify l o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 .Gam m scans were Sodium io these scans.
La Cross License T Revision The Cha quality a and is su follows:
M ode l 44-1 0 Model 44-1 0 g was perfo r t o exceed 0
E op A
.n tained wit h a tions of ele v.Beta S g was pe r m/100c m 2 a g , but not l i l d beta sci n n ning was p h a scannin g d scanning a e rmined, a n d a priori t o r vey. m pacted by h n t to identi o n. Any id e a tion and po t.Direc t measuremen t of the buil dperformed
st D
: s. measurement s g data over used for s u e d investiga t as appropri a.Rem o able, remo v o ose surfac e W ater Reacto r Plan ma Surface Sperformed odide (NaI) g  Energy Sol 0 Detector 0 NaI detect o rmed by m o.5 m (20 in) hin 15 cm (6 vated direct l S urface Sca n rformed in a ction level.
Details o the proce data acqu requirem P
imited to; f l n tillation an d performed w g speed of o a t the speci f n d the sca n o ensure tha t high ambien tfy location s e ntified area s t ential deco n t Measurem e t s were pe r dings or o nusing ~1 0 s were cond u a pre-deter m urface meas u tion level o r a te to achie v o vable Surfa c vable beta a n e contamin a r Scans o ver open l a gamma sci nutions Tech n Sensitivity (o rs to Co-6 0 oving the d e per second. in) of the s levels were f n s order to  Beta scan s l oors, walls
E P
, d/or gas-fl o with the dete o ne detecto r fied distanc e n ning techn i t the MDC f t noise level s of elevate s of elevate d ntamination.
S P
e nts rformed to n concrete o 0 0 cm 2 or l u cted by pl a m ined cou n urements an d r MDC un d ve an accept a ce Contami n n d/or alpha ation is les s 2-17 and surfaces n tillation det n ical Suppo r (10) exami n 0 and Cs-13 7 e tector in a s  The dista n u rface if po flagged for flocate ar s were perf o , ceilings, r o o w proporti octor positio n r active wi n e, the detec t i que adjust e f or scannin g s, technicia nd activity t h d contamin adetect total or asphalt p a arger size d acing the de t nt time. A d generally p er consider a a ble MDC f o nation contaminati s than the to identify t ectors (typi c r t Docu m en t n es the resp 7 when used serpentine p nce betwee n ssible. Au d f urther inve s reas of re s ormed over a o ofs, aspha l o nal detect o n maintaine d n dow per s e t ion sensiti v e d accordi n g was appro p ns monitore d t hat require a tion were m levels of a ved areas.scintillati o t ector near tcount time p rovided de t ation. The i or direct me aon or smea rapplicable locations o f cally 2" x 2 "t (TSD) RS
M pr All chara Plan, the 2.3.
-onse and s c d for scannin g pattern, whi l n the detect o d ible signals stigation an dsidual acti v accessible s t l t and conc r o rs (typicall y d within 1 c econd. If s u v ity for the a ngly. Sca n priate for th e d the audibl further inv m arked or fl acontaminat i These me o n or gas-f l the surface t o of one to t t ection leve l instrument c asurements.
S In Octob placing t October character accelerat EnergySo October 9 August 6 documen Characte PN-1640 2015 Fie Radioact character character se Boiling W Termination n 0 aracterization assurance and ubject to the Establishmen perations.
r surveys w action leve l f residual s u") were typ i-TD-31319 6 c an MDC o g surface so i l e advancin g or and the s uwere moni t d/or samplin g v ity above tructural su r r ete paved a y 126 cm 2) cm of the s u u rface cond i alternate di s n ning speed e stated obj e e response oestigation a a gged for f u i on on stru casurements l ow propor t o be counte d two minute s ls well belo w count times were perfor m l. A sme a u rface ically 6-006, of the ils. g at a u rface t ored; g. the rfaces areas. were u rface i tions stance was ective of the a nd/or u rther ctural were t ional d and s was w the were med to a r for La Cros s License T Revisio nremovab surfaces.
Actions to en taff.
moderat eactivity a 2.2.2.4.5 Concret econtami n will rem adiamond 1/2-inch w pulveriz e 2.2.2.4.6Samples location s scannin g defined a split spo otools. Subsurf a hand au g survey u n 2.2.3.I n The radi provide bidentifie daction l e and exp e static m e Concern Commerperform
Documentatio of the QA/QC edures and s uisition and ments. The sp ersonnel qua Execution in roper docum election of a roper instrum Management rocedures, p acterization QAPP, all a ummary of ber of 2005, the unit into of 2014, rization of L tion of de olutions in a 9, 2014. T 6, 2015. The nted in two erization Sur 017-001, LA eld Work (14 tive systems rization dat rization has Water Reactor Plan n Survey Pl d quality co QAPP. The nt/implement nsure that the on of the dat C elements s sample plan d recording pecific QA/Q alifications, accordance mentation of appropriate i ment calibra oversight of protocols, an activities w applicable im f Characteri Dairyland p o a SAFSTO Dairyland LACBWR in commission accordance w The schedule e results of th o separate rvey Report CBWR Radi 4).
: 3) analy s Instrum e in Table 2.2.3.1.All data characte r s e Boiling W Termination n 0 le activity w  A 100 c m e pressure.
s that rema a in certain been deferre r
S a s appropria t.Conc r e core borin g n ation and t h a in and be s ubit core dr i wide "puck s e d and anal y.Mate r of soil, sed s as well as
lan was dev ontrol (QA/Q e QA/QC pr tation of plan e procedures ta collected.
: g. Surface s o as soil belo w on samplin g a ce soil was gers. Subsu r n it. n strument a ation detec t b oth reliabl e d for the d e e vels. Dete c e cted perfo r m easurements (ROC) at a cially avail a the three b a sis of materi a ntation and 2-3. Calib rloggers, as s rization we r W ater Reacto r Plan w as usually m 2 surface a Smears wer e te. rete and As p g and the s a h e presence u bjected to F ill. The co n s", represe n y zed for isot o rial Samplin g iment, and sother locati o o il is define d w the top 15 g system or, b sampled b y r face soil sa m ation Selecti o tion and me e operation a ecommissio n ctor selecti o m ance in th and scanni M DC of 50%able portabl e asic survey m al samples.
specific to ch instructions was guided QC program experience, with approv survey data instruments t ation and dai f characteriz d documenta were conduct mplementing ization Surv performed a OR condition contracted n anticipation ning activiti with EnergyS ed EnergyS he site chara reports, GG for October iological Ch ain at LAC n areas du ed until such 2-20 veloped acco QC) program ogram elem ns, procedur are understo haracterizati
nominal M D ration s ociated det e re calibrate d r taken at ea c area was s a e then analy z p halt Core S a a mpling of of volume t F RS. Core b ncrete samp nting a ce r t a o pic content
. The chara d and condu m component and training ved procedur and sample to perform th ily functiona zation activit ation require ted in accor g procedures vey Results limited cha
.g sludge were ons in area s d as the top cm layer i n b y using ha n y direct pus h m pling was o n, Use an dasurement i a nd adequat e n ing of LA C on was base d e field. In ng were ca p% of the ap p e and labora t measuremen D C values t h e ctors, and a d on an ann u 2-18 c h direct m e ampled wit h zed for the p ampling concrete w e tric contami bore sampli n le produce d a in depth i
: n. This sur EnergySol n of the deve ies. Char Solutions cha Solutions sit acterization s G-EO-31319 r and Novem haracterizati CBWR affec ue to ambie h time that ra ording to th m for the dec ments applica res, and prot ood and foll ion are prese acterization o ucted in com s for site cha
: n. obtained fr s exhibiting 15 cm (6-i n n 1 m incre m n d trowels, b h sampling sperformed a d Minimum nstrumentat e sensitivity t C BWR at l e d on detect i all cases, t h p able of de t plicable acti o t ory instru mts: 1) surfa c h at were e m a ll other po r ual basis u s easurement l h a circular p resence of g ere used to nation in c o n g of concr e d by the cor i n to the sur f rom designe delevated ac t n ch) layer o f ments. Surf a b ucket auge r systems (e.
: g.
g a s necessar y Detectable t ion for cha rto detect th e evels suffic i i on sensitiv i he instrume n tecting the a on level. m ents and de t c e scanning; m ployed duri n rtable instru m sing Nation a l ocation on cloth or p a g ross beta a n assess the d o nc r ete wal l e te was acc o i ng was ty p f ace. Con c d biased an d t ivity that w f soil while s ace soil was r s, or other s g. GeoProbe y to add r ess t Concentra t racterizatio n e initial suit e i ently belo w ity, operati n n ts and dete c anticipated R tectors were 2) static m eng characte r m entation t h al Institute o non-asphal t aper filter, u n d/or gross d epth of su r l s and floor s omplished u s p ically slice d c rete pucks d random s a were identifi e subsurface scollected u s s uitable sa m) or by m t he DQOs f o tions (MD C n was selec t e of radionu c w the estab l ng character i ctors select e Radionucli dtypically u s easurement s rization are hat were us e o f Standard s t type using alpha rficial s that s ing a d into    were ample e d by s oil is sing a m pling anual o r the C s) ted to c lides lished i stics, e d for d es of sed to s; and listed e d for s an d La Cros s License T Revisio n Technol o addresse d 2.2.3.2.The rece i used for portable characte r 2.2.4.LGamma proporti o laborato r quality p preparat i site labo r In all c a achieve d accepted analytic a laborato r 2.2.5.Q MARSS I used to quality fo 1576, Mu Regulat o through (12). F umay be achieve d The QA P used dur i function a All char a approve d audit a Charact e prescrib e applied contract o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 o gy (NIST) t d in the QA P Instr u ipt, inspecti ocharacteriz a radiologic a rization is a d L aborator y I spectrosco p o nal counti n r y in accord a programs of i on and anal y r atory under ases, analyt i d. The ana l methodolo g al methods ries used for Q ualit y Ass u I M, section demonstrat e for sample a n ulti-Agency R ory Guide 4
res.
.Normal Op urthe r , MA R used in ad d d. P P was pre p i ng the site c al activities, acterization d procedure s a nd survei l rization sta f ed, implem e to any ap p o rs. W ater Reacto r Plan t raceable so u PP. ument Use a n o n, issue, co ation was p al instrume n ddressed in t h I nstrument py was pri m n g and liqui d ance with a p the contra c ysis of char athe QAPP.
analyses.
ical method s l ysis of ra d gies or oth e employed characteriz a u rance 2.2 discuss e e that site c nalysis take n R adiologic a.15, Qualit y erations to R SSIM and dition to, o r p ared and i m c haracteriza t the DQO p r activities e s s. The eff e llance acti v f f and prog r e nted, and v plicable ser v r urces. The c n d Control ntrol, and a c performed i n n tation. T he QAPP. Methods a n marily perfo r d scintillati o p proved lab o cted off-site a cterization s s were esta b diological c o er compara band the l a a tion. es the need f c onditions a r n to suppor t a l Laborator y y Assurance License Te rMARLAP b r in lieu of, mplemented t t ion and FR S r ocess, and m ssential to d ective imple v ities, inc l ram self-as s v erified w h v ices provi d 2-19 calibration o c countabilit y n accordanc e T he issue a n d Sensitiv i rmed by t h o n analysis oratory proc e vendor lab o samples pro v blished to e ontaminants ble method o a boratory M f or a qualit y r e acceptab l t characteri z y Analytica l of Radiol o rmination)
he surveys.
-b oth indicat eexisting q u to ensure th S process.
T m easures ne c data quality wmentation o l uding fie l sessments, a h en deficien c d ed by off-of instrumen t y of portabl e e with issu e and contro l ities h e on-site r a was perfor m e dures. Ene r oratories th a vided the sa m e nsure that used stan d o logies. T a M DC achie v y system to le for unre s zation and F l Protocols M o gical Mon i- Effluent S t e that a Qu a uality syste me adequacy T he QAPP d e c essary to a c w e re imple m o f character i l d walk-d o a s appropria tcies were i-site vendo r t s used for c e radiologic a e and contr o l of instr u adiological m ed by an r gy Solution s at were use d me level of required M d ard approv e able 2-4 pro v v ed by the ensure the a s tricted rele F RS is discu M anual (M A itoring Pro g t reams and ality Assur a ms to ensu rof data bei n e scribes pol i chieve quali t m ented and ization was o wns by t e. Correc t identified.
rs, as well c haracterizat i al instrumen t ol procedur e uments use dlaboratory.
approved v e s ensured th a d for the re c quality as t h M DC values e d and gen e vides the t yoff-site v e a dequacy o f ase. Labo rssed in NU R ARLAP) (11 g rams (Inc epthe Enviro n ance Project r e data qual n g develope d i cy, organiz a t y data. performed u verified th r Energy Sol u tive actions These me a as on-site i on is tation es for d for  Gas e ndor a t the ceipt, he on-were erally y pical e ndor f data r atory R EG-) and eption n ment Plan ity is d and a tion, u sing r ough utions were a sures sub-La Cros s License T Revisio n The Ch a quality a and is s ufollows: E o pA s tD Details o the proc e data acq u require mPEPSPM p r All char a Plan, the 2.3.S In Octo b placing t October characte r accelera t Energy S o October 9 August 6docume n Charact e PN-164 0 2015 Fi e Radioac t characte r characte r s e Boiling W Termination n 0 a racterizatio n assurance an d ubject to the Establishme n perations.
A ctions to e n t aff. Documentati o o f the QA/Q C e dures and s uisition an d m ents. The s p ersonnel qu a E xecution in roper docu m election of a roper instru m Management r ocedures, p acterization QAPP, all a ummar y o f ber of 2005, the unit int o of 2014, r ization of L t ion of de o lutions in a 9, 2014. T 6, 2015. Th e n ted in tw o e rization Su r 0 17-001, LA e ld Work (1 4 t ive system s r ization dat r ization has W ater Reacto r Plan n Survey P l d quality c o QAPP. Th e nt/implemen t nsure that th e o n of the da t C elements s sample plan d recording p ecific QA/
Q alifications, accordance m entation of a ppropriate i ment calibr a oversight o f protocols, anactivities w applicable i m f Character i Dairyland p o a SAFST ODairyland LACBWR i n commissio n accordance w T he schedul e e results of t h o separate r vey Report CBWR Rad i 4). s that rem aa in certai n been deferr e r l an was de v o ntrol (QA/
Q e QA/QC p r t ation of pla n e procedures t a collected.
s pecific to c hinstructions was guide d Q C progra mexperience, with appro v survey data instruments t a tion and da i f characteri zd document a w ere conduc t mplementin g ization Sur v performed a O R conditio ncontracted n anticipatio n ning activit i w ith Energy S ed Energy S he site char areports, G Gfor Octobe r i ological C h a in at LA C n areas d u ed until suc h 2-20 veloped acc o Q C) progra mogram ele m n s, procedu r are underst o h aracterizat
: i. The char a d and cond u m component and trainin g v ed procedu rand sample to perform t h ily function a zation activi t a tion requir e t ed in acco r g procedures v e y Results limited ch a n. This su r Energy So l n of the dev e ies. Cha r S olutions ch a S olutions si t acterization s G-EO-3131 9 r and Nove m h aracterizat i CBWR affe c ue to ambi e h time that r a ording to t h m for the de c m ents applic a r es, and pro t o od and foll i on are pres e a cterization o u cted in co m s for site ch a g. r es. analyses.
h e surveys.
al checks.
al checks.
t ies relative t ements. r dance with , and appro v a racterizatio n rvey is doc u l utions to elopment o f racterizatio n aracterizati o t e character i s urveys per f 9 6-RS-RP-0 m ber 2014 F i on Survey R cted the ab e nt radiatioadiological o h e essential commission i able to char a t ocols for th e l owed by th e ented in the Q o perations a n m pliance w i a racterizati o to the adher e the Charac t ved sample p n survey of umented in perform a f this LTP a n n activities, o n procedur e ization eff o f ormed by E n 01, LACB W Field Work (Report for J ility to ac q o n levels.
ties relative t ements.
o r physical celements o i ng of LAC B acterization a e field e implement i QAPP, as w nd the asso c ith these Q A o n are as foll ence to terization S u plan instructthe LSE pr i Reference 7 a more de t nd the antici p , performe d es commenc e o rt conclud e nergy Soluti o W R R adiol o(13) and L C J une thru A quire mean iIn these c c onditions w of the BWR a re as i ng w ell as ciated A/QC ows: urvey ions. ior to 7. In tailed pated d by e d on e d on o ns is o gical C-RS-ugust ingful cases, would La Cros s License T Revisio n allow th e the deco m significa n b y revisi o 2.3.1.B During t backgro u acquired b ackgro u As part o b ackgro u LACB WNormall y be repre ssite area Supervis appropri a results.
rdance with  
, and approv aracterization rvey is docu lutions to elopment of racterization aracterizatio te characteri surveys perf 96-RS-RP-0 mber 2014 F ion Survey R cted the ab ent radiatio adiological o he essential commissioni able to chara tocols for the lowed by the ented in the Q operations an mpliance wi aracterizatio to the adhere the Charact ved sample p n survey of umented in perform a f this LTP an n activities, on procedure ization effo formed by En 01, LACBW Field Work (
Report for J ility to acq on levels.
or physical c elements o ing of LACB acterization a e field e implementi QAPP, as w nd the assoc ith these QA on are as foll ence to terization Su plan instruct the LSE pri Reference 7 a more det nd the anticip
, performed es commence ort conclude nergySolutio WR Radiolo (13) and LC June thru A quire meani In these c conditions w of the BWR are as ing well as ciated A/QC ows:
urvey ions.
ior to
: 7. In tailed pated d by ed on ed on ons is ogical C-RS-ugust ingful
: cases, would
 
La Cross License T Revision allow the the decom significan by revisio 2.3.1. B During t backgrou acquired backgrou As part o backgrou LACBW Normally be repres site area Supervis appropria results.
were con Concrete is located non-impa approxim unit L40 L401210 samples a The ana backgrou can be at mean Cs 0.135 pC was 0.07 Relevant Station (Z at Zion S Zion to C geograph for distu backgrou within th categorie drainage se Boiling W Termination n 0 e survey of t mmissioning nt additiona on or addend
 
===Background===
the initial ch und study fo from vario und study is of the 2014 und levels a WR fell within y, backgroun sentative. H was chosen.
or selected a ate for obtain Although th nsidered unaf e samples an d north of th acted survey mately 100 s 12108. Soil 08 were also are provided lysis of the und study fo ttributed to g
-137 concen Ci/g with a m 0 resulting i t to LACBW ZNPS) titled Station (15).
Cs-137 leve hically simila urbed soils a und Cs-137 he expected es of soil in and non-dra Water Reactor Plan hese survey g process, in l characteriz dum as a par Study haracterizati or soils at LA ous location summarized characteriza at LACBWR n nominal ex nd reference However, no
. The Energ an area outs ning backgro he selected s ffected by pa nd direct me he LSE. A y unit L4012 quare meter l samples fro evaluated f d in sections e backgroun or soils. The global fallou ntration of s maximum ob in the upper WR is a study d ZionSolutio This docum ls anticipate ar. The docu as well as u levels for th range of d the non-im ainage, distu r
units. Solu ncluding foll zation data i rt of the requ on survey p ACBWR. R ns outside o d in Table 2-ation effort, R. The pur xpected leve areas shoul suitable off gySolutions P side of the L ound measu sample locat ast LACBW asurements sphalt samp 2106. Surfa rs of undistu om non-imp for use as ba 2.3.3 and 2.
nd soil sam e results did ut. For the t surface samp bserved con r range for th y performed ons TSD 13 ment was pr ed from wor ument predic undisturbed he site speci disturbed so mpacted area urbed and un 2-21 tions intends lowing the s is obtained, uired 2 year performed in Reference 7 of the owne
: 5.
EnergySolu rpose of the els for soils, d be reasona f-site locatio Project Heal LSE but on rements bas tions were i WR operation were taken ples and dire ace soil samp urbed non-dr pacted survey ackground re
.3.5.3.
mples in 201 d report Cs-1 two backgrou ples taken o ncentration o his data set a for the deco
-004, Exami repared to co rldwide fall cted ranges f soils and is fic backgrou ils in non-d s at LACBW ndisturbed so s to continue submittal of this chapter update of th n October 2 states that a er controlled utions perfor e study was concrete, an ably close to on was ident lth Physicist the licensed ed upon the inside the LA ns.
in Class 3 s ect measurem ples were ac rainage soil y units L401 eference soil 14 compare 137 at levels und studies n or around of 0.268 pCi at a 95% con ommissionin ination of Cs ompare site out. The L for backgrou presented i und studies drainage are WR, the upp oil from the e characteriz this LTP. I r of the LTP he approved 005, Dairyl a series of s d area. Th rmed a limit s to assess i nd asphalt.
o the decomm tified. Cons and the Rad d LACBWR previous ra ACBWR lic survey unit L ments were cquired from within non-12107 and o ls. Analysis ed favorably s slightly ab performed a d the site pro i/g. The st nfidence leve ng of the Zio s-137 Globa soil sample LACBWR an und concentr in Table 2-6 performed a eas. As the per 95th per Zion backgr zation throug In the case w P will be up LTP.
and perform oil samples he result of ted assessme if backgroun missioning s sequently, an diation Prote site that se diological su censed area, L3012101, w also collect m a small ar
-impacted su other areas w s results for y with the bove MDC.
at LACBWR oduced a me tandard devi el of 0.275 p on Nuclear P al Fallout in Cs-137 resu nd Zion site rations of Cs
: 6. The obse at LACBWR ere were va centile level round study ghout where dated med a were f this ent of nd at site to n on-ection emed urvey
, they which ted in rea of urvey within these 2005 This R, the ean of iation Ci/g.
Power Soils ults at es are s-137 erved R fall arious ls for were
 
La Cross License T Revision considere areas, an 2.3.2. P EnergySo Decomm decommi from the some of t less than prepared 2.3.3. N Based up 163.5 acr impacted contamin operation ISFSI w operation physical for comp for the cl The non-segregate inside of Highway study for within su in coal f ISFSI fac From Oc impacted survey un and the i impacted To supp objective open land by perfor The 2015 primary surveys a se Boiling W Termination n 0 ed appropria d Class 2 an Potential Ra olutions TS issioning (
issioning of sampling o the theoretic n 2 years, an
. The list of Non-Impacte pon the infor re licensed
: d. The n nation given ns. The det were not imp ns (i.e., with characterist pliance beyo lassification.
-impacted op ed into five f survey uni y 35. This s r soils. The urvey unit L4 from the G-cility, which ctober 2014 d open land nits and wer initial result d as it was d ort this con e of the add d survey uni rming additi 5 characteriz objectives and samplin Water Reactor Plan ate backgro nd 3 open lan dionuclides SD RS-TD-3 (16) establi LACBWR.
of various m cal neutron a n initial suite f potential ra ed Open La rmation com site surroun non-impacte that historic termination pacted by l hin the LSE ics. The are ond the chara pen land are survey unit it L4012108 survey unit non-impacte 4012103. A
-3 station an h has not bee to August areas of th re characteri s of the 201 determined t nclusion, ad itional chara its given an i onal soil sam zation camp of the addi ng to suppor r
ound concen nd area surve s of Concern 313196-001, shes the ba Industry gu media from p activation pro e of potentia adionuclides and Areas mpiled in the nding the L d areas ha cal informati that the con licensed ope
), site use, t eas designat acterization a is approxim ts. Non-imp 8 in a veget was formed ed survey un A majority of nd survey un en characteriz 2015, char he site. The ized as such 14 characteri that there is dditional ch acterization initial Class mpling and g aign was de tional chara rt the non-2-22 ntration leve ey units at L n
, Radionuc asis for an uidance was past plant o oducts, nobl al ROC for is listed in T e HSA, a lar LSE and IS ave no rea ion provides ntiguous ope erations was topography, ted as non-im surveys and mately 352,3 pacted open ated area w d during cha nits are show f the surface nit L401210 zed and is no racterization e survey uni h in Referenc ization, thes no reasonab haracterizatio surveys per 3 classificat gamma walk esigned in ac acterization
-impacted c els for the LACBWR.
clides of C initial suite reviewed as operations.
le gases and the decomm Table 2-7.
rge portion o SFSI receive asonable po s no indicatio en land area s based on site dischar mpacted are d sampling p 360 square m n land surve with minimal aracterizatio wn in Figure area in surv 06 complete ot addressed surveys w its were ori ce 13. Base se survey un ble potentia on was perf rformed in 2 tion for re-cl kover survey ccordance w was to per classification evaluation Concern D e of potenti s well as the Based on th radionuclide missioning o of the open ed a classif otential to on of impact as surroundi the locatio rge pathway e not require performed to meters in siz ey unit L40 l ground dis on to facilita 2-1. The G vey unit L40 ely surround d by this LTP were perform iginally clas ed upon a rev nits were rec al for residua formed in 2 2015 was to lassification ys.
with Referenc rform suffic n and to pr of non-imp uring LAC ial ROC fo analytical re he eliminatio es with a hal f LACBWR land areas o fication as contain res t from LACB ing the LSE on(s) of lice ys, and othe ed to be surv o provide a ze. This area 12109 is lo sturbance ea ate a backgr G-3 station re 012105 is cov ds the LACB P.
med in the ssified as Cl view of the classified as al contamina 2015. A m o evaluate ce n as non-imp ce 4. One o cient radiolo rovide reaso pacted CBWR or the esults on of lf-life R was on the non-sidual BWR E and ensed er site veyed basis a was ocated ast of round esides vered BWR non-lass 3 HSA non-ation.
major ertain pacted of the ogical nable
 
La Cross License T Revision assurance 2015 cha based on During th units L40 logger w was scan Gamma s or gravel Minimum evaluated survey un an Explo were due Thirty-tw toward d shown in instrumen positively surface s These va in section specific b in the gr were very Seventee meter.
concentra derived g average maximum backgrou 137 conc surface s the Hwy Two asp survey un were less identified A summ presented se Boiling W Termination n 0 e that the n aracterization a random d he 2015 cha 012103, L40 with a 2 by 2 nned due to surface scan
: l. Alarm se m Detectabl d during the nit L401210 oranium GR-e to the prese wo surface s discolored ar n Figure 2-5 nt MDC in y identified soil samples alues are wit n 2.3.1. On background rounds east y close at 0.
en subsurfac Of the 17 ations greate gamma-emit Cs-137 conc m observed und range fo centrations th soil backgrou 35/Railroad phalt sample nits. The asp s than the M d by gamma ary of the g d in Table 2-Water Reactor Plan non-impacted n survey foc esign to ensu aracterizatio 012105, L40 2 NaI detec inaccessibili nning focused et-points for e Count Ra e performan 7 and one in
-135. The ence of natur soil samples eas or areas
: 5. Cs-137 26 of the 32 by gamma s was 0.131 hin the expe ly one Cs-13 data set. Th of Highway 135 pCi/g an e soil sampl 7 subsurface er than the tting radionu centration ob concentrati r Cs-137 as hat exceede und. This s d Right of W es were coll phalt surface MDC of 1,93 spectroscop gamma spect
-8.
r d survey uni cused primar ure an unbia n survey, a 012106 and ctor. In surv ity from the d on undistu r the instrum ate (MDCR) nce of the g n survey unit results of th ral backgrou s were colle where the g was positiv 2 samples.
spectroscopy pCi/g with ected backgr 37 result exc his sample w y 35. The m nd 0.131 pC les were tak e soil samp instrument uclides were bserved in t ion of 0.40 discussed in d the maxim sample was t Way Grounds lected from e was first sc 38 dpm/100c py in any of t troscopy resu 2-23 its do not c rily on soils ased survey.
minimum o L4012108 vey unit L40 e presence o urbed soils w ment were s
) of the ins gamma scan t L4012108.
he investiga und activity.
ected from ground had b vely identif No other po
: y. The avera a maximum round range ceeded the m was the maxi mean of the n i/g, respectiv ken at random ples taken, MDC in ei e positively i the subsurfa 09 pCi/g. Th n section 2.3 mum Cs-137 the maximu random loc canned with cm2. No pla the asphalt s ults for each contain plant and asphalt of 1% of the was scanned 012107, less f tall, thick with minimal set at the ob strument. A n, one in su All scan al ation indicat non-impacte been disturbe fied in conc otential plan age Cs-137 c m observed c for Cs-137 maxium resu imum 0.463 non-impacte vely.
mly selected Cs-137 w ght samples identified by ace soil sam hese value 3.1. Only on 7 concentrati um 0.409 pC cations in p h a beta-gamm ant derived r samples.
h non-impac t-derived ra
: t. The samp e surface so d with a Mo s than 1% of vegetation a l vegetation bserved back A total of f urvey unit L larms were in ted the elev ed areas at ed. The sam centrations nt-derived ra concentratio concentration surface sam ult of 0.268 pCi/g value ed and site-s d locations t was positive
: s. No other y gamma sp mples was 0.
es are with ne subsurfac ion found in Ci/g value th paved areas mma detector radionuclide cted open la adioactivity.
ple locations oil area in su odel 2350-1 f the surface and steep te or disturbed kground plu four alarms L4012106, tw nvestigated u vated scan re locations b mple location greater than adionuclides n observed i n of 0.463 p mples as discu pCi/g in the e and was lo specific data to a depth o ely identifie r potential p pectroscopy.
087 pCi/g w hin the exp e sample ha n the site-spe at was locat in non-imp
. All scan re s were posit and survey u The were urvey data e area rrain.
d soils us the were wo in using esults biased ns are n the were in the pCi/g.
ussed e site-ocated a sets of one ed in plant-The with a pected d Cs-ecific ted in pacted esults tively unit is
 
La Cross License T Revision A coal as samples The resul The lab concentra also posi concentra considere of the pl radionuc positive ratios ar compared higher th operation consisten the spora derived r In survey gamma s area to d approxim uranium readings 2.3.4. Im The HSA operation been clas been iden into two north of Highway three Cla The char prepared employed radionuc of suffici surface a obtained Survey contamin se Boiling W Termination n 0 sh sample fr were sent to lts of the ana boratory an ations excee tively detect ations of the ed to very li lant-derived lide mixtur results for C re 118 and d to the site han expected nal history, t nt with natur adic positive radionuclide y unit L4012 spectroscopy determine if mately 7,000 and thorium conducted d mpacted Op A identified ns. The app ssified as C ntified as i Class 2 surv the LSE, th y 35 and the ass 3 survey racterization for each s d to determ lide concent ient quantity and subsurf from below techniques nation identi Water Reactor Plan rom survey u o Test Ame alysis are pre nalysis spor eding the MD ted but at lev e positively i ikely be the radionuclid re fractions Cs-137, Sr-16, respect e-specific mi d by factors the radionuc ral backgrou analytical r s in these su 2108, a repr
: y. In additio f there is a 0 to 8,000 cp m series nuc during the w pen Land A d the open proximate are Class 1. An impacted b vey units. T he transmiss e haul road u units combin of the impac survey unit ine the later trations in th y and quality face soils in w the structur were empl ified and th r
unit L40121 erica Labora esented in T radically id DC, includin vels that are identified rad result of cou des. This c
. For exam 90 and Fe-5 tively. Wh ixture fracti s of 4,800 a lide ratios, a und and com esults are ve urvey units.
resentative s on, gamma s significant pm). The a clides with alkover surv Areas land area ea is 1.5 acr approximat y reactor op Three impact sion switchy used to tran ned is appro cted open la in accorda ral and vert he soil. Char y to quantify n each open res due to int loyed to de he radionucl 2-24 05, six surfa atories for g Table 2-9.
dentified se ng H-3, C-14 consistent w dionuclides w unting uncer conclusion w mple, samp
: 55. Howev hen the rati ons in Chap and 10,700, and primarily mprise 88% o ery unlikely sample of th scan reading difference analysis of t no plant de vey averaged inside the res. All ope tely 3.46 acr perations. T ted Class 3 s yard and the nsport dry fu oximately 16 and areas beg ance with R ical extent o racterization the potentia n land surve terferences a etermine th lide concent face soil sam gamma spect everal plan 4, Fe-55, Ni with natural b were close t rtainty as op was supporte le L301210 ver, the Sr-9 ios from L3 pter 6, Table respectivel y the concen of the site-sp to represent he rail road gs were take from site b the railroad erived radio d 7,000-8,50 fenced LSE en land surve re area that This open la survey units e area encom uel casks to 6.5 acres.
gan in Octob Reference 4 of any cont n inspections al volumetric ey unit. Li and inaccess he lateral a trations in t mples and fiv troscopy and nt-derived r i-63, and Sr-background to the detecti pposed to th ed by a rev 05-CR-GS-0 90/Cs-137 an 3012105-CR e 6-3, it is s ly. In conc ntrations of C pecific radio t the actual p bed gravel en of the rail background bed gravel onuclides. T 00 cpm.
E as impac ey units insi surrounds t and area has were design mpassing th the ISFSI.
ber 2014. A
: 4. Survey amination id s and surveys c contaminat imited soil ibility.
and vertical the soil. A ve subsurfac d HTD anal radionuclide
-90. Cs-137
. In all case ion limits an e actual pres view of exp 002-SS indi nd Fe-55/Cs R-GS-002-SS een that the clusion, base Cs-137 whic onuclide mix presence of p was analyze l road bed g (which aver indicated na The gamma cted by re ide the LSE the LSE has been segre nated for the he site acces The area o A sample plan techniques dentified an s were perfo tion of acces information l extent of A combinatio e soil lyses.
es at 7 was es, the nd are sence pected icates s-137 S are ey are ed on ch are
: xture, plant-ed by gravel raged atural scan eactor have s also gated e area ss off of the n was were nd the ormed ssible n was f any on of
 
La Cross License T Revision random a survey p professio Protectio radioactiv spill loca survey lo not requ locations radiologi A surface surface s or surfac were take intervals Each sur site radio necessary All surfa Several s full isoto survey un 2.3.4.1.
There are The Clas area in th Reactor radioactiv areas, pre Twenty-t measurab locations taken in taken, C samples 13 sampl identified the surf 0.287 pC samples w Seventy-one mete se Boiling W Termination n 0 and biased s ackage. The onal judgme on Supervis vity, depres ations, or ar ocations was uired for soi s were selec ical contamin e soil sample oil samples ce scans indi en from 0.15 rface soil, co ological lab y to achieve ace and sub soil samples opic analysis nit per Refe Class e four (4) op ss 1 open lan he Class 1 op Building, th vely contam evented the a two (22) sur ble radioact s, or areas w Class 1 open Co-60 was p and Cs-137 les. No oth d by gamma face soil sa Ci/g. The a was 0.096 p nine (79) su er, two (2) lo Water Reactor Plan urvey locati e locations o ent of the E or. Consi sions, disco reas where t s also determ ils in an op cted on asp nation.
e was taken were acquir icated elevat 5 cm to dept omposite sub oratory by e an isotopic surface com were selecte s (HTD radi erence 4.
1 Open Lan pen land sur nd survey un pen land sur he Turbine minated build ability to per rface soil sam tivity, disco where the gro n land surve positively id 7 was posit her potentia spectroscop amples was verage Cs-1 Ci/g with a m ubsurface so ocations bias r
ions were es of biased me EnergySoluti deration wa lored areas, the ground h mined by are pen land are phalt in Cla at each sele red at severa ted activity.
ths ranging f bsurface soil gamma-spec c MDC equa mposite samp ed at random ionuclides).
nd Areas rvey units cl nits are show rvey units is Building, th ding and sys rform surfac mples were lored areas, ound had be ey units are s dentified in tively ident al plant-deriv py. The aver s 0.058 pCi/
137 concent maximum ob il samples w sed to areas o 2-25 stablished in easurements ions Project as given to low point g had been di ea classificat eas designat ass 1 survey cted biased a al random lo Depending from 1 to 3 m l sample or ctroscopy.
al to or less ples were an m and were s Duplicate lassified as wn in Figure obstructed b he WTB and stems, as we ce scanning d taken at loc
, buried pip een disturbed shown in Fig concentrati tified in con ved gamma rage Co-60 c
/g with a tration obser bserved conc were taken a on the south each survey s and/or sam Health Phy o locations gravity drain isturbed. Th tion. Rando ated as Clas y units whe and random cations or if on the loca m below gra asphalt sam Analysis co s than 0.10 p nalyzed afte shipped to T samples and Class 1 at L 2-1. A sign by the prese d the LSA ell as stored due to high b cations biase pe locations
: d. The loca gure 2-6. O ions greater ncentrations a-emitting ra concentratio maximum rved in the centration o at 10 surface and west sid y unit in acc mples were d ysicist and that exhib n areas, actu he number m-based me ss 1. Rando ere there wa
-based surve f surface soi ation, subsur ade and com mple was ana ount times w pCi/g for Cs er drying th Test America d concrete w LACBWR to nificant porti ence of build Building.
radioactive background.
ed toward sit s, actual an ations of surf Of the 22 sur r than the M s greater th adionuclides on observed observed c analysis of f 1.07 pCi/g e soil locatio de of the WG cordance wit determined b the Radiolo bited measu ual and pote of random-b easurements om measure as no histor ey location.
l sample ana face soil sam mposited ove alyzed by th were adjuste s-137 and C he sample m a Laboratorie were collecte otaling 8,443 ion of the su dings, namel The presen material in tes that exhi nd potential face soil sam face soil sam MDC in tw han the MD s were posit in the analy concentratio f the surface
: g.
ons to a dep GTV and fiv th the by the ogical urable ential based were ement ry of Sub-alysis mples r 1 m he on-ed as Co-60.
media.
es for ed by 3 m2.
urface ly the ce of these ibited spill mples mples wo (2)
DC in tively sis of on of e soil pth of ve (5)
 
La Cross License T Revision locations The sam evaluate Building samples 15 sampl identified of the su 0.161 pC areas is foundatio decommi Ten sam asphalt w this surv results ra measurem identified 0.057 pC A summ presented Nine sur samples gamma s In additi detected One sedi unit L10 and HTD 0.136 pC 2.3.4.2.
The imp immediat two surv LACBW these two Approxim 2350-1 d Alarm se instrumen se Boiling W Termination n 0 s that access mples at the t the subsurfa were taken taken, Cs-1 les. No oth d by gamma ubsurface so Ci/g. The ass not current ons and surr issioning pro mples were ta was taken fro vey unit. Th anging from ment of 3,09 d in concen Ci/g.
ary of the fi d in Table 2-rface soil sa taken from spectroscopy on to detect at concentra iment sampl 10103. This D analyses.
Ci/g.
Class acted Class te area surro ey units. Th WR Crib Hou o survey unit mately 1% o data logger w et-points for nt. No scan Water Reactor Plan ed the soils two WGTV ace soils alon and compo 137 was pos her potentia a spectroscop oil samples sessment of tly complete rounding bu ocess, when aken of asp om the same he asphalt s the instrume 95 dpm/100 ntrations gre indings of th
-10.
amples, 11 s Class 1 open y and HTD a ting Co-60 ations greate le was taken s sample wa Co-60 and 2 Open Lan 2 open lan ounding the hese are sho use, the G-3 ts.
of the surfac with a 2 by the instrum alarms were r
under the T V locations w ngside and u sited at dept sitively iden al plant-deriv py. The ave was 0.055 p potential su
: e. Soil in uried structu access will b phalt from p e location se surface was ent MDC of cm2. Of th eater than he survey fo subsurface s n land surve analyses. Th and Cs-137 r than the in n from the s as also sent t C-137 were nd Areas nd areas tota LSE. The C own in Figur 3 Crib Hous ce soil area i y 2 NaI de ment were set e observed.
2-26 urbine Build were acquire underneath th ths of 10, 15 ntified in co ved gamma erage Cs-13 pCi/g with ubsurface soi difficult to ures and pip be more read paved areas lected for th first scanne f 2,771 dpm/
he 10 asphal MDC in on or each indiv soil samples ey units wer he results of
, H-3, C-14 nstrument MD sanitary solid to Test Amer e detected in al approxim Class 2 impa re 2-1. The se and the L in survey un etector. Thi t at the obse ding through ed to a dept he vault. Th 5 and 20 fee oncentration a-emitting ra 7 concentrat a maximum il contamina o access are ping has bee dily availabl in Class 1 s he surface an ed with beta
/100cm2 to a lt samples t nly one sam vidual Class s, one concr re sent to Te f the analysis 4, Fe-55 and DC.
ds tank that rica Laborat n this sampl mately 13,99 acted open l LACBWR LACBWR w nit L201110 is area inclu erved backgr h angled Geo th of five m he samples u et. Of the 7 ns greater th adionuclides tion observe m observed ation in the C eas such as en deferred le.
survey unit nd subsurfac a-gamma de a maximum taken, Cs-13 mple at a s 1 open land rete sample est America s are present d Ni-63 wer is located i tory for gam e, both at a 6 m2 and ar and area wa Administrat warehouses a 1 was scann uded asphalt round plus t oprobe samp meters in ord under the Tu 79 subsurface han the MD s were posit ed in the ana concentratio Class 1 open s under bui until later i L1010104.
ce soil sampl etector with of observed 37 was posit concentratio d survey un and two as a Laboratorie ted in Table re also posit in Class 1 su mma spectros concentrati re located in as segregated tion Building are all locat ned with a M t paved surf the MDCR o pling.
der to urbine e soil DC in tively alysis on of n land ilding n the The les in scan d scan tively on of nit are sphalt es for 2-11.
tively urvey scopy on of n the d into g, the ted in Model faces.
of the
 
La Cross License T Revision Twenty-t measurab locations taken in taken, Cs other pot The aver 0.077 pC Twenty-t and three resides in Of the 2 greater th than MD identified of 0.112 samples assessme currently surround process, w Twelve s selected results r 2,748 dpm concentra concentra observed A summ presented Three sur samples Administ HTD ana Co-60 a concentra HTD rad 2.3.4.3.
The impa land area Figure 2-site, the t se Boiling W Termination n 0 three surfac ble radioact s, or areas w Class 2 open s-137 was p tential plant rage Cs-137 Ci/g with a m three subsur e locations b n survey uni 23 subsurfac han MDC in DC in four d by gamma pCi/g. The was 0.043 ent of poten y complete.
ding buried s when access samples were randomly.
ranging fro m/100cm2.
ations great ation observ d concentrati ary of the fi d in Table 2-rface soil sa taken from tration Build alyses. The and Cs-137, ations greate dionuclides e Class acted Class 3 a was segre
-1. The Cla transmission Water Reactor Plan e soil samp tivity, disco where the gro n land surve positively ide t-derived rad 7 concentrat maximum obs face soil sam biased to are it L2011101 ce soil samp n one sample samples. N spectroscop average Cs-pCi/g with ntial subsurf Soil in dif structures an s will be mor e taken of as The asphalt om the ins Of the 12 ter than the ved in the an on of 0.055 indings of th
-12.
amples, five m an acces ding were se results of th H-3, C-14 er than MD exceeding M 3 Open Lan 3 open land egated into ass 3 impacte n switchyard r
ples were tak lored areas, ound had be ey units are s entified at co dionuclides tion observe served conce mples were t eas alongsid
: 1. The biase ples taken, e and Cs-13 No other po py. The sing
-137 concent h a maximu face soil con fficult to ac nd piping ha re readily av sphalt from p t surface wa strument M 2 asphalt sa e instrumen nalysis of the pCi/g.
he survey fo subsurface s ssible storm ent to Test he analysis a 4, Fe-55 an DC. As disc MDC are likel nd Areas areas total a three surve ed open land for the LAC 2-27 ken at locat
, buried pip een disturbed shown in Fig oncentration were positiv ed in the an entration of taken at 14 r de and under ed samples w Co-60 was 7 was positi otential plan gle sample w tration obser um observe ntamination cess areas s as been defe vailable.
paved areas s first scann MDC of 2, mples taken nt MDC in e asphalt sam or each indiv soil samples, m sewer ba America La are presented nd Cm-243/
cussed in se ly to be false approximatel ey units. T d survey un CBWR and G tions biased pe locations
: d. The loca gure 2-7. O ns greater th vely identifi nalysis of th 0.200 pCi/g random loca rneath the S were acquire positively ively identif nt-derived ra with detectab rved in the a d concentra n in the Cla such as und erred until l in Class 2 su ned with bet
,529 dpm/10 n, Cs-137 w three samp mples was 0 vidual Class
, three aspha asin manhol aboratories f d in Table 2
/244 were ection 2.3.3 e positives.
ly 66,765m2 The Class 3 nits include t G-3 facilitie d toward sit s, actual an ations of surf Of the 23 sur han MDC in ied by gamm he surface s
: g.
ations to a de Storm Sewer ed to a dept identified a fied at conce adionuclides ble Co-60 ha analysis of th ation of 0.0 ass 2 open l der building ater in the d urvey units.
ta-gamma de 00cm2 to a was positive ples. The 0.049 pCi/g s 2 open land alt samples a le located for gamma s
-13. In add also positiv for non-imp
: 2. The Class survey uni the north en s, the LACB es that exhi nd potential face soil sam face soil sam 14 samples ma spectrosc soil samples epth of one m r Water pipe th of five m at concentra entrations gr s were posit ad a concentr he subsurfac 088 pCi/g.
land areas i foundations decommissio The asphal etector with a maximum ely identifie average Cs with a maxi d survey un and two sedi in front of spectroscopy dition to dete vely detecte pacted areas 3 impacted its are show nd of the lice BWR plant a ibited spill mples mples
. No copy.
s was meter e that meters.
ations reater tively ration e soil The s not s and oning lt was h scan m of ed in s-137 imum nit are iment f the y and ecting ed at s, the open wn in ensed access
 
La Cross License T Revision and right was deem LACBW Crib Hou facility d were dee These ar Solutions A minim scanned was excl focused o points fo No scan Thirty-tw where th open lan was posi plant-der The aver 0.131 pC Seventee meter.
concentra radionuc concentra maximum Two sam selected results w were pos A summ presented As part o of concre Crib Hou Administ survey un Three co L301210 three sur Laborato se Boiling W Termination n 0 t-of-way are med impacte WR Administ use). The tr during operat emed as imp reas were c s maintains t mum of 1%
with a Mod luded from on undisturb r the instrum alarms were wo surface so he ground ha d survey un tively identi rived gamma rage Cs-137 Ci/g with a m en subsurfac Of the 17 ations grea lides were ation observ m observed c mples were t randomly.
were less tha sitively ident ary of the fi d in Table 2-of the charac ete located i use. In addi tration Build nit L301210 oncrete samp 01, the two se rface soil s ories for gam Water Reactor Plan a and the ha ed by LACB tration Build ransmission tions. The p pacted by th onservativel that classifyi of the surf el 2350-1 da gamma sur bed soils wi ment were se e observed in oil samples ad been dist nits are show ified in conc a-emitting ra 7 concentrat maximum obs e soil sampl 7 subsurface ater than M positively ved in the a concentratio aken of asph The asphalt an instrumen tified by gam indings of th
-14.
cterization of in the north ition, a sam ding and tw
: 9. These sam ples from su ediment sam samples and mma spectr r
aul road to th BWR due to ding and the yard was d plant access he transit of ly classified ing these are face soil are ata logger w rface scanni ith minimal et at the obse n these surve were taken turbed. The wn in Figure centrations g adionuclides tion observe served conce les were tak e soil samp MDC in ei identified analysis of th on of 0.409 p halt from pa surface wa nt MDC of 1 mma spectro he survey fo f survey unit h section of mple was take wo sediment mples were urvey unit L3 mples taken f d two subs roscopy and 2-28 he ISFSI fac o the presen presence of deemed as im area, Highw f packaged r d as impacte eas as non-im ea in survey with a 2 by ing for safe vegetation o erved backgr ey units.
at locations e locations o e 2-8. Of th greater than s were positi ed in the an entration of ken at random ples taken, ight samples by gamma he subsurfac pCi/g.
aved areas in s first scann 1,938 dpm/1 scopy in any or each indiv t L3012101, the survey u en from a sa t samples w sent off-site 3012101, th from the stor surface soil d HTD anal cility. The n nce of a sep f concrete fr mpacted as i way 35 right radioactive m ed. Howev mpacted wou y units L30 2 NaI dete ety reasons.
or disturbed round plus t biased tow of surface s he 32 surface MDC in 26 ively identif nalysis of th 0.463 pCi/g mly selected Cs-137 w
: s. No oth spectrosco ce soil samp n Class 3 su ned with bet 100cm2. No y of these sam vidual Class
, samples we unit that ori anitary tank were taken fr e for isotopic he sanitary ta rm sewer ba samples w lyses. The north end of ptic system from impacte it was part o t-of way and material thro ver, it shou uld have bee 012101 and ector. Surve Gamma d soils or gra the MDCR o ard discolor oil samples e soil sampl samples. N fied by gamm he surface s
: g.
d locations t was positive ther potenti opy. The ples was 0.0 urvey units.
ta-gamma de o plant deriv amples.
s 3 open land ere taken fro iginated from k that service from a storm c analysis.
ank sample asin in survey were sent t results of f the license that service ed structures of the LACB d ISFSI haul ough these a ld be noted en appropriat L3012109 ey unit L301 surface scan avel. Alarm of the instrum red areas or taken in Cl les taken, Cs No other pote ma spectrosc soil samples to a depth o ely identifie ial plant-de average Cs 087 pCi/g w The asphalt etector. All ved radionuc d survey un om several p m the LACB es the LACB m sewer bas from survey y unit L3012 to Test Am the analysi d site es the s (the BWR l road areas.
d that te.
were 12102 nning m set-ment.
areas lass 3 s-137 ential copy.
s was of one ed in erived s-137 with a t was l scan clides nit are pieces BWR BWR sin in y unit
: 2109, merica is are
 
La Cross License T Revision presented derived R and Ni-6 exceedin consisten 2.3.5. N Based up associate indicated A full lis
: 2.
The prim informati operation from the character The resu conducte traffic in The G-3 incidents results of A scan su gamma d using an was also gross bet MDC of identified gross alp contamin samples.
derived 0.061 pC that the material Direct an traffic ar Model 23 areas of i ranged f exceeded se Boiling W Termination n 0 d in Table 2 ROC at resid
: 63. As dis ng MDC are nt with natur Non-Impacte pon the inf ed with the G d that there w st of G-3 stru mary basis f ion documen ns. Additio e LACBWR rization of t ults are prov ed during the the major st station res s of radioact f the charact urvey was p detector. In alpha/beta-g taken at the ta-gamma a f 2,816 dpm/
d gross beta-pha activity nation was i The roof m ROC that w Ci/g. Based elevated dir on the roof.
nd removabl reas of the 360 instrume interest were from 2,540 d the MDC d Water Reactor Plan 2-15. The dual concent scussed in s likely to be ral backgroun ed Structur formation co G-3 Coal Pla was no reaso uctures that for the non nted in the H nally, the p R Stack du the LACBW vided in Re e 2015 chara tation buildin sides in non tive contam erization sur performed of addition, six gamma prop location of ctivity rangi
/100cm2. T
-gamma acti y ranging f dentified at material itse was positive on the fact t rect alpha m le contamin G-3 Coal P ent with 43-e scanned, in dpm/100cm during the co r
analysis of trations grea section 2.3.3 false positiv nd.
es ompiled in ant may be c onable poten have been d n-impacted HSA that the potential for uring opera WR Administ eference 13 acterization ngs were sur n-impacted s mination of s rveys perform f the mid-lev x (6) locatio portional dete each direct m ing from 2,3 The results o ivity ranging from 142 dp concentratio elf was samp ely identifie that no other measurements ation survey Plant. Scan
-93 detector.
ncluding floo m2 to 2,617 ourse of this 2-29 f these samp ater than the 3 for non-im ves. Cs-137 the HSA, S classified as ntial for resi designated as classificatio e G-3 structu windborne ations to s tration Build
. Addition campaign w rveyed.
survey unit soils, asphal med in the G vel roof of th ons were sele ector. A sm measuremen 302 dpm/10 of the direc g from 1,603 pm/100cm2 ons greater t pled on Jun ed by gamm r plant deriv s were due ys were perf n measureme
. Approxim ors and lowe 7 dpm/100cm s survey. Te ples positive e instrument mpacted are was also po Solutions co non-impac dual contam s non-impa on for the G ures were no migration o structure roo ding roof an nal surveys where the su L4012103.
lt or concre G-3 station a he G-3 Coal ected at rand mear sample nt. The resu 0cm2 to 2,8 ct beta-gamm 3 dpm/100cm to 258 dpm than MDC b ne 30, 2015.
ma spectros ved ROC wa most likely formed of re ents were p mately 5% of er wall surfa m2. No o en (10) locat ely identifie MDC, inclu eas, the HT ositively dete oncluded th cted. Histo mination from acted is prov G-3 station ot used for L of airborne ofs was ev nd the G-3 of the G-3 urfaces subje There are ete in this su are summariz l Plant build dom for dire for removab ults of the be 816 dpm/100 ma and alph m2 to 2,072 m/100cm2.
by the analy Cs-137 wa scopy at a as detected, to the pres epresentativ performed us f the concret aces. The av observed sca tions were ch ed several p uding H-3, F TD radionuc ected but at l hat the struc orical inform m site operat vided in Tab structures i LACBWR-re effluent rele valuated by Coal Plant structures ected to high e no docum urvey unit.
zed as follow ding using a ect measurem ble contamin eta scan iden 0cm2 with a ha measurem dpm/100cm No remov ysis of the s as the only concentratio it was concl sence of coa ve high perso sing the Lu te surfaces i verage scan M an measure hosen at ran plant-Fe-55 clides levels ctures mation tions.
ble 2-is the elated eased y the roof.
were h foot ented The ws:
beta-ments nation ntified scan ments m2 and vable smear plant on of luded al ash onnel udlum in the MDC ement
: ndom,
 
La Cross License T Revision primarily measurem 875 dpm greater th 2.3.6. Im The deco impacted In additio accepted remain a Reactor B remainin and floo Reactor/G Turbine surfaces segregate radioactiv systems o Radiolog complian radiologi areas.
disassem remediat demolitio waste.
After com 3 feet be radioactiv use criter 2.3.6.1.
Characte consisted walls an (primaril taken fro 621 foot the 633 f samples w Piping Tu se Boiling W Termination n 0 y from the ments for g
/100cm2 for han MDC by mpacted Str ommissionin d buildings, s on, all system elevation fo and be subje Building tha ng reinforced ors of the Generator P sump and th above the ed by waste ve waste.
or structures gical surveys nce with 10 ical conditio The radiolo mbly and rem ion has ade on, the impa mmodity rem elow grade, vity and the ria.
Basem rization of d primarily o d floors of ly the Piping om the 615 elevation in foot elevatio were collect unnel. The l Water Reactor Plan main lobby gross activit beta-gamm y the analysi ructures an ng approach structures, sy ms and expo or grade at L ected to STS at will be exp d concrete w WGTV, an lant baseme he Turbine 636 foot ele classificatio No extensi s that will be s of the inter 0 CFR 20 re ons for the im ogical infor moval of syst equately red acted structu moval is com
, will be r e extent of a ment Structu the structur of the acquis the Reactor g Tunnels).
foot elevati n the Reactor on concrete f ted, six (6) in locations wh r
y area and y was less
: a. No remov s of the sme nd Systems h for LACB ystems and c osed metal b LACBWR is S are the rem posed by the walls floors o nd the rem ent, the one pit. Conseq evation will on and dispo ive characte e removed pr riors of struc equirements mplementati rmation from tems and the duced radiol ures will be mplete, the s re-surveyed additional re ures Below 6 ral surfaces ition and rad r Building, In June and on concrete r Building, th floor of the P n the Reacto here the core 2-30 the mainte than the M vable contam ar samples.
BWR requir components below 3 feet the 639 foo maining rein e removal of of the WTB, mainder of foot thick p quently, all l be remedi osed of as c erization wa rior to the pe tures at LAC regarding on of contro m these su e demolition logical cond demolished tructures tha to determi emediation r 36 Foot Elev of basemen diological an WTB and July of 2015 floor and t he 630 foot Piping Tunn or Building, e samples we enance area.
MDC of 74 mination wa res the dem to a depth o below grad ot elevation.
nforced conc f the interior the remaini the Piping portion of th systems and iated, disass clean demoli as or will b erformance o CBWR are r the posting ols for the pr urveys will of impacted ditions to le d, packaged at will remai ine the con required, if a vation nts that wil nalysis of co the balance 5, a series o the concrete elevation co nels. A total three (3) in ere taken are
. The resu dpm/100cm as identified molition and of at least 3 de will also b The only st crete walls a r concrete an ing reinforce g and Vent he Chimney d componen sembled and ition debris, be performe of FRS.
routinely per g of areas rotection of provide th d structures a evels suitabl and properl in at license ncentrations any, to meet ll remain in oncrete core e of the bas f concrete co e floor and oncrete floor l of twelve (
the WTB an e shown in F ults of all d m2 for alpha at concentra d removal o feet below g be removed.
tructures tha and floors o nd steel line ed concrete tilation Tun y Foundation nts and struc d/or demoli clean salva ed of equipm rformed to en and to ide f workers in he basis for at the site. W le for contr ly disposed termination of the res t the unrestr n the end-s samples from sement struc ore samples east wall o r of the WTB
: 12) concrete nd three (3) i Figures 2-9.
direct a and ations of all grade.
The at will of the er, the walls
: nnels, n, the ctural
: ished, age or
: ment, nsure entify these r the When rolled of as n, i.e.,
sidual ricted state m the ctures were n the B and e core in the
 
La Cross License T Revision The loca condition volumetr elevated wall sur discolora that exh condition there was radionuc The conc Test Ame ROC. In Reactor B and #002 concrete analysis positively 59, Tc-99 concrete 2.3.6.2.
A concre Turbine contamin in the T Analysis 0.106 pC 2.3.6.3.
As stated subjected graded su As repor radioactiv building located i Administ proximity laborator Characte beta-gam gross bet se Boiling W Termination n 0 ations selecte n or observ ric contamin observed co faces were ation or stan hibited the h n for concre s sufficient s lide fraction crete pucks r erica Labora n addition, Building sam 2 were also cores is pr of the conc y detected at 9, Pu-238, P core sample Turbin ete core was Building T nation event Turbine Buil of this sam Ci/g and H-3 LACB d previously d to FRS. In urvey approa rted in the H ve spills or has primaril in the build tration Build y to the LSE ry.
rization surv mma/alpha a ta-gamma/al Water Reactor Plan ed for concr ved radiolog ation of the ontact dose r used to id nding water.
highest pot ete in each s source term ns of gamma representing atory for gam the concrete mple locatio o sent for is resented in rete core sa t concentrati Pu-239/240, es is presente ne Building s obtained as Tunnel to cited in the lding and t mple indicate at 1.71 pCi/
BWR Admin y, the LACB nstead, these ach in accord HSA, there w radioactive ly been used ding that sup ding was in E, occupancy veys of the ctivity of in lpha activity r
rete core sam gical measu concrete. W rates or coun dentify poten The goal w ential of re survey unit.
in the cores emitters as w g the first 1/2 mma spectro e pucks rep ns #001, #0 sotopic analy Table 2-16.
amples inclu ions greater Pu-241, Am ed in Referen Tunnel s part of the attempt to HSA pertain the potential ed detectable
/g.
nistration Bu BWR Admin e two structu dance with M was no past contaminati d for office sp pported both nitially class y by LACBW LACBWR nterior floor were also p 2-31 mpling were urements in When possibl nt rates. In a ntial locatio was to ident epresenting This judg to achieve t well as HTD inch of conc oscopy and H presenting th 03, #005 an ysis. A sum Significan ude Ni-63, H than their re m-241 and A nce 16.
e 2014 chara evaluate ning to the d l radiologic e concentrat uilding nistration Bu ures will be MARSAME history of th ion in the LA pace and rec h LACBWR sified as a M WR personn Administrat rs surfaces a performed on biased tow ndicated the le, locations addition, vis ons of surf tify, to the e the worst gmental samp the sensitivit D radionuclid crete at each HTD analyse he concrete nd #006 and mmary of t nt HTD rad H-3 and Sr-9 espective MD Am-243. An acterization the possibl discovery of cal contamin tions of Cs-1 uilding and surveyed fo E guidance.
he use of un ACBWR A cords storage R and G-3 MARSSIM nel and the p tion Buildin and the roof n the roof, on ward location e presence were determ sual observat face contam extent possib case bound mpling appro ties required des.
h sample loc es for beta an deeper than WTB samp the analytica dionuclides i
: 90. The oth DC include; analysis of survey from le extent o f cracked dra nation of su 137 at 0.352 G-3 Crib H or unrestricte nsealed radio dministratio
: e. An enviro operations.
Class 2 stru resence of th ng included
: f. Direct m n floor tiles ns where phy of fixed a mined based tions of floo mination, suc ble, the loca ding radiolo ach also en d to determin cation was se nd alpha em n 1/2 inch de le locations al results fo identified by her radionuc C-14, Fe-55 the results o m the floor o of a radioa ain system p urrounding 2 pCi/g, Co-House will n ed release us oactive mate on Building.
onmental lab The LACB ucture due t he environm a scan for measurement and around ysical and/or upon or and ch as ations ogical sured ne the ent to mitting eep at
#001 or the y the clides 5, Ni-of the of the active piping soils.
-60 at not be sing a
: erials, The b was BWR to its mental gross ts for floor
 
La Cross License T Revision drain ope each dire The resu 4,915 dpm the secon imbedded gamma s was then and seco from less and dire observed Beta sc 2,261 dpm from less Direct be of 243 d measurem identified 2.3.7. S Section 8 hydrogeo was deri Haley &
(18) supp 2.3.7.1.
For a di towns an river wat
: Lansing, water fo approxim The LAC well at th state perm LACBW Building areas are to the gr pathway se Boiling W Termination n 0 enings. A sm ect measurem ults of the m/100cm2 w nd floor ha d in a floor spectroscopy n performed ond floor lam s than MDC ct alpha re d reading of 7 cans of th m/100cm2 w s than MDC eta-gamma m dpm/100cm2 ments were d concentrati urface and 8.5 in Chap ology and hy ived directly Aldrich, Hy plements the Area Grou stance of 40 nd cities alon ter for indus Iowa, about or industria mately 40 mi CBWR site he site. Sani mitted sanit WR Adminis
. Storm wa e periodically round area su after passing Water Reactor Plan mear sample ment.
beta scans with a scan M allway, a di tile. The c
: y. The analy involving th minated woo of 329 dpm adings rang 72 dpm/100c he roof are with a scan M C of 113 dpm measurement to a maxim all less than ions greater Groundwat pter 8 of t ydrology of y from Hal ydrogeologic e preliminary undwater Us 0 miles dow ng the Missis strial purpos t 15 miles d al purposes les downstre has its own itary wastes tary wastes h tration Buil ater runoff is y monitored urrounding t g through an r
e for remova of the int MDC of 2,10 screte radio contaminated ysis of the ti he acquisitio od, carpet, a m/100cm2 to ged from le cm2.
ea indicate MDC of 2,26 m/100cm2 to ts taken on t mum observ n MDC of 4 than MDC b ter his LTP c ZNPS and e ey & Aldri cal Investiga y findings in se wnstream of ssippi River ses, excludin downstream o between t eam.
potable wa are collecte hauler. Thi lding and a s diverted di d for oil shee the facility v n oil separato 2-32 able contam terior surfac 00 dpm/100c oactive parti d portion of ile identified n of ten (10) and floor til a maximum ess than MD ed results 61 dpm/100c o a maximum the floor dra ved reading 42 dpm/100c by the analy ontains a s environs. T ich, Hydrog ation Report n Reference 1 the site, vir are obtained ng the adjac of the site.
the LACBW ater supply, p d in a solids is includes a a sanitary h irectly to th en and disco via downspo or located in mination was ces ranged cm2. During icle was dis f the tile wa d 0.005 uCi
) biased dire le. Direct b m observed re DC of 39 d ranging fr cm2. Direct m observed ain openings g of 333 dp cm2. No re sis of the sm summary d The informat geological C t for the LaC
: 17.
rtually all m d from groun cent G-3 pla There are n WR site an provided thr s holding tan a sanitary ho holding tank he Mississipp oloration. R outs or ente nside the LSE also taken from 1,420 g the scan of scovered. T as removed of Cs-137.
ect measurem beta-gamma eading of 5, dpm/100cm2 rom 1,872 t alpha meas reading of 1 s ranged from pm/100cm2 a emovable co mear samples description tion containe Conceptual S Crosse Boilin municipal w und water. T ant, is the co no other know nd Prairie rough a sing nk and pump olding tank k that servi pi River at o Roof drains d r the norma E.
at the locati 0 dpm/100cm f the north e The particle and analyze An investig ments on the readings ra
,743 dpm/10 to a maxi dpm/100cm surements ra 152 dpm/100 m less than M and direct ontamination
: s.
of the geo ed in this se Site Model ng Water Re water supplie The nearest u oal-fired pla wn users of du Chien, gle ground w ped off by a that service ices the Tu outfalls. Re discharge dir al effluent re on of m2 to end of e was ed by gation e first anged 00cm2 imum m2 to anged 0cm2.
MDC alpha n was
: ology, ection (17).
eactor es for use of ant in f river WI, water local es the urbine elease rectly elease


were co n Concret eis locate dnon-imp a approxi m unit L40 L40121 0samples a The ana b ackgro u can be a tmean Cs 0.135 p C was 0.07 Relevan tStation (Z at Zion S Zion to C geograp hfor dist u b ackgro u within t hcategori e drainage s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e survey of t mmissionin g nt additiona o n or adden d B ack g round t he initial c h u nd study f ofrom vari o u nd study is o f the 2014 u nd levels a W R fell withi n y , backg r ou n sentative.
La Cross License T Revision 2.3.7.2.
H was chosen
Regional Mississip parallels upward; river stag demonstr river stag Groundw surface (
.or selected a a te for obtai n Although t h n sidered una f e samples a n d north of t h a cte d surve y mately 100 s 12108. Soi l 0 8 were also a re provide d l ysis of th e u nd study f o ttributed to g-137 conce n C i/g with a m 0 resulting i t to LACB W ZNPS) title d S tation (15). C s-137 leve hically simil a u rbed soils a u nd Cs-137 h e expecte d es of soil in and non-dr a W ater Reacto r Plan hese survey g process, i nl characteri z dum as a pa r Stud y h aracterizati or soils at L A o us locatio nsummarize d characteriz a a t LACBW R n nominal e x n d reference H owever, no
Groundw the Missi may turn chemical the shallo Based on of the G-located i monitorin a slightly has a do gradient towards t there are stages. G Reactor B are below During p was com permeabi buildings soils will will circ localized outside th other han or buried underlyin shallow s contamin soils with orders of se Boiling W Termination n 0 Groundw lly, groundw ppi river. C the river. U however, th ge data comp rates that the ge impacts th water beneath bgs) and the water in the s issippi Rive n and flow l constituent ow system.
. The Ener g a n area out s n ing backgr o he selected s f fected by p a nd direct me h e LSE. A y unit L401 2quare mete r l samples fr oevaluated f d in sections e backgrou n o r soils. Th e global fallo u n tration  of s maximum o b i n  the uppe r WR is a stud y d Zion Soluti o This docu mls anticipat e a r. The doc u as well as ulevels for t h range of d the non-i m ainage, dist u r units. Solu n cluding fol l zation data i rt of the req u on survey p A CBWR. R n s outside o d in Table 2-ation effort, R. The pu r x pected lev e areas shoul suitable of f g y Solutions P side of the L ound measu sample loca t ast LACB Wasurements sphalt sam p 2 106. Surf a r s of undist u om non-im p f or use as b a2.3.3 and 2
n a review of
.nd soil sa m e results di d u t. For the t s u r face sam p b served co n r range for t h y performed o ns TSD 13 m ent was p r ed from wo r ument predi c undisturbed he site spec i d isturbed so m pacted area u rbed and u n 2-21 tions intend s l owing the s is obtained, u ired 2 year performed i n R eference 7 of the own e5. Energy Solu r pose of th e els for soils, d be reason a f-site locati o P roject Heal L SE but on rements bas tions were i W R operatio n were taken p les and dir e a ce soil sam p u rbed non-d r p acte d surve y a ckground r e.3.5.3. m ples in 20 1 d report Cs-1 t wo backgro u p les taken o n centration o his data set afor the dec o-004, Exam i r epared to c o rldwide fall c ted ranges f s oils and is fic backgro u ils in non-d s at LACB W n disturbed s o s to continu e s ubmittal of this chapte r update of t h n Octobe r 2states that a e r controlle d utions perfo r e study wa s concrete, a n a bly close t o o n was iden t lth Physicist the license d ed upon the inside the L A ns. in Class 3 s ect measure m p les were a c rainage soil y units L40 1 e ference soi l 14 compar e 1 37 at level s und studies n or aroun d o f 0.268 pC i at a 95% co n ommissioni n i nation of C s ompare site out. The L for backgro u presented i u nd studies d rainage ar e W R, the up p oil from the e characteri z this LTP.
-3 Ash Land in the sout ng wells (B1 y downward ownward gr at well pair the river bas e some perio Groundwater Building ba w the water t plant constru mpacted, redu ility can dec
I r of the LT P h e approved 005, Dairyl a series of s d area. T h rmed a limi t s to assess i nd asphalt.
: s. The resul l flow at a s cumnavigate d flow regim he footprint nd, potential d piling, will ng groundw soils from p nation. The hin the supp f magnitude Water Reactor Plan ater Flow water flows i Closer to th Under typic he vertical gr pared to wa e shallow aq he water tabl h the site is e groundwat shallow depo
o the decom m tifie d. Con sand the Ra d d LACBWR previous ra ACBWR li c s urvey unit L m ents were c quired fro mwithin non
: r. The deep parallel to s would occu f the ground dfill area grou th side of t 11AR/B11R vertical gra radient at w B9/B9A. T sin with a lo ods where t r flow throu sement shel table during uction, and m ucing the eff crease the h lting impact slower veloc the area, e mes on contam of these str l releases tha l likely take water. This precipitation, average sha port pilings, lower.
-1 2107 and o ls. Analysi s e d favorabl y s slightly a bperformed a d the site pr o i/g. The  s t n fidence lev e n g of the Zi o s-137 Glob asoil sample LACBWR a n u nd concent r in Table 2-6performed a eas. As th e per 95 th per Zion backg r zation throu g I n the case w P will be up LTP. and perfor moil samples h e result o f t ed assessm e i f backgrou n m issioning s s equently, a n d iation Prot e site that sediological s u c ensed area
r in a westerl he shore, gr al river stag radient rever ter table ele quifer is in di le elevation.
, L 3012101, walso collec t m a small a r-impacted s u o ther areas w s results for y with the b ove MDC. a t LACBW R oduced a m e t andard dev i e l of 0.275 p o n Nuclear P al Fallout in Cs-137 res u nd Zion sit e rations of C s 6. The obs e a t LACBW R e re were v acentile leve l r ound study g hout w here dated m ed a were f this e nt of n d at site to n on-e ction emed urvey , they w hich ted in r ea of urvey within these 2005  This R, the e an of iation Ci/g. P ower Soils ults at e s are s-137 erved R fall arious l s for were La Cros s License T Revisio n consider e areas, an 2.3.2.P Energy S o Decomm decomm ifrom th esome of tless tha n prepared 2.3.3.N Based u p 163.5 ac rimpacte dcontami n operatio n ISFSI w operatio n physical for com pfor the c l The non-segregat einside o f Highwa y study fo r within s uin coal f ISFSI fa c From O cimpacte d survey u n and the iimpacte d To supp objectiv e open lan d b y perfo r The 201 5primary surveys a s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e d appropri a d Class 2 a n P otential Ra o lutions T S issioning (i ssioning of sampling o the theoreti c n 2 years, a
first encoun ter is in dire osits and fill per groundw the river.
: n. The list o f N on-Impact e pon the info r re licensed d."  The n n ation given n s. The de t w ere not im p n s (i.e., wit h characterist p liance bey o l assification
ur at or near dwater elevat undwater mo the LACBW
.-impacted o p e d into five f survey un i y 35. This s r soils. The u rvey unit L 4 from the G-c ility, whic h c tobe r 2014 d open land n its and we r initial result d as it was d ort this co n e of the ad d d survey un i rming additi 5 characteri zobjectives and sampli n W ater Reacto r Plan a te backgr o n d 3 open la n dionuclide s S D RS-TD-3 (16) establi LACBWR. o f various m c al neutron a n initial suit e f potential r a e d Open L a rmation co m site surrou n n on-impacte that histori c termination p acted by l h in the LSE i cs. The ar e o nd the char
) to the east adient. Durin well pairs B This is expec ocalized influ the gradients ugh the LAC l) as well as high and low more specifi fective poros hydraulic con to groundw city, and reg effectively b minant fate a ructures will at occurred w much longe is further c
: a. p en land are survey uni t it L401210 8 s urvey unit non-impact e 4 012103. A-3 station a n h has not be e to August areas of t h r e character is of the 20 1 dete rmined t n clusion, a ditional char a i ts given an ional soil sa m zation camp o f the addi n g to suppo r r o und conce n n d area surv e s of Concer n 3 13196-001 ,shes the b a Industry g u media from p activation pr o e of potenti a a dionuclides a nd Areas mpiled in th e nding the L d areas h a cal informat ithat the co n l icensed op e), site use, t e as designa t acterization a is approxi m t s. Non-im p 8 in a vegetwas forme d ed survey u n A majority o f nd survey u n en characteri z 2015, cha r h e site. Th e ized as suc h 14 character i that there is d ditional c h acterization initial Class m pling and g aign was d etional char a r t the "non 22 ntration lev e e y units at L n , R adionu c a sis for an uidance was p ast plant o o ducts, nobl a l ROC for is listed in T e HSA, a la r L SE and I S a ve no re a i on provide s n tiguous op e e rations wa s t opography, t ed as non-i msurveys an d m ately 352, 3 p acte d ope nated area w d during ch a n its are sho w f the surface n it L40121 0 z ed and is n o r acterization e survey un i h in Referen c ization, the s no reasona b haracterizati osurveys pe r 3 classifica t gamma wal k esigne d in a c a cterization
, creating an allow aquifer the hydraul 2-33 ly direction roundwater ge, groundw rses during f evations mea irect hydrau ntered at an ect hydraulic l material flo water is also Because th r the surface tion measure onitoring we WR site, an of and up gr ng times of n B11R/B11AR cted as grou uence at B9/
-impacted" c els for the LACBWR. c lides of C initial suit ereviewed a s o perations.
s are revers CBWR site is s the deep p w river stage ically the ins sity and perm nductivity o water flow is gionally, a si bypassing th and transpor l likely be d within the fo er to migrate compounded n area that w r hydraulic c ic conductiv from the bl may also h water gradien flood stages.
l e gases and the decom m T able 2-7.
asure in LAC ulic commun n average de c communica ows towards likely to flo he potential
rge portion o S FSI receiv e a sonable p o s no indicati o e n land are a s based on site discha r m pacted ar e d sampling p 3 60 square m n land surv e with minima l aracterizati o w n in Figurearea in sur v 06 complet e ot addresse dsurveys w its were or i ce 13. Bas e se survey u n ble potentia on was per f rformed in 2 t ion for re-c l k over surve y ccordance w was to pe r classificatio n evaluation C oncern D e of potent i s well as the Based on t h radionuclid e m issioning o o f the open ed a classi f o tential to on of impac t a s surround ithe locati o rge pathwa y e not requir e p erformed t o meters in si z e y unit L40 l ground di s on to facilit a 2-1. The G vey unit L4 0 e ly surroun d d by this LT P w ere perfor m i ginally cla s e d upon a re v n its were re c a l for residu a formed in 2 2 015 was t olassificatio n ys. with Referen c r form suffi c n and to p r of non-im p uring LA C ial ROC f oanalytical r e he eliminati o e s with a ha lf LACBW R land areas o fication as "contain re s t from LAC B i ng the LS E o n(s) of lic e y s, and oth e e d to be sur v o provide a ze. This are a 12109 is l o sturbance e a ate a backg r G-3 station r e 0 12105 is co v ds the LAC B P.      m ed in the ssified as C l v iew of the classified as al contamin a 2 015. A m o evaluate c e n as non-im p c e 4. One o c ient radiol o rovide reaso p acte d C BWR o r the esults o n of lf-life R was o n the "non-s idual BWR E and e nsed er site v eyed basis a was o cated ast of r ound esides v ered B WR non-l ass 3 HSA non-a tion. m ajor ertain pacted of the o gical nable La Cros s License T Revisio n assuranc e 2015 ch a b ased o n During t h units L4 0 logger w was sca nGamma s or grave lMinimu m evaluate d survey u n an Expl o were du eThirty-t w toward d shown i ninstrume npositivel y surface s These v ain sectio n specific bin the g r were ver y Sevente emeter. concentr a derived g average maximu m b ackgro u 137 con c surface s the Hwy Two as p survey u n were les sidentifie dA summ presente d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e that the n a racterizatio n a random d h e 2015 ch a 0 12103, L4 0 w ith a 2" by 2 n ned due to s urface sca n l. Alarm s e m Detectab l d during th e n it L40121 0 oranium GR-e to the pres e w o surface s d iscolored ar n Figure 2-5 n t MDC in y identified soil samples a lues are wi t n 2.3.1. On b ackground r ounds east y close at 0.
, the release ements colle ells (# B2/B3 nd associate radient of LA normal and R and B2/B undwater flo
e n subsurfac Of the 1 7 ations great e gamma-emi t C s-137 con c m observed u nd range fo c entrations t h s oil backgro u 35/Railroa d phalt sampl e nits. The as p s than the M d by gamma ary of the g d in Table 2
/B9A from t sed; and this s impacted b pilings that s e conditions.
-W ater Reacto r Plan n on-impacte d n survey fo c esign to ens u a racterizatio 0 12105, L4 0 2" NaI dete cinaccessibil i nning focuse d e t-points fo r e Count R a e performa n 7 and one i n-135. The e nce of natu r s oil sample seas or areas
stallation of meability of of the aquife s that ground ignificant pe these soils.
: 5. Cs-137 26 of the 3 2 by gamma swas 0.131 hin the exp e ly one Cs-1 3data set. T h of Highwa y 135 pCi/g a ne soil samp l 7 subsurfac e e r than the t ting radion u c entration o b concentrat i r Cs-137 as ha t exceede und. This s d Right of W e s were col l phalt surfac e MDC of 1,9 3 spectrosco p gamma spec t-8. r d survey un i cused prima r u re an unbi a n survey, a 0 12106 and ctor. In sur v ity from th e d on undist u r the instru m a te (MDCR)n ce of the g n survey uni tresults of t h ral backgro u s were coll e where the g was positi v 2 samples.
rt are that po deflected and ootprint of th e both in th d as the ove will likely re conductivity vity would b luffs on the have a flow nts near the
s pectroscop y p Ci/g with ected backg r 37 result ex c his sample w y 35. The m nd 0.131 pC l es were ta k e soil sam pinstrument uclides wer e b serve d in t i on of 0.4 0 discussed i nd the maxi m sample was t W ay Grounds lected from e was first s c 38 dpm/100 c p y in any of t t roscopy res u 2-23 i ts do not c rily on soils a sed survey.minimum o L4012108 v ey unit L4 0 e presence o urbed soils w m ent were s) of the in s gamma sca n t L4012108.
. The geolog CBWR site nication with epth of 20 fe ation with th s the west an ow towards t l releases of s would like ected during 3/B9A/B9/B ed backgrou ACBWR, th low river sta B3, with an ows generally the adjacent s is likely d by deeper st support the f the support f the soils. T er within the dwater withi ercentage of The impli otential relea d flow aroun he buildings e vadose zo erlying struc etain any po y is 313 feet be expected east toward component river are sli gical and his monitoring h the river an eet below gr he adjacent nd discharges the west but f radiologic ely be confin routine sam B7/B8), whic und groundw here appears age, groundw upward ve y from the b t inlet. How due to high tructures (i.e structures, w t pilings, the This reducti e footprint o in the comp f the flow re ications of ases that occ nd them. O s, via floor d one as well a ctures isolat tentially rele per day. Fo to be one to ds the t that ightly storic wells nd the round river.
h e investig a und activity.
s into t then cal or ned to mpling ch are water to be water ertical bluffs
ected from g round had b vely identi f No other p o y. The aver aa maximu m r ound range ceeded the m was the max i m ean of the ni/g, respecti v k en at rando m p les taken, MDC in ei e positively i t he subsurf a 09 pCi/g. T h n section 2.
: wever, river e., the which e soil ion in of the pacted egime these curred On the drains as the te the eased or the o two
3 mum Cs-13 7 the maxim u. random lo c c anned wit h cm 2. No pl a t he asphalt s ults for eac h c ontain plan tand asphalt of 1% of th e was scanne d 0 12107, les sf tall, thick with minima l s et at the o b strument.
A n, one in s u  All scan a l a tion indica tnon-impact e been disturb e f ied in con c o tential pla n a ge Cs-137 c m observed c for Cs-137 maxium res u imum 0.463 non-impact e v ely. mly selecte d Cs-137 wght sample s i dentified b y ace soil sa m h ese  valu e 3.1. Only o n 7 concentrat i um 0.409 p C cations in p h a beta-gam m a nt derived r samples. h non-impa c t-derived r a t. The sam p e surface s o d with a M o s than 1% o f vegetation a l vegetation bserved bac k A total of f u rvey unit L larms were i n t ed the elev e d areas at e d. The sa m centrations n t-derived r a concentratio concentratio n surface sa m ult of 0.268  pCi/g valu e e d and site-s d locations t w as positiv e s. No othe r y gamma s p m ples was 0.
e s are wit h n e subsurfac i on found i n C i/g value th paved areas mma detector radionuclide c te d open l a adioactivity.
ple locations oil area in s u o del 2350-1 f the surfac e a nd steep te or disturbe d k ground pl u f ou r alarms L 4012106, t w nvestigated u vated scan r elocations b m ple locatio ngreater tha n a dionuclides n observed i n of 0.463 p m ples as disc upCi/g in th e e and was l o s pecific dat a t o a depth o ely identifi e r potential p p ectroscopy.
087 pCi/g w h in the ex pe sample ha n the site-sp eat was loca tin non-imp. All scan r e s were posi t a nd survey u The were urvey  data e area rrain. d soils u s the were w o in using e sults b iased n s are n the were i n the pCi/g. u ssed e site-ocated a sets o f one e d in plant- The with a pected d Cs-ecific ted in p acte d esults tively u nit is La Cros s License T Revisio n A coal a ssamples The resu l The la b concentr a also posi concentr a consider e of the p l radionucpositive ratios a rcompare d higher t h operatio n consiste n the spor a derived r In surve y gamma s area to d approxi muranium readings 2.3.4.I m The HS A operatio n been cla s b een ide n into two north of Highwa y three Cl a The cha r prepared employe d radionuc of suffic i surface a obtained Survey contami n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 sh sample f r were sent t o lts of the an a b oratory a n ations exce e tively detec t a tions of th e e d to very l i l ant-derived lide mixtu rresults for C r e 118 and d to the sit e han expecte d n al history, t n t with natu r adic positive r adionuclide y unit L401 2 s pectroscop y determine i f m ately 7,00 0 and thoriu m conducted d m pacted O p A identifie d n s. The ap p ssified as C ntified as "
iClass 2 sur v the LSE, t h y 35 and th e a ss 3 survey r acterization for each s d to determ l ide concen t i ent quantit y a nd subsur ffrom belo w techniques n ation ident i W ater Reacto r Plan rom survey u o Test Am e alysis are pr e nalysis spo r eding the M D t ed but at le v e positively i i kely be the radionucli d r e fractions C s-137, Sr-16, respec t e-specific m i d by factor s t he radionuc ral backgro u analytical r s in these s u 2 108, a rep r y. In additi o f there is a 0 to 8,000 c p m series nu c during the w p en Land A d the open proximate ar e Class 1. An impacted" b vey units.
T he transmis s e haul road uunits combi nof the impa c s urvey unit ine the late r trations in t h y and qualit y face soils i n w the structu rwere emp l i fied an d t h r u nit L40121 e rica Labor a esented in T radically i d D C, includi n v els that are i dentified ra dresult of co u d es. This
: c. For exa m 90 and Fe-5 tively. W h i xture fracti s of 4,800 a l ide ratios, a u nd and co m esults are v e urvey units.
resentative s o n, gamma ssignificant pm). The a clides with alkover sur v Areas land area ea is 1.5 ac rapproxima t y reactor o p Three impac t s ion switch y used to tra n n ed is appr o c ted open l a in accord a r al and vert he soil. Cha r y to quantify n each ope n res due to in t l oyed to d e h e radionuc l 2-24 05, six surf a atories for g T able 2-9.
d entified s e ng H-3, C-1 4consistent w dionuclides w u nting unce r c onclusion w mple, samp 5 5. Howe v hen the rati ons in Cha p a nd 10,700, and primaril y m prise 88%
o ery unlikely s ample of t h s can readin gdifference analysis of t no plant d e v ey average dinside the r es. All op e tely 3.46 ac r p erations.
T ted Class 3 s y ard and th e n sport dry f u oximately 1 6 a nd areas be g ance with Rical extent o racterizatio n the potenti a n land surv e t erferences a etermine t h l ide concen t face soil sa m gamma spec t e veral pla n 4, Fe-55, N i with natural b were close t rtainty as o p w as support e le L30121 0 v er, the S r-9 ios from L 3 p te r 6, Tabl e respectivel y the conce n of the site-s p to represen t he rail road g s were tak efrom site b t he railroad e rived radio d 7,000-8,5 0 fenced LS E e n land surv e r e area that T his open l a s urvey units e area enco m u el casks to 6.5 acres.
g an in Octo b R eference 4 o f any cont n inspection s al volumetri c ey unit. L i a nd inaccess he lateral a t rations in t m ples and fi v t roscopy an d n t-derived r i-63, and Sr
-background t o the detect i pposed to th e d by a re v 0 5-CR-GS-0 9 0/Cs-137 a n 3012105-C R e 6-3, it is s l y. In con c n trations of C p ecific radi o t the actual p bed gravel e n of the rai l b ackground bed gravel o nuclides.
T 0 0 cpm. E as "impa c e y units ins i surrounds t a nd area has were desig n mpassing t h the ISFSI.
b e r 2014. A 4. Survey amination i d s and survey s c contamina t imited soil ibility.
a nd vertica l t he soil.
A ve subsurfac d HTD ana l radionuclid e-90. Cs-13
: 7. In all cas e ion limits a ne actual pre s view of exp 0 02-SS ind i nd Fe-55/C s R-GS-002-S Seen that th e clusion, bas e C s-137 whi c onuclide mi x presence of pwas analyz e l road bed g (which ave r indicated n a T he gamma c ted" by r e i de the LSE t he LSE ha s b een segre n ated for th e he site acce s The area o A sample pla ntechniques dentified a n s were perf o t ion of acce sinformatio n l extent o f A combinati oe soil lyses. e s at 7 was e s, the nd are s ence p ected icates s-137 S are e y are ed on c h are xture, p lant-ed by g ravel raged atural scan eactor have s also gated e area s s off of the n was were nd the ormed ssible n was f any o n of La Cros s License T Revisio nrandom a survey p professi o Protecti o radioacti v spill loc a survey l o not req u location s radiolog i A surfac e surface s or surfa c were tak eintervals Each su rsite radi o necessar y All surf a Several sfull isot o survey u n 2.3.4.1.
There ar e The Cla sarea in t h Reactor radioacti vareas, pr e Twenty-tmeasura b location s taken in taken, Csamples 13 samp lidentifie dthe sur f 0.287 p Csamples w Seventy-one met e s e Boiling W Termination n 0 a nd biased s ackage. Th e o nal judgm e o n Supervis v ity, depres a tions, or a r o cations wa s u ired for so i s were sele c ical contami n e soil sampl eoil samples ce scans ind i e n from 0.1
: 5. rface soil, c o ological lab y to achiev e a ce and sub soil samples opic analysi s n it  per Ref e Class e fou r (4) o p ss 1 open la n he Class 1 o p Building, t h v ely conta m e vented the a two (22) su r b le radioac t s , or areas wClass 1 ope n C o-60 was p and Cs-13 7 l es. No ot h d by gamm a fa ce soil s a Ci/g. The a w as 0.096 pnine (79) s u e r, two (2) l o W ater Reacto r Plan urvey locat i e locations o e nt of the E o r. Consi sions, disco reas where t s also deter m i ls in an o p c ted on as p n ation. e was taken were acqui r i cated eleva t 5 cm to dep t omposite su b oratory by e an isotopi c surface co m were select e s (HTD rad i erence 4. 1 Open La n p en land su r n d survey u n p en land su r h e Turbine m inated buil d ability to pe r rface soil sa m tivity, disco w here the gr o n land su r v e p ositively i d 7 was posi t h er potenti a spectrosco p amples wa s verage Cs-1Ci/g with a m ubsurface so o cations bia s r i ons were e s o f biased m e E nergy Solut i deration w alored areas, t he ground h m ined by ar e p en land ar e p halt in Cl a at each sele r ed at sever a ted activity.
t hs ranging f b surface soi l gamma-spe c c MDC equ a m posite sam p e d at rando m i onuclides).
n d Areas r vey units c l nits are sho w r vey units is Building, t h d ing and sy s r form surfa c mples were lored areas
, o und had b e ey units are s dentified in tively iden t al plant-deri v py. The ave r s 0.058 pCi
/1 37 concen t maximum o bil samples w s ed to areas o 2-25 s tablished in easurement s i ons Project a s given t o low point g h ad been d i e a classifica t e as designa t ass 1 surve y cted biased a al random lo Depending from 1 to 3 m l sample or c troscopy.
a l to or less p les were a n m an d were s Duplicate lassified as w n in Figure obstructed b h e WTB an d s tems, as w e c e scanning dtaken at lo c , buried pi p e en disturbe d s hown in Fi gconcentrat i tified in co n ved gamm a r age Co-60 c/g with a t ration obse r b served con c w ere taken a o n the south  each surve y s and/or sa mHealth Ph y o locations gravity drai n isturbed. T h tion. Rando a ted as Cla s y units wh e and rando m cations or i f on the loc a m below gr aasphalt sa mAnalysis c o s than 0.10 p nalyzed aft e s hipped to Tsamples an dClass 1 at L 2-1. A sig nby the pres e d the LSA ell as stored d ue to high b cations b ias e pe location s d. The loc a gure 2-6.
O i ons greate r ncentration s a-emitting r a concentrati omaximum r ved in the centration o at 10 surfac e and west si d y unit in ac c m ples were d ysicist and that exhi b n areas, act u h e number m-b ased m e ss 1. Rand o ere there w a-b ased surv e f surface soi a tion, subsur a de an d co m m ple was an a ount times w pCi/g for C s er drying t h Test Americ a d concrete w LACBWR t o nificant port i ence of buil d Building. radioactive b ackground.e d toward si t s, actual a n a tions of sur f Of the 22 sur r than the M s greater t h adionuclide s on observed observed canalysis o f f 1.07 pCi/
g e soil locati o de of the W G cordance wi t d etermined b the Radiol o bited meas u u al and pot eof rando m-b easurements om measur e a s no histo r e y location. l sample an aface soil sa m m posited ove alyzed by t h were adjust e s-137 and C he sample m a Laboratori e w ere collect e otaling 8,44 3 i on of the s u dings, name lThe presenmaterial in
. tes that exh i nd potential f ace soil sa m face soil sa m M DC in t w h an the M D s were posi tin the analy c oncentrati o f the surfac e g. o ns to a de p G TV and fi v th the b y the ogical urable e ntial based were ement r y of  Sub-alysis mples r 1 m h e on-e d as C o-60. m edia. es for e d by 3 m 2. u rface l y the ce of these i bited spill mples m ples w o (2) D C in tively sis of on of e soil pth of v e (5)
La Cros s License T Revisio n location s The sa m evaluate Building samples 15 samp lidentifie d of the s u 0.161 p C areas is foundati o decomm i Ten sa m asphalt w this sur v results r ameasure midentifie d 0.057 p CA summ presente d Nine su rsamples gamma s In additi detected One sed i unit L10 and HT D 0.136 p C 2.3.4.2.The im pimmedia t two sur v LACB W these tw o Approxi m 2350-1 dAlarm s einstrume n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 s that access mples at the t the subsurf a were taken taken, Cs-1 l es. No ot h d by gamm a ubsurface s o Ci/g. The as snot curren t o ns and sur r i ssioning pr o mples were t a was taken fr o v ey unit. T h anging from ment of 3,0 9 d in conce n Ci/g. ary of the f i d in Table 2
-rface soil s ataken from s pectroscop y on to detec t at concentr a iment samp l 10103. Thi s D analyses.
Ci/g. Class acted Class te area surr o ey units. T h WR Crib Ho u o survey uni t mately 1% o d ata logger w et-points for n t. No scan W ater Reacto r Plan e d the soils two WGT V ace soils alo nand compo 1 37 was po s h er potenti a a spectrosco p oil samples sessment of tly complet e r ounding b u o cess, when a ken of as p om the sam e h e asphalt s the instrum e 95 dpm/100 ntrations gr e i ndings of t h-10. amples, 11 sClass 1 ope n y and HTD a t ing Co-60 ations greate le was take n s sample w a Co-60 and 2 Open La n 2 open la n o unding the hese are sh o u se, the G-3 t s. o f the surfa c w ith a 2" b ythe instru malarms wer e r under the T V locations w n gside and usited at dep t sitively ide n al plant-deri v p y. The av e was 0.055 ppotential s u e. Soil in uried struct uaccess will b phalt from p e location se s urface was e nt MDC o f c m 2. Of t h eater than he survey f o subsurface s n land surv e a nalyses. T hand Cs-137r than the i n n from the s a s also sent t C-137 wer e n d Areas nd areas tot a LSE. The C o wn in Figu r 3 Crib Hou s ce soil area i y 2" NaI d e m ent were se t e observed.
2-26 u rbine Buil d w ere acquir e u nderneath t h t hs of 10, 1 5 ntified in c o ved gamm a e rage Cs-13 p Ci/g with ubsurface so idifficult t o u res and pi p b e more rea d p aved areas lected for t hfirst scann e f 2,771 dpm
/he 10 aspha lMDC in o n o r each indi v soil samples ey units we r he results of , H-3, C-1 4 nstru m ent M D sanitary soli d to Test Ame r e detected i n a l approxi m Class 2 imp a re 2-1. The se and the L in survey u n etector. Th i t at the obs e d ing throug h e d to a dep t h e vault. T h 5 and 20 fe e oncentratio n a-emitting r a 7 concentra ta maximu m il contamin a o access ar e p ing has be edily availab lin Class 1 s h e surface a n ed with bet a/100c m 2 to a l t samples t n ly one sa m v idual Clas s s , one conc r r e sent to T e fthe analysi s 4, Fe-55 an d DC. ds tank that rica Labora t n this sampl m ately 13,99 a cted open l LACBWR LACBWR w nit L201110 is area incl u erved backg r h angled Ge o t h of five m h e samples u e t. Of the 7 ns greater t h adionuclide s t ion observ e m observed ation in the C eas such a s e n deferred le. s urvey unit n d subsurfa c a-gamma d e a maximum t aken, Cs-1 3 m ple at a s 1 open lan d rete sample est Americ a s are presen t d Ni-63 we ris located i t ory for ga me, both at a 6 m 2 and a rand area w aAdministra t w arehouses a 1 was scan n u ded asphal t r ound plus t o probe sam p m eters in or d u nder the T u 7 9 subsurfac e han the M D s were posi t e d in the an a concentrati o Class 1 ope n s under b u iuntil later i L1010104.
ce soil samp l etector with of observe d 3 7 was posi tconcentrati o d survey u n and two a s a Laboratori e ted in Table r e also posi t in Class 1 s u m ma spectro sconcentrati re located i n as segregate d tion Buildin g a re all loca t ned with a M t paved sur f t he MDCR o p ling. d er to urbine e soil D C in tively alysis o n of n land ilding n the  The l es in scan d scan tively on of nit are s phalt e s for 2-11. tively urvey scopy on of n the d into g , the ted in M odel f aces. of the La Cros s License T Revisio n Twenty-tmeasura b location s taken in taken, C s other po t The ave r 0.077 p C Twenty-t and thre e resides i n Of the 2 greater t h than M Didentifie d of 0.112 samples assessm ecurrentl y surroun d process, w Twelve s selected results r 2,748 dp m concentr a concentr a observe dA summ presente d Three su rsamples Adminis t HTD an a Co-60 a concentr a HTD ra d 2.3.4.3.The imp a land are a Figure 2-site, the t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 t hree surfac b le radioac t s , or areas wClass 2 ope n s-137 was p tential plan t rage Cs-13 7 C i/g with a m t hree subsur e locations b n survey un i 23 subsurfa c han MDC i n D C in fou r d by gamma pCi/g. The was 0.043 e nt of pote n y complete.
d ing buried s when acces s samples wer erandomly.
r anging fr o m/100c m 2. a tions grea t a tion obser v d concentrati ary of the f i d in Table 2
-rface soil s a taken fro m tration Buil d a lyses. The a nd Cs-137, ations great e d ionuclides e Class a cted Class 3 a was segr e-1. The Cl a transmissio n W ater Reacto r Plan e soil sam p tivity, disco w here the gr o n land surv e positively id e t-derived ra d 7 concentra t maximum ob s face soil sa m b iased to ar e i t L201110 1 ce soil sam p n one sampl e samples.
N spectrosco p average Cs
-pCi/g wit h n tial subsur f Soil in di f s tructures a n s will be mo r e taken of a s The asphal t o m the in s Of the 1 2 ter than th e v ed in the a n on of 0.055 i ndings of t h-12. amples, five m an acce s ding were s eresults of t h H-3, C-1 4 e r than M D e xceeding M 3 Open La n 3 open land egated into ass 3 impact e n switchyard r p les were ta klored areas
, o und had b e ey units are s e ntified at c o dionuclides t ion observ e s erved conc e m ples were t e as alongsi d 1. The b ias e p les taken, e and Cs-13 N o other p o p y. The sin g-137 concen t h a maxim u f ace soil co n fficult to ac n d piping h a r e readily a v sphalt from p t surface wa strument M 2 asphalt s a e instrume n n alysis of th epCi/g. he survey f osubsurface s ssible stor m e nt to Test he analysis a 4 , Fe-55 a n D C. As dis c M DC are like l n d Areas areas total athree surv e e d open lan dfor the LA C 2-27 k en at loca t , buried pi p e en disturbe d s hown in Fi g oncentratio n were positi v e d in the a n e ntration of taken at 14 r d e and unde r ed samples w Co-60 was 7 was posit i o tential pla n gle sample w t ration obse r u m observe ntamination cess areas s a s been def e vailable. p aved areas s first scan n M DC of 2 ,mples take n n t MDC in e asphalt sa m o r each indi v soil samples
, m sewer b aAmerica L a are presente d nd Cm-243/c ussed in s e l y to be fals e approximate l e y units.
T d survey u n C BWR and G t ions biase d pe location s d. The loc a gure 2-7.
O n s greater t h vely identif i nalysis of t h 0.200 pCi/g r andom loc a rneath the S were acquir e positively ively identi f n t-derived r a w ith d etecta b r ved in the a d concentr a n in the Cl a s uch as un d e rred until lin Class 2 s u ned with be t,529 dpm/1 0 n, Cs-137 w three sam p m ples was 0 v idual Clas s , three asph a asin manho l aboratories f d in Table 2
/244 were e ction 2.3.3 e positives.
ly 66,765m 2 The Class 3 n its include t G-3 facilitie d toward sit s, actual a n a tions of sur f Of the 23 sur h an MDC in i ed by gam m h e surface s g. a tions to a d e Storm Sewe r ed to a dep tidentified a f ied at conc e a dionuclide s ble Co-60 h a a nalysis of t h a tion of 0.
0 ass 2 open l d er building ater in the d u rvey units.
t a-gamma d e 0 0c m 2 to a was positiv e p les. The 0.049 pCi/g s 2 open lan d a lt samples a l e located f or gamma s-13. In ad d also positi v for non-im p 2. The Class survey un i t he north e ns, the LAC Bes that exh i nd potential f ace soil sa m face soil sa m14 samples ma spectros c soil sample s e pth of one m r Water pip e t h of five m at concentr a e ntrations g r s were posi t a d a concent r h e subsurfac 088 pCi/g.
l and areas i foundation s decommissi o The aspha l e tector wit h a maximu mely identifi e average C swith a max i d survey u n a nd two sed i in front o f s pectroscop y d ition to det e vely detect e p acted area s 3 impacted i ts are sho w nd of the lic e BWR plant a ibited spill mples m ples . No c opy. s was m ete r e that m eters. ations r eater tively ration e soil The s not s and o ning l t was h scan m of e d in s-137 imum nit are iment f the y and e cting ed at s , the open w n in e nsed a ccess La Cros s License T Revisio n and righ t was dee m LACB W Crib Ho ufacility d were de e These a r Solution sA mini m scanned was exc l focused o points fo No scan Thirty-t w where t h open lan was posi plant-de r The ave r 0.131 p C Sevente emeter.
concentr a radionuc concentr amaximu m Two sa m selected results w were po sA summ presente d As part o of concr e Crib Ho uAdminis t survey u n Three c o L30121 0 three su r Laborat o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 t-of-way are med impact e WR Adminis t u se). The t r d uring opera t emed as im p reas were c s maintains t mum of 1% with a Mod luded from o n undistur br the instru malarms wer e wo surface s o h e ground h a d survey u ntively ident i rived gamm a rage Cs-13 7 C i/g with a m e n subsurfac Of the 1 7 a tions gre a lides were a tion obser v m observed c m ples were trandomly.
were less th a sitively iden t ary of the f i d in Table 2
-o f the chara c e te located i use. In add i tration Buil d n it L301210 o ncrete sam p 0 1, the two s e rface soil s ories for ga m W ater Reacto r Plan a and the h a e d by LAC B tration Buil d ransmission tions. The p p acted by t h onservative l that classify i of the sur f el 2350-1 d agamma su r bed soils w i m ent were s e e observed i n oil samples a d been dis t n its are sho w ified in con c a-emitting r a 7 concentra t maximum ob se soil samp l 7 subsurfac e ater than Mpositively v ed in the a concentrati o aken of asp hThe asphalt an instrume n t ified by ga m i ndings of t h-14. cterization o f i n the nort h ition, a sa m d ing and t w 9. These sa m ples from s u ediment sa m samples an d m ma spect r r aul road to t h B WR due t o ding and the yard was d p lant access he transit o f l y classifie d i ng these ar e f ace soil ar e a ta logger w r face scann i ith minimal e t at the obs e n these surv e were taken t urbed. Th e w n in Figur e centrations g a dionuclide s t ion observ e s erved conc e l es were ta k e soil sam p MDC in e iidentified analysis of t h on of 0.409 p halt from p asurface wa nt MDC of 1 m ma spectro he survey f o f survey uni t h section of m ple was tak e wo sedimen t m ples were u rvey unit L 3 m ples taken f d two sub s r oscopy an d 2-28 h e ISFSI fa c o the prese n presence o f d eemed as i marea, High w f packaged r d as impact e e as as non-i m ea in surve y w ith a 2" by i ng for saf e vegetation o erved backg r ey units. at locations e locations o e 2-8. Of t h greater than s were posit i e d in the a n e ntration of k en at rando m p les taken, ight sample s by gamma h e subsurfa c pCi/g. a ved areas i n s first scan n 1,938 dpm/1 scopy in an y o r each indi v t L3012101 ,the survey u en from a s a t samples wsent off-site 3 012101, t h f rom the sto r s urface soil d HTD ana l c ility. The n n ce of a se p f concrete fr m pacted as i w ay 35 righ t radioactive m ed. Howe v m pacted wo u y units L3 0 2" NaI det e e ty reasons.
o r disturbe d round plus t biased tow of surface s he 32 surfac eMDC in 26 ively identi f nalysis of t h 0.463 pCi/g mly selecte d Cs-137 w s. No ot h spectrosc o c e soil sam p n Class 3 s u n ed with be t 1 00c m 2. N o y of these sa m v idual Clas s , samples w e unit that or i anitary tan k w ere taken fr e for isotopi c he sanitary t a rm sewer b a samples w l yses. The n orth end o f ptic system from impact e it was part o t-of way an d m aterial thr o v e r , it shou u ld have be e 0 12101 and ector. Surv e  Gamma d soils or gr a t he MDCR o ard discolo roil samples e soil samp lsamples.
N fied by gam m h e surface s g. d locations t w as positiv e t her potent i opy. The p les was 0.
0 urvey units.
ta-gamma d e o plant deri v amples. s 3 open lan d e re taken fr o i ginated fro m k that servic e from a stor m c analysis.
a nk sample a sin in surve y w ere sent tresults of f the license that servic e e d structure s of the LAC B d ISFSI hau l o ugh these a ld be note d e n appropria t L3012109 ey unit L30 1 surface sca n avel. Alar m of the instru m r ed areas or taken in C l l es taken, C s N o other pot e m a spectros c soil sample s t o a depth o ely identifi e i al plant-d eaverage C s 0 87 pCi/g w The asphal t e tector. Al l v ed radionu c d survey u n om several p m the LAC B e s the LAC B m sewer ba sfrom surve y y unit L301 2 to Test A mthe analysi d site es the s (the B WR l road areas. d that te. were 1 2102 nning m set-m ent. areas l ass 3 s-137 e ntial copy. s was o f one e d in erived s-137 w ith a t was l scan c lides nit are pieces BWR BWR s in in y unit 2 109, m erica i s are La Cros s License T Revisio n presente d derived R and Ni-6 exceedi n consiste n 2.3.5.N Based u p associat e indicate dA full li s 2. The pri minformat i operatio nfrom th e characte r The res u conduct etraffic in


The G-3incident s results o f A scan s u gamma d using an was also gross be t MDC o fidentifie d gross al pcontami nsamples.
La Cross License T Revision The velo gradient.
derived 0.061 p C that the material Direct a ntraffic a r Model 2 3 areas of i ranged f exceede d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 d in Table 2 R OC at resi d 6 3. As di s n g MDC are nt with natu r N on-Impact e p on the in f ed with the G d that there w s t of G-3 str u m ary b asis f ion docume n n s. Additio e LACBW R r ization of t ults are pro v e d during th ethe major s t station re s s of radioac t f the charac t urvey was p d etector. In alpha/beta-gtaken at th e t a-gamma a f 2,816 dpm
across th Therefor the inch Environm show sea stage. Th LACBW vicinity structure direction 2.3.7.3.
/d gross beta
Historica monitorin monitorin monitorin Dairylan Of the w LACBW routine b designate Environm G-3 Foss Nos. 3, 4 levels re 3.0E-08 µ During th to the s radioactiv The well suspected that samp As note Activities wells to monitorin if ground located n interval o below gr B.
-p ha activit y n ation was i The roof m ROC that w Ci/g. Based elevated di r on the roof.
se Boiling W Termination n 0 ocity of gro The gradie he site, groun e, it is likely hes and fee mental Moni asonal varia hese wells a WR site struct of suspect s/foundation ns.
nd removab l reas of the 3 60 instrum e i nterest wer e from 2,540 d the MDC d W ater Reacto r Plan 2-15. The dual concen t scussed in slikely to be r al backgrou n e d Structur f ormation c o G-3 Coal Pl a was no reas o uctures that for the "no n n ted in the H nally, the p R Stack d u t he LACB W vided in R e e 2015 char a tation buildi n sides in no n t ive conta merization su r performed o f addition, si x gamma pro p location of ctivity rang i/100c m 2. T-gamma act i y ranging fdentified at material its e w as positiv e on the fact t r ect alpha m le contamin G-3 Coal P e nt with 43
Previous I ally, the LAC ng wells. F ng wells loc ng wells of d for radiolo wells shown WR facilities basis. The gr ed as B-2, mental Moni sil Station op 4 and 5 wer ported durin
-e scanne d , i ndpm/100c m d uring the c o r analysis o f t rations gre a s ection 2.3.
µCi/ml to 9.
3 false positi v nd. es ompiled in ant may be c o nable pote nhave been d n-impacted" HSA that th e potential for u ring oper a WR Adminis t e ference 13 a cterization ngs were su r n-impacted s m ination of s r veys perfor m f the mi d-le v x (6) locati o p ortional det eeach direct m ing from 2, 3 The results o i vity rangin g from 142 d pconcentrati o elf was sam p ely identifi e t hat no othe r measurement s ation surve y Plant. Sca n-93 detector
he recovery outh of the ve liquids fr l-point show d leakage. T ple are prese d in the L s Report (D support gro ng wells (10 dwater qual nominally wi of 15 to 25 f rade. These Water Reactor Plan oundwater is ent of the wa ndwater mon y that the gro et/day rang itoring Prog ation on upw are not suffic tures or area broken dra ns or variati Investigation CBWR Lice igure 2-11 i cated on th ff the LACB ogical purpo n on Figure were histor roundwater m B-3, B-7, itoring staff perational re re routinely ng this mon 0E-08 µCi/m of a probab e Turbine B rom suspect wn on Figure The well-po ented in Tabl LACBWR D D-Plan/PSDA oundwater e 0 wells total) ity had bee ithin five (5) feet below g wells are sh r
.n cluding flo o m 2 to 2,61 7 o urse of thi s 2-29 fthese sam p a ter than th e 3 for non-i m ves. Cs-137 the HSA, S classified as n tial for resi designated a sclassificati o e G-3 struct u windborne ations to s tration Buil
s directly r ater table is i nitoring has oundwater v e). Ground gram wells a ward and do cient to char as where pote ain lines) co ions in fill m ns ensed Site ha llustrates the e LACBWR BWR site t ses.
: d. Additio ncampaign w r veyed. s urvey unit soils, aspha l m ed in the G v el roof of t h ons were sel e ector. A s m measureme n 302 dpm/10 of the dire c g from 1,60 3 pm/100c m 2 ons greater t p led on Ju n ed by gam m r plant deri v s were due ys were per f n measurem e. Approxi m o rs and low e 7 dpm/100c m s survey. T e p les positiv e e instrument m pacted ar e was also po S olutions c o"non-impa cdual conta m s "non-imp a o n fo r the G u res were n omigration o structure ro o ding roof a n n al surveys w here the s u L4012103.
2-11, only P rically monit monitoring w B-8, B-9, on a routine equirements.
l t or concr e G-3 station a h e G-3 Coa l e cted at ran d mear sample n t. The res u 0c m 2 to 2, 8 c t beta-gam m 3 dpm/100c mto 258 dp mthan MDC b ne 30, 2015.
monitored f nitoring peri ml).
m a spectro s v ed ROC w amost likely f ormed of r e e nts were p m ately 5% o f er wall surf a m 2. No o en (10) loca t ely identifi e MDC, incl u eas, the H T o sitively det e o ncluded t h cted". Hist o m ination fro m a cted" is pro v G-3 station o t used for L o f airborne ofs was e v n d the G-3 of the G-3 u rfaces subj e There ar e e te in this s u are summari z l Plant buil d dom for dir efor remova b ults of the b e 816 dpm/10 0 m a and alp h m 2 to 2,072 m/100c m 2. b y the anal y Cs-137 w a scopy at a as detected,  to the pre s epresentati v p erformed u s f the concre t a ces. The a v o bserved sc a tions were c h e d several p u ding H-3, F T D radionu c e cted but at l hat the stru c orical infor m m site opera t v ided in Ta b structures i LACBWR-r e effluent rel e v aluated b y Coal Plant  structures ected to hig h e no docum urvey unit.
le spill incid Building. T broken drain 2-11 was es int was sam le 2-17. Thi Decommissio AR) (19), D evaluation.
zed as follo w d ing using a ect measure m ble contami n eta scan ide n 0 c m 2 with a h a measure mdpm/100c m No remo v ysis of the s a s the only concentrati o it was conc l sence of co a ve high pers o s ing the L u te surfaces i verage scan Man measur e hosen at ra n p lant-Fe-55 c lides levels c tures m ation tions. ble 2-is the elated eased y the roof. were h foot ented  The w s: beta-m ents n ation n tified scan m ents m 2 and v able smear plant o n of l uded a l ash onnel udlum i n the MDC ement ndom, La Cros s License T Revisio nprimaril ymeasure m 875 dp m greater t h 2.3.6.I m The dec oimpacte dIn additi o accepted remain a Reactor Bremaini n and flo o Reactor/G Turbine surfaces segregat e radioacti vsystems o Radiolo gcomplia n radiolog i areas.
) were instal en impacted
disasse mremediat demoliti o waste. After co m3 feet b e radioacti v use crite r 2.3.6.1.
) feet of one grade and on how on Figu 2-34 elated to bo nfluenced by shown that velocity acro water eleva agree with t ownward gra racterize the ential releas ould have o materials co as had sever e current loc R site. The that are or Potable Wa tored by Da wells and ba B-9A, B11A e basis for no During LA for gross be iod was less dent in 1983 This inciden n lines in th stablished do mpled once o is well-point oning Plan airyland rec In Novemb lled within t by plant o e another con ne deep well ure 2-11 as M oth the hyd y the topogr the water ta oss the site is ation data the regional adients that groundwate es associated occurred. In ould locally ral potable w cation of po ere is no po have been ater Wells N airyland for ackground gr AR, and B on-radiologi ACBWR ope eta activity.
Charact e consiste d walls an(primari l taken fr o 621 foot the 633 fsamples w Piping T u s e Boiling W Termination n 0 y from the m ents for g/100c m 2 for h an MDC b y mpacted St r ommissioni n d b uildings, s on, all syste m elevation f o a nd be subj e B uilding th a ng reinforce d o rs of the Generator P sump and t habove the ed by waste v e waste.
s than or eq
or structure s g ical survey s n ce with 1 0 i cal conditi o The radiol o m bly and re m i on has ad e on, the imp a mmodity re m elow grade , vity and th e ria. Base m rization of d primarily o d floors of l y the Pipin g om the 615 elevation i n f oot elevati o w ere collec t unnel. The l W ater Reacto r Plan main lobb y gross activit beta-gamm y the analysi r uctures a n n g approac h structures, s y m s and exp o o r grade at L ected to ST S at will be ex p d concrete w WGTV, a nlant basem e he Turbine 636 foot el e classificati o No extens i s that will b e s of the inte r 0 CFR 20 r e o ns for the i m o gical info r m oval of sys t e quately re d acted struct u m oval is co m , will be r e extent of a m ent Struct uthe structu r o f the acquis the Reacto r g Tunnels).
, a temporar nt concerne e Turbine B own gradien on May 3, 19 t has since be and Post-S cently instal ber 2012, fi the LACBW operations.
foot elevati n the Reacto r o n conc r ete f ted, six (6) i n l ocations w h r y area and y was less a. No remo v s of the sm e n d S y stems h for LAC B ystems and c osed metal b LACBWR is S are the re m p osed by th e walls floors o nd the re m e nt, the one pit. Conse q e vation wil l on and disp o i ve charact e e removed p r r iors of stru c equirements mplementati rmation fro m tems and th e d uced radio l ures will be m plete, the s r e-surveyed a dditional r e u res Below 6 ral surfaces ition and ra d r Building, In June and on concrete r Building, t h f loor of the P n the React o h ere the cor e 2-30 the maintethan the M vable conta m ar samples.
nsist of one with a scree MW 200A an draulic cond raphy; and, w able has a v s also relativ from the groundwate are influen er flow below d with LAC n these area influence g water wells otable water otable water monitored Nos. 3 and 4 radiological roundwater B11R are m ical paramete erations, Pota Typical gr qual to MD ry well-poin ed the pote Building to su nt and below 983. The an een abandon Shutdown D lled groundw ive (5) pairs WR licensed The well p shallow wel ened interva nd B throug ductivity and with the flat ery low grad vely slow (i.
B WR requi r components below 3 feet the 639 fo o m aining rei n e removal o f of the WTB, m ainder of foot thick p q uently, all l be remed i o sed of as c e rization w a r ior to the p etures at LA C regarding on of contr o m these s u e demolition logical con d demolishe dtructures th ato determi emediation r 36 Foot Ele vof baseme n diological a nWTB and July of 201 5 floor and t he 630 foot P iping Tun n o r Building, e samples w e e nance area
G-3 Coal er flow, and nced by the w and aroun BWR (i.e., i as, pilings, groundwater and groundw and groundw r or groundw by Solution 4 which serv l conditions monitoring monitored by ers to suppo able Water W ross beta ac DC (ranging nt was establ ential leakag ub-building w the grade o nalysis resul ned.
.M DC of 74 mination w a r es the de m to a depth o below gra d o t elevation.
Decommissio water monit s of groundw site to deter pairs which ll with a scre al of 45 to 55 h MW-204A d the areas dient.  
n forced con c f the interio r the remain i the Pipin g p ortion of t hsystems an d iated, disas s clean demol i as or will b erformance o C BWR are rthe postin g ols for the p r urveys will of impacte d ditions to l e d, packaged at will rema i i ne the co n r equired, if a vation n ts that wi l n alysis of c o the balanc e 5 , a series o t he concret e elevation c o n els. A totalthree (3) in ere taken ar
.e., in Plant d also river nd the in the deep flow water water water ns or viced on a wells y the ort the Wells ctivity from lished ge of soils.
: e. The res udpm/100c m as identified m olition an d of at least 3 de will also b The only s t crete walls a r concrete a n ing reinforc e g and Ven t he Chimne y d compone n sembled an d i tion debris, b e perform e of FRS. r outinely pe r g of areas rotection o f provide t h d structures a e vels suitab l and proper l i n at license n centrations any, to mee t ll remain i n o ncrete core e of the ba s f concrete c o e floor and o ncrete floo r l of twelve (
of the ts for oning toring water rmine were eened 5 feet A and  
the WTB a n e shown in F ults of all d m 2 for alph a at concentr a d removal o feet below g b e removed.
tructures th a a nd floors o nd steel lin e e d concrete tilation Tu n y Foundatio n n ts and stru c d/or demol iclean salv a ed of equip m rformed to e nand to id e f workers in he basis fo r at the site.
Wle for cont r l y disposed  terminatio n of the re s t the unrest r n the "end-ssamples fro m sement stru c o re samples east wall o r of the WT B 12) concret e nd three (3) i F igures 2-9.
d irect a and ations of all grade. The a t will of the er, the walls n nels, n, the  ctural i shed, age or m ent, n sure entify these r the W hen r olled of as n , i.e., sidual ricted state" m the ctures were n the B and e core in the La Cros s License T Revisio n The loc a conditio nvolumet r elevated wall su r discolor a that ex h conditio nthere wa s radionuc The con c Test Am eROC. I n Reactor B and #00 2 concrete analysis positivel y 59, Tc-9 9 concrete 2.3.6.2.A concr e Turbine contami nin the T Analysis 0.106 p C 2.3.6.3.As state d subjecte d graded s u As repo r radioacti vbuilding located iAdminis tproximit y laborato r Charact e beta-ga m gross be t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ations select e n or obser v ric contamin observed c o faces were a tion or sta n hibited the h n for concr e s sufficient s lide fractio n c rete pucks r e rica Labor a n addition, B uilding sa m 2 were als ocores is p r of the conc y detected a t 9, Pu-238, Pcore sampl e Turbi n ete core wa s Building T n ation event T urbine Bui lof this sa m C i/g and H-3 LAC B d previousl y d to FRS. I n ur vey appro a r ted in the H v e spills or has primari l i n the buil d tration Buil d y to the LS E r y. rization sur v mma/alpha a ta-gamma/a l W ater Reacto r Plan e d for conc r v ed radiolo gation of the o ntact dose r used to i d n ding water.
h ighest pot e te in each s source term n s of gamma r epresentin g atory for ga m the concret e mple locatio o sent for i s resented in rete core s a t concentrat i P u-239/240, e s is present e n e Building s obtained a s T unnel to cited in the lding and t m ple indicat e at 1.71 pCi
/BWR Admi n y, the LAC B n stead, thes e ach in accor d H SA, there wradioactive l y b een use d ding that su p ding was i n E, occupanc y veys of the c tivity of i n l pha activity r r ete core sa m gical meas u concrete.
W r ates or cou n d entify pote n The goal wential of r e s urvey unit.in the cores emitters as w g the first 1/2 m ma spectr o e pucks re p ns #001, #0 s otopic anal y Table 2-16.
amples incl u i ons greater Pu-241, A m e d in Refere n Tunnel s part of th eattempt to HSA pertai n t he potentia l e d detectabl e/g. nistration B u BWR Admi n e two struct u dance with M was no past contaminat i d for office s p p ported bot h n itially clas s y by LACB W LACBWR nterior floo r were also p 2-31 m pling were urements i n W hen possib l n t rates. In a ntial locati o was to iden t e presenting  This judgto achieve t w ell as HT Dinch of con c o scopy and H p resenting t h 0 3, #005 an ysis. A su m Significa n u de Ni-63, Hthan their r e m-241 and A nce 16. e 2014 char a evaluate ning to the d l radiologi c e concentrat uilding nistration B u ures will be M ARSAM E history of t h i on in the L A p ace and re c h LACBW R sifie d as a M W R person nAdministra t r s surfaces a performed o n biased tow n dicated th e le, locations a ddition, vis o ns of sur f tify, to the ethe worst gmental sa mp the sensitivi t D radionucli d c rete at eac h H TD analys e h e concrete n d #006 and mmary of t n t HTD ra d H-3 and Sr-9 espective M D Am-243. An a cterization the possib l d iscovery o f cal contami n tions of Cs-1 u ilding and surveyed fo E guidance.
h e use of u nACBWR A c ords storag e R and G-3 M ARSSIM nel and the p tion Buildi n a nd the roo f n the roof, o n w ard locatio n e presence we re deter m s ual observa t f ace conta m e xtent possi b case boun d m pling appro ties require d d es. h sample lo c es for beta a n deeper tha nWTB samp t he analytic a dionuclides i 9 0. The ot h DC include; analysis of survey fro m le extent o f cracked dr a n ation of s u 1 37 at 0.35 2 G-3 Crib H or unrestrict e nsealed radi odministrati o e. An envir o operations. Class 2 str u resence of t h n g included
: f. Direct mn floor tiles n s where ph y of fixed a m ined based tions of flo o m ination, su c ble, the loc a d ing radiol o ach also en d to determi n c ation was s e nd alpha e m n 1/2 inch d ele locations al results f o i dentified b y h er radionu cC-14, Fe-5 5the results o m the floor o of a radio a ain system p u rrounding 2 pCi/g, Co
-H ouse will n e d release u s oactive mat e o n Building.
onmental la b The LAC B u cture due t h e environ ma scan for measuremen t and around ysical a nd/or upon o r and c h as a tions ogical sured n e the ent to m itting e ep at #001 or the y the c lides 5, Ni-of the of the active p iping soils.  -60 at not be s ing a erials,  The b was B WR to its m ental gross t s for floor La Cros s License T Revisio n drain op e each dir e The res u 4,915 dp mthe seco nimbedde d gamma s was the n and sec ofrom les s and dire observe d Beta s c 2,261 dp mfrom les s Direct b e of 243 dmeasure midentifie d 2.3.7.S Section 8 hydroge o was der i Haley &
(18) sup p 2.3.7.1.For a di towns a n river wa t Lansing, water f o approxi m The LA C well at t h state per m LACB W Building areas ar e to the g r pathway s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e nings. A s m ect measure m u lts of the m/100cm 2 w n d floor h a d in a floor s pectroscop y n performed o nd floor la m s than MDC ct alpha re d reading of 7 cans of t h m/100cm 2 w s than MD C e ta-gamma m dpm/100c m 2 m ents were d concentrat i urface and 8.5 in Cha p o logy and h y i ved directl y Aldrich, H y p lements th e Area Gro u stance of 4 0 nd cities alo n t er for indu s Iowa, abou t o r industri a m ately 40 m i C BWR site he site. San i m itted sani t WR Adminis. Storm w a e periodicall y r ound area s uafter passin g W ater Reacto r Plan mear sampl e m ent. beta scans w ith a scan M a llway, a ditile. The c y. The anal y involving t h m inated wo o of 329 dp m adings ran g 72 dpm/100 c h e roof ar e w ith a scan M C of 113 dp m measuremen tto a maxi mall less tha n ions greater Groundwa t p te r 8 of t y drology of y from Hal y drogeologi c e preliminar y u ndwater U s 0 miles do w ng the Missi s s trial purpo s t 15 miles d a l purposes les downstr e has its own itary wastes t ary wastes h t ration Bui l a ter runoff i s y monitore d u rrounding t g through a n r e for remov aof the in t M DC of 2,1 0screte radi o contaminate d ysis of the t i h e acquisitio o d, carpet, a m/100c m 2 to ged from l e cm 2. e a indicat e M DC of 2,2 6 m/100c m 2 t o t s taken on t mum obser v n MDC of 4than MDC b t er h is LTP cZNPS and e e y & Aldr i cal Investig a y findings i n s e wnstream of s sippi River s es, excludi n downstream o between t e am. potable w aare collect e hauler. Th i l ding and a s diverted d i d for oil she e t he facility v n oil separat o 2-32 a ble conta m terior surfa c 00 dpm/100 c oactive part i d portion o f ile identifie dn of ten (10
)a nd floor ti la maximu m e ss than M D ed results 61 dpm/100 c o a maximu m the floor dr a v ed readin g 42 dpm/100 c b y the analy ontains a s e nvirons.
T i ch, Hydro g a tion Report n Reference 1the site, vi rare obtaine d ng the adja c of the site.
t he LACB W a ter supply, pd in a solid s is includes a a sanitary h irectly to th e n and disc o v ia downsp o or located i n m ination was c es ranged cm 2. Durin g icle was di s f the tile w a d 0.005 uCi
) biase d dir e l e. Direct b m observed r e D C of 39 d ranging f r cm 2. Direc t m observed ain opening s g of 333 d p cm 2. No r esis of the s msummary d The informa t geological C tfor the La C 17. rtually all m d from grou n c ent G-3 pl a There are n W R site a n provided th r s holding ta n a sanitary h o h olding tan k h e Mississip p oloration.
R o uts or ente n side the LS E also taken from 1,42 0 g the scan o f scovered.
T a s removed of Cs-137.
ect measure m b et a-gamma eading of 5, dpm/100c m 2 rom 1,872 t alpha mea s reading of 1 s ranged fro m pm/100c m 2 a emovable c o mear sample s d escription t ion contain e C onceptual S C rosse Boili n m unicipal w und water.
T ant, is the c o n o other kno w n d Prairie r ough a sin g nk and pum p olding tank k that serv i p i River at o R oof drains d r the norm a E. at the locati 0 dpm/100c m f the north e T he particl eand analyz eAn investi g ments on th e readings r a ,743 dpm/1 0to a max idpm/100c m s ure m ents r a 152 dpm/10 0 m less than M a nd direct ontaminatio n s. of the ge o ed in this s e S ite Mode l n g Water R e w ater suppli e The nearest u oal-fired pl a w n users o f du Chien, g le ground w p ed off by a that servic e i ces the T u o utfalls. R e discharge di r a l effluent r e on of m 2 to e nd of e was e d by gation e first a nged 0 0c m 2 imum m 2 to a nged 0 c m 2. MDC alpha n was o logy, e ction (17). e acto r e s for u se of a nt in friver WI, w ater local es the urbine e lease rectly e lease La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.3.7.2.Regiona l Mississi p parallels upward; river sta gdemonst r river sta g Ground w surface (
Ground wthe Miss imay tur nchemica lthe shall o Based o n of the G-located i monitori n a slightl y has a d o gradient towards t there ar e stages. G Reactor B are belo w During p was co mpermeab i b uilding ssoils wil lwill cir c localize d outside t h other ha n or burie d underlyi n shallow scontami n soils wit h orders o f s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Groundw l ly, ground w ppi river.
Cthe river.
U however, t h ge data com p r ates that th e g e impacts t h w ater beneat h bgs) and th e w ater in the s i ssippi Rive n and flow l constituent ow system.
n a review o f-3 Ash Lan d i n the sou t ng wells (B 1 y downward o wnward g r at well pair t he river ba s e some peri o G roundwate r B uilding ba w the water t plant constr u mpacted, red u ility can de c s. The resu l l flow at a s cumnavigate d flow regi m h e footprint n d, potentia l d piling, wil l n g ground w soils from p n ation. The h in the sup p f magnitude W ater Reacto r Plan ater Flow w ater flows i Closer to t h U nder typic he vertical g r p ared to w a e shallow a q h e water tab l h the site is e groundwa t s hallow dep or. The dee pparallel to s would occ u f the groun d dfill area gro u t h side of t 1 1AR/B11 R vertical gr a r adient at w B9/B9A. T sin with a l o o ds where t r flow thro u sement shel table during u ction, and m ucing the ef f c rease the h lting impact slower velo cthe area, e m es on conta mof these st r l releases th a l likely tak e w ate r. This precipitation
,average sh a p ort pilings, lower. r i n a wester l he shore, g r al river sta g r adient reve r ter table el e quifer is in d i l e elevation. first encou n t e r is in dir e osits and fil l p er ground wthe river.
u r at or nea r dwater eleva t u ndwater m o t he LACB W) to the east adient. Duri n w ell pairs B T his is expe c o calized infl u the gradient s u gh the LA C l) as well a s high and lo w m ore specif i f ective poro s h ydraulic co n to ground w city, and re g effectively b minant fate a r uctures wil l at occurred w much long e is further c , creating a n allow aquife r the hydraul 2-33 l y direction r oundwater g e, groundw r ses during f evations me a i rect hydrau ntered at a n e ct hydrauli c l material fl o water is also Because t h r the surface tion measur e o nitoring w e W R site, a n of and up g r n g times of n B 11R/B11A R c ted as gro u u ence at B9
/s are rever s C BWR site i s s the deep p w river stag e ically the in s s ity and per m n ductivity o w ater flow i s gionally, a s i b ypassing t h a nd transpo r l likely be d within the f o er to migrat e compounde d n area that w r hydraulic c ic conducti vfrom the b lmay also h w ater gradie n f lood stages
.a sure in LA C ulic commu n n average d e c communic a o ws towardslikely to fl o he potentia l, the release ements coll e e lls (# B2/B 3 nd associat e r adient of L A normal and R and B2/B u ndwater fl o/B9A from t sed; and thi s s impacted b pilings that s e conditions
.stallation o f m eability o f o f the aquif e s that groun d i gnificant p e these soils.
r t are that p o d eflected an d o otprint of t h e both in th d as the ov e w ill likely r e c onductivit y v ity would b l uffs on the h ave a flow nts near the
. The geolo g C BWR site n ication wit h epth of 20 f e ation with t h s the west a n o w towards t l releases o f s would lik e e cted during 3/B9A/B9/B e d backgro u A CBWR, t h low river st a B3, with an o ws generall y t he adjacen t s is likely d b y deeper s t s upport the
. f the suppor t f the soils.
T er within th e dwater with i ercentage o f The impl i otential rele a d flow arou n he building se vadose z o erlying stru c e tain any po y is 313 feet b e expected east towar dcomponen triver are sl i g ical and hi smonitoring h the river a n e et below g r he adjacent n d discharge s t he west bu t f radiologi c e ly be confi nroutine sa m B 7/B8), whi c u nd ground w h ere appea r s a ge, ground w upward v e y from the b t inlet. Ho w d ue to high tructures (i.
estructures, w t pilings, th e T his reduct i e footprint o in the comp f the flow r e i cations of ases that oc c nd them. O s, via floor d o ne as well a ctures isola t tentially rel e per day. F o to be one t o ds the t that ightly storic wells nd the round river. s into t then cal or ned to m pling c h are w ater to be w ater ertical bluffs w ever, river e., the w hich e soil i on in of the p acted egime these curred On the drains a s the t e the eased or the o two La Cros s License T Revisio n The vel o gradient.across t h Therefor the inc h Environ m show se astage. T h LACB Wvicinity structure directio n 2.3.7.3.Historic a monitori n monitori n monitori n Dairylan Of the w LACB Wroutine b designat e Environ m G-3 Fos s Nos. 3, 4 levels re 3.0E-08 µDuring t h to the s radioacti v The wel l suspecte dthat sam p As note Activitie s wells to monitori n if groun d located ninterval o b elow g r B. s e Boiling W Termination n 0 o city of gr o  The gradi e h e site, grou n e, it is likel y hes and fe e m ental Mon i a sonal vari a hese wells a WR site struc t of suspect s/foundatio n ns. Previous I a lly, the LA C n g wells. F n g wells lo c n g wells o fd for radiol o w ells show n W R facilities basis. The g r e d as B-2, m ental Mon i s il Station o p 4 and 5 we r ported duri nµCi/ml to 9.
h e recovery outh of th e v e liquids f r l-point sho w d leakage.
T p le are pres e d in the L s Report (D support gr o ng wells (1 0 d water qua l n ominally w i o f 15 to 25 f r ade. These W ater Reacto r Plan o undwater i s e nt of the w a ndwater mo n y that the gr o e t/day rang i toring Pro g a tion on up w are not suffi c tures or are abroken dr a ns or variat i Investigatio n CBWR Lic eigure 2-11 i c ated on th ff the LAC B o gical purpo n on Figure were histo r r oundwater m B-3, B-7, i toring staff p e r ational r e r e routinely ng this mo n 0E-08 µCi/
m of a probab e Turbine B rom suspect w n on Figure T he well-po e nted in Tab l L ACBWR D D-Plan/PSD A o undwater e 0 wells total
)ity had be e ithin five (5
)f eet below g wells are s h r s directly r ater table is i n itoring has o undwater ve). Ground g ram wells a w ard and d o cient to cha r as where pot e ain lines) c o i ons in fill m n s ensed Site h allustrates th ee LACBW R B WR site t ses. 2-11, only P r ically moni t m onito r ing w B-8, B-9, on a routin e equirements. monitored f n itoring per i m l). le spill inci d B uilding.
T broken drai n 2-11 was e s int was sa m l e 2-17. Th i D ecommissi o AR) (19), D e valuation.
) were insta l e n impacted
) feet of on e g rade and o n h ow on Fig u 2-34 e lated to b onfluenced b yshown that v elocity acr o w ater elev a agree with t o wnward gr a racterize the ential releas o uld have o materials c o a s had seve r e current lo c R site. Th e that are or P otable W a t ored by D a wells and b a B-9A, B11 A e basis for n o During L A f or gross b e i od was les s d ent in 1983 T his incide n n lines in th s tablished d o mpled once o i s well-poin t o ning Plan airyland re cIn Novem b lled within t by plant o e another co n n e deep well ure 2-11 as M o th the hy d y the topog r the water t a oss the site i s a tion data t he regional adients that groundwat ees associate d occurred. I n ould locally r al potable w c ation of po e re is no p o have been a ter Wells N a iryland for a ckground g r AR, and B o n-radiologi A CBWR op e e ta activity.
s than or e q, a tempora r nt concern e e Turbine B o wn gradie n on May 3, 1 9 t has since b e and Post-S cently insta l b e r 2012, fi t he LACB W o pe r ations. n sist of one with a scre e MW 200A a n draulic con d r aphy; and, w able has a vs also relati vfrom the groundwat e are influe n e r flow belo w d with LAC n these are ainfluence g water wells otable water otable wate rmonitored Nos. 3 and 4 radiologica l r oundwater B 11R are m ical paramet e e rations, Pot a Typical g r q ual to MD r y well-poi n e d the pot e Building to s u nt and belo w 9 83. The a n een abando n S hutdown D l led ground w ive (5) pair s WR licensed The well p shallow we l e ned interv a n d B throug ductivity an d with the flat ery low gra d v ely slow (i
.G-3 Coal e r flow, an d nced by the w and arou n BWR (i.e., i a s, pilings, g roundwater and ground w and ground w r or ground w by Solutio n 4 which ser v l conditions monitoring m onitored b y e rs to supp o a ble Water W r oss beta a c DC (ranging nt was estab l e ntial leaka g u b-b uilding w the grade o nalysis resul ned. D ecommissi o water moni t s of ground wsite to dete r pairs which l l with a scr e al of 45 to 5 5 h MW-204 A d the areas dient.  .e., in Plant d also river n d the in the deep flow w ater w ater w ater n s o r viced on a wells y the ort the Wells c tivity from  lished g e of soils. of the ts for o ning t oring w ater rmine were eened 5 feet A and La Cros s License T Revisio n Two (2) in June ground w 90 and C In June o through 2 and B11 several r fourth r o Potable samples transura n of the gr o Additio n 18. 2.3.7.4.The LA C twice p e ground w the MW-The coll eDM pR g r 2.3.7.5.
Ground w (5 pairs) samplin g wells M WNovemb epositivel y ranging Novemb e during t h During t hMW-20 2 Sr-90 w s e Boiling W Termination n 0 rounds of g r 2 013 and t h w ate r sample s C s-137. Anal y o f 2014, a t 2 04 A and B A R. Thes e r adionuclide o und of gr oWell #5, a n were sent o n ic radionuc l o undwater s a nal details, i n On-Goin g CBWR Site g er year for r w ater is at re l-200A/B thr u e cted infor m D epth to gro u M onitoring w otential/tur b Radiological r oundwater Sum m w ater charac t within the g in 2013.
H W-201A an d er of 2013 y detected i from 1.43 p er 2013 sa m h e 2013 sam p h e June 201 2A, MW-20 3 w as also po W ater Reacto r Plan roundwater h en during s were sent y sis for H-3 t hird round o B; Potable W e collected g s including o undwater w n d Monitor i o ff for radi o lides. Tabl e amples and r n cluding th e g Investigati o g roundwate r r adiological l atively hig h u MW-204 A m ation durin g und water in w ell ground w bidity/dissol vsample info rsample coll e m ary of Gro u terization e ff LSE area H-3 was posi d B, MW-2 0 at concentr a in the same pCi/L to 2.
1 m pling perio d p ling period 4 sample p e 3 A and M W sitively det r samples we r a seasonal lto an off-si t was perfor m o f groundw a Water Wells
#groundwater HTD and t w ere collect e i ng Wells B ological an a es 2-18 and 2 results. e off-site an a ons r monitorin g analysis p u h er and low e A/B wells as g each moni tthe respect i w ater pH/sp e v ed oxygen/
t rmation inc l ection. u ndwater A n fforts comm ein Novem b tively detec t 0 2-A and B, a tions rang iwells duri n 18 pCi/L; h o d. Co-60 a
: n. eriod, H-3 w W-203B) at c e cted in w 2-35 r e collected l ow ground w te laborator y m ed on site.
ater sample s#3, 4, 5, and samples w t ransuranic r ed from: M B 11R and B alysis of se v 2-19 provid e alytical labo r g program c o u rposes onl y er elevations shown on F toring interv ive monitori n e cific condu c temperature
.l uding a co m n alytical Re s e nce d throu g b e r 2012 a n t e d at conce nMW-203A i ng fro m 1 5 n g the June o wever, it w n d Cs-137 w was positivel yoncentratio n wells MW-2 0 in 2013, d u w ater level y for radiol o  s was colle c 7; and Mo n ere sent of f radionuclid e MW 200A a n B 11AR. T v eral radio n es a summa rratory repo r onsists of o b y from exis. The moni


igure 2-11.
La Cross License T Revision Two (2) in June groundw 90 and C In June o through 2 and B11 several r fourth ro Potable samples transuran of the gro Addition
: 18.
2.3.7.4.
The LAC twice pe groundw the MW-The colle D
M p
R gr 2.3.7.5.
Groundw (5 pairs) sampling wells MW Novembe positively ranging Novembe during th During th MW-202 Sr-90 w se Boiling W Termination n 0 rounds of gr 2013 and th water samples Cs-137. Analy of 2014, a t 204 A and B AR. These radionuclide ound of gro Well #5, an were sent o nic radionucl oundwater sa nal details, in On-Going CBWR Site g er year for r water is at rel
-200A/B thru ected inform Depth to grou Monitoring w otential/turb Radiological roundwater Summ water charact within the g in 2013. H W-201A and er of 2013 y detected i from 1.43 p er 2013 sam he 2013 samp he June 201 2A, MW-203 was also po Water Reactor Plan roundwater hen during s were sent ysis for H-3 third round o B; Potable W e collected g s including oundwater w nd Monitori off for radio lides. Table amples and r ncluding the g Investigatio groundwater radiological latively high u MW-204A mation during und water in well groundw bidity/dissolv sample infor sample colle mary of Grou terization eff LSE area H-3 was posi d B, MW-20 at concentra in the same pCi/L to 2.1 mpling period pling period 4 sample pe 3A and MW sitively det r
samples wer a seasonal l to an off-sit was perform of groundwa Water Wells #
groundwater HTD and t were collecte ing Wells B ological ana es 2-18 and 2 results.
e off-site ana ons r monitoring analysis pu her and lowe A/B wells as g each monit the respecti water pH/spe ved oxygen/t rmation incl ection.
undwater An fforts comme in Novemb tively detect 02-A and B, ations rangi wells durin 18 pCi/L; ho
: d. Co-60 an eriod, H-3 w W-203B) at c ected in w 2-35 re collected low groundw te laboratory med on site.
ater samples
#3, 4, 5, and samples w transuranic r ed from: M B11R and B alysis of sev 2-19 provide alytical labor g program co urposes only er elevations shown on F toring interv ive monitorin ecific conduc temperature.
luding a com nalytical Res enced throug ber 2012 an ted at concen MW-203A ing from 15 ng the June owever, it w nd Cs-137 w was positively oncentration wells MW-20 in 2013, du water level y for radiolo s was collec 7; and Mon ere sent off radionuclide MW 200A an B11AR. T veral radion es a summar ratory repor onsists of ob y from exis
. The moni igure 2-11.
val includes:
val includes:
ng well. c tance/oxid
ng well.
: a. m pleted chai n sults gh the instal l n d the co m n tration gre a and B and M 50 pCi/L to 2013 samp l w as not po were not po y detected i n n s ranging fr02A, MW-2 u ring the se a in Novem b ogical analy s cted from:
ctance/oxida mpleted chain sults gh the install nd the com ntration grea and B and M 50 pCi/L to 2013 sampl was not po were not po y detected in ns ranging fr 02A, MW-2 uring the sea in Novemb ogical analys cted from: M nitoring Well f for radiolo es. In Septe nd B throug These collec nuclides incl ry of the radi rts are provi btaining grou ting monito toring wells ation and red n of custody lation of 10 mmencement ater than MD MW-204A a 660 pCi/L.
M nitoring Wel l f for radiol o es. In Sept e n d B throu g T hese colle c nuclides inc l r y of the rad i r ts are provi b taining gro u ting monit otoring well s a tion and re d n of custod y l ation of 10 mmencement ater than M D MW-204A a 660 pCi/L.
ling period a ositively dete sitively dete n four (4) w from 245 pC 203A and asonal high w ber 2013. T sis for Co-60 MW-200A a ls B2, B-3, B ogical analys ember of 20 gh 204A an cted groundw luding HTD iological ana ded in Refer undwater sam oring wells w s sampled in duction y following monitoring of groundw DC in monit and B in Jun Sr-90 was at concentra ected during ected in any wells (MW-B i/L to 336 p MW-204A water These 0, Sr-and B B11R sis of 014 a nd B, water D and alysis rence mples when clude wells water toring e and s also ations g the y well
l ing period a ositively det esitively det e n fou r (4) w from 245 pC 203A and a sonal high w b er 2013.
: B11R, pCi/L.
T s is for Co-6 0 MW-200A a l s B2, B-3, B ogical analy s ember of 2 0 g h 204A a n c ted ground w l uding HT D i ological an a ded in Refe r u ndwater sa m o ring wells w s sample d in d uction y following monitoring of ground w D C in moni t a nd B in Jun S r-90 wa sat concentr aected durin g ected in an y wells (MW-B i/L to 336 pMW-204A w ater T hese 0 , S r-a nd B B11R sis of 0 14 a n d B, w ater D and a lysis r ence m ples when clude wells w ater t oring e and s also ations g the y well B 11R, p Ci/L. with La Cros s License T Revisio n concentr aAm-241 During t greater t h concentr a were als o 2.4.C The sur v deferred.
with  
under co that will basemen tillustrate
 
La Cross License T Revision concentra Am-241 During t greater th concentra were also 2.4.
C The surv deferred.
under co that will basement illustrate defer the condition ALARA data wou areas),
Safet Histo Acce struct interf The a physi condi As acces will be co for the s radionuc and HTD events ca of a surv stored in validatin As decom surface d for open documen se Boiling W Termination n 0 ations rangin were also po he Septemb han MDC in ation of 1.14 o positively d Continuing C vey of many Examples ncrete or asp remain and t after liner s buried pip e characteriz ns:
consideratio uld likely not ty considerat orical data sh ss for charac tures or othe fere with con ability to use ical relations itions repres ss is gained ollected, eva survey unit.
lides present D radionuclid aused by equ vey unit(s) w n the charac g the initial mmissioning decontamina n air demolit nted survey a Water Reactor Plan ng from 1.1 ositively det ber 2014 sam n any well.
4 pCi/L. Co detected at r Characteriz inaccessible s of areas w phalt coverin d be subjec r removal an ping systems zation of a ons (e.g., the t change the
: tions, hows that the cterization w er obstacles w ntinued oper e engineering ship to surro sented by the to areas tha aluated and s This data t and update des. In addi uipment failu will be reco terization d classificatio g proceeds, ation (as wel tion or unre and a formal r
12 pCi/L to ected at resi mple period, Sr-90 was o-60, Ni-63, residual conc zation e or not read where survey ngs, structur cted to FRS nd the inter s that may r soil or stru e area is eith e survey area e area could would require where the re ration of ope g judgment i ounding area e conditions at were prev stored with-o will be use e the variabil ition, as the ures or perso orded. Thes atabase. Th n and in plan areas will, ll as fixed co estricted rele l turnover w 2-36 2.01 pCi/L.
dual concen
, H-3 was n positively d
, Cs-137, Eu centrations in dily accessib ys are deferr ral wall and
, the underl riors of bur remain in th ucture was b her a radiati a or area clas be classified e significant emoval could erating system in assigning s and the lik in these adja viously inacc other radiolo ed along wi lity in the ra decommiss onnel errors, se events w his additiona nning for the as necessar ontamination ease. When will be made C-14, Tc-9 ntrations in se not positivel detected in o u-152, Eu-15 n several we ble subsurfa rred include floor surfac rlying concr ried pipe tha he end-state based on on ion or conta ssification o d without fur t deconstruct d result in an ms, or the area a cl kelihood of th acent areas.
cessible, add ogical survey ith existing adionuclide m ioning progr
, which may will be evalu al character e FRS.
ry, be decon n) to levels n a structur by the Radi 99, Eu-152, everal wells ly detected a one (1) well 54, Pu-239/2 ells.
ace soils or s soils under ces in some rete in the R at may rem condition.
ne or more amination are of the locatio rther charact tion of adjac n unsafe con lassification he area to ha ditional char y data in a s data to upd mix for both resses, data y affect the ra uated and, w rization data ntaminated that will me e is ready f ological Pro Pu-239/240 at concentra l, MW-200A 240 and Am surfaces has r structures, of the basem Reactor Bui main. Figure The decisi of the follo ea and addit on or surroun terization, cent systems ndition or n based on ave radiolog racterization urvey histor date the typ h gamma-em from operat adiological s when approp a will be us to remove eet the condi for demoliti otection grou 0 and ations A at a m-241 been soils ments ilding e 2-3 on to owing tional nding s,
gical n data ry file pes of mitting tional status
: priate, ed in loose itions ion, a up for
 
La Cross License T Revision the comp are suitab Followin a "turnov acceptan transferre performa may inclu The "turn survey pe survey da
: turnover, survey p met. The Appr action Appr Appr with Appr radio Data addit Appr 2.5.
R
: 1.
U C
2
: 2.
U R
: 3.
U C
o
: 4.
E C
: 5.
E S
se Boiling W Termination n 0 pany preform ble.
ng the demol ver assessme ce criteria w ed to Charac ance of the F ude a "turno nover surve erformed, re ata prior to c
, and FRS), a lans will co ese objective ropriate instr n level and/o ropriate instr ropriate surv the calibrati ropriate samp nuclide ratio analysis crit ional sample ropriate class References U.S. Nuclear Content of Li 011.
U.S. Nuclear Radiation Sur U.S. Nuclear Consolidated f Radiologic EnergySoluti Crosse Boilin EnergySoluti ite Characte Water Reactor Plan ming demoli lition and/or ent" will be p will be met, cterization/L FRS. Otherw over survey,"
ey" process, epresent at le conducting t a documente ontain the ap es include:
rument selec or release cri rument quali ey technique on methodol ple collectio os, teria to ident es and, sification of Regulatory icense Termi Regulatory rvey and Site Regulatory Decommiss cal Criteria, F ons PG-EO-ng Water Rea ons GP-EO-erization Proj r
ition, validat r remediation performed. I
, then physi License Term wise, additio
" primarily fo together wi east one, but the FRS. Fo ed survey pl ppropriate da ction to ensur
: iteria, ity control m es to ensure
: logies, n and analys tify follow-u the survey a Commission ination Plan Commission e Investigati Commission sioning Guid Final Report
-313196-SV actor.
-313196-QA ject (QAPP) 2-37 ting that the n, and when If the results ical and adm mination grou onal remedia for Class 1 an ith any addi t possibly se or each type an will be d ata assessme re the proper measures to e that the field sis to determ up actions su area.
n, Regulator s for Nuclea n, NUREG-1 ion Manual (
n, NUREG-1 dance - Char t - Septembe
-PL-001, Ch A-PL-001, Qu
).
e radiologica n an area is b s of this asse ministrative up personne ation may b nd 2 areas w itional chara everal, oppo of survey (c developed us ent to ensur r sensitivity ensure operab d measurem mine spatial v uch as remed ry Guide 1.1 ar Power Rea 1575, Revisi (MARSSIM 1757, Volum racterization er 2006.
haracterizatio uality Assur al condition believed to b essment indi control of l for prepara be required.
within the LS acterization ortunities to c characterizat ing the DQO re that sever relative to th
: bility, ent techniqu variability an diation and th 79, Standard actors, Revis ion 1, Multi-M), August 20 me 2, Revisio
, Survey, an on Survey P rance Project s in the stru be ready for icate that the the area wi ation, design This assess SE.
and remedi collect addit tion, remedia O process. T ral objective he applicabl ues are consi nd variability he collection d Format and sion 1 - June
-Agency 000.
on 1, nd Determina Plan for the L t Plan LACB ucture
: FRS, e FRS ill be n, and sment iation tional
: ation, These es are le istent y in n of d
e ation La BWR
 
La Cross License T Revision
: 6.
E W
: 7.
D S
: 8.
U R
D
: 9.
S C
: 10.
E 1
: 11.
U L
: 12.
U R
T
: 13.
E S
: 14.
E S
: 15.
Z F
: 16.
E C
: 17.
H 3
: 18.
H R
2
: 19.
D D
: 20.
In E
1 se Boiling W Termination n 0 EnergySoluti Water Reacto Dairyland Po AFSTOR -
U.S. Nuclear Radiation Sur December 20 andia Nation Contaminatio EnergySoluti 0 Detector S U.S. Nuclear Laboratory A U.S. Nuclear Radiological Termination)
EnergySoluti urvey Repor EnergySoluti urvey Repor ZionSolution allout in Soi EnergySoluti Concern Duri Haley & Aldr 0, 2012.
Haley & Aldr Reactor, Dair 015.
Dairyland Po Decommissio nternational Emitters (max 998.
Water Reactor Plan ons Technic or Historical wer Corpora December 2 Regulatory rvey and As 006.
nal Laborato on From Dec ons Technic Sensitivity.
Regulatory Analytical Pro Regulatory Monitoring
- Effluent S ons GG-EO-rt for Octobe ons LC-RS-rt for June th s Technical ils at Zion St ons Technic ing LACBW rich, Hydrog rich Inc., Hy ryland Powe wer Coopera oning Activit Standard IS ximum beta r
cal Support D Site Assessm ation LAC-T 2009.
Commission sessment of ory, NUREG commissioni cal Support D Commission otocols Man Commission Programs (I Streams and
-313196-RS er and Novem PN-164017-hru August 2 Support Doc tation.
cal Support D WR Decomm geological C ydrogeologic r Cooperativ ative, LACB ties Report (
O 7503-1, P energy grea 2-38 Document R ment (HSA)
TR-138, Initi n NUREG-1 Materials an G/CR-5512, V ing Paramete Document R n, NUREG-1 nual (MARL n Regulatory Inception Th the Environ S-RP-001, LA mber 2014 F
-001, LACB 2015 Field W cument 13-0 Document R missioning.
onceptual Si cal Investiga ve, Genoa W BWR Decom (D-Plan/PSD Part 1, Evalua ater than 0.15 RS-TD-31319
).
ial Site Char 1575, Supple nd Equipmen Volume 3, R er Analysis -
RS-TD-31319 1576, Multi-LAP) - Augu y Guide 4.15 hrough Norm nment - July ACBWR Ra Field Work -
BWR Radiolo Work - Nove 004, Examin RS-TD-31319 ite Model, F ation Report, Wisconsin, Fi mmissioning DAR), Revis ation of Surf 5 MeV) and 96-003, La C racterization ement 1, Mu nt Manual (M Residual Rad
- October 19 96-006, Lud
-Agency Rad ust 2001.
5, Quality A mal Operatio 2007.
adiological C
- November ogical Chara ember 2015.
nation of Cs-96-001, Rad File No. 3870
, La Crosse B ile No. 3870 Plan and Po sion - March face Contam Alpha-Emit Crosse Boilin n Survey for ulti-Agency MARSAME dioactive 999.
dlum Model 4 diological ssurance or ns to Licens Characterizat r 2015.
acterization 137 Global dionuclides o 05-001 - Au Boiling Wat 05-008, Janu ost Shutdown h 2014.
mination, Bet tters - Augu ng E) -
44-se tion of ugust ter ary n
ta-ust
 
La Cross License T Revision Survey Unit ID #
L101010 L101010 L101010 L101010 L201110 L201110 L301210 L301210 L301210 L401210 L401210 L401210 L401210 L401210 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Survey 01 Reactor Stack G 02 Turbine Diesel G 03 LSA Bu 04 North L 01 LACBW Crib Ho 02 G-3 Cri Dischar 01 North E 02 Transm 09 Plant A 03 G-3 Co 05 Coal Pi 06 Capped 07 Ground 08 Hwy 35 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-1 y Unit Descr LA r Building, W Grounds e Building, T Generator Bu uilding, Mai LSE Grounds WR Adminis ouse, Wareh ib House, LA rge Line, Are End of Licen mission Switc Access, ISFSI al Plant Gro le Grounds d Ash Impou ds East of Hi 5/Railroad R r
LACBW ription ACBWR Sit WTB, WGTV Turbine Offi uilding Grou ntenance Ea s
LSE Buff stration Buil ouse Ground ACBWR Cir ea South of L Clas nsed Site chyard Area I Haul Road Non-Im ounds undment Gro ghway 35 Right of Way 2-39 WR Open L te Enclosure V, Ventilatio ce Building, unds at Shack Gro fer Zone Gro lding, LACB ds rc. Water LSE Fence ss 3 Grounds d Grounds mpacted Grou ounds y Grounds Land Survey Cl e Grounds on
, 1B ounds ounds BWR s
unds No No No No No y Units Initial lassification Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted n
Approxim Survey U Area (m 1,992 2,315 1,749 2,387 7,211 6,785 24,04 11,71 31,01 d
66,86 d
82,89 d
111,89 d
81,25 d
9,444 mate Unit m2) 2 5
9 7
1 5
2 1
2 9
4 99 4
4
 
La Cross License T Revision Surve B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B201 B201 B201 B201 B201 B201 B301 B301 B301 B301 se Boiling W Termination n 0 ey Unit 10001 10002 10003 10004 10005 10006 10007 10008 10009 10101 10102 10103 10104 10105 10106 12101 12102 12103 12104 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-2 Sur Wa LAC W
LACBWR LACBWR M
L LACBW LA LA LA Ba Transmissi Barg r
LACBW rvey Area D Reactor Bu aste Treatmen CBWR Venti Waste Gas Ta R Turbine Bld Bldg 1B Diesel G LSA Buil Maintenance E Pipe Tun ACBWR Cr G-3 Crib H WR Administ ACBWR War ACBWR War ACBWR War ack-up Contr ion Sub-Stat G-1 Crib H ge Washing B 2-40 WR Structu Description uilding nt Building ilation Stack ank Vault dg./Turbine Generator Str lding Eat Shack nnel rib House House tration Build rehouse #1 rehouse #2 rehouse #3 rol Center tion Switch H House Break Room ural Survey k
Office ructure ding House m
y Units Class Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl sification lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3
 
La Cross License T Revision G-3 R G-3 S G-3 C G-3 T G-3 E G-3 C G-3 C G-4 W G-3 L G-3 L G-3 C G-3 C G-3 V G-3 T G-3 B G-3 F G-3 F G-3 W G-3 S G-3 S
#6 W se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table Reclaim Buil Stock Out Tr Coal Unload Transfer Tow Electrical Ro Crusher Tow Conveyor #6 Warehouse a LRAPB Buil Lime Silo El CAT Buildin Coal Plant Vehicle Stora Train Shed Bottom Ash Fly Ash Silo Fly Ash Elec Waste Silo Surge Tank Settling Tank Well House Water Reactor Plan e 2-2 (contin lding ransfer Build ing Tower wer A oom wer 6 (2) and Electrica lding ectrical Buil ng age Building Dewatering ctrical Buildi k
r nued)
Non Imp ding al Room lding g
Buildings ing 2-41 LACBWR pacted Struc G-3 An G-3 Bo G-3 Ex G-3 Ga G-3 Su G-3 Su G-3 Li G-3 W G-3 Ac G-3 As G-3 Ba G-3 Fl
#7 We G-3 Co G-3 Sa G-3 St G-3 Gr G-3 As Main P S03 Ta Structural ctures nnex Buildin oiler Fuel Oi xplosive Gas as Room ub Station Sh ub Station Sh ime Storage Weigh Station ctive Reclaim sh Coordina ag Houses (5 ammable St ll House oal Scale ample Buildi tock Out Tra rid Shed sh handling Pollution Co ank Building Survey Uni ng il Pump Bui s Storage Ro hed hed Silo n
m Buildings ators Office
: 5) torage Shed ing ansfer Buildi Blower Buil ontrol Electri g
its lding oom s/ Tunnel ing lding ical Buildingg
 
La Cross License T Revision Dete Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Gamma System a
Bas Stan b
Fun se Boiling W Termination n 0 ector Model m 44-9 m 43-68 mo m 43-68 mo m 43-93 mo m 43-89 mo m 43-93 mo m 43-89 mo m 44-10 m 43-37 m 43-10-1 a Spectroscop ed on 1-minute ndard, ISO 750 nctional equival Water Reactor Plan Table 2-3 l b Me Ludl ode Ludl ode Ludl ode ode Ludl ode ode Ludl Ludl Ludl Ludl py e count time; a 03-1 (20).
lent instrument r
Instrume eter Model lum 3 lum 2350-1 lum 2350-1 lum 2360 lum 2360 lum 2350-1 lum 2350-1 lum 2929 N/A and default valu tation may be u 2-42 ent Types a Applica sca static &
stat static &
stat sca sca and/
smea Anal ues for surface used and Nomina ation Ty (dp an 1,0
& scan 1,8 tic
& scan 1,8 2,0 tic an 3.5 6.5 an 2,0 or ar lysis efficiencies (
al MDCs Typical Dete MDCscan pm/100cm2) 000 to 2,000 800 to 2,000 N/A 800 to 2,000 000 to 2,200 N/A 5 pCi/g 60Co 5 pCi/g 137Cs 000 to 2,200 N/A N/A s) as specified ction Sensit
)
MDCst (dpm/10 0
N/A 0
600 to 80 to 0
0 800 to 800 to 90 to 1 90 to 1 o
s N/A 0
N/A
~0.10 p for Co-6 Cs-13 in Internationa tivity tatic a
0cm2)
A 700 90 900 900 100 100 A
A
-15
-80 pCi/g 60 and 37 al


defer th e conditio nALARA data wo uareas), Safe tHist oAcc e struc tinter fThe a phys i cond i As acce s will be c ofor the s radionuc and HT D events c a of a sur v stored i nvalidatin As deco m surface d for ope ndocume n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 a tions rangi n were also p o h e Septem b han MDC i n a tion of 1.1 4 o positively d C ontinuin g C vey of many  Example s ncrete or as p remain an d t after line rs buried pi p e characteri z n s: considerati o u ld likely no t t y considera t orical data s h ss for chara c t ures or oth e f ere with co n a bility to us e ical relation s i tions repre s ss is gained o llected, ev a s urvey unit.
La Cross License T Revision Analysis /
l ides presen t D radionucli d a used by eq u v ey unit(s) w n the chara cg the initial mmissionin g decontamin a n ai r demoli t n ted survey a W ater Reacto r Plan ng from 1.1 o sitively det b er 2014 sa m n any well.
Gamma Radionucli Isotopic N (Np-237)
4 pCi/L. C o detected at r C haracteri zinaccessibl e s of areas w p halt coveri n d be subje c r removal a n ping system s z ation of a o ns (e.g., th e t change th e tions, hows that th e cterization w e r obstacles w n tinued ope r e engineerin g s hip to surr o sented b y th eto areas th a a luated and s This data t and updat e des. In add i uipment fail u w ill be rec oterization dclassificatio g proceeds, a tion (as we l t ion or unr e and a forma l r 12 pCi/L to ected at resi mple period
Isotopic Pl (Pu-238/23 Isotopic Th (Th-228/23 Isotopic Ur (U-234/235 Isotopic Cu (Cm-243/2 Isotopic Am (Am-241/2 C-14 Tritium Sr-90 Pu-241 Tc-99 Gross Alph Fe-55 Ni-63 Ni-59 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-4 Analytes ides G
, S r-90 was o-60, Ni-63
eptunium A
, residual con c zation e or not rea d where surve y ngs, structu r cted to FRS n d the inte r s that may rsoil or str u e area is eit h e survey are a e area could w ould requir e w here the r e r ation of op e g judgment i o unding area e conditions at were pre v stored with-o will be us e e the variabi l ition, as the u res or pers o o rde d. The s atabase. T h n and in pla nareas will, l l as fixed c o e stricted rel e l turnover w 2-36 2.01 pCi/L.
lutonium 39/240)
dual conce n , H-3 was npositively d , Cs-137, E u centrations i n dily accessi b y s are defer r ral wall and , the under l r iors of bur remain in t h ucture was b her a radiat i a or area cla sbe classifie d e significan t emoval coul d erating syste m i n assigning s and the li kin these adj a v iously inac c o ther radiol o e d along w i l ity in the r adecommiss onnel errors
A horium 30/232)
, se events w h is addition a nning for th eas necessa r ontaminatio n ease. Whe n will be made C-14, Tc-9 n trations in s e not positive l d etected in o u-152, Eu-1 5 n several w e b le subsurfa r red include floor surfa c r lying concr r ied pipe th a h e en d-state based on o n i on or cont assification o d without fu r t deconstruc t d result in a n m s, o r the area a c l k elihood of t h acent areas.
A ranium 5/238)
cessible, ad d ogical surve y ith existing a dionuclide m ioning prog r , which ma y w ill be eval ual characte r e FRS. r y, be deco n n) to levels n a structur by the Radi 9 9, Eu-152, everal wells l y detected a o ne (1) wel l 5 4, Pu-239/
A urium 244)
2 e lls. a ce soils or s soils unde r ces in some r ete in the R a t may re m condition.
A mericium 243)
ne or more amination ar e of the locati orther charac t t ion of adja c n unsafe co nlassificatio n h e area to h a ditional cha r y data in a sdata to up d m ix for bot h resses, data y affect the r a u ated and, w rization dat a ntaminated that will m e e is ready f ological Pr o Pu-239/24
A LS LS G
: 0. at concentr a l , MW-200 A 2 40 and A m s urfaces has r structures, of the base m R eactor Bu i m ain. Figur e The decisiof the foll o e a and addi t on or surrou n terization, cent system s n dition or n based on ave radiolo g r acterizatio n urvey histo r date the ty p h gamma-e m fro m opera t a diological s w hen appro p a will be us to remove e et the cond i for demoliti o tection gro u 0 and ations A at a m-241 been soils m ents ilding e 2-3 on to owing t ional n ding s , gical n data r y file p es of m itting tional s tatus priate, ed in loose i tions i on, a u p for La Cros s License T Revisio n the com p are suita b Followi n a "turno v acceptan transferr e perform amay incl u The "tur n survey p e survey d a turnover , survey p met. Th eApp r actio nApp rApp r with App r radi oData additApp r 2.5.R 1. U C 2 2. U R 3. U C o 4. E C 5. E S s e Boiling W Termination n 0 p any prefor m ble. ng the demo l v er assessm e ce criteria w e d to Chara c a nce of the F u de a "turn o n over surv e erformed, r e ata prior to c , and FRS), alans will c o e se objectiv e r opriate inst r n level and/
LS LS ha / Beta G
o r opriate inst r r opriate survthe calibrati r opriate sam p nuclide rati oanalysis cri t i onal sampl e r opriate clas s References U.S. Nuclear C ontent of L i 011. U.S. Nuclear Radiation Su r U.S. Nuclear C onsolidated f Radiologi c E nergySoluti C rosse Boili n E nergySoluti ite Cha r act e W ater Reacto r Plan ming demol i lition and/o r e nt" will be p will be met
LS LS LS Water Reactor Plan Off-Site Technique Gamma Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec SC SC GFPC SC SC GFPC SC SC SC r
, cterization/
e Laboratory DOE E
L F RS. Other w over survey," e y" process, epresent at l e c onducting t a document e ontain the a p e s include:
< 0.1pC DOE E
rument sele c or release c r i rument qual iey techniqu eon methodo l ple collecti o os, teria to iden t es and, sification of Regulatory i cense Term iRegulatory r vey and Sit eRegulatory Decommis s c al Criteria, F ons PG-EO-ng Water Re a ons GP-EO-erization Pro j r ition, valida t r remediatio n performed.
< 0.04 p DOE E
I , then phys i License Ter m wise, additi o" primarily fotogether w i e ast one, bu t t he FRS. F o e d survey pl ppropriate d a ction to ensu r iteria, ity control m e s to ensure logies, n and analy s tify follow-uthe survey aCommissio n i nation PlanCommissio n e Investigat iCommissio n s ioning Gui d F inal Repor t-313196-SV a ctor.  -313196-Q A j ect (QAPP)2-37 ting that th e n , and when If the result s i cal and ad m m ination gro u onal remedi a fo r Class 1 a n i th any add i t possibly s e or each type an will be d a ta assessm e re the prope r m easures to ethat the fiel d sis to deter m up actions s u area. n , Regulato r s for Nucle a n, NUREG-1 i on Manual (n, NUREG-1 d ance - Cha r t - Septemb e-PL-001, C h A-PL-001, Q u). e radiologic a n an area is b s of this ass e ministrative u p personneation may b n d 2 areas witional char a e veral, oppo of survey (c developed us e nt to ensu r r sensitivity e nsure opera b d measurem m ine spatial v uch as reme d r y Guide 1.1 a r Power Re a 1575, Revis i (MARSSI M 1757, Volu m racterization e r 2006. h aracterizati o u ality Assu r al condition believed to b essment ind icontrol of l for prepar a be required.
< 0.05 p DOE E
w ithin the L S a cterization o rtunities to c c haracteriza t ing the DQ O re that seve rrelative to t h bility, ent techniq u variability a n d iation and t h 79, Standar d actors, Revi s i on 1, Multi
< 0.05 p DOE E
-M), August 2 0 m e 2, Revisi o, Survey, a n o n Survey P rance Projec t s in the str u be ready for i cate that th e the area w i ation, desig n This asses s S E. and remed i collect addi t tion, remedi a O process.
< 0.06 p DOE E
T ral objectiv e h e applicab l ues are cons i n d variabilit y h e collectio n d Format an d s ion 1 - Jun e-Agency 0 00. o n 1, nd Determin a Plan for the L t Plan LAC B ucture FRS, e FRS i ll be n , and sment i ation t ional ation, T hese es are l e istent y in n of d e a tion L a B WR La Cros s License T Revisio n 6. E W 7. D S 8. U R D9. S C 10. E 1 11. U L 12. U R T 13. E S 14. E S 15. Z F 16. E C 17. H 3 18. H R 2 19. D D20. I n E 1  s e Boiling W Termination n 0 E nergySoluti W ater React o Dairyland PoAFSTOR - U.S. Nuclear Radiation Su r December 2 0 andia Natio n Contaminati o E nergySoluti0 Detector S U.S. Nuclear L aboratory A U.S. Nuclear Radiological Termination)
< 0.03 p DOE E
E nergySoluti urvey Repo r E nergySoluti urvey Repo r Z ionSolutionallout in So i E nergySoluti C oncern Dur i H aley & Ald r 0, 2012.
< 0.04 p EPA EE
H aley & Ald r R eactor, Dai r 015. Dairyland Po Decommissi o nternational Emitters (ma x 998. W ater Reacto r Plan ons Techni c or Historical wer Corpor aDecember 2Regulatory r vey and As 0 06. n al Laborat o on From De c ons Techni c Sensitivity. Regulatory Analytical Pr oRegulatory Monitoring
< 5.0 pC EPA 90
- Effluent S ons GG-EO-rt for Octob e ons LC-RS-r t for June t h s Technical i ls at Zion S t ons Techni c i ng LACB W r ich, Hydro g r ich Inc., H y r yland Powe wer Cooper a o ning Activi t Standard IS ximum beta r c al Support D Site Assess m a tion LAC-T 2 009. Commissio nsessment of o ry, NURE G commission i c al Support DCommissio n otocols Ma nCommissio nPrograms (I Streams and  
< 10.0 p DOE E
-313196-R S e r and Nove m PN-164017-h ru August 2 Support Do c t ation. c al Support D W R Decom m geological C y drogeologi c r Cooperati v a tive, LAC B ties Report (O 7503-1, Penergy gre a 2-38 Document R m ent (HSA)T R-138, Init i n NUREG-1Materials a n G/CR-5512, V ing Paramet e Document R n, NUREG-1 n ual (MAR L n Regulator y I nception T h the Enviro n S-RP-001, L A m ber 2014 F-001, LAC B 2 015 Field W cument 13-0 Document R m issioning.
< 1.0 pC DOE E
onceptual S i cal Investig a v e, Genoa W B WR Deco m (D-Plan/PS D P art 1, Evalu a a ter than 0.1 5 R S-TD-3131 9). i al Site Cha r 1 575, Suppl e nd Equipme n Volume 3, R e r Analysis
< 10.0 p DOE E
-R S-TD-3131 9 1576, Multi
< 2.0 pC DOE E
-L AP) - Aug u y Guide 4.1 5 h rough Nor m nment - July A CBWR R a Field Work
< 10.0 p DOE E
-B WR Radiol o W ork - Nov e 004, Exami n R S-TD-3131 9 ite Model, F a tion Report
< 2.0 pC DOE E
, Wisconsin, F i mmissioning D AR), Revi s ation of Sur f 5 MeV) and 9 6-003, La C racterizatio n ement 1, M u nt Manual (M R esidual Ra d- October 1 9 9 6-006, Lu d-Agency Ra d u st 2001.
< 50.0 p 2-43 y Analytica Soils (pCi/
5 , Quality A m al Operatio 2007. a diological C- Novembe r o gical Char a ember 2015.
EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g ERF C-01 Ci/g 06.0 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/
nation of Cs-9 6-001, Ra d F ile No. 387 0 , La Crosse B i le No. 387 0 Plan and P o s ion - Marc h f ace Conta mAlpha-Emi t C rosse Boili n n Survey for u lti-Agency M ARSAM E d ioactive 9 99. dlum Model 4 d iological ssurance or ns to Licen s C haracteriza t r 2015. a cterization
EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g al Methods a Method and
/g) 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 (SRW01) 0 (SRW01) and Typical d Sensitivity Wat EPA Method 10.0 pCi/L EML Pu-02 M 1.0 pCi/L ENIC Modifi 50.0 pCi/L EPA 906.0 300.0 pCi/L EICHROM M 2.0 pCi/L EML Pu-01 50.0 pCi/L EICHROM T 15.0 pCi/L EPA 900.0 5.0 pCi/L EML Fe-01 M 100.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M 15.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M 100.0 pCi/L l MDCs ter (pCi/L) 901.1 Modified ied Modified Metho Tc-01 Modified Modified Modified od


137 Global d ionuclides o 0 5-001 - A u Boiling Wat 0 5-008, Janu o st Shutdow n h 2014. m ination, Be t t ters - Aug u n g E) - 4 4-s e t ion o f u gust t er ary n t a-u st La Cros s License T Revisio n Survey Unit ID #L10101 0 L10101 0 L10101 0 L10101 0 L20111 0 L20111 0 L30121 0 L30121 0 L30121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 # Surve y 0 1 Reacto r Stack G 0 2 Turbin e Diesel G 03 LSA B u 0 4 North L 0 1 LACB W Crib H o 0 2 G-3 Cr i Discha r 0 1 North E 0 2 Trans m 0 9 Plant A 03 G-3 Co 05 Coal Pi 0 6 Cappe d 0 7 Groun d 08 Hwy 3 5 W ater Reacto r Plan Table 2-1 y Unit Desc r L A r Building, W G rounds e Building, T G enerator B u u ilding, Mai L SE Ground s WR Admini s o use, Wareh i b House, L A rge Line, Ar e E nd of Lice n m ission Swit c Access, ISFS I al Plant Gr o le Grounds d Ash Impo u d s East of Hi 5/Railroad R r LACB W ription ACBWR Si t WTB, WGT V T urbine Offi u ilding Gro untenance E a s LSE Buf f s tration Bui l ouse Groun d A CBWR Ci r e a South of L Cla s nsed Site c hyard Area I Haul Roa d Non-I m o unds undment Gr o ghway 35 Right of Wa y 2-39 W R Open L t e Enclosur e V , Ventilati o ce Building
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Ta Location Area West o Area South Area North Area at G-3 Area Outsid Area at G-3 33 miles So Pedretti Far Radio Towe Junction of East of Stod Water Reactor Plan able 2-5 of #2 Wareh of Parking L of LACBW Gas Silo de G-3 Offic Outfall uth at Bad A m Substation er Northeast Hwy O and ddard at Hwy r
, u nds at Shack Gr o f er Zone Gr o lding, LAC B d s r c. Water L SE Fence s s 3 Ground s d Grounds m pacted Gro u o unds y Grounds L and Surve y C l e Grounds o n , 1B o unds o unds BWR s u nds N o N o N o N o N o y Units Initial lassificatio nClass 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 on-Impacte d on-Impacte d on-Impacte d on-Impacte d on-Impacte d n Approxi m Surve y U Area (m 1,99 2 2,31 5 1,74 9 2,38 7 7,21 1 6,78 5 24,04 11,71 31,01 d 66,86 d 82,89 d 111,8 9 d 81,25 d 9,44 4 m ate U nit m 2) 2 5 9 7 1 5 2 1 2 9 4 9 9 4 4 La Cros s License T Revisio n Surv e B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B30 1 B30 1 B30 1 B30 1 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ey Unit 1 0001 1 0002 1 0003 1 0004 1 0005 1 0006 1 0007 1 0008 1 0009 1 0101 1 0102 1 0103 1 0104 1 0105 1 0106 1 2101 1 2102 1 2103 1 2104 W ater Reacto r Plan Table 2-2 Su r W a LA C W LACBW R LACBWR M L LACB W L A L A L A B aTransmiss i Bar g r LACB W r ve y Area D Reactor B u aste Treatme n CBWR Vent i W aste Gas T a R Turbine Bl d Bld g 1B Diesel G LSA Bui l M aintenance E Pipe Tu n A CBWR C r G-3 Crib H WR Adminis t ACBWR Wa r ACBWR Wa r ACBWR Wa r a ck-up Cont r i on Sub-Sta t G-1 Crib H ge Washing B 2-40 W R Struct u D escription u ilding n t Building ilation Stac k a nk Vault d g./Turbine . Generator St r l ding Eat Shack n nel r ib House H ouse tration Buil d r ehouse #1 r ehouse #2 r ehouse #3 r ol Cente r tion Switch H H ouse Break Roo m u ral Surve y k Office ructure ding H ouse m y Units Clas s C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l sification lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 La Cros s License T Revisio n G-3 R G-3 S G-3 C G-3 T G-3 E G-3 C G-3 C G-4 W G-3 L G-3 L G-3 C G-3 C G-3 V G-3 T G-3 B G-3 F G-3 F G-3 W G-3 S G-3 S#6 W  s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Tabl e R eclaim Bui l S tock Out T r C oal Unload T ransfer To w E lectrical R o C rusher To w C onveyor #6 W arehouse a LRAPB Bui l Lime Silo El C AT Buildi n C oal Plant Vehicle Stor a Train She d Bottom Ash Fly Ash Silo F ly Ash Ele c Waste Silo S urge Tank Settling Tan k W ell House W ater Reacto r Plan e 2-2 (conti n l ding r ansfer Buil d ing Towe r w er A o om w e r 6 (2) a nd Electric a l ding ectrical Bui l n g a ge Buildin g Dewatering ctrical Build i k r n ued)Non Im p ding a l Room l ding g Buildings i ng 2-41 LACBWR p acted Stru c G-3 A n G-3 B o G-3 E x G-3 G a G-3 S u G-3 S u G-3 L i G-3 W G-3 A c G-3 A s G-3 B a G-3 Fl#7 We G-3 C o G-3 S a G-3 St G-3 G r G-3 A s Main P S03 T a Structural ctures n nex Buildi n oiler Fuel O i x plosive Ga s a s Room u b Station S h u b Station S h ime Storage W eigh Statio n c tive Reclai m sh Coordina ag Houses (5ammable St ll House o al Scale ample Build i t ock Out Tr a r id She d s h handling P ollution C o a nk Buildin g Surve y Un i n g i l Pump Bui s Storage R o h e d h e d Silo n m Building s a tor's Office
2005 Dairy (on L house Lot R Admin Bu es (off L Axe Boat Lan n East of LA of LACBW Hwy K y O Junction 2-44 yland Backg Licensed Site uilding Licensed Site nding ACBWR WR n
: 5) t orage She d i ng ansfer Build i Blower Bui l o ntrol Electr i g its lding oom s/ Tunnel i ng l ding ical Buildin g g La Cros s License T Revisio n Det e Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu mGamm a System a Bas Sta n b Fu n  s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ector Mode l m 44-9 m 43-68  m o m 43-68  m o m 43-93  m o m 43-89  m o m 43-93  m o m 43-89  m o m 44-10 m 43-37 m 43-10-1 a Spectrosco ped on 1-minut e ndard, ISO 75 0 nctional equiva l W ater Reacto r Plan Table 2-3 l b M e Lud l ode Lud l ode Lud l o de ode Lud l o de ode Lud l Lud l Lud l Lud l p y e count time; a 03-1 (20).
ground Stud Co-60 (pCi/g) e)  
lent instrumen t r Instrum e eter Model l um 3 l um 2350-1 l um 2350-1 l um 2360 l um 2360 l um 2350-1 l um 2350-1 lum 2929 N/A and default val u tation may be u 2-42 e nt T y pes a Applic a sc a static & sta t static & sta t sc a sc a and/sme a Ana l ues for surface u se d a nd Nomin a ation Ty (d p a n 1, 0& scan 1, 8 tic & scan 1, 8 2, 0 tic a n 3.5 6.5 a n 2, 0 or  a r l ysis  efficiencies ( al MDCs Ty pical Dete MDC scan p m/100cm 2)0 00 to 2,00 0 8 00 to 2,00 0 N/A 8 00 to 2,00 0 0 00 to 2,20 0 N/A 5 pCi/g 60 C o 5 pCi/g 137 C s 0 00 to 2,20 0 N/A N/A  s) as specified ction Sensi t) MDC s t (dpm/10 0 N/A 0 600 to 80 to 0 0 800 to 800 to 90 to 1 90 to 1 o s N/A 0 N/A - 75-~0.10 pfor Co-6 Cs-1 3in Internation a t ivit y tatic a 0cm 2)A 700 90 900 900 1 00      1 00 A A -15      -80 p Ci/g 6 0 and 3 7 a l La Cros s License T Revisio nAnal y sis / Gamma Radionucl iIsotopic N(Np-237) Isotopic P l(Pu-238/2 3Isotopic T h(Th-228/2 3Isotopic U r(U-234/23 5Isotopic C u(Cm-243/2Isotopic A m(Am-241/2C-14 Tritium Sr-90 Pu-241 Tc-99 Gross Alp h Fe-55 Ni-63 Ni-59  s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-4 Anal ytes ides Geptunium A lutonium 39/240) A horium 30/232) A ranium 5/238) A urium 244) A mericium 243) A L S L S G L S L S ha / Beta G L S L S L S W ater Reacto r Plan Off-Sit eTechnique Gamma Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec S C S C GFPC S C S C GFPC S C S C S C r e Laborator yDOE E< 0.1p CDOE E< 0.04 pDOE E< 0.05 pDOE E< 0.05 pDOE E< 0.06 pDOE E< 0.03 pDOE E< 0.04 p EPA E E< 5.0 p C EPA 9 0< 10.0 pDOE E< 1.0 p CDOE E< 10.0 pDOE E< 2.0 p C DOE E< 10.0 pDOE E< 2.0 pCDOE E< 50.0 p 2-43 y Anal y tic aSoils (pCi
<MDC
/EML HASL 30 0 C i/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g ERF C-01 C i/g 0 6.0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 C i/ EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 C i/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 C i/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g a l Methods aMethod an d/g) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (SRW01) 0 (SRW01) a nd T y pica l d Sensitivit y Wa tEPA Method 10.0 pCi/L EML Pu-02 M1.0 pCi/L ENIC Modif i50.0 pCi/L EPA 906.0 300.0 pCi/L EICHROM M2.0 pCi/L EML Pu-01 50.0 pCi/L EICHROM T15.0 pCi/L EPA 900.0 5.0 pCi/L EML Fe-01 M100.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M15.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M100.0 pCi/L l MDCs ter (pCi/L) 901.1 Modifie d i e d Modified Meth o Tc-01 Modifie d Modifie d Modifie d od La Cros s License T Revisio n 
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC e) 0.023
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC dy for Soils Cs-(pC 0.0 0.0 0.
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.
0.0
-137 Ci/g) 077 026 149 038 076 017 381 227 035 188 065


s e Boiling W Termination n 0 T a Location Area West o Area South Area North Area at G-3 Area Outsi d Area at G-333 miles So Pedretti Fa r Radio Tow e Junction of East of Sto d W ater Reacto r Plan a ble 2-5 of #2 Ware h of Parking L of LACBW Gas Silo d e G-3 Offic Outfall uth at Bad A m Substatio n er Northeast Hwy O and d dard at Hw y r 2005 Dair y (on L h ouse L ot R Admin B ues (off L A xe Boat La n n East of L A of LACB W Hwy K y O Junctio n 2-44 y land Back g Licensed Sit e uilding L icensed Sit e n ding A CBWR W R n g round Stu d Co-60 (pCi/g)e) <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC e) 0.023 <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC dy for Soils Cs-(p C 0.0 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0.0-137 C i/g) 0 77 0 26 149 0 38 0 76 0 17 3 81 2 27 0 35 188 0 65 La Cros s License T Revisio n T Conditi o Undistur b Disturbe d Undistur b Disturbe d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 T able 2-6 o n and Dep t b e d d b e d d W ater Reacto r Plan Investi ga t h D No n r ative Levels Mea s D raina g e Ar 0.0.n-Draina g e 0.0.2-45 for Cs-137 s ured Ran g(pCi/g) eas Surfac e 00 to 2.80 00 to 1.67 A reas Surf a 23 to 0.66 27 to 0.34 Based on B g e R e 0-10 cm ace 0-10 c m B ack g roun d R an g e for 9 5 (p 0.4 5 0.3 5 m 0.1 5 0.23 d Studies 5% Distrib u p Ci/g) 5 to 3.63 5 to 2.86 5 to 0.77 to 0.42 u tion La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2*L W ater Reacto r Plan -7 Initi a Radi o H C F e N C o N S r N b T c C s E u E u E u N p P u P u P u P u A mCm-2 4 Listed half life i r a l Suite of L o nuclide H-3 C-14 e-55 i-59 o-60 i-63 r-90 b-94 c-99 -137 u-152 u-154 u-155 p-237 u-238 u-239 u-240 u-241 m-241 4 3/244* is the shortest h 2-46 LACBWR S H a half life for th e S ite-Specifi c alf Life (Ye a 1.24E+01 5.73E+03 2.70E+00 7.50E+04 5.27E+00 9.60E+01 2.91E+01 2.03E+04 2.13E+05 3.00E+01 1.33E+01 8.80E+00 4.76E+00 2.14E+06 8.78E+01 2.41E+04 6.60E+03 1.44E+01 4.32E+02 1.81E+01 e radionuclide s c Radionuc l a rs) s in the pai r lides L L R S S##M M M M S S##M M M M S A##M M M M S%M M L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 S urve y Unit Surface Area Description S urface Soil
La Cross License T Revision T
Conditio Undisturb Disturbed Undisturb Disturbed se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-6 on and Dept bed d
bed d
Water Reactor Plan Investiga th D
Non r
ative Levels Meas Drainage Ar 0.
0.
n-Drainage 0.
0.
2-45 for Cs-137 sured Rang (pCi/g) eas Surface 00 to 2.80 00 to 1.67 Areas Surfa 23 to 0.66 27 to 0.34 Based on B ge R e 0-10 cm ace 0-10 cm
 
===Background===
Range for 95 (p
0.45 0.35 m
0.15 0.23 d Studies 5% Distribu pCi/g) 5 to 3.63 5 to 2.86 5 to 0.77 to 0.42 ution
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2
*L Water Reactor Plan  
-7 Initia Radio H
C Fe N
Co N
Sr Nb Tc Cs Eu Eu Eu Np Pu Pu Pu Pu Am Cm-24 Listed half life i r
al Suite of L onuclide H-3 C-14 e-55 i-59 o-60 i-63 r-90 b-94 c-99  
-137 u-152 u-154 u-155 p-237 u-238 u-239 u-240 u-241 m-241 43/244*
is the shortest h 2-46 LACBWR S Ha half life for the Site-Specific alf Life (Yea 1.24E+01 5.73E+03 2.70E+00 7.50E+04 5.27E+00 9.60E+01 2.91E+01 2.03E+04 2.13E+05 3.00E+01 1.33E+01 8.80E+00 4.76E+00 2.14E+06 8.78E+01 2.41E+04 6.60E+03 1.44E+01 4.32E+02 1.81E+01 e radionuclides c Radionucl ars) s in the pair lides  
 
L L
R S
S M
M M
M S
S M
M M
M S
A M
M M
M S
M M
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Survey Unit Surface Area Description Surface Soil  
# of Samples  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Subsurface Soil  
SD Subsurface Soil  
# of Samples  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Asphalt # of Samples  
SD Asphalt  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Surface Scans  
SD Surface Scans  
% Scanne d Mean Scan (cpm)
% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
Max Scan (cpm) ng Water Reac t ation Plan Table 2-8 Surve y Uni t 66,869 m 2 G-3 Coal Pla nCo-60 3 0 0.070 0.075 0.078 0.057 0.011 Co-60 4 0 0.060 0.056 0.084 0.047 0.016 Co-60 None Taken 1% 5,550 6,700 o r  Non-Impact t L4012103 n t Grounds Cs-137 3 1 0.082 0.083 0.092 0.071 0.011 Cs-137 4 1 0.048 0.038 0.081 0.036 0.022 Cs-137 ed Open Land Surve y Unit 82,894 m 2 Coal Pile GrouCo-60 3 0 0.071 0.072 0.084 0.057 0.014 Co-60 3 0 0.061 0.063 0.068 0.052 0.008 Co-60 None Taken 1% 5,050 8,800 2-47 Surve y Units -L4012105 1 nds C GCs-137 3 1 0.061 0.060 0.068 0.055 0.006 Cs-137 3 1 0.042 0.040 0.056 0.030 0.013 Cs-137 1 8 1- Characteriza tSurvey Unit L 1 11,899 m 2 C apped Ash I m G rounds Co-60 3 0 0.082 0.084 0.090 0.072 0.009 Co-60 4 0 0.081 0.083 0.102 0.056 0.021 Co-60 2 0 0.073 0.073 0.082 0.065 0.012 1% 8 ,340 1 2,000 tion Surve y S u L4012106 8 m poundment G HCs-137 3 2 0.100 0.099 0.121 0.079 0.021 Cs-137 4 2 0.088 0.084 0.130 0.054 0.037 Cs-137 2 0 0.062 0.062 0.084 0.040 0.031 u mmar y Survey Unit L 8 1,254m 2 G rounds East o f H ighway 35 Co-60 3 0 0.080 0.079 0.089 0.072 0.009 Co-60 3 0 0.081 0.069 0.106 0.068 0.022 Co-60 None Ta k 1% 8,0009,080 L4012107 fCs-137 3 3 0.264 0.263 0.463 0.065 0.199 Cs-137 3 2 0.068 0.057 0.091 0.056 0.020 Cs-137 k en L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Tab l ng Water Reac t ation Plan l e 2-8 (continu e S S# # M M M M S D S# # M M M M S D A# # M M M M S D S%M M o r  e d) Non-I urve y Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples  
Max Scan (cpm) ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-8 Survey Unit 66,869 m2 G-3 Coal Plan Co-60 3
0 0.070 0.075 0.078 0.057 0.011 Co-60 4
0 0.060 0.056 0.084 0.047 0.016 Co-60 None Taken 1%
5,550 6,700 or Non-Impact t L4012103 nt Grounds Cs-137 3
1 0.082 0.083 0.092 0.071 0.011 Cs-137 4
1 0.048 0.038 0.081 0.036 0.022 Cs-137 ed Open Land Survey Unit 82,894 m2 Coal Pile Grou Co-60 3
0 0.071 0.072 0.084 0.057 0.014 Co-60 3
0 0.061 0.063 0.068 0.052 0.008 Co-60 None Taken 1%
5,050 8,800 2-47 Survey Units -
L4012105 1
nds C
G Cs-137 3
1 0.061 0.060 0.068 0.055 0.006 Cs-137 3
1 0.042 0.040 0.056 0.030 0.013 Cs-137 1
8 1
- Characterizat Survey Unit L 111,899 m2 Capped Ash Im Grounds Co-60 3
0 0.082 0.084 0.090 0.072 0.009 Co-60 4
0 0.081 0.083 0.102 0.056 0.021 Co-60 2
0 0.073 0.073 0.082 0.065 0.012 1%
8,340 12,000 tion Survey Su L4012106 8
mpoundment G H
Cs-137 3
2 0.100 0.099 0.121 0.079 0.021 Cs-137 4
2 0.088 0.084 0.130 0.054 0.037 Cs-137 2
0 0.062 0.062 0.084 0.040 0.031 ummary Survey Unit L 81,254m2 Grounds East of Highway 35 Co-60 3
0 0.080 0.079 0.089 0.072 0.009 Co-60 3
0 0.081 0.069 0.106 0.068 0.022 Co-60 None Tak 1%
8,000 9,080 L4012107 f
Cs-137 3
3 0.264 0.263 0.463 0.065 0.199 Cs-137 3
2 0.068 0.057 0.091 0.056 0.020 Cs-137 ken
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Tabl ng Water React ation Plan le 2-8 (continue S
S M
M M
M SD S
M M
M M
SD A
M M
M M
SD S
M M
or ed)
Non-I urvey Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D ubsurface Soil of Samples  
D ubsurface Soil of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D Asphalt of Samples  
D Asphalt of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D urface Scans  
D urface Scans  
% Scanne d Mean Scan (cpm)
% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
Max Scan (cpm)
Max Scan (cpm)
I mpacted Ope n Surve y Unit 9,444 m 2 Hwy 35/Railro Way GroundsCo-60 3 0 0.079 0.075 0.095 0.068 0.014 Co-60 3 0 0.086 0.092 0.107 0.060 0.024 Co-60 None Taken 1% 8,124 9,200 2-48 n Land Surve y L4012108 1 ad Right of B ACs-137 3 2 0.119 0.108 0.156 0.093 0.033 Cs-137 3 2 0.189 0.091 0.409 0.067 0.191 Cs-137 Units - Char a Surve y Unit L 1 00 m 2 B ackground So i Area (inside L4 0Co-60 17 0 0.087 0.086 0.101 0.077 0.007 Co-60 None T aCo-60 None T a No Scanning P acterization Su r L4012109 ils Test 012108) Cs-137 17 17 0.160 0.161 0.268 0.059 0.059 Cs-137 aken Cs-137 aken Performe d r ve y Summar y y L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L L a b L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-Genoa Coal P L3012105-CR-GS-002
Impacted Open Survey Unit 9,444 m2 Hwy 35/Railro Way Grounds Co-60 3
-L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S a Bold values b Survey unit s ng Water Reac t ation Plan H-3 C S B 4.390 1 S S 3.570 0.Pile -SS 0.533 0.S B  S S  S B 14.600 0.S S 0.813 0.S B  S S 1.420 0.S B 2.350 0.S S 6.490 0.indicate concentration g originally classified as t o r  Table 2-9 C-14 Fe-55 N.230 3.430 1.671 2.790 1 .675 2.130 1   .713 2.300 2
0 0.079 0.075 0.095 0.068 0.014 Co-60 3
.713 3.550 2 .719 3.610 2.705 1.920 3
0 0.086 0.092 0.107 0.060 0.024 Co-60 None Taken 1%
.728 2.260 3 greater than MDC. Ital i Class 3 at time of sam p Non Imp a Ni-59 Co-60 N.470 0.026 2.870 0.027 3 0.018 .730 0.025 2 0.026 0.030 .370 0.037 3.560 0.037 3 0.019 .800 0.025 3.110 0.018 4.200 0.030 4icized values indicate M p le a cted Coal Pile Ni-63 Sr-90 N.140 0.321 0.380 0.391 0 0.950 0.289 0 0 0.950 0.348 0.580 0.338 0 0.940 0.293 0.440 0.278 0.710 0.271 0 MDC value 2-49 and Soil Sam p Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.018 0.820 0 0.022 0.628 0 0.022 0 0.016 0.587 0 0.020 0 0.020 0 0.030 0.611 0 0.028 0.616 0 0.013 0 0.019 0.593 0 0.016 0.604 0 0.020 0.576 0 ples - Test Am e s-137 Pm-147 E u 0.024 0.714 0 0.018 0.847 0 0.019 0 0.018 0.698 0 0.023 0 0.028 0.319 1.500 0.096 0.826 0 0.021 0.018 1.450 0.033 1.310 0.182 0.770 0 e rica Laborato r u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.071 0.190 0 0.060 0.167 0 0.052 0.152 0 0.051 0.137 0 0.049 0.166 0 0.072 0.199 0 0.115 0.223 0 0.079 0.232 0 0.045 0.115 0 0.049 0.156 0 0.041 0.128 0 0.059 0.176 0 ry Anal y sis (p C u-155 Np-237 P u 0.095 0.025 0 0.096 0.024 0 0.048 0.056 0.023 0 0.055 0.074 0.080 0.035 0 0.112 0.027 0 0.038 0.048 0.040 0 0.044 0.030 0 0.060 0.020 0 C i/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 P u 0.046 0.015 1 0.040 0.021 1 0.036 0.029 1   0.036 0.014 2 0.044 0.026 2 0.021 0.024 2 0.026 0.021 2 0.028 0.029 2 u-241 Am-241 A 1.730 0.032 0 1.650 0.025 0 0.041 1.670 0.018 0 0.048 0.061 2.550 0.019 0 2.740 0.025 0 0.034 2.580 0.020 0 2.670 0.017 0 2.740 0.015 0 A m-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.010 0.024 0.019 0.025 0.006 0.034 0.006 0.013 0.019 0.035 0.006 0.036 0.017 0.024 0.015 L L R S S##M M M M S S##M M M M S A##M M M M S S%M M a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 S urve y Unit Surface Area Description S urface Soil
8,124 9,200 2-48 n Land Survey L4012108 1
ad Right of B A
Cs-137 3
2 0.119 0.108 0.156 0.093 0.033 Cs-137 3
2 0.189 0.091 0.409 0.067 0.191 Cs-137 Units - Chara Survey Unit L 100 m2 Background Soi Area (inside L40 Co-60 17 0
0.087 0.086 0.101 0.077 0.007 Co-60 None Ta Co-60 None Ta No Scanning P acterization Sur L4012109 ils Test 012108)
Cs-137 17 17 0.160 0.161 0.268 0.059 0.059 Cs-137 aken Cs-137 aken Performed rvey Summaryy
 
L L
R R
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
a b
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-Genoa Coal P L3012105-CR-GS-002-L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S a
Bold values b
Survey units ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C
SB 4.390 1
SS 3.570 0.
Pile  
-SS 0.533 0.
SB SS SB 14.600 0.
SS 0.813 0.
SB SS 1.420 0.
SB 2.350 0.
SS 6.490 0.
indicate concentration g originally classified as tor Table 2-9 C-14 Fe-55 N
.230 3.430 1
.671 2.790 1
.675 2.130 1
.713 2.300 2
.713 3.550 2
.719 3.610 2
.705 1.920 3
.728 2.260 3
greater than MDC. Itali Class 3 at time of samp Non Impa Ni-59 Co-60 N
.470 0.026 2
.870 0.027 3
0.018  
.730 0.025 2
0.026 0.030  
.370 0.037 3
.560 0.037 3
0.019  
.800 0.025 3
.110 0.018 4
.200 0.030 4
icized values indicate M ple acted Coal Pile Ni-63 Sr-90 N
.140 0.321 0
.380 0.391 0
0
.950 0.289 0
0 0
.950 0.348 0
.580 0.338 0
0
.940 0.293 0
.440 0.278 0
.710 0.271 0
MDC value 2-49 and Soil Samp Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.018 0.820 0
0.022 0.628 0
0.022 0
0.016 0.587 0
0.020 0
0.020 0
0.030 0.611 0
0.028 0.616 0
0.013 0
0.019 0.593 0
0.016 0.604 0
0.020 0.576 0
ples - Test Ame s-137 Pm-147 Eu 0.024 0.714 0
0.018 0.847 0
0.019 0
0.018 0.698 0
0.023 0
0.028 0
.319 1.500 0
.096 0.826 0
0.021 0
.018 1.450 0
.033 1.310 0
.182 0.770 0
erica Laborator u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.071 0.190 0
0.060 0.167 0
0.052 0.152 0
0.051 0.137 0
0.049 0.166 0
0.072 0.199 0
0.115 0.223 0
0.079 0.232 0
0.045 0.115 0
0.049 0.156 0
0.041 0.128 0
0.059 0.176 0
ry Analysis (pC u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.095 0.025 0
0.096 0.024 0
0.048 0.056 0.023 0
0.055 0.074 0.080 0.035 0
0.112 0.027 0
0.038 0.048 0.040 0
0.044 0.030 0
0.060 0.020 0
Ci/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.015 1
0.040 0.021 1
0.036 0.029 1
0.036 0.014 2
0.044 0.026 2
0.021 0.024 2
0.026 0.021 2
0.028 0.029 2
u-241 Am-241 A
1.730 0.032 0
1.650 0.025 0
0.041 1.670 0.018 0
0.048 0.061 2.550 0.019 0
2.740 0.025 0
0.034 2.580 0.020 0
2.670 0.017 0
2.740 0.015 0
Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.010 0.024 0.019 0.025 0.006 0.034 0.006 0.013 0.019 0.035 0.006 0.036 0.017 0.024 0.015  
 
L L
R S
S M
M M
M S
S M
M M
M S
A M
M M
M S
S M
M a
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Survey Unit Surface Area Description Surface Soil  
# of Samples  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Subsurface Soil  
SD Subsurface Soil  
# of Samples  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Asphalt # of Samples  
SD Asphalt  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Surface Scans  
SD Surface Scans  
% Scanne d Mean Scan (cpm)
% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
Max Scan (cpm) a MDC v a ng Water Reac t ation Plan Table 2-10 Surve y Uni t 1,992 m 2 Reactor Bui lWGTV, Ven t Grounds Co-60 12 2 0.080 0.058 0.287 0.048 0.066 Co-60 18 0 0.078 0.052 0.516 0.047 0.109 None Taken No Scanning P a lue used for an a o r  Impacted Cl a t L1010101 l ding, WTB, tilation Stack Cs-137 12 12 0.215 0.100 1.070 0.032 0.296 Cs-137 18 8 0.066 0.054 0.161 0.033 0.035 Performed a lytical results l ass 1 Open Lan d Surve y Unit 2,315 m 2 Turbine, Offic eGenerator Buil Grounds Co-60 2 0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.044 0.007 Co-60 22 0 0.058 0.058 0.080 0.043 0.010 None Taken No Scanning P l ess than MDC.
Max Scan (cpm) a MDC va ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-10 Survey Unit 1,992 m2 Reactor Buil WGTV, Vent Grounds Co-60 12 2
2-50 d Surve y Unit sL1010102 1 e, Diesel ding L M GCs-137 2 0 0.050 0.050 0.051 0.050 0.001 Cs-137 22 4 0.064 0.065 0.130 0.044 0.017 Nerformed N s - Characteri z Surve y Unit L 1 ,749 m 2 LSA Building, M aintenance E a G rounds Co-60 7 0 0.059 0.050 0.099 0.048 0.019 Co-60 25 0 0.046 0.046 0.055 0.025 0.005 N one Taken N o Scanning P e z ation Surve y S L1010103 2 a t Shack NCs-137 7 1 0.069 0.054 0.161 0.048 0.041 Cs-137 25 0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.042 0.003 erformed S ummar y Surve y Unit L 2 ,387 m 2 N orth LSE Gro uCo-60 1 0 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 N/A Co-60 14 0 0.048 0.048 0.050 0.043 0.002 Co-60 10 0 0.053 0.054 0.062 0.042 0.006 No Scanning P e L1010104 u nds Cs-137 1 0 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 N/A Cs-137 14 3 0.041 0.042 0.051 0.027 0.009 Cs-137 10 1 0.051 0.053 0.057 0.037 0.006 erforme d L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L1010101-CJ-GS-002-S L1010101-CJ-GS-009-S L1010101-CJ-GS-010-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010102-CJ-FC-001-C L1010102-CJ-GS-013-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-CJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-SL-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CR-PA-007
0.080 0.058 0.287 0.048 0.066 Co-60 18 0
-L1010104-QQ-PA-001
0.078 0.052 0.516 0.047 0.109 None Taken No Scanning P alue used for ana or Impacted Cla t L1010101 lding, WTB, tilation Stack Cs-137 12 12 0.215 0.100 1.070 0.032 0.296 Cs-137 18 8
-L1010104-QR-GS-001
0.066 0.054 0.161 0.033 0.035 Performed alytical results l ass 1 Open Land Survey Unit 2,315 m2 Turbine, Office Generator Buil Grounds Co-60 2
-a Bold values ng Water Reac t ation Plan TH-3 C SS   SS   SS   S B 0.364 0 S S 0.441 0.S B 0.377 0.S S 1.380 0.C V 1.710 0.S B  S B 8.740 0.S S  S B 24.700 0.SB   S M 0.354 0 S B 3.260 0.S S  S B 0.649 0.S S  S B 0.654 0.SS   SB   -AV   -AV   -SB   indicate concentration g t o r  Table 2-11 C C-14 Fe-55 N           .896 2.430 1.676 2.190 1
0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.044 0.007 Co-60 22 0
0.058 0.058 0.080 0.043 0.010 None Taken No Scanning P less than MDC.
2-50 d Survey Units L1010102 1
e, Diesel ding L
M G
Cs-137 2
0 0.050 0.050 0.051 0.050 0.001 Cs-137 22 4
0.064 0.065 0.130 0.044 0.017 N
erformed N
s - Characteriz Survey Unit L 1,749 m2 LSA Building, Maintenance Ea Grounds Co-60 7
0 0.059 0.050 0.099 0.048 0.019 Co-60 25 0
0.046 0.046 0.055 0.025 0.005 None Taken No Scanning Pe zation Survey S L1010103 2
at Shack N
Cs-137 7
1 0.069 0.054 0.161 0.048 0.041 Cs-137 25 0
0.049 0.049 0.054 0.042 0.003 erformed Summary Survey Unit L 2,387 m2 North LSE Grou Co-60 1
0 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 N/A Co-60 14 0
0.048 0.048 0.050 0.043 0.002 Co-60 10 0
0.053 0.054 0.062 0.042 0.006 No Scanning Pe L1010104 unds Cs-137 1
0 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 N/A Cs-137 14 3
0.041 0.042 0.051 0.027 0.009 Cs-137 10 1
0.051 0.053 0.057 0.037 0.006 erformed
 
L L
R R
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
a La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L1010101-CJ-GS-002-S L1010101-CJ-GS-009-S L1010101-CJ-GS-010-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010102-CJ-FC-001-C L1010102-CJ-GS-013-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-CJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-SL-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CR-PA-007-L1010104-QQ-PA-001-L1010104-QR-GS-001-a Bold values ng Water React ation Plan T
H-3 C
SS SS SS SB 0.364 0
SS 0.441 0.
SB 0.377 0.
SS 1.380 0.
CV 1.710 0.
SB SB 8.740 0.
SS SB 24.700 0.
SB SM 0.354 0
SB 3.260 0.
SS SB 0.649 0.
SS SB 0.654 0.
SS SB  
-AV  
-AV  
-SB indicate concentration g tor Table 2-11 C
C-14 Fe-55 N
.896 2.430 1
.676 2.190 1
.679 2.150 1
.679 2.150 1
.67 7 4.190 2.72 7 1.650 2   .726 2.120 2   .715 2.230 2   .453 0.689 0.715 1.830 2   .702 2.100 2   .71 7 2.340 2                   greater than MDC. Ital i lass 1 Concret e Ni-59 Co-60 N 0.024   0.040   0.286 .850 0.024 3.900 0.018 3.750 0.017 2.010 0.015 3.630 0.106 3 0.030 .620 0.015 4 0.022 .760 0.021 3 0.011 0.711 0.136 1.850 0.017 4 0.025 .620 0.014 3 0.019 .630 0.012 3 0.023   0.015   0.021   0.025   0.017 icized values indicate M e , Asphalt, Se d Ni-63 Sr-90 N   0   0   0.040 0.335 0.040 0.440 0.930 0.338 0.320 0.357 0.920 0.292 0   0.000 0.310 0   0.920 0.316 0   0.090 0.132 0.240 0.333 0   0.710 0.325 0   0.660 0.300 0   0   0   0   0   0 MDC value. 2-51 d iment and Soi l Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.020   0 0.020   0 0.025   0 0.015 0.579 0 0.012 0.587 0 0.011 0.620 0 0.010 0.521 0 0.022 0.536 0 0.016   0 0.011 0.539 0 0.015   0 0.014 0.537 0 0.01 7  0 0.018 0.432 0 0.011 0.606 0 0.015   0 0.012 0.645 0 0.01 7  0 0.009 0.557 0 0.019   0 0.008   0 0.014   0 0.025   0 0.011   0 l Samples - Te s s-137 Pm-147 E u.233   0.185   0.413   0 0.020 0.800 0.147 3.170 0.149 0.772 0.059 0.978 0.352 1.290 0 0.021   0 0.012 0.961 0 0.018   0 0.016 0.722 0 0.021   0.136 0.360 0 0.015 0.740 0 0.020   0 0.012 0.838 0 0.01 7  0 0.011 0.713 0.091   0 0.013   0 0.016   0 0.028   0 0.012   0 s t America La b u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.056 0.161 0 0.056 0.181 0 0.062 0.247 0 0.050 0.143 0 0.034 0.112 0 0.040 0.109 0 0.033 0.096 0 0.061 0.239 0 0.044 0.170 0 0.030 0.101 0 0.036 0.113 0 0.043 0.139 0 0.044 0.181 0 0.054 0.199 0 0.036 0.117 0 0.046 0.174 0 0.029 0.103 0 0.040 0.139 0 0.029 0.092 0 0.05 7 0.186 0 0.032 0.078 0 0.042 0.141 0 0.058 0.218 0 0.038 0.132 0 b orator y Anal y u-155 Np-237 P u 0.066   0.050   0.05 7  0.044 0.019 0 0.044 0.006 0 0.040 0.019 0 0.036 0.016 0 0.062 0.029 0 0.041   0.028 0.028 0 0.042   0.042 0.032 0 0.046   0.049 0.018 0 0.039 0.026 0 0.04 7  0.034 0.020 0 0.045   0.034 0.040 0 0.063   0.036   0.044   0.061   0.032   y sis (pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 P u            0.046 0.023 1 0.039 0.023 1 0.041 0.022 1 0.040 0.016 2 0.041 0.028 2   0.040 0.026 2   0.042 0.029 2   0.015 0.015 0 0.029 0.017 1   0.034 0.024 2   0.028 0.028 2                   u-241 Am-241 A 0.058   0.042   0.051 1.970 0.015 0 1.830 0.016 0 1.950 0.017 0 2.090 0.020 0 2.490 0.018 0 0.036 2.780 0.015 0 0.039 2.660 0.015 0 0.044 0.86 7 0.008 0 1.430 0.009 0 0.043 2.570 0.018 0 0.024 2.470 0.018 0 0.052   0.034   0.040   0.050   0.032 A m-243 Cm-243/244             0.023 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.029 0.014 0.01 7 0.022 0.019 0.021     0.020 0.021     0.021 0.018     0.019 0.008 0.024 0.005     0.024 0.014     0.022 0.005 La Cros s License T Revisio n Tab l Su r Su r# o f# >C Me a Me d Ma x Mi n SD Su b# o f# >C Me a Me d Ma x Mi n SD As p# o f# >C Me a Me d Ma x Mi n SD Su r% S Me a Ma x 
.677 4.190 2
.727 1.650 2
.726 2.120 2
.715 2.230 2
.453 0.689 0
.715 1.830 2
.702 2.100 2
.717 2.340 2
greater than MDC. Itali lass 1 Concrete Ni-59 Co-60 N
0.024 0.040 0.286  
.850 0.024 3
.900 0.018 3
.750 0.017 2
.010 0.015 3
.630 0.106 3
0.030  
.620 0.015 4
0.022  
.760 0.021 3
0.011 0.711 0.136 1
.850 0.017 4
0.025  
.620 0.014 3
0.019  
.630 0.012 3
0.023 0.015 0.021 0.025 0.017 icized values indicate M e, Asphalt, Sed Ni-63 Sr-90 N
0 0
0
.040 0.335 0
.040 0.440 0
.930 0.338 0
.320 0.357 0
.920 0.292 0
0
.000 0.310 0
0
.920 0.316 0
0
.090 0.132 0
.240 0.333 0
0
.710 0.325 0
0
.660 0.300 0
0 0
0 0
0 MDC value.
2-51 diment and Soil Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.020 0
0.020 0
0.025 0
0.015 0.579 0
0.012 0.587 0
0.011 0.620 0
0.010 0.521 0
0.022 0.536 0
0.016 0
0.011 0.539 0
0.015 0
0.014 0.537 0
0.017 0
0.018 0.432 0
0.011 0.606 0
0.015 0
0.012 0.645 0
0.017 0
0.009 0.557 0
0.019 0
0.008 0
0.014 0
0.025 0
0.011 0
l Samples - Tes s-137 Pm-147 Eu
.233 0
.185 0
.413 0
0.020 0.800 0
.147 3.170 0
.149 0.772 0
.059 0.978 0
.352 1.290 0
0.021 0
0.012 0.961 0
0.018 0
0.016 0.722 0
0.021 0
.136 0.360 0
0.015 0.740 0
0.020 0
0.012 0.838 0
0.017 0
0.011 0.713 0
.091 0
0.013 0
0.016 0
0.028 0
0.012 0
st America Lab u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.056 0.161 0
0.056 0.181 0
0.062 0.247 0
0.050 0.143 0
0.034 0.112 0
0.040 0.109 0
0.033 0.096 0
0.061 0.239 0
0.044 0.170 0
0.030 0.101 0
0.036 0.113 0
0.043 0.139 0
0.044 0.181 0
0.054 0.199 0
0.036 0.117 0
0.046 0.174 0
0.029 0.103 0
0.040 0.139 0
0.029 0.092 0
0.057 0.186 0
0.032 0.078 0
0.042 0.141 0
0.058 0.218 0
0.038 0.132 0
boratory Analy u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.066 0.050 0.057 0.044 0.019 0
0.044 0.006 0
0.040 0.019 0
0.036 0.016 0
0.062 0.029 0
0.041 0.028 0.028 0
0.042 0.042 0.032 0
0.046 0.049 0.018 0
0.039 0.026 0
0.047 0.034 0.020 0
0.045 0.034 0.040 0
0.063 0.036 0.044 0.061 0.032 ysis (pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.023 1
0.039 0.023 1
0.041 0.022 1
0.040 0.016 2
0.041 0.028 2
0.040 0.026 2
0.042 0.029 2
0.015 0.015 0
0.029 0.017 1
0.034 0.024 2
0.028 0.028 2
u-241 Am-241 A
0.058 0.042 0.051 1.970 0.015 0
1.830 0.016 0
1.950 0.017 0
2.090 0.020 0
2.490 0.018 0
0.036 2.780 0.015 0
0.039 2.660 0.015 0
0.044 0.867 0.008 0
1.430 0.009 0
0.043 2.570 0.018 0
0.024 2.470 0.018 0
0.052 0.034 0.040 0.050 0.032 Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.023 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.029 0.014 0.017 0.022 0.019 0.021 0.020 0.021 0.021 0.018 0.019 0.008 0.024 0.005 0.024 0.014 0.022 0.005  


s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 le 2-12 I m r ve y Unit Surface Area Description r face Soil f Samples C L an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) bsurface Soil f Samples C L an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) phalt f Samples C L an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) rface Scans Scanne d an Scan (cpm) x Scan (cpm)
La Cross License T Revision Tabl Sur Sur
W ater Reacto r Plan mpacted Cl a Su r 7,211 m 2 LACBW RBuilding, House, WCo-6 013 0 0.07 30.07 70.10 60.05 30.01 6Co-6 016 1 0.05 20.04 60.11 20.04 00.01 8Co-6 0 6 0 0.0510.0510.05 40.04 70.00 2 50% 7,500 to 8, 011,500 to 1 2 r ass 2 Open L S r ve y Unit L20 1 R Ad m LACB W W arehouse G r 0 3 7 6 3 6 0 2 6 2 0 8 0   4 7 2 00 2,000 2-52 L and Surv e S ummar y 11101 ministration W R Crib r ounds Cs-137 13 8 0.090 0.100 0.139 0.041 0.030 Cs-137 16 2 0.049 0.048 0.088 0.034 0.012 Cs-137 6 0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.003 ey Units - C Su r 6,785 m 2 G-3 Cri b Circ. W a Area Sou tCo-6 010 0 0.06 40.06 40.0810.05 20.00 9Co-6 0 7 0 0.04 90.04 80.05 50.04 20.00 4Co-6 0 6 0 0.05 60.05 70.05 90.04 90.00 3 1 C haracteriz a r ve y Unit L20 1 b House, a ter Disch a t h of LSE F e 0 4 4 2 9 0 9 8 5 2 4 0 6 7 9 9 3 50% 7,500 to 8,00 0 11,500 to 12,0 0 a tion Surv e 11102 LACBWR arge Line, ence Cs-137 10 6 0.065 0.054 0.200 0.030 0.049 Cs-137 7 2 0.038 0.033 0.052 0.029 0.009 Cs-137 6 3 0.048 0.051 0.055 0.009 0.008 0 0 0 ey L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L L L a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L2011101-CJ-GS-001-S L2011101-CR-PA-003
# of
-L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QQ-GS-001
# >C Mea Med Max Min SD Sub
-L2011101-QQ-GS-001
# of
-L2011101-QQ-GS-002
# >C Mea Med Max Min SD Asp
-L2011101-QQ-PA-001
# of
-L2011102-QQ-GS-001
# >C Mea Med Max Min SD Sur
-L2011102-QQ-GS-001
% S Mea Max se Boiling W Termination n 0 le 2-12 Im rvey Unit Surface Area Description rface Soil f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) bsurface Soil f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) phalt f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) rface Scans Scanned an Scan (cpm) x Scan (cpm)
-L2011102-QQ-GS-002
Water Reactor Plan mpacted Cla Sur 7,211 m2 LACBWR
-L2011102-QQ-PA-001
: Building, House, W Co-60 13 0
-a Bold va l ng Water Reac t ation Plan H-3 C S M  -AV  S B 0.518 0.S M 2.040 0.S S  -SB  -SS 11.810 0.-SB 2.500 0.-AV  -SB 1.370 1-SS 0.533 0.-SB 0.525 0.-AV  l ues indicate co n t o r Table 2 C-14 Fe-55 N    .72 7 2.290 2.70 7 2.240 2    .726 2.590 2
0.073 0.077 0.106 0.053 0.016 Co-60 16 1
.731 1.940 2  .560 2.260 3.713 2.330 2
0.052 0.046 0.112 0.040 0.018 Co-60 6
.702 3.890 2 ncentration gre a 2-13 Class 2 Ni-59 Co-60 N 0.096  0.023 .660 0.016 4.950 0.049 4 0.012  0.017 .600 0.035 3.680 0.017 3 0.022 .040 0.007 4.820 0.019 4.880 0.031 3 0.027 ater than MDC.
0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.002 50%
Asphalt, Sedi m Ni-63 Sr-90 N  0  0.030 0.273 0.140 0.523 0  0  0.720 0.255 0.870 0.314 0  0.390 0.291 0.300 0.361 0.950 0.327 0  0 Italicized valu e 2-53 m ent and Soil S Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.011  0 0.016  0 0.014 0.643 0 0.018 0.585 0 0.020  0 0.012  0 0.035 0.532 0 0.014 0.616 0 0.015  0 0.018 0.537 0 0.014 0.595 0 0.016 0.568 0 0.01 7  0 es indicate MD C S amples - Test s-137 Pm-147 E u.137  0 0.01 7  0 0.015 0.705 0.107 0.615 0.080  0 0.013  0.103 0.779 0 0.016 0.697 0 0.015  0 0.021 0.672 0 0.014 0.772 0 0.018 0.717 0 0.018  0 C value. America Lab o u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.041 0.098 0 0.039 0.131 0 0.033 0.108 0 0.048 0.178 0 0.060 0.188 0 0.040 0.127 0 0.09 7 0.205 0 0.03 7 0.119 0 0.046 0.135 0 0.044 0.173 0 0.039 0.111 0 0.052 0.183 0 0.051 0.142 0 o rator y Anal y s i u-155 Np-237 P u 0.033  0.039  0.040 0.022 0 0.049 0.026 0 0.091  0.03 7  0.102 0.023 0 0.041 0.019 0 0.042  0.055 0.031 0 0.045 0.017 0 0.051 0.022 0 0.038  i s u-238 Pu-239/240 P u    0.028 0.025 2 0.045 0.021 3    0.03 7 0.024 2 0.039 0.016 2  0.026 0.018 2 0.036 0.026 2 0.028 0.020 1  u-241 Am-241 A 0.031  0.038 2.470 0.015 0 3.100 0.037 0 0.042  0.031 2.800 0.019 0 2.920 0.020 0 0.040 2.680 0.029 0 2.880 0.026 0 1.710 0.010 0 0.036 A m-243 Cm-243/244    0.022 0.019 0.036 0.034    0.015 0.015 0.028 0.016 0.028 0.024 0.034 0.021 0.028 0.006
7,500 to 8,0 11,500 to 12 r
ass 2 Open L S
rvey Unit L201 R
Adm LACBW Warehouse Gr 0
3 7
6 3
6 0
2 6
2 0
8 0
4 7
2 00 2,000 2-52 Land Surve Summary 11101 ministration WR Crib rounds Cs-137 13 8
0.090 0.100 0.139 0.041 0.030 Cs-137 16 2
0.049 0.048 0.088 0.034 0.012 Cs-137 6
0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.003 ey Units - C Sur 6,785 m2 G-3 Crib Circ. Wa Area Sout Co-60 10 0
0.064 0.064 0.081 0.052 0.009 Co-60 7
0 0.049 0.048 0.055 0.042 0.004 Co-60 6
0 0.056 0.057 0.059 0.049 0.003 1
Characteriza rvey Unit L201 b House, ater Discha th of LSE Fe 0
4 4
2 9
0 9
8 5
2 4
0 6
7 9
9 3
50%
7,500 to 8,000 11,500 to 12,00 ation Surve 11102 LACBWR arge Line, ence Cs-137 10 6
0.065 0.054 0.200 0.030 0.049 Cs-137 7
2 0.038 0.033 0.052 0.029 0.009 Cs-137 6
3 0.048 0.051 0.055 0.009 0.008 0
00 ey  


L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 S S# # M M M M S S# # M M M M S C# # M M M M S S M M ng Water Reac t ation Plan Table 2-14 urve y Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples  
L L
R R
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L a
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L2011101-CJ-GS-001-S L2011101-CR-PA-003-L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QQ-GS-001-L2011101-QQ-GS-001-L2011101-QQ-GS-002-L2011101-QQ-PA-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-002-L2011102-QQ-PA-001-a Bold val ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C
SM
-AV SB 0.518 0.
SM 2.040 0.
SS
-SB
-SS 11.810 0.
-SB 2.500 0.
-AV
-SB 1.370 1
-SS 0.533 0.
-SB 0.525 0.
-AV lues indicate con tor Table 2 C-14 Fe-55 N
.727 2.290 2
.707 2.240 2
.726 2.590 2
.731 1.940 2
.560 2.260 3
.713 2.330 2
.702 3.890 2
ncentration grea 2-13 Class 2 Ni-59 Co-60 N
0.096 0.023
.660 0.016 4
.950 0.049 4
0.012 0.017
.600 0.035 3
.680 0.017 3
0.022
.040 0.007 4
.820 0.019 4
.880 0.031 3
0.027 ater than MDC.
Asphalt, Sedim Ni-63 Sr-90 N
0 0
.030 0.273 0
.140 0.523 0
0 0
.720 0.255 0
.870 0.314 0
0
.390 0.291 0
.300 0.361 0
.950 0.327 0
0 Italicized value 2-53 ment and Soil S Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.011 0
0.016 0
0.014 0.643 0
0.018 0.585 0
0.020 0
0.012 0
0.035 0.532 0
0.014 0.616 0
0.015 0
0.018 0.537 0
0.014 0.595 0
0.016 0.568 0
0.017 0
es indicate MDC Samples - Test s-137 Pm-147 Eu
.137 0
0.017 0
0.015 0.705 0
.107 0.615 0
.080 0
0.013 0
.103 0.779 0
0.016 0.697 0
0.015 0
0.021 0.672 0
0.014 0.772 0
0.018 0.717 0
0.018 0
C value.
America Labo u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.041 0.098 0
0.039 0.131 0
0.033 0.108 0
0.048 0.178 0
0.060 0.188 0
0.040 0.127 0
0.097 0.205 0
0.037 0.119 0
0.046 0.135 0
0.044 0.173 0
0.039 0.111 0
0.052 0.183 0
0.051 0.142 0
oratory Analysi u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.033 0.039 0.040 0.022 0
0.049 0.026 0
0.091 0.037 0.102 0.023 0
0.041 0.019 0
0.042 0.055 0.031 0
0.045 0.017 0
0.051 0.022 0
0.038 is u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.028 0.025 2
0.045 0.021 3
0.037 0.024 2
0.039 0.016 2
0.026 0.018 2
0.036 0.026 2
0.028 0.020 1
u-241 Am-241 A
0.031 0.038 2.470 0.015 0
3.100 0.037 0
0.042 0.031 2.800 0.019 0
2.920 0.020 0
0.040 2.680 0.029 0
2.880 0.026 0
1.710 0.010 0
0.036 Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.019 0.036 0.034 0.015 0.015 0.028 0.016 0.028 0.024 0.034 0.021 0.028 0.006
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 S
S M
M M
M S
S M
M M
M S
C M
M M
M S
S M
M ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-14 urvey Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D ubsurface Soil of Samples  
D ubsurface Soil of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D Concrete/Asphalt of Samples  
D Concrete/Asphalt of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D urface Scans % Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
D urface Scans  
Max Scan (cpm) o r Impacted Cl a Surve y Uni t24,042 m 2 North End of Li cCo-60 3 0 0.070 0.076 0.077 0.058 0.011 Co-60 3 0 0.051 0.053 0.054 0.046 0.004 Co-60 3 0 0.031 0.031 0.035 0.028 0.003 1%9,000 10,000 ass 3 Open Lan d t L3012101 c ensed Site Cs-137 3 0 0.073 0.072 0.083 0.065 0.009 Cs-137 3 0 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.051 0.001 Cs-137 3 0 0.029 0.027 0.033 0.026 0.004 % 2-54 d Surve y Unit s Surve y Unit 11,711 m 2 Transmission SwiCo-60 None TCo-60 None TCo-60 None Taken No Scanning s - Characteri zL3012102 3 tchyard Area P GCs-137 Taken Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Performe d z ation Surve y S Surve y Unit L 31,012 m 2 Plant Access, ISF Grounds Co-60 5 0 0.063 0.064 0.078 0.053 0.010 Co-60 4 0 0.072 0.072 0.100 0.046 0.023 Co-60 7 0 0.062 0.055 0.080 0.047 0.013 1%5,89 06,40 0 S ummar y L3012109 SI Haul Road Cs-137 5 5 0.152 0.143 0.267 0.075 0.078 Cs-137 4 0 0.066 0.059 0.101 0.045 0.025 Cs-137 7 0 0.059 0.052 0.079 0.028 0.019 0 0 L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012101-CR-GC-001
% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
-L3012101-CR-GC-002
Max Scan (cpm) or Impacted Cla Survey Unit 24,042 m2 North End of Lic Co-60 3
-L3012101-CR-GC-003
0 0.070 0.076 0.077 0.058 0.011 Co-60 3
-L3012101-CR-GS-003
0 0.051 0.053 0.054 0.046 0.004 Co-60 3
-L3012101-QQ-GS-001
0 0.031 0.031 0.035 0.028 0.003 1%
-L3012101-QQ-GS-001
9,000 10,000 ass 3 Open Land t L3012101 censed Site Cs-137 3
-L3012101-QQ-SL-001
0 0.073 0.072 0.083 0.065 0.009 Cs-137 3
-L3012104-CR-GS-002
0 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.051 0.001 Cs-137 3
-L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S a Bold values ng Water Reac t ation Plan H-3 C-CV  -CV  -CV  0.-SS  -SB 18.400 0.-SS 15.500 0.-SM 0.364 0.-SM  S B 2.160 0.S M 2.890 0.S S 2.190 0.indicate concentration g t o r Table 2-15 C-14 Fe-55 N    .669 2.180 2
0 0.029 0.027 0.033 0.026 0.004 2-54 d Survey Units Survey Unit 11,711 m2 Transmission Swi Co-60 None T Co-60 None T Co-60 None Taken No Scanning s - Characteriz L3012102 3
  .71 7 2.390 2.708 2.330 2.342 2.710 0  .670 1.950 1.672 2.720 1.676 4.240 1 greater than MDC. Ital i 5 Class 3 As p Ni-59 Co-60 N 0.028  0.035 .020 0.031 3 0.025 .870 0.016 5.660 0.020 3 0.739 0.022 1 0.015 .750 0.021 3.990 0.037 3.880 0.029 3icized values indicate M p halt, Sedimen t Ni-63 Sr-90 N  0  0.590 0.374 0  0.640 0.309 0.890 0.295 0.090 0.152 0  0.060 0.325 0.500 0.298 0.300 0.329 0 MDC value 2-55 t and Soil Sam p Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.030  0 0.026  0 0.02 7 0.521 0 0.01 7  0 0.014 0.550 0 0.01 7 0.603 0 0.01 7 0.360 0 0.013  0 0.018 0.469 0 0.020 0.651 0 0.020 0.631 0 p les - Test A m s-137 Pm-147 E u 0.026  0 0.033  0 0.02 7 1.480 0.113  0 0.015 0.899 0.059 1.090 0 0.020 0.333 0.066  0 0.025 0.818 0.094 0.818 0.138 0.667 0 m erica Laborat o u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.043 0.221 0 0.062 0.271 0 0.056 0.249 0 0.052 0.157 0 0.036 0.128 0 0.04 7 0.116 0 0.042 0.153 0 0.035 0.128 0 0.053 0.160 0 0.074 0.217 0 0.068 0.181 0 o r y Anal y sis (p u-155 Np-237 P u 0.059  0.056  0.069 0.025 0 0.059  0.036 0.039 0 0.054 0.028 0 0.034 0.009 0 0.04 7  0.054 0.022 0 0.071 0.006 0 0.080 0.020 0 p Ci/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 P u    0.046 0.018 1  0.035 0.022 2 0.028 0.022 2 0.016 0.013 0  0.02 7 0.021 1 0.031 0.017 1 0.043 0.026 1 u-241 Am-241 A 0.053  0.055 1.690 0.019 0 0.052 2.590 0.023 0 2.640 0.019 0 0.79 7 0.009 0 0.036 1.610 0.016 0 1.560 0.016 0 1.580 0.019 0 A m-243 Cm-243/244    0.021 0.006 0.029 0.027 0.021 0.006 0.009 0.011 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.019 0.021 La Cros s License T Revisio n  H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240
tchyard Area P
G Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Performed zation Survey S Survey Unit L 31,012 m2 Plant Access, ISF Grounds Co-60 5
0 0.063 0.064 0.078 0.053 0.010 Co-60 4
0 0.072 0.072 0.100 0.046 0.023 Co-60 7
0 0.062 0.055 0.080 0.047 0.013 1%
5,890 6,400 Summary L3012109 SI Haul Road Cs-137 5
5 0.152 0.143 0.267 0.075 0.078 Cs-137 4
0 0.066 0.059 0.101 0.045 0.025 Cs-137 7
0 0.059 0.052 0.079 0.028 0.019 0
0  


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244  
L L
R R
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L a
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012101-CR-GC-001-L3012101-CR-GC-002-L3012101-CR-GC-003-L3012101-CR-GS-003-L3012101-QQ-GS-001-L3012101-QQ-GS-001-L3012101-QQ-SL-001-L3012104-CR-GS-002-L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S a
Bold values ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C
-CV
-CV
-CV 0.
-SS
-SB 18.400 0.
-SS 15.500 0.
-SM 0.364 0.
-SM SB 2.160 0.
SM 2.890 0.
SS 2.190 0.
indicate concentration g tor Table 2-15 C-14 Fe-55 N
.669 2.180 2
.717 2.390 2
.708 2.330 2
.342 2.710 0
.670 1.950 1
.672 2.720 1
.676 4.240 1
greater than MDC. Itali 5
Class 3 Asp Ni-59 Co-60 N
0.028 0.035
.020 0.031 3
0.025
.870 0.016 5
.660 0.020 3
0.739 0.022 1
0.015
.750 0.021 3
.990 0.037 3
.880 0.029 3
icized values indicate M phalt, Sediment Ni-63 Sr-90 N
0 0
.590 0.374 0
0
.640 0.309 0
.890 0.295 0
.090 0.152 0
0
.060 0.325 0
.500 0.298 0
.300 0.329 0
MDC value 2-55 t and Soil Samp Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.030 0
0.026 0
0.027 0.521 0
0.017 0
0.014 0.550 0
0.017 0.603 0
0.017 0.360 0
0.013 0
0.018 0.469 0
0.020 0.651 0
0.020 0.631 0
ples - Test Am s-137 Pm-147 Eu 0.026 0
0.033 0
0.027 1.480 0
.113 0
0.015 0.899 0
.059 1.090 0
0.020 0.333 0
.066 0
0.025 0.818 0
.094 0.818 0
.138 0.667 0
merica Laborato u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.043 0.221 0
0.062 0.271 0
0.056 0.249 0
0.052 0.157 0
0.036 0.128 0
0.047 0.116 0
0.042 0.153 0
0.035 0.128 0
0.053 0.160 0
0.074 0.217 0
0.068 0.181 0
ory Analysis (p u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.059 0.056 0.069 0.025 0
0.059 0.036 0.039 0
0.054 0.028 0
0.034 0.009 0
0.047 0.054 0.022 0
0.071 0.006 0
0.080 0.020 0
pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.018 1
0.035 0.022 2
0.028 0.022 2
0.016 0.013 0
0.027 0.021 1
0.031 0.017 1
0.043 0.026 1
u-241 Am-241 A
0.053 0.055 1.690 0.019 0
0.052 2.590 0.023 0
2.640 0.019 0
0.797 0.009 0
0.036 1.610 0.016 0
1.560 0.016 0
1.580 0.019 0
Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.021 0.006 0.029 0.027 0.021 0.006 0.009 0.011 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.019 0.021


H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240  
La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 T
B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.950
-0.162 9.130 0.000 11.500 39.300 6.910
-0.120 0.024 7500 2.580 0.266 0.369 0.009 0.176 0.132 0.902 0.407 0.028 0.0579 B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 7.240
-0.492 9.450 0.000 57.700 202.000 34.500 0.191
-0.189 614.000 0.768 0.335
-0.429 0.000 0.528 0.491 7.470 1.450 0.052 0.0879 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-16 CJ-FC-001-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.590 1
1.400 0
16.000 7
0.254 0
0.377 1
0.402 4
0.043 0
0.312 0
0.566 0
7.090 78 9.020 5
2.410 0
4.440 1
0.042 0
0.056 0
0.048 0
2.700 1
0.048 0
0.046 0
0.0302 0.
CJ-FC-003-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.360 1
1.460 0
9.040 4
0.365 0
0.333 5
0.593 21 0.040 3
0.392 0
0.586 0
0.732 64 2.870 1
5.460 0
1.510 0
0.041 0
0.058 0
0.030 0
2.640 2
0.047 0
0.027 0
0.0408 0.
r Concrete 0-1/2 B
R pCi/g)
(p
.350 9
.793
-0
.880 10
.325 0
.250 0
.110 3
.680 0
.189 0
.330 0
1.000 9
.230
-0
.398 0
.140 0
.021
-0
.065
-0
.055
-0
.660
-1
.107 0
.030 0
0371
-0 0-1/2 B
R pCi/g)
(p
.580 12
.806
-0
.950 6
.806 0
.880 0
1.100 2
.330 0
.203
-0
.330
-0 4.000 2
.300 0
.536 0
.914
-0
.016
-0
.111
-0
.104
-0
.160
-1
.250 0
.033 0
0496 0.
2-56 Core Isotop B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
9.720 1.56 0.346 1.44 0.400 21.3 0.000 0.26 0.082 0.16 3.850 0.42 0.162 0.05 0.001 0.13 0.076 0.52 9.660 0.15 0.039 0.51 0.025 1.26 0.071 0.37 0.002 0.04 0.017 0.06 0.006 0.04 1.510 2.50 0.011 0.03 0.014 0.03
.0081 0.04 B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
2.600 1.57 0.566 1.39 6.160 14.3 0.000 0.25 0.435 0.05 2.990 0.40 0.304 0.05 0.001 0.15 0.129 0.59 2.450 0.11 0.045 0.34 0.179 1.02 0.007 0.28 0.010 0.05 0.005 0.06 0.004 0.04 1.320 2.66 0.018 0.03 0.009 0.03
.0000 0.01 pic Analysis C-001-CV 1/2-1 DC


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 T B1001101-CResult (pCi/g) 3.950 -0.162 9.130 0.000 11.500 39.300 6.910 -0.120 0.024 7500 2.580 0.266 0.369 0.009 0.176 0.132 0.902 0.407 0.028 0.0579  B1001101-CResult (pCi/g) 7.240 -0.492 9.450 0.000 57.700 202.000 34.500 0.191 -0.189 614.000 0.768 0.335 -0.429 0.000 0.528 0.491 7.470 1.450 0.052 0.0879 W ater Reacto r Plan T able 2-16 C J-FC-001-CV 0MDC (pCi/g) (p1.590 11.400 016.000 70.254 00.377 10.402 40.043 00.312 00.566 07.090 789.020 52.410 04.440 10.042 00.056 00.048 02.700 10.048 00.046 00.0302 0. C J-FC-003-CV 0MDC (pCi/g) (p1.360 11.460 09.040 40.365 00.333 50.593 2 10.040 30.392 00.586 00.732 6 42.870 15.460 01.510 00.041 00.058 00.030 02.640 20.047 00.027 00.0408 0. r Concrete 0-1/2  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.350  9.793  -0.880  1 0.325  0.250  0.110  3.680  0.189  0.330  01.000  9.230  -0.398  0.140  0.021  -0.065  -0.055  -0.660  -1.107  0.030  00371  -0  0-1/2  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.580  1 2.806  -0.950  6.806  0.880  0 1.100  2.330  0.203  -0.330  -0 4.000  2.300  0.536  0.914  -0.016  -0.111  -0.104  -0.160  -1.250  0.033  00496  0.2-56 Core Isoto p B 1001101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/9.720 1.5 6 0.346 1.4 4 0.400 21.3 0.000 0.2 6 0.082 0.1 6 3.850 0.4 2 0.162 0.0 5 0.001 0.1 3 0.076 0.5 2 9.660 0.1 5 0.039 0.5 1 0.025 1.2 6 0.071 0.3 7 0.002 0.0 4 0.017 0.0 6 0.006 0.0 4 1.510 2.5 0 0.011 0.0 3 0.014 0.0 3.0081 0.0 4 B 1001101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/2.600 1.5 7 0.566 1.3 9 6.160 14.3 0.000 0.2 5 0.435 0.0 5 2.990 0.4 0 0.304 0.0 5 0.001 0.1 5 0.129 0.5 9 2.450 0.1 1 0.045 0.3 4 0.179 1.0 2 0.007 0.2 8 0.010 0.0 5 0.005 0.0 6 0.004 0.0 4 1.320 2.6 6 0.018 0.0 3 0.009 0.0 3.0000 0.01 p ic Anal y si s C-001-CV 1/2-1 D C /g) (pCi/g)60 1.950 40 0.806 300 10.20 0 64 0.151 68 0.078 25 0.474 51 0.041 39 0.078 26 0.310 52 1.100 11 0.055 60 0.171 76 0.118 45 0.017 66 0.026 49 0.018 00 1.360 37 0.020 30 0.019 478 0.009 4 C-003-CV 1/2-1 D C /g) (pCi/g)70 2.240 90 0.765 300 6.960 57 0.157 57 0.096 00 0.392 51 0.052 53 0.086 96 0.339 13 0.348 46 0.154 20 0.383 82 0.164 51 0.018 64 0.029 47 0.017 60 1.480 38 0.024 30 0.01668 0.004 7 s Results B1001 Resul t (pCi/g) 3.640  -0.27 0 0  11.30 0 0.000  0.800  4.860  11.60 0 -0.01 7 -0.10 4 450.00 0.173  -0.00 8 0.145  -0.01 0 0.575  0.715  13.20 0 0.550  -0.03 6 4  0.154 0  B1001 Resul t (pCi/g) 4.490  -0.55 5 7.600  0.000  28.10 0 88.30 0 11.00 0 -0.01 6 0.153  213.00 0.162  0.557  0.108  -0.02 0 0.413  0.336  -7.72 0 0.614  0.052 7  -0.054 7 101-CJ-FC-002 t MDC  (pCi/g) 1.620 0 1.410 0 9.950 0.289 0.117 0.492 0 0.046 7 0.165 4 0.564 0 0.597 2.150 8 1.460 0.837 0 0.042 0.617 0.466 0 23.500 0.401 6 0.433 0 0.4670  101-CJ-FC-004 t MDC  (pCi/g) 1.590 5 1.450 7.070 0.276 0 0.190 0 0.467 0 0.045 6 0.264 0.592 0 0.439 1.570 3.070 0.850 0 0.060 0.426 0.325 0 26.000 0.441 0.292 7 0.4320 -CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 1.330 0.794 5.540 0.183 0.172 0.581 1.130 0.095 0.322 46.900 0.924 0.820 0.503 0.009 0.436 0.413 15.100 0.419 0.140 0.2600  -CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 1.420 0.795 4.040 0.467 2.950 9.200 1.070 0.155 0.352 22.200 0.611 0.863 0.138 0.020 0.320 0.265 14.400 0.436 0.136 0.0776 La Cros s License T Revisio n H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240
/g)
(pCi/g) 60 1.950 40 0.806 300 10.200 64 0.151 68 0.078 25 0.474 51 0.041 39 0.078 26 0.310 52 1.100 11 0.055 60 0.171 76 0.118 45 0.017 66 0.026 49 0.018 00 1.360 37 0.020 30 0.019 478 0.0094 C-003-CV 1/2-1 DC


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244
/g)
(pCi/g) 70 2.240 90 0.765 300 6.960 57 0.157 57 0.096 00 0.392 51 0.052 53 0.086 96 0.339 13 0.348 46 0.154 20 0.383 82 0.164 51 0.018 64 0.029 47 0.017 60 1.480 38 0.024 30 0.016 68 0.0047 s Results B1001 Result (pCi/g) 3.640
-0.270 0
11.300 0.000 0.800 4.860 11.600
-0.017
-0.104 450.00 0.173
-0.008 0.145
-0.010 0.575 0.715 13.200 0.550
-0.036 4
0.1540 B1001 Result (pCi/g) 4.490
-0.555 7.600 0.000 28.100 88.300 11.000
-0.016 0.153 213.00 0.162 0.557 0.108
-0.020 0.413 0.336
-7.720 0.614 0.052 7
-0.0547 101-CJ-FC-002 t
MDC (pCi/g) 1.620 0
1.410 0
9.950 0.289 0.117 0.492 0
0.046 7
0.165 4
0.564 0
0.597 2.150 8
1.460 0.837 0
0.042 0.617 0.466 0
23.500 0.401 6
0.433 0
0.4670 101-CJ-FC-004 t
MDC (pCi/g) 1.590 5
1.450 7.070 0.276 0
0.190 0
0.467 0
0.045 6
0.264 0.592 0
0.439 1.570 3.070 0.850 0
0.060 0.426 0.325 0
26.000 0.441 0.292 7
0.4320
-CV 0-1/2


H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Table 2-B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 2.960 -0.077 8.070 2.590 73.900 221.000 32.800 -0.089 0.178 65.700 0.395 0.637 0.011 0.005 0.706 0.489 9.090 1.590 0.048 0.1160  B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.590 -0.246 6.030 0.000 -0.026 2.310 0.146 0.019 0.024 1.410 0.021 0.055 0.003 0.003 -0.004 0.035 -1.890 0.006 -0.002 -0.0036 W ater Reacto r Plan -16 (contin u C J-FC-005-CV 0MDC (pCi/g) (p1.520 11.410 09.770 50.267 00.372 70.427 2 30.043 30.531 00.562 00.569 61.240 05.650 00.699 00.015 00.065 00.035 02.540 20.045 00.031 00.0443 0. C J-WC-006-CV MDC (pCi/g) (p1.640 11.490 014.500 70.257 00.207 00.396 00.038 00.141 00.556 00.153 00.434 01.270 00.336 00.045 00.043 00.033 02.360 10.036 00.031 00.0287 0. r u ed) C o 0-1/2  B  R pCi/g)  (p.200  4.810  -0.230  8.813  0.510  0 3.000  4.170  0.317  -0.336  -0.970  0.746  0.831  0.414  0.010  -0.134  -0.106  -0.270  0.273  0.034  -00590  0  1/2-1   R pCi/g)  (p.350  0.836  0.050  1.147  0.240  0.335  2.034  0.060  0.324  -0.258  1 6.113  0.137  0.196  0.021  0.016  0.028  -0.270  -1.017  0.005  -00052  0 2-57 o ncrete Co r B 1001101-CJ-F C Result M D pCi/g) (pCi/4.180 1.8 5 0.701 1.3 5 8.170 9.8 7 0.000 0.2 7 0.075 0.1 7 4.870 0.4 3 0.423 0.0 5 0.015 0.1 2 0.124 0.5 4 0.801 0.1 1 0.001 0.3 7 0.119 0.9 2 0.013 0.2 5 0.017 0.0 5 0.003 0.0 5 0.008 0.0 3 0.337 2.5 3 0.012 0.0 1 0.002 0.0 5.0000 0.01 B1008101-CJ
(pCi/g) 1.330 0.794 5.540 0.183 0.172 0.581 1.130 0.095 0.322 46.900 0.924 0.820 0.503 0.009 0.436 0.413 15.100 0.419 0.140 0.2600
-Result M D pCi/g) (pCi/0.382 0.9 4 0.053 1.3 7 1.610 6.5 5 0.000 0.2 3 0.662 0.0 6 2.730 0.3 5 0.154 0.0 5 0.000 0.2 1 0.010 0.5 7 6.000 0.1 7 0.034 0.6 3 0.060 1.2 0 0.140 0.3 5 0.003 0.0 4 0.018 0.0 6 0.011 0.0 5 1.120 2.7 1 0.020 0.0 4 0.002 0.0 4.0062 0.01 r e Isotopic A C-005-CV 1/2-1 D C  i/g) (pCi/g)50 1.520 50 0.733 70 5.340 70 0.165 71 0.080 30 0.570 51 0.063 28 0.074 40 0.307 17 0.172 73 0.005 23 0.245 55 0.148 54 0.016 53 0.023 38 0.008 30 1.510 18 0.017 54 0.02276 0.0049 -FC-002-CV D C  i/g) (pCi/g)40 0.559 70 0.794 50 3.370 34 0.151 65 0.131 53 0.355 53 0.041 11 0.066 79 0.335 77 1.780 33 0.056 00 0.239 57 0.215 48 0.022 60 0.033 54 0.019 10 1.480 42 0.027 44 0.01787 0.0125 A nal y sis Re B1001 Resul t  (pCi/g) 4.210  0.077  11.70 0 0.000  2.040  13.40 0 7.150  0.026  0.083  1490  0.031  0.128  0.737  -0.013 0.029  0.035  -1.380 0.048  0.003  -0.005 3  B1 0 Resul t  (pCi/g) 1.300  -0.296 6.460  0.000  0.974  4.400  0.235  0.016  -0.005 10.00 0 0.291  0.019  0.101  -0.024 0.042  0.008  -0.194 0.019  -0.001 -0.005 6 e sults 101-CJ-WC-00 6 t MDC ) (pCi/g) 1.700 1.440 0 9.320 0.263 0.047 0 0.420 0.034 0.154 0.580 0.721 3.660 1.190 1.470  0.044 0.037 0.025  2.650 0.052 0.029 3 0.0419  0 08101-CJ-FC-0 t MDC ) (pCi/g) 1.020  1.440 14.500 0.241 0.142 0.356 0.035 0.141  0.592 0 0.154 0.470 1.410 0.348  0.068 0.057 0.034  2.550 0.051  0.052 6 0.0444 6-CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 1.440 0.832 5.530 0.230 0.264 1.430 0.703 0.090 0.341 155.000 2.210 0.679 0.896 0.010 0.027 0.026 1.470 0.041 0.011 0.0075  0 03-CV (pCi/g) 0.713 0.810 7.050 0.171 0.162 0.510 0.041 0.081 0.343 1.130 0.270 0.052 0.208 0.025 0.038 0.017 1.470 0.029 0.023 0.0080 La Cros s License T Revisio n  H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240
-CV 0-1/2  


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244
(pCi/g) 1.420 0.795 4.040 0.467 2.950 9.200 1.070 0.155 0.352 22.200 0.611 0.863 0.138 0.020 0.320 0.265 14.400 0.436 0.136 0.0776


H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240  
La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 2.960
-0.077 8.070 2.590 73.900 221.000 32.800
-0.089 0.178 65.700 0.395 0.637 0.011 0.005 0.706 0.489 9.090 1.590 0.048 0.1160 B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.590
-0.246 6.030 0.000
-0.026 2.310 0.146 0.019 0.024 1.410 0.021 0.055 0.003 0.003
-0.004 0.035
-1.890 0.006
-0.002
-0.0036 Water Reactor Plan
-16 (continu CJ-FC-005-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.520 1
1.410 0
9.770 5
0.267 0
0.372 7
0.427 23 0.043 3
0.531 0
0.562 0
0.569 6
1.240 0
5.650 0
0.699 0
0.015 0
0.065 0
0.035 0
2.540 2
0.045 0
0.031 0
0.0443 0.
CJ-WC-006-CV MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.640 1
1.490 0
14.500 7
0.257 0
0.207 0
0.396 0
0.038 0
0.141 0
0.556 0
0.153 0
0.434 0
1.270 0
0.336 0
0.045 0
0.043 0
0.033 0
2.360 1
0.036 0
0.031 0
0.0287 0.
r ued)
Co 0-1/2 B
R pCi/g)
(p
.200 4
.810
-0
.230 8
.813 0
.510 0
3.000 4
.170 0
.317
-0
.336
-0
.970 0
.746 0
.831 0
.414 0
.010
-0
.134
-0
.106
-0
.270 0
.273 0
.034
-0 0590 0
1/2-1 R
pCi/g)
(p
.350 0
.836 0
.050 1
.147 0
.240 0
.335 2
.034 0
.060 0
.324
-0
.258 16
.113 0
.137 0
.196 0
.021 0
.016 0
.028
-0
.270
-1
.017 0
.005
-0 0052 0
2-57 oncrete Cor B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
4.180 1.85 0.701 1.35 8.170 9.87 0.000 0.27 0.075 0.17 4.870 0.43 0.423 0.05 0.015 0.12 0.124 0.54 0.801 0.11 0.001 0.37 0.119 0.92 0.013 0.25 0.017 0.05 0.003 0.05 0.008 0.03 0.337 2.53 0.012 0.01 0.002 0.05
.0000 0.01 B1008101-CJ-Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
0.382 0.94 0.053 1.37 1.610 6.55 0.000 0.23 0.662 0.06 2.730 0.35 0.154 0.05 0.000 0.21 0.010 0.57 6.000 0.17 0.034 0.63 0.060 1.20 0.140 0.35 0.003 0.04 0.018 0.06 0.011 0.05 1.120 2.71 0.020 0.04 0.002 0.04
.0062 0.01 re Isotopic A C-005-CV 1/2-1 DC


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Table 2-B10081 0Result (pCi/g) 1.200 0.077 6.520 0.000 1.390 4.260 0.216 0.001 0.043 19.800 -0.119 -0.061 0.006 0.014 0.020 0.025 -1.610 0.052 -0.004 0.0100  B1002101-CResult (pCi/g) 0.763 -0.776 3.540 0.000 0.742 3.360 2.410 0.035 0.259 3.630 0.156 0.119 0.159 0.000 0.023 0.000 -0.052 0.020 0.013 0.0048 W ater Reacto r Plan -16 (contin u 0 1-CJ-FC-004-CMDC (pCi/g) (p0.990 01.430 011.500 50.229 00.095 00.339 00.040 00.143 00.599 00.166 20.580 01.370 00.376 00.065 00.052 00.042 02.610 10.034 00.032 00.0150 0. C J-FC-001-CV MDC (pCi/g) (p1.000 01.410 05.670 30.228 00.069 00.333 00.050 00.149 00.564 00.150 00.420 01.400 00.335 00.045 00.061 00.049 02.820 10.015 00.029 00.0143 0. r u ed) C o C V  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.685  0.829  0.820  1 5.162  6 5.255  9 5.492  81.041  9 9.081  0.350  0.150  4.344  0.296  1.220  0.035  -0.030  0.028  1.430  5.035  3.006  00142  0. 1-1.5  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.638  0.763  0.150  7.159  0.148 0.407  5.250  0.066  -0.342  0.493  2.236  0.382  0.204  0.018  -0.035  0.021  0.640  -2.020  0.018  00096  0.2-58 o ncrete Co r B 1002101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/0.820 0.9 8 0.505 1.4 1 5.400 13.8 5.500 0.3 1 5.000 0.4 27.000 0.4 7 9.800 0.0 4 0.098 0.4 7 0.113 0.5 6 4710 1.6 9 0.815 5.9 4.250 5.4 6 0.073 2.1 2 0.012 0.0 6 0.920 0.6 2.280 0.4 6 5.240 26.7 3.200 0.4 2 0.406 0.2 9.2020 0.4 2 B 1002101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/0.094 0.9 1 0.372 1.3 8 7.770 25.0 0.000 0.2 5 0.872 0.1 3 5.730 0.3 8 0.106 0.0 4 0.034 0.1 4 0.032 0.5 2 2.440 0.1 4 0.125 0.3 8 0.271 0.9 5 0.099 0.3 2 0.007 0.0 5 0.004 0.0 6 0.009 0.0 4 2.090 2.7 0 0.017 0.0 4 0.029 0.0 2.0059 0.03 r e Isotopic A C-001-CV 0-1/2 D C /g) (pCi/g)85 0.637 10 0.850 800 7.430 10 8.690 20 9.600 72 85.00 0 45 9.600 75 0.149 64 0.333 90 491.00 0 40 1.410 60 1.980 20 1.280 60 0.023 20 0.511 69 0.537 700 16.20 0 28 0.989 96 0.310 200 0.267 0 C-001-CV 1.5-2 D C /g) (pCi/g)17 0.512 80 0.819 000 11.40 0 59 0.188 38 0.161 88 0.646 41 0.032 42 0.083 28 0.308 46 0.343 83 0.195 56 0.406 26 0.196 52 0.019 61 0.030 41 0.021 00 1.460 41 0.025 29 0.026 331 0.015 4 A nal y sis Re B100 2 Resul t (pCi/g) 0.275  -0.01 8 0.547  0.000  1.010 0  5.640  0.253  0.029  -0.10 1 0  3.870  0.039  -0.26 0 0.077  -0.02 2 0.017 -0.00 5 0  -0.98 4 0.035  -0.01 8 0  -0.004 6  B100 2 Resul t (pCi/g) 1.710  15.40 0 0  8.960  423.00 300.00 2360  220.00 -0.35 0 0.792  2540 0 0.510  4.650  1.060  0.024  3.200  2.580  36.90 0 9.080  0.305 4  0.428 0 e sults 2 101-CJ-FC-001 t MDC  (pCi/g) 0.931 8 1.440 5.510 0.245 0.149 0.367 0.053 0.102 1 0.507 0.137 0.444 0 1.480 0.272 2 0.064 0.059 5 0.042 4 2.680 0.037 8 0.054 6 0.0366  2 101-CJ-FC-002 t MDC  (pCi/g) 1.180 0 1.510 5.860 0 0.446 0 0.762 0.661 0 0.052 0 0.935 0.562 0 4.140 13.700 7.170 7.370 0.042 0.497 0.287 0 24.000 0.682 0.388 0 0.5450 -CV 1/2-1 (pCi/g) 0.543 0.824 2.840 0.170 0.168 0.633 0.049 0.054 0.289 0.496 0.107 0.859 0.162 0.023 0.033 0.013 1.510 0.031 0.013 0.0066  -CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 0.846 2.310 3.640 55.200 30.200 245.000 21.100 0.567 0.373 2650 0.956 4.390 0.988 0.027 0.825 0.713 17.100 2.030 0.286 0.4200 La Cros s License T Revisio n  H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240
i/g)
(pCi/g) 50 1.520 50 0.733 70 5.340 70 0.165 71 0.080 30 0.570 51 0.063 28 0.074 40 0.307 17 0.172 73 0.005 23 0.245 55 0.148 54 0.016 53 0.023 38 0.008 30 1.510 18 0.017 54 0.022 76 0.0049
-FC-002-CV DC


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244
i/g)
(pCi/g) 40 0.559 70 0.794 50 3.370 34 0.151 65 0.131 53 0.355 53 0.041 11 0.066 79 0.335 77 1.780 33 0.056 00 0.239 57 0.215 48 0.022 60 0.033 54 0.019 10 1.480 42 0.027 44 0.017 87 0.0125 Analysis Re B1001 Result (pCi/g) 4.210 0.077 11.700 0.000 2.040 13.400 7.150 0.026 0.083 1490 0.031 0.128 0.737
-0.013 0.029 0.035
-1.380 0.048 0.003
-0.0053 B10 Result (pCi/g) 1.300
-0.296 6.460 0.000 0.974 4.400 0.235 0.016
-0.005 10.000 0.291 0.019 0.101
-0.024 0.042 0.008
-0.194 0.019
-0.001
-0.0056 esults 101-CJ-WC-006 t
MDC
)
(pCi/g) 1.700 1.440 0
9.320 0.263 0.047 0
0.420 0.034 0.154 0.580 0.721 3.660 1.190 1.470 0.044 0.037 0.025 2.650 0.052 0.029 3
0.0419 008101-CJ-FC-0 t
MDC
)
(pCi/g) 1.020 1.440 14.500 0.241 0.142 0.356 0.035 0.141 0.592 0
0.154 0.470 1.410 0.348 0.068 0.057 0.034 2.550 0.051 0.052 6
0.0444 6-CV 0-1/2


s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Table 2-B1002101-CResult (pCi/g) 0.846 6.180 5.270 0.000 8.270 175.000 3.520 -0.041 0.165 208.000 -0.280 0.255 0.116 -0.019 0.059 0.056 -0.965 0.238 0.005 0.0018  W ater Reacto r Plan -16 (contin u C J-FC-002-CV 1MDC (pCi/g) (p1.120 01.420 125.300 1 10.269 00.114 00.442 1 80.047 00.230 00.522 00.362 2 11.580 01.900 00.864 00.056 00.064 00.049 02.970 10.048 00.060 00.0438 0. r u ed) C o 1/2-1  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.716  0.340  -0 1.400  8.616  0.907  8 8.300  7 0.356  7.135  0.312  0 1.700  1.950  0.259  0.205  -0.017  -0.046  0.040  0.690  1.080  0.028  -00179  0. 2-59 o ncrete Co r B 1002101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/0.836 0.9 6 0.405 1.4 4 8.430 17.0 0.000 0.3 3 8.570 0.1 4 0.600 0.5 4 7.000 0.0 5 0.038 0.2 1 0.062 0.5 4 1240 0.8 1 0.176 2.6 0 0.090 2.3 2 0.004 1.7 1 0.011 0.0 4 0.105 0.0 5 0.126 0.0 3.500 2.5 6 0.339 0.0 4 0.001 0.0 3.0175 0.01 r e Isotopic A C-003-CV 0-1/2 D C /g) (pCi/g)62 0.624 40 0.803 000 8.210 34 0.484 48 0.940 48 7.370 50 0.691 11 0.060 43 0.318 17 129.00 0 00 0.514 20 0.202 10 1.030 44 0.009 56 0.051 39 0.051 60 1.640 44 0.099 37 0.01275 0.0203 A nal y sis Re                      0                    3    e sults     
(pCi/g) 1.440 0.832 5.530 0.230 0.264 1.430 0.703 0.090 0.341 155.000 2.210 0.679 0.896 0.010 0.027 0.026 1.470 0.041 0.011 0.0075 003-CV  


La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Ta b W ater Reacto r Plan ble 2-17 19 8 W e Radio n Mn-Co-Co-Nb-Cs-1 Ce-1 r 8 3 Ground w e ll-Point S o n uclide 57 95 1 37 1 41 2-60 w ater Anal y o uth of Tur b A (p y sis from T e b ine Buildi n A ctivit y pCi/L) 63.4 6.4 508 21.4 21.7 18.9 e mporar y  ng L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Ju n  H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a B No v  H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a B ng Water Reac t ation Plan e 2013 MW-2 0 (pCi/L 57 2 6 0 4.0 0 9 0 2.0 5 137 3.9 7 B old values ind i v ember 2013 MW-2 0 (pCi/L 23 5 6 0 4.6 4 9 0 1.1 8 137 4.6 4 B old values ind i o r  Table 2 01-A MW-201-B L) (pCi/L)2 506 0 5.01 5 2.00 7 3.84 icate concentrat i 01-A MW-201-B L) (pCi/L)5 150 4 3.80 8 3.73 4 1.90 icate concentrat i 2-18 2013 G r B MW-202-A (pCi/L) 660 4.76 1.82 4.05 i on greater tha n B MW-202-A (pCi/L) 257 5.26 1.18 6.54 i on greater tha n 2-61 roundwater MMW-202-B M W (pCi/L) (p484 4.51 1.43 3.91 n MDC. Italiciz eMW-202-B M W (pCi/L) (p278 5.41 1.61 4.70 n MDC. Italiciz e onitorin g Res u W-203-A MW-2 p Ci/L) (pC iN/A 424.95 4.12.06 2.04.52 4.3 e d values indic a W-203-A MW-2 p Ci/L) (pC i449 234.43 3.81.87 2.44.41 3.9 e d values indic a ults 203-B MW-204-i/L) (pCi/L)20 397 12 4.36 06 2.18 31 4.11 a te MDC value.
(pCi/g) 0.713 0.810 7.050 0.171 0.162 0.510 0.041 0.081 0.343 1.130 0.270 0.052 0.208 0.025 0.038 0.017 1.470 0.029 0.023 0.0080
203-B MW-204-i/L) (pCi/L)35 193 89 4.52 40 1.18 98 4.77 a te MDC value.
 
-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 420 4.26 2.08 3.96 -A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 171 8.24 1.51 7.92 L L R J G A G B H C F N C N S N T C E E E P P 2 P A a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 J UNE 2014 MW- DW3 G ross A lpha 1.26E-0 1 G ross Beta 1.48E+0 H-3 1.05E+0 C-14 2.79E+0 F e-55 -2.00E+0 N i-59 1.83E+0 C o-60 1.02E+0 N i-63 -1.78E+0 Sr-90 6.09E-0 1 N b-94 4.40E-0 1 Tc-99 -8.28E+0 C s-137 -5.97E-0 E u-152 9.48E+0 0 E u-154 -5.24E+0 E u-155 -2.67E+0 P u-238 2.83E-0 2 P u-2 39/240 -9.61E-0 2 P u-241 3.51E+0 Am-241 5.39E-0 2 a Bold va l ng Water Reac t ation Plan MW- DW4 M D 1 -1.33E-01 4.4 4 0 3.13E+00 1.9 3 2 1.59E+02 1.9 40 0.00E+00 -3.
La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B100810 Result (pCi/g) 1.200 0.077 6.520 0.000 1.390 4.260 0.216 0.001 0.043 19.800
9 01 -3.12E+01 -2.
-0.119
61 3.96E+01 -4.
-0.061 0.006 0.014 0.020 0.025
70 3.94E-01 2.5 00 -6.14E+00 -7.
-1.610 0.052
4 1 8.99E-02 8.
-0.004 0.0100 B1002101-C Result (pCi/g) 0.763
9 1 1.43E-01 -1.
-0.776 3.540 0.000 0.742 3.360 2.410 0.035 0.259 3.630 0.156 0.119 0.159 0.000 0.023 0.000
2 00 -7.37E+00 -8.
-0.052 0.020 0.013 0.0048 Water Reactor Plan
21 -3.47E-01 -7.
-16 (continu 01-CJ-FC-004-C MDC (pCi/g)
4 0 2.34E+00 -7.
(p 0.990 0
4 00 3.16E+00 1.3 5 00 1.46E+00 -1.
1.430 0
5 2 -4.77E-02 -2.
11.500 5
2 2 3.36E-02 3.
0.229 0
10 2.70E+00 -8.
0.095 0
3 2 3.42E-02 4.
0.339 0
6 l ues indicate co n t o r M W- D W5 MW- DW7 4E+00 -3.78E-01 3E+00 0.00E+00 4E+02 1.23E+02 97E+00 -5.08E+00 66E+01 -3.86E+01 75E+01 2.60E+01 0E+00 -2.42E+00 40E+00 -4.38E+00 9 9 E-02 1.78E-02 26E+00 7.49E-01 26E+00 -9.36E+00 4 5 E-01 -1.83E+00 43E+00 -5.51E+00 5E+00 -4.73E+00 5 4 E-01 -1.07E+02 2 2 E-02 8.22E-02 1 3 E-02 4.07E-01 39E+00 2.62E+00 6 5 E-03 -1.01E-02 ncentration gre a Tab l MW-B11R M W B11 A0.00E+00 7.33 E3.59E+00 -2.70 E2.45E+02 1.61E+9.06E+00 6.83E
0.040 0
+-3.19E+01 -3.75 E-4.16E+00 2.53E
0.143 0
+8.76E-01 -1.94 E-3.57E+00 0.00E
0.599 0
+7.34E-01 6.11 E-6.99E-01 1.53E
0.166 2
+-5.52E+00 -8.46 E1.24E+00 1.84E
0.580 0
+-9.93E-01 1.48E
1.370 0
+1.63E+00 -2.61 E1.60E+00 -4.47 E0.00E+00 4.09 E-2.54E-02 -3.39 E-5.72E+00 8.38 E1.22E-02 8.37 E ater than MDC.
0.376 0
le 2-19 2014 W-A R MW-     B2 2.13E+00 6 E-01 1.12E+01 4+02 1.60E+02 1+00 1.94E+00 -
0.065 0
2 E+01 -9.20E+00 -
0.052 0
4+00 -7.13E+00 3 E+00 -1.39E+00 -
0.042 0
1+00 -7.94E+00 1 E-01 6.52E-01 6+00 1.77E+00 6 E+00 -7.41E+00 -
2.610 1
8+00 1.37E+00 2+00 1.07E-01 1 E+00 2.36E+00 1 E+00 1.60E+00 -
0.034 0
3 E-02 5.40E-02 8 E-02 3.40E-02 1 E-01 0.00E+00
0.032 0
-E-02 3.98E-03 2 Italicized valu e 2-62 Groundwater MW-      B3 MW- 200-A 6.46E-01 4.04E+0 0 4.14E+00 8.66E+0 0 1.94E+02 5.23E+0 1 2.05E+00 9.26E+0 0 4.39E+01 1.93E+0 1 3.15E+01 -2.18E+0 1.13E+00 1.01E+0 0 1.50E+00 -1.97E+0 6.12 E-01 9.86E-0 1 6.65 E-01 1.08E+0 0 8.10E+00 3.55E+0 0 2.14E+00 1.77E-0 1 1.42E+01 9.71E+0 0 1.69E+00 5.77E-0 1 3.17E+00 -3.63E+0 8.29 E-02 -1.38E-0 2 1.46 E-01 2.68E-0 2-7.39E-01 0.00E+0 0 2.28 E-02 1.72E-0 1 es indicate MD C Monitorin g R e    MW-    200-B M 2 0 0 -2.26E-01 3.8 4 0 -1.79E+00 7.2 6 1 1.24E+02 7.0 3 0 4.84E+00 4.8 4 1 -4.16E+01 -3.2 01 3.32E+01 -1.6 0 -1.27E+00 -6.
0.0150 0.
00 -4.69E+00 1.8 2 1 9.98E-01 6.8 6 0 8.47E-01 3.7 3 0 5.08E+00 3.9 2 1 -3.64E-01 3.1 0 0 -1.16E+01 4.1 5 1 5.60E-01 -2.3 90 -3.44E+00 -2.9 2 2 1.51E-02 5.3 3 2 -1.57E-02 -6.
CJ-FC-001-CV MDC (pCi/g)
8 0 4.49E+00 -4.
(p 1.000 0
8 1 9.71E-01 9.4 6 C value. e sults (pCi/L)
1.410 0
MW-     0 1-A MW-     201-B 4E-01 -1.04E+00 6E+00 -1.04E+00 3E+01 1.05E+02 4E+00 4.51E+00 0E+01 1.58E+01 7E+01 -7.11E+01 0 4 E-02 1.73E+00 2E+00 -1.91E+00 6E-02 1.02E+00 3E-01 1.80E+00 2E+00 1.17E+00 0E-01 -6.21E-01 5E+00 1.12E+01 9E+00 -2.43E+00 2E+00 -2.60E+00 3E-02 -5.02E-02 8 6 E-03 2.36E-02 8 5 E-01 -1.42E+00 6E-02 3.99E-03 MW-    202-A M W 202-1.06E+00 4.07E-4.34E+00 1.49E+3.36E+02 1.06E+0.00E+00 4.70E
5.670 3
+-3.26E+00 -4.54E
0.228 0
+2.49E+01 -1.05E
0.069 0
+-8.91E-01 1.02E
0.333 0
+-1.94E+00 -3.73E
0.050 0
+1.12E+00 6.05E--3.55E-01 1.04E
0.149 0
-3.88E-01 2.73E
0.564 0
+-4.64E-01 2.86E
0.150 0
+4.11E+00 1.08E+-1.12E+00 -1.18E
0.420 0
+-1.59E+00 -3.49E
1.400 0
+-8.46E-03 1.48E
0.335 0
--2.27E-02 -4.54 E2.20E+00 2.72E
0.045 0
+1.16E-01 3.92E-W-     B MW-     203-A -01 1.74E+00 -2+00 2.27E+00 5+02 2.79E+02 2+00 4.54E+00 4+01 -4.95E+01 -
0.061 0
4+01 -2.71E+01 -
0.049 0
4+00 3.48E 9+00 -3.70E+00 -
2.820 1
3-01 1.17E+00 8-01 1.59E+00 1
0.015 0
+00 4.36E+00 4+00 1.48E+00 1
0.029 0
+01 -9.59E-01 4+00 1.93E+00 -
0.0143 0.
3+00 -4.91E+00 4-01 -5.67E 5-02 -2.27E 3+00 4.07E+00 1
r ued)
-02 2.94E-02 7MW-      203-B MW-  204-A 2.29 E-01 7.58E-01 5.53E+00 2.69E+0 0 2.79E+02 1.06E+0 2 4.55E+00 4.66E+0 0 4.96E+01 -4.03E+0 1 4.66E+00 -6.22E+0 0 9.55 E-01 1.91E-01 3.80E+00 0.00E+0 0 8.23 E-01 2.01E+0 0.50E+00 2.26E-01 4.17E+00 6.95E+0 0.39E+00 -3.04E-0 1 4.99E+00 2.12E+0 0 3.69E+00 2.36+00 4.05E+00 -4.34E-0 1 5.87 E-02 -5.12E-0 2 3.95 E-02 -2.49E-0 2.03E+01 4.07E+0 0 7.64 E-02 1.56E-01    MW-     204-B 1.27E+00 0 2.57E-01 2 3.49E+01 0 1.30E+01 1 -3.98E+00 0 -2.47E+01 -2.31E-01 0 -1.97E+00 0 6.11E-01 1.28E+00 0 6.31E+00  1.93E+00 0 7.68E+00 6.06E-01  1.66E+00 2 -9.28E-03 2 6.28E-02 0 -1.89E+00 8.24E-02 L L R S G G H C F N C N S N T C E E E P P P A a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 September 201 4 M G ross Alpha 8 Gross Beta 2 H-3 3 C-14 -9 Fe-55 9 Ni-59 3 Co-60 2 Ni-63 2 Sr-90 -1 Nb-94 -9 Tc-99 -1 Cs-137 3 Eu-152 2 Eu-154 -3 Eu-155 2 Pu-238 1 Pu-239/240 9 Pu-241 3 Am-241 1 a Bold va l ng Water Reac t ation Plan 4 MW-DW5 MW-8.47E-01 3.09 E.96E+00 1.45 E.43E+01 0.00 E 9.44 E-01 -2.70 E 9.39E+00 -3.10 E.13E+00 1.64 E.17E+00 1.32 E.79E+00 2.48 E 1.06E+00 5.90 E 9.45 E-01 -1.39 E 1.54E+00 -4.0 0.97E+00 -7.2 4.48E+00 3.00 E 3.31E+00 -3.93 E.69E+00 1.95 E 1.71 E-02 3.69 E 9.28 E-02 0.00 E.18E+00 -3.68 E 1.28 E-01 3.69 E l ues indicate co n t o r -B11R MW-B11 A E+00 2.07E-0 E+01 3.04E-0 E+00 3.44E+
Co CV B
0 E+00 0.00E+
R pCi/g)
0 E+01 -3.49E+
(p
0 E+01 -8.49E+
.685 0
0 E+00 1.22E+
.829 0
0 E+00 -4.14E-0 E-01 2.80E-0 E+00 -1.29E-0 0E-01 -1.56E+
.820 15
0 4E-01 9.72E-0 E+00 6.42E+
.162 65
0 E+00 1.10E+
.255 95
0 E+00 1.69E+
.492 81
0 E-02 -5.50E-0 E+00 -1.10E-0 E+00 -2.29E+
.041 99
0 E-02 -1.69E-0 ncentration gre a Table 2-19 AR MW-200-A 0 1 2.42E-01 01 2.41E+00 01 6.86E+01 00 -4.56E-01 01 -3.35E+01 00 7.84E+00 0 0 3.56E+00 01 3.62E+00 0 1 1.14E+00 01 -1.43E+00 00 -1.57E+00 0 1 2.17E+01 00 -2.39E+00 00 -6.57E-01 00 -8.16E-01 03 2.65E-02 02 5.83E-02 00 -2.23E+00 02 1.10E-01 ater than MDC.
.081 0
(continued)MW-200-B 2.01E+00 9.11E+00 5.17E+01 -4.98E+00 -4.56E+01 2.37E+01 6.20E-01 -7.87E-01 5.10E-01 -2.68E-01 -1.54E+00 1.94E+00 -1.34E+01 -1.54E+00 -1.64E+00 -6.50E-03 0.00E+00 8.49E+00 2.29E-01 Italicized valu e 2-63 2014 Groun dMW-201-A M1.18E+00 7.36E+00 8.67E+01 2.69E+00 -2.18E+01 -1.99E+01 -7.23E-02 5.00E+00 -1.19E-01 6.56E-01 -7.94E-01 -1.09E+00 4.79E+00 -3.09E+00 -1.48E+00 -3.59E-02 0.00E+00 -6.92E-01 1.40E-01 es indicate MD C dwater Monit o MW-201-B M W1.43E+00 1.03.67E+00 4.8-3.42E+01 -5.
.350 0
19.28E-01 4.9 42.77E+01 -5.
.150 4
43.09E+01 -1.
.344 0
19.50E-01 9.
.296 1
72.15E+00 8.
.220 0
2-4.99E-01 6.
.035
76.44E-01 -6.
-0
4-1.95E+00 7.
.030 0
91.84E+00 -4.
.028 1
32.53E+00 9.41.94E+00 -3.
.430 5
64.13E+00 -2.
.035 3
08.55E-02 1.
.006 0
11.41E-01 5.8-5.85E-01 0.02.80E-02 6.
0142 0.
6 C value. o rin g Results (p W-202-A MW-2 04E+00 -2.10E-8 6 E-01 2.30E+18E+01 1.04E
1-1.5 B
+4E+00 -2.72E
R pCi/g)
+43E+01 3.37E
(p
+18E+01 -4.46E
.638 0
+7 2 E-01 1.18E+2 5 E-01 -8.30E
.763 0
-7 0 E-01 5.40E-4 8 E-02 -1.02E
.150 7
+9 7 E-01 -1.95E
.159 0
-3 4 E-01 2.31E+0E+00 6.51E+6 7 E-01 4.18E+08E+00 -8.41E
.148 0
-1 3 E-02 3.63E-8 7 E-02 5.25E-0E+00 -1.76E
.407 5
+6 2 E-02 9.48E-p Ci/L) 02-B MW-203-A E-01 1.37E+00+00 1.52E+00
.250 0
+02 -3.44E+0 1+00 -3.95E+0 0+01 -4.95E+0 1+01 5.30E+01
.066
-0
.342 0
.493 2
.236 0
.382 0
.204 0
.018
-0
.035 0
.021 0
.640
-2
.020 0
.018 0
0096 0.
2-58 oncrete Cor B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
0.820 0.98 0.505 1.41 5.400 13.8 5.500 0.31 5.000 0.42 7.000 0.47 9.800 0.04 0.098 0.47 0.113 0.56 4710 1.69 0.815 5.94
.250 5.46 0.073 2.12 0.012 0.06 0.920 0.62
.280 0.46 5.240 26.7 3.200 0.42 0.406 0.29
.2020 0.42 B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
0.094 0.91 0.372 1.38 7.770 25.0 0.000 0.25 0.872 0.13 5.730 0.38 0.106 0.04 0.034 0.14 0.032 0.52 2.440 0.14 0.125 0.38 0.271 0.95 0.099 0.32 0.007 0.05 0.004 0.06 0.009 0.04 2.090 2.70 0.017 0.04 0.029 0.02
.0059 0.03 re Isotopic A C-001-CV 0-1/2 DC
 
/g)
(pCi/g) 85 0.637 10 0.850 800 7.430 10 8.690 20 9.600 72 85.000 45 9.600 75 0.149 64 0.333 90 491.000 40 1.410 60 1.980 20 1.280 60 0.023 20 0.511 69 0.537 700 16.200 28 0.989 96 0.310 200 0.2670 C-001-CV 1.5-2 DC
 
/g)
(pCi/g) 17 0.512 80 0.819 000 11.400 59 0.188 38 0.161 88 0.646 41 0.032 42 0.083 28 0.308 46 0.343 83 0.195 56 0.406 26 0.196 52 0.019 61 0.030 41 0.021 00 1.460 41 0.025 29 0.026 331 0.0154 Analysis Re B1002 Result (pCi/g) 0.275
-0.018 0.547 0.000 1.010 0
5.640 0.253 0.029
-0.101 0
3.870 0.039
-0.260 0.077
-0.022 0.017
-0.005 0
-0.984 0.035
-0.018 0
-0.0046 B1002 Result (pCi/g) 1.710 15.400 0
8.960 423.00 300.00 2360 220.00
-0.350 0.792 25400 0.510 4.650 1.060 0.024 3.200 2.580 36.900 9.080 0.305 4
0.4280 esults 2101-CJ-FC-001 t
MDC (pCi/g) 0.931 8
1.440 5.510 0.245 0.149 0.367 0.053 0.102 1
0.507 0.137 0.444 0
1.480 0.272 2
0.064 0.059 5
0.042 4
2.680 0.037 8
0.054 6
0.0366 2101-CJ-FC-002 t
MDC (pCi/g) 1.180 0
1.510 5.860 0
0.446 0
0.762 0.661 0
0.052 0
0.935 0.562 0
4.140 13.700 7.170 7.370 0.042 0.497 0.287 0
24.000 0.682 0.388 0
0.5450
-CV 1/2-1
 
(pCi/g) 0.543 0.824 2.840 0.170 0.168 0.633 0.049 0.054 0.289 0.496 0.107 0.859 0.162 0.023 0.033 0.013 1.510 0.031 0.013 0.0066
-CV 0-1/2
 
(pCi/g) 0.846 2.310 3.640 55.200 30.200 245.000 21.100 0.567 0.373 2650 0.956 4.390 0.988 0.027 0.825 0.713 17.100 2.030 0.286 0.4200
 
La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B1002101-C Result (pCi/g) 0.846 6.180 5.270 0.000 8.270 175.000 3.520
-0.041 0.165 208.000
-0.280 0.255 0.116
-0.019 0.059 0.056
-0.965 0.238 0.005 0.0018 Water Reactor Plan
-16 (continu CJ-FC-002-CV 1 MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.120 0
1.420 1
25.300 11 0.269 0
0.114 0
0.442 18 0.047 0
0.230 0
0.522 0
0.362 21 1.580 0
1.900 0
0.864 0
0.056 0
0.064 0
0.049 0
2.970 1
0.048 0
0.060 0
0.0438 0.
r ued)
Co 1/2-1 B
R pCi/g)
(p
.716 0
.340
-0 1.400 8
.616 0
.907 8
8.300 70
.356 7
.135 0
.312 0
1.700 1
.950 0
.259 0
.205
-0
.017
-0
.046 0
.040 0
.690 1
.080 0
.028
-0 0179 0.
2-59 oncrete Cor B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
0.836 0.96 0.405 1.44 8.430 17.0 0.000 0.33 8.570 0.14 0.600 0.54 7.000 0.05 0.038 0.21 0.062 0.54 1240 0.81 0.176 2.60 0.090 2.32 0.004 1.71 0.011 0.04 0.105 0.05 0.126 0.03
.500 2.56 0.339 0.04 0.001 0.03
.0175 0.01 re Isotopic A C-003-CV 0-1/2 DC
 
/g)
(pCi/g) 62 0.624 40 0.803 000 8.210 34 0.484 48 0.940 48 7.370 50 0.691 11 0.060 43 0.318 17 129.000 00 0.514 20 0.202 10 1.030 44 0.009 56 0.051 39 0.051 60 1.640 44 0.099 37 0.012 75 0.0203 Analysis Re 0
3 esults
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Tab Water Reactor Plan ble 2-17 198 We Radion Mn-Co-Co-Nb-Cs-1 Ce-1 r
83 Groundw ell-Point So nuclide
-54
-57
-60
-95 137 141 2-60 water Analy outh of Turb A
(p ysis from Te bine Buildin Activity pCi/L) 63.4 6.4 508 21.4 21.7 18.9 emporary ng
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Jun H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a
B Nov H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a
B ng Water React ation Plan e 2013 MW-20 (pCi/L 572 60 4.00 90 2.05 137 3.97 Bold values indi vember 2013 MW-20 (pCi/L 235 60 4.64 90 1.18 137 4.64 Bold values indi or Table 2 01-A MW-201-B L)
(pCi/L) 2 506 0
5.01 5
2.00 7
3.84 icate concentrati 01-A MW-201-B L)
(pCi/L) 5 150 4
3.80 8
3.73 4
1.90 icate concentrati 2-18 2013 Gr B
MW-202-A (pCi/L) 660 4.76 1.82 4.05 ion greater than B
MW-202-A (pCi/L) 257 5.26 1.18 6.54 ion greater than 2-61 roundwater M MW-202-B MW (pCi/L)
(p 484 4.51 1.43 3.91 n MDC. Italicize MW-202-B MW (pCi/L)
(p 278 5.41 1.61 4.70 n MDC. Italicize onitoring Resu W-203-A MW-2 pCi/L)
(pCi N/A 42 4.95 4.1 2.06 2.0 4.52 4.3 ed values indica W-203-A MW-2 pCi/L)
(pCi 449 23 4.43 3.8 1.87 2.4 4.41 3.9 ed values indica ults 203-B MW-204-i/L)
(pCi/L) 20 397 12 4.36 06 2.18 31 4.11 ate MDC value.
203-B MW-204-i/L)
(pCi/L) 35 193 89 4.52 40 1.18 98 4.77 ate MDC value.
-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 420 4.26 2.08 3.96
-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 171 8.24 1.51 7.92
 
L L
R J
G A
G B
H C
F N
C N
S N
T C
E E
E P
P 2
P A
a La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 JUNE 2014 MW-DW3 Gross Alpha 1.26E-01 Gross Beta 1.48E+0 H-3 1.05E+0 C-14 2.79E+0 Fe-55
-2.00E+0 Ni-59 1.83E+0 Co-60 1.02E+0 Ni-63
-1.78E+0 Sr-90 6.09E-01 Nb-94 4.40E-01 Tc-99
-8.28E+0 Cs-137
-5.97E-0 Eu-152 9.48E+00 Eu-154
-5.24E+0 Eu-155
-2.67E+0 Pu-238 2.83E-02 Pu-239/240
-9.61E-02 Pu-241 3.51E+0 Am-241 5.39E-02 a
Bold val ng Water React ation Plan MW-DW4 M
D 1
-1.33E-01 4.44 0
3.13E+00 1.93 2
1.59E+02 1.94 0
0.00E+00  
-3.9 01  
-3.12E+01
-2.6 1
3.96E+01  
-4.7 0
3.94E-01 2.5 00
-6.14E+00  
-7.4 1
8.99E-02 8.9 1
1.43E-01  
-1.2 00  
-7.37E+00  
-8.2 1
-3.47E-01  
-7.4 0
2.34E+00  
-7.4 00 3.16E+00 1.35 00 1.46E+00
-1.5 2
-4.77E-02  
-2.2 2
3.36E-02 3.1 0
2.70E+00  
-8.3 2
3.42E-02 4.6 lues indicate con tor MW-DW5 MW-DW7 4E+00  
-3.78E-01 3E+00 0.00E+00 4E+02 1.23E+02 97E+00
-5.08E+00 66E+01  
-3.86E+01 75E+01 2.60E+01 0E+00  
-2.42E+00 40E+00
-4.38E+00 99E-02 1.78E-02 26E+00 7.49E-01 26E+00
-9.36E+00 45E-01  
-1.83E+00 43E+00
-5.51E+00 5E+00  
-4.73E+00 54E-01  
-1.07E+02 22E-02 8.22E-02 13E-02 4.07E-01 39E+00 2.62E+00 65E-03
-1.01E-02 ncentration grea Tabl MW-B11R MW B11A 0.00E+00 7.33E 3.59E+00
-2.70E 2.45E+02 1.61E+
9.06E+00 6.83E+
-3.19E+01
-3.75E
-4.16E+00 2.53E+
8.76E-01  
-1.94E
-3.57E+00 0.00E+
7.34E-01 6.11E
-6.99E-01 1.53E+
-5.52E+00
-8.46E 1.24E+00 1.84E+
-9.93E-01 1.48E+
1.63E+00  
-2.61E 1.60E+00
-4.47E 0.00E+00 4.09E
-2.54E-02  
-3.39E
-5.72E+00 8.38E 1.22E-02 8.37E ater than MDC.
le 2-19 2014 W-AR MW-B2
-01
-2.13E+00 6
E-01 1.12E+01 4
+02 1.60E+02 1
+00 1.94E+00
-2 E+01
-9.20E+00
-4
+00
-7.13E+00 3
E+00
-1.39E+00
-1
+00
-7.94E+00 1
E-01 6.52E-01 6
+00 1.77E+00 6
E+00
-7.41E+00
-8
+00 1.37E+00 2
+00 1.07E-01 1
E+00 2.36E+00 1
E+00 1.60E+00
-3 E-02 5.40E-02 8
E-02 3.40E-02 1
E-01 0.00E+00 E-02 3.98E-03 2
Italicized value 2-62 Groundwater MW-B3 MW-200-A 6.46E-01 4.04E+00 4.14E+00 8.66E+00 1.94E+02 5.23E+01 2.05E+00 9.26E+00 4.39E+01 1.93E+01 3.15E+01
-2.18E+0 1.13E+00 1.01E+00 1.50E+00
-1.97E+0 6.12E-01 9.86E-01 6.65E-01 1.08E+00 8.10E+00 3.55E+00 2.14E+00 1.77E-01 1.42E+01 9.71E+00 1.69E+00 5.77E-01 3.17E+00
-3.63E+0 8.29E-02
-1.38E-02 1.46E-01 2.68E-02
-7.39E-01 0.00E+00 2.28E-02 1.72E-01 es indicate MDC Monitoring Re MW-200-B M
20 0
-2.26E-01 3.84 0
-1.79E+00 7.26 1
1.24E+02 7.03 0
4.84E+00 4.84 1
-4.16E+01
-3.20 1
3.32E+01
-1.6 0
-1.27E+00
-6.0 0
-4.69E+00 1.82 1
9.98E-01 6.86 0
8.47E-01 3.73 0
5.08E+00 3.92 1
-3.64E-01 3.10 0
-1.16E+01 4.15 1
5.60E-01
-2.39 0
-3.44E+00
-2.92 2
1.51E-02 5.33 2
-1.57E-02
-6.8 0
4.49E+00
-4.8 1
9.71E-01 9.46 C value.
esults (pCi/L)
MW-01-A MW-201-B 4E-01
-1.04E+00 6E+00
-1.04E+00 3E+01 1.05E+02 4E+00 4.51E+00 0E+01 1.58E+01 7E+01
-7.11E+01 04E-02 1.73E+00 2E+00
-1.91E+00 6E-02 1.02E+00 3E-01 1.80E+00 2E+00 1.17E+00 0E-01
-6.21E-01 5E+00 1.12E+01 9E+00
-2.43E+00 2E+00
-2.60E+00 3E-02
-5.02E-02 86E-03 2.36E-02 85E-01
-1.42E+00 6E-02 3.99E-03 MW-202-A MW 202-1.06E+00 4.07E-4.34E+00 1.49E+
3.36E+02 1.06E+
0.00E+00 4.70E+
-3.26E+00
-4.54E+
2.49E+01
-1.05E+
-8.91E-01 1.02E+
-1.94E+00
-3.73E+
1.12E+00 6.05E-
-3.55E-01 1.04E-3.88E-01 2.73E+
-4.64E-01 2.86E+
4.11E+00 1.08E+
-1.12E+00
-1.18E+
-1.59E+00
-3.49E+
-8.46E-03 1.48E-
-2.27E-02
-4.54E 2.20E+00 2.72E+
1.16E-01 3.92E-W-
B MW-203-A
-01 1.74E+00
-2
+00 2.27E+00 5
+02 2.79E+02 2
+00 4.54E+00 4
+01
-4.95E+01
-4
+01
-2.71E+01
-4
+00 3.48E-02
-9
+00
-3.70E+00
-3
-01 1.17E+00 8
-01 1.59E+00 1
+00 4.36E+00 4
+00 1.48E+00 1
+01
-9.59E-01 4
+00 1.93E+00
-3
+00
-4.91E+00 4
-01
-5.67E-02
-5
-02
-2.27E-02
-3
+00 4.07E+00 1
-02 2.94E-02 7
MW-203-B MW-204-A 2.29E-01 7.58E-01 5.53E+00 2.69E+00 2.79E+02 1.06E+02 4.55E+00 4.66E+00 4.96E+01
-4.03E+01 4.66E+00
-6.22E+00 9.55E-01 1.91E-01 3.80E+00 0.00E+00 8.23E-01 2.01E+00
.50E+00 2.26E-01 4.17E+00 6.95E+00
.39E+00
-3.04E-01 4.99E+00 2.12E+00 3.69E+00 2.36+00 4.05E+00
-4.34E-01 5.87E-02
-5.12E-02 3.95E-02
-2.49E-02
.03E+01 4.07E+00 7.64E-02 1.56E-01 MW-204-B 1.27E+00 0
2.57E-01 2
3.49E+01 0
1.30E+01 1
-3.98E+00 0
-2.47E+01
-2.31E-01 0
-1.97E+00 0
6.11E-01 1.28E+00 0
6.31E+00 1.93E+00 0
7.68E+00 6.06E-01 1.66E+00 2
-9.28E-03 2
6.28E-02 0
-1.89E+00 8.24E-02
 
L L
R S
G G
H C
F N
C N
S N
T C
E E
E P
P P
A a
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 September 2014 M
Gross Alpha 8
Gross Beta 2
H-3 3
C-14
-9 Fe-55 9
Ni-59 3
Co-60 2
Ni-63 2
Sr-90
-1 Nb-94
-9 Tc-99
-1 Cs-137 3
Eu-152 2
Eu-154
-3 Eu-155 2
Pu-238 1
Pu-239/240 9
Pu-241 3
Am-241 1
a Bold val ng Water React ation Plan 4
MW-DW5 MW-8.47E-01 3.09E
.96E+00 1.45E
.43E+01 0.00E 9.44E-01
-2.70E 9.39E+00
-3.10E
.13E+00 1.64E
.17E+00 1.32E
.79E+00 2.48E 1.06E+00 5.90E 9.45E-01
-1.39E 1.54E+00
-4.00
.97E+00
-7.24
.48E+00 3.00E 3.31E+00
-3.93E
.69E+00 1.95E 1.71E-02 3.69E 9.28E-02 0.00E
.18E+00
-3.68E 1.28E-01 3.69E lues indicate con tor
-B11R MW-B11A E+00 2.07E-0 E+01 3.04E-0 E+00 3.44E+0 E+00 0.00E+0 E+01
-3.49E+0 E+01
-8.49E+0 E+00 1.22E+0 E+00
-4.14E-0 E-01 2.80E-0 E+00
-1.29E-0 0E-01
-1.56E+0 4E-01 9.72E-0 E+00 6.42E+0 E+00 1.10E+0 E+00 1.69E+0 E-02
-5.50E-0 E+00
-1.10E-0 E+00
-2.29E+0 E-02
-1.69E-0 ncentration grea Table 2-19 AR MW-200-A 01 2.42E-01 01 2.41E+00 01 6.86E+01 00
-4.56E-01 01
-3.35E+01 00 7.84E+00 00 3.56E+00 01 3.62E+00 01 1.14E+00 01
-1.43E+00 00
-1.57E+00 01 2.17E+01 00
-2.39E+00 00
-6.57E-01 00
-8.16E-01 03 2.65E-02 02 5.83E-02 00
-2.23E+00 02 1.10E-01 ater than MDC.
(continued)
MW-200-B 2.01E+00 9.11E+00 5.17E+01
-4.98E+00
-4.56E+01 2.37E+01 6.20E-01
-7.87E-01 5.10E-01
-2.68E-01
-1.54E+00 1.94E+00
-1.34E+01
-1.54E+00
-1.64E+00
-6.50E-03 0.00E+00 8.49E+00 2.29E-01 Italicized value 2-63 2014 Ground MW-201-A M
1.18E+00 7.36E+00 8.67E+01 2.69E+00
-2.18E+01
-1.99E+01
-7.23E-02 5.00E+00
-1.19E-01 6.56E-01
-7.94E-01
-1.09E+00 4.79E+00
-3.09E+00
-1.48E+00
-3.59E-02 0.00E+00
-6.92E-01 1.40E-01 es indicate MDC dwater Monito MW-201-B MW 1.43E+00 1.0 3.67E+00 4.8
-3.42E+01
-5.1 9.28E-01 4.94 2.77E+01
-5.4 3.09E+01
-1.1 9.50E-01 9.7 2.15E+00 8.2
-4.99E-01 6.7 6.44E-01
-6.4
-1.95E+00 7.9 1.84E+00
-4.3 2.53E+00 9.4 1.94E+00
-3.6 4.13E+00
-2.0 8.55E-02 1.1 1.41E-01 5.8
-5.85E-01 0.0 2.80E-02 6.6 C value.
oring Results (p W-202-A MW-20 4E+00
-2.10E-86E-01 2.30E+
18E+01 1.04E+
4E+00
-2.72E+
43E+01 3.37E+
18E+01
-4.46E+
72E-01 1.18E+
25E-01
-8.30E-70E-01 5.40E-48E-02
-1.02E+
97E-01
-1.95E-34E-01 2.31E+
0E+00 6.51E+
67E-01 4.18E+
08E+00
-8.41E-13E-02 3.63E-87E-02 5.25E-0E+00
-1.76E+
62E-02 9.48E-pCi/L) 02-B MW-203-A E-01 1.37E+00
+00 1.52E+00
+02
-3.44E+01
+00
-3.95E+00
+01
-4.95E+01
+01 5.30E+01
+00 3.67E+00 E-01 1.62E+00
+00 3.67E+00 E-01 1.62E+00
-01 4.80E-01
-01 4.80E-01
+00 8.53E-02 E-01 -1.24E+0 0+00 1.56E+00
+00 8.53E-02 E-01  
-1.24E+00
+00 1.56E+00
+00 4.06E+00
+00 4.06E+00
+00 -3.33E+0 0 E-01 -9.54E-02
+00  
-3.33E+00 E-01  
-9.54E-02
-02 7.08E-02
-02 7.08E-02
-02 9.15E-02
-02 9.15E-02
+00 5.04E-01
+00 5.04E-01
-02 2.51E-01 A MW-203-B -6.68E-01 1.00E+00 1.21E+02 0 4.89E-01 4.32E+01 -4.34E+01 1.99E+00 -1.77E+00 8.70E-01 2.16E+00 0 -3.32E+00 6.84E-01 -1.15E+00 0 -2.31E-01 -3.66E-01 8.12E-02 5.97E-02 -3.71E+00 1.03E-01 MW-204-A 6.00E-01 5.28E+00 6.88E+01 4.73E-01 3.45E+01 -3.13E+01 -3.77E-01 -1.84E-01 9.00E-01 1.18E-01 -1.96E+00 -1.14E+00 -1.92E+01 -4.95E+00 -2.02E+00 -6.45E-04 -5.48E-03 -3.97E+00 1.06E-01 MW-204-B 3.53E+00 0.00E+00 -1.21E+02 9.46E-01 -9.25E+01 -1.87E+01 2.05E+00 3.94E-01 2.30E-01 -1.88E+00 3.89E-01 1.24E+00 2.23E+00 2.36E+00 9.46E-01 -3.26E-02 7.02E-02 -6.46E+00 2.69E-01 L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan Fi g ur e o r  e 2-1 LACB WR Site Map 64 - Open Land S S urve y Units a n n d Classificati o o n L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan o r  Figure 2-2 LACBWR 2-65 Site Map - Bu i i ldin g s Identif i ication La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-3 r LACBW R 2-66 R Site Drai n n a g e and S e e wer Map La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-4 r LACBW R 2-67 R LCE Exc l l usion Area (Class 1)  
-02 2.51E-01 A
MW-203-B  
-6.68E-01 1.00E+00 1.21E+02 0
4.89E-01 4.32E+01  
-4.34E+01 1.99E+00  
-1.77E+00 8.70E-01 2.16E+00 0  
-3.32E+00 6.84E-01  
-1.15E+00 0  
-2.31E-01  
-3.66E-01 8.12E-02 5.97E-02  
-3.71E+00 1.03E-01 MW-204-A 6.00E-01 5.28E+00 6.88E+01 4.73E-01 3.45E+01  
-3.13E+01  
-3.77E-01  
-1.84E-01 9.00E-01 1.18E-01  
-1.96E+00  
-1.14E+00  
-1.92E+01  
-4.95E+00  
-2.02E+00  
-6.45E-04  
-5.48E-03  
-3.97E+00 1.06E-01 MW-204-B 3.53E+00 0.00E+00  
-1.21E+02 9.46E-01  
-9.25E+01  
-1.87E+01 2.05E+00 3.94E-01 2.30E-01  
-1.88E+00 3.89E-01 1.24E+00 2.23E+00 2.36E+00 9.46E-01  
-3.26E-02 7.02E-02  
-6.46E+00 2.69E-01  
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan Figure or e 2-1 LACBWR Site Map -
2-64  
- Open Land Survey Units annd Classificatioon
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-2 LACBWR 2-65 Site Map - Buildings Identifiication
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-3 r
LACBWR 2-66 R Site Drainnage and Seewer Map  
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-4 r
LACBWR 2-67 R LCE Excllusion Area (Class 1)  
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figu Water Reactor Plan ure 2-5 N
r Non Impacte 2-68 ed Open Laand Samplinng Locations
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-6 r
Class 1 O 2-69 Open Land SSampling LLocations


La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Fi gu W ater Reacto r Plan ure 2-5 N r  N on Impact e 2-68 e d Open La a nd Sampli n ng Location s La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-6 r  Class 1 O 2-69 O pen Land S S amplin g L L ocations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-7 r Class 2 O 2-70 O pen Land S S amplin g L L ocations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-8 r  Class 3 O 2-71 O pen Land S S amplin g L L ocations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 W ater Reacto r Plan Figure 2-9 r  9 Concr e 2-72 e te Core Sa mmplin g Lo c c ations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Fi g u r W ater Reacto r Plan r e 2-9 (cont i r  i nued)2-73 Concrete C C ore Sampl i i n g Locatio n n s La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Fi g u r W ater Reacto r Plan r e 2-9 (cont i r  i nued)2-74 Concrete C C ore Sampl i i n g Locatio n n s L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan o r  Figure 2-10 LACBWR S i 2-75 ite - Typical G e eolo g ical Cross s-Section L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan o r  Figure 2-1 1 1 Groundwa t 2-76 t er Samplin g W Wells - LACB W WR Site LA CROSSE BOILIN G WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-7 r
Class 2 O 2-70 Open Land SSampling LLocations


La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.Sit e 2.1.2.1.2.1.2 2 2 2
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-8 r
Class 3 O 2-71 Open Land SSampling LLocations
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-9 r
9 Concre 2-72 ete Core Sam mpling Loccations
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figur Water Reactor Plan re 2-9 (conti r
inued) 2-73 Concrete CCore Sampliing Locationns
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figur Water Reactor Plan re 2-9 (conti r
inued) 2-74 Concrete CCore Sampliing Locationns
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-10 LACBWR Si 2-75 ite - Typical Geological Crosss-Section
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-111 Groundwat 2-76 ter Sampling Wells - LACBW WR Site
 
LA CROSSE BOILING WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
 
La Cross License T Revision 2.
Site 2.1.
2.1.
2.1.
2 2
2 2
2 2.1.
2.1.4 2
2 2.1.
2 2.1.
2.1.4 2 2 2.1.
2.1.
2.1.2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2.2.
2.2.
2.2.
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2 2.2.2.2.
2.2.
2.2.2 2
2 2
2 2 2.2.2 2 2.2.4 2.2.2.3.2.3.
2.2.4 2.2.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.
2.3.4 2 2 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Characteri z Historical S 1.Object i 2.Metho d.1.2.1.Pr e.1.2.2.Do c.1.2.3.Li c.1.2.4.Pe r.1.2.5.Pr o 3.Operat i 4.Incide n.1.4.1.Ra d.1.4.2.Ch e 5.Findin g 6.Initial S.1.6.1.Su r.1.6.2.Su r.1.6.3.Cl a.1.6.4.Cl a.1.6.5.Cl a.1.6.6.No n.1.6.7.Cl a.1.6.8.Cl a Characteriz 1.Data Q 2.Surve y.2.2.1.Nu m.2.2.2.De t.2.2.3.Sc a.2.2.4.Ty p 3.Instru m Conce n.2.3.1.Ca l.2.3.2.Ins t 4.Labor a 5.Qualit ySummary o 1.Backg r 2.Potent i 3.Non-I m 4.Impact.3.4.1.Cl a.3.4.2.Cl a W ater Reacto r Plan z ation ..........
2.3.4 2
S ite Assess m i ves ............
2 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Characteriz Historical S 1.
d ology ........liminary Cl a cument Rev i enses, Per m r sonnel Inte r o perty Inspe c i onal Histor y n ts ...............
Objecti 2.
diological S p emical Spill s g s and Conc S urvey Are a rvey Areas ..
Method
r vey Units...
.1.2.1. Pre
a ss 1 Open L a ss 2 Open L a ss 3 Open L n-Impacted O ass 1 Structu r a ss 2 and 3 S ation Appro Q uality Obje c y Design ......
.1.2.2. Doc
m ber of Sta t termination o a n Coverage p es of Meas u m entation Se n trations (M l ibration......
.1.2.3. Lic
trument Us e atory Instru m y Assurance f Characteri r ound Study i al Radionu c m pacted Op e ed Open La n a ss 1 Open L a ss 2 Open L r TABLE O...................
.1.2.4. Per
.m ent .............
.1.2.5. Pro 3.
....................
Operati 4.
....................
Inciden
.assification .
.1.4.1. Rad
.i ew .............
.1.4.2. Che 5.
.m its and Aut h r views .........
Finding 6.
.c tions ..........
Initial S
.y .................
.1.6.1. Sur
....................
.1.6.2. Sur
.p ills ............
.1.6.3. Cla
.s .................
.1.6.4. Cla
.lusions .......
.1.6.5. Cla
.a s/Units and  
.1.6.6. Non
...................
.1.6.7. Cla
....................
.1.6.8. Cla Characteriz 1.
.Land Areas ..
Data Q 2.
.Land Areas ..
Survey
.Land Areas ..
.2.2.1. Num
.O pen Land A r es ..............
.2.2.2. Det
.S tructures ....
.2.2.3. Sca
.ach .............
.2.2.4. Typ 3.
.c tives ..........
Instrum Concen
....................
.2.3.1. Cal
.tic Measure m of Static M e..................
.2.3.2. Inst 4.
.urements an dlection, Use M DCs) .........
Labora 5.
....................
Quality Summary o 1.
.e and Contro m ent Metho d...................
Backgr 2.
.z ation Surv e...................
Potenti 3.
.c lides of Co n e n Land Are a nd Areas ....
Non-Im 4.
.Land Areas ..
Impact
.Land Areas ..
.3.4.1. Cla
.2-i OF CONT E...................
.3.4.2. Cla Water Reactor Plan zation..........
....................
Site Assessm ives............
....................
dology........
....................
liminary Cla cument Revi enses, Perm rsonnel Inter operty Inspec ional History nts...............
....................
diological Sp emical Spills gs and Conc Survey Area rvey Areas..
....................
rvey Units...
.horizations ..
ass 1 Open L ass 2 Open L ass 3 Open L n-Impacted O ass 1 Structur ass 2 and 3 S ation Appro Quality Objec y Design......
....................
mber of Stat termination o an Coverage pes of Measu mentation Se ntrations (M libration......
....................
trument Use atory Instrum y Assurance f Characteri round Study ial Radionuc mpacted Ope ed Open Lan ass 1 Open L ass 2 Open L r
....................
TABLE O ment..............
....................
assification..
....................
iew..............
....................
mits and Auth rviews..........
....................
ctions...........
.Classificati o...................
y..................
....................
pills.............
....................
s..................
....................
lusions........
....................
as/Units and Land Areas...
.A reas .........
Land Areas...
....................
Land Areas...
....................
Open Land A res...............
....................
Structures.....
....................
ach..............
....................
ctives...........
.m ents and/o r easurement a...................
tic Measurem of Static Me urements and lection, Use MDCs)..........
.d Samples ..
e and Contro ment Method zation Surve clides of Con en Land Area nd Areas.....
. and Minim u...................
Land Areas...
....................
Land Areas...
.l .................
2-i OF CONTE horizations...
.d s and Sensi t...................
Classificatio Areas..........
.ey Results ..
ments and/or easurement a d Samples...
....................
and Minimu l..................
.n cern ...........
ds and Sensit ey Results...
.a s ...............
ncern............
....................
as................
....................
ENTS on................
....................
r Samples....
.E NTS ...................
and Sample L um Detectab tivities.........
....................
Locations....
....................
ble
....................
... 2-1
....................
... 2-2
....................
... 2-2
....................
... 2-3
....................
... 2-3
....................
... 2-4
....................
... 2-5
....................
... 2-5
....................
... 2-5
....................
... 2-6
....................
... 2-6
.o n ...............
... 2-7
....................
... 2-8
....................
... 2-8
....................
... 2-9
....................
... 2-9
....................
... 2-9
....................
. 2-10
....................
. 2-10
....................
. 2-10
....................
. 2-11
....................
. 2-11
....................
. 2-12
.r Samples ...
. 2-12
.and Sample L...................
. 2-14
....................
. 2-14
.um Detecta b...................
. 2-15
....................
. 2-16
....................
. 2-16
.t ivities ........
. 2-16
....................
. 2-18
....................
. 2-18
....................
. 2-19
....................
. 2-19
....................
. 2-19
....................
. 2-20
....................
. 2-21
....................
. 2-22
....................
. 2-22
....................
. 2-24
....................
. 2-25
....................
. 2-26
....................
 
....................
La Cross License T Revision 2
....................
2.3.
....................
2.3.
....................
2 2
....................
2 2.3.
....................
2 2
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.L ocations ...
....................
....................
.b le  ...................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.... 2-1... 2-2... 2-2... 2-3... 2-3... 2-4... 2-5... 2-5... 2-5... 2-6... 2-6... 2-7... 2-8... 2-8... 2-9... 2-9... 2-9. 2-10. 2-10. 2-10. 2-11. 2-11. 2-12. 2-12. 2-14. 2-14. 2-15. 2-16. 2-16. 2-16. 2-18. 2-18. 2-19. 2-19. 2-19. 2-20. 2-21. 2-22. 2-22. 2-24. 2-25. 2-26 La Cros s License T Revisio n 2 2.3.2.3.2 2
2 2.3.2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2.4.2.5. s e Boiling W Termination n 0 .3.4.3.Cl a 5.Non-I m 6.Impact.3.6.1.Ba s.3.6.2.Tu r.3.6.3.L A 7.Surfac e.3.7.1.Ar e.3.7.2.Gr o.3.7.3.Pr e.3.7.4.On-.3.7.5.Su m Continuing References W ater Reacto r Plan a ss 3 Open L m pacted Str u ed Structur e sement Stru c r bine Buildi n A CBWR Ad m e and Groun e a Groundw a o undwater F vious Inves t-Going Inve mmary of G r Characteriz a...................
2 2.4.
r Land Areas ..
2.5.
.u ctures ........
se Boiling W Termination n 0  
.es and Syste m ctures Belo w n g Tunnel...
.3.4.3. Cla 5.
.ministration dwate r ........ater Use .....
Non-Im 6.
.low ............
Impact
.t igations .....
.3.6.1. Bas
.stigations ...
.3.6.2. Tur
.r oundwater A a tion ..........
.3.6.3. LA 7.
....................
Surface
.2-ii ...................
.3.7.1. Are
....................
.3.7.2. Gro
.ms ..............
.3.7.3. Pre
.w 636 foot E l...................
.3.7.4. On-
.Building ....
.3.7.5. Sum Continuing References Water Reactor Plan ass 3 Open L mpacted Stru ed Structure sement Struc rbine Buildin ACBWR Adm e and Groun ea Groundwa oundwater F vious Invest
....................
-Going Inve mmary of Gr Characteriza r
....................
Land Areas...
....................
uctures.........
....................
es and System ctures Below ng Tunnel....
....................
ministration dwater........
.Analytical R...................
ater Use......
....................
low.............
....................
tigations......
....................
stigations....
....................
roundwater A ation...........
.levation .....
2-ii ms...............
....................
w 636 foot El Building.....
....................
Analytical R levation......
....................
Results.........
....................
. 2-27
....................
. 2-29
....................
. 2-30
....................
. 2-30
.R esults ........
. 2-31
....................
. 2-31
....................
. 2-32
....................
. 2-32
....................
. 2-33
....................
. 2-34
....................
. 2-35
....................
. 2-35
....................
. 2-36
....................
. 2-37
....................
 
....................
La Cross License T Revision Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 2-4 Table 2-5 Table 2-6 Table 2-7 Table 2-8 Table 2-9 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-se Boiling W Termination n 0 1
....................
LACBW 2
....................
LACBW 3
....................
Instrum 4
....................
Off-Sit 5
....................
2005 D 6
....................
Investig 7
....................
Initial S 8
....................
Non-Im Survey 9
....................
Non Im Labora 10 Impact Summa 11 Class 1 Labora 12 Impact Survey 13 Class 2 Labora 14 Impact Survey 15 Class 3 Labora 16 Concre 17 1983 G Buildin 18 2013 G 19 2014 G
....................
-1 LACBW
....................
-2 LACBW
....................
-3 LACBW
....................
-4 LACBW
....................
-5 Non Im
....................
-6 Class 1
....................
-7 Class 2
....................
-8 Class 3
....................
-9 Concre
....................
-10 LACB
.. 2-27. 2-29. 2-30. 2-30. 2-31. 2-31. 2-32. 2-32. 2-33. 2-34. 2-35. 2-35. 2-36. 2-37 La Cros s License T Revisio n Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 2-4 Table 2-5 Table 2-6 Table 2-7 Table 2-8 Table 2-9 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2- s e Boiling W Termination n 0 1LACB W 2LACB W 3Instru m 4Off-Si t 52005 D 6Investi g 7Initial S 8Non-I m Surve y 9Non I m Labor a 1 0ImpactSumm a 1 1Class 1 Labor a 1 2Impact Surve y 1 3Class 2 Labor a 1 4Impact Surve y 1 5Class 3 Labor a 1 6Concr e 1 71983 G Buildi n 1 82013 G 1 92014 G-1LACB W-2LACB W-3LACB W-4LACB W-5Non I m-6Class 1-7Class 2-8Class 3-9Concr e-10LACB-11Groun d W ater Reacto r Plan WR Open L WR Structu r m ent Types a te Laborator y D airyland B a gative Leve l Suite of LA C m pacted Op e y Summary .
-11 Ground Water Reactor Plan WR Open L WR Structur ment Types a te Laboratory Dairyland Ba gative Level Suite of LAC mpacted Ope y Summary.
m pacted Coa atory Analy s ed Class 1 O ary .............
mpacted Coa atory Analys ed Class 1 O ary.............
Concrete, A atory Analy s ed Class 2 O y Summary .
Concrete, A atory Analys ed Class 2 O y Summary.
2 Asphalt, S e atory Analy s ed Class 3 O y Summary .
2 Asphalt, Se atory Analys ed Class 3 O y Summary.
3 Asphalt, S e atory Analy s ete Core Isot G roundwater n g ...............
3 Asphalt, Se atory Analys ete Core Isot Groundwater ng...............
G roundwater G roundwater W R Site M a W R Site M a W R Site Dr a W R LCE E x m pacted Op e Open Lan d 2 Open Lan d 3 Open Lan d ete Core Sa m W R Site - T d water Sam p r LIST and Survey ral Survey U and Nomina l y Analytica l a ckground S t l s for Cs-13 7 C BWR Site-e n Land Sur v...................
Groundwater Groundwater WR Site Ma WR Site Ma WR Site Dra WR LCE Ex mpacted Ope Open Land 2 Open Land 3 Open Land ete Core Sam WR Site - T dwater Samp r
.l Pile and S o sis (pCi/g) ...
LIST and Survey ral Survey U and Nominal y Analytical ackground St ls for Cs-137 CBWR Site-en Land Surv l Pile and So sis (pCi/g)....
.O pen Land S...................
Open Land S Asphalt, Sed sis (pCi/g)....
.A sphalt, Se d sis (pCi/g) ...
Open Land S ediment and sis................
.O pen Land S...................
Open Land S ediment and sis (pCi/g)....
.ediment and s is ...............
opic Analys Analysis fro Monitoring Monitoring LIST O ap - Open La ap - Building ainage and S xclusion Are en Land Sam d Sampling L d Sampling L d Sampling L mpling Locat Typical Geolo pling Wells -
.O pen Land S...................
2-iii OF TABLE Units...........
.ediment and sis (pCi/g) ...
Units.............
.opic Analys Analysis fr o...................
l MDCs.......
.Monitoring Monitoring LIST O a p - Open L a a p - Buildin g a inage and S x clusion Ar e e n Land Sa m d Sampling L d Sampling L d Sampling L m pling Loca t T ypical Geol o p ling Wells  iii OF TABL E U nits..........
l Methods an tudy for Soil 7 Based on B
.U nits ............
-Specific Ra vey Units - C oil Samples -
.l MDCs ......
Survey Units diment and S Survey Units Soil Sample Survey Units Soil Sample is Results....
.l Methods a n t udy for Soi l 7 Based on B-Specific Ra v ey Units -
om Tempora Results......
C...................
Results (pC OF FIGURE and Survey U gs Identifica Sewer Map..
.oil Samples
ea (Class 1)..
-...................
mpling Locati Locations.....
.S urvey Units
Locations.....
...................
Locations.....
.diment and S...................
tions............
.S urvey Units
ogical Cross
...................
- LACBWR ES nd Typical M ls.................
.Soil Sampl e...................
.S urvey Units
...................
.Soil Sampl e...................
.is Results ...
.om Tempor a...................
.Results .....
.Results (p C O F FIGUR E a nd Survey U gs Identific a Sewer Map .
.ea (Class 1) .
.m pling Locat i L ocations ....
.L ocations ....
.L ocations ....
.t ions ...........
.o gical Cros s- LACBW R E S ...................
....................
....................
.n d Typical M l s ................
.B ackground dionuclides
.C haracteriz a...................
.- Test Ame r...................
. - Characte r...................
.Soil Samples
...................
. - Characte r...................
.e s - Test A m...................
. - Characte r...................
.e s - Test A m...................
....................
.a ry  Well-P o...................
....................
.C i/L) ...........
.RES U nits and C l a tion ............
....................
....................
.i ons ............
....................
....................
....................
....................
.s-Section ....
.R Site ..........
....................
....................
....................
.M DCs .........
....................
.Studies ......
....................
.a tion  ...................
.r ica  ...................
.rization Sur v...................
. - Test Am e...................
.rization  ...................
.m erica  ...................
.rization  ...................
.m erica  ...................
....................
.oint South o f...................
....................
....................
.lassification
...................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.v ey  ...................
.e rica  ...................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.f Turbine ...................
....................
....................
. ..................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
.. 2-39. 2-40. 2-42. 2-43. 2-44. 2-45. 2-46. 2-47. 2-49. 2-50. 2-51. 2-52. 2-53. 2-54. 2-55. 2-56. 2-60. 2-61. 2-62. 2-64. 2-65. 2-66. 2-67. 2-68. 2-69. 2-70. 2-71. 2-72. 2-75. 2-76 La Cros s License T Revisio nAEC ALARA bgs CRD DCGL DQO EPA FCP FESW FRS FSS G-1 G-3 HSA HTD IR ISFSI LACB W LER LSA LSE LTP MARL A MARS A MARSS I MDC MDCR MWe NIST s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Unite d As L o Belo w Contr Deriv Data Q Unite d Force Fuel E Final Final Geno a Geno a Histo r Hard-Incid e Indep WR La C r Licen Low S LAC B Licen A P Multi-A ME Multi-Man u I M Multi-Mini m Mini m Mega w Natio n W ater Reacto r Plan LIST OF d States At o o w As Reas o w Ground S u ol Rod Driv


ed Concent r Q uality Obj e d States En v d Circulatio n Element Sto r Radiation S u Status Surv e a 1 Coal/Oil a 3 Fossil S t rical Site A s to-Detect e nt Reports endent Spe n r osse Boilin gsee Event R S pecific Act B WR Site E nse Terminat i-Agency Ra d-Agency Ra d u al -Agency Ra d m al Detecta b mum Detect a watt Electri c nal Institute r ACRONY Mmic Energy o nably Achi e u rface e r ation Guide ective vironmental P n Pump rage Well urvey e y Station tation sessment n t Fuel Stor a g Water Rea c eports ivity n closure i on Plan diological L diation Sur v diation Sur v ble Concent r a ble Count R c of Standar d 2-iv M S AND A BCommissio n e vable line Levels P rotection A age Installati o c to r Laboratory A v ey and Ass e v ey and Site rations R ate d s and Tech n B BREVIA T n A gency on Analytical Pr o essment of MInvestigatio n ology TIONS otocols Ma n M aterials an d n Manual n ual d Equipmen t t La Cros s License T Revisio nNRC ORC PSDAR QA QAPP QC RCA REMP ROC RPV SRC STS TSD WDNR WGTV WTB ZNPS s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Unite d Oper a Post-S Quali t Quali t Quali t Radi o Radi o Radi o React Safet y Sour c Tech nWisc o Wast e Wast e Zion N W ater Reacto r Plan d States Nu c ational Revi e S hutdown D t y Assuranc e t y Assuranc e t y Control o logically C o o active Effl u o nuclides of or Pressure V y Review C o e Term Sur v n ical Suppo r o nsin Depar t e Gas Tank V e Treatment N uclear Po w r clear Regul a e w Committecommissio e e Project Pl a o ntrolled Ar e ent Monitor Concern V essel ommittee v ey rt Document tment of Na t V ault Building w er Station 2-v atory Comm i ee ning Activi t a n e a ing Reports t ural Resou r i ssion ties Report rces La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 W ater Reacto r Plan r Page Inten t 2-vi t ionally Le ft ft Blank La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.S In acco r Regulat o Nuclear characte r The pur p conduct eremain.
===Background===
License Tof comp l Survey (1575, Mu Source Tterminat i The site quantify characte rsite that classific a The ch aNUREG-Decomm Criteria, PG-EO-3 Reactor Charact e the Data informat iremediat at conce nremoved The dec o waste o f LACB W None o f radiolog i planned a G-3 po wminor st rThe maj o basemen t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 S ite Char a rdance wit h ory Guide 1
dionuclides.
.Power R e r ization per fo p ose of site e d in all ar eThe term "
Characteriza
F Terminatio n liance surve y FSS) for o p u lti-Agency T erm Surv e i on. See LT Pcharacterizthe extent a rization sur vwill require a tion and vo l a racterizatio n-1575 (M A issioning G Final Repo r 3 13196-SV-P(4), and G P e rization Pr o Quality Ob j i on obtaine d i on plannin g ntrations gr e and proper l ommissioni n f all LAC B WR Adminis t fthe buildi n ically impa c and these st r w er operatio n r uctures wil l o r sub-grad e t s of the R e W ater Reacto r Plan acterizatio n h the requi
- Test Amer
.179, Stand a e actors (1), fo rmed at th e characteriz a e as where c o F inal Radia t n Plan (LTP
- Character Soil Samples
)y s that will b p en land ar e Radiation S e y (STS) f o P Chapte r 5 ation incor p a nd nature o v eys and an a remediatio n l umes, and e n survey w A RSSIM) G uidance -
- Character es - Test Am
C r t, (3). In a d P L-001, C h P-EO-3131 9 oject (QAP P j ective (DQ O d from the
  - Character es - Test Am ary Well-Po Ci/L)............
: g. Materials e ater than t h ly packaged n g approach B WR b uild i t ration buil d n gs and str u c ted such t h ructures, in c n s. The pu b l also remai n e structures t e actor Build i r n rements o f a rd Format
RES Units and Cl ation.............
, this cha p e La Crosse B ation is to e n ontaminatio n tion Survey
ions.............
") in order to be performe d e as and buri S urvey and S o r below g r for a descri p p orates the r of contamin a lyses have b n , as well a s estimate cos t w as designe d and NUR E C haracteriz a d dition, sur v haracterizati o 9 6-QA-PL-0 0 P) (5) which O) process, a characteri z which wer e he unrestrict efor shipme n for LACB W i ngs, struct u d ing and Cr i uctures ass o hat they req u c luding the G blic roads a n n. that will b e i ng, Waste T 2-1 f 10 CFR 5 0 and Cont e p ter provid e Boiling Wa t nsure that t h n existed, r e" is from 1 0 acknowled g d at LACB W ed piping b Site Investi g r ound struc t p tion of the r esults of i nation at L A b een and co n s to plan re m t s. d and exe c E G-1757, a tion, Surv e veys were d e o n Survey P 0 1, Quality describes p and measur e z ation provi e shown to b e d release c r n t and dispo s WR requires u res and c o ib House) t o ociated with uire remedi G-3 Crib Ho u nd railways backfilled a Treatment B 0.82 (a)(9)(i i e nts for Lic e s a desc r t er Reactor (he Final Ra d emains, or h 0 CFR 50.82 g e the disti n W R. These ased on gu i g ation Manu t ures to be FRS. n vestigatio n A CBWR. I n ntinue to be mediation m c uted using Volume 2, e y, and De esigned and Plan for thAssurance p olicy, orga n e s necessary des guidan c be contamin a r iteri a have sal. the demoli t omponents o a depth o f h the Geno a al actions; use, will re mthat traver s and remain a B uilding (W i)(A) and tense Termi n r iption of (LACBWR) diation Surv h as the pot e (9)(ii)(D) a n n ction betw esurveys are; i dance prov i al (MARS Sbackfilled ns and surv e n addition, t h e used to ide m ethodologi e the guida n Revision 1 termination executed i n e La Cros s Project Pl a nization, fu n to achieve q c e for dec o a ted with ra dbeen and w i tion, remov a (with the e f at least 3 f a 3 Fossil Stherefore, n main intact a se the site a a t license te r W TB), Waste t he guidan c nation Pla n the radiol osite. ey (FRS) w ential to ex i n d is used i n e en the two  1) a Final S i ded in NU R S IM) (2) an dprior to li c e ys conduct he results o ntify areas o es, develop w n ce provid e 1 , Consoli d of Radiol o n accordanc e s e Boiling W a n LACBW R n ctional acti v quality data.
s-Section.....
ontaminatio n dioactive m a ill continue al and dispo s e xception o feet below g S tation (G-3 no remediati and function as well as s e rmination a r Gas Tank V ce of ns for ogical will be i st or n this types Status R EG-d 2) a c ense ed to of site of the waste ed in  dated o gical e with Water R Site vities,  The n and a terial to be s al as f the grade. 3) are ion is al for e veral r e the Vault La Cros s License T Revisio n (WGTV)(3 feet b Reactor/Gsump an d In the Rremovedremoved elevatio n WTB, t h concrete the rema cap and pfollowin g covered bremaini n LTP Ch a Indepen d shown i n 2.1.H In acco r Assessm informat i reports, marine f Environ mcompile d 2.1.1.O The HS A LACB W surroun d resulted Radiolo g subsurfa c the 1.5 ainformat imay als o The sco p hazardo u The objeI d b s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ) and the r eelow grade
R Site...........
)Generator P d the Turbi n R eactor Bui. All inter n , leaving o n n (i.e., conc r h e only porti footers bel oining struct u p iles below t g the termin a by at least 3 n g backfille d a pter 1, se c dent Spent F n Figure 2-1
MDCs..........
)Historical Si rdance wit h ent (HSA) i on, includi n pre-operati o f auna and s m ental Rep o d for this in v O b jectives A was a d WR activities dings. The in contami n gically Cont r ce soils out s a cre fenced ion compile o be used as p e of the us materials. ctives of th e d entify pote ased on exi s W ater Reacto r Plan emainder o f ). These re Plant, the o ne pit. lding, all i n n al concrete n ly the rem a r ete "bowl" on of the st r ow the 636 f o u re will con s t he 636 foot ation of the l feet of soil d structures t o c tion 1.3.1 d F uel Storage
Studies.......
) is exclude d te Assessm e h the guid a (6) was p n g any 10 C o nal survey sediment s u orts to the vestigation.
ation rica rization Surv
detailed inv erelated to rHSA focus e n ation of pl a r olled Area (ide of the R LACBWR d by the H Sinput into t hHSA inclu  e HSA were ntial, likely s ting or deri v r fthe basem emaining str u ne foot thic k nternal str uwill be re m a ining struc t below 636 ructure that o ot elevatio n sist of the f l elevation.
- Test Ame rization merica rization merica oint South of lassification vey erica f Turbine
T l icense are c and physic a o be plausib l d escribes thInstallatio n d from the s c e nt a nce provi d performed a C FR 50.75(g data, spill u rveys), ope Nuclear R e e stigation t o radioactive m e d on histo r ant systems
. 2-39
, (RCA). It a l R CA but wit h Site Enclo s S A was use d he develop m ded potent i to: , or known ved informa t 2-2 e nt structur e uctures incl u k portion o f uctural surf a moved to e x t ural concr e foot elevati o will remain
. 2-40
: n. In the W G l oors and fo u T he structu r c onstructed o ally altered t l y occupied
. 2-42
.e site lice n (ISFSI) Fa c c ope of the L d ed in MA R a nd docum e g) files, em preports, sp erational su r e gulatory C o collect e x materials or r ical events
. 2-43
, buildings, l so addresse h in the own e sure (LSE) d to establi s m ent of rem e ial contami n sources of tion, es located b l ude the Pi p f the Chim n a ces, syste m xpose the st e e te outside t o n, concret e is the 630 a G TV and th e u ndation w a ral surfaces t o f steel rein f t o a conditi
. 2-44
: o. n se boundar y c ility as loc a L TP. R SSIM, se c e nted in A u p loyee inte r e cial surve y rvey record s Commission x isting inf o other cont a and routi n surface an d d support st r er controlle darea  shar e sh initial su r e diation pla n n ation fro m radioactive below the 6 3 p ing and V e n ey Founda t m s and co m eel liner, w h t he liner be e pile cap a n and 635 foo t e other rem a alls as well a that will re m f orce d conc r o n which w o y. The fe n a ted in Lot 7 ction 3.0, a u gust of 1 9 r views, radi y s (e.g., sit e s , and An n (NRC) we r ormation (f r aminants) f o ne operation a d subsurfac e r uctures, op e d area. The e the same r vey units.
. 2-45
ns and the d e m radioacti vand chemi 36 foot ele v entilation T u t ion, the T u mponents w i hich will al s low the 63 6 n d piles.)
. 2-46
I t floor, sum p aining base m as concrete p m ain at LAC B r ete which w o uld not allo w n ced area o 7 of the sit e a Historical 9 99. Hist o ological in c e aerial su r n ual Radiol o r e reviewe d rom the st a or the site a n al processe s e soils withi e n land are acurrent RC A boundary. This infor m e sign of the v e material s cal contam i v ation unnel, urbine ill be so be 6 foot I n the p and m ents, piling B WR will be w the of the e (and Site orical c ident r veys, ogical d and a rt of n d its s that in the as and A and  The m ation FRS. s and i nants La Cros s License T Revisio nD nPPPP MD 2.1.2.M The obj emay hav e land are afailures rmaterial.contami n deconta m their pot e Each inc was furt hanalysis, samplin g location.
. 2-47
Relevan tremediat Also inc lRP p S i dInformat data, ev aUnits. 2.1.2.1.The HS Aclassific a have a p s e Boiling W Termination n 0 D istinguish po threat to h rovide an a s rovide info r rovide an i n rovide a gr a M ARSSIM g Delineate ini t M ethodolo gy ective of the e significan t a s and struc t resulting in Dependi n n ation varie s mination act i ential for co nident identi f h er investig aany reme d g , survey, a n Historical r t informati o i on phases o luded in the Relevant exc e ersonnel in t l ant person nite inspecti o d entify, loca t ion from th i a luation of r Preli m A investig a a tion of the potential for W ater Reacto r Plan p ortions of t human healt h ssessment o f rmation use fu nitial classifi c aded initial c g uidance, an d t ial survey u y HSA recor d t ly impacte d t ures. Thes e airborne rel n g upon p a s by area. I n i vities and F ntamination
. 2-49
.fied that po s a ted. This i n dial actions nd analysis i records pro v o n that be c of the licens e research as s erpts from w terviews, in c n el to confi r o n, utilizin g te, confirm, i s research w results, doc u m inary Clas s a tion was dsite land ar econtaminat i r h e site that m h , f the likeliho fu l to subseq u c ation of ar elassificatio n d u nit boundar i ds search an d d the hazard o e included s y eases, liqui d a st site op e n order to fa cRS plannin
. 2-50
: g. sed a realist i nvestigatio n taken to m i n an attem p vided the so u comes avai l e terminatio n sociated wit h written repor t c luding the u rm docume n g historic si and docum e w as used in umentation o sification d esigned t o e as and stru c ion (based o 2-3 m ay need fu r od of conta m u ent contin u e as and stru c n for impact e i es and area s d interview ous materia l ystem, stru c d spills or r e e rations an d c ilitate effe c g, land area s ic potential t n focused o n m itigate the s p t to identi fy urce of a vas t lable durin g n plan will b h the develo p t s and corre s u se of ques t nted inciden tte drawing s e nt areas of c the HSA d e o f findings, o obtain su ctures as im p o n historica l rther action minant migr a u ing charact e c tures as no n e d soils and s s based upo nprocess wa s l or radiolo g cture, or are a eleases, or t d processes
. 2-51
, c tive charact s and struct u t o impact t h n the scope osituation, a n f y the "as l et majority o f g any add i be evaluated
. 2-52
.pment of th e s pondences, t ionnaires, o t s and iden t s , photogra p concern. evelopment, and the id e u fficient in fo p acted or n o l data) or c ofrom those ation, erization su r n-impacted o structures i n n the initial c s to identify g ical status o a contamina t he loss of c , the pote n terization, a n u res are clas s he character i of contamin a n d any pos t e ft" conditio f the docum e itional cha
. 2-53
: r. e HSA were: o f current, f o t ify undocu m phs, prints, including t h entification formation t o on-impacted o ntain kno w that pose li t rveys, or impacte d , n accordanc e c lassificatio nthose event of LACBW R ation from s y c ontrol over ntial for re s n d to guide f s ified based i zation of th ant samplin g t-remedial a n of the in c e nts inspect e racterizatio n: ormer and r e m ented inci d and diagra m he compilatiof initial S u o provide i. Impacted wn contami n ttle or e with n. s that R site ystem solid sidual f uture upon e site g and action cident ed. n and e tired dents, ms to on of u rvey initial areas nation La Cros s License T Revisio n (based o through k is no re aimpacte d controll e If a land area cla swas ma d Initial c l historica l initial cl aat the ti m prepared FRS des iclassific acontinui n surveilla nclassific aof com m 2.1.2.2.Records source o f for LAC B include: OSLSOAERDHSR s e Boiling W Termination n 0 on past or p k nowledge o a sonable po d from a r a d areas wer e area or stru c s sification (e e based upo n lassification l radiologic a assification a me of identif
. 2-54
: i. Final cla s i gn. The c h a tions indic a n g character i nce, and a n a tions (for e x mencement o f Docu mmaintained f document a B WR, man y Operational R afety Revie w L icensee Ev eite Initiated O perator Lo g A nnual Envi r Environment a R egulatory a c Documentati o Health Physi cite inspecti o Radiological W ater Reacto r Plan preliminary o f site histor yssibility for a diological p e also docu m cture was cl a e.g. Class 1, n the infor m of LACB W a l survey da t and (2) fina l i cation of th e ssification i s haracterizati o ated in the H i zation surv e n y other a p xample, fro m f the FRS.
. 2-55
m ent Revie wto satisfy t ation for th e y record typ e R eview Co m w Committ e e nt Reports (Incident Re p gs including ronmental M a l investiga t ctions conc e on from int e cs surveys a n o n and surve i and enviro n r radiologica l y or previo u residual r a perspective.
. 2-56
mented. assified as i mClass 2 or C m ation obtai n W R areas w t a. Classif y l classificat i e survey are s performed o n data was H SA as desc r eys, operati o p plicable su r m Class 3 t o w t he require m e HSA reco r es were eva l mmittee (OR C e e (SRC) M eLER) Sum m ports (IR), Reactor Op e M onitoring R t ions perfor m e rning the si t rviews con d nd samplin g illance type nmental surv 2-4 l surveillan c us survey in f adioactive c o Potential m pacted, th e Class 3) in a ned. w as based o ying a surve y i on. Initial c a using the i and verifie d used to va l ribed in this o nal survey s r vey data m o Class 2 an d m ents of 10 r ds review p l uated. A s u C) Meeting M e eting Minu t m aries, erator and H Reports, m ed by inde p te, d ucted with r g results ass odocuments a ey docume n c e). Non-i m formation a n ontaminatio nchemical h en a determi accordance w o n historic a y area has a classificatio n information d as a DQ O l idate or up d Chapter.
. 2-60
R s in suppo r t m ay cause d from Cla sCFR Part 5 0 process. Du r u mmary of t Minutes, tes, Health Physi c p endent enti t retired/sepa r o ciated with a ssociated w nts, m pacted ar e n d are those a n. Areas w h azards inci d ination of th ewith MAR S al informati ominimum o n of most a r available w h O during ch a date, as nec e R adiological of decomm i an increas e ss 2 to Class 0.75(g)(1) p r ing the co n t he types of cs entries, ties, rated site pe ridentified e v with identifi e eas are ide n a reas where were classifi e d ents on o w e initial imp SSIM, secti o o n and ava i of two stage r eas is perf o h en the HS A a racterizatio n e ssary, the i survey data i ssioning, r o e in survey s 1) until th e p rovided a m n duct of the records rev i rsonnel, vents, ed events, ntified there ed as w ne r-p acted o n 2.2 ilable s: (1) ormed A was n an d initial from o utine area e time m ajor HSA i ewed La Cros s License T Revisio nQ 2.1.2.3.LACB Wpermits. allowed D the site, activitie s Several glicensin gUUUWLFrom A u This per i 1987, an d 2.1.2.4.Intervie w about th e The per sthe parti c personn eterms be site kno w Between individu a standard isite pers othe pers omemori e operatio n 2.1.2.5.Several Several s s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Quality Cont r Licen WR was oper a The NRC D airyland P t o support o s. government g , constructi o United State s United State s United State s W isconsin D e L ocal/Count y ugust 28, 19 7 i od include s d ISFSI con s Perso n ws with curr e e site and to onnel inter v cipants as w e l were cho s i ng investig wledge and e 2010 and a ls contact e ized person n o nnel who w o nnel obser v s of other q n al period e x Prop e on-site pro p s ite events o f W ater Reacto r Plan r ol (QC) /Q uses, Permits a ted in acco r Operating L ower Coop e o perations d u and regulat o on, operatio n s Atomic En e s Nuclear R e s Environme n epartment o f y Governme n 73 to the pr e s power op e s truction an d nnel Intervi e e nt or previ o verify or cl views inclu d well as indiv i s en due to t hated for the e xperience t h 2011, app r e d as part nel survey w w orked at th v ations docu m q uestionnair e xperience, o rrty Inspecti o p erty inspe c f interest w e r u ality Assur a and Author r dance with License for erative (Dai r uring its op e o ry agencies ns, and deco m e rgy Comm i e gulatory C o ntal Protect i f Natural R e nts. esent, the fa c e rations to 1 d spent fuel e ws ous employ earify infor m ded a combi n i dual and gr o h eir knowle dassessment
. 2-61
.h at ranged f r roximately 4 of the H S w hich was c e LACBW R mented on t h e completer s r by docum e o ns c tions were ere identifie d 2-5 a nce (QA) f iizations several Fe d LACBWR a r ylan d) to u s erating lifet i have provi d mmissionin g i ssion (AEC ommission (N i on Agency (e sources (W D c ility has be e 1 987, perm aoff-load wh i e es were pe r m ation gathe r n ation of q u oup intervie w d ge of and
. 2-62
: a. A numbe r rom the site c 4 0 recollect i S A questio n completed v R during its o h e question n s, current o n ntation disc omade over d which wer e fi nding type d d eral and St a and support s e any quan t ime, and to ded oversig h g. These ag e C), NRC), (EPA), DNR), en operated u anent shutd o i ch was co m rformed to c red from th e uestionnaire s ws with se vassociation r of the per s constructio n i ons of int e n naire prog r voluntarily b operational n aire were c n-site work i o vered duri n r the cours e e subsequen t documents.
. 2-64
ate of Wisc o t ing Techni c t ity of radio aimplement d ht at LACB Wencies inclu d u nder NRC o wn for de c m pleted in 2 0 collect first-h e records th a s completed veral of the pwith the sy s s onnel inter v n period to s h e rest were l r a m. This by retired/se pyears. Wit h corroborate d i ng staff th a ng the recor d e of the H S tly docume n o nsin licens e c al Specific a active mate r d ecommissi o WR during s de: License DP R commissioni n 0 12. hand infor m at were revi eby a major i participants.
. 2-65
stems and s o v iewed poss h utdown. l ogged fro m consisted parated sta f h few excep t d either by l o a t had LAC B d s search.
. 2-66
SA develop m n ted in the H es and a tions r ial at o ning siting, R-45. n g in m ation e wed. ity of  Key ource essed m the of a ff and tions, o gged BWR m ent. H SA.
. 2-67
La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.1.3.O LACB W Dairylan Mississi p b ordere d Mississi p LSE co m served a s confirm e road on tt h f oa n 1t ha l i The pla nChalmer s provide d LACB W 19 years defuelin g Operatin No. 56, d 333 irra dinto five Limited d ongoing shipped internals
. 2-68
. 2-69
. 2-70
. 2-71
. 2-72
. 2-75
. 2-76


Building removed undergr o Condens Water S y Building 2.1.4.I n Based o nnotificat i s e Boiling W Termination n 0 O perational WR was a 5 d. This sin g ppi River s o d on the n o ppi River a
La Cross License T Revision AEC ALARA bgs CRD DCGL DQO EPA FCP FESW FRS FSS G-1 G-3 HSA HTD IR ISFSI LACBW LER LSA LSE LTP MARLA MARSA MARSSI MDC MDCR MWe NIST se Boiling W Termination n 0 United As Lo Below Contr Deriv Data Q United Force Fuel E Final Final Genoa Genoa Histor Hard-Incide Indep WR La Cr Licen Low S LACB Licen AP Multi-AME Multi-Manu IM Multi-Minim Minim Megaw Nation Water Reactor Plan LIST OF d States Ato ow As Reaso w Ground Su ol Rod Driv ed Concentr Quality Obje d States Env d Circulation Element Stor Radiation Su Status Surve a 1 Coal/Oil a 3 Fossil St rical Site As to-Detect ent Reports endent Spen rosse Boiling see Event R Specific Act BWR Site En se Terminati
-Agency Rad
-Agency Rad ual
-Agency Rad mal Detectab mum Detecta watt Electric nal Institute r
ACRONYM mic Energy onably Achie urface e
ration Guide ective vironmental P n Pump rage Well urvey ey Station tation sessment nt Fuel Stora g Water Reac eports ivity nclosure ion Plan diological L diation Surv diation Surv ble Concentr able Count R c
of Standard 2-iv MS AND AB Commission evable line Levels Protection A age Installatio ctor Laboratory A vey and Asse vey and Site rations Rate ds and Techn BBREVIAT n
Agency on Analytical Pro essment of M Investigatio nology TIONS otocols Man Materials and n Manual nual d Equipmentt
 
La Cross License T Revision NRC ORC PSDAR QA QAPP QC RCA REMP ROC RPV SRC STS TSD WDNR WGTV WTB ZNPS se Boiling W Termination n 0 United Opera Post-S Qualit Qualit Qualit Radio Radio Radio React Safety Sourc Techn Wisco Waste Waste Zion N Water Reactor Plan d States Nuc ational Revie Shutdown D ty Assurance ty Assurance ty Control ologically
g operations.
g operations.
u t were us e H ouse and B o nsidered C l of the LAC B o n Switch H n d disposal o portion of s sion Sub-S t be surveye f NUREG-s and Equi pfor buildin g ts as docum summariz e a ble potenti a station, incl u w as perfor m on Survey p acted  The   The e d by B arge l ass 3 B WR H ouse, of all these t ation d for 1575, p ment g s are ented ed in al for u ding med in Plan La Cros s License T Revisio n incorpor adocume n develop e executin g procedu r safely a n Charact e objectiv eProv iDev eSupp volu m The dec o b uilding s characte r subjecte dremoved 1757, A p The cha r subsurfa c structura surveys w structure used to m above g r of the e x planned, planning A signif i unit is cl a design f o result in unit mee terrors. As site-s LACB W selected.
ut were use House and B onsidered Cl of the LACB on Switch H nd disposal o portion of ssion Sub-St be surveye f NUREG-s and Equip for building ts as docum summarize able potentia station, inclu was perform on Survey pacted The The ed by Barge lass 3 BWR
in NUR E Paramet e assess th e s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ated the pr e n ted in the s u e d to provid e g characteri z r es and sur v n d effectivel y rization dat a e s: i de radiolog i e lop the req uort the ev a m es. ommissioni n s, structures
: House, of all these tation d for
, rization eff o d to FRS.
: 1575, pment gs are ented ed in al for uding med in Plan  
E prior to th e p pendix O.
 
racterizatio n ce soils, pa v l basement s w ere perfor ms. Upon co m m ake deter m r ade or subg x pected en d-executed a
La Cross License T Revision incorpora documen develope executing procedur safely an Characte objective Provi Deve Supp volum The deco buildings character subjected removed 1757, Ap The char subsurfac structura surveys w structure used to m above gr of the ex
: n. icant questi o assified cor r o r FRS. A a survey de s ts the releas e pecific Der i WR at the ti m The scree n EG/CR-551 2 e r Analysis e correct cl a W ater Reacto r Plan evious hist o urvey areas e guidance a zation surve y ey unit spe c y acquire th e a acquired t h ical inputs n uired inputs f aluation of r n g approach  
: planned, planning A signifi unit is cla design fo result in unit meet errors.
, and comp o orts focuse d E xtensive c h e performan c n surveys f o ved surfaces
As site-s LACBW selected.
, s that will r e m ed in the L m pletion, th e m inations on wrade struct u-state struct u nd docume n on that must r ectly. The a classificati o s ign that do e e criteria. I n i ved Conce n m e the char a n ing DCGL s 2 Volume 3(9), Table 6 a ssification o r or ical oper afrom the H S a nd directio n y activities.
in NURE Paramete assess the se Boiling W Termination n 0 ated the pre nted in the su ed to provide g characteriz res and surv nd effectively rization data es:
cific survey e requisite c h h rough the e necessary fo r f or LTP, an d remediation for LACB W onents to a d d on open h aracterizati o c e of final s o cused on g , and concre t emain in th e LACBWR A d e data was a w hether ad d u res, surface ures at LA C n ted with th e be answer e a ppropriate c o n which u n e s not obtai n n some case s n tration Gui d a cterization s presented i , Residual R.91 (P crit = 0 of impacted o 2-13 a tional and S A and pre v n to the per s The Plan winstruction s h aracterizati e xecution of r the design o d alternative s WR calls for t d epth of at lland areas o n of equip m s urveys is n o g eneral ope n t e pads. Co e en d-state dministratio n ssessed for q ditional char a and subsur f C BWR. Co n e same data e d by the ch a classificatio n nderestimat e n adequate i n s, this can i n deline Leve lsurvey was i n NUREG-1 R adioactive 0.10) for soi l o pen land o rradiologica l vious site ch s onnel resp o w orked in co s (sample p lon data. the Plan w a of FRS, s and tech nthe demolit i least 3 feet band remai nment, syste m ot required i n land area s o ncrete core condition.
ide radiologi elop the requ ort the eva mes.
n Building a q uality and a a cterization face soils, o r n tinuing ch a quality an d aracterizati o n of a surve y e s the pote n nformation t o n crease the p l s (DCGLs)performe d , 1757 and th Contamin a l s were use d r soil survey l informati o aracterizati o onsible for i m njunction w l ans) that w as used to m n ologies an d i on and rem o below grad e n ing struct u ms or struc t in accordan c s including: samples we rIn addition
ommissionin s, structures, rization effo d to FRS. E prior to the ppendix O.
, a nd several o adequacy.
racterization ce soils, pav l basements were perform
T data is req u r beneath t h aracterizatio n d the results on is wheth e y unit is cri t n tial for con o demonstr a potential for m were not y e alternate a ce concentra t ation from D d as alternat units. o n collecte d on efforts. I mplementin g with implem e were develo p meet three pr i d estimate w oval of all o n e. Consequ e u res that w i tures that w c e with NU R site surfac e re taken fro m , characteri z of the G-3 s t T he data wa s uired, primar h e concrete f n surveys wincluded i n er or not a s u tical to the s u tamination c ate that the s u m aking dec i et establish e c tion levels tion values f D ecommissi o e action lev e d and t was g and e nting ped to imary w aste n-site e ntly, ill be ill be R EG-e and m the zation tation s then ily of f loors will be n FRS u rvey urvey c ould urvey isions e d for were f ound oning els to La Cros s License T Revisio n For stru c to eval u 7,100 dp m Appendi x radionuc the cons e for Cs-1 3 2.2.1.D DQOs w FRS. H oto deter m unrestric tinspecti onature, e applicab l Charact eoutlined 1)State 2)Iden t 3)Iden t 4)Defi n 5)Dev e 6)Spec i 7)Opti m The DQ O collect.
: s. Upon com make determ rade or subg xpected end-executed an icant questio assified corr or FRS. A a survey des ts the release pecific Deri WR at the tim The screen EG/CR-5512 er Analysis e correct cla Water Reactor Plan evious histo urvey areas e guidance a zation survey ey unit spec y acquire the a acquired th ical inputs n uired inputs f aluation of r ng approach  
N and will assessm e obtainin g obtained Direct mMinimal that exh i Detect (H 2.2.2.S Charact e approve d approac h s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ctures, the g r ate the cla s m/100c m 2 t o x H. Use o f lide distrib u e rvative app r 3 7 is signifi c D ata Qualit y were implem e owever, the m ine the ra d ted use cri t o ns and sur v xtent and r a le structures rization sur v in MARSSI Mthe proble m t ify the deci s t ify inputs t o n e the study elop a decisi o ify limits o n m ize the des O s for site N o structur e therefore n o e nt of concr e g core sam pto determi n measurement Detectable i bited the h i H TD) radio n urve y Desi g rization su r d procedure s h based upo n W ater Reacto r Plan r oss screeni n ssification o o tal gross b e f the Co-60 ution for sur f r oach was t o c antly great e y Ob j ective s e nted for c h goal of cha rionuclide m teria to de m veys of su ff a nge of radi o , residues, s o veys were d e M , Append i m , sion, o the decisio nboundaries, on rule, n decision er r ign for obta i characteriz a es located a b o t b e subject e te in base m p les. Soils ne the mean s and scan sConcentrati ighest activ i nuclide(s).
, and compo orts focused Extensive ch e performanc n surveys fo ved surfaces, s that will re med in the L mpletion, the minations on w rade structu
g n rveys were s and the Ch a n the DQOs f r n g level tha t o f survey u e t a-gamma sscreening v f ace conta m o assume a d er. s h aracterizati o r acterizatio n mixture, whe r monstrate c o ff icient qual i o active con t o ils and sur f e signed to g i x D. The s e n , r ors, an d ining data.
-state structu nd documen on that must rectly. The a classificatio sign that doe e criteria. In ived Concen me the chara ning DCGLs 2 Volume 3 (9), Table 6 assification o r
a tion includ e bove 3 feet b ed to FRS.
orical opera from the HS and direction y activities.
m ents and s uwere samp land maxim u s of surfaceons (MDC) i ty were se n designed a a racterizati o f or each sur v 2-14 t was used d u nits was t h s urface acti v value was c o m ination wo u distribution o on surveys i n n is to quant i r eas the FR S ompliance w i ty and qu a tamination i n face water.
cific survey e requisite ch hrough the e necessary for for LTP, and remediation for LACBW onents to a d d on open haracterizatio ce of final s ocused on g
g ather the ap e ven steps i n ed identifyi n below grade Consequen t u rrounding s o led volume t um activity asoils were as will be e nt to an off
, and concret emain in the LACBWR Ad e data was a whether add ures, surface ures at LAC nted with the be answere appropriate c on which un es not obtain n some cases ntration Guid acterization s presented i
-a nd perfor m o n Survey Pl vey unit. F o during char a he nuclide-vity based o n o nservative a u ld be princ i o f 100% Co n a similar m ify and deli n S goal is co with 10 CF R antity were n each appl i propriate d a n the DQO d ng the type swill remai n tly, sample coils. Build i t rically. S u a s well as t hmade usin g employed f o-site labora t med in acc oan. Survey o r example, acterization a specific sc r n Co-60 fro m a s it was a n i pally Co-6 0-60 since th e manner as a n n eate conta m omparison o f R 20.1402. performed ticable surv e a ta using th e development s and quant i n following d c ollection w a i ng concret e ufficient me h e sample st a g the same o r FSS. Vo t ory for ana ordance wi t design inco ran open lan d as an action r eening val u m NUREG-nticipated th a 0 and Cs-13 7 e screening v n ticipated f o m inated are a f data again s Characteri z to determin ey unit, incl u e DQO proc e process are
, Residual R
: ities of me d decommissi o a s focused o e was sampl easurements a ndard devi ainstrument slumetric sa mlysis of Ha r t h all appl i r porated a g r d survey un i level u e of 1757, a t the 7 and v alue or the as and s t the zation e the u ding e ss as : d ia to o ning o n the ed by were a tion. s and mples rd-to-icable raded it was La Cros s License T Revisio n designat e the unre s Class 1 s present.
.91 (Pcrit = 0 of impacted o 2-13 ational and SA and prev n to the pers The Plan w instructions haracterizati execution of r the design o d
to identi f Class 2 o survey mselect lo cmeasure m b iased s u unit. Adelineat e warrante survey u n The are a characte rS a l s uB s y FR a dS ASS a rSC PA L 2.2.2.1.The nu m b y asses s s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e d as Class stricted rele a s urvey unit f The survey fy the latera l or Class 3 r e measurement c ations for s ment and/or urvey desig n A biased ap p e the extent od if the cha r n it. as and mate r rization sur v urface scan s ll Class 1, 2 u rvey unit L B iased subsu r ystems of cigure 2-3.
alternatives WR calls for t depth of at l land areas on of equipm surveys is no general open te pads. Co e end-state dministration ssessed for q ditional chara and subsurf CBWR. Con e same data ed by the cha classification nderestimate n adequate in s, this can in deline Level survey was in NUREG-1 Radioactive 0.10) for soil open land or radiological vious site ch sonnel respo worked in co s (sample pl on data.
Random sa m d dition, soil cans and s Administrati oamples wer ecans and sa m reas. cans and sa m C oncrete sa m iping and V A b ackgrou n LACBWR i nNum b mber of meas u sing the sa m W ater Reacto r Plan 1 because i t a se criteria.
the Plan wa of FRS, s and techn the demoliti least 3 feet b and remain ment, system ot required i n land areas oncrete core condition.
f ocused on b design was l and vertic a e ceived sur vlocations a n static meas usample lo c n or a rando m proach was o f an area t h racterization ials survey e v ey included s and r ando m 2 , 3, and n o L 3012102 (i.
n Building a quality and a acterization face soils, or ntinuing cha quality and aracterizatio n of a survey es the poten nformation to ncrease the p ls (DCGLs) performed, 1757 and th Contamina ls were used r soil survey l informatio aracterizatio onsible for im njunction w lans) that w as used to m nologies and ion and remo below grade ning structu ms or struct in accordanc s including:
e r face soil s a oncern in C m ples were t asamples w eamples we r o n Building e taken fro m m ples were m ples were t m ples were t entillation t u nd radiation cluding: as p b er of Static urements a n p le size nec e r t may cont a Therefore, t b ounding th e based upo n al extent of t h v eys develo p nd scan area u rements an d cations at ra n m approach warranted h at requires effort was d e d and/or sa m: m and biase d on-impacted e., the switc h amples were Class 1 and a ken from a e re obtaine d re taken o n and the G-3 m the septic t a taken on L A t aken on G-3aken in the unnels. study was phalt, concre tMeasureme n nd/or sample e ssary to sa t 2-15 ain levels o f the characte r e contamina t n the numbe r he contami n ped to inclu d s. Biased s u d/or sample s n dom. The was addres s when the c remediatio n d esigned to v m pled in an d d surface an d open land a h yar d). taken alon g 2 areas inc l a sphalt and c directly bel o n accessible Coal Plant.
samples wer In addition, and several o adequacy. T data is requ r beneath th aracterization d the results on is whethe y unit is crit ntial for con o demonstra potential for m were not ye alternate ac e concentrat ation from D d as alternat units.
anks. A CBWR A d 3 Building abasement a rperformed te, and soil.
on collected on efforts. I mplementing with impleme were develop meet three pri d estimate w oval of all on
n ts and/or Ss that were t tisfy the DQ O f radiologic a rization sur v t ion where c r of measur e nation. Are a de a combi n urvey desig n s. Random e decision o f sed by the D c haracteriza t n. Alternati v verify the b a d around th e d subsurfac earea survey g side and un l uding the p c oncrete fro m o w the asph a e roof surf a dministratio n a ccess and h e reas of the Ron materia lamples t aken in eac h O s. al contamin a veys that we rontaminatio ements and a s classified n ation of ra n n s used kno w survey desi g f whether t o D QO proces s t ion effort w v ely, a rand o a sis for the c e licensed a r e soils sam p units with derneath un d p iping syste m pads and a lt to a one m a ce areas o f n Building s u eavily trave l R eactor Bui ls similar t o h survey un i a tion greate r re performe d n was pote nsamples re qas non-imp a ndom and b wn informat i g n selected o use prima r s for each s u w as design e om approac h classificatio n r ea as part o p les were ta k the excepti o d erground pms as sho w paved area m eter depth.
: e. Conseque ures that wi tures that w ce with NUR site surface re taken from
f the LAC B u rfaces and led surfaces.lding, WT B o those fou n it was deter m r than d in a n tially q uired a cted, b iased ion to static rily a urvey e d to h was n of a of the k en in o n of piping wn on s. In BWR drain B , and n d at m ined La Cros s License T Revisio n For the c that will and/or s a of resid u For the sample s vertical e For non-validate measure mtrivial le v generate d 2.2.2.2.For the c survey uSample l to speci fi that we r responsi b survey d radioacti v potential from the 2.2.2.3.Survey u area to b area sca n Supervis was giv e survey u n 2.2.2.4.The cha r (beta an d survey o f FRS co n and vol usamplin gfollowin g s e Boiling W Termination n 0 c haracteriza t be subject e amples take n al radioacti v characteriz a s ize was ba s e xtent of the impacted a nthe basis m ents and/o vels of lice n d radionucli d Deter m c haracteriza t n its that wi l l ocations w e ic locations w r e taken in b le Radiolo g d esign pro c v ity, depresspill locati oHSA aided Scan C u nits were s c b e scanned i n ned was c or and/or t h en to infor m n it. Type s r acterizatio n d gamma); s t f any concr e n sisted of a c umetric sam p g of surface g is a descri p W ater Reacto r Plan tion of imp a e d to FSS, t h n in the surv e ve contamin a a tion of Cla s ed upon th econtaminat i nd Class 3 o p of the cla s o r samples w n see-genera t d es are pres e m ination of t ion of non
, characteriz of the G-3 st The data was uired, primar he concrete f n surveys w included in er or not a su tical to the su tamination c ate that the su making deci et establishe ction levels tion values f Decommissio e action leve d and t was g and enting ped to imary waste n-site
-l l be subjec t ere determin w ithin the s u each surve g ical Protec t cess. Consions, disc o ons, or area sin the selec t C overage c anned to t h n each surv ontingent u pe Project H e mation from s of Measur e n survey of tatic beta m e e te and/or as combinatio n p les. The s u and subsur f p tion of the d r a cted Class 1 he minimu m ey units we r ation in the sss 1 structu r e necessary n ion. p en land su r s sification.
: ently, ill be ill be REG-e and m the zation tation s then ily of floors will be n FRS urvey urvey could urvey isions ed for were found oning els to  
w as suffici e t ed radionu c e nt in non-i m Static Meas u-impacted a n t ed to FRS, e d by gener urvey unit.
 
Ty unit was t ion Super v sideration w olored areas
La Cross License T Revision For struc to evalu 7,100 dpm Appendix radionuc the conse for Cs-13 2.2.1. D DQOs w FRS. Ho to determ unrestrict inspectio nature, e applicabl Characte outlined
, s where the t ion of biase d h e extent pr ey unit was p on the pr o ealth Physic the initial w ements and S building su r easurement s phalt-paved n of surface urvey of th e face soil, se d d ifferent ty p 2-16 1 and Class m number o f re commens u survey unit.
: 1) State
res that wil n umber of s r vey units, t h Conseque n e nt to ensur e c lides are p r m pacted are a urement an d n d impacte d sample loc aating rando m T he locatio ndetermine d v isor and/or w as given , cracks, lo w ground ha s d locations.actical in a cdetermine d o fessional j uist during t h w alk downs Samples r faces cons i s , m aterial s a open land ascans (beta e open land diment and s pes of meas u 2 open lan d f random o r urate with t h  l remain a n samples ne e he primary c n tly, the n u e with reas o resent in C l a s. d Sample L o d open land a tions were m pairs of c n of biased m d by the p r the Project to locatio n w point gra v s been distu r ccordance w d during the udgment of he survey d e and the a m i sted of a c o amples and s a reas that w i and gamm aareas consi ssurface wat e u rements an d d areas (pa v r biased dir e h e probabili t n d be subje c e ded to asse s c haracteriza tumber of sonable con f lass 3 areas ocations areas and C primarily c h oordinates t measuremen t r ofessional j Health Ph y ns that ex h v ity drain p rbed. Hist o w ith their cl asurvey des i the Radiol o e sign proces m bient radia t o mbination smears. Th e i ll remain a n a), static be t sted of gam m e r for isoto p d samples th a ved and unp a e ct measure m t y of the pre s cted to FR S ss the later a t ion DQO w systematic fidence that and no lic e Class 2 stru c hosen at ra nhat corresp o t s and/or sa m judgment o y sicist duri n hibit meas u p oints, actu a orical infor m a ssification.
: 2) Ident
i gn process.
: 3) Ident
o gical Prot es. Conside r t ion levels i of surface e characteri z nd be subjec t ta measure m m a scans a n pic analysis. at were utili z a ved) ments sence S , the al and w as to static only e nsee-ctural ndom. o nded m ples of the n g the u rable a l and m ation  The The e ction r ation i n the scans zation ted to ments, n d the The zed.
: 4) Defin
La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.2.2.4.1Gamma activity.  
: 5) Deve
: 6) Speci
: 7) Optim The DQO collect. N and will assessme obtaining obtained Direct m Minimal that exhi Detect (H 2.2.2. S Characte approved approach se Boiling W Termination n 0 ctures, the gr ate the clas m/100cm2 to x H. Use of lide distribu ervative appr 37 is signific Data Quality were impleme owever, the mine the rad ted use crit ons and surv xtent and ra le structures rization surv in MARSSIM the problem tify the decis tify inputs to ne the study elop a decisio ify limits on mize the des Os for site No structure therefore no ent of concre g core samp to determin measurement Detectable ibited the hi HTD) radion urvey Desig rization sur d procedures h based upon Water Reactor Plan ross screenin ssification o otal gross be f the Co-60 ution for surf roach was to cantly greate y Objectives ented for ch goal of char ionuclide m teria to dem veys of suff ange of radio
, residues, so veys were de M, Appendi m,
: sion, o the decision boundaries, on rule, n decision err ign for obtai characteriza es located ab ot be subject ete in basem ples. Soils ne the mean s and scans Concentrati ighest activi nuclide(s).
gn rveys were s and the Cha n the DQOs f r
ng level that of survey u eta-gamma s screening v face contam o assume a d er.
s haracterizatio racterization mixture, wher monstrate co fficient quali oactive cont oils and surf esigned to g ix D. The se n,
rors, and ining data.
ation include bove 3 feet b ed to FRS.
ments and su were sampl and maximu s of surface ons (MDC) ity were sen designed a aracterizatio for each surv 2-14 t was used d units was th surface activ value was co mination wou distribution o on surveys in n is to quanti reas the FRS ompliance w ity and qua tamination in face water.
gather the ap even steps in ed identifyin below grade Consequent urrounding so led volumet um activity a soils were as will be e nt to an off-and perform on Survey Pl vey unit. Fo during chara he nuclide-vity based on onservative a uld be princi of 100% Co n a similar m ify and delin S goal is co with 10 CFR antity were n each appli propriate da n the DQO d ng the types will remain tly, sample c oils. Buildi trically. Su as well as th made using employed fo
-site laborat med in acco an. Survey or example, acterization a specific scr n Co-60 from as it was an ipally Co-60
-60 since the manner as an neate contam omparison of R 20.1402.
performed t icable surve ata using the development s and quanti n following d collection wa ing concrete ufficient me he sample sta g the same or FSS. Vo tory for ana ordance wit design incor an open land as an action reening valu m NUREG-nticipated tha 0 and Cs-137 e screening v nticipated fo minated area f data agains Characteriz to determin ey unit, inclu e DQO proce process are:
ities of med decommissio as focused o e was sample asurements andard devia instruments lumetric sam lysis of Har th all appli rporated a gr d survey uni level ue of
: 1757, at the 7 and value or the as and st the zation e the uding ess as dia to oning on the ed by were ation.
s and mples rd-to-icable raded it was  
 
La Cross License T Revision designate the unres Class 1 s present.
to identif Class 2 o survey m select loc measurem biased su unit. A delineate warrante survey un The area character S
al su B
sy F
R ad S
A S
S ar S
C P
A L
2.2.2.1.
The num by assess se Boiling W Termination n 0 ed as Class stricted relea survey unit f The survey fy the lateral or Class 3 re measurement cations for s ment and/or urvey design A biased app e the extent o d if the char nit.
as and mater rization surv urface scans ll Class 1, 2 urvey unit L Biased subsur ystems of c igure 2-3.
Random sam ddition, soil cans and s Administratio amples were cans and sam reas.
cans and sam Concrete sam iping and V A backgroun LACBWR in Numb mber of measu sing the sam Water Reactor Plan 1 because it ase criteria.
focused on b design was l and vertica eceived surv locations an static measu sample loc n or a random proach was of an area th racterization ials surveye vey included s and random 2, 3, and no L3012102 (i.e rface soil sa oncern in C mples were ta samples we amples wer on Building e taken from mples were mples were t mples were t entillation tu nd radiation cluding: asp ber of Static urements an ple size nece r
t may conta Therefore, t bounding the based upon al extent of th veys develop nd scan area urements and cations at ran m approach warranted hat requires effort was d ed and/or sam m and biased on-impacted e., the switch amples were Class 1 and aken from a ere obtained re taken on and the G-3 m the septic ta taken on LA taken on G-3 aken in the unnels.
study was phalt, concret Measuremen nd/or sample essary to sat 2-15 ain levels of the character e contaminat n the number he contamin ped to includ
: s. Biased su d/or samples ndom. The was address when the c remediation designed to v mpled in and d surface and open land a hyard).
taken along 2 areas incl asphalt and c directly belo n accessible Coal Plant.
anks.
ACBWR Ad 3 Building a basement ar performed te, and soil.
nts and/or S s that were t tisfy the DQO f radiologica rization surv tion where c r of measure nation. Area de a combin urvey design
: s. Random e decision of sed by the D characterizat
: n. Alternativ verify the ba d around the d subsurface area survey gside and un luding the p concrete from ow the aspha e roof surfa dministration access and he reas of the R on material amples taken in each Os.
al contamina veys that wer ontaminatio ements and as classified nation of ran ns used know survey desig f whether to DQO process tion effort w vely, a rando asis for the c e licensed ar e soils samp units with derneath und piping syste m pads and alt to a one m ace areas of n Building su eavily travel Reactor Bui ls similar to h survey uni ation greater re performed n was poten samples req as non-impa ndom and b wn informati gn selected o use primar s for each su was designe om approach classification rea as part o ples were tak the exceptio derground p ms as show paved area meter depth.
f the LACB urfaces and led surfaces.
lding, WTB o those foun it was determ r than d in a ntially quired
: acted, biased ion to static rily a urvey ed to h was n of a of the ken in on of piping wn on
: s. In BWR drain B, and nd at mined
 
La Cross License T Revision For the c that will and/or sa of residu For the sample s vertical e For non-validate measurem trivial lev generated 2.2.2.2.
For the c survey u Sample l to specifi that wer responsib survey d radioactiv potential from the 2.2.2.3.
Survey u area to b area scan Supervis was give survey un 2.2.2.4.
The char (beta and survey of FRS con and volu sampling following se Boiling W Termination n 0 characterizat be subjecte amples taken al radioactiv characteriza size was bas extent of the impacted an the basis ments and/o vels of licen d radionuclid Determ characterizat nits that wil locations we ic locations w re taken in ble Radiolog design proc vity, depres spill locatio HSA aided Scan C units were sc be scanned i nned was c or and/or th en to inform nit.
Types racterization d gamma); st f any concre nsisted of a c umetric samp g of surface g is a descrip Water Reactor Plan tion of impa ed to FSS, th n in the surve ve contamina ation of Cla sed upon the contaminati nd Class 3 op of the clas or samples w nsee-generat des are prese mination of tion of non-ll be subject ere determin within the su each surve gical Protect cess. Con sions, disco ons, or areas in the select Coverage canned to th n each surv ontingent up e Project He mation from s of Measure n survey of tatic beta me ete and/or as combination ples. The su and subsurf ption of the d r
acted Class 1 he minimum ey units wer ation in the s ss 1 structur e necessary n ion.
pen land sur ssification.
was sufficie ted radionuc ent in non-im Static Measu
-impacted an ted to FRS, ed by gener urvey unit. T y unit was tion Superv sideration w olored areas, s where the tion of biased he extent pr ey unit was pon the pro ealth Physic the initial w ements and S building sur easurements phalt-paved n of surface urvey of the face soil, sed different typ 2-16 1 and Class m number of re commensu survey unit.
res that wil number of s rvey units, th Consequen ent to ensure clides are pr mpacted area urement and nd impacted sample loca ating random The location determined visor and/or was given  
, cracks, low ground has d locations.
actical in ac determined ofessional ju ist during th walk downs Samples rfaces consi s, material sa open land a scans (beta e open land diment and s pes of measu 2 open land f random or urate with th l remain an samples nee he primary c ntly, the nu e with reaso resent in Cl as.
d Sample Lo d open land ations were m pairs of c n of biased m d by the pr the Project to location w point grav s been distur ccordance w d during the udgment of he survey de and the am isted of a co amples and s areas that wi and gamma areas consis surface wate urements and d areas (pav r biased dire he probabilit nd be subjec eded to asses characterizat umber of s onable conf lass 3 areas ocations areas and C primarily ch oordinates t measurement rofessional j Health Phy ns that exh vity drain p rbed. Histo with their cla survey desi the Radiolo esign proces mbient radiat ombination smears. The ill remain an a), static bet sted of gamm er for isotop d samples tha ved and unpa ect measurem ty of the pres cted to FRS ss the latera tion DQO w systematic fidence that and no lice Class 2 struc hosen at ran hat correspo ts and/or sam judgment o ysicist durin hibit measu points, actua orical inform assification.
ign process.
ogical Prote
: s. Consider tion levels i of surface e characteriz nd be subject ta measurem ma scans an pic analysis.
at were utiliz aved) ments sence S, the al and was to static only ensee-ctural ndom.
onded mples of the ng the urable al and mation The The ection ration in the scans zation ted to
: ments, nd the The zed.  
 
La Cross License T Revision 2.2.2.4.1 Gamma activity.
used for Ludlum M Ludlum M Scanning rate not t was main and, loca 2.2.2.4.2 Scanning 7,100 dpm including Hand-hel used.
Beta scan and with prevented was dete calculate of the sur If not im instrumen evaluatio investiga 2.2.2.4.3 Direct m surfaces typically detectors Direct m acquiring typically designate adjusted 2.2.2.4.4 If applic verify lo se Boiling W Termination n 0 Gamm scans were Sodium io these scans.
Model 44-10 Model 44-10 g was perfor to exceed 0.
ntained with ations of elev Beta S g was per m/100cm2 a g, but not li ld beta scin nning was p h a scanning d scanning a ermined, an d a priori to rvey.
mpacted by h nt to identi on. Any ide ation and pot Direct measurement of the build performed
: s.
measurements g data over used for su ed investigat as appropria Remo able, remov oose surface Water Reactor Plan ma Surface S performed o dide (NaI) g EnergySol 0 Detector 0 NaI detecto rmed by mo
.5 m (20 in) hin 15 cm (6 vated direct l Surface Scan rformed in action level.
imited to; fl ntillation and performed w g speed of o at the specif nd the scan o ensure that high ambient fy locations entified areas tential decon t Measureme ts were per dings or on using ~10 s were condu a pre-determ urface measu tion level or ate to achiev ovable Surfac vable beta an e contamina r
Scans over open la gamma scin utions Techn Sensitivity (
ors to Co-60 oving the de per second.
in) of the s levels were f ns order to Beta scans loors, walls, d/or gas-flo with the dete one detector fied distance nning techni t the MDC f t noise level s of elevate s of elevated ntamination.
ents rformed to n concrete o 00 cm2 or l ucted by pla mined coun urements and r MDC und ve an accepta ce Contamin nd/or alpha ation is less 2-17 and surfaces ntillation det nical Suppor (10) examin 0 and Cs-137 etector in a s The distan urface if po flagged for f locate ar s were perfo
, ceilings, ro ow proportio ctor position r active win e, the detect ique adjuste for scanning s, technician d activity th d contamina detect total or asphalt pa arger sized acing the det nt time. A d generally p er considera able MDC fo nation contaminati s than the to identify tectors (typic rt Document nes the resp 7 when used serpentine p nce between ssible. Aud further inves reas of res ormed over a oofs, asphal onal detecto n maintained ndow per se tion sensitiv ed accordin g was approp ns monitored that require ation were m levels of aved areas.
scintillatio tector near t count time provided det ation. The i or direct mea on or smear applicable locations of cally 2 x 2 t (TSD) RS-onse and sc d for scanning pattern, whil n the detecto dible signals stigation and sidual activ accessible st lt and concr ors (typically d within 1 c econd. If su vity for the a ngly. Scan priate for the d the audibl further inv marked or fla contaminati These me on or gas-fl the surface to of one to t tection level instrument c asurements.
r surveys w action level f residual su
) were typi
-TD-313196 can MDC o g surface soi le advancing or and the su were monit d/or sampling vity above tructural sur rete paved a y 126 cm2) cm of the su urface condi alternate dis nning speed e stated obje e response o estigation a agged for fu ion on struc asurements low proport o be counted two minutes ls well below count times were perform
: l. A smea urface ically 6-006, of the ils.
g at a urface tored;
: g.
the rfaces areas.
were urface itions stance was ective of the and/or urther ctural were tional d and s was w the were med to ar for


used for Ludlum MLudlum M Scannin g rate not twas mai n and, loc a 2.2.2.4.2 Scannin g 7,100 dp mincludin g Hand-he l used.
La Cross License T Revision removab surfaces.
Beta sca n and wit h prevente d was det ecalculat e of the su r If not i minstrume n evaluati o investig a 2.2.2.4.3 Direct m surfaces typically  
moderate activity a 2.2.2.4.5 Concrete contamin will rema diamond 1/2-inch w pulverize 2.2.2.4.6 Samples locations scanning defined a split spoo tools.
Subsurfa hand aug survey un 2.2.3. In The radi provide b identified action le and expe static me Concern Commer perform
: 3) analys Instrume in Table 2.2.3.1.
All data character se Boiling W Termination n 0 le activity w A 100 cm e pressure. S as appropriat Concr e core boring nation and th ain and be su bit core dri wide pucks ed and analy Mater of soil, sed s as well as
: g. Surface so as soil below on sampling ace soil was gers. Subsur nit.
nstrumenta ation detect both reliable d for the de evels. Detec ected perform easurements (ROC) at a cially availa the three ba sis of materia ntation and 2-3.
Calibr loggers, ass rization wer Water Reactor Plan was usually m2 surface a Smears were te.
rete and Asp g and the sa he presence ubjected to F ill. The con s, represen yzed for isoto rial Sampling iment, and s other locatio oil is defined w the top 15 g system or, b sampled by rface soil sam ation Selectio tion and me e operation a ecommission ctor selectio mance in th and scanni MDC of 50%
able portable asic survey m al samples.
nominal MD ration sociated dete re calibrated r
taken at eac area was sa e then analyz phalt Core Sa ampling of of volumet FRS. Core b ncrete samp nting a certa opic content.
g sludge were ons in areas d as the top cm layer in by using han y direct push mpling was on, Use and asurement i and adequate ning of LAC on was based e field. In ng were cap
% of the app e and laborat measuremen DC values th ectors, and a d on an annu 2-18 ch direct me ampled with zed for the p ampling concrete we tric contami bore samplin le produced ain depth in obtained fr s exhibiting 15 cm (6-in n 1 m increm nd trowels, b h sampling s performed a d Minimum nstrumentat e sensitivity t CBWR at le d on detecti all cases, th pable of det plicable actio tory instrum ts: 1) surfac hat were em all other por ual basis us easurement l h a circular presence of g ere used to nation in co ng of concre d by the cori nto the surf rom designed elevated act nch) layer of ments. Surfa bucket auger systems (e.g as necessary Detectable tion for char to detect the evels suffici ion sensitivi he instrumen tecting the a on level.
ments and det ce scanning; mployed durin rtable instrum sing Nationa location on cloth or pa gross beta an assess the d oncrete wall ete was acco ing was typ face. Conc d biased and tivity that w f soil while s ace soil was rs, or other s
: g. GeoProbe y to address t Concentrat racterization e initial suite iently below ity, operatin nts and detec anticipated R tectors were
: 2) static me ng character mentation th al Institute o non-asphalt aper filter, u nd/or gross depth of sur ls and floors omplished us pically sliced crete pucks d random sa were identifie subsurface s collected us suitable sam
) or by m the DQOs fo tions (MDC n was select e of radionuc w the establ ng characteri ctors selecte Radionuclid typically us easurements rization are hat were use of Standards t type using alpha rficial s that sing a d into were ample ed by soil is sing a mpling anual or the Cs) ted to clides lished
: istics, ed for des of sed to s; and listed ed for s and


detector s Direct m acquirin gtypically
La Cross License T Revision Technolo addressed 2.2.3.2.
The recei used for portable character 2.2.4. L Gamma proportio laborator quality p preparati site labor In all ca achieved accepted analytica laborator 2.2.5. Q MARSSI used to quality fo 1576, Mu Regulato through (12). Fu may be achieved The QAP used duri functiona All chara approved audit a
Characte prescribe applied contracto se Boiling W Termination n 0 ogy (NIST) t d in the QAP Instru ipt, inspectio characteriza radiologica rization is ad Laboratory I spectroscop onal countin ry in accorda programs of ion and analy ratory under ases, analyti
: d. The anal methodolog al methods ries used for Quality Assu IM, section demonstrate for sample an ulti-Agency R ory Guide 4.
Normal Op urther, MAR used in add
: d.
PP was prep ing the site c al activities, acterization d procedures and surveil rization staf ed, impleme to any app ors.
Water Reactor Plan traceable sou PP.
ument Use an on, issue, co ation was p al instrumen ddressed in th Instrument py was prim ng and liquid ance with ap the contrac ysis of chara the QAPP.
ical methods lysis of rad gies or othe employed characteriza urance 2.2 discusse e that site c nalysis taken Radiologica
.15, Quality erations to RSSIM and dition to, or pared and im characterizat the DQO pr activities es
: s. The effe llance activ ff and progr ented, and v plicable serv r
urces. The c nd Control ntrol, and ac performed in ntation. T he QAPP.
Methods an marily perfor d scintillatio pproved labo cted off-site acterization s s were estab diological co er comparab and the la ation.
es the need f conditions ar n to support al Laboratory y Assurance License Ter MARLAP b r in lieu of, mplemented t tion and FRS rocess, and m ssential to d ective imple
: vities, incl ram self-ass verified wh vices provid 2-19 calibration o ccountability n accordance The issue a nd Sensitivi rmed by th on analysis oratory proce vendor labo samples prov blished to e ontaminants ble methodo aboratory M for a quality re acceptabl t characteriz y Analytical of Radiolo rmination) -
both indicate existing qu to ensure th S process. T measures nec data quality w mentation o luding fiel sessments, a hen deficienc ded by off-of instrument y of portable e with issue and control ities he on-site ra was perform edures. Ener oratories tha vided the sam ensure that used stand ologies. Ta MDC achiev y system to le for unres zation and F l Protocols M ogical Moni
- Effluent St e that a Qua uality system e adequacy The QAPP de cessary to ac were implem of characteri ld walk-do as appropriat cies were i
-site vendor ts used for c e radiologica e and contro l of instru adiological med by an rgySolutions at were used me level of required M dard approve able 2-4 prov ved by the ensure the a stricted rele FRS is discu Manual (MA itoring Prog treams and ality Assura ms to ensur of data bein escribes poli chieve qualit mented and ization was owns by te. Correct identified.
rs, as well characterizati al instrument ol procedure uments used laboratory.
approved ve s ensured tha d for the rec quality as th MDC values ed and gene vides the ty off-site ve adequacy of ase. Labor ssed in NUR ARLAP) (11 grams (Incep the Environ ance Project re data qual ng developed icy, organiza ty data.
performed u verified thr EnergySolu tive actions These mea as on-site ion is tation es for d for Gas endor at the
: ceipt, he on-were erally ypical endor f data ratory REG-
) and eption nment Plan ity is d and
: ation, using rough utions were asures sub-


designat e adjusted 2.2.2.4.4If applic verify l o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 .Gam m scans were Sodium io these scans.
La Cross License T Revision The Cha quality a and is su follows:
M ode l 44-1 0 Model 44-1 0 g was perfo r t o exceed 0
E op A
.n tained wit h a tions of ele v.Beta S g was pe r m/100c m 2 a g , but not l i l d beta sci n n ning was p h a scannin g d scanning a e rmined, a n d a priori t o r vey. m pacted by h n t to identi o n. Any id e a tion and po t.Direc t measuremen t of the buil dperformed
st D
: s. measurement s g data over used for s u e d investiga t as appropri a.Rem o able, remo v o ose surfac e W ater Reacto r Plan ma Surface Sperformed odide (NaI) g  Energy Sol 0 Detector 0 NaI detect o rmed by m o.5 m (20 in) hin 15 cm (6 vated direct l S urface Sca n rformed in a ction level.
Details o the proce data acqu requirem P
imited to; f l n tillation an d performed w g speed of o a t the speci f n d the sca n o ensure tha t high ambien tfy location s e ntified area s t ential deco n t Measurem e t s were pe r dings or o nusing ~1 0 s were cond u a pre-deter m urface meas u tion level o r a te to achie v o vable Surfa c vable beta a n e contamin a r Scans o ver open l a gamma sci nutions Tech n Sensitivity (o rs to Co-6 0 oving the d e per second. in) of the s levels were f n s order to  Beta scan s l oors, walls
E P
, d/or gas-fl o with the dete o ne detecto r fied distanc e n ning techn i t the MDC f t noise level s of elevate s of elevate d ntamination.
S P
e nts rformed to n concrete o 0 0 cm 2 or l u cted by pl a m ined cou n urements an d r MDC un d ve an accept a ce Contami n n d/or alpha ation is les s 2-17 and surfaces n tillation det n ical Suppo r (10) exami n 0 and Cs-13 7 e tector in a s  The dista n u rface if po flagged for flocate ar s were perf o , ceilings, r o o w proporti octor positio n r active wi n e, the detec t i que adjust e f or scannin g s, technicia nd activity t h d contamin adetect total or asphalt p a arger size d acing the de t nt time. A d generally p er consider a a ble MDC f o nation contaminati s than the to identify t ectors (typi c r t Docu m en t n es the resp 7 when used serpentine p nce betwee n ssible. Au d f urther inve s reas of re s ormed over a o ofs, aspha l o nal detect o n maintaine d n dow per s e t ion sensiti v e d accordi n g was appro p ns monitore d t hat require a tion were m levels of a ved areas.scintillati o t ector near tcount time p rovided de t ation. The i or direct me aon or smea rapplicable locations o f cally 2" x 2 "t (TSD) RS
M pr All chara Plan, the 2.3.
-onse and s c d for scannin g pattern, whi l n the detect o d ible signals stigation an dsidual acti v accessible s t l t and conc r o rs (typicall y d within 1 c econd. If s u v ity for the a ngly. Sca n priate for th e d the audibl further inv m arked or fl acontaminat i These me o n or gas-f l the surface t o of one to t t ection leve l instrument c asurements.
S In Octob placing t October character accelerat EnergySo October 9 August 6 documen Characte PN-1640 2015 Fie Radioact character character se Boiling W Termination n 0 aracterization assurance and ubject to the Establishmen perations.
r surveys w action leve l f residual s u") were typ i-TD-31319 6 c an MDC o g surface so i l e advancin g or and the s uwere moni t d/or samplin g v ity above tructural su r r ete paved a y 126 cm 2) cm of the s u u rface cond i alternate di s n ning speed e stated obj e e response oestigation a a gged for f u i on on stru casurements l ow propor t o be counte d two minute s ls well belo w count times were perfor m l. A sme a u rface ically 6-006, of the ils. g at a u rface t ored; g. the rfaces areas. were u rface i tions stance was ective of the a nd/or u rther ctural were t ional d and s was w the were med to a r for La Cros s License T Revisio nremovab surfaces.
Actions to en taff.
moderat eactivity a 2.2.2.4.5 Concret econtami n will rem adiamond 1/2-inch w pulveriz e 2.2.2.4.6Samples location s scannin g defined a split spo otools. Subsurf a hand au g survey u n 2.2.3.I n The radi provide bidentifie daction l e and exp e static m e Concern Commerperform
Documentatio of the QA/QC edures and s uisition and ments. The sp ersonnel qua Execution in roper docum election of a roper instrum Management rocedures, p acterization QAPP, all a ummary of ber of 2005, the unit into of 2014, rization of L tion of de olutions in a 9, 2014. T 6, 2015. The nted in two erization Sur 017-001, LA eld Work (14 tive systems rization dat rization has Water Reactor Plan n Survey Pl d quality co QAPP. The nt/implement nsure that the on of the dat C elements s sample plan d recording pecific QA/Q alifications, accordance mentation of appropriate i ment calibra oversight of protocols, an activities w applicable im f Characteri Dairyland p o a SAFSTO Dairyland LACBWR in commission accordance w The schedule e results of th o separate rvey Report CBWR Radi 4).
: 3) analy s Instrum e in Table 2.2.3.1.All data characte r s e Boiling W Termination n 0 le activity w  A 100 c m e pressure.
s that rema a in certain been deferre r
S a s appropria t.Conc r e core borin g n ation and t h a in and be s ubit core dr i wide "puck s e d and anal y.Mate r of soil, sed s as well as
lan was dev ontrol (QA/Q e QA/QC pr tation of plan e procedures ta collected.
: g. Surface s o as soil belo w on samplin g a ce soil was gers. Subsu r n it. n strument a ation detec t b oth reliabl e d for the d e e vels. Dete c e cted perfo r m easurements (ROC) at a cially avail a the three b a sis of materi a ntation and 2-3. Calib rloggers, as s rization we r W ater Reacto r Plan w as usually m 2 surface a Smears wer e te. rete and As p g and the s a h e presence u bjected to F ill. The co n s", represe n y zed for isot o rial Samplin g iment, and sother locati o o il is define d w the top 15 g system or, b sampled b y r face soil sa m ation Selecti o tion and me e operation a ecommissio n ctor selecti o m ance in th and scanni M DC of 50%able portabl e asic survey m al samples.
specific to ch instructions was guided QC program experience, with approv survey data instruments t ation and dai f characteriz d documenta were conduct mplementing ization Surv performed a OR condition contracted n anticipation ning activiti with EnergyS ed EnergyS he site chara reports, GG for October iological Ch ain at LAC n areas du ed until such 2-20 veloped acco QC) program ogram elem ns, procedur are understo haracterizati
nominal M D ration s ociated det e re calibrate d r taken at ea c area was s a e then analy z p halt Core S a a mpling of of volume t F RS. Core b ncrete samp nting a ce r t a o pic content
. The chara d and condu m component and training ved procedur and sample to perform th ily functiona zation activit ation require ted in accor g procedures vey Results limited cha
.g sludge were ons in area s d as the top cm layer i n b y using ha n y direct pus h m pling was o n, Use an dasurement i a nd adequat e n ing of LA C on was base d e field. In ng were ca p% of the ap p e and labora t measuremen D C values t h e ctors, and a d on an ann u 2-18 c h direct m e ampled wit h zed for the p ampling concrete w e tric contami bore sampli n le produce d a in depth i
: n. This sur EnergySol n of the deve ies. Char Solutions cha Solutions sit acterization s G-EO-31319 r and Novem haracterizati CBWR affec ue to ambie h time that ra ording to th m for the dec ments applica res, and prot ood and foll ion are prese acterization o ucted in com s for site cha
: n. obtained fr s exhibiting 15 cm (6-i n n 1 m incre m n d trowels, b h sampling sperformed a d Minimum nstrumentat e sensitivity t C BWR at l e d on detect i all cases, t h p able of de t plicable acti o t ory instru mts: 1) surfa c h at were e m a ll other po r ual basis u s easurement l h a circular p resence of g ere used to nation in c o n g of concr e d by the cor i n to the sur f rom designe delevated ac t n ch) layer o f ments. Surf a b ucket auge r systems (e.
: g.
g a s necessar y Detectable t ion for cha rto detect th e evels suffic i i on sensitiv i he instrume n tecting the a on level. m ents and de t c e scanning; m ployed duri n rtable instru m sing Nation a l ocation on cloth or p a g ross beta a n assess the d o nc r ete wal l e te was acc o i ng was ty p f ace. Con c d biased an d t ivity that w f soil while s ace soil was r s, or other s g. GeoProbe y to add r ess t Concentra t racterizatio n e initial suit e i ently belo w ity, operati n n ts and dete c anticipated R tectors were 2) static m eng characte r m entation t h al Institute o non-asphal t aper filter, u n d/or gross d epth of su r l s and floor s omplished u s p ically slice d c rete pucks d random s a were identifi e subsurface scollected u s s uitable sa m) or by m t he DQOs f o tions (MD C n was selec t e of radionu c w the estab l ng character i ctors select e Radionucli dtypically u s easurement s rization are hat were us e o f Standard s t type using alpha rficial s that s ing a d into    were ample e d by s oil is sing a m pling anual o r the C s) ted to c lides lished i stics, e d for d es of sed to s; and listed e d for s an d La Cros s License T Revisio n Technol o addresse d 2.2.3.2.The rece i used for portable characte r 2.2.4.LGamma proporti o laborato r quality p preparat i site labo r In all c a achieve d accepted analytic a laborato r 2.2.5.Q MARSS I used to quality fo 1576, Mu Regulat o through (12). F umay be achieve d The QA P used dur i function a All char a approve d audit a Charact e prescrib e applied contract o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 o gy (NIST) t d in the QA P Instr u ipt, inspecti ocharacteriz a radiologic a rization is a d L aborator y I spectrosco p o nal counti n r y in accord a programs of i on and anal y r atory under ases, analyt i d. The ana l methodolo g al methods ries used for Q ualit y Ass u I M, section demonstrat e for sample a n ulti-Agency R ory Guide 4
res.
.Normal Op urthe r , MA R used in ad d d. P P was pre p i ng the site c al activities, acterization d procedure s a nd survei l rization sta f ed, implem e to any ap p o rs. W ater Reacto r Plan t raceable so u PP. ument Use a n o n, issue, co ation was p al instrume n ddressed in t h I nstrument py was pri m n g and liqui d ance with a p the contra c ysis of char athe QAPP.
analyses.
ical method s l ysis of ra d gies or oth e employed characteriz a u rance 2.2 discuss e e that site c nalysis take n R adiologic a.15, Qualit y erations to R SSIM and dition to, o r p ared and i m c haracteriza t the DQO p r activities e s s. The eff e llance acti v f f and prog r e nted, and v plicable ser v r urces. The c n d Control ntrol, and a c performed i n n tation. T he QAPP. Methods a n marily perfo r d scintillati o p proved lab o cted off-site a cterization s s were esta b diological c o er compara band the l a a tion. es the need f c onditions a r n to suppor t a l Laborator y y Assurance License Te rMARLAP b r in lieu of, mplemented t t ion and FR S r ocess, and m ssential to d ective imple v ities, inc l ram self-as s v erified w h v ices provi d 2-19 calibration o c countabilit y n accordanc e T he issue a n d Sensitiv i rmed by t h o n analysis oratory proc e vendor lab o samples pro v blished to e ontaminants ble method o a boratory M f or a qualit y r e acceptab l t characteri z y Analytica l of Radiol o rmination)
he surveys.
-b oth indicat eexisting q u to ensure th S process.
T m easures ne c data quality wmentation o l uding fie l sessments, a h en deficien c d ed by off-of instrumen t y of portabl e e with issu e and contro l ities h e on-site r a was perfor m e dures. Ene r oratories th a vided the sa m e nsure that used stan d o logies. T a M DC achie v y system to le for unre s zation and F l Protocols M o gical Mon i- Effluent S t e that a Qu a uality syste me adequacy T he QAPP d e c essary to a c w e re imple m o f character i l d walk-d o a s appropria tcies were i-site vendo r t s used for c e radiologic a e and contr o l of instr u adiological m ed by an r gy Solution s at were use d me level of required M d ard approv e able 2-4 pro v v ed by the ensure the a s tricted rele F RS is discu M anual (M A itoring Pro g t reams and ality Assur a ms to ensu rof data bei n e scribes pol i chieve quali t m ented and ization was o wns by t e. Correc t identified.
rs, as well c haracterizat i al instrumen t ol procedur e uments use dlaboratory.
approved v e s ensured th a d for the re c quality as t h M DC values e d and gen e vides the t yoff-site v e a dequacy o f ase. Labo rssed in NU R ARLAP) (11 g rams (Inc epthe Enviro n ance Project r e data qual n g develope d i cy, organiz a t y data. performed u verified th r Energy Sol u tive actions These me a as on-site i on is tation es for d for  Gas e ndor a t the ceipt, he on-were erally y pical e ndor f data r atory R EG-) and eption n ment Plan ity is d and a tion, u sing r ough utions were a sures sub-La Cros s License T Revisio n The Ch a quality a and is s ufollows: E o pA s tD Details o the proc e data acq u require mPEPSPM p r All char a Plan, the 2.3.S In Octo b placing t October characte r accelera t Energy S o October 9 August 6docume n Charact e PN-164 0 2015 Fi e Radioac t characte r characte r s e Boiling W Termination n 0 a racterizatio n assurance an d ubject to the Establishme n perations.
A ctions to e n t aff. Documentati o o f the QA/Q C e dures and s uisition an d m ents. The s p ersonnel qu a E xecution in roper docu m election of a roper instru m Management r ocedures, p acterization QAPP, all a ummar y o f ber of 2005, the unit int o of 2014, r ization of L t ion of de o lutions in a 9, 2014. T 6, 2015. Th e n ted in tw o e rization Su r 0 17-001, LA e ld Work (1 4 t ive system s r ization dat r ization has W ater Reacto r Plan n Survey P l d quality c o QAPP. Th e nt/implemen t nsure that th e o n of the da t C elements s sample plan d recording p ecific QA/
Q alifications, accordance m entation of a ppropriate i ment calibr a oversight o f protocols, anactivities w applicable i m f Character i Dairyland p o a SAFST ODairyland LACBWR i n commissio n accordance w T he schedul e e results of t h o separate r vey Report CBWR Rad i 4). s that rem aa in certai n been deferr e r l an was de v o ntrol (QA/
Q e QA/QC p r t ation of pla n e procedures t a collected.
s pecific to c hinstructions was guide d Q C progra mexperience, with appro v survey data instruments t a tion and da i f characteri zd document a w ere conduc t mplementin g ization Sur v performed a O R conditio ncontracted n anticipatio n ning activit i w ith Energy S ed Energy S he site char areports, G Gfor Octobe r i ological C h a in at LA C n areas d u ed until suc h 2-20 veloped acc o Q C) progra mogram ele m n s, procedu r are underst o h aracterizat
: i. The char a d and cond u m component and trainin g v ed procedu rand sample to perform t h ily function a zation activi t a tion requir e t ed in acco r g procedures v e y Results limited ch a n. This su r Energy So l n of the dev e ies. Cha r S olutions ch a S olutions si t acterization s G-EO-3131 9 r and Nove m h aracterizat i CBWR affe c ue to ambi e h time that r a ording to t h m for the de c m ents applic a r es, and pro t o od and foll i on are pres e a cterization o u cted in co m s for site ch a g. r es. analyses.
h e surveys.
al checks.
al checks.
t ies relative t ements. r dance with , and appro v a racterizatio n rvey is doc u l utions to elopment o f racterizatio n aracterizati o t e character i s urveys per f 9 6-RS-RP-0 m ber 2014 F i on Survey R cted the ab e nt radiatioadiological o h e essential commission i able to char a t ocols for th e l owed by th e ented in the Q o perations a n m pliance w i a racterizati o to the adher e the Charac t ved sample p n survey of umented in perform a f this LTP a n n activities, o n procedur e ization eff o f ormed by E n 01, LACB W Field Work (Report for J ility to ac q o n levels.
ties relative t ements.
o r physical celements o i ng of LAC B acterization a e field e implement i QAPP, as w nd the asso c ith these Q A o n are as foll ence to terization S u plan instructthe LSE pr i Reference 7 a more de t nd the antici p , performe d es commenc e o rt conclud e nergy Soluti o W R R adiol o(13) and L C J une thru A quire mean iIn these c c onditions w of the BWR a re as i ng w ell as ciated A/QC ows: urvey ions. ior to 7. In tailed pated d by e d on e d on o ns is o gical C-RS-ugust ingful cases, would La Cros s License T Revisio n allow th e the deco m significa n b y revisi o 2.3.1.B During t backgro u acquired b ackgro u As part o b ackgro u LACB WNormall y be repre ssite area Supervis appropri a results.
rdance with  
, and approv aracterization rvey is docu lutions to elopment of racterization aracterizatio te characteri surveys perf 96-RS-RP-0 mber 2014 F ion Survey R cted the ab ent radiatio adiological o he essential commissioni able to chara tocols for the lowed by the ented in the Q operations an mpliance wi aracterizatio to the adhere the Charact ved sample p n survey of umented in perform a f this LTP an n activities, on procedure ization effo formed by En 01, LACBW Field Work (
Report for J ility to acq on levels.
or physical c elements o ing of LACB acterization a e field e implementi QAPP, as w nd the assoc ith these QA on are as foll ence to terization Su plan instruct the LSE pri Reference 7 a more det nd the anticip
, performed es commence ort conclude nergySolutio WR Radiolo (13) and LC June thru A quire meani In these c conditions w of the BWR are as ing well as ciated A/QC ows:
urvey ions.
ior to
: 7. In tailed pated d by ed on ed on ons is ogical C-RS-ugust ingful
: cases, would  
 
La Cross License T Revision allow the the decom significan by revisio 2.3.1. B During t backgrou acquired backgrou As part o backgrou LACBW Normally be repres site area Supervis appropria results.
were con Concrete is located non-impa approxim unit L40 L401210 samples a The ana backgrou can be at mean Cs 0.135 pC was 0.07 Relevant Station (Z at Zion S Zion to C geograph for distu backgrou within th categorie drainage se Boiling W Termination n 0 e survey of t mmissioning nt additiona on or addend
 
===Background===
the initial ch und study fo from vario und study is of the 2014 und levels a WR fell within y, backgroun sentative. H was chosen.
or selected a ate for obtain Although th nsidered unaf e samples an d north of th acted survey mately 100 s 12108. Soil 08 were also are provided lysis of the und study fo ttributed to g
-137 concen Ci/g with a m 0 resulting i t to LACBW ZNPS) titled Station (15).
Cs-137 leve hically simila urbed soils a und Cs-137 he expected es of soil in and non-dra Water Reactor Plan hese survey g process, in l characteriz dum as a par Study haracterizati or soils at LA ous location summarized characteriza at LACBWR n nominal ex nd reference However, no
. The Energ an area outs ning backgro he selected s ffected by pa nd direct me he LSE. A y unit L4012 quare meter l samples fro evaluated f d in sections e backgroun or soils. The global fallou ntration of s maximum ob in the upper WR is a study d ZionSolutio This docum ls anticipate ar. The docu as well as u levels for th range of d the non-im ainage, distu r
units. Solu ncluding foll zation data i rt of the requ on survey p ACBWR. R ns outside o d in Table 2-ation effort, R. The pur xpected leve areas shoul suitable off gySolutions P side of the L ound measu sample locat ast LACBW asurements sphalt samp 2106. Surfa rs of undistu om non-imp for use as ba 2.3.3 and 2.
nd soil sam e results did ut. For the t surface samp bserved con r range for th y performed ons TSD 13 ment was pr ed from wor ument predic undisturbed he site speci disturbed so mpacted area urbed and un 2-21 tions intends lowing the s is obtained, uired 2 year performed in Reference 7 of the owne
: 5.
EnergySolu rpose of the els for soils, d be reasona f-site locatio Project Heal LSE but on rements bas tions were i WR operation were taken ples and dire ace soil samp urbed non-dr pacted survey ackground re
.3.5.3.
mples in 201 d report Cs-1 two backgrou ples taken o ncentration o his data set a for the deco
-004, Exami repared to co rldwide fall cted ranges f soils and is fic backgrou ils in non-d s at LACBW ndisturbed so s to continue submittal of this chapter update of th n October 2 states that a er controlled utions perfor e study was concrete, an ably close to on was ident lth Physicist the licensed ed upon the inside the LA ns.
in Class 3 s ect measurem ples were ac rainage soil y units L401 eference soil 14 compare 137 at levels und studies n or around of 0.268 pCi at a 95% con ommissionin ination of Cs ompare site out. The L for backgrou presented i und studies drainage are WR, the upp oil from the e characteriz this LTP. I r of the LTP he approved 005, Dairyl a series of s d area. Th rmed a limit s to assess i nd asphalt.
o the decomm tified. Cons and the Rad d LACBWR previous ra ACBWR lic survey unit L ments were cquired from within non-12107 and o ls. Analysis ed favorably s slightly ab performed a d the site pro i/g. The st nfidence leve ng of the Zio s-137 Globa soil sample LACBWR an und concentr in Table 2-6 performed a eas. As the per 95th per Zion backgr zation throug In the case w P will be up LTP.
and perform oil samples he result of ted assessme if backgroun missioning s sequently, an diation Prote site that se diological su censed area, L3012101, w also collect m a small ar
-impacted su other areas w s results for y with the bove MDC.
at LACBWR oduced a me tandard devi el of 0.275 p on Nuclear P al Fallout in Cs-137 resu nd Zion site rations of Cs
: 6. The obse at LACBWR ere were va centile level round study ghout where dated med a were f this ent of nd at site to n on-ection emed urvey
, they which ted in rea of urvey within these 2005 This R, the ean of iation Ci/g.
Power Soils ults at es are s-137 erved R fall arious ls for were
 
La Cross License T Revision considere areas, an 2.3.2. P EnergySo Decomm decommi from the some of t less than prepared 2.3.3. N Based up 163.5 acr impacted contamin operation ISFSI w operation physical for comp for the cl The non-segregate inside of Highway study for within su in coal f ISFSI fac From Oc impacted survey un and the i impacted To supp objective open land by perfor The 2015 primary surveys a se Boiling W Termination n 0 ed appropria d Class 2 an Potential Ra olutions TS issioning (
issioning of sampling o the theoretic n 2 years, an
. The list of Non-Impacte pon the infor re licensed
: d. The n nation given ns. The det were not imp ns (i.e., with characterist pliance beyo lassification.
-impacted op ed into five f survey uni y 35. This s r soils. The urvey unit L4 from the G-cility, which ctober 2014 d open land nits and wer initial result d as it was d ort this con e of the add d survey uni rming additi 5 characteriz objectives and samplin Water Reactor Plan ate backgro nd 3 open lan dionuclides SD RS-TD-3 (16) establi LACBWR.
of various m cal neutron a n initial suite f potential ra ed Open La rmation com site surroun non-impacte that historic termination pacted by l hin the LSE ics. The are ond the chara pen land are survey unit it L4012108 survey unit non-impacte 4012103. A
-3 station an h has not bee to August areas of th re characteri s of the 201 determined t nclusion, ad itional chara its given an i onal soil sam zation camp of the addi ng to suppor r
ound concen nd area surve s of Concern 313196-001, shes the ba Industry gu media from p activation pro e of potentia adionuclides and Areas mpiled in the nding the L d areas ha cal informati that the con licensed ope
), site use, t eas designat acterization a is approxim ts. Non-imp 8 in a veget was formed ed survey un A majority of nd survey un en characteriz 2015, char he site. The ized as such 14 characteri that there is dditional ch acterization initial Class mpling and g aign was de tional chara rt the non-2-22 ntration leve ey units at L n
, Radionuc asis for an uidance was past plant o oducts, nobl al ROC for is listed in T e HSA, a lar LSE and IS ave no rea ion provides ntiguous ope erations was topography, ted as non-im surveys and mately 352,3 pacted open ated area w d during cha nits are show f the surface nit L401210 zed and is no racterization e survey uni h in Referenc ization, thes no reasonab haracterizatio surveys per 3 classificat gamma walk esigned in ac acterization
-impacted c els for the LACBWR.
clides of C initial suite reviewed as operations.
le gases and the decomm Table 2-7.
rge portion o SFSI receive asonable po s no indicatio en land area s based on site dischar mpacted are d sampling p 360 square m n land surve with minimal aracterizatio wn in Figure area in surv 06 complete ot addressed surveys w its were ori ce 13. Base se survey un ble potentia on was perf rformed in 2 tion for re-cl kover survey ccordance w was to per classification evaluation Concern D e of potenti s well as the Based on th radionuclide missioning o of the open ed a classif otential to on of impact as surroundi the locatio rge pathway e not require performed to meters in siz ey unit L40 l ground dis on to facilita 2-1. The G vey unit L40 ely surround d by this LTP were perform iginally clas ed upon a rev nits were rec al for residua formed in 2 2015 was to lassification ys.
with Referenc rform suffic n and to pr of non-imp uring LAC ial ROC fo analytical re he eliminatio es with a hal f LACBWR land areas o fication as contain res t from LACB ing the LSE on(s) of lice ys, and othe ed to be surv o provide a ze. This area 12109 is lo sturbance ea ate a backgr G-3 station re 012105 is cov ds the LACB P.
med in the ssified as Cl view of the classified as al contamina 2015. A m o evaluate ce n as non-imp ce 4. One o cient radiolo rovide reaso pacted CBWR or the esults on of lf-life R was on the non-sidual BWR E and ensed er site veyed basis a was ocated ast of round esides vered BWR non-lass 3 HSA non-ation.
major ertain pacted of the ogical nable


were co n Concret eis locate dnon-imp a approxi m unit L40 L40121 0samples a The ana b ackgro u can be a tmean Cs 0.135 p C was 0.07 Relevan tStation (Z at Zion S Zion to C geograp hfor dist u b ackgro u within t hcategori e drainage s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e survey of t mmissionin g nt additiona o n or adden d B ack g round t he initial c h u nd study f ofrom vari o u nd study is o f the 2014 u nd levels a W R fell withi n y , backg r ou n sentative.
La Cross License T Revision assurance 2015 cha based on During th units L40 logger w was scan Gamma s or gravel Minimum evaluated survey un an Explo were due Thirty-tw toward d shown in instrumen positively surface s These va in section specific b in the gr were very Seventee meter.
H was chosen
concentra derived g average maximum backgrou 137 conc surface s the Hwy Two asp survey un were less identified A summ presented se Boiling W Termination n 0 e that the n aracterization a random d he 2015 cha 012103, L40 with a 2 by 2 nned due to surface scan
.or selected a a te for obtai n Although t h n sidered una f e samples a n d north of t h a cte d surve y mately 100 s 12108. Soi l 0 8 were also a re provide d l ysis of th e u nd study f o ttributed to g-137 conce n C i/g with a m 0 resulting i t to LACB W ZNPS) title d S tation (15). C s-137 leve hically simil a u rbed soils a u nd Cs-137 h e expecte d es of soil in and non-dr a W ater Reacto r Plan hese survey g process, i nl characteri z dum as a pa r Stud y h aracterizati or soils at L A o us locatio nsummarize d characteriz a a t LACBW R n nominal e x n d reference H owever, no
: l. Alarm se m Detectabl d during the nit L401210 oranium GR-e to the prese wo surface s discolored ar n Figure 2-5 nt MDC in y identified soil samples alues are wit n 2.3.1. On background rounds east y close at 0.
. The Ener g a n area out s n ing backgr o he selected s f fected by p a nd direct me h e LSE. A y unit L401 2quare mete r l samples fr oevaluated f d in sections e backgrou n o r soils. Th e global fallo u n tration  of s maximum o b i n  the uppe r WR is a stud y d Zion Soluti o This docu mls anticipat e a r. The doc u as well as ulevels for t h range of d the non-i m ainage, dist u r units. Solu n cluding fol l zation data i rt of the req u on survey p A CBWR. R n s outside o d in Table 2-ation effort, R. The pu r x pected lev e areas shoul suitable of f g y Solutions P side of the L ound measu sample loca t ast LACB Wasurements sphalt sam p 2 106. Surf a r s of undist u om non-im p f or use as b a2.3.3 and 2
en subsurfac Of the 17 ations greate gamma-emit Cs-137 conc m observed und range fo centrations th soil backgrou 35/Railroad phalt sample nits. The asp s than the M d by gamma ary of the g d in Table 2-Water Reactor Plan non-impacted n survey foc esign to ensu aracterizatio 012105, L40 2 NaI detec inaccessibili nning focused et-points for e Count Ra e performan 7 and one in
.nd soil sa m e results di d u t. For the t s u r face sam p b served co n r range for t h y performed o ns TSD 13 m ent was p r ed from wo r ument predi c undisturbed he site spec i d isturbed so m pacted area u rbed and u n 2-21 tions intend s l owing the s is obtained, u ired 2 year performed i n R eference 7 of the own e5. Energy Solu r pose of th e els for soils, d be reason a f-site locati o P roject Heal L SE but on rements bas tions were i W R operatio n were taken p les and dir e a ce soil sam p u rbed non-d r p acte d surve y a ckground r e.3.5.3. m ples in 20 1 d report Cs-1 t wo backgro u p les taken o n centration o his data set afor the dec o-004, Exam i r epared to c o rldwide fall c ted ranges f s oils and is fic backgro u ils in non-d s at LACB W n disturbed s o s to continu e s ubmittal of this chapte r update of t h n Octobe r 2states that a e r controlle d utions perfo r e study wa s concrete, a n a bly close t o o n was iden t lth Physicist the license d ed upon the inside the L A ns. in Class 3 s ect measure m p les were a c rainage soil y units L40 1 e ference soi l 14 compar e 1 37 at level s und studies n or aroun d o f 0.268 pC i at a 95% co n ommissioni n i nation of C s ompare site out. The L for backgro u presented i u nd studies d rainage ar e W R, the up p oil from the e characteri z this LTP.
-135. The ence of natur soil samples eas or areas
I r of the LT P h e approved 005, Dairyl a series of s d area. T h rmed a limi t s to assess i nd asphalt.
: 5. Cs-137 26 of the 32 by gamma s was 0.131 hin the expe ly one Cs-13 data set. Th of Highway 135 pCi/g an e soil sampl 7 subsurface er than the tting radionu centration ob concentrati r Cs-137 as hat exceede und. This s d Right of W es were coll phalt surface MDC of 1,93 spectroscop gamma spect
o the decom m tifie d. Con sand the Ra d d LACBWR previous ra ACBWR li c s urvey unit L m ents were c quired fro mwithin non
-8.
-1 2107 and o ls. Analysi s e d favorabl y s slightly a bperformed a d the site pr o i/g. The s t n fidence lev e n g of the Zi o s-137 Glob asoil sample LACBWR a n u nd concent r in Table 2-6performed a eas. As th e per 95 th per Zion backg r zation throu g I n the case w P will be up LTP. and perfor moil samples h e result o f t ed assessm e i f backgrou n m issioning s s equently, a n d iation Prot e site that sediological s u c ensed area
r d survey uni cused primar ure an unbia n survey, a 012106 and ctor. In surv ity from the d on undistu r the instrum ate (MDCR) nce of the g n survey unit results of th ral backgrou s were colle where the g was positiv 2 samples.
, L 3012101, walso collec t m a small a r-impacted s u o ther areas w s results for y with the b ove MDC. a t LACBW R oduced a m e t andard dev i e l of 0.275 p o n Nuclear P al Fallout in Cs-137 res u nd Zion sit e rations of C s 6. The obs e a t LACBW R e re were v acentile leve l r ound study g hout w here dated m ed a were f this e nt of n d at site to n on-e ction emed urvey , they w hich ted in r ea of urvey within these 2005  This R, the e an of iation Ci/g. P ower Soils ults at e s are s-137 erved R fall arious l s for were La Cros s License T Revisio n consider e areas, an 2.3.2.P Energy S o Decomm decomm ifrom th esome of tless tha n prepared 2.3.3.N Based u p 163.5 ac rimpacte dcontami n operatio n ISFSI w operatio n physical for com pfor the c l The non-segregat einside o f Highwa y study fo r within s uin coal f ISFSI fa c From O cimpacte d survey u n and the iimpacte d To supp objectiv e open lan d b y perfo r The 201 5primary surveys a s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e d appropri a d Class 2 a n P otential Ra o lutions T S issioning (i ssioning of sampling o the theoreti c n 2 years, a
spectroscopy pCi/g with ected backgr 37 result exc his sample w y 35. The m nd 0.131 pC les were tak e soil samp instrument uclides were bserved in t ion of 0.40 discussed in d the maxim sample was t Way Grounds lected from e was first sc 38 dpm/100c py in any of t troscopy resu 2-23 its do not c rily on soils ased survey.
: n. The list o f N on-Impact e pon the info r re licensed d."  The n n ation given n s. The de t w ere not im p n s (i.e., wit h characterist p liance bey o l assification
minimum o L4012108 vey unit L40 e presence o urbed soils w ment were s
.-impacted o p e d into five f survey un i y 35. This s r soils. The u rvey unit L 4 from the G-c ility, whic h c tobe r 2014 d open land n its and we r initial result d as it was d ort this co n e of the ad d d survey un i rming additi 5 characteri zobjectives and sampli n W ater Reacto r Plan a te backgr o n d 3 open la n dionuclide s S D RS-TD-3 (16) establi LACBWR. o f various m c al neutron a n initial suit e f potential r a e d Open L a rmation co m site surrou n n on-impacte that histori c termination p acted by l h in the LSE i cs. The ar e o nd the char
) of the ins gamma scan t L4012108.
: a. p en land are survey uni t it L401210 8 s urvey unit non-impact e 4 012103. A-3 station a n h has not be e to August areas of t h r e character is of the 20 1 dete rmined t n clusion, a ditional char a i ts given an ional soil sa m zation camp o f the addi n g to suppo r r o und conce n n d area surv e s of Concer n 3 13196-001 ,shes the b a Industry g u media from p activation pr o e of potenti a a dionuclides a nd Areas mpiled in th e nding the L d areas h a cal informat ithat the co n l icensed op e), site use, t e as designa t acterization a is approxi m t s. Non-im p 8 in a vegetwas forme d ed survey u n A majority o f nd survey u n en characteri z 2015, cha r h e site. Th e ized as suc h 14 character i that there is d ditional c h acterization initial Class m pling and g aign was d etional char a r t the "non 22 ntration lev e e y units at L n , R adionu c a sis for an uidance was p ast plant o o ducts, nobl a l ROC for is listed in T e HSA, a la r L SE and I S a ve no re a i on provide s n tiguous op e e rations wa s t opography, t ed as non-i msurveys an d m ately 352, 3 p acte d ope nated area w d during ch a n its are sho w f the surface n it L40121 0 z ed and is n o r acterization e survey un i h in Referen c ization, the s no reasona b haracterizati osurveys pe r 3 classifica t gamma wal k esigne d in a c a cterization
he investiga und activity.
-impacted" c els for the LACBWR. c lides of C initial suit ereviewed a s o perations.
ected from ground had b vely identif No other po
l e gases and the decom m T able 2-7.
: y. The avera a maximum round range ceeded the m was the maxi mean of the n i/g, respectiv ken at random ples taken, MDC in ei e positively i the subsurfa 09 pCi/g. Th n section 2.3 mum Cs-137 the maximu random loc canned with cm2. No pla the asphalt s ults for each contain plant and asphalt of 1% of the was scanned 012107, less f tall, thick with minimal set at the ob strument. A n, one in su All scan al ation indicat non-impacte been disturbe fied in conc otential plan age Cs-137 c m observed c for Cs-137 maxium resu imum 0.463 non-impacte vely.
rge portion o S FSI receiv e a sonable p o s no indicati o e n land are a s based on site discha r m pacted ar e d sampling p 3 60 square m n land surv e with minima l aracterizati o w n in Figurearea in sur v 06 complet e ot addresse dsurveys w its were or i ce 13. Bas e se survey u n ble potentia on was per f rformed in 2 t ion for re-c l k over surve y ccordance w was to pe r classificatio n evaluation C oncern D e of potent i s well as the Based on t h radionuclid e m issioning o o f the open ed a classi f o tential to on of impac t a s surround ithe locati o rge pathwa y e not requir e p erformed t o meters in si z e y unit L40 l ground di s on to facilit a 2-1. The G vey unit L4 0 e ly surroun d d by this LT P w ere perfor m i ginally cla s e d upon a re v n its were re c a l for residu a formed in 2 2 015 was t olassificatio n ys. with Referen c r form suffi c n and to p r of non-im p uring LA C ial ROC f oanalytical r e he eliminati o e s with a ha lf LACBW R land areas o fication as "contain re s t from LAC B i ng the LS E o n(s) of lic e y s, and oth e e d to be sur v o provide a ze. This are a 12109 is l o sturbance e a ate a backg r G-3 station r e 0 12105 is co v ds the LAC B P.      m ed in the ssified as C l v iew of the classified as al contamin a 2 015. A m o evaluate c e n as non-im p c e 4. One o c ient radiol o rovide reaso p acte d C BWR o r the esults o n of lf-life R was o n the "non-s idual BWR E and e nsed er site v eyed basis a was o cated ast of r ound esides v ered B WR non-l ass 3 HSA non-a tion. m ajor ertain pacted of the o gical nable La Cros s License T Revisio n assuranc e 2015 ch a b ased o n During t h units L4 0 logger w was sca nGamma s or grave lMinimu m evaluate d survey u n an Expl o were du eThirty-t w toward d shown i ninstrume npositivel y surface s These v ain sectio n specific bin the g r were ver y Sevente emeter. concentr a derived g average maximu m b ackgro u 137 con c surface s the Hwy Two as p survey u n were les sidentifie dA summ presente d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e that the n a racterizatio n a random d h e 2015 ch a 0 12103, L4 0 w ith a 2" by 2 n ned due to s urface sca n l. Alarm s e m Detectab l d during th e n it L40121 0 oranium GR-e to the pres e w o surface s d iscolored ar n Figure 2-5 n t MDC in y identified soil samples a lues are wi t n 2.3.1. On b ackground r ounds east y close at 0.
mly selected Cs-137 w ght samples identified by ace soil sam hese value 3.1. Only on 7 concentrati um 0.409 pC cations in p h a beta-gamm ant derived r samples.
e n subsurfac Of the 1 7 ations great e gamma-emi t C s-137 con c m observed u nd range fo c entrations t h s oil backgro u 35/Railroa d phalt sampl e nits. The as p s than the M d by gamma ary of the g d in Table 2
h non-impac t-derived ra
-W ater Reacto r Plan n on-impacte d n survey fo c esign to ens u a racterizatio 0 12105, L4 0 2" NaI dete cinaccessibil i nning focuse d e t-points fo r e Count R a e performa n 7 and one i n-135. The e nce of natu r s oil sample seas or areas
: t. The samp e surface so d with a Mo s than 1% of vegetation a l vegetation bserved back A total of f urvey unit L larms were in ted the elev ed areas at ed. The sam centrations nt-derived ra concentratio concentration surface sam ult of 0.268 pCi/g value ed and site-s d locations t was positive
: 5. Cs-137 26 of the 3 2 by gamma swas 0.131 hin the exp e ly one Cs-1 3data set. T h of Highwa y 135 pCi/g a ne soil samp l 7 subsurfac e e r than the t ting radion u c entration o b concentrat i r Cs-137 as ha t exceede und. This s d Right of W e s were col l phalt surfac e MDC of 1,9 3 spectrosco p gamma spec t-8. r d survey un i cused prima r u re an unbi a n survey, a 0 12106 and ctor. In sur v ity from th e d on undist u r the instru m a te (MDCR)n ce of the g n survey uni tresults of t h ral backgro u s were coll e where the g was positi v 2 samples.
: s. No other y gamma sp mples was 0.
s pectroscop y p Ci/g with ected backg r 37 result ex c his sample w y 35. The m nd 0.131 pC l es were ta k e soil sam pinstrument uclides wer e b serve d in t i on of 0.4 0 discussed i nd the maxi m sample was t W ay Grounds lected from e was first s c 38 dpm/100 c p y in any of t t roscopy res u 2-23 i ts do not c rily on soils a sed survey.minimum o L4012108 v ey unit L4 0 e presence o urbed soils w m ent were s) of the in s gamma sca n t L4012108.
es are with ne subsurfac ion found in Ci/g value th paved areas mma detector radionuclide cted open la adioactivity.
h e investig a und activity.
ple locations oil area in su odel 2350-1 f the surface and steep te or disturbed kground plu four alarms L4012106, tw nvestigated u vated scan re locations b mple location greater than adionuclides n observed i n of 0.463 p mples as discu pCi/g in the e and was lo specific data to a depth o ely identifie r potential p pectroscopy.
ected from g round had b vely identi f No other p o y. The aver aa maximu m r ound range ceeded the m was the max i m ean of the ni/g, respecti v k en at rando m p les taken, MDC in ei e positively i t he subsurf a 09 pCi/g. T h n section 2.
087 pCi/g w hin the exp e sample ha n the site-spe at was locat in non-imp
3 mum Cs-13 7 the maxim u. random lo c c anned wit h cm 2. No pl a t he asphalt s ults for eac h c ontain plan tand asphalt of 1% of th e was scanne d 0 12107, les sf tall, thick with minima l s et at the o b strument.
. All scan re s were posit and survey u The were urvey data e area rrain.
A n, one in s u  All scan a l a tion indica tnon-impact e been disturb e f ied in con c o tential pla n a ge Cs-137 c m observed c for Cs-137 maxium res u imum 0.463 non-impact e v ely. mly selecte d Cs-137 wght sample s i dentified b y ace soil sa m h ese  valu e 3.1. Only o n 7 concentrat i um 0.409 p C cations in p h a beta-gam m a nt derived r samples. h non-impa c t-derived r a t. The sam p e surface s o d with a M o s than 1% o f vegetation a l vegetation bserved bac k A total of f u rvey unit L larms were i n t ed the elev e d areas at e d. The sa m centrations n t-derived r a concentratio concentratio n surface sa m ult of 0.268  pCi/g valu e e d and site-s d locations t w as positiv e s. No othe r y gamma s p m ples was 0.
d soils us the were wo in using esults biased ns are n the were in the pCi/g.
e s are wit h n e subsurfac i on found i n C i/g value th paved areas mma detector radionuclide c te d open l a adioactivity.
ussed e site-ocated a sets of one ed in plant-The with a pected d Cs-ecific ted in pacted esults tively unit is
ple locations oil area in s u o del 2350-1 f the surfac e a nd steep te or disturbe d k ground pl u f ou r alarms L 4012106, t w nvestigated u vated scan r elocations b m ple locatio ngreater tha n a dionuclides n observed i n of 0.463 p m ples as disc upCi/g in th e e and was l o s pecific dat a t o a depth o ely identifi e r potential p p ectroscopy.
087 pCi/g w h in the ex pe sample ha n the site-sp eat was loca tin non-imp. All scan r e s were posi t a nd survey u The were urvey  data e area rrain. d soils u s the were w o in using e sults b iased n s are n the were i n the pCi/g. u ssed e site-ocated a sets o f one e d in plant- The with a pected d Cs-ecific ted in p acte d esults tively u nit is La Cros s License T Revisio n A coal a ssamples The resu l The la b concentr a also posi concentr a consider e of the p l radionucpositive ratios a rcompare d higher t h operatio n consiste n the spor a derived r In surve y gamma s area to d approxi muranium readings 2.3.4.I m The HS A operatio n been cla s b een ide n into two north of Highwa y three Cl a The cha r prepared employe d radionuc of suffic i surface a obtained Survey contami n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 sh sample f r were sent t o lts of the an a b oratory a n ations exce e tively detec t a tions of th e e d to very l i l ant-derived lide mixtu rresults for C r e 118 and d to the sit e han expecte d n al history, t n t with natu r adic positive r adionuclide y unit L401 2 s pectroscop y determine i f m ately 7,00 0 and thoriu m conducted d m pacted O p A identifie d n s. The ap p ssified as C ntified as "
iClass 2 sur v the LSE, t h y 35 and th e a ss 3 survey r acterization for each s d to determ l ide concen t i ent quantit y a nd subsur ffrom belo w techniques n ation ident i W ater Reacto r Plan rom survey u o Test Am e alysis are pr e nalysis spo r eding the M D t ed but at le v e positively i i kely be the radionucli d r e fractions C s-137, Sr-16, respec t e-specific m i d by factor s t he radionuc ral backgro u analytical r s in these s u 2 108, a rep r y. In additi o f there is a 0 to 8,000 c p m series nu c during the w p en Land A d the open proximate ar e Class 1. An impacted" b vey units.
T he transmis s e haul road uunits combi nof the impa c s urvey unit ine the late r trations in t h y and qualit y face soils i n w the structu rwere emp l i fied an d t h r u nit L40121 e rica Labor a esented in T radically i d D C, includi n v els that are i dentified ra dresult of co u d es. This
: c. For exa m 90 and Fe-5 tively. W h i xture fracti s of 4,800 a l ide ratios, a u nd and co m esults are v e urvey units.
resentative s o n, gamma ssignificant pm). The a clides with alkover sur v Areas land area ea is 1.5 ac rapproxima t y reactor o p Three impac t s ion switch y used to tra n n ed is appr o c ted open l a in accord a r al and vert he soil. Cha r y to quantify n each ope n res due to in t l oyed to d e h e radionuc l 2-24 05, six surf a atories for g T able 2-9.
d entified s e ng H-3, C-1 4consistent w dionuclides w u nting unce r c onclusion w mple, samp 5 5. Howe v hen the rati ons in Cha p a nd 10,700, and primaril y m prise 88%
o ery unlikely s ample of t h s can readin gdifference analysis of t no plant d e v ey average dinside the r es. All op e tely 3.46 ac r p erations.
T ted Class 3 s y ard and th e n sport dry f u oximately 1 6 a nd areas be g ance with Rical extent o racterizatio n the potenti a n land surv e t erferences a etermine t h l ide concen t face soil sa m gamma spec t e veral pla n 4, Fe-55, N i with natural b were close t rtainty as o p w as support e le L30121 0 v er, the S r-9 ios from L 3 p te r 6, Tabl e respectivel y the conce n of the site-s p to represen t he rail road g s were tak efrom site b t he railroad e rived radio d 7,000-8,5 0 fenced LS E e n land surv e r e area that T his open l a s urvey units e area enco m u el casks to 6.5 acres.
g an in Octo b R eference 4 o f any cont n inspection s al volumetri c ey unit. L i a nd inaccess he lateral a t rations in t m ples and fi v t roscopy an d n t-derived r i-63, and Sr
-background t o the detect i pposed to th e d by a re v 0 5-CR-GS-0 9 0/Cs-137 a n 3012105-C R e 6-3, it is s l y. In con c n trations of C p ecific radi o t the actual p bed gravel e n of the rai l b ackground bed gravel o nuclides.
T 0 0 cpm. E as "impa c e y units ins i surrounds t a nd area has were desig n mpassing t h the ISFSI.
b e r 2014. A 4. Survey amination i d s and survey s c contamina t imited soil ibility.
a nd vertica l t he soil.
A ve subsurfac d HTD ana l radionuclid e-90. Cs-13
: 7. In all cas e ion limits a ne actual pre s view of exp 0 02-SS ind i nd Fe-55/C s R-GS-002-S Seen that th e clusion, bas e C s-137 whi c onuclide mi x presence of pwas analyz e l road bed g (which ave r indicated n a T he gamma c ted" by r e i de the LSE t he LSE ha s b een segre n ated for th e he site acce s The area o A sample pla ntechniques dentified a n s were perf o t ion of acce sinformatio n l extent o f A combinati oe soil lyses. e s at 7 was e s, the nd are s ence p ected icates s-137 S are e y are ed on c h are xture, p lant-ed by g ravel raged atural scan eactor have s also gated e area s s off of the n was were nd the ormed ssible n was f any o n of La Cros s License T Revisio nrandom a survey p professi o Protecti o radioacti v spill loc a survey l o not req u location s radiolog i A surfac e surface s or surfa c were tak eintervals Each su rsite radi o necessar y All surf a Several sfull isot o survey u n 2.3.4.1.
There ar e The Cla sarea in t h Reactor radioacti vareas, pr e Twenty-tmeasura b location s taken in taken, Csamples 13 samp lidentifie dthe sur f 0.287 p Csamples w Seventy-one met e s e Boiling W Termination n 0 a nd biased s ackage. Th e o nal judgm e o n Supervis v ity, depres a tions, or a r o cations wa s u ired for so i s were sele c ical contami n e soil sampl eoil samples ce scans ind i e n from 0.1
: 5. rface soil, c o ological lab y to achiev e a ce and sub soil samples opic analysi s n it  per Ref e Class e fou r (4) o p ss 1 open la n he Class 1 o p Building, t h v ely conta m e vented the a two (22) su r b le radioac t s , or areas wClass 1 ope n C o-60 was p and Cs-13 7 l es. No ot h d by gamm a fa ce soil s a Ci/g. The a w as 0.096 pnine (79) s u e r, two (2) l o W ater Reacto r Plan urvey locat i e locations o e nt of the E o r. Consi sions, disco reas where t s also deter m i ls in an o p c ted on as p n ation. e was taken were acqui r i cated eleva t 5 cm to dep t omposite su b oratory by e an isotopi c surface co m were select e s (HTD rad i erence 4. 1 Open La n p en land su r n d survey u n p en land su r h e Turbine m inated buil d ability to pe r rface soil sa m tivity, disco w here the gr o n land su r v e p ositively i d 7 was posi t h er potenti a spectrosco p amples wa s verage Cs-1Ci/g with a m ubsurface so o cations bia s r i ons were e s o f biased m e E nergy Solut i deration w alored areas, t he ground h m ined by ar e p en land ar e p halt in Cl a at each sele r ed at sever a ted activity.
t hs ranging f b surface soi l gamma-spe c c MDC equ a m posite sam p e d at rando m i onuclides).
n d Areas r vey units c l nits are sho w r vey units is Building, t h d ing and sy s r form surfa c mples were lored areas
, o und had b e ey units are s dentified in tively iden t al plant-deri v py. The ave r s 0.058 pCi
/1 37 concen t maximum o bil samples w s ed to areas o 2-25 s tablished in easurement s i ons Project a s given t o low point g h ad been d i e a classifica t e as designa t ass 1 surve y cted biased a al random lo Depending from 1 to 3 m l sample or c troscopy.
a l to or less p les were a n m an d were s Duplicate lassified as w n in Figure obstructed b h e WTB an d s tems, as w e c e scanning dtaken at lo c , buried pi p e en disturbe d s hown in Fi gconcentrat i tified in co n ved gamm a r age Co-60 c/g with a t ration obse r b served con c w ere taken a o n the south  each surve y s and/or sa mHealth Ph y o locations gravity drai n isturbed. T h tion. Rando a ted as Cla s y units wh e and rando m cations or i f on the loc a m below gr aasphalt sa mAnalysis c o s than 0.10 p nalyzed aft e s hipped to Tsamples an dClass 1 at L 2-1. A sig nby the pres e d the LSA ell as stored d ue to high b cations b ias e pe location s d. The loc a gure 2-6.
O i ons greate r ncentration s a-emitting r a concentrati omaximum r ved in the centration o at 10 surfac e and west si d y unit in ac c m ples were d ysicist and that exhi b n areas, act u h e number m-b ased m e ss 1. Rand o ere there w a-b ased surv e f surface soi a tion, subsur a de an d co m m ple was an a ount times w pCi/g for C s er drying t h Test Americ a d concrete w LACBWR t o nificant port i ence of buil d Building. radioactive b ackground.e d toward si t s, actual a n a tions of sur f Of the 22 sur r than the M s greater t h adionuclide s on observed observed canalysis o f f 1.07 pCi/
g e soil locati o de of the W G cordance wi t d etermined b the Radiol o bited meas u u al and pot eof rando m-b easurements om measur e a s no histo r e y location. l sample an aface soil sa m m posited ove alyzed by t h were adjust e s-137 and C he sample m a Laboratori e w ere collect e otaling 8,44 3 i on of the s u dings, name lThe presenmaterial in
. tes that exh i nd potential f ace soil sa m face soil sa m M DC in t w h an the M D s were posi tin the analy c oncentrati o f the surfac e g. o ns to a de p G TV and fi v th the b y the ogical urable e ntial based were ement r y of  Sub-alysis mples r 1 m h e on-e d as C o-60. m edia. es for e d by 3 m 2. u rface l y the ce of these i bited spill mples m ples w o (2) D C in tively sis of on of e soil pth of v e (5)
La Cros s License T Revisio n location s The sa m evaluate Building samples 15 samp lidentifie d of the s u 0.161 p C areas is foundati o decomm i Ten sa m asphalt w this sur v results r ameasure midentifie d 0.057 p CA summ presente d Nine su rsamples gamma s In additi detected One sed i unit L10 and HT D 0.136 p C 2.3.4.2.The im pimmedia t two sur v LACB W these tw o Approxi m 2350-1 dAlarm s einstrume n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 s that access mples at the t the subsurf a were taken taken, Cs-1 l es. No ot h d by gamm a ubsurface s o Ci/g. The as snot curren t o ns and sur r i ssioning pr o mples were t a was taken fr o v ey unit. T h anging from ment of 3,0 9 d in conce n Ci/g. ary of the f i d in Table 2
-rface soil s ataken from s pectroscop y on to detec t at concentr a iment samp l 10103. Thi s D analyses.
Ci/g. Class acted Class te area surr o ey units. T h WR Crib Ho u o survey uni t mately 1% o d ata logger w et-points for n t. No scan W ater Reacto r Plan e d the soils two WGT V ace soils alo nand compo 1 37 was po s h er potenti a a spectrosco p oil samples sessment of tly complet e r ounding b u o cess, when a ken of as p om the sam e h e asphalt s the instrum e 95 dpm/100 ntrations gr e i ndings of t h-10. amples, 11 sClass 1 ope n y and HTD a t ing Co-60 ations greate le was take n s sample w a Co-60 and 2 Open La n 2 open la n o unding the hese are sh o u se, the G-3 t s. o f the surfa c w ith a 2" b ythe instru malarms wer e r under the T V locations w n gside and usited at dep t sitively ide n al plant-deri v p y. The av e was 0.055 ppotential s u e. Soil in uried struct uaccess will b phalt from p e location se s urface was e nt MDC o f c m 2. Of t h eater than he survey f o subsurface s n land surv e a nalyses. T hand Cs-137r than the i n n from the s a s also sent t C-137 wer e n d Areas nd areas tot a LSE. The C o wn in Figu r 3 Crib Hou s ce soil area i y 2" NaI d e m ent were se t e observed.
2-26 u rbine Buil d w ere acquir e u nderneath t h t hs of 10, 1 5 ntified in c o ved gamm a e rage Cs-13 p Ci/g with ubsurface so idifficult t o u res and pi p b e more rea d p aved areas lected for t hfirst scann e f 2,771 dpm
/he 10 aspha lMDC in o n o r each indi v soil samples ey units we r he results of , H-3, C-1 4 nstru m ent M D sanitary soli d to Test Ame r e detected i n a l approxi m Class 2 imp a re 2-1. The se and the L in survey u n etector. Th i t at the obs e d ing throug h e d to a dep t h e vault. T h 5 and 20 fe e oncentratio n a-emitting r a 7 concentra ta maximu m il contamin a o access ar e p ing has be edily availab lin Class 1 s h e surface a n ed with bet a/100c m 2 to a l t samples t n ly one sa m v idual Clas s s , one conc r r e sent to T e fthe analysi s 4, Fe-55 an d DC. ds tank that rica Labora t n this sampl m ately 13,99 a cted open l LACBWR LACBWR w nit L201110 is area incl u erved backg r h angled Ge o t h of five m h e samples u e t. Of the 7 ns greater t h adionuclide s t ion observ e m observed ation in the C eas such a s e n deferred le. s urvey unit n d subsurfa c a-gamma d e a maximum t aken, Cs-1 3 m ple at a s 1 open lan d rete sample est Americ a s are presen t d Ni-63 we ris located i t ory for ga me, both at a 6 m 2 and a rand area w aAdministra t w arehouses a 1 was scan n u ded asphal t r ound plus t o probe sam p m eters in or d u nder the T u 7 9 subsurfac e han the M D s were posi t e d in the an a concentrati o Class 1 ope n s under b u iuntil later i L1010104.
ce soil samp l etector with of observe d 3 7 was posi tconcentrati o d survey u n and two a s a Laboratori e ted in Table r e also posi t in Class 1 s u m ma spectro sconcentrati re located i n as segregate d tion Buildin g a re all loca t ned with a M t paved sur f t he MDCR o p ling. d er to urbine e soil D C in tively alysis o n of n land ilding n the  The l es in scan d scan tively on of nit are s phalt e s for 2-11. tively urvey scopy on of n the d into g , the ted in M odel f aces. of the La Cros s License T Revisio n Twenty-tmeasura b location s taken in taken, C s other po t The ave r 0.077 p C Twenty-t and thre e resides i n Of the 2 greater t h than M Didentifie d of 0.112 samples assessm ecurrentl y surroun d process, w Twelve s selected results r 2,748 dp m concentr a concentr a observe dA summ presente d Three su rsamples Adminis t HTD an a Co-60 a concentr a HTD ra d 2.3.4.3.The imp a land are a Figure 2-site, the t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 t hree surfac b le radioac t s , or areas wClass 2 ope n s-137 was p tential plan t rage Cs-13 7 C i/g with a m t hree subsur e locations b n survey un i 23 subsurfa c han MDC i n D C in fou r d by gamma pCi/g. The was 0.043 e nt of pote n y complete.
d ing buried s when acces s samples wer erandomly.
r anging fr o m/100c m 2. a tions grea t a tion obser v d concentrati ary of the f i d in Table 2
-rface soil s a taken fro m tration Buil d a lyses. The a nd Cs-137, ations great e d ionuclides e Class a cted Class 3 a was segr e-1. The Cl a transmissio n W ater Reacto r Plan e soil sam p tivity, disco w here the gr o n land surv e positively id e t-derived ra d 7 concentra t maximum ob s face soil sa m b iased to ar e i t L201110 1 ce soil sam p n one sampl e samples.
N spectrosco p average Cs
-pCi/g wit h n tial subsur f Soil in di f s tructures a n s will be mo r e taken of a s The asphal t o m the in s Of the 1 2 ter than th e v ed in the a n on of 0.055 i ndings of t h-12. amples, five m an acce s ding were s eresults of t h H-3, C-1 4 e r than M D e xceeding M 3 Open La n 3 open land egated into ass 3 impact e n switchyard r p les were ta klored areas
, o und had b e ey units are s e ntified at c o dionuclides t ion observ e s erved conc e m ples were t e as alongsi d 1. The b ias e p les taken, e and Cs-13 N o other p o p y. The sin g-137 concen t h a maxim u f ace soil co n fficult to ac n d piping h a r e readily a v sphalt from p t surface wa strument M 2 asphalt s a e instrume n n alysis of th epCi/g. he survey f osubsurface s ssible stor m e nt to Test he analysis a 4 , Fe-55 a n D C. As dis c M DC are like l n d Areas areas total athree surv e e d open lan dfor the LA C 2-27 k en at loca t , buried pi p e en disturbe d s hown in Fi g oncentratio n were positi v e d in the a n e ntration of taken at 14 r d e and unde r ed samples w Co-60 was 7 was posit i o tential pla n gle sample w t ration obse r u m observe ntamination cess areas s a s been def e vailable. p aved areas s first scan n M DC of 2 ,mples take n n t MDC in e asphalt sa m o r each indi v soil samples
, m sewer b aAmerica L a are presente d nd Cm-243/c ussed in s e l y to be fals e approximate l e y units.
T d survey u n C BWR and G t ions biase d pe location s d. The loc a gure 2-7.
O n s greater t h vely identif i nalysis of t h 0.200 pCi/g r andom loc a rneath the S were acquir e positively ively identi f n t-derived r a w ith d etecta b r ved in the a d concentr a n in the Cl a s uch as un d e rred until lin Class 2 s u ned with be t,529 dpm/1 0 n, Cs-137 w three sam p m ples was 0 v idual Clas s , three asph a asin manho l aboratories f d in Table 2
/244 were e ction 2.3.3 e positives.
ly 66,765m 2 The Class 3 n its include t G-3 facilitie d toward sit s, actual a n a tions of sur f Of the 23 sur h an MDC in i ed by gam m h e surface s g. a tions to a d e Storm Sewe r ed to a dep tidentified a f ied at conc e a dionuclide s ble Co-60 h a a nalysis of t h a tion of 0.
0 ass 2 open l d er building ater in the d u rvey units.
t a-gamma d e 0 0c m 2 to a was positiv e p les. The 0.049 pCi/g s 2 open lan d a lt samples a l e located f or gamma s-13. In ad d also positi v for non-im p 2. The Class survey un i t he north e ns, the LAC Bes that exh i nd potential f ace soil sa m face soil sa m14 samples ma spectros c soil sample s e pth of one m r Water pip e t h of five m at concentr a e ntrations g r s were posi t a d a concent r h e subsurfac 088 pCi/g.
l and areas i foundation s decommissi o The aspha l e tector wit h a maximu mely identifi e average C swith a max i d survey u n a nd two sed i in front o f s pectroscop y d ition to det e vely detect e p acted area s 3 impacted i ts are sho w nd of the lic e BWR plant a ibited spill mples m ples . No c opy. s was m ete r e that m eters. ations r eater tively ration e soil The s not s and o ning l t was h scan m of e d in s-137 imum nit are iment f the y and e cting ed at s , the open w n in e nsed a ccess La Cros s License T Revisio n and righ t was dee m LACB W Crib Ho ufacility d were de e These a r Solution sA mini m scanned was exc l focused o points fo No scan Thirty-t w where t h open lan was posi plant-de r The ave r 0.131 p C Sevente emeter.
concentr a radionuc concentr amaximu m Two sa m selected results w were po sA summ presente d As part o of concr e Crib Ho uAdminis t survey u n Three c o L30121 0 three su r Laborat o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 t-of-way are med impact e WR Adminis t u se). The t r d uring opera t emed as im p reas were c s maintains t mum of 1% with a Mod luded from o n undistur br the instru malarms wer e wo surface s o h e ground h a d survey u ntively ident i rived gamm a rage Cs-13 7 C i/g with a m e n subsurfac Of the 1 7 a tions gre a lides were a tion obser v m observed c m ples were trandomly.
were less th a sitively iden t ary of the f i d in Table 2
-o f the chara c e te located i use. In add i tration Buil d n it L301210 o ncrete sam p 0 1, the two s e rface soil s ories for ga m W ater Reacto r Plan a and the h a e d by LAC B tration Buil d ransmission tions. The p p acted by t h onservative l that classify i of the sur f el 2350-1 d agamma su r bed soils w i m ent were s e e observed i n oil samples a d been dis t n its are sho w ified in con c a-emitting r a 7 concentra t maximum ob se soil samp l 7 subsurfac e ater than Mpositively v ed in the a concentrati o aken of asp hThe asphalt an instrume n t ified by ga m i ndings of t h-14. cterization o f i n the nort h ition, a sa m d ing and t w 9. These sa m ples from s u ediment sa m samples an d m ma spect r r aul road to t h B WR due t o ding and the yard was d p lant access he transit o f l y classifie d i ng these ar e f ace soil ar e a ta logger w r face scann i ith minimal e t at the obs e n these surv e were taken t urbed. Th e w n in Figur e centrations g a dionuclide s t ion observ e s erved conc e l es were ta k e soil sam p MDC in e iidentified analysis of t h on of 0.409 p halt from p asurface wa nt MDC of 1 m ma spectro he survey f o f survey uni t h section of m ple was tak e wo sedimen t m ples were u rvey unit L 3 m ples taken f d two sub s r oscopy an d 2-28 h e ISFSI fa c o the prese n presence o f d eemed as i marea, High w f packaged r d as impact e e as as non-i m ea in surve y w ith a 2" by i ng for saf e vegetation o erved backg r ey units. at locations e locations o e 2-8. Of t h greater than s were posit i e d in the a n e ntration of k en at rando m p les taken, ight sample s by gamma h e subsurfa c pCi/g. a ved areas i n s first scan n 1,938 dpm/1 scopy in an y o r each indi v t L3012101 ,the survey u en from a s a t samples wsent off-site 3 012101, t h f rom the sto r s urface soil d HTD ana l c ility. The n n ce of a se p f concrete fr m pacted as i w ay 35 righ t radioactive m ed. Howe v m pacted wo u y units L3 0 2" NaI det e e ty reasons.
o r disturbe d round plus t biased tow of surface s he 32 surfac eMDC in 26 ively identi f nalysis of t h 0.463 pCi/g mly selecte d Cs-137 w s. No ot h spectrosc o c e soil sam p n Class 3 s u n ed with be t 1 00c m 2. N o y of these sa m v idual Clas s , samples w e unit that or i anitary tan k w ere taken fr e for isotopi c he sanitary t a rm sewer b a samples w l yses. The n orth end o f ptic system from impact e it was part o t-of way an d m aterial thr o v e r , it shou u ld have be e 0 12101 and ector. Surv e  Gamma d soils or gr a t he MDCR o ard discolo roil samples e soil samp lsamples.
N fied by gam m h e surface s g. d locations t w as positiv e t her potent i opy. The p les was 0.
0 urvey units.
ta-gamma d e o plant deri v amples. s 3 open lan d e re taken fr o i ginated fro m k that servic e from a stor m c analysis.
a nk sample a sin in surve y w ere sent tresults of f the license that servic e e d structure s of the LAC B d ISFSI hau l o ugh these a ld be note d e n appropria t L3012109 ey unit L30 1 surface sca n avel. Alar m of the instru m r ed areas or taken in C l l es taken, C s N o other pot e m a spectros c soil sample s t o a depth o ely identifi e i al plant-d eaverage C s 0 87 pCi/g w The asphal t e tector. Al l v ed radionu c d survey u n om several p m the LAC B e s the LAC B m sewer ba sfrom surve y y unit L301 2 to Test A mthe analysi d site es the s (the B WR l road areas. d that te. were 1 2102 nning m set-m ent. areas l ass 3 s-137 e ntial copy. s was o f one e d in erived s-137 w ith a t was l scan c lides nit are pieces BWR BWR s in in y unit 2 109, m erica i s are La Cros s License T Revisio n presente d derived R and Ni-6 exceedi n consiste n 2.3.5.N Based u p associat e indicate dA full li s 2. The pri minformat i operatio nfrom th e characte r The res u conduct etraffic in


The G-3incident s results o f A scan s u gamma d using an was also gross be t MDC o fidentifie d gross al pcontami nsamples.
La Cross License T Revision A coal as samples The resul The lab concentra also posi concentra considere of the pl radionuc positive ratios ar compared higher th operation consisten the spora derived r In survey gamma s area to d approxim uranium readings 2.3.4. Im The HSA operation been clas been iden into two north of Highway three Cla The char prepared employed radionuc of suffici surface a obtained Survey contamin se Boiling W Termination n 0 sh sample fr were sent to lts of the ana boratory an ations excee tively detect ations of the ed to very li lant-derived lide mixtur results for C re 118 and d to the site han expected nal history, t nt with natur adic positive radionuclide y unit L4012 spectroscopy determine if mately 7,000 and thorium conducted d mpacted Op A identified ns. The app ssified as C ntified as i Class 2 surv the LSE, th y 35 and the ass 3 survey racterization for each s d to determ lide concent ient quantity and subsurf from below techniques nation identi Water Reactor Plan rom survey u o Test Ame alysis are pre nalysis spor eding the MD ted but at lev e positively i ikely be the radionuclid re fractions Cs-137, Sr-16, respect e-specific mi d by factors the radionuc ral backgrou analytical r s in these su 2108, a repr
derived 0.061 p C that the material Direct a ntraffic a r Model 2 3 areas of i ranged f exceede d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 d in Table 2 R OC at resi d 6 3. As di s n g MDC are nt with natu r N on-Impact e p on the in f ed with the G d that there w s t of G-3 str u m ary b asis f ion docume n n s. Additio e LACBW R r ization of t ults are pro v e d during th ethe major s t station re s s of radioac t f the charac t urvey was p d etector. In alpha/beta-gtaken at th e t a-gamma a f 2,816 dpm
: y. In additio f there is a 0 to 8,000 cp m series nuc during the w pen Land A d the open proximate are Class 1. An impacted b vey units. T he transmiss e haul road u units combin of the impac survey unit ine the later trations in th y and quality face soils in w the structur were empl ified and th r
/d gross beta
unit L40121 erica Labora esented in T radically id DC, includin vels that are identified rad result of cou des. This c
-p ha activit y n ation was i The roof m ROC that w Ci/g. Based elevated di r on the roof.
. For exam 90 and Fe-5 tively. Wh ixture fracti s of 4,800 a lide ratios, a und and com esults are ve urvey units.
nd removab l reas of the 3 60 instrum e i nterest wer e from 2,540 d the MDC d W ater Reacto r Plan 2-15. The dual concen t scussed in slikely to be r al backgrou n e d Structur f ormation c o G-3 Coal Pl a was no reas o uctures that for the "no n n ted in the H nally, the p R Stack d u t he LACB W vided in R e e 2015 char a tation buildi n sides in no n t ive conta merization su r performed o f addition, si x gamma pro p location of ctivity rang i/100c m 2. T-gamma act i y ranging fdentified at material its e w as positiv e on the fact t r ect alpha m le contamin G-3 Coal P e nt with 43
resentative s on, gamma s significant pm). The a clides with alkover surv Areas land area ea is 1.5 acr approximat y reactor op Three impact sion switchy used to tran ned is appro cted open la in accorda ral and vert he soil. Char y to quantify n each open res due to int loyed to de he radionucl 2-24 05, six surfa atories for g Table 2-9.
-e scanne d , i ndpm/100c m d uring the c o r analysis o f t rations gre a s ection 2.3.
dentified se ng H-3, C-14 consistent w dionuclides w unting uncer conclusion w mple, samp
3 false positi v nd. es ompiled in ant may be c o nable pote nhave been d n-impacted" HSA that th e potential for u ring oper a WR Adminis t e ference 13 a cterization ngs were su r n-impacted s m ination of s r veys perfor m f the mi d-le v x (6) locati o p ortional det eeach direct m ing from 2, 3 The results o i vity rangin g from 142 d pconcentrati o elf was sam p ely identifi e t hat no othe r measurement s ation surve y Plant. Sca n-93 detector
: 55. Howev hen the rati ons in Chap and 10,700, and primarily mprise 88% o ery unlikely sample of th scan reading difference analysis of t no plant de vey averaged inside the res. All ope tely 3.46 acr perations. T ted Class 3 s yard and the nsport dry fu oximately 16 and areas beg ance with R ical extent o racterization the potentia n land surve terferences a etermine th lide concent face soil sam gamma spect everal plan 4, Fe-55, Ni with natural b were close t rtainty as op was supporte le L301210 ver, the Sr-9 ios from L3 pter 6, Table respectivel y the concen of the site-sp to represent he rail road gs were take from site b the railroad erived radio d 7,000-8,50 fenced LSE en land surve re area that This open la survey units e area encom uel casks to 6.5 acres.
.n cluding flo o m 2 to 2,61 7 o urse of thi s 2-29 fthese sam p a ter than th e 3 for non-i m ves. Cs-137 the HSA, S classified as n tial for resi designated a sclassificati o e G-3 struct u windborne ations to s tration Buil
gan in Octob Reference 4 of any cont n inspections al volumetric ey unit. Li and inaccess he lateral a trations in t mples and fiv troscopy and nt-derived r i-63, and Sr-background to the detecti pposed to th ed by a rev 05-CR-GS-0 90/Cs-137 an 3012105-CR e 6-3, it is s ly. In conc ntrations of C pecific radio t the actual p bed gravel en of the rail background bed gravel onuclides. T 00 cpm.
: d. Additio ncampaign w r veyed. s urvey unit soils, aspha l m ed in the G v el roof of t h ons were sel e ector. A s m measureme n 302 dpm/10 of the dire c g from 1,60 3 pm/100c m 2 ons greater t p led on Ju n ed by gam m r plant deri v s were due ys were per f n measurem e. Approxi m o rs and low e 7 dpm/100c m s survey. T e p les positiv e e instrument m pacted ar e was also po S olutions c o"non-impa cdual conta m s "non-imp a o n fo r the G u res were n omigration o structure ro o ding roof a n n al surveys w here the s u L4012103.
E as impac ey units insi surrounds t and area has were design mpassing th the ISFSI.
l t or concr e G-3 station a h e G-3 Coa l e cted at ran d mear sample n t. The res u 0c m 2 to 2, 8 c t beta-gam m 3 dpm/100c mto 258 dp mthan MDC b ne 30, 2015.
ber 2014. A
m a spectro s v ed ROC w amost likely f ormed of r e e nts were p m ately 5% o f er wall surf a m 2. No o en (10) loca t ely identifi e MDC, incl u eas, the H T o sitively det e o ncluded t h cted". Hist o m ination fro m a cted" is pro v G-3 station o t used for L o f airborne ofs was e v n d the G-3 of the G-3 u rfaces subj e There ar e e te in this s u are summari z l Plant buil d dom for dir efor remova b ults of the b e 816 dpm/10 0 m a and alp h m 2 to 2,072 m/100c m 2. b y the anal y Cs-137 w a scopy at a as detected,  to the pre s epresentati v p erformed u s f the concre t a ces. The a v o bserved sc a tions were c h e d several p u ding H-3, F T D radionu c e cted but at l hat the stru c orical infor m m site opera t v ided in Ta b structures i LACBWR-r e effluent rel e v aluated b y Coal Plant  structures ected to hig h e no docum urvey unit.
: 4. Survey amination id s and surveys c contaminat imited soil ibility.
zed as follo w d ing using a ect measure m ble contami n eta scan ide n 0 c m 2 with a h a measure mdpm/100c m No remo v ysis of the s a s the only concentrati o it was conc l sence of co a ve high pers o s ing the L u te surfaces i verage scan Man measur e hosen at ra n p lant-Fe-55 c lides levels c tures m ation tions. ble 2-is the elated eased y the roof. were h foot ented  The w s: beta-m ents n ation n tified scan m ents m 2 and v able smear plant o n of l uded a l ash onnel udlum i n the MDC ement ndom, La Cros s License T Revisio nprimaril ymeasure m 875 dp m greater t h 2.3.6.I m The dec oimpacte dIn additi o accepted remain a Reactor Bremaini n and flo o Reactor/G Turbine surfaces segregat e radioacti vsystems o Radiolo gcomplia n radiolog i areas.
and vertical the soil. A ve subsurfac d HTD anal radionuclide
disasse mremediat demoliti o waste. After co m3 feet b e radioacti v use crite r 2.3.6.1.
-90. Cs-137
Charact e consiste d walls an(primari l taken fr o 621 foot the 633 fsamples w Piping T u s e Boiling W Termination n 0 y from the m ents for g/100c m 2 for h an MDC b y mpacted St r ommissioni n d b uildings, s on, all syste m elevation f o a nd be subj e B uilding th a ng reinforce d o rs of the Generator P sump and t habove the ed by waste v e waste.
. In all case ion limits an e actual pres view of exp 002-SS indi nd Fe-55/Cs R-GS-002-SS een that the clusion, base Cs-137 whic onuclide mix presence of p was analyze l road bed g (which aver indicated na The gamma cted by re ide the LSE the LSE has been segre nated for the he site acces The area o A sample plan techniques dentified an s were perfo tion of acces information l extent of A combinatio e soil lyses.
or structure s g ical survey s n ce with 1 0 i cal conditi o The radiol o m bly and re m i on has ad e on, the imp a mmodity re m elow grade , vity and th e ria. Base m rization of d primarily o d floors of l y the Pipin g om the 615 elevation i n f oot elevati o w ere collec t unnel. The l W ater Reacto r Plan main lobb y gross activit beta-gamm y the analysi r uctures a n n g approac h structures, s y m s and exp o o r grade at L ected to ST S at will be ex p d concrete w WGTV, a nlant basem e he Turbine 636 foot el e classificati o No extens i s that will b e s of the inte r 0 CFR 20 r e o ns for the i m o gical info r m oval of sys t e quately re d acted struct u m oval is co m , will be r e extent of a m ent Struct uthe structu r o f the acquis the Reacto r g Tunnels).
es at 7 was es, the nd are sence pected icates s-137 S are ey are ed on ch are
foot elevati n the Reacto r o n conc r ete f ted, six (6) i n l ocations w h r y area and y was less a. No remo v s of the sm e n d S y stems h for LAC B ystems and c osed metal b LACBWR is S are the re m p osed by th e walls floors o nd the re m e nt, the one pit. Conse q e vation wil l on and disp o i ve charact e e removed p r r iors of stru c equirements mplementati rmation fro m tems and th e d uced radio l ures will be m plete, the s r e-surveyed a dditional r e u res Below 6 ral surfaces ition and ra d r Building, In June and on concrete r Building, t h f loor of the P n the React o h ere the cor e 2-30 the maintethan the M vable conta m ar samples.
: xture, plant-ed by gravel raged atural scan eactor have s also gated e area ss off of the n was were nd the ormed ssible n was f any on of  
B WR requi r components below 3 feet the 639 fo o m aining rei n e removal o f of the WTB, m ainder of foot thick p q uently, all l be remed i o sed of as c e rization w a r ior to the p etures at LA C regarding on of contr o m these s u e demolition logical con d demolishe dtructures th ato determi emediation r 36 Foot Ele vof baseme n diological a nWTB and July of 201 5 floor and t he 630 foot P iping Tun n o r Building, e samples w e e nance area
.M DC of 74 mination w a r es the de m to a depth o below gra d o t elevation.
n forced con c f the interio r the remain i the Pipin g p ortion of t hsystems an d iated, disas s clean demol i as or will b erformance o C BWR are rthe postin g ols for the p r urveys will of impacte d ditions to l e d, packaged at will rema i i ne the co n r equired, if a vation n ts that wi l n alysis of c o the balanc e 5 , a series o t he concret e elevation c o n els. A totalthree (3) in ere taken ar
: e. The res udpm/100c m as identified m olition an d of at least 3 de will also b The only s t crete walls a r concrete a n ing reinforc e g and Ven t he Chimne y d compone n sembled an d i tion debris, b e perform e of FRS. r outinely pe r g of areas rotection o f provide t h d structures a e vels suitab l and proper l i n at license n centrations any, to mee t ll remain i n o ncrete core e of the ba s f concrete c o e floor and o ncrete floo r l of twelve (
the WTB a n e shown in F ults of all d m 2 for alph a at concentr a d removal o feet below g b e removed.
tructures th a a nd floors o nd steel lin e e d concrete tilation Tu n y Foundatio n n ts and stru c d/or demol iclean salv a ed of equip m rformed to e nand to id e f workers in he basis fo r at the site.
Wle for cont r l y disposed  terminatio n of the re s t the unrest r n the "end-ssamples fro m sement stru c o re samples east wall o r of the WT B 12) concret e nd three (3) i F igures 2-9.
d irect a and ations of all grade. The a t will of the er, the walls n nels, n, the  ctural i shed, age or m ent, n sure entify these r the W hen r olled of as n , i.e., sidual ricted state" m the ctures were n the B and e core in the La Cros s License T Revisio n The loc a conditio nvolumet r elevated wall su r discolor a that ex h conditio nthere wa s radionuc The con c Test Am eROC. I n Reactor B and #00 2 concrete analysis positivel y 59, Tc-9 9 concrete 2.3.6.2.A concr e Turbine contami nin the T Analysis 0.106 p C 2.3.6.3.As state d subjecte d graded s u As repo r radioacti vbuilding located iAdminis tproximit y laborato r Charact e beta-ga m gross be t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ations select e n or obser v ric contamin observed c o faces were a tion or sta n hibited the h n for concr e s sufficient s lide fractio n c rete pucks r e rica Labor a n addition, B uilding sa m 2 were als ocores is p r of the conc y detected a t 9, Pu-238, Pcore sampl e Turbi n ete core wa s Building T n ation event T urbine Bui lof this sa m C i/g and H-3 LAC B d previousl y d to FRS. I n ur vey appro a r ted in the H v e spills or has primari l i n the buil d tration Buil d y to the LS E r y. rization sur v mma/alpha a ta-gamma/a l W ater Reacto r Plan e d for conc r v ed radiolo gation of the o ntact dose r used to i d n ding water.
h ighest pot e te in each s source term n s of gamma r epresentin g atory for ga m the concret e mple locatio o sent for i s resented in rete core s a t concentrat i P u-239/240, e s is present e n e Building s obtained a s T unnel to cited in the lding and t m ple indicat e at 1.71 pCi
/BWR Admi n y, the LAC B n stead, thes e ach in accor d H SA, there wradioactive l y b een use d ding that su p ding was i n E, occupanc y veys of the c tivity of i n l pha activity r r ete core sa m gical meas u concrete.
W r ates or cou n d entify pote n The goal wential of r e s urvey unit.in the cores emitters as w g the first 1/2 m ma spectr o e pucks re p ns #001, #0 s otopic anal y Table 2-16.
amples incl u i ons greater Pu-241, A m e d in Refere n Tunnel s part of th eattempt to HSA pertai n t he potentia l e d detectabl e/g. nistration B u BWR Admi n e two struct u dance with M was no past contaminat i d for office s p p ported bot h n itially clas s y by LACB W LACBWR nterior floo r were also p 2-31 m pling were urements i n W hen possib l n t rates. In a ntial locati o was to iden t e presenting  This judgto achieve t w ell as HT Dinch of con c o scopy and H p resenting t h 0 3, #005 an ysis. A su m Significa n u de Ni-63, Hthan their r e m-241 and A nce 16. e 2014 char a evaluate ning to the d l radiologi c e concentrat uilding nistration B u ures will be M ARSAM E history of t h i on in the L A p ace and re c h LACBW R sifie d as a M W R person nAdministra t r s surfaces a performed o n biased tow n dicated th e le, locations a ddition, vis o ns of sur f tify, to the ethe worst gmental sa mp the sensitivi t D radionucli d c rete at eac h H TD analys e h e concrete n d #006 and mmary of t n t HTD ra d H-3 and Sr-9 espective M D Am-243. An a cterization the possib l d iscovery o f cal contami n tions of Cs-1 u ilding and surveyed fo E guidance.
h e use of u nACBWR A c ords storag e R and G-3 M ARSSIM nel and the p tion Buildi n a nd the roo f n the roof, o n w ard locatio n e presence we re deter m s ual observa t f ace conta m e xtent possi b case boun d m pling appro ties require d d es. h sample lo c es for beta a n deeper tha nWTB samp t he analytic a dionuclides i 9 0. The ot h DC include; analysis of survey fro m le extent o f cracked dr a n ation of s u 1 37 at 0.35 2 G-3 Crib H or unrestrict e nsealed radi odministrati o e. An envir o operations. Class 2 str u resence of t h n g included
: f. Direct mn floor tiles n s where ph y of fixed a m ined based tions of flo o m ination, su c ble, the loc a d ing radiol o ach also en d to determi n c ation was s e nd alpha e m n 1/2 inch d ele locations al results f o i dentified b y h er radionu cC-14, Fe-5 5the results o m the floor o of a radio a ain system p u rrounding 2 pCi/g, Co
-H ouse will n e d release u s oactive mat e o n Building.
onmental la b The LAC B u cture due t h e environ ma scan for measuremen t and around ysical a nd/or upon o r and c h as a tions ogical sured n e the ent to m itting e ep at #001 or the y the c lides 5, Ni-of the of the active p iping soils.  -60 at not be s ing a erials,  The b was B WR to its m ental gross t s for floor La Cros s License T Revisio n drain op e each dir e The res u 4,915 dp mthe seco nimbedde d gamma s was the n and sec ofrom les s and dire observe d Beta s c 2,261 dp mfrom les s Direct b e of 243 dmeasure midentifie d 2.3.7.S Section 8 hydroge o was der i Haley &
(18) sup p 2.3.7.1.For a di towns a n river wa t Lansing, water f o approxi m The LA C well at t h state per m LACB W Building areas ar e to the g r pathway s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e nings. A s m ect measure m u lts of the m/100cm 2 w n d floor h a d in a floor s pectroscop y n performed o nd floor la m s than MDC ct alpha re d reading of 7 cans of t h m/100cm 2 w s than MD C e ta-gamma m dpm/100c m 2 m ents were d concentrat i urface and 8.5 in Cha p o logy and h y i ved directl y Aldrich, H y p lements th e Area Gro u stance of 4 0 nd cities alo n t er for indu s Iowa, abou t o r industri a m ately 40 m i C BWR site he site. San i m itted sani t WR Adminis. Storm w a e periodicall y r ound area s uafter passin g W ater Reacto r Plan mear sampl e m ent. beta scans w ith a scan M a llway, a ditile. The c y. The anal y involving t h m inated wo o of 329 dp m adings ran g 72 dpm/100 c h e roof ar e w ith a scan M C of 113 dp m measuremen tto a maxi mall less tha n ions greater Groundwa t p te r 8 of t y drology of y from Hal y drogeologi c e preliminar y u ndwater U s 0 miles do w ng the Missi s s trial purpo s t 15 miles d a l purposes les downstr e has its own itary wastes t ary wastes h t ration Bui l a ter runoff i s y monitore d u rrounding t g through a n r e for remov aof the in t M DC of 2,1 0screte radi o contaminate d ysis of the t i h e acquisitio o d, carpet, a m/100c m 2 to ged from l e cm 2. e a indicat e M DC of 2,2 6 m/100c m 2 t o t s taken on t mum obser v n MDC of 4than MDC b t er h is LTP cZNPS and e e y & Aldr i cal Investig a y findings i n s e wnstream of s sippi River s es, excludi n downstream o between t e am. potable w aare collect e hauler. Th i l ding and a s diverted d i d for oil she e t he facility v n oil separat o 2-32 a ble conta m terior surfa c 00 dpm/100 c oactive part i d portion o f ile identifie dn of ten (10
)a nd floor ti la maximu m e ss than M D ed results 61 dpm/100 c o a maximu m the floor dr a v ed readin g 42 dpm/100 c b y the analy ontains a s e nvirons.
T i ch, Hydro g a tion Report n Reference 1the site, vi rare obtaine d ng the adja c of the site.
t he LACB W a ter supply, pd in a solid s is includes a a sanitary h irectly to th e n and disc o v ia downsp o or located i n m ination was c es ranged cm 2. Durin g icle was di s f the tile w a d 0.005 uCi
) biase d dir e l e. Direct b m observed r e D C of 39 d ranging f r cm 2. Direc t m observed ain opening s g of 333 d p cm 2. No r esis of the s msummary d The informa t geological C tfor the La C 17. rtually all m d from grou n c ent G-3 pl a There are n W R site a n provided th r s holding ta n a sanitary h o h olding tan k h e Mississip p oloration.
R o uts or ente n side the LS E also taken from 1,42 0 g the scan o f scovered.
T a s removed of Cs-137.
ect measure m b et a-gamma eading of 5, dpm/100c m 2 rom 1,872 t alpha mea s reading of 1 s ranged fro m pm/100c m 2 a emovable c o mear sample s d escription t ion contain e C onceptual S C rosse Boili n m unicipal w und water.
T ant, is the c o n o other kno w n d Prairie r ough a sin g nk and pum p olding tank k that serv i p i River at o R oof drains d r the norm a E. at the locati 0 dpm/100c m f the north e T he particl eand analyz eAn investi g ments on th e readings r a ,743 dpm/1 0to a max idpm/100c m s ure m ents r a 152 dpm/10 0 m less than M a nd direct ontaminatio n s. of the ge o ed in this s e S ite Mode l n g Water R e w ater suppli e The nearest u oal-fired pl a w n users o f du Chien, g le ground w p ed off by a that servic e i ces the T u o utfalls. R e discharge di r a l effluent r e on of m 2 to e nd of e was e d by gation e first a nged 0 0c m 2 imum m 2 to a nged 0 c m 2. MDC alpha n was o logy, e ction (17). e acto r e s for u se of a nt in friver WI, w ater local es the urbine e lease rectly e lease La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.3.7.2.Regiona l Mississi p parallels upward; river sta gdemonst r river sta g Ground w surface (
Ground wthe Miss imay tur nchemica lthe shall o Based o n of the G-located i monitori n a slightl y has a d o gradient towards t there ar e stages. G Reactor B are belo w During p was co mpermeab i b uilding ssoils wil lwill cir c localize d outside t h other ha n or burie d underlyi n shallow scontami n soils wit h orders o f s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Groundw l ly, ground w ppi river.
Cthe river.
U however, t h ge data com p r ates that th e g e impacts t h w ater beneat h bgs) and th e w ater in the s i ssippi Rive n and flow l constituent ow system.
n a review o f-3 Ash Lan d i n the sou t ng wells (B 1 y downward o wnward g r at well pair t he river ba s e some peri o G roundwate r B uilding ba w the water t plant constr u mpacted, red u ility can de c s. The resu l l flow at a s cumnavigate d flow regi m h e footprint n d, potentia l d piling, wil l n g ground w soils from p n ation. The h in the sup p f magnitude W ater Reacto r Plan ater Flow w ater flows i Closer to t h U nder typic he vertical g r p ared to w a e shallow a q h e water tab l h the site is e groundwa t s hallow dep or. The dee pparallel to s would occ u f the groun d dfill area gro u t h side of t 1 1AR/B11 R vertical gr a r adient at w B9/B9A. T sin with a l o o ds where t r flow thro u sement shel table during u ction, and m ucing the ef f c rease the h lting impact slower velo cthe area, e m es on conta mof these st r l releases th a l likely tak e w ate r. This precipitation
,average sh a p ort pilings, lower. r i n a wester l he shore, g r al river sta g r adient reve r ter table el e quifer is in d i l e elevation. first encou n t e r is in dir e osits and fil l p er ground wthe river.
u r at or nea r dwater eleva t u ndwater m o t he LACB W) to the east adient. Duri n w ell pairs B T his is expe c o calized infl u the gradient s u gh the LA C l) as well a s high and lo w m ore specif i f ective poro s h ydraulic co n to ground w city, and re g effectively b minant fate a r uctures wil l at occurred w much long e is further c , creating a n allow aquife r the hydraul 2-33 l y direction r oundwater g e, groundw r ses during f evations me a i rect hydrau ntered at a n e ct hydrauli c l material fl o water is also Because t h r the surface tion measur e o nitoring w e W R site, a n of and up g r n g times of n B 11R/B11A R c ted as gro u u ence at B9
/s are rever s C BWR site i s s the deep p w river stag e ically the in s s ity and per m n ductivity o w ater flow i s gionally, a s i b ypassing t h a nd transpo r l likely be d within the f o er to migrat e compounde d n area that w r hydraulic c ic conducti vfrom the b lmay also h w ater gradie n f lood stages
.a sure in LA C ulic commu n n average d e c communic a o ws towardslikely to fl o he potentia l, the release ements coll e e lls (# B2/B 3 nd associat e r adient of L A normal and R and B2/B u ndwater fl o/B9A from t sed; and thi s s impacted b pilings that s e conditions
.stallation o f m eability o f o f the aquif e s that groun d i gnificant p e these soils.
r t are that p o d eflected an d o otprint of t h e both in th d as the ov e w ill likely r e c onductivit y v ity would b l uffs on the h ave a flow nts near the
. The geolo g C BWR site n ication wit h epth of 20 f e ation with t h s the west a n o w towards t l releases o f s would lik e e cted during 3/B9A/B9/B e d backgro u A CBWR, t h low river st a B3, with an o ws generall y t he adjacen t s is likely d b y deeper s t s upport the
. f the suppor t f the soils.
T er within th e dwater with i ercentage o f The impl i otential rele a d flow arou n he building se vadose z o erlying stru c e tain any po y is 313 feet b e expected east towar dcomponen triver are sl i g ical and hi smonitoring h the river a n e et below g r he adjacent n d discharge s t he west bu t f radiologi c e ly be confi nroutine sa m B 7/B8), whi c u nd ground w h ere appea r s a ge, ground w upward v e y from the b t inlet. Ho w d ue to high tructures (i.
estructures, w t pilings, th e T his reduct i e footprint o in the comp f the flow r e i cations of ases that oc c nd them. O s, via floor d o ne as well a ctures isola t tentially rel e per day. F o to be one t o ds the t that ightly storic wells nd the round river. s into t then cal or ned to m pling c h are w ater to be w ater ertical bluffs w ever, river e., the w hich e soil i on in of the p acted egime these curred On the drains a s the t e the eased or the o two La Cros s License T Revisio n The vel o gradient.across t h Therefor the inc h Environ m show se astage. T h LACB Wvicinity structure directio n 2.3.7.3.Historic a monitori n monitori n monitori n Dairylan Of the w LACB Wroutine b designat e Environ m G-3 Fos s Nos. 3, 4 levels re 3.0E-08 &#xb5;During t h to the s radioacti v The wel l suspecte dthat sam p As note Activitie s wells to monitori n if groun d located ninterval o b elow g r B. s e Boiling W Termination n 0 o city of gr o  The gradi e h e site, grou n e, it is likel y hes and fe e m ental Mon i a sonal vari a hese wells a WR site struc t of suspect s/foundatio n ns. Previous I a lly, the LA C n g wells. F n g wells lo c n g wells o fd for radiol o w ells show n W R facilities basis. The g r e d as B-2, m ental Mon i s il Station o p 4 and 5 we r ported duri n&#xb5;Ci/ml to 9.
h e recovery outh of th e v e liquids f r l-point sho w d leakage.
T p le are pres e d in the L s Report (D support gr o ng wells (1 0 d water qua l n ominally w i o f 15 to 25 f r ade. These W ater Reacto r Plan o undwater i s e nt of the w a ndwater mo n y that the gr o e t/day rang i toring Pro g a tion on up w are not suffi c tures or are abroken dr a ns or variat i Investigatio n CBWR Lic eigure 2-11 i c ated on th ff the LAC B o gical purpo n on Figure were histo r r oundwater m B-3, B-7, i toring staff p e r ational r e r e routinely ng this mo n 0E-08 &#xb5;Ci/
m of a probab e Turbine B rom suspect w n on Figure T he well-po e nted in Tab l L ACBWR D D-Plan/PSD A o undwater e 0 wells total
)ity had be e ithin five (5
)f eet below g wells are s h r s directly r ater table is i n itoring has o undwater ve). Ground g ram wells a w ard and d o cient to cha r as where pot e ain lines) c o i ons in fill m n s ensed Site h allustrates th ee LACBW R B WR site t ses. 2-11, only P r ically moni t m onito r ing w B-8, B-9, on a routin e equirements. monitored f n itoring per i m l). le spill inci d B uilding.
T broken drai n 2-11 was e s int was sa m l e 2-17. Th i D ecommissi o AR) (19), D e valuation.
) were insta l e n impacted
) feet of on e g rade and o n h ow on Fig u 2-34 e lated to b onfluenced b yshown that v elocity acr o w ater elev a agree with t o wnward gr a racterize the ential releas o uld have o materials c o a s had seve r e current lo c R site. Th e that are or P otable W a t ored by D a wells and b a B-9A, B11 A e basis for n o During L A f or gross b e i od was les s d ent in 1983 T his incide n n lines in th s tablished d o mpled once o i s well-poin t o ning Plan airyland re cIn Novem b lled within t by plant o e another co n n e deep well ure 2-11 as M o th the hy d y the topog r the water t a oss the site i s a tion data t he regional adients that groundwat ees associate d occurred. I n ould locally r al potable w c ation of po e re is no p o have been a ter Wells N a iryland for a ckground g r AR, and B o n-radiologi A CBWR op e e ta activity.
s than or e q, a tempora r nt concern e e Turbine B o wn gradie n on May 3, 1 9 t has since b e and Post-S cently insta l b e r 2012, fi t he LACB W o pe r ations. n sist of one with a scre e MW 200A a n draulic con d r aphy; and, w able has a vs also relati vfrom the groundwat e are influe n e r flow belo w d with LAC n these are ainfluence g water wells otable water otable wate rmonitored Nos. 3 and 4 radiologica l r oundwater B 11R are m ical paramet e e rations, Pot a Typical g r q ual to MD r y well-poi n e d the pot e Building to s u nt and belo w 9 83. The a n een abando n S hutdown D l led ground w ive (5) pair s WR licensed The well p shallow we l e ned interv a n d B throug ductivity an d with the flat ery low gra d v ely slow (i
.G-3 Coal e r flow, an d nced by the w and arou n BWR (i.e., i a s, pilings, g roundwater and ground w and ground w r or ground w by Solutio n 4 which ser v l conditions monitoring m onitored b y e rs to supp o a ble Water W r oss beta a c DC (ranging nt was estab l e ntial leaka g u b-b uilding w the grade o nalysis resul ned. D ecommissi o water moni t s of ground wsite to dete r pairs which l l with a scr e al of 45 to 5 5 h MW-204 A d the areas dient.  .e., in Plant d also river n d the in the deep flow w ater w ater w ater n s o r viced on a wells y the ort the Wells c tivity from  lished g e of soils. of the ts for o ning t oring w ater rmine were eened 5 feet A and La Cros s License T Revisio n Two (2) in June ground w 90 and C In June o through 2 and B11 several r fourth r o Potable samples transura n of the gr o Additio n 18. 2.3.7.4.The LA C twice p e ground w the MW-The coll eDM pR g r 2.3.7.5.
Ground w (5 pairs) samplin g wells M WNovemb epositivel y ranging Novemb e during t h During t hMW-20 2 Sr-90 w s e Boiling W Termination n 0 rounds of g r 2 013 and t h w ate r sample s C s-137. Anal y o f 2014, a t 2 04 A and B A R. Thes e r adionuclide o und of gr oWell #5, a n were sent o n ic radionuc l o undwater s a nal details, i n On-Goin g CBWR Site g er year for r w ater is at re l-200A/B thr u e cted infor m D epth to gro u M onitoring w otential/tur b Radiological r oundwater Sum m w ater charac t within the g in 2013.
H W-201A an d er of 2013 y detected i from 1.43 p er 2013 sa m h e 2013 sam p h e June 201 2A, MW-20 3 w as also po W ater Reacto r Plan roundwater h en during s were sent y sis for H-3 t hird round o B; Potable W e collected g s including o undwater w n d Monitor i o ff for radi o lides. Tabl e amples and r n cluding th e g Investigati o g roundwate r r adiological l atively hig h u MW-204 A m ation durin g und water in w ell ground w bidity/dissol vsample info rsample coll e m ary of Gro u terization e ff LSE area H-3 was posi d B, MW-2 0 at concentr a in the same pCi/L to 2.
1 m pling perio d p ling period 4 sample p e 3 A and M W sitively det r samples we r a seasonal lto an off-si t was perfor m o f groundw a Water Wells
#groundwater HTD and t w ere collect e i ng Wells B ological an a es 2-18 and 2 results. e off-site an a ons r monitorin g analysis p u h er and low e A/B wells as g each moni tthe respect i w ater pH/sp e v ed oxygen/
t rmation inc l ection. u ndwater A n fforts comm ein Novem b tively detec t 0 2-A and B, a tions rang iwells duri n 18 pCi/L; h o d. Co-60 a
: n. eriod, H-3 w W-203B) at c e cted in w 2-35 r e collected l ow ground w te laborator y m ed on site.
ater sample s#3, 4, 5, and samples w t ransuranic r ed from: M B 11R and B alysis of se v 2-19 provid e alytical labo r g program c o u rposes onl y er elevations shown on F toring interv ive monitori n e cific condu c temperature
.l uding a co m n alytical Re s e nce d throu g b e r 2012 a n t e d at conce nMW-203A i ng fro m 1 5 n g the June o wever, it w n d Cs-137 w was positivel yoncentratio n wells MW-2 0 in 2013, d u w ater level y for radiol o  s was colle c 7; and Mo n ere sent of f radionuclid e MW 200A a n B 11AR. T v eral radio n es a summa rratory repo r onsists of o b y from exis. The moni


igure 2-11.
La Cross License T Revision random a survey p professio Protectio radioactiv spill loca survey lo not requ locations radiologi A surface surface s or surfac were take intervals Each sur site radio necessary All surfa Several s full isoto survey un 2.3.4.1.
There are The Clas area in th Reactor radioactiv areas, pre Twenty-t measurab locations taken in taken, C samples 13 sampl identified the surf 0.287 pC samples w Seventy-one mete se Boiling W Termination n 0 and biased s ackage. The onal judgme on Supervis vity, depres ations, or ar ocations was uired for soi s were selec ical contamin e soil sample oil samples ce scans indi en from 0.15 rface soil, co ological lab y to achieve ace and sub soil samples opic analysis nit per Refe Class e four (4) op ss 1 open lan he Class 1 op Building, th vely contam evented the a two (22) sur ble radioact s, or areas w Class 1 open Co-60 was p and Cs-137 les. No oth d by gamma face soil sa Ci/g. The a was 0.096 p nine (79) su er, two (2) lo Water Reactor Plan urvey locati e locations o ent of the E or. Consi sions, disco reas where t s also determ ils in an op cted on asp nation.
e was taken were acquir icated elevat 5 cm to dept omposite sub oratory by e an isotopic surface com were selecte s (HTD radi erence 4.
1 Open Lan pen land sur nd survey un pen land sur he Turbine minated build ability to per rface soil sam tivity, disco where the gro n land surve positively id 7 was posit her potentia spectroscop amples was verage Cs-1 Ci/g with a m ubsurface so ocations bias r
ions were es of biased me EnergySoluti deration wa lored areas, the ground h mined by are pen land are phalt in Cla at each sele red at severa ted activity.
ths ranging f bsurface soil gamma-spec c MDC equa mposite samp ed at random ionuclides).
nd Areas rvey units cl nits are show rvey units is Building, th ding and sys rform surfac mples were lored areas, ound had be ey units are s dentified in tively ident al plant-deriv py. The aver s 0.058 pCi/
137 concent maximum ob il samples w sed to areas o 2-25 stablished in easurements ions Project as given to low point g had been di ea classificat eas designat ass 1 survey cted biased a al random lo Depending from 1 to 3 m l sample or ctroscopy.
al to or less ples were an m and were s Duplicate lassified as wn in Figure obstructed b he WTB and stems, as we ce scanning d taken at loc
, buried pip een disturbed shown in Fig concentrati tified in con ved gamma rage Co-60 c
/g with a tration obser bserved conc were taken a on the south each survey s and/or sam Health Phy o locations gravity drain isturbed. Th tion. Rando ated as Clas y units whe and random cations or if on the loca m below gra asphalt sam Analysis co s than 0.10 p nalyzed afte shipped to T samples and Class 1 at L 2-1. A sign by the prese d the LSA ell as stored due to high b cations biase pe locations
: d. The loca gure 2-6. O ions greater ncentrations a-emitting ra concentratio maximum rved in the centration o at 10 surface and west sid y unit in acc mples were d ysicist and that exhib n areas, actu he number m-based me ss 1. Rando ere there wa
-based surve f surface soi ation, subsur ade and com mple was ana ount times w pCi/g for Cs er drying th Test America d concrete w LACBWR to nificant porti ence of build Building.
radioactive background.
ed toward sit s, actual an ations of surf Of the 22 sur r than the M s greater th adionuclides on observed observed c analysis of f 1.07 pCi/g e soil locatio de of the WG cordance wit determined b the Radiolo bited measu ual and pote of random-b easurements om measure as no histor ey location.
l sample ana face soil sam mposited ove alyzed by th were adjuste s-137 and C he sample m a Laboratorie were collecte otaling 8,443 ion of the su dings, namel The presen material in tes that exhi nd potential face soil sam face soil sam MDC in tw han the MD s were posit in the analy concentratio f the surface
: g.
ons to a dep GTV and fiv th the by the ogical urable ential based were ement ry of Sub-alysis mples r 1 m he on-ed as Co-60.
media.
es for ed by 3 m2.
urface ly the ce of these ibited spill mples mples wo (2)
DC in tively sis of on of e soil pth of ve (5)
 
La Cross License T Revision locations The sam evaluate Building samples 15 sampl identified of the su 0.161 pC areas is foundatio decommi Ten sam asphalt w this surv results ra measurem identified 0.057 pC A summ presented Nine sur samples gamma s In additi detected One sedi unit L10 and HTD 0.136 pC 2.3.4.2.
The imp immediat two surv LACBW these two Approxim 2350-1 d Alarm se instrumen se Boiling W Termination n 0 s that access mples at the t the subsurfa were taken taken, Cs-1 les. No oth d by gamma ubsurface so Ci/g. The ass not current ons and surr issioning pro mples were ta was taken fro vey unit. Th anging from ment of 3,09 d in concen Ci/g.
ary of the fi d in Table 2-rface soil sa taken from spectroscopy on to detect at concentra iment sampl 10103. This D analyses.
Ci/g.
Class acted Class te area surro ey units. Th WR Crib Hou o survey unit mately 1% o data logger w et-points for nt. No scan Water Reactor Plan ed the soils two WGTV ace soils alon and compo 137 was pos her potentia a spectroscop oil samples sessment of tly complete rounding bu ocess, when aken of asp om the same he asphalt s the instrume 95 dpm/100 ntrations gre indings of th
-10.
amples, 11 s Class 1 open y and HTD a ting Co-60 ations greate le was taken s sample wa Co-60 and 2 Open Lan 2 open lan ounding the hese are sho use, the G-3 ts.
of the surfac with a 2 by the instrum alarms were r
under the T V locations w ngside and u sited at dept sitively iden al plant-deriv py. The ave was 0.055 p potential su
: e. Soil in uried structu access will b phalt from p e location se surface was ent MDC of cm2. Of th eater than he survey fo subsurface s n land surve analyses. Th and Cs-137 r than the in n from the s as also sent t C-137 were nd Areas nd areas tota LSE. The C own in Figur 3 Crib Hous ce soil area i y 2 NaI de ment were set e observed.
2-26 urbine Build were acquire underneath th ths of 10, 15 ntified in co ved gamma erage Cs-13 pCi/g with ubsurface soi difficult to ures and pip be more read paved areas lected for th first scanne f 2,771 dpm/
he 10 asphal MDC in on or each indiv soil samples ey units wer he results of
, H-3, C-14 nstrument MD sanitary solid to Test Amer e detected in al approxim Class 2 impa re 2-1. The se and the L in survey un etector. Thi t at the obse ding through ed to a dept he vault. Th 5 and 20 fee oncentration a-emitting ra 7 concentrat a maximum il contamina o access are ping has bee dily availabl in Class 1 s he surface an ed with beta
/100cm2 to a lt samples t nly one sam vidual Class s, one concr re sent to Te f the analysis 4, Fe-55 and DC.
ds tank that rica Laborat n this sampl mately 13,99 acted open l LACBWR LACBWR w nit L201110 is area inclu erved backgr h angled Geo th of five m he samples u et. Of the 7 ns greater th adionuclides tion observe m observed ation in the C eas such as en deferred le.
survey unit nd subsurfac a-gamma de a maximum taken, Cs-13 mple at a s 1 open land rete sample est America s are present d Ni-63 wer is located i tory for gam e, both at a 6 m2 and ar and area wa Administrat warehouses a 1 was scann uded asphalt round plus t oprobe samp meters in ord under the Tu 79 subsurface han the MD s were posit ed in the ana concentratio Class 1 open s under bui until later i L1010104.
ce soil sampl etector with of observed 37 was posit concentratio d survey un and two as a Laboratorie ted in Table re also posit in Class 1 su mma spectros concentrati re located in as segregated tion Building are all locat ned with a M t paved surf the MDCR o pling.
der to urbine e soil DC in tively alysis on of n land ilding n the The les in scan d scan tively on of nit are sphalt es for 2-11.
tively urvey scopy on of n the d into g, the ted in Model faces.
of the
 
La Cross License T Revision Twenty-t measurab locations taken in taken, Cs other pot The aver 0.077 pC Twenty-t and three resides in Of the 2 greater th than MD identified of 0.112 samples assessme currently surround process, w Twelve s selected results r 2,748 dpm concentra concentra observed A summ presented Three sur samples Administ HTD ana Co-60 a concentra HTD rad 2.3.4.3.
The impa land area Figure 2-site, the t se Boiling W Termination n 0 three surfac ble radioact s, or areas w Class 2 open s-137 was p tential plant rage Cs-137 Ci/g with a m three subsur e locations b n survey uni 23 subsurfac han MDC in DC in four d by gamma pCi/g. The was 0.043 ent of poten y complete.
ding buried s when access samples were randomly.
ranging fro m/100cm2.
ations great ation observ d concentrati ary of the fi d in Table 2-rface soil sa taken from tration Build alyses. The and Cs-137, ations greate dionuclides e Class acted Class 3 a was segre
-1. The Cla transmission Water Reactor Plan e soil samp tivity, disco where the gro n land surve positively ide t-derived rad 7 concentrat maximum obs face soil sam biased to are it L2011101 ce soil samp n one sample samples. N spectroscop average Cs-pCi/g with ntial subsurf Soil in dif structures an s will be mor e taken of as The asphalt om the ins Of the 12 ter than the ved in the an on of 0.055 indings of th
-12.
amples, five m an acces ding were se results of th H-3, C-14 er than MD exceeding M 3 Open Lan 3 open land egated into ass 3 impacte n switchyard r
ples were tak lored areas, ound had be ey units are s entified at co dionuclides tion observe served conce mples were t eas alongsid
: 1. The biase ples taken, e and Cs-13 No other po py. The sing
-137 concent h a maximu face soil con fficult to ac nd piping ha re readily av sphalt from p t surface wa strument M 2 asphalt sa e instrumen nalysis of the pCi/g.
he survey fo subsurface s ssible storm ent to Test he analysis a 4, Fe-55 an DC. As disc MDC are likel nd Areas areas total a three surve ed open land for the LAC 2-27 ken at locat
, buried pip een disturbed shown in Fig oncentration were positiv ed in the an entration of taken at 14 r de and under ed samples w Co-60 was 7 was positi otential plan gle sample w tration obser um observe ntamination cess areas s as been defe vailable.
paved areas s first scann MDC of 2, mples taken nt MDC in e asphalt sam or each indiv soil samples, m sewer ba America La are presented nd Cm-243/
cussed in se ly to be false approximatel ey units. T d survey un CBWR and G tions biased pe locations
: d. The loca gure 2-7. O ns greater th vely identifi nalysis of th 0.200 pCi/g random loca rneath the S were acquire positively ively identif nt-derived ra with detectab rved in the a d concentra n in the Cla such as und erred until l in Class 2 su ned with bet
,529 dpm/10 n, Cs-137 w three samp mples was 0 vidual Class
, three aspha asin manhol aboratories f d in Table 2
/244 were ection 2.3.3 e positives.
ly 66,765m2 The Class 3 nits include t G-3 facilitie d toward sit s, actual an ations of surf Of the 23 sur han MDC in ied by gamm he surface s
: g.
ations to a de Storm Sewer ed to a dept identified a fied at conce adionuclides ble Co-60 ha analysis of th ation of 0.0 ass 2 open l der building ater in the d urvey units.
ta-gamma de 00cm2 to a was positive ples. The 0.049 pCi/g s 2 open land alt samples a le located for gamma s
-13. In add also positiv for non-imp
: 2. The Class survey uni the north en s, the LACB es that exhi nd potential face soil sam face soil sam 14 samples ma spectrosc soil samples epth of one m r Water pipe th of five m at concentra entrations gr s were posit ad a concentr he subsurfac 088 pCi/g.
land areas i foundations decommissio The asphal etector with a maximum ely identifie average Cs with a maxi d survey un and two sedi in front of spectroscopy dition to dete vely detecte pacted areas 3 impacted its are show nd of the lice BWR plant a ibited spill mples mples
. No copy.
s was meter e that meters.
ations reater tively ration e soil The s not s and oning lt was h scan m of ed in s-137 imum nit are iment f the y and ecting ed at s, the open wn in ensed access
 
La Cross License T Revision and right was deem LACBW Crib Hou facility d were dee These ar Solutions A minim scanned was excl focused o points fo No scan Thirty-tw where th open lan was posi plant-der The aver 0.131 pC Seventee meter.
concentra radionuc concentra maximum Two sam selected results w were pos A summ presented As part o of concre Crib Hou Administ survey un Three co L301210 three sur Laborato se Boiling W Termination n 0 t-of-way are med impacte WR Administ use). The tr during operat emed as imp reas were c s maintains t mum of 1%
with a Mod luded from on undisturb r the instrum alarms were wo surface so he ground ha d survey un tively identi rived gamma rage Cs-137 Ci/g with a m en subsurfac Of the 17 ations grea lides were ation observ m observed c mples were t randomly.
were less tha sitively ident ary of the fi d in Table 2-of the charac ete located i use. In addi tration Build nit L301210 oncrete samp 01, the two se rface soil s ories for gam Water Reactor Plan a and the ha ed by LACB tration Build ransmission tions. The p pacted by th onservativel that classifyi of the surf el 2350-1 da gamma sur bed soils wi ment were se e observed in oil samples ad been dist nits are show ified in conc a-emitting ra 7 concentrat maximum obs e soil sampl 7 subsurface ater than M positively ved in the a concentratio aken of asph The asphalt an instrumen tified by gam indings of th
-14.
cterization of in the north ition, a sam ding and tw
: 9. These sam ples from su ediment sam samples and mma spectr r
aul road to th BWR due to ding and the yard was d plant access he transit of ly classified ing these are face soil are ata logger w rface scanni ith minimal et at the obse n these surve were taken turbed. The wn in Figure centrations g adionuclides tion observe served conce les were tak e soil samp MDC in ei identified analysis of th on of 0.409 p halt from pa surface wa nt MDC of 1 mma spectro he survey fo f survey unit h section of mple was take wo sediment mples were urvey unit L3 mples taken f d two subs roscopy and 2-28 he ISFSI fac o the presen presence of deemed as im area, Highw f packaged r d as impacte eas as non-im ea in survey with a 2 by ing for safe vegetation o erved backgr ey units.
at locations e locations o e 2-8. Of th greater than s were positi ed in the an entration of ken at random ples taken, ight samples by gamma he subsurfac pCi/g.
aved areas in s first scann 1,938 dpm/1 scopy in any or each indiv t L3012101, the survey u en from a sa t samples w sent off-site 3012101, th from the stor surface soil d HTD anal cility. The n nce of a sep f concrete fr mpacted as i way 35 right radioactive m ed. Howev mpacted wou y units L30 2 NaI dete ety reasons.
or disturbed round plus t biased tow of surface s he 32 surface MDC in 26 ively identif nalysis of th 0.463 pCi/g mly selected Cs-137 w
: s. No oth spectrosco ce soil samp n Class 3 su ned with bet 100cm2. No y of these sam vidual Class
, samples we unit that ori anitary tank were taken fr e for isotopic he sanitary ta rm sewer ba samples w lyses. The north end of ptic system from impacte it was part o t-of way and material thro ver, it shou uld have bee 012101 and ector. Surve Gamma d soils or gra the MDCR o ard discolor oil samples e soil sampl samples. N fied by gamm he surface s
: g.
d locations t was positive ther potenti opy. The ples was 0.0 urvey units.
ta-gamma de o plant deriv amples.
s 3 open land ere taken fro iginated from k that service from a storm c analysis.
ank sample asin in survey were sent t results of f the license that service ed structures of the LACB d ISFSI haul ough these a ld be noted en appropriat L3012109 ey unit L301 surface scan avel. Alarm of the instrum red areas or taken in Cl les taken, Cs No other pote ma spectrosc soil samples to a depth o ely identifie ial plant-de average Cs 087 pCi/g w The asphalt etector. All ved radionuc d survey un om several p m the LACB es the LACB m sewer bas from survey y unit L3012 to Test Am the analysi d site es the s (the BWR l road areas.
d that te.
were 12102 nning m set-ment.
areas lass 3 s-137 ential copy.
s was of one ed in erived s-137 with a t was l scan clides nit are pieces BWR BWR sin in y unit
: 2109, merica is are
 
La Cross License T Revision presented derived R and Ni-6 exceedin consisten 2.3.5. N Based up associate indicated A full lis
: 2.
The prim informati operation from the character The resu conducte traffic in The G-3 incidents results of A scan su gamma d using an was also gross bet MDC of identified gross alp contamin samples.
derived 0.061 pC that the material Direct an traffic ar Model 23 areas of i ranged f exceeded se Boiling W Termination n 0 d in Table 2 ROC at resid
: 63. As dis ng MDC are nt with natur Non-Impacte pon the inf ed with the G d that there w st of G-3 stru mary basis f ion documen ns. Additio e LACBWR rization of t ults are prov ed during the the major st station res s of radioact f the charact urvey was p detector. In alpha/beta-g taken at the ta-gamma a f 2,816 dpm/
d gross beta-pha activity nation was i The roof m ROC that w Ci/g. Based elevated dir on the roof.
nd removabl reas of the 360 instrume interest were from 2,540 d the MDC d Water Reactor Plan 2-15. The dual concent scussed in s likely to be ral backgroun ed Structur formation co G-3 Coal Pla was no reaso uctures that for the non nted in the H nally, the p R Stack du the LACBW vided in Re e 2015 chara tation buildin sides in non tive contam erization sur performed of addition, six gamma prop location of ctivity rangi
/100cm2. T
-gamma acti y ranging f dentified at material itse was positive on the fact t rect alpha m le contamin G-3 Coal P ent with 43-e scanned, in dpm/100cm during the co r
analysis of trations grea section 2.3.3 false positiv nd.
es ompiled in ant may be c onable poten have been d n-impacted HSA that the potential for uring opera WR Administ eference 13 acterization ngs were sur n-impacted s mination of s rveys perform f the mid-lev x (6) locatio portional dete each direct m ing from 2,3 The results o ivity ranging from 142 dp concentratio elf was samp ely identifie that no other measurements ation survey Plant. Scan
-93 detector.
ncluding floo m2 to 2,617 ourse of this 2-29 f these samp ater than the 3 for non-im ves. Cs-137 the HSA, S classified as ntial for resi designated as classificatio e G-3 structu windborne ations to s tration Build
. Addition campaign w rveyed.
survey unit soils, asphal med in the G vel roof of th ons were sele ector. A sm measuremen 302 dpm/10 of the direc g from 1,603 pm/100cm2 ons greater t pled on Jun ed by gamm r plant deriv s were due ys were perf n measureme
. Approxim ors and lowe 7 dpm/100cm s survey. Te ples positive e instrument mpacted are was also po Solutions co non-impac dual contam s non-impa on for the G ures were no migration o structure roo ding roof an nal surveys where the su L4012103.
lt or concre G-3 station a he G-3 Coal ected at rand mear sample nt. The resu 0cm2 to 2,8 ct beta-gamm 3 dpm/100cm to 258 dpm than MDC b ne 30, 2015.
ma spectros ved ROC wa most likely formed of re ents were p mately 5% of er wall surfa m2. No o en (10) locat ely identifie MDC, inclu eas, the HT ositively dete oncluded th cted. Histo mination from acted is prov G-3 station ot used for L of airborne ofs was ev nd the G-3 of the G-3 urfaces subje There are ete in this su are summariz l Plant build dom for dire for removab ults of the be 816 dpm/100 ma and alph m2 to 2,072 m/100cm2.
by the analy Cs-137 wa scopy at a as detected, to the pres epresentativ performed us f the concret aces. The av observed sca tions were ch ed several p uding H-3, F TD radionuc ected but at l hat the struc orical inform m site operat vided in Tab structures i LACBWR-re effluent rele valuated by Coal Plant structures ected to high e no docum urvey unit.
zed as follow ding using a ect measurem ble contamin eta scan iden 0cm2 with a ha measurem dpm/100cm No remov ysis of the s as the only concentratio it was concl sence of coa ve high perso sing the Lu te surfaces i verage scan M an measure hosen at ran plant-Fe-55 clides levels ctures mation tions.
ble 2-is the elated eased y the roof.
were h foot ented The ws:
beta-ments nation ntified scan ments m2 and vable smear plant on of luded al ash onnel udlum in the MDC ement
: ndom,
 
La Cross License T Revision primarily measurem 875 dpm greater th 2.3.6. Im The deco impacted In additio accepted remain a Reactor B remainin and floo Reactor/G Turbine surfaces segregate radioactiv systems o Radiolog complian radiologi areas.
disassem remediat demolitio waste.
After com 3 feet be radioactiv use criter 2.3.6.1.
Characte consisted walls an (primaril taken fro 621 foot the 633 f samples w Piping Tu se Boiling W Termination n 0 y from the ments for g
/100cm2 for han MDC by mpacted Str ommissionin d buildings, s on, all system elevation fo and be subje Building tha ng reinforced ors of the Generator P sump and th above the ed by waste ve waste.
or structures gical surveys nce with 10 ical conditio The radiolo mbly and rem ion has ade on, the impa mmodity rem elow grade, vity and the ria.
Basem rization of d primarily o d floors of ly the Piping om the 615 elevation in foot elevatio were collect unnel. The l Water Reactor Plan main lobby gross activit beta-gamm y the analysi ructures an ng approach structures, sy ms and expo or grade at L ected to STS at will be exp d concrete w WGTV, an lant baseme he Turbine 636 foot ele classificatio No extensi s that will be s of the inter 0 CFR 20 re ons for the im ogical infor moval of syst equately red acted structu moval is com
, will be r e extent of a ment Structu the structur of the acquis the Reactor g Tunnels).
foot elevati n the Reactor on concrete f ted, six (6) in locations wh r
y area and y was less
: a. No remov s of the sme nd Systems h for LACB ystems and c osed metal b LACBWR is S are the rem posed by the walls floors o nd the rem ent, the one pit. Conseq evation will on and dispo ive characte e removed pr riors of struc equirements mplementati rmation from tems and the duced radiol ures will be mplete, the s re-surveyed additional re ures Below 6 ral surfaces ition and rad r Building, In June and on concrete r Building, th floor of the P n the Reacto here the core 2-30 the mainte than the M vable contam ar samples.
BWR requir components below 3 feet the 639 foo maining rein e removal of of the WTB, mainder of foot thick p quently, all l be remedi osed of as c erization wa rior to the pe tures at LAC regarding on of contro m these su e demolition logical cond demolished tructures tha to determi emediation r 36 Foot Elev of basemen diological an WTB and July of 2015 floor and t he 630 foot Piping Tunn or Building, e samples we enance area.
MDC of 74 mination wa res the dem to a depth o below grad ot elevation.
nforced conc f the interior the remaini the Piping portion of th systems and iated, disass clean demoli as or will b erformance o CBWR are r the posting ols for the pr urveys will of impacted ditions to le d, packaged at will remai ine the con required, if a vation nts that wil nalysis of co the balance 5, a series o the concrete elevation co nels. A total three (3) in ere taken are
. The resu dpm/100cm as identified molition and of at least 3 de will also b The only st crete walls a r concrete an ing reinforce g and Vent he Chimney d componen sembled and ition debris, be performe of FRS.
routinely per g of areas rotection of provide th d structures a evels suitabl and properl in at license ncentrations any, to meet ll remain in oncrete core e of the bas f concrete co e floor and oncrete floor l of twelve (
the WTB an e shown in F ults of all d m2 for alpha at concentra d removal o feet below g be removed.
tructures tha and floors o nd steel line ed concrete tilation Tun y Foundation nts and struc d/or demoli clean salva ed of equipm rformed to en and to ide f workers in he basis for at the site. W le for contr ly disposed termination of the res t the unrestr n the end-s samples from sement struc ore samples east wall o r of the WTB
: 12) concrete nd three (3) i Figures 2-9.
direct a and ations of all grade.
The at will of the er, the walls
: nnels, n, the ctural
: ished, age or
: ment, nsure entify these r the When rolled of as n, i.e.,
sidual ricted state m the ctures were n the B and e core in the
 
La Cross License T Revision The loca condition volumetr elevated wall sur discolora that exh condition there was radionuc The conc Test Ame ROC. In Reactor B and #002 concrete analysis positively 59, Tc-99 concrete 2.3.6.2.
A concre Turbine contamin in the T Analysis 0.106 pC 2.3.6.3.
As stated subjected graded su As repor radioactiv building located i Administ proximity laborator Characte beta-gam gross bet se Boiling W Termination n 0 ations selecte n or observ ric contamin observed co faces were ation or stan hibited the h n for concre s sufficient s lide fraction crete pucks r erica Labora n addition, Building sam 2 were also cores is pr of the conc y detected at 9, Pu-238, P core sample Turbin ete core was Building T nation event Turbine Buil of this sam Ci/g and H-3 LACB d previously d to FRS. In urvey approa rted in the H ve spills or has primaril in the build tration Build y to the LSE ry.
rization surv mma/alpha a ta-gamma/al Water Reactor Plan ed for concr ved radiolog ation of the ontact dose r used to id nding water.
highest pot ete in each s source term ns of gamma representing atory for gam the concrete mple locatio o sent for is resented in rete core sa t concentrati Pu-239/240, es is presente ne Building s obtained as Tunnel to cited in the lding and t mple indicate at 1.71 pCi/
BWR Admin y, the LACB nstead, these ach in accord HSA, there w radioactive ly been used ding that sup ding was in E, occupancy veys of the ctivity of in lpha activity r
rete core sam gical measu concrete. W rates or coun dentify poten The goal w ential of re survey unit.
in the cores emitters as w g the first 1/2 mma spectro e pucks rep ns #001, #0 sotopic analy Table 2-16.
amples inclu ions greater Pu-241, Am ed in Referen Tunnel s part of the attempt to HSA pertain the potential ed detectable
/g.
nistration Bu BWR Admin e two structu dance with M was no past contaminati d for office sp pported both nitially class y by LACBW LACBWR nterior floor were also p 2-31 mpling were urements in When possibl nt rates. In a ntial locatio was to ident epresenting This judg to achieve t well as HTD inch of conc oscopy and H presenting th 03, #005 an ysis. A sum Significan ude Ni-63, H than their re m-241 and A nce 16.
e 2014 chara evaluate ning to the d l radiologic e concentrat uilding nistration Bu ures will be MARSAME history of th ion in the LA pace and rec h LACBWR sified as a M WR personn Administrat rs surfaces a performed on biased tow ndicated the le, locations addition, vis ons of surf tify, to the e the worst gmental samp the sensitivit D radionuclid crete at each HTD analyse he concrete nd #006 and mmary of t nt HTD rad H-3 and Sr-9 espective MD Am-243. An acterization the possibl discovery of cal contamin tions of Cs-1 uilding and surveyed fo E guidance.
he use of un ACBWR A cords storage R and G-3 MARSSIM nel and the p tion Buildin and the roof n the roof, on ward location e presence were determ sual observat face contam extent possib case bound mpling appro ties required des.
h sample loc es for beta an deeper than WTB samp the analytica dionuclides i
: 90. The oth DC include; analysis of survey from le extent o f cracked dra nation of su 137 at 0.352 G-3 Crib H or unrestricte nsealed radio dministratio
: e. An enviro operations.
Class 2 stru resence of th ng included
: f. Direct m n floor tiles ns where phy of fixed a mined based tions of floo mination, suc ble, the loca ding radiolo ach also en d to determin cation was se nd alpha em n 1/2 inch de le locations al results fo identified by her radionuc C-14, Fe-55 the results o m the floor o of a radioa ain system p urrounding 2 pCi/g, Co-House will n ed release us oactive mate on Building.
onmental lab The LACB ucture due t he environm a scan for measurement and around ysical and/or upon or and ch as ations ogical sured ne the ent to mitting eep at
#001 or the y the clides 5, Ni-of the of the active piping soils.
-60 at not be sing a
: erials, The b was BWR to its mental gross ts for floor
 
La Cross License T Revision drain ope each dire The resu 4,915 dpm the secon imbedded gamma s was then and seco from less and dire observed Beta sc 2,261 dpm from less Direct be of 243 d measurem identified 2.3.7. S Section 8 hydrogeo was deri Haley &
(18) supp 2.3.7.1.
For a di towns an river wat
: Lansing, water fo approxim The LAC well at th state perm LACBW Building areas are to the gr pathway se Boiling W Termination n 0 enings. A sm ect measurem ults of the m/100cm2 w nd floor ha d in a floor spectroscopy n performed ond floor lam s than MDC ct alpha re d reading of 7 cans of th m/100cm2 w s than MDC eta-gamma m dpm/100cm2 ments were d concentrati urface and 8.5 in Chap ology and hy ived directly Aldrich, Hy plements the Area Grou stance of 40 nd cities alon ter for indus Iowa, about or industria mately 40 mi CBWR site he site. Sani mitted sanit WR Adminis
. Storm wa e periodically round area su after passing Water Reactor Plan mear sample ment.
beta scans with a scan M allway, a di tile. The c
: y. The analy involving th minated woo of 329 dpm adings rang 72 dpm/100c he roof are with a scan M C of 113 dpm measurement to a maxim all less than ions greater Groundwat pter 8 of t ydrology of y from Hal ydrogeologic e preliminary undwater Us 0 miles dow ng the Missis strial purpos t 15 miles d al purposes les downstre has its own itary wastes tary wastes h tration Buil ater runoff is y monitored urrounding t g through an r
e for remova of the int MDC of 2,10 screte radio contaminated ysis of the ti he acquisitio od, carpet, a m/100cm2 to ged from le cm2.
ea indicate MDC of 2,26 m/100cm2 to ts taken on t mum observ n MDC of 4 than MDC b ter his LTP c ZNPS and e ey & Aldri cal Investiga y findings in se wnstream of ssippi River ses, excludin downstream o between t eam.
potable wa are collecte hauler. Thi lding and a s diverted di d for oil shee the facility v n oil separato 2-32 able contam terior surfac 00 dpm/100c oactive parti d portion of ile identified n of ten (10) and floor til a maximum ess than MD ed results 61 dpm/100c o a maximum the floor dra ved reading 42 dpm/100c by the analy ontains a s environs. T ich, Hydrog ation Report n Reference 1 the site, vir are obtained ng the adjac of the site.
the LACBW ater supply, p d in a solids is includes a a sanitary h irectly to th en and disco via downspo or located in mination was ces ranged cm2. During icle was dis f the tile wa d 0.005 uCi
) biased dire le. Direct b m observed re DC of 39 d ranging fr cm2. Direct m observed ain openings g of 333 dp cm2. No re sis of the sm summary d The informat geological C t for the LaC
: 17.
rtually all m d from groun cent G-3 pla There are n WR site an provided thr s holding tan a sanitary ho holding tank he Mississipp oloration. R outs or ente nside the LSE also taken from 1,420 g the scan of scovered. T as removed of Cs-137.
ect measurem beta-gamma eading of 5, dpm/100cm2 rom 1,872 t alpha meas reading of 1 s ranged from pm/100cm2 a emovable co mear samples description tion containe Conceptual S Crosse Boilin municipal w und water. T ant, is the co no other know nd Prairie rough a sing nk and pump olding tank k that servi pi River at o Roof drains d r the norma E.
at the locati 0 dpm/100cm f the north e The particle and analyze An investig ments on the readings ra
,743 dpm/10 to a maxi dpm/100cm surements ra 152 dpm/100 m less than M and direct ontamination
: s.
of the geo ed in this se Site Model ng Water Re water supplie The nearest u oal-fired pla wn users of du Chien, gle ground w ped off by a that service ices the Tu outfalls. Re discharge dir al effluent re on of m2 to end of e was ed by gation e first anged 00cm2 imum m2 to anged 0cm2.
MDC alpha n was
: ology, ection (17).
eactor es for use of ant in f river WI, water local es the urbine elease rectly elease
 
La Cross License T Revision 2.3.7.2.
Regional Mississip parallels upward; river stag demonstr river stag Groundw surface (
Groundw the Missi may turn chemical the shallo Based on of the G-located i monitorin a slightly has a do gradient towards t there are stages. G Reactor B are below During p was com permeabi buildings soils will will circ localized outside th other han or buried underlyin shallow s contamin soils with orders of se Boiling W Termination n 0 Groundw lly, groundw ppi river. C the river. U however, th ge data comp rates that the ge impacts th water beneath bgs) and the water in the s issippi Rive n and flow l constituent ow system.
n a review of
-3 Ash Land in the sout ng wells (B1 y downward ownward gr at well pair the river bas e some perio Groundwater Building ba w the water t plant constru mpacted, redu ility can dec
: s. The resul l flow at a s cumnavigate d flow regim he footprint nd, potential d piling, will ng groundw soils from p nation. The hin the supp f magnitude Water Reactor Plan ater Flow water flows i Closer to th Under typic he vertical gr pared to wa e shallow aq he water tabl h the site is e groundwat shallow depo
: r. The deep parallel to s would occu f the ground dfill area grou th side of t 11AR/B11R vertical gra radient at w B9/B9A. T sin with a lo ods where t r flow throu sement shel table during uction, and m ucing the eff crease the h lting impact slower veloc the area, e mes on contam of these str l releases tha l likely take water. This precipitation, average sha port pilings, lower.
r in a westerl he shore, gr al river stag radient rever ter table ele quifer is in di le elevation.
first encoun ter is in dire osits and fill per groundw the river.
ur at or near dwater elevat undwater mo the LACBW
) to the east adient. Durin well pairs B This is expec ocalized influ the gradients ugh the LAC l) as well as high and low more specifi fective poros hydraulic con to groundw city, and reg effectively b minant fate a ructures will at occurred w much longe is further c
, creating an allow aquifer the hydraul 2-33 ly direction roundwater ge, groundw rses during f evations mea irect hydrau ntered at an ect hydraulic l material flo water is also Because th r the surface tion measure onitoring we WR site, an of and up gr ng times of n B11R/B11AR cted as grou uence at B9/
s are revers CBWR site is s the deep p w river stage ically the ins sity and perm nductivity o water flow is gionally, a si bypassing th and transpor l likely be d within the fo er to migrate compounded n area that w r hydraulic c ic conductiv from the bl may also h water gradien flood stages.
asure in LAC ulic commun n average de c communica ows towards likely to flo he potential
, the release ements colle ells (# B2/B3 nd associate radient of LA normal and R and B2/B undwater flo
/B9A from t sed; and this s impacted b pilings that s e conditions.
stallation of meability of of the aquife s that ground ignificant pe these soils.
rt are that po deflected and ootprint of th e both in th d as the ove will likely re conductivity vity would b luffs on the have a flow nts near the
. The geolog CBWR site nication with epth of 20 fe ation with th s the west an ow towards t l releases of s would like ected during 3/B9A/B9/B ed backgrou ACBWR, th low river sta B3, with an ows generally the adjacent s is likely d by deeper st support the f the support f the soils. T er within the dwater withi ercentage of The impli otential relea d flow aroun he buildings e vadose zo erlying struc etain any po y is 313 feet be expected east toward component river are sli gical and his monitoring h the river an eet below gr he adjacent nd discharges the west but f radiologic ely be confin routine sam B7/B8), whic und groundw here appears age, groundw upward ve y from the b t inlet. How due to high tructures (i.e structures, w t pilings, the This reducti e footprint o in the comp f the flow re ications of ases that occ nd them. O s, via floor d one as well a ctures isolat tentially rele per day. Fo to be one to ds the t that ightly storic wells nd the round river.
s into t then cal or ned to mpling ch are water to be water ertical bluffs
: wever, river e., the which e soil ion in of the pacted egime these curred On the drains as the te the eased or the o two
 
La Cross License T Revision The velo gradient.
across th Therefor the inch Environm show sea stage. Th LACBW vicinity structure direction 2.3.7.3.
Historica monitorin monitorin monitorin Dairylan Of the w LACBW routine b designate Environm G-3 Foss Nos. 3, 4 levels re 3.0E-08 &#xb5; During th to the s radioactiv The well suspected that samp As note Activities wells to monitorin if ground located n interval o below gr B.
se Boiling W Termination n 0 ocity of gro The gradie he site, groun e, it is likely hes and fee mental Moni asonal varia hese wells a WR site struct of suspect s/foundation ns.
Previous I ally, the LAC ng wells. F ng wells loc ng wells of d for radiolo wells shown WR facilities basis. The gr ed as B-2, mental Moni sil Station op 4 and 5 wer ported durin
&#xb5;Ci/ml to 9.
he recovery outh of the ve liquids fr l-point show d leakage. T ple are prese d in the L s Report (D support gro ng wells (10 dwater qual nominally wi of 15 to 25 f rade. These Water Reactor Plan oundwater is ent of the wa ndwater mon y that the gro et/day rang itoring Prog ation on upw are not suffic tures or area broken dra ns or variati Investigation CBWR Lice igure 2-11 i cated on th ff the LACB ogical purpo n on Figure were histor roundwater m B-3, B-7, itoring staff perational re re routinely ng this mon 0E-08 &#xb5;Ci/m of a probab e Turbine B rom suspect wn on Figure The well-po ented in Tabl LACBWR D D-Plan/PSDA oundwater e 0 wells total) ity had bee ithin five (5) feet below g wells are sh r
s directly r ater table is i nitoring has oundwater v e). Ground gram wells a ward and do cient to char as where pote ain lines) co ions in fill m ns ensed Site ha llustrates the e LACBWR BWR site t ses.
2-11, only P rically monit monitoring w B-8, B-9, on a routine equirements.
monitored f nitoring peri ml).
le spill incid Building. T broken drain 2-11 was es int was sam le 2-17. Thi Decommissio AR) (19), D evaluation.
) were instal en impacted
) feet of one grade and on how on Figu 2-34 elated to bo nfluenced by shown that velocity acro water eleva agree with t ownward gra racterize the ential releas ould have o materials co as had sever e current loc R site. The that are or Potable Wa tored by Da wells and ba B-9A, B11A e basis for no During LA for gross be iod was less dent in 1983 This inciden n lines in th stablished do mpled once o is well-point oning Plan airyland rec In Novemb lled within t by plant o e another con ne deep well ure 2-11 as M oth the hyd y the topogr the water ta oss the site is ation data the regional adients that groundwate es associated occurred. In ould locally ral potable w cation of po ere is no po have been ater Wells N airyland for ackground gr AR, and B on-radiologi ACBWR ope eta activity.
s than or eq
, a temporar nt concerne e Turbine B own gradien on May 3, 19 t has since be and Post-S cently instal ber 2012, fi the LACBW operations.
nsist of one with a scree MW 200A an draulic cond raphy; and, w able has a v s also relativ from the groundwate are influen er flow below d with LAC n these area influence g water wells otable water otable water monitored Nos. 3 and 4 radiological roundwater B11R are m ical paramete erations, Pota Typical gr qual to MD ry well-poin ed the pote Building to su nt and below 983. The an een abandon Shutdown D lled groundw ive (5) pairs WR licensed The well p shallow wel ened interva nd B throug ductivity and with the flat ery low grad vely slow (i.
G-3 Coal er flow, and nced by the w and aroun BWR (i.e., i as, pilings, groundwater and groundw and groundw r or groundw by Solution 4 which serv l conditions monitoring monitored by ers to suppo able Water W ross beta ac DC (ranging nt was establ ential leakag ub-building w the grade o nalysis resul ned.
Decommissio water monit s of groundw site to deter pairs which ll with a scre al of 45 to 55 h MW-204A d the areas dient.
.e., in Plant d also river nd the in the deep flow water water water ns or viced on a wells y the ort the Wells ctivity from lished ge of soils.
of the ts for oning toring water rmine were eened 5 feet A and
 
La Cross License T Revision Two (2) in June groundw 90 and C In June o through 2 and B11 several r fourth ro Potable samples transuran of the gro Addition
: 18.
2.3.7.4.
The LAC twice pe groundw the MW-The colle D
M p
R gr 2.3.7.5.
Groundw (5 pairs) sampling wells MW Novembe positively ranging Novembe during th During th MW-202 Sr-90 w se Boiling W Termination n 0 rounds of gr 2013 and th water samples Cs-137. Analy of 2014, a t 204 A and B AR. These radionuclide ound of gro Well #5, an were sent o nic radionucl oundwater sa nal details, in On-Going CBWR Site g er year for r water is at rel
-200A/B thru ected inform Depth to grou Monitoring w otential/turb Radiological roundwater Summ water charact within the g in 2013. H W-201A and er of 2013 y detected i from 1.43 p er 2013 sam he 2013 samp he June 201 2A, MW-203 was also po Water Reactor Plan roundwater hen during s were sent ysis for H-3 third round o B; Potable W e collected g s including oundwater w nd Monitori off for radio lides. Table amples and r ncluding the g Investigatio groundwater radiological latively high u MW-204A mation during und water in well groundw bidity/dissolv sample infor sample colle mary of Grou terization eff LSE area H-3 was posi d B, MW-20 at concentra in the same pCi/L to 2.1 mpling period pling period 4 sample pe 3A and MW sitively det r
samples wer a seasonal l to an off-sit was perform of groundwa Water Wells #
groundwater HTD and t were collecte ing Wells B ological ana es 2-18 and 2 results.
e off-site ana ons r monitoring analysis pu her and lowe A/B wells as g each monit the respecti water pH/spe ved oxygen/t rmation incl ection.
undwater An fforts comme in Novemb tively detect 02-A and B, ations rangi wells durin 18 pCi/L; ho
: d. Co-60 an eriod, H-3 w W-203B) at c ected in w 2-35 re collected low groundw te laboratory med on site.
ater samples
#3, 4, 5, and samples w transuranic r ed from: M B11R and B alysis of sev 2-19 provide alytical labor g program co urposes only er elevations shown on F toring interv ive monitorin ecific conduc temperature.
luding a com nalytical Res enced throug ber 2012 an ted at concen MW-203A ing from 15 ng the June owever, it w nd Cs-137 w was positively oncentration wells MW-20 in 2013, du water level y for radiolo s was collec 7; and Mon ere sent off radionuclide MW 200A an B11AR. T veral radion es a summar ratory repor onsists of ob y from exis
. The moni igure 2-11.
val includes:
val includes:
ng well. c tance/oxid
ng well.
: a. m pleted chai n sults gh the instal l n d the co m n tration gre a and B and M 50 pCi/L to 2013 samp l w as not po were not po y detected i n n s ranging fr02A, MW-2 u ring the se a in Novem b ogical analy s cted from:
ctance/oxida mpleted chain sults gh the install nd the com ntration grea and B and M 50 pCi/L to 2013 sampl was not po were not po y detected in ns ranging fr 02A, MW-2 uring the sea in Novemb ogical analys cted from: M nitoring Well f for radiolo es. In Septe nd B throug These collec nuclides incl ry of the radi rts are provi btaining grou ting monito toring wells ation and red n of custody lation of 10 mmencement ater than MD MW-204A a 660 pCi/L.
M nitoring Wel l f for radiol o es. In Sept e n d B throu g T hese colle c nuclides inc l r y of the rad i r ts are provi b taining gro u ting monit otoring well s a tion and re d n of custod y l ation of 10 mmencement ater than M D MW-204A a 660 pCi/L.
ling period a ositively dete sitively dete n four (4) w from 245 pC 203A and asonal high w ber 2013. T sis for Co-60 MW-200A a ls B2, B-3, B ogical analys ember of 20 gh 204A an cted groundw luding HTD iological ana ded in Refer undwater sam oring wells w s sampled in duction y following monitoring of groundw DC in monit and B in Jun Sr-90 was at concentra ected during ected in any wells (MW-B i/L to 336 p MW-204A water These 0, Sr-and B B11R sis of 014 a nd B, water D and alysis rence mples when clude wells water toring e and s also ations g the y well
l ing period a ositively det esitively det e n fou r (4) w from 245 pC 203A and a sonal high w b er 2013.
: B11R, pCi/L.
T s is for Co-6 0 MW-200A a l s B2, B-3, B ogical analy s ember of 2 0 g h 204A a n c ted ground w l uding HT D i ological an a ded in Refe r u ndwater sa m o ring wells w s sample d in d uction y following monitoring of ground w D C in moni t a nd B in Jun S r-90 wa sat concentr aected durin g ected in an y wells (MW-B i/L to 336 pMW-204A w ater T hese 0 , S r-a nd B B11R sis of 0 14 a n d B, w ater D and a lysis r ence m ples when clude wells w ater t oring e and s also ations g the y well B 11R, p Ci/L. with La Cros s License T Revisio n concentr aAm-241 During t greater t h concentr a were als o 2.4.C The sur v deferred.
with  
under co that will basemen tillustrate
 
La Cross License T Revision concentra Am-241 During t greater th concentra were also 2.4.
C The surv deferred.
under co that will basement illustrate defer the condition ALARA data wou areas),
Safet Histo Acce struct interf The a physi condi As acces will be co for the s radionuc and HTD events ca of a surv stored in validatin As decom surface d for open documen se Boiling W Termination n 0 ations rangin were also po he Septemb han MDC in ation of 1.14 o positively d Continuing C vey of many Examples ncrete or asp remain and t after liner s buried pip e characteriz ns:
consideratio uld likely not ty considerat orical data sh ss for charac tures or othe fere with con ability to use ical relations itions repres ss is gained ollected, eva survey unit.
lides present D radionuclid aused by equ vey unit(s) w n the charac g the initial mmissioning decontamina n air demolit nted survey a Water Reactor Plan ng from 1.1 ositively det ber 2014 sam n any well.
4 pCi/L. Co detected at r Characteriz inaccessible s of areas w phalt coverin d be subjec r removal an ping systems zation of a ons (e.g., the t change the
: tions, hows that the cterization w er obstacles w ntinued oper e engineering ship to surro sented by the to areas tha aluated and s This data t and update des. In addi uipment failu will be reco terization d classificatio g proceeds, ation (as wel tion or unre and a formal r
12 pCi/L to ected at resi mple period, Sr-90 was o-60, Ni-63, residual conc zation e or not read where survey ngs, structur cted to FRS nd the inter s that may r soil or stru e area is eith e survey area e area could would require where the re ration of ope g judgment i ounding area e conditions at were prev stored with-o will be use e the variabil ition, as the ures or perso orded. Thes atabase. Th n and in plan areas will, ll as fixed co estricted rele l turnover w 2-36 2.01 pCi/L.
dual concen
, H-3 was n positively d
, Cs-137, Eu centrations in dily accessib ys are deferr ral wall and
, the underl riors of bur remain in th ucture was b her a radiati a or area clas be classified e significant emoval could erating system in assigning s and the lik in these adja viously inacc other radiolo ed along wi lity in the ra decommiss onnel errors, se events w his additiona nning for the as necessar ontamination ease. When will be made C-14, Tc-9 ntrations in se not positivel detected in o u-152, Eu-15 n several we ble subsurfa rred include floor surfac rlying concr ried pipe tha he end-state based on on ion or conta ssification o d without fur t deconstruct d result in an ms, or the area a cl kelihood of th acent areas.
cessible, add ogical survey ith existing adionuclide m ioning progr
, which may will be evalu al character e FRS.
ry, be decon n) to levels n a structur by the Radi 99, Eu-152, everal wells ly detected a one (1) well 54, Pu-239/2 ells.
ace soils or s soils under ces in some rete in the R at may rem condition.
ne or more amination are of the locatio rther charact tion of adjac n unsafe con lassification he area to ha ditional char y data in a s data to upd mix for both resses, data y affect the ra uated and, w rization data ntaminated that will me e is ready f ological Pro Pu-239/240 at concentra l, MW-200A 240 and Am surfaces has r structures, of the basem Reactor Bui main. Figure The decisi of the follo ea and addit on or surroun terization, cent systems ndition or n based on ave radiolog racterization urvey histor date the typ h gamma-em from operat adiological s when approp a will be us to remove eet the condi for demoliti otection grou 0 and ations A at a m-241 been soils ments ilding e 2-3 on to owing tional nding s,
gical n data ry file pes of mitting tional status
: priate, ed in loose itions ion, a up for
 
La Cross License T Revision the comp are suitab Followin a "turnov acceptan transferre performa may inclu The "turn survey pe survey da
: turnover, survey p met. The Appr action Appr Appr with Appr radio Data addit Appr 2.5.
R
: 1.
U C
2
: 2.
U R
: 3.
U C
o
: 4.
E C
: 5.
E S
se Boiling W Termination n 0 pany preform ble.
ng the demol ver assessme ce criteria w ed to Charac ance of the F ude a "turno nover surve erformed, re ata prior to c
, and FRS), a lans will co ese objective ropriate instr n level and/o ropriate instr ropriate surv the calibrati ropriate samp nuclide ratio analysis crit ional sample ropriate class References U.S. Nuclear Content of Li 011.
U.S. Nuclear Radiation Sur U.S. Nuclear Consolidated f Radiologic EnergySoluti Crosse Boilin EnergySoluti ite Characte Water Reactor Plan ming demoli lition and/or ent" will be p will be met, cterization/L FRS. Otherw over survey,"
ey" process, epresent at le conducting t a documente ontain the ap es include:
rument selec or release cri rument quali ey technique on methodol ple collectio os, teria to ident es and, sification of Regulatory icense Termi Regulatory rvey and Site Regulatory Decommiss cal Criteria, F ons PG-EO-ng Water Rea ons GP-EO-erization Proj r
ition, validat r remediation performed. I
, then physi License Term wise, additio
" primarily fo together wi east one, but the FRS. Fo ed survey pl ppropriate da ction to ensur
: iteria, ity control m es to ensure
: logies, n and analys tify follow-u the survey a Commission ination Plan Commission e Investigati Commission sioning Guid Final Report
-313196-SV actor.
-313196-QA ject (QAPP) 2-37 ting that the n, and when If the results ical and adm mination grou onal remedia for Class 1 an ith any addi t possibly se or each type an will be d ata assessme re the proper measures to e that the field sis to determ up actions su area.
n, Regulator s for Nuclea n, NUREG-1 ion Manual (
n, NUREG-1 dance - Char t - Septembe
-PL-001, Ch A-PL-001, Qu
).
e radiologica n an area is b s of this asse ministrative up personne ation may b nd 2 areas w itional chara everal, oppo of survey (c developed us ent to ensur r sensitivity ensure operab d measurem mine spatial v uch as remed ry Guide 1.1 ar Power Rea 1575, Revisi (MARSSIM 1757, Volum racterization er 2006.
haracterizatio uality Assur al condition believed to b essment indi control of l for prepara be required.
within the LS acterization ortunities to c characterizat ing the DQO re that sever relative to th
: bility, ent techniqu variability an diation and th 79, Standard actors, Revis ion 1, Multi-M), August 20 me 2, Revisio
, Survey, an on Survey P rance Project s in the stru be ready for icate that the the area wi ation, design This assess SE.
and remedi collect addit tion, remedia O process. T ral objective he applicabl ues are consi nd variability he collection d Format and sion 1 - June
-Agency 000.
on 1, nd Determina Plan for the L t Plan LACB ucture
: FRS, e FRS ill be n, and sment iation tional
: ation, These es are le istent y in n of d
e ation La BWR
 
La Cross License T Revision
: 6.
E W
: 7.
D S
: 8.
U R
D
: 9.
S C
: 10.
E 1
: 11.
U L
: 12.
U R
T
: 13.
E S
: 14.
E S
: 15.
Z F
: 16.
E C
: 17.
H 3
: 18.
H R
2
: 19.
D D
: 20.
In E
1 se Boiling W Termination n 0 EnergySoluti Water Reacto Dairyland Po AFSTOR -
U.S. Nuclear Radiation Sur December 20 andia Nation Contaminatio EnergySoluti 0 Detector S U.S. Nuclear Laboratory A U.S. Nuclear Radiological Termination)
EnergySoluti urvey Repor EnergySoluti urvey Repor ZionSolution allout in Soi EnergySoluti Concern Duri Haley & Aldr 0, 2012.
Haley & Aldr Reactor, Dair 015.
Dairyland Po Decommissio nternational Emitters (max 998.
Water Reactor Plan ons Technic or Historical wer Corpora December 2 Regulatory rvey and As 006.
nal Laborato on From Dec ons Technic Sensitivity.
Regulatory Analytical Pro Regulatory Monitoring
- Effluent S ons GG-EO-rt for Octobe ons LC-RS-rt for June th s Technical ils at Zion St ons Technic ing LACBW rich, Hydrog rich Inc., Hy ryland Powe wer Coopera oning Activit Standard IS ximum beta r
cal Support D Site Assessm ation LAC-T 2009.
Commission sessment of ory, NUREG commissioni cal Support D Commission otocols Man Commission Programs (I Streams and
-313196-RS er and Novem PN-164017-hru August 2 Support Doc tation.
cal Support D WR Decomm geological C ydrogeologic r Cooperativ ative, LACB ties Report (
O 7503-1, P energy grea 2-38 Document R ment (HSA)
TR-138, Initi n NUREG-1 Materials an G/CR-5512, V ing Paramete Document R n, NUREG-1 nual (MARL n Regulatory Inception Th the Environ S-RP-001, LA mber 2014 F
-001, LACB 2015 Field W cument 13-0 Document R missioning.
onceptual Si cal Investiga ve, Genoa W BWR Decom (D-Plan/PSD Part 1, Evalua ater than 0.15 RS-TD-31319
).
ial Site Char 1575, Supple nd Equipmen Volume 3, R er Analysis -
RS-TD-31319 1576, Multi-LAP) - Augu y Guide 4.15 hrough Norm nment - July ACBWR Ra Field Work -
BWR Radiolo Work - Nove 004, Examin RS-TD-31319 ite Model, F ation Report, Wisconsin, Fi mmissioning DAR), Revis ation of Surf 5 MeV) and 96-003, La C racterization ement 1, Mu nt Manual (M Residual Rad
- October 19 96-006, Lud
-Agency Rad ust 2001.
5, Quality A mal Operatio 2007.
adiological C
- November ogical Chara ember 2015.
nation of Cs-96-001, Rad File No. 3870
, La Crosse B ile No. 3870 Plan and Po sion - March face Contam Alpha-Emit Crosse Boilin n Survey for ulti-Agency MARSAME dioactive 999.
dlum Model 4 diological ssurance or ns to Licens Characterizat r 2015.
acterization 137 Global dionuclides o 05-001 - Au Boiling Wat 05-008, Janu ost Shutdown h 2014.
mination, Bet tters - Augu ng E) -
44-se tion of ugust ter ary n
ta-ust
 
La Cross License T Revision Survey Unit ID #
L101010 L101010 L101010 L101010 L201110 L201110 L301210 L301210 L301210 L401210 L401210 L401210 L401210 L401210 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Survey 01 Reactor Stack G 02 Turbine Diesel G 03 LSA Bu 04 North L 01 LACBW Crib Ho 02 G-3 Cri Dischar 01 North E 02 Transm 09 Plant A 03 G-3 Co 05 Coal Pi 06 Capped 07 Ground 08 Hwy 35 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-1 y Unit Descr LA r Building, W Grounds e Building, T Generator Bu uilding, Mai LSE Grounds WR Adminis ouse, Wareh ib House, LA rge Line, Are End of Licen mission Switc Access, ISFSI al Plant Gro le Grounds d Ash Impou ds East of Hi 5/Railroad R r
LACBW ription ACBWR Sit WTB, WGTV Turbine Offi uilding Grou ntenance Ea s
LSE Buff stration Buil ouse Ground ACBWR Cir ea South of L Clas nsed Site chyard Area I Haul Road Non-Im ounds undment Gro ghway 35 Right of Way 2-39 WR Open L te Enclosure V, Ventilatio ce Building, unds at Shack Gro fer Zone Gro lding, LACB ds rc. Water LSE Fence ss 3 Grounds d Grounds mpacted Grou ounds y Grounds Land Survey Cl e Grounds on
, 1B ounds ounds BWR s
unds No No No No No y Units Initial lassification Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted n
Approxim Survey U Area (m 1,992 2,315 1,749 2,387 7,211 6,785 24,04 11,71 31,01 d
66,86 d
82,89 d
111,89 d
81,25 d
9,444 mate Unit m2) 2 5
9 7
1 5
2 1
2 9
4 99 4
4
 
La Cross License T Revision Surve B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B201 B201 B201 B201 B201 B201 B301 B301 B301 B301 se Boiling W Termination n 0 ey Unit 10001 10002 10003 10004 10005 10006 10007 10008 10009 10101 10102 10103 10104 10105 10106 12101 12102 12103 12104 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-2 Sur Wa LAC W
LACBWR LACBWR M
L LACBW LA LA LA Ba Transmissi Barg r
LACBW rvey Area D Reactor Bu aste Treatmen CBWR Venti Waste Gas Ta R Turbine Bld Bldg 1B Diesel G LSA Buil Maintenance E Pipe Tun ACBWR Cr G-3 Crib H WR Administ ACBWR War ACBWR War ACBWR War ack-up Contr ion Sub-Stat G-1 Crib H ge Washing B 2-40 WR Structu Description uilding nt Building ilation Stack ank Vault dg./Turbine Generator Str lding Eat Shack nnel rib House House tration Build rehouse #1 rehouse #2 rehouse #3 rol Center tion Switch H House Break Room ural Survey k
Office ructure ding House m
y Units Class Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl sification lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3
 
La Cross License T Revision G-3 R G-3 S G-3 C G-3 T G-3 E G-3 C G-3 C G-4 W G-3 L G-3 L G-3 C G-3 C G-3 V G-3 T G-3 B G-3 F G-3 F G-3 W G-3 S G-3 S
#6 W se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table Reclaim Buil Stock Out Tr Coal Unload Transfer Tow Electrical Ro Crusher Tow Conveyor #6 Warehouse a LRAPB Buil Lime Silo El CAT Buildin Coal Plant Vehicle Stora Train Shed Bottom Ash Fly Ash Silo Fly Ash Elec Waste Silo Surge Tank Settling Tank Well House Water Reactor Plan e 2-2 (contin lding ransfer Build ing Tower wer A oom wer 6 (2) and Electrica lding ectrical Buil ng age Building Dewatering ctrical Buildi k
r nued)
Non Imp ding al Room lding g
Buildings ing 2-41 LACBWR pacted Struc G-3 An G-3 Bo G-3 Ex G-3 Ga G-3 Su G-3 Su G-3 Li G-3 W G-3 Ac G-3 As G-3 Ba G-3 Fl
#7 We G-3 Co G-3 Sa G-3 St G-3 Gr G-3 As Main P S03 Ta Structural ctures nnex Buildin oiler Fuel Oi xplosive Gas as Room ub Station Sh ub Station Sh ime Storage Weigh Station ctive Reclaim sh Coordina ag Houses (5 ammable St ll House oal Scale ample Buildi tock Out Tra rid Shed sh handling Pollution Co ank Building Survey Uni ng il Pump Bui s Storage Ro hed hed Silo n
m Buildings ators Office
: 5) torage Shed ing ansfer Buildi Blower Buil ontrol Electri g
its lding oom s/ Tunnel ing lding ical Buildingg
 
La Cross License T Revision Dete Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Gamma System a
Bas Stan b
Fun se Boiling W Termination n 0 ector Model m 44-9 m 43-68 mo m 43-68 mo m 43-93 mo m 43-89 mo m 43-93 mo m 43-89 mo m 44-10 m 43-37 m 43-10-1 a Spectroscop ed on 1-minute ndard, ISO 750 nctional equival Water Reactor Plan Table 2-3 l b Me Ludl ode Ludl ode Ludl ode ode Ludl ode ode Ludl Ludl Ludl Ludl py e count time; a 03-1 (20).
lent instrument r
Instrume eter Model lum 3 lum 2350-1 lum 2350-1 lum 2360 lum 2360 lum 2350-1 lum 2350-1 lum 2929 N/A and default valu tation may be u 2-42 ent Types a Applica sca static &
stat static &
stat sca sca and/
smea Anal ues for surface used and Nomina ation Ty (dp an 1,0
& scan 1,8 tic
& scan 1,8 2,0 tic an 3.5 6.5 an 2,0 or ar lysis efficiencies (
al MDCs Typical Dete MDCscan pm/100cm2) 000 to 2,000 800 to 2,000 N/A 800 to 2,000 000 to 2,200 N/A 5 pCi/g 60Co 5 pCi/g 137Cs 000 to 2,200 N/A N/A s) as specified ction Sensit
)
MDCst (dpm/10 0
N/A 0
600 to 80 to 0
0 800 to 800 to 90 to 1 90 to 1 o
s N/A 0
N/A
~0.10 p for Co-6 Cs-13 in Internationa tivity tatic a
0cm2)
A 700 90 900 900 100 100 A
A
-15
-80 pCi/g 60 and 37 al
 
La Cross License T Revision Analysis /
Gamma Radionucli Isotopic N (Np-237)
Isotopic Pl (Pu-238/23 Isotopic Th (Th-228/23 Isotopic Ur (U-234/235 Isotopic Cu (Cm-243/2 Isotopic Am (Am-241/2 C-14 Tritium Sr-90 Pu-241 Tc-99 Gross Alph Fe-55 Ni-63 Ni-59 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-4 Analytes ides G
eptunium A
lutonium 39/240)
A horium 30/232)
A ranium 5/238)
A urium 244)
A mericium 243)
A LS LS G
LS LS ha / Beta G
LS LS LS Water Reactor Plan Off-Site Technique Gamma Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec SC SC GFPC SC SC GFPC SC SC SC r
e Laboratory DOE E
< 0.1pC DOE E
< 0.04 p DOE E
< 0.05 p DOE E
< 0.05 p DOE E
< 0.06 p DOE E
< 0.03 p DOE E
< 0.04 p EPA EE
< 5.0 pC EPA 90
< 10.0 p DOE E
< 1.0 pC DOE E
< 10.0 p DOE E
< 2.0 pC DOE E
< 10.0 p DOE E
< 2.0 pC DOE E
< 50.0 p 2-43 y Analytica Soils (pCi/
EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g ERF C-01 Ci/g 06.0 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/
EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g al Methods a Method and
/g) 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 (SRW01) 0 (SRW01) and Typical d Sensitivity Wat EPA Method 10.0 pCi/L EML Pu-02 M 1.0 pCi/L ENIC Modifi 50.0 pCi/L EPA 906.0 300.0 pCi/L EICHROM M 2.0 pCi/L EML Pu-01 50.0 pCi/L EICHROM T 15.0 pCi/L EPA 900.0 5.0 pCi/L EML Fe-01 M 100.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M 15.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M 100.0 pCi/L l MDCs ter (pCi/L) 901.1 Modified ied Modified Metho Tc-01 Modified Modified Modified od
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Ta Location Area West o Area South Area North Area at G-3 Area Outsid Area at G-3 33 miles So Pedretti Far Radio Towe Junction of East of Stod Water Reactor Plan able 2-5 of #2 Wareh of Parking L of LACBW Gas Silo de G-3 Offic Outfall uth at Bad A m Substation er Northeast Hwy O and ddard at Hwy r
2005 Dairy (on L house Lot R Admin Bu es (off L Axe Boat Lan n East of LA of LACBW Hwy K y O Junction 2-44 yland Backg Licensed Site uilding Licensed Site nding ACBWR WR n
ground Stud Co-60 (pCi/g) e)
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC e) 0.023
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC
<MDC dy for Soils Cs-(pC 0.0 0.0 0.
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.
0.0
-137 Ci/g) 077 026 149 038 076 017 381 227 035 188 065


defer th e conditio nALARA data wo uareas), Safe tHist oAcc e struc tinter fThe a phys i cond i As acce s will be c ofor the s radionuc and HT D events c a of a sur v stored i nvalidatin As deco m surface d for ope ndocume n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 a tions rangi n were also p o h e Septem b han MDC i n a tion of 1.1 4 o positively d C ontinuin g C vey of many  Example s ncrete or as p remain an d t after line rs buried pi p e characteri z n s: considerati o u ld likely no t t y considera t orical data s h ss for chara c t ures or oth e f ere with co n a bility to us e ical relation s i tions repre s ss is gained o llected, ev a s urvey unit.
La Cross License T Revision T
l ides presen t D radionucli d a used by eq u v ey unit(s) w n the chara cg the initial mmissionin g decontamin a n ai r demoli t n ted survey a W ater Reacto r Plan ng from 1.1 o sitively det b er 2014 sa m n any well.
Conditio Undisturb Disturbed Undisturb Disturbed se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-6 on and Dept bed d
4 pCi/L. C o detected at r C haracteri zinaccessibl e s of areas w p halt coveri n d be subje c r removal a n ping system s z ation of a o ns (e.g., th e t change th e tions, hows that th e cterization w e r obstacles w n tinued ope r e engineerin g s hip to surr o sented b y th eto areas th a a luated and s This data t and updat e des. In add i uipment fail u w ill be rec oterization dclassificatio g proceeds, a tion (as we l t ion or unr e and a forma l r 12 pCi/L to ected at resi mple period
bed d
, S r-90 was o-60, Ni-63
Water Reactor Plan Investiga th D
, residual con c zation e or not rea d where surve y ngs, structu r cted to FRS n d the inte r s that may rsoil or str u e area is eit h e survey are a e area could w ould requir e w here the r e r ation of op e g judgment i o unding area e conditions at were pre v stored with-o will be us e e the variabi l ition, as the u res or pers o o rde d. The s atabase. T h n and in pla nareas will, l l as fixed c o e stricted rel e l turnover w 2-36 2.01 pCi/L.
Non r
dual conce n , H-3 was npositively d , Cs-137, E u centrations i n dily accessi b y s are defer r ral wall and , the under l r iors of bur remain in t h ucture was b her a radiat i a or area cla sbe classifie d e significan t emoval coul d erating syste m i n assigning s and the li kin these adj a v iously inac c o ther radiol o e d along w i l ity in the r adecommiss onnel errors
ative Levels Meas Drainage Ar 0.
, se events w h is addition a nning for th eas necessa r ontaminatio n ease. Whe n will be made C-14, Tc-9 n trations in s e not positive l d etected in o u-152, Eu-1 5 n several w e b le subsurfa r red include floor surfa c r lying concr r ied pipe th a h e en d-state based on o n i on or cont assification o d without fu r t deconstruc t d result in a n m s, o r the area a c l k elihood of t h acent areas.
0.
cessible, ad d ogical surve y ith existing a dionuclide m ioning prog r , which ma y w ill be eval ual characte r e FRS. r y, be deco n n) to levels n a structur by the Radi 9 9, Eu-152, everal wells l y detected a o ne (1) wel l 5 4, Pu-239/
n-Drainage 0.
2 e lls. a ce soils or s soils unde r ces in some r ete in the R a t may re m condition.
0.
ne or more amination ar e of the locati orther charac t t ion of adja c n unsafe co nlassificatio n h e area to h a ditional cha r y data in a sdata to up d m ix for bot h resses, data y affect the r a u ated and, w rization dat a ntaminated that will m e e is ready f ological Pr o Pu-239/24
2-45 for Cs-137 sured Rang (pCi/g) eas Surface 00 to 2.80 00 to 1.67 Areas Surfa 23 to 0.66 27 to 0.34 Based on B ge R e 0-10 cm ace 0-10 cm
: 0. at concentr a l , MW-200 A 2 40 and A m s urfaces has r structures, of the base m R eactor Bu i m ain. Figur e The decisiof the foll o e a and addi t on or surrou n terization, cent system s n dition or n based on ave radiolo g r acterizatio n urvey histo r date the ty p h gamma-e m fro m opera t a diological s w hen appro p a will be us to remove e et the cond i for demoliti o tection gro u 0 and ations A at a m-241 been soils m ents ilding e 2-3 on to owing t ional n ding s , gical n data r y file p es of m itting tional s tatus priate, ed in loose i tions i on, a u p for La Cros s License T Revisio n the com p are suita b Followi n a "turno v acceptan transferr e perform amay incl u The "tur n survey p e survey d a turnover , survey p met. Th eApp r actio nApp rApp r with App r radi oData additApp r 2.5.R 1. U C 2 2. U R 3. U C o 4. E C 5. E S s e Boiling W Termination n 0 p any prefor m ble. ng the demo l v er assessm e ce criteria w e d to Chara c a nce of the F u de a "turn o n over surv e erformed, r e ata prior to c , and FRS), alans will c o e se objectiv e r opriate inst r n level and/
o r opriate inst r r opriate survthe calibrati r opriate sam p nuclide rati oanalysis cri t i onal sampl e r opriate clas s References U.S. Nuclear C ontent of L i 011. U.S. Nuclear Radiation Su r U.S. Nuclear C onsolidated f Radiologi c E nergySoluti C rosse Boili n E nergySoluti ite Cha r act e W ater Reacto r Plan ming demol i lition and/o r e nt" will be p will be met
, cterization/
L F RS. Other w over survey," e y" process, epresent at l e c onducting t a document e ontain the a p e s include:
rument sele c or release c r i rument qual iey techniqu eon methodo l ple collecti o os, teria to iden t es and, sification of Regulatory i cense Term iRegulatory r vey and Sit eRegulatory Decommis s c al Criteria, F ons PG-EO-ng Water Re a ons GP-EO-erization Pro j r ition, valida t r remediatio n performed.
I , then phys i License Ter m wise, additi o" primarily fotogether w i e ast one, bu t t he FRS. F o e d survey pl ppropriate d a ction to ensu r iteria, ity control m e s to ensure logies, n and analy s tify follow-uthe survey aCommissio n i nation PlanCommissio n e Investigat iCommissio n s ioning Gui d F inal Repor t-313196-SV a ctor.  -313196-Q A j ect (QAPP)2-37 ting that th e n , and when If the result s i cal and ad m m ination gro u onal remedi a fo r Class 1 a n i th any add i t possibly s e or each type an will be d a ta assessm e re the prope r m easures to ethat the fiel d sis to deter m up actions s u area. n , Regulato r s for Nucle a n, NUREG-1 i on Manual (n, NUREG-1 d ance - Cha r t - Septemb e-PL-001, C h A-PL-001, Q u). e radiologic a n an area is b s of this ass e ministrative u p personneation may b n d 2 areas witional char a e veral, oppo of survey (c developed us e nt to ensu r r sensitivity e nsure opera b d measurem m ine spatial v uch as reme d r y Guide 1.1 a r Power Re a 1575, Revis i (MARSSI M 1757, Volu m racterization e r 2006. h aracterizati o u ality Assu r al condition believed to b essment ind icontrol of l for prepar a be required.
w ithin the L S a cterization o rtunities to c c haracteriza t ing the DQ O re that seve rrelative to t h bility, ent techniq u variability a n d iation and t h 79, Standar d actors, Revi s i on 1, Multi
-M), August 2 0 m e 2, Revisi o, Survey, a n o n Survey P rance Projec t s in the str u be ready for i cate that th e the area w i ation, desig n This asses s S E. and remed i collect addi t tion, remedi a O process.
T ral objectiv e h e applicab l ues are cons i n d variabilit y h e collectio n d Format an d s ion 1 - Jun e-Agency 0 00. o n 1, nd Determin a Plan for the L t Plan LAC B ucture FRS, e FRS i ll be n , and sment i ation t ional ation, T hese es are l e istent y in n of d e a tion L a B WR La Cros s License T Revisio n 6. E W 7. D S 8. U R D9. S C 10. E 1 11. U L 12. U R T 13. E S 14. E S 15. Z F 16. E C 17. H 3 18. H R 2 19. D D20. I n E 1  s e Boiling W Termination n 0 E nergySoluti W ater React o Dairyland PoAFSTOR - U.S. Nuclear Radiation Su r December 2 0 andia Natio n Contaminati o E nergySoluti0 Detector S U.S. Nuclear L aboratory A U.S. Nuclear Radiological Termination)
E nergySoluti urvey Repo r E nergySoluti urvey Repo r Z ionSolutionallout in So i E nergySoluti C oncern Dur i H aley & Ald r 0, 2012.
H aley & Ald r R eactor, Dai r 015. Dairyland Po Decommissi o nternational Emitters (ma x 998. W ater Reacto r Plan ons Techni c or Historical wer Corpor aDecember 2Regulatory r vey and As 0 06. n al Laborat o on From De c ons Techni c Sensitivity. Regulatory Analytical Pr oRegulatory Monitoring
- Effluent S ons GG-EO-rt for Octob e ons LC-RS-r t for June t h s Technical i ls at Zion S t ons Techni c i ng LACB W r ich, Hydro g r ich Inc., H y r yland Powe wer Cooper a o ning Activi t Standard IS ximum beta r c al Support D Site Assess m a tion LAC-T 2 009. Commissio nsessment of o ry, NURE G commission i c al Support DCommissio n otocols Ma nCommissio nPrograms (I Streams and
-313196-R S e r and Nove m PN-164017-h ru August 2 Support Do c t ation. c al Support D W R Decom m geological C y drogeologi c r Cooperati v a tive, LAC B ties Report (O 7503-1, Penergy gre a 2-38 Document R m ent (HSA)T R-138, Init i n NUREG-1Materials a n G/CR-5512, V ing Paramet e Document R n, NUREG-1 n ual (MAR L n Regulator y I nception T h the Enviro n S-RP-001, L A m ber 2014 F-001, LAC B 2 015 Field W cument 13-0 Document R m issioning.
onceptual S i cal Investig a v e, Genoa W B WR Deco m (D-Plan/PS D P art 1, Evalu a a ter than 0.1 5 R S-TD-3131 9). i al Site Cha r 1 575, Suppl e nd Equipme n Volume 3, R e r Analysis
-R S-TD-3131 9 1576, Multi
-L AP) - Aug u y Guide 4.1 5 h rough Nor m nment - July A CBWR R a Field Work
-B WR Radiol o W ork - Nov e 004, Exami n R S-TD-3131 9 ite Model, F a tion Report
, Wisconsin, F i mmissioning D AR), Revi s ation of Sur f 5 MeV) and 9 6-003, La C racterizatio n ement 1, M u nt Manual (M R esidual Ra d- October 1 9 9 6-006, Lu d-Agency Ra d u st 2001.
5 , Quality A m al Operatio 2007. a diological C- Novembe r o gical Char a ember 2015.
nation of Cs-9 6-001, Ra d F ile No. 387 0 , La Crosse B i le No. 387 0 Plan and P o s ion - Marc h f ace Conta mAlpha-Emi t C rosse Boili n n Survey for u lti-Agency M ARSAM E d ioactive 9 99. dlum Model 4 d iological ssurance or ns to Licen s C haracteriza t r 2015. a cterization


137 Global d ionuclides o 0 5-001 - A u Boiling Wat 0 5-008, Janu o st Shutdow n h 2014. m ination, Be t t ters - Aug u n g E) - 4 4-s e t ion o f u gust t er ary n t a-u st La Cros s License T Revisio n Survey Unit ID #L10101 0 L10101 0 L10101 0 L10101 0 L20111 0 L20111 0 L30121 0 L30121 0 L30121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 # Surve y 0 1 Reacto r Stack G 0 2 Turbin e Diesel G 03 LSA B u 0 4 North L 0 1 LACB W Crib H o 0 2 G-3 Cr i Discha r 0 1 North E 0 2 Trans m 0 9 Plant A 03 G-3 Co 05 Coal Pi 0 6 Cappe d 0 7 Groun d 08 Hwy 3 5 W ater Reacto r Plan Table 2-1 y Unit Desc r L A r Building, W G rounds e Building, T G enerator B u u ilding, Mai L SE Ground s WR Admini s o use, Wareh i b House, L A rge Line, Ar e E nd of Lice n m ission Swit c Access, ISFS I al Plant Gr o le Grounds d Ash Impo u d s East of Hi 5/Railroad R r LACB W ription ACBWR Si t WTB, WGT V T urbine Offi u ilding Gro untenance E a s LSE Buf f s tration Bui l ouse Groun d A CBWR Ci r e a South of L Cla s nsed Site c hyard Area I Haul Roa d Non-I m o unds undment Gr o ghway 35 Right of Wa y 2-39 W R Open L t e Enclosur e V , Ventilati o ce Building
===Background===
, u nds at Shack Gr o f er Zone Gr o lding, LAC B d s r c. Water L SE Fence s s 3 Ground s d Grounds m pacted Gro u o unds y Grounds L and Surve y C l e Grounds o n , 1B o unds o unds BWR s u nds N o N o N o N o N o y Units Initial lassificatio nClass 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 on-Impacte d on-Impacte d on-Impacte d on-Impacte d on-Impacte d n Approxi m Surve y U Area (m 1,99 2 2,31 5 1,74 9 2,38 7 7,21 1 6,78 5 24,04 11,71 31,01 d 66,86 d 82,89 d 111,8 9 d 81,25 d 9,44 4 m ate U nit m 2) 2 5 9 7 1 5 2 1 2 9 4 9 9 4 4 La Cros s License T Revisio n Surv e B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B30 1 B30 1 B30 1 B30 1 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ey Unit 1 0001 1 0002 1 0003 1 0004 1 0005 1 0006 1 0007 1 0008 1 0009 1 0101 1 0102 1 0103 1 0104 1 0105 1 0106 1 2101 1 2102 1 2103 1 2104 W ater Reacto r Plan Table 2-2 Su r W a LA C W LACBW R LACBWR M L LACB W L A L A L A B aTransmiss i Bar g r LACB W r ve y Area D Reactor B u aste Treatme n CBWR Vent i W aste Gas T a R Turbine Bl d Bld g 1B Diesel G LSA Bui l M aintenance E Pipe Tu n A CBWR C r G-3 Crib H WR Adminis t ACBWR Wa r ACBWR Wa r ACBWR Wa r a ck-up Cont r i on Sub-Sta t G-1 Crib H ge Washing B 2-40 W R Struct u D escription u ilding n t Building ilation Stac k a nk Vault d g./Turbine . Generator St r l ding Eat Shack n nel r ib House H ouse tration Buil d r ehouse #1 r ehouse #2 r ehouse #3 r ol Cente r tion Switch H H ouse Break Roo m u ral Surve y k Office ructure ding H ouse m y Units Clas s C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l sification lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 La Cros s License T Revisio n G-3 R G-3 S G-3 C G-3 T G-3 E G-3 C G-3 C G-4 W G-3 L G-3 L G-3 C G-3 C G-3 V G-3 T G-3 B G-3 F G-3 F G-3 W G-3 S G-3 S#6 W  s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Tabl e R eclaim Bui l S tock Out T r C oal Unload T ransfer To w E lectrical R o C rusher To w C onveyor #6 W arehouse a LRAPB Bui l Lime Silo El C AT Buildi n C oal Plant Vehicle Stor a Train She d Bottom Ash Fly Ash Silo F ly Ash Ele c Waste Silo S urge Tank Settling Tan k W ell House W ater Reacto r Plan e 2-2 (conti n l ding r ansfer Buil d ing Towe r w er A o om w e r 6 (2) a nd Electric a l ding ectrical Bui l n g a ge Buildin g Dewatering ctrical Build i k r n ued)Non Im p ding a l Room l ding g Buildings i ng 2-41 LACBWR p acted Stru c G-3 A n G-3 B o G-3 E x G-3 G a G-3 S u G-3 S u G-3 L i G-3 W G-3 A c G-3 A s G-3 B a G-3 Fl#7 We G-3 C o G-3 S a G-3 St G-3 G r G-3 A s Main P S03 T a Structural ctures n nex Buildi n oiler Fuel O i x plosive Ga s a s Room u b Station S h u b Station S h ime Storage W eigh Statio n c tive Reclai m sh Coordina ag Houses (5ammable St ll House o al Scale ample Build i t ock Out Tr a r id She d s h handling P ollution C o a nk Buildin g Surve y Un i n g i l Pump Bui s Storage R o h e d h e d Silo n m Building s a tor's Office
Range for 95 (p
: 5) t orage She d i ng ansfer Build i Blower Bui l o ntrol Electr i g its lding oom s/ Tunnel i ng l ding ical Buildin g g La Cros s License T Revisio n Det e Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu mGamm a System a Bas Sta n b Fu n  s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ector Mode l m 44-9 m 43-68  m o m 43-68  m o m 43-93  m o m 43-89  m o m 43-93  m o m 43-89  m o m 44-10 m 43-37 m 43-10-1 a Spectrosco ped on 1-minut e ndard, ISO 75 0 nctional equiva l W ater Reacto r Plan Table 2-3 l b M e Lud l ode Lud l ode Lud l o de ode Lud l o de ode Lud l Lud l Lud l Lud l p y e count time; a 03-1 (20).
0.45 0.35 m
lent instrumen t r Instrum e eter Model l um 3 l um 2350-1 l um 2350-1 l um 2360 l um 2360 l um 2350-1 l um 2350-1 lum 2929 N/A and default val u tation may be u 2-42 e nt T y pes a Applic a sc a static & sta t static & sta t sc a sc a and/sme a Ana l ues for surface u se d a nd Nomin a ation Ty (d p a n 1, 0& scan 1, 8 tic & scan 1, 8 2, 0 tic a n 3.5 6.5 a n 2, 0 or  a r l ysis  efficiencies ( al MDCs Ty pical Dete MDC scan p m/100cm 2)0 00 to 2,00 0 8 00 to 2,00 0 N/A 8 00 to 2,00 0 0 00 to 2,20 0 N/A 5 pCi/g 60 C o 5 pCi/g 137 C s 0 00 to 2,20 0 N/A N/A  s) as specified ction Sensi t) MDC s t (dpm/10 0 N/A 0 600 to 80 to 0 0 800 to 800 to 90 to 1 90 to 1 o s N/A 0 N/A - 75-~0.10 pfor Co-6 Cs-1 3in Internation a t ivit y tatic a 0cm 2)A 700 90 900 900 1 00      1 00 A A -15      -80 p Ci/g 6 0 and 3 7 a l La Cros s License T Revisio nAnal y sis / Gamma Radionucl iIsotopic N(Np-237) Isotopic P l(Pu-238/2 3Isotopic T h(Th-228/2 3Isotopic U r(U-234/23 5Isotopic C u(Cm-243/2Isotopic A m(Am-241/2C-14 Tritium Sr-90 Pu-241 Tc-99 Gross Alp h Fe-55 Ni-63 Ni-59  s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-4 Anal ytes ides Geptunium A lutonium 39/240) A horium 30/232) A ranium 5/238) A urium 244) A mericium 243) A L S L S G L S L S ha / Beta G L S L S L S W ater Reacto r Plan Off-Sit eTechnique Gamma Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec S C S C GFPC S C S C GFPC S C S C S C r e Laborator yDOE E< 0.1p CDOE E< 0.04 pDOE E< 0.05 pDOE E< 0.05 pDOE E< 0.06 pDOE E< 0.03 pDOE E< 0.04 p EPA E E< 5.0 p C EPA 9 0< 10.0 pDOE E< 1.0 p CDOE E< 10.0 pDOE E< 2.0 p C DOE E< 10.0 pDOE E< 2.0 pCDOE E< 50.0 p 2-43 y Anal y tic aSoils (pCi
0.15 0.23 d Studies 5% Distribu pCi/g) 5 to 3.63 5 to 2.86 5 to 0.77 to 0.42 ution
/EML HASL 30 0 C i/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g ERF C-01 C i/g 0 6.0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 C i/ EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 C i/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 C i/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g a l Methods aMethod an d/g) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (SRW01) 0 (SRW01) a nd T y pica l d Sensitivit y Wa tEPA Method 10.0 pCi/L EML Pu-02 M1.0 pCi/L ENIC Modif i50.0 pCi/L EPA 906.0 300.0 pCi/L EICHROM M2.0 pCi/L EML Pu-01 50.0 pCi/L EICHROM T15.0 pCi/L EPA 900.0 5.0 pCi/L EML Fe-01 M100.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M15.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M100.0 pCi/L l MDCs ter (pCi/L) 901.1 Modifie d i e d Modified Meth o Tc-01 Modifie d Modifie d Modifie d od La Cros s License T Revisio n 


s e Boiling W Termination n 0 T a Location Area West o Area South Area North Area at G-3 Area Outsi d Area at G-333 miles So Pedretti Fa r Radio Tow e Junction of East of Sto d W ater Reacto r Plan a ble 2-5 of #2 Ware h of Parking L of LACBW Gas Silo d e G-3 Offic Outfall uth at Bad A m Substatio n er Northeast Hwy O and d dard at Hw y r 2005 Dair y (on L h ouse L ot R Admin B ues (off L A xe Boat La n n East of L A of LACB W Hwy K y O Junctio n 2-44 y land Back g Licensed Sit e uilding L icensed Sit e n ding A CBWR W R n g round Stu d Co-60 (pCi/g)e) <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC e) 0.023 <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC dy for Soils Cs-(p C 0.0 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0.0-137 C i/g) 0 77 0 26 149 0 38 0 76 0 17 3 81 2 27 0 35 188 0 65 La Cros s License T Revisio n T Conditi o Undistur b Disturbe d Undistur b Disturbe d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 T able 2-6 o n and Dep t b e d d b e d d W ater Reacto r Plan Investi ga t h D No n r ative Levels Mea s D raina g e Ar 0.0.n-Draina g e 0.0.2-45  for Cs-137 s ured Ran g(pCi/g) eas  Surfac e 00 to 2.80 00 to 1.67 A reas Surf a 23 to 0.66 27 to 0.34 Based on B g e R e 0-10 cm ace 0-10 c m B ack g roun d R an g e for 9 5 (p 0.4 5 0.3 5 m 0.1 5 0.23 d Studies 5% Distrib u p Ci/g) 5 to 3.63 5 to 2.86 5 to 0.77  to 0.42 u tion La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2*L W ater Reacto r Plan -7 Initi a Radi o H C F e N C o N S r N b T c C s E u E u E u N p P u P u P u P u A mCm-2 4 Listed half life i r a l Suite of L o nuclide H-3 C-14 e-55 i-59 o-60 i-63 r-90 b-94 c-99 -137 u-152 u-154 u-155 p-237 u-238 u-239 u-240 u-241 m-241 4 3/244* is the shortest h 2-46 LACBWR S H a half life for th e S ite-Specifi c alf Life (Ye a 1.24E+01 5.73E+03 2.70E+00 7.50E+04 5.27E+00 9.60E+01 2.91E+01 2.03E+04 2.13E+05 3.00E+01 1.33E+01 8.80E+00 4.76E+00 2.14E+06 8.78E+01 2.41E+04 6.60E+03 1.44E+01 4.32E+02 1.81E+01 e radionuclide s c Radionuc l a rs) s in the pai r lides L L R S S##M M M M S S##M M M M S A##M M M M S%M M L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 S urve y Unit Surface Area Description S urface Soil
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2
*L Water Reactor Plan  
-7 Initia Radio H
C Fe N
Co N
Sr Nb Tc Cs Eu Eu Eu Np Pu Pu Pu Pu Am Cm-24 Listed half life i r
al Suite of L onuclide H-3 C-14 e-55 i-59 o-60 i-63 r-90 b-94 c-99  
-137 u-152 u-154 u-155 p-237 u-238 u-239 u-240 u-241 m-241 43/244*
is the shortest h 2-46 LACBWR S Ha half life for the Site-Specific alf Life (Yea 1.24E+01 5.73E+03 2.70E+00 7.50E+04 5.27E+00 9.60E+01 2.91E+01 2.03E+04 2.13E+05 3.00E+01 1.33E+01 8.80E+00 4.76E+00 2.14E+06 8.78E+01 2.41E+04 6.60E+03 1.44E+01 4.32E+02 1.81E+01 e radionuclides c Radionucl ars) s in the pair lides  
 
L L
R S
S M
M M
M S
S M
M M
M S
A M
M M
M S
M M
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Survey Unit Surface Area Description Surface Soil  
# of Samples  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Subsurface Soil  
SD Subsurface Soil  
# of Samples  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Asphalt # of Samples  
SD Asphalt  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Surface Scans  
SD Surface Scans  
% Scanne d Mean Scan (cpm)
% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
Max Scan (cpm) ng Water Reac t ation Plan Table 2-8 Surve y Uni t 66,869 m 2 G-3 Coal Pla nCo-60 3 0 0.070 0.075 0.078 0.057 0.011 Co-60 4 0 0.060 0.056 0.084 0.047 0.016 Co-60 None Taken 1% 5,550 6,700 o r  Non-Impact t L4012103 n t Grounds Cs-137 3 1 0.082 0.083 0.092 0.071 0.011 Cs-137 4 1 0.048 0.038 0.081 0.036 0.022 Cs-137 ed Open Land Surve y Unit 82,894 m 2 Coal Pile GrouCo-60 3 0 0.071 0.072 0.084 0.057 0.014 Co-60 3 0 0.061 0.063 0.068 0.052 0.008 Co-60 None Taken 1% 5,050 8,800 2-47 Surve y Units -L4012105 1 nds C GCs-137 3 1 0.061 0.060 0.068 0.055 0.006 Cs-137 3 1 0.042 0.040 0.056 0.030 0.013 Cs-137 1 8 1- Characteriza tSurvey Unit L 1 11,899 m 2 C apped Ash I m G rounds Co-60 3 0 0.082 0.084 0.090 0.072 0.009 Co-60 4 0 0.081 0.083 0.102 0.056 0.021 Co-60 2 0 0.073 0.073 0.082 0.065 0.012 1% 8 ,340 1 2,000 tion Surve y S u L4012106 8 m poundment G HCs-137 3 2 0.100 0.099 0.121 0.079 0.021 Cs-137 4 2 0.088 0.084 0.130 0.054 0.037 Cs-137 2 0 0.062 0.062 0.084 0.040 0.031 u mmar y Survey Unit L 8 1,254m 2 G rounds East o f H ighway 35 Co-60 3 0 0.080 0.079 0.089 0.072 0.009 Co-60 3 0 0.081 0.069 0.106 0.068 0.022 Co-60 None Ta k 1% 8,0009,080 L4012107 fCs-137 3 3 0.264 0.263 0.463 0.065 0.199 Cs-137 3 2 0.068 0.057 0.091 0.056 0.020 Cs-137 k en L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Tab l ng Water Reac t ation Plan l e 2-8 (continu e S S# # M M M M S D S# # M M M M S D A# # M M M M S D S%M M o r  e d) Non-I urve y Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples  
Max Scan (cpm) ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-8 Survey Unit 66,869 m2 G-3 Coal Plan Co-60 3
0 0.070 0.075 0.078 0.057 0.011 Co-60 4
0 0.060 0.056 0.084 0.047 0.016 Co-60 None Taken 1%
5,550 6,700 or Non-Impact t L4012103 nt Grounds Cs-137 3
1 0.082 0.083 0.092 0.071 0.011 Cs-137 4
1 0.048 0.038 0.081 0.036 0.022 Cs-137 ed Open Land Survey Unit 82,894 m2 Coal Pile Grou Co-60 3
0 0.071 0.072 0.084 0.057 0.014 Co-60 3
0 0.061 0.063 0.068 0.052 0.008 Co-60 None Taken 1%
5,050 8,800 2-47 Survey Units -
L4012105 1
nds C
G Cs-137 3
1 0.061 0.060 0.068 0.055 0.006 Cs-137 3
1 0.042 0.040 0.056 0.030 0.013 Cs-137 1
8 1
- Characterizat Survey Unit L 111,899 m2 Capped Ash Im Grounds Co-60 3
0 0.082 0.084 0.090 0.072 0.009 Co-60 4
0 0.081 0.083 0.102 0.056 0.021 Co-60 2
0 0.073 0.073 0.082 0.065 0.012 1%
8,340 12,000 tion Survey Su L4012106 8
mpoundment G H
Cs-137 3
2 0.100 0.099 0.121 0.079 0.021 Cs-137 4
2 0.088 0.084 0.130 0.054 0.037 Cs-137 2
0 0.062 0.062 0.084 0.040 0.031 ummary Survey Unit L 81,254m2 Grounds East of Highway 35 Co-60 3
0 0.080 0.079 0.089 0.072 0.009 Co-60 3
0 0.081 0.069 0.106 0.068 0.022 Co-60 None Tak 1%
8,000 9,080 L4012107 f
Cs-137 3
3 0.264 0.263 0.463 0.065 0.199 Cs-137 3
2 0.068 0.057 0.091 0.056 0.020 Cs-137 ken
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Tabl ng Water React ation Plan le 2-8 (continue S
S M
M M
M SD S
M M
M M
SD A
M M
M M
SD S
M M
or ed)
Non-I urvey Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D ubsurface Soil of Samples  
D ubsurface Soil of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D Asphalt of Samples  
D Asphalt of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D urface Scans  
D urface Scans  
% Scanne d Mean Scan (cpm)
% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
Max Scan (cpm)
Max Scan (cpm)
I mpacted Ope n Surve y Unit 9,444 m 2 Hwy 35/Railro Way GroundsCo-60 3 0 0.079 0.075 0.095 0.068 0.014 Co-60 3 0 0.086 0.092 0.107 0.060 0.024 Co-60 None Taken 1% 8,124 9,200 2-48 n Land Surve y L4012108 1 ad Right of B ACs-137 3 2 0.119 0.108 0.156 0.093 0.033 Cs-137 3 2 0.189 0.091 0.409 0.067 0.191 Cs-137 Units - Char a Surve y Unit L 1 00 m 2 B ackground So i Area (inside L4 0Co-60 17 0 0.087 0.086 0.101 0.077 0.007 Co-60 None T aCo-60 None T a No Scanning P acterization Su r L4012109 ils Test 012108) Cs-137 17 17 0.160 0.161 0.268 0.059 0.059 Cs-137 aken Cs-137 aken Performe d r ve y Summar y y L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L L a b L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-Genoa Coal P L3012105-CR-GS-002
Impacted Open Survey Unit 9,444 m2 Hwy 35/Railro Way Grounds Co-60 3
-L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S a Bold values b Survey unit s ng Water Reac t ation Plan H-3 C S B 4.390 1 S S 3.570 0.Pile -SS 0.533 0.S B  S S  S B 14.600 0.S S 0.813 0.S B  S S 1.420 0.S B 2.350 0.S S 6.490 0.indicate concentration g originally classified as t o r  Table 2-9 C-14 Fe-55 N.230 3.430 1.671 2.790 1 .675 2.130 1   .713 2.300 2
0 0.079 0.075 0.095 0.068 0.014 Co-60 3
.713 3.550 2 .719 3.610 2.705 1.920 3
0 0.086 0.092 0.107 0.060 0.024 Co-60 None Taken 1%
.728 2.260 3 greater than MDC. Ital i Class 3 at time of sam p Non Imp a Ni-59 Co-60 N.470 0.026 2.870 0.027 3 0.018 .730 0.025 2 0.026 0.030 .370 0.037 3.560 0.037 3 0.019 .800 0.025 3.110 0.018 4.200 0.030 4icized values indicate M p le a cted Coal Pile Ni-63 Sr-90 N.140 0.321 0.380 0.391 0 0.950 0.289 0 0 0.950 0.348 0.580 0.338 0 0.940 0.293 0.440 0.278 0.710 0.271 0 MDC value 2-49 and Soil Sam p Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.018 0.820 0 0.022 0.628 0 0.022 0 0.016 0.587 0 0.020 0 0.020 0 0.030 0.611 0 0.028 0.616 0 0.013 0 0.019 0.593 0 0.016 0.604 0 0.020 0.576 0 ples - Test Am e s-137 Pm-147 E u 0.024 0.714 0 0.018 0.847 0 0.019 0 0.018 0.698 0 0.023 0 0.028 0.319 1.500 0.096 0.826 0 0.021 0.018 1.450 0.033 1.310 0.182 0.770 0 e rica Laborato r u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.071 0.190 0 0.060 0.167 0 0.052 0.152 0 0.051 0.137 0 0.049 0.166 0 0.072 0.199 0 0.115 0.223 0 0.079 0.232 0 0.045 0.115 0 0.049 0.156 0 0.041 0.128 0 0.059 0.176 0 ry Anal y sis (p C u-155 Np-237 P u 0.095 0.025 0 0.096 0.024 0 0.048 0.056 0.023 0 0.055 0.074 0.080 0.035 0 0.112 0.027 0 0.038 0.048 0.040 0 0.044 0.030 0 0.060 0.020 0 C i/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 P u 0.046 0.015 1 0.040 0.021 1 0.036 0.029 1   0.036 0.014 2 0.044 0.026 2 0.021 0.024 2 0.026 0.021 2 0.028 0.029 2 u-241 Am-241 A 1.730 0.032 0 1.650 0.025 0 0.041 1.670 0.018 0 0.048 0.061 2.550 0.019 0 2.740 0.025 0 0.034 2.580 0.020 0 2.670 0.017 0 2.740 0.015 0 A m-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.010 0.024 0.019 0.025 0.006 0.034 0.006 0.013 0.019 0.035 0.006 0.036 0.017 0.024 0.015 L L R S S##M M M M S S##M M M M S A##M M M M S S%M M a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 S urve y Unit Surface Area Description S urface Soil
8,124 9,200 2-48 n Land Survey L4012108 1
ad Right of B A
Cs-137 3
2 0.119 0.108 0.156 0.093 0.033 Cs-137 3
2 0.189 0.091 0.409 0.067 0.191 Cs-137 Units - Chara Survey Unit L 100 m2 Background Soi Area (inside L40 Co-60 17 0
0.087 0.086 0.101 0.077 0.007 Co-60 None Ta Co-60 None Ta No Scanning P acterization Sur L4012109 ils Test 012108)
Cs-137 17 17 0.160 0.161 0.268 0.059 0.059 Cs-137 aken Cs-137 aken Performed rvey Summaryy
 
L L
R R
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
a b
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-Genoa Coal P L3012105-CR-GS-002-L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S a
Bold values b
Survey units ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C
SB 4.390 1
SS 3.570 0.
Pile  
-SS 0.533 0.
SB SS SB 14.600 0.
SS 0.813 0.
SB SS 1.420 0.
SB 2.350 0.
SS 6.490 0.
indicate concentration g originally classified as tor Table 2-9 C-14 Fe-55 N
.230 3.430 1
.671 2.790 1
.675 2.130 1
.713 2.300 2
.713 3.550 2
.719 3.610 2
.705 1.920 3
.728 2.260 3
greater than MDC. Itali Class 3 at time of samp Non Impa Ni-59 Co-60 N
.470 0.026 2
.870 0.027 3
0.018  
.730 0.025 2
0.026 0.030  
.370 0.037 3
.560 0.037 3
0.019  
.800 0.025 3
.110 0.018 4
.200 0.030 4
icized values indicate M ple acted Coal Pile Ni-63 Sr-90 N
.140 0.321 0
.380 0.391 0
0
.950 0.289 0
0 0
.950 0.348 0
.580 0.338 0
0
.940 0.293 0
.440 0.278 0
.710 0.271 0
MDC value 2-49 and Soil Samp Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.018 0.820 0
0.022 0.628 0
0.022 0
0.016 0.587 0
0.020 0
0.020 0
0.030 0.611 0
0.028 0.616 0
0.013 0
0.019 0.593 0
0.016 0.604 0
0.020 0.576 0
ples - Test Ame s-137 Pm-147 Eu 0.024 0.714 0
0.018 0.847 0
0.019 0
0.018 0.698 0
0.023 0
0.028 0
.319 1.500 0
.096 0.826 0
0.021 0
.018 1.450 0
.033 1.310 0
.182 0.770 0
erica Laborator u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.071 0.190 0
0.060 0.167 0
0.052 0.152 0
0.051 0.137 0
0.049 0.166 0
0.072 0.199 0
0.115 0.223 0
0.079 0.232 0
0.045 0.115 0
0.049 0.156 0
0.041 0.128 0
0.059 0.176 0
ry Analysis (pC u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.095 0.025 0
0.096 0.024 0
0.048 0.056 0.023 0
0.055 0.074 0.080 0.035 0
0.112 0.027 0
0.038 0.048 0.040 0
0.044 0.030 0
0.060 0.020 0
Ci/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.015 1
0.040 0.021 1
0.036 0.029 1
0.036 0.014 2
0.044 0.026 2
0.021 0.024 2
0.026 0.021 2
0.028 0.029 2
u-241 Am-241 A
1.730 0.032 0
1.650 0.025 0
0.041 1.670 0.018 0
0.048 0.061 2.550 0.019 0
2.740 0.025 0
0.034 2.580 0.020 0
2.670 0.017 0
2.740 0.015 0
Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.010 0.024 0.019 0.025 0.006 0.034 0.006 0.013 0.019 0.035 0.006 0.036 0.017 0.024 0.015  
 
L L
R S
S M
M M
M S
S M
M M
M S
A M
M M
M S
S M
M a
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Survey Unit Surface Area Description Surface Soil  
# of Samples  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Subsurface Soil  
SD Subsurface Soil  
# of Samples  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Asphalt # of Samples  
SD Asphalt  
# of Samples  
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
# >CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
S D Surface Scans  
SD Surface Scans  
% Scanne d Mean Scan (cpm)
% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
Max Scan (cpm) a MDC v a ng Water Reac t ation Plan Table 2-10 Surve y Uni t 1,992 m 2 Reactor Bui lWGTV, Ven t Grounds Co-60 12 2 0.080 0.058 0.287 0.048 0.066 Co-60 18 0 0.078 0.052 0.516 0.047 0.109 None Taken No Scanning P a lue used for an a o r  Impacted Cl a t L1010101 l ding, WTB, tilation Stack Cs-137 12 12 0.215 0.100 1.070 0.032 0.296 Cs-137 18 8 0.066 0.054 0.161 0.033 0.035 Performed a lytical results l ass 1 Open Lan d Surve y Unit 2,315 m 2 Turbine, Offic eGenerator Buil Grounds Co-60 2 0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.044 0.007 Co-60 22 0 0.058 0.058 0.080 0.043 0.010 None Taken No Scanning P l ess than MDC.
Max Scan (cpm) a MDC va ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-10 Survey Unit 1,992 m2 Reactor Buil WGTV, Vent Grounds Co-60 12 2
2-50 d Surve y Unit sL1010102 1 e, Diesel ding L M GCs-137 2 0 0.050 0.050 0.051 0.050 0.001 Cs-137 22 4 0.064 0.065 0.130 0.044 0.017 Nerformed N s - Characteri z Surve y Unit L 1 ,749 m 2 LSA Building, M aintenance E a G rounds Co-60 7 0 0.059 0.050 0.099 0.048 0.019 Co-60 25 0 0.046 0.046 0.055 0.025 0.005 N one Taken N o Scanning P e z ation Surve y S L1010103 2 a t Shack NCs-137 7 1 0.069 0.054 0.161 0.048 0.041 Cs-137 25 0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.042 0.003 erformed S ummar y Surve y Unit L 2 ,387 m 2 N orth LSE Gro uCo-60 1 0 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 N/A Co-60 14 0 0.048 0.048 0.050 0.043 0.002 Co-60 10 0 0.053 0.054 0.062 0.042 0.006 No Scanning P e L1010104 u nds Cs-137 1 0 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 N/A Cs-137 14 3 0.041 0.042 0.051 0.027 0.009 Cs-137 10 1 0.051 0.053 0.057 0.037 0.006 erforme d L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L1010101-CJ-GS-002-S L1010101-CJ-GS-009-S L1010101-CJ-GS-010-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010102-CJ-FC-001-C L1010102-CJ-GS-013-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-CJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-SL-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CR-PA-007
0.080 0.058 0.287 0.048 0.066 Co-60 18 0
-L1010104-QQ-PA-001
0.078 0.052 0.516 0.047 0.109 None Taken No Scanning P alue used for ana or Impacted Cla t L1010101 lding, WTB, tilation Stack Cs-137 12 12 0.215 0.100 1.070 0.032 0.296 Cs-137 18 8
-L1010104-QR-GS-001
0.066 0.054 0.161 0.033 0.035 Performed alytical results l ass 1 Open Land Survey Unit 2,315 m2 Turbine, Office Generator Buil Grounds Co-60 2
-a Bold values ng Water Reac t ation Plan TH-3 C SS   SS   SS   S B 0.364 0 S S 0.441 0.S B 0.377 0.S S 1.380 0.C V 1.710 0.S B  S B 8.740 0.S S  S B 24.700 0.SB   S M 0.354 0 S B 3.260 0.S S  S B 0.649 0.S S  S B 0.654 0.SS   SB   -AV   -AV   -SB   indicate concentration g t o r  Table 2-11 C C-14 Fe-55 N           .896 2.430 1.676 2.190 1
0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.044 0.007 Co-60 22 0
0.058 0.058 0.080 0.043 0.010 None Taken No Scanning P less than MDC.
2-50 d Survey Units L1010102 1
e, Diesel ding L
M G
Cs-137 2
0 0.050 0.050 0.051 0.050 0.001 Cs-137 22 4
0.064 0.065 0.130 0.044 0.017 N
erformed N
s - Characteriz Survey Unit L 1,749 m2 LSA Building, Maintenance Ea Grounds Co-60 7
0 0.059 0.050 0.099 0.048 0.019 Co-60 25 0
0.046 0.046 0.055 0.025 0.005 None Taken No Scanning Pe zation Survey S L1010103 2
at Shack N
Cs-137 7
1 0.069 0.054 0.161 0.048 0.041 Cs-137 25 0
0.049 0.049 0.054 0.042 0.003 erformed Summary Survey Unit L 2,387 m2 North LSE Grou Co-60 1
0 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 N/A Co-60 14 0
0.048 0.048 0.050 0.043 0.002 Co-60 10 0
0.053 0.054 0.062 0.042 0.006 No Scanning Pe L1010104 unds Cs-137 1
0 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 N/A Cs-137 14 3
0.041 0.042 0.051 0.027 0.009 Cs-137 10 1
0.051 0.053 0.057 0.037 0.006 erformed
 
L L
R R
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
a La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L1010101-CJ-GS-002-S L1010101-CJ-GS-009-S L1010101-CJ-GS-010-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010102-CJ-FC-001-C L1010102-CJ-GS-013-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-CJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-SL-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CR-PA-007-L1010104-QQ-PA-001-L1010104-QR-GS-001-a Bold values ng Water React ation Plan T
H-3 C
SS SS SS SB 0.364 0
SS 0.441 0.
SB 0.377 0.
SS 1.380 0.
CV 1.710 0.
SB SB 8.740 0.
SS SB 24.700 0.
SB SM 0.354 0
SB 3.260 0.
SS SB 0.649 0.
SS SB 0.654 0.
SS SB  
-AV  
-AV  
-SB indicate concentration g tor Table 2-11 C
C-14 Fe-55 N
.896 2.430 1
.676 2.190 1
.679 2.150 1
.679 2.150 1
.67 7 4.190 2.72 7 1.650 2   .726 2.120 2   .715 2.230 2   .453 0.689 0.715 1.830 2   .702 2.100 2   .71 7 2.340 2                   greater than MDC. Ital i lass 1 Concret e Ni-59 Co-60 N 0.024   0.040   0.286 .850 0.024 3.900 0.018 3.750 0.017 2.010 0.015 3.630 0.106 3 0.030 .620 0.015 4 0.022 .760 0.021 3 0.011 0.711 0.136 1.850 0.017 4 0.025 .620 0.014 3 0.019 .630 0.012 3 0.023   0.015   0.021   0.025   0.017 icized values indicate M e , Asphalt, Se d Ni-63 Sr-90 N   0   0   0.040 0.335 0.040 0.440 0.930 0.338 0.320 0.357 0.920 0.292 0   0.000 0.310 0   0.920 0.316 0   0.090 0.132 0.240 0.333 0   0.710 0.325 0   0.660 0.300 0   0   0   0   0   0 MDC value. 2-51 d iment and Soi l Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.020   0 0.020   0 0.025   0 0.015 0.579 0 0.012 0.587 0 0.011 0.620 0 0.010 0.521 0 0.022 0.536 0 0.016   0 0.011 0.539 0 0.015   0 0.014 0.537 0 0.01 7  0 0.018 0.432 0 0.011 0.606 0 0.015   0 0.012 0.645 0 0.01 7  0 0.009 0.557 0 0.019   0 0.008   0 0.014   0 0.025   0 0.011   0 l Samples - Te s s-137 Pm-147 E u.233   0.185   0.413   0 0.020 0.800 0.147 3.170 0.149 0.772 0.059 0.978 0.352 1.290 0 0.021   0 0.012 0.961 0 0.018   0 0.016 0.722 0 0.021   0.136 0.360 0 0.015 0.740 0 0.020   0 0.012 0.838 0 0.01 7  0 0.011 0.713 0.091   0 0.013   0 0.016   0 0.028   0 0.012   0 s t America La b u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.056 0.161 0 0.056 0.181 0 0.062 0.247 0 0.050 0.143 0 0.034 0.112 0 0.040 0.109 0 0.033 0.096 0 0.061 0.239 0 0.044 0.170 0 0.030 0.101 0 0.036 0.113 0 0.043 0.139 0 0.044 0.181 0 0.054 0.199 0 0.036 0.117 0 0.046 0.174 0 0.029 0.103 0 0.040 0.139 0 0.029 0.092 0 0.05 7 0.186 0 0.032 0.078 0 0.042 0.141 0 0.058 0.218 0 0.038 0.132 0 b orator y Anal y u-155 Np-237 P u 0.066   0.050   0.05 7  0.044 0.019 0 0.044 0.006 0 0.040 0.019 0 0.036 0.016 0 0.062 0.029 0 0.041   0.028 0.028 0 0.042   0.042 0.032 0 0.046   0.049 0.018 0 0.039 0.026 0 0.04 7  0.034 0.020 0 0.045   0.034 0.040 0 0.063   0.036   0.044   0.061   0.032   y sis (pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 P u            0.046 0.023 1 0.039 0.023 1 0.041 0.022 1 0.040 0.016 2 0.041 0.028 2   0.040 0.026 2   0.042 0.029 2   0.015 0.015 0 0.029 0.017 1   0.034 0.024 2   0.028 0.028 2                   u-241 Am-241 A 0.058   0.042   0.051 1.970 0.015 0 1.830 0.016 0 1.950 0.017 0 2.090 0.020 0 2.490 0.018 0 0.036 2.780 0.015 0 0.039 2.660 0.015 0 0.044 0.86 7 0.008 0 1.430 0.009 0 0.043 2.570 0.018 0 0.024 2.470 0.018 0 0.052   0.034   0.040   0.050   0.032 A m-243 Cm-243/244             0.023 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.029 0.014 0.01 7 0.022 0.019 0.021     0.020 0.021     0.021 0.018     0.019 0.008 0.024 0.005     0.024 0.014     0.022 0.005 La Cros s License T Revisio n Tab l Su r Su r# o f# >C Me a Me d Ma x Mi n SD Su b# o f# >C Me a Me d Ma x Mi n SD As p# o f# >C Me a Me d Ma x Mi n SD Su r% S Me a Ma x 
.677 4.190 2
.727 1.650 2
.726 2.120 2
.715 2.230 2
.453 0.689 0
.715 1.830 2
.702 2.100 2
.717 2.340 2
greater than MDC. Itali lass 1 Concrete Ni-59 Co-60 N
0.024 0.040 0.286  
.850 0.024 3
.900 0.018 3
.750 0.017 2
.010 0.015 3
.630 0.106 3
0.030  
.620 0.015 4
0.022  
.760 0.021 3
0.011 0.711 0.136 1
.850 0.017 4
0.025  
.620 0.014 3
0.019  
.630 0.012 3
0.023 0.015 0.021 0.025 0.017 icized values indicate M e, Asphalt, Sed Ni-63 Sr-90 N
0 0
0
.040 0.335 0
.040 0.440 0
.930 0.338 0
.320 0.357 0
.920 0.292 0
0
.000 0.310 0
0
.920 0.316 0
0
.090 0.132 0
.240 0.333 0
0
.710 0.325 0
0
.660 0.300 0
0 0
0 0
0 MDC value.
2-51 diment and Soil Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.020 0
0.020 0
0.025 0
0.015 0.579 0
0.012 0.587 0
0.011 0.620 0
0.010 0.521 0
0.022 0.536 0
0.016 0
0.011 0.539 0
0.015 0
0.014 0.537 0
0.017 0
0.018 0.432 0
0.011 0.606 0
0.015 0
0.012 0.645 0
0.017 0
0.009 0.557 0
0.019 0
0.008 0
0.014 0
0.025 0
0.011 0
l Samples - Tes s-137 Pm-147 Eu
.233 0
.185 0
.413 0
0.020 0.800 0
.147 3.170 0
.149 0.772 0
.059 0.978 0
.352 1.290 0
0.021 0
0.012 0.961 0
0.018 0
0.016 0.722 0
0.021 0
.136 0.360 0
0.015 0.740 0
0.020 0
0.012 0.838 0
0.017 0
0.011 0.713 0
.091 0
0.013 0
0.016 0
0.028 0
0.012 0
st America Lab u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.056 0.161 0
0.056 0.181 0
0.062 0.247 0
0.050 0.143 0
0.034 0.112 0
0.040 0.109 0
0.033 0.096 0
0.061 0.239 0
0.044 0.170 0
0.030 0.101 0
0.036 0.113 0
0.043 0.139 0
0.044 0.181 0
0.054 0.199 0
0.036 0.117 0
0.046 0.174 0
0.029 0.103 0
0.040 0.139 0
0.029 0.092 0
0.057 0.186 0
0.032 0.078 0
0.042 0.141 0
0.058 0.218 0
0.038 0.132 0
boratory Analy u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.066 0.050 0.057 0.044 0.019 0
0.044 0.006 0
0.040 0.019 0
0.036 0.016 0
0.062 0.029 0
0.041 0.028 0.028 0
0.042 0.042 0.032 0
0.046 0.049 0.018 0
0.039 0.026 0
0.047 0.034 0.020 0
0.045 0.034 0.040 0
0.063 0.036 0.044 0.061 0.032 ysis (pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.023 1
0.039 0.023 1
0.041 0.022 1
0.040 0.016 2
0.041 0.028 2
0.040 0.026 2
0.042 0.029 2
0.015 0.015 0
0.029 0.017 1
0.034 0.024 2
0.028 0.028 2
u-241 Am-241 A
0.058 0.042 0.051 1.970 0.015 0
1.830 0.016 0
1.950 0.017 0
2.090 0.020 0
2.490 0.018 0
0.036 2.780 0.015 0
0.039 2.660 0.015 0
0.044 0.867 0.008 0
1.430 0.009 0
0.043 2.570 0.018 0
0.024 2.470 0.018 0
0.052 0.034 0.040 0.050 0.032 Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.023 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.029 0.014 0.017 0.022 0.019 0.021 0.020 0.021 0.021 0.018 0.019 0.008 0.024 0.005 0.024 0.014 0.022 0.005  


s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 le 2-12 I m r ve y Unit Surface Area Description r face Soil f Samples C L an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) bsurface Soil f Samples C L an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) phalt f Samples C L an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) rface Scans Scanne d an Scan (cpm) x Scan (cpm)
La Cross License T Revision Tabl Sur Sur
W ater Reacto r Plan mpacted Cl a Su r 7,211 m 2 LACBW RBuilding, House, WCo-6 013 0 0.07 30.07 70.10 60.05 30.01 6Co-6 016 1 0.05 20.04 60.11 20.04 00.01 8Co-6 0 6 0 0.0510.0510.05 40.04 70.00 2 50% 7,500 to 8, 011,500 to 1 2 r ass 2 Open L S r ve y Unit L20 1 R Ad m LACB W W arehouse G r 0 3 7 6 3 6 0 2 6 2 0 8 0   4 7 2 00 2,000 2-52 L and Surv e S ummar y 11101 ministration W R Crib r ounds Cs-137 13 8 0.090 0.100 0.139 0.041 0.030 Cs-137 16 2 0.049 0.048 0.088 0.034 0.012 Cs-137 6 0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.003 ey Units - C Su r 6,785 m 2 G-3 Cri b Circ. W a Area Sou tCo-6 010 0 0.06 40.06 40.0810.05 20.00 9Co-6 0 7 0 0.04 90.04 80.05 50.04 20.00 4Co-6 0 6 0 0.05 60.05 70.05 90.04 90.00 3 1 C haracteriz a r ve y Unit L20 1 b House, a ter Disch a t h of LSE F e 0 4 4 2 9 0 9 8 5 2 4 0 6 7 9 9 3 50% 7,500 to 8,00 0 11,500 to 12,0 0 a tion Surv e 11102 LACBWR arge Line, ence Cs-137 10 6 0.065 0.054 0.200 0.030 0.049 Cs-137 7 2 0.038 0.033 0.052 0.029 0.009 Cs-137 6 3 0.048 0.051 0.055 0.009 0.008 0 0 0 ey L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L L L a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L2011101-CJ-GS-001-S L2011101-CR-PA-003
# of
-L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QQ-GS-001
# >C Mea Med Max Min SD Sub
-L2011101-QQ-GS-001
# of
-L2011101-QQ-GS-002
# >C Mea Med Max Min SD Asp
-L2011101-QQ-PA-001
# of
-L2011102-QQ-GS-001
# >C Mea Med Max Min SD Sur
-L2011102-QQ-GS-001
% S Mea Max se Boiling W Termination n 0 le 2-12 Im rvey Unit Surface Area Description rface Soil f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) bsurface Soil f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) phalt f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) rface Scans Scanned an Scan (cpm) x Scan (cpm)
-L2011102-QQ-GS-002
Water Reactor Plan mpacted Cla Sur 7,211 m2 LACBWR
-L2011102-QQ-PA-001
: Building, House, W Co-60 13 0
-a Bold va l ng Water Reac t ation Plan H-3 C S M  -AV  S B 0.518 0.S M 2.040 0.S S  -SB  -SS 11.810 0.-SB 2.500 0.-AV  -SB 1.370 1-SS 0.533 0.-SB 0.525 0.-AV  l ues indicate co n t o r Table 2 C-14 Fe-55 N    .72 7 2.290 2.70 7 2.240 2    .726 2.590 2
0.073 0.077 0.106 0.053 0.016 Co-60 16 1
.731 1.940 2  .560 2.260 3.713 2.330 2
0.052 0.046 0.112 0.040 0.018 Co-60 6
.702 3.890 2 ncentration gre a 2-13 Class 2 Ni-59 Co-60 N 0.096  0.023 .660 0.016 4.950 0.049 4 0.012  0.017 .600 0.035 3.680 0.017 3 0.022 .040 0.007 4.820 0.019 4.880 0.031 3 0.027 ater than MDC.
0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.002 50%
Asphalt, Sedi m Ni-63 Sr-90 N  0  0.030 0.273 0.140 0.523 0  0  0.720 0.255 0.870 0.314 0  0.390 0.291 0.300 0.361 0.950 0.327 0  0 Italicized valu e 2-53 m ent and Soil S Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.011  0 0.016  0 0.014 0.643 0 0.018 0.585 0 0.020  0 0.012  0 0.035 0.532 0 0.014 0.616 0 0.015  0 0.018 0.537 0 0.014 0.595 0 0.016 0.568 0 0.01 7  0 es indicate MD C S amples - Test s-137 Pm-147 E u.137  0 0.01 7  0 0.015 0.705 0.107 0.615 0.080  0 0.013  0.103 0.779 0 0.016 0.697 0 0.015  0 0.021 0.672 0 0.014 0.772 0 0.018 0.717 0 0.018  0 C value. America Lab o u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.041 0.098 0 0.039 0.131 0 0.033 0.108 0 0.048 0.178 0 0.060 0.188 0 0.040 0.127 0 0.09 7 0.205 0 0.03 7 0.119 0 0.046 0.135 0 0.044 0.173 0 0.039 0.111 0 0.052 0.183 0 0.051 0.142 0 o rator y Anal y s i u-155 Np-237 P u 0.033  0.039  0.040 0.022 0 0.049 0.026 0 0.091  0.03 7  0.102 0.023 0 0.041 0.019 0 0.042  0.055 0.031 0 0.045 0.017 0 0.051 0.022 0 0.038  i s u-238 Pu-239/240 P u    0.028 0.025 2 0.045 0.021 3    0.03 7 0.024 2 0.039 0.016 2  0.026 0.018 2 0.036 0.026 2 0.028 0.020 1  u-241 Am-241 A 0.031  0.038 2.470 0.015 0 3.100 0.037 0 0.042  0.031 2.800 0.019 0 2.920 0.020 0 0.040 2.680 0.029 0 2.880 0.026 0 1.710 0.010 0 0.036 A m-243 Cm-243/244    0.022 0.019 0.036 0.034    0.015 0.015 0.028 0.016 0.028 0.024 0.034 0.021 0.028 0.006
7,500 to 8,0 11,500 to 12 r
ass 2 Open L S
rvey Unit L201 R
Adm LACBW Warehouse Gr 0
3 7
6 3
6 0
2 6
2 0
8 0
4 7
2 00 2,000 2-52 Land Surve Summary 11101 ministration WR Crib rounds Cs-137 13 8
0.090 0.100 0.139 0.041 0.030 Cs-137 16 2
0.049 0.048 0.088 0.034 0.012 Cs-137 6
0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.003 ey Units - C Sur 6,785 m2 G-3 Crib Circ. Wa Area Sout Co-60 10 0
0.064 0.064 0.081 0.052 0.009 Co-60 7
0 0.049 0.048 0.055 0.042 0.004 Co-60 6
0 0.056 0.057 0.059 0.049 0.003 1
Characteriza rvey Unit L201 b House, ater Discha th of LSE Fe 0
4 4
2 9
0 9
8 5
2 4
0 6
7 9
9 3
50%
7,500 to 8,000 11,500 to 12,00 ation Surve 11102 LACBWR arge Line, ence Cs-137 10 6
0.065 0.054 0.200 0.030 0.049 Cs-137 7
2 0.038 0.033 0.052 0.029 0.009 Cs-137 6
3 0.048 0.051 0.055 0.009 0.008 0
00 ey  


L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 S S# # M M M M S S# # M M M M S C# # M M M M S S M M ng Water Reac t ation Plan Table 2-14 urve y Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples  
L L
R R
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L a
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L2011101-CJ-GS-001-S L2011101-CR-PA-003-L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QQ-GS-001-L2011101-QQ-GS-001-L2011101-QQ-GS-002-L2011101-QQ-PA-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-002-L2011102-QQ-PA-001-a Bold val ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C
SM
-AV SB 0.518 0.
SM 2.040 0.
SS
-SB
-SS 11.810 0.
-SB 2.500 0.
-AV
-SB 1.370 1
-SS 0.533 0.
-SB 0.525 0.
-AV lues indicate con tor Table 2 C-14 Fe-55 N
.727 2.290 2
.707 2.240 2
.726 2.590 2
.731 1.940 2
.560 2.260 3
.713 2.330 2
.702 3.890 2
ncentration grea 2-13 Class 2 Ni-59 Co-60 N
0.096 0.023
.660 0.016 4
.950 0.049 4
0.012 0.017
.600 0.035 3
.680 0.017 3
0.022
.040 0.007 4
.820 0.019 4
.880 0.031 3
0.027 ater than MDC.
Asphalt, Sedim Ni-63 Sr-90 N
0 0
.030 0.273 0
.140 0.523 0
0 0
.720 0.255 0
.870 0.314 0
0
.390 0.291 0
.300 0.361 0
.950 0.327 0
0 Italicized value 2-53 ment and Soil S Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.011 0
0.016 0
0.014 0.643 0
0.018 0.585 0
0.020 0
0.012 0
0.035 0.532 0
0.014 0.616 0
0.015 0
0.018 0.537 0
0.014 0.595 0
0.016 0.568 0
0.017 0
es indicate MDC Samples - Test s-137 Pm-147 Eu
.137 0
0.017 0
0.015 0.705 0
.107 0.615 0
.080 0
0.013 0
.103 0.779 0
0.016 0.697 0
0.015 0
0.021 0.672 0
0.014 0.772 0
0.018 0.717 0
0.018 0
C value.
America Labo u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.041 0.098 0
0.039 0.131 0
0.033 0.108 0
0.048 0.178 0
0.060 0.188 0
0.040 0.127 0
0.097 0.205 0
0.037 0.119 0
0.046 0.135 0
0.044 0.173 0
0.039 0.111 0
0.052 0.183 0
0.051 0.142 0
oratory Analysi u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.033 0.039 0.040 0.022 0
0.049 0.026 0
0.091 0.037 0.102 0.023 0
0.041 0.019 0
0.042 0.055 0.031 0
0.045 0.017 0
0.051 0.022 0
0.038 is u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.028 0.025 2
0.045 0.021 3
0.037 0.024 2
0.039 0.016 2
0.026 0.018 2
0.036 0.026 2
0.028 0.020 1
u-241 Am-241 A
0.031 0.038 2.470 0.015 0
3.100 0.037 0
0.042 0.031 2.800 0.019 0
2.920 0.020 0
0.040 2.680 0.029 0
2.880 0.026 0
1.710 0.010 0
0.036 Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.019 0.036 0.034 0.015 0.015 0.028 0.016 0.028 0.024 0.034 0.021 0.028 0.006
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 S
S M
M M
M S
S M
M M
M S
C M
M M
M S
S M
M ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-14 urvey Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D ubsurface Soil of Samples  
D ubsurface Soil of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D Concrete/Asphalt of Samples  
D Concrete/Asphalt of Samples  
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
>CL Mean (pCi/g)
M edian (pCi/g)
Median (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
Max (pCi/g)
M in (pCi/g)
Min (pCi/g)
D urface Scans % Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
D urface Scans  
Max Scan (cpm) o r Impacted Cl a Surve y Uni t24,042 m 2 North End of Li cCo-60 3 0 0.070 0.076 0.077 0.058 0.011 Co-60 3 0 0.051 0.053 0.054 0.046 0.004 Co-60 3 0 0.031 0.031 0.035 0.028 0.003 1%9,000 10,000 ass 3 Open Lan d t L3012101 c ensed Site Cs-137 3 0 0.073 0.072 0.083 0.065 0.009 Cs-137 3 0 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.051 0.001 Cs-137 3 0 0.029 0.027 0.033 0.026 0.004 % 2-54 d Surve y Unit s Surve y Unit 11,711 m 2 Transmission SwiCo-60 None TCo-60 None TCo-60 None Taken No Scanning s - Characteri zL3012102 3 tchyard Area P GCs-137 Taken Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Performe d z ation Surve y S Surve y Unit L 31,012 m 2 Plant Access, ISF Grounds Co-60 5 0 0.063 0.064 0.078 0.053 0.010 Co-60 4 0 0.072 0.072 0.100 0.046 0.023 Co-60 7 0 0.062 0.055 0.080 0.047 0.013 1%5,89 06,40 0 S ummar y L3012109 SI Haul Road Cs-137 5 5 0.152 0.143 0.267 0.075 0.078 Cs-137 4 0 0.066 0.059 0.101 0.045 0.025 Cs-137 7 0 0.059 0.052 0.079 0.028 0.019 0 0 L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012101-CR-GC-001
% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)
-L3012101-CR-GC-002
Max Scan (cpm) or Impacted Cla Survey Unit 24,042 m2 North End of Lic Co-60 3
-L3012101-CR-GC-003
0 0.070 0.076 0.077 0.058 0.011 Co-60 3
-L3012101-CR-GS-003
0 0.051 0.053 0.054 0.046 0.004 Co-60 3
-L3012101-QQ-GS-001
0 0.031 0.031 0.035 0.028 0.003 1%
-L3012101-QQ-GS-001
9,000 10,000 ass 3 Open Land t L3012101 censed Site Cs-137 3
-L3012101-QQ-SL-001
0 0.073 0.072 0.083 0.065 0.009 Cs-137 3
-L3012104-CR-GS-002
0 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.051 0.001 Cs-137 3
-L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S a Bold values ng Water Reac t ation Plan H-3 C-CV -CV -CV 0.-SS -SB 18.400 0.-SS 15.500 0.-SM 0.364 0.-SM S B 2.160 0.S M 2.890 0.S S 2.190 0.indicate concentration g t o r Table 2-15 C-14 Fe-55 N   .669 2.180 2
0 0.029 0.027 0.033 0.026 0.004 2-54 d Survey Units Survey Unit 11,711 m2 Transmission Swi Co-60 None T Co-60 None T Co-60 None Taken No Scanning s - Characteriz L3012102 3
  .71 7 2.390 2.708 2.330 2.342 2.710 0 .670 1.950 1.672 2.720 1.676 4.240 1 greater than MDC. Ital i 5 Class 3 As p Ni-59 Co-60 N 0.028 0.035 .020 0.031 3 0.025 .870 0.016 5.660 0.020 3 0.739 0.022 1 0.015 .750 0.021 3.990 0.037 3.880 0.029 3icized values indicate M p halt, Sedimen t Ni-63 Sr-90 N 0 0.590 0.374 0 0.640 0.309 0.890 0.295 0.090 0.152 0 0.060 0.325 0.500 0.298 0.300 0.329 0 MDC value 2-55 t and Soil Sam p Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.030 0 0.026 0 0.02 7 0.521 0 0.01 7  0 0.014 0.550 0 0.01 7 0.603 0 0.01 7 0.360 0 0.013 0 0.018 0.469 0 0.020 0.651 0 0.020 0.631 0 p les - Test A m s-137 Pm-147 E u 0.026 0 0.033 0 0.02 7 1.480 0.113 0 0.015 0.899 0.059 1.090 0 0.020 0.333 0.066 0 0.025 0.818 0.094 0.818 0.138 0.667 0 m erica Laborat o u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.043 0.221 0 0.062 0.271 0 0.056 0.249 0 0.052 0.157 0 0.036 0.128 0 0.04 7 0.116 0 0.042 0.153 0 0.035 0.128 0 0.053 0.160 0 0.074 0.217 0 0.068 0.181 0 o r y Anal y sis (p u-155 Np-237 P u 0.059 0.056 0.069 0.025 0 0.059 0.036 0.039 0 0.054 0.028 0 0.034 0.009 0 0.04 7  0.054 0.022 0 0.071 0.006 0 0.080 0.020 0 p Ci/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 P u    0.046 0.018 1 0.035 0.022 2 0.028 0.022 2 0.016 0.013 0 0.02 7 0.021 1 0.031 0.017 1 0.043 0.026 1 u-241 Am-241 A 0.053 0.055 1.690 0.019 0 0.052 2.590 0.023 0 2.640 0.019 0 0.79 7 0.009 0 0.036 1.610 0.016 0 1.560 0.016 0 1.580 0.019 0 A m-243 Cm-243/244     0.021 0.006 0.029 0.027 0.021 0.006 0.009 0.011 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.019 0.021 La Cros s License T Revisio n  H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240  
tchyard Area P
G Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Performed zation Survey S Survey Unit L 31,012 m2 Plant Access, ISF Grounds Co-60 5
0 0.063 0.064 0.078 0.053 0.010 Co-60 4
0 0.072 0.072 0.100 0.046 0.023 Co-60 7
0 0.062 0.055 0.080 0.047 0.013 1%
5,890 6,400 Summary L3012109 SI Haul Road Cs-137 5
5 0.152 0.143 0.267 0.075 0.078 Cs-137 4
0 0.066 0.059 0.101 0.045 0.025 Cs-137 7
0 0.059 0.052 0.079 0.028 0.019 0
0  
 
L L
R R
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L a
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012101-CR-GC-001-L3012101-CR-GC-002-L3012101-CR-GC-003-L3012101-CR-GS-003-L3012101-QQ-GS-001-L3012101-QQ-GS-001-L3012101-QQ-SL-001-L3012104-CR-GS-002-L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S a
Bold values ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C
-CV  
-CV  
-CV 0.
-SS  
-SB 18.400 0.
-SS 15.500 0.
-SM 0.364 0.
-SM SB 2.160 0.
SM 2.890 0.
SS 2.190 0.
indicate concentration g tor Table 2-15 C-14 Fe-55 N
.669 2.180 2
.717 2.390 2
.708 2.330 2
.342 2.710 0
.670 1.950 1
.672 2.720 1
.676 4.240 1
greater than MDC. Itali 5
Class 3 Asp Ni-59 Co-60 N
0.028 0.035  
.020 0.031 3
0.025  
.870 0.016 5
.660 0.020 3
0.739 0.022 1
0.015  
.750 0.021 3
.990 0.037 3
.880 0.029 3
icized values indicate M phalt, Sediment Ni-63 Sr-90 N
0 0
.590 0.374 0
0
.640 0.309 0
.890 0.295 0
.090 0.152 0
0
.060 0.325 0
.500 0.298 0
.300 0.329 0
MDC value 2-55 t and Soil Samp Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.030 0
0.026 0
0.027 0.521 0
0.017 0
0.014 0.550 0
0.017 0.603 0
0.017 0.360 0
0.013 0
0.018 0.469 0
0.020 0.651 0
0.020 0.631 0
ples - Test Am s-137 Pm-147 Eu 0.026 0
0.033 0
0.027 1.480 0
.113 0
0.015 0.899 0
.059 1.090 0
0.020 0.333 0
.066 0
0.025 0.818 0
.094 0.818 0
.138 0.667 0
merica Laborato u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.043 0.221 0
0.062 0.271 0
0.056 0.249 0
0.052 0.157 0
0.036 0.128 0
0.047 0.116 0
0.042 0.153 0
0.035 0.128 0
0.053 0.160 0
0.074 0.217 0
0.068 0.181 0
ory Analysis (p u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.059 0.056 0.069 0.025 0
0.059 0.036 0.039 0
0.054 0.028 0
0.034 0.009 0
0.047 0.054 0.022 0
0.071 0.006 0
0.080 0.020 0
pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.018 1
0.035 0.022 2
0.028 0.022 2
0.016 0.013 0
0.027 0.021 1
0.031 0.017 1
0.043 0.026 1
u-241 Am-241 A
0.053 0.055 1.690 0.019 0
0.052 2.590 0.023 0
2.640 0.019 0
0.797 0.009 0
0.036 1.610 0.016 0
1.560 0.016 0
1.580 0.019 0
Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.021 0.006 0.029 0.027 0.021 0.006 0.009 0.011 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.019 0.021  
 
La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 T
B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.950
-0.162 9.130 0.000 11.500 39.300 6.910
-0.120 0.024 7500 2.580 0.266 0.369 0.009 0.176 0.132 0.902 0.407 0.028 0.0579 B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 7.240
-0.492 9.450 0.000 57.700 202.000 34.500 0.191
-0.189 614.000 0.768 0.335
-0.429 0.000 0.528 0.491 7.470 1.450 0.052 0.0879 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-16 CJ-FC-001-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.590 1
1.400 0
16.000 7
0.254 0
0.377 1
0.402 4
0.043 0
0.312 0
0.566 0
7.090 78 9.020 5
2.410 0
4.440 1
0.042 0
0.056 0
0.048 0
2.700 1
0.048 0
0.046 0
0.0302 0.
CJ-FC-003-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.360 1
1.460 0
9.040 4
0.365 0
0.333 5
0.593 21 0.040 3
0.392 0
0.586 0
0.732 64 2.870 1
5.460 0
1.510 0
0.041 0
0.058 0
0.030 0
2.640 2
0.047 0
0.027 0
0.0408 0.
r Concrete 0-1/2 B
R pCi/g)
(p
.350 9
.793
-0
.880 10
.325 0
.250 0
.110 3
.680 0
.189 0
.330 0
1.000 9
.230
-0
.398 0
.140 0
.021
-0
.065
-0
.055
-0
.660
-1
.107 0
.030 0
0371
-0 0-1/2 B
R pCi/g)
(p
.580 12
.806
-0
.950 6
.806 0
.880 0
1.100 2
.330 0
.203
-0
.330
-0 4.000 2
.300 0
.536 0
.914
-0
.016
-0
.111
-0
.104
-0
.160
-1
.250 0
.033 0
0496 0.
2-56 Core Isotop B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
9.720 1.56 0.346 1.44 0.400 21.3 0.000 0.26 0.082 0.16 3.850 0.42 0.162 0.05 0.001 0.13 0.076 0.52 9.660 0.15 0.039 0.51 0.025 1.26 0.071 0.37 0.002 0.04 0.017 0.06 0.006 0.04 1.510 2.50 0.011 0.03 0.014 0.03
.0081 0.04 B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
2.600 1.57 0.566 1.39 6.160 14.3 0.000 0.25 0.435 0.05 2.990 0.40 0.304 0.05 0.001 0.15 0.129 0.59 2.450 0.11 0.045 0.34 0.179 1.02 0.007 0.28 0.010 0.05 0.005 0.06 0.004 0.04 1.320 2.66 0.018 0.03 0.009 0.03
.0000 0.01 pic Analysis C-001-CV 1/2-1 DC
 
/g)
(pCi/g) 60 1.950 40 0.806 300 10.200 64 0.151 68 0.078 25 0.474 51 0.041 39 0.078 26 0.310 52 1.100 11 0.055 60 0.171 76 0.118 45 0.017 66 0.026 49 0.018 00 1.360 37 0.020 30 0.019 478 0.0094 C-003-CV 1/2-1 DC
 
/g)
(pCi/g) 70 2.240 90 0.765 300 6.960 57 0.157 57 0.096 00 0.392 51 0.052 53 0.086 96 0.339 13 0.348 46 0.154 20 0.383 82 0.164 51 0.018 64 0.029 47 0.017 60 1.480 38 0.024 30 0.016 68 0.0047 s Results B1001 Result (pCi/g) 3.640
-0.270 0
11.300 0.000 0.800 4.860 11.600
-0.017
-0.104 450.00 0.173
-0.008 0.145
-0.010 0.575 0.715 13.200 0.550
-0.036 4
0.1540 B1001 Result (pCi/g) 4.490
-0.555 7.600 0.000 28.100 88.300 11.000
-0.016 0.153 213.00 0.162 0.557 0.108
-0.020 0.413 0.336
-7.720 0.614 0.052 7
-0.0547 101-CJ-FC-002 t
MDC (pCi/g) 1.620 0
1.410 0
9.950 0.289 0.117 0.492 0
0.046 7
0.165 4
0.564 0
0.597 2.150 8
1.460 0.837 0
0.042 0.617 0.466 0
23.500 0.401 6
0.433 0
0.4670 101-CJ-FC-004 t
MDC (pCi/g) 1.590 5
1.450 7.070 0.276 0
0.190 0
0.467 0
0.045 6
0.264 0.592 0
0.439 1.570 3.070 0.850 0
0.060 0.426 0.325 0
26.000 0.441 0.292 7
0.4320
-CV 0-1/2
 
(pCi/g) 1.330 0.794 5.540 0.183 0.172 0.581 1.130 0.095 0.322 46.900 0.924 0.820 0.503 0.009 0.436 0.413 15.100 0.419 0.140 0.2600
-CV 0-1/2


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244
(pCi/g) 1.420 0.795 4.040 0.467 2.950 9.200 1.070 0.155 0.352 22.200 0.611 0.863 0.138 0.020 0.320 0.265 14.400 0.436 0.136 0.0776


H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240  
La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 2.960
-0.077 8.070 2.590 73.900 221.000 32.800
-0.089 0.178 65.700 0.395 0.637 0.011 0.005 0.706 0.489 9.090 1.590 0.048 0.1160 B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.590
-0.246 6.030 0.000
-0.026 2.310 0.146 0.019 0.024 1.410 0.021 0.055 0.003 0.003
-0.004 0.035
-1.890 0.006
-0.002
-0.0036 Water Reactor Plan
-16 (continu CJ-FC-005-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.520 1
1.410 0
9.770 5
0.267 0
0.372 7
0.427 23 0.043 3
0.531 0
0.562 0
0.569 6
1.240 0
5.650 0
0.699 0
0.015 0
0.065 0
0.035 0
2.540 2
0.045 0
0.031 0
0.0443 0.
CJ-WC-006-CV MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.640 1
1.490 0
14.500 7
0.257 0
0.207 0
0.396 0
0.038 0
0.141 0
0.556 0
0.153 0
0.434 0
1.270 0
0.336 0
0.045 0
0.043 0
0.033 0
2.360 1
0.036 0
0.031 0
0.0287 0.
r ued)
Co 0-1/2 B
R pCi/g)
(p
.200 4
.810
-0
.230 8
.813 0
.510 0
3.000 4
.170 0
.317
-0
.336
-0
.970 0
.746 0
.831 0
.414 0
.010
-0
.134
-0
.106
-0
.270 0
.273 0
.034
-0 0590 0
1/2-1 R
pCi/g)
(p
.350 0
.836 0
.050 1
.147 0
.240 0
.335 2
.034 0
.060 0
.324
-0
.258 16
.113 0
.137 0
.196 0
.021 0
.016 0
.028
-0
.270
-1
.017 0
.005
-0 0052 0
2-57 oncrete Cor B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
4.180 1.85 0.701 1.35 8.170 9.87 0.000 0.27 0.075 0.17 4.870 0.43 0.423 0.05 0.015 0.12 0.124 0.54 0.801 0.11 0.001 0.37 0.119 0.92 0.013 0.25 0.017 0.05 0.003 0.05 0.008 0.03 0.337 2.53 0.012 0.01 0.002 0.05
.0000 0.01 B1008101-CJ-Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
0.382 0.94 0.053 1.37 1.610 6.55 0.000 0.23 0.662 0.06 2.730 0.35 0.154 0.05 0.000 0.21 0.010 0.57 6.000 0.17 0.034 0.63 0.060 1.20 0.140 0.35 0.003 0.04 0.018 0.06 0.011 0.05 1.120 2.71 0.020 0.04 0.002 0.04
.0062 0.01 re Isotopic A C-005-CV 1/2-1 DC


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 T B1001101-CResult (pCi/g) 3.950 -0.162 9.130 0.000 11.500 39.300 6.910 -0.120 0.024 7500 2.580 0.266 0.369 0.009 0.176 0.132 0.902 0.407 0.028 0.0579  B1001101-CResult (pCi/g) 7.240 -0.492 9.450 0.000 57.700 202.000 34.500 0.191 -0.189 614.000 0.768 0.335 -0.429 0.000 0.528 0.491 7.470 1.450 0.052 0.0879 W ater Reacto r Plan T able 2-16 C J-FC-001-CV 0MDC (pCi/g) (p1.590 11.400 016.000 70.254 00.377 10.402 40.043 00.312 00.566 07.090 789.020 52.410 04.440 10.042 00.056 00.048 02.700 10.048 00.046 00.0302 0. C J-FC-003-CV 0MDC (pCi/g) (p1.360 11.460 09.040 40.365 00.333 50.593 2 10.040 30.392 00.586 00.732 6 42.870 15.460 01.510 00.041 00.058 00.030 02.640 20.047 00.027 00.0408 0. r Concrete 0-1/2  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.350  9.793  -0.880  1 0.325  0.250  0.110  3.680  0.189  0.330  01.000  9.230  -0.398  0.140  0.021  -0.065  -0.055  -0.660  -1.107  0.030  00371  -0  0-1/2  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.580  1 2.806  -0.950  6.806  0.880  0 1.100  2.330  0.203  -0.330  -0 4.000  2.300  0.536  0.914  -0.016  -0.111  -0.104  -0.160  -1.250  0.033  00496  0.2-56 Core Isoto p B 1001101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/9.720 1.5 6 0.346 1.4 4 0.400 21.3 0.000 0.2 6 0.082 0.1 6 3.850 0.4 2 0.162 0.0 5 0.001 0.1 3 0.076 0.5 2 9.660 0.1 5 0.039 0.5 1 0.025 1.2 6 0.071 0.3 7 0.002 0.0 4 0.017 0.0 6 0.006 0.0 4 1.510 2.5 0 0.011 0.0 3 0.014 0.0 3.0081 0.0 4 B 1001101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/2.600 1.5 7 0.566 1.3 9 6.160 14.3 0.000 0.2 5 0.435 0.0 5 2.990 0.4 0 0.304 0.0 5 0.001 0.1 5 0.129 0.5 9 2.450 0.1 1 0.045 0.3 4 0.179 1.0 2 0.007 0.2 8 0.010 0.0 5 0.005 0.0 6 0.004 0.0 4 1.320 2.6 6 0.018 0.0 3 0.009 0.0 3.0000 0.01 p ic Anal y si s C-001-CV 1/2-1 D C /g) (pCi/g)60 1.950 40 0.806 300 10.20 0 64 0.151 68 0.078 25 0.474 51 0.041 39 0.078 26 0.310 52 1.100 11 0.055 60 0.171 76 0.118 45 0.017 66 0.026 49 0.018 00 1.360 37 0.020 30 0.019 478 0.009 4 C-003-CV 1/2-1 D C /g) (pCi/g)70 2.240 90 0.765 300 6.960 57 0.157 57 0.096 00 0.392 51 0.052 53 0.086 96 0.339 13 0.348 46 0.154 20 0.383 82 0.164 51 0.018 64 0.029 47 0.017 60 1.480 38 0.024 30 0.01668 0.004 7 s Results B1001 Resul t (pCi/g) 3.640  -0.27 0 0  11.30 0 0.000  0.800  4.860  11.60 0 -0.01 7 -0.10 4 450.00 0.173  -0.00 8 0.145  -0.01 0 0.575  0.715  13.20 0 0.550  -0.03 6 4  0.154 0  B1001 Resul t (pCi/g) 4.490  -0.55 5 7.600  0.000  28.10 0 88.30 0 11.00 0 -0.01 6 0.153  213.00 0.162  0.557  0.108  -0.02 0 0.413  0.336  -7.72 0 0.614  0.052 7  -0.054 7 101-CJ-FC-002 t MDC  (pCi/g) 1.620 0 1.410 0 9.950 0.289 0.117 0.492 0 0.046 7 0.165 4 0.564 0 0.597 2.150 8 1.460 0.837 0 0.042 0.617 0.466 0 23.500 0.401 6 0.433 0 0.4670  101-CJ-FC-004 t MDC  (pCi/g) 1.590 5 1.450 7.070 0.276 0 0.190 0 0.467 0 0.045 6 0.264 0.592 0 0.439 1.570 3.070 0.850 0 0.060 0.426 0.325 0 26.000 0.441 0.292 7 0.4320 -CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 1.330 0.794 5.540 0.183 0.172 0.581 1.130 0.095 0.322 46.900 0.924 0.820 0.503 0.009 0.436 0.413 15.100 0.419 0.140 0.2600  -CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 1.420 0.795 4.040 0.467 2.950 9.200 1.070 0.155 0.352 22.200 0.611 0.863 0.138 0.020 0.320 0.265 14.400 0.436 0.136 0.0776 La Cros s License T Revisio n H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240
i/g)
(pCi/g) 50 1.520 50 0.733 70 5.340 70 0.165 71 0.080 30 0.570 51 0.063 28 0.074 40 0.307 17 0.172 73 0.005 23 0.245 55 0.148 54 0.016 53 0.023 38 0.008 30 1.510 18 0.017 54 0.022 76 0.0049
-FC-002-CV DC


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244
i/g)
(pCi/g) 40 0.559 70 0.794 50 3.370 34 0.151 65 0.131 53 0.355 53 0.041 11 0.066 79 0.335 77 1.780 33 0.056 00 0.239 57 0.215 48 0.022 60 0.033 54 0.019 10 1.480 42 0.027 44 0.017 87 0.0125 Analysis Re B1001 Result (pCi/g) 4.210 0.077 11.700 0.000 2.040 13.400 7.150 0.026 0.083 1490 0.031 0.128 0.737
-0.013 0.029 0.035
-1.380 0.048 0.003
-0.0053 B10 Result (pCi/g) 1.300
-0.296 6.460 0.000 0.974 4.400 0.235 0.016
-0.005 10.000 0.291 0.019 0.101
-0.024 0.042 0.008
-0.194 0.019
-0.001
-0.0056 esults 101-CJ-WC-006 t
MDC
)
(pCi/g) 1.700 1.440 0
9.320 0.263 0.047 0
0.420 0.034 0.154 0.580 0.721 3.660 1.190 1.470 0.044 0.037 0.025 2.650 0.052 0.029 3
0.0419 008101-CJ-FC-0 t
MDC
)
(pCi/g) 1.020 1.440 14.500 0.241 0.142 0.356 0.035 0.141 0.592 0
0.154 0.470 1.410 0.348 0.068 0.057 0.034 2.550 0.051 0.052 6
0.0444 6-CV 0-1/2


H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Table 2-B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 2.960 -0.077 8.070 2.590 73.900 221.000 32.800 -0.089 0.178 65.700 0.395 0.637 0.011 0.005 0.706 0.489 9.090 1.590 0.048 0.1160  B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.590 -0.246 6.030 0.000 -0.026 2.310 0.146 0.019 0.024 1.410 0.021 0.055 0.003 0.003 -0.004 0.035 -1.890 0.006 -0.002 -0.0036 W ater Reacto r Plan -16 (contin u C J-FC-005-CV 0MDC (pCi/g) (p1.520 11.410 09.770 50.267 00.372 70.427 2 30.043 30.531 00.562 00.569 61.240 05.650 00.699 00.015 00.065 00.035 02.540 20.045 00.031 00.0443 0. C J-WC-006-CV MDC (pCi/g) (p1.640 11.490 014.500 70.257 00.207 00.396 00.038 00.141 00.556 00.153 00.434 01.270 00.336 00.045 00.043 00.033 02.360 10.036 00.031 00.0287 0. r u ed) C o 0-1/2  B  R pCi/g)  (p.200  4.810  -0.230  8.813  0.510  0 3.000  4.170  0.317  -0.336  -0.970  0.746  0.831  0.414  0.010  -0.134  -0.106  -0.270  0.273  0.034  -00590  0  1/2-1    R pCi/g)  (p.350  0.836  0.050  1.147  0.240  0.335  2.034  0.060  0.324  -0.258  1 6.113  0.137  0.196  0.021  0.016  0.028  -0.270  -1.017  0.005  -00052  0 2-57 o ncrete Co r B 1001101-CJ-F C Result M D pCi/g) (pCi/4.180 1.8 5 0.701 1.3 5 8.170 9.8 7 0.000 0.2 7 0.075 0.1 7 4.870 0.4 3 0.423 0.0 5 0.015 0.1 2 0.124 0.5 4 0.801 0.1 1 0.001 0.3 7 0.119 0.9 2 0.013 0.2 5 0.017 0.0 5 0.003 0.0 5 0.008 0.0 3 0.337 2.5 3 0.012 0.0 1 0.002 0.0 5.0000 0.01 B1008101-CJ
(pCi/g) 1.440 0.832 5.530 0.230 0.264 1.430 0.703 0.090 0.341 155.000 2.210 0.679 0.896 0.010 0.027 0.026 1.470 0.041 0.011 0.0075 003-CV  
-Result M D pCi/g) (pCi/0.382 0.9 4 0.053 1.3 7 1.610 6.5 5 0.000 0.2 3 0.662 0.0 6 2.730 0.3 5 0.154 0.0 5 0.000 0.2 1 0.010 0.5 7 6.000 0.1 7 0.034 0.6 3 0.060 1.2 0 0.140 0.3 5 0.003 0.0 4 0.018 0.0 6 0.011 0.0 5 1.120 2.7 1 0.020 0.0 4 0.002 0.0 4.0062 0.01 r e Isotopic A C-005-CV 1/2-1 D C  i/g) (pCi/g)50 1.520 50 0.733 70 5.340 70 0.165 71 0.080 30 0.570 51 0.063 28 0.074 40 0.307 17 0.172 73 0.005 23 0.245 55 0.148 54 0.016 53 0.023 38 0.008 30 1.510 18 0.017 54 0.02276 0.0049 -FC-002-CV D C  i/g) (pCi/g)40 0.559 70 0.794 50 3.370 34 0.151 65 0.131 53 0.355 53 0.041 11 0.066 79 0.335 77 1.780 33 0.056 00 0.239 57 0.215 48 0.022 60 0.033 54 0.019 10 1.480 42 0.027 44 0.01787 0.0125 A nal y sis Re B1001 Resul t  (pCi/g) 4.210  0.077  11.70 0 0.000  2.040  13.40 0 7.150  0.026  0.083  1490  0.031  0.128  0.737  -0.013 0.029  0.035  -1.380 0.048  0.003  -0.005 3  B1 0 Resul t  (pCi/g) 1.300  -0.296 6.460  0.000  0.974  4.400  0.235  0.016  -0.005 10.00 0 0.291  0.019  0.101  -0.024 0.042  0.008  -0.194 0.019  -0.001 -0.005 6 e sults 101-CJ-WC-00 6 t MDC ) (pCi/g) 1.700 1.440 0 9.320 0.263 0.047 0 0.420 0.034 0.154 0.580 0.721 3.660 1.190 1.470  0.044 0.037 0.025  2.650 0.052 0.029 3 0.0419  0 08101-CJ-FC-0 t MDC ) (pCi/g) 1.020  1.440 14.500 0.241 0.142 0.356 0.035 0.141  0.592 0 0.154 0.470 1.410 0.348  0.068 0.057 0.034  2.550 0.051  0.052 6 0.0444 6-CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 1.440 0.832 5.530 0.230 0.264 1.430 0.703 0.090 0.341 155.000 2.210 0.679 0.896 0.010 0.027 0.026 1.470 0.041 0.011 0.0075 0 03-CV (pCi/g) 0.713 0.810 7.050 0.171 0.162 0.510 0.041 0.081 0.343 1.130 0.270 0.052 0.208 0.025 0.038 0.017 1.470 0.029 0.023 0.0080 La Cros s License T Revisio n  H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244
(pCi/g) 0.713 0.810 7.050 0.171 0.162 0.510 0.041 0.081 0.343 1.130 0.270 0.052 0.208 0.025 0.038 0.017 1.470 0.029 0.023 0.0080


H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240  
La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B100810 Result (pCi/g) 1.200 0.077 6.520 0.000 1.390 4.260 0.216 0.001 0.043 19.800
-0.119
-0.061 0.006 0.014 0.020 0.025
-1.610 0.052
-0.004 0.0100 B1002101-C Result (pCi/g) 0.763
-0.776 3.540 0.000 0.742 3.360 2.410 0.035 0.259 3.630 0.156 0.119 0.159 0.000 0.023 0.000
-0.052 0.020 0.013 0.0048 Water Reactor Plan
-16 (continu 01-CJ-FC-004-C MDC (pCi/g)
(p 0.990 0
1.430 0
11.500 5
0.229 0
0.095 0
0.339 0
0.040 0
0.143 0
0.599 0
0.166 2
0.580 0
1.370 0
0.376 0
0.065 0
0.052 0
0.042 0
2.610 1
0.034 0
0.032 0
0.0150 0.
CJ-FC-001-CV MDC (pCi/g)
(p 1.000 0
1.410 0
5.670 3
0.228 0
0.069 0
0.333 0
0.050 0
0.149 0
0.564 0
0.150 0
0.420 0
1.400 0
0.335 0
0.045 0
0.061 0
0.049 0
2.820 1
0.015 0
0.029 0
0.0143 0.
r ued)
Co CV B
R pCi/g)
(p
.685 0
.829 0
.820 15
.162 65
.255 95
.492 81
.041 99
.081 0
.350 0
.150 4
.344 0
.296 1
.220 0
.035
-0
.030 0
.028 1
.430 5
.035 3
.006 0
0142 0.
1-1.5 B
R pCi/g)
(p
.638 0
.763 0
.150 7
.159 0
.148 0
.407 5
.250 0
.066
-0
.342 0
.493 2
.236 0
.382 0
.204 0
.018
-0
.035 0
.021 0
.640
-2
.020 0
.018 0
0096 0.
2-58 oncrete Cor B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
0.820 0.98 0.505 1.41 5.400 13.8 5.500 0.31 5.000 0.42 7.000 0.47 9.800 0.04 0.098 0.47 0.113 0.56 4710 1.69 0.815 5.94
.250 5.46 0.073 2.12 0.012 0.06 0.920 0.62
.280 0.46 5.240 26.7 3.200 0.42 0.406 0.29
.2020 0.42 B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
(pCi/
0.094 0.91 0.372 1.38 7.770 25.0 0.000 0.25 0.872 0.13 5.730 0.38 0.106 0.04 0.034 0.14 0.032 0.52 2.440 0.14 0.125 0.38 0.271 0.95 0.099 0.32 0.007 0.05 0.004 0.06 0.009 0.04 2.090 2.70 0.017 0.04 0.029 0.02
.0059 0.03 re Isotopic A C-001-CV 0-1/2 DC


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Table 2-B10081 0Result (pCi/g) 1.200 0.077 6.520 0.000 1.390 4.260 0.216 0.001 0.043 19.800 -0.119 -0.061 0.006 0.014 0.020 0.025 -1.610 0.052 -0.004 0.0100  B1002101-CResult (pCi/g) 0.763 -0.776 3.540 0.000 0.742 3.360 2.410 0.035 0.259 3.630 0.156 0.119 0.159 0.000 0.023 0.000 -0.052 0.020 0.013 0.0048 W ater Reacto r Plan -16 (contin u 0 1-CJ-FC-004-CMDC (pCi/g) (p0.990 01.430 011.500 50.229 00.095 00.339 00.040 00.143 00.599 00.166 20.580 01.370 00.376 00.065 00.052 00.042 02.610 10.034 00.032 00.0150 0. C J-FC-001-CV MDC (pCi/g) (p1.000 01.410 05.670 30.228 00.069 00.333 00.050 00.149 00.564 00.150 00.420 01.400 00.335 00.045 00.061 00.049 02.820 10.015 00.029 00.0143 0. r u ed) C o C V  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.685  0.829  0.820  1 5.162  6 5.255  9 5.492  81.041  9 9.081  0.350  0.150  4.344  0.296  1.220  0.035  -0.030  0.028  1.430  5.035  3.006  00142  0. 1-1.5  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.638  0.763  0.150  7.159  0.148  0.407  5.250  0.066  -0.342  0.493  2.236  0.382  0.204  0.018  -0.035  0.021  0.640  -2.020  0.018  00096  0.2-58 o ncrete Co r B 1002101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/0.820 0.9 8 0.505 1.4 1 5.400 13.8 5.500 0.3 1 5.000 0.4 27.000 0.4 7 9.800 0.0 4 0.098 0.4 7 0.113 0.5 6 4710 1.6 9 0.815 5.9 4.250 5.4 6 0.073 2.1 2 0.012 0.0 6 0.920 0.6 2.280 0.4 6 5.240 26.7 3.200 0.4 2 0.406 0.2 9.2020 0.4 2 B 1002101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/0.094 0.9 1 0.372 1.3 8 7.770 25.0 0.000 0.2 5 0.872 0.1 3 5.730 0.3 8 0.106 0.0 4 0.034 0.1 4 0.032 0.5 2 2.440 0.1 4 0.125 0.3 8 0.271 0.9 5 0.099 0.3 2 0.007 0.0 5 0.004 0.0 6 0.009 0.0 4 2.090 2.7 0 0.017 0.0 4 0.029 0.0 2.0059 0.03 r e Isotopic A C-001-CV 0-1/2 D C /g) (pCi/g)85 0.637 10 0.850 800 7.430 10 8.690 20 9.600 72 85.00 0 45 9.600 75 0.149 64 0.333 90 491.00 0 40 1.410 60 1.980 20 1.280 60 0.023 20 0.511 69 0.537 700 16.20 0 28 0.989 96 0.310 200 0.267 0 C-001-CV 1.5-2 D C /g) (pCi/g)17 0.512 80 0.819 000 11.40 0 59 0.188 38 0.161 88 0.646 41 0.032 42 0.083 28 0.308 46 0.343 83 0.195 56 0.406 26 0.196 52 0.019 61 0.030 41 0.021 00 1.460 41 0.025 29 0.026 331 0.015 4 A nal y sis Re B100 2 Resul t (pCi/g) 0.275  -0.01 8 0.547  0.000  1.010 0  5.640  0.253  0.029  -0.10 1 0  3.870  0.039  -0.26 0 0.077  -0.02 2 0.017  -0.00 5 0  -0.98 4 0.035  -0.01 8 0  -0.004 6  B100 2 Resul t (pCi/g) 1.710  15.40 0 0  8.960  423.00 300.00 2360  220.00 -0.35 0 0.792  2540 0 0.510  4.650  1.060  0.024  3.200  2.580  36.90 0 9.080  0.305 4  0.428 0 e sults 2 101-CJ-FC-001 t MDC  (pCi/g) 0.931 8 1.440 5.510 0.245 0.149 0.367 0.053 0.102 1 0.507 0.137 0.444 0 1.480 0.272 2 0.064 0.059 5 0.042 4 2.680 0.037 8 0.054 6 0.0366  2 101-CJ-FC-002 t MDC  (pCi/g) 1.180 0 1.510 5.860 0 0.446 0 0.762 0.661 0 0.052 0 0.935 0.562 0 4.140 13.700 7.170 7.370 0.042 0.497 0.287 0 24.000 0.682 0.388 0 0.5450 -CV 1/2-1 (pCi/g) 0.543 0.824 2.840 0.170 0.168 0.633 0.049 0.054 0.289 0.496 0.107 0.859 0.162 0.023 0.033 0.013 1.510 0.031 0.013 0.0066  -CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 0.846 2.310 3.640 55.200 30.200 245.000 21.100 0.567 0.373 2650 0.956 4.390 0.988 0.027 0.825 0.713 17.100 2.030 0.286 0.4200 La Cros s License T Revisio n  H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240
/g)
(pCi/g) 85 0.637 10 0.850 800 7.430 10 8.690 20 9.600 72 85.000 45 9.600 75 0.149 64 0.333 90 491.000 40 1.410 60 1.980 20 1.280 60 0.023 20 0.511 69 0.537 700 16.200 28 0.989 96 0.310 200 0.2670 C-001-CV 1.5-2 DC


Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244
/g)
(pCi/g) 17 0.512 80 0.819 000 11.400 59 0.188 38 0.161 88 0.646 41 0.032 42 0.083 28 0.308 46 0.343 83 0.195 56 0.406 26 0.196 52 0.019 61 0.030 41 0.021 00 1.460 41 0.025 29 0.026 331 0.0154 Analysis Re B1002 Result (pCi/g) 0.275
-0.018 0.547 0.000 1.010 0
5.640 0.253 0.029
-0.101 0
3.870 0.039
-0.260 0.077
-0.022 0.017
-0.005 0
-0.984 0.035
-0.018 0
-0.0046 B1002 Result (pCi/g) 1.710 15.400 0
8.960 423.00 300.00 2360 220.00
-0.350 0.792 25400 0.510 4.650 1.060 0.024 3.200 2.580 36.900 9.080 0.305 4
0.4280 esults 2101-CJ-FC-001 t
MDC (pCi/g) 0.931 8
1.440 5.510 0.245 0.149 0.367 0.053 0.102 1
0.507 0.137 0.444 0
1.480 0.272 2
0.064 0.059 5
0.042 4
2.680 0.037 8
0.054 6
0.0366 2101-CJ-FC-002 t
MDC (pCi/g) 1.180 0
1.510 5.860 0
0.446 0
0.762 0.661 0
0.052 0
0.935 0.562 0
4.140 13.700 7.170 7.370 0.042 0.497 0.287 0
24.000 0.682 0.388 0
0.5450
-CV 1/2-1


s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Table 2-B1002101-CResult (pCi/g) 0.846 6.180 5.270 0.000 8.270 175.000 3.520 -0.041 0.165 208.000 -0.280 0.255 0.116 -0.019 0.059 0.056 -0.965 0.238 0.005 0.0018  W ater Reacto r Plan -16 (contin u C J-FC-002-CV 1MDC (pCi/g) (p1.120 01.420 125.300 1 10.269 00.114 00.442 1 80.047 00.230 00.522 00.362 2 11.580 01.900 00.864 00.056 00.064 00.049 02.970 10.048 00.060 00.0438 0. r u ed) C o 1/2-1  B  R p Ci/g)  (p.716  0.340  -0 1.400  8.616  0.907  8 8.300  7 0.356  7.135  0.312  0 1.700  1.950  0.259  0.205  -0.017  -0.046  0.040  0.690  1.080  0.028  -00179  0. 2-59 o ncrete Co r B 1002101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/0.836 0.9 6 0.405 1.4 4 8.430 17.0 0.000 0.3 3 8.570 0.1 4 0.600 0.5 4 7.000 0.0 5 0.038 0.2 1 0.062 0.5 4 1240 0.8 1 0.176 2.6 0 0.090 2.3 2 0.004 1.7 1 0.011 0.0 4 0.105 0.0 5 0.126 0.0 3.500 2.5 6 0.339 0.0 4 0.001 0.0 3.0175 0.01 r e Isotopic A C-003-CV 0-1/2 D C /g) (pCi/g)62 0.624 40 0.803 000 8.210 34 0.484 48 0.940 48 7.370 50 0.691 11 0.060 43 0.318 17 129.00 0 00 0.514 20 0.202 10 1.030 44 0.009 56 0.051 39 0.051 60 1.640 44 0.099 37 0.01275 0.0203 A nal y sis Re                      0                    3    e sults     
(pCi/g) 0.543 0.824 2.840 0.170 0.168 0.633 0.049 0.054 0.289 0.496 0.107 0.859 0.162 0.023 0.033 0.013 1.510 0.031 0.013 0.0066
-CV 0-1/2  


La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Ta b W ater Reacto r Plan ble 2-17 19 8 W e Radio n Mn-Co-Co-Nb-Cs-1 Ce-1 r 8 3 Ground w e ll-Point S o n uclide 57 95 1 37 1 41 2-60 w ater Anal y o uth of Tur b A (p y sis from T e b ine Buildi n A ctivit y pCi/L) 63.4 6.4 508 21.4 21.7 18.9 e mporar y  ng L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Ju n  H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a B No v  H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a B ng Water Reac t ation Plan e 2013 MW-2 0 (pCi/L 57 2 6 0 4.0 0 9 0 2.0 5 137 3.9 7 B old values ind i v ember 2013 MW-2 0 (pCi/L 23 5 6 0 4.6 4 9 0 1.1 8 137 4.6 4 B old values ind i o r  Table 2 01-A MW-201-B L) (pCi/L)2 506 0 5.01 5 2.00 7 3.84 icate concentrat i 01-A MW-201-B L) (pCi/L)5 150 4 3.80 8 3.73 4 1.90 icate concentrat i 2-18 2013 G r B MW-202-A (pCi/L) 660 4.76 1.82 4.05 i on greater tha n B MW-202-A (pCi/L) 257 5.26 1.18 6.54 i on greater tha n 2-61 roundwater MMW-202-B M W (pCi/L) (p484 4.51 1.43 3.91 n MDC. Italiciz eMW-202-B M W (pCi/L) (p278 5.41 1.61 4.70 n MDC. Italiciz e onitorin g Res u W-203-A MW-2 p Ci/L) (pC iN/A 424.95 4.12.06 2.04.52 4.3 e d values indic a W-203-A MW-2 p Ci/L) (pC i449 234.43 3.81.87 2.44.41 3.9 e d values indic a ults 203-B MW-204-i/L) (pCi/L)20 397 12 4.36 06 2.18 31 4.11 a te MDC value.
(pCi/g) 0.846 2.310 3.640 55.200 30.200 245.000 21.100 0.567 0.373 2650 0.956 4.390 0.988 0.027 0.825 0.713 17.100 2.030 0.286 0.4200
203-B MW-204-i/L) (pCi/L)35 193 89 4.52 40 1.18 98 4.77 a te MDC value.
 
-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 420 4.26 2.08 3.96 -A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 171 8.24 1.51 7.92 L L R J G A G B H C F N C N S N T C E E E P P 2 P A a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 J UNE 2014 MW- DW3 G ross A lpha 1.26E-0 1 G ross Beta 1.48E+0 H-3 1.05E+0 C-14 2.79E+0 F e-55 -2.00E+0 N i-59 1.83E+0 C o-60 1.02E+0 N i-63 -1.78E+0 Sr-90 6.09E-0 1 N b-94 4.40E-0 1 Tc-99 -8.28E+0 C s-137 -5.97E-0 E u-152 9.48E+0 0 E u-154 -5.24E+0 E u-155 -2.67E+0 P u-238 2.83E-0 2 P u-2 39/240 -9.61E-0 2 P u-241 3.51E+0 Am-241 5.39E-0 2 a Bold va l ng Water Reac t ation Plan MW- DW4 M D 1 -1.33E-01 4.4 4 0 3.13E+00 1.9 3 2 1.59E+02 1.9 40 0.00E+00 -3.
La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B1002101-C Result (pCi/g) 0.846 6.180 5.270 0.000 8.270 175.000 3.520
9 01 -3.12E+01 -2.
-0.041 0.165 208.000
61 3.96E+01 -4.
-0.280 0.255 0.116
70 3.94E-01 2.5 00 -6.14E+00 -7.
-0.019 0.059 0.056
4 1 8.99E-02 8.
-0.965 0.238 0.005 0.0018 Water Reactor Plan
9 1 1.43E-01 -1.
-16 (continu CJ-FC-002-CV 1 MDC (pCi/g)
2 00 -7.37E+00 -8.
(p 1.120 0
21 -3.47E-01 -7.
1.420 1
4 0 2.34E+00 -7.
25.300 11 0.269 0
4 00 3.16E+00 1.3 5 00 1.46E+00 -1.
0.114 0
5 2 -4.77E-02 -2.
0.442 18 0.047 0
2 2 3.36E-02 3.
0.230 0
10 2.70E+00 -8.
0.522 0
3 2 3.42E-02 4.
0.362 21 1.580 0
6 l ues indicate co n t o r M W- D W5 MW- DW7 4E+00 -3.78E-01 3E+00 0.00E+00 4E+02 1.23E+02 97E+00 -5.08E+00 66E+01 -3.86E+01 75E+01 2.60E+01 0E+00 -2.42E+00 40E+00 -4.38E+00 9 9 E-02 1.78E-02 26E+00 7.49E-01 26E+00 -9.36E+00 4 5 E-01 -1.83E+00 43E+00 -5.51E+00 5E+00 -4.73E+00 5 4 E-01 -1.07E+02 2 2 E-02 8.22E-02 1 3 E-02 4.07E-01 39E+00 2.62E+00 6 5 E-03 -1.01E-02 ncentration gre a Tab l MW-B11R M W B11 A0.00E+00 7.33 E3.59E+00 -2.70 E2.45E+02 1.61E+9.06E+00 6.83E
1.900 0
+-3.19E+01 -3.75 E-4.16E+00 2.53E
0.864 0
+8.76E-01 -1.94 E-3.57E+00 0.00E
0.056 0
+7.34E-01 6.11 E-6.99E-01 1.53E
0.064 0
+-5.52E+00 -8.46 E1.24E+00 1.84E
0.049 0
+-9.93E-01 1.48E
2.970 1
+1.63E+00 -2.61 E1.60E+00 -4.47 E0.00E+00 4.09 E-2.54E-02 -3.39 E-5.72E+00 8.38 E1.22E-02 8.37 E ater than MDC.
0.048 0
le 2-19 2014 W-A R MW-    B2 2.13E+00 6 E-01 1.12E+01 4+02 1.60E+02 1+00 1.94E+00 -
0.060 0
2 E+01 -9.20E+00 -
0.0438 0.
4+00 -7.13E+00 3 E+00 -1.39E+00 -
r ued)
1+00 -7.94E+00 1 E-01 6.52E-01 6+00 1.77E+00 6 E+00 -7.41E+00 -
Co 1/2-1 B
8+00 1.37E+00 2+00 1.07E-01 1 E+00 2.36E+00 1 E+00 1.60E+00 -
R pCi/g)
3 E-02 5.40E-02 8 E-02 3.40E-02 1 E-01 0.00E+00  
(p
-E-02 3.98E-03 2 Italicized valu e 2-62 Groundwater MW-     B3 MW- 200-A 6.46E-01 4.04E+0 0 4.14E+00 8.66E+0 0 1.94E+02 5.23E+0 1 2.05E+00 9.26E+0 0 4.39E+01 1.93E+0 1 3.15E+01 -2.18E+0 1.13E+00 1.01E+0 0 1.50E+00 -1.97E+0 6.12 E-01 9.86E-0 1 6.65 E-01 1.08E+0 0 8.10E+00 3.55E+0 0 2.14E+00 1.77E-0 1 1.42E+01 9.71E+0 0 1.69E+00 5.77E-0 1 3.17E+00 -3.63E+0 8.29 E-02 -1.38E-0 2 1.46 E-01 2.68E-0 2-7.39E-01 0.00E+0 0 2.28 E-02 1.72E-0 1 es indicate MD C Monitorin g R e    MW-     200-B M 2 0 0 -2.26E-01 3.8 4 0 -1.79E+00 7.2 6 1 1.24E+02 7.0 3 0 4.84E+00 4.8 4 1 -4.16E+01 -3.2 01 3.32E+01 -1.6 0 -1.27E+00 -6.
.716 0
00 -4.69E+00 1.8 2 1 9.98E-01 6.8 6 0 8.47E-01 3.7 3 0 5.08E+00 3.9 2 1 -3.64E-01 3.1 0 0 -1.16E+01 4.1 5 1 5.60E-01 -2.3 90 -3.44E+00 -2.9 2 2 1.51E-02 5.3 3 2 -1.57E-02 -6.
.340
8 0 4.49E+00 -4.
-0 1.400 8
8 1 9.71E-01 9.4 6 C value. e sults (pCi/L)
.616 0
MW-    0 1-A MW-    201-B 4E-01 -1.04E+00 6E+00 -1.04E+00 3E+01 1.05E+02 4E+00 4.51E+00 0E+01 1.58E+01 7E+01 -7.11E+01 0 4 E-02 1.73E+00 2E+00 -1.91E+00 6E-02 1.02E+00 3E-01 1.80E+00 2E+00 1.17E+00 0E-01 -6.21E-01 5E+00 1.12E+01 9E+00 -2.43E+00 2E+00 -2.60E+00 3E-02 -5.02E-02 8 6 E-03 2.36E-02 8 5 E-01 -1.42E+00 6E-02 3.99E-03 MW-     202-A M W 202-1.06E+00 4.07E-4.34E+00 1.49E+3.36E+02 1.06E+0.00E+00 4.70E
.907 8
+-3.26E+00 -4.54E
8.300 70
+2.49E+01 -1.05E
.356 7
+-8.91E-01 1.02E
.135 0
+-1.94E+00 -3.73E
.312 0
+1.12E+00 6.05E--3.55E-01 1.04E
1.700 1
-3.88E-01 2.73E
.950 0
+-4.64E-01 2.86E
.259 0
+4.11E+00 1.08E+-1.12E+00 -1.18E
.205
+-1.59E+00 -3.49E
-0
+-8.46E-03 1.48E
.017
--2.27E-02 -4.54 E2.20E+00 2.72E
-0
+1.16E-01 3.92E-W-     B MW-     203-A -01 1.74E+00 -2+00 2.27E+00 5+02 2.79E+02 2+00 4.54E+00 4+01 -4.95E+01 -
.046 0
4+01 -2.71E+01 -
.040 0
4+00 3.48E 9+00 -3.70E+00 -
.690 1
3-01 1.17E+00 8-01 1.59E+00 1
.080 0
+00 4.36E+00 4+00 1.48E+00 1
.028
+01 -9.59E-01 4+00 1.93E+00 -
-0 0179 0.
3+00 -4.91E+00 4-01 -5.67E 5-02 -2.27E 3+00 4.07E+00 1
2-59 oncrete Cor B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)
-02 2.94E-02 7MW-     203-B MW-   204-A 2.29 E-01 7.58E-01 5.53E+00 2.69E+0 0 2.79E+02 1.06E+0 2 4.55E+00 4.66E+0 0 4.96E+01 -4.03E+0 1 4.66E+00 -6.22E+0 0 9.55 E-01 1.91E-01 3.80E+00 0.00E+0 0 8.23 E-01 2.01E+0 0.50E+00 2.26E-01 4.17E+00 6.95E+0 0.39E+00 -3.04E-0 1 4.99E+00 2.12E+0 0 3.69E+00 2.36+00 4.05E+00 -4.34E-0 1 5.87 E-02 -5.12E-0 2 3.95 E-02 -2.49E-0 2.03E+01 4.07E+0 0 7.64 E-02 1.56E-01    MW-     204-B 1.27E+00 0 2.57E-01 2 3.49E+01 0 1.30E+01 1 -3.98E+00 0 -2.47E+01 -2.31E-01 0 -1.97E+00 0 6.11E-01 1.28E+00 0 6.31E+00 1.93E+00 0 7.68E+00 6.06E-01 1.66E+00 2 -9.28E-03 2 6.28E-02 0 -1.89E+00 8.24E-02 L L R S G G H C F N C N S N T C E E E P P P A a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 September 201 4 M G ross Alpha 8 Gross Beta 2 H-3 3 C-14 -9 Fe-55 9 Ni-59 3 Co-60 2 Ni-63 2 Sr-90 -1 Nb-94 -9 Tc-99 -1 Cs-137 3 Eu-152 2 Eu-154 -3 Eu-155 2 Pu-238 1 Pu-239/240 9 Pu-241 3 Am-241 1 a Bold va l ng Water Reac t ation Plan 4 MW-DW5 MW-8.47E-01 3.09 E.96E+00 1.45 E.43E+01 0.00 E 9.44 E-01 -2.70 E 9.39E+00 -3.10 E.13E+00 1.64 E.17E+00 1.32 E.79E+00 2.48 E 1.06E+00 5.90 E 9.45 E-01 -1.39 E 1.54E+00 -4.0 0.97E+00 -7.2 4.48E+00 3.00 E 3.31E+00 -3.93 E.69E+00 1.95 E 1.71 E-02 3.69 E 9.28 E-02 0.00 E.18E+00 -3.68 E 1.28 E-01 3.69 E l ues indicate co n t o r -B11R MW-B11 A E+00 2.07E-0 E+01 3.04E-0 E+00 3.44E+
(pCi/
0 E+00 0.00E+
0.836 0.96 0.405 1.44 8.430 17.0 0.000 0.33 8.570 0.14 0.600 0.54 7.000 0.05 0.038 0.21 0.062 0.54 1240 0.81 0.176 2.60 0.090 2.32 0.004 1.71 0.011 0.04 0.105 0.05 0.126 0.03
0 E+01 -3.49E+
.500 2.56 0.339 0.04 0.001 0.03
0 E+01 -8.49E+
.0175 0.01 re Isotopic A C-003-CV 0-1/2 DC
0 E+00 1.22E+
 
0 E+00 -4.14E-0 E-01 2.80E-0 E+00 -1.29E-0 0E-01 -1.56E+
/g)
0 4E-01 9.72E-0 E+00 6.42E+
(pCi/g) 62 0.624 40 0.803 000 8.210 34 0.484 48 0.940 48 7.370 50 0.691 11 0.060 43 0.318 17 129.000 00 0.514 20 0.202 10 1.030 44 0.009 56 0.051 39 0.051 60 1.640 44 0.099 37 0.012 75 0.0203 Analysis Re 0
0 E+00 1.10E+
3 esults
0 E+00 1.69E+
 
0 E-02 -5.50E-0 E+00 -1.10E-0 E+00 -2.29E+
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Tab Water Reactor Plan ble 2-17 198 We Radion Mn-Co-Co-Nb-Cs-1 Ce-1 r
0 E-02 -1.69E-0 ncentration gre a Table 2-19 AR MW-200-A 0 1 2.42E-01 01 2.41E+00 01 6.86E+01 00 -4.56E-01 01 -3.35E+01 00 7.84E+00 0 0 3.56E+00 01 3.62E+00 0 1 1.14E+00 01 -1.43E+00 00 -1.57E+00 0 1 2.17E+01 00 -2.39E+00 00 -6.57E-01 00 -8.16E-01 03 2.65E-02 02 5.83E-02 00 -2.23E+00 02 1.10E-01 ater than MDC.
83 Groundw ell-Point So nuclide
(continued)MW-200-B 2.01E+00 9.11E+00 5.17E+01 -4.98E+00 -4.56E+01 2.37E+01 6.20E-01 -7.87E-01 5.10E-01 -2.68E-01 -1.54E+00 1.94E+00 -1.34E+01 -1.54E+00 -1.64E+00 -6.50E-03 0.00E+00 8.49E+00 2.29E-01  Italicized valu e 2-63 2014 Groun dMW-201-A M1.18E+00 7.36E+00 8.67E+01 2.69E+00 -2.18E+01 -1.99E+01 -7.23E-02 5.00E+00 -1.19E-01 6.56E-01 -7.94E-01 -1.09E+00 4.79E+00 -3.09E+00 -1.48E+00 -3.59E-02 0.00E+00 -6.92E-01 1.40E-01 es indicate MD C dwater Monit o MW-201-B M W1.43E+00 1.03.67E+00 4.8-3.42E+01 -5.
-54
19.28E-01 4.9 42.77E+01 -5.
-57
43.09E+01 -1.
-60
19.50E-01 9.
-95 137 141 2-60 water Analy outh of Turb A
72.15E+00 8.
(p ysis from Te bine Buildin Activity pCi/L) 63.4 6.4 508 21.4 21.7 18.9 emporary ng
2-4.99E-01 6.
 
76.44E-01 -6.
L L
4-1.95E+00 7.
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Jun H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a
91.84E+00 -4.
B Nov H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a
32.53E+00 9.41.94E+00 -3.
B ng Water React ation Plan e 2013 MW-20 (pCi/L 572 60 4.00 90 2.05 137 3.97 Bold values indi vember 2013 MW-20 (pCi/L 235 60 4.64 90 1.18 137 4.64 Bold values indi or Table 2 01-A MW-201-B L)
64.13E+00 -2.
(pCi/L) 2 506 0
08.55E-02 1.
5.01 5
11.41E-01 5.8-5.85E-01 0.02.80E-02 6.
2.00 7
6 C value. o rin g Results (p W-202-A MW-2 04E+00 -2.10E-8 6 E-01 2.30E+18E+01 1.04E
3.84 icate concentrati 01-A MW-201-B L)
+4E+00 -2.72E
(pCi/L) 5 150 4
+43E+01 3.37E
3.80 8
+18E+01 -4.46E
3.73 4
+7 2 E-01 1.18E+2 5 E-01 -8.30E
1.90 icate concentrati 2-18 2013 Gr B
-7 0 E-01 5.40E-4 8 E-02 -1.02E
MW-202-A (pCi/L) 660 4.76 1.82 4.05 ion greater than B
+9 7 E-01 -1.95E
MW-202-A (pCi/L) 257 5.26 1.18 6.54 ion greater than 2-61 roundwater M MW-202-B MW (pCi/L)
-3 4 E-01 2.31E+0E+00 6.51E+6 7 E-01 4.18E+08E+00 -8.41E
(p 484 4.51 1.43 3.91 n MDC. Italicize MW-202-B MW (pCi/L)
-1 3 E-02 3.63E-8 7 E-02 5.25E-0E+00 -1.76E
(p 278 5.41 1.61 4.70 n MDC. Italicize onitoring Resu W-203-A MW-2 pCi/L)
+6 2 E-02 9.48E-p Ci/L) 02-B MW-203-A E-01 1.37E+00+00 1.52E+00
(pCi N/A 42 4.95 4.1 2.06 2.0 4.52 4.3 ed values indica W-203-A MW-2 pCi/L)
+02 -3.44E+0 1+00 -3.95E+0 0+01 -4.95E+0 1+01 5.30E+01
(pCi 449 23 4.43 3.8 1.87 2.4 4.41 3.9 ed values indica ults 203-B MW-204-i/L)
(pCi/L) 20 397 12 4.36 06 2.18 31 4.11 ate MDC value.
203-B MW-204-i/L)
(pCi/L) 35 193 89 4.52 40 1.18 98 4.77 ate MDC value.
-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 420 4.26 2.08 3.96
-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 171 8.24 1.51 7.92
 
L L
R J
G A
G B
H C
F N
C N
S N
T C
E E
E P
P 2
P A
a La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 JUNE 2014 MW-DW3 Gross Alpha 1.26E-01 Gross Beta 1.48E+0 H-3 1.05E+0 C-14 2.79E+0 Fe-55
-2.00E+0 Ni-59 1.83E+0 Co-60 1.02E+0 Ni-63
-1.78E+0 Sr-90 6.09E-01 Nb-94 4.40E-01 Tc-99
-8.28E+0 Cs-137
-5.97E-0 Eu-152 9.48E+00 Eu-154
-5.24E+0 Eu-155
-2.67E+0 Pu-238 2.83E-02 Pu-239/240
-9.61E-02 Pu-241 3.51E+0 Am-241 5.39E-02 a
Bold val ng Water React ation Plan MW-DW4 M
D 1
-1.33E-01 4.44 0
3.13E+00 1.93 2
1.59E+02 1.94 0
0.00E+00  
-3.9 01
-3.12E+01  
-2.6 1
3.96E+01
-4.7 0
3.94E-01 2.5 00  
-6.14E+00  
-7.4 1
8.99E-02 8.9 1
1.43E-01  
-1.2 00  
-7.37E+00  
-8.2 1  
-3.47E-01  
-7.4 0
2.34E+00
-7.4 00 3.16E+00 1.35 00 1.46E+00  
-1.5 2
-4.77E-02  
-2.2 2
3.36E-02 3.1 0
2.70E+00  
-8.3 2
3.42E-02 4.6 lues indicate con tor MW-DW5 MW-DW7 4E+00
-3.78E-01 3E+00 0.00E+00 4E+02 1.23E+02 97E+00
-5.08E+00 66E+01
-3.86E+01 75E+01 2.60E+01 0E+00
-2.42E+00 40E+00
-4.38E+00 99E-02 1.78E-02 26E+00 7.49E-01 26E+00  
-9.36E+00 45E-01  
-1.83E+00 43E+00
-5.51E+00 5E+00  
-4.73E+00 54E-01
-1.07E+02 22E-02 8.22E-02 13E-02 4.07E-01 39E+00 2.62E+00 65E-03
-1.01E-02 ncentration grea Tabl MW-B11R MW B11A 0.00E+00 7.33E 3.59E+00
-2.70E 2.45E+02 1.61E+
9.06E+00 6.83E+
-3.19E+01
-3.75E
-4.16E+00 2.53E+
8.76E-01
-1.94E
-3.57E+00 0.00E+
7.34E-01 6.11E
-6.99E-01 1.53E+
-5.52E+00
-8.46E 1.24E+00 1.84E+
-9.93E-01 1.48E+
1.63E+00
-2.61E 1.60E+00
-4.47E 0.00E+00 4.09E
-2.54E-02
-3.39E
-5.72E+00 8.38E 1.22E-02 8.37E ater than MDC.
le 2-19 2014 W-AR MW-B2
-01
-2.13E+00 6
E-01 1.12E+01 4
+02 1.60E+02 1
+00 1.94E+00  
-2 E+01  
-9.20E+00  
-4
+00  
-7.13E+00 3
E+00
-1.39E+00  
-1
+00  
-7.94E+00 1
E-01 6.52E-01 6
+00 1.77E+00 6
E+00
-7.41E+00
-8
+00 1.37E+00 2
+00 1.07E-01 1
E+00 2.36E+00 1
E+00 1.60E+00
-3 E-02 5.40E-02 8
E-02 3.40E-02 1
E-01 0.00E+00 E-02 3.98E-03 2
Italicized value 2-62 Groundwater MW-B3 MW-200-A 6.46E-01 4.04E+00 4.14E+00 8.66E+00 1.94E+02 5.23E+01 2.05E+00 9.26E+00 4.39E+01 1.93E+01 3.15E+01
-2.18E+0 1.13E+00 1.01E+00 1.50E+00
-1.97E+0 6.12E-01 9.86E-01 6.65E-01 1.08E+00 8.10E+00 3.55E+00 2.14E+00 1.77E-01 1.42E+01 9.71E+00 1.69E+00 5.77E-01 3.17E+00  
-3.63E+0 8.29E-02
-1.38E-02 1.46E-01 2.68E-02
-7.39E-01 0.00E+00 2.28E-02 1.72E-01 es indicate MDC Monitoring Re MW-200-B M
20 0
-2.26E-01 3.84 0
-1.79E+00 7.26 1
1.24E+02 7.03 0
4.84E+00 4.84 1
-4.16E+01  
-3.20 1
3.32E+01  
-1.6 0
-1.27E+00  
-6.0 0
-4.69E+00 1.82 1
9.98E-01 6.86 0
8.47E-01 3.73 0
5.08E+00 3.92 1  
-3.64E-01 3.10 0
-1.16E+01 4.15 1
5.60E-01  
-2.39 0
-3.44E+00  
-2.92 2
1.51E-02 5.33 2
-1.57E-02
-6.8 0
4.49E+00  
-4.8 1
9.71E-01 9.46 C value.
esults (pCi/L)
MW-01-A MW-201-B 4E-01  
-1.04E+00 6E+00
-1.04E+00 3E+01 1.05E+02 4E+00 4.51E+00 0E+01 1.58E+01 7E+01
-7.11E+01 04E-02 1.73E+00 2E+00  
-1.91E+00 6E-02 1.02E+00 3E-01 1.80E+00 2E+00 1.17E+00 0E-01
-6.21E-01 5E+00 1.12E+01 9E+00
-2.43E+00 2E+00
-2.60E+00 3E-02  
-5.02E-02 86E-03 2.36E-02 85E-01
-1.42E+00 6E-02 3.99E-03 MW-202-A MW 202-1.06E+00 4.07E-4.34E+00 1.49E+
3.36E+02 1.06E+
0.00E+00 4.70E+
-3.26E+00  
-4.54E+
2.49E+01  
-1.05E+
-8.91E-01 1.02E+
-1.94E+00  
-3.73E+
1.12E+00 6.05E-
-3.55E-01 1.04E-3.88E-01 2.73E+
-4.64E-01 2.86E+
4.11E+00 1.08E+
-1.12E+00  
-1.18E+
-1.59E+00
-3.49E+
-8.46E-03 1.48E-
-2.27E-02  
-4.54E 2.20E+00 2.72E+
1.16E-01 3.92E-W-
B MW-203-A
-01 1.74E+00
-2
+00 2.27E+00 5
+02 2.79E+02 2
+00 4.54E+00 4
+01
-4.95E+01
-4
+01
-2.71E+01
-4
+00 3.48E-02
-9
+00
-3.70E+00
-3
-01 1.17E+00 8
-01 1.59E+00 1
+00 4.36E+00 4
+00 1.48E+00 1
+01
-9.59E-01 4
+00 1.93E+00  
-3
+00  
-4.91E+00 4
-01
-5.67E-02
-5
-02
-2.27E-02
-3
+00 4.07E+00 1
-02 2.94E-02 7
MW-203-B MW-204-A 2.29E-01 7.58E-01 5.53E+00 2.69E+00 2.79E+02 1.06E+02 4.55E+00 4.66E+00 4.96E+01
-4.03E+01 4.66E+00  
-6.22E+00 9.55E-01 1.91E-01 3.80E+00 0.00E+00 8.23E-01 2.01E+00
.50E+00 2.26E-01 4.17E+00 6.95E+00
.39E+00  
-3.04E-01 4.99E+00 2.12E+00 3.69E+00 2.36+00 4.05E+00
-4.34E-01 5.87E-02
-5.12E-02 3.95E-02
-2.49E-02
.03E+01 4.07E+00 7.64E-02 1.56E-01 MW-204-B 1.27E+00 0
2.57E-01 2
3.49E+01 0
1.30E+01 1
-3.98E+00 0
-2.47E+01
-2.31E-01 0  
-1.97E+00 0
6.11E-01 1.28E+00 0
6.31E+00 1.93E+00 0
7.68E+00 6.06E-01 1.66E+00 2
-9.28E-03 2
6.28E-02 0  
-1.89E+00 8.24E-02  
 
L L
R S
G G
H C
F N
C N
S N
T C
E E
E P
P P
A a
La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 September 2014 M
Gross Alpha 8
Gross Beta 2
H-3 3
C-14
-9 Fe-55 9
Ni-59 3
Co-60 2
Ni-63 2
Sr-90
-1 Nb-94
-9 Tc-99
-1 Cs-137 3
Eu-152 2
Eu-154
-3 Eu-155 2
Pu-238 1
Pu-239/240 9
Pu-241 3
Am-241 1
a Bold val ng Water React ation Plan 4
MW-DW5 MW-8.47E-01 3.09E
.96E+00 1.45E
.43E+01 0.00E 9.44E-01  
-2.70E 9.39E+00  
-3.10E
.13E+00 1.64E
.17E+00 1.32E
.79E+00 2.48E 1.06E+00 5.90E 9.45E-01  
-1.39E 1.54E+00  
-4.00
.97E+00
-7.24
.48E+00 3.00E 3.31E+00
-3.93E
.69E+00 1.95E 1.71E-02 3.69E 9.28E-02 0.00E
.18E+00  
-3.68E 1.28E-01 3.69E lues indicate con tor
-B11R MW-B11A E+00 2.07E-0 E+01 3.04E-0 E+00 3.44E+0 E+00 0.00E+0 E+01
-3.49E+0 E+01
-8.49E+0 E+00 1.22E+0 E+00  
-4.14E-0 E-01 2.80E-0 E+00  
-1.29E-0 0E-01
-1.56E+0 4E-01 9.72E-0 E+00 6.42E+0 E+00 1.10E+0 E+00 1.69E+0 E-02
-5.50E-0 E+00
-1.10E-0 E+00
-2.29E+0 E-02
-1.69E-0 ncentration grea Table 2-19 AR MW-200-A 01 2.42E-01 01 2.41E+00 01 6.86E+01 00
-4.56E-01 01
-3.35E+01 00 7.84E+00 00 3.56E+00 01 3.62E+00 01 1.14E+00 01
-1.43E+00 00
-1.57E+00 01 2.17E+01 00
-2.39E+00 00
-6.57E-01 00
-8.16E-01 03 2.65E-02 02 5.83E-02 00
-2.23E+00 02 1.10E-01 ater than MDC.
(continued)
MW-200-B 2.01E+00 9.11E+00 5.17E+01
-4.98E+00
-4.56E+01 2.37E+01 6.20E-01
-7.87E-01 5.10E-01
-2.68E-01
-1.54E+00 1.94E+00
-1.34E+01
-1.54E+00
-1.64E+00
-6.50E-03 0.00E+00 8.49E+00 2.29E-01 Italicized value 2-63 2014 Ground MW-201-A M
1.18E+00 7.36E+00 8.67E+01 2.69E+00
-2.18E+01
-1.99E+01
-7.23E-02 5.00E+00
-1.19E-01 6.56E-01
-7.94E-01
-1.09E+00 4.79E+00
-3.09E+00
-1.48E+00
-3.59E-02 0.00E+00
-6.92E-01 1.40E-01 es indicate MDC dwater Monito MW-201-B MW 1.43E+00 1.0 3.67E+00 4.8
-3.42E+01
-5.1 9.28E-01 4.94 2.77E+01
-5.4 3.09E+01
-1.1 9.50E-01 9.7 2.15E+00 8.2
-4.99E-01 6.7 6.44E-01
-6.4
-1.95E+00 7.9 1.84E+00
-4.3 2.53E+00 9.4 1.94E+00
-3.6 4.13E+00
-2.0 8.55E-02 1.1 1.41E-01 5.8
-5.85E-01 0.0 2.80E-02 6.6 C value.
oring Results (p W-202-A MW-20 4E+00
-2.10E-86E-01 2.30E+
18E+01 1.04E+
4E+00
-2.72E+
43E+01 3.37E+
18E+01
-4.46E+
72E-01 1.18E+
25E-01
-8.30E-70E-01 5.40E-48E-02
-1.02E+
97E-01
-1.95E-34E-01 2.31E+
0E+00 6.51E+
67E-01 4.18E+
08E+00
-8.41E-13E-02 3.63E-87E-02 5.25E-0E+00
-1.76E+
62E-02 9.48E-pCi/L) 02-B MW-203-A E-01 1.37E+00
+00 1.52E+00
+02
-3.44E+01
+00
-3.95E+00
+01  
-4.95E+01
+01 5.30E+01
+00 3.67E+00 E-01 1.62E+00
+00 3.67E+00 E-01 1.62E+00
-01 4.80E-01
-01 4.80E-01
+00 8.53E-02 E-01 -1.24E+0 0+00 1.56E+00
+00 8.53E-02 E-01  
-1.24E+00
+00 1.56E+00
+00 4.06E+00
+00 4.06E+00
+00 -3.33E+0 0 E-01 -9.54E-02
+00  
-3.33E+00 E-01  
-9.54E-02
-02 7.08E-02
-02 7.08E-02
-02 9.15E-02
-02 9.15E-02
+00 5.04E-01
+00 5.04E-01
-02 2.51E-01 A MW-203-B -6.68E-01 1.00E+00 1.21E+02 0 4.89E-01 4.32E+01 -4.34E+01 1.99E+00 -1.77E+00 8.70E-01 2.16E+00 0 -3.32E+00 6.84E-01 -1.15E+00 0 -2.31E-01 -3.66E-01 8.12E-02 5.97E-02 -3.71E+00 1.03E-01 MW-204-A 6.00E-01 5.28E+00 6.88E+01 4.73E-01 3.45E+01 -3.13E+01 -3.77E-01 -1.84E-01 9.00E-01 1.18E-01 -1.96E+00 -1.14E+00 -1.92E+01 -4.95E+00 -2.02E+00 -6.45E-04 -5.48E-03 -3.97E+00 1.06E-01 MW-204-B 3.53E+00 0.00E+00 -1.21E+02 9.46E-01 -9.25E+01 -1.87E+01 2.05E+00 3.94E-01 2.30E-01 -1.88E+00 3.89E-01 1.24E+00 2.23E+00 2.36E+00 9.46E-01 -3.26E-02 7.02E-02 -6.46E+00 2.69E-01 L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan Fi g ur e o r  e 2-1 LACB WR Site Map 64 - Open Land S S urve y Units a n n d Classificati o o n L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan o r  Figure 2-2 LACBWR 2-65 Site Map - Bu i i ldin g s Identif i ication La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-3 r LACBW R 2-66 R Site Drai n n a g e and S e e wer Map La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-4 r LACBW R 2-67 R LCE Exc l l usion Area (Class 1)  
-02 2.51E-01 A
MW-203-B  
-6.68E-01 1.00E+00 1.21E+02 0
4.89E-01 4.32E+01  
-4.34E+01 1.99E+00  
-1.77E+00 8.70E-01 2.16E+00 0  
-3.32E+00 6.84E-01  
-1.15E+00 0  
-2.31E-01  
-3.66E-01 8.12E-02 5.97E-02  
-3.71E+00 1.03E-01 MW-204-A 6.00E-01 5.28E+00 6.88E+01 4.73E-01 3.45E+01  
-3.13E+01  
-3.77E-01  
-1.84E-01 9.00E-01 1.18E-01  
-1.96E+00  
-1.14E+00  
-1.92E+01  
-4.95E+00  
-2.02E+00  
-6.45E-04  
-5.48E-03  
-3.97E+00 1.06E-01 MW-204-B 3.53E+00 0.00E+00  
-1.21E+02 9.46E-01  
-9.25E+01  
-1.87E+01 2.05E+00 3.94E-01 2.30E-01  
-1.88E+00 3.89E-01 1.24E+00 2.23E+00 2.36E+00 9.46E-01  
-3.26E-02 7.02E-02  
-6.46E+00 2.69E-01  
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan Figure or e 2-1 LACBWR Site Map -
2-64  
- Open Land Survey Units annd Classificatioon
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-2 LACBWR 2-65 Site Map - Buildings Identifiication
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-3 r
LACBWR 2-66 R Site Drainnage and Seewer Map  
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-4 r
LACBWR 2-67 R LCE Excllusion Area (Class 1)  
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figu Water Reactor Plan ure 2-5 N
r Non Impacte 2-68 ed Open Laand Samplinng Locations
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-6 r
Class 1 O 2-69 Open Land SSampling LLocations
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-7 r
Class 2 O 2-70 Open Land SSampling LLocations
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F
Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-8 r
Class 3 O 2-71 Open Land SSampling LLocations
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-9 r
9 Concre 2-72 ete Core Sam mpling Loccations
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figur Water Reactor Plan re 2-9 (conti r
inued) 2-73 Concrete CCore Sampliing Locationns
 
La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figur Water Reactor Plan re 2-9 (conti r
inued) 2-74 Concrete CCore Sampliing Locationns
 
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-10 LACBWR Si 2-75 ite - Typical Geological Crosss-Section


La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Fi gu W ater Reacto r Plan ure 2-5 N r  N on Impact e 2-68 e d Open La a nd Sampli n ng Location s La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-6 r  Class 1 O 2-69 O pen Land S S amplin g L L ocations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-7 r  Class 2 O 2-70 O pen Land S S amplin g L L ocations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-8 r  Class 3 O 2-71 O pen Land S S amplin g L L ocations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 W ater Reacto r Plan Figure 2-9 r  9 Concr e 2-72 e te Core Sa mmplin g Lo c c ations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Fi g u r W ater Reacto r Plan r e 2-9 (cont i r  i nued)2-73 Concrete C C ore Sampl i i n g Locatio n n s La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Fi g u r W ater Reacto r Plan r e 2-9 (cont i r  i nued)2-74 Concrete C C ore Sampl i i n g Locatio n n s L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan o r  Figure 2-10 LACBWR S i 2-75 ite - Typical G e eolo g ical Cross s-Section L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan o r  Figure 2-1 1 1 Groundwa t 2-76 t er Samplin g W Wells - LACB W WR Site}}
L L
R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-111 Groundwat 2-76 ter Sampling Wells - LACBW WR Site}}

Latest revision as of 21:52, 9 January 2025

License Termination Plan - Chapter 2 - Site Characterization, Rev. 0
ML16200A086
Person / Time
Site: La Crosse  File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png
Issue date: 06/27/2016
From:
LaCrosseSolutions
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
Download: ML16200A086 (83)


Text

LA CROSSE BOILING WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION

La Cross License T Revision 2.

Site 2.1.

2.1.

2.1.

2 2

2 2

2 2.1.

2.1.4 2

2 2.1.

2.1.

2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

2.2.

2.2.

2.2.

2 2

2 2

2.2.

2 2

2.2.4 2.2.

2.3.

2.3.

2.3.

2.3.

2.3.4 2

2 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Characteriz Historical S 1.

Objecti 2.

Method

.1.2.1. Pre

.1.2.2. Doc

.1.2.3. Lic

.1.2.4. Per

.1.2.5. Pro 3.

Operati 4.

Inciden

.1.4.1. Rad

.1.4.2. Che 5.

Finding 6.

Initial S

.1.6.1. Sur

.1.6.2. Sur

.1.6.3. Cla

.1.6.4. Cla

.1.6.5. Cla

.1.6.6. Non

.1.6.7. Cla

.1.6.8. Cla Characteriz 1.

Data Q 2.

Survey

.2.2.1. Num

.2.2.2. Det

.2.2.3. Sca

.2.2.4. Typ 3.

Instrum Concen

.2.3.1. Cal

.2.3.2. Inst 4.

Labora 5.

Quality Summary o 1.

Backgr 2.

Potenti 3.

Non-Im 4.

Impact

.3.4.1. Cla

.3.4.2. Cla Water Reactor Plan zation..........

Site Assessm ives............

dology........

liminary Cla cument Revi enses, Perm rsonnel Inter operty Inspec ional History nts...............

diological Sp emical Spills gs and Conc Survey Area rvey Areas..

rvey Units...

ass 1 Open L ass 2 Open L ass 3 Open L n-Impacted O ass 1 Structur ass 2 and 3 S ation Appro Quality Objec y Design......

mber of Stat termination o an Coverage pes of Measu mentation Se ntrations (M libration......

trument Use atory Instrum y Assurance f Characteri round Study ial Radionuc mpacted Ope ed Open Lan ass 1 Open L ass 2 Open L r

TABLE O ment..............

assification..

iew..............

mits and Auth rviews..........

ctions...........

y..................

pills.............

s..................

lusions........

as/Units and Land Areas...

Land Areas...

Land Areas...

Open Land A res...............

Structures.....

ach..............

ctives...........

tic Measurem of Static Me urements and lection, Use MDCs)..........

e and Contro ment Method zation Surve clides of Con en Land Area nd Areas.....

Land Areas...

Land Areas...

2-i OF CONTE horizations...

Classificatio Areas..........

ments and/or easurement a d Samples...

and Minimu l..................

ds and Sensit ey Results...

ncern............

as................

ENTS on................

r Samples....

and Sample L um Detectab tivities.........

Locations....

ble

... 2-1

... 2-2

... 2-2

... 2-3

... 2-3

... 2-4

... 2-5

... 2-5

... 2-5

... 2-6

... 2-6

... 2-7

... 2-8

... 2-8

... 2-9

... 2-9

... 2-9

. 2-10

. 2-10

. 2-10

. 2-11

. 2-11

. 2-12

. 2-12

. 2-14

. 2-14

. 2-15

. 2-16

. 2-16

. 2-16

. 2-18

. 2-18

. 2-19

. 2-19

. 2-19

. 2-20

. 2-21

. 2-22

. 2-22

. 2-24

. 2-25

. 2-26

La Cross License T Revision 2

2.3.

2.3.

2 2

2 2.3.

2 2

2 2

2 2.4.

2.5.

se Boiling W Termination n 0

.3.4.3. Cla 5.

Non-Im 6.

Impact

.3.6.1. Bas

.3.6.2. Tur

.3.6.3. LA 7.

Surface

.3.7.1. Are

.3.7.2. Gro

.3.7.3. Pre

.3.7.4. On-

.3.7.5. Sum Continuing References Water Reactor Plan ass 3 Open L mpacted Stru ed Structure sement Struc rbine Buildin ACBWR Adm e and Groun ea Groundwa oundwater F vious Invest

-Going Inve mmary of Gr Characteriza r

Land Areas...

uctures.........

es and System ctures Below ng Tunnel....

ministration dwater........

ater Use......

low.............

tigations......

stigations....

roundwater A ation...........

2-ii ms...............

w 636 foot El Building.....

Analytical R levation......

Results.........

. 2-27

. 2-29

. 2-30

. 2-30

. 2-31

. 2-31

. 2-32

. 2-32

. 2-33

. 2-34

. 2-35

. 2-35

. 2-36

. 2-37

La Cross License T Revision Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 2-4 Table 2-5 Table 2-6 Table 2-7 Table 2-8 Table 2-9 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-se Boiling W Termination n 0 1

LACBW 2

LACBW 3

Instrum 4

Off-Sit 5

2005 D 6

Investig 7

Initial S 8

Non-Im Survey 9

Non Im Labora 10 Impact Summa 11 Class 1 Labora 12 Impact Survey 13 Class 2 Labora 14 Impact Survey 15 Class 3 Labora 16 Concre 17 1983 G Buildin 18 2013 G 19 2014 G

-1 LACBW

-2 LACBW

-3 LACBW

-4 LACBW

-5 Non Im

-6 Class 1

-7 Class 2

-8 Class 3

-9 Concre

-10 LACB

-11 Ground Water Reactor Plan WR Open L WR Structur ment Types a te Laboratory Dairyland Ba gative Level Suite of LAC mpacted Ope y Summary.

mpacted Coa atory Analys ed Class 1 O ary.............

Concrete, A atory Analys ed Class 2 O y Summary.

2 Asphalt, Se atory Analys ed Class 3 O y Summary.

3 Asphalt, Se atory Analys ete Core Isot Groundwater ng...............

Groundwater Groundwater WR Site Ma WR Site Ma WR Site Dra WR LCE Ex mpacted Ope Open Land 2 Open Land 3 Open Land ete Core Sam WR Site - T dwater Samp r

LIST and Survey ral Survey U and Nominal y Analytical ackground St ls for Cs-137 CBWR Site-en Land Surv l Pile and So sis (pCi/g)....

Open Land S Asphalt, Sed sis (pCi/g)....

Open Land S ediment and sis................

Open Land S ediment and sis (pCi/g)....

opic Analys Analysis fro Monitoring Monitoring LIST O ap - Open La ap - Building ainage and S xclusion Are en Land Sam d Sampling L d Sampling L d Sampling L mpling Locat Typical Geolo pling Wells -

2-iii OF TABLE Units...........

Units.............

l MDCs.......

l Methods an tudy for Soil 7 Based on B

-Specific Ra vey Units - C oil Samples -

Survey Units diment and S Survey Units Soil Sample Survey Units Soil Sample is Results....

om Tempora Results......

Results (pC OF FIGURE and Survey U gs Identifica Sewer Map..

ea (Class 1)..

mpling Locati Locations.....

Locations.....

Locations.....

tions............

ogical Cross

- LACBWR ES nd Typical M ls.................

Background

dionuclides.

Characteriza

- Test Amer

- Character Soil Samples

- Character es - Test Am

- Character es - Test Am ary Well-Po Ci/L)............

RES Units and Cl ation.............

ions.............

s-Section.....

R Site...........

MDCs..........

Studies.......

ation rica rization Surv

- Test Ame rization merica rization merica oint South of lassification vey erica f Turbine

. 2-39

. 2-40

. 2-42

. 2-43

. 2-44

. 2-45

. 2-46

. 2-47

. 2-49

. 2-50

. 2-51

. 2-52

. 2-53

. 2-54

. 2-55

. 2-56

. 2-60

. 2-61

. 2-62

. 2-64

. 2-65

. 2-66

. 2-67

. 2-68

. 2-69

. 2-70

. 2-71

. 2-72

. 2-75

. 2-76

La Cross License T Revision AEC ALARA bgs CRD DCGL DQO EPA FCP FESW FRS FSS G-1 G-3 HSA HTD IR ISFSI LACBW LER LSA LSE LTP MARLA MARSA MARSSI MDC MDCR MWe NIST se Boiling W Termination n 0 United As Lo Below Contr Deriv Data Q United Force Fuel E Final Final Genoa Genoa Histor Hard-Incide Indep WR La Cr Licen Low S LACB Licen AP Multi-AME Multi-Manu IM Multi-Minim Minim Megaw Nation Water Reactor Plan LIST OF d States Ato ow As Reaso w Ground Su ol Rod Driv ed Concentr Quality Obje d States Env d Circulation Element Stor Radiation Su Status Surve a 1 Coal/Oil a 3 Fossil St rical Site As to-Detect ent Reports endent Spen rosse Boiling see Event R Specific Act BWR Site En se Terminati

-Agency Rad

-Agency Rad ual

-Agency Rad mal Detectab mum Detecta watt Electric nal Institute r

ACRONYM mic Energy onably Achie urface e

ration Guide ective vironmental P n Pump rage Well urvey ey Station tation sessment nt Fuel Stora g Water Reac eports ivity nclosure ion Plan diological L diation Surv diation Surv ble Concentr able Count R c

of Standard 2-iv MS AND AB Commission evable line Levels Protection A age Installatio ctor Laboratory A vey and Asse vey and Site rations Rate ds and Techn BBREVIAT n

Agency on Analytical Pro essment of M Investigatio nology TIONS otocols Man Materials and n Manual nual d Equipmentt

La Cross License T Revision NRC ORC PSDAR QA QAPP QC RCA REMP ROC RPV SRC STS TSD WDNR WGTV WTB ZNPS se Boiling W Termination n 0 United Opera Post-S Qualit Qualit Qualit Radio Radio Radio React Safety Sourc Techn Wisco Waste Waste Zion N Water Reactor Plan d States Nuc ational Revie Shutdown D ty Assurance ty Assurance ty Control ologically Co oactive Efflu onuclides of or Pressure V y Review Co e Term Surv nical Suppor onsin Depart e Gas Tank V e Treatment Nuclear Pow r

clear Regula ew Committ ecommissio e

e Project Pla ontrolled Are ent Monitor Concern Vessel ommittee vey rt Document tment of Nat Vault Building wer Station 2-v atory Commi ee ning Activit an ea ing Reports tural Resour ission ties Report rces

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Water Reactor Plan r

Page Intent 2-vi tionally Leftft Blank

La Cross License T Revision

2.

S In accor Regulato Nuclear character The purp conducte remain.

License T of compl Survey (

1575, Mu Source T terminati The site quantify character site that classifica The cha NUREG-Decomm

Criteria, PG-EO-3 Reactor Characte the Data informati remediat at concen removed The deco waste of LACBW None of radiologi planned a G-3 pow minor str The majo basement se Boiling W Termination n 0 Site Chara rdance with ory Guide 1.

Power Re rization perfo pose of site ed in all are The term F Termination liance survey FSS) for op ulti-Agency Term Surve ion. See LTP characteriz the extent a rization surv will require ation and vol aracterization

-1575 (MA issioning G Final Repor 313196-SV-P (4), and GP erization Pro Quality Obj ion obtained ion planning ntrations gre and properl ommissionin f all LACB WR Administ f the buildin ically impac and these str wer operation ructures will or sub-grade ts of the Re Water Reactor Plan acterization h the requi

.179, Standa eactors (1),

formed at the characteriza eas where co Final Radiat n Plan (LTP) ys that will b pen land are Radiation S ey (STS) fo P Chapter 5 ation incorp and nature o veys and ana remediation lumes, and e n survey w ARSSIM)

Guidance - C rt, (3). In ad PL-001, Ch P-EO-31319 oject (QAPP jective (DQO d from the

g. Materials eater than th ly packaged ng approach BWR buildi tration build ngs and stru cted such th ructures, inc ns. The pub l also remain e structures t eactor Buildi r

n rements of ard Format

, this chap e La Crosse B ation is to en ontamination tion Survey

) in order to be performed eas and buri Survey and S or below gr for a descrip porates the r of contamin alyses have b n, as well as estimate cost was designed and NURE Characteriza ddition, surv haracterizatio 96-QA-PL-00 P) (5) which O) process, a characteriz which were he unrestricte for shipmen for LACBW ings, structu ding and Cri uctures asso hat they requ cluding the G blic roads an

n.

that will be ing, Waste T 2-1 f 10 CFR 50 and Conte pter provide Boiling Wat nsure that th n existed, re is from 10 acknowledg d at LACBW ed piping b Site Investig round struct ption of the results of in ation at LA been and con s to plan rem ts.

d and exec EG-1757, ation, Surve veys were de on Survey P 01, Quality describes p and measure zation provi e shown to b ed release cr nt and dispos WR requires ures and co ib House) to ociated with uire remedi G-3 Crib Hou nd railways backfilled a Treatment B 0.82 (a)(9)(ii ents for Lic es a descr ter Reactor (

he Final Rad emains, or h 0 CFR 50.82 ge the distin WR. These ased on gui gation Manu tures to be FRS.

nvestigation ACBWR. In ntinue to be mediation m cuted using Volume 2, ey, and De esigned and Plan for th Assurance policy, organ es necessary des guidanc be contamina riteria have sal.

the demolit omponents o a depth of h the Genoa al actions; use, will rem that travers and remain a Building (W i)(A) and t ense Termin ription of (LACBWR) diation Surv has the pote (9)(ii)(D) an nction betwe surveys are; idance provi al (MARSS backfilled ns and surve n addition, th e used to ide methodologie the guidan Revision 1 termination executed in e La Cross Project Pla nization, fun to achieve q ce for deco ated with rad been and wi tion, remova (with the e f at least 3 f a 3 Fossil S therefore, n main intact a se the site a at license ter WTB), Waste the guidanc nation Plan the radiolo site.

ey (FRS) w ential to exi nd is used in een the two

1) a Final S ided in NUR SIM) (2) and prior to lic eys conduct he results o ntify areas o es, develop w nce provide 1,

Consolid of Radiolo n accordance se Boiling W an LACBWR nctional activ quality data.

ontamination dioactive ma ill continue al and dispos exception o feet below g Station (G-3 no remediati and function as well as se rmination ar Gas Tank V ce of ns for ogical will be ist or n this types Status REG-d 2) a cense ed to of site of the waste ed in dated ogical e with Water R Site

vities, The n and aterial to be sal as f the grade.
3) are ion is al for everal re the Vault

La Cross License T Revision (WGTV)

(3 feet b Reactor/G sump and In the R removed removed elevation WTB, th concrete the rema cap and p following covered b remainin LTP Cha Independ shown in 2.1.

H In accor Assessm informati

reports, marine f Environm compiled 2.1.1. O The HSA LACBW surround resulted Radiolog subsurfac the 1.5 a informati may also The scop hazardou The obje Id b

se Boiling W Termination n 0

) and the re elow grade)

Generator P d the Turbin Reactor Bui

. All intern

, leaving on n (i.e., concr he only porti footers belo ining structu piles below t g the termina by at least 3 ng backfilled apter 1, sec dent Spent F n Figure 2-1)

Historical Si rdance with ent (HSA) ion, includin pre-operatio fauna and s mental Repo d for this inv Objectives A was a d WR activities dings. The in contamin gically Contr ce soils outs acre fenced ion compile o be used as pe of the us materials.

ctives of the dentify pote ased on exis Water Reactor Plan emainder of

). These re Plant, the on e pit.

lding, all in nal concrete nly the rema rete bowl on of the str ow the 636 fo ure will cons the 636 foot ation of the l feet of soil d structures to ction 1.3.1 d Fuel Storage

) is excluded te Assessme h the guida (6) was p ng any 10 C onal survey sediment su orts to the vestigation.

detailed inve related to r HSA focuse nation of pla rolled Area (

ide of the R LACBWR d by the HS input into th HSA inclu e HSA were ntial, likely sting or deriv r

f the baseme maining stru ne foot thick nternal stru will be rem aining struct below 636 ructure that oot elevation sist of the fl elevation. T license are c and physica o be plausibl describes th Installation d from the sc ent ance provid performed a CFR 50.75(g data, spill urveys), ope Nuclear Re estigation to radioactive m ed on histor ant systems, (RCA). It al RCA but with Site Enclos SA was used he developm ded potenti to:

, or known ved informat 2-2 ent structure uctures inclu k portion of uctural surfa moved to ex tural concre foot elevatio will remain

n. In the WG loors and fou The structur constructed o ally altered t ly occupied.

e site licen (ISFSI) Fac cope of the L ded in MAR and docume g) files, emp reports, spe rational sur egulatory C o collect ex materials or rical events

, buildings, lso addresse hin the owne sure (LSE) d to establis ment of reme ial contamin sources of

tion, es located b lude the Pip f the Chimn aces, system xpose the ste ete outside t on, concrete is the 630 a GTV and the undation wa ral surfaces t of steel reinf to a conditio nse boundary cility as loca LTP.

RSSIM, sec ented in Au ployee inter ecial survey rvey records Commission xisting info other conta and routin surface and d support str er controlled area share sh initial sur ediation plan nation from radioactive below the 63 ping and Ve ney Foundat ms and com eel liner, wh the liner be e pile cap an and 635 foot e other rema alls as well a that will rem forced concr on which wo

y. The fen ated in Lot 7 ction 3.0, a ugust of 19 rviews, radi ys (e.g., site s, and Ann (NRC) wer ormation (fr aminants) fo ne operationa d subsurface ructures, ope d area. The e the same rvey units.

ns and the de m radioactiv and chemi 36 foot elev entilation Tu tion, the Tu mponents wi hich will als low the 636 nd piles.) I t floor, sump aining basem as concrete p main at LACB rete which w ould not allow nced area o 7 of the site a Historical 999. Histo ological inc e aerial sur nual Radiolo re reviewed rom the sta or the site an al processes e soils withi en land area current RCA boundary.

This inform esign of the ve materials cal contami vation

unnel, urbine ill be so be 6 foot In the p and
ments, piling BWR will be w the of the e (and Site orical cident
rveys, ogical d and art of nd its s that in the as and A and The mation FRS.

s and inants

La Cross License T Revision D

n P

P P

P M

D 2.1.2. M The obje may have land area failures r material.

contamin decontam their pote Each inc was furth

analysis, sampling location.

Relevant remediat Also incl R

P p

S id Informat data, eva Units.

2.1.2.1.

The HSA classifica have a p se Boiling W Termination n 0 Distinguish p o threat to h rovide an as rovide infor rovide an in rovide a gra MARSSIM g Delineate init Methodology ective of the e significant as and struct resulting in Dependin nation varies mination acti ential for con ident identif her investiga any remed g, survey, an Historical r t informatio ion phases o luded in the Relevant exce ersonnel int lant personn ite inspectio dentify, locat ion from thi aluation of r Prelim A investiga ation of the potential for Water Reactor Plan portions of th uman health ssessment of rmation usefu nitial classific aded initial c guidance, and tial survey u y

HSA record tly impacted tures. These airborne rel ng upon pa s by area. In ivities and F ntamination.

fied that pos ated. This in dial actions nd analysis i records prov on that bec of the license research ass erpts from w terviews, inc nel to confir on, utilizing te, confirm, is research w results, docu minary Class ation was d site land are contaminati r

he site that m h,

f the likeliho ful to subsequ cation of are lassification d

unit boundari ds search and d the hazardo e included sy eases, liquid ast site ope n order to fac RS planning sed a realisti nvestigation taken to m in an attemp vided the sou comes avail e termination sociated with written report cluding the u rm documen g historic si and docume was used in umentation o sification designed to eas and struc ion (based o 2-3 may need fur od of contam uent continu eas and struc n for impacte ies and areas d interview ous material ystem, struc d spills or re erations and cilitate effec g, land areas ic potential t n focused on mitigate the s pt to identify urce of a vast lable during n plan will b h the develop ts and corres use of quest nted incident te drawings ent areas of c the HSA de of findings, o obtain su ctures as imp on historical rther action minant migra uing characte ctures as non ed soils and s s based upon process was l or radiolog cture, or area eleases, or t d processes, ctive charact s and structu to impact th n the scope o situation, an fy the as le t majority of g any addi be evaluated.

pment of the spondences, tionnaires, o ts and ident s, photograp concern.

evelopment, and the ide ufficient info pacted or no l data) or co from those

ation, erization sur n-impacted o structures in n the initial c s to identify gical status o a contamina the loss of c

, the poten terization, an ures are class he characteri of contamina nd any post eft conditio f the docume itional char e HSA were:

of current, fo tify undocum phs, prints, including th entification formation to on-impacted ontain know that pose lit

rveys, or impacted, n accordance classification those event of LACBWR ation from sy control over ntial for res nd to guide f sified based ization of th ant sampling t-remedial a n of the inc ents inspecte racterization ormer and re mented incid and diagram he compilati of initial Su o provide i

. Impacted wn contamin ttle or e with

n.

s that R site ystem solid sidual future upon e site g and action cident ed.

n and etired

dents, ms to on of urvey initial areas nation

La Cross License T Revision (based o through k is no rea impacted controlle If a land area clas was mad Initial cl historical initial cla at the tim prepared FRS desi classifica continuin surveillan classifica of comm 2.1.2.2.

Records source of for LACB include:

O S

L S

O A

E R

D H

S R

se Boiling W Termination n 0 on past or p knowledge o asonable po d from a ra d areas were area or struc ssification (e e based upon lassification l radiologica assification a me of identifi

. Final clas ign. The ch ations indica ng characteri nce, and an ations (for ex mencement of Docum maintained f documenta BWR, many Operational R afety Review Licensee Eve ite Initiated Operator Log Annual Envir Environmenta Regulatory ac Documentatio Health Physic ite inspectio Radiological Water Reactor Plan preliminary of site history ssibility for adiological p e also docum cture was cla e.g. Class 1, n the inform of LACBW al survey dat and (2) final ication of the ssification is haracterizatio ated in the H ization surve ny other ap xample, from f the FRS.

ment Review to satisfy t ation for the y record type Review Com w Committe ent Reports (

Incident Rep gs including ronmental M al investigat ctions conce on from inte cs surveys an on and survei and environ r

radiological y or previou residual ra perspective.

mented.

assified as im Class 2 or C mation obtain WR areas w ta. Classify l classificati e survey are s performed on data was HSA as descr eys, operatio pplicable sur m Class 3 to w

the requirem e HSA recor es were eval mmittee (ORC ee (SRC) Me LER) Summ ports (IR),

Reactor Ope Monitoring R tions perform erning the sit rviews cond nd sampling illance type nmental surv 2-4 l surveillanc us survey inf adioactive co Potential mpacted, the Class 3) in a ned.

was based o ying a survey ion. Initial c a using the i and verified used to val ribed in this onal surveys rvey data m o Class 2 and ments of 10 rds review p luated. A su C) Meeting M eeting Minut

maries, erator and H
Reports, med by indep te, ducted with r g results asso documents a ey documen ce). Non-im formation an ontamination chemical h en a determi accordance w on historica y area has a classification information d as a DQO lidate or upd Chapter. R s in support may cause d from Clas CFR Part 50 process. Dur ummary of t
Minutes, tes, Health Physic pendent entit retired/separ ociated with associated w
nts, mpacted are nd are those a
n. Areas w hazards incid ination of the with MARS al informatio minimum o n of most ar available wh O during cha date, as nece Radiological of decommi an increase ss 2 to Class 0.75(g)(1) p ring the con the types of cs entries,
ties, rated site per identified ev with identifie eas are iden areas where were classifie dents on ow e initial imp SSIM, sectio on and avai of two stage reas is perfo hen the HSA aracterization essary, the i survey data issioning, ro e in survey s 1) until the provided a m nduct of the records revi
rsonnel, vents, ed events, ntified there ed as wner-pacted on 2.2 ilable s: (1) ormed A was n and initial from outine area e time major HSA iewed

La Cross License T Revision Q

2.1.2.3.

LACBW permits.

allowed D the site, activities Several g licensing U

U U

W L

From Au This peri 1987, and 2.1.2.4.

Interview about the The pers the partic personne terms be site know Between individua standardi site perso the perso memorie operation 2.1.2.5.

Several Several s se Boiling W Termination n 0 Quality Contr Licen WR was opera The NRC Dairyland P to support o

s.

government g, constructio United States United States United States Wisconsin De Local/County ugust 28, 197 iod includes d ISFSI cons Person ws with curre e site and to onnel interv cipants as w el were chos ing investig wledge and e 2010 and als contacte ized personn onnel who w onnel observ s of other q nal period ex Prope on-site prop site events of Water Reactor Plan rol (QC) /Qu ses, Permits ated in accor Operating L ower Coope operations du and regulato on, operation s Atomic Ene s Nuclear Re s Environmen epartment of y Governmen 73 to the pre s power ope struction and nnel Intervie ent or previo verify or cl views includ well as indivi sen due to th ated for the experience th 2011, appr ed as part nel survey w worked at th vations docum questionnaire xperience, or rty Inspectio perty inspec f interest we r

uality Assura and Author rdance with License for erative (Dair uring its ope ory agencies ns, and decom ergy Commi egulatory Co ntal Protecti f Natural Re nts.

esent, the fac erations to 1 d spent fuel ews ous employe arify inform ded a combin idual and gro heir knowled assessment.

hat ranged fr roximately 4 of the HS which was c e LACBWR mented on th e completers r by docume ons ctions were ere identified 2-5 ance (QA) fi izations several Fed LACBWR a ryland) to us erating lifeti have provid mmissioning ission (AEC ommission (N ion Agency (

esources (WD cility has bee 1987, perma off-load whi ees were per mation gather nation of qu oup interview dge of and a

. A number rom the site c 40 recollecti SA question completed v R during its o he questionn s, current on ntation disco made over d which were finding type d deral and Sta and support se any quant ime, and to ded oversigh

g. These age C),

NRC),

(EPA),

DNR),

en operated u anent shutdo ich was com rformed to c red from the uestionnaires ws with sev association r of the pers construction ions of inte nnaire progr voluntarily b operational naire were c n-site worki overed durin r the course e subsequent documents.

ate of Wisco ting Technic tity of radioa implement d ht at LACBW encies includ under NRC own for dec mpleted in 20 collect first-h e records tha s completed veral of the p with the sys sonnel interv n period to sh erest were l ram. This by retired/sep years. With corroborated ing staff tha ng the record e of the HS tly documen onsin license cal Specifica active mater decommissio WR during s de:

License DPR commissionin 012.

hand inform at were revie by a majori participants.

stems and so viewed poss hutdown.

logged from consisted parated staf h few except d either by lo at had LACB ds search.

SA developm nted in the H es and ations rial at oning

siting, R-45.

ng in mation ewed.

ity of Key ource essed m the of a ff and

tions, ogged BWR ment.

HSA.

La Cross License T Revision 2.1.3. O LACBW Dairylan Mississip bordered Mississip LSE com served as confirme road on t th fo an 1

th a

li The plan Chalmers provided LACBW 19 years defueling Operatin No. 56, d 333 irrad into five Limited d ongoing shipped internals Building removed undergro Condens Water Sy Building 2.1.4. In Based on notificati se Boiling W Termination n 0 Operational WR was a 5

d. This sing ppi River so d on the no ppi River an mprising app s the RCA b ed to be suit the south sid he land north ormer Genoa n operationa 75 feet from he fenced ISF small parce icensed site.

nt was one s Company d them with a WR achieved until it was g was compl g License D dated Augus diated fuel as (5) dry cask dismantleme at LACBW for disposal intact, and 2

, and shippe

, including t ound gas sto ate Storage ystem pump ncidents n the review ions, occurre Water Reactor Plan History 50 Megawatt gle unit, also outh of the orth by the nd Highway proximately boundary du table for unr de of the plan h of the LA a Station #1 al 350 MWe m the LSE, FSI facility t l of land to t of a series was the ori a provisional d initial criti s permanent leted on June DPR-45, pur st 4, 1987; a ssemblies, w ks and transfe ent of shutdo WR since 199 l in June 20 29 control ro ed for dispo the spent fue orage tanks)

Tank and s, heat exch w of existin ence reports r

t Electric (

o known as G Village of Mississippi

35. The lic 1.5 acres of uring operat restricted us nt. Other pro ACBWR plan (G-1) coal (

fossil gener that is locate the east of H of demonst iginal licens l operating l icality on Ju tly shut dow e 11, 1987.

rsuant to 10 and a posses which were i ferred to the own and unu

94. Waste s 007. The R ods in place osal in June el storage rac

); Condensa condenser);

angers, pipin g plant reco s, and questi 2-6 (MWe) Boil Genoa Statio f Genoa, Ve i River and ensed site c the licensed tions. Mate e before rel ominent feat nt, including (and later oil rating station ed directly so Highway 35, tration plant see; the AEC icense.

uly 11, 1967 wn by Dairy The Dairyla 0 CFR 50, w ss but not-op in Fuel Elem sites ISFSI used systems stored in the Reactor Pres was filled w e 2007. Oth cks, Gaseou ate system Turbine an ng and comp ords (e.g. an ionnaires), i ling Water on #2, is loc ernon Coun d a narrow omprises a t d site. The erial leaving ease. The s tures on the g the site sw l) fueled pow n (G-3) loca outh of G-3, across from ts funded in C later sold 7, and was yland on Ap and authority was terminat perate status ment Storage by Septemb s and waste e FESW and sure Vessel with concret her systems us Waste Dis and Feedwa nd Generato ponents that nnual and s incidents wi Reactor th cated on the nty, Wiscons strip of la total of 163 LSE bounda g the LSE w site is acces site include:

witchyard an wer plant (re ated south an

, and m LACBWR n part by A d the plant t operated fo pril 30, 198 y to operate ated by Lice s was grante e Well (FES ber 2012.

disposal op d other Clas (RPV) wit te, removed and compo sposal System ater system or; and Com t were locate semi-annual ith radiologi hat is owne east shore o sin. The s and between

.5 acres, wit ary is fenced was surveyed sed by an a nd the site o moved in 19 nd approxim that is part o AEC. The A to Dairyland or approxim

7. Final re LACBWR u ense Amend ed by NRC.

SW), were p erations has ss B/C waste th head insta from the Re onents have m (except fo m (except fo mponent Co ed in the Tu reports, lice ical or hazar ed by of the ite is n the th the d and d and access of the 989),

mately of the Allis-d and mately eactor under dment The placed been e was

alled, eactor been or the or the ooling urbine ensee rdous

La Cross License T Revision material placing t the LSE the struct LSE, wh Special Monitori reports c shutdown around th posing a of LACB contamin 2.1.4.1.

The hist involving potential chronolo T

fl In W

In su In d

st O

th 8

O th 8

O ap In O

in se Boiling W Termination n 0 implication the reactor in and, while c tures and so ich is alread emphasis w ing Reports covering the n in 1987.

he plant site significant p BWR site nation from s Radio torical revie g system lea to affect th gical order a The stainless loor. Inciden ncidents inv Water Discha n 1970, pot uppression o n

Septemb econtaminat team cleanin On Novembe he potential 0-84 Inciden On Novembe he Turbine B 7, ORC-80-9 On Decemb pproximately ncident Repo On December nto the Turbi Water Reactor Plan ns occurred n a SAFSTO contributing ils directly r dy known to was placed o (REMP), fo e periods o Available sa e were also probability o land areas system failur ological Spill ew indicated akages, radio e classificati as follows; steel liner nts involving olving leaka arge line wer tentially con on the license

ber, 1977, tion of a Fo ng tank in the er 5, 1980, p for leakage nt Report, OR er 24, 1980, Building. (D 97, LER 80-ber 6, 1980 y 1/2 gallon ort, ORC-80 r 15, 1980, t ine Building r

between th OR conditio to the radiol related to the be impacte on obtainin focusing on of SAFSTOR ampling resu reviewed. T of impacting and structu res resulting ls d that betwe ological spill ion of LACB in the FESW g leakage of age from the re noted from ntaminated ed site roads removable orced Circul e Reactor Bu artial blocka of drain wa RC-80-71, O residual rad DPC-80-93 I

-12)

, the Turb of waste w 0-71, ORC-8 the Turbine g Basement T 2-7 he commenc n in 1987.

logical conta e operation o ed.

g and revie gaseous an R and deco ults associat The objectiv g the radiolo ures. Thes g in airborne een 1967 a ls, and/or rad BWR structu W had a his f the FESW w e resin regen m 1967 to 19 Control Rod

s.

e alpha c

ation Pump uilding 701 f age of drain ater into the ORC-80-75, dioactive con Incident Rep bine Build water to the 0-75, ORC-Building Wa Tunnel. (DP cement of p All of these amination an of the reacto ewing the a nd liquid rel ommissionin ted with soi ve was the i ogical status se included releases, liq and 1987, th dioactive liq ures or soils story of leak were noted f neration was 973.

d Drive (C contaminatio (FCP) duri foot elevatio lines under soil under th ORC-80-87 ntamination port, ORC-8 ding Waste Turbine Bu 80-87, ORC aste Water T PC-80-106 In plant operati e incidents t nd potential or, were con annual Radi leases since ng activities il and groun identification or hazardou system, st quid spills or here were s quid effluent

s. The incid kage to the R from 1967 to ste system t CRD) oil wa on was d

ing mainten on. (ORC, 0 Turbine Bu he Turbine B 7, ORC-80-9 n was detect 80-71, ORC-Water T uilding floor C-80-97)

Tank overflo ncident Repo ion in 1967 took place w contaminati ntained withi ioactive Eff 1967, inclu s after the ndwater with n of those e us material s tructure, or r releases.

several inci releases wit dents are list Reactor Bui o 2012.

to the Circul as used for detected d

ance involv 09/27/77) uilding result Building. (D

97) ed in soils u 75, ORC Tank overfl
r. (DPC-80 owed waste w ort) 7 and within ion of in the fluent uding plant hin or events status area idents th the ted in ilding lating dust during ving a ted in DPC-under C owed 0-102 water

La Cross License T Revision In w

D O

un O

co in O

si co B

to O

ap b

2.1.4.2.

Between release o ranged fr and fuel impacted policies releases.

2.1.5. F LACBW within its been imp post ope Survey fo for fissio Structure Turbine Stack. In to be dire An area s support b various w se Boiling W Termination n 0 ncidents invo waste water t Discharge lin On January nspecified v On May 31, ontaminated nto the basem On July 02, 1 ight flow se ontaminated Bay door. In o an unrestri On July 16, pproximately asement floo Chem 1967 and 20 of chemicals rom spills of oil from sy d buildings.

and proced Findings and WR was desig s many syste pacted due t erational his or SAFSTOR on products t es classified Building, W n addition to ectly impacte surrounding buildings su warehouses a Water Reactor Plan olving leaka tanks throug ne were noted 30, 1981, volume of wa 1982, a lid d water and ment. (DPC 1982, approx eal rupture t d water flow n addition, a cted area. (D 1983, a leak y 15,000 gal or. (LER 83 mical Spills 014, the HSA s and/or pote f acids and c ystems and These spills dures for id d Conclusio gned with mu ems, compon to routine op tory of the R (7) identifi to enter and i as impact WTB, Low S o the structur ed by the op the LSE ha uch as the L and storage b r

age of potent gh the norma d from 1980 the Turbin ater into the seal failed o spent resin 51 Incid ximately 1,2 o the Turbin wed into the approximatel DPC-82-58 I k in the Sea llons of reac 3-07)

A document entially haza caustics used storage tank s were contr dentification ns ultiple bound nents, and st perations an plant. Dai ied historica impact react ted by the Specific Act res, the soils peration of th s also been d LACBWR C buildings.

2-8 tially contam al effluent re 0 to 1986.

e Building laundry room on a spent r onto the flo dent Report) 200 gallons o ne Building soils outsid ly 25 gallons Incident Rep al Water Inj ctor coolant ted several in ardous liquid d in the plan ks. A majo rolled and re n, control a daries to con tructures. M nd maintenan iryland LAC al failed fuel tor and supp operation o tivity (LSA) s surrounding his facility. T designated a rib House, L minated liqui elease pathw Waste W

m. (DPC-81 resin liner w oor of the S of condensat g floor, and de the Turbi s of contam port, LER 82 njection Syst to be discha ncidents inv ds to the en nts various ority of the emediated in and remedia ntrol and con Many of these nce activitie C-TR-138, I incidents at ort systems.

of the facilit

) Building, g these build This area is as impacted.

LACBWR A id from the T way to the C Water Tank 1-10 Inciden which resulte Spent Resin te water was approximate ine Building minated liquid 2-016) tem leak at arged to the volving the u nvironment.

systems to t incidents oc n accordance ation of haz ntain the rad e systems an es during the Initial Site t LACBWR ty include R WGTV, and dings have a defined by t This area i Administrati Turbine Bui Circulating W overflowed nt Report) ed in the sp Liner Room s released fr ely 20 gallo g door and T d was discha 1A FCP ca Reactor Bui unplanned sp These inci the spill of d ccurred insid e with the st zardous ma dioactive con nd structures e operationa Characteriz and the pote Reactor Buil d the Ventil also been de the LSE fenc includes anc ion Building ilding Water d and pill of m and rom a ons of Truck arged aused ilding pill or idents diesel de of tation aterial ntents have al and zation ential

lding, lation emed ce.

cillary g and

La Cross License T Revision In additi support impacted LSE whi the LSE 2.1.6. In As part o into preli and exist 2.1.6.1.

The entir larger ph classifica efficient identified were clas and are id were clas current c 2.1.6.2.

The surv or open l were deli radioactiv relatively appropria The surv Prior to accordan sizes for The deco segmenta the excep any struc survey u These ob volume c In additio the purpo se Boiling W Termination n 0 ion to the a buildings, t d to provide ich is consid areas compr nitial Surve of the HSA p iminary surv ting survey d Surve re 163.5 acr hysical sectio ation. Surv and practic d in the area ssified as n dentified in ssified as im lassification Surve vey areas wer land area tha ineated to ph vity to the e y compact sh ate for the si vey units est characteriza nce with the g survey units ommissionin ation, remov ption of stru cture will re units have be bjectives inc contained on on, the surve ose of chara Water Reactor Plan area within the open lan a buffer zon dered non-im rising approx ey Areas/Un process, the i vey areas an data.

y Areas res licensed ons of the sit vey area size cal size need

a. Survey ar on-impacted the HSA. S mpacted. F ns by area.

y Units re further di at is surveye hysical areas extent practi hapes and hi ite operation tablished by ation, survey guidance pro s for FSS.

ng approach val and dispo cture basem emain at sit een establish clude provid nsite, and dis ey units estab acterization p r

the LSE an nd immedia ne between t mpacted. Th ximately 1.5 nits and Clas impacted LA nd assigned site was div te that may e was deter ded to boun reas that hav

d. These ar Survey areas Figure 2-1 p vided into su ed and evalu s with simila cal. To the ghly irregula nal history or the HSA w y unit sizes f ovided in M that will be osal of all im ment floors an te closure a hed for struc ding survey d sposition opt blished for s planning and 2-9 nd the open ately surroun the LSE and he licensed s acres of the ssification ACBWR stru area classifi vided into su contain one rmined base nd the latera ve no reason reas have no with reason provides an i urvey units.

uated as a sin ar operationa extent prac ar shapes we r the site top were used as for Class 1 o ARSSIM, se e implement mpacted sys nd walls that and consequ ctures to fac data for rem tions for the structures tha d do not cor land areas unding the L d the G-3 lan site comprise e owner cont uctures and o ications base urvey areas.

or more sur ed upon the al and verti nable potenti o radiologica nable potenti illustration o A survey u ngle entity f al history or ctical, survey ere avoided u ography.

initial surve open land su ection 4.6 fo ted at LACB stems and ab t reside 3 fee uently, be su cilitate other mediation pla waste.

at are 3 feet rrespond to surroundin LSE fence nd and facil es a total of trolled area.

open land ar ed on the op

. Survey ar rvey units de specific ar ical extent o al for residu al impact fro ial for residu of the LACB unit is a port following FR similar pote y units were unless the un ey units for urvey units or the sugges BWR calls bove-grade et below gra ubjected to r characteriz anning, estim below grade the survey u g the LACB is designate lities south o f 163.5 acres reas were div perational hi reas are typi epending on rea and the of contamin ual contamin om site opera ual contamin BWR site an tion of a stru RS. Survey ential for res e established nusual shape characteriza were adjust sted physical for the com structures.

ade, no porti FRS. How zation objec mating the w e are intende units that w BWR ed as of the s with vided istory ically n their most nation nation ations nation nd the ucture units sidual d with e was ation.

ted in l area mplete With ion of

wever, tives.

waste ed for will be

La Cross License T Revision used for section 5 Tables 2-impacted site struc 2.1.6.3.

The follo React Turbi (L10 LSA North The basis soil by r spills of packages Based on subsurfac the unres 2.1.6.4.

The follo LACB (L20 G-3 C (L20 Based up surveys p radioactiv Class 2 o 2.1.6.5.

The follo North Trans Plant se Boiling W Termination n 0 the FRS o

.5.2 of Chap

-1 and 2-2 p d structures ctures. A sum Class owing open l tor Building ine Buildin 10102),

Building, M h LSE Area s for this cla radioactive m radioactive s and contain n an assessm ce soils in th stricted use c Class owing open l BWR Adm 11101),

Crib House, 11102).

pon a review performed in ve contamin open land sur Class owing open l h End of Lic smission Sw t Access, ISF Water Reactor Plan f remaining pter 5).

provide a de respectively mmary of th 1 Open Lan land areas ha g, WTB, WG ng, Turbine Maintenance (L1010104) assification is material in t liquids and ners.

ment of histor hese areas c criteria. Clas 2 Open Lan land areas w ministration LACBWR w of the hist n these area nation to exc rvey units ar 3 Open Lan land areas w censed Site (L witchyard Are FSI Haul Ro r

g below grad etailed list o

y. Figure 2-2 he survey uni nd Areas ave been cla GTV, Ventila Office Bu Eat Shack G s due to a se these areas d resins, radi rical inciden could possibl ss 1 open lan nd Areas were classifie
Building, Circ. Water torical inform as as docume eed the unre re shown on nd Areas were classifie L3012101),

ea (L301210 ad Grounds 2-10 de structure of the survey 2 provides a it classificati assified as im ation Stack G uilding, 1B Grounds (L10 ries of docum during facil ioactive sys nts and event ly contain re nd survey un ed as impacte LACBWR Discharge L mation and ented in the estricted rele Figure 2-1.

ed as Class 3 02),

(L3012109) es (designate y units for b a detailed in ions are pres mpacted Clas Grounds (L1 Diesel G 010103),

mented incid lity operation stem leakage ts, it was an esidual radio nits are show ed Class 2:

R Crib Ho Line, Area S operational HSA, there ease criteria.

).

ed as STS a both the ope nventory of sented as fol ss 1:

010101),

Generator Bu dents of the ns. These i e, and storag nticipated tha oactive mate wn on Figure ouse, Ware South of LSE radiation an e was a pote and discuss en land area the building llows.

uilding Gro contaminati incidents in ge of radioa at the surfac erial in exce e 2-1.

ehouse Gro E Fence Gro nd contamin ential for res ed in s and g and ounds ion of clude active e and ess of ounds ounds nation sidual

La Cross License T Revision Historica in concen Class 3 o 2.1.6.6.

Based on in the HS contamin G-3 C Coal Capp Grou Hwy The non-2.1.6.7.

The follo structure These str radioactiv radioactiv majority React Wast Venti Wast Turbi Diese LSA Main Througho spread o were rou structure structura below gr subjected se Boiling W Termination n 0 al informatio ntrations in e open land sur Non-I n a review o SA, the bala nation and ha Coal Plant G Pile Ground ped Ash Imp unds East of H 35/Railroad

-impacted op Class owing is a li

s. The com ructures con ve waste sy ve material of the curren tor Building te Treatment ilation Stack te Gas Tank ine Building el Generator Building (B ntenance Eat out facility o f loose surf utinely post s involves l material as rade, no por d to FRS. Th Water Reactor Plan on contained excess of the rvey units ar Impacted Op f the operati ance of the as been desig Grounds (L40 ds (L401210 oundment G Highway 35 d Right of W pen land surv 1 Structures ist of the m mplete list of ntain the nuc ystems, and n was routine nt radioactiv g (B1010001 t Building (B k (B1010003 Vault (B101 g (B1010005 r Building (B B1010007)

Shack (B10 operations, th face contam ted as cont the comple s waste. Wi rtion of the he Class 1 st r

d in the HSA e unrestricted re shown on pen Land Are ing history o 163.5 acre li gnated as no 012103)

5)

Grounds (L40 5 (L4012107 Way Grounds vey units are s

major buildin f all impact clear reactor nuclear fuel ely handled, ve material in

)

B1010002)

3) 10004)
5)

B1010006) 010008) hese structur ination, and taminated a ete segment ith the excep se structure tructural surv 2-11 A indicated th d release cri Figure 2-1.

eas of the facility icensed site on-impacted.

012106)

)

(L4012108) e shown on F ngs that were ted structura r, primary re l handling a

, transferred nventory at L res were sub d airborne ra areas. The tation, remo ption of stru s will rema vey units are hat the prese teria was no y and histor has no reas

)

Figure 2-1.

e initially cl al survey un eactor system and storage s d, and stored LACBWR r bjected to spi adioactive m decommis oval, and d uctural floor ain at site cl e depicted in ence of resid ot expected.

rical incident sonable pote lassified as nits is provid ms, reactor systems. D d within the resides in the ills of radioa material. St sioning app disposal of s and walls losure and a n Figure 2-1 dual radioac ts as docum ential for res impacted Cl ded in Table support sys uring operat ese building ese structure active liquid tructural sur proach for all systems that reside 3 are therefor ctivity ented sidual lass 1 e 2-2.

tems, tions,
s. A es:

ds, the rfaces these s and 3 feet re not

La Cross License T Revision 2.1.6.8.

The follo Class 2 o complete LACB G-3 C LACB LACB LACB LACB Back Trans G-1 C Barge These str structure LACBW Washing structure Administ the decom LACBW structure The LAC Switch H unrestrict Supplem Manual depicted Based on in the H section 2 residual the G-3 C 2.2.

C From Oc accordan se Boiling W Termination n 0 Class owing is a li or 3 structur e list of all im BWR Crib H Crib House (

BWR Admi BWR Wareh BWR Wareh BWR Wareh k-up Control smission Sub Crib House (

e Washing B ructures did s associated WR workers g Break Room s because th tration build mmissioning WR Class 2 or s will remain CBWR Adm House will n ted release ment 1, Multi (MARSAM in Figure 2-n a review o HSA, coup 2.3.5), the bu contaminatio Crib House, Characteriza ctober 2014 nce with th Water Reactor Plan 2 and 3 Stru ist of some res. All are mpacted stru House (B201 (B2010102) nistration Bu house #1 (B2 house #2 (B2 house #3 (B2 Center (B30 b-Station Sw (B3012103)

Break Room not routinely d with LAC and therefo m were not a hey reside i ding, the G-3 g approach c r 3 systems n at site clos ministration b not be subj using a gr i-Agency Ra E) (8). The

-1.

f the operati pled with t uildings ass on and have will remain ation Appro through Aug he Characte r

uctures of the major e located wi uctural surve 10101) uilding (B20 2010104) 2010105) 2010106) 012101) witch House (B3012104) y house radi CBWR listed re considere associated w in a Class 3 3 Crib Hous calls for the and structur sure and ther building, the ected to FR raded survey adiation Sur e Class 2 an ing history o the results sociated with e been desig intact and fu oach gust 2015, s erization Su 2-12 r buildings t ithin the lice y units is pro 010103)

(B3012102)

)

ioactive syst d above are ed Class 2 with LACBW 3 land area.

se and the T complete se ral material a refore will n e G-3 Crib H RS. Instead y approach rvey and As nd Class 3 s of the facility of charact h the G-3 s gnated as no unctional for site characte urvey Plan.

that were in ensed site b ovided in Ta

)

tems or mate outside of or 3. The WR operation With the Transmission egmentation, as waste or ot be subjec House and th d, these stru using the ssessment of structural su y and histor terization su station have on-impacted.

r G-3 power erization of L The Ch nitially classi but outside o able 2-2.

erials during the LSE bu G-1 Crib H ns but are co exception o n Sub-Statio

, removal, an salvage. No ted to FRS.

he Transmis uctures will guidance o of Materials urvey units rical incident urveys (as no reasona

. The G-3 s r operations.

LACBWR w haracterizatio ified as imp of the LSE.

g operations.

ut were use House and B onsidered Cl of the LACB on Switch H nd disposal o portion of ssion Sub-St be surveye f NUREG-s and Equip for building ts as docum summarize able potentia station, inclu was perform on Survey pacted The The ed by Barge lass 3 BWR

House, of all these tation d for
1575, pment gs are ented ed in al for uding med in Plan

La Cross License T Revision incorpora documen develope executing procedur safely an Characte objective Provi Deve Supp volum The deco buildings character subjected removed 1757, Ap The char subsurfac structura surveys w structure used to m above gr of the ex

planned, planning A signifi unit is cla design fo result in unit meet errors.

As site-s LACBW selected.

in NURE Paramete assess the se Boiling W Termination n 0 ated the pre nted in the su ed to provide g characteriz res and surv nd effectively rization data es:

ide radiologi elop the requ ort the eva mes.

ommissionin s, structures, rization effo d to FRS. E prior to the ppendix O.

racterization ce soils, pav l basements were perform

s. Upon com make determ rade or subg xpected end-executed an icant questio assified corr or FRS. A a survey des ts the release pecific Deri WR at the tim The screen EG/CR-5512 er Analysis e correct cla Water Reactor Plan evious histo urvey areas e guidance a zation survey ey unit spec y acquire the a acquired th ical inputs n uired inputs f aluation of r ng approach

, and compo orts focused Extensive ch e performanc n surveys fo ved surfaces, s that will re med in the L mpletion, the minations on w rade structu

-state structu nd documen on that must rectly. The a classificatio sign that doe e criteria. In ived Concen me the chara ning DCGLs 2 Volume 3 (9), Table 6 assification o r

orical opera from the HS and direction y activities.

cific survey e requisite ch hrough the e necessary for for LTP, and remediation for LACBW onents to a d d on open haracterizatio ce of final s ocused on g

, and concret emain in the LACBWR Ad e data was a whether add ures, surface ures at LAC nted with the be answere appropriate c on which un es not obtain n some cases ntration Guid acterization s presented i

, Residual R

.91 (Pcrit = 0 of impacted o 2-13 ational and SA and prev n to the pers The Plan w instructions haracterizati execution of r the design o d

alternatives WR calls for t depth of at l land areas on of equipm surveys is no general open te pads. Co e end-state dministration ssessed for q ditional chara and subsurf CBWR. Con e same data ed by the cha classification nderestimate n adequate in s, this can in deline Level survey was in NUREG-1 Radioactive 0.10) for soil open land or radiological vious site ch sonnel respo worked in co s (sample pl on data.

the Plan wa of FRS, s and techn the demoliti least 3 feet b and remain ment, system ot required i n land areas oncrete core condition.

n Building a quality and a acterization face soils, or ntinuing cha quality and aracterizatio n of a survey es the poten nformation to ncrease the p ls (DCGLs) performed, 1757 and th Contamina ls were used r soil survey l informatio aracterizatio onsible for im njunction w lans) that w as used to m nologies and ion and remo below grade ning structu ms or struct in accordanc s including:

samples wer In addition, and several o adequacy. T data is requ r beneath th aracterization d the results on is whethe y unit is crit ntial for con o demonstra potential for m were not ye alternate ac e concentrat ation from D d as alternat units.

on collected on efforts. I mplementing with impleme were develop meet three pri d estimate w oval of all on

e. Conseque ures that wi tures that w ce with NUR site surface re taken from

, characteriz of the G-3 st The data was uired, primar he concrete f n surveys w included in er or not a su tical to the su tamination c ate that the su making deci et establishe ction levels tion values f Decommissio e action leve d and t was g and enting ped to imary waste n-site

ently, ill be ill be REG-e and m the zation tation s then ily of floors will be n FRS urvey urvey could urvey isions ed for were found oning els to

La Cross License T Revision For struc to evalu 7,100 dpm Appendix radionuc the conse for Cs-13 2.2.1. D DQOs w FRS. Ho to determ unrestrict inspectio nature, e applicabl Characte outlined

1) State
2) Ident
3) Ident
4) Defin
5) Deve
6) Speci
7) Optim The DQO collect. N and will assessme obtaining obtained Direct m Minimal that exhi Detect (H 2.2.2. S Characte approved approach se Boiling W Termination n 0 ctures, the gr ate the clas m/100cm2 to x H. Use of lide distribu ervative appr 37 is signific Data Quality were impleme owever, the mine the rad ted use crit ons and surv xtent and ra le structures rization surv in MARSSIM the problem tify the decis tify inputs to ne the study elop a decisio ify limits on mize the des Os for site No structure therefore no ent of concre g core samp to determin measurement Detectable ibited the hi HTD) radion urvey Desig rization sur d procedures h based upon Water Reactor Plan ross screenin ssification o otal gross be f the Co-60 ution for surf roach was to cantly greate y Objectives ented for ch goal of char ionuclide m teria to dem veys of suff ange of radio

, residues, so veys were de M, Appendi m,

sion, o the decision boundaries, on rule, n decision err ign for obtai characteriza es located ab ot be subject ete in basem ples. Soils ne the mean s and scans Concentrati ighest activi nuclide(s).

gn rveys were s and the Cha n the DQOs f r

ng level that of survey u eta-gamma s screening v face contam o assume a d er.

s haracterizatio racterization mixture, wher monstrate co fficient quali oactive cont oils and surf esigned to g ix D. The se n,

rors, and ining data.

ation include bove 3 feet b ed to FRS.

ments and su were sampl and maximu s of surface ons (MDC) ity were sen designed a aracterizatio for each surv 2-14 t was used d units was th surface activ value was co mination wou distribution o on surveys in n is to quanti reas the FRS ompliance w ity and qua tamination in face water.

gather the ap even steps in ed identifyin below grade Consequent urrounding so led volumet um activity a soils were as will be e nt to an off-and perform on Survey Pl vey unit. Fo during chara he nuclide-vity based on onservative a uld be princi of 100% Co n a similar m ify and delin S goal is co with 10 CFR antity were n each appli propriate da n the DQO d ng the types will remain tly, sample c oils. Buildi trically. Su as well as th made using employed fo

-site laborat med in acco an. Survey or example, acterization a specific scr n Co-60 from as it was an ipally Co-60

-60 since the manner as an neate contam omparison of R 20.1402.

performed t icable surve ata using the development s and quanti n following d collection wa ing concrete ufficient me he sample sta g the same or FSS. Vo tory for ana ordance wit design incor an open land as an action reening valu m NUREG-nticipated tha 0 and Cs-137 e screening v nticipated fo minated area f data agains Characteriz to determin ey unit, inclu e DQO proce process are:

ities of med decommissio as focused o e was sample asurements andard devia instruments lumetric sam lysis of Har th all appli rporated a gr d survey uni level ue of

1757, at the 7 and value or the as and st the zation e the uding ess as dia to oning on the ed by were ation.

s and mples rd-to-icable raded it was

La Cross License T Revision designate the unres Class 1 s present.

to identif Class 2 o survey m select loc measurem biased su unit. A delineate warrante survey un The area character S

al su B

sy F

R ad S

A S

S ar S

C P

A L

2.2.2.1.

The num by assess se Boiling W Termination n 0 ed as Class stricted relea survey unit f The survey fy the lateral or Class 3 re measurement cations for s ment and/or urvey design A biased app e the extent o d if the char nit.

as and mater rization surv urface scans ll Class 1, 2 urvey unit L Biased subsur ystems of c igure 2-3.

Random sam ddition, soil cans and s Administratio amples were cans and sam reas.

cans and sam Concrete sam iping and V A backgroun LACBWR in Numb mber of measu sing the sam Water Reactor Plan 1 because it ase criteria.

focused on b design was l and vertica eceived surv locations an static measu sample loc n or a random proach was of an area th racterization ials surveye vey included s and random 2, 3, and no L3012102 (i.e rface soil sa oncern in C mples were ta samples we amples wer on Building e taken from mples were mples were t mples were t entillation tu nd radiation cluding: asp ber of Static urements an ple size nece r

t may conta Therefore, t bounding the based upon al extent of th veys develop nd scan area urements and cations at ran m approach warranted hat requires effort was d ed and/or sam m and biased on-impacted e., the switch amples were Class 1 and aken from a ere obtained re taken on and the G-3 m the septic ta taken on LA taken on G-3 aken in the unnels.

study was phalt, concret Measuremen nd/or sample essary to sat 2-15 ain levels of the character e contaminat n the number he contamin ped to includ

s. Biased su d/or samples ndom. The was address when the c remediation designed to v mpled in and d surface and open land a hyard).

taken along 2 areas incl asphalt and c directly belo n accessible Coal Plant.

anks.

ACBWR Ad 3 Building a basement ar performed te, and soil.

nts and/or S s that were t tisfy the DQO f radiologica rization surv tion where c r of measure nation. Area de a combin urvey design

s. Random e decision of sed by the D characterizat
n. Alternativ verify the ba d around the d subsurface area survey gside and un luding the p concrete from ow the aspha e roof surfa dministration access and he reas of the R on material amples taken in each Os.

al contamina veys that wer ontaminatio ements and as classified nation of ran ns used know survey desig f whether to DQO process tion effort w vely, a rando asis for the c e licensed ar e soils samp units with derneath und piping syste m pads and alt to a one m ace areas of n Building su eavily travel Reactor Bui ls similar to h survey uni ation greater re performed n was poten samples req as non-impa ndom and b wn informati gn selected o use primar s for each su was designe om approach classification rea as part o ples were tak the exceptio derground p ms as show paved area meter depth.

f the LACB urfaces and led surfaces.

lding, WTB o those foun it was determ r than d in a ntially quired

acted, biased ion to static rily a urvey ed to h was n of a of the ken in on of piping wn on
s. In BWR drain B, and nd at mined

La Cross License T Revision For the c that will and/or sa of residu For the sample s vertical e For non-validate measurem trivial lev generated 2.2.2.2.

For the c survey u Sample l to specifi that wer responsib survey d radioactiv potential from the 2.2.2.3.

Survey u area to b area scan Supervis was give survey un 2.2.2.4.

The char (beta and survey of FRS con and volu sampling following se Boiling W Termination n 0 characterizat be subjecte amples taken al radioactiv characteriza size was bas extent of the impacted an the basis ments and/o vels of licen d radionuclid Determ characterizat nits that wil locations we ic locations w re taken in ble Radiolog design proc vity, depres spill locatio HSA aided Scan C units were sc be scanned i nned was c or and/or th en to inform nit.

Types racterization d gamma); st f any concre nsisted of a c umetric samp g of surface g is a descrip Water Reactor Plan tion of impa ed to FSS, th n in the surve ve contamina ation of Cla sed upon the contaminati nd Class 3 op of the clas or samples w nsee-generat des are prese mination of tion of non-ll be subject ere determin within the su each surve gical Protect cess. Con sions, disco ons, or areas in the select Coverage canned to th n each surv ontingent up e Project He mation from s of Measure n survey of tatic beta me ete and/or as combination ples. The su and subsurf ption of the d r

acted Class 1 he minimum ey units wer ation in the s ss 1 structur e necessary n ion.

pen land sur ssification.

was sufficie ted radionuc ent in non-im Static Measu

-impacted an ted to FRS, ed by gener urvey unit. T y unit was tion Superv sideration w olored areas, s where the tion of biased he extent pr ey unit was pon the pro ealth Physic the initial w ements and S building sur easurements phalt-paved n of surface urvey of the face soil, sed different typ 2-16 1 and Class m number of re commensu survey unit.

res that wil number of s rvey units, th Consequen ent to ensure clides are pr mpacted area urement and nd impacted sample loca ating random The location determined visor and/or was given

, cracks, low ground has d locations.

actical in ac determined ofessional ju ist during th walk downs Samples rfaces consi s, material sa open land a scans (beta e open land diment and s pes of measu 2 open land f random or urate with th l remain an samples nee he primary c ntly, the nu e with reaso resent in Cl as.

d Sample Lo d open land ations were m pairs of c n of biased m d by the pr the Project to location w point grav s been distur ccordance w d during the udgment of he survey de and the am isted of a co amples and s areas that wi and gamma areas consis surface wate urements and d areas (pav r biased dire he probabilit nd be subjec eded to asses characterizat umber of s onable conf lass 3 areas ocations areas and C primarily ch oordinates t measurement rofessional j Health Phy ns that exh vity drain p rbed. Histo with their cla survey desi the Radiolo esign proces mbient radiat ombination smears. The ill remain an a), static bet sted of gamm er for isotop d samples tha ved and unpa ect measurem ty of the pres cted to FRS ss the latera tion DQO w systematic fidence that and no lice Class 2 struc hosen at ran hat correspo ts and/or sam judgment o ysicist durin hibit measu points, actua orical inform assification.

ign process.

ogical Prote

s. Consider tion levels i of surface e characteriz nd be subject ta measurem ma scans an pic analysis.

at were utiliz aved) ments sence S, the al and was to static only ensee-ctural ndom.

onded mples of the ng the urable al and mation The The ection ration in the scans zation ted to

ments, nd the The zed.

La Cross License T Revision 2.2.2.4.1 Gamma activity.

used for Ludlum M Ludlum M Scanning rate not t was main and, loca 2.2.2.4.2 Scanning 7,100 dpm including Hand-hel used.

Beta scan and with prevented was dete calculate of the sur If not im instrumen evaluatio investiga 2.2.2.4.3 Direct m surfaces typically detectors Direct m acquiring typically designate adjusted 2.2.2.4.4 If applic verify lo se Boiling W Termination n 0 Gamm scans were Sodium io these scans.

Model 44-10 Model 44-10 g was perfor to exceed 0.

ntained with ations of elev Beta S g was per m/100cm2 a g, but not li ld beta scin nning was p h a scanning d scanning a ermined, an d a priori to rvey.

mpacted by h nt to identi on. Any ide ation and pot Direct measurement of the build performed

s.

measurements g data over used for su ed investigat as appropria Remo able, remov oose surface Water Reactor Plan ma Surface S performed o dide (NaI) g EnergySol 0 Detector 0 NaI detecto rmed by mo

.5 m (20 in) hin 15 cm (6 vated direct l Surface Scan rformed in action level.

imited to; fl ntillation and performed w g speed of o at the specif nd the scan o ensure that high ambient fy locations entified areas tential decon t Measureme ts were per dings or on using ~10 s were condu a pre-determ urface measu tion level or ate to achiev ovable Surfac vable beta an e contamina r

Scans over open la gamma scin utions Techn Sensitivity (

ors to Co-60 oving the de per second.

in) of the s levels were f ns order to Beta scans loors, walls, d/or gas-flo with the dete one detector fied distance nning techni t the MDC f t noise level s of elevate s of elevated ntamination.

ents rformed to n concrete o 00 cm2 or l ucted by pla mined coun urements and r MDC und ve an accepta ce Contamin nd/or alpha ation is less 2-17 and surfaces ntillation det nical Suppor (10) examin 0 and Cs-137 etector in a s The distan urface if po flagged for f locate ar s were perfo

, ceilings, ro ow proportio ctor position r active win e, the detect ique adjuste for scanning s, technician d activity th d contamina detect total or asphalt pa arger sized acing the det nt time. A d generally p er considera able MDC fo nation contaminati s than the to identify tectors (typic rt Document nes the resp 7 when used serpentine p nce between ssible. Aud further inves reas of res ormed over a oofs, asphal onal detecto n maintained ndow per se tion sensitiv ed accordin g was approp ns monitored that require ation were m levels of aved areas.

scintillatio tector near t count time provided det ation. The i or direct mea on or smear applicable locations of cally 2 x 2 t (TSD) RS-onse and sc d for scanning pattern, whil n the detecto dible signals stigation and sidual activ accessible st lt and concr ors (typically d within 1 c econd. If su vity for the a ngly. Scan priate for the d the audibl further inv marked or fla contaminati These me on or gas-fl the surface to of one to t tection level instrument c asurements.

r surveys w action level f residual su

) were typi

-TD-313196 can MDC o g surface soi le advancing or and the su were monit d/or sampling vity above tructural sur rete paved a y 126 cm2) cm of the su urface condi alternate dis nning speed e stated obje e response o estigation a agged for fu ion on struc asurements low proport o be counted two minutes ls well below count times were perform

l. A smea urface ically 6-006, of the ils.

g at a urface tored;

g.

the rfaces areas.

were urface itions stance was ective of the and/or urther ctural were tional d and s was w the were med to ar for

La Cross License T Revision removab surfaces.

moderate activity a 2.2.2.4.5 Concrete contamin will rema diamond 1/2-inch w pulverize 2.2.2.4.6 Samples locations scanning defined a split spoo tools.

Subsurfa hand aug survey un 2.2.3. In The radi provide b identified action le and expe static me Concern Commer perform

3) analys Instrume in Table 2.2.3.1.

All data character se Boiling W Termination n 0 le activity w A 100 cm e pressure. S as appropriat Concr e core boring nation and th ain and be su bit core dri wide pucks ed and analy Mater of soil, sed s as well as

g. Surface so as soil below on sampling ace soil was gers. Subsur nit.

nstrumenta ation detect both reliable d for the de evels. Detec ected perform easurements (ROC) at a cially availa the three ba sis of materia ntation and 2-3.

Calibr loggers, ass rization wer Water Reactor Plan was usually m2 surface a Smears were te.

rete and Asp g and the sa he presence ubjected to F ill. The con s, represen yzed for isoto rial Sampling iment, and s other locatio oil is defined w the top 15 g system or, b sampled by rface soil sam ation Selectio tion and me e operation a ecommission ctor selectio mance in th and scanni MDC of 50%

able portable asic survey m al samples.

nominal MD ration sociated dete re calibrated r

taken at eac area was sa e then analyz phalt Core Sa ampling of of volumet FRS. Core b ncrete samp nting a certa opic content.

g sludge were ons in areas d as the top cm layer in by using han y direct push mpling was on, Use and asurement i and adequate ning of LAC on was based e field. In ng were cap

% of the app e and laborat measuremen DC values th ectors, and a d on an annu 2-18 ch direct me ampled with zed for the p ampling concrete we tric contami bore samplin le produced ain depth in obtained fr s exhibiting 15 cm (6-in n 1 m increm nd trowels, b h sampling s performed a d Minimum nstrumentat e sensitivity t CBWR at le d on detecti all cases, th pable of det plicable actio tory instrum ts: 1) surfac hat were em all other por ual basis us easurement l h a circular presence of g ere used to nation in co ng of concre d by the cori nto the surf rom designed elevated act nch) layer of ments. Surfa bucket auger systems (e.g as necessary Detectable tion for char to detect the evels suffici ion sensitivi he instrumen tecting the a on level.

ments and det ce scanning; mployed durin rtable instrum sing Nationa location on cloth or pa gross beta an assess the d oncrete wall ete was acco ing was typ face. Conc d biased and tivity that w f soil while s ace soil was rs, or other s

g. GeoProbe y to address t Concentrat racterization e initial suite iently below ity, operatin nts and detec anticipated R tectors were
2) static me ng character mentation th al Institute o non-asphalt aper filter, u nd/or gross depth of sur ls and floors omplished us pically sliced crete pucks d random sa were identifie subsurface s collected us suitable sam

) or by m the DQOs fo tions (MDC n was select e of radionuc w the establ ng characteri ctors selecte Radionuclid typically us easurements rization are hat were use of Standards t type using alpha rficial s that sing a d into were ample ed by soil is sing a mpling anual or the Cs) ted to clides lished

istics, ed for des of sed to s; and listed ed for s and

La Cross License T Revision Technolo addressed 2.2.3.2.

The recei used for portable character 2.2.4. L Gamma proportio laborator quality p preparati site labor In all ca achieved accepted analytica laborator 2.2.5. Q MARSSI used to quality fo 1576, Mu Regulato through (12). Fu may be achieved The QAP used duri functiona All chara approved audit a

Characte prescribe applied contracto se Boiling W Termination n 0 ogy (NIST) t d in the QAP Instru ipt, inspectio characteriza radiologica rization is ad Laboratory I spectroscop onal countin ry in accorda programs of ion and analy ratory under ases, analyti

d. The anal methodolog al methods ries used for Quality Assu IM, section demonstrate for sample an ulti-Agency R ory Guide 4.

Normal Op urther, MAR used in add

d.

PP was prep ing the site c al activities, acterization d procedures and surveil rization staf ed, impleme to any app ors.

Water Reactor Plan traceable sou PP.

ument Use an on, issue, co ation was p al instrumen ddressed in th Instrument py was prim ng and liquid ance with ap the contrac ysis of chara the QAPP.

ical methods lysis of rad gies or othe employed characteriza urance 2.2 discusse e that site c nalysis taken Radiologica

.15, Quality erations to RSSIM and dition to, or pared and im characterizat the DQO pr activities es

s. The effe llance activ ff and progr ented, and v plicable serv r

urces. The c nd Control ntrol, and ac performed in ntation. T he QAPP.

Methods an marily perfor d scintillatio pproved labo cted off-site acterization s s were estab diological co er comparab and the la ation.

es the need f conditions ar n to support al Laboratory y Assurance License Ter MARLAP b r in lieu of, mplemented t tion and FRS rocess, and m ssential to d ective imple

vities, incl ram self-ass verified wh vices provid 2-19 calibration o ccountability n accordance The issue a nd Sensitivi rmed by th on analysis oratory proce vendor labo samples prov blished to e ontaminants ble methodo aboratory M for a quality re acceptabl t characteriz y Analytical of Radiolo rmination) -

both indicate existing qu to ensure th S process. T measures nec data quality w mentation o luding fiel sessments, a hen deficienc ded by off-of instrument y of portable e with issue and control ities he on-site ra was perform edures. Ener oratories tha vided the sam ensure that used stand ologies. Ta MDC achiev y system to le for unres zation and F l Protocols M ogical Moni

- Effluent St e that a Qua uality system e adequacy The QAPP de cessary to ac were implem of characteri ld walk-do as appropriat cies were i

-site vendor ts used for c e radiologica e and contro l of instru adiological med by an rgySolutions at were used me level of required M dard approve able 2-4 prov ved by the ensure the a stricted rele FRS is discu Manual (MA itoring Prog treams and ality Assura ms to ensur of data bein escribes poli chieve qualit mented and ization was owns by te. Correct identified.

rs, as well characterizati al instrument ol procedure uments used laboratory.

approved ve s ensured tha d for the rec quality as th MDC values ed and gene vides the ty off-site ve adequacy of ase. Labor ssed in NUR ARLAP) (11 grams (Incep the Environ ance Project re data qual ng developed icy, organiza ty data.

performed u verified thr EnergySolu tive actions These mea as on-site ion is tation es for d for Gas endor at the

ceipt, he on-were erally ypical endor f data ratory REG-

) and eption nment Plan ity is d and

ation, using rough utions were asures sub-

La Cross License T Revision The Cha quality a and is su follows:

E op A

st D

Details o the proce data acqu requirem P

E P

S P

M pr All chara Plan, the 2.3.

S In Octob placing t October character accelerat EnergySo October 9 August 6 documen Characte PN-1640 2015 Fie Radioact character character se Boiling W Termination n 0 aracterization assurance and ubject to the Establishmen perations.

Actions to en taff.

Documentatio of the QA/QC edures and s uisition and ments. The sp ersonnel qua Execution in roper docum election of a roper instrum Management rocedures, p acterization QAPP, all a ummary of ber of 2005, the unit into of 2014, rization of L tion of de olutions in a 9, 2014. T 6, 2015. The nted in two erization Sur 017-001, LA eld Work (14 tive systems rization dat rization has Water Reactor Plan n Survey Pl d quality co QAPP. The nt/implement nsure that the on of the dat C elements s sample plan d recording pecific QA/Q alifications, accordance mentation of appropriate i ment calibra oversight of protocols, an activities w applicable im f Characteri Dairyland p o a SAFSTO Dairyland LACBWR in commission accordance w The schedule e results of th o separate rvey Report CBWR Radi 4).

s that rema a in certain been deferre r

lan was dev ontrol (QA/Q e QA/QC pr tation of plan e procedures ta collected.

specific to ch instructions was guided QC program experience, with approv survey data instruments t ation and dai f characteriz d documenta were conduct mplementing ization Surv performed a OR condition contracted n anticipation ning activiti with EnergyS ed EnergyS he site chara reports, GG for October iological Ch ain at LAC n areas du ed until such 2-20 veloped acco QC) program ogram elem ns, procedur are understo haracterizati

. The chara d and condu m component and training ved procedur and sample to perform th ily functiona zation activit ation require ted in accor g procedures vey Results limited cha

n. This sur EnergySol n of the deve ies. Char Solutions cha Solutions sit acterization s G-EO-31319 r and Novem haracterizati CBWR affec ue to ambie h time that ra ording to th m for the dec ments applica res, and prot ood and foll ion are prese acterization o ucted in com s for site cha
g.

res.

analyses.

he surveys.

al checks.

ties relative t ements.

rdance with

, and approv aracterization rvey is docu lutions to elopment of racterization aracterizatio te characteri surveys perf 96-RS-RP-0 mber 2014 F ion Survey R cted the ab ent radiatio adiological o he essential commissioni able to chara tocols for the lowed by the ented in the Q operations an mpliance wi aracterizatio to the adhere the Charact ved sample p n survey of umented in perform a f this LTP an n activities, on procedure ization effo formed by En 01, LACBW Field Work (

Report for J ility to acq on levels.

or physical c elements o ing of LACB acterization a e field e implementi QAPP, as w nd the assoc ith these QA on are as foll ence to terization Su plan instruct the LSE pri Reference 7 a more det nd the anticip

, performed es commence ort conclude nergySolutio WR Radiolo (13) and LC June thru A quire meani In these c conditions w of the BWR are as ing well as ciated A/QC ows:

urvey ions.

ior to

7. In tailed pated d by ed on ed on ons is ogical C-RS-ugust ingful
cases, would

La Cross License T Revision allow the the decom significan by revisio 2.3.1. B During t backgrou acquired backgrou As part o backgrou LACBW Normally be repres site area Supervis appropria results.

were con Concrete is located non-impa approxim unit L40 L401210 samples a The ana backgrou can be at mean Cs 0.135 pC was 0.07 Relevant Station (Z at Zion S Zion to C geograph for distu backgrou within th categorie drainage se Boiling W Termination n 0 e survey of t mmissioning nt additiona on or addend

Background

the initial ch und study fo from vario und study is of the 2014 und levels a WR fell within y, backgroun sentative. H was chosen.

or selected a ate for obtain Although th nsidered unaf e samples an d north of th acted survey mately 100 s 12108. Soil 08 were also are provided lysis of the und study fo ttributed to g

-137 concen Ci/g with a m 0 resulting i t to LACBW ZNPS) titled Station (15).

Cs-137 leve hically simila urbed soils a und Cs-137 he expected es of soil in and non-dra Water Reactor Plan hese survey g process, in l characteriz dum as a par Study haracterizati or soils at LA ous location summarized characteriza at LACBWR n nominal ex nd reference However, no

. The Energ an area outs ning backgro he selected s ffected by pa nd direct me he LSE. A y unit L4012 quare meter l samples fro evaluated f d in sections e backgroun or soils. The global fallou ntration of s maximum ob in the upper WR is a study d ZionSolutio This docum ls anticipate ar. The docu as well as u levels for th range of d the non-im ainage, distu r

units. Solu ncluding foll zation data i rt of the requ on survey p ACBWR. R ns outside o d in Table 2-ation effort, R. The pur xpected leve areas shoul suitable off gySolutions P side of the L ound measu sample locat ast LACBW asurements sphalt samp 2106. Surfa rs of undistu om non-imp for use as ba 2.3.3 and 2.

nd soil sam e results did ut. For the t surface samp bserved con r range for th y performed ons TSD 13 ment was pr ed from wor ument predic undisturbed he site speci disturbed so mpacted area urbed and un 2-21 tions intends lowing the s is obtained, uired 2 year performed in Reference 7 of the owne

5.

EnergySolu rpose of the els for soils, d be reasona f-site locatio Project Heal LSE but on rements bas tions were i WR operation were taken ples and dire ace soil samp urbed non-dr pacted survey ackground re

.3.5.3.

mples in 201 d report Cs-1 two backgrou ples taken o ncentration o his data set a for the deco

-004, Exami repared to co rldwide fall cted ranges f soils and is fic backgrou ils in non-d s at LACBW ndisturbed so s to continue submittal of this chapter update of th n October 2 states that a er controlled utions perfor e study was concrete, an ably close to on was ident lth Physicist the licensed ed upon the inside the LA ns.

in Class 3 s ect measurem ples were ac rainage soil y units L401 eference soil 14 compare 137 at levels und studies n or around of 0.268 pCi at a 95% con ommissionin ination of Cs ompare site out. The L for backgrou presented i und studies drainage are WR, the upp oil from the e characteriz this LTP. I r of the LTP he approved 005, Dairyl a series of s d area. Th rmed a limit s to assess i nd asphalt.

o the decomm tified. Cons and the Rad d LACBWR previous ra ACBWR lic survey unit L ments were cquired from within non-12107 and o ls. Analysis ed favorably s slightly ab performed a d the site pro i/g. The st nfidence leve ng of the Zio s-137 Globa soil sample LACBWR an und concentr in Table 2-6 performed a eas. As the per 95th per Zion backgr zation throug In the case w P will be up LTP.

and perform oil samples he result of ted assessme if backgroun missioning s sequently, an diation Prote site that se diological su censed area, L3012101, w also collect m a small ar

-impacted su other areas w s results for y with the bove MDC.

at LACBWR oduced a me tandard devi el of 0.275 p on Nuclear P al Fallout in Cs-137 resu nd Zion site rations of Cs

6. The obse at LACBWR ere were va centile level round study ghout where dated med a were f this ent of nd at site to n on-ection emed urvey

, they which ted in rea of urvey within these 2005 This R, the ean of iation Ci/g.

Power Soils ults at es are s-137 erved R fall arious ls for were

La Cross License T Revision considere areas, an 2.3.2. P EnergySo Decomm decommi from the some of t less than prepared 2.3.3. N Based up 163.5 acr impacted contamin operation ISFSI w operation physical for comp for the cl The non-segregate inside of Highway study for within su in coal f ISFSI fac From Oc impacted survey un and the i impacted To supp objective open land by perfor The 2015 primary surveys a se Boiling W Termination n 0 ed appropria d Class 2 an Potential Ra olutions TS issioning (

issioning of sampling o the theoretic n 2 years, an

. The list of Non-Impacte pon the infor re licensed

d. The n nation given ns. The det were not imp ns (i.e., with characterist pliance beyo lassification.

-impacted op ed into five f survey uni y 35. This s r soils. The urvey unit L4 from the G-cility, which ctober 2014 d open land nits and wer initial result d as it was d ort this con e of the add d survey uni rming additi 5 characteriz objectives and samplin Water Reactor Plan ate backgro nd 3 open lan dionuclides SD RS-TD-3 (16) establi LACBWR.

of various m cal neutron a n initial suite f potential ra ed Open La rmation com site surroun non-impacte that historic termination pacted by l hin the LSE ics. The are ond the chara pen land are survey unit it L4012108 survey unit non-impacte 4012103. A

-3 station an h has not bee to August areas of th re characteri s of the 201 determined t nclusion, ad itional chara its given an i onal soil sam zation camp of the addi ng to suppor r

ound concen nd area surve s of Concern 313196-001, shes the ba Industry gu media from p activation pro e of potentia adionuclides and Areas mpiled in the nding the L d areas ha cal informati that the con licensed ope

), site use, t eas designat acterization a is approxim ts. Non-imp 8 in a veget was formed ed survey un A majority of nd survey un en characteriz 2015, char he site. The ized as such 14 characteri that there is dditional ch acterization initial Class mpling and g aign was de tional chara rt the non-2-22 ntration leve ey units at L n

, Radionuc asis for an uidance was past plant o oducts, nobl al ROC for is listed in T e HSA, a lar LSE and IS ave no rea ion provides ntiguous ope erations was topography, ted as non-im surveys and mately 352,3 pacted open ated area w d during cha nits are show f the surface nit L401210 zed and is no racterization e survey uni h in Referenc ization, thes no reasonab haracterizatio surveys per 3 classificat gamma walk esigned in ac acterization

-impacted c els for the LACBWR.

clides of C initial suite reviewed as operations.

le gases and the decomm Table 2-7.

rge portion o SFSI receive asonable po s no indicatio en land area s based on site dischar mpacted are d sampling p 360 square m n land surve with minimal aracterizatio wn in Figure area in surv 06 complete ot addressed surveys w its were ori ce 13. Base se survey un ble potentia on was perf rformed in 2 tion for re-cl kover survey ccordance w was to per classification evaluation Concern D e of potenti s well as the Based on th radionuclide missioning o of the open ed a classif otential to on of impact as surroundi the locatio rge pathway e not require performed to meters in siz ey unit L40 l ground dis on to facilita 2-1. The G vey unit L40 ely surround d by this LTP were perform iginally clas ed upon a rev nits were rec al for residua formed in 2 2015 was to lassification ys.

with Referenc rform suffic n and to pr of non-imp uring LAC ial ROC fo analytical re he eliminatio es with a hal f LACBWR land areas o fication as contain res t from LACB ing the LSE on(s) of lice ys, and othe ed to be surv o provide a ze. This area 12109 is lo sturbance ea ate a backgr G-3 station re 012105 is cov ds the LACB P.

med in the ssified as Cl view of the classified as al contamina 2015. A m o evaluate ce n as non-imp ce 4. One o cient radiolo rovide reaso pacted CBWR or the esults on of lf-life R was on the non-sidual BWR E and ensed er site veyed basis a was ocated ast of round esides vered BWR non-lass 3 HSA non-ation.

major ertain pacted of the ogical nable

La Cross License T Revision assurance 2015 cha based on During th units L40 logger w was scan Gamma s or gravel Minimum evaluated survey un an Explo were due Thirty-tw toward d shown in instrumen positively surface s These va in section specific b in the gr were very Seventee meter.

concentra derived g average maximum backgrou 137 conc surface s the Hwy Two asp survey un were less identified A summ presented se Boiling W Termination n 0 e that the n aracterization a random d he 2015 cha 012103, L40 with a 2 by 2 nned due to surface scan

l. Alarm se m Detectabl d during the nit L401210 oranium GR-e to the prese wo surface s discolored ar n Figure 2-5 nt MDC in y identified soil samples alues are wit n 2.3.1. On background rounds east y close at 0.

en subsurfac Of the 17 ations greate gamma-emit Cs-137 conc m observed und range fo centrations th soil backgrou 35/Railroad phalt sample nits. The asp s than the M d by gamma ary of the g d in Table 2-Water Reactor Plan non-impacted n survey foc esign to ensu aracterizatio 012105, L40 2 NaI detec inaccessibili nning focused et-points for e Count Ra e performan 7 and one in

-135. The ence of natur soil samples eas or areas

5. Cs-137 26 of the 32 by gamma s was 0.131 hin the expe ly one Cs-13 data set. Th of Highway 135 pCi/g an e soil sampl 7 subsurface er than the tting radionu centration ob concentrati r Cs-137 as hat exceede und. This s d Right of W es were coll phalt surface MDC of 1,93 spectroscop gamma spect

-8.

r d survey uni cused primar ure an unbia n survey, a 012106 and ctor. In surv ity from the d on undistu r the instrum ate (MDCR) nce of the g n survey unit results of th ral backgrou s were colle where the g was positiv 2 samples.

spectroscopy pCi/g with ected backgr 37 result exc his sample w y 35. The m nd 0.131 pC les were tak e soil samp instrument uclides were bserved in t ion of 0.40 discussed in d the maxim sample was t Way Grounds lected from e was first sc 38 dpm/100c py in any of t troscopy resu 2-23 its do not c rily on soils ased survey.

minimum o L4012108 vey unit L40 e presence o urbed soils w ment were s

) of the ins gamma scan t L4012108.

he investiga und activity.

ected from ground had b vely identif No other po

y. The avera a maximum round range ceeded the m was the maxi mean of the n i/g, respectiv ken at random ples taken, MDC in ei e positively i the subsurfa 09 pCi/g. Th n section 2.3 mum Cs-137 the maximu random loc canned with cm2. No pla the asphalt s ults for each contain plant and asphalt of 1% of the was scanned 012107, less f tall, thick with minimal set at the ob strument. A n, one in su All scan al ation indicat non-impacte been disturbe fied in conc otential plan age Cs-137 c m observed c for Cs-137 maxium resu imum 0.463 non-impacte vely.

mly selected Cs-137 w ght samples identified by ace soil sam hese value 3.1. Only on 7 concentrati um 0.409 pC cations in p h a beta-gamm ant derived r samples.

h non-impac t-derived ra

t. The samp e surface so d with a Mo s than 1% of vegetation a l vegetation bserved back A total of f urvey unit L larms were in ted the elev ed areas at ed. The sam centrations nt-derived ra concentratio concentration surface sam ult of 0.268 pCi/g value ed and site-s d locations t was positive
s. No other y gamma sp mples was 0.

es are with ne subsurfac ion found in Ci/g value th paved areas mma detector radionuclide cted open la adioactivity.

ple locations oil area in su odel 2350-1 f the surface and steep te or disturbed kground plu four alarms L4012106, tw nvestigated u vated scan re locations b mple location greater than adionuclides n observed i n of 0.463 p mples as discu pCi/g in the e and was lo specific data to a depth o ely identifie r potential p pectroscopy.

087 pCi/g w hin the exp e sample ha n the site-spe at was locat in non-imp

. All scan re s were posit and survey u The were urvey data e area rrain.

d soils us the were wo in using esults biased ns are n the were in the pCi/g.

ussed e site-ocated a sets of one ed in plant-The with a pected d Cs-ecific ted in pacted esults tively unit is

La Cross License T Revision A coal as samples The resul The lab concentra also posi concentra considere of the pl radionuc positive ratios ar compared higher th operation consisten the spora derived r In survey gamma s area to d approxim uranium readings 2.3.4. Im The HSA operation been clas been iden into two north of Highway three Cla The char prepared employed radionuc of suffici surface a obtained Survey contamin se Boiling W Termination n 0 sh sample fr were sent to lts of the ana boratory an ations excee tively detect ations of the ed to very li lant-derived lide mixtur results for C re 118 and d to the site han expected nal history, t nt with natur adic positive radionuclide y unit L4012 spectroscopy determine if mately 7,000 and thorium conducted d mpacted Op A identified ns. The app ssified as C ntified as i Class 2 surv the LSE, th y 35 and the ass 3 survey racterization for each s d to determ lide concent ient quantity and subsurf from below techniques nation identi Water Reactor Plan rom survey u o Test Ame alysis are pre nalysis spor eding the MD ted but at lev e positively i ikely be the radionuclid re fractions Cs-137, Sr-16, respect e-specific mi d by factors the radionuc ral backgrou analytical r s in these su 2108, a repr

y. In additio f there is a 0 to 8,000 cp m series nuc during the w pen Land A d the open proximate are Class 1. An impacted b vey units. T he transmiss e haul road u units combin of the impac survey unit ine the later trations in th y and quality face soils in w the structur were empl ified and th r

unit L40121 erica Labora esented in T radically id DC, includin vels that are identified rad result of cou des. This c

. For exam 90 and Fe-5 tively. Wh ixture fracti s of 4,800 a lide ratios, a und and com esults are ve urvey units.

resentative s on, gamma s significant pm). The a clides with alkover surv Areas land area ea is 1.5 acr approximat y reactor op Three impact sion switchy used to tran ned is appro cted open la in accorda ral and vert he soil. Char y to quantify n each open res due to int loyed to de he radionucl 2-24 05, six surfa atories for g Table 2-9.

dentified se ng H-3, C-14 consistent w dionuclides w unting uncer conclusion w mple, samp

55. Howev hen the rati ons in Chap and 10,700, and primarily mprise 88% o ery unlikely sample of th scan reading difference analysis of t no plant de vey averaged inside the res. All ope tely 3.46 acr perations. T ted Class 3 s yard and the nsport dry fu oximately 16 and areas beg ance with R ical extent o racterization the potentia n land surve terferences a etermine th lide concent face soil sam gamma spect everal plan 4, Fe-55, Ni with natural b were close t rtainty as op was supporte le L301210 ver, the Sr-9 ios from L3 pter 6, Table respectivel y the concen of the site-sp to represent he rail road gs were take from site b the railroad erived radio d 7,000-8,50 fenced LSE en land surve re area that This open la survey units e area encom uel casks to 6.5 acres.

gan in Octob Reference 4 of any cont n inspections al volumetric ey unit. Li and inaccess he lateral a trations in t mples and fiv troscopy and nt-derived r i-63, and Sr-background to the detecti pposed to th ed by a rev 05-CR-GS-0 90/Cs-137 an 3012105-CR e 6-3, it is s ly. In conc ntrations of C pecific radio t the actual p bed gravel en of the rail background bed gravel onuclides. T 00 cpm.

E as impac ey units insi surrounds t and area has were design mpassing th the ISFSI.

ber 2014. A

4. Survey amination id s and surveys c contaminat imited soil ibility.

and vertical the soil. A ve subsurfac d HTD anal radionuclide

-90. Cs-137

. In all case ion limits an e actual pres view of exp 002-SS indi nd Fe-55/Cs R-GS-002-SS een that the clusion, base Cs-137 whic onuclide mix presence of p was analyze l road bed g (which aver indicated na The gamma cted by re ide the LSE the LSE has been segre nated for the he site acces The area o A sample plan techniques dentified an s were perfo tion of acces information l extent of A combinatio e soil lyses.

es at 7 was es, the nd are sence pected icates s-137 S are ey are ed on ch are

xture, plant-ed by gravel raged atural scan eactor have s also gated e area ss off of the n was were nd the ormed ssible n was f any on of

La Cross License T Revision random a survey p professio Protectio radioactiv spill loca survey lo not requ locations radiologi A surface surface s or surfac were take intervals Each sur site radio necessary All surfa Several s full isoto survey un 2.3.4.1.

There are The Clas area in th Reactor radioactiv areas, pre Twenty-t measurab locations taken in taken, C samples 13 sampl identified the surf 0.287 pC samples w Seventy-one mete se Boiling W Termination n 0 and biased s ackage. The onal judgme on Supervis vity, depres ations, or ar ocations was uired for soi s were selec ical contamin e soil sample oil samples ce scans indi en from 0.15 rface soil, co ological lab y to achieve ace and sub soil samples opic analysis nit per Refe Class e four (4) op ss 1 open lan he Class 1 op Building, th vely contam evented the a two (22) sur ble radioact s, or areas w Class 1 open Co-60 was p and Cs-137 les. No oth d by gamma face soil sa Ci/g. The a was 0.096 p nine (79) su er, two (2) lo Water Reactor Plan urvey locati e locations o ent of the E or. Consi sions, disco reas where t s also determ ils in an op cted on asp nation.

e was taken were acquir icated elevat 5 cm to dept omposite sub oratory by e an isotopic surface com were selecte s (HTD radi erence 4.

1 Open Lan pen land sur nd survey un pen land sur he Turbine minated build ability to per rface soil sam tivity, disco where the gro n land surve positively id 7 was posit her potentia spectroscop amples was verage Cs-1 Ci/g with a m ubsurface so ocations bias r

ions were es of biased me EnergySoluti deration wa lored areas, the ground h mined by are pen land are phalt in Cla at each sele red at severa ted activity.

ths ranging f bsurface soil gamma-spec c MDC equa mposite samp ed at random ionuclides).

nd Areas rvey units cl nits are show rvey units is Building, th ding and sys rform surfac mples were lored areas, ound had be ey units are s dentified in tively ident al plant-deriv py. The aver s 0.058 pCi/

137 concent maximum ob il samples w sed to areas o 2-25 stablished in easurements ions Project as given to low point g had been di ea classificat eas designat ass 1 survey cted biased a al random lo Depending from 1 to 3 m l sample or ctroscopy.

al to or less ples were an m and were s Duplicate lassified as wn in Figure obstructed b he WTB and stems, as we ce scanning d taken at loc

, buried pip een disturbed shown in Fig concentrati tified in con ved gamma rage Co-60 c

/g with a tration obser bserved conc were taken a on the south each survey s and/or sam Health Phy o locations gravity drain isturbed. Th tion. Rando ated as Clas y units whe and random cations or if on the loca m below gra asphalt sam Analysis co s than 0.10 p nalyzed afte shipped to T samples and Class 1 at L 2-1. A sign by the prese d the LSA ell as stored due to high b cations biase pe locations

d. The loca gure 2-6. O ions greater ncentrations a-emitting ra concentratio maximum rved in the centration o at 10 surface and west sid y unit in acc mples were d ysicist and that exhib n areas, actu he number m-based me ss 1. Rando ere there wa

-based surve f surface soi ation, subsur ade and com mple was ana ount times w pCi/g for Cs er drying th Test America d concrete w LACBWR to nificant porti ence of build Building.

radioactive background.

ed toward sit s, actual an ations of surf Of the 22 sur r than the M s greater th adionuclides on observed observed c analysis of f 1.07 pCi/g e soil locatio de of the WG cordance wit determined b the Radiolo bited measu ual and pote of random-b easurements om measure as no histor ey location.

l sample ana face soil sam mposited ove alyzed by th were adjuste s-137 and C he sample m a Laboratorie were collecte otaling 8,443 ion of the su dings, namel The presen material in tes that exhi nd potential face soil sam face soil sam MDC in tw han the MD s were posit in the analy concentratio f the surface

g.

ons to a dep GTV and fiv th the by the ogical urable ential based were ement ry of Sub-alysis mples r 1 m he on-ed as Co-60.

media.

es for ed by 3 m2.

urface ly the ce of these ibited spill mples mples wo (2)

DC in tively sis of on of e soil pth of ve (5)

La Cross License T Revision locations The sam evaluate Building samples 15 sampl identified of the su 0.161 pC areas is foundatio decommi Ten sam asphalt w this surv results ra measurem identified 0.057 pC A summ presented Nine sur samples gamma s In additi detected One sedi unit L10 and HTD 0.136 pC 2.3.4.2.

The imp immediat two surv LACBW these two Approxim 2350-1 d Alarm se instrumen se Boiling W Termination n 0 s that access mples at the t the subsurfa were taken taken, Cs-1 les. No oth d by gamma ubsurface so Ci/g. The ass not current ons and surr issioning pro mples were ta was taken fro vey unit. Th anging from ment of 3,09 d in concen Ci/g.

ary of the fi d in Table 2-rface soil sa taken from spectroscopy on to detect at concentra iment sampl 10103. This D analyses.

Ci/g.

Class acted Class te area surro ey units. Th WR Crib Hou o survey unit mately 1% o data logger w et-points for nt. No scan Water Reactor Plan ed the soils two WGTV ace soils alon and compo 137 was pos her potentia a spectroscop oil samples sessment of tly complete rounding bu ocess, when aken of asp om the same he asphalt s the instrume 95 dpm/100 ntrations gre indings of th

-10.

amples, 11 s Class 1 open y and HTD a ting Co-60 ations greate le was taken s sample wa Co-60 and 2 Open Lan 2 open lan ounding the hese are sho use, the G-3 ts.

of the surfac with a 2 by the instrum alarms were r

under the T V locations w ngside and u sited at dept sitively iden al plant-deriv py. The ave was 0.055 p potential su

e. Soil in uried structu access will b phalt from p e location se surface was ent MDC of cm2. Of th eater than he survey fo subsurface s n land surve analyses. Th and Cs-137 r than the in n from the s as also sent t C-137 were nd Areas nd areas tota LSE. The C own in Figur 3 Crib Hous ce soil area i y 2 NaI de ment were set e observed.

2-26 urbine Build were acquire underneath th ths of 10, 15 ntified in co ved gamma erage Cs-13 pCi/g with ubsurface soi difficult to ures and pip be more read paved areas lected for th first scanne f 2,771 dpm/

he 10 asphal MDC in on or each indiv soil samples ey units wer he results of

, H-3, C-14 nstrument MD sanitary solid to Test Amer e detected in al approxim Class 2 impa re 2-1. The se and the L in survey un etector. Thi t at the obse ding through ed to a dept he vault. Th 5 and 20 fee oncentration a-emitting ra 7 concentrat a maximum il contamina o access are ping has bee dily availabl in Class 1 s he surface an ed with beta

/100cm2 to a lt samples t nly one sam vidual Class s, one concr re sent to Te f the analysis 4, Fe-55 and DC.

ds tank that rica Laborat n this sampl mately 13,99 acted open l LACBWR LACBWR w nit L201110 is area inclu erved backgr h angled Geo th of five m he samples u et. Of the 7 ns greater th adionuclides tion observe m observed ation in the C eas such as en deferred le.

survey unit nd subsurfac a-gamma de a maximum taken, Cs-13 mple at a s 1 open land rete sample est America s are present d Ni-63 wer is located i tory for gam e, both at a 6 m2 and ar and area wa Administrat warehouses a 1 was scann uded asphalt round plus t oprobe samp meters in ord under the Tu 79 subsurface han the MD s were posit ed in the ana concentratio Class 1 open s under bui until later i L1010104.

ce soil sampl etector with of observed 37 was posit concentratio d survey un and two as a Laboratorie ted in Table re also posit in Class 1 su mma spectros concentrati re located in as segregated tion Building are all locat ned with a M t paved surf the MDCR o pling.

der to urbine e soil DC in tively alysis on of n land ilding n the The les in scan d scan tively on of nit are sphalt es for 2-11.

tively urvey scopy on of n the d into g, the ted in Model faces.

of the

La Cross License T Revision Twenty-t measurab locations taken in taken, Cs other pot The aver 0.077 pC Twenty-t and three resides in Of the 2 greater th than MD identified of 0.112 samples assessme currently surround process, w Twelve s selected results r 2,748 dpm concentra concentra observed A summ presented Three sur samples Administ HTD ana Co-60 a concentra HTD rad 2.3.4.3.

The impa land area Figure 2-site, the t se Boiling W Termination n 0 three surfac ble radioact s, or areas w Class 2 open s-137 was p tential plant rage Cs-137 Ci/g with a m three subsur e locations b n survey uni 23 subsurfac han MDC in DC in four d by gamma pCi/g. The was 0.043 ent of poten y complete.

ding buried s when access samples were randomly.

ranging fro m/100cm2.

ations great ation observ d concentrati ary of the fi d in Table 2-rface soil sa taken from tration Build alyses. The and Cs-137, ations greate dionuclides e Class acted Class 3 a was segre

-1. The Cla transmission Water Reactor Plan e soil samp tivity, disco where the gro n land surve positively ide t-derived rad 7 concentrat maximum obs face soil sam biased to are it L2011101 ce soil samp n one sample samples. N spectroscop average Cs-pCi/g with ntial subsurf Soil in dif structures an s will be mor e taken of as The asphalt om the ins Of the 12 ter than the ved in the an on of 0.055 indings of th

-12.

amples, five m an acces ding were se results of th H-3, C-14 er than MD exceeding M 3 Open Lan 3 open land egated into ass 3 impacte n switchyard r

ples were tak lored areas, ound had be ey units are s entified at co dionuclides tion observe served conce mples were t eas alongsid

1. The biase ples taken, e and Cs-13 No other po py. The sing

-137 concent h a maximu face soil con fficult to ac nd piping ha re readily av sphalt from p t surface wa strument M 2 asphalt sa e instrumen nalysis of the pCi/g.

he survey fo subsurface s ssible storm ent to Test he analysis a 4, Fe-55 an DC. As disc MDC are likel nd Areas areas total a three surve ed open land for the LAC 2-27 ken at locat

, buried pip een disturbed shown in Fig oncentration were positiv ed in the an entration of taken at 14 r de and under ed samples w Co-60 was 7 was positi otential plan gle sample w tration obser um observe ntamination cess areas s as been defe vailable.

paved areas s first scann MDC of 2, mples taken nt MDC in e asphalt sam or each indiv soil samples, m sewer ba America La are presented nd Cm-243/

cussed in se ly to be false approximatel ey units. T d survey un CBWR and G tions biased pe locations

d. The loca gure 2-7. O ns greater th vely identifi nalysis of th 0.200 pCi/g random loca rneath the S were acquire positively ively identif nt-derived ra with detectab rved in the a d concentra n in the Cla such as und erred until l in Class 2 su ned with bet

,529 dpm/10 n, Cs-137 w three samp mples was 0 vidual Class

, three aspha asin manhol aboratories f d in Table 2

/244 were ection 2.3.3 e positives.

ly 66,765m2 The Class 3 nits include t G-3 facilitie d toward sit s, actual an ations of surf Of the 23 sur han MDC in ied by gamm he surface s

g.

ations to a de Storm Sewer ed to a dept identified a fied at conce adionuclides ble Co-60 ha analysis of th ation of 0.0 ass 2 open l der building ater in the d urvey units.

ta-gamma de 00cm2 to a was positive ples. The 0.049 pCi/g s 2 open land alt samples a le located for gamma s

-13. In add also positiv for non-imp

2. The Class survey uni the north en s, the LACB es that exhi nd potential face soil sam face soil sam 14 samples ma spectrosc soil samples epth of one m r Water pipe th of five m at concentra entrations gr s were posit ad a concentr he subsurfac 088 pCi/g.

land areas i foundations decommissio The asphal etector with a maximum ely identifie average Cs with a maxi d survey un and two sedi in front of spectroscopy dition to dete vely detecte pacted areas 3 impacted its are show nd of the lice BWR plant a ibited spill mples mples

. No copy.

s was meter e that meters.

ations reater tively ration e soil The s not s and oning lt was h scan m of ed in s-137 imum nit are iment f the y and ecting ed at s, the open wn in ensed access

La Cross License T Revision and right was deem LACBW Crib Hou facility d were dee These ar Solutions A minim scanned was excl focused o points fo No scan Thirty-tw where th open lan was posi plant-der The aver 0.131 pC Seventee meter.

concentra radionuc concentra maximum Two sam selected results w were pos A summ presented As part o of concre Crib Hou Administ survey un Three co L301210 three sur Laborato se Boiling W Termination n 0 t-of-way are med impacte WR Administ use). The tr during operat emed as imp reas were c s maintains t mum of 1%

with a Mod luded from on undisturb r the instrum alarms were wo surface so he ground ha d survey un tively identi rived gamma rage Cs-137 Ci/g with a m en subsurfac Of the 17 ations grea lides were ation observ m observed c mples were t randomly.

were less tha sitively ident ary of the fi d in Table 2-of the charac ete located i use. In addi tration Build nit L301210 oncrete samp 01, the two se rface soil s ories for gam Water Reactor Plan a and the ha ed by LACB tration Build ransmission tions. The p pacted by th onservativel that classifyi of the surf el 2350-1 da gamma sur bed soils wi ment were se e observed in oil samples ad been dist nits are show ified in conc a-emitting ra 7 concentrat maximum obs e soil sampl 7 subsurface ater than M positively ved in the a concentratio aken of asph The asphalt an instrumen tified by gam indings of th

-14.

cterization of in the north ition, a sam ding and tw

9. These sam ples from su ediment sam samples and mma spectr r

aul road to th BWR due to ding and the yard was d plant access he transit of ly classified ing these are face soil are ata logger w rface scanni ith minimal et at the obse n these surve were taken turbed. The wn in Figure centrations g adionuclides tion observe served conce les were tak e soil samp MDC in ei identified analysis of th on of 0.409 p halt from pa surface wa nt MDC of 1 mma spectro he survey fo f survey unit h section of mple was take wo sediment mples were urvey unit L3 mples taken f d two subs roscopy and 2-28 he ISFSI fac o the presen presence of deemed as im area, Highw f packaged r d as impacte eas as non-im ea in survey with a 2 by ing for safe vegetation o erved backgr ey units.

at locations e locations o e 2-8. Of th greater than s were positi ed in the an entration of ken at random ples taken, ight samples by gamma he subsurfac pCi/g.

aved areas in s first scann 1,938 dpm/1 scopy in any or each indiv t L3012101, the survey u en from a sa t samples w sent off-site 3012101, th from the stor surface soil d HTD anal cility. The n nce of a sep f concrete fr mpacted as i way 35 right radioactive m ed. Howev mpacted wou y units L30 2 NaI dete ety reasons.

or disturbed round plus t biased tow of surface s he 32 surface MDC in 26 ively identif nalysis of th 0.463 pCi/g mly selected Cs-137 w

s. No oth spectrosco ce soil samp n Class 3 su ned with bet 100cm2. No y of these sam vidual Class

, samples we unit that ori anitary tank were taken fr e for isotopic he sanitary ta rm sewer ba samples w lyses. The north end of ptic system from impacte it was part o t-of way and material thro ver, it shou uld have bee 012101 and ector. Surve Gamma d soils or gra the MDCR o ard discolor oil samples e soil sampl samples. N fied by gamm he surface s

g.

d locations t was positive ther potenti opy. The ples was 0.0 urvey units.

ta-gamma de o plant deriv amples.

s 3 open land ere taken fro iginated from k that service from a storm c analysis.

ank sample asin in survey were sent t results of f the license that service ed structures of the LACB d ISFSI haul ough these a ld be noted en appropriat L3012109 ey unit L301 surface scan avel. Alarm of the instrum red areas or taken in Cl les taken, Cs No other pote ma spectrosc soil samples to a depth o ely identifie ial plant-de average Cs 087 pCi/g w The asphalt etector. All ved radionuc d survey un om several p m the LACB es the LACB m sewer bas from survey y unit L3012 to Test Am the analysi d site es the s (the BWR l road areas.

d that te.

were 12102 nning m set-ment.

areas lass 3 s-137 ential copy.

s was of one ed in erived s-137 with a t was l scan clides nit are pieces BWR BWR sin in y unit

2109, merica is are

La Cross License T Revision presented derived R and Ni-6 exceedin consisten 2.3.5. N Based up associate indicated A full lis

2.

The prim informati operation from the character The resu conducte traffic in The G-3 incidents results of A scan su gamma d using an was also gross bet MDC of identified gross alp contamin samples.

derived 0.061 pC that the material Direct an traffic ar Model 23 areas of i ranged f exceeded se Boiling W Termination n 0 d in Table 2 ROC at resid

63. As dis ng MDC are nt with natur Non-Impacte pon the inf ed with the G d that there w st of G-3 stru mary basis f ion documen ns. Additio e LACBWR rization of t ults are prov ed during the the major st station res s of radioact f the charact urvey was p detector. In alpha/beta-g taken at the ta-gamma a f 2,816 dpm/

d gross beta-pha activity nation was i The roof m ROC that w Ci/g. Based elevated dir on the roof.

nd removabl reas of the 360 instrume interest were from 2,540 d the MDC d Water Reactor Plan 2-15. The dual concent scussed in s likely to be ral backgroun ed Structur formation co G-3 Coal Pla was no reaso uctures that for the non nted in the H nally, the p R Stack du the LACBW vided in Re e 2015 chara tation buildin sides in non tive contam erization sur performed of addition, six gamma prop location of ctivity rangi

/100cm2. T

-gamma acti y ranging f dentified at material itse was positive on the fact t rect alpha m le contamin G-3 Coal P ent with 43-e scanned, in dpm/100cm during the co r

analysis of trations grea section 2.3.3 false positiv nd.

es ompiled in ant may be c onable poten have been d n-impacted HSA that the potential for uring opera WR Administ eference 13 acterization ngs were sur n-impacted s mination of s rveys perform f the mid-lev x (6) locatio portional dete each direct m ing from 2,3 The results o ivity ranging from 142 dp concentratio elf was samp ely identifie that no other measurements ation survey Plant. Scan

-93 detector.

ncluding floo m2 to 2,617 ourse of this 2-29 f these samp ater than the 3 for non-im ves. Cs-137 the HSA, S classified as ntial for resi designated as classificatio e G-3 structu windborne ations to s tration Build

. Addition campaign w rveyed.

survey unit soils, asphal med in the G vel roof of th ons were sele ector. A sm measuremen 302 dpm/10 of the direc g from 1,603 pm/100cm2 ons greater t pled on Jun ed by gamm r plant deriv s were due ys were perf n measureme

. Approxim ors and lowe 7 dpm/100cm s survey. Te ples positive e instrument mpacted are was also po Solutions co non-impac dual contam s non-impa on for the G ures were no migration o structure roo ding roof an nal surveys where the su L4012103.

lt or concre G-3 station a he G-3 Coal ected at rand mear sample nt. The resu 0cm2 to 2,8 ct beta-gamm 3 dpm/100cm to 258 dpm than MDC b ne 30, 2015.

ma spectros ved ROC wa most likely formed of re ents were p mately 5% of er wall surfa m2. No o en (10) locat ely identifie MDC, inclu eas, the HT ositively dete oncluded th cted. Histo mination from acted is prov G-3 station ot used for L of airborne ofs was ev nd the G-3 of the G-3 urfaces subje There are ete in this su are summariz l Plant build dom for dire for removab ults of the be 816 dpm/100 ma and alph m2 to 2,072 m/100cm2.

by the analy Cs-137 wa scopy at a as detected, to the pres epresentativ performed us f the concret aces. The av observed sca tions were ch ed several p uding H-3, F TD radionuc ected but at l hat the struc orical inform m site operat vided in Tab structures i LACBWR-re effluent rele valuated by Coal Plant structures ected to high e no docum urvey unit.

zed as follow ding using a ect measurem ble contamin eta scan iden 0cm2 with a ha measurem dpm/100cm No remov ysis of the s as the only concentratio it was concl sence of coa ve high perso sing the Lu te surfaces i verage scan M an measure hosen at ran plant-Fe-55 clides levels ctures mation tions.

ble 2-is the elated eased y the roof.

were h foot ented The ws:

beta-ments nation ntified scan ments m2 and vable smear plant on of luded al ash onnel udlum in the MDC ement

ndom,

La Cross License T Revision primarily measurem 875 dpm greater th 2.3.6. Im The deco impacted In additio accepted remain a Reactor B remainin and floo Reactor/G Turbine surfaces segregate radioactiv systems o Radiolog complian radiologi areas.

disassem remediat demolitio waste.

After com 3 feet be radioactiv use criter 2.3.6.1.

Characte consisted walls an (primaril taken fro 621 foot the 633 f samples w Piping Tu se Boiling W Termination n 0 y from the ments for g

/100cm2 for han MDC by mpacted Str ommissionin d buildings, s on, all system elevation fo and be subje Building tha ng reinforced ors of the Generator P sump and th above the ed by waste ve waste.

or structures gical surveys nce with 10 ical conditio The radiolo mbly and rem ion has ade on, the impa mmodity rem elow grade, vity and the ria.

Basem rization of d primarily o d floors of ly the Piping om the 615 elevation in foot elevatio were collect unnel. The l Water Reactor Plan main lobby gross activit beta-gamm y the analysi ructures an ng approach structures, sy ms and expo or grade at L ected to STS at will be exp d concrete w WGTV, an lant baseme he Turbine 636 foot ele classificatio No extensi s that will be s of the inter 0 CFR 20 re ons for the im ogical infor moval of syst equately red acted structu moval is com

, will be r e extent of a ment Structu the structur of the acquis the Reactor g Tunnels).

foot elevati n the Reactor on concrete f ted, six (6) in locations wh r

y area and y was less

a. No remov s of the sme nd Systems h for LACB ystems and c osed metal b LACBWR is S are the rem posed by the walls floors o nd the rem ent, the one pit. Conseq evation will on and dispo ive characte e removed pr riors of struc equirements mplementati rmation from tems and the duced radiol ures will be mplete, the s re-surveyed additional re ures Below 6 ral surfaces ition and rad r Building, In June and on concrete r Building, th floor of the P n the Reacto here the core 2-30 the mainte than the M vable contam ar samples.

BWR requir components below 3 feet the 639 foo maining rein e removal of of the WTB, mainder of foot thick p quently, all l be remedi osed of as c erization wa rior to the pe tures at LAC regarding on of contro m these su e demolition logical cond demolished tructures tha to determi emediation r 36 Foot Elev of basemen diological an WTB and July of 2015 floor and t he 630 foot Piping Tunn or Building, e samples we enance area.

MDC of 74 mination wa res the dem to a depth o below grad ot elevation.

nforced conc f the interior the remaini the Piping portion of th systems and iated, disass clean demoli as or will b erformance o CBWR are r the posting ols for the pr urveys will of impacted ditions to le d, packaged at will remai ine the con required, if a vation nts that wil nalysis of co the balance 5, a series o the concrete elevation co nels. A total three (3) in ere taken are

. The resu dpm/100cm as identified molition and of at least 3 de will also b The only st crete walls a r concrete an ing reinforce g and Vent he Chimney d componen sembled and ition debris, be performe of FRS.

routinely per g of areas rotection of provide th d structures a evels suitabl and properl in at license ncentrations any, to meet ll remain in oncrete core e of the bas f concrete co e floor and oncrete floor l of twelve (

the WTB an e shown in F ults of all d m2 for alpha at concentra d removal o feet below g be removed.

tructures tha and floors o nd steel line ed concrete tilation Tun y Foundation nts and struc d/or demoli clean salva ed of equipm rformed to en and to ide f workers in he basis for at the site. W le for contr ly disposed termination of the res t the unrestr n the end-s samples from sement struc ore samples east wall o r of the WTB

12) concrete nd three (3) i Figures 2-9.

direct a and ations of all grade.

The at will of the er, the walls

nnels, n, the ctural
ished, age or
ment, nsure entify these r the When rolled of as n, i.e.,

sidual ricted state m the ctures were n the B and e core in the

La Cross License T Revision The loca condition volumetr elevated wall sur discolora that exh condition there was radionuc The conc Test Ame ROC. In Reactor B and #002 concrete analysis positively 59, Tc-99 concrete 2.3.6.2.

A concre Turbine contamin in the T Analysis 0.106 pC 2.3.6.3.

As stated subjected graded su As repor radioactiv building located i Administ proximity laborator Characte beta-gam gross bet se Boiling W Termination n 0 ations selecte n or observ ric contamin observed co faces were ation or stan hibited the h n for concre s sufficient s lide fraction crete pucks r erica Labora n addition, Building sam 2 were also cores is pr of the conc y detected at 9, Pu-238, P core sample Turbin ete core was Building T nation event Turbine Buil of this sam Ci/g and H-3 LACB d previously d to FRS. In urvey approa rted in the H ve spills or has primaril in the build tration Build y to the LSE ry.

rization surv mma/alpha a ta-gamma/al Water Reactor Plan ed for concr ved radiolog ation of the ontact dose r used to id nding water.

highest pot ete in each s source term ns of gamma representing atory for gam the concrete mple locatio o sent for is resented in rete core sa t concentrati Pu-239/240, es is presente ne Building s obtained as Tunnel to cited in the lding and t mple indicate at 1.71 pCi/

BWR Admin y, the LACB nstead, these ach in accord HSA, there w radioactive ly been used ding that sup ding was in E, occupancy veys of the ctivity of in lpha activity r

rete core sam gical measu concrete. W rates or coun dentify poten The goal w ential of re survey unit.

in the cores emitters as w g the first 1/2 mma spectro e pucks rep ns #001, #0 sotopic analy Table 2-16.

amples inclu ions greater Pu-241, Am ed in Referen Tunnel s part of the attempt to HSA pertain the potential ed detectable

/g.

nistration Bu BWR Admin e two structu dance with M was no past contaminati d for office sp pported both nitially class y by LACBW LACBWR nterior floor were also p 2-31 mpling were urements in When possibl nt rates. In a ntial locatio was to ident epresenting This judg to achieve t well as HTD inch of conc oscopy and H presenting th 03, #005 an ysis. A sum Significan ude Ni-63, H than their re m-241 and A nce 16.

e 2014 chara evaluate ning to the d l radiologic e concentrat uilding nistration Bu ures will be MARSAME history of th ion in the LA pace and rec h LACBWR sified as a M WR personn Administrat rs surfaces a performed on biased tow ndicated the le, locations addition, vis ons of surf tify, to the e the worst gmental samp the sensitivit D radionuclid crete at each HTD analyse he concrete nd #006 and mmary of t nt HTD rad H-3 and Sr-9 espective MD Am-243. An acterization the possibl discovery of cal contamin tions of Cs-1 uilding and surveyed fo E guidance.

he use of un ACBWR A cords storage R and G-3 MARSSIM nel and the p tion Buildin and the roof n the roof, on ward location e presence were determ sual observat face contam extent possib case bound mpling appro ties required des.

h sample loc es for beta an deeper than WTB samp the analytica dionuclides i

90. The oth DC include; analysis of survey from le extent o f cracked dra nation of su 137 at 0.352 G-3 Crib H or unrestricte nsealed radio dministratio
e. An enviro operations.

Class 2 stru resence of th ng included

f. Direct m n floor tiles ns where phy of fixed a mined based tions of floo mination, suc ble, the loca ding radiolo ach also en d to determin cation was se nd alpha em n 1/2 inch de le locations al results fo identified by her radionuc C-14, Fe-55 the results o m the floor o of a radioa ain system p urrounding 2 pCi/g, Co-House will n ed release us oactive mate on Building.

onmental lab The LACB ucture due t he environm a scan for measurement and around ysical and/or upon or and ch as ations ogical sured ne the ent to mitting eep at

  1. 001 or the y the clides 5, Ni-of the of the active piping soils.

-60 at not be sing a

erials, The b was BWR to its mental gross ts for floor

La Cross License T Revision drain ope each dire The resu 4,915 dpm the secon imbedded gamma s was then and seco from less and dire observed Beta sc 2,261 dpm from less Direct be of 243 d measurem identified 2.3.7. S Section 8 hydrogeo was deri Haley &

(18) supp 2.3.7.1.

For a di towns an river wat

Lansing, water fo approxim The LAC well at th state perm LACBW Building areas are to the gr pathway se Boiling W Termination n 0 enings. A sm ect measurem ults of the m/100cm2 w nd floor ha d in a floor spectroscopy n performed ond floor lam s than MDC ct alpha re d reading of 7 cans of th m/100cm2 w s than MDC eta-gamma m dpm/100cm2 ments were d concentrati urface and 8.5 in Chap ology and hy ived directly Aldrich, Hy plements the Area Grou stance of 40 nd cities alon ter for indus Iowa, about or industria mately 40 mi CBWR site he site. Sani mitted sanit WR Adminis

. Storm wa e periodically round area su after passing Water Reactor Plan mear sample ment.

beta scans with a scan M allway, a di tile. The c

y. The analy involving th minated woo of 329 dpm adings rang 72 dpm/100c he roof are with a scan M C of 113 dpm measurement to a maxim all less than ions greater Groundwat pter 8 of t ydrology of y from Hal ydrogeologic e preliminary undwater Us 0 miles dow ng the Missis strial purpos t 15 miles d al purposes les downstre has its own itary wastes tary wastes h tration Buil ater runoff is y monitored urrounding t g through an r

e for remova of the int MDC of 2,10 screte radio contaminated ysis of the ti he acquisitio od, carpet, a m/100cm2 to ged from le cm2.

ea indicate MDC of 2,26 m/100cm2 to ts taken on t mum observ n MDC of 4 than MDC b ter his LTP c ZNPS and e ey & Aldri cal Investiga y findings in se wnstream of ssippi River ses, excludin downstream o between t eam.

potable wa are collecte hauler. Thi lding and a s diverted di d for oil shee the facility v n oil separato 2-32 able contam terior surfac 00 dpm/100c oactive parti d portion of ile identified n of ten (10) and floor til a maximum ess than MD ed results 61 dpm/100c o a maximum the floor dra ved reading 42 dpm/100c by the analy ontains a s environs. T ich, Hydrog ation Report n Reference 1 the site, vir are obtained ng the adjac of the site.

the LACBW ater supply, p d in a solids is includes a a sanitary h irectly to th en and disco via downspo or located in mination was ces ranged cm2. During icle was dis f the tile wa d 0.005 uCi

) biased dire le. Direct b m observed re DC of 39 d ranging fr cm2. Direct m observed ain openings g of 333 dp cm2. No re sis of the sm summary d The informat geological C t for the LaC

17.

rtually all m d from groun cent G-3 pla There are n WR site an provided thr s holding tan a sanitary ho holding tank he Mississipp oloration. R outs or ente nside the LSE also taken from 1,420 g the scan of scovered. T as removed of Cs-137.

ect measurem beta-gamma eading of 5, dpm/100cm2 rom 1,872 t alpha meas reading of 1 s ranged from pm/100cm2 a emovable co mear samples description tion containe Conceptual S Crosse Boilin municipal w und water. T ant, is the co no other know nd Prairie rough a sing nk and pump olding tank k that servi pi River at o Roof drains d r the norma E.

at the locati 0 dpm/100cm f the north e The particle and analyze An investig ments on the readings ra

,743 dpm/10 to a maxi dpm/100cm surements ra 152 dpm/100 m less than M and direct ontamination

s.

of the geo ed in this se Site Model ng Water Re water supplie The nearest u oal-fired pla wn users of du Chien, gle ground w ped off by a that service ices the Tu outfalls. Re discharge dir al effluent re on of m2 to end of e was ed by gation e first anged 00cm2 imum m2 to anged 0cm2.

MDC alpha n was

ology, ection (17).

eactor es for use of ant in f river WI, water local es the urbine elease rectly elease

La Cross License T Revision 2.3.7.2.

Regional Mississip parallels upward; river stag demonstr river stag Groundw surface (

Groundw the Missi may turn chemical the shallo Based on of the G-located i monitorin a slightly has a do gradient towards t there are stages. G Reactor B are below During p was com permeabi buildings soils will will circ localized outside th other han or buried underlyin shallow s contamin soils with orders of se Boiling W Termination n 0 Groundw lly, groundw ppi river. C the river. U however, th ge data comp rates that the ge impacts th water beneath bgs) and the water in the s issippi Rive n and flow l constituent ow system.

n a review of

-3 Ash Land in the sout ng wells (B1 y downward ownward gr at well pair the river bas e some perio Groundwater Building ba w the water t plant constru mpacted, redu ility can dec

s. The resul l flow at a s cumnavigate d flow regim he footprint nd, potential d piling, will ng groundw soils from p nation. The hin the supp f magnitude Water Reactor Plan ater Flow water flows i Closer to th Under typic he vertical gr pared to wa e shallow aq he water tabl h the site is e groundwat shallow depo
r. The deep parallel to s would occu f the ground dfill area grou th side of t 11AR/B11R vertical gra radient at w B9/B9A. T sin with a lo ods where t r flow throu sement shel table during uction, and m ucing the eff crease the h lting impact slower veloc the area, e mes on contam of these str l releases tha l likely take water. This precipitation, average sha port pilings, lower.

r in a westerl he shore, gr al river stag radient rever ter table ele quifer is in di le elevation.

first encoun ter is in dire osits and fill per groundw the river.

ur at or near dwater elevat undwater mo the LACBW

) to the east adient. Durin well pairs B This is expec ocalized influ the gradients ugh the LAC l) as well as high and low more specifi fective poros hydraulic con to groundw city, and reg effectively b minant fate a ructures will at occurred w much longe is further c

, creating an allow aquifer the hydraul 2-33 ly direction roundwater ge, groundw rses during f evations mea irect hydrau ntered at an ect hydraulic l material flo water is also Because th r the surface tion measure onitoring we WR site, an of and up gr ng times of n B11R/B11AR cted as grou uence at B9/

s are revers CBWR site is s the deep p w river stage ically the ins sity and perm nductivity o water flow is gionally, a si bypassing th and transpor l likely be d within the fo er to migrate compounded n area that w r hydraulic c ic conductiv from the bl may also h water gradien flood stages.

asure in LAC ulic commun n average de c communica ows towards likely to flo he potential

, the release ements colle ells (# B2/B3 nd associate radient of LA normal and R and B2/B undwater flo

/B9A from t sed; and this s impacted b pilings that s e conditions.

stallation of meability of of the aquife s that ground ignificant pe these soils.

rt are that po deflected and ootprint of th e both in th d as the ove will likely re conductivity vity would b luffs on the have a flow nts near the

. The geolog CBWR site nication with epth of 20 fe ation with th s the west an ow towards t l releases of s would like ected during 3/B9A/B9/B ed backgrou ACBWR, th low river sta B3, with an ows generally the adjacent s is likely d by deeper st support the f the support f the soils. T er within the dwater withi ercentage of The impli otential relea d flow aroun he buildings e vadose zo erlying struc etain any po y is 313 feet be expected east toward component river are sli gical and his monitoring h the river an eet below gr he adjacent nd discharges the west but f radiologic ely be confin routine sam B7/B8), whic und groundw here appears age, groundw upward ve y from the b t inlet. How due to high tructures (i.e structures, w t pilings, the This reducti e footprint o in the comp f the flow re ications of ases that occ nd them. O s, via floor d one as well a ctures isolat tentially rele per day. Fo to be one to ds the t that ightly storic wells nd the round river.

s into t then cal or ned to mpling ch are water to be water ertical bluffs

wever, river e., the which e soil ion in of the pacted egime these curred On the drains as the te the eased or the o two

La Cross License T Revision The velo gradient.

across th Therefor the inch Environm show sea stage. Th LACBW vicinity structure direction 2.3.7.3.

Historica monitorin monitorin monitorin Dairylan Of the w LACBW routine b designate Environm G-3 Foss Nos. 3, 4 levels re 3.0E-08 µ During th to the s radioactiv The well suspected that samp As note Activities wells to monitorin if ground located n interval o below gr B.

se Boiling W Termination n 0 ocity of gro The gradie he site, groun e, it is likely hes and fee mental Moni asonal varia hese wells a WR site struct of suspect s/foundation ns.

Previous I ally, the LAC ng wells. F ng wells loc ng wells of d for radiolo wells shown WR facilities basis. The gr ed as B-2, mental Moni sil Station op 4 and 5 wer ported durin

µCi/ml to 9.

he recovery outh of the ve liquids fr l-point show d leakage. T ple are prese d in the L s Report (D support gro ng wells (10 dwater qual nominally wi of 15 to 25 f rade. These Water Reactor Plan oundwater is ent of the wa ndwater mon y that the gro et/day rang itoring Prog ation on upw are not suffic tures or area broken dra ns or variati Investigation CBWR Lice igure 2-11 i cated on th ff the LACB ogical purpo n on Figure were histor roundwater m B-3, B-7, itoring staff perational re re routinely ng this mon 0E-08 µCi/m of a probab e Turbine B rom suspect wn on Figure The well-po ented in Tabl LACBWR D D-Plan/PSDA oundwater e 0 wells total) ity had bee ithin five (5) feet below g wells are sh r

s directly r ater table is i nitoring has oundwater v e). Ground gram wells a ward and do cient to char as where pote ain lines) co ions in fill m ns ensed Site ha llustrates the e LACBWR BWR site t ses.

2-11, only P rically monit monitoring w B-8, B-9, on a routine equirements.

monitored f nitoring peri ml).

le spill incid Building. T broken drain 2-11 was es int was sam le 2-17. Thi Decommissio AR) (19), D evaluation.

) were instal en impacted

) feet of one grade and on how on Figu 2-34 elated to bo nfluenced by shown that velocity acro water eleva agree with t ownward gra racterize the ential releas ould have o materials co as had sever e current loc R site. The that are or Potable Wa tored by Da wells and ba B-9A, B11A e basis for no During LA for gross be iod was less dent in 1983 This inciden n lines in th stablished do mpled once o is well-point oning Plan airyland rec In Novemb lled within t by plant o e another con ne deep well ure 2-11 as M oth the hyd y the topogr the water ta oss the site is ation data the regional adients that groundwate es associated occurred. In ould locally ral potable w cation of po ere is no po have been ater Wells N airyland for ackground gr AR, and B on-radiologi ACBWR ope eta activity.

s than or eq

, a temporar nt concerne e Turbine B own gradien on May 3, 19 t has since be and Post-S cently instal ber 2012, fi the LACBW operations.

nsist of one with a scree MW 200A an draulic cond raphy; and, w able has a v s also relativ from the groundwate are influen er flow below d with LAC n these area influence g water wells otable water otable water monitored Nos. 3 and 4 radiological roundwater B11R are m ical paramete erations, Pota Typical gr qual to MD ry well-poin ed the pote Building to su nt and below 983. The an een abandon Shutdown D lled groundw ive (5) pairs WR licensed The well p shallow wel ened interva nd B throug ductivity and with the flat ery low grad vely slow (i.

G-3 Coal er flow, and nced by the w and aroun BWR (i.e., i as, pilings, groundwater and groundw and groundw r or groundw by Solution 4 which serv l conditions monitoring monitored by ers to suppo able Water W ross beta ac DC (ranging nt was establ ential leakag ub-building w the grade o nalysis resul ned.

Decommissio water monit s of groundw site to deter pairs which ll with a scre al of 45 to 55 h MW-204A d the areas dient.

.e., in Plant d also river nd the in the deep flow water water water ns or viced on a wells y the ort the Wells ctivity from lished ge of soils.

of the ts for oning toring water rmine were eened 5 feet A and

La Cross License T Revision Two (2) in June groundw 90 and C In June o through 2 and B11 several r fourth ro Potable samples transuran of the gro Addition

18.

2.3.7.4.

The LAC twice pe groundw the MW-The colle D

M p

R gr 2.3.7.5.

Groundw (5 pairs) sampling wells MW Novembe positively ranging Novembe during th During th MW-202 Sr-90 w se Boiling W Termination n 0 rounds of gr 2013 and th water samples Cs-137. Analy of 2014, a t 204 A and B AR. These radionuclide ound of gro Well #5, an were sent o nic radionucl oundwater sa nal details, in On-Going CBWR Site g er year for r water is at rel

-200A/B thru ected inform Depth to grou Monitoring w otential/turb Radiological roundwater Summ water charact within the g in 2013. H W-201A and er of 2013 y detected i from 1.43 p er 2013 sam he 2013 samp he June 201 2A, MW-203 was also po Water Reactor Plan roundwater hen during s were sent ysis for H-3 third round o B; Potable W e collected g s including oundwater w nd Monitori off for radio lides. Table amples and r ncluding the g Investigatio groundwater radiological latively high u MW-204A mation during und water in well groundw bidity/dissolv sample infor sample colle mary of Grou terization eff LSE area H-3 was posi d B, MW-20 at concentra in the same pCi/L to 2.1 mpling period pling period 4 sample pe 3A and MW sitively det r

samples wer a seasonal l to an off-sit was perform of groundwa Water Wells #

groundwater HTD and t were collecte ing Wells B ological ana es 2-18 and 2 results.

e off-site ana ons r monitoring analysis pu her and lowe A/B wells as g each monit the respecti water pH/spe ved oxygen/t rmation incl ection.

undwater An fforts comme in Novemb tively detect 02-A and B, ations rangi wells durin 18 pCi/L; ho

d. Co-60 an eriod, H-3 w W-203B) at c ected in w 2-35 re collected low groundw te laboratory med on site.

ater samples

  1. 3, 4, 5, and samples w transuranic r ed from: M B11R and B alysis of sev 2-19 provide alytical labor g program co urposes only er elevations shown on F toring interv ive monitorin ecific conduc temperature.

luding a com nalytical Res enced throug ber 2012 an ted at concen MW-203A ing from 15 ng the June owever, it w nd Cs-137 w was positively oncentration wells MW-20 in 2013, du water level y for radiolo s was collec 7; and Mon ere sent off radionuclide MW 200A an B11AR. T veral radion es a summar ratory repor onsists of ob y from exis

. The moni igure 2-11.

val includes:

ng well.

ctance/oxida mpleted chain sults gh the install nd the com ntration grea and B and M 50 pCi/L to 2013 sampl was not po were not po y detected in ns ranging fr 02A, MW-2 uring the sea in Novemb ogical analys cted from: M nitoring Well f for radiolo es. In Septe nd B throug These collec nuclides incl ry of the radi rts are provi btaining grou ting monito toring wells ation and red n of custody lation of 10 mmencement ater than MD MW-204A a 660 pCi/L.

ling period a ositively dete sitively dete n four (4) w from 245 pC 203A and asonal high w ber 2013. T sis for Co-60 MW-200A a ls B2, B-3, B ogical analys ember of 20 gh 204A an cted groundw luding HTD iological ana ded in Refer undwater sam oring wells w s sampled in duction y following monitoring of groundw DC in monit and B in Jun Sr-90 was at concentra ected during ected in any wells (MW-B i/L to 336 p MW-204A water These 0, Sr-and B B11R sis of 014 a nd B, water D and alysis rence mples when clude wells water toring e and s also ations g the y well

B11R, pCi/L.

with

La Cross License T Revision concentra Am-241 During t greater th concentra were also 2.4.

C The surv deferred.

under co that will basement illustrate defer the condition ALARA data wou areas),

Safet Histo Acce struct interf The a physi condi As acces will be co for the s radionuc and HTD events ca of a surv stored in validatin As decom surface d for open documen se Boiling W Termination n 0 ations rangin were also po he Septemb han MDC in ation of 1.14 o positively d Continuing C vey of many Examples ncrete or asp remain and t after liner s buried pip e characteriz ns:

consideratio uld likely not ty considerat orical data sh ss for charac tures or othe fere with con ability to use ical relations itions repres ss is gained ollected, eva survey unit.

lides present D radionuclid aused by equ vey unit(s) w n the charac g the initial mmissioning decontamina n air demolit nted survey a Water Reactor Plan ng from 1.1 ositively det ber 2014 sam n any well.

4 pCi/L. Co detected at r Characteriz inaccessible s of areas w phalt coverin d be subjec r removal an ping systems zation of a ons (e.g., the t change the

tions, hows that the cterization w er obstacles w ntinued oper e engineering ship to surro sented by the to areas tha aluated and s This data t and update des. In addi uipment failu will be reco terization d classificatio g proceeds, ation (as wel tion or unre and a formal r

12 pCi/L to ected at resi mple period, Sr-90 was o-60, Ni-63, residual conc zation e or not read where survey ngs, structur cted to FRS nd the inter s that may r soil or stru e area is eith e survey area e area could would require where the re ration of ope g judgment i ounding area e conditions at were prev stored with-o will be use e the variabil ition, as the ures or perso orded. Thes atabase. Th n and in plan areas will, ll as fixed co estricted rele l turnover w 2-36 2.01 pCi/L.

dual concen

, H-3 was n positively d

, Cs-137, Eu centrations in dily accessib ys are deferr ral wall and

, the underl riors of bur remain in th ucture was b her a radiati a or area clas be classified e significant emoval could erating system in assigning s and the lik in these adja viously inacc other radiolo ed along wi lity in the ra decommiss onnel errors, se events w his additiona nning for the as necessar ontamination ease. When will be made C-14, Tc-9 ntrations in se not positivel detected in o u-152, Eu-15 n several we ble subsurfa rred include floor surfac rlying concr ried pipe tha he end-state based on on ion or conta ssification o d without fur t deconstruct d result in an ms, or the area a cl kelihood of th acent areas.

cessible, add ogical survey ith existing adionuclide m ioning progr

, which may will be evalu al character e FRS.

ry, be decon n) to levels n a structur by the Radi 99, Eu-152, everal wells ly detected a one (1) well 54, Pu-239/2 ells.

ace soils or s soils under ces in some rete in the R at may rem condition.

ne or more amination are of the locatio rther charact tion of adjac n unsafe con lassification he area to ha ditional char y data in a s data to upd mix for both resses, data y affect the ra uated and, w rization data ntaminated that will me e is ready f ological Pro Pu-239/240 at concentra l, MW-200A 240 and Am surfaces has r structures, of the basem Reactor Bui main. Figure The decisi of the follo ea and addit on or surroun terization, cent systems ndition or n based on ave radiolog racterization urvey histor date the typ h gamma-em from operat adiological s when approp a will be us to remove eet the condi for demoliti otection grou 0 and ations A at a m-241 been soils ments ilding e 2-3 on to owing tional nding s,

gical n data ry file pes of mitting tional status

priate, ed in loose itions ion, a up for

La Cross License T Revision the comp are suitab Followin a "turnov acceptan transferre performa may inclu The "turn survey pe survey da

turnover, survey p met. The Appr action Appr Appr with Appr radio Data addit Appr 2.5.

R

1.

U C

2

2.

U R

3.

U C

o

4.

E C

5.

E S

se Boiling W Termination n 0 pany preform ble.

ng the demol ver assessme ce criteria w ed to Charac ance of the F ude a "turno nover surve erformed, re ata prior to c

, and FRS), a lans will co ese objective ropriate instr n level and/o ropriate instr ropriate surv the calibrati ropriate samp nuclide ratio analysis crit ional sample ropriate class References U.S. Nuclear Content of Li 011.

U.S. Nuclear Radiation Sur U.S. Nuclear Consolidated f Radiologic EnergySoluti Crosse Boilin EnergySoluti ite Characte Water Reactor Plan ming demoli lition and/or ent" will be p will be met, cterization/L FRS. Otherw over survey,"

ey" process, epresent at le conducting t a documente ontain the ap es include:

rument selec or release cri rument quali ey technique on methodol ple collectio os, teria to ident es and, sification of Regulatory icense Termi Regulatory rvey and Site Regulatory Decommiss cal Criteria, F ons PG-EO-ng Water Rea ons GP-EO-erization Proj r

ition, validat r remediation performed. I

, then physi License Term wise, additio

" primarily fo together wi east one, but the FRS. Fo ed survey pl ppropriate da ction to ensur

iteria, ity control m es to ensure
logies, n and analys tify follow-u the survey a Commission ination Plan Commission e Investigati Commission sioning Guid Final Report

-313196-SV actor.

-313196-QA ject (QAPP) 2-37 ting that the n, and when If the results ical and adm mination grou onal remedia for Class 1 an ith any addi t possibly se or each type an will be d ata assessme re the proper measures to e that the field sis to determ up actions su area.

n, Regulator s for Nuclea n, NUREG-1 ion Manual (

n, NUREG-1 dance - Char t - Septembe

-PL-001, Ch A-PL-001, Qu

).

e radiologica n an area is b s of this asse ministrative up personne ation may b nd 2 areas w itional chara everal, oppo of survey (c developed us ent to ensur r sensitivity ensure operab d measurem mine spatial v uch as remed ry Guide 1.1 ar Power Rea 1575, Revisi (MARSSIM 1757, Volum racterization er 2006.

haracterizatio uality Assur al condition believed to b essment indi control of l for prepara be required.

within the LS acterization ortunities to c characterizat ing the DQO re that sever relative to th

bility, ent techniqu variability an diation and th 79, Standard actors, Revis ion 1, Multi-M), August 20 me 2, Revisio

, Survey, an on Survey P rance Project s in the stru be ready for icate that the the area wi ation, design This assess SE.

and remedi collect addit tion, remedia O process. T ral objective he applicabl ues are consi nd variability he collection d Format and sion 1 - June

-Agency 000.

on 1, nd Determina Plan for the L t Plan LACB ucture

FRS, e FRS ill be n, and sment iation tional
ation, These es are le istent y in n of d

e ation La BWR

La Cross License T Revision

6.

E W

7.

D S

8.

U R

D

9.

S C

10.

E 1

11.

U L

12.

U R

T

13.

E S

14.

E S

15.

Z F

16.

E C

17.

H 3

18.

H R

2

19.

D D

20.

In E

1 se Boiling W Termination n 0 EnergySoluti Water Reacto Dairyland Po AFSTOR -

U.S. Nuclear Radiation Sur December 20 andia Nation Contaminatio EnergySoluti 0 Detector S U.S. Nuclear Laboratory A U.S. Nuclear Radiological Termination)

EnergySoluti urvey Repor EnergySoluti urvey Repor ZionSolution allout in Soi EnergySoluti Concern Duri Haley & Aldr 0, 2012.

Haley & Aldr Reactor, Dair 015.

Dairyland Po Decommissio nternational Emitters (max 998.

Water Reactor Plan ons Technic or Historical wer Corpora December 2 Regulatory rvey and As 006.

nal Laborato on From Dec ons Technic Sensitivity.

Regulatory Analytical Pro Regulatory Monitoring

- Effluent S ons GG-EO-rt for Octobe ons LC-RS-rt for June th s Technical ils at Zion St ons Technic ing LACBW rich, Hydrog rich Inc., Hy ryland Powe wer Coopera oning Activit Standard IS ximum beta r

cal Support D Site Assessm ation LAC-T 2009.

Commission sessment of ory, NUREG commissioni cal Support D Commission otocols Man Commission Programs (I Streams and

-313196-RS er and Novem PN-164017-hru August 2 Support Doc tation.

cal Support D WR Decomm geological C ydrogeologic r Cooperativ ative, LACB ties Report (

O 7503-1, P energy grea 2-38 Document R ment (HSA)

TR-138, Initi n NUREG-1 Materials an G/CR-5512, V ing Paramete Document R n, NUREG-1 nual (MARL n Regulatory Inception Th the Environ S-RP-001, LA mber 2014 F

-001, LACB 2015 Field W cument 13-0 Document R missioning.

onceptual Si cal Investiga ve, Genoa W BWR Decom (D-Plan/PSD Part 1, Evalua ater than 0.15 RS-TD-31319

).

ial Site Char 1575, Supple nd Equipmen Volume 3, R er Analysis -

RS-TD-31319 1576, Multi-LAP) - Augu y Guide 4.15 hrough Norm nment - July ACBWR Ra Field Work -

BWR Radiolo Work - Nove 004, Examin RS-TD-31319 ite Model, F ation Report, Wisconsin, Fi mmissioning DAR), Revis ation of Surf 5 MeV) and 96-003, La C racterization ement 1, Mu nt Manual (M Residual Rad

- October 19 96-006, Lud

-Agency Rad ust 2001.

5, Quality A mal Operatio 2007.

adiological C

- November ogical Chara ember 2015.

nation of Cs-96-001, Rad File No. 3870

, La Crosse B ile No. 3870 Plan and Po sion - March face Contam Alpha-Emit Crosse Boilin n Survey for ulti-Agency MARSAME dioactive 999.

dlum Model 4 diological ssurance or ns to Licens Characterizat r 2015.

acterization 137 Global dionuclides o 05-001 - Au Boiling Wat 05-008, Janu ost Shutdown h 2014.

mination, Bet tters - Augu ng E) -

44-se tion of ugust ter ary n

ta-ust

La Cross License T Revision Survey Unit ID #

L101010 L101010 L101010 L101010 L201110 L201110 L301210 L301210 L301210 L401210 L401210 L401210 L401210 L401210 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Survey 01 Reactor Stack G 02 Turbine Diesel G 03 LSA Bu 04 North L 01 LACBW Crib Ho 02 G-3 Cri Dischar 01 North E 02 Transm 09 Plant A 03 G-3 Co 05 Coal Pi 06 Capped 07 Ground 08 Hwy 35 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-1 y Unit Descr LA r Building, W Grounds e Building, T Generator Bu uilding, Mai LSE Grounds WR Adminis ouse, Wareh ib House, LA rge Line, Are End of Licen mission Switc Access, ISFSI al Plant Gro le Grounds d Ash Impou ds East of Hi 5/Railroad R r

LACBW ription ACBWR Sit WTB, WGTV Turbine Offi uilding Grou ntenance Ea s

LSE Buff stration Buil ouse Ground ACBWR Cir ea South of L Clas nsed Site chyard Area I Haul Road Non-Im ounds undment Gro ghway 35 Right of Way 2-39 WR Open L te Enclosure V, Ventilatio ce Building, unds at Shack Gro fer Zone Gro lding, LACB ds rc. Water LSE Fence ss 3 Grounds d Grounds mpacted Grou ounds y Grounds Land Survey Cl e Grounds on

, 1B ounds ounds BWR s

unds No No No No No y Units Initial lassification Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted n

Approxim Survey U Area (m 1,992 2,315 1,749 2,387 7,211 6,785 24,04 11,71 31,01 d

66,86 d

82,89 d

111,89 d

81,25 d

9,444 mate Unit m2) 2 5

9 7

1 5

2 1

2 9

4 99 4

4

La Cross License T Revision Surve B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B201 B201 B201 B201 B201 B201 B301 B301 B301 B301 se Boiling W Termination n 0 ey Unit 10001 10002 10003 10004 10005 10006 10007 10008 10009 10101 10102 10103 10104 10105 10106 12101 12102 12103 12104 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-2 Sur Wa LAC W

LACBWR LACBWR M

L LACBW LA LA LA Ba Transmissi Barg r

LACBW rvey Area D Reactor Bu aste Treatmen CBWR Venti Waste Gas Ta R Turbine Bld Bldg 1B Diesel G LSA Buil Maintenance E Pipe Tun ACBWR Cr G-3 Crib H WR Administ ACBWR War ACBWR War ACBWR War ack-up Contr ion Sub-Stat G-1 Crib H ge Washing B 2-40 WR Structu Description uilding nt Building ilation Stack ank Vault dg./Turbine Generator Str lding Eat Shack nnel rib House House tration Build rehouse #1 rehouse #2 rehouse #3 rol Center tion Switch H House Break Room ural Survey k

Office ructure ding House m

y Units Class Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl sification lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3

La Cross License T Revision G-3 R G-3 S G-3 C G-3 T G-3 E G-3 C G-3 C G-4 W G-3 L G-3 L G-3 C G-3 C G-3 V G-3 T G-3 B G-3 F G-3 F G-3 W G-3 S G-3 S

  1. 6 W se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table Reclaim Buil Stock Out Tr Coal Unload Transfer Tow Electrical Ro Crusher Tow Conveyor #6 Warehouse a LRAPB Buil Lime Silo El CAT Buildin Coal Plant Vehicle Stora Train Shed Bottom Ash Fly Ash Silo Fly Ash Elec Waste Silo Surge Tank Settling Tank Well House Water Reactor Plan e 2-2 (contin lding ransfer Build ing Tower wer A oom wer 6 (2) and Electrica lding ectrical Buil ng age Building Dewatering ctrical Buildi k

r nued)

Non Imp ding al Room lding g

Buildings ing 2-41 LACBWR pacted Struc G-3 An G-3 Bo G-3 Ex G-3 Ga G-3 Su G-3 Su G-3 Li G-3 W G-3 Ac G-3 As G-3 Ba G-3 Fl

  1. 7 We G-3 Co G-3 Sa G-3 St G-3 Gr G-3 As Main P S03 Ta Structural ctures nnex Buildin oiler Fuel Oi xplosive Gas as Room ub Station Sh ub Station Sh ime Storage Weigh Station ctive Reclaim sh Coordina ag Houses (5 ammable St ll House oal Scale ample Buildi tock Out Tra rid Shed sh handling Pollution Co ank Building Survey Uni ng il Pump Bui s Storage Ro hed hed Silo n

m Buildings ators Office

5) torage Shed ing ansfer Buildi Blower Buil ontrol Electri g

its lding oom s/ Tunnel ing lding ical Buildingg

La Cross License T Revision Dete Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Gamma System a

Bas Stan b

Fun se Boiling W Termination n 0 ector Model m 44-9 m 43-68 mo m 43-68 mo m 43-93 mo m 43-89 mo m 43-93 mo m 43-89 mo m 44-10 m 43-37 m 43-10-1 a Spectroscop ed on 1-minute ndard, ISO 750 nctional equival Water Reactor Plan Table 2-3 l b Me Ludl ode Ludl ode Ludl ode ode Ludl ode ode Ludl Ludl Ludl Ludl py e count time; a 03-1 (20).

lent instrument r

Instrume eter Model lum 3 lum 2350-1 lum 2350-1 lum 2360 lum 2360 lum 2350-1 lum 2350-1 lum 2929 N/A and default valu tation may be u 2-42 ent Types a Applica sca static &

stat static &

stat sca sca and/

smea Anal ues for surface used and Nomina ation Ty (dp an 1,0

& scan 1,8 tic

& scan 1,8 2,0 tic an 3.5 6.5 an 2,0 or ar lysis efficiencies (

al MDCs Typical Dete MDCscan pm/100cm2) 000 to 2,000 800 to 2,000 N/A 800 to 2,000 000 to 2,200 N/A 5 pCi/g 60Co 5 pCi/g 137Cs 000 to 2,200 N/A N/A s) as specified ction Sensit

)

MDCst (dpm/10 0

N/A 0

600 to 80 to 0

0 800 to 800 to 90 to 1 90 to 1 o

s N/A 0

N/A

~0.10 p for Co-6 Cs-13 in Internationa tivity tatic a

0cm2)

A 700 90 900 900 100 100 A

A

-15

-80 pCi/g 60 and 37 al

La Cross License T Revision Analysis /

Gamma Radionucli Isotopic N (Np-237)

Isotopic Pl (Pu-238/23 Isotopic Th (Th-228/23 Isotopic Ur (U-234/235 Isotopic Cu (Cm-243/2 Isotopic Am (Am-241/2 C-14 Tritium Sr-90 Pu-241 Tc-99 Gross Alph Fe-55 Ni-63 Ni-59 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-4 Analytes ides G

eptunium A

lutonium 39/240)

A horium 30/232)

A ranium 5/238)

A urium 244)

A mericium 243)

A LS LS G

LS LS ha / Beta G

LS LS LS Water Reactor Plan Off-Site Technique Gamma Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec SC SC GFPC SC SC GFPC SC SC SC r

e Laboratory DOE E

< 0.1pC DOE E

< 0.04 p DOE E

< 0.05 p DOE E

< 0.05 p DOE E

< 0.06 p DOE E

< 0.03 p DOE E

< 0.04 p EPA EE

< 5.0 pC EPA 90

< 10.0 p DOE E

< 1.0 pC DOE E

< 10.0 p DOE E

< 2.0 pC DOE E

< 10.0 p DOE E

< 2.0 pC DOE E

< 50.0 p 2-43 y Analytica Soils (pCi/

EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g ERF C-01 Ci/g 06.0 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/

EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g al Methods a Method and

/g) 0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 (SRW01) 0 (SRW01) and Typical d Sensitivity Wat EPA Method 10.0 pCi/L EML Pu-02 M 1.0 pCi/L ENIC Modifi 50.0 pCi/L EPA 906.0 300.0 pCi/L EICHROM M 2.0 pCi/L EML Pu-01 50.0 pCi/L EICHROM T 15.0 pCi/L EPA 900.0 5.0 pCi/L EML Fe-01 M 100.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M 15.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M 100.0 pCi/L l MDCs ter (pCi/L) 901.1 Modified ied Modified Metho Tc-01 Modified Modified Modified od

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Ta Location Area West o Area South Area North Area at G-3 Area Outsid Area at G-3 33 miles So Pedretti Far Radio Towe Junction of East of Stod Water Reactor Plan able 2-5 of #2 Wareh of Parking L of LACBW Gas Silo de G-3 Offic Outfall uth at Bad A m Substation er Northeast Hwy O and ddard at Hwy r

2005 Dairy (on L house Lot R Admin Bu es (off L Axe Boat Lan n East of LA of LACBW Hwy K y O Junction 2-44 yland Backg Licensed Site uilding Licensed Site nding ACBWR WR n

ground Stud Co-60 (pCi/g) e)

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC e) 0.023

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC dy for Soils Cs-(pC 0.0 0.0 0.

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.

0.0

-137 Ci/g) 077 026 149 038 076 017 381 227 035 188 065

La Cross License T Revision T

Conditio Undisturb Disturbed Undisturb Disturbed se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-6 on and Dept bed d

bed d

Water Reactor Plan Investiga th D

Non r

ative Levels Meas Drainage Ar 0.

0.

n-Drainage 0.

0.

2-45 for Cs-137 sured Rang (pCi/g) eas Surface 00 to 2.80 00 to 1.67 Areas Surfa 23 to 0.66 27 to 0.34 Based on B ge R e 0-10 cm ace 0-10 cm

Background

Range for 95 (p

0.45 0.35 m

0.15 0.23 d Studies 5% Distribu pCi/g) 5 to 3.63 5 to 2.86 5 to 0.77 to 0.42 ution

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2

  • L Water Reactor Plan

-7 Initia Radio H

C Fe N

Co N

Sr Nb Tc Cs Eu Eu Eu Np Pu Pu Pu Pu Am Cm-24 Listed half life i r

al Suite of L onuclide H-3 C-14 e-55 i-59 o-60 i-63 r-90 b-94 c-99

-137 u-152 u-154 u-155 p-237 u-238 u-239 u-240 u-241 m-241 43/244*

is the shortest h 2-46 LACBWR S Ha half life for the Site-Specific alf Life (Yea 1.24E+01 5.73E+03 2.70E+00 7.50E+04 5.27E+00 9.60E+01 2.91E+01 2.03E+04 2.13E+05 3.00E+01 1.33E+01 8.80E+00 4.76E+00 2.14E+06 8.78E+01 2.41E+04 6.60E+03 1.44E+01 4.32E+02 1.81E+01 e radionuclides c Radionucl ars) s in the pair lides

L L

R S

S M

M M

M S

S M

M M

M S

A M

M M

M S

M M

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Survey Unit Surface Area Description Surface Soil

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Subsurface Soil

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Asphalt

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Surface Scans

% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm) ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-8 Survey Unit 66,869 m2 G-3 Coal Plan Co-60 3

0 0.070 0.075 0.078 0.057 0.011 Co-60 4

0 0.060 0.056 0.084 0.047 0.016 Co-60 None Taken 1%

5,550 6,700 or Non-Impact t L4012103 nt Grounds Cs-137 3

1 0.082 0.083 0.092 0.071 0.011 Cs-137 4

1 0.048 0.038 0.081 0.036 0.022 Cs-137 ed Open Land Survey Unit 82,894 m2 Coal Pile Grou Co-60 3

0 0.071 0.072 0.084 0.057 0.014 Co-60 3

0 0.061 0.063 0.068 0.052 0.008 Co-60 None Taken 1%

5,050 8,800 2-47 Survey Units -

L4012105 1

nds C

G Cs-137 3

1 0.061 0.060 0.068 0.055 0.006 Cs-137 3

1 0.042 0.040 0.056 0.030 0.013 Cs-137 1

8 1

- Characterizat Survey Unit L 111,899 m2 Capped Ash Im Grounds Co-60 3

0 0.082 0.084 0.090 0.072 0.009 Co-60 4

0 0.081 0.083 0.102 0.056 0.021 Co-60 2

0 0.073 0.073 0.082 0.065 0.012 1%

8,340 12,000 tion Survey Su L4012106 8

mpoundment G H

Cs-137 3

2 0.100 0.099 0.121 0.079 0.021 Cs-137 4

2 0.088 0.084 0.130 0.054 0.037 Cs-137 2

0 0.062 0.062 0.084 0.040 0.031 ummary Survey Unit L 81,254m2 Grounds East of Highway 35 Co-60 3

0 0.080 0.079 0.089 0.072 0.009 Co-60 3

0 0.081 0.069 0.106 0.068 0.022 Co-60 None Tak 1%

8,000 9,080 L4012107 f

Cs-137 3

3 0.264 0.263 0.463 0.065 0.199 Cs-137 3

2 0.068 0.057 0.091 0.056 0.020 Cs-137 ken

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Tabl ng Water React ation Plan le 2-8 (continue S

S M

M M

M SD S

M M

M M

SD A

M M

M M

SD S

M M

or ed)

Non-I urvey Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D ubsurface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D Asphalt of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D urface Scans

% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm)

Impacted Open Survey Unit 9,444 m2 Hwy 35/Railro Way Grounds Co-60 3

0 0.079 0.075 0.095 0.068 0.014 Co-60 3

0 0.086 0.092 0.107 0.060 0.024 Co-60 None Taken 1%

8,124 9,200 2-48 n Land Survey L4012108 1

ad Right of B A

Cs-137 3

2 0.119 0.108 0.156 0.093 0.033 Cs-137 3

2 0.189 0.091 0.409 0.067 0.191 Cs-137 Units - Chara Survey Unit L 100 m2 Background Soi Area (inside L40 Co-60 17 0

0.087 0.086 0.101 0.077 0.007 Co-60 None Ta Co-60 None Ta No Scanning P acterization Sur L4012109 ils Test 012108)

Cs-137 17 17 0.160 0.161 0.268 0.059 0.059 Cs-137 aken Cs-137 aken Performed rvey Summaryy

L L

R R

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

a b

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-Genoa Coal P L3012105-CR-GS-002-L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S a

Bold values b

Survey units ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C

SB 4.390 1

SS 3.570 0.

Pile

-SS 0.533 0.

SB SS SB 14.600 0.

SS 0.813 0.

SB SS 1.420 0.

SB 2.350 0.

SS 6.490 0.

indicate concentration g originally classified as tor Table 2-9 C-14 Fe-55 N

.230 3.430 1

.671 2.790 1

.675 2.130 1

.713 2.300 2

.713 3.550 2

.719 3.610 2

.705 1.920 3

.728 2.260 3

greater than MDC. Itali Class 3 at time of samp Non Impa Ni-59 Co-60 N

.470 0.026 2

.870 0.027 3

0.018

.730 0.025 2

0.026 0.030

.370 0.037 3

.560 0.037 3

0.019

.800 0.025 3

.110 0.018 4

.200 0.030 4

icized values indicate M ple acted Coal Pile Ni-63 Sr-90 N

.140 0.321 0

.380 0.391 0

0

.950 0.289 0

0 0

.950 0.348 0

.580 0.338 0

0

.940 0.293 0

.440 0.278 0

.710 0.271 0

MDC value 2-49 and Soil Samp Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.018 0.820 0

0.022 0.628 0

0.022 0

0.016 0.587 0

0.020 0

0.020 0

0.030 0.611 0

0.028 0.616 0

0.013 0

0.019 0.593 0

0.016 0.604 0

0.020 0.576 0

ples - Test Ame s-137 Pm-147 Eu 0.024 0.714 0

0.018 0.847 0

0.019 0

0.018 0.698 0

0.023 0

0.028 0

.319 1.500 0

.096 0.826 0

0.021 0

.018 1.450 0

.033 1.310 0

.182 0.770 0

erica Laborator u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.071 0.190 0

0.060 0.167 0

0.052 0.152 0

0.051 0.137 0

0.049 0.166 0

0.072 0.199 0

0.115 0.223 0

0.079 0.232 0

0.045 0.115 0

0.049 0.156 0

0.041 0.128 0

0.059 0.176 0

ry Analysis (pC u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.095 0.025 0

0.096 0.024 0

0.048 0.056 0.023 0

0.055 0.074 0.080 0.035 0

0.112 0.027 0

0.038 0.048 0.040 0

0.044 0.030 0

0.060 0.020 0

Ci/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.015 1

0.040 0.021 1

0.036 0.029 1

0.036 0.014 2

0.044 0.026 2

0.021 0.024 2

0.026 0.021 2

0.028 0.029 2

u-241 Am-241 A

1.730 0.032 0

1.650 0.025 0

0.041 1.670 0.018 0

0.048 0.061 2.550 0.019 0

2.740 0.025 0

0.034 2.580 0.020 0

2.670 0.017 0

2.740 0.015 0

Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.010 0.024 0.019 0.025 0.006 0.034 0.006 0.013 0.019 0.035 0.006 0.036 0.017 0.024 0.015

L L

R S

S M

M M

M S

S M

M M

M S

A M

M M

M S

S M

M a

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Survey Unit Surface Area Description Surface Soil

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Subsurface Soil

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Asphalt

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Surface Scans

% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm) a MDC va ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-10 Survey Unit 1,992 m2 Reactor Buil WGTV, Vent Grounds Co-60 12 2

0.080 0.058 0.287 0.048 0.066 Co-60 18 0

0.078 0.052 0.516 0.047 0.109 None Taken No Scanning P alue used for ana or Impacted Cla t L1010101 lding, WTB, tilation Stack Cs-137 12 12 0.215 0.100 1.070 0.032 0.296 Cs-137 18 8

0.066 0.054 0.161 0.033 0.035 Performed alytical results l ass 1 Open Land Survey Unit 2,315 m2 Turbine, Office Generator Buil Grounds Co-60 2

0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.044 0.007 Co-60 22 0

0.058 0.058 0.080 0.043 0.010 None Taken No Scanning P less than MDC.

2-50 d Survey Units L1010102 1

e, Diesel ding L

M G

Cs-137 2

0 0.050 0.050 0.051 0.050 0.001 Cs-137 22 4

0.064 0.065 0.130 0.044 0.017 N

erformed N

s - Characteriz Survey Unit L 1,749 m2 LSA Building, Maintenance Ea Grounds Co-60 7

0 0.059 0.050 0.099 0.048 0.019 Co-60 25 0

0.046 0.046 0.055 0.025 0.005 None Taken No Scanning Pe zation Survey S L1010103 2

at Shack N

Cs-137 7

1 0.069 0.054 0.161 0.048 0.041 Cs-137 25 0

0.049 0.049 0.054 0.042 0.003 erformed Summary Survey Unit L 2,387 m2 North LSE Grou Co-60 1

0 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 N/A Co-60 14 0

0.048 0.048 0.050 0.043 0.002 Co-60 10 0

0.053 0.054 0.062 0.042 0.006 No Scanning Pe L1010104 unds Cs-137 1

0 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 N/A Cs-137 14 3

0.041 0.042 0.051 0.027 0.009 Cs-137 10 1

0.051 0.053 0.057 0.037 0.006 erformed

L L

R R

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

a La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L1010101-CJ-GS-002-S L1010101-CJ-GS-009-S L1010101-CJ-GS-010-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010102-CJ-FC-001-C L1010102-CJ-GS-013-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-CJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-SL-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CR-PA-007-L1010104-QQ-PA-001-L1010104-QR-GS-001-a Bold values ng Water React ation Plan T

H-3 C

SS SS SS SB 0.364 0

SS 0.441 0.

SB 0.377 0.

SS 1.380 0.

CV 1.710 0.

SB SB 8.740 0.

SS SB 24.700 0.

SB SM 0.354 0

SB 3.260 0.

SS SB 0.649 0.

SS SB 0.654 0.

SS SB

-AV

-AV

-SB indicate concentration g tor Table 2-11 C

C-14 Fe-55 N

.896 2.430 1

.676 2.190 1

.679 2.150 1

.677 4.190 2

.727 1.650 2

.726 2.120 2

.715 2.230 2

.453 0.689 0

.715 1.830 2

.702 2.100 2

.717 2.340 2

greater than MDC. Itali lass 1 Concrete Ni-59 Co-60 N

0.024 0.040 0.286

.850 0.024 3

.900 0.018 3

.750 0.017 2

.010 0.015 3

.630 0.106 3

0.030

.620 0.015 4

0.022

.760 0.021 3

0.011 0.711 0.136 1

.850 0.017 4

0.025

.620 0.014 3

0.019

.630 0.012 3

0.023 0.015 0.021 0.025 0.017 icized values indicate M e, Asphalt, Sed Ni-63 Sr-90 N

0 0

0

.040 0.335 0

.040 0.440 0

.930 0.338 0

.320 0.357 0

.920 0.292 0

0

.000 0.310 0

0

.920 0.316 0

0

.090 0.132 0

.240 0.333 0

0

.710 0.325 0

0

.660 0.300 0

0 0

0 0

0 MDC value.

2-51 diment and Soil Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.020 0

0.020 0

0.025 0

0.015 0.579 0

0.012 0.587 0

0.011 0.620 0

0.010 0.521 0

0.022 0.536 0

0.016 0

0.011 0.539 0

0.015 0

0.014 0.537 0

0.017 0

0.018 0.432 0

0.011 0.606 0

0.015 0

0.012 0.645 0

0.017 0

0.009 0.557 0

0.019 0

0.008 0

0.014 0

0.025 0

0.011 0

l Samples - Tes s-137 Pm-147 Eu

.233 0

.185 0

.413 0

0.020 0.800 0

.147 3.170 0

.149 0.772 0

.059 0.978 0

.352 1.290 0

0.021 0

0.012 0.961 0

0.018 0

0.016 0.722 0

0.021 0

.136 0.360 0

0.015 0.740 0

0.020 0

0.012 0.838 0

0.017 0

0.011 0.713 0

.091 0

0.013 0

0.016 0

0.028 0

0.012 0

st America Lab u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.056 0.161 0

0.056 0.181 0

0.062 0.247 0

0.050 0.143 0

0.034 0.112 0

0.040 0.109 0

0.033 0.096 0

0.061 0.239 0

0.044 0.170 0

0.030 0.101 0

0.036 0.113 0

0.043 0.139 0

0.044 0.181 0

0.054 0.199 0

0.036 0.117 0

0.046 0.174 0

0.029 0.103 0

0.040 0.139 0

0.029 0.092 0

0.057 0.186 0

0.032 0.078 0

0.042 0.141 0

0.058 0.218 0

0.038 0.132 0

boratory Analy u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.066 0.050 0.057 0.044 0.019 0

0.044 0.006 0

0.040 0.019 0

0.036 0.016 0

0.062 0.029 0

0.041 0.028 0.028 0

0.042 0.042 0.032 0

0.046 0.049 0.018 0

0.039 0.026 0

0.047 0.034 0.020 0

0.045 0.034 0.040 0

0.063 0.036 0.044 0.061 0.032 ysis (pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.023 1

0.039 0.023 1

0.041 0.022 1

0.040 0.016 2

0.041 0.028 2

0.040 0.026 2

0.042 0.029 2

0.015 0.015 0

0.029 0.017 1

0.034 0.024 2

0.028 0.028 2

u-241 Am-241 A

0.058 0.042 0.051 1.970 0.015 0

1.830 0.016 0

1.950 0.017 0

2.090 0.020 0

2.490 0.018 0

0.036 2.780 0.015 0

0.039 2.660 0.015 0

0.044 0.867 0.008 0

1.430 0.009 0

0.043 2.570 0.018 0

0.024 2.470 0.018 0

0.052 0.034 0.040 0.050 0.032 Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.023 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.029 0.014 0.017 0.022 0.019 0.021 0.020 0.021 0.021 0.018 0.019 0.008 0.024 0.005 0.024 0.014 0.022 0.005

La Cross License T Revision Tabl Sur Sur

  1. of
  1. >C Mea Med Max Min SD Sub
  1. of
  1. >C Mea Med Max Min SD Asp
  1. of
  1. >C Mea Med Max Min SD Sur

% S Mea Max se Boiling W Termination n 0 le 2-12 Im rvey Unit Surface Area Description rface Soil f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) bsurface Soil f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) phalt f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) rface Scans Scanned an Scan (cpm) x Scan (cpm)

Water Reactor Plan mpacted Cla Sur 7,211 m2 LACBWR

Building, House, W Co-60 13 0

0.073 0.077 0.106 0.053 0.016 Co-60 16 1

0.052 0.046 0.112 0.040 0.018 Co-60 6

0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.002 50%

7,500 to 8,0 11,500 to 12 r

ass 2 Open L S

rvey Unit L201 R

Adm LACBW Warehouse Gr 0

3 7

6 3

6 0

2 6

2 0

8 0

4 7

2 00 2,000 2-52 Land Surve Summary 11101 ministration WR Crib rounds Cs-137 13 8

0.090 0.100 0.139 0.041 0.030 Cs-137 16 2

0.049 0.048 0.088 0.034 0.012 Cs-137 6

0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.003 ey Units - C Sur 6,785 m2 G-3 Crib Circ. Wa Area Sout Co-60 10 0

0.064 0.064 0.081 0.052 0.009 Co-60 7

0 0.049 0.048 0.055 0.042 0.004 Co-60 6

0 0.056 0.057 0.059 0.049 0.003 1

Characteriza rvey Unit L201 b House, ater Discha th of LSE Fe 0

4 4

2 9

0 9

8 5

2 4

0 6

7 9

9 3

50%

7,500 to 8,000 11,500 to 12,00 ation Surve 11102 LACBWR arge Line, ence Cs-137 10 6

0.065 0.054 0.200 0.030 0.049 Cs-137 7

2 0.038 0.033 0.052 0.029 0.009 Cs-137 6

3 0.048 0.051 0.055 0.009 0.008 0

00 ey

L L

R R

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L a

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L2011101-CJ-GS-001-S L2011101-CR-PA-003-L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QQ-GS-001-L2011101-QQ-GS-001-L2011101-QQ-GS-002-L2011101-QQ-PA-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-002-L2011102-QQ-PA-001-a Bold val ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C

SM

-AV SB 0.518 0.

SM 2.040 0.

SS

-SB

-SS 11.810 0.

-SB 2.500 0.

-AV

-SB 1.370 1

-SS 0.533 0.

-SB 0.525 0.

-AV lues indicate con tor Table 2 C-14 Fe-55 N

.727 2.290 2

.707 2.240 2

.726 2.590 2

.731 1.940 2

.560 2.260 3

.713 2.330 2

.702 3.890 2

ncentration grea 2-13 Class 2 Ni-59 Co-60 N

0.096 0.023

.660 0.016 4

.950 0.049 4

0.012 0.017

.600 0.035 3

.680 0.017 3

0.022

.040 0.007 4

.820 0.019 4

.880 0.031 3

0.027 ater than MDC.

Asphalt, Sedim Ni-63 Sr-90 N

0 0

.030 0.273 0

.140 0.523 0

0 0

.720 0.255 0

.870 0.314 0

0

.390 0.291 0

.300 0.361 0

.950 0.327 0

0 Italicized value 2-53 ment and Soil S Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.011 0

0.016 0

0.014 0.643 0

0.018 0.585 0

0.020 0

0.012 0

0.035 0.532 0

0.014 0.616 0

0.015 0

0.018 0.537 0

0.014 0.595 0

0.016 0.568 0

0.017 0

es indicate MDC Samples - Test s-137 Pm-147 Eu

.137 0

0.017 0

0.015 0.705 0

.107 0.615 0

.080 0

0.013 0

.103 0.779 0

0.016 0.697 0

0.015 0

0.021 0.672 0

0.014 0.772 0

0.018 0.717 0

0.018 0

C value.

America Labo u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.041 0.098 0

0.039 0.131 0

0.033 0.108 0

0.048 0.178 0

0.060 0.188 0

0.040 0.127 0

0.097 0.205 0

0.037 0.119 0

0.046 0.135 0

0.044 0.173 0

0.039 0.111 0

0.052 0.183 0

0.051 0.142 0

oratory Analysi u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.033 0.039 0.040 0.022 0

0.049 0.026 0

0.091 0.037 0.102 0.023 0

0.041 0.019 0

0.042 0.055 0.031 0

0.045 0.017 0

0.051 0.022 0

0.038 is u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.028 0.025 2

0.045 0.021 3

0.037 0.024 2

0.039 0.016 2

0.026 0.018 2

0.036 0.026 2

0.028 0.020 1

u-241 Am-241 A

0.031 0.038 2.470 0.015 0

3.100 0.037 0

0.042 0.031 2.800 0.019 0

2.920 0.020 0

0.040 2.680 0.029 0

2.880 0.026 0

1.710 0.010 0

0.036 Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.019 0.036 0.034 0.015 0.015 0.028 0.016 0.028 0.024 0.034 0.021 0.028 0.006

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 S

S M

M M

M S

S M

M M

M S

C M

M M

M S

S M

M ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-14 urvey Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D ubsurface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D Concrete/Asphalt of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D urface Scans

% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm) or Impacted Cla Survey Unit 24,042 m2 North End of Lic Co-60 3

0 0.070 0.076 0.077 0.058 0.011 Co-60 3

0 0.051 0.053 0.054 0.046 0.004 Co-60 3

0 0.031 0.031 0.035 0.028 0.003 1%

9,000 10,000 ass 3 Open Land t L3012101 censed Site Cs-137 3

0 0.073 0.072 0.083 0.065 0.009 Cs-137 3

0 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.051 0.001 Cs-137 3

0 0.029 0.027 0.033 0.026 0.004 2-54 d Survey Units Survey Unit 11,711 m2 Transmission Swi Co-60 None T Co-60 None T Co-60 None Taken No Scanning s - Characteriz L3012102 3

tchyard Area P

G Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Performed zation Survey S Survey Unit L 31,012 m2 Plant Access, ISF Grounds Co-60 5

0 0.063 0.064 0.078 0.053 0.010 Co-60 4

0 0.072 0.072 0.100 0.046 0.023 Co-60 7

0 0.062 0.055 0.080 0.047 0.013 1%

5,890 6,400 Summary L3012109 SI Haul Road Cs-137 5

5 0.152 0.143 0.267 0.075 0.078 Cs-137 4

0 0.066 0.059 0.101 0.045 0.025 Cs-137 7

0 0.059 0.052 0.079 0.028 0.019 0

0

L L

R R

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L a

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012101-CR-GC-001-L3012101-CR-GC-002-L3012101-CR-GC-003-L3012101-CR-GS-003-L3012101-QQ-GS-001-L3012101-QQ-GS-001-L3012101-QQ-SL-001-L3012104-CR-GS-002-L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S a

Bold values ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C

-CV

-CV

-CV 0.

-SS

-SB 18.400 0.

-SS 15.500 0.

-SM 0.364 0.

-SM SB 2.160 0.

SM 2.890 0.

SS 2.190 0.

indicate concentration g tor Table 2-15 C-14 Fe-55 N

.669 2.180 2

.717 2.390 2

.708 2.330 2

.342 2.710 0

.670 1.950 1

.672 2.720 1

.676 4.240 1

greater than MDC. Itali 5

Class 3 Asp Ni-59 Co-60 N

0.028 0.035

.020 0.031 3

0.025

.870 0.016 5

.660 0.020 3

0.739 0.022 1

0.015

.750 0.021 3

.990 0.037 3

.880 0.029 3

icized values indicate M phalt, Sediment Ni-63 Sr-90 N

0 0

.590 0.374 0

0

.640 0.309 0

.890 0.295 0

.090 0.152 0

0

.060 0.325 0

.500 0.298 0

.300 0.329 0

MDC value 2-55 t and Soil Samp Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.030 0

0.026 0

0.027 0.521 0

0.017 0

0.014 0.550 0

0.017 0.603 0

0.017 0.360 0

0.013 0

0.018 0.469 0

0.020 0.651 0

0.020 0.631 0

ples - Test Am s-137 Pm-147 Eu 0.026 0

0.033 0

0.027 1.480 0

.113 0

0.015 0.899 0

.059 1.090 0

0.020 0.333 0

.066 0

0.025 0.818 0

.094 0.818 0

.138 0.667 0

merica Laborato u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.043 0.221 0

0.062 0.271 0

0.056 0.249 0

0.052 0.157 0

0.036 0.128 0

0.047 0.116 0

0.042 0.153 0

0.035 0.128 0

0.053 0.160 0

0.074 0.217 0

0.068 0.181 0

ory Analysis (p u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.059 0.056 0.069 0.025 0

0.059 0.036 0.039 0

0.054 0.028 0

0.034 0.009 0

0.047 0.054 0.022 0

0.071 0.006 0

0.080 0.020 0

pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.018 1

0.035 0.022 2

0.028 0.022 2

0.016 0.013 0

0.027 0.021 1

0.031 0.017 1

0.043 0.026 1

u-241 Am-241 A

0.053 0.055 1.690 0.019 0

0.052 2.590 0.023 0

2.640 0.019 0

0.797 0.009 0

0.036 1.610 0.016 0

1.560 0.016 0

1.580 0.019 0

Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.021 0.006 0.029 0.027 0.021 0.006 0.009 0.011 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.019 0.021

La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 T

B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.950

-0.162 9.130 0.000 11.500 39.300 6.910

-0.120 0.024 7500 2.580 0.266 0.369 0.009 0.176 0.132 0.902 0.407 0.028 0.0579 B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 7.240

-0.492 9.450 0.000 57.700 202.000 34.500 0.191

-0.189 614.000 0.768 0.335

-0.429 0.000 0.528 0.491 7.470 1.450 0.052 0.0879 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-16 CJ-FC-001-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.590 1

1.400 0

16.000 7

0.254 0

0.377 1

0.402 4

0.043 0

0.312 0

0.566 0

7.090 78 9.020 5

2.410 0

4.440 1

0.042 0

0.056 0

0.048 0

2.700 1

0.048 0

0.046 0

0.0302 0.

CJ-FC-003-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.360 1

1.460 0

9.040 4

0.365 0

0.333 5

0.593 21 0.040 3

0.392 0

0.586 0

0.732 64 2.870 1

5.460 0

1.510 0

0.041 0

0.058 0

0.030 0

2.640 2

0.047 0

0.027 0

0.0408 0.

r Concrete 0-1/2 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.350 9

.793

-0

.880 10

.325 0

.250 0

.110 3

.680 0

.189 0

.330 0

1.000 9

.230

-0

.398 0

.140 0

.021

-0

.065

-0

.055

-0

.660

-1

.107 0

.030 0

0371

-0 0-1/2 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.580 12

.806

-0

.950 6

.806 0

.880 0

1.100 2

.330 0

.203

-0

.330

-0 4.000 2

.300 0

.536 0

.914

-0

.016

-0

.111

-0

.104

-0

.160

-1

.250 0

.033 0

0496 0.

2-56 Core Isotop B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

9.720 1.56 0.346 1.44 0.400 21.3 0.000 0.26 0.082 0.16 3.850 0.42 0.162 0.05 0.001 0.13 0.076 0.52 9.660 0.15 0.039 0.51 0.025 1.26 0.071 0.37 0.002 0.04 0.017 0.06 0.006 0.04 1.510 2.50 0.011 0.03 0.014 0.03

.0081 0.04 B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

2.600 1.57 0.566 1.39 6.160 14.3 0.000 0.25 0.435 0.05 2.990 0.40 0.304 0.05 0.001 0.15 0.129 0.59 2.450 0.11 0.045 0.34 0.179 1.02 0.007 0.28 0.010 0.05 0.005 0.06 0.004 0.04 1.320 2.66 0.018 0.03 0.009 0.03

.0000 0.01 pic Analysis C-001-CV 1/2-1 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 60 1.950 40 0.806 300 10.200 64 0.151 68 0.078 25 0.474 51 0.041 39 0.078 26 0.310 52 1.100 11 0.055 60 0.171 76 0.118 45 0.017 66 0.026 49 0.018 00 1.360 37 0.020 30 0.019 478 0.0094 C-003-CV 1/2-1 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 70 2.240 90 0.765 300 6.960 57 0.157 57 0.096 00 0.392 51 0.052 53 0.086 96 0.339 13 0.348 46 0.154 20 0.383 82 0.164 51 0.018 64 0.029 47 0.017 60 1.480 38 0.024 30 0.016 68 0.0047 s Results B1001 Result (pCi/g) 3.640

-0.270 0

11.300 0.000 0.800 4.860 11.600

-0.017

-0.104 450.00 0.173

-0.008 0.145

-0.010 0.575 0.715 13.200 0.550

-0.036 4

0.1540 B1001 Result (pCi/g) 4.490

-0.555 7.600 0.000 28.100 88.300 11.000

-0.016 0.153 213.00 0.162 0.557 0.108

-0.020 0.413 0.336

-7.720 0.614 0.052 7

-0.0547 101-CJ-FC-002 t

MDC (pCi/g) 1.620 0

1.410 0

9.950 0.289 0.117 0.492 0

0.046 7

0.165 4

0.564 0

0.597 2.150 8

1.460 0.837 0

0.042 0.617 0.466 0

23.500 0.401 6

0.433 0

0.4670 101-CJ-FC-004 t

MDC (pCi/g) 1.590 5

1.450 7.070 0.276 0

0.190 0

0.467 0

0.045 6

0.264 0.592 0

0.439 1.570 3.070 0.850 0

0.060 0.426 0.325 0

26.000 0.441 0.292 7

0.4320

-CV 0-1/2

(pCi/g) 1.330 0.794 5.540 0.183 0.172 0.581 1.130 0.095 0.322 46.900 0.924 0.820 0.503 0.009 0.436 0.413 15.100 0.419 0.140 0.2600

-CV 0-1/2

(pCi/g) 1.420 0.795 4.040 0.467 2.950 9.200 1.070 0.155 0.352 22.200 0.611 0.863 0.138 0.020 0.320 0.265 14.400 0.436 0.136 0.0776

La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 2.960

-0.077 8.070 2.590 73.900 221.000 32.800

-0.089 0.178 65.700 0.395 0.637 0.011 0.005 0.706 0.489 9.090 1.590 0.048 0.1160 B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.590

-0.246 6.030 0.000

-0.026 2.310 0.146 0.019 0.024 1.410 0.021 0.055 0.003 0.003

-0.004 0.035

-1.890 0.006

-0.002

-0.0036 Water Reactor Plan

-16 (continu CJ-FC-005-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.520 1

1.410 0

9.770 5

0.267 0

0.372 7

0.427 23 0.043 3

0.531 0

0.562 0

0.569 6

1.240 0

5.650 0

0.699 0

0.015 0

0.065 0

0.035 0

2.540 2

0.045 0

0.031 0

0.0443 0.

CJ-WC-006-CV MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.640 1

1.490 0

14.500 7

0.257 0

0.207 0

0.396 0

0.038 0

0.141 0

0.556 0

0.153 0

0.434 0

1.270 0

0.336 0

0.045 0

0.043 0

0.033 0

2.360 1

0.036 0

0.031 0

0.0287 0.

r ued)

Co 0-1/2 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.200 4

.810

-0

.230 8

.813 0

.510 0

3.000 4

.170 0

.317

-0

.336

-0

.970 0

.746 0

.831 0

.414 0

.010

-0

.134

-0

.106

-0

.270 0

.273 0

.034

-0 0590 0

1/2-1 R

pCi/g)

(p

.350 0

.836 0

.050 1

.147 0

.240 0

.335 2

.034 0

.060 0

.324

-0

.258 16

.113 0

.137 0

.196 0

.021 0

.016 0

.028

-0

.270

-1

.017 0

.005

-0 0052 0

2-57 oncrete Cor B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

4.180 1.85 0.701 1.35 8.170 9.87 0.000 0.27 0.075 0.17 4.870 0.43 0.423 0.05 0.015 0.12 0.124 0.54 0.801 0.11 0.001 0.37 0.119 0.92 0.013 0.25 0.017 0.05 0.003 0.05 0.008 0.03 0.337 2.53 0.012 0.01 0.002 0.05

.0000 0.01 B1008101-CJ-Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

0.382 0.94 0.053 1.37 1.610 6.55 0.000 0.23 0.662 0.06 2.730 0.35 0.154 0.05 0.000 0.21 0.010 0.57 6.000 0.17 0.034 0.63 0.060 1.20 0.140 0.35 0.003 0.04 0.018 0.06 0.011 0.05 1.120 2.71 0.020 0.04 0.002 0.04

.0062 0.01 re Isotopic A C-005-CV 1/2-1 DC

i/g)

(pCi/g) 50 1.520 50 0.733 70 5.340 70 0.165 71 0.080 30 0.570 51 0.063 28 0.074 40 0.307 17 0.172 73 0.005 23 0.245 55 0.148 54 0.016 53 0.023 38 0.008 30 1.510 18 0.017 54 0.022 76 0.0049

-FC-002-CV DC

i/g)

(pCi/g) 40 0.559 70 0.794 50 3.370 34 0.151 65 0.131 53 0.355 53 0.041 11 0.066 79 0.335 77 1.780 33 0.056 00 0.239 57 0.215 48 0.022 60 0.033 54 0.019 10 1.480 42 0.027 44 0.017 87 0.0125 Analysis Re B1001 Result (pCi/g) 4.210 0.077 11.700 0.000 2.040 13.400 7.150 0.026 0.083 1490 0.031 0.128 0.737

-0.013 0.029 0.035

-1.380 0.048 0.003

-0.0053 B10 Result (pCi/g) 1.300

-0.296 6.460 0.000 0.974 4.400 0.235 0.016

-0.005 10.000 0.291 0.019 0.101

-0.024 0.042 0.008

-0.194 0.019

-0.001

-0.0056 esults 101-CJ-WC-006 t

MDC

)

(pCi/g) 1.700 1.440 0

9.320 0.263 0.047 0

0.420 0.034 0.154 0.580 0.721 3.660 1.190 1.470 0.044 0.037 0.025 2.650 0.052 0.029 3

0.0419 008101-CJ-FC-0 t

MDC

)

(pCi/g) 1.020 1.440 14.500 0.241 0.142 0.356 0.035 0.141 0.592 0

0.154 0.470 1.410 0.348 0.068 0.057 0.034 2.550 0.051 0.052 6

0.0444 6-CV 0-1/2

(pCi/g) 1.440 0.832 5.530 0.230 0.264 1.430 0.703 0.090 0.341 155.000 2.210 0.679 0.896 0.010 0.027 0.026 1.470 0.041 0.011 0.0075 003-CV

(pCi/g) 0.713 0.810 7.050 0.171 0.162 0.510 0.041 0.081 0.343 1.130 0.270 0.052 0.208 0.025 0.038 0.017 1.470 0.029 0.023 0.0080

La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B100810 Result (pCi/g) 1.200 0.077 6.520 0.000 1.390 4.260 0.216 0.001 0.043 19.800

-0.119

-0.061 0.006 0.014 0.020 0.025

-1.610 0.052

-0.004 0.0100 B1002101-C Result (pCi/g) 0.763

-0.776 3.540 0.000 0.742 3.360 2.410 0.035 0.259 3.630 0.156 0.119 0.159 0.000 0.023 0.000

-0.052 0.020 0.013 0.0048 Water Reactor Plan

-16 (continu 01-CJ-FC-004-C MDC (pCi/g)

(p 0.990 0

1.430 0

11.500 5

0.229 0

0.095 0

0.339 0

0.040 0

0.143 0

0.599 0

0.166 2

0.580 0

1.370 0

0.376 0

0.065 0

0.052 0

0.042 0

2.610 1

0.034 0

0.032 0

0.0150 0.

CJ-FC-001-CV MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.000 0

1.410 0

5.670 3

0.228 0

0.069 0

0.333 0

0.050 0

0.149 0

0.564 0

0.150 0

0.420 0

1.400 0

0.335 0

0.045 0

0.061 0

0.049 0

2.820 1

0.015 0

0.029 0

0.0143 0.

r ued)

Co CV B

R pCi/g)

(p

.685 0

.829 0

.820 15

.162 65

.255 95

.492 81

.041 99

.081 0

.350 0

.150 4

.344 0

.296 1

.220 0

.035

-0

.030 0

.028 1

.430 5

.035 3

.006 0

0142 0.

1-1.5 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.638 0

.763 0

.150 7

.159 0

.148 0

.407 5

.250 0

.066

-0

.342 0

.493 2

.236 0

.382 0

.204 0

.018

-0

.035 0

.021 0

.640

-2

.020 0

.018 0

0096 0.

2-58 oncrete Cor B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

0.820 0.98 0.505 1.41 5.400 13.8 5.500 0.31 5.000 0.42 7.000 0.47 9.800 0.04 0.098 0.47 0.113 0.56 4710 1.69 0.815 5.94

.250 5.46 0.073 2.12 0.012 0.06 0.920 0.62

.280 0.46 5.240 26.7 3.200 0.42 0.406 0.29

.2020 0.42 B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

0.094 0.91 0.372 1.38 7.770 25.0 0.000 0.25 0.872 0.13 5.730 0.38 0.106 0.04 0.034 0.14 0.032 0.52 2.440 0.14 0.125 0.38 0.271 0.95 0.099 0.32 0.007 0.05 0.004 0.06 0.009 0.04 2.090 2.70 0.017 0.04 0.029 0.02

.0059 0.03 re Isotopic A C-001-CV 0-1/2 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 85 0.637 10 0.850 800 7.430 10 8.690 20 9.600 72 85.000 45 9.600 75 0.149 64 0.333 90 491.000 40 1.410 60 1.980 20 1.280 60 0.023 20 0.511 69 0.537 700 16.200 28 0.989 96 0.310 200 0.2670 C-001-CV 1.5-2 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 17 0.512 80 0.819 000 11.400 59 0.188 38 0.161 88 0.646 41 0.032 42 0.083 28 0.308 46 0.343 83 0.195 56 0.406 26 0.196 52 0.019 61 0.030 41 0.021 00 1.460 41 0.025 29 0.026 331 0.0154 Analysis Re B1002 Result (pCi/g) 0.275

-0.018 0.547 0.000 1.010 0

5.640 0.253 0.029

-0.101 0

3.870 0.039

-0.260 0.077

-0.022 0.017

-0.005 0

-0.984 0.035

-0.018 0

-0.0046 B1002 Result (pCi/g) 1.710 15.400 0

8.960 423.00 300.00 2360 220.00

-0.350 0.792 25400 0.510 4.650 1.060 0.024 3.200 2.580 36.900 9.080 0.305 4

0.4280 esults 2101-CJ-FC-001 t

MDC (pCi/g) 0.931 8

1.440 5.510 0.245 0.149 0.367 0.053 0.102 1

0.507 0.137 0.444 0

1.480 0.272 2

0.064 0.059 5

0.042 4

2.680 0.037 8

0.054 6

0.0366 2101-CJ-FC-002 t

MDC (pCi/g) 1.180 0

1.510 5.860 0

0.446 0

0.762 0.661 0

0.052 0

0.935 0.562 0

4.140 13.700 7.170 7.370 0.042 0.497 0.287 0

24.000 0.682 0.388 0

0.5450

-CV 1/2-1

(pCi/g) 0.543 0.824 2.840 0.170 0.168 0.633 0.049 0.054 0.289 0.496 0.107 0.859 0.162 0.023 0.033 0.013 1.510 0.031 0.013 0.0066

-CV 0-1/2

(pCi/g) 0.846 2.310 3.640 55.200 30.200 245.000 21.100 0.567 0.373 2650 0.956 4.390 0.988 0.027 0.825 0.713 17.100 2.030 0.286 0.4200

La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B1002101-C Result (pCi/g) 0.846 6.180 5.270 0.000 8.270 175.000 3.520

-0.041 0.165 208.000

-0.280 0.255 0.116

-0.019 0.059 0.056

-0.965 0.238 0.005 0.0018 Water Reactor Plan

-16 (continu CJ-FC-002-CV 1 MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.120 0

1.420 1

25.300 11 0.269 0

0.114 0

0.442 18 0.047 0

0.230 0

0.522 0

0.362 21 1.580 0

1.900 0

0.864 0

0.056 0

0.064 0

0.049 0

2.970 1

0.048 0

0.060 0

0.0438 0.

r ued)

Co 1/2-1 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.716 0

.340

-0 1.400 8

.616 0

.907 8

8.300 70

.356 7

.135 0

.312 0

1.700 1

.950 0

.259 0

.205

-0

.017

-0

.046 0

.040 0

.690 1

.080 0

.028

-0 0179 0.

2-59 oncrete Cor B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

0.836 0.96 0.405 1.44 8.430 17.0 0.000 0.33 8.570 0.14 0.600 0.54 7.000 0.05 0.038 0.21 0.062 0.54 1240 0.81 0.176 2.60 0.090 2.32 0.004 1.71 0.011 0.04 0.105 0.05 0.126 0.03

.500 2.56 0.339 0.04 0.001 0.03

.0175 0.01 re Isotopic A C-003-CV 0-1/2 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 62 0.624 40 0.803 000 8.210 34 0.484 48 0.940 48 7.370 50 0.691 11 0.060 43 0.318 17 129.000 00 0.514 20 0.202 10 1.030 44 0.009 56 0.051 39 0.051 60 1.640 44 0.099 37 0.012 75 0.0203 Analysis Re 0

3 esults

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Tab Water Reactor Plan ble 2-17 198 We Radion Mn-Co-Co-Nb-Cs-1 Ce-1 r

83 Groundw ell-Point So nuclide

-54

-57

-60

-95 137 141 2-60 water Analy outh of Turb A

(p ysis from Te bine Buildin Activity pCi/L) 63.4 6.4 508 21.4 21.7 18.9 emporary ng

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Jun H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a

B Nov H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a

B ng Water React ation Plan e 2013 MW-20 (pCi/L 572 60 4.00 90 2.05 137 3.97 Bold values indi vember 2013 MW-20 (pCi/L 235 60 4.64 90 1.18 137 4.64 Bold values indi or Table 2 01-A MW-201-B L)

(pCi/L) 2 506 0

5.01 5

2.00 7

3.84 icate concentrati 01-A MW-201-B L)

(pCi/L) 5 150 4

3.80 8

3.73 4

1.90 icate concentrati 2-18 2013 Gr B

MW-202-A (pCi/L) 660 4.76 1.82 4.05 ion greater than B

MW-202-A (pCi/L) 257 5.26 1.18 6.54 ion greater than 2-61 roundwater M MW-202-B MW (pCi/L)

(p 484 4.51 1.43 3.91 n MDC. Italicize MW-202-B MW (pCi/L)

(p 278 5.41 1.61 4.70 n MDC. Italicize onitoring Resu W-203-A MW-2 pCi/L)

(pCi N/A 42 4.95 4.1 2.06 2.0 4.52 4.3 ed values indica W-203-A MW-2 pCi/L)

(pCi 449 23 4.43 3.8 1.87 2.4 4.41 3.9 ed values indica ults 203-B MW-204-i/L)

(pCi/L) 20 397 12 4.36 06 2.18 31 4.11 ate MDC value.

203-B MW-204-i/L)

(pCi/L) 35 193 89 4.52 40 1.18 98 4.77 ate MDC value.

-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 420 4.26 2.08 3.96

-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 171 8.24 1.51 7.92

L L

R J

G A

G B

H C

F N

C N

S N

T C

E E

E P

P 2

P A

a La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 JUNE 2014 MW-DW3 Gross Alpha 1.26E-01 Gross Beta 1.48E+0 H-3 1.05E+0 C-14 2.79E+0 Fe-55

-2.00E+0 Ni-59 1.83E+0 Co-60 1.02E+0 Ni-63

-1.78E+0 Sr-90 6.09E-01 Nb-94 4.40E-01 Tc-99

-8.28E+0 Cs-137

-5.97E-0 Eu-152 9.48E+00 Eu-154

-5.24E+0 Eu-155

-2.67E+0 Pu-238 2.83E-02 Pu-239/240

-9.61E-02 Pu-241 3.51E+0 Am-241 5.39E-02 a

Bold val ng Water React ation Plan MW-DW4 M

D 1

-1.33E-01 4.44 0

3.13E+00 1.93 2

1.59E+02 1.94 0

0.00E+00

-3.9 01

-3.12E+01

-2.6 1

3.96E+01

-4.7 0

3.94E-01 2.5 00

-6.14E+00

-7.4 1

8.99E-02 8.9 1

1.43E-01

-1.2 00

-7.37E+00

-8.2 1

-3.47E-01

-7.4 0

2.34E+00

-7.4 00 3.16E+00 1.35 00 1.46E+00

-1.5 2

-4.77E-02

-2.2 2

3.36E-02 3.1 0

2.70E+00

-8.3 2

3.42E-02 4.6 lues indicate con tor MW-DW5 MW-DW7 4E+00

-3.78E-01 3E+00 0.00E+00 4E+02 1.23E+02 97E+00

-5.08E+00 66E+01

-3.86E+01 75E+01 2.60E+01 0E+00

-2.42E+00 40E+00

-4.38E+00 99E-02 1.78E-02 26E+00 7.49E-01 26E+00

-9.36E+00 45E-01

-1.83E+00 43E+00

-5.51E+00 5E+00

-4.73E+00 54E-01

-1.07E+02 22E-02 8.22E-02 13E-02 4.07E-01 39E+00 2.62E+00 65E-03

-1.01E-02 ncentration grea Tabl MW-B11R MW B11A 0.00E+00 7.33E 3.59E+00

-2.70E 2.45E+02 1.61E+

9.06E+00 6.83E+

-3.19E+01

-3.75E

-4.16E+00 2.53E+

8.76E-01

-1.94E

-3.57E+00 0.00E+

7.34E-01 6.11E

-6.99E-01 1.53E+

-5.52E+00

-8.46E 1.24E+00 1.84E+

-9.93E-01 1.48E+

1.63E+00

-2.61E 1.60E+00

-4.47E 0.00E+00 4.09E

-2.54E-02

-3.39E

-5.72E+00 8.38E 1.22E-02 8.37E ater than MDC.

le 2-19 2014 W-AR MW-B2

-01

-2.13E+00 6

E-01 1.12E+01 4

+02 1.60E+02 1

+00 1.94E+00

-2 E+01

-9.20E+00

-4

+00

-7.13E+00 3

E+00

-1.39E+00

-1

+00

-7.94E+00 1

E-01 6.52E-01 6

+00 1.77E+00 6

E+00

-7.41E+00

-8

+00 1.37E+00 2

+00 1.07E-01 1

E+00 2.36E+00 1

E+00 1.60E+00

-3 E-02 5.40E-02 8

E-02 3.40E-02 1

E-01 0.00E+00 E-02 3.98E-03 2

Italicized value 2-62 Groundwater MW-B3 MW-200-A 6.46E-01 4.04E+00 4.14E+00 8.66E+00 1.94E+02 5.23E+01 2.05E+00 9.26E+00 4.39E+01 1.93E+01 3.15E+01

-2.18E+0 1.13E+00 1.01E+00 1.50E+00

-1.97E+0 6.12E-01 9.86E-01 6.65E-01 1.08E+00 8.10E+00 3.55E+00 2.14E+00 1.77E-01 1.42E+01 9.71E+00 1.69E+00 5.77E-01 3.17E+00

-3.63E+0 8.29E-02

-1.38E-02 1.46E-01 2.68E-02

-7.39E-01 0.00E+00 2.28E-02 1.72E-01 es indicate MDC Monitoring Re MW-200-B M

20 0

-2.26E-01 3.84 0

-1.79E+00 7.26 1

1.24E+02 7.03 0

4.84E+00 4.84 1

-4.16E+01

-3.20 1

3.32E+01

-1.6 0

-1.27E+00

-6.0 0

-4.69E+00 1.82 1

9.98E-01 6.86 0

8.47E-01 3.73 0

5.08E+00 3.92 1

-3.64E-01 3.10 0

-1.16E+01 4.15 1

5.60E-01

-2.39 0

-3.44E+00

-2.92 2

1.51E-02 5.33 2

-1.57E-02

-6.8 0

4.49E+00

-4.8 1

9.71E-01 9.46 C value.

esults (pCi/L)

MW-01-A MW-201-B 4E-01

-1.04E+00 6E+00

-1.04E+00 3E+01 1.05E+02 4E+00 4.51E+00 0E+01 1.58E+01 7E+01

-7.11E+01 04E-02 1.73E+00 2E+00

-1.91E+00 6E-02 1.02E+00 3E-01 1.80E+00 2E+00 1.17E+00 0E-01

-6.21E-01 5E+00 1.12E+01 9E+00

-2.43E+00 2E+00

-2.60E+00 3E-02

-5.02E-02 86E-03 2.36E-02 85E-01

-1.42E+00 6E-02 3.99E-03 MW-202-A MW 202-1.06E+00 4.07E-4.34E+00 1.49E+

3.36E+02 1.06E+

0.00E+00 4.70E+

-3.26E+00

-4.54E+

2.49E+01

-1.05E+

-8.91E-01 1.02E+

-1.94E+00

-3.73E+

1.12E+00 6.05E-

-3.55E-01 1.04E-3.88E-01 2.73E+

-4.64E-01 2.86E+

4.11E+00 1.08E+

-1.12E+00

-1.18E+

-1.59E+00

-3.49E+

-8.46E-03 1.48E-

-2.27E-02

-4.54E 2.20E+00 2.72E+

1.16E-01 3.92E-W-

B MW-203-A

-01 1.74E+00

-2

+00 2.27E+00 5

+02 2.79E+02 2

+00 4.54E+00 4

+01

-4.95E+01

-4

+01

-2.71E+01

-4

+00 3.48E-02

-9

+00

-3.70E+00

-3

-01 1.17E+00 8

-01 1.59E+00 1

+00 4.36E+00 4

+00 1.48E+00 1

+01

-9.59E-01 4

+00 1.93E+00

-3

+00

-4.91E+00 4

-01

-5.67E-02

-5

-02

-2.27E-02

-3

+00 4.07E+00 1

-02 2.94E-02 7

MW-203-B MW-204-A 2.29E-01 7.58E-01 5.53E+00 2.69E+00 2.79E+02 1.06E+02 4.55E+00 4.66E+00 4.96E+01

-4.03E+01 4.66E+00

-6.22E+00 9.55E-01 1.91E-01 3.80E+00 0.00E+00 8.23E-01 2.01E+00

.50E+00 2.26E-01 4.17E+00 6.95E+00

.39E+00

-3.04E-01 4.99E+00 2.12E+00 3.69E+00 2.36+00 4.05E+00

-4.34E-01 5.87E-02

-5.12E-02 3.95E-02

-2.49E-02

.03E+01 4.07E+00 7.64E-02 1.56E-01 MW-204-B 1.27E+00 0

2.57E-01 2

3.49E+01 0

1.30E+01 1

-3.98E+00 0

-2.47E+01

-2.31E-01 0

-1.97E+00 0

6.11E-01 1.28E+00 0

6.31E+00 1.93E+00 0

7.68E+00 6.06E-01 1.66E+00 2

-9.28E-03 2

6.28E-02 0

-1.89E+00 8.24E-02

L L

R S

G G

H C

F N

C N

S N

T C

E E

E P

P P

A a

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 September 2014 M

Gross Alpha 8

Gross Beta 2

H-3 3

C-14

-9 Fe-55 9

Ni-59 3

Co-60 2

Ni-63 2

Sr-90

-1 Nb-94

-9 Tc-99

-1 Cs-137 3

Eu-152 2

Eu-154

-3 Eu-155 2

Pu-238 1

Pu-239/240 9

Pu-241 3

Am-241 1

a Bold val ng Water React ation Plan 4

MW-DW5 MW-8.47E-01 3.09E

.96E+00 1.45E

.43E+01 0.00E 9.44E-01

-2.70E 9.39E+00

-3.10E

.13E+00 1.64E

.17E+00 1.32E

.79E+00 2.48E 1.06E+00 5.90E 9.45E-01

-1.39E 1.54E+00

-4.00

.97E+00

-7.24

.48E+00 3.00E 3.31E+00

-3.93E

.69E+00 1.95E 1.71E-02 3.69E 9.28E-02 0.00E

.18E+00

-3.68E 1.28E-01 3.69E lues indicate con tor

-B11R MW-B11A E+00 2.07E-0 E+01 3.04E-0 E+00 3.44E+0 E+00 0.00E+0 E+01

-3.49E+0 E+01

-8.49E+0 E+00 1.22E+0 E+00

-4.14E-0 E-01 2.80E-0 E+00

-1.29E-0 0E-01

-1.56E+0 4E-01 9.72E-0 E+00 6.42E+0 E+00 1.10E+0 E+00 1.69E+0 E-02

-5.50E-0 E+00

-1.10E-0 E+00

-2.29E+0 E-02

-1.69E-0 ncentration grea Table 2-19 AR MW-200-A 01 2.42E-01 01 2.41E+00 01 6.86E+01 00

-4.56E-01 01

-3.35E+01 00 7.84E+00 00 3.56E+00 01 3.62E+00 01 1.14E+00 01

-1.43E+00 00

-1.57E+00 01 2.17E+01 00

-2.39E+00 00

-6.57E-01 00

-8.16E-01 03 2.65E-02 02 5.83E-02 00

-2.23E+00 02 1.10E-01 ater than MDC.

(continued)

MW-200-B 2.01E+00 9.11E+00 5.17E+01

-4.98E+00

-4.56E+01 2.37E+01 6.20E-01

-7.87E-01 5.10E-01

-2.68E-01

-1.54E+00 1.94E+00

-1.34E+01

-1.54E+00

-1.64E+00

-6.50E-03 0.00E+00 8.49E+00 2.29E-01 Italicized value 2-63 2014 Ground MW-201-A M

1.18E+00 7.36E+00 8.67E+01 2.69E+00

-2.18E+01

-1.99E+01

-7.23E-02 5.00E+00

-1.19E-01 6.56E-01

-7.94E-01

-1.09E+00 4.79E+00

-3.09E+00

-1.48E+00

-3.59E-02 0.00E+00

-6.92E-01 1.40E-01 es indicate MDC dwater Monito MW-201-B MW 1.43E+00 1.0 3.67E+00 4.8

-3.42E+01

-5.1 9.28E-01 4.94 2.77E+01

-5.4 3.09E+01

-1.1 9.50E-01 9.7 2.15E+00 8.2

-4.99E-01 6.7 6.44E-01

-6.4

-1.95E+00 7.9 1.84E+00

-4.3 2.53E+00 9.4 1.94E+00

-3.6 4.13E+00

-2.0 8.55E-02 1.1 1.41E-01 5.8

-5.85E-01 0.0 2.80E-02 6.6 C value.

oring Results (p W-202-A MW-20 4E+00

-2.10E-86E-01 2.30E+

18E+01 1.04E+

4E+00

-2.72E+

43E+01 3.37E+

18E+01

-4.46E+

72E-01 1.18E+

25E-01

-8.30E-70E-01 5.40E-48E-02

-1.02E+

97E-01

-1.95E-34E-01 2.31E+

0E+00 6.51E+

67E-01 4.18E+

08E+00

-8.41E-13E-02 3.63E-87E-02 5.25E-0E+00

-1.76E+

62E-02 9.48E-pCi/L) 02-B MW-203-A E-01 1.37E+00

+00 1.52E+00

+02

-3.44E+01

+00

-3.95E+00

+01

-4.95E+01

+01 5.30E+01

+00 3.67E+00 E-01 1.62E+00

-01 4.80E-01

+00 8.53E-02 E-01

-1.24E+00

+00 1.56E+00

+00 4.06E+00

+00

-3.33E+00 E-01

-9.54E-02

-02 7.08E-02

-02 9.15E-02

+00 5.04E-01

-02 2.51E-01 A

MW-203-B

-6.68E-01 1.00E+00 1.21E+02 0

4.89E-01 4.32E+01

-4.34E+01 1.99E+00

-1.77E+00 8.70E-01 2.16E+00 0

-3.32E+00 6.84E-01

-1.15E+00 0

-2.31E-01

-3.66E-01 8.12E-02 5.97E-02

-3.71E+00 1.03E-01 MW-204-A 6.00E-01 5.28E+00 6.88E+01 4.73E-01 3.45E+01

-3.13E+01

-3.77E-01

-1.84E-01 9.00E-01 1.18E-01

-1.96E+00

-1.14E+00

-1.92E+01

-4.95E+00

-2.02E+00

-6.45E-04

-5.48E-03

-3.97E+00 1.06E-01 MW-204-B 3.53E+00 0.00E+00

-1.21E+02 9.46E-01

-9.25E+01

-1.87E+01 2.05E+00 3.94E-01 2.30E-01

-1.88E+00 3.89E-01 1.24E+00 2.23E+00 2.36E+00 9.46E-01

-3.26E-02 7.02E-02

-6.46E+00 2.69E-01

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan Figure or e 2-1 LACBWR Site Map -

2-64

- Open Land Survey Units annd Classificatioon

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-2 LACBWR 2-65 Site Map - Buildings Identifiication

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-3 r

LACBWR 2-66 R Site Drainnage and Seewer Map

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-4 r

LACBWR 2-67 R LCE Excllusion Area (Class 1)

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figu Water Reactor Plan ure 2-5 N

r Non Impacte 2-68 ed Open Laand Samplinng Locations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-6 r

Class 1 O 2-69 Open Land SSampling LLocations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-7 r

Class 2 O 2-70 Open Land SSampling LLocations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-8 r

Class 3 O 2-71 Open Land SSampling LLocations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-9 r

9 Concre 2-72 ete Core Sam mpling Loccations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figur Water Reactor Plan re 2-9 (conti r

inued) 2-73 Concrete CCore Sampliing Locationns

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figur Water Reactor Plan re 2-9 (conti r

inued) 2-74 Concrete CCore Sampliing Locationns

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-10 LACBWR Si 2-75 ite - Typical Geological Crosss-Section

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-111 Groundwat 2-76 ter Sampling Wells - LACBW WR Site

LA CROSSE BOILING WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION

La Cross License T Revision 2.

Site 2.1.

2.1.

2.1.

2 2

2 2

2 2.1.

2.1.4 2

2 2.1.

2.1.

2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

2.2.

2.2.

2.2.

2 2

2 2

2.2.

2 2

2.2.4 2.2.

2.3.

2.3.

2.3.

2.3.

2.3.4 2

2 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Characteriz Historical S 1.

Objecti 2.

Method

.1.2.1. Pre

.1.2.2. Doc

.1.2.3. Lic

.1.2.4. Per

.1.2.5. Pro 3.

Operati 4.

Inciden

.1.4.1. Rad

.1.4.2. Che 5.

Finding 6.

Initial S

.1.6.1. Sur

.1.6.2. Sur

.1.6.3. Cla

.1.6.4. Cla

.1.6.5. Cla

.1.6.6. Non

.1.6.7. Cla

.1.6.8. Cla Characteriz 1.

Data Q 2.

Survey

.2.2.1. Num

.2.2.2. Det

.2.2.3. Sca

.2.2.4. Typ 3.

Instrum Concen

.2.3.1. Cal

.2.3.2. Inst 4.

Labora 5.

Quality Summary o 1.

Backgr 2.

Potenti 3.

Non-Im 4.

Impact

.3.4.1. Cla

.3.4.2. Cla Water Reactor Plan zation..........

Site Assessm ives............

dology........

liminary Cla cument Revi enses, Perm rsonnel Inter operty Inspec ional History nts...............

diological Sp emical Spills gs and Conc Survey Area rvey Areas..

rvey Units...

ass 1 Open L ass 2 Open L ass 3 Open L n-Impacted O ass 1 Structur ass 2 and 3 S ation Appro Quality Objec y Design......

mber of Stat termination o an Coverage pes of Measu mentation Se ntrations (M libration......

trument Use atory Instrum y Assurance f Characteri round Study ial Radionuc mpacted Ope ed Open Lan ass 1 Open L ass 2 Open L r

TABLE O ment..............

assification..

iew..............

mits and Auth rviews..........

ctions...........

y..................

pills.............

s..................

lusions........

as/Units and Land Areas...

Land Areas...

Land Areas...

Open Land A res...............

Structures.....

ach..............

ctives...........

tic Measurem of Static Me urements and lection, Use MDCs)..........

e and Contro ment Method zation Surve clides of Con en Land Area nd Areas.....

Land Areas...

Land Areas...

2-i OF CONTE horizations...

Classificatio Areas..........

ments and/or easurement a d Samples...

and Minimu l..................

ds and Sensit ey Results...

ncern............

as................

ENTS on................

r Samples....

and Sample L um Detectab tivities.........

Locations....

ble

... 2-1

... 2-2

... 2-2

... 2-3

... 2-3

... 2-4

... 2-5

... 2-5

... 2-5

... 2-6

... 2-6

... 2-7

... 2-8

... 2-8

... 2-9

... 2-9

... 2-9

. 2-10

. 2-10

. 2-10

. 2-11

. 2-11

. 2-12

. 2-12

. 2-14

. 2-14

. 2-15

. 2-16

. 2-16

. 2-16

. 2-18

. 2-18

. 2-19

. 2-19

. 2-19

. 2-20

. 2-21

. 2-22

. 2-22

. 2-24

. 2-25

. 2-26

La Cross License T Revision 2

2.3.

2.3.

2 2

2 2.3.

2 2

2 2

2 2.4.

2.5.

se Boiling W Termination n 0

.3.4.3. Cla 5.

Non-Im 6.

Impact

.3.6.1. Bas

.3.6.2. Tur

.3.6.3. LA 7.

Surface

.3.7.1. Are

.3.7.2. Gro

.3.7.3. Pre

.3.7.4. On-

.3.7.5. Sum Continuing References Water Reactor Plan ass 3 Open L mpacted Stru ed Structure sement Struc rbine Buildin ACBWR Adm e and Groun ea Groundwa oundwater F vious Invest

-Going Inve mmary of Gr Characteriza r

Land Areas...

uctures.........

es and System ctures Below ng Tunnel....

ministration dwater........

ater Use......

low.............

tigations......

stigations....

roundwater A ation...........

2-ii ms...............

w 636 foot El Building.....

Analytical R levation......

Results.........

. 2-27

. 2-29

. 2-30

. 2-30

. 2-31

. 2-31

. 2-32

. 2-32

. 2-33

. 2-34

. 2-35

. 2-35

. 2-36

. 2-37

La Cross License T Revision Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 2-4 Table 2-5 Table 2-6 Table 2-7 Table 2-8 Table 2-9 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-se Boiling W Termination n 0 1

LACBW 2

LACBW 3

Instrum 4

Off-Sit 5

2005 D 6

Investig 7

Initial S 8

Non-Im Survey 9

Non Im Labora 10 Impact Summa 11 Class 1 Labora 12 Impact Survey 13 Class 2 Labora 14 Impact Survey 15 Class 3 Labora 16 Concre 17 1983 G Buildin 18 2013 G 19 2014 G

-1 LACBW

-2 LACBW

-3 LACBW

-4 LACBW

-5 Non Im

-6 Class 1

-7 Class 2

-8 Class 3

-9 Concre

-10 LACB

-11 Ground Water Reactor Plan WR Open L WR Structur ment Types a te Laboratory Dairyland Ba gative Level Suite of LAC mpacted Ope y Summary.

mpacted Coa atory Analys ed Class 1 O ary.............

Concrete, A atory Analys ed Class 2 O y Summary.

2 Asphalt, Se atory Analys ed Class 3 O y Summary.

3 Asphalt, Se atory Analys ete Core Isot Groundwater ng...............

Groundwater Groundwater WR Site Ma WR Site Ma WR Site Dra WR LCE Ex mpacted Ope Open Land 2 Open Land 3 Open Land ete Core Sam WR Site - T dwater Samp r

LIST and Survey ral Survey U and Nominal y Analytical ackground St ls for Cs-137 CBWR Site-en Land Surv l Pile and So sis (pCi/g)....

Open Land S Asphalt, Sed sis (pCi/g)....

Open Land S ediment and sis................

Open Land S ediment and sis (pCi/g)....

opic Analys Analysis fro Monitoring Monitoring LIST O ap - Open La ap - Building ainage and S xclusion Are en Land Sam d Sampling L d Sampling L d Sampling L mpling Locat Typical Geolo pling Wells -

2-iii OF TABLE Units...........

Units.............

l MDCs.......

l Methods an tudy for Soil 7 Based on B

-Specific Ra vey Units - C oil Samples -

Survey Units diment and S Survey Units Soil Sample Survey Units Soil Sample is Results....

om Tempora Results......

Results (pC OF FIGURE and Survey U gs Identifica Sewer Map..

ea (Class 1)..

mpling Locati Locations.....

Locations.....

Locations.....

tions............

ogical Cross

- LACBWR ES nd Typical M ls.................

Background

dionuclides.

Characteriza

- Test Amer

- Character Soil Samples

- Character es - Test Am

- Character es - Test Am ary Well-Po Ci/L)............

RES Units and Cl ation.............

ions.............

s-Section.....

R Site...........

MDCs..........

Studies.......

ation rica rization Surv

- Test Ame rization merica rization merica oint South of lassification vey erica f Turbine

. 2-39

. 2-40

. 2-42

. 2-43

. 2-44

. 2-45

. 2-46

. 2-47

. 2-49

. 2-50

. 2-51

. 2-52

. 2-53

. 2-54

. 2-55

. 2-56

. 2-60

. 2-61

. 2-62

. 2-64

. 2-65

. 2-66

. 2-67

. 2-68

. 2-69

. 2-70

. 2-71

. 2-72

. 2-75

. 2-76

La Cross License T Revision AEC ALARA bgs CRD DCGL DQO EPA FCP FESW FRS FSS G-1 G-3 HSA HTD IR ISFSI LACBW LER LSA LSE LTP MARLA MARSA MARSSI MDC MDCR MWe NIST se Boiling W Termination n 0 United As Lo Below Contr Deriv Data Q United Force Fuel E Final Final Genoa Genoa Histor Hard-Incide Indep WR La Cr Licen Low S LACB Licen AP Multi-AME Multi-Manu IM Multi-Minim Minim Megaw Nation Water Reactor Plan LIST OF d States Ato ow As Reaso w Ground Su ol Rod Driv ed Concentr Quality Obje d States Env d Circulation Element Stor Radiation Su Status Surve a 1 Coal/Oil a 3 Fossil St rical Site As to-Detect ent Reports endent Spen rosse Boiling see Event R Specific Act BWR Site En se Terminati

-Agency Rad

-Agency Rad ual

-Agency Rad mal Detectab mum Detecta watt Electric nal Institute r

ACRONYM mic Energy onably Achie urface e

ration Guide ective vironmental P n Pump rage Well urvey ey Station tation sessment nt Fuel Stora g Water Reac eports ivity nclosure ion Plan diological L diation Surv diation Surv ble Concentr able Count R c

of Standard 2-iv MS AND AB Commission evable line Levels Protection A age Installatio ctor Laboratory A vey and Asse vey and Site rations Rate ds and Techn BBREVIAT n

Agency on Analytical Pro essment of M Investigatio nology TIONS otocols Man Materials and n Manual nual d Equipmentt

La Cross License T Revision NRC ORC PSDAR QA QAPP QC RCA REMP ROC RPV SRC STS TSD WDNR WGTV WTB ZNPS se Boiling W Termination n 0 United Opera Post-S Qualit Qualit Qualit Radio Radio Radio React Safety Sourc Techn Wisco Waste Waste Zion N Water Reactor Plan d States Nuc ational Revie Shutdown D ty Assurance ty Assurance ty Control ologically Co oactive Efflu onuclides of or Pressure V y Review Co e Term Surv nical Suppor onsin Depart e Gas Tank V e Treatment Nuclear Pow r

clear Regula ew Committ ecommissio e

e Project Pla ontrolled Are ent Monitor Concern Vessel ommittee vey rt Document tment of Nat Vault Building wer Station 2-v atory Commi ee ning Activit an ea ing Reports tural Resour ission ties Report rces

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Water Reactor Plan r

Page Intent 2-vi tionally Leftft Blank

La Cross License T Revision

2.

S In accor Regulato Nuclear character The purp conducte remain.

License T of compl Survey (

1575, Mu Source T terminati The site quantify character site that classifica The cha NUREG-Decomm

Criteria, PG-EO-3 Reactor Characte the Data informati remediat at concen removed The deco waste of LACBW None of radiologi planned a G-3 pow minor str The majo basement se Boiling W Termination n 0 Site Chara rdance with ory Guide 1.

Power Re rization perfo pose of site ed in all are The term F Termination liance survey FSS) for op ulti-Agency Term Surve ion. See LTP characteriz the extent a rization surv will require ation and vol aracterization

-1575 (MA issioning G Final Repor 313196-SV-P (4), and GP erization Pro Quality Obj ion obtained ion planning ntrations gre and properl ommissionin f all LACB WR Administ f the buildin ically impac and these str wer operation ructures will or sub-grade ts of the Re Water Reactor Plan acterization h the requi

.179, Standa eactors (1),

formed at the characteriza eas where co Final Radiat n Plan (LTP) ys that will b pen land are Radiation S ey (STS) fo P Chapter 5 ation incorp and nature o veys and ana remediation lumes, and e n survey w ARSSIM)

Guidance - C rt, (3). In ad PL-001, Ch P-EO-31319 oject (QAPP jective (DQO d from the

g. Materials eater than th ly packaged ng approach BWR buildi tration build ngs and stru cted such th ructures, inc ns. The pub l also remain e structures t eactor Buildi r

n rements of ard Format

, this chap e La Crosse B ation is to en ontamination tion Survey

) in order to be performed eas and buri Survey and S or below gr for a descrip porates the r of contamin alyses have b n, as well as estimate cost was designed and NURE Characteriza ddition, surv haracterizatio 96-QA-PL-00 P) (5) which O) process, a characteriz which were he unrestricte for shipmen for LACBW ings, structu ding and Cri uctures asso hat they requ cluding the G blic roads an

n.

that will be ing, Waste T 2-1 f 10 CFR 50 and Conte pter provide Boiling Wat nsure that th n existed, re is from 10 acknowledg d at LACBW ed piping b Site Investig round struct ption of the results of in ation at LA been and con s to plan rem ts.

d and exec EG-1757, ation, Surve veys were de on Survey P 01, Quality describes p and measure zation provi e shown to b ed release cr nt and dispos WR requires ures and co ib House) to ociated with uire remedi G-3 Crib Hou nd railways backfilled a Treatment B 0.82 (a)(9)(ii ents for Lic es a descr ter Reactor (

he Final Rad emains, or h 0 CFR 50.82 ge the distin WR. These ased on gui gation Manu tures to be FRS.

nvestigation ACBWR. In ntinue to be mediation m cuted using Volume 2, ey, and De esigned and Plan for th Assurance policy, organ es necessary des guidanc be contamina riteria have sal.

the demolit omponents o a depth of h the Genoa al actions; use, will rem that travers and remain a Building (W i)(A) and t ense Termin ription of (LACBWR) diation Surv has the pote (9)(ii)(D) an nction betwe surveys are; idance provi al (MARSS backfilled ns and surve n addition, th e used to ide methodologie the guidan Revision 1 termination executed in e La Cross Project Pla nization, fun to achieve q ce for deco ated with rad been and wi tion, remova (with the e f at least 3 f a 3 Fossil S therefore, n main intact a se the site a at license ter WTB), Waste the guidanc nation Plan the radiolo site.

ey (FRS) w ential to exi nd is used in een the two

1) a Final S ided in NUR SIM) (2) and prior to lic eys conduct he results o ntify areas o es, develop w nce provide 1,

Consolid of Radiolo n accordance se Boiling W an LACBWR nctional activ quality data.

ontamination dioactive ma ill continue al and dispos exception o feet below g Station (G-3 no remediati and function as well as se rmination ar Gas Tank V ce of ns for ogical will be ist or n this types Status REG-d 2) a cense ed to of site of the waste ed in dated ogical e with Water R Site

vities, The n and aterial to be sal as f the grade.
3) are ion is al for everal re the Vault

La Cross License T Revision (WGTV)

(3 feet b Reactor/G sump and In the R removed removed elevation WTB, th concrete the rema cap and p following covered b remainin LTP Cha Independ shown in 2.1.

H In accor Assessm informati

reports, marine f Environm compiled 2.1.1. O The HSA LACBW surround resulted Radiolog subsurfac the 1.5 a informati may also The scop hazardou The obje Id b

se Boiling W Termination n 0

) and the re elow grade)

Generator P d the Turbin Reactor Bui

. All intern

, leaving on n (i.e., concr he only porti footers belo ining structu piles below t g the termina by at least 3 ng backfilled apter 1, sec dent Spent F n Figure 2-1)

Historical Si rdance with ent (HSA) ion, includin pre-operatio fauna and s mental Repo d for this inv Objectives A was a d WR activities dings. The in contamin gically Contr ce soils outs acre fenced ion compile o be used as pe of the us materials.

ctives of the dentify pote ased on exis Water Reactor Plan emainder of

). These re Plant, the on e pit.

lding, all in nal concrete nly the rema rete bowl on of the str ow the 636 fo ure will cons the 636 foot ation of the l feet of soil d structures to ction 1.3.1 d Fuel Storage

) is excluded te Assessme h the guida (6) was p ng any 10 C onal survey sediment su orts to the vestigation.

detailed inve related to r HSA focuse nation of pla rolled Area (

ide of the R LACBWR d by the HS input into th HSA inclu e HSA were ntial, likely sting or deriv r

f the baseme maining stru ne foot thick nternal stru will be rem aining struct below 636 ructure that oot elevation sist of the fl elevation. T license are c and physica o be plausibl describes th Installation d from the sc ent ance provid performed a CFR 50.75(g data, spill urveys), ope Nuclear Re estigation to radioactive m ed on histor ant systems, (RCA). It al RCA but with Site Enclos SA was used he developm ded potenti to:

, or known ved informat 2-2 ent structure uctures inclu k portion of uctural surfa moved to ex tural concre foot elevatio will remain

n. In the WG loors and fou The structur constructed o ally altered t ly occupied.

e site licen (ISFSI) Fac cope of the L ded in MAR and docume g) files, emp reports, spe rational sur egulatory C o collect ex materials or rical events

, buildings, lso addresse hin the owne sure (LSE) d to establis ment of reme ial contamin sources of

tion, es located b lude the Pip f the Chimn aces, system xpose the ste ete outside t on, concrete is the 630 a GTV and the undation wa ral surfaces t of steel reinf to a conditio nse boundary cility as loca LTP.

RSSIM, sec ented in Au ployee inter ecial survey rvey records Commission xisting info other conta and routin surface and d support str er controlled area share sh initial sur ediation plan nation from radioactive below the 63 ping and Ve ney Foundat ms and com eel liner, wh the liner be e pile cap an and 635 foot e other rema alls as well a that will rem forced concr on which wo

y. The fen ated in Lot 7 ction 3.0, a ugust of 19 rviews, radi ys (e.g., site s, and Ann (NRC) wer ormation (fr aminants) fo ne operationa d subsurface ructures, ope d area. The e the same rvey units.

ns and the de m radioactiv and chemi 36 foot elev entilation Tu tion, the Tu mponents wi hich will als low the 636 nd piles.) I t floor, sump aining basem as concrete p main at LACB rete which w ould not allow nced area o 7 of the site a Historical 999. Histo ological inc e aerial sur nual Radiolo re reviewed rom the sta or the site an al processes e soils withi en land area current RCA boundary.

This inform esign of the ve materials cal contami vation

unnel, urbine ill be so be 6 foot In the p and
ments, piling BWR will be w the of the e (and Site orical cident
rveys, ogical d and art of nd its s that in the as and A and The mation FRS.

s and inants

La Cross License T Revision D

n P

P P

P M

D 2.1.2. M The obje may have land area failures r material.

contamin decontam their pote Each inc was furth

analysis, sampling location.

Relevant remediat Also incl R

P p

S id Informat data, eva Units.

2.1.2.1.

The HSA classifica have a p se Boiling W Termination n 0 Distinguish p o threat to h rovide an as rovide infor rovide an in rovide a gra MARSSIM g Delineate init Methodology ective of the e significant as and struct resulting in Dependin nation varies mination acti ential for con ident identif her investiga any remed g, survey, an Historical r t informatio ion phases o luded in the Relevant exce ersonnel int lant personn ite inspectio dentify, locat ion from thi aluation of r Prelim A investiga ation of the potential for Water Reactor Plan portions of th uman health ssessment of rmation usefu nitial classific aded initial c guidance, and tial survey u y

HSA record tly impacted tures. These airborne rel ng upon pa s by area. In ivities and F ntamination.

fied that pos ated. This in dial actions nd analysis i records prov on that bec of the license research ass erpts from w terviews, inc nel to confir on, utilizing te, confirm, is research w results, docu minary Class ation was d site land are contaminati r

he site that m h,

f the likeliho ful to subsequ cation of are lassification d

unit boundari ds search and d the hazardo e included sy eases, liquid ast site ope n order to fac RS planning sed a realisti nvestigation taken to m in an attemp vided the sou comes avail e termination sociated with written report cluding the u rm documen g historic si and docume was used in umentation o sification designed to eas and struc ion (based o 2-3 may need fur od of contam uent continu eas and struc n for impacte ies and areas d interview ous material ystem, struc d spills or re erations and cilitate effec g, land areas ic potential t n focused on mitigate the s pt to identify urce of a vast lable during n plan will b h the develop ts and corres use of quest nted incident te drawings ent areas of c the HSA de of findings, o obtain su ctures as imp on historical rther action minant migra uing characte ctures as non ed soils and s s based upon process was l or radiolog cture, or area eleases, or t d processes, ctive charact s and structu to impact th n the scope o situation, an fy the as le t majority of g any addi be evaluated.

pment of the spondences, tionnaires, o ts and ident s, photograp concern.

evelopment, and the ide ufficient info pacted or no l data) or co from those

ation, erization sur n-impacted o structures in n the initial c s to identify gical status o a contamina the loss of c

, the poten terization, an ures are class he characteri of contamina nd any post eft conditio f the docume itional char e HSA were:

of current, fo tify undocum phs, prints, including th entification formation to on-impacted ontain know that pose lit

rveys, or impacted, n accordance classification those event of LACBWR ation from sy control over ntial for res nd to guide f sified based ization of th ant sampling t-remedial a n of the inc ents inspecte racterization ormer and re mented incid and diagram he compilati of initial Su o provide i

. Impacted wn contamin ttle or e with

n.

s that R site ystem solid sidual future upon e site g and action cident ed.

n and etired

dents, ms to on of urvey initial areas nation

La Cross License T Revision (based o through k is no rea impacted controlle If a land area clas was mad Initial cl historical initial cla at the tim prepared FRS desi classifica continuin surveillan classifica of comm 2.1.2.2.

Records source of for LACB include:

O S

L S

O A

E R

D H

S R

se Boiling W Termination n 0 on past or p knowledge o asonable po d from a ra d areas were area or struc ssification (e e based upon lassification l radiologica assification a me of identifi

. Final clas ign. The ch ations indica ng characteri nce, and an ations (for ex mencement of Docum maintained f documenta BWR, many Operational R afety Review Licensee Eve ite Initiated Operator Log Annual Envir Environmenta Regulatory ac Documentatio Health Physic ite inspectio Radiological Water Reactor Plan preliminary of site history ssibility for adiological p e also docum cture was cla e.g. Class 1, n the inform of LACBW al survey dat and (2) final ication of the ssification is haracterizatio ated in the H ization surve ny other ap xample, from f the FRS.

ment Review to satisfy t ation for the y record type Review Com w Committe ent Reports (

Incident Rep gs including ronmental M al investigat ctions conce on from inte cs surveys an on and survei and environ r

radiological y or previou residual ra perspective.

mented.

assified as im Class 2 or C mation obtain WR areas w ta. Classify l classificati e survey are s performed on data was HSA as descr eys, operatio pplicable sur m Class 3 to w

the requirem e HSA recor es were eval mmittee (ORC ee (SRC) Me LER) Summ ports (IR),

Reactor Ope Monitoring R tions perform erning the sit rviews cond nd sampling illance type nmental surv 2-4 l surveillanc us survey inf adioactive co Potential mpacted, the Class 3) in a ned.

was based o ying a survey ion. Initial c a using the i and verified used to val ribed in this onal surveys rvey data m o Class 2 and ments of 10 rds review p luated. A su C) Meeting M eeting Minut

maries, erator and H
Reports, med by indep te, ducted with r g results asso documents a ey documen ce). Non-im formation an ontamination chemical h en a determi accordance w on historica y area has a classification information d as a DQO lidate or upd Chapter. R s in support may cause d from Clas CFR Part 50 process. Dur ummary of t
Minutes, tes, Health Physic pendent entit retired/separ ociated with associated w
nts, mpacted are nd are those a
n. Areas w hazards incid ination of the with MARS al informatio minimum o n of most ar available wh O during cha date, as nece Radiological of decommi an increase ss 2 to Class 0.75(g)(1) p ring the con the types of cs entries,
ties, rated site per identified ev with identifie eas are iden areas where were classifie dents on ow e initial imp SSIM, sectio on and avai of two stage reas is perfo hen the HSA aracterization essary, the i survey data issioning, ro e in survey s 1) until the provided a m nduct of the records revi
rsonnel, vents, ed events, ntified there ed as wner-pacted on 2.2 ilable s: (1) ormed A was n and initial from outine area e time major HSA iewed

La Cross License T Revision Q

2.1.2.3.

LACBW permits.

allowed D the site, activities Several g licensing U

U U

W L

From Au This peri 1987, and 2.1.2.4.

Interview about the The pers the partic personne terms be site know Between individua standardi site perso the perso memorie operation 2.1.2.5.

Several Several s se Boiling W Termination n 0 Quality Contr Licen WR was opera The NRC Dairyland P to support o

s.

government g, constructio United States United States United States Wisconsin De Local/County ugust 28, 197 iod includes d ISFSI cons Person ws with curre e site and to onnel interv cipants as w el were chos ing investig wledge and e 2010 and als contacte ized personn onnel who w onnel observ s of other q nal period ex Prope on-site prop site events of Water Reactor Plan rol (QC) /Qu ses, Permits ated in accor Operating L ower Coope operations du and regulato on, operation s Atomic Ene s Nuclear Re s Environmen epartment of y Governmen 73 to the pre s power ope struction and nnel Intervie ent or previo verify or cl views includ well as indivi sen due to th ated for the experience th 2011, appr ed as part nel survey w worked at th vations docum questionnaire xperience, or rty Inspectio perty inspec f interest we r

uality Assura and Author rdance with License for erative (Dair uring its ope ory agencies ns, and decom ergy Commi egulatory Co ntal Protecti f Natural Re nts.

esent, the fac erations to 1 d spent fuel ews ous employe arify inform ded a combin idual and gro heir knowled assessment.

hat ranged fr roximately 4 of the HS which was c e LACBWR mented on th e completers r by docume ons ctions were ere identified 2-5 ance (QA) fi izations several Fed LACBWR a ryland) to us erating lifeti have provid mmissioning ission (AEC ommission (N ion Agency (

esources (WD cility has bee 1987, perma off-load whi ees were per mation gather nation of qu oup interview dge of and a

. A number rom the site c 40 recollecti SA question completed v R during its o he questionn s, current on ntation disco made over d which were finding type d deral and Sta and support se any quant ime, and to ded oversigh

g. These age C),

NRC),

(EPA),

DNR),

en operated u anent shutdo ich was com rformed to c red from the uestionnaires ws with sev association r of the pers construction ions of inte nnaire progr voluntarily b operational naire were c n-site worki overed durin r the course e subsequent documents.

ate of Wisco ting Technic tity of radioa implement d ht at LACBW encies includ under NRC own for dec mpleted in 20 collect first-h e records tha s completed veral of the p with the sys sonnel interv n period to sh erest were l ram. This by retired/sep years. With corroborated ing staff tha ng the record e of the HS tly documen onsin license cal Specifica active mater decommissio WR during s de:

License DPR commissionin 012.

hand inform at were revie by a majori participants.

stems and so viewed poss hutdown.

logged from consisted parated staf h few except d either by lo at had LACB ds search.

SA developm nted in the H es and ations rial at oning

siting, R-45.

ng in mation ewed.

ity of Key ource essed m the of a ff and

tions, ogged BWR ment.

HSA.

La Cross License T Revision 2.1.3. O LACBW Dairylan Mississip bordered Mississip LSE com served as confirme road on t th fo an 1

th a

li The plan Chalmers provided LACBW 19 years defueling Operatin No. 56, d 333 irrad into five Limited d ongoing shipped internals Building removed undergro Condens Water Sy Building 2.1.4. In Based on notificati se Boiling W Termination n 0 Operational WR was a 5

d. This sing ppi River so d on the no ppi River an mprising app s the RCA b ed to be suit the south sid he land north ormer Genoa n operationa 75 feet from he fenced ISF small parce icensed site.

nt was one s Company d them with a WR achieved until it was g was compl g License D dated Augus diated fuel as (5) dry cask dismantleme at LACBW for disposal intact, and 2

, and shippe

, including t ound gas sto ate Storage ystem pump ncidents n the review ions, occurre Water Reactor Plan History 50 Megawatt gle unit, also outh of the orth by the nd Highway proximately boundary du table for unr de of the plan h of the LA a Station #1 al 350 MWe m the LSE, FSI facility t l of land to t of a series was the ori a provisional d initial criti s permanent leted on June DPR-45, pur st 4, 1987; a ssemblies, w ks and transfe ent of shutdo WR since 199 l in June 20 29 control ro ed for dispo the spent fue orage tanks)

Tank and s, heat exch w of existin ence reports r

t Electric (

o known as G Village of Mississippi

35. The lic 1.5 acres of uring operat restricted us nt. Other pro ACBWR plan (G-1) coal (

fossil gener that is locate the east of H of demonst iginal licens l operating l icality on Ju tly shut dow e 11, 1987.

rsuant to 10 and a posses which were i ferred to the own and unu

94. Waste s 007. The R ods in place osal in June el storage rac

); Condensa condenser);

angers, pipin g plant reco s, and questi 2-6 (MWe) Boil Genoa Statio f Genoa, Ve i River and ensed site c the licensed tions. Mate e before rel ominent feat nt, including (and later oil rating station ed directly so Highway 35, tration plant see; the AEC icense.

uly 11, 1967 wn by Dairy The Dairyla 0 CFR 50, w ss but not-op in Fuel Elem sites ISFSI used systems stored in the Reactor Pres was filled w e 2007. Oth cks, Gaseou ate system Turbine an ng and comp ords (e.g. an ionnaires), i ling Water on #2, is loc ernon Coun d a narrow omprises a t d site. The erial leaving ease. The s tures on the g the site sw l) fueled pow n (G-3) loca outh of G-3, across from ts funded in C later sold 7, and was yland on Ap and authority was terminat perate status ment Storage by Septemb s and waste e FESW and sure Vessel with concret her systems us Waste Dis and Feedwa nd Generato ponents that nnual and s incidents wi Reactor th cated on the nty, Wiscons strip of la total of 163 LSE bounda g the LSE w site is acces site include:

witchyard an wer plant (re ated south an

, and m LACBWR n part by A d the plant t operated fo pril 30, 198 y to operate ated by Lice s was grante e Well (FES ber 2012.

disposal op d other Clas (RPV) wit te, removed and compo sposal System ater system or; and Com t were locate semi-annual ith radiologi hat is owne east shore o sin. The s and between

.5 acres, wit ary is fenced was surveyed sed by an a nd the site o moved in 19 nd approxim that is part o AEC. The A to Dairyland or approxim

7. Final re LACBWR u ense Amend ed by NRC.

SW), were p erations has ss B/C waste th head insta from the Re onents have m (except fo m (except fo mponent Co ed in the Tu reports, lice ical or hazar ed by of the ite is n the th the d and d and access of the 989),

mately of the Allis-d and mately eactor under dment The placed been e was

alled, eactor been or the or the ooling urbine ensee rdous

La Cross License T Revision material placing t the LSE the struct LSE, wh Special Monitori reports c shutdown around th posing a of LACB contamin 2.1.4.1.

The hist involving potential chronolo T

fl In W

In su In d

st O

th 8

O th 8

O ap In O

in se Boiling W Termination n 0 implication the reactor in and, while c tures and so ich is alread emphasis w ing Reports covering the n in 1987.

he plant site significant p BWR site nation from s Radio torical revie g system lea to affect th gical order a The stainless loor. Inciden ncidents inv Water Discha n 1970, pot uppression o n

Septemb econtaminat team cleanin On Novembe he potential 0-84 Inciden On Novembe he Turbine B 7, ORC-80-9 On Decemb pproximately ncident Repo On December nto the Turbi Water Reactor Plan ns occurred n a SAFSTO contributing ils directly r dy known to was placed o (REMP), fo e periods o Available sa e were also probability o land areas system failur ological Spill ew indicated akages, radio e classificati as follows; steel liner nts involving olving leaka arge line wer tentially con on the license

ber, 1977, tion of a Fo ng tank in the er 5, 1980, p for leakage nt Report, OR er 24, 1980, Building. (D 97, LER 80-ber 6, 1980 y 1/2 gallon ort, ORC-80 r 15, 1980, t ine Building r

between th OR conditio to the radiol related to the be impacte on obtainin focusing on of SAFSTOR ampling resu reviewed. T of impacting and structu res resulting ls d that betwe ological spill ion of LACB in the FESW g leakage of age from the re noted from ntaminated ed site roads removable orced Circul e Reactor Bu artial blocka of drain wa RC-80-71, O residual rad DPC-80-93 I

-12)

, the Turb of waste w 0-71, ORC-8 the Turbine g Basement T 2-7 he commenc n in 1987.

logical conta e operation o ed.

g and revie gaseous an R and deco ults associat The objectiv g the radiolo ures. Thes g in airborne een 1967 a ls, and/or rad BWR structu W had a his f the FESW w e resin regen m 1967 to 19 Control Rod

s.

e alpha c

ation Pump uilding 701 f age of drain ater into the ORC-80-75, dioactive con Incident Rep bine Build water to the 0-75, ORC-Building Wa Tunnel. (DP cement of p All of these amination an of the reacto ewing the a nd liquid rel ommissionin ted with soi ve was the i ogical status se included releases, liq and 1987, th dioactive liq ures or soils story of leak were noted f neration was 973.

d Drive (C contaminatio (FCP) duri foot elevatio lines under soil under th ORC-80-87 ntamination port, ORC-8 ding Waste Turbine Bu 80-87, ORC aste Water T PC-80-106 In plant operati e incidents t nd potential or, were con annual Radi leases since ng activities il and groun identification or hazardou system, st quid spills or here were s quid effluent

s. The incid kage to the R from 1967 to ste system t CRD) oil wa on was d

ing mainten on. (ORC, 0 Turbine Bu he Turbine B 7, ORC-80-9 n was detect 80-71, ORC-Water T uilding floor C-80-97)

Tank overflo ncident Repo ion in 1967 took place w contaminati ntained withi ioactive Eff 1967, inclu s after the ndwater with n of those e us material s tructure, or r releases.

several inci releases wit dents are list Reactor Bui o 2012.

to the Circul as used for detected d

ance involv 09/27/77) uilding result Building. (D

97) ed in soils u 75, ORC Tank overfl
r. (DPC-80 owed waste w ort) 7 and within ion of in the fluent uding plant hin or events status area idents th the ted in ilding lating dust during ving a ted in DPC-under C owed 0-102 water

La Cross License T Revision In w

D O

un O

co in O

si co B

to O

ap b

2.1.4.2.

Between release o ranged fr and fuel impacted policies releases.

2.1.5. F LACBW within its been imp post ope Survey fo for fissio Structure Turbine Stack. In to be dire An area s support b various w se Boiling W Termination n 0 ncidents invo waste water t Discharge lin On January nspecified v On May 31, ontaminated nto the basem On July 02, 1 ight flow se ontaminated Bay door. In o an unrestri On July 16, pproximately asement floo Chem 1967 and 20 of chemicals rom spills of oil from sy d buildings.

and proced Findings and WR was desig s many syste pacted due t erational his or SAFSTOR on products t es classified Building, W n addition to ectly impacte surrounding buildings su warehouses a Water Reactor Plan olving leaka tanks throug ne were noted 30, 1981, volume of wa 1982, a lid d water and ment. (DPC 1982, approx eal rupture t d water flow n addition, a cted area. (D 1983, a leak y 15,000 gal or. (LER 83 mical Spills 014, the HSA s and/or pote f acids and c ystems and These spills dures for id d Conclusio gned with mu ems, compon to routine op tory of the R (7) identifi to enter and i as impact WTB, Low S o the structur ed by the op the LSE ha uch as the L and storage b r

age of potent gh the norma d from 1980 the Turbin ater into the seal failed o spent resin 51 Incid ximately 1,2 o the Turbin wed into the approximatel DPC-82-58 I k in the Sea llons of reac 3-07)

A document entially haza caustics used storage tank s were contr dentification ns ultiple bound nents, and st perations an plant. Dai ied historica impact react ted by the Specific Act res, the soils peration of th s also been d LACBWR C buildings.

2-8 tially contam al effluent re 0 to 1986.

e Building laundry room on a spent r onto the flo dent Report) 200 gallons o ne Building soils outsid ly 25 gallons Incident Rep al Water Inj ctor coolant ted several in ardous liquid d in the plan ks. A majo rolled and re n, control a daries to con tructures. M nd maintenan iryland LAC al failed fuel tor and supp operation o tivity (LSA) s surrounding his facility. T designated a rib House, L minated liqui elease pathw Waste W

m. (DPC-81 resin liner w oor of the S of condensat g floor, and de the Turbi s of contam port, LER 82 njection Syst to be discha ncidents inv ds to the en nts various ority of the emediated in and remedia ntrol and con Many of these nce activitie C-TR-138, I incidents at ort systems.

of the facilit

) Building, g these build This area is as impacted.

LACBWR A id from the T way to the C Water Tank 1-10 Inciden which resulte Spent Resin te water was approximate ine Building minated liquid 2-016) tem leak at arged to the volving the u nvironment.

systems to t incidents oc n accordance ation of haz ntain the rad e systems an es during the Initial Site t LACBWR ty include R WGTV, and dings have a defined by t This area i Administrati Turbine Bui Circulating W overflowed nt Report) ed in the sp Liner Room s released fr ely 20 gallo g door and T d was discha 1A FCP ca Reactor Bui unplanned sp These inci the spill of d ccurred insid e with the st zardous ma dioactive con nd structures e operationa Characteriz and the pote Reactor Buil d the Ventil also been de the LSE fenc includes anc ion Building ilding Water d and pill of m and rom a ons of Truck arged aused ilding pill or idents diesel de of tation aterial ntents have al and zation ential

lding, lation emed ce.

cillary g and

La Cross License T Revision In additi support impacted LSE whi the LSE 2.1.6. In As part o into preli and exist 2.1.6.1.

The entir larger ph classifica efficient identified were clas and are id were clas current c 2.1.6.2.

The surv or open l were deli radioactiv relatively appropria The surv Prior to accordan sizes for The deco segmenta the excep any struc survey u These ob volume c In additio the purpo se Boiling W Termination n 0 ion to the a buildings, t d to provide ich is consid areas compr nitial Surve of the HSA p iminary surv ting survey d Surve re 163.5 acr hysical sectio ation. Surv and practic d in the area ssified as n dentified in ssified as im lassification Surve vey areas wer land area tha ineated to ph vity to the e y compact sh ate for the si vey units est characteriza nce with the g survey units ommissionin ation, remov ption of stru cture will re units have be bjectives inc contained on on, the surve ose of chara Water Reactor Plan area within the open lan a buffer zon dered non-im rising approx ey Areas/Un process, the i vey areas an data.

y Areas res licensed ons of the sit vey area size cal size need

a. Survey ar on-impacted the HSA. S mpacted. F ns by area.

y Units re further di at is surveye hysical areas extent practi hapes and hi ite operation tablished by ation, survey guidance pro s for FSS.

ng approach val and dispo cture basem emain at sit een establish clude provid nsite, and dis ey units estab acterization p r

the LSE an nd immedia ne between t mpacted. Th ximately 1.5 nits and Clas impacted LA nd assigned site was div te that may e was deter ded to boun reas that hav

d. These ar Survey areas Figure 2-1 p vided into su ed and evalu s with simila cal. To the ghly irregula nal history or the HSA w y unit sizes f ovided in M that will be osal of all im ment floors an te closure a hed for struc ding survey d sposition opt blished for s planning and 2-9 nd the open ately surroun the LSE and he licensed s acres of the ssification ACBWR stru area classifi vided into su contain one rmined base nd the latera ve no reason reas have no with reason provides an i urvey units.

uated as a sin ar operationa extent prac ar shapes we r the site top were used as for Class 1 o ARSSIM, se e implement mpacted sys nd walls that and consequ ctures to fac data for rem tions for the structures tha d do not cor land areas unding the L d the G-3 lan site comprise e owner cont uctures and o ications base urvey areas.

or more sur ed upon the al and verti nable potenti o radiologica nable potenti illustration o A survey u ngle entity f al history or ctical, survey ere avoided u ography.

initial surve open land su ection 4.6 fo ted at LACB stems and ab t reside 3 fee uently, be su cilitate other mediation pla waste.

at are 3 feet rrespond to surroundin LSE fence nd and facil es a total of trolled area.

open land ar ed on the op

. Survey ar rvey units de specific ar ical extent o al for residu al impact fro ial for residu of the LACB unit is a port following FR similar pote y units were unless the un ey units for urvey units or the sugges BWR calls bove-grade et below gra ubjected to r characteriz anning, estim below grade the survey u g the LACB is designate lities south o f 163.5 acres reas were div perational hi reas are typi epending on rea and the of contamin ual contamin om site opera ual contamin BWR site an tion of a stru RS. Survey ential for res e established nusual shape characteriza were adjust sted physical for the com structures.

ade, no porti FRS. How zation objec mating the w e are intende units that w BWR ed as of the s with vided istory ically n their most nation nation ations nation nd the ucture units sidual d with e was ation.

ted in l area mplete With ion of

wever, tives.

waste ed for will be

La Cross License T Revision used for section 5 Tables 2-impacted site struc 2.1.6.3.

The follo React Turbi (L10 LSA North The basis soil by r spills of packages Based on subsurfac the unres 2.1.6.4.

The follo LACB (L20 G-3 C (L20 Based up surveys p radioactiv Class 2 o 2.1.6.5.

The follo North Trans Plant se Boiling W Termination n 0 the FRS o

.5.2 of Chap

-1 and 2-2 p d structures ctures. A sum Class owing open l tor Building ine Buildin 10102),

Building, M h LSE Area s for this cla radioactive m radioactive s and contain n an assessm ce soils in th stricted use c Class owing open l BWR Adm 11101),

Crib House, 11102).

pon a review performed in ve contamin open land sur Class owing open l h End of Lic smission Sw t Access, ISF Water Reactor Plan f remaining pter 5).

provide a de respectively mmary of th 1 Open Lan land areas ha g, WTB, WG ng, Turbine Maintenance (L1010104) assification is material in t liquids and ners.

ment of histor hese areas c criteria. Clas 2 Open Lan land areas w ministration LACBWR w of the hist n these area nation to exc rvey units ar 3 Open Lan land areas w censed Site (L witchyard Are FSI Haul Ro r

g below grad etailed list o

y. Figure 2-2 he survey uni nd Areas ave been cla GTV, Ventila Office Bu Eat Shack G s due to a se these areas d resins, radi rical inciden could possibl ss 1 open lan nd Areas were classifie
Building, Circ. Water torical inform as as docume eed the unre re shown on nd Areas were classifie L3012101),

ea (L301210 ad Grounds 2-10 de structure of the survey 2 provides a it classificati assified as im ation Stack G uilding, 1B Grounds (L10 ries of docum during facil ioactive sys nts and event ly contain re nd survey un ed as impacte LACBWR Discharge L mation and ented in the estricted rele Figure 2-1.

ed as Class 3 02),

(L3012109) es (designate y units for b a detailed in ions are pres mpacted Clas Grounds (L1 Diesel G 010103),

mented incid lity operation stem leakage ts, it was an esidual radio nits are show ed Class 2:

R Crib Ho Line, Area S operational HSA, there ease criteria.

).

ed as STS a both the ope nventory of sented as fol ss 1:

010101),

Generator Bu dents of the ns. These i e, and storag nticipated tha oactive mate wn on Figure ouse, Ware South of LSE radiation an e was a pote and discuss en land area the building llows.

uilding Gro contaminati incidents in ge of radioa at the surfac erial in exce e 2-1.

ehouse Gro E Fence Gro nd contamin ential for res ed in s and g and ounds ion of clude active e and ess of ounds ounds nation sidual

La Cross License T Revision Historica in concen Class 3 o 2.1.6.6.

Based on in the HS contamin G-3 C Coal Capp Grou Hwy The non-2.1.6.7.

The follo structure These str radioactiv radioactiv majority React Wast Venti Wast Turbi Diese LSA Main Througho spread o were rou structure structura below gr subjected se Boiling W Termination n 0 al informatio ntrations in e open land sur Non-I n a review o SA, the bala nation and ha Coal Plant G Pile Ground ped Ash Imp unds East of H 35/Railroad

-impacted op Class owing is a li

s. The com ructures con ve waste sy ve material of the curren tor Building te Treatment ilation Stack te Gas Tank ine Building el Generator Building (B ntenance Eat out facility o f loose surf utinely post s involves l material as rade, no por d to FRS. Th Water Reactor Plan on contained excess of the rvey units ar Impacted Op f the operati ance of the as been desig Grounds (L40 ds (L401210 oundment G Highway 35 d Right of W pen land surv 1 Structures ist of the m mplete list of ntain the nuc ystems, and n was routine nt radioactiv g (B1010001 t Building (B k (B1010003 Vault (B101 g (B1010005 r Building (B B1010007)

Shack (B10 operations, th face contam ted as cont the comple s waste. Wi rtion of the he Class 1 st r

d in the HSA e unrestricted re shown on pen Land Are ing history o 163.5 acre li gnated as no 012103)

5)

Grounds (L40 5 (L4012107 Way Grounds vey units are s

major buildin f all impact clear reactor nuclear fuel ely handled, ve material in

)

B1010002)

3) 10004)
5)

B1010006) 010008) hese structur ination, and taminated a ete segment ith the excep se structure tructural surv 2-11 A indicated th d release cri Figure 2-1.

eas of the facility icensed site on-impacted.

012106)

)

(L4012108) e shown on F ngs that were ted structura r, primary re l handling a

, transferred nventory at L res were sub d airborne ra areas. The tation, remo ption of stru s will rema vey units are hat the prese teria was no y and histor has no reas

)

Figure 2-1.

e initially cl al survey un eactor system and storage s d, and stored LACBWR r bjected to spi adioactive m decommis oval, and d uctural floor ain at site cl e depicted in ence of resid ot expected.

rical incident sonable pote lassified as nits is provid ms, reactor systems. D d within the resides in the ills of radioa material. St sioning app disposal of s and walls losure and a n Figure 2-1 dual radioac ts as docum ential for res impacted Cl ded in Table support sys uring operat ese building ese structure active liquid tructural sur proach for all systems that reside 3 are therefor ctivity ented sidual lass 1 e 2-2.

tems, tions,
s. A es:

ds, the rfaces these s and 3 feet re not

La Cross License T Revision 2.1.6.8.

The follo Class 2 o complete LACB G-3 C LACB LACB LACB LACB Back Trans G-1 C Barge These str structure LACBW Washing structure Administ the decom LACBW structure The LAC Switch H unrestrict Supplem Manual depicted Based on in the H section 2 residual the G-3 C 2.2.

C From Oc accordan se Boiling W Termination n 0 Class owing is a li or 3 structur e list of all im BWR Crib H Crib House (

BWR Admi BWR Wareh BWR Wareh BWR Wareh k-up Control smission Sub Crib House (

e Washing B ructures did s associated WR workers g Break Room s because th tration build mmissioning WR Class 2 or s will remain CBWR Adm House will n ted release ment 1, Multi (MARSAM in Figure 2-n a review o HSA, coup 2.3.5), the bu contaminatio Crib House, Characteriza ctober 2014 nce with th Water Reactor Plan 2 and 3 Stru ist of some res. All are mpacted stru House (B201 (B2010102) nistration Bu house #1 (B2 house #2 (B2 house #3 (B2 Center (B30 b-Station Sw (B3012103)

Break Room not routinely d with LAC and therefo m were not a hey reside i ding, the G-3 g approach c r 3 systems n at site clos ministration b not be subj using a gr i-Agency Ra E) (8). The

-1.

f the operati pled with t uildings ass on and have will remain ation Appro through Aug he Characte r

uctures of the major e located wi uctural surve 10101) uilding (B20 2010104) 2010105) 2010106) 012101) witch House (B3012104) y house radi CBWR listed re considere associated w in a Class 3 3 Crib Hous calls for the and structur sure and ther building, the ected to FR raded survey adiation Sur e Class 2 an ing history o the results sociated with e been desig intact and fu oach gust 2015, s erization Su 2-12 r buildings t ithin the lice y units is pro 010103)

(B3012102)

)

ioactive syst d above are ed Class 2 with LACBW 3 land area.

se and the T complete se ral material a refore will n e G-3 Crib H RS. Instead y approach rvey and As nd Class 3 s of the facility of charact h the G-3 s gnated as no unctional for site characte urvey Plan.

that were in ensed site b ovided in Ta

)

tems or mate outside of or 3. The WR operation With the Transmission egmentation, as waste or ot be subjec House and th d, these stru using the ssessment of structural su y and histor terization su station have on-impacted.

r G-3 power erization of L The Ch nitially classi but outside o able 2-2.

erials during the LSE bu G-1 Crib H ns but are co exception o n Sub-Statio

, removal, an salvage. No ted to FRS.

he Transmis uctures will guidance o of Materials urvey units rical incident urveys (as no reasona

. The G-3 s r operations.

LACBWR w haracterizatio ified as imp of the LSE.

g operations.

ut were use House and B onsidered Cl of the LACB on Switch H nd disposal o portion of ssion Sub-St be surveye f NUREG-s and Equip for building ts as docum summarize able potentia station, inclu was perform on Survey pacted The The ed by Barge lass 3 BWR

House, of all these tation d for
1575, pment gs are ented ed in al for uding med in Plan

La Cross License T Revision incorpora documen develope executing procedur safely an Characte objective Provi Deve Supp volum The deco buildings character subjected removed 1757, Ap The char subsurfac structura surveys w structure used to m above gr of the ex

planned, planning A signifi unit is cla design fo result in unit meet errors.

As site-s LACBW selected.

in NURE Paramete assess the se Boiling W Termination n 0 ated the pre nted in the su ed to provide g characteriz res and surv nd effectively rization data es:

ide radiologi elop the requ ort the eva mes.

ommissionin s, structures, rization effo d to FRS. E prior to the ppendix O.

racterization ce soils, pav l basements were perform

s. Upon com make determ rade or subg xpected end-executed an icant questio assified corr or FRS. A a survey des ts the release pecific Deri WR at the tim The screen EG/CR-5512 er Analysis e correct cla Water Reactor Plan evious histo urvey areas e guidance a zation survey ey unit spec y acquire the a acquired th ical inputs n uired inputs f aluation of r ng approach

, and compo orts focused Extensive ch e performanc n surveys fo ved surfaces, s that will re med in the L mpletion, the minations on w rade structu

-state structu nd documen on that must rectly. The a classificatio sign that doe e criteria. In ived Concen me the chara ning DCGLs 2 Volume 3 (9), Table 6 assification o r

orical opera from the HS and direction y activities.

cific survey e requisite ch hrough the e necessary for for LTP, and remediation for LACBW onents to a d d on open haracterizatio ce of final s ocused on g

, and concret emain in the LACBWR Ad e data was a whether add ures, surface ures at LAC nted with the be answere appropriate c on which un es not obtain n some cases ntration Guid acterization s presented i

, Residual R

.91 (Pcrit = 0 of impacted o 2-13 ational and SA and prev n to the pers The Plan w instructions haracterizati execution of r the design o d

alternatives WR calls for t depth of at l land areas on of equipm surveys is no general open te pads. Co e end-state dministration ssessed for q ditional chara and subsurf CBWR. Con e same data ed by the cha classification nderestimate n adequate in s, this can in deline Level survey was in NUREG-1 Radioactive 0.10) for soil open land or radiological vious site ch sonnel respo worked in co s (sample pl on data.

the Plan wa of FRS, s and techn the demoliti least 3 feet b and remain ment, system ot required i n land areas oncrete core condition.

n Building a quality and a acterization face soils, or ntinuing cha quality and aracterizatio n of a survey es the poten nformation to ncrease the p ls (DCGLs) performed, 1757 and th Contamina ls were used r soil survey l informatio aracterizatio onsible for im njunction w lans) that w as used to m nologies and ion and remo below grade ning structu ms or struct in accordanc s including:

samples wer In addition, and several o adequacy. T data is requ r beneath th aracterization d the results on is whethe y unit is crit ntial for con o demonstra potential for m were not ye alternate ac e concentrat ation from D d as alternat units.

on collected on efforts. I mplementing with impleme were develop meet three pri d estimate w oval of all on

e. Conseque ures that wi tures that w ce with NUR site surface re taken from

, characteriz of the G-3 st The data was uired, primar he concrete f n surveys w included in er or not a su tical to the su tamination c ate that the su making deci et establishe ction levels tion values f Decommissio e action leve d and t was g and enting ped to imary waste n-site

ently, ill be ill be REG-e and m the zation tation s then ily of floors will be n FRS urvey urvey could urvey isions ed for were found oning els to

La Cross License T Revision For struc to evalu 7,100 dpm Appendix radionuc the conse for Cs-13 2.2.1. D DQOs w FRS. Ho to determ unrestrict inspectio nature, e applicabl Characte outlined

1) State
2) Ident
3) Ident
4) Defin
5) Deve
6) Speci
7) Optim The DQO collect. N and will assessme obtaining obtained Direct m Minimal that exhi Detect (H 2.2.2. S Characte approved approach se Boiling W Termination n 0 ctures, the gr ate the clas m/100cm2 to x H. Use of lide distribu ervative appr 37 is signific Data Quality were impleme owever, the mine the rad ted use crit ons and surv xtent and ra le structures rization surv in MARSSIM the problem tify the decis tify inputs to ne the study elop a decisio ify limits on mize the des Os for site No structure therefore no ent of concre g core samp to determin measurement Detectable ibited the hi HTD) radion urvey Desig rization sur d procedures h based upon Water Reactor Plan ross screenin ssification o otal gross be f the Co-60 ution for surf roach was to cantly greate y Objectives ented for ch goal of char ionuclide m teria to dem veys of suff ange of radio

, residues, so veys were de M, Appendi m,

sion, o the decision boundaries, on rule, n decision err ign for obtai characteriza es located ab ot be subject ete in basem ples. Soils ne the mean s and scans Concentrati ighest activi nuclide(s).

gn rveys were s and the Cha n the DQOs f r

ng level that of survey u eta-gamma s screening v face contam o assume a d er.

s haracterizatio racterization mixture, wher monstrate co fficient quali oactive cont oils and surf esigned to g ix D. The se n,

rors, and ining data.

ation include bove 3 feet b ed to FRS.

ments and su were sampl and maximu s of surface ons (MDC) ity were sen designed a aracterizatio for each surv 2-14 t was used d units was th surface activ value was co mination wou distribution o on surveys in n is to quanti reas the FRS ompliance w ity and qua tamination in face water.

gather the ap even steps in ed identifyin below grade Consequent urrounding so led volumet um activity a soils were as will be e nt to an off-and perform on Survey Pl vey unit. Fo during chara he nuclide-vity based on onservative a uld be princi of 100% Co n a similar m ify and delin S goal is co with 10 CFR antity were n each appli propriate da n the DQO d ng the types will remain tly, sample c oils. Buildi trically. Su as well as th made using employed fo

-site laborat med in acco an. Survey or example, acterization a specific scr n Co-60 from as it was an ipally Co-60

-60 since the manner as an neate contam omparison of R 20.1402.

performed t icable surve ata using the development s and quanti n following d collection wa ing concrete ufficient me he sample sta g the same or FSS. Vo tory for ana ordance wit design incor an open land as an action reening valu m NUREG-nticipated tha 0 and Cs-137 e screening v nticipated fo minated area f data agains Characteriz to determin ey unit, inclu e DQO proce process are:

ities of med decommissio as focused o e was sample asurements andard devia instruments lumetric sam lysis of Har th all appli rporated a gr d survey uni level ue of

1757, at the 7 and value or the as and st the zation e the uding ess as dia to oning on the ed by were ation.

s and mples rd-to-icable raded it was

La Cross License T Revision designate the unres Class 1 s present.

to identif Class 2 o survey m select loc measurem biased su unit. A delineate warrante survey un The area character S

al su B

sy F

R ad S

A S

S ar S

C P

A L

2.2.2.1.

The num by assess se Boiling W Termination n 0 ed as Class stricted relea survey unit f The survey fy the lateral or Class 3 re measurement cations for s ment and/or urvey design A biased app e the extent o d if the char nit.

as and mater rization surv urface scans ll Class 1, 2 urvey unit L Biased subsur ystems of c igure 2-3.

Random sam ddition, soil cans and s Administratio amples were cans and sam reas.

cans and sam Concrete sam iping and V A backgroun LACBWR in Numb mber of measu sing the sam Water Reactor Plan 1 because it ase criteria.

focused on b design was l and vertica eceived surv locations an static measu sample loc n or a random proach was of an area th racterization ials surveye vey included s and random 2, 3, and no L3012102 (i.e rface soil sa oncern in C mples were ta samples we amples wer on Building e taken from mples were mples were t mples were t entillation tu nd radiation cluding: asp ber of Static urements an ple size nece r

t may conta Therefore, t bounding the based upon al extent of th veys develop nd scan area urements and cations at ran m approach warranted hat requires effort was d ed and/or sam m and biased on-impacted e., the switch amples were Class 1 and aken from a ere obtained re taken on and the G-3 m the septic ta taken on LA taken on G-3 aken in the unnels.

study was phalt, concret Measuremen nd/or sample essary to sat 2-15 ain levels of the character e contaminat n the number he contamin ped to includ

s. Biased su d/or samples ndom. The was address when the c remediation designed to v mpled in and d surface and open land a hyard).

taken along 2 areas incl asphalt and c directly belo n accessible Coal Plant.

anks.

ACBWR Ad 3 Building a basement ar performed te, and soil.

nts and/or S s that were t tisfy the DQO f radiologica rization surv tion where c r of measure nation. Area de a combin urvey design

s. Random e decision of sed by the D characterizat
n. Alternativ verify the ba d around the d subsurface area survey gside and un luding the p concrete from ow the aspha e roof surfa dministration access and he reas of the R on material amples taken in each Os.

al contamina veys that wer ontaminatio ements and as classified nation of ran ns used know survey desig f whether to DQO process tion effort w vely, a rando asis for the c e licensed ar e soils samp units with derneath und piping syste m pads and alt to a one m ace areas of n Building su eavily travel Reactor Bui ls similar to h survey uni ation greater re performed n was poten samples req as non-impa ndom and b wn informati gn selected o use primar s for each su was designe om approach classification rea as part o ples were tak the exceptio derground p ms as show paved area meter depth.

f the LACB urfaces and led surfaces.

lding, WTB o those foun it was determ r than d in a ntially quired

acted, biased ion to static rily a urvey ed to h was n of a of the ken in on of piping wn on
s. In BWR drain B, and nd at mined

La Cross License T Revision For the c that will and/or sa of residu For the sample s vertical e For non-validate measurem trivial lev generated 2.2.2.2.

For the c survey u Sample l to specifi that wer responsib survey d radioactiv potential from the 2.2.2.3.

Survey u area to b area scan Supervis was give survey un 2.2.2.4.

The char (beta and survey of FRS con and volu sampling following se Boiling W Termination n 0 characterizat be subjecte amples taken al radioactiv characteriza size was bas extent of the impacted an the basis ments and/o vels of licen d radionuclid Determ characterizat nits that wil locations we ic locations w re taken in ble Radiolog design proc vity, depres spill locatio HSA aided Scan C units were sc be scanned i nned was c or and/or th en to inform nit.

Types racterization d gamma); st f any concre nsisted of a c umetric samp g of surface g is a descrip Water Reactor Plan tion of impa ed to FSS, th n in the surve ve contamina ation of Cla sed upon the contaminati nd Class 3 op of the clas or samples w nsee-generat des are prese mination of tion of non-ll be subject ere determin within the su each surve gical Protect cess. Con sions, disco ons, or areas in the select Coverage canned to th n each surv ontingent up e Project He mation from s of Measure n survey of tatic beta me ete and/or as combination ples. The su and subsurf ption of the d r

acted Class 1 he minimum ey units wer ation in the s ss 1 structur e necessary n ion.

pen land sur ssification.

was sufficie ted radionuc ent in non-im Static Measu

-impacted an ted to FRS, ed by gener urvey unit. T y unit was tion Superv sideration w olored areas, s where the tion of biased he extent pr ey unit was pon the pro ealth Physic the initial w ements and S building sur easurements phalt-paved n of surface urvey of the face soil, sed different typ 2-16 1 and Class m number of re commensu survey unit.

res that wil number of s rvey units, th Consequen ent to ensure clides are pr mpacted area urement and nd impacted sample loca ating random The location determined visor and/or was given

, cracks, low ground has d locations.

actical in ac determined ofessional ju ist during th walk downs Samples rfaces consi s, material sa open land a scans (beta e open land diment and s pes of measu 2 open land f random or urate with th l remain an samples nee he primary c ntly, the nu e with reaso resent in Cl as.

d Sample Lo d open land ations were m pairs of c n of biased m d by the pr the Project to location w point grav s been distur ccordance w d during the udgment of he survey de and the am isted of a co amples and s areas that wi and gamma areas consis surface wate urements and d areas (pav r biased dire he probabilit nd be subjec eded to asses characterizat umber of s onable conf lass 3 areas ocations areas and C primarily ch oordinates t measurement rofessional j Health Phy ns that exh vity drain p rbed. Histo with their cla survey desi the Radiolo esign proces mbient radiat ombination smears. The ill remain an a), static bet sted of gamm er for isotop d samples tha ved and unpa ect measurem ty of the pres cted to FRS ss the latera tion DQO w systematic fidence that and no lice Class 2 struc hosen at ran hat correspo ts and/or sam judgment o ysicist durin hibit measu points, actua orical inform assification.

ign process.

ogical Prote

s. Consider tion levels i of surface e characteriz nd be subject ta measurem ma scans an pic analysis.

at were utiliz aved) ments sence S, the al and was to static only ensee-ctural ndom.

onded mples of the ng the urable al and mation The The ection ration in the scans zation ted to

ments, nd the The zed.

La Cross License T Revision 2.2.2.4.1 Gamma activity.

used for Ludlum M Ludlum M Scanning rate not t was main and, loca 2.2.2.4.2 Scanning 7,100 dpm including Hand-hel used.

Beta scan and with prevented was dete calculate of the sur If not im instrumen evaluatio investiga 2.2.2.4.3 Direct m surfaces typically detectors Direct m acquiring typically designate adjusted 2.2.2.4.4 If applic verify lo se Boiling W Termination n 0 Gamm scans were Sodium io these scans.

Model 44-10 Model 44-10 g was perfor to exceed 0.

ntained with ations of elev Beta S g was per m/100cm2 a g, but not li ld beta scin nning was p h a scanning d scanning a ermined, an d a priori to rvey.

mpacted by h nt to identi on. Any ide ation and pot Direct measurement of the build performed

s.

measurements g data over used for su ed investigat as appropria Remo able, remov oose surface Water Reactor Plan ma Surface S performed o dide (NaI) g EnergySol 0 Detector 0 NaI detecto rmed by mo

.5 m (20 in) hin 15 cm (6 vated direct l Surface Scan rformed in action level.

imited to; fl ntillation and performed w g speed of o at the specif nd the scan o ensure that high ambient fy locations entified areas tential decon t Measureme ts were per dings or on using ~10 s were condu a pre-determ urface measu tion level or ate to achiev ovable Surfac vable beta an e contamina r

Scans over open la gamma scin utions Techn Sensitivity (

ors to Co-60 oving the de per second.

in) of the s levels were f ns order to Beta scans loors, walls, d/or gas-flo with the dete one detector fied distance nning techni t the MDC f t noise level s of elevate s of elevated ntamination.

ents rformed to n concrete o 00 cm2 or l ucted by pla mined coun urements and r MDC und ve an accepta ce Contamin nd/or alpha ation is less 2-17 and surfaces ntillation det nical Suppor (10) examin 0 and Cs-137 etector in a s The distan urface if po flagged for f locate ar s were perfo

, ceilings, ro ow proportio ctor position r active win e, the detect ique adjuste for scanning s, technician d activity th d contamina detect total or asphalt pa arger sized acing the det nt time. A d generally p er considera able MDC fo nation contaminati s than the to identify tectors (typic rt Document nes the resp 7 when used serpentine p nce between ssible. Aud further inves reas of res ormed over a oofs, asphal onal detecto n maintained ndow per se tion sensitiv ed accordin g was approp ns monitored that require ation were m levels of aved areas.

scintillatio tector near t count time provided det ation. The i or direct mea on or smear applicable locations of cally 2 x 2 t (TSD) RS-onse and sc d for scanning pattern, whil n the detecto dible signals stigation and sidual activ accessible st lt and concr ors (typically d within 1 c econd. If su vity for the a ngly. Scan priate for the d the audibl further inv marked or fla contaminati These me on or gas-fl the surface to of one to t tection level instrument c asurements.

r surveys w action level f residual su

) were typi

-TD-313196 can MDC o g surface soi le advancing or and the su were monit d/or sampling vity above tructural sur rete paved a y 126 cm2) cm of the su urface condi alternate dis nning speed e stated obje e response o estigation a agged for fu ion on struc asurements low proport o be counted two minutes ls well below count times were perform

l. A smea urface ically 6-006, of the ils.

g at a urface tored;

g.

the rfaces areas.

were urface itions stance was ective of the and/or urther ctural were tional d and s was w the were med to ar for

La Cross License T Revision removab surfaces.

moderate activity a 2.2.2.4.5 Concrete contamin will rema diamond 1/2-inch w pulverize 2.2.2.4.6 Samples locations scanning defined a split spoo tools.

Subsurfa hand aug survey un 2.2.3. In The radi provide b identified action le and expe static me Concern Commer perform

3) analys Instrume in Table 2.2.3.1.

All data character se Boiling W Termination n 0 le activity w A 100 cm e pressure. S as appropriat Concr e core boring nation and th ain and be su bit core dri wide pucks ed and analy Mater of soil, sed s as well as

g. Surface so as soil below on sampling ace soil was gers. Subsur nit.

nstrumenta ation detect both reliable d for the de evels. Detec ected perform easurements (ROC) at a cially availa the three ba sis of materia ntation and 2-3.

Calibr loggers, ass rization wer Water Reactor Plan was usually m2 surface a Smears were te.

rete and Asp g and the sa he presence ubjected to F ill. The con s, represen yzed for isoto rial Sampling iment, and s other locatio oil is defined w the top 15 g system or, b sampled by rface soil sam ation Selectio tion and me e operation a ecommission ctor selectio mance in th and scanni MDC of 50%

able portable asic survey m al samples.

nominal MD ration sociated dete re calibrated r

taken at eac area was sa e then analyz phalt Core Sa ampling of of volumet FRS. Core b ncrete samp nting a certa opic content.

g sludge were ons in areas d as the top cm layer in by using han y direct push mpling was on, Use and asurement i and adequate ning of LAC on was based e field. In ng were cap

% of the app e and laborat measuremen DC values th ectors, and a d on an annu 2-18 ch direct me ampled with zed for the p ampling concrete we tric contami bore samplin le produced ain depth in obtained fr s exhibiting 15 cm (6-in n 1 m increm nd trowels, b h sampling s performed a d Minimum nstrumentat e sensitivity t CBWR at le d on detecti all cases, th pable of det plicable actio tory instrum ts: 1) surfac hat were em all other por ual basis us easurement l h a circular presence of g ere used to nation in co ng of concre d by the cori nto the surf rom designed elevated act nch) layer of ments. Surfa bucket auger systems (e.g as necessary Detectable tion for char to detect the evels suffici ion sensitivi he instrumen tecting the a on level.

ments and det ce scanning; mployed durin rtable instrum sing Nationa location on cloth or pa gross beta an assess the d oncrete wall ete was acco ing was typ face. Conc d biased and tivity that w f soil while s ace soil was rs, or other s

g. GeoProbe y to address t Concentrat racterization e initial suite iently below ity, operatin nts and detec anticipated R tectors were
2) static me ng character mentation th al Institute o non-asphalt aper filter, u nd/or gross depth of sur ls and floors omplished us pically sliced crete pucks d random sa were identifie subsurface s collected us suitable sam

) or by m the DQOs fo tions (MDC n was select e of radionuc w the establ ng characteri ctors selecte Radionuclid typically us easurements rization are hat were use of Standards t type using alpha rficial s that sing a d into were ample ed by soil is sing a mpling anual or the Cs) ted to clides lished

istics, ed for des of sed to s; and listed ed for s and

La Cross License T Revision Technolo addressed 2.2.3.2.

The recei used for portable character 2.2.4. L Gamma proportio laborator quality p preparati site labor In all ca achieved accepted analytica laborator 2.2.5. Q MARSSI used to quality fo 1576, Mu Regulato through (12). Fu may be achieved The QAP used duri functiona All chara approved audit a

Characte prescribe applied contracto se Boiling W Termination n 0 ogy (NIST) t d in the QAP Instru ipt, inspectio characteriza radiologica rization is ad Laboratory I spectroscop onal countin ry in accorda programs of ion and analy ratory under ases, analyti

d. The anal methodolog al methods ries used for Quality Assu IM, section demonstrate for sample an ulti-Agency R ory Guide 4.

Normal Op urther, MAR used in add

d.

PP was prep ing the site c al activities, acterization d procedures and surveil rization staf ed, impleme to any app ors.

Water Reactor Plan traceable sou PP.

ument Use an on, issue, co ation was p al instrumen ddressed in th Instrument py was prim ng and liquid ance with ap the contrac ysis of chara the QAPP.

ical methods lysis of rad gies or othe employed characteriza urance 2.2 discusse e that site c nalysis taken Radiologica

.15, Quality erations to RSSIM and dition to, or pared and im characterizat the DQO pr activities es

s. The effe llance activ ff and progr ented, and v plicable serv r

urces. The c nd Control ntrol, and ac performed in ntation. T he QAPP.

Methods an marily perfor d scintillatio pproved labo cted off-site acterization s s were estab diological co er comparab and the la ation.

es the need f conditions ar n to support al Laboratory y Assurance License Ter MARLAP b r in lieu of, mplemented t tion and FRS rocess, and m ssential to d ective imple

vities, incl ram self-ass verified wh vices provid 2-19 calibration o ccountability n accordance The issue a nd Sensitivi rmed by th on analysis oratory proce vendor labo samples prov blished to e ontaminants ble methodo aboratory M for a quality re acceptabl t characteriz y Analytical of Radiolo rmination) -

both indicate existing qu to ensure th S process. T measures nec data quality w mentation o luding fiel sessments, a hen deficienc ded by off-of instrument y of portable e with issue and control ities he on-site ra was perform edures. Ener oratories tha vided the sam ensure that used stand ologies. Ta MDC achiev y system to le for unres zation and F l Protocols M ogical Moni

- Effluent St e that a Qua uality system e adequacy The QAPP de cessary to ac were implem of characteri ld walk-do as appropriat cies were i

-site vendor ts used for c e radiologica e and contro l of instru adiological med by an rgySolutions at were used me level of required M dard approve able 2-4 prov ved by the ensure the a stricted rele FRS is discu Manual (MA itoring Prog treams and ality Assura ms to ensur of data bein escribes poli chieve qualit mented and ization was owns by te. Correct identified.

rs, as well characterizati al instrument ol procedure uments used laboratory.

approved ve s ensured tha d for the rec quality as th MDC values ed and gene vides the ty off-site ve adequacy of ase. Labor ssed in NUR ARLAP) (11 grams (Incep the Environ ance Project re data qual ng developed icy, organiza ty data.

performed u verified thr EnergySolu tive actions These mea as on-site ion is tation es for d for Gas endor at the

ceipt, he on-were erally ypical endor f data ratory REG-

) and eption nment Plan ity is d and

ation, using rough utions were asures sub-

La Cross License T Revision The Cha quality a and is su follows:

E op A

st D

Details o the proce data acqu requirem P

E P

S P

M pr All chara Plan, the 2.3.

S In Octob placing t October character accelerat EnergySo October 9 August 6 documen Characte PN-1640 2015 Fie Radioact character character se Boiling W Termination n 0 aracterization assurance and ubject to the Establishmen perations.

Actions to en taff.

Documentatio of the QA/QC edures and s uisition and ments. The sp ersonnel qua Execution in roper docum election of a roper instrum Management rocedures, p acterization QAPP, all a ummary of ber of 2005, the unit into of 2014, rization of L tion of de olutions in a 9, 2014. T 6, 2015. The nted in two erization Sur 017-001, LA eld Work (14 tive systems rization dat rization has Water Reactor Plan n Survey Pl d quality co QAPP. The nt/implement nsure that the on of the dat C elements s sample plan d recording pecific QA/Q alifications, accordance mentation of appropriate i ment calibra oversight of protocols, an activities w applicable im f Characteri Dairyland p o a SAFSTO Dairyland LACBWR in commission accordance w The schedule e results of th o separate rvey Report CBWR Radi 4).

s that rema a in certain been deferre r

lan was dev ontrol (QA/Q e QA/QC pr tation of plan e procedures ta collected.

specific to ch instructions was guided QC program experience, with approv survey data instruments t ation and dai f characteriz d documenta were conduct mplementing ization Surv performed a OR condition contracted n anticipation ning activiti with EnergyS ed EnergyS he site chara reports, GG for October iological Ch ain at LAC n areas du ed until such 2-20 veloped acco QC) program ogram elem ns, procedur are understo haracterizati

. The chara d and condu m component and training ved procedur and sample to perform th ily functiona zation activit ation require ted in accor g procedures vey Results limited cha

n. This sur EnergySol n of the deve ies. Char Solutions cha Solutions sit acterization s G-EO-31319 r and Novem haracterizati CBWR affec ue to ambie h time that ra ording to th m for the dec ments applica res, and prot ood and foll ion are prese acterization o ucted in com s for site cha
g.

res.

analyses.

he surveys.

al checks.

ties relative t ements.

rdance with

, and approv aracterization rvey is docu lutions to elopment of racterization aracterizatio te characteri surveys perf 96-RS-RP-0 mber 2014 F ion Survey R cted the ab ent radiatio adiological o he essential commissioni able to chara tocols for the lowed by the ented in the Q operations an mpliance wi aracterizatio to the adhere the Charact ved sample p n survey of umented in perform a f this LTP an n activities, on procedure ization effo formed by En 01, LACBW Field Work (

Report for J ility to acq on levels.

or physical c elements o ing of LACB acterization a e field e implementi QAPP, as w nd the assoc ith these QA on are as foll ence to terization Su plan instruct the LSE pri Reference 7 a more det nd the anticip

, performed es commence ort conclude nergySolutio WR Radiolo (13) and LC June thru A quire meani In these c conditions w of the BWR are as ing well as ciated A/QC ows:

urvey ions.

ior to

7. In tailed pated d by ed on ed on ons is ogical C-RS-ugust ingful
cases, would

La Cross License T Revision allow the the decom significan by revisio 2.3.1. B During t backgrou acquired backgrou As part o backgrou LACBW Normally be repres site area Supervis appropria results.

were con Concrete is located non-impa approxim unit L40 L401210 samples a The ana backgrou can be at mean Cs 0.135 pC was 0.07 Relevant Station (Z at Zion S Zion to C geograph for distu backgrou within th categorie drainage se Boiling W Termination n 0 e survey of t mmissioning nt additiona on or addend

Background

the initial ch und study fo from vario und study is of the 2014 und levels a WR fell within y, backgroun sentative. H was chosen.

or selected a ate for obtain Although th nsidered unaf e samples an d north of th acted survey mately 100 s 12108. Soil 08 were also are provided lysis of the und study fo ttributed to g

-137 concen Ci/g with a m 0 resulting i t to LACBW ZNPS) titled Station (15).

Cs-137 leve hically simila urbed soils a und Cs-137 he expected es of soil in and non-dra Water Reactor Plan hese survey g process, in l characteriz dum as a par Study haracterizati or soils at LA ous location summarized characteriza at LACBWR n nominal ex nd reference However, no

. The Energ an area outs ning backgro he selected s ffected by pa nd direct me he LSE. A y unit L4012 quare meter l samples fro evaluated f d in sections e backgroun or soils. The global fallou ntration of s maximum ob in the upper WR is a study d ZionSolutio This docum ls anticipate ar. The docu as well as u levels for th range of d the non-im ainage, distu r

units. Solu ncluding foll zation data i rt of the requ on survey p ACBWR. R ns outside o d in Table 2-ation effort, R. The pur xpected leve areas shoul suitable off gySolutions P side of the L ound measu sample locat ast LACBW asurements sphalt samp 2106. Surfa rs of undistu om non-imp for use as ba 2.3.3 and 2.

nd soil sam e results did ut. For the t surface samp bserved con r range for th y performed ons TSD 13 ment was pr ed from wor ument predic undisturbed he site speci disturbed so mpacted area urbed and un 2-21 tions intends lowing the s is obtained, uired 2 year performed in Reference 7 of the owne

5.

EnergySolu rpose of the els for soils, d be reasona f-site locatio Project Heal LSE but on rements bas tions were i WR operation were taken ples and dire ace soil samp urbed non-dr pacted survey ackground re

.3.5.3.

mples in 201 d report Cs-1 two backgrou ples taken o ncentration o his data set a for the deco

-004, Exami repared to co rldwide fall cted ranges f soils and is fic backgrou ils in non-d s at LACBW ndisturbed so s to continue submittal of this chapter update of th n October 2 states that a er controlled utions perfor e study was concrete, an ably close to on was ident lth Physicist the licensed ed upon the inside the LA ns.

in Class 3 s ect measurem ples were ac rainage soil y units L401 eference soil 14 compare 137 at levels und studies n or around of 0.268 pCi at a 95% con ommissionin ination of Cs ompare site out. The L for backgrou presented i und studies drainage are WR, the upp oil from the e characteriz this LTP. I r of the LTP he approved 005, Dairyl a series of s d area. Th rmed a limit s to assess i nd asphalt.

o the decomm tified. Cons and the Rad d LACBWR previous ra ACBWR lic survey unit L ments were cquired from within non-12107 and o ls. Analysis ed favorably s slightly ab performed a d the site pro i/g. The st nfidence leve ng of the Zio s-137 Globa soil sample LACBWR an und concentr in Table 2-6 performed a eas. As the per 95th per Zion backgr zation throug In the case w P will be up LTP.

and perform oil samples he result of ted assessme if backgroun missioning s sequently, an diation Prote site that se diological su censed area, L3012101, w also collect m a small ar

-impacted su other areas w s results for y with the bove MDC.

at LACBWR oduced a me tandard devi el of 0.275 p on Nuclear P al Fallout in Cs-137 resu nd Zion site rations of Cs

6. The obse at LACBWR ere were va centile level round study ghout where dated med a were f this ent of nd at site to n on-ection emed urvey

, they which ted in rea of urvey within these 2005 This R, the ean of iation Ci/g.

Power Soils ults at es are s-137 erved R fall arious ls for were

La Cross License T Revision considere areas, an 2.3.2. P EnergySo Decomm decommi from the some of t less than prepared 2.3.3. N Based up 163.5 acr impacted contamin operation ISFSI w operation physical for comp for the cl The non-segregate inside of Highway study for within su in coal f ISFSI fac From Oc impacted survey un and the i impacted To supp objective open land by perfor The 2015 primary surveys a se Boiling W Termination n 0 ed appropria d Class 2 an Potential Ra olutions TS issioning (

issioning of sampling o the theoretic n 2 years, an

. The list of Non-Impacte pon the infor re licensed

d. The n nation given ns. The det were not imp ns (i.e., with characterist pliance beyo lassification.

-impacted op ed into five f survey uni y 35. This s r soils. The urvey unit L4 from the G-cility, which ctober 2014 d open land nits and wer initial result d as it was d ort this con e of the add d survey uni rming additi 5 characteriz objectives and samplin Water Reactor Plan ate backgro nd 3 open lan dionuclides SD RS-TD-3 (16) establi LACBWR.

of various m cal neutron a n initial suite f potential ra ed Open La rmation com site surroun non-impacte that historic termination pacted by l hin the LSE ics. The are ond the chara pen land are survey unit it L4012108 survey unit non-impacte 4012103. A

-3 station an h has not bee to August areas of th re characteri s of the 201 determined t nclusion, ad itional chara its given an i onal soil sam zation camp of the addi ng to suppor r

ound concen nd area surve s of Concern 313196-001, shes the ba Industry gu media from p activation pro e of potentia adionuclides and Areas mpiled in the nding the L d areas ha cal informati that the con licensed ope

), site use, t eas designat acterization a is approxim ts. Non-imp 8 in a veget was formed ed survey un A majority of nd survey un en characteriz 2015, char he site. The ized as such 14 characteri that there is dditional ch acterization initial Class mpling and g aign was de tional chara rt the non-2-22 ntration leve ey units at L n

, Radionuc asis for an uidance was past plant o oducts, nobl al ROC for is listed in T e HSA, a lar LSE and IS ave no rea ion provides ntiguous ope erations was topography, ted as non-im surveys and mately 352,3 pacted open ated area w d during cha nits are show f the surface nit L401210 zed and is no racterization e survey uni h in Referenc ization, thes no reasonab haracterizatio surveys per 3 classificat gamma walk esigned in ac acterization

-impacted c els for the LACBWR.

clides of C initial suite reviewed as operations.

le gases and the decomm Table 2-7.

rge portion o SFSI receive asonable po s no indicatio en land area s based on site dischar mpacted are d sampling p 360 square m n land surve with minimal aracterizatio wn in Figure area in surv 06 complete ot addressed surveys w its were ori ce 13. Base se survey un ble potentia on was perf rformed in 2 tion for re-cl kover survey ccordance w was to per classification evaluation Concern D e of potenti s well as the Based on th radionuclide missioning o of the open ed a classif otential to on of impact as surroundi the locatio rge pathway e not require performed to meters in siz ey unit L40 l ground dis on to facilita 2-1. The G vey unit L40 ely surround d by this LTP were perform iginally clas ed upon a rev nits were rec al for residua formed in 2 2015 was to lassification ys.

with Referenc rform suffic n and to pr of non-imp uring LAC ial ROC fo analytical re he eliminatio es with a hal f LACBWR land areas o fication as contain res t from LACB ing the LSE on(s) of lice ys, and othe ed to be surv o provide a ze. This area 12109 is lo sturbance ea ate a backgr G-3 station re 012105 is cov ds the LACB P.

med in the ssified as Cl view of the classified as al contamina 2015. A m o evaluate ce n as non-imp ce 4. One o cient radiolo rovide reaso pacted CBWR or the esults on of lf-life R was on the non-sidual BWR E and ensed er site veyed basis a was ocated ast of round esides vered BWR non-lass 3 HSA non-ation.

major ertain pacted of the ogical nable

La Cross License T Revision assurance 2015 cha based on During th units L40 logger w was scan Gamma s or gravel Minimum evaluated survey un an Explo were due Thirty-tw toward d shown in instrumen positively surface s These va in section specific b in the gr were very Seventee meter.

concentra derived g average maximum backgrou 137 conc surface s the Hwy Two asp survey un were less identified A summ presented se Boiling W Termination n 0 e that the n aracterization a random d he 2015 cha 012103, L40 with a 2 by 2 nned due to surface scan

l. Alarm se m Detectabl d during the nit L401210 oranium GR-e to the prese wo surface s discolored ar n Figure 2-5 nt MDC in y identified soil samples alues are wit n 2.3.1. On background rounds east y close at 0.

en subsurfac Of the 17 ations greate gamma-emit Cs-137 conc m observed und range fo centrations th soil backgrou 35/Railroad phalt sample nits. The asp s than the M d by gamma ary of the g d in Table 2-Water Reactor Plan non-impacted n survey foc esign to ensu aracterizatio 012105, L40 2 NaI detec inaccessibili nning focused et-points for e Count Ra e performan 7 and one in

-135. The ence of natur soil samples eas or areas

5. Cs-137 26 of the 32 by gamma s was 0.131 hin the expe ly one Cs-13 data set. Th of Highway 135 pCi/g an e soil sampl 7 subsurface er than the tting radionu centration ob concentrati r Cs-137 as hat exceede und. This s d Right of W es were coll phalt surface MDC of 1,93 spectroscop gamma spect

-8.

r d survey uni cused primar ure an unbia n survey, a 012106 and ctor. In surv ity from the d on undistu r the instrum ate (MDCR) nce of the g n survey unit results of th ral backgrou s were colle where the g was positiv 2 samples.

spectroscopy pCi/g with ected backgr 37 result exc his sample w y 35. The m nd 0.131 pC les were tak e soil samp instrument uclides were bserved in t ion of 0.40 discussed in d the maxim sample was t Way Grounds lected from e was first sc 38 dpm/100c py in any of t troscopy resu 2-23 its do not c rily on soils ased survey.

minimum o L4012108 vey unit L40 e presence o urbed soils w ment were s

) of the ins gamma scan t L4012108.

he investiga und activity.

ected from ground had b vely identif No other po

y. The avera a maximum round range ceeded the m was the maxi mean of the n i/g, respectiv ken at random ples taken, MDC in ei e positively i the subsurfa 09 pCi/g. Th n section 2.3 mum Cs-137 the maximu random loc canned with cm2. No pla the asphalt s ults for each contain plant and asphalt of 1% of the was scanned 012107, less f tall, thick with minimal set at the ob strument. A n, one in su All scan al ation indicat non-impacte been disturbe fied in conc otential plan age Cs-137 c m observed c for Cs-137 maxium resu imum 0.463 non-impacte vely.

mly selected Cs-137 w ght samples identified by ace soil sam hese value 3.1. Only on 7 concentrati um 0.409 pC cations in p h a beta-gamm ant derived r samples.

h non-impac t-derived ra

t. The samp e surface so d with a Mo s than 1% of vegetation a l vegetation bserved back A total of f urvey unit L larms were in ted the elev ed areas at ed. The sam centrations nt-derived ra concentratio concentration surface sam ult of 0.268 pCi/g value ed and site-s d locations t was positive
s. No other y gamma sp mples was 0.

es are with ne subsurfac ion found in Ci/g value th paved areas mma detector radionuclide cted open la adioactivity.

ple locations oil area in su odel 2350-1 f the surface and steep te or disturbed kground plu four alarms L4012106, tw nvestigated u vated scan re locations b mple location greater than adionuclides n observed i n of 0.463 p mples as discu pCi/g in the e and was lo specific data to a depth o ely identifie r potential p pectroscopy.

087 pCi/g w hin the exp e sample ha n the site-spe at was locat in non-imp

. All scan re s were posit and survey u The were urvey data e area rrain.

d soils us the were wo in using esults biased ns are n the were in the pCi/g.

ussed e site-ocated a sets of one ed in plant-The with a pected d Cs-ecific ted in pacted esults tively unit is

La Cross License T Revision A coal as samples The resul The lab concentra also posi concentra considere of the pl radionuc positive ratios ar compared higher th operation consisten the spora derived r In survey gamma s area to d approxim uranium readings 2.3.4. Im The HSA operation been clas been iden into two north of Highway three Cla The char prepared employed radionuc of suffici surface a obtained Survey contamin se Boiling W Termination n 0 sh sample fr were sent to lts of the ana boratory an ations excee tively detect ations of the ed to very li lant-derived lide mixtur results for C re 118 and d to the site han expected nal history, t nt with natur adic positive radionuclide y unit L4012 spectroscopy determine if mately 7,000 and thorium conducted d mpacted Op A identified ns. The app ssified as C ntified as i Class 2 surv the LSE, th y 35 and the ass 3 survey racterization for each s d to determ lide concent ient quantity and subsurf from below techniques nation identi Water Reactor Plan rom survey u o Test Ame alysis are pre nalysis spor eding the MD ted but at lev e positively i ikely be the radionuclid re fractions Cs-137, Sr-16, respect e-specific mi d by factors the radionuc ral backgrou analytical r s in these su 2108, a repr

y. In additio f there is a 0 to 8,000 cp m series nuc during the w pen Land A d the open proximate are Class 1. An impacted b vey units. T he transmiss e haul road u units combin of the impac survey unit ine the later trations in th y and quality face soils in w the structur were empl ified and th r

unit L40121 erica Labora esented in T radically id DC, includin vels that are identified rad result of cou des. This c

. For exam 90 and Fe-5 tively. Wh ixture fracti s of 4,800 a lide ratios, a und and com esults are ve urvey units.

resentative s on, gamma s significant pm). The a clides with alkover surv Areas land area ea is 1.5 acr approximat y reactor op Three impact sion switchy used to tran ned is appro cted open la in accorda ral and vert he soil. Char y to quantify n each open res due to int loyed to de he radionucl 2-24 05, six surfa atories for g Table 2-9.

dentified se ng H-3, C-14 consistent w dionuclides w unting uncer conclusion w mple, samp

55. Howev hen the rati ons in Chap and 10,700, and primarily mprise 88% o ery unlikely sample of th scan reading difference analysis of t no plant de vey averaged inside the res. All ope tely 3.46 acr perations. T ted Class 3 s yard and the nsport dry fu oximately 16 and areas beg ance with R ical extent o racterization the potentia n land surve terferences a etermine th lide concent face soil sam gamma spect everal plan 4, Fe-55, Ni with natural b were close t rtainty as op was supporte le L301210 ver, the Sr-9 ios from L3 pter 6, Table respectivel y the concen of the site-sp to represent he rail road gs were take from site b the railroad erived radio d 7,000-8,50 fenced LSE en land surve re area that This open la survey units e area encom uel casks to 6.5 acres.

gan in Octob Reference 4 of any cont n inspections al volumetric ey unit. Li and inaccess he lateral a trations in t mples and fiv troscopy and nt-derived r i-63, and Sr-background to the detecti pposed to th ed by a rev 05-CR-GS-0 90/Cs-137 an 3012105-CR e 6-3, it is s ly. In conc ntrations of C pecific radio t the actual p bed gravel en of the rail background bed gravel onuclides. T 00 cpm.

E as impac ey units insi surrounds t and area has were design mpassing th the ISFSI.

ber 2014. A

4. Survey amination id s and surveys c contaminat imited soil ibility.

and vertical the soil. A ve subsurfac d HTD anal radionuclide

-90. Cs-137

. In all case ion limits an e actual pres view of exp 002-SS indi nd Fe-55/Cs R-GS-002-SS een that the clusion, base Cs-137 whic onuclide mix presence of p was analyze l road bed g (which aver indicated na The gamma cted by re ide the LSE the LSE has been segre nated for the he site acces The area o A sample plan techniques dentified an s were perfo tion of acces information l extent of A combinatio e soil lyses.

es at 7 was es, the nd are sence pected icates s-137 S are ey are ed on ch are

xture, plant-ed by gravel raged atural scan eactor have s also gated e area ss off of the n was were nd the ormed ssible n was f any on of

La Cross License T Revision random a survey p professio Protectio radioactiv spill loca survey lo not requ locations radiologi A surface surface s or surfac were take intervals Each sur site radio necessary All surfa Several s full isoto survey un 2.3.4.1.

There are The Clas area in th Reactor radioactiv areas, pre Twenty-t measurab locations taken in taken, C samples 13 sampl identified the surf 0.287 pC samples w Seventy-one mete se Boiling W Termination n 0 and biased s ackage. The onal judgme on Supervis vity, depres ations, or ar ocations was uired for soi s were selec ical contamin e soil sample oil samples ce scans indi en from 0.15 rface soil, co ological lab y to achieve ace and sub soil samples opic analysis nit per Refe Class e four (4) op ss 1 open lan he Class 1 op Building, th vely contam evented the a two (22) sur ble radioact s, or areas w Class 1 open Co-60 was p and Cs-137 les. No oth d by gamma face soil sa Ci/g. The a was 0.096 p nine (79) su er, two (2) lo Water Reactor Plan urvey locati e locations o ent of the E or. Consi sions, disco reas where t s also determ ils in an op cted on asp nation.

e was taken were acquir icated elevat 5 cm to dept omposite sub oratory by e an isotopic surface com were selecte s (HTD radi erence 4.

1 Open Lan pen land sur nd survey un pen land sur he Turbine minated build ability to per rface soil sam tivity, disco where the gro n land surve positively id 7 was posit her potentia spectroscop amples was verage Cs-1 Ci/g with a m ubsurface so ocations bias r

ions were es of biased me EnergySoluti deration wa lored areas, the ground h mined by are pen land are phalt in Cla at each sele red at severa ted activity.

ths ranging f bsurface soil gamma-spec c MDC equa mposite samp ed at random ionuclides).

nd Areas rvey units cl nits are show rvey units is Building, th ding and sys rform surfac mples were lored areas, ound had be ey units are s dentified in tively ident al plant-deriv py. The aver s 0.058 pCi/

137 concent maximum ob il samples w sed to areas o 2-25 stablished in easurements ions Project as given to low point g had been di ea classificat eas designat ass 1 survey cted biased a al random lo Depending from 1 to 3 m l sample or ctroscopy.

al to or less ples were an m and were s Duplicate lassified as wn in Figure obstructed b he WTB and stems, as we ce scanning d taken at loc

, buried pip een disturbed shown in Fig concentrati tified in con ved gamma rage Co-60 c

/g with a tration obser bserved conc were taken a on the south each survey s and/or sam Health Phy o locations gravity drain isturbed. Th tion. Rando ated as Clas y units whe and random cations or if on the loca m below gra asphalt sam Analysis co s than 0.10 p nalyzed afte shipped to T samples and Class 1 at L 2-1. A sign by the prese d the LSA ell as stored due to high b cations biase pe locations

d. The loca gure 2-6. O ions greater ncentrations a-emitting ra concentratio maximum rved in the centration o at 10 surface and west sid y unit in acc mples were d ysicist and that exhib n areas, actu he number m-based me ss 1. Rando ere there wa

-based surve f surface soi ation, subsur ade and com mple was ana ount times w pCi/g for Cs er drying th Test America d concrete w LACBWR to nificant porti ence of build Building.

radioactive background.

ed toward sit s, actual an ations of surf Of the 22 sur r than the M s greater th adionuclides on observed observed c analysis of f 1.07 pCi/g e soil locatio de of the WG cordance wit determined b the Radiolo bited measu ual and pote of random-b easurements om measure as no histor ey location.

l sample ana face soil sam mposited ove alyzed by th were adjuste s-137 and C he sample m a Laboratorie were collecte otaling 8,443 ion of the su dings, namel The presen material in tes that exhi nd potential face soil sam face soil sam MDC in tw han the MD s were posit in the analy concentratio f the surface

g.

ons to a dep GTV and fiv th the by the ogical urable ential based were ement ry of Sub-alysis mples r 1 m he on-ed as Co-60.

media.

es for ed by 3 m2.

urface ly the ce of these ibited spill mples mples wo (2)

DC in tively sis of on of e soil pth of ve (5)

La Cross License T Revision locations The sam evaluate Building samples 15 sampl identified of the su 0.161 pC areas is foundatio decommi Ten sam asphalt w this surv results ra measurem identified 0.057 pC A summ presented Nine sur samples gamma s In additi detected One sedi unit L10 and HTD 0.136 pC 2.3.4.2.

The imp immediat two surv LACBW these two Approxim 2350-1 d Alarm se instrumen se Boiling W Termination n 0 s that access mples at the t the subsurfa were taken taken, Cs-1 les. No oth d by gamma ubsurface so Ci/g. The ass not current ons and surr issioning pro mples were ta was taken fro vey unit. Th anging from ment of 3,09 d in concen Ci/g.

ary of the fi d in Table 2-rface soil sa taken from spectroscopy on to detect at concentra iment sampl 10103. This D analyses.

Ci/g.

Class acted Class te area surro ey units. Th WR Crib Hou o survey unit mately 1% o data logger w et-points for nt. No scan Water Reactor Plan ed the soils two WGTV ace soils alon and compo 137 was pos her potentia a spectroscop oil samples sessment of tly complete rounding bu ocess, when aken of asp om the same he asphalt s the instrume 95 dpm/100 ntrations gre indings of th

-10.

amples, 11 s Class 1 open y and HTD a ting Co-60 ations greate le was taken s sample wa Co-60 and 2 Open Lan 2 open lan ounding the hese are sho use, the G-3 ts.

of the surfac with a 2 by the instrum alarms were r

under the T V locations w ngside and u sited at dept sitively iden al plant-deriv py. The ave was 0.055 p potential su

e. Soil in uried structu access will b phalt from p e location se surface was ent MDC of cm2. Of th eater than he survey fo subsurface s n land surve analyses. Th and Cs-137 r than the in n from the s as also sent t C-137 were nd Areas nd areas tota LSE. The C own in Figur 3 Crib Hous ce soil area i y 2 NaI de ment were set e observed.

2-26 urbine Build were acquire underneath th ths of 10, 15 ntified in co ved gamma erage Cs-13 pCi/g with ubsurface soi difficult to ures and pip be more read paved areas lected for th first scanne f 2,771 dpm/

he 10 asphal MDC in on or each indiv soil samples ey units wer he results of

, H-3, C-14 nstrument MD sanitary solid to Test Amer e detected in al approxim Class 2 impa re 2-1. The se and the L in survey un etector. Thi t at the obse ding through ed to a dept he vault. Th 5 and 20 fee oncentration a-emitting ra 7 concentrat a maximum il contamina o access are ping has bee dily availabl in Class 1 s he surface an ed with beta

/100cm2 to a lt samples t nly one sam vidual Class s, one concr re sent to Te f the analysis 4, Fe-55 and DC.

ds tank that rica Laborat n this sampl mately 13,99 acted open l LACBWR LACBWR w nit L201110 is area inclu erved backgr h angled Geo th of five m he samples u et. Of the 7 ns greater th adionuclides tion observe m observed ation in the C eas such as en deferred le.

survey unit nd subsurfac a-gamma de a maximum taken, Cs-13 mple at a s 1 open land rete sample est America s are present d Ni-63 wer is located i tory for gam e, both at a 6 m2 and ar and area wa Administrat warehouses a 1 was scann uded asphalt round plus t oprobe samp meters in ord under the Tu 79 subsurface han the MD s were posit ed in the ana concentratio Class 1 open s under bui until later i L1010104.

ce soil sampl etector with of observed 37 was posit concentratio d survey un and two as a Laboratorie ted in Table re also posit in Class 1 su mma spectros concentrati re located in as segregated tion Building are all locat ned with a M t paved surf the MDCR o pling.

der to urbine e soil DC in tively alysis on of n land ilding n the The les in scan d scan tively on of nit are sphalt es for 2-11.

tively urvey scopy on of n the d into g, the ted in Model faces.

of the

La Cross License T Revision Twenty-t measurab locations taken in taken, Cs other pot The aver 0.077 pC Twenty-t and three resides in Of the 2 greater th than MD identified of 0.112 samples assessme currently surround process, w Twelve s selected results r 2,748 dpm concentra concentra observed A summ presented Three sur samples Administ HTD ana Co-60 a concentra HTD rad 2.3.4.3.

The impa land area Figure 2-site, the t se Boiling W Termination n 0 three surfac ble radioact s, or areas w Class 2 open s-137 was p tential plant rage Cs-137 Ci/g with a m three subsur e locations b n survey uni 23 subsurfac han MDC in DC in four d by gamma pCi/g. The was 0.043 ent of poten y complete.

ding buried s when access samples were randomly.

ranging fro m/100cm2.

ations great ation observ d concentrati ary of the fi d in Table 2-rface soil sa taken from tration Build alyses. The and Cs-137, ations greate dionuclides e Class acted Class 3 a was segre

-1. The Cla transmission Water Reactor Plan e soil samp tivity, disco where the gro n land surve positively ide t-derived rad 7 concentrat maximum obs face soil sam biased to are it L2011101 ce soil samp n one sample samples. N spectroscop average Cs-pCi/g with ntial subsurf Soil in dif structures an s will be mor e taken of as The asphalt om the ins Of the 12 ter than the ved in the an on of 0.055 indings of th

-12.

amples, five m an acces ding were se results of th H-3, C-14 er than MD exceeding M 3 Open Lan 3 open land egated into ass 3 impacte n switchyard r

ples were tak lored areas, ound had be ey units are s entified at co dionuclides tion observe served conce mples were t eas alongsid

1. The biase ples taken, e and Cs-13 No other po py. The sing

-137 concent h a maximu face soil con fficult to ac nd piping ha re readily av sphalt from p t surface wa strument M 2 asphalt sa e instrumen nalysis of the pCi/g.

he survey fo subsurface s ssible storm ent to Test he analysis a 4, Fe-55 an DC. As disc MDC are likel nd Areas areas total a three surve ed open land for the LAC 2-27 ken at locat

, buried pip een disturbed shown in Fig oncentration were positiv ed in the an entration of taken at 14 r de and under ed samples w Co-60 was 7 was positi otential plan gle sample w tration obser um observe ntamination cess areas s as been defe vailable.

paved areas s first scann MDC of 2, mples taken nt MDC in e asphalt sam or each indiv soil samples, m sewer ba America La are presented nd Cm-243/

cussed in se ly to be false approximatel ey units. T d survey un CBWR and G tions biased pe locations

d. The loca gure 2-7. O ns greater th vely identifi nalysis of th 0.200 pCi/g random loca rneath the S were acquire positively ively identif nt-derived ra with detectab rved in the a d concentra n in the Cla such as und erred until l in Class 2 su ned with bet

,529 dpm/10 n, Cs-137 w three samp mples was 0 vidual Class

, three aspha asin manhol aboratories f d in Table 2

/244 were ection 2.3.3 e positives.

ly 66,765m2 The Class 3 nits include t G-3 facilitie d toward sit s, actual an ations of surf Of the 23 sur han MDC in ied by gamm he surface s

g.

ations to a de Storm Sewer ed to a dept identified a fied at conce adionuclides ble Co-60 ha analysis of th ation of 0.0 ass 2 open l der building ater in the d urvey units.

ta-gamma de 00cm2 to a was positive ples. The 0.049 pCi/g s 2 open land alt samples a le located for gamma s

-13. In add also positiv for non-imp

2. The Class survey uni the north en s, the LACB es that exhi nd potential face soil sam face soil sam 14 samples ma spectrosc soil samples epth of one m r Water pipe th of five m at concentra entrations gr s were posit ad a concentr he subsurfac 088 pCi/g.

land areas i foundations decommissio The asphal etector with a maximum ely identifie average Cs with a maxi d survey un and two sedi in front of spectroscopy dition to dete vely detecte pacted areas 3 impacted its are show nd of the lice BWR plant a ibited spill mples mples

. No copy.

s was meter e that meters.

ations reater tively ration e soil The s not s and oning lt was h scan m of ed in s-137 imum nit are iment f the y and ecting ed at s, the open wn in ensed access

La Cross License T Revision and right was deem LACBW Crib Hou facility d were dee These ar Solutions A minim scanned was excl focused o points fo No scan Thirty-tw where th open lan was posi plant-der The aver 0.131 pC Seventee meter.

concentra radionuc concentra maximum Two sam selected results w were pos A summ presented As part o of concre Crib Hou Administ survey un Three co L301210 three sur Laborato se Boiling W Termination n 0 t-of-way are med impacte WR Administ use). The tr during operat emed as imp reas were c s maintains t mum of 1%

with a Mod luded from on undisturb r the instrum alarms were wo surface so he ground ha d survey un tively identi rived gamma rage Cs-137 Ci/g with a m en subsurfac Of the 17 ations grea lides were ation observ m observed c mples were t randomly.

were less tha sitively ident ary of the fi d in Table 2-of the charac ete located i use. In addi tration Build nit L301210 oncrete samp 01, the two se rface soil s ories for gam Water Reactor Plan a and the ha ed by LACB tration Build ransmission tions. The p pacted by th onservativel that classifyi of the surf el 2350-1 da gamma sur bed soils wi ment were se e observed in oil samples ad been dist nits are show ified in conc a-emitting ra 7 concentrat maximum obs e soil sampl 7 subsurface ater than M positively ved in the a concentratio aken of asph The asphalt an instrumen tified by gam indings of th

-14.

cterization of in the north ition, a sam ding and tw

9. These sam ples from su ediment sam samples and mma spectr r

aul road to th BWR due to ding and the yard was d plant access he transit of ly classified ing these are face soil are ata logger w rface scanni ith minimal et at the obse n these surve were taken turbed. The wn in Figure centrations g adionuclides tion observe served conce les were tak e soil samp MDC in ei identified analysis of th on of 0.409 p halt from pa surface wa nt MDC of 1 mma spectro he survey fo f survey unit h section of mple was take wo sediment mples were urvey unit L3 mples taken f d two subs roscopy and 2-28 he ISFSI fac o the presen presence of deemed as im area, Highw f packaged r d as impacte eas as non-im ea in survey with a 2 by ing for safe vegetation o erved backgr ey units.

at locations e locations o e 2-8. Of th greater than s were positi ed in the an entration of ken at random ples taken, ight samples by gamma he subsurfac pCi/g.

aved areas in s first scann 1,938 dpm/1 scopy in any or each indiv t L3012101, the survey u en from a sa t samples w sent off-site 3012101, th from the stor surface soil d HTD anal cility. The n nce of a sep f concrete fr mpacted as i way 35 right radioactive m ed. Howev mpacted wou y units L30 2 NaI dete ety reasons.

or disturbed round plus t biased tow of surface s he 32 surface MDC in 26 ively identif nalysis of th 0.463 pCi/g mly selected Cs-137 w

s. No oth spectrosco ce soil samp n Class 3 su ned with bet 100cm2. No y of these sam vidual Class

, samples we unit that ori anitary tank were taken fr e for isotopic he sanitary ta rm sewer ba samples w lyses. The north end of ptic system from impacte it was part o t-of way and material thro ver, it shou uld have bee 012101 and ector. Surve Gamma d soils or gra the MDCR o ard discolor oil samples e soil sampl samples. N fied by gamm he surface s

g.

d locations t was positive ther potenti opy. The ples was 0.0 urvey units.

ta-gamma de o plant deriv amples.

s 3 open land ere taken fro iginated from k that service from a storm c analysis.

ank sample asin in survey were sent t results of f the license that service ed structures of the LACB d ISFSI haul ough these a ld be noted en appropriat L3012109 ey unit L301 surface scan avel. Alarm of the instrum red areas or taken in Cl les taken, Cs No other pote ma spectrosc soil samples to a depth o ely identifie ial plant-de average Cs 087 pCi/g w The asphalt etector. All ved radionuc d survey un om several p m the LACB es the LACB m sewer bas from survey y unit L3012 to Test Am the analysi d site es the s (the BWR l road areas.

d that te.

were 12102 nning m set-ment.

areas lass 3 s-137 ential copy.

s was of one ed in erived s-137 with a t was l scan clides nit are pieces BWR BWR sin in y unit

2109, merica is are

La Cross License T Revision presented derived R and Ni-6 exceedin consisten 2.3.5. N Based up associate indicated A full lis

2.

The prim informati operation from the character The resu conducte traffic in The G-3 incidents results of A scan su gamma d using an was also gross bet MDC of identified gross alp contamin samples.

derived 0.061 pC that the material Direct an traffic ar Model 23 areas of i ranged f exceeded se Boiling W Termination n 0 d in Table 2 ROC at resid

63. As dis ng MDC are nt with natur Non-Impacte pon the inf ed with the G d that there w st of G-3 stru mary basis f ion documen ns. Additio e LACBWR rization of t ults are prov ed during the the major st station res s of radioact f the charact urvey was p detector. In alpha/beta-g taken at the ta-gamma a f 2,816 dpm/

d gross beta-pha activity nation was i The roof m ROC that w Ci/g. Based elevated dir on the roof.

nd removabl reas of the 360 instrume interest were from 2,540 d the MDC d Water Reactor Plan 2-15. The dual concent scussed in s likely to be ral backgroun ed Structur formation co G-3 Coal Pla was no reaso uctures that for the non nted in the H nally, the p R Stack du the LACBW vided in Re e 2015 chara tation buildin sides in non tive contam erization sur performed of addition, six gamma prop location of ctivity rangi

/100cm2. T

-gamma acti y ranging f dentified at material itse was positive on the fact t rect alpha m le contamin G-3 Coal P ent with 43-e scanned, in dpm/100cm during the co r

analysis of trations grea section 2.3.3 false positiv nd.

es ompiled in ant may be c onable poten have been d n-impacted HSA that the potential for uring opera WR Administ eference 13 acterization ngs were sur n-impacted s mination of s rveys perform f the mid-lev x (6) locatio portional dete each direct m ing from 2,3 The results o ivity ranging from 142 dp concentratio elf was samp ely identifie that no other measurements ation survey Plant. Scan

-93 detector.

ncluding floo m2 to 2,617 ourse of this 2-29 f these samp ater than the 3 for non-im ves. Cs-137 the HSA, S classified as ntial for resi designated as classificatio e G-3 structu windborne ations to s tration Build

. Addition campaign w rveyed.

survey unit soils, asphal med in the G vel roof of th ons were sele ector. A sm measuremen 302 dpm/10 of the direc g from 1,603 pm/100cm2 ons greater t pled on Jun ed by gamm r plant deriv s were due ys were perf n measureme

. Approxim ors and lowe 7 dpm/100cm s survey. Te ples positive e instrument mpacted are was also po Solutions co non-impac dual contam s non-impa on for the G ures were no migration o structure roo ding roof an nal surveys where the su L4012103.

lt or concre G-3 station a he G-3 Coal ected at rand mear sample nt. The resu 0cm2 to 2,8 ct beta-gamm 3 dpm/100cm to 258 dpm than MDC b ne 30, 2015.

ma spectros ved ROC wa most likely formed of re ents were p mately 5% of er wall surfa m2. No o en (10) locat ely identifie MDC, inclu eas, the HT ositively dete oncluded th cted. Histo mination from acted is prov G-3 station ot used for L of airborne ofs was ev nd the G-3 of the G-3 urfaces subje There are ete in this su are summariz l Plant build dom for dire for removab ults of the be 816 dpm/100 ma and alph m2 to 2,072 m/100cm2.

by the analy Cs-137 wa scopy at a as detected, to the pres epresentativ performed us f the concret aces. The av observed sca tions were ch ed several p uding H-3, F TD radionuc ected but at l hat the struc orical inform m site operat vided in Tab structures i LACBWR-re effluent rele valuated by Coal Plant structures ected to high e no docum urvey unit.

zed as follow ding using a ect measurem ble contamin eta scan iden 0cm2 with a ha measurem dpm/100cm No remov ysis of the s as the only concentratio it was concl sence of coa ve high perso sing the Lu te surfaces i verage scan M an measure hosen at ran plant-Fe-55 clides levels ctures mation tions.

ble 2-is the elated eased y the roof.

were h foot ented The ws:

beta-ments nation ntified scan ments m2 and vable smear plant on of luded al ash onnel udlum in the MDC ement

ndom,

La Cross License T Revision primarily measurem 875 dpm greater th 2.3.6. Im The deco impacted In additio accepted remain a Reactor B remainin and floo Reactor/G Turbine surfaces segregate radioactiv systems o Radiolog complian radiologi areas.

disassem remediat demolitio waste.

After com 3 feet be radioactiv use criter 2.3.6.1.

Characte consisted walls an (primaril taken fro 621 foot the 633 f samples w Piping Tu se Boiling W Termination n 0 y from the ments for g

/100cm2 for han MDC by mpacted Str ommissionin d buildings, s on, all system elevation fo and be subje Building tha ng reinforced ors of the Generator P sump and th above the ed by waste ve waste.

or structures gical surveys nce with 10 ical conditio The radiolo mbly and rem ion has ade on, the impa mmodity rem elow grade, vity and the ria.

Basem rization of d primarily o d floors of ly the Piping om the 615 elevation in foot elevatio were collect unnel. The l Water Reactor Plan main lobby gross activit beta-gamm y the analysi ructures an ng approach structures, sy ms and expo or grade at L ected to STS at will be exp d concrete w WGTV, an lant baseme he Turbine 636 foot ele classificatio No extensi s that will be s of the inter 0 CFR 20 re ons for the im ogical infor moval of syst equately red acted structu moval is com

, will be r e extent of a ment Structu the structur of the acquis the Reactor g Tunnels).

foot elevati n the Reactor on concrete f ted, six (6) in locations wh r

y area and y was less

a. No remov s of the sme nd Systems h for LACB ystems and c osed metal b LACBWR is S are the rem posed by the walls floors o nd the rem ent, the one pit. Conseq evation will on and dispo ive characte e removed pr riors of struc equirements mplementati rmation from tems and the duced radiol ures will be mplete, the s re-surveyed additional re ures Below 6 ral surfaces ition and rad r Building, In June and on concrete r Building, th floor of the P n the Reacto here the core 2-30 the mainte than the M vable contam ar samples.

BWR requir components below 3 feet the 639 foo maining rein e removal of of the WTB, mainder of foot thick p quently, all l be remedi osed of as c erization wa rior to the pe tures at LAC regarding on of contro m these su e demolition logical cond demolished tructures tha to determi emediation r 36 Foot Elev of basemen diological an WTB and July of 2015 floor and t he 630 foot Piping Tunn or Building, e samples we enance area.

MDC of 74 mination wa res the dem to a depth o below grad ot elevation.

nforced conc f the interior the remaini the Piping portion of th systems and iated, disass clean demoli as or will b erformance o CBWR are r the posting ols for the pr urveys will of impacted ditions to le d, packaged at will remai ine the con required, if a vation nts that wil nalysis of co the balance 5, a series o the concrete elevation co nels. A total three (3) in ere taken are

. The resu dpm/100cm as identified molition and of at least 3 de will also b The only st crete walls a r concrete an ing reinforce g and Vent he Chimney d componen sembled and ition debris, be performe of FRS.

routinely per g of areas rotection of provide th d structures a evels suitabl and properl in at license ncentrations any, to meet ll remain in oncrete core e of the bas f concrete co e floor and oncrete floor l of twelve (

the WTB an e shown in F ults of all d m2 for alpha at concentra d removal o feet below g be removed.

tructures tha and floors o nd steel line ed concrete tilation Tun y Foundation nts and struc d/or demoli clean salva ed of equipm rformed to en and to ide f workers in he basis for at the site. W le for contr ly disposed termination of the res t the unrestr n the end-s samples from sement struc ore samples east wall o r of the WTB

12) concrete nd three (3) i Figures 2-9.

direct a and ations of all grade.

The at will of the er, the walls

nnels, n, the ctural
ished, age or
ment, nsure entify these r the When rolled of as n, i.e.,

sidual ricted state m the ctures were n the B and e core in the

La Cross License T Revision The loca condition volumetr elevated wall sur discolora that exh condition there was radionuc The conc Test Ame ROC. In Reactor B and #002 concrete analysis positively 59, Tc-99 concrete 2.3.6.2.

A concre Turbine contamin in the T Analysis 0.106 pC 2.3.6.3.

As stated subjected graded su As repor radioactiv building located i Administ proximity laborator Characte beta-gam gross bet se Boiling W Termination n 0 ations selecte n or observ ric contamin observed co faces were ation or stan hibited the h n for concre s sufficient s lide fraction crete pucks r erica Labora n addition, Building sam 2 were also cores is pr of the conc y detected at 9, Pu-238, P core sample Turbin ete core was Building T nation event Turbine Buil of this sam Ci/g and H-3 LACB d previously d to FRS. In urvey approa rted in the H ve spills or has primaril in the build tration Build y to the LSE ry.

rization surv mma/alpha a ta-gamma/al Water Reactor Plan ed for concr ved radiolog ation of the ontact dose r used to id nding water.

highest pot ete in each s source term ns of gamma representing atory for gam the concrete mple locatio o sent for is resented in rete core sa t concentrati Pu-239/240, es is presente ne Building s obtained as Tunnel to cited in the lding and t mple indicate at 1.71 pCi/

BWR Admin y, the LACB nstead, these ach in accord HSA, there w radioactive ly been used ding that sup ding was in E, occupancy veys of the ctivity of in lpha activity r

rete core sam gical measu concrete. W rates or coun dentify poten The goal w ential of re survey unit.

in the cores emitters as w g the first 1/2 mma spectro e pucks rep ns #001, #0 sotopic analy Table 2-16.

amples inclu ions greater Pu-241, Am ed in Referen Tunnel s part of the attempt to HSA pertain the potential ed detectable

/g.

nistration Bu BWR Admin e two structu dance with M was no past contaminati d for office sp pported both nitially class y by LACBW LACBWR nterior floor were also p 2-31 mpling were urements in When possibl nt rates. In a ntial locatio was to ident epresenting This judg to achieve t well as HTD inch of conc oscopy and H presenting th 03, #005 an ysis. A sum Significan ude Ni-63, H than their re m-241 and A nce 16.

e 2014 chara evaluate ning to the d l radiologic e concentrat uilding nistration Bu ures will be MARSAME history of th ion in the LA pace and rec h LACBWR sified as a M WR personn Administrat rs surfaces a performed on biased tow ndicated the le, locations addition, vis ons of surf tify, to the e the worst gmental samp the sensitivit D radionuclid crete at each HTD analyse he concrete nd #006 and mmary of t nt HTD rad H-3 and Sr-9 espective MD Am-243. An acterization the possibl discovery of cal contamin tions of Cs-1 uilding and surveyed fo E guidance.

he use of un ACBWR A cords storage R and G-3 MARSSIM nel and the p tion Buildin and the roof n the roof, on ward location e presence were determ sual observat face contam extent possib case bound mpling appro ties required des.

h sample loc es for beta an deeper than WTB samp the analytica dionuclides i

90. The oth DC include; analysis of survey from le extent o f cracked dra nation of su 137 at 0.352 G-3 Crib H or unrestricte nsealed radio dministratio
e. An enviro operations.

Class 2 stru resence of th ng included

f. Direct m n floor tiles ns where phy of fixed a mined based tions of floo mination, suc ble, the loca ding radiolo ach also en d to determin cation was se nd alpha em n 1/2 inch de le locations al results fo identified by her radionuc C-14, Fe-55 the results o m the floor o of a radioa ain system p urrounding 2 pCi/g, Co-House will n ed release us oactive mate on Building.

onmental lab The LACB ucture due t he environm a scan for measurement and around ysical and/or upon or and ch as ations ogical sured ne the ent to mitting eep at

  1. 001 or the y the clides 5, Ni-of the of the active piping soils.

-60 at not be sing a

erials, The b was BWR to its mental gross ts for floor

La Cross License T Revision drain ope each dire The resu 4,915 dpm the secon imbedded gamma s was then and seco from less and dire observed Beta sc 2,261 dpm from less Direct be of 243 d measurem identified 2.3.7. S Section 8 hydrogeo was deri Haley &

(18) supp 2.3.7.1.

For a di towns an river wat

Lansing, water fo approxim The LAC well at th state perm LACBW Building areas are to the gr pathway se Boiling W Termination n 0 enings. A sm ect measurem ults of the m/100cm2 w nd floor ha d in a floor spectroscopy n performed ond floor lam s than MDC ct alpha re d reading of 7 cans of th m/100cm2 w s than MDC eta-gamma m dpm/100cm2 ments were d concentrati urface and 8.5 in Chap ology and hy ived directly Aldrich, Hy plements the Area Grou stance of 40 nd cities alon ter for indus Iowa, about or industria mately 40 mi CBWR site he site. Sani mitted sanit WR Adminis

. Storm wa e periodically round area su after passing Water Reactor Plan mear sample ment.

beta scans with a scan M allway, a di tile. The c

y. The analy involving th minated woo of 329 dpm adings rang 72 dpm/100c he roof are with a scan M C of 113 dpm measurement to a maxim all less than ions greater Groundwat pter 8 of t ydrology of y from Hal ydrogeologic e preliminary undwater Us 0 miles dow ng the Missis strial purpos t 15 miles d al purposes les downstre has its own itary wastes tary wastes h tration Buil ater runoff is y monitored urrounding t g through an r

e for remova of the int MDC of 2,10 screte radio contaminated ysis of the ti he acquisitio od, carpet, a m/100cm2 to ged from le cm2.

ea indicate MDC of 2,26 m/100cm2 to ts taken on t mum observ n MDC of 4 than MDC b ter his LTP c ZNPS and e ey & Aldri cal Investiga y findings in se wnstream of ssippi River ses, excludin downstream o between t eam.

potable wa are collecte hauler. Thi lding and a s diverted di d for oil shee the facility v n oil separato 2-32 able contam terior surfac 00 dpm/100c oactive parti d portion of ile identified n of ten (10) and floor til a maximum ess than MD ed results 61 dpm/100c o a maximum the floor dra ved reading 42 dpm/100c by the analy ontains a s environs. T ich, Hydrog ation Report n Reference 1 the site, vir are obtained ng the adjac of the site.

the LACBW ater supply, p d in a solids is includes a a sanitary h irectly to th en and disco via downspo or located in mination was ces ranged cm2. During icle was dis f the tile wa d 0.005 uCi

) biased dire le. Direct b m observed re DC of 39 d ranging fr cm2. Direct m observed ain openings g of 333 dp cm2. No re sis of the sm summary d The informat geological C t for the LaC

17.

rtually all m d from groun cent G-3 pla There are n WR site an provided thr s holding tan a sanitary ho holding tank he Mississipp oloration. R outs or ente nside the LSE also taken from 1,420 g the scan of scovered. T as removed of Cs-137.

ect measurem beta-gamma eading of 5, dpm/100cm2 rom 1,872 t alpha meas reading of 1 s ranged from pm/100cm2 a emovable co mear samples description tion containe Conceptual S Crosse Boilin municipal w und water. T ant, is the co no other know nd Prairie rough a sing nk and pump olding tank k that servi pi River at o Roof drains d r the norma E.

at the locati 0 dpm/100cm f the north e The particle and analyze An investig ments on the readings ra

,743 dpm/10 to a maxi dpm/100cm surements ra 152 dpm/100 m less than M and direct ontamination

s.

of the geo ed in this se Site Model ng Water Re water supplie The nearest u oal-fired pla wn users of du Chien, gle ground w ped off by a that service ices the Tu outfalls. Re discharge dir al effluent re on of m2 to end of e was ed by gation e first anged 00cm2 imum m2 to anged 0cm2.

MDC alpha n was

ology, ection (17).

eactor es for use of ant in f river WI, water local es the urbine elease rectly elease

La Cross License T Revision 2.3.7.2.

Regional Mississip parallels upward; river stag demonstr river stag Groundw surface (

Groundw the Missi may turn chemical the shallo Based on of the G-located i monitorin a slightly has a do gradient towards t there are stages. G Reactor B are below During p was com permeabi buildings soils will will circ localized outside th other han or buried underlyin shallow s contamin soils with orders of se Boiling W Termination n 0 Groundw lly, groundw ppi river. C the river. U however, th ge data comp rates that the ge impacts th water beneath bgs) and the water in the s issippi Rive n and flow l constituent ow system.

n a review of

-3 Ash Land in the sout ng wells (B1 y downward ownward gr at well pair the river bas e some perio Groundwater Building ba w the water t plant constru mpacted, redu ility can dec

s. The resul l flow at a s cumnavigate d flow regim he footprint nd, potential d piling, will ng groundw soils from p nation. The hin the supp f magnitude Water Reactor Plan ater Flow water flows i Closer to th Under typic he vertical gr pared to wa e shallow aq he water tabl h the site is e groundwat shallow depo
r. The deep parallel to s would occu f the ground dfill area grou th side of t 11AR/B11R vertical gra radient at w B9/B9A. T sin with a lo ods where t r flow throu sement shel table during uction, and m ucing the eff crease the h lting impact slower veloc the area, e mes on contam of these str l releases tha l likely take water. This precipitation, average sha port pilings, lower.

r in a westerl he shore, gr al river stag radient rever ter table ele quifer is in di le elevation.

first encoun ter is in dire osits and fill per groundw the river.

ur at or near dwater elevat undwater mo the LACBW

) to the east adient. Durin well pairs B This is expec ocalized influ the gradients ugh the LAC l) as well as high and low more specifi fective poros hydraulic con to groundw city, and reg effectively b minant fate a ructures will at occurred w much longe is further c

, creating an allow aquifer the hydraul 2-33 ly direction roundwater ge, groundw rses during f evations mea irect hydrau ntered at an ect hydraulic l material flo water is also Because th r the surface tion measure onitoring we WR site, an of and up gr ng times of n B11R/B11AR cted as grou uence at B9/

s are revers CBWR site is s the deep p w river stage ically the ins sity and perm nductivity o water flow is gionally, a si bypassing th and transpor l likely be d within the fo er to migrate compounded n area that w r hydraulic c ic conductiv from the bl may also h water gradien flood stages.

asure in LAC ulic commun n average de c communica ows towards likely to flo he potential

, the release ements colle ells (# B2/B3 nd associate radient of LA normal and R and B2/B undwater flo

/B9A from t sed; and this s impacted b pilings that s e conditions.

stallation of meability of of the aquife s that ground ignificant pe these soils.

rt are that po deflected and ootprint of th e both in th d as the ove will likely re conductivity vity would b luffs on the have a flow nts near the

. The geolog CBWR site nication with epth of 20 fe ation with th s the west an ow towards t l releases of s would like ected during 3/B9A/B9/B ed backgrou ACBWR, th low river sta B3, with an ows generally the adjacent s is likely d by deeper st support the f the support f the soils. T er within the dwater withi ercentage of The impli otential relea d flow aroun he buildings e vadose zo erlying struc etain any po y is 313 feet be expected east toward component river are sli gical and his monitoring h the river an eet below gr he adjacent nd discharges the west but f radiologic ely be confin routine sam B7/B8), whic und groundw here appears age, groundw upward ve y from the b t inlet. How due to high tructures (i.e structures, w t pilings, the This reducti e footprint o in the comp f the flow re ications of ases that occ nd them. O s, via floor d one as well a ctures isolat tentially rele per day. Fo to be one to ds the t that ightly storic wells nd the round river.

s into t then cal or ned to mpling ch are water to be water ertical bluffs

wever, river e., the which e soil ion in of the pacted egime these curred On the drains as the te the eased or the o two

La Cross License T Revision The velo gradient.

across th Therefor the inch Environm show sea stage. Th LACBW vicinity structure direction 2.3.7.3.

Historica monitorin monitorin monitorin Dairylan Of the w LACBW routine b designate Environm G-3 Foss Nos. 3, 4 levels re 3.0E-08 µ During th to the s radioactiv The well suspected that samp As note Activities wells to monitorin if ground located n interval o below gr B.

se Boiling W Termination n 0 ocity of gro The gradie he site, groun e, it is likely hes and fee mental Moni asonal varia hese wells a WR site struct of suspect s/foundation ns.

Previous I ally, the LAC ng wells. F ng wells loc ng wells of d for radiolo wells shown WR facilities basis. The gr ed as B-2, mental Moni sil Station op 4 and 5 wer ported durin

µCi/ml to 9.

he recovery outh of the ve liquids fr l-point show d leakage. T ple are prese d in the L s Report (D support gro ng wells (10 dwater qual nominally wi of 15 to 25 f rade. These Water Reactor Plan oundwater is ent of the wa ndwater mon y that the gro et/day rang itoring Prog ation on upw are not suffic tures or area broken dra ns or variati Investigation CBWR Lice igure 2-11 i cated on th ff the LACB ogical purpo n on Figure were histor roundwater m B-3, B-7, itoring staff perational re re routinely ng this mon 0E-08 µCi/m of a probab e Turbine B rom suspect wn on Figure The well-po ented in Tabl LACBWR D D-Plan/PSDA oundwater e 0 wells total) ity had bee ithin five (5) feet below g wells are sh r

s directly r ater table is i nitoring has oundwater v e). Ground gram wells a ward and do cient to char as where pote ain lines) co ions in fill m ns ensed Site ha llustrates the e LACBWR BWR site t ses.

2-11, only P rically monit monitoring w B-8, B-9, on a routine equirements.

monitored f nitoring peri ml).

le spill incid Building. T broken drain 2-11 was es int was sam le 2-17. Thi Decommissio AR) (19), D evaluation.

) were instal en impacted

) feet of one grade and on how on Figu 2-34 elated to bo nfluenced by shown that velocity acro water eleva agree with t ownward gra racterize the ential releas ould have o materials co as had sever e current loc R site. The that are or Potable Wa tored by Da wells and ba B-9A, B11A e basis for no During LA for gross be iod was less dent in 1983 This inciden n lines in th stablished do mpled once o is well-point oning Plan airyland rec In Novemb lled within t by plant o e another con ne deep well ure 2-11 as M oth the hyd y the topogr the water ta oss the site is ation data the regional adients that groundwate es associated occurred. In ould locally ral potable w cation of po ere is no po have been ater Wells N airyland for ackground gr AR, and B on-radiologi ACBWR ope eta activity.

s than or eq

, a temporar nt concerne e Turbine B own gradien on May 3, 19 t has since be and Post-S cently instal ber 2012, fi the LACBW operations.

nsist of one with a scree MW 200A an draulic cond raphy; and, w able has a v s also relativ from the groundwate are influen er flow below d with LAC n these area influence g water wells otable water otable water monitored Nos. 3 and 4 radiological roundwater B11R are m ical paramete erations, Pota Typical gr qual to MD ry well-poin ed the pote Building to su nt and below 983. The an een abandon Shutdown D lled groundw ive (5) pairs WR licensed The well p shallow wel ened interva nd B throug ductivity and with the flat ery low grad vely slow (i.

G-3 Coal er flow, and nced by the w and aroun BWR (i.e., i as, pilings, groundwater and groundw and groundw r or groundw by Solution 4 which serv l conditions monitoring monitored by ers to suppo able Water W ross beta ac DC (ranging nt was establ ential leakag ub-building w the grade o nalysis resul ned.

Decommissio water monit s of groundw site to deter pairs which ll with a scre al of 45 to 55 h MW-204A d the areas dient.

.e., in Plant d also river nd the in the deep flow water water water ns or viced on a wells y the ort the Wells ctivity from lished ge of soils.

of the ts for oning toring water rmine were eened 5 feet A and

La Cross License T Revision Two (2) in June groundw 90 and C In June o through 2 and B11 several r fourth ro Potable samples transuran of the gro Addition

18.

2.3.7.4.

The LAC twice pe groundw the MW-The colle D

M p

R gr 2.3.7.5.

Groundw (5 pairs) sampling wells MW Novembe positively ranging Novembe during th During th MW-202 Sr-90 w se Boiling W Termination n 0 rounds of gr 2013 and th water samples Cs-137. Analy of 2014, a t 204 A and B AR. These radionuclide ound of gro Well #5, an were sent o nic radionucl oundwater sa nal details, in On-Going CBWR Site g er year for r water is at rel

-200A/B thru ected inform Depth to grou Monitoring w otential/turb Radiological roundwater Summ water charact within the g in 2013. H W-201A and er of 2013 y detected i from 1.43 p er 2013 sam he 2013 samp he June 201 2A, MW-203 was also po Water Reactor Plan roundwater hen during s were sent ysis for H-3 third round o B; Potable W e collected g s including oundwater w nd Monitori off for radio lides. Table amples and r ncluding the g Investigatio groundwater radiological latively high u MW-204A mation during und water in well groundw bidity/dissolv sample infor sample colle mary of Grou terization eff LSE area H-3 was posi d B, MW-20 at concentra in the same pCi/L to 2.1 mpling period pling period 4 sample pe 3A and MW sitively det r

samples wer a seasonal l to an off-sit was perform of groundwa Water Wells #

groundwater HTD and t were collecte ing Wells B ological ana es 2-18 and 2 results.

e off-site ana ons r monitoring analysis pu her and lowe A/B wells as g each monit the respecti water pH/spe ved oxygen/t rmation incl ection.

undwater An fforts comme in Novemb tively detect 02-A and B, ations rangi wells durin 18 pCi/L; ho

d. Co-60 an eriod, H-3 w W-203B) at c ected in w 2-35 re collected low groundw te laboratory med on site.

ater samples

  1. 3, 4, 5, and samples w transuranic r ed from: M B11R and B alysis of sev 2-19 provide alytical labor g program co urposes only er elevations shown on F toring interv ive monitorin ecific conduc temperature.

luding a com nalytical Res enced throug ber 2012 an ted at concen MW-203A ing from 15 ng the June owever, it w nd Cs-137 w was positively oncentration wells MW-20 in 2013, du water level y for radiolo s was collec 7; and Mon ere sent off radionuclide MW 200A an B11AR. T veral radion es a summar ratory repor onsists of ob y from exis

. The moni igure 2-11.

val includes:

ng well.

ctance/oxida mpleted chain sults gh the install nd the com ntration grea and B and M 50 pCi/L to 2013 sampl was not po were not po y detected in ns ranging fr 02A, MW-2 uring the sea in Novemb ogical analys cted from: M nitoring Well f for radiolo es. In Septe nd B throug These collec nuclides incl ry of the radi rts are provi btaining grou ting monito toring wells ation and red n of custody lation of 10 mmencement ater than MD MW-204A a 660 pCi/L.

ling period a ositively dete sitively dete n four (4) w from 245 pC 203A and asonal high w ber 2013. T sis for Co-60 MW-200A a ls B2, B-3, B ogical analys ember of 20 gh 204A an cted groundw luding HTD iological ana ded in Refer undwater sam oring wells w s sampled in duction y following monitoring of groundw DC in monit and B in Jun Sr-90 was at concentra ected during ected in any wells (MW-B i/L to 336 p MW-204A water These 0, Sr-and B B11R sis of 014 a nd B, water D and alysis rence mples when clude wells water toring e and s also ations g the y well

B11R, pCi/L.

with

La Cross License T Revision concentra Am-241 During t greater th concentra were also 2.4.

C The surv deferred.

under co that will basement illustrate defer the condition ALARA data wou areas),

Safet Histo Acce struct interf The a physi condi As acces will be co for the s radionuc and HTD events ca of a surv stored in validatin As decom surface d for open documen se Boiling W Termination n 0 ations rangin were also po he Septemb han MDC in ation of 1.14 o positively d Continuing C vey of many Examples ncrete or asp remain and t after liner s buried pip e characteriz ns:

consideratio uld likely not ty considerat orical data sh ss for charac tures or othe fere with con ability to use ical relations itions repres ss is gained ollected, eva survey unit.

lides present D radionuclid aused by equ vey unit(s) w n the charac g the initial mmissioning decontamina n air demolit nted survey a Water Reactor Plan ng from 1.1 ositively det ber 2014 sam n any well.

4 pCi/L. Co detected at r Characteriz inaccessible s of areas w phalt coverin d be subjec r removal an ping systems zation of a ons (e.g., the t change the

tions, hows that the cterization w er obstacles w ntinued oper e engineering ship to surro sented by the to areas tha aluated and s This data t and update des. In addi uipment failu will be reco terization d classificatio g proceeds, ation (as wel tion or unre and a formal r

12 pCi/L to ected at resi mple period, Sr-90 was o-60, Ni-63, residual conc zation e or not read where survey ngs, structur cted to FRS nd the inter s that may r soil or stru e area is eith e survey area e area could would require where the re ration of ope g judgment i ounding area e conditions at were prev stored with-o will be use e the variabil ition, as the ures or perso orded. Thes atabase. Th n and in plan areas will, ll as fixed co estricted rele l turnover w 2-36 2.01 pCi/L.

dual concen

, H-3 was n positively d

, Cs-137, Eu centrations in dily accessib ys are deferr ral wall and

, the underl riors of bur remain in th ucture was b her a radiati a or area clas be classified e significant emoval could erating system in assigning s and the lik in these adja viously inacc other radiolo ed along wi lity in the ra decommiss onnel errors, se events w his additiona nning for the as necessar ontamination ease. When will be made C-14, Tc-9 ntrations in se not positivel detected in o u-152, Eu-15 n several we ble subsurfa rred include floor surfac rlying concr ried pipe tha he end-state based on on ion or conta ssification o d without fur t deconstruct d result in an ms, or the area a cl kelihood of th acent areas.

cessible, add ogical survey ith existing adionuclide m ioning progr

, which may will be evalu al character e FRS.

ry, be decon n) to levels n a structur by the Radi 99, Eu-152, everal wells ly detected a one (1) well 54, Pu-239/2 ells.

ace soils or s soils under ces in some rete in the R at may rem condition.

ne or more amination are of the locatio rther charact tion of adjac n unsafe con lassification he area to ha ditional char y data in a s data to upd mix for both resses, data y affect the ra uated and, w rization data ntaminated that will me e is ready f ological Pro Pu-239/240 at concentra l, MW-200A 240 and Am surfaces has r structures, of the basem Reactor Bui main. Figure The decisi of the follo ea and addit on or surroun terization, cent systems ndition or n based on ave radiolog racterization urvey histor date the typ h gamma-em from operat adiological s when approp a will be us to remove eet the condi for demoliti otection grou 0 and ations A at a m-241 been soils ments ilding e 2-3 on to owing tional nding s,

gical n data ry file pes of mitting tional status

priate, ed in loose itions ion, a up for

La Cross License T Revision the comp are suitab Followin a "turnov acceptan transferre performa may inclu The "turn survey pe survey da

turnover, survey p met. The Appr action Appr Appr with Appr radio Data addit Appr 2.5.

R

1.

U C

2

2.

U R

3.

U C

o

4.

E C

5.

E S

se Boiling W Termination n 0 pany preform ble.

ng the demol ver assessme ce criteria w ed to Charac ance of the F ude a "turno nover surve erformed, re ata prior to c

, and FRS), a lans will co ese objective ropriate instr n level and/o ropriate instr ropriate surv the calibrati ropriate samp nuclide ratio analysis crit ional sample ropriate class References U.S. Nuclear Content of Li 011.

U.S. Nuclear Radiation Sur U.S. Nuclear Consolidated f Radiologic EnergySoluti Crosse Boilin EnergySoluti ite Characte Water Reactor Plan ming demoli lition and/or ent" will be p will be met, cterization/L FRS. Otherw over survey,"

ey" process, epresent at le conducting t a documente ontain the ap es include:

rument selec or release cri rument quali ey technique on methodol ple collectio os, teria to ident es and, sification of Regulatory icense Termi Regulatory rvey and Site Regulatory Decommiss cal Criteria, F ons PG-EO-ng Water Rea ons GP-EO-erization Proj r

ition, validat r remediation performed. I

, then physi License Term wise, additio

" primarily fo together wi east one, but the FRS. Fo ed survey pl ppropriate da ction to ensur

iteria, ity control m es to ensure
logies, n and analys tify follow-u the survey a Commission ination Plan Commission e Investigati Commission sioning Guid Final Report

-313196-SV actor.

-313196-QA ject (QAPP) 2-37 ting that the n, and when If the results ical and adm mination grou onal remedia for Class 1 an ith any addi t possibly se or each type an will be d ata assessme re the proper measures to e that the field sis to determ up actions su area.

n, Regulator s for Nuclea n, NUREG-1 ion Manual (

n, NUREG-1 dance - Char t - Septembe

-PL-001, Ch A-PL-001, Qu

).

e radiologica n an area is b s of this asse ministrative up personne ation may b nd 2 areas w itional chara everal, oppo of survey (c developed us ent to ensur r sensitivity ensure operab d measurem mine spatial v uch as remed ry Guide 1.1 ar Power Rea 1575, Revisi (MARSSIM 1757, Volum racterization er 2006.

haracterizatio uality Assur al condition believed to b essment indi control of l for prepara be required.

within the LS acterization ortunities to c characterizat ing the DQO re that sever relative to th

bility, ent techniqu variability an diation and th 79, Standard actors, Revis ion 1, Multi-M), August 20 me 2, Revisio

, Survey, an on Survey P rance Project s in the stru be ready for icate that the the area wi ation, design This assess SE.

and remedi collect addit tion, remedia O process. T ral objective he applicabl ues are consi nd variability he collection d Format and sion 1 - June

-Agency 000.

on 1, nd Determina Plan for the L t Plan LACB ucture

FRS, e FRS ill be n, and sment iation tional
ation, These es are le istent y in n of d

e ation La BWR

La Cross License T Revision

6.

E W

7.

D S

8.

U R

D

9.

S C

10.

E 1

11.

U L

12.

U R

T

13.

E S

14.

E S

15.

Z F

16.

E C

17.

H 3

18.

H R

2

19.

D D

20.

In E

1 se Boiling W Termination n 0 EnergySoluti Water Reacto Dairyland Po AFSTOR -

U.S. Nuclear Radiation Sur December 20 andia Nation Contaminatio EnergySoluti 0 Detector S U.S. Nuclear Laboratory A U.S. Nuclear Radiological Termination)

EnergySoluti urvey Repor EnergySoluti urvey Repor ZionSolution allout in Soi EnergySoluti Concern Duri Haley & Aldr 0, 2012.

Haley & Aldr Reactor, Dair 015.

Dairyland Po Decommissio nternational Emitters (max 998.

Water Reactor Plan ons Technic or Historical wer Corpora December 2 Regulatory rvey and As 006.

nal Laborato on From Dec ons Technic Sensitivity.

Regulatory Analytical Pro Regulatory Monitoring

- Effluent S ons GG-EO-rt for Octobe ons LC-RS-rt for June th s Technical ils at Zion St ons Technic ing LACBW rich, Hydrog rich Inc., Hy ryland Powe wer Coopera oning Activit Standard IS ximum beta r

cal Support D Site Assessm ation LAC-T 2009.

Commission sessment of ory, NUREG commissioni cal Support D Commission otocols Man Commission Programs (I Streams and

-313196-RS er and Novem PN-164017-hru August 2 Support Doc tation.

cal Support D WR Decomm geological C ydrogeologic r Cooperativ ative, LACB ties Report (

O 7503-1, P energy grea 2-38 Document R ment (HSA)

TR-138, Initi n NUREG-1 Materials an G/CR-5512, V ing Paramete Document R n, NUREG-1 nual (MARL n Regulatory Inception Th the Environ S-RP-001, LA mber 2014 F

-001, LACB 2015 Field W cument 13-0 Document R missioning.

onceptual Si cal Investiga ve, Genoa W BWR Decom (D-Plan/PSD Part 1, Evalua ater than 0.15 RS-TD-31319

).

ial Site Char 1575, Supple nd Equipmen Volume 3, R er Analysis -

RS-TD-31319 1576, Multi-LAP) - Augu y Guide 4.15 hrough Norm nment - July ACBWR Ra Field Work -

BWR Radiolo Work - Nove 004, Examin RS-TD-31319 ite Model, F ation Report, Wisconsin, Fi mmissioning DAR), Revis ation of Surf 5 MeV) and 96-003, La C racterization ement 1, Mu nt Manual (M Residual Rad

- October 19 96-006, Lud

-Agency Rad ust 2001.

5, Quality A mal Operatio 2007.

adiological C

- November ogical Chara ember 2015.

nation of Cs-96-001, Rad File No. 3870

, La Crosse B ile No. 3870 Plan and Po sion - March face Contam Alpha-Emit Crosse Boilin n Survey for ulti-Agency MARSAME dioactive 999.

dlum Model 4 diological ssurance or ns to Licens Characterizat r 2015.

acterization 137 Global dionuclides o 05-001 - Au Boiling Wat 05-008, Janu ost Shutdown h 2014.

mination, Bet tters - Augu ng E) -

44-se tion of ugust ter ary n

ta-ust

La Cross License T Revision Survey Unit ID #

L101010 L101010 L101010 L101010 L201110 L201110 L301210 L301210 L301210 L401210 L401210 L401210 L401210 L401210 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Survey 01 Reactor Stack G 02 Turbine Diesel G 03 LSA Bu 04 North L 01 LACBW Crib Ho 02 G-3 Cri Dischar 01 North E 02 Transm 09 Plant A 03 G-3 Co 05 Coal Pi 06 Capped 07 Ground 08 Hwy 35 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-1 y Unit Descr LA r Building, W Grounds e Building, T Generator Bu uilding, Mai LSE Grounds WR Adminis ouse, Wareh ib House, LA rge Line, Are End of Licen mission Switc Access, ISFSI al Plant Gro le Grounds d Ash Impou ds East of Hi 5/Railroad R r

LACBW ription ACBWR Sit WTB, WGTV Turbine Offi uilding Grou ntenance Ea s

LSE Buff stration Buil ouse Ground ACBWR Cir ea South of L Clas nsed Site chyard Area I Haul Road Non-Im ounds undment Gro ghway 35 Right of Way 2-39 WR Open L te Enclosure V, Ventilatio ce Building, unds at Shack Gro fer Zone Gro lding, LACB ds rc. Water LSE Fence ss 3 Grounds d Grounds mpacted Grou ounds y Grounds Land Survey Cl e Grounds on

, 1B ounds ounds BWR s

unds No No No No No y Units Initial lassification Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted on-Impacted n

Approxim Survey U Area (m 1,992 2,315 1,749 2,387 7,211 6,785 24,04 11,71 31,01 d

66,86 d

82,89 d

111,89 d

81,25 d

9,444 mate Unit m2) 2 5

9 7

1 5

2 1

2 9

4 99 4

4

La Cross License T Revision Surve B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B101 B201 B201 B201 B201 B201 B201 B301 B301 B301 B301 se Boiling W Termination n 0 ey Unit 10001 10002 10003 10004 10005 10006 10007 10008 10009 10101 10102 10103 10104 10105 10106 12101 12102 12103 12104 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-2 Sur Wa LAC W

LACBWR LACBWR M

L LACBW LA LA LA Ba Transmissi Barg r

LACBW rvey Area D Reactor Bu aste Treatmen CBWR Venti Waste Gas Ta R Turbine Bld Bldg 1B Diesel G LSA Buil Maintenance E Pipe Tun ACBWR Cr G-3 Crib H WR Administ ACBWR War ACBWR War ACBWR War ack-up Contr ion Sub-Stat G-1 Crib H ge Washing B 2-40 WR Structu Description uilding nt Building ilation Stack ank Vault dg./Turbine Generator Str lding Eat Shack nnel rib House House tration Build rehouse #1 rehouse #2 rehouse #3 rol Center tion Switch H House Break Room ural Survey k

Office ructure ding House m

y Units Class Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl sification lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3

La Cross License T Revision G-3 R G-3 S G-3 C G-3 T G-3 E G-3 C G-3 C G-4 W G-3 L G-3 L G-3 C G-3 C G-3 V G-3 T G-3 B G-3 F G-3 F G-3 W G-3 S G-3 S

  1. 6 W se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table Reclaim Buil Stock Out Tr Coal Unload Transfer Tow Electrical Ro Crusher Tow Conveyor #6 Warehouse a LRAPB Buil Lime Silo El CAT Buildin Coal Plant Vehicle Stora Train Shed Bottom Ash Fly Ash Silo Fly Ash Elec Waste Silo Surge Tank Settling Tank Well House Water Reactor Plan e 2-2 (contin lding ransfer Build ing Tower wer A oom wer 6 (2) and Electrica lding ectrical Buil ng age Building Dewatering ctrical Buildi k

r nued)

Non Imp ding al Room lding g

Buildings ing 2-41 LACBWR pacted Struc G-3 An G-3 Bo G-3 Ex G-3 Ga G-3 Su G-3 Su G-3 Li G-3 W G-3 Ac G-3 As G-3 Ba G-3 Fl

  1. 7 We G-3 Co G-3 Sa G-3 St G-3 Gr G-3 As Main P S03 Ta Structural ctures nnex Buildin oiler Fuel Oi xplosive Gas as Room ub Station Sh ub Station Sh ime Storage Weigh Station ctive Reclaim sh Coordina ag Houses (5 ammable St ll House oal Scale ample Buildi tock Out Tra rid Shed sh handling Pollution Co ank Building Survey Uni ng il Pump Bui s Storage Ro hed hed Silo n

m Buildings ators Office

5) torage Shed ing ansfer Buildi Blower Buil ontrol Electri g

its lding oom s/ Tunnel ing lding ical Buildingg

La Cross License T Revision Dete Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Ludlum Gamma System a

Bas Stan b

Fun se Boiling W Termination n 0 ector Model m 44-9 m 43-68 mo m 43-68 mo m 43-93 mo m 43-89 mo m 43-93 mo m 43-89 mo m 44-10 m 43-37 m 43-10-1 a Spectroscop ed on 1-minute ndard, ISO 750 nctional equival Water Reactor Plan Table 2-3 l b Me Ludl ode Ludl ode Ludl ode ode Ludl ode ode Ludl Ludl Ludl Ludl py e count time; a 03-1 (20).

lent instrument r

Instrume eter Model lum 3 lum 2350-1 lum 2350-1 lum 2360 lum 2360 lum 2350-1 lum 2350-1 lum 2929 N/A and default valu tation may be u 2-42 ent Types a Applica sca static &

stat static &

stat sca sca and/

smea Anal ues for surface used and Nomina ation Ty (dp an 1,0

& scan 1,8 tic

& scan 1,8 2,0 tic an 3.5 6.5 an 2,0 or ar lysis efficiencies (

al MDCs Typical Dete MDCscan pm/100cm2) 000 to 2,000 800 to 2,000 N/A 800 to 2,000 000 to 2,200 N/A 5 pCi/g 60Co 5 pCi/g 137Cs 000 to 2,200 N/A N/A s) as specified ction Sensit

)

MDCst (dpm/10 0

N/A 0

600 to 80 to 0

0 800 to 800 to 90 to 1 90 to 1 o

s N/A 0

N/A

~0.10 p for Co-6 Cs-13 in Internationa tivity tatic a

0cm2)

A 700 90 900 900 100 100 A

A

-15

-80 pCi/g 60 and 37 al

La Cross License T Revision Analysis /

Gamma Radionucli Isotopic N (Np-237)

Isotopic Pl (Pu-238/23 Isotopic Th (Th-228/23 Isotopic Ur (U-234/235 Isotopic Cu (Cm-243/2 Isotopic Am (Am-241/2 C-14 Tritium Sr-90 Pu-241 Tc-99 Gross Alph Fe-55 Ni-63 Ni-59 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-4 Analytes ides G

eptunium A

lutonium 39/240)

A horium 30/232)

A ranium 5/238)

A urium 244)

A mericium 243)

A LS LS G

LS LS ha / Beta G

LS LS LS Water Reactor Plan Off-Site Technique Gamma Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec SC SC GFPC SC SC GFPC SC SC SC r

e Laboratory DOE E

< 0.1pC DOE E

< 0.04 p DOE E

< 0.05 p DOE E

< 0.05 p DOE E

< 0.06 p DOE E

< 0.03 p DOE E

< 0.04 p EPA EE

< 5.0 pC EPA 90

< 10.0 p DOE E

< 1.0 pC DOE E

< 10.0 p DOE E

< 2.0 pC DOE E

< 10.0 p DOE E

< 2.0 pC DOE E

< 50.0 p 2-43 y Analytica Soils (pCi/

EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g ERF C-01 Ci/g 06.0 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/

EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g EML HASL 300 Ci/g EML HASL 300 pCi/g al Methods a Method and

/g) 0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 (SRW01) 0 (SRW01) and Typical d Sensitivity Wat EPA Method 10.0 pCi/L EML Pu-02 M 1.0 pCi/L ENIC Modifi 50.0 pCi/L EPA 906.0 300.0 pCi/L EICHROM M 2.0 pCi/L EML Pu-01 50.0 pCi/L EICHROM T 15.0 pCi/L EPA 900.0 5.0 pCi/L EML Fe-01 M 100.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M 15.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M 100.0 pCi/L l MDCs ter (pCi/L) 901.1 Modified ied Modified Metho Tc-01 Modified Modified Modified od

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Ta Location Area West o Area South Area North Area at G-3 Area Outsid Area at G-3 33 miles So Pedretti Far Radio Towe Junction of East of Stod Water Reactor Plan able 2-5 of #2 Wareh of Parking L of LACBW Gas Silo de G-3 Offic Outfall uth at Bad A m Substation er Northeast Hwy O and ddard at Hwy r

2005 Dairy (on L house Lot R Admin Bu es (off L Axe Boat Lan n East of LA of LACBW Hwy K y O Junction 2-44 yland Backg Licensed Site uilding Licensed Site nding ACBWR WR n

ground Stud Co-60 (pCi/g) e)

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC e) 0.023

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC

<MDC dy for Soils Cs-(pC 0.0 0.0 0.

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.

0.0

-137 Ci/g) 077 026 149 038 076 017 381 227 035 188 065

La Cross License T Revision T

Conditio Undisturb Disturbed Undisturb Disturbed se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-6 on and Dept bed d

bed d

Water Reactor Plan Investiga th D

Non r

ative Levels Meas Drainage Ar 0.

0.

n-Drainage 0.

0.

2-45 for Cs-137 sured Rang (pCi/g) eas Surface 00 to 2.80 00 to 1.67 Areas Surfa 23 to 0.66 27 to 0.34 Based on B ge R e 0-10 cm ace 0-10 cm

Background

Range for 95 (p

0.45 0.35 m

0.15 0.23 d Studies 5% Distribu pCi/g) 5 to 3.63 5 to 2.86 5 to 0.77 to 0.42 ution

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2

  • L Water Reactor Plan

-7 Initia Radio H

C Fe N

Co N

Sr Nb Tc Cs Eu Eu Eu Np Pu Pu Pu Pu Am Cm-24 Listed half life i r

al Suite of L onuclide H-3 C-14 e-55 i-59 o-60 i-63 r-90 b-94 c-99

-137 u-152 u-154 u-155 p-237 u-238 u-239 u-240 u-241 m-241 43/244*

is the shortest h 2-46 LACBWR S Ha half life for the Site-Specific alf Life (Yea 1.24E+01 5.73E+03 2.70E+00 7.50E+04 5.27E+00 9.60E+01 2.91E+01 2.03E+04 2.13E+05 3.00E+01 1.33E+01 8.80E+00 4.76E+00 2.14E+06 8.78E+01 2.41E+04 6.60E+03 1.44E+01 4.32E+02 1.81E+01 e radionuclides c Radionucl ars) s in the pair lides

L L

R S

S M

M M

M S

S M

M M

M S

A M

M M

M S

M M

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Survey Unit Surface Area Description Surface Soil

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Subsurface Soil

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Asphalt

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Surface Scans

% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm) ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-8 Survey Unit 66,869 m2 G-3 Coal Plan Co-60 3

0 0.070 0.075 0.078 0.057 0.011 Co-60 4

0 0.060 0.056 0.084 0.047 0.016 Co-60 None Taken 1%

5,550 6,700 or Non-Impact t L4012103 nt Grounds Cs-137 3

1 0.082 0.083 0.092 0.071 0.011 Cs-137 4

1 0.048 0.038 0.081 0.036 0.022 Cs-137 ed Open Land Survey Unit 82,894 m2 Coal Pile Grou Co-60 3

0 0.071 0.072 0.084 0.057 0.014 Co-60 3

0 0.061 0.063 0.068 0.052 0.008 Co-60 None Taken 1%

5,050 8,800 2-47 Survey Units -

L4012105 1

nds C

G Cs-137 3

1 0.061 0.060 0.068 0.055 0.006 Cs-137 3

1 0.042 0.040 0.056 0.030 0.013 Cs-137 1

8 1

- Characterizat Survey Unit L 111,899 m2 Capped Ash Im Grounds Co-60 3

0 0.082 0.084 0.090 0.072 0.009 Co-60 4

0 0.081 0.083 0.102 0.056 0.021 Co-60 2

0 0.073 0.073 0.082 0.065 0.012 1%

8,340 12,000 tion Survey Su L4012106 8

mpoundment G H

Cs-137 3

2 0.100 0.099 0.121 0.079 0.021 Cs-137 4

2 0.088 0.084 0.130 0.054 0.037 Cs-137 2

0 0.062 0.062 0.084 0.040 0.031 ummary Survey Unit L 81,254m2 Grounds East of Highway 35 Co-60 3

0 0.080 0.079 0.089 0.072 0.009 Co-60 3

0 0.081 0.069 0.106 0.068 0.022 Co-60 None Tak 1%

8,000 9,080 L4012107 f

Cs-137 3

3 0.264 0.263 0.463 0.065 0.199 Cs-137 3

2 0.068 0.057 0.091 0.056 0.020 Cs-137 ken

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Tabl ng Water React ation Plan le 2-8 (continue S

S M

M M

M SD S

M M

M M

SD A

M M

M M

SD S

M M

or ed)

Non-I urvey Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D ubsurface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D Asphalt of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D urface Scans

% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm)

Impacted Open Survey Unit 9,444 m2 Hwy 35/Railro Way Grounds Co-60 3

0 0.079 0.075 0.095 0.068 0.014 Co-60 3

0 0.086 0.092 0.107 0.060 0.024 Co-60 None Taken 1%

8,124 9,200 2-48 n Land Survey L4012108 1

ad Right of B A

Cs-137 3

2 0.119 0.108 0.156 0.093 0.033 Cs-137 3

2 0.189 0.091 0.409 0.067 0.191 Cs-137 Units - Chara Survey Unit L 100 m2 Background Soi Area (inside L40 Co-60 17 0

0.087 0.086 0.101 0.077 0.007 Co-60 None Ta Co-60 None Ta No Scanning P acterization Sur L4012109 ils Test 012108)

Cs-137 17 17 0.160 0.161 0.268 0.059 0.059 Cs-137 aken Cs-137 aken Performed rvey Summaryy

L L

R R

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

a b

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-Genoa Coal P L3012105-CR-GS-002-L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S a

Bold values b

Survey units ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C

SB 4.390 1

SS 3.570 0.

Pile

-SS 0.533 0.

SB SS SB 14.600 0.

SS 0.813 0.

SB SS 1.420 0.

SB 2.350 0.

SS 6.490 0.

indicate concentration g originally classified as tor Table 2-9 C-14 Fe-55 N

.230 3.430 1

.671 2.790 1

.675 2.130 1

.713 2.300 2

.713 3.550 2

.719 3.610 2

.705 1.920 3

.728 2.260 3

greater than MDC. Itali Class 3 at time of samp Non Impa Ni-59 Co-60 N

.470 0.026 2

.870 0.027 3

0.018

.730 0.025 2

0.026 0.030

.370 0.037 3

.560 0.037 3

0.019

.800 0.025 3

.110 0.018 4

.200 0.030 4

icized values indicate M ple acted Coal Pile Ni-63 Sr-90 N

.140 0.321 0

.380 0.391 0

0

.950 0.289 0

0 0

.950 0.348 0

.580 0.338 0

0

.940 0.293 0

.440 0.278 0

.710 0.271 0

MDC value 2-49 and Soil Samp Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.018 0.820 0

0.022 0.628 0

0.022 0

0.016 0.587 0

0.020 0

0.020 0

0.030 0.611 0

0.028 0.616 0

0.013 0

0.019 0.593 0

0.016 0.604 0

0.020 0.576 0

ples - Test Ame s-137 Pm-147 Eu 0.024 0.714 0

0.018 0.847 0

0.019 0

0.018 0.698 0

0.023 0

0.028 0

.319 1.500 0

.096 0.826 0

0.021 0

.018 1.450 0

.033 1.310 0

.182 0.770 0

erica Laborator u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.071 0.190 0

0.060 0.167 0

0.052 0.152 0

0.051 0.137 0

0.049 0.166 0

0.072 0.199 0

0.115 0.223 0

0.079 0.232 0

0.045 0.115 0

0.049 0.156 0

0.041 0.128 0

0.059 0.176 0

ry Analysis (pC u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.095 0.025 0

0.096 0.024 0

0.048 0.056 0.023 0

0.055 0.074 0.080 0.035 0

0.112 0.027 0

0.038 0.048 0.040 0

0.044 0.030 0

0.060 0.020 0

Ci/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.015 1

0.040 0.021 1

0.036 0.029 1

0.036 0.014 2

0.044 0.026 2

0.021 0.024 2

0.026 0.021 2

0.028 0.029 2

u-241 Am-241 A

1.730 0.032 0

1.650 0.025 0

0.041 1.670 0.018 0

0.048 0.061 2.550 0.019 0

2.740 0.025 0

0.034 2.580 0.020 0

2.670 0.017 0

2.740 0.015 0

Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.010 0.024 0.019 0.025 0.006 0.034 0.006 0.013 0.019 0.035 0.006 0.036 0.017 0.024 0.015

L L

R S

S M

M M

M S

S M

M M

M S

A M

M M

M S

S M

M a

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Survey Unit Surface Area Description Surface Soil

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Subsurface Soil

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Asphalt

  1. of Samples
  1. >CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

SD Surface Scans

% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm) a MDC va ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-10 Survey Unit 1,992 m2 Reactor Buil WGTV, Vent Grounds Co-60 12 2

0.080 0.058 0.287 0.048 0.066 Co-60 18 0

0.078 0.052 0.516 0.047 0.109 None Taken No Scanning P alue used for ana or Impacted Cla t L1010101 lding, WTB, tilation Stack Cs-137 12 12 0.215 0.100 1.070 0.032 0.296 Cs-137 18 8

0.066 0.054 0.161 0.033 0.035 Performed alytical results l ass 1 Open Land Survey Unit 2,315 m2 Turbine, Office Generator Buil Grounds Co-60 2

0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.044 0.007 Co-60 22 0

0.058 0.058 0.080 0.043 0.010 None Taken No Scanning P less than MDC.

2-50 d Survey Units L1010102 1

e, Diesel ding L

M G

Cs-137 2

0 0.050 0.050 0.051 0.050 0.001 Cs-137 22 4

0.064 0.065 0.130 0.044 0.017 N

erformed N

s - Characteriz Survey Unit L 1,749 m2 LSA Building, Maintenance Ea Grounds Co-60 7

0 0.059 0.050 0.099 0.048 0.019 Co-60 25 0

0.046 0.046 0.055 0.025 0.005 None Taken No Scanning Pe zation Survey S L1010103 2

at Shack N

Cs-137 7

1 0.069 0.054 0.161 0.048 0.041 Cs-137 25 0

0.049 0.049 0.054 0.042 0.003 erformed Summary Survey Unit L 2,387 m2 North LSE Grou Co-60 1

0 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 N/A Co-60 14 0

0.048 0.048 0.050 0.043 0.002 Co-60 10 0

0.053 0.054 0.062 0.042 0.006 No Scanning Pe L1010104 unds Cs-137 1

0 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 N/A Cs-137 14 3

0.041 0.042 0.051 0.027 0.009 Cs-137 10 1

0.051 0.053 0.057 0.037 0.006 erformed

L L

R R

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

a La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L1010101-CJ-GS-002-S L1010101-CJ-GS-009-S L1010101-CJ-GS-010-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010102-CJ-FC-001-C L1010102-CJ-GS-013-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-CJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-SL-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CR-PA-007-L1010104-QQ-PA-001-L1010104-QR-GS-001-a Bold values ng Water React ation Plan T

H-3 C

SS SS SS SB 0.364 0

SS 0.441 0.

SB 0.377 0.

SS 1.380 0.

CV 1.710 0.

SB SB 8.740 0.

SS SB 24.700 0.

SB SM 0.354 0

SB 3.260 0.

SS SB 0.649 0.

SS SB 0.654 0.

SS SB

-AV

-AV

-SB indicate concentration g tor Table 2-11 C

C-14 Fe-55 N

.896 2.430 1

.676 2.190 1

.679 2.150 1

.677 4.190 2

.727 1.650 2

.726 2.120 2

.715 2.230 2

.453 0.689 0

.715 1.830 2

.702 2.100 2

.717 2.340 2

greater than MDC. Itali lass 1 Concrete Ni-59 Co-60 N

0.024 0.040 0.286

.850 0.024 3

.900 0.018 3

.750 0.017 2

.010 0.015 3

.630 0.106 3

0.030

.620 0.015 4

0.022

.760 0.021 3

0.011 0.711 0.136 1

.850 0.017 4

0.025

.620 0.014 3

0.019

.630 0.012 3

0.023 0.015 0.021 0.025 0.017 icized values indicate M e, Asphalt, Sed Ni-63 Sr-90 N

0 0

0

.040 0.335 0

.040 0.440 0

.930 0.338 0

.320 0.357 0

.920 0.292 0

0

.000 0.310 0

0

.920 0.316 0

0

.090 0.132 0

.240 0.333 0

0

.710 0.325 0

0

.660 0.300 0

0 0

0 0

0 MDC value.

2-51 diment and Soil Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.020 0

0.020 0

0.025 0

0.015 0.579 0

0.012 0.587 0

0.011 0.620 0

0.010 0.521 0

0.022 0.536 0

0.016 0

0.011 0.539 0

0.015 0

0.014 0.537 0

0.017 0

0.018 0.432 0

0.011 0.606 0

0.015 0

0.012 0.645 0

0.017 0

0.009 0.557 0

0.019 0

0.008 0

0.014 0

0.025 0

0.011 0

l Samples - Tes s-137 Pm-147 Eu

.233 0

.185 0

.413 0

0.020 0.800 0

.147 3.170 0

.149 0.772 0

.059 0.978 0

.352 1.290 0

0.021 0

0.012 0.961 0

0.018 0

0.016 0.722 0

0.021 0

.136 0.360 0

0.015 0.740 0

0.020 0

0.012 0.838 0

0.017 0

0.011 0.713 0

.091 0

0.013 0

0.016 0

0.028 0

0.012 0

st America Lab u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.056 0.161 0

0.056 0.181 0

0.062 0.247 0

0.050 0.143 0

0.034 0.112 0

0.040 0.109 0

0.033 0.096 0

0.061 0.239 0

0.044 0.170 0

0.030 0.101 0

0.036 0.113 0

0.043 0.139 0

0.044 0.181 0

0.054 0.199 0

0.036 0.117 0

0.046 0.174 0

0.029 0.103 0

0.040 0.139 0

0.029 0.092 0

0.057 0.186 0

0.032 0.078 0

0.042 0.141 0

0.058 0.218 0

0.038 0.132 0

boratory Analy u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.066 0.050 0.057 0.044 0.019 0

0.044 0.006 0

0.040 0.019 0

0.036 0.016 0

0.062 0.029 0

0.041 0.028 0.028 0

0.042 0.042 0.032 0

0.046 0.049 0.018 0

0.039 0.026 0

0.047 0.034 0.020 0

0.045 0.034 0.040 0

0.063 0.036 0.044 0.061 0.032 ysis (pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.023 1

0.039 0.023 1

0.041 0.022 1

0.040 0.016 2

0.041 0.028 2

0.040 0.026 2

0.042 0.029 2

0.015 0.015 0

0.029 0.017 1

0.034 0.024 2

0.028 0.028 2

u-241 Am-241 A

0.058 0.042 0.051 1.970 0.015 0

1.830 0.016 0

1.950 0.017 0

2.090 0.020 0

2.490 0.018 0

0.036 2.780 0.015 0

0.039 2.660 0.015 0

0.044 0.867 0.008 0

1.430 0.009 0

0.043 2.570 0.018 0

0.024 2.470 0.018 0

0.052 0.034 0.040 0.050 0.032 Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.023 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.029 0.014 0.017 0.022 0.019 0.021 0.020 0.021 0.021 0.018 0.019 0.008 0.024 0.005 0.024 0.014 0.022 0.005

La Cross License T Revision Tabl Sur Sur

  1. of
  1. >C Mea Med Max Min SD Sub
  1. of
  1. >C Mea Med Max Min SD Asp
  1. of
  1. >C Mea Med Max Min SD Sur

% S Mea Max se Boiling W Termination n 0 le 2-12 Im rvey Unit Surface Area Description rface Soil f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) bsurface Soil f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) phalt f Samples CL an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) rface Scans Scanned an Scan (cpm) x Scan (cpm)

Water Reactor Plan mpacted Cla Sur 7,211 m2 LACBWR

Building, House, W Co-60 13 0

0.073 0.077 0.106 0.053 0.016 Co-60 16 1

0.052 0.046 0.112 0.040 0.018 Co-60 6

0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.002 50%

7,500 to 8,0 11,500 to 12 r

ass 2 Open L S

rvey Unit L201 R

Adm LACBW Warehouse Gr 0

3 7

6 3

6 0

2 6

2 0

8 0

4 7

2 00 2,000 2-52 Land Surve Summary 11101 ministration WR Crib rounds Cs-137 13 8

0.090 0.100 0.139 0.041 0.030 Cs-137 16 2

0.049 0.048 0.088 0.034 0.012 Cs-137 6

0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.003 ey Units - C Sur 6,785 m2 G-3 Crib Circ. Wa Area Sout Co-60 10 0

0.064 0.064 0.081 0.052 0.009 Co-60 7

0 0.049 0.048 0.055 0.042 0.004 Co-60 6

0 0.056 0.057 0.059 0.049 0.003 1

Characteriza rvey Unit L201 b House, ater Discha th of LSE Fe 0

4 4

2 9

0 9

8 5

2 4

0 6

7 9

9 3

50%

7,500 to 8,000 11,500 to 12,00 ation Surve 11102 LACBWR arge Line, ence Cs-137 10 6

0.065 0.054 0.200 0.030 0.049 Cs-137 7

2 0.038 0.033 0.052 0.029 0.009 Cs-137 6

3 0.048 0.051 0.055 0.009 0.008 0

00 ey

L L

R R

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L a

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L2011101-CJ-GS-001-S L2011101-CR-PA-003-L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QQ-GS-001-L2011101-QQ-GS-001-L2011101-QQ-GS-002-L2011101-QQ-PA-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-001-L2011102-QQ-GS-002-L2011102-QQ-PA-001-a Bold val ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C

SM

-AV SB 0.518 0.

SM 2.040 0.

SS

-SB

-SS 11.810 0.

-SB 2.500 0.

-AV

-SB 1.370 1

-SS 0.533 0.

-SB 0.525 0.

-AV lues indicate con tor Table 2 C-14 Fe-55 N

.727 2.290 2

.707 2.240 2

.726 2.590 2

.731 1.940 2

.560 2.260 3

.713 2.330 2

.702 3.890 2

ncentration grea 2-13 Class 2 Ni-59 Co-60 N

0.096 0.023

.660 0.016 4

.950 0.049 4

0.012 0.017

.600 0.035 3

.680 0.017 3

0.022

.040 0.007 4

.820 0.019 4

.880 0.031 3

0.027 ater than MDC.

Asphalt, Sedim Ni-63 Sr-90 N

0 0

.030 0.273 0

.140 0.523 0

0 0

.720 0.255 0

.870 0.314 0

0

.390 0.291 0

.300 0.361 0

.950 0.327 0

0 Italicized value 2-53 ment and Soil S Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.011 0

0.016 0

0.014 0.643 0

0.018 0.585 0

0.020 0

0.012 0

0.035 0.532 0

0.014 0.616 0

0.015 0

0.018 0.537 0

0.014 0.595 0

0.016 0.568 0

0.017 0

es indicate MDC Samples - Test s-137 Pm-147 Eu

.137 0

0.017 0

0.015 0.705 0

.107 0.615 0

.080 0

0.013 0

.103 0.779 0

0.016 0.697 0

0.015 0

0.021 0.672 0

0.014 0.772 0

0.018 0.717 0

0.018 0

C value.

America Labo u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.041 0.098 0

0.039 0.131 0

0.033 0.108 0

0.048 0.178 0

0.060 0.188 0

0.040 0.127 0

0.097 0.205 0

0.037 0.119 0

0.046 0.135 0

0.044 0.173 0

0.039 0.111 0

0.052 0.183 0

0.051 0.142 0

oratory Analysi u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.033 0.039 0.040 0.022 0

0.049 0.026 0

0.091 0.037 0.102 0.023 0

0.041 0.019 0

0.042 0.055 0.031 0

0.045 0.017 0

0.051 0.022 0

0.038 is u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.028 0.025 2

0.045 0.021 3

0.037 0.024 2

0.039 0.016 2

0.026 0.018 2

0.036 0.026 2

0.028 0.020 1

u-241 Am-241 A

0.031 0.038 2.470 0.015 0

3.100 0.037 0

0.042 0.031 2.800 0.019 0

2.920 0.020 0

0.040 2.680 0.029 0

2.880 0.026 0

1.710 0.010 0

0.036 Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.019 0.036 0.034 0.015 0.015 0.028 0.016 0.028 0.024 0.034 0.021 0.028 0.006

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 S

S M

M M

M S

S M

M M

M S

C M

M M

M S

S M

M ng Water React ation Plan Table 2-14 urvey Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D ubsurface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D Concrete/Asphalt of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

Median (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

Min (pCi/g)

D urface Scans

% Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm) or Impacted Cla Survey Unit 24,042 m2 North End of Lic Co-60 3

0 0.070 0.076 0.077 0.058 0.011 Co-60 3

0 0.051 0.053 0.054 0.046 0.004 Co-60 3

0 0.031 0.031 0.035 0.028 0.003 1%

9,000 10,000 ass 3 Open Land t L3012101 censed Site Cs-137 3

0 0.073 0.072 0.083 0.065 0.009 Cs-137 3

0 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.051 0.001 Cs-137 3

0 0.029 0.027 0.033 0.026 0.004 2-54 d Survey Units Survey Unit 11,711 m2 Transmission Swi Co-60 None T Co-60 None T Co-60 None Taken No Scanning s - Characteriz L3012102 3

tchyard Area P

G Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Performed zation Survey S Survey Unit L 31,012 m2 Plant Access, ISF Grounds Co-60 5

0 0.063 0.064 0.078 0.053 0.010 Co-60 4

0 0.072 0.072 0.100 0.046 0.023 Co-60 7

0 0.062 0.055 0.080 0.047 0.013 1%

5,890 6,400 Summary L3012109 SI Haul Road Cs-137 5

5 0.152 0.143 0.267 0.075 0.078 Cs-137 4

0 0.066 0.059 0.101 0.045 0.025 Cs-137 7

0 0.059 0.052 0.079 0.028 0.019 0

0

L L

R R

L L

L L

L L

L L

L L

L a

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012101-CR-GC-001-L3012101-CR-GC-002-L3012101-CR-GC-003-L3012101-CR-GS-003-L3012101-QQ-GS-001-L3012101-QQ-GS-001-L3012101-QQ-SL-001-L3012104-CR-GS-002-L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S a

Bold values ng Water React ation Plan H-3 C

-CV

-CV

-CV 0.

-SS

-SB 18.400 0.

-SS 15.500 0.

-SM 0.364 0.

-SM SB 2.160 0.

SM 2.890 0.

SS 2.190 0.

indicate concentration g tor Table 2-15 C-14 Fe-55 N

.669 2.180 2

.717 2.390 2

.708 2.330 2

.342 2.710 0

.670 1.950 1

.672 2.720 1

.676 4.240 1

greater than MDC. Itali 5

Class 3 Asp Ni-59 Co-60 N

0.028 0.035

.020 0.031 3

0.025

.870 0.016 5

.660 0.020 3

0.739 0.022 1

0.015

.750 0.021 3

.990 0.037 3

.880 0.029 3

icized values indicate M phalt, Sediment Ni-63 Sr-90 N

0 0

.590 0.374 0

0

.640 0.309 0

.890 0.295 0

.090 0.152 0

0

.060 0.325 0

.500 0.298 0

.300 0.329 0

MDC value 2-55 t and Soil Samp Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs 0.030 0

0.026 0

0.027 0.521 0

0.017 0

0.014 0.550 0

0.017 0.603 0

0.017 0.360 0

0.013 0

0.018 0.469 0

0.020 0.651 0

0.020 0.631 0

ples - Test Am s-137 Pm-147 Eu 0.026 0

0.033 0

0.027 1.480 0

.113 0

0.015 0.899 0

.059 1.090 0

0.020 0.333 0

.066 0

0.025 0.818 0

.094 0.818 0

.138 0.667 0

merica Laborato u-152 Eu-154 Eu 0.043 0.221 0

0.062 0.271 0

0.056 0.249 0

0.052 0.157 0

0.036 0.128 0

0.047 0.116 0

0.042 0.153 0

0.035 0.128 0

0.053 0.160 0

0.074 0.217 0

0.068 0.181 0

ory Analysis (p u-155 Np-237 Pu 0.059 0.056 0.069 0.025 0

0.059 0.036 0.039 0

0.054 0.028 0

0.034 0.009 0

0.047 0.054 0.022 0

0.071 0.006 0

0.080 0.020 0

pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 Pu 0.046 0.018 1

0.035 0.022 2

0.028 0.022 2

0.016 0.013 0

0.027 0.021 1

0.031 0.017 1

0.043 0.026 1

u-241 Am-241 A

0.053 0.055 1.690 0.019 0

0.052 2.590 0.023 0

2.640 0.019 0

0.797 0.009 0

0.036 1.610 0.016 0

1.560 0.016 0

1.580 0.019 0

Am-243 Cm-243/244 0.021 0.006 0.029 0.027 0.021 0.006 0.009 0.011 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.019 0.021

La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 T

B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.950

-0.162 9.130 0.000 11.500 39.300 6.910

-0.120 0.024 7500 2.580 0.266 0.369 0.009 0.176 0.132 0.902 0.407 0.028 0.0579 B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 7.240

-0.492 9.450 0.000 57.700 202.000 34.500 0.191

-0.189 614.000 0.768 0.335

-0.429 0.000 0.528 0.491 7.470 1.450 0.052 0.0879 Water Reactor Plan Table 2-16 CJ-FC-001-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.590 1

1.400 0

16.000 7

0.254 0

0.377 1

0.402 4

0.043 0

0.312 0

0.566 0

7.090 78 9.020 5

2.410 0

4.440 1

0.042 0

0.056 0

0.048 0

2.700 1

0.048 0

0.046 0

0.0302 0.

CJ-FC-003-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.360 1

1.460 0

9.040 4

0.365 0

0.333 5

0.593 21 0.040 3

0.392 0

0.586 0

0.732 64 2.870 1

5.460 0

1.510 0

0.041 0

0.058 0

0.030 0

2.640 2

0.047 0

0.027 0

0.0408 0.

r Concrete 0-1/2 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.350 9

.793

-0

.880 10

.325 0

.250 0

.110 3

.680 0

.189 0

.330 0

1.000 9

.230

-0

.398 0

.140 0

.021

-0

.065

-0

.055

-0

.660

-1

.107 0

.030 0

0371

-0 0-1/2 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.580 12

.806

-0

.950 6

.806 0

.880 0

1.100 2

.330 0

.203

-0

.330

-0 4.000 2

.300 0

.536 0

.914

-0

.016

-0

.111

-0

.104

-0

.160

-1

.250 0

.033 0

0496 0.

2-56 Core Isotop B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

9.720 1.56 0.346 1.44 0.400 21.3 0.000 0.26 0.082 0.16 3.850 0.42 0.162 0.05 0.001 0.13 0.076 0.52 9.660 0.15 0.039 0.51 0.025 1.26 0.071 0.37 0.002 0.04 0.017 0.06 0.006 0.04 1.510 2.50 0.011 0.03 0.014 0.03

.0081 0.04 B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

2.600 1.57 0.566 1.39 6.160 14.3 0.000 0.25 0.435 0.05 2.990 0.40 0.304 0.05 0.001 0.15 0.129 0.59 2.450 0.11 0.045 0.34 0.179 1.02 0.007 0.28 0.010 0.05 0.005 0.06 0.004 0.04 1.320 2.66 0.018 0.03 0.009 0.03

.0000 0.01 pic Analysis C-001-CV 1/2-1 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 60 1.950 40 0.806 300 10.200 64 0.151 68 0.078 25 0.474 51 0.041 39 0.078 26 0.310 52 1.100 11 0.055 60 0.171 76 0.118 45 0.017 66 0.026 49 0.018 00 1.360 37 0.020 30 0.019 478 0.0094 C-003-CV 1/2-1 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 70 2.240 90 0.765 300 6.960 57 0.157 57 0.096 00 0.392 51 0.052 53 0.086 96 0.339 13 0.348 46 0.154 20 0.383 82 0.164 51 0.018 64 0.029 47 0.017 60 1.480 38 0.024 30 0.016 68 0.0047 s Results B1001 Result (pCi/g) 3.640

-0.270 0

11.300 0.000 0.800 4.860 11.600

-0.017

-0.104 450.00 0.173

-0.008 0.145

-0.010 0.575 0.715 13.200 0.550

-0.036 4

0.1540 B1001 Result (pCi/g) 4.490

-0.555 7.600 0.000 28.100 88.300 11.000

-0.016 0.153 213.00 0.162 0.557 0.108

-0.020 0.413 0.336

-7.720 0.614 0.052 7

-0.0547 101-CJ-FC-002 t

MDC (pCi/g) 1.620 0

1.410 0

9.950 0.289 0.117 0.492 0

0.046 7

0.165 4

0.564 0

0.597 2.150 8

1.460 0.837 0

0.042 0.617 0.466 0

23.500 0.401 6

0.433 0

0.4670 101-CJ-FC-004 t

MDC (pCi/g) 1.590 5

1.450 7.070 0.276 0

0.190 0

0.467 0

0.045 6

0.264 0.592 0

0.439 1.570 3.070 0.850 0

0.060 0.426 0.325 0

26.000 0.441 0.292 7

0.4320

-CV 0-1/2

(pCi/g) 1.330 0.794 5.540 0.183 0.172 0.581 1.130 0.095 0.322 46.900 0.924 0.820 0.503 0.009 0.436 0.413 15.100 0.419 0.140 0.2600

-CV 0-1/2

(pCi/g) 1.420 0.795 4.040 0.467 2.950 9.200 1.070 0.155 0.352 22.200 0.611 0.863 0.138 0.020 0.320 0.265 14.400 0.436 0.136 0.0776

La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 2.960

-0.077 8.070 2.590 73.900 221.000 32.800

-0.089 0.178 65.700 0.395 0.637 0.011 0.005 0.706 0.489 9.090 1.590 0.048 0.1160 B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.590

-0.246 6.030 0.000

-0.026 2.310 0.146 0.019 0.024 1.410 0.021 0.055 0.003 0.003

-0.004 0.035

-1.890 0.006

-0.002

-0.0036 Water Reactor Plan

-16 (continu CJ-FC-005-CV 0 MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.520 1

1.410 0

9.770 5

0.267 0

0.372 7

0.427 23 0.043 3

0.531 0

0.562 0

0.569 6

1.240 0

5.650 0

0.699 0

0.015 0

0.065 0

0.035 0

2.540 2

0.045 0

0.031 0

0.0443 0.

CJ-WC-006-CV MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.640 1

1.490 0

14.500 7

0.257 0

0.207 0

0.396 0

0.038 0

0.141 0

0.556 0

0.153 0

0.434 0

1.270 0

0.336 0

0.045 0

0.043 0

0.033 0

2.360 1

0.036 0

0.031 0

0.0287 0.

r ued)

Co 0-1/2 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.200 4

.810

-0

.230 8

.813 0

.510 0

3.000 4

.170 0

.317

-0

.336

-0

.970 0

.746 0

.831 0

.414 0

.010

-0

.134

-0

.106

-0

.270 0

.273 0

.034

-0 0590 0

1/2-1 R

pCi/g)

(p

.350 0

.836 0

.050 1

.147 0

.240 0

.335 2

.034 0

.060 0

.324

-0

.258 16

.113 0

.137 0

.196 0

.021 0

.016 0

.028

-0

.270

-1

.017 0

.005

-0 0052 0

2-57 oncrete Cor B1001101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

4.180 1.85 0.701 1.35 8.170 9.87 0.000 0.27 0.075 0.17 4.870 0.43 0.423 0.05 0.015 0.12 0.124 0.54 0.801 0.11 0.001 0.37 0.119 0.92 0.013 0.25 0.017 0.05 0.003 0.05 0.008 0.03 0.337 2.53 0.012 0.01 0.002 0.05

.0000 0.01 B1008101-CJ-Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

0.382 0.94 0.053 1.37 1.610 6.55 0.000 0.23 0.662 0.06 2.730 0.35 0.154 0.05 0.000 0.21 0.010 0.57 6.000 0.17 0.034 0.63 0.060 1.20 0.140 0.35 0.003 0.04 0.018 0.06 0.011 0.05 1.120 2.71 0.020 0.04 0.002 0.04

.0062 0.01 re Isotopic A C-005-CV 1/2-1 DC

i/g)

(pCi/g) 50 1.520 50 0.733 70 5.340 70 0.165 71 0.080 30 0.570 51 0.063 28 0.074 40 0.307 17 0.172 73 0.005 23 0.245 55 0.148 54 0.016 53 0.023 38 0.008 30 1.510 18 0.017 54 0.022 76 0.0049

-FC-002-CV DC

i/g)

(pCi/g) 40 0.559 70 0.794 50 3.370 34 0.151 65 0.131 53 0.355 53 0.041 11 0.066 79 0.335 77 1.780 33 0.056 00 0.239 57 0.215 48 0.022 60 0.033 54 0.019 10 1.480 42 0.027 44 0.017 87 0.0125 Analysis Re B1001 Result (pCi/g) 4.210 0.077 11.700 0.000 2.040 13.400 7.150 0.026 0.083 1490 0.031 0.128 0.737

-0.013 0.029 0.035

-1.380 0.048 0.003

-0.0053 B10 Result (pCi/g) 1.300

-0.296 6.460 0.000 0.974 4.400 0.235 0.016

-0.005 10.000 0.291 0.019 0.101

-0.024 0.042 0.008

-0.194 0.019

-0.001

-0.0056 esults 101-CJ-WC-006 t

MDC

)

(pCi/g) 1.700 1.440 0

9.320 0.263 0.047 0

0.420 0.034 0.154 0.580 0.721 3.660 1.190 1.470 0.044 0.037 0.025 2.650 0.052 0.029 3

0.0419 008101-CJ-FC-0 t

MDC

)

(pCi/g) 1.020 1.440 14.500 0.241 0.142 0.356 0.035 0.141 0.592 0

0.154 0.470 1.410 0.348 0.068 0.057 0.034 2.550 0.051 0.052 6

0.0444 6-CV 0-1/2

(pCi/g) 1.440 0.832 5.530 0.230 0.264 1.430 0.703 0.090 0.341 155.000 2.210 0.679 0.896 0.010 0.027 0.026 1.470 0.041 0.011 0.0075 003-CV

(pCi/g) 0.713 0.810 7.050 0.171 0.162 0.510 0.041 0.081 0.343 1.130 0.270 0.052 0.208 0.025 0.038 0.017 1.470 0.029 0.023 0.0080

La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B100810 Result (pCi/g) 1.200 0.077 6.520 0.000 1.390 4.260 0.216 0.001 0.043 19.800

-0.119

-0.061 0.006 0.014 0.020 0.025

-1.610 0.052

-0.004 0.0100 B1002101-C Result (pCi/g) 0.763

-0.776 3.540 0.000 0.742 3.360 2.410 0.035 0.259 3.630 0.156 0.119 0.159 0.000 0.023 0.000

-0.052 0.020 0.013 0.0048 Water Reactor Plan

-16 (continu 01-CJ-FC-004-C MDC (pCi/g)

(p 0.990 0

1.430 0

11.500 5

0.229 0

0.095 0

0.339 0

0.040 0

0.143 0

0.599 0

0.166 2

0.580 0

1.370 0

0.376 0

0.065 0

0.052 0

0.042 0

2.610 1

0.034 0

0.032 0

0.0150 0.

CJ-FC-001-CV MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.000 0

1.410 0

5.670 3

0.228 0

0.069 0

0.333 0

0.050 0

0.149 0

0.564 0

0.150 0

0.420 0

1.400 0

0.335 0

0.045 0

0.061 0

0.049 0

2.820 1

0.015 0

0.029 0

0.0143 0.

r ued)

Co CV B

R pCi/g)

(p

.685 0

.829 0

.820 15

.162 65

.255 95

.492 81

.041 99

.081 0

.350 0

.150 4

.344 0

.296 1

.220 0

.035

-0

.030 0

.028 1

.430 5

.035 3

.006 0

0142 0.

1-1.5 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.638 0

.763 0

.150 7

.159 0

.148 0

.407 5

.250 0

.066

-0

.342 0

.493 2

.236 0

.382 0

.204 0

.018

-0

.035 0

.021 0

.640

-2

.020 0

.018 0

0096 0.

2-58 oncrete Cor B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

0.820 0.98 0.505 1.41 5.400 13.8 5.500 0.31 5.000 0.42 7.000 0.47 9.800 0.04 0.098 0.47 0.113 0.56 4710 1.69 0.815 5.94

.250 5.46 0.073 2.12 0.012 0.06 0.920 0.62

.280 0.46 5.240 26.7 3.200 0.42 0.406 0.29

.2020 0.42 B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

0.094 0.91 0.372 1.38 7.770 25.0 0.000 0.25 0.872 0.13 5.730 0.38 0.106 0.04 0.034 0.14 0.032 0.52 2.440 0.14 0.125 0.38 0.271 0.95 0.099 0.32 0.007 0.05 0.004 0.06 0.009 0.04 2.090 2.70 0.017 0.04 0.029 0.02

.0059 0.03 re Isotopic A C-001-CV 0-1/2 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 85 0.637 10 0.850 800 7.430 10 8.690 20 9.600 72 85.000 45 9.600 75 0.149 64 0.333 90 491.000 40 1.410 60 1.980 20 1.280 60 0.023 20 0.511 69 0.537 700 16.200 28 0.989 96 0.310 200 0.2670 C-001-CV 1.5-2 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 17 0.512 80 0.819 000 11.400 59 0.188 38 0.161 88 0.646 41 0.032 42 0.083 28 0.308 46 0.343 83 0.195 56 0.406 26 0.196 52 0.019 61 0.030 41 0.021 00 1.460 41 0.025 29 0.026 331 0.0154 Analysis Re B1002 Result (pCi/g) 0.275

-0.018 0.547 0.000 1.010 0

5.640 0.253 0.029

-0.101 0

3.870 0.039

-0.260 0.077

-0.022 0.017

-0.005 0

-0.984 0.035

-0.018 0

-0.0046 B1002 Result (pCi/g) 1.710 15.400 0

8.960 423.00 300.00 2360 220.00

-0.350 0.792 25400 0.510 4.650 1.060 0.024 3.200 2.580 36.900 9.080 0.305 4

0.4280 esults 2101-CJ-FC-001 t

MDC (pCi/g) 0.931 8

1.440 5.510 0.245 0.149 0.367 0.053 0.102 1

0.507 0.137 0.444 0

1.480 0.272 2

0.064 0.059 5

0.042 4

2.680 0.037 8

0.054 6

0.0366 2101-CJ-FC-002 t

MDC (pCi/g) 1.180 0

1.510 5.860 0

0.446 0

0.762 0.661 0

0.052 0

0.935 0.562 0

4.140 13.700 7.170 7.370 0.042 0.497 0.287 0

24.000 0.682 0.388 0

0.5450

-CV 1/2-1

(pCi/g) 0.543 0.824 2.840 0.170 0.168 0.633 0.049 0.054 0.289 0.496 0.107 0.859 0.162 0.023 0.033 0.013 1.510 0.031 0.013 0.0066

-CV 0-1/2

(pCi/g) 0.846 2.310 3.640 55.200 30.200 245.000 21.100 0.567 0.373 2650 0.956 4.390 0.988 0.027 0.825 0.713 17.100 2.030 0.286 0.4200

La Cross License T Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 se Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-B1002101-C Result (pCi/g) 0.846 6.180 5.270 0.000 8.270 175.000 3.520

-0.041 0.165 208.000

-0.280 0.255 0.116

-0.019 0.059 0.056

-0.965 0.238 0.005 0.0018 Water Reactor Plan

-16 (continu CJ-FC-002-CV 1 MDC (pCi/g)

(p 1.120 0

1.420 1

25.300 11 0.269 0

0.114 0

0.442 18 0.047 0

0.230 0

0.522 0

0.362 21 1.580 0

1.900 0

0.864 0

0.056 0

0.064 0

0.049 0

2.970 1

0.048 0

0.060 0

0.0438 0.

r ued)

Co 1/2-1 B

R pCi/g)

(p

.716 0

.340

-0 1.400 8

.616 0

.907 8

8.300 70

.356 7

.135 0

.312 0

1.700 1

.950 0

.259 0

.205

-0

.017

-0

.046 0

.040 0

.690 1

.080 0

.028

-0 0179 0.

2-59 oncrete Cor B1002101-CJ-FC Result MD pCi/g)

(pCi/

0.836 0.96 0.405 1.44 8.430 17.0 0.000 0.33 8.570 0.14 0.600 0.54 7.000 0.05 0.038 0.21 0.062 0.54 1240 0.81 0.176 2.60 0.090 2.32 0.004 1.71 0.011 0.04 0.105 0.05 0.126 0.03

.500 2.56 0.339 0.04 0.001 0.03

.0175 0.01 re Isotopic A C-003-CV 0-1/2 DC

/g)

(pCi/g) 62 0.624 40 0.803 000 8.210 34 0.484 48 0.940 48 7.370 50 0.691 11 0.060 43 0.318 17 129.000 00 0.514 20 0.202 10 1.030 44 0.009 56 0.051 39 0.051 60 1.640 44 0.099 37 0.012 75 0.0203 Analysis Re 0

3 esults

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Tab Water Reactor Plan ble 2-17 198 We Radion Mn-Co-Co-Nb-Cs-1 Ce-1 r

83 Groundw ell-Point So nuclide

-54

-57

-60

-95 137 141 2-60 water Analy outh of Turb A

(p ysis from Te bine Buildin Activity pCi/L) 63.4 6.4 508 21.4 21.7 18.9 emporary ng

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Jun H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a

B Nov H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a

B ng Water React ation Plan e 2013 MW-20 (pCi/L 572 60 4.00 90 2.05 137 3.97 Bold values indi vember 2013 MW-20 (pCi/L 235 60 4.64 90 1.18 137 4.64 Bold values indi or Table 2 01-A MW-201-B L)

(pCi/L) 2 506 0

5.01 5

2.00 7

3.84 icate concentrati 01-A MW-201-B L)

(pCi/L) 5 150 4

3.80 8

3.73 4

1.90 icate concentrati 2-18 2013 Gr B

MW-202-A (pCi/L) 660 4.76 1.82 4.05 ion greater than B

MW-202-A (pCi/L) 257 5.26 1.18 6.54 ion greater than 2-61 roundwater M MW-202-B MW (pCi/L)

(p 484 4.51 1.43 3.91 n MDC. Italicize MW-202-B MW (pCi/L)

(p 278 5.41 1.61 4.70 n MDC. Italicize onitoring Resu W-203-A MW-2 pCi/L)

(pCi N/A 42 4.95 4.1 2.06 2.0 4.52 4.3 ed values indica W-203-A MW-2 pCi/L)

(pCi 449 23 4.43 3.8 1.87 2.4 4.41 3.9 ed values indica ults 203-B MW-204-i/L)

(pCi/L) 20 397 12 4.36 06 2.18 31 4.11 ate MDC value.

203-B MW-204-i/L)

(pCi/L) 35 193 89 4.52 40 1.18 98 4.77 ate MDC value.

-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 420 4.26 2.08 3.96

-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 171 8.24 1.51 7.92

L L

R J

G A

G B

H C

F N

C N

S N

T C

E E

E P

P 2

P A

a La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 JUNE 2014 MW-DW3 Gross Alpha 1.26E-01 Gross Beta 1.48E+0 H-3 1.05E+0 C-14 2.79E+0 Fe-55

-2.00E+0 Ni-59 1.83E+0 Co-60 1.02E+0 Ni-63

-1.78E+0 Sr-90 6.09E-01 Nb-94 4.40E-01 Tc-99

-8.28E+0 Cs-137

-5.97E-0 Eu-152 9.48E+00 Eu-154

-5.24E+0 Eu-155

-2.67E+0 Pu-238 2.83E-02 Pu-239/240

-9.61E-02 Pu-241 3.51E+0 Am-241 5.39E-02 a

Bold val ng Water React ation Plan MW-DW4 M

D 1

-1.33E-01 4.44 0

3.13E+00 1.93 2

1.59E+02 1.94 0

0.00E+00

-3.9 01

-3.12E+01

-2.6 1

3.96E+01

-4.7 0

3.94E-01 2.5 00

-6.14E+00

-7.4 1

8.99E-02 8.9 1

1.43E-01

-1.2 00

-7.37E+00

-8.2 1

-3.47E-01

-7.4 0

2.34E+00

-7.4 00 3.16E+00 1.35 00 1.46E+00

-1.5 2

-4.77E-02

-2.2 2

3.36E-02 3.1 0

2.70E+00

-8.3 2

3.42E-02 4.6 lues indicate con tor MW-DW5 MW-DW7 4E+00

-3.78E-01 3E+00 0.00E+00 4E+02 1.23E+02 97E+00

-5.08E+00 66E+01

-3.86E+01 75E+01 2.60E+01 0E+00

-2.42E+00 40E+00

-4.38E+00 99E-02 1.78E-02 26E+00 7.49E-01 26E+00

-9.36E+00 45E-01

-1.83E+00 43E+00

-5.51E+00 5E+00

-4.73E+00 54E-01

-1.07E+02 22E-02 8.22E-02 13E-02 4.07E-01 39E+00 2.62E+00 65E-03

-1.01E-02 ncentration grea Tabl MW-B11R MW B11A 0.00E+00 7.33E 3.59E+00

-2.70E 2.45E+02 1.61E+

9.06E+00 6.83E+

-3.19E+01

-3.75E

-4.16E+00 2.53E+

8.76E-01

-1.94E

-3.57E+00 0.00E+

7.34E-01 6.11E

-6.99E-01 1.53E+

-5.52E+00

-8.46E 1.24E+00 1.84E+

-9.93E-01 1.48E+

1.63E+00

-2.61E 1.60E+00

-4.47E 0.00E+00 4.09E

-2.54E-02

-3.39E

-5.72E+00 8.38E 1.22E-02 8.37E ater than MDC.

le 2-19 2014 W-AR MW-B2

-01

-2.13E+00 6

E-01 1.12E+01 4

+02 1.60E+02 1

+00 1.94E+00

-2 E+01

-9.20E+00

-4

+00

-7.13E+00 3

E+00

-1.39E+00

-1

+00

-7.94E+00 1

E-01 6.52E-01 6

+00 1.77E+00 6

E+00

-7.41E+00

-8

+00 1.37E+00 2

+00 1.07E-01 1

E+00 2.36E+00 1

E+00 1.60E+00

-3 E-02 5.40E-02 8

E-02 3.40E-02 1

E-01 0.00E+00 E-02 3.98E-03 2

Italicized value 2-62 Groundwater MW-B3 MW-200-A 6.46E-01 4.04E+00 4.14E+00 8.66E+00 1.94E+02 5.23E+01 2.05E+00 9.26E+00 4.39E+01 1.93E+01 3.15E+01

-2.18E+0 1.13E+00 1.01E+00 1.50E+00

-1.97E+0 6.12E-01 9.86E-01 6.65E-01 1.08E+00 8.10E+00 3.55E+00 2.14E+00 1.77E-01 1.42E+01 9.71E+00 1.69E+00 5.77E-01 3.17E+00

-3.63E+0 8.29E-02

-1.38E-02 1.46E-01 2.68E-02

-7.39E-01 0.00E+00 2.28E-02 1.72E-01 es indicate MDC Monitoring Re MW-200-B M

20 0

-2.26E-01 3.84 0

-1.79E+00 7.26 1

1.24E+02 7.03 0

4.84E+00 4.84 1

-4.16E+01

-3.20 1

3.32E+01

-1.6 0

-1.27E+00

-6.0 0

-4.69E+00 1.82 1

9.98E-01 6.86 0

8.47E-01 3.73 0

5.08E+00 3.92 1

-3.64E-01 3.10 0

-1.16E+01 4.15 1

5.60E-01

-2.39 0

-3.44E+00

-2.92 2

1.51E-02 5.33 2

-1.57E-02

-6.8 0

4.49E+00

-4.8 1

9.71E-01 9.46 C value.

esults (pCi/L)

MW-01-A MW-201-B 4E-01

-1.04E+00 6E+00

-1.04E+00 3E+01 1.05E+02 4E+00 4.51E+00 0E+01 1.58E+01 7E+01

-7.11E+01 04E-02 1.73E+00 2E+00

-1.91E+00 6E-02 1.02E+00 3E-01 1.80E+00 2E+00 1.17E+00 0E-01

-6.21E-01 5E+00 1.12E+01 9E+00

-2.43E+00 2E+00

-2.60E+00 3E-02

-5.02E-02 86E-03 2.36E-02 85E-01

-1.42E+00 6E-02 3.99E-03 MW-202-A MW 202-1.06E+00 4.07E-4.34E+00 1.49E+

3.36E+02 1.06E+

0.00E+00 4.70E+

-3.26E+00

-4.54E+

2.49E+01

-1.05E+

-8.91E-01 1.02E+

-1.94E+00

-3.73E+

1.12E+00 6.05E-

-3.55E-01 1.04E-3.88E-01 2.73E+

-4.64E-01 2.86E+

4.11E+00 1.08E+

-1.12E+00

-1.18E+

-1.59E+00

-3.49E+

-8.46E-03 1.48E-

-2.27E-02

-4.54E 2.20E+00 2.72E+

1.16E-01 3.92E-W-

B MW-203-A

-01 1.74E+00

-2

+00 2.27E+00 5

+02 2.79E+02 2

+00 4.54E+00 4

+01

-4.95E+01

-4

+01

-2.71E+01

-4

+00 3.48E-02

-9

+00

-3.70E+00

-3

-01 1.17E+00 8

-01 1.59E+00 1

+00 4.36E+00 4

+00 1.48E+00 1

+01

-9.59E-01 4

+00 1.93E+00

-3

+00

-4.91E+00 4

-01

-5.67E-02

-5

-02

-2.27E-02

-3

+00 4.07E+00 1

-02 2.94E-02 7

MW-203-B MW-204-A 2.29E-01 7.58E-01 5.53E+00 2.69E+00 2.79E+02 1.06E+02 4.55E+00 4.66E+00 4.96E+01

-4.03E+01 4.66E+00

-6.22E+00 9.55E-01 1.91E-01 3.80E+00 0.00E+00 8.23E-01 2.01E+00

.50E+00 2.26E-01 4.17E+00 6.95E+00

.39E+00

-3.04E-01 4.99E+00 2.12E+00 3.69E+00 2.36+00 4.05E+00

-4.34E-01 5.87E-02

-5.12E-02 3.95E-02

-2.49E-02

.03E+01 4.07E+00 7.64E-02 1.56E-01 MW-204-B 1.27E+00 0

2.57E-01 2

3.49E+01 0

1.30E+01 1

-3.98E+00 0

-2.47E+01

-2.31E-01 0

-1.97E+00 0

6.11E-01 1.28E+00 0

6.31E+00 1.93E+00 0

7.68E+00 6.06E-01 1.66E+00 2

-9.28E-03 2

6.28E-02 0

-1.89E+00 8.24E-02

L L

R S

G G

H C

F N

C N

S N

T C

E E

E P

P P

A a

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 September 2014 M

Gross Alpha 8

Gross Beta 2

H-3 3

C-14

-9 Fe-55 9

Ni-59 3

Co-60 2

Ni-63 2

Sr-90

-1 Nb-94

-9 Tc-99

-1 Cs-137 3

Eu-152 2

Eu-154

-3 Eu-155 2

Pu-238 1

Pu-239/240 9

Pu-241 3

Am-241 1

a Bold val ng Water React ation Plan 4

MW-DW5 MW-8.47E-01 3.09E

.96E+00 1.45E

.43E+01 0.00E 9.44E-01

-2.70E 9.39E+00

-3.10E

.13E+00 1.64E

.17E+00 1.32E

.79E+00 2.48E 1.06E+00 5.90E 9.45E-01

-1.39E 1.54E+00

-4.00

.97E+00

-7.24

.48E+00 3.00E 3.31E+00

-3.93E

.69E+00 1.95E 1.71E-02 3.69E 9.28E-02 0.00E

.18E+00

-3.68E 1.28E-01 3.69E lues indicate con tor

-B11R MW-B11A E+00 2.07E-0 E+01 3.04E-0 E+00 3.44E+0 E+00 0.00E+0 E+01

-3.49E+0 E+01

-8.49E+0 E+00 1.22E+0 E+00

-4.14E-0 E-01 2.80E-0 E+00

-1.29E-0 0E-01

-1.56E+0 4E-01 9.72E-0 E+00 6.42E+0 E+00 1.10E+0 E+00 1.69E+0 E-02

-5.50E-0 E+00

-1.10E-0 E+00

-2.29E+0 E-02

-1.69E-0 ncentration grea Table 2-19 AR MW-200-A 01 2.42E-01 01 2.41E+00 01 6.86E+01 00

-4.56E-01 01

-3.35E+01 00 7.84E+00 00 3.56E+00 01 3.62E+00 01 1.14E+00 01

-1.43E+00 00

-1.57E+00 01 2.17E+01 00

-2.39E+00 00

-6.57E-01 00

-8.16E-01 03 2.65E-02 02 5.83E-02 00

-2.23E+00 02 1.10E-01 ater than MDC.

(continued)

MW-200-B 2.01E+00 9.11E+00 5.17E+01

-4.98E+00

-4.56E+01 2.37E+01 6.20E-01

-7.87E-01 5.10E-01

-2.68E-01

-1.54E+00 1.94E+00

-1.34E+01

-1.54E+00

-1.64E+00

-6.50E-03 0.00E+00 8.49E+00 2.29E-01 Italicized value 2-63 2014 Ground MW-201-A M

1.18E+00 7.36E+00 8.67E+01 2.69E+00

-2.18E+01

-1.99E+01

-7.23E-02 5.00E+00

-1.19E-01 6.56E-01

-7.94E-01

-1.09E+00 4.79E+00

-3.09E+00

-1.48E+00

-3.59E-02 0.00E+00

-6.92E-01 1.40E-01 es indicate MDC dwater Monito MW-201-B MW 1.43E+00 1.0 3.67E+00 4.8

-3.42E+01

-5.1 9.28E-01 4.94 2.77E+01

-5.4 3.09E+01

-1.1 9.50E-01 9.7 2.15E+00 8.2

-4.99E-01 6.7 6.44E-01

-6.4

-1.95E+00 7.9 1.84E+00

-4.3 2.53E+00 9.4 1.94E+00

-3.6 4.13E+00

-2.0 8.55E-02 1.1 1.41E-01 5.8

-5.85E-01 0.0 2.80E-02 6.6 C value.

oring Results (p W-202-A MW-20 4E+00

-2.10E-86E-01 2.30E+

18E+01 1.04E+

4E+00

-2.72E+

43E+01 3.37E+

18E+01

-4.46E+

72E-01 1.18E+

25E-01

-8.30E-70E-01 5.40E-48E-02

-1.02E+

97E-01

-1.95E-34E-01 2.31E+

0E+00 6.51E+

67E-01 4.18E+

08E+00

-8.41E-13E-02 3.63E-87E-02 5.25E-0E+00

-1.76E+

62E-02 9.48E-pCi/L) 02-B MW-203-A E-01 1.37E+00

+00 1.52E+00

+02

-3.44E+01

+00

-3.95E+00

+01

-4.95E+01

+01 5.30E+01

+00 3.67E+00 E-01 1.62E+00

-01 4.80E-01

+00 8.53E-02 E-01

-1.24E+00

+00 1.56E+00

+00 4.06E+00

+00

-3.33E+00 E-01

-9.54E-02

-02 7.08E-02

-02 9.15E-02

+00 5.04E-01

-02 2.51E-01 A

MW-203-B

-6.68E-01 1.00E+00 1.21E+02 0

4.89E-01 4.32E+01

-4.34E+01 1.99E+00

-1.77E+00 8.70E-01 2.16E+00 0

-3.32E+00 6.84E-01

-1.15E+00 0

-2.31E-01

-3.66E-01 8.12E-02 5.97E-02

-3.71E+00 1.03E-01 MW-204-A 6.00E-01 5.28E+00 6.88E+01 4.73E-01 3.45E+01

-3.13E+01

-3.77E-01

-1.84E-01 9.00E-01 1.18E-01

-1.96E+00

-1.14E+00

-1.92E+01

-4.95E+00

-2.02E+00

-6.45E-04

-5.48E-03

-3.97E+00 1.06E-01 MW-204-B 3.53E+00 0.00E+00

-1.21E+02 9.46E-01

-9.25E+01

-1.87E+01 2.05E+00 3.94E-01 2.30E-01

-1.88E+00 3.89E-01 1.24E+00 2.23E+00 2.36E+00 9.46E-01

-3.26E-02 7.02E-02

-6.46E+00 2.69E-01

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan Figure or e 2-1 LACBWR Site Map -

2-64

- Open Land Survey Units annd Classificatioon

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-2 LACBWR 2-65 Site Map - Buildings Identifiication

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-3 r

LACBWR 2-66 R Site Drainnage and Seewer Map

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-4 r

LACBWR 2-67 R LCE Excllusion Area (Class 1)

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figu Water Reactor Plan ure 2-5 N

r Non Impacte 2-68 ed Open Laand Samplinng Locations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-6 r

Class 1 O 2-69 Open Land SSampling LLocations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-7 r

Class 2 O 2-70 Open Land SSampling LLocations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 F

Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-8 r

Class 3 O 2-71 Open Land SSampling LLocations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Water Reactor Plan Figure 2-9 r

9 Concre 2-72 ete Core Sam mpling Loccations

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figur Water Reactor Plan re 2-9 (conti r

inued) 2-73 Concrete CCore Sampliing Locationns

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Figur Water Reactor Plan re 2-9 (conti r

inued) 2-74 Concrete CCore Sampliing Locationns

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-10 LACBWR Si 2-75 ite - Typical Geological Crosss-Section

L L

R La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 ng Water React ation Plan or Figure 2-111 Groundwat 2-76 ter Sampling Wells - LACBW WR Site