ML18053A058: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Holonich, Joseph To: Amberge, Kyle Cc: Poehler, Jeffrey | {{#Wiki_filter:From: | ||
Holonich, Joseph To: | |||
Amberge, Kyle Cc: | |||
Poehler, Jeffrey | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Information We Want on the Docket from MRP-227, Rev. 1 RAI Discussion Date: Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:47:00 AM Good morning Kyle, Here is where the staff would like to have details on the docket from the information presented at the meeting yesterday. | Information We Want on the Docket from MRP-227, Rev. 1 RAI Discussion Date: | ||
If the information is proprietary and can be covered by an existing affidavit you can say that in the letter and avoid another affidavit. | Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:47:00 AM Good morning Kyle, Here is where the staff would like to have details on the docket from the information presented at the meeting yesterday. If the information is proprietary and can be covered by an existing affidavit you can say that in the letter and avoid another affidavit. If I get any other information I will forward it onto you. | ||
If I get any other information I will forward it onto you. | |||
Industry response to observed degradation (Slide 6) | Industry response to observed degradation (Slide 6) | ||
Relevance of BWR experience (Slide 7-8) | Relevance of BWR experience (Slide 7-8) | ||
Slides 10, 11, 12 Response to Question 1, particularly MRP-191 Rev. 2 FMECA information compared to the previous FMECA information. | Slides 10, 11, 12 Response to Question 1, particularly MRP-191 Rev. 2 FMECA information compared to the previous FMECA information. | ||
Question 3, Information on CRDM Drop Testing--- | Question 3, Information on CRDM Drop Testing---Brians explanation (in the meeting and during the break) with drawings. | ||
Question 4 - All.}} | Question 4 - All.}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:30, 6 January 2025
| ML18053A058 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/22/2018 |
| From: | Joseph Holonich NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB |
| To: | Amberge K Electric Power Research Institute |
| Holonich J | |
| References | |
| MRP-227, Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML18053A058 (1) | |
Text
From:
Holonich, Joseph To:
Amberge, Kyle Cc:
Poehler, Jeffrey
Subject:
Information We Want on the Docket from MRP-227, Rev. 1 RAI Discussion Date:
Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:47:00 AM Good morning Kyle, Here is where the staff would like to have details on the docket from the information presented at the meeting yesterday. If the information is proprietary and can be covered by an existing affidavit you can say that in the letter and avoid another affidavit. If I get any other information I will forward it onto you.
Industry response to observed degradation (Slide 6)
Relevance of BWR experience (Slide 7-8)
Slides 10, 11, 12 Response to Question 1, particularly MRP-191 Rev. 2 FMECA information compared to the previous FMECA information.
Question 3, Information on CRDM Drop Testing---Brians explanation (in the meeting and during the break) with drawings.
Question 4 - All.