ML20064H654: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20064H654 | | number = ML20064H654 | ||
| issue date = 01/05/1983 | | issue date = 01/05/1983 | ||
| title = Responds to NRC | | title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-443/82-13 & 50-444/82-11.Corrective Actions: Pullman-Higgins Revised Expansion Anchor Process Sheet & Issued Field Instruction 177 | ||
| author name = Devincentis J | | author name = Devincentis J | ||
| author affiliation = PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. | | author affiliation = PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = SBN-414, NUDOCS 8301170369 | | document report number = SBN-414, NUDOCS 8301170369 | ||
| title reference date = 12-06-1982 | |||
| package number = ML20064H622 | | package number = ML20064H622 | ||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
/ | |||
SEABROOK STATION | PUBLIC SERVICE SEABROOK STATION I | ||
Engineedng Office: | |||
January 5, 1983 SBN-414 T.F. B4.2.7 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Attention: | Companyof New Hampshw e 1671 Worcester Road Framinoham, Massachusetts 01701 (617) - 872-8100 e | ||
January 5, 1983 SBN-414 T.F. B4.2.7 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Attention: | |||
Mr. Richard W. Starostecki, Director Division Project and Resident Programs | |||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 33: | ||
==Dear Sir:== | ==Dear Sir:== | ||
In response to the violation which you reported in Reference (b), PSNH offers the following: | In response to the violation which you reported in Reference (b), PSNH offers the following: | ||
NRC Notice of Violation (443/82-13-01): | NRC Notice of Violation (443/82-13-01): | ||
As a result of the inspection conducted on October 1 - November 5, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10CFR2, Appendix C) published in the Federal Register on March 9, 1982 ( 7FR9987), the following violation was identified: | As a result of the inspection conducted on October 1 - November 5, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10CFR2, Appendix C) published in the Federal Register on March 9, 1982 ( 7FR9987), the following violation was identified: | ||
10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion X ant the Seabrook Station PSAR require that inspection shall be provided fe activities which affect quality. | 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion X ant the Seabrook Station PSAR require that inspection shall be provided fe activities which affect quality. | ||
Pullman Power Products Pipe Support Procedure JS-1X-6 provides installation inspection requirements including hold points for safety-related expansion anchors. | Pullman Power Products Pipe Support Procedure JS-1X-6 provides installation inspection requirements including hold points for safety-related expansion anchors. | ||
An associated Pullman Procedure VI-5 prohibits work from proceeding past an inspection hold point until the item has been inspected and signed off. | |||
Contrary to the above, on October 28, 1982, work on the expansion anchor installations for Pipe Support 1212-SH-06 had proceeded past six designated inspection hold points without the required inspection and sign off. | Contrary to the above, on October 28, 1982, work on the expansion anchor installations for Pipe Support 1212-SH-06 had proceeded past six designated inspection hold points without the required inspection and sign off. | ||
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement II). | This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement II). | ||
8301170369 830112 PDR ADOCK 05000443 O | 8301170369 830112 PDR ADOCK 05000443 O | ||
PDR | |||
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission | United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission January 5, 1983 Attention: | ||
Mr. Richard W. Starostecki Page 2 | |||
===Response=== | ===Response=== | ||
Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved: | Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved: | ||
The piping contractor, Pullman-Higgins, has revised the expansion anchor process sheet in order to make applicability of the witness and hold points clear to craft and inspection personnel. Witness points shall be verified by the QC inspector at any point in the installation process, while hold points require QC approval prior to proceeding to the next operation. Unacceptable initial torque shall be cause for rejection and will require a new process sheet in order to retorque the installation. | The piping contractor, Pullman-Higgins, has revised the expansion anchor process sheet in order to make applicability of the witness and hold points clear to craft and inspection personnel. Witness points shall be verified by the QC inspector at any point in the installation process, while hold points require QC approval prior to proceeding to the next operation. | ||
Unacceptable initial torque shall be cause for rejection and will require a new process sheet in order to retorque the installation. | |||
Pullman-Higgins issued Field Instruction 177 to explain the use of the new process sheets and to effect their use. | Pullman-Higgins issued Field Instruction 177 to explain the use of the new process sheets and to effect their use. | ||
Previously released field erection packages which contain the obsolete form will be returned to the hanger department for issuance of the revised process sheet. | Previously released field erection packages which contain the obsolete form will be returned to the hanger department for issuance of the revised process sheet. | ||
| Line 53: | Line 59: | ||
i l | i l | ||
L | L e | ||
ASLB SERVICE LIST Philip Ahrecs, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Department of the Attorney General Augusta, ME 04333 Representative Beverly Hollingworth Coastal Chamber of Commerec 209 Winnacunnet Road Hampton, NH 03842 William S. Jordan, III, Esquire Harmon & Weiss 1725 I Street, N.W. | |||
Department of the Attorney General Augusta, ME 04333 Representative Beverly Hollingworth Coastal Chamber of Commerec | Suite 506 Washington, DC 20006 E. Tupper Kinder, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General 208 State House Annex Concord, NH 03301 Robert A. Backus, Esquire 116 Lowell Street P.O. Box 516 Manchester, NH 03105 Edward J. McDermott, Esquire Sanders and McDermott Professional Association 408 Lafayette Road Hampton, NH 03842 Jo Ann Shotwell, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau Department of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor Boston, MA 02108 e | ||
***a es b e i | |||
Suite 506 Washington, DC 20006 E. Tupper Kinder, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General 208 State House Annex Concord, NH 03301 Robert A. Backus, Esquire 116 Lowell Street P.O. Box 516 Manchester, NH 03105 Edward J. McDermott , Esquire Sanders and McDermott Professional Association 408 Lafayette Road Hampton, NH 03842 Jo Ann Shotwell, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau Department of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor Boston, MA 02108 e | *'f 9-- | ||
e m hsw we me.y a=e-g-e | |||
~- | |||
- + | |||
--}} | |||
Latest revision as of 20:40, 16 December 2024
| ML20064H654 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 01/05/1983 |
| From: | Devincentis J PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20064H622 | List: |
| References | |
| SBN-414, NUDOCS 8301170369 | |
| Download: ML20064H654 (3) | |
Text
.
/
PUBLIC SERVICE SEABROOK STATION I
Engineedng Office:
Companyof New Hampshw e 1671 Worcester Road Framinoham, Massachusetts 01701 (617) - 872-8100 e
January 5, 1983 SBN-414 T.F. B4.2.7 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Attention:
Mr. Richard W. Starostecki, Director Division Project and Resident Programs
References:
(a) Construction Permit CPPR-135 and CPPR-136, Docket Nos. 50-443 and 50-444 (b) USNRC Letter, dated December 6, 1982, " Combined Inspection Nos. 50-443/82-13 and 50-444/82-11," R. W. Starostecki to W. C. Tallman
Subject:
Response to Inspection Nos. 50-443/82-13 and 50-444/82-11
Dear Sir:
In response to the violation which you reported in Reference (b), PSNH offers the following:
NRC Notice of Violation (443/82-13-01):
As a result of the inspection conducted on October 1 - November 5, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10CFR2, Appendix C) published in the Federal Register on March 9, 1982 ( 7FR9987), the following violation was identified:
10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion X ant the Seabrook Station PSAR require that inspection shall be provided fe activities which affect quality.
Pullman Power Products Pipe Support Procedure JS-1X-6 provides installation inspection requirements including hold points for safety-related expansion anchors.
An associated Pullman Procedure VI-5 prohibits work from proceeding past an inspection hold point until the item has been inspected and signed off.
Contrary to the above, on October 28, 1982, work on the expansion anchor installations for Pipe Support 1212-SH-06 had proceeded past six designated inspection hold points without the required inspection and sign off.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement II).
8301170369 830112 PDR ADOCK 05000443 O
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission January 5, 1983 Attention:
Mr. Richard W. Starostecki Page 2
Response
Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved:
The piping contractor, Pullman-Higgins, has revised the expansion anchor process sheet in order to make applicability of the witness and hold points clear to craft and inspection personnel. Witness points shall be verified by the QC inspector at any point in the installation process, while hold points require QC approval prior to proceeding to the next operation.
Unacceptable initial torque shall be cause for rejection and will require a new process sheet in order to retorque the installation.
Pullman-Higgins issued Field Instruction 177 to explain the use of the new process sheets and to effect their use.
Previously released field erection packages which contain the obsolete form will be returned to the hanger department for issuance of the revised process sheet.
Corrective action was completed on November 10, 1982.
Very truly yours, YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY f
J. DeVincentis Project Manager ALL/fsf cc: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Service List i
I e
i l
L e
ASLB SERVICE LIST Philip Ahrecs, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Department of the Attorney General Augusta, ME 04333 Representative Beverly Hollingworth Coastal Chamber of Commerec 209 Winnacunnet Road Hampton, NH 03842 William S. Jordan, III, Esquire Harmon & Weiss 1725 I Street, N.W.
Suite 506 Washington, DC 20006 E. Tupper Kinder, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General 208 State House Annex Concord, NH 03301 Robert A. Backus, Esquire 116 Lowell Street P.O. Box 516 Manchester, NH 03105 Edward J. McDermott, Esquire Sanders and McDermott Professional Association 408 Lafayette Road Hampton, NH 03842 Jo Ann Shotwell, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau Department of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor Boston, MA 02108 e
- a es b e i
- 'f 9--
e m hsw we me.y a=e-g-e
~-
- +
--