ML20004D025: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:- | ||
Deholt | Deholt 2000 Second Avenue c'"CISOn asthua"'22' June 4, 1981 EF2-53457 q | ||
h g\\ | |||
N k"k{ | |||
f Mr. L.L. Kintner E | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4-JUN 051984 }h Division of Project Management Office rf Nuclear Reactor Regulation 44, g | |||
7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20014 b | |||
7 Re ference : Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 m | |||
m NRC Docket No. 50-341 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 25: | Line 30: | ||
==Dear Mr. Kintner:== | ==Dear Mr. Kintner:== | ||
Attached is an update to the Reactor Water Sampling and Analysis Parameters and Sumary of Chemical Administrative Controls submitted in the referenced letter. This additional information was requested by P. Matthews and F. Witt. | Attached is an update to the Reactor Water Sampling and Analysis Parameters and Sumary of Chemical Administrative Controls submitted in the referenced letter. This additional information was requested by P. Matthews and F. Witt. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
[f | [f | ||
[])v William F. Colbert Technical Director Enrico Fermi 2 WFC/sak Attachments t | |||
si ( | si ( | ||
8106 0go | 8106 0go | ||
Detroit Ecison ni?5!! | Detroit Ecison ni?5!! | ||
May 21, 1981 H | May 21, 1981 H | ||
f /981 Mr. L. L. Kintner' U. S., Nuclear Regulatory | f /981 | ||
7920 Norfolk | [ | ||
Mr. L. L. Kintner' U. | |||
S., Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk j | |||
f Bethesda, Maryland 20014 | |||
/ | |||
6 | |||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
| Line 41: | Line 51: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Reactor Water Sampling,iAnalysis, and Administrative Control | Reactor Water Sampling,iAnalysis, and Administrative Control | ||
==Dear Mr. Kintner:== | ==Dear Mr. Kintner:== | ||
Attached to this letter are Reactor Water Sampling and Analysis parameters and a summary of Chemical Administrative Controls for reactor water main-tenance. | ~ | ||
Attached to this letter are Reactor Water Sampling and Analysis parameters and a summary of Chemical Administrative Controls for reactor water main-tenance. | |||
Reactor water copper will have an admin-istrative trigger point of 40 ppb. | |||
In addition, Feedwater copper will have an administrative trig-ger point of 0.6 ppb. | |||
kfanyadditionalinformationorclarificationis required, please contact L. E. Schuerman. | kfanyadditionalinformationorclarificationis required, please contact L. E. Schuerman. | ||
I Very truly yours, W. F. Colbert | I Very truly yours, W. F. Colbert | ||
, Technical Director Enrico Fermi 2 WFC:ca g | |||
Atta nment x | |||
e cc: | |||
l | G. Bethke R. | ||
R. Eberhardt E. Lusis l | |||
W. McNeil I | |||
L. E. Schuerman I | |||
l c | |||
s | |||
~ | |||
.*s..- | |||
~==--~;,_., -~ ~ - * - - - | |||
CE UW | |||
\\" | |||
n | |||
/ | |||
REACTOR WATER SA!!PLING AND ANALYSIS SUMtARY OF CORRECTIVE ACTION / ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL The Radchem Engineer or his delegate is responsible for: | REACTOR WATER SA!!PLING AND ANALYSIS SUMtARY OF CORRECTIVE ACTION / ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL The Radchem Engineer or his delegate is responsible for: | ||
(1) the interpretation and recording of data, | (1) the interpretation and recording of data, (2) investigative analysis, (3) the identification of problem sources, and (4) re-commendations to the Nuclear Shif t Supervisor to control / minimize detrimental eff ects to reactor water and to the System. | ||
Specific guidelines are outlined below: | Specific guidelines are outlined below: | ||
Power Operacion When the reactor water conductivity exceeds a control point of 0.7 pS/cm, increased sampling and investigative analysis (eg; Feed-water, Reactor water, Demineralizer Influent, pH and condenser leak determinations) will be performed to identify the source and control / | Power Operacion When the reactor water conductivity exceeds a control point of 0.7 pS/cm, increased sampling and investigative analysis (eg; Feed-water, Reactor water, Demineralizer Influent, pH and condenser leak determinations) will be performed to identify the source and control / | ||
minimize its ef f ects. If reactor water conductivity is ll .0 pS/cm | minimize its ef f ects. If reactor water conductivity is ll.0 pS/cm operations will continue as outlined in Enrico Fermi 2 Technical Specification Section 3.4.4. | ||
operations will continue as outlined in Enrico Fermi 2 Technical Specification Section 3.4.4. | |||
Startup/ Hot Standby If reactor water conductivity exceeds a control point of 1.3 pS/ | Startup/ Hot Standby If reactor water conductivity exceeds a control point of 1.3 pS/ | ||
cm and trending upward during startup/ hot standby, increased sa=pling and investigative analysis (eg; Feedwater, Reactor water Deminerali-zer Influent, pH and condenser leak determinctions) will be performed to identify the source and control / minimize its eff ects. | cm and trending upward during startup/ hot standby, increased sa=pling and investigative analysis (eg; Feedwater, Reactor water Deminerali-zer Influent, pH and condenser leak determinctions) will be performed to identify the source and control / minimize its eff ects. | ||
Il r eactor | |||
will continue as outlined in Enrico Fermi 2 Technical Specification Section 3.4.4. | ') | ||
water conductivity is 2 2.0 pS/cm during startup/ hot standby, operations will continue as outlined in Enrico Fermi 2 Technical Specification Section 3.4.4. | |||
Copper | Copper | ||
~ | |||
The control point for Copper (Cu) in reactor water is 40 ppb. If previous samples indicate an upward trend, increased sampling and f nvestigative analysis (eg; Feedwater, Reactor water, Demineralizer In-Cluent and pH determinations) will be performed to identify the source | The control point for Copper (Cu) in reactor water is 40 ppb. If previous samples indicate an upward trend, increased sampling and f nvestigative analysis (eg; Feedwater, Reactor water, Demineralizer In-Cluent and pH determinations) will be performed to identify the source and control / minimize copper input. The number of excursions beyond the 40 ppb control point will be identified in the annual report. | ||
N s | N s | ||
WWM/sha | |||
WWM/sha 4 | ~ | ||
9 | 4 9 | ||
9 i*'-.- | |||
'~ | |||
~ | |||
a REACYOR WATER SAMPLING & ANALYSIS NORMAL ANAYLSIS | a REACYOR WATER SAMPLING & ANALYSIS NORMAL ANAYLSIS LIMITS / CONTROL POINTS SAMPLING FREQUENCY | ||
* Conduct ivity | * Conduct ivity Power Operation 41.0 pS/cm Daily and Continuously Startup/ Hot Standby i 2.0 pS/cm Cold Shutdown 510.0 pS/cm | ||
* Chloride | * Chloride Power Operation' 200 ppb Daily and Every 8 Hours Startup/ Hot Standby 6100 ppb When Conductivity is Cold Shutdown 6500 ppb 21.0 pS/cm | ||
*pH Power Operation - 5.6-8.6 Daily and Every 8 Hours Depressurized 5.3-8.6 When Conductivity is 21.0 pS/cm 2 | |||
Suspended 500 ppb Daily Solids Silica 1000 ppb Daily | |||
Silica | ~ | ||
For Information | Boron 1000 ppb Weekly Fe For Information Monthly Ni For Information Monthly Cr For Information Monthly Cu' 40 ppb ** | ||
200 ppb | Weekly and Monthly | ||
i | .,iI D0 200 ppb As required by procedures 2 | ||
l i | |||
l l | l l | ||
1 -Chemical analysis exclusively | l 1 -Chemical analysis exclusively 2 -For information Only | ||
* Critical parameters s | |||
* Critical parameters | ** Control point l | ||
WWM/sim l | |||
~ | |||
t | t | ||
., _ - - - -,,,.N Q $ -,,- | |||
=2,,,.,,,-,- | |||
----,,,-m--,.,.,-r,- | |||
e- | |||
-w c,,..~. | |||
g | |||
.-, - ~ | |||
c,- | |||
-_e | |||
-.-.-.,, -,..,,. -.= | |||
-y | |||
.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:16, 23 December 2024
| ML20004D025 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi |
| Issue date: | 06/04/1981 |
| From: | Colbert W DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | Kintner L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| EF2-53457, NUDOCS 8106080197 | |
| Download: ML20004D025 (1) | |
Text
-
Deholt 2000 Second Avenue c'"CISOn asthua"'22' June 4, 1981 EF2-53457 q
h g\\
N k"k{
f Mr. L.L. Kintner E
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4-JUN 051984 }h Division of Project Management Office rf Nuclear Reactor Regulation 44, g
7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20014 b
7 Re ference : Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 m
m NRC Docket No. 50-341
Subject:
Letter to L.L. Kintner from Detroit Edison 5/21/81 Reactor Water Sampling, Analysis & Administrative Control
Dear Mr. Kintner:
Attached is an update to the Reactor Water Sampling and Analysis Parameters and Sumary of Chemical Administrative Controls submitted in the referenced letter. This additional information was requested by P. Matthews and F. Witt.
Sincerely,
[f
[])v William F. Colbert Technical Director Enrico Fermi 2 WFC/sak Attachments t
si (
8106 0go
Detroit Ecison ni?5!!
May 21, 1981 H
f /981
[
Mr. L. L. Kintner' U.
S., Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk j
f Bethesda, Maryland 20014
/
6
References:
EF-2 Technical Specifications EF-2 NRC Docket No. 50-3'41
Subject:
Reactor Water Sampling,iAnalysis, and Administrative Control
Dear Mr. Kintner:
~
Attached to this letter are Reactor Water Sampling and Analysis parameters and a summary of Chemical Administrative Controls for reactor water main-tenance.
Reactor water copper will have an admin-istrative trigger point of 40 ppb.
In addition, Feedwater copper will have an administrative trig-ger point of 0.6 ppb.
kfanyadditionalinformationorclarificationis required, please contact L. E. Schuerman.
I Very truly yours, W. F. Colbert
, Technical Director Enrico Fermi 2 WFC:ca g
Atta nment x
e cc:
G. Bethke R.
R. Eberhardt E. Lusis l
W. McNeil I
L. E. Schuerman I
l c
s
~
.*s..-
~==--~;,_., -~ ~ - * - - -
CE UW
\\"
n
/
REACTOR WATER SA!!PLING AND ANALYSIS SUMtARY OF CORRECTIVE ACTION / ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL The Radchem Engineer or his delegate is responsible for:
(1) the interpretation and recording of data, (2) investigative analysis, (3) the identification of problem sources, and (4) re-commendations to the Nuclear Shif t Supervisor to control / minimize detrimental eff ects to reactor water and to the System.
Specific guidelines are outlined below:
Power Operacion When the reactor water conductivity exceeds a control point of 0.7 pS/cm, increased sampling and investigative analysis (eg; Feed-water, Reactor water, Demineralizer Influent, pH and condenser leak determinations) will be performed to identify the source and control /
minimize its ef f ects. If reactor water conductivity is ll.0 pS/cm operations will continue as outlined in Enrico Fermi 2 Technical Specification Section 3.4.4.
Startup/ Hot Standby If reactor water conductivity exceeds a control point of 1.3 pS/
cm and trending upward during startup/ hot standby, increased sa=pling and investigative analysis (eg; Feedwater, Reactor water Deminerali-zer Influent, pH and condenser leak determinctions) will be performed to identify the source and control / minimize its eff ects.
Il r eactor
')
water conductivity is 2 2.0 pS/cm during startup/ hot standby, operations will continue as outlined in Enrico Fermi 2 Technical Specification Section 3.4.4.
~
The control point for Copper (Cu) in reactor water is 40 ppb. If previous samples indicate an upward trend, increased sampling and f nvestigative analysis (eg; Feedwater, Reactor water, Demineralizer In-Cluent and pH determinations) will be performed to identify the source and control / minimize copper input. The number of excursions beyond the 40 ppb control point will be identified in the annual report.
N s
WWM/sha
~
4 9
9 i*'-.-
'~
~
a REACYOR WATER SAMPLING & ANALYSIS NORMAL ANAYLSIS LIMITS / CONTROL POINTS SAMPLING FREQUENCY
- Conduct ivity Power Operation 41.0 pS/cm Daily and Continuously Startup/ Hot Standby i 2.0 pS/cm Cold Shutdown 510.0 pS/cm
- Chloride Power Operation' 200 ppb Daily and Every 8 Hours Startup/ Hot Standby 6100 ppb When Conductivity is Cold Shutdown 6500 ppb 21.0 pS/cm
- pH Power Operation - 5.6-8.6 Daily and Every 8 Hours Depressurized 5.3-8.6 When Conductivity is 21.0 pS/cm 2
Suspended 500 ppb Daily Solids Silica 1000 ppb Daily
~
Boron 1000 ppb Weekly Fe For Information Monthly Ni For Information Monthly Cr For Information Monthly Cu' 40 ppb **
Weekly and Monthly
.,iI D0 200 ppb As required by procedures 2
l i
l l
l 1 -Chemical analysis exclusively 2 -For information Only
- Critical parameters s
- Control point l
WWM/sim l
~
t
., _ - - - -,,,.N Q $ -,,-
=2,,,.,,,-,-
,,,-m--,.,.,-r,-
e-
-w c,,..~.
g
.-, - ~
c,-
-_e
-.-.-.,, -,..,,. -.=
-y
.