ML17184A146: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I..
{{#Wiki_filter:I...
Dominion Energy Services, Inc.
Dominion Energy Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060                       ~Dominion
5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060 DominionEnergy.com June 27, 2017  
    .      DominionEnergy.com                                                   ~Energy June 27, 2017 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                               Serial No.:    17-264 Attention: Document Control Desk                                 NRA/GDM        R1 Washington, DC 20555                                             Docket Nos.:  50-336/423 50-338/339 50-280/281 License Nos.: DPR-65/NPF-49 NPF-4/7 DPR-32/37 DOMINION NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.
~Dominion
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND. 2
~Energy U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOMINION NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.
      . SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM CECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii), Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company hereby submit the annual summary of permanent changes to the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) evaluation models for Millstone Power Station (MPS) Units 2 and 3, North Anna Power Station (NAPS) Units 1 and 2, and Surry Power Station (SPS) Units 1 and 2, respectively.
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND. 2  
Attachment 1 of this letter provides a report describing plant-specific evaluation model changes associated with the Westinghouse and AREVA Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident (SBLOCA) and Large Break Loss of Coolant Acddent (LBLOCA) ECCS evaluation models for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2, as applicable.
. SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 Serial No.:
Information regarding the effect of the ECCS evaluation model changes upon the reported SBLOCA and LBLOCA analyses of record results is provided for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2 in Attachments 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The calculated peak cladding temperatures (PCT) for the SBLOCA and LBLOCA analyses for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2 are summarized below:
NRA/GDM Docket Nos.:
Millstone Unit 2                   Small break -AREVA Evaluation Model:             1711°F Millstone Unit 2                  Large break -AREVA Evaluation Model:             1845°F Millstone Unit 3                  Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:     1193°F Millstone Unit 3                  Large break -Westinghouse Evaluation Model:     1933°F North Anna Unit 1                  Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:     1834.1°F North Anna Unit 1                  Large break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:     1982°F North Anna Unit 2                  Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:     1834.1°F North Anna Unit 2                  Large break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:     1982°F Surry Units 1 and 2                Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:     2012°F Surry Units 1 and 2                Large .break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:   2071°F
License Nos.:
17-264 R1 50-336/423 50-338/339 50-280/281 DPR-65/NPF-49 NPF-4/7 DPR-32/37 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM CECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii), Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company hereby submit the annual summary of permanent changes to the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) evaluation models for Millstone Power Station (MPS) Units 2 and 3, North Anna Power Station (NAPS) Units 1 and 2, and Surry Power Station (SPS) Units 1 and 2, respectively. of this letter provides a report describing plant-specific evaluation model changes associated with the Westinghouse and AREVA Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident (SBLOCA) and Large Break Loss of Coolant Acddent (LBLOCA) ECCS evaluation models for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2, as applicable.
Information regarding the effect of the ECCS evaluation model changes upon the reported SBLOCA and LBLOCA analyses of record results is provided for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2 in Attachments 2, 3 and 4, respectively.
The calculated peak cladding temperatures (PCT) for the SBLOCA and LBLOCA analyses for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2 are summarized below:
Millstone Unit 2 Millstone Unit 2 Millstone Unit 3 Millstone Unit 3 North Anna Unit 1 North Anna Unit 1 North Anna Unit 2 North Anna Unit 2 Surry Units 1 and 2 Surry Units 1 and 2 Small break -AREVA Evaluation Model:
Large break -AREVA Evaluation Model:
Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:
Large break -Westinghouse Evaluation Model:
Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:
Large break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:
Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:
Large break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:
Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:
Large.break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:
1711°F 1845°F 1193°F 1933°F 1834.1°F 1982°F 1834.1°F 1982°F 2012°F 2071°F  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Page 2 of 3 The LOCA results for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2 are confirmed to have margin to the 2200°F limit for PCT specified in 10 CFR 50.46. Based on the evaluation of this information and the resulting changes in the applicable licensing basis PCT results, no further action is required to demonstrate compliance with the 10 CFR 50.46 requirements.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Page 2 of 3 The LOCA results for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2 are confirmed to have margin to the 2200°F limit for PCT specified in 10 CFR 50.46.
Based on the evaluation of this information and the resulting changes in the applicable licensing basis PCT results, no further action is required to demonstrate compliance with the 10 CFR 50.46 requirements.
The information contained herein satisfies the 2016 annual reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii).
The information contained herein satisfies the 2016 annual reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii).
If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Gary D. Miller at (804) 273-2771.
If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Gary D. Miller at (804) 273-2771.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,  
~-
~-
Mark D. Sartain Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Fleet Support Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Mark D. Sartain Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Fleet Support Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Virginia Electric and Power Company Commitments made in this letter: None Attachments:
Virginia Electric and Power Company Commitments made in this letter: None Attachments:
Line 36: Line 51:
: 2. 2016 Annual Reporting of 10 CFR 50.46 Margin Utilization - Millstone Power Station Units 2 and 3
: 2. 2016 Annual Reporting of 10 CFR 50.46 Margin Utilization - Millstone Power Station Units 2 and 3
: 3. 2016 Annual Reporting of 10 CFR 50.46 Margin Utilization - North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2
: 3. 2016 Annual Reporting of 10 CFR 50.46 Margin Utilization - North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2
: 4. 2016 Annual Reporting of 10 CFR 50.46 Margin Utilization - Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2
: 4. 2016 Annual Reporting of 10 CFR 50.46 Margin Utilization - Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Page 3 of 3 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I Regional Administrator 2100 Renaissance Blvd., Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-2713 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Regional Administrator Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Millstone Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Mr. J. R. Hall NRC Senior Project Manager - North Anna U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. R. Guzman NRC Senior Project Manager - Millstone Units 2 and 3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 C-2 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Ms. K. R. Cotton Gross NRC Project Manager - Surry U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. J. E. Reasor, Jr.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Page 3 of 3 cc:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I Regional Administrator 2100 Renaissance Blvd., Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-2713 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Regional Administrator Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Millstone Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Mr. J. R. Hall NRC Senior Project Manager - North Anna U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. R. Guzman NRC Senior Project Manager - Millstone Units 2 and 3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 C-2 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Ms. K. R. Cotton Gross NRC Project Manager - Surry U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. J. E. Reasor, Jr.
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Innsbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300 4201 Dominion Blvd.
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Innsbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300 4201 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 Attachment 1 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM (ECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 REPORT OF CHANGES IN AREVA AND WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION MODELS DOMINION NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM (ECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 REPORT OF CHANGES IN AREVA AND WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION MODELS DOMINION NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 1 REPORT OF CHANGES IN AREVA AND WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION MODELS Millstone Power Station Unit 2
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report REPORT OF CHANGES IN AREVA AND WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION MODELS Millstone Power Station Unit 2
: 1. AREVA identified no changes or errors applicable to the 2002 S-RELAPS based Small Break LOCA (SBLOCA) Evaluation Model for Millstone Unit 2 during 2016.
: 1. AREVA identified no changes or errors applicable to the 2002 S-RELAPS based Small Break LOCA (SBLOCA) Evaluation Model for Millstone Unit 2 during 2016.
This was the analysis of record in 2016 until the implementation of License Amendment 329 with the new SBLOCA analysis described in Item #2 below.                 *
This was the analysis of record in 2016 until the implementation of License Amendment 329 with the new SBLOCA analysis described in Item #2 below.
: 2. On September 30, 2016, a new SBLOCA analysis was approved by the NRC based upon EMF-2328(P)(A), Revision 0 with Supplement 1. That analysis was performed in support of introduction of the AREVA Standard CE14 HTP fuel product with MS' fuel rod cladding. The new limiting break size resulted in a peak clad temperature (PCT) of 1707°F. Additionally, results were presented for the current fuel product with Zircaloy-4 (Zr-4) cladding. The Zr-4 necessitated a 4°F PCT penalty.
: 2. On September 30, 2016, a new SBLOCA analysis was approved by the NRC based upon EMF-2328(P)(A), Revision 0 with Supplement 1. That analysis was performed in support of introduction of the AREVA Standard CE14 HTP fuel product with MS' fuel rod cladding. The new limiting break size resulted in a peak clad temperature (PCT) of 1707°F. Additionally, results were presented for the current fuel product with Zircaloy-4 (Zr-4) cladding. The Zr-4 necessitated a 4°F PCT penalty.
: 3. AREVA identified no changes or errors applicable to the SEM/PWR-98 evaluation model for Large Break LOCA (LBLOCA) for Millstone Unit 2 during 2016.
: 3. AREVA identified no changes or errors applicable to the SEM/PWR-98 evaluation model for Large Break LOCA (LBLOCA) for Millstone Unit 2 during 2016.
: 4. On January 24, 2017, a new LBLOCA analysis was approved by the NRC based upon the EMF-2103(P)(A), Revision 3, Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors. The new analysis was applicable to the AREVA Standard CE14 HTP fuel product with MS' fuel rod cladding only: The analysis predicted a PCT of 161S°F. As this fuel type will not be included in the Millstone 2 core until the spring of 2017, the margin utilization table for the realistic LBLOCA analysis is not included in this 2016 annual report.
: 4. On January 24, 2017, a new LBLOCA analysis was approved by the NRC based upon the EMF-2103(P)(A), Revision 3, Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors.
The new analysis was applicable to the AREVA Standard CE14 HTP fuel product with MS' fuel rod cladding only:
The analysis predicted a PCT of 161S°F. As this fuel type will not be included in the Millstone 2 core until the spring of 2017, the margin utilization table for the realistic LBLOCA analysis is not included in this 2016 annual report.
Millstone Power Station (Millstone) Unit 3
Millstone Power Station (Millstone) Unit 3
: 1. Westinghouse identified no changes or errors to the 198S Westinghouse SBLOCA Evaluation Model with NOTRUMP for Millstone Unit 3 during 2016.
: 1. Westinghouse identified no changes or errors to the 198S Westinghouse SBLOCA Evaluation Model with NOTRUMP for Millstone Unit 3 during 2016.
: 2. Westinghouse identified the following changes and errors applicable to the 2004 Westinghouse Best Estimate (BE) LBLOCA Evaluation Model using the Automated Statistical Treatment of Uncertainty Method (ASTRUM) for Millstone Unit 3 during 2016:
: 2. Westinghouse identified the following changes and errors applicable to the 2004 Westinghouse Best Estimate (BE) LBLOCA Evaluation Model using the Automated Statistical Treatment of Uncertainty Method (ASTRUM) for Millstone Unit 3 during 2016:
* General Code Maintenance. Various changes have been made to enhance the usability of codes and to streamline future analyses. Examples of these changes include modifying input variable definitions, units and defaults; improving the .
General Code Maintenance. Various changes have been made to enhance the usability of codes and to streamline future analyses. Examples of these changes include modifying input variable definitions, units and defaults; improving the.
input diagnostic checks; enhancing the code output; optimizing active coding; and eliminating inactive coding. The nature of these changes leads to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
input diagnostic checks; enhancing the code output; optimizing active coding; and eliminating inactive coding.
Page 1 of 6
The nature of these changes leads to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Page 1 of 6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 1
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Error in Oxidation Calculations.
* Error in Oxidation Calculations. A closely-related group of errors were discovered in the WCOBRA/TRAC software program. The errors are related to the calculation of high temperature oxidation within a realistic LBLOCA calculation. This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on the ASTRUM and the BE LBLOCA licensing basis analysis results.                   It was determined that correcting the high temperature oxidation calculation in WCOBRA/TRAC is estimated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA PCT analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
A closely-related group of errors were discovered in the WCOBRA/TRAC software program. The errors are related to the calculation of high temperature oxidation within a realistic LBLOCA calculation.
* Error in use of ASME Steam Tables. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) steam tables are used to calculate the steady state upper head liquid temperature as a function of the pressure and specific enthalpy in the ASTRUM software program. The steam table applicable to steam/gas is used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. However, the water in the upper head is in the subcooled liquid state during normal operation (and the steady-state calculation). Therefore, the steam table applicable to liquid should be used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. This issue-has been evaluated to estimate the impact on ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results.                     It was determined that the temperatures calculated by the ASME steam tables applicable to the steam/gas side and the liquid side are very similar within the typical upper head pressure and liquid specific enthalpy ranges. Therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on the ASTRUM and the BE LBLOCA licensing basis analysis results.
It was determined that correcting the high temperature oxidation calculation in WCOBRA/TRAC is estimated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA PCT analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Error in use of ASME Steam Tables. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) steam tables are used to calculate the steady state upper head liquid temperature as a function of the pressure and specific enthalpy in the ASTRUM software program. The steam table applicable to steam/gas is used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. However, the water in the upper head is in the subcooled liquid state during normal operation (and the steady-state calculation). Therefore, the steam table applicable to liquid should be used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. This issue-has been evaluated to estimate the impact on ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results.
It was determined that the temperatures calculated by the ASME steam tables applicable to the steam/gas side and the liquid side are very similar within the typical upper head pressure and liquid specific enthalpy ranges. Therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
: 3. A future plant change, the insertion of up to eight (8) AXIOM' lead test assemblies (LTAs) into fuel cycle 19 was evaluated. The AXIOM' cladding LTAs at Millstone Unit 3 will be non-limiting with respect to the Millstone Unit 3 LOCA analyses, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F on the LBLOCA and SBLOCA analyses.
: 3. A future plant change, the insertion of up to eight (8) AXIOM' lead test assemblies (LTAs) into fuel cycle 19 was evaluated. The AXIOM' cladding LTAs at Millstone Unit 3 will be non-limiting with respect to the Millstone Unit 3 LOCA analyses, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F on the LBLOCA and SBLOCA analyses.
North Anna Power Station (North Anna) Units 1 and 2
North Anna Power Station (North Anna) Units 1 and 2
: 1. For consistency with the completion of the fuel transition to Westinghouse fuel assemblies and Dominion's plans not to re-insert AREVA fuel assemblies into the North Anna cores, the PCT utilization tables for AREVA Evaluation Models have been deleted as stated in the Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to the NRC dated May 6, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16134A071) and as indicated below:
: 1. For consistency with the completion of the fuel transition to Westinghouse fuel assemblies and Dominion's plans not to re-insert AREVA fuel assemblies into the North Anna cores, the PCT utilization tables for AREVA Evaluation Models have been deleted as stated in the Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to the NRC dated May 6, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16134A071) and as indicated below:
North Anna Unit 1 - Small break -AREVA Evaluation     Model:           deleted North Anna Unit 1 - Large break -AREVA Evaluation     Model:           deleted North Anna Unit 2 - Small break -AREVA Evaluation     Model:           deleted North Anna Unit 2 - Large break -AREVA Evaluation     Model:           deleted
North Anna Unit 1 - Small break -AREVA Evaluation Model:
: 2. Westinghouse identified no changes or errors applicable to the 1985 Westinghouse
North Anna Unit 1 - Large break -AREVA Evaluation Model:
  ~BLOCA Evaluation Model with NOTRUMP for North Anna Units 1 and 2 during 2016.
North Anna Unit 2 - Small break -AREVA Evaluation Model:
Page 2of6
North Anna Unit 2 - Large break -AREVA Evaluation Model:
deleted deleted deleted deleted
: 2. Westinghouse identified no changes or errors applicable to the 1985 Westinghouse  
~BLOCA Evaluation Model with NOTRUMP for North Anna Units 1 and 2 during 2016.
Page 2of6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 1
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report
: 3. A design change (reactor vessel barrel\baffle upflow conversion) was completed for North Anna Unit 2 during the spring 2016 refueling outage. Westinghouse performed an evaluation and concluded the SBLOCA analysis of record performed with the NOTRUMP Evaluation Model continues to remain applicable to North Anna Unit 2 after the implementation of the upflow conversion. Therefore, no changes were made to the SBLOCA rack-up table for North Anna Unit 2 presented in Attachment 3. This information, regarding changes to the North Anna Unit 2 Evaluation Model in 2016, was transmitted to the NRC in the Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to the NRC dated May 6, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16134A071).
: 3. A design change (reactor vessel barrel\\baffle upflow conversion) was completed for North Anna Unit 2 during the spring 2016 refueling outage.
: 4. A design change (reactor vessel barrel\baffle upflow conversion) was completed for North Anna Unit 2 during the spring 2016 refueling outage. Westinghouse performed an evaluation to ensure the LBLOCA model for North Anna Unit 1, which has an upflow baffle/barrel configuration, . is representative of Unit 2 subsequent to the upflow conversion. Westinghouse concluded that the LBLOCA analysis results for North Anna Unit 1 are also applicable to North Anna Unit 2. Therefore, the LBLOCA rackup table for North Anna Unit 2 presented in Attachment 3 is updated to reflect this change.
Westinghouse performed an evaluation and concluded the SBLOCA analysis of record performed with the NOTRUMP Evaluation Model continues to remain applicable to North Anna Unit 2 after the implementation of the upflow conversion. Therefore, no changes were made to the SBLOCA rack-up table for North Anna Unit 2 presented in.
This information, regarding changes to the North Anna Unit 2 Evaluation Model in 2016, was transmitted to the NRC in the Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to the NRC dated May 6, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16134A071).
: 4. A design change (reactor vessel barrel\\baffle upflow conversion) was completed for North Anna Unit 2 during the spring 2016 refueling outage. Westinghouse performed an evaluation to ensure the LBLOCA model for North Anna Unit 1, which has an upflow baffle/barrel configuration,. is representative of Unit 2 subsequent to the upflow conversion.
Westinghouse concluded that the LBLOCA analysis results for North Anna Unit 1 are also applicable to North Anna Unit 2. Therefore, the LBLOCA rackup table for North Anna Unit 2 presented in Attachment 3 is updated to reflect this change.
This information, regarding changes to the North Anna Unit 2 Evaluation Model in 2016, was transmitted to the NRC in the Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to the NRC dated May 6, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16134A071).
This information, regarding changes to the North Anna Unit 2 Evaluation Model in 2016, was transmitted to the NRC in the Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to the NRC dated May 6, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16134A071).
: 5. Westinghouse identified the following changes or errors applicable to the 2004 Westinghouse BE LBLOCA Evaluation Model using ASTRUM for North Anna Units 1 and 2 during 2016:
: 5. Westinghouse identified the following changes or errors applicable to the 2004 Westinghouse BE LBLOCA Evaluation Model using ASTRUM for North Anna Units 1 and 2 during 2016:
* General Code Maintenance. Various changes have been made to enhance the usability of codes and to streamline future analyses.- Examples of these changes include modifying input variable definitions, units and defaults; improving the input diagnostic checks; enhancing the code output; optimizing active coding; and eliminating inactive coding. The nature of these changes leads to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
General Code Maintenance. Various changes have been made to enhance the usability of codes and to streamline future analyses.- Examples of these changes include modifying input variable definitions, units and defaults; improving the input diagnostic checks; enhancing the code output; optimizing active coding; and eliminating inactive coding. The nature of these changes leads to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
* Error in Oxidation Calculations. A closely-related group of errors were discovered in the WCOBRA/TRAC software program. The errors are related to the calculation of high temperature oxidation within a realistic LBLOCA calculation. This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on the ASTRUM and the BE LBLOCA licensing basis analysis results.                       It was determined that correcting the high temperature oxidation calculation in WCOBRA/TRAC is estimated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA peak cladding temperature (PCT) analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Error in Oxidation Calculations.
Page 3 of 6
A closely-related group of errors were discovered in the WCOBRA/TRAC software program. The errors are related to the calculation of high temperature oxidation within a realistic LBLOCA calculation.
This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on the ASTRUM and the BE LBLOCA licensing basis analysis results.
It was determined that correcting the high temperature oxidation calculation in WCOBRA/TRAC is estimated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA peak cladding temperature (PCT) analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Page 3 of 6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 1
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Error in use of ASME Steam Tables. The ASME steam tables are used to calculate the steady state upper head liquid temperature as a function of the pressure and specific enthalpy in the ASTRUM software program. The steam table applicable to steam/gas is used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. However, the water in the upper head is in the subcooled liquid state during normal operation (and the steady-state calculation). Therefore, the steam table applicable to liquid should be used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results. It was determined that the temperatures calculated by the ASME steam tables applicable to the steam/gas side and the liquid side are very similar within the typical upper head pressure and liquid specific enthalpy ranges. Therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
* Error in use of ASME Steam Tables. The ASME steam tables are used to calculate the steady state upper head liquid temperature as a function of the pressure and specific enthalpy in the ASTRUM software program. The steam table applicable to steam/gas is used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. However, the water in the upper head is in the subcooled liquid state during normal operation (and the steady-state calculation). Therefore, the steam table applicable to liquid should be used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results. It was determined that the temperatures calculated by the ASME steam tables applicable to the steam/gas side and the liquid side are very similar within the typical upper head pressure and liquid specific enthalpy ranges. Therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Support Column Unheated Conductor Error.
* Support Column Unheated Conductor Error.                 A modeling error was discovered in the support column unheated conductor in several BE LBLOCA analyses of record in which the metal thickness of the support columns in the upper plenum was underestimated. The heat transferred to the fluid from the support columns is small relative to the heat release from the core due to high fuel stored energy, decay heat, and since the upper plenum rapidly becomes a steam environment in a LBLOCA. Therefore, it does not significantly contribute to the transient response. The support column unheated conductor modeling error has been generically evaluated to have a negligible impact on the existing analyses, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
A modeling error was discovered in the support column unheated conductor in several BE LBLOCA analyses of record in which the metal thickness of the support columns in the upper plenum was underestimated. The heat transferred to the fluid from the support columns is small relative to the heat release from the core due to high fuel stored energy, decay heat, and since the upper plenum rapidly becomes a steam environment in a LBLOCA. Therefore, it does not significantly contribute to the transient response. The support column unheated conductor modeling error has been generically evaluated to have a negligible impact on the existing analyses, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Surry Power Station (Surry) Units 1 and 2
Surry Power Station (Surry) Units 1 and 2
: 1. Westinghouse identified no changes or errors applicable to the 1985 Westinghouse SBLOCA Evaluation Model with NOTRUMP for Surry Units 1 and 2 during 2016.
: 1. Westinghouse identified no changes or errors applicable to the 1985 Westinghouse SBLOCA Evaluation Model with NOTRUMP for Surry Units 1 and 2 during 2016.
: 2. Westinghouse identified the following changes or errors* applicable to the 2004 Westinghouse BE LBLOCA Evaluation Model using ASTRUM for Surry Units 1 and 2 during 2016.
: 2. Westinghouse identified the following changes or errors* applicable to the 2004 Westinghouse BE LBLOCA Evaluation Model using ASTRUM for Surry Units 1 and 2 during 2016.
* General Code Maintenance. Various changes have been made to enhance the usability of codes and to streamline future analyses. Examples of these changes include modifying input variable definitions, units and defaults; improving the input diagnostic checks; enhancing the code output; optimizing active coding; and eliminating inactive coding. The nature of these changes leads to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
General Code Maintenance. Various changes have been made to enhance the usability of codes and to streamline future analyses. Examples of these changes include modifying input variable definitions, units and defaults; improving the input diagnostic checks; enhancing the code output; optimizing active coding; and eliminating inactive coding.
* Error in Oxidation Calculations. A closely-related group of errors were discovered in the WCOBRA/TRAC software program. The errors are related to the calculation of high temperature oxidation within a realistic LBLOCA Page 4of6
The nature of these changes leads to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Error in Oxidation Calculations.
A closely-related group of errors were discovered in the WCOBRA/TRAC software program. The errors are related to the calculation of high temperature oxidation within a realistic LBLOCA Page 4of6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 1 calculation. This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on the ASTRUM and the BE LBLOCA licensing basis analysis results.                   It was determined that correcting the high temperature oxidation calculation in WCOBRA!TRAC is estimated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA PCT analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report calculation.
* Error in use of ASME Steam Tables. The ASME steam tables are used to calculate the steady state upper head liquid temperature as a function of the pressure and specific enthalpy in the ASTRUM software program. The steam table applicable to steam/gas is used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. However, the water in the upper head is in the subcooled liquid state during normal operation (and the steady-state calculation). Therefore, the steam table applicable to liquid should be used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results. It was determined that the temperatures calculated by the ASME steam tables applicable to the steam/gas side and the liquid side are very similar within the typical upper head pressure and liquid specific enthalpy ranges. Therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on the ASTRUM and the BE LBLOCA licensing basis analysis results.
* Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors. Errors were discovered in modeling the core barrel in the vessel lower plenum within the BE LBLOCA analysis of record. An evaluation was performed to estimate the impact on the Surry Units 1 and 2 BE LBLOCA analysis. The modeling errors impacted the thermal resistance and stored energy of the core barrel. A qualitative evaluation concluded that the material modeled for the core barrel unheated conductor is adequate; therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F .
It was determined that correcting the high temperature oxidation calculation in WCOBRA!TRAC is estimated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA PCT analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
  .*  Discrepancy in Wetted Perimeter Inputs. Inconsistencies were discovered in the wetted perimeter inputs in the upper plenum and upper head of the vessel model for the BE LBLOCA analysis of record. An evaluation was performed to estimate the impact on the Surry Units 1 and 2 BE LBLOCA analysis. A qualitative evaluation of the wetted perimeter at the bottom of the upper head concluded a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Error in use of ASME Steam Tables. The ASME steam tables are used to calculate the steady state upper head liquid temperature as a function of the pressure and specific enthalpy in the ASTRUM software program. The steam table applicable to steam/gas is used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. However, the water in the upper head is in the subcooled liquid state during normal operation (and the steady-state calculation). Therefore, the steam table applicable to liquid should be used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results. It was determined that the temperatures calculated by the ASME steam tables applicable to the steam/gas side and the liquid side are very similar within the typical upper head pressure and liquid specific enthalpy ranges. Therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors. Errors were discovered in modeling the core barrel in the vessel lower plenum within the BE LBLOCA analysis of record. An evaluation was performed to estimate the impact on the Surry Units 1 and 2 BE LBLOCA analysis.
The modeling errors impacted the thermal resistance and stored energy of the core barrel.
A qualitative evaluation concluded that the material modeled for the core barrel unheated conductor is adequate; therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Discrepancy in Wetted Perimeter Inputs. Inconsistencies were discovered in the wetted perimeter inputs in the upper plenum and upper head of the vessel model for the BE LBLOCA analysis of record. An evaluation was performed to estimate the impact on the Surry Units 1 and 2 BE LBLOCA analysis.
A qualitative evaluation of the wetted perimeter at the bottom of the upper head concluded a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.
Conclusion The LOCA results for Millstone Units 2 and 3, North Anna Units 1 and 2, and Surry Units 1 and 2 are confirmed in the PCT rack-up tables, Attachments 2 through 4, respectively, to have margin to the 2200°F limit for PCT specified in 10 CFR 50.46.
Conclusion The LOCA results for Millstone Units 2 and 3, North Anna Units 1 and 2, and Surry Units 1 and 2 are confirmed in the PCT rack-up tables, Attachments 2 through 4, respectively, to have margin to the 2200°F limit for PCT specified in 10 CFR 50.46.
Based on the evaluation of this information and the resulting changes in the applicable licensing basis PCT results, no further action is required to demonstrate compliance Page 5of6
Based on the evaluation of this information and the resulting changes in the applicable licensing basis PCT results, no further action is required to demonstrate compliance Page 5of6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 1 with the 10 CFR 50.46 requirements. Reporting of this information is required per 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii), which obligates each licensee to report the effect upon calculated temperature of any change or error in evaluation models or their application on an annual basis.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report with the 1 O CFR 50.46 requirements. Reporting of this information is required per 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii), which obligates each licensee to report the effect upon calculated temperature of any change or error in evaluation models or their application on an annual basis.
This information satisfies the annual reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii) for calendar year 2016.
This information satisfies the annual reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii) for calendar year 2016.
Page 6 of 6
Page 6 of 6 Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM (ECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 2016 ANNUAL REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION DOMINION NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.
MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 Attachment 2 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM (ECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 2016 ANNUAL REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION DOMINION NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3
Millstone Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:
 
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 2 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:           Millstone Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:         Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Analysis Information
Analysis Information
* EM: 2015, Supp. 1, SBLOCA, S-RELAP5 Based Limiting Break Size: 3.78 Inches Analysis Date:       April 2015 Vendor:               AREVA Peak Linear Power: 15.1 kW/ft Notes:               None Clad Temp(OF)
* EM:
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                     1707 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
2015, Supp. 1, SBLOCA, S-RELAP5 Based Limiting Break Size: 3.78 Inches Analysis Date:
A.     Prior ECCS Model Assessments
April 2015 Vendor:
: 1. Zirc-4 Product Penalty                                     4 B.     Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
AREVA Peak Linear Power: 15.1 kW/ft Notes:
: 1. None                                                       0 C.     2016 ECCS Model Assessments
None LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
: 1. None                                                       0 D.     Other
A.
: 1. None                                                       0 LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS                   PCT=      1711 Page 1 of 6
Prior ECCS Model Assessments
: 1. Zirc-4 Product Penalty B.
Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1. None C.
2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1. None D.
Other
: 1. None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS Page 1 of 6 Clad Temp(OF) 1707 4
0 0
0 PCT=
1711


                                                                                      -----------~
-----------~
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 2 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:           Millstone Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:          Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
Analysis Information EM:                   SEM/PWR-98                   Limiting Break Size: 1.0 DECLG Analysis Date:         11/98 Vendor:               AREVA Peak Linear Power: 15 .1 kW/ft Notes:                 None Clad Temp (OF)
Millstone Power Station, Unit 2 Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                               1814 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
Utility Name:
A.     Prior ECCS Model Assessments
Analysis Information EM:
: 1. Corrected Corrosion Enhancement Factor                             -1
SEM/PWR-98 Limiting Break Size: 1.0 DECLG Analysis Date:
: 2. ICECON Coding Errors                                               0
11/98 Vendor:
: 3. Setting RFPAC Fuel Temperatures at Start ofReflood                 -2
AREVA Peak Linear Power: 15.1 kW /ft Notes:
: 4. SISPUNCH/ujun98 Code Error                                         0
None Clad Temp (OF)
: 5. Error in Flow Blockage Model in TOODEE2                             0
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1814 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
: 6. Change in TOODEE2-Calculation of QMAX                               0
A.
: 7. Change in Gadolinia Modeling                                       0
Prior ECCS Model Assessments
: 8. PWR LBLOCA Split Break Modeling                                     0
: 1.
: 9. TEOBY Calculation Error                                             0
Corrected Corrosion Enhancement Factor  
: 10. Inappropriate Heat Transfer in TOODEE2                               0
-1
: 11. End-of-Bypass Prediction by TEOBY                                   0
: 2.
: 12. R4SS Overwrite of Junction Inertia                                   0
ICECON Coding Errors 0
: 13. Incorrect Junction Inertia Multipliers                               1
: 3.
: 14. Errors Discovered During RODEX2 V&V                                 0
Setting RFPAC Fuel Temperatures at Start ofReflood  
: 15. Error in Broken Loop SG Tube Exit Junction Inertia                   0
-2
: 16. RFP AC Refill and Reflood Calculation Code Errors                   16
: 4.
: 17. Incorrect Pump Junction Area Used in RELAP4                         0
SISPUNCH/ujun98 Code Error 0
: 18. Error in TOODEE2 Clad Thermal Expansion                             -1
: 5.
: 19. Accumulator Line Loss Error                                         -1
Error in Flow Blockage Model in TOODEE2 0
: 20. Inconsistent Loss Coefficients Used for Robinson LBLOCA             0
: 6.
: 21. Pump Head Adjustment for Pressure Balance Initialization           -3
Change in TOODEE2-Calculation of QMAX 0
: 22. ICECON Code Errors                                                   0
: 7.
: 23. Containment Sump Modification and Replacement PZR                   2
Change in Gadolinia Modeling 0
: 24. Non-Conservative RODEX Fuel Pellet Temperature                     20
: 8.
: 25. Array Index Issues in the RELAP4 Code                               0 B.     Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
PWR LBLOCA Split Break Modeling 0
: 1. None                                                             0
: 9.
: c.     2016 ECCS Model Assessments
TEOBY Calculation Error 0
: 1. None                                                             0 Page 2of6
: 10.
Inappropriate Heat Transfer in TOODEE2 0
: 11.
End-of-Bypass Prediction by TEOBY 0
: 12.
R4SS Overwrite of Junction Inertia 0
: 13.
Incorrect Junction Inertia Multipliers 1
: 14.
Errors Discovered During RODEX2 V&V 0
: 15.
Error in Broken Loop SG Tube Exit Junction Inertia 0
: 16.
RFP AC Refill and Reflood Calculation Code Errors 16
: 17.
Incorrect Pump Junction Area Used in RELAP4 0
: 18.
Error in TOODEE2 Clad Thermal Expansion  
-1
: 19.
Accumulator Line Loss Error  
-1
: 20.
Inconsistent Loss Coefficients Used for Robinson LBLOCA 0
: 21.
Pump Head Adjustment for Pressure Balance Initialization  
-3
: 22.
ICECON Code Errors 0
: 23.
Containment Sump Modification and Replacement PZR 2
: 24.
Non-Conservative RODEX Fuel Pellet Temperature 20
: 25.
Array Index Issues in the RELAP4 Code 0
B.
Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1.
None 0
: c.
2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
None 0
Page 2of6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 2 D. Other
D.
: 1. None                                        0 LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS    PCT=       1845 Page 3of6
Other
: 1.
None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS Page 3of6 Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 0
PCT=
1845  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 2 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:           Millstone Power Station, Unit 3 Utility Name:         Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
Analysis Information EM:                   NOTRUMP                 Limiting Break Size:   4 inches Analysis Date:         02/07107 Vendor:               Westinghouse FQ:                   2.6                     FdH:             1.65 Fuel:                 RFA-2                   SGTP (%):       10 Notes:                 None Clad Temp (°F)
Millstone Power Station, Unit 3 Utility Name:
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                               1193 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
A.     Prior ECCS Model Assessments
Analysis Information EM:
: 1. Errors in Reactor Vessel Lower Plenum Surface Area Calculations                                                     0
NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:
: 2. Discrepancy in Metal Masses Used From Drawings                   0
4 inches Analysis Date:
: 3. Urania-Gadolinia Pellet Thermal Conductivity Calculation         0
02/07107 Vendor:
: 4. Pellet Crack and Dish Volume Calculation                         0
Westinghouse FQ:
: 5. Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty               0
2.6 FdH:
: 6. Maximum Fuel Rod Time Step Logic                                 0
1.65 Fuel:
: 7. Radiation Heat Transfer Logic                                     0
RFA-2 SGTP (%):
: 8. NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal                     0 Conductivity Degradation
10 Notes:
: 9. SBLOCA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst             0
None Clad Temp (°F)
: 10. Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error                                   0
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
: 11. Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error                               0
A.
: 12. SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer                           0 Coefficient Calculation B.      Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
Prior ECCS Model Assessments B.
: 1. Insertion of AXIOM' Cladding LTAs                                 0
: c.
: c.      2016 ECCS Model Assessments
D.
: 1. None                                                             0 D.      Other
: 1.
: 1. None                                                             0 LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS                         PCT=         1193 Page 4 of 6
Errors in Reactor Vessel Lower Plenum Surface Area Calculations
: 2.
: 3.
: 4.
: 5.
: 6.
: 7.
: 8.
: 9.
: 10.
: 11.
: 12.
Discrepancy in Metal Masses Used From Drawings Urania-Gadolinia Pellet Thermal Conductivity Calculation Pellet Crack and Dish Volume Calculation Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty Maximum Fuel Rod Time Step Logic Radiation Heat Transfer Logic NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity Degradation SBLOCA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1.
Insertion of AXIOM' Cladding LTAs 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
None Other
: 1.
None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=
Page 4 of 6 1193 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1193


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 2 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name: _           Millstone Power Station, Unit 3 Utility Name:           Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name: _
Analysis Information EM:                     ASTRUM (2004)           Limiting Break Size:   Guillotine Analysis Date:           04/17/07 Vendor:'                Westinghouse FQ:                     2.6                     FdH:             1.65 Fuel:                   RFA-2                   SGTP (%):         10 Notes:                   None Clad Temp (°F)
Millstone Power Station, Unit 3 Utility Name:
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                                 1781
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Analysis Information EM:
ASTRUM (2004)
Limiting Break Size:
Guillotine Analysis Date:
04/17 /07 Vendor:
Westinghouse FQ:
2.6 FdH:
1.65 Fuel:
RFA-2 SGTP (%):
10 Notes:
None Clad Temp (°F)
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1781  
. PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
. PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
A.       Prior ECCS Model Assessments
A.
: 1. HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Logic Errors                             0
Prior ECCS Model Assessments
: 2. CCFL Global Volume Error                                           0
: 1.
: 3. HOTSPOT Gap Heat Transfer Logic                                   0
HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Logic Errors 0
: 4. Discrepancy in Metal Masses Used From Drawings                     0
: 2.
: 5. Error in ASTRUM Processing of Average Rod Burnup                   0 and Rod Internal Pressure
CCFL Global Volume Error 0
: 6. Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty               0
: 3.
: 7. PBOT and PMID Evaluation                                           0
HOTSPOT Gap Heat Transfer Logic 0
: 8. Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity                   222 Degradation
: 4.
: 9. HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation                             0 for ZIRLO Cladding
Discrepancy in Metal Masses Used From Drawings 0
: 10. Rod Internal Pressure Calculation                                 0
: 5.
: 11. HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the                   0 Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature
Error in ASTRUM Processing of Average Rod Burnup 0
: 12. WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File                         0 Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background
and Rod Internal Pressure
: 13. WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error                 0
: 6.
: 14. Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty               0 Calculation                                         *
Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty 0
: 15. Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization                 0
: 7.
: 16. Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections                             0
PBOT and PMID Evaluation 0
: 17. Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization                   0
: 8.
: 18. Mass Conservation Error Fix                                       0
Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 222 Degradation
: 19. Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation                     0
: 9.
: 20. Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation           0
HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0
: 21. Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties                     0
for ZIRLO Cladding
: 22. Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures                     0
: 10.
: 23. Decay Heat Model Error Corrections                                 0
Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0
: 24. Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error                     0 Page 5of6
: 11.
HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature
: 12.
WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0
Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background
: 13.
WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0
: 14.
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 0
Calculation
: 15.
Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization 0
: 16.
Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections 0
: 17.
Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization 0
: 18.
Mass Conservation Error Fix 0
: 19.
Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation 0
: 20.
Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation 0
: 21.
Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties 0
: 22.
Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures 0
: 23.
Decay Heat Model Error Corrections 0
: 24.
Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error 0
Page 5of6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 2
B.
: 25. WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction                   0
: c.
: 26. Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions                 -91
D.
: 27. HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction                           21
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report
: 28. Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity                       0
: 25.
: 29. Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation                       0
: 26.
: 30. Burst Elevation Selection                                         0
: 27.
: 31. Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors                         0
: 28.
: 32. Errors in Support Plate, Core Barrel, and Vessel Wall             0 Unheated Conductor B. Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 29.
: 1. Insertion of AXIOM' Cladding LTAs                                0
: 30.
: c. 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 31.
: 1. Error in Oxidation Calculations                                   0
: 32.
: 2. Error in use of ASME Steam Tables                                 0 D. Other
WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Errors in Support Plate, Core Barrel, and Vessel Wall Unheated Conductor Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1. None                                                             0 LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS                         PCT=     1933 Page 6of6
: 1.
Insertion of AXIOM' Cladding LT As 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
Error in Oxidation Calculations
: 2.
Error in use of ASME Steam Tables Other
: 1.
None 0  
-91 21 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=
1933 Page 6of6 Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM CECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 2016 ANNUAL REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 Attachment 3 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM CECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 2016 ANNUAL REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:
Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:
NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:
2.75 inches Analysis Date:
12/20/2010 Vendor:
Westinghouse FQ:
2.32 FMI:
1.65 Fuel:
RFA-2 SGTP (%):
7 Notes:
None Clad Temp (OF)
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
A.
Prior ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal B.
: c.
D.
: 2.
: 3.
: 4.
: 5.
Conductivity Degradation SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1.
None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
None Other
: 1.
None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=
Page 1 of 6 1834.1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1834.1


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 3 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:           North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:         Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:                  NOTRUMP                  Limiting Break Size:  2.75 inches Analysis Date:        12/20/2010 Vendor:              Westinghouse FQ:                  2.32                    FMI:            1.65 Fuel:                RFA-2                    SGTP (%):      7 Notes:                None Clad Temp (OF)
\\
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                            1834.1 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
A.      Prior ECCS Model Assessments
Utility Name:
: 1. NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal                    0 Conductivity Degradation
North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:
: 2. SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst          0
ASTRUM (2004)
: 3. Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error                                  0
Limiting Break Size:
: 4. Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error                              0
Analysis Date:
: 5. SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer                          0 Coefficient Calculation B.      Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
8/25/2010 Vendor:
: 1. None                                                              0
Westinghouse FQ:
: c.      2016 ECCS Model Assessments
232 FMI:
: 1. None                                                              0 D.      Other
1.65 Fuel:
: 1. None                                                              0 LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS                        PCT=        1834.1 Page 1 of 6
RFA-2 SGTP (%):
 
7 DEGB Notes:
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 3 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:            North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:          Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:                     ASTRUM (2004)                 Limiting Break Size:         DEGB Analysis Date:         8/25/2010 Vendor:                 Westinghouse FQ:                     232                           FMI:                 1.65 Fuel:                   RFA-2                         SGTP (%):             7 Notes:                 Core Power::; 100% of2951 MWt; SG Model 54F; 17x17 RFA-2 Fuel with ZIRLO or Optimized ZIRLO' cladding, Non-IFBA or IFBA, IFMs Clad Temp (OF)
Core Power::; 100% of2951 MWt; SG Model 54F; 17x17 RFA-2 Fuel with ZIRLO or Optimized ZIRLO' cladding, Non-IFBA or IFBA, IFMs Clad Temp (OF)
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                                           1852 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1852 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
A.     Prior ECCS Model Assessments
A.
: 1. Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity                               135
Prior ECCS Model Assessments
\                Degradation
: 1.
: 2. HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation                                         0 for ZIRLO Cladding
Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 135 Degradation
: 3. Rod Internal Pressure Calculation                                             0
: 2.
: 4. HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the                               0 Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature
HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0
: 5. WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File                                     0 Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background
for ZIRLO Cladding
: 6. WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error                             0
: 3.
: 7. Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty                           1 Calculation
Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0
: 8. Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization                           0
: 4.
: 9. Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections                                         0
HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0
: 10. Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization                               0
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature
: 11. Mass Conservation Error Fix
: 5.
WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0
Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background
: 6.
WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0
: 7.
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 1
Calculation
: 8.
Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization 0
: 9.
Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections 0
: 10.
Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization 0
: 11.
Mass Conservation Error Fix
* 0
* 0
: 12. Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation                                 0
: 12.
: 13. Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation                       0
Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation 0
: 14. Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties                                 0
: 13.
: 15. Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures                                 0
Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation 0
: 16. Decay Heat Model Error Corrections                                             0
: 14.
: 17. Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error                               0
Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties 0
: 18. WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction                               0
: 15.
: 19. Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions                               -27
Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures 0
: 20. HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction                                         21
: 16.
: 21. Changes to .Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity                                   0
Decay Heat Model Error Corrections 0
: 22. Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation                                     0 Page 2of6
: 17.
Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error 0
: 18.
WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction 0
: 19.
Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions  
-27
: 20.
HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction 21
: 21.
Changes to.Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity 0
: 22.
Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation 0
Page 2of6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 3
B.
: 23. Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling                 0
: c.
: 24. Burst Elevation Selection                                     0
: 23.
: 25. Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors                     0 B. Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 24.
: 1. None                                                         0
: 25.
: c. 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1. Error in Oxidation Calculations                               0
: 1.
: 2. Error in use of ASME Steam Tables                             0
None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 3. Support Column Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors         0 D. Other
: 1.
: 1. Transition Core                                               0 LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS                     PCT=       1982 Page 3of6
Error in Oxidation Calculations
: 2.
Error in use of ASME Steam Tables Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 0
0 0
0
: 3.
Support Column Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors 0
0 0
D.
Other
: 1.
Transition Core 0
LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=
1982 Page 3of6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 3 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:           North Anna Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:        Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:                   NOTRUMP                   Limiting Break Size:   2.75 inches Analysis Date:       12/20/2010 Vendor:               Westinghouse FQ:                   2.32                     FMI:             1.65 Fuel:                 RFA-2                     SGTP (%):       7 Notes:               None Clad Temp (°F)
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                             1834.1 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
Utility Name:
A.     Prior ECCS Model Assessments
North Anna Power Station, Unit 2 Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:
: 1. NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal                     0 Conductivity Degradation
NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:
: 2. SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst           0
Analysis Date:
: 3. Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error                                   0
12/20/2010 Vendor:
: 4. Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error                               0
Westinghouse FQ:
: 5. SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer                           0 Coefficient Calculation B.     Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
2.32 FMI:
: 1. None                                                             0
1.65 Fuel:
: c.     2016 ECCS Model Assessments
RFA-2 SGTP (%):
: 1. None                                                             0 D.     Other
7 Notes:
: 1. None                                                             0 LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS                           PCT=       1834.1 Page 4 of 6
None LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
A.
Prior ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity Degradation 2.75 inches Clad Temp (°F) 1834.1 0
: 2.
: 3.
: 4.
: 5.
SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error 0
0 0
0 Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation B.
Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1.
None 0
: c.
2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
None 0
D.
Other
: 1.
None 0
LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=
1834.1 Page 4 of 6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 3 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:             North Anna Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:           Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:                     ASTRUM (2004)                 Limiting Break Size:         DEGB Analysis Date:         8/25/2010 Vendor:                 Westinghouse FQ:                     2.32                         FMI:               . 1.65 Fuel:                   RF A-2                       SGTP (% ):           7 Notes:                 CorePower:'.S 100% of2951 MWt; SG Model 54F; 17xl7 RFA-2 Fuel with ZIRLO or Optimized ZIRLO' cladding, Non-IFBA or IFBA, IFMs Clad Temp (OF)
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                                           1852 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
North Anna Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:
A.     Prior ECCS Model Assessments
Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:
: 1. Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity                               135 Degradation
ASTRUM (2004)
: 2. HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation                                         0 for ZIRLO Cladding
Limiting Break Size:
: 3. Rod Internal Pressure Calculation                                             0
DEGB Analysis Date:
: 4. HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the                               0 Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature
8/25/2010 Vendor:
: 5. WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File                                     0 Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background
Westinghouse FQ:
: 6. WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error                             0
2.32 FMI:  
: 7. Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty                           1 Calculation
. 1.65 Fuel:
: 8. Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization                           0
RF A-2 SGTP (% ):
: 9. Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections                                         0
7 Notes:
: 10. Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization                               0
CorePower:'.S 100% of2951 MWt; SG Model 54F; 17xl7 RFA-2 Fuel with ZIRLO or Optimized ZIRLO' cladding, Non-IFBA or IFBA, IFMs Clad Temp (OF)
: 11. Mass Conservation Error Fix                                                   0
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1852 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
: 12. Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation                                 0
A.
: 13. Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation                       0
Prior ECCS Model Assessments
: 14. Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties                                 0
: 1.
: 15. Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures                                 0
Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 135 Degradation
: 16. Decay Heat Model Error Corrections                                             0
: 2.
: 17. Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error                               0
HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0
: 18. WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction                               0
for ZIRLO Cladding
: 19. Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions                               -27
: 3.
: 20. HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction                                         21
Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0
: 21. Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity                                   0 Page 5of6
: 4.
HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature
: 5.
WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0
Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background
: 6.
WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0
: 7.
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 1
Calculation
: 8.
: 9.
: 10.
: 11.
: 12.
: 13.
: 14.
: 15.
: 16.
: 17.
: 18.
: 19.
: 20.
: 21.
Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization Mass Conservation Error Fix Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures Decay Heat Model Error Corrections Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity Page 5of6 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-27 21 0


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 3
B.
: 22. Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation                   0
: c.
: 23. Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling                 0
: 22.
: 24. Burst Elevation Selection                                     0
: 23.
: 25. Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors                     0 B. Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 24.
: 1. None                                                         0
: 25.
: c. 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1. Error in Oxidation Calculations                               0
: 1.
: 2. Error in use of ASME Steam Tables                             0
None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 3. Support Column Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors         0 D. Other
: 1.
: 1. Transition Core                                               0 LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS                   PCT=       1982 Page 6 of 6
Error in Oxidation Calculations
: 2.
Error in use of ASME Steam Tables Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 0
0 0
0 0
: 3.
Support Column Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors 0
0 0
D.
Other
: 1.
Transition Core 0
LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=
1982 Page 6 of 6 Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM (ECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 2016 ANNUAL REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 Attachment 4 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM (ECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 2016 ANNUAL REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
Surry Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:
Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:
NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:
2.75 inches Analysis Date:
5/7 /2009 Vendor:
Westinghouse FQ:
2.5 FMI:
1.7 Fuel:
Upgrade SGTP (%):
7 Notes:
None Clad Temp (°F)
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 2012 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
A.
Prior ECCS Model Assessments B.
: c.
D.
: 1.
Urania-Gadolinia Pellet Thermal Conductivity Calculation.
0
: 2.
Pellet Crack and Dish Volume Calculation.
0
: 3.
Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty 0
: 4.
15Xl 5 Upgrade Fuel 0
: 5.
Maximum Fuel Rod Time Step Logic 0
: 6.
Radiation Heat Transfer Logic 0
: 7.
NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal 0
: 8.
: 9.
: 10.
: 11.
Conductivity Degradation SBLOCT A Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1.
None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
None Other
: 1.
None 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=
2012 Page 1 of 6


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 4 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:           Surry Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:         Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:                   NOTRUMP                  Limiting Break Size:     2.75 inches Analysis Date:         5/7/2009 Vendor:               Westinghouse FQ:                   2.5                      FMI:            1.7 Fuel:                  Upgrade                  SGTP (%):        7 Notes:                None Clad Temp (°F)
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                              2012 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
Surry Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:
A.      Prior ECCS Model Assessments
Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:
: 1. Urania-Gadolinia Pellet Thermal Conductivity Calculation.        0
ASTRUM (2004)
: 2. Pellet Crack and Dish Volume Calculation.                        0
Limiting Break Size:
: 3. Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty              0
DEG Analysis Date:
: 4. 15Xl 5 Upgrade Fuel                                              0
10/6/2010 Vendor:
: 5. Maximum Fuel Rod Time Step Logic                                  0
Westinghouse FQ:  
: 6. Radiation Heat Transfer Logic                                    0
: 7. NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal                      0 Conductivity Degradation
: 8. SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst            0
: 9. Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error                                    0
: 10. Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error                              0
: 11. SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer                            0 Coefficient Calculation B.      Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1. None                                                              0
: c.      2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1. None                                                              0 D.      Other
: 1. None                                                              0 LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS                          PCT=          2012 Page 1 of 6


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 4 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:            Surry Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:          Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:                    ASTRUM (2004)            Limiting Break Size:  DEG Analysis Date:          10/6/2010 Vendor:                Westinghouse FQ:                    2.5                     FLill:            1.7 Fuel:                   Upgrade                   SGTP (%):       7 Notes:                 None Clad Temp (°F)
===2.5 FLill===
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                               1853 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
1.7 Fuel:
A.     Prior ECCS Model Assessments
Upgrade SGTP (%):
: 1. Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity                 183 Degradation
7 Notes:
: 2. Pellet Radial Profile Option                                   -13
None Clad Temp (°F)
: 3. HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation                             0 for ZIRLO Cladding
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1853 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
: 4. Rod Internal Pressure Calculation                                 0
A.
: 5. HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the                   0 Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature*
Prior ECCS Model Assessments
: 6. WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File                       0 Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background
: 1.
: 7. WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error                 0
Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 183 Degradation
: 8. Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty               0 Calculation
: 2.
: 9. Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization               0
Pellet Radial Profile Option  
: 10. Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections                             0
-13
: 11. Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization                   0
: 3.
: 12. Mass Conservation Error Fix                                       0
HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0
: 13. Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation                     0
for ZIRLO Cladding
: 14. Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation         0
: 4.
: 15. Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties                   0
Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0
: 16. Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures                   0
: 5.
: 17. Decay Heat Model Error Corrections                               0
HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0
: 18. Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error                   0
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature*
: 19. WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction                   0
: 6.
: 20. Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions                   -7
WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0
: 21. HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction                           51
Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background
: 22. Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity                       0
: 7.
: 23. Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation                       0 Page 2of6
WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0
: 8.
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 0
Calculation
: 9.
Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization 0
: 10.
Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections 0
: 11.
Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization 0
: 12.
Mass Conservation Error Fix 0
: 13.
Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation 0
: 14.
Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation 0
: 15.
Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties 0
: 16.
Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures 0
: 17.
Decay Heat Model Error Corrections 0
: 18.
Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error 0
: 19.
WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction 0
: 20.
Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions  
-7
: 21.
HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction 51
: 22.
Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity 0
: 23.
Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation 0
Page 2of6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 4
B.
: 24. Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling               0
: c.
: 25. Burst Elevation Selection                                   0
D.
: 26. Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors                   4 B. Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 24.
: 25.
: 26.
Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1.
* Evaluation of Additional Containment Metal 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
Error in Oxidation Calculations
: 2.
Error in use of ASME Steam Tables
: 3.
Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors
: 4.
Discrepancy in Wetted Perimeter Inputs Other
: 1.
: 1.
* Evaluation of Additional Containment Metal                  0
None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS Page 3of6 Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report PCT=
: c. 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
0 0
: 1. Error in Oxidation Calculations                            0
4 0
: 2. Error in use of ASME Steam Tables                          0
0 0
: 3. Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors                      0
0 0
: 4. Discrepancy in Wetted Perimeter Inputs                      0 D. Other
0 2071  
: 1. None                                                        0 LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS                    PCT=      2071 Page 3of6


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 4 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:           Surry Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:         Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:                   NOTRUMP                 Limiting Break Size:   2.75 inches Analysis Date:         5/7/2009 Vendor:               Westinghouse FQ:                   2.5                     FAH:             1.7 Fuel:                 Upgrade                   SGTP (% ):     7 Notes:                 None*
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
Clad Temp (0 F}
Surry Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                             2012 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:
A.     Prior ECCS Model Assessments
NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:
: 1. Urania-Gadolinia Pellet Thermal Conductivity Calculation         0
2.75 inches Analysis Date:
: 2. Pellet Crack and Dish Volume Calculation                         0
5/7 /2009 Vendor:
: 3. Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty             0
Westinghouse FQ:
: 4. 15X15 Upgrade Fuel                                               0
2.5 FAH:
: 5. Maximum Fuel Rod Time Step Logic                                 0
1.7 Fuel:
: 6. Radiation Heat Transfer Logic                                   0
Upgrade SGTP (% ):
: 7. NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal                     0 Conductivity Degradation
7 Notes:
: 8. SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst           0
None*
: 9. Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error                                   0
Clad Temp (0F}
: 10. Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error                             0
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 2012 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
: 11. SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer                           0 Coefficient Calculation B.      Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
A.
: 1. None                                                             0
Prior ECCS Model Assessments B.
: c.      2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: c.
: 1. None                                                             0 D.      Other
D.
: 1. None                                                             0 LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS                         PCT=         2012 Page 4of6
: 1.
Urania-Gadolinia Pellet Thermal Conductivity Calculation 0
: 2.
Pellet Crack and Dish Volume Calculation 0
: 3.
Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty 0
: 4.
15X15 Upgrade Fuel 0
: 5.
Maximum Fuel Rod Time Step Logic 0
: 6.
Radiation Heat Transfer Logic 0
: 7.
NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal 0
: 8.
: 9.
: 10.
: 11.
Conductivity Degradation SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1.
None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1.
None Other
: 1.
None 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=
2012 Page 4of6  


Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 4 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:             Surry Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:           Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:                     ASTRUM (2004)             Limiting Break Size: DEG Analysis Date:         10/6/2010 Vendor:                 Westinghouse FQ:                     2.5                       FL\11:           1.7 Fuel:                   Upgrade                   SGTP (%):       7 Notes:                 None Clad Temp (°F)
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT                                               1853 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
Surry Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:
A.     Prior ECCS Model Assessments
Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:
: 1. Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity                 183 Degradation
ASTRUM (2004)
: 2. Pellet Radial Profile Option                                   -13
Limiting Break Size:
: 3. HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation                             0 for ZIRLO Cladding
DEG Analysis Date:
: 4. Rod Internal Pressure Calculation                                 0
10/6/2010 Vendor:
: 5. HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the                   0 Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature
Westinghouse FQ:
: 6. WCOBRAJTRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File                       0 Dimension used in HSDRlVER Background
2.5 FL\\11:
: 7. WCOBRAJTRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error                 0
1.7 Fuel:
: 8. Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty               0 Calculation
Upgrade SGTP (%):
: 9. Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization               0
7 Notes:
: 10. Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections                             0
None Clad Temp (°F)
: 11. Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization                   0
LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1853 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)
: 12. Mass Conservation Error Fix                                       0
A.
: 13. Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation                     0
Prior ECCS Model Assessments
: 14. Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation         0
: 1.
: 15. Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties                   0
Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 183 Degradation
: 16. Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures                   0
: 2.
: 17. Decay Heat Model Error Corrections                               0
Pellet Radial Profile Option  
: 18. Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error                   0
-13
: 19. WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction                   0
: 3.
: 20. Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions                   -7
HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0
: 21. HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction                           51
for ZIRLO Cladding
: 22. Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity                       0
: 4.
: 23. Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation                       0 Page 5of6
Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0
 
: 5.
Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Attachment 4
HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0
: 24. Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling               0
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature
: 25. Burst Elevation Selection                                   0
: 6.
: 26. Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors                   4
WCOBRAJTRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0
:B. Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
Dimension used in HSDRlVER Background
: 1.     Evaluation of Additional Containment Metal                 0 C. 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 7.
: 1. Error in Oxidation Calculations                                 0
WCOBRAJTRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0
: 2. Error in use of ASME Steam Tables                               0
: 8.
: 3. Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors                           0
Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 0
: 4. Discrepancy in Wetted Perimeter Inputs                           0 D. Other
Calculation
: 1.     None                                                       0 LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS                     PCT=      2071 Page 6 of 6}}
: 9.
Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization 0
: 10.
Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections 0
: 11.
Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization 0
: 12.
Mass Conservation Error Fix 0
: 13.
Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation 0
: 14.
Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation 0
: 15.
Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties 0
: 16.
Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures 0
: 17.
Decay Heat Model Error Corrections 0
: 18.
Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error 0
: 19.
WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction 0
: 20.
Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions  
-7
: 21.
HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction 51
: 22.
Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity 0
: 23.
Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation 0
Page 5of6
:B.
: 24.
: 25.
: 26.
Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Planned Plant Modification Evaluations
: 1.
Evaluation of Additional Containment Metal C.
2016 ECCS Model Assessments
: 1. Error in Oxidation Calculations
: 2. Error in use of ASME Steam Tables
: 3. Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors
: 4. Discrepancy in Wetted Perimeter Inputs D.
Other
: 1.
None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS Page 6 of 6 Serial No. 17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report PCT=
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 2071}}

Latest revision as of 18:25, 8 January 2025

Transmittal of 2016 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) Model Changes Pursuant to the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.46
ML17184A146
Person / Time
Site: Millstone, Surry, North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 06/27/2017
From: Mark D. Sartain
Dominion Energy Services
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
17-264
Download: ML17184A146 (31)


Text

I...

Dominion Energy Services, Inc.

5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060 DominionEnergy.com June 27, 2017

~Dominion

~Energy U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOMINION NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND. 2

. SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 Serial No.:

NRA/GDM Docket Nos.:

License Nos.:

17-264 R1 50-336/423 50-338/339 50-280/281 DPR-65/NPF-49 NPF-4/7 DPR-32/37 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM CECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii), Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company hereby submit the annual summary of permanent changes to the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) evaluation models for Millstone Power Station (MPS) Units 2 and 3, North Anna Power Station (NAPS) Units 1 and 2, and Surry Power Station (SPS) Units 1 and 2, respectively. of this letter provides a report describing plant-specific evaluation model changes associated with the Westinghouse and AREVA Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident (SBLOCA) and Large Break Loss of Coolant Acddent (LBLOCA) ECCS evaluation models for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2, as applicable.

Information regarding the effect of the ECCS evaluation model changes upon the reported SBLOCA and LBLOCA analyses of record results is provided for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2 in Attachments 2, 3 and 4, respectively.

The calculated peak cladding temperatures (PCT) for the SBLOCA and LBLOCA analyses for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2 are summarized below:

Millstone Unit 2 Millstone Unit 2 Millstone Unit 3 Millstone Unit 3 North Anna Unit 1 North Anna Unit 1 North Anna Unit 2 North Anna Unit 2 Surry Units 1 and 2 Surry Units 1 and 2 Small break -AREVA Evaluation Model:

Large break -AREVA Evaluation Model:

Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:

Large break -Westinghouse Evaluation Model:

Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:

Large break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:

Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:

Large break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:

Small break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:

Large.break - Westinghouse Evaluation Model:

1711°F 1845°F 1193°F 1933°F 1834.1°F 1982°F 1834.1°F 1982°F 2012°F 2071°F

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Page 2 of 3 The LOCA results for MPS 2 and 3, NAPS 1 and 2, and SPS 1 and 2 are confirmed to have margin to the 2200°F limit for PCT specified in 10 CFR 50.46.

Based on the evaluation of this information and the resulting changes in the applicable licensing basis PCT results, no further action is required to demonstrate compliance with the 10 CFR 50.46 requirements.

The information contained herein satisfies the 2016 annual reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii).

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Gary D. Miller at (804) 273-2771.

Respectfully,

~-

Mark D. Sartain Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Fleet Support Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

Virginia Electric and Power Company Commitments made in this letter: None Attachments:

1. Report of Changes in AREVA and Westinghouse ECCS Evaluation Models
2. 2016 Annual Reporting of 10 CFR 50.46 Margin Utilization - Millstone Power Station Units 2 and 3
3. 2016 Annual Reporting of 10 CFR 50.46 Margin Utilization - North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2
4. 2016 Annual Reporting of 10 CFR 50.46 Margin Utilization - Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Page 3 of 3 cc:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I Regional Administrator 2100 Renaissance Blvd., Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-2713 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Regional Administrator Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Millstone Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Mr. J. R. Hall NRC Senior Project Manager - North Anna U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. R. Guzman NRC Senior Project Manager - Millstone Units 2 and 3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 C-2 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Ms. K. R. Cotton Gross NRC Project Manager - Surry U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. J. E. Reasor, Jr.

Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Innsbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300 4201 Dominion Blvd.

Glen Allen, Virginia 23060

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM (ECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 REPORT OF CHANGES IN AREVA AND WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION MODELS DOMINION NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report REPORT OF CHANGES IN AREVA AND WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION MODELS Millstone Power Station Unit 2

1. AREVA identified no changes or errors applicable to the 2002 S-RELAPS based Small Break LOCA (SBLOCA) Evaluation Model for Millstone Unit 2 during 2016.

This was the analysis of record in 2016 until the implementation of License Amendment 329 with the new SBLOCA analysis described in Item #2 below.

2. On September 30, 2016, a new SBLOCA analysis was approved by the NRC based upon EMF-2328(P)(A), Revision 0 with Supplement 1. That analysis was performed in support of introduction of the AREVA Standard CE14 HTP fuel product with MS' fuel rod cladding. The new limiting break size resulted in a peak clad temperature (PCT) of 1707°F. Additionally, results were presented for the current fuel product with Zircaloy-4 (Zr-4) cladding. The Zr-4 necessitated a 4°F PCT penalty.
3. AREVA identified no changes or errors applicable to the SEM/PWR-98 evaluation model for Large Break LOCA (LBLOCA) for Millstone Unit 2 during 2016.
4. On January 24, 2017, a new LBLOCA analysis was approved by the NRC based upon the EMF-2103(P)(A), Revision 3, Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors.

The new analysis was applicable to the AREVA Standard CE14 HTP fuel product with MS' fuel rod cladding only:

The analysis predicted a PCT of 161S°F. As this fuel type will not be included in the Millstone 2 core until the spring of 2017, the margin utilization table for the realistic LBLOCA analysis is not included in this 2016 annual report.

Millstone Power Station (Millstone) Unit 3

1. Westinghouse identified no changes or errors to the 198S Westinghouse SBLOCA Evaluation Model with NOTRUMP for Millstone Unit 3 during 2016.
2. Westinghouse identified the following changes and errors applicable to the 2004 Westinghouse Best Estimate (BE) LBLOCA Evaluation Model using the Automated Statistical Treatment of Uncertainty Method (ASTRUM) for Millstone Unit 3 during 2016:

General Code Maintenance. Various changes have been made to enhance the usability of codes and to streamline future analyses. Examples of these changes include modifying input variable definitions, units and defaults; improving the.

input diagnostic checks; enhancing the code output; optimizing active coding; and eliminating inactive coding.

The nature of these changes leads to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Page 1 of 6

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Error in Oxidation Calculations.

A closely-related group of errors were discovered in the WCOBRA/TRAC software program. The errors are related to the calculation of high temperature oxidation within a realistic LBLOCA calculation.

This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on the ASTRUM and the BE LBLOCA licensing basis analysis results.

It was determined that correcting the high temperature oxidation calculation in WCOBRA/TRAC is estimated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA PCT analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Error in use of ASME Steam Tables. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) steam tables are used to calculate the steady state upper head liquid temperature as a function of the pressure and specific enthalpy in the ASTRUM software program. The steam table applicable to steam/gas is used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. However, the water in the upper head is in the subcooled liquid state during normal operation (and the steady-state calculation). Therefore, the steam table applicable to liquid should be used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. This issue-has been evaluated to estimate the impact on ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results.

It was determined that the temperatures calculated by the ASME steam tables applicable to the steam/gas side and the liquid side are very similar within the typical upper head pressure and liquid specific enthalpy ranges. Therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

3. A future plant change, the insertion of up to eight (8) AXIOM' lead test assemblies (LTAs) into fuel cycle 19 was evaluated. The AXIOM' cladding LTAs at Millstone Unit 3 will be non-limiting with respect to the Millstone Unit 3 LOCA analyses, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F on the LBLOCA and SBLOCA analyses.

North Anna Power Station (North Anna) Units 1 and 2

1. For consistency with the completion of the fuel transition to Westinghouse fuel assemblies and Dominion's plans not to re-insert AREVA fuel assemblies into the North Anna cores, the PCT utilization tables for AREVA Evaluation Models have been deleted as stated in the Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to the NRC dated May 6, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16134A071) and as indicated below:

North Anna Unit 1 - Small break -AREVA Evaluation Model:

North Anna Unit 1 - Large break -AREVA Evaluation Model:

North Anna Unit 2 - Small break -AREVA Evaluation Model:

North Anna Unit 2 - Large break -AREVA Evaluation Model:

deleted deleted deleted deleted

2. Westinghouse identified no changes or errors applicable to the 1985 Westinghouse

~BLOCA Evaluation Model with NOTRUMP for North Anna Units 1 and 2 during 2016.

Page 2of6

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report

3. A design change (reactor vessel barrel\\baffle upflow conversion) was completed for North Anna Unit 2 during the spring 2016 refueling outage.

Westinghouse performed an evaluation and concluded the SBLOCA analysis of record performed with the NOTRUMP Evaluation Model continues to remain applicable to North Anna Unit 2 after the implementation of the upflow conversion. Therefore, no changes were made to the SBLOCA rack-up table for North Anna Unit 2 presented in.

This information, regarding changes to the North Anna Unit 2 Evaluation Model in 2016, was transmitted to the NRC in the Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to the NRC dated May 6, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16134A071).

4. A design change (reactor vessel barrel\\baffle upflow conversion) was completed for North Anna Unit 2 during the spring 2016 refueling outage. Westinghouse performed an evaluation to ensure the LBLOCA model for North Anna Unit 1, which has an upflow baffle/barrel configuration,. is representative of Unit 2 subsequent to the upflow conversion.

Westinghouse concluded that the LBLOCA analysis results for North Anna Unit 1 are also applicable to North Anna Unit 2. Therefore, the LBLOCA rackup table for North Anna Unit 2 presented in Attachment 3 is updated to reflect this change.

This information, regarding changes to the North Anna Unit 2 Evaluation Model in 2016, was transmitted to the NRC in the Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to the NRC dated May 6, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16134A071).

5. Westinghouse identified the following changes or errors applicable to the 2004 Westinghouse BE LBLOCA Evaluation Model using ASTRUM for North Anna Units 1 and 2 during 2016:

General Code Maintenance. Various changes have been made to enhance the usability of codes and to streamline future analyses.- Examples of these changes include modifying input variable definitions, units and defaults; improving the input diagnostic checks; enhancing the code output; optimizing active coding; and eliminating inactive coding. The nature of these changes leads to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Error in Oxidation Calculations.

A closely-related group of errors were discovered in the WCOBRA/TRAC software program. The errors are related to the calculation of high temperature oxidation within a realistic LBLOCA calculation.

This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on the ASTRUM and the BE LBLOCA licensing basis analysis results.

It was determined that correcting the high temperature oxidation calculation in WCOBRA/TRAC is estimated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA peak cladding temperature (PCT) analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Page 3 of 6

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report Error in use of ASME Steam Tables. The ASME steam tables are used to calculate the steady state upper head liquid temperature as a function of the pressure and specific enthalpy in the ASTRUM software program. The steam table applicable to steam/gas is used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. However, the water in the upper head is in the subcooled liquid state during normal operation (and the steady-state calculation). Therefore, the steam table applicable to liquid should be used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results. It was determined that the temperatures calculated by the ASME steam tables applicable to the steam/gas side and the liquid side are very similar within the typical upper head pressure and liquid specific enthalpy ranges. Therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Support Column Unheated Conductor Error.

A modeling error was discovered in the support column unheated conductor in several BE LBLOCA analyses of record in which the metal thickness of the support columns in the upper plenum was underestimated. The heat transferred to the fluid from the support columns is small relative to the heat release from the core due to high fuel stored energy, decay heat, and since the upper plenum rapidly becomes a steam environment in a LBLOCA. Therefore, it does not significantly contribute to the transient response. The support column unheated conductor modeling error has been generically evaluated to have a negligible impact on the existing analyses, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Surry Power Station (Surry) Units 1 and 2

1. Westinghouse identified no changes or errors applicable to the 1985 Westinghouse SBLOCA Evaluation Model with NOTRUMP for Surry Units 1 and 2 during 2016.
2. Westinghouse identified the following changes or errors* applicable to the 2004 Westinghouse BE LBLOCA Evaluation Model using ASTRUM for Surry Units 1 and 2 during 2016.

General Code Maintenance. Various changes have been made to enhance the usability of codes and to streamline future analyses. Examples of these changes include modifying input variable definitions, units and defaults; improving the input diagnostic checks; enhancing the code output; optimizing active coding; and eliminating inactive coding.

The nature of these changes leads to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Error in Oxidation Calculations.

A closely-related group of errors were discovered in the WCOBRA/TRAC software program. The errors are related to the calculation of high temperature oxidation within a realistic LBLOCA Page 4of6

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report calculation.

This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on the ASTRUM and the BE LBLOCA licensing basis analysis results.

It was determined that correcting the high temperature oxidation calculation in WCOBRA!TRAC is estimated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA PCT analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Error in use of ASME Steam Tables. The ASME steam tables are used to calculate the steady state upper head liquid temperature as a function of the pressure and specific enthalpy in the ASTRUM software program. The steam table applicable to steam/gas is used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. However, the water in the upper head is in the subcooled liquid state during normal operation (and the steady-state calculation). Therefore, the steam table applicable to liquid should be used to determine the upper head fluid temperature. This issue has been evaluated to estimate the impact on ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results. It was determined that the temperatures calculated by the ASME steam tables applicable to the steam/gas side and the liquid side are very similar within the typical upper head pressure and liquid specific enthalpy ranges. Therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the ASTRUM BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors. Errors were discovered in modeling the core barrel in the vessel lower plenum within the BE LBLOCA analysis of record. An evaluation was performed to estimate the impact on the Surry Units 1 and 2 BE LBLOCA analysis.

The modeling errors impacted the thermal resistance and stored energy of the core barrel.

A qualitative evaluation concluded that the material modeled for the core barrel unheated conductor is adequate; therefore, this error was evaluated to have a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Discrepancy in Wetted Perimeter Inputs. Inconsistencies were discovered in the wetted perimeter inputs in the upper plenum and upper head of the vessel model for the BE LBLOCA analysis of record. An evaluation was performed to estimate the impact on the Surry Units 1 and 2 BE LBLOCA analysis.

A qualitative evaluation of the wetted perimeter at the bottom of the upper head concluded a negligible impact on the BE LBLOCA analysis results, leading to an estimated PCT impact of 0°F.

Conclusion The LOCA results for Millstone Units 2 and 3, North Anna Units 1 and 2, and Surry Units 1 and 2 are confirmed in the PCT rack-up tables, Attachments 2 through 4, respectively, to have margin to the 2200°F limit for PCT specified in 10 CFR 50.46.

Based on the evaluation of this information and the resulting changes in the applicable licensing basis PCT results, no further action is required to demonstrate compliance Page 5of6

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423/338/339/280/281 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report with the 1 O CFR 50.46 requirements. Reporting of this information is required per 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii), which obligates each licensee to report the effect upon calculated temperature of any change or error in evaluation models or their application on an annual basis.

This information satisfies the annual reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii) for calendar year 2016.

Page 6 of 6 Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM (ECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 2016 ANNUAL REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION DOMINION NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.

MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

Millstone Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

Analysis Information

  • EM:

2015, Supp. 1, SBLOCA, S-RELAP5 Based Limiting Break Size: 3.78 Inches Analysis Date:

April 2015 Vendor:

AREVA Peak Linear Power: 15.1 kW/ft Notes:

None LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments

1. Zirc-4 Product Penalty B.

Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1. None C.

2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1. None D.

Other

1. None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS Page 1 of 6 Clad Temp(OF) 1707 4

0 0

0 PCT=

1711


~

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

Millstone Power Station, Unit 2 Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

Utility Name:

Analysis Information EM:

SEM/PWR-98 Limiting Break Size: 1.0 DECLG Analysis Date:

11/98 Vendor:

AREVA Peak Linear Power: 15.1 kW /ft Notes:

None Clad Temp (OF)

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1814 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments

1.

Corrected Corrosion Enhancement Factor

-1

2.

ICECON Coding Errors 0

3.

Setting RFPAC Fuel Temperatures at Start ofReflood

-2

4.

SISPUNCH/ujun98 Code Error 0

5.

Error in Flow Blockage Model in TOODEE2 0

6.

Change in TOODEE2-Calculation of QMAX 0

7.

Change in Gadolinia Modeling 0

8.

PWR LBLOCA Split Break Modeling 0

9.

TEOBY Calculation Error 0

10.

Inappropriate Heat Transfer in TOODEE2 0

11.

End-of-Bypass Prediction by TEOBY 0

12.

R4SS Overwrite of Junction Inertia 0

13.

Incorrect Junction Inertia Multipliers 1

14.

Errors Discovered During RODEX2 V&V 0

15.

Error in Broken Loop SG Tube Exit Junction Inertia 0

16.

RFP AC Refill and Reflood Calculation Code Errors 16

17.

Incorrect Pump Junction Area Used in RELAP4 0

18.

Error in TOODEE2 Clad Thermal Expansion

-1

19.

Accumulator Line Loss Error

-1

20.

Inconsistent Loss Coefficients Used for Robinson LBLOCA 0

21.

Pump Head Adjustment for Pressure Balance Initialization

-3

22.

ICECON Code Errors 0

23.

Containment Sump Modification and Replacement PZR 2

24.

Non-Conservative RODEX Fuel Pellet Temperature 20

25.

Array Index Issues in the RELAP4 Code 0

B.

Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

None 0

c.

2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1.

None 0

Page 2of6

D.

Other

1.

None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS Page 3of6 Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 0

PCT=

1845

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

Millstone Power Station, Unit 3 Utility Name:

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

Analysis Information EM:

NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:

4 inches Analysis Date:

02/07107 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

2.6 FdH:

1.65 Fuel:

RFA-2 SGTP (%):

10 Notes:

None Clad Temp (°F)

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments B.

c.

D.

1.

Errors in Reactor Vessel Lower Plenum Surface Area Calculations

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Discrepancy in Metal Masses Used From Drawings Urania-Gadolinia Pellet Thermal Conductivity Calculation Pellet Crack and Dish Volume Calculation Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty Maximum Fuel Rod Time Step Logic Radiation Heat Transfer Logic NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity Degradation SBLOCA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

Insertion of AXIOM' Cladding LTAs 2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1.

None Other

1.

None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=

Page 4 of 6 1193 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

1193

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name: _

Millstone Power Station, Unit 3 Utility Name:

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

Analysis Information EM:

ASTRUM (2004)

Limiting Break Size:

Guillotine Analysis Date:

04/17 /07 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

2.6 FdH:

1.65 Fuel:

RFA-2 SGTP (%):

10 Notes:

None Clad Temp (°F)

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1781

. PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments

1.

HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Logic Errors 0

2.

CCFL Global Volume Error 0

3.

HOTSPOT Gap Heat Transfer Logic 0

4.

Discrepancy in Metal Masses Used From Drawings 0

5.

Error in ASTRUM Processing of Average Rod Burnup 0

and Rod Internal Pressure

6.

Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty 0

7.

PBOT and PMID Evaluation 0

8.

Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 222 Degradation

9.

HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0

for ZIRLO Cladding

10.

Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0

11.

HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature

12.

WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0

Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background

13.

WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0

14.

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 0

Calculation

15.

Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization 0

16.

Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections 0

17.

Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization 0

18.

Mass Conservation Error Fix 0

19.

Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation 0

20.

Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation 0

21.

Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties 0

22.

Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures 0

23.

Decay Heat Model Error Corrections 0

24.

Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error 0

Page 5of6

B.

c.

D.

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-336/423 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report

25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.

WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Errors in Support Plate, Core Barrel, and Vessel Wall Unheated Conductor Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

Insertion of AXIOM' Cladding LT As 2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1.

Error in Oxidation Calculations

2.

Error in use of ASME Steam Tables Other

1.

None 0

-91 21 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=

1933 Page 6of6 Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM CECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 2016 ANNUAL REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:

Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:

NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:

2.75 inches Analysis Date:

12/20/2010 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

2.32 FMI:

1.65 Fuel:

RFA-2 SGTP (%):

7 Notes:

None Clad Temp (OF)

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments

1.

NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal B.

c.

D.

2.
3.
4.
5.

Conductivity Degradation SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1.

None Other

1.

None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=

Page 1 of 6 1834.1 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 1834.1

\\

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

Utility Name:

North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:

ASTRUM (2004)

Limiting Break Size:

Analysis Date:

8/25/2010 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

232 FMI:

1.65 Fuel:

RFA-2 SGTP (%):

7 DEGB Notes:

Core Power::; 100% of2951 MWt; SG Model 54F; 17x17 RFA-2 Fuel with ZIRLO or Optimized ZIRLO' cladding, Non-IFBA or IFBA, IFMs Clad Temp (OF)

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1852 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments

1.

Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 135 Degradation

2.

HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0

for ZIRLO Cladding

3.

Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0

4.

HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature

5.

WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0

Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background

6.

WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0

7.

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 1

Calculation

8.

Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization 0

9.

Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections 0

10.

Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization 0

11.

Mass Conservation Error Fix

  • 0
12.

Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation 0

13.

Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation 0

14.

Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties 0

15.

Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures 0

16.

Decay Heat Model Error Corrections 0

17.

Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error 0

18.

WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction 0

19.

Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions

-27

20.

HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction 21

21.

Changes to.Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity 0

22.

Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation 0

Page 2of6

B.

c.
23.
24.
25.

Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1.

Error in Oxidation Calculations

2.

Error in use of ASME Steam Tables Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 0

0 0

0

3.

Support Column Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors 0

0 0

D.

Other

1.

Transition Core 0

LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=

1982 Page 3of6

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

Utility Name:

North Anna Power Station, Unit 2 Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:

NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:

Analysis Date:

12/20/2010 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

2.32 FMI:

1.65 Fuel:

RFA-2 SGTP (%):

7 Notes:

None LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments

1.

NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity Degradation 2.75 inches Clad Temp (°F) 1834.1 0

2.
3.
4.
5.

SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error 0

0 0

0 Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation B.

Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

None 0

c.

2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1.

None 0

D.

Other

1.

None 0

LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=

1834.1 Page 4 of 6

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

North Anna Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:

Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:

ASTRUM (2004)

Limiting Break Size:

DEGB Analysis Date:

8/25/2010 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

2.32 FMI:

. 1.65 Fuel:

RF A-2 SGTP (% ):

7 Notes:

CorePower:'.S 100% of2951 MWt; SG Model 54F; 17xl7 RFA-2 Fuel with ZIRLO or Optimized ZIRLO' cladding, Non-IFBA or IFBA, IFMs Clad Temp (OF)

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1852 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments

1.

Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 135 Degradation

2.

HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0

for ZIRLO Cladding

3.

Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0

4.

HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature

5.

WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0

Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background

6.

WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0

7.

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 1

Calculation

8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.

Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization Mass Conservation Error Fix Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures Decay Heat Model Error Corrections Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity Page 5of6 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

-27 21 0

B.

c.
22.
23.
24.
25.

Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1.

Error in Oxidation Calculations

2.

Error in use of ASME Steam Tables Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-338/339 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 0

0 0

0 0

3.

Support Column Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors 0

0 0

D.

Other

1.

Transition Core 0

LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=

1982 Page 6 of 6 Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM (ECCS) MODEL CHANGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.46 2016 ANNUAL REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

Surry Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:

Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:

NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:

2.75 inches Analysis Date:

5/7 /2009 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

2.5 FMI:

1.7 Fuel:

Upgrade SGTP (%):

7 Notes:

None Clad Temp (°F)

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 2012 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments B.

c.

D.

1.

Urania-Gadolinia Pellet Thermal Conductivity Calculation.

0

2.

Pellet Crack and Dish Volume Calculation.

0

3.

Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty 0

4.

15Xl 5 Upgrade Fuel 0

5.

Maximum Fuel Rod Time Step Logic 0

6.

Radiation Heat Transfer Logic 0

7.

NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal 0

8.
9.
10.
11.

Conductivity Degradation SBLOCT A Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1.

None Other

1.

None 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

LICENSING BASIS PCT +PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=

2012 Page 1 of 6

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

Surry Power Station, Unit 1 Utility Name:

Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:

ASTRUM (2004)

Limiting Break Size:

DEG Analysis Date:

10/6/2010 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

2.5 FLill

1.7 Fuel:

Upgrade SGTP (%):

7 Notes:

None Clad Temp (°F)

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1853 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments

1.

Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 183 Degradation

2.

Pellet Radial Profile Option

-13

3.

HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0

for ZIRLO Cladding

4.

Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0

5.

HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature*

6.

WCOBRA/TRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0

Dimension used in HSDRIVER Background

7.

WCOBRA/TRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0

8.

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 0

Calculation

9.

Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization 0

10.

Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections 0

11.

Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization 0

12.

Mass Conservation Error Fix 0

13.

Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation 0

14.

Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation 0

15.

Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties 0

16.

Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures 0

17.

Decay Heat Model Error Corrections 0

18.

Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error 0

19.

WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction 0

20.

Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions

-7

21.

HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction 51

22.

Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity 0

23.

Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation 0

Page 2of6

B.

c.

D.

24.
25.
26.

Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.
  • Evaluation of Additional Containment Metal 2016 ECCS Model Assessments
1.

Error in Oxidation Calculations

2.

Error in use of ASME Steam Tables

3.

Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors

4.

Discrepancy in Wetted Perimeter Inputs Other

1.

None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS Page 3of6 Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report PCT=

0 0

4 0

0 0

0 0

0 2071

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 1 O CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

Surry Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:

Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:

NOTRUMP Limiting Break Size:

2.75 inches Analysis Date:

5/7 /2009 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

2.5 FAH:

1.7 Fuel:

Upgrade SGTP (% ):

7 Notes:

None*

Clad Temp (0F}

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 2012 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments B.

c.

D.

1.

Urania-Gadolinia Pellet Thermal Conductivity Calculation 0

2.

Pellet Crack and Dish Volume Calculation 0

3.

Treatment of Vessel Average Temperature Uncertainty 0

4.

15X15 Upgrade Fuel 0

5.

Maximum Fuel Rod Time Step Logic 0

6.

Radiation Heat Transfer Logic 0

7.

NOTRUMP-EM Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal 0

8.
9.
10.
11.

Conductivity Degradation SBLOCTA Cladding Strain Requirement for Fuel Rod Burst Fuel Rod Gap Conductance Error Radiation Heat Transfer Model Error SBLOCTA Pre-DNB Cladding Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

None 2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1.

None Other

1.

None 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS PCT=

2012 Page 4of6

Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report 10 CFR 50.46 MARGIN UTILIZATION - WESTINGHOUSE LARGE BREAK LOCA Plant Name:

Surry Power Station, Unit 2 Utility Name:

Virginia Electric and Power Company Analysis Information EM:

ASTRUM (2004)

Limiting Break Size:

DEG Analysis Date:

10/6/2010 Vendor:

Westinghouse FQ:

2.5 FL\\11:

1.7 Fuel:

Upgrade SGTP (%):

7 Notes:

None Clad Temp (°F)

LICENSING BASIS Analysis of Record PCT 1853 PCT ASSESSMENTS (Delta PCT)

A.

Prior ECCS Model Assessments

1.

Evaluation of Fuel Pellet Thermal Conductivity 183 Degradation

2.

Pellet Radial Profile Option

-13

3.

HOTSPOT Burst Temperature Calculation 0

for ZIRLO Cladding

4.

Rod Internal Pressure Calculation 0

5.

HOTSPOT Iteration Algorithm for Calculating the 0

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature

6.

WCOBRAJTRAC Thermal-Hydraulic History File 0

Dimension used in HSDRlVER Background

7.

WCOBRAJTRAC Automated Restart Process Logic Error 0

8.

Initial Fuel Pellet Average Temperature Uncertainty 0

Calculation

9.

Elevations for Heat Slab Temperature Initialization 0

10.

Heat Transfer Model Error Corrections 0

11.

Correction to Heat Transfer Node Initialization 0

12.

Mass Conservation Error Fix 0

13.

Correction to Split Channel Momentum Equation 0

14.

Heat Transfer Logic Correction for Rod Burst Calculation 0

15.

Changes to Vessel Superheated Steam Properties 0

16.

Update to Metal Density Reference Temperatures 0

17.

Decay Heat Model Error Corrections 0

18.

Correction to the Pipe Exit Pressure Drop Error 0

19.

WCOBRA/TRAC U19 File Dimension Error Correction 0

20.

Revised Heat Transfer Multiplier Distributions

-7

21.

HOTSPOT Burst Strain Error Correction 51

22.

Changes to Grid Blockage Ratio and Porosity 0

23.

Grid Heat Transfer Enhancement Calculation 0

Page 5of6

B.
24.
25.
26.

Vessel Section 7 Mid-Level Elevation Modeling Burst Elevation Selection Errors in Decay Group Uncertainty Factors Planned Plant Modification Evaluations

1.

Evaluation of Additional Containment Metal C.

2016 ECCS Model Assessments

1. Error in Oxidation Calculations
2. Error in use of ASME Steam Tables
3. Core Barrel Unheated Conductor Errors
4. Discrepancy in Wetted Perimeter Inputs D.

Other

1.

None LICENSING BASIS PCT + PCT ASSESSMENTS Page 6 of 6 Serial No.17-264 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report PCT=

0 0

4 0

0 0

0 0

0 2071