ML17065A064: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report January 30, 2017 IOSB Hot Cell Survey Unit F8300061 Approved By:   ~.                       Date: ~ /17 Manager, Rancho Seco Assets
{{#Wiki_filter:*Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report January 30, 2017 IOSB Hot Cell Survey Unit F8300061 Approved By: ~.
Date: ~  
/17 Manager, Rancho Seco Assets  


FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Survey Unit:
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Survey Unit:
Line 23: Line 25:


== Description:==
== Description:==
 
Operating History: Designed primarily to store packaged radioactive waste containers safely, protected from the elements, and maintain radiological dose as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), each storage cell possibly stored media of many types, including filters, resins, contaminated chemicals, DAW, activated reactor components, contaminated plant components and other.contaminated items.
Operating History: Designed primarily to store packaged radioactive waste containers safely, protected from the elements, and maintain radiological dose as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), each storage cell possibly stored media of many types, including filters, resins, contaminated chemicals, DAW, activated reactor components, contaminated plant components and other .contaminated items.
Site Characterization: Static measurements were made on the floor and wall surfaces, to confirm the absence or presence of plant-derived radionuclides. Static measurements showed a mean gross beta activity level of 2,880 dpm/l 00 cm2 and a maximum value of 5, 112 dpm/100 cm2*
Site Characterization: Static measurements were made on the floor and wall surfaces, to confirm the absence or presence of plant-derived radionuclides. Static measurements showed a mean gross beta activity level of 2,880 dpm/l 00 cm 2 and a maximum value of 5, 112 dpm/100 cm 2
Previous surveys and floor scanning indicated significant contamination in excess of the DCGLw.
* Previous surveys and floor scanning indicated significant contamination in excess of the DCGLw. This area was identified and characterized separately as a hot spot. The average static measurement in the hot spot was 390, 104 dpm/100 cm 2 and a maximum value of 2,285,418 dpm/100 cm 2 . The hot spot was remediated prior to performance of the FSS. Based upon the hot spot the Hot Cell was classified as a MARSSIM Class 1 survey unit.
This area was identified and characterized separately as a hot spot. The average static measurement in the hot spot was 390, 104 dpm/100 cm2 and a maximum value of 2,285,418 dpm/100 cm2.
The hot spot was remediated prior to performance of the FSS. Based upon the hot spot the Hot Cell was classified as a MARSSIM Class 1 survey unit.
Survey Unit Design Information:
Survey Unit Design Information:
In accordance with MARSSIM Section 4.6, special considerations may be necessary for survey units with structure surface areas less than 10 m2 or land areas less than 100 m 2
In accordance with MARSSIM Section 4.6, special considerations may be necessary for survey units with structure surface areas less than 10 m2 or land areas less than 100 m2* In this case, the number of data points obtained from.the statistical tests is unnecessarily large and not appropriate for smaller survey unit areas. The data generated from these smaller survey units should be obtained based on judgment, rather than on systematic or random design, and compared individually to the PCGLs. This survey unit meets this criterion as the size is less than ten square meter (8 m2).
* In this case, the number of data points obtained from.the statistical tests is unnecessarily large and not appropriate for smaller survey unit areas. The data generated from these smaller survey units should be obtained based on judgment, rather than on systematic or random design, and compared individually to the PCGLs. This survey unit meets this criterion as the size is less than ten square meter (8 m2).
The Survey Unit Design Parameters are presented in Table 1 below. The survey unit and measurement locations are depicted on the maps in Attachment 1. Static measurement locations were based upon professional judgment in accordance with MARSSIM guidance and approximately 100% of the area scanned. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Table 2-1Attachment2.
The Survey Unit Design Parameters are presented in Table 1 below. The survey unit and measurement locations are depicted on the maps in Attachment 1. Static measurement locations were based upon professional judgment in accordance with MARSSIM guidance and approximately 100% of the area scanned. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Table 2-1Attachment2.
FSS Hot Cell                                 F8300061
FSS Hot Cell F8300061  


FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Table 1, Survey Unit Design Parameters
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Table 1, Survey Unit Design Parameters  
,,  .        -;;:_
-;;:_ ~~
:;E~~'iu~tion *fri:i>uJ vai'J'es:
:;E~~'iu~tion *fri:i>uJ vai'J'es:  
                    ~~                                                                              -
~ -(  
                                                                                                  ~  (
*,cc>rnrrleiit~{ * *
                                                                                                                    *,cc>rnrrleiit~{ **
* Survey PackaQe:
* Survey PackaQe:                             F830             Hot Cell Survev Unit:                           006 Class                             1 SU Area (m 2)                                   8 Evaluator:                             JR DCGLw:                   43,000               Gross Activity DCGL Area Factor                             3.3           Class 1 Desiqn DCGLemc (dpm/100cm 2 ):                                       141,900                 Class 1 LBGR:                   141,90(                         =
F830 Hot Cell Survev Unit:
Default 50% DCGL Sigma:                         740           Scoping Survey Data Type I error:                         0.05 Type II error:                         0.05 Predominant Nuclide                         Cs-137 Sample Area (m 2)                               N/A Total Instrument Efficiency:                                 0.129 Total Area Scanned (m2):                                           8 Scan Coveraqe (%) *. ~ :;.}i'.t>O:?lo'.!: Class 1 Choosing 'N/A' sets material Material Type:                             N/A           background to "O"
006 Class 1
*;:,:.r~: ..?<<<         .,:*;*1c**~cu
SU Area (m2) 8 Evaluator:
                " ...........              f''ifv 1, .. 1a.~      *(***'*\;;:;-:;,
JR DCGLw:
                                                .. * .au~~.,,
43,000 Gross Activity DCGL Area Factor 3.3 Class 1 Desiqn DCGLemc (dpm/100cm2):
1 l~ii{;;;,>."
141,900 Class 1 LBGR:
                                                                  ... ,,.,..,.,            ''\: *:\.}'.;::~<;i.;:;;?:::.&#xa2;.omtnefi't.S.:** ., . .,, ...
141,90( Default = 50% DCGL Sigma:
                                                                              ......;."""****~
740 Scoping Survey Data Type I error:
                                                                                                                                                *-:    )"'.
0.05 Type II error:
Z1'{L:                 1.645.   .,,
0.05 Predominant Nuclide Cs-137 Sample Area (m2)
Z1-o:                 1.645' SiQn p:               b. 99865 Calculated Relative Shift:                                   29.0 Relative Shift Used:                                 3.0 Uses 3.0 if Relative Shift >3 N-Value:                             11 N-Value+20%:                                 14*
N/A Total Instrument Efficiency:
0.129 Total Area Scanned (m2):
8 Scan Coveraqe (%) *. ~ :;.}i'.t>O:?lo'.!: Class 1 Choosing 'N/A' sets material Material Type:
N/A background to "O"  
*;:,:.r~:..?<<<.,:*;*1c** 1,.. 1 f''ifv *(***'*\\;;:;-:;,
1l~ii{;;;,>." ''\\: *
:\\.}'.;::~<;i.;:;;?:::.&#xa2;.omtnefi't.S.:**.,.. *-:...
)"'.
........... ~cu a.~.. *.au~~.,,...,,.,..,.,...... ;."""****~
Z1'{L:
1.645.
Z1-o:
1.645' SiQn p: b.. 99865 Calculated Relative Shift:
29.0 Relative Shift Used:
3.0 Uses 3.0 if Relative Shift >3 N-Value:
11 N-Value+20%:
14*
Survey Results:
Survey Results:
A total of l 5 direct measurements were made in F8300061. The results of the static measurements are shown in Table 2. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. None of the scan measurements indicated areas of elevated activity. Swipe data did not indicate elevated activity levels above the MDA.
A total of l 5 direct measurements were made in F8300061. The results of the static measurements are shown in Table 2. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. None of the scan measurements indicated areas of elevated activity. Swipe data did not indicate elevated activity levels above the MDA.
2                                                               FSS Hot Cell                                                                               F8300061
2 FSS Hot Cell F8300061  


FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Table 2, Static Measurement Results
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Table 2, Static Measurement Results
                                                                    ;
* 1Number"
1 Number"
* S~mpl~.#
* S~mpl~.#               Be_ta (cpm)     ,.
Be_ta (cpm)
                                                                      *.B~ta.
* B~ta. (dpm) 1 F8300061X00001 364 2,758 2 F8300061 X00002 396 3,000 3 F8300061X00003 425 3,220 4 F8300061X00004 362 2,742 5 F8300061X00005 350 2,652 6 F8300061X00006 435 3,295 7 F8300061X00007 605 4,583 8 F8300061X00008 397 3,008 9 F8300061X00009 414 3,136 10 F8300061X00010 314 2,379 11 F8300061X00011 362 2,742 12 F8300061 X00012 282 2,136 13 F8300061X00013 357 2,705 14 F8300061X00014 423 3,205 15 F8300061X00015 407 3,083 Table 3 contains the statistical summary of the static measurement data for the Hot Cell.
                                                                            . (dpm) 1 F8300061X00001                     364                   2,758 2 F8300061 X00002                   396                     3,000 3 F8300061X00003                     425                     3,220 4 F8300061X00004                     362                   2,742 5 F8300061X00005                     350                   2,652 6 F8300061X00006                     435                     3,295 7 F8300061X00007                     605                   4,583 8 F8300061X00008                     397                     3,008 9 F8300061X00009                     414                     3,136 10 F8300061X00010                     314                     2,379 11 F8300061X00011                     362                     2,742 12 F8300061 X00012                   282                     2,136 13 F8300061X00013                     357                     2,705 14 F8300061X00014                     423                     3,205 15 F8300061X00015                     407                     3,083 Table 3 contains the statistical summary of the static measurement data for the Hot Cell.
Table 3, Beta Summary Statistics Beta Static Hot Cell Mean 2,976 Median 3,000 Standard Deviation 550 Minimum 2, 136 Maximum 4,583 Count 15 Survey Unit Data Assessment:
Table 3, Beta Summary Statistics Beta Static Hot Cell Mean                         2,976 Median                       3,000 Standard Deviation             550 Minimum                     2, 136 Maximum                     4,583 Count                           15 Survey Unit Data Assessment:
The survey design required 15 static measurements located based upon professional judgment.
The survey design required 15 static measurements located based upon professional judgment. Following the guidance in MARSSIM Section 4.6, these values are compared directly to the DCGLw.
Following the guidance in MARSSIM Section 4.6, these values are compared directly to the DCGLw.
The comparison and the results are presented in Table 4. The sample mean and median values were less than the DCGL.
The comparison and the results are presented in Table 4. The sample mean and median values were less than the DCGL.
3                                 FSS Hot Cell                                       F8300061
3 FSS Hot Cell F8300061  


FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Table 4, Data Assessment Results
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Table 4, Data Assessment Results  
                                                                                * * *Con:hn.~*nts .* . * *.. * , .
* *
* Con:hn.~*nts.*. * *.. *,.
Number of Samples:
Number of Samples:
* 15 Median: 3,QOO Static Data Standard Deviation:             550 .
* 15 Median:
Maximum:       4,583 .
3,QOO Static Data Standard Deviation:
Adjusted N Value:             14 S+ Value:         '15.
550..
Critical Value:         1()
Maximum:
.>'. ,::*:*.'L~: ~'.>.Grit~ri~.si!t!$t~(iilcfW' :**:.: '.*;>;?~: ::*;;*;.>** :* *.* oom.ments **.:v.: ':*.
4,583.
Sufficient samples collected:         Pass
Adjusted N Value:
* Maximum value <DCGLw:             Pass Median value <DCGLw:           .Pass Mean value <DCGLw:             Pa$S
14 S+ Value:  
* Maximum value <DCGLemc:             N/A ..
'15.
SiQn test results:     Pass .
Critical Value:
The survey unit passes all conditions:               Pass
1 ()  
. >'.,::*:*.'L~: ~'.>.Grit~ri~.si!t!$t~(iilcfW' :**:.: '.*;>;?~: ::*;;*;.>** :* *.* oom.ments * *.:v.: ':*.
Sufficient samples collected:
Pass
* Maximum value <DCGLw:
Pass Median value <DCGLw:  
.Pass Mean value <DCGLw:
Pa$S
* Maximum value <DCGLemc:
N/A..
SiQn test results:
Pass.
The survey unit passes all conditions:
Pass
* Survey Unit Investigations and Results:
* Survey Unit Investigations and Results:
No investigations were required for either direct or scan measurements and no investigation results are reported.
No investigations were required for either direct or scan measurements and no investigation results are reported.
Line 83: Line 115:
As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as 1.ong as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL, the ALARA criterion has been met.
As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as 1.ong as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL, the ALARA criterion has been met.
Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:
Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:
The survey unit was designed as a Class I survey and the sample results are consistent with that classification. The variability of the survey results was less than the characterization data used for survey design. No individual measurement exceeded the DCGL. No potential areas of elevated activity were detected.
The survey unit was designed as a Class I survey and the sample results are consistent with that classification. The variability of the survey results was less than the characterization data used for survey design. No individual measurement exceeded the DCGL. No potential areas of elevated activity were detected.  


==
==
Conclusion:==
Conclusion:==
 
The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 1 survey based on the results of the scoping survey. The required number of direct measurements was made and the scan coverage met the requirement of Table 5-6 of the L TP. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. No investigations were required.
The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 1 survey based on the results of the scoping survey. The required number of direct measurements was made and the scan coverage met the requirement of Table 5-6 of the LTP. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. No investigations were required.
4 FSS Hot Cell F8300061  
4                                             FSS Hot Cell                                                         F8300061


FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 The static measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 The static measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high
* confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.
* confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.
It is concluded that survey unit F8300061 meets the release criteria of l OCFR20.1402.
It is concluded that survey unit F8300061 meets the release criteria of l OCFR20.1402.
5                               FSS Hot Cell                                 F8300061
5 FSS Hot Cell F8300061 Maps January 30, 2017 Survey Unit F8300061  


Attachment 1 Maps January 30, 2017 Survey Unit F8300061
F8300061 X0011 f3 =2,742 dpm/100 cm" F8300061 X0015 W f3 =3,083 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0013 f3 =2,705 dpm/100 c SMUD ~TIDEWATER INC U GIN'H:!l;S I SCIUITfStS I PllotiMM MAJU,G.!RS DAW BAY* HOT CELL SMUD Location:
Rancho Seco Task:
Final Status Surve Approved by.
Drawing No.:
IOSB Final Status Surve


N
==
                                                                                                                                                                              /f'\.F! 300061X0003 W13    1:3,220 dpm/100 cm" F8300061X0009     $
Description:==
f3 =3,136 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0002 ~
HOT CELL
f3 =3,000 dpm/100 cm F8300061 X0011 f3 =2,742 dpm/100 cm"
!Xown B.
                                                                                                                                                                                                      &F8300061X0014
C Gra Oc'd:
                                                                                        &  F8300061 X0015                                    &F8300061X0006 W  f3 =3,083 dpm/100 cm2                                                                                    W f3 =3,202 dpm/100 er l2 W f3 =3,295 dpm/100 cm2 L'.t::-,. F8300061X0008 F8300061X0013 f3 =2,705 dpm/100 c              W[3 =3*008 dpm/100 .%F8300061X0005 W f3 =2,652 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0007   $
J Reese Dote:
                                                                                                                          &F8300061X0004                 f3 =4,583 dpm/100 cm2 Wf3 =2,742 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0001         $           L!'..F8300061X0010 f3 =2,758 dpm/100 cm2               W13 =2,379 dpm/100 cm 2 F8300061X0012 SMUD              ~TIDEWATER INC                                                                                                        f3 =2,136 dpm/100 cm"~
0U62017 Appro'IOI date:
U GIN'H:!l;S I SCIUITfSt S I PllotiMMMAJU,G.!RS DAW BAY* HOT CELL SMUD Location:    Rancho Seco Approved by.
Rev No.:
Task:        Final Status Surve Drawing No. : IOSB Final Status Surve
Page I
/f'\\.F! 300061X0003 F8300061X0009 $
f3 =3, 136 dpm/100 cm2 W13 1:3,220 dpm/100 cm" F8300061X0002 ~
f3 =3,000 dpm/100 cm  
&F8300061X0006 W f3 =3,295 dpm/100 cm2 L'.t::-,. F8300061X0008 W[3 =3*008 dpm/100.%F8300061X0005 W f3 =2,652 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0007 $  
&F8300061X0004 f3 =4,583 dpm/100 cm2 Wf3 =2, 7 42 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0001 $
f3 =2,758 dpm/100 cm2 Att. I Maps L!'..F8300061X0010 W13 =2,379 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0012 f3 =2,136 dpm/100 cm"~  
&F8300061X0014 W f3 =3,202 dpm/100 er l2 0
N 6
12 5cale In feet F8300061 Instrumentation January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F83000061


== Description:==
M~as&#xb5;i;ement
HOT CELL
,T:Y:P,e* :*.
      !Xown B.      C Gra                                                                                                                                                                                      0                  6            12 Oc'd:         J Reese Appro'IOI date:                                                                                                                                                 5cale In feet Dote:         0U62017 Rev No.:
Beta Static Measurement Swipe Measurements Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation  
Page I                                                                                                                          Att. I Maps                                                                                            F8300061
.,1ri~(r~iT!~!itType
 
(
Attachment 2 Instrumentation January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F83000061
*~
 
Ludlum Model 2350-1 Ludlum Model 44-l 16 B Detector Ludlum Model 2929 Ludlum Model 44-10-1 Miniml_im *~etcctabfo: Activity~
Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation M~as&#xb5;i;ement                                    Miniml_im *~etcctabfo: Activity~          Oe(ector .        Calibration.'
'~
                    . ,1ri~(r~iT!~!itType
Beta - 466 dpm/100 cm2 Beta - 74.5 dpm/l 00 cm2 Oe(ector.
                                .                    '~ '                  *, '' .
*Efficiende.s 13.2%
o~~*oateb
43.4%
      ,T:Y:P,e* :*.          (    *~ ' .                                            . ' *Efficiende.s Beta Static          Ludlum Model               Beta - 466 dpm/100 cm 2                  13.2%          317897/331972 Measurement                2350-1                                                                             2/10/17 Ludlum Model 44- l 16 B Detector Swipe        Ludlum Model 2929               Beta - 74.5 dpm/l 00 cm 2               43.4%           1825971188736 Measurements        Ludlum Model 44-                                                                          5/13/17 10-1
Calibration.'
o~~*oateb 317897 /331972 2/10/17 1825971188736 5/13/17
* Minimum detectable activities for the count rate instrumentation were calculated in accordance with NUREG-1507, "Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions" (U.S. NRC, 1997).
* Minimum detectable activities for the count rate instrumentation were calculated in accordance with NUREG-1507, "Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions" (U.S. NRC, 1997).
* b Detectors are required to be calibrated once every 12 months. Calibration due date indicates the date by which the detector must be calibrated again.
b Detectors are required to be calibrated once every 12 months. Calibration due date indicates the date by which the detector must be calibrated again.
cm 2 = square centimeters cpm = counts per minute dpm = disintegrations per minute Page 1                                       Att. 2 Instrumentation                                      F8300061
cm2 = square centimeters cpm = counts per minute dpm = disintegrations per minute Page 1 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300061  
 
Static Measurement MDA Beta  Survey Type PR331972    Detector Number 158 Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.132  Efficiency 100 Area of Detector (cm 2)
Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br .. t) 0 *5/t .. E .. A/100    (NUREG 1507)
Where:                  Br    Background Countrate t      Count Time (min)
E      Efficiency A      Area of detector (cm 2)
Static MDA                            466 dpm/100 cm 2 Page 2                                      Att. 2 Instrumentation   F8300061


Attachment 3 Investigation January 30, 2017 Survey Unit F8300061 (none required)
Static Measurement MDA Beta Survey Type PR331972 Detector Number 158 Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.132 Efficiency 100 Area of Detector ( cm 2)
Att. 3 Investigation                      F8300061
Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br.. t)0*5/t.. E.. A/100 (NUREG 1507)
Where:
Br Background Countrate t
Count Time (min)
E Efficiency A
Area of detector ( cm2)
Static MDA 466 dpm/100 cm 2 Page 2 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300061  


Attachment 4 Data Assessment January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300061
Att. 3 Investigation Investigation January 30, 2017 Survey Unit F8300061 (none required)
F8300061 Data Assessment January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300061  


ActN~
I
Histogram for Beta Static Activity (dpm/100cm2) Hot Cell Nl.M'rb6rofValt..ie:       15 M~                   2.13&.3' M"""""               .(581 33 so
/
          /                                                                                  ,......,,              5'$. 90 164 Kuto:i.s                 5.(f;
/
        /
Page I
      /
/
BM ~
Histogram for Beta Static Activity (dpm/100cm2) Hot Cell  
(;;JModan 3.ool.00 Eil""""' o""""""
\\
Olei.: Bni 0M01e8N I                                                  \
2936 3670 3915
2936                                      3670        3915    '160 Page I                          Att. 4 Data Assessment                          F8300061
'160 Att. 4 Data Assessment F8300061 ActN~
Nl.M'rb6rofValt..ie:
15 M~
2.13&.3' M"""""  
.(581 33 so 5'$.90 164 Kuto:i.s 5.(f; BM~
(;;JModan 3.ool.00 Eil""""'o""""""
Olei.: Bni 0M01e8N  


Q-Q Plot for Beta Static Activity (dpm/100cm2) Hot Cell               Activ~
Q-Q Plot for Beta Static Activity (dpm/100cm2) Hot Cell  
H*15 Mean*297S Sd*~9.9 s..... 520.6
'400.
'400 .                                                                                           lrtoi~*2976 ConclaOOn.f! *0.905 IEIBeitFitlft 3200 2<00
3200 2<00  
      *1.5       *1.0     -0.5                       0.0                 0.5 1.0        1.5 Theoretical Quantiles (Standard Normaq Page 2                         Att. 4 Data Assessment                   F8300061
*1.5  
*1.0  
-0.5 0.0 0.5 Theoretical Quantiles (Standard Normaq Page 2 Att. 4 Data Assessment 1.0 1.5 F8300061 Activ~
H*15 Mean*297S Sd*~9.9 s..... 520.6 lrtoi~*2976 ConclaOOn.f! *0.905 IEIBeitFitlft


Smear _D;it a_ Calculation _Sheet _101316 IOSB Final Status Survey I.Cl   I.Cl.     LC3 1.Cll         I.CG     LCS                                         (ICPM                     jldpm                   Date/Time of Count                                   Sample Comments 1   FH30   006           l       c     00001       SM                 Hot (<:'II                   49                       10                   11/01/lG               1210 2   F830     006           I     c     00002       SM                 Hol Cell                     5.:J                       20                 11/01/1c;             1211 3   ~1:130   006           I     c     00003       SM                 HO\ Cell                     50                       l3                 11/01/16               1212 4   f830     006           I       c     00004       SM                 Ho! Ci:ll                   58                       31                   u/Ol/lu               1214 s   FS30     006           I     c     00005       SM                 Hot Cell                     44                         -1                 11/01/16               1215 6   F830     006           J       c     00006       SM                 Mot Cell                     47                         6                   U/01/16               l.2.16 7   F830     006           l       c     00007       SM                 HOI Cell                     53                       20                 11/01/IG               12.17 8   FB30     OOG           I       c     00008       SM                 Hot Cell                     53                         20                 ll/01/16               12.19 9   F830     006           I     c     00009       SM                 Hot Cell                     52                       17                   ll/01/lC.             1220 10   F830   006           l       c     00010       SM                 Hot Cdl                     59                       33                   11/01/!G               122.1 11   H!JO   OOf,           I       c     00011       SM                 Hol Cell                     47                         6                 11/01/16               1222 12   f830     006           I       c     00012       SM                 Hot   Cc~!                   119                       10                 11/01/Hi               1224 l3   f.830   006           1       c     00013       SM                 Hot   C~ll                   51                       15                   11/01/16               J.225 14   F8:30   ooc.           I       c     00014       SM                 Hot Cell                     62                       40                   11/01/IG               1226 15   F830   006           l       c     00015       SM                 Hot Cell                     42                         -6                 11/01/16               1227 Comrnents     nv 5*r:n:1ru1t: llC"low. the reoui11~ ~oori.:c ch1:cl.:. and o,,d:cround t:hf:<:k'.~w1~rt* '.;,;11i~l.1c1oritv p<;rlornh-.,,:t mio1 to u!-..-~ of lh~ insuvmcnt identified b..:luw.
Smear _D;it a_ Calculation _Sheet _101316 IOSB Final Status Survey I.Cl I.Cl.
Ludlum 2929 Bcnchtop Instrument
LC3 1.Cll I.CG LCS (ICPM jldpm Date/Time of Count Sample Comments 1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        !)!:1; C'f1ic1.,.*11t\*   l1~:r. C\>Ulll 2929 S/N: 182597                                                                     rah~     dm<<         Ml)A llOIV/O!
FH30 006 l
                                                                                                                                                                                <:X         0.36'1 43*:10*1S/N:188736                                                                   Cf)lll   111l11 dpmJ>r:r.1rr:;1 Tech A Sign/ Date       fL       11-~*         /jJ..-1~!6                                                                                                                                                   114.~       l       711.5 T1~ch B Sign/ Da;e /                   ,,,! /(
c 00001 SM Hot (<:'II 49 10 11/01/lG 1210 2
Cal Due Date: 5/13/2017                                 fJ          0.434 C:::j)ln min   dp:n pl!: ;1r,:-:z Page 3                                                                       Att. 4 Data Assessment                                                                                                       F8300061}}
F830 006 I
c 00002 SM Hol Cell 5.:J 20 11/01/1c; 1211 3  
~1:130 006 I
c 00003 SM HO\\ Cell 50 l3 11/01/16 1212 4
f830 006 I
c 00004 SM Ho! Ci:ll 58 31 u/Ol/lu 1214 s
FS30 006 I
c 00005 SM Hot Cell 44  
-1 11/01/16 1215 6
F830 006 J
c 00006 SM Mot Cell 47 6
U/01/16 l.2.16 7
F830 006 l
c 00007 SM HOI Cell 53 20 11/01/IG 12.17 8
FB30 OOG I
c 00008 SM Hot Cell 53 20 ll/01/16 12.19 9
F830 006 I
c 00009 SM Hot Cell 52 17 ll/01/lC.
1220 10 F830 006 l
c 00010 SM Hot Cdl 59 33 11/01/!G 122.1 11 H!JO
: OOf, I
c 00011 SM Hol Cell 47 6
11/01/16 1222 12 f830 006 I
c 00012 SM Hot Cc~!
119 10 11/01/Hi 1224 l3 f.830 006 1
c 00013 SM Hot C~ll 51 15 11/01/16 J.225 14 F8:30 ooc.
I c
00014 SM Hot Cell 62 40 11/01/IG 1226 15 F830 006 l
c 00015 SM Hot Cell 42  
-6 11/01/16 1227 Comrnents nv 5*r:n:1ru1t: llC"low. the reoui11~ ~oori.:c ch1:cl.:. and o,,d:cround t:hf:<:k'.~w1~rt* '.;,;11i~l.1c1oritv p<;rlornh-.,,:t mio1 to u!-..-~ of lh~ insuvmcnt identified b..:luw.
Ludlum 2929 Bcnchtop Instrument  
!)!:1; C'f1ic1.,.*11t\\*
l1~:r.
C\\>Ulll 2929 S/N: 182597 rah~
dm<<
Ml)A 0.36'1 llOIV/O!  
<:X 43*:10*1S/N:188736 Cf)lll 111l11 dpmJ>r:r.1rr:;1 Tech A Sign/ Date fL 11-~*  
/jJ..-1~!6 fJ 114.~
l 711.5 T1~ch B Sign/ Da;e /  
,,,! /(
Cal Due Date: 5/13/2017 0.434 C:::j)ln min dp:n pl!: ;1r,:-:z Page 3 Att. 4 Data Assessment F8300061}}

Latest revision as of 11:25, 9 January 2025

Final Status Survey Summary Report, January 30, 2017, Iosb Hot Cell, Survey Unit F8300061
ML17065A064
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 01/30/2017
From:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML17065A032 List:
References
DPG 17-038
Download: ML17065A064 (16)


Text

  • Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report January 30, 2017 IOSB Hot Cell Survey Unit F8300061 Approved By: ~.

Date: ~

/17 Manager, Rancho Seco Assets

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Survey Unit:

F8300061, Interim Onsite Storage Building (IOSB) Hot Cell Survey Unit

Description:

Operating History: Designed primarily to store packaged radioactive waste containers safely, protected from the elements, and maintain radiological dose as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), each storage cell possibly stored media of many types, including filters, resins, contaminated chemicals, DAW, activated reactor components, contaminated plant components and other.contaminated items.

Site Characterization: Static measurements were made on the floor and wall surfaces, to confirm the absence or presence of plant-derived radionuclides. Static measurements showed a mean gross beta activity level of 2,880 dpm/l 00 cm2 and a maximum value of 5, 112 dpm/100 cm2*

Previous surveys and floor scanning indicated significant contamination in excess of the DCGLw.

This area was identified and characterized separately as a hot spot. The average static measurement in the hot spot was 390, 104 dpm/100 cm2 and a maximum value of 2,285,418 dpm/100 cm2.

The hot spot was remediated prior to performance of the FSS. Based upon the hot spot the Hot Cell was classified as a MARSSIM Class 1 survey unit.

Survey Unit Design Information:

In accordance with MARSSIM Section 4.6, special considerations may be necessary for survey units with structure surface areas less than 10 m2 or land areas less than 100 m2* In this case, the number of data points obtained from.the statistical tests is unnecessarily large and not appropriate for smaller survey unit areas. The data generated from these smaller survey units should be obtained based on judgment, rather than on systematic or random design, and compared individually to the PCGLs. This survey unit meets this criterion as the size is less than ten square meter (8 m2).

The Survey Unit Design Parameters are presented in Table 1 below. The survey unit and measurement locations are depicted on the maps in Attachment 1. Static measurement locations were based upon professional judgment in accordance with MARSSIM guidance and approximately 100% of the area scanned. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Table 2-1Attachment2.

FSS Hot Cell F8300061

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Table 1, Survey Unit Design Parameters

-;;:_ ~~

E~~'iu~tion *fri
i>uJ vai'J'es:

~ -(

  • ,cc>rnrrleiit~{ * *
  • Survey PackaQe:

F830 Hot Cell Survev Unit:

006 Class 1

SU Area (m2) 8 Evaluator:

JR DCGLw:

43,000 Gross Activity DCGL Area Factor 3.3 Class 1 Desiqn DCGLemc (dpm/100cm2):

141,900 Class 1 LBGR:

141,90( Default = 50% DCGL Sigma:

740 Scoping Survey Data Type I error:

0.05 Type II error:

0.05 Predominant Nuclide Cs-137 Sample Area (m2)

N/A Total Instrument Efficiency:

0.129 Total Area Scanned (m2):

8 Scan Coveraqe (%) *. ~ :;.}i'.t>O:?lo'.!: Class 1 Choosing 'N/A' sets material Material Type:

N/A background to "O"

  • ,
    .r~:..?<<<.,:*;*1c** 1,.. 1 fifv *(***'*\\;;:;-:;,

1l~ii{;;;,>." \\: *

\\.}'.;::~<;i.;:;;?:::.¢.omtnefi't.S.:**.,.. *-:...

)"'.

........... ~cu a.~.. *.au~~.,,...,,.,..,.,...... ;."""****~

Z1'{L:

1.645.

Z1-o:

1.645' SiQn p: b.. 99865 Calculated Relative Shift:

29.0 Relative Shift Used:

3.0 Uses 3.0 if Relative Shift >3 N-Value:

11 N-Value+20%:

14*

Survey Results:

A total of l 5 direct measurements were made in F8300061. The results of the static measurements are shown in Table 2. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. None of the scan measurements indicated areas of elevated activity. Swipe data did not indicate elevated activity levels above the MDA.

2 FSS Hot Cell F8300061

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Table 2, Static Measurement Results

  • 1Number"
  • S~mpl~.#

Be_ta (cpm)

  • B~ta. (dpm) 1 F8300061X00001 364 2,758 2 F8300061 X00002 396 3,000 3 F8300061X00003 425 3,220 4 F8300061X00004 362 2,742 5 F8300061X00005 350 2,652 6 F8300061X00006 435 3,295 7 F8300061X00007 605 4,583 8 F8300061X00008 397 3,008 9 F8300061X00009 414 3,136 10 F8300061X00010 314 2,379 11 F8300061X00011 362 2,742 12 F8300061 X00012 282 2,136 13 F8300061X00013 357 2,705 14 F8300061X00014 423 3,205 15 F8300061X00015 407 3,083 Table 3 contains the statistical summary of the static measurement data for the Hot Cell.

Table 3, Beta Summary Statistics Beta Static Hot Cell Mean 2,976 Median 3,000 Standard Deviation 550 Minimum 2, 136 Maximum 4,583 Count 15 Survey Unit Data Assessment:

The survey design required 15 static measurements located based upon professional judgment.

Following the guidance in MARSSIM Section 4.6, these values are compared directly to the DCGLw.

The comparison and the results are presented in Table 4. The sample mean and median values were less than the DCGL.

3 FSS Hot Cell F8300061

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 Table 4, Data Assessment Results

  • *
  • Con:hn.~*nts.*. * *.. *,.

Number of Samples:

  • 15 Median:

3,QOO Static Data Standard Deviation:

550..

Maximum:

4,583.

Adjusted N Value:

14 S+ Value:

'15.

Critical Value:

1 ()

. >'.,::*:*.'L~: ~'.>.Grit~ri~.si!t!$t~(iilcfW' :**:.: '.*;>;?~: ::*;;*;.>** :* *.* oom.ments * *.:v.: ':*.

Sufficient samples collected:

Pass

  • Maximum value <DCGLw:

Pass Median value <DCGLw:

.Pass Mean value <DCGLw:

Pa$S

  • Maximum value <DCGLemc:

N/A..

SiQn test results:

Pass.

The survey unit passes all conditions:

Pass

  • Survey Unit Investigations and Results:

No investigations were required for either direct or scan measurements and no investigation results are reported.

ALARA Statement:

As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as 1.ong as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL, the ALARA criterion has been met.

Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:

The survey unit was designed as a Class I survey and the sample results are consistent with that classification. The variability of the survey results was less than the characterization data used for survey design. No individual measurement exceeded the DCGL. No potential areas of elevated activity were detected.

==

Conclusion:==

The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 1 survey based on the results of the scoping survey. The required number of direct measurements was made and the scan coverage met the requirement of Table 5-6 of the L TP. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. No investigations were required.

4 FSS Hot Cell F8300061

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300061 The static measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high

  • confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.

It is concluded that survey unit F8300061 meets the release criteria of l OCFR20.1402.

5 FSS Hot Cell F8300061 Maps January 30, 2017 Survey Unit F8300061

F8300061 X0011 f3 =2,742 dpm/100 cm" F8300061 X0015 W f3 =3,083 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0013 f3 =2,705 dpm/100 c SMUD ~TIDEWATER INC U GIN'H:!l;S I SCIUITfStS I PllotiMM MAJU,G.!RS DAW BAY* HOT CELL SMUD Location:

Rancho Seco Task:

Final Status Surve Approved by.

Drawing No.:

IOSB Final Status Surve

==

Description:==

HOT CELL

!Xown B.

C Gra Oc'd:

J Reese Dote:

0U62017 Appro'IOI date:

Rev No.:

Page I

/f'\\.F! 300061X0003 F8300061X0009 $

f3 =3, 136 dpm/100 cm2 W13 1:3,220 dpm/100 cm" F8300061X0002 ~

f3 =3,000 dpm/100 cm

&F8300061X0006 W f3 =3,295 dpm/100 cm2 L'.t::-,. F8300061X0008 W[3 =3*008 dpm/100.%F8300061X0005 W f3 =2,652 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0007 $

&F8300061X0004 f3 =4,583 dpm/100 cm2 Wf3 =2, 7 42 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0001 $

f3 =2,758 dpm/100 cm2 Att. I Maps L!'..F8300061X0010 W13 =2,379 dpm/100 cm2 F8300061X0012 f3 =2,136 dpm/100 cm"~

&F8300061X0014 W f3 =3,202 dpm/100 er l2 0

N 6

12 5cale In feet F8300061 Instrumentation January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F83000061

M~asµi;ement

,T:Y:P,e* :*.

Beta Static Measurement Swipe Measurements Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation

.,1ri~(r~iT!~!itType

(

  • ~

Ludlum Model 2350-1 Ludlum Model 44-l 16 B Detector Ludlum Model 2929 Ludlum Model 44-10-1 Miniml_im *~etcctabfo: Activity~

'~

Beta - 466 dpm/100 cm2 Beta - 74.5 dpm/l 00 cm2 Oe(ector.

  • Efficiende.s 13.2%

43.4%

Calibration.'

o~~*oateb 317897 /331972 2/10/17 1825971188736 5/13/17

  • Minimum detectable activities for the count rate instrumentation were calculated in accordance with NUREG-1507, "Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions" (U.S. NRC, 1997).

b Detectors are required to be calibrated once every 12 months. Calibration due date indicates the date by which the detector must be calibrated again.

cm2 = square centimeters cpm = counts per minute dpm = disintegrations per minute Page 1 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300061

Static Measurement MDA Beta Survey Type PR331972 Detector Number 158 Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.132 Efficiency 100 Area of Detector ( cm 2)

Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br.. t)0*5/t.. E.. A/100 (NUREG 1507)

Where:

Br Background Countrate t

Count Time (min)

E Efficiency A

Area of detector ( cm2)

Static MDA 466 dpm/100 cm 2 Page 2 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300061

Att. 3 Investigation Investigation January 30, 2017 Survey Unit F8300061 (none required)

F8300061 Data Assessment January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300061

I

/

/

Page I

/

Histogram for Beta Static Activity (dpm/100cm2) Hot Cell

\\

2936 3670 3915

'160 Att. 4 Data Assessment F8300061 ActN~

Nl.M'rb6rofValt..ie:

15 M~

2.13&.3' M"""""

.(581 33 so 5'$.90 164 Kuto:i.s 5.(f; BM~

(;;JModan 3.ool.00 Eil""""'o""""""

Olei.: Bni 0M01e8N

Q-Q Plot for Beta Static Activity (dpm/100cm2) Hot Cell

'400.

3200 2<00

  • 1.5
  • 1.0

-0.5 0.0 0.5 Theoretical Quantiles (Standard Normaq Page 2 Att. 4 Data Assessment 1.0 1.5 F8300061 Activ~

H*15 Mean*297S Sd*~9.9 s..... 520.6 lrtoi~*2976 ConclaOOn.f! *0.905 IEIBeitFitlft

Smear _D;it a_ Calculation _Sheet _101316 IOSB Final Status Survey I.Cl I.Cl.

LC3 1.Cll I.CG LCS (ICPM jldpm Date/Time of Count Sample Comments 1

FH30 006 l

c 00001 SM Hot (<:'II 49 10 11/01/lG 1210 2

F830 006 I

c 00002 SM Hol Cell 5.:J 20 11/01/1c; 1211 3

~1:130 006 I

c 00003 SM HO\\ Cell 50 l3 11/01/16 1212 4

f830 006 I

c 00004 SM Ho! Ci:ll 58 31 u/Ol/lu 1214 s

FS30 006 I

c 00005 SM Hot Cell 44

-1 11/01/16 1215 6

F830 006 J

c 00006 SM Mot Cell 47 6

U/01/16 l.2.16 7

F830 006 l

c 00007 SM HOI Cell 53 20 11/01/IG 12.17 8

FB30 OOG I

c 00008 SM Hot Cell 53 20 ll/01/16 12.19 9

F830 006 I

c 00009 SM Hot Cell 52 17 ll/01/lC.

1220 10 F830 006 l

c 00010 SM Hot Cdl 59 33 11/01/!G 122.1 11 H!JO

OOf, I

c 00011 SM Hol Cell 47 6

11/01/16 1222 12 f830 006 I

c 00012 SM Hot Cc~!

119 10 11/01/Hi 1224 l3 f.830 006 1

c 00013 SM Hot C~ll 51 15 11/01/16 J.225 14 F8:30 ooc.

I c

00014 SM Hot Cell 62 40 11/01/IG 1226 15 F830 006 l

c 00015 SM Hot Cell 42

-6 11/01/16 1227 Comrnents nv 5*r:n:1ru1t: llC"low. the reoui11~ ~oori.:c ch1:cl.:. and o,,d:cround t:hf:<:k'.~w1~rt* '.;,;11i~l.1c1oritv p<;rlornh-.,,:t mio1 to u!-..-~ of lh~ insuvmcnt identified b..:luw.

Ludlum 2929 Bcnchtop Instrument

!)!:1; C'f1ic1.,.*11t\\*

l1~:r.

C\\>Ulll 2929 S/N: 182597 rah~

dm<<

Ml)A 0.36'1 llOIV/O!

<:X 43*:10*1S/N:188736 Cf)lll 111l11 dpmJ>r:r.1rr:;1 Tech A Sign/ Date fL 11-~*

/jJ..-1~!6 fJ 114.~

l 711.5 T1~ch B Sign/ Da;e /

,,,! /(

Cal Due Date: 5/13/2017 0.434 C:::j)ln min dp:n pl!: ;1r,:-:z Page 3 Att. 4 Data Assessment F8300061