ML19325C897: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:m;; - | {{#Wiki_filter:m;; - | ||
'E g | |||
1 | |||
._.t. | |||
~ }<i Q 4 : | |||
e | y39 e | ||
p | p ic | ||
y , | ;./ | ||
N Commonweehh Edison y, g ;b l,- ' | |||
gar i | |||
c_ , | _ d 72 West Adams Street Chicago, Illinois b,' | ||
t .- | jy' | ||
p,g | \\ '''' / Address Reply to: Pc.t Offica Box 767 --- | ||
y | A4 Chicago, Illinois 60690 0767 4, | ||
jy Qi,' < | |||
:[ | c_, | ||
t.- | |||
p,g | |||
: October 11, 1989: | |||
U.SL Nuclear Regulatory Commission | y | ||
, 1 | |||
Hashington, DC 20555 | :[ | ||
Dr; Thomas E..Murley. Director? | |||
' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 4 | |||
U.SL Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
-l Hashington, DC 20555 4 | |||
^ | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unitel | Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unitel l | ||
Cycle 11 Reload | |||
,o JiRC Docket No. 50-254 | |||
~ | |||
==Reference:== | ==Reference:== | ||
J. A.;Silady to T.E. Murley, " Quad Cities Nuclear- | J. A.;Silady to T.E. Murley, " Quad Cities Nuclear- | ||
.t Power Station Units 1:and 2, Proposed Amendment m | |||
- to Remove Cycle-Specific Core Limits from the-. | |||
- Technical Specification", dated July' 11,:1989/ | |||
.n tv s | |||
tv | A | ||
= | |||
.Dr. Murley:' | |||
\r | \\r 1. | ||
g-E[] - | |||
g- | ' Quad Cities Station Unit 1,:which has completed its tenth cycle of | ||
~ | |||
E[] | u 3 | ||
L, operation,=is currently preparing for. Cycle-11 startup. | |||
The purpose of this | |||
. letter is twofold:.'(1) -to advise you of: Commonwealth, Edison's review and | |||
- approval..'of the Cycle 11-reload!under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59,-and (2). | |||
C to transmit the attached Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) forLthe upcoming l | |||
L, | ~ | ||
- cycle 7as required by Generic-Letter 88-16. | |||
Note that Edison has submitted the- | |||
- necess'ary Technical Specification changes-(See Reference) to incorporate:the | |||
C | / | ||
- COLR.. Edison's.10 CFR 50.59 evaluation assumes approval of-this-amendment prior to unit startup. | |||
y s | |||
- The Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 11 core consists of NRC approved fuel designs:and was designed to' operate under currently approved fuel design q | |||
parameters, Technical Specifications and related bases such that: | |||
{ | |||
W | |||
' 1 )-. Core operating characteristics will be less limiting than those ll-} | |||
previously reviewed and accepted; or | |||
designs:and was designed to' operate under currently approved fuel design | |||
W | |||
: 2) For those' postulated incidents analyzed and reported in the Final Safety Analysis ~ Report (FSAR) which could potentially be affected by the fuel reload,: re-analysis using NRC-approved methods has demonstrated that the results of the postulated events are within allowable limits. | : 2) For those' postulated incidents analyzed and reported in the Final Safety Analysis ~ Report (FSAR) which could potentially be affected by the fuel reload,: re-analysis using NRC-approved methods has demonstrated that the results of the postulated events are within allowable limits. | ||
Of f 1 0318T:1 891018o056 891011 i | |||
PDR ADOCK 0500o254 m | |||
0318T:1 | p PDC | ||
: 5. k- - | |||
3 | |||
: 5. k- - | |||
[ | |||
.c. | |||
3, i | |||
b | b Dr. T.E. Nurley October 11, 1989 Commonwealth Edison has performed a detailed review of the relevant licensing documents, the bases, and references. | ||
Dr. T.E. Nurley | Based on the review..a safety j | ||
evaluation was prepared as required by 10 CFR 50.5?(a,b) and submitted to On-Site and Off-Site Review. As in the past, the. reload licensing documents j | |||
Commonwealth Edison has performed a detailed review of the relevant | .were prepared using previously approved methodologies as reported in the FSAR NEDE-24011 (GESTAR), and other generically approved documents. | ||
licensing documents, the bases, and references. Based on the review..a safety | i | ||
On-Site and Off-Site Review. As in the past, the. reload licensing documents | .: Edison has reviewed the cycle-specific licensing results and concluded j | ||
that additional Technical-Specification changes are not required for Cycle 11-operation at Quad Cities Unit 1 assuming the reference amendment receives NRC approval. | |||
NEDE-24011 (GESTAR), and other generically approved documents. | Furthermore, Edison has completed On-Site and Off-Site Reviews-which determined that no unreviewed safety questions are created by the reload. | ||
.) | |||
1 | |||
\\ | |||
operation at Quad Cities Unit 1 assuming the reference amendment receives NRC approval. Furthermore, Edison has completed On-Site and Off-Site Reviews-which determined that no unreviewed safety questions are created by the reload. | 'Therefore, application for an amendment to the Quad Cities Unit 1 1 | ||
1 | operating license is not required for resumption of operation with the Cycle 11 reload core. | ||
The estimated startup is November 20, 1989. | |||
l L | |||
'If-there are any further questions regarding this matter, please j | |||
L | contact this office. | ||
i Very truly yours, l | |||
contact this office. | g J. A. S11ady Nuclear Licensing Administrator im Attachment. | ||
Very truly yours, l | .cc: | ||
g | T.M. Ross - Project. Manager, NRR R.L. Higgins - Senior Resident Inspector, Quad Cities 0318T:2 | ||
J. A. S11ady Nuclear Licensing Administrator | -}} | ||
0318T:2 | |||
Latest revision as of 17:41, 31 December 2024
| ML19325C897 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities |
| Issue date: | 10/11/1989 |
| From: | Silady J COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Murely T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19325C898 | List: |
| References | |
| 0318T:1, 318T:1, GL-88-16, NUDOCS 8910180056 | |
| Download: ML19325C897 (2) | |
Text
m;; -
'E g
1
._.t.
~ }<i Q 4 :
y39 e
p ic
- ./
N Commonweehh Edison y, g ;b l,- '
gar i
_ d 72 West Adams Street Chicago, Illinois b,'
jy'
\\ ' / Address Reply to: Pc.t Offica Box 767 ---
A4 Chicago, Illinois 60690 0767 4,
jy Qi,' <
c_,
t.-
p,g
- October 11, 1989:
y
, 1
- [
Dr; Thomas E..Murley. Director?
' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 4
U.SL Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-l Hashington, DC 20555 4
^
Subject:
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unitel l
Cycle 11 Reload
,o JiRC Docket No. 50-254
~
Reference:
J. A.;Silady to T.E. Murley, " Quad Cities Nuclear-
.t Power Station Units 1:and 2, Proposed Amendment m
- to Remove Cycle-Specific Core Limits from the-.
- Technical Specification", dated July' 11,:1989/
.n tv s
A
=
.Dr. Murley:'
\\r 1.
g-E[] -
' Quad Cities Station Unit 1,:which has completed its tenth cycle of
~
u 3
L, operation,=is currently preparing for. Cycle-11 startup.
The purpose of this
. letter is twofold:.'(1) -to advise you of: Commonwealth, Edison's review and
- approval..'of the Cycle 11-reload!under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59,-and (2).
C to transmit the attached Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) forLthe upcoming l
~
- cycle 7as required by Generic-Letter 88-16.
Note that Edison has submitted the-
- necess'ary Technical Specification changes-(See Reference) to incorporate:the
/
- COLR.. Edison's.10 CFR 50.59 evaluation assumes approval of-this-amendment prior to unit startup.
y s
- The Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 11 core consists of NRC approved fuel designs:and was designed to' operate under currently approved fuel design q
parameters, Technical Specifications and related bases such that:
{
W
' 1 )-. Core operating characteristics will be less limiting than those ll-}
previously reviewed and accepted; or
- 2) For those' postulated incidents analyzed and reported in the Final Safety Analysis ~ Report (FSAR) which could potentially be affected by the fuel reload,: re-analysis using NRC-approved methods has demonstrated that the results of the postulated events are within allowable limits.
Of f 1 0318T:1 891018o056 891011 i
PDR ADOCK 0500o254 m
p PDC
- 5. k- -
3
[
.c.
3, i
b Dr. T.E. Nurley October 11, 1989 Commonwealth Edison has performed a detailed review of the relevant licensing documents, the bases, and references.
Based on the review..a safety j
evaluation was prepared as required by 10 CFR 50.5?(a,b) and submitted to On-Site and Off-Site Review. As in the past, the. reload licensing documents j
.were prepared using previously approved methodologies as reported in the FSAR NEDE-24011 (GESTAR), and other generically approved documents.
i
.: Edison has reviewed the cycle-specific licensing results and concluded j
that additional Technical-Specification changes are not required for Cycle 11-operation at Quad Cities Unit 1 assuming the reference amendment receives NRC approval.
Furthermore, Edison has completed On-Site and Off-Site Reviews-which determined that no unreviewed safety questions are created by the reload.
.)
1
\\
'Therefore, application for an amendment to the Quad Cities Unit 1 1
operating license is not required for resumption of operation with the Cycle 11 reload core.
The estimated startup is November 20, 1989.
l L
'If-there are any further questions regarding this matter, please j
contact this office.
i Very truly yours, l
g J. A. S11ady Nuclear Licensing Administrator im Attachment.
.cc:
T.M. Ross - Project. Manager, NRR R.L. Higgins - Senior Resident Inspector, Quad Cities 0318T:2
-