ML18053A058: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:           Holonich, Joseph To:             Amberge, Kyle Cc:             Poehler, Jeffrey
{{#Wiki_filter:From:
Holonich, Joseph To:
Amberge, Kyle Cc:
Poehler, Jeffrey


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Information We Want on the Docket from MRP-227, Rev. 1 RAI Discussion Date:           Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:47:00 AM Good morning Kyle, Here is where the staff would like to have details on the docket from the information presented at the meeting yesterday. If the information is proprietary and can be covered by an existing affidavit you can say that in the letter and avoid another affidavit. If I get any other information I will forward it onto you.
Information We Want on the Docket from MRP-227, Rev. 1 RAI Discussion Date:
Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:47:00 AM Good morning Kyle, Here is where the staff would like to have details on the docket from the information presented at the meeting yesterday. If the information is proprietary and can be covered by an existing affidavit you can say that in the letter and avoid another affidavit. If I get any other information I will forward it onto you.
Industry response to observed degradation (Slide 6)
Industry response to observed degradation (Slide 6)
Relevance of BWR experience (Slide 7-8)
Relevance of BWR experience (Slide 7-8)

Latest revision as of 09:30, 6 January 2025

E-mail Information Staff Request on the Docket from MRP-227, Revision 1 RAI Discussion
ML18053A058
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/22/2018
From: Joseph Holonich
NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
To: Amberge K
Electric Power Research Institute
Holonich J
References
MRP-227, Rev 1
Download: ML18053A058 (1)


Text

From:

Holonich, Joseph To:

Amberge, Kyle Cc:

Poehler, Jeffrey

Subject:

Information We Want on the Docket from MRP-227, Rev. 1 RAI Discussion Date:

Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:47:00 AM Good morning Kyle, Here is where the staff would like to have details on the docket from the information presented at the meeting yesterday. If the information is proprietary and can be covered by an existing affidavit you can say that in the letter and avoid another affidavit. If I get any other information I will forward it onto you.

Industry response to observed degradation (Slide 6)

Relevance of BWR experience (Slide 7-8)

Slides 10, 11, 12 Response to Question 1, particularly MRP-191 Rev. 2 FMECA information compared to the previous FMECA information.

Question 3, Information on CRDM Drop Testing---Brians explanation (in the meeting and during the break) with drawings.

Question 4 - All.