IR 05000454/2017009: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17300B053
| number = ML17300B053
| issue date = 10/26/2017
| issue date = 10/26/2017
| title = Ltr 10/26/17 Byron Station Follow-Up to Disputed Violation of NRC Inspection Report 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009 (DRS-D.Szwarc)
| title = Follow-Up to Disputed Violation of NRC Inspection Report 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009 (DRS-D.Szwarc)
| author name = Daley R C
| author name = Daley R
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB3
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB3
| addressee name = Hanson B C
| addressee name = Hanson B
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear
| docket = 05000454, 05000455
| docket = 05000454, 05000455
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:October 26, 2017
[[Issue date::October 26, 2017]]


EA-17-138 Mr. Bryan Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
==SUBJECT:==
BYRON STATION FOLLOW-UP TO DISPUTED VIOLATION OF NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009


SUBJECT: BYRON STATION FOLLOW-UP TO DISPUTED VIOLATION OF NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009
==Dear Mr. Hanson:==
This is a follow-up letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) acknowledgement of disputed violation of NRC Inspection Report 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009.
 
Specifically, on August 28, 2017, the NRC acknowledged your letter sent to the NRC, dated July 31, 2017, that contested a Non-Cited Violation documented in our inspection report issued on June 29, 2017. The contested Non-Cited Violation is Failure to Perform 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation for Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Change.
 
The NRC seeks to provide a thorough response to disputed violations within 90 days of receipt of a licensees points of contention, as described in Section 2.2.7 of the NRC Enforcement Manual, Part I. However, the NRC review of this disputed violation is expected to take longer than 90 days because of ongoing activities related to the subject of this disputed violation. We will inform you as soon as we complete our evaluation.


==Dear Mr. Hanson:==
This letter will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
This is a follow-up letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) acknowledgement of disputed violation of NRC Inspection Report 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009. Specifically, on August 28, 2017, the NRC acknowledged your letter sent to the NRC, dated July 31, 2017, that contested a Non-Cited Violation documented in our inspection report issued on June 29, 2017. The contested Non-Cited Violation is The NRC seeks to provide a thorough response to disputed violations within 90 days of receipt of a n, as described in Section 2.2.7 of the NRC Enforcement Manual, Part I. However, the NRC review of this disputed violation is expected to take longer than 90 days because of ongoing activities related to the subject of this disputed violation. We will inform you as soon as we complete our evaluation. This letter will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR Exemptions  
 
Sincerely,
/RA/
 
Robert C. Daley, Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455 License Nos. NPF-37; NPF-66 cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
 
Letter to Bryan from Robert C. Daley dated October 26, 2017 SUBJECT: BYRON STATION FOLLOW-UP TO DISPUTED VIOLATION OF NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009 DISTRIBUTION:
Theresa Clark RidsNrrDorlLpl3 RidsNrrPMByron Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Kenneth OBrien Richard Skokowski Allan Barker Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRPIII DRSIII
 
ADAMS Accession Number ML17300B053 OFFICE RIII
 
RIII
 
RIII
 
RIII
 
NAME DSzwarc:cl RDaley RSkokowski
 
DATE 10/825/17 10/26/17 10/25/17


Sincerely,/RA/ Robert C. Daley, Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50454; 50455 License Nos. NPF37; NPF66 cc: Distribution via LISTSERV Letter to Bryan from Robert C. Daley dated October 26, 2017 SUBJECT: BYRON STATION FOLLOW-UP TO DISPUTED VIOLATION OF NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009 DISTRIBUTION: Theresa Clark RidsNrrDorlLpl3 RidsNrrPMByron Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Richard Skokowski Allan Barker Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRPIII DRSIII  ADAMS Accession Number ML17300B053 OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME DSzwarc:cl RDaley RSkokowski DATE 10/825/17 10/26/17 10/25/17 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:12, 8 January 2025

Follow-Up to Disputed Violation of NRC Inspection Report 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009 (DRS-D.Szwarc)
ML17300B053
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/26/2017
From: Robert Daley
Engineering Branch 3
To: Bryan Hanson
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
EA-17-138 IR 2017009
Preceding documents:
Download: ML17300B053 (2)


Text

October 26, 2017

SUBJECT:

BYRON STATION FOLLOW-UP TO DISPUTED VIOLATION OF NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009

Dear Mr. Hanson:

This is a follow-up letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) acknowledgement of disputed violation of NRC Inspection Report 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009.

Specifically, on August 28, 2017, the NRC acknowledged your letter sent to the NRC, dated July 31, 2017, that contested a Non-Cited Violation documented in our inspection report issued on June 29, 2017. The contested Non-Cited Violation is Failure to Perform 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation for Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Change.

The NRC seeks to provide a thorough response to disputed violations within 90 days of receipt of a licensees points of contention, as described in Section 2.2.7 of the NRC Enforcement Manual, Part I. However, the NRC review of this disputed violation is expected to take longer than 90 days because of ongoing activities related to the subject of this disputed violation. We will inform you as soon as we complete our evaluation.

This letter will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Robert C. Daley, Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455 License Nos. NPF-37; NPF-66 cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

Letter to Bryan from Robert C. Daley dated October 26, 2017 SUBJECT: BYRON STATION FOLLOW-UP TO DISPUTED VIOLATION OF NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000454/2017009; 05000455/2017009 DISTRIBUTION:

Theresa Clark RidsNrrDorlLpl3 RidsNrrPMByron Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Kenneth OBrien Richard Skokowski Allan Barker Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRPIII DRSIII

ADAMS Accession Number ML17300B053 OFFICE RIII

RIII

RIII

RIII

NAME DSzwarc:cl RDaley RSkokowski

DATE 10/825/17 10/26/17 10/25/17

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY