ML20148G914: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_._ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .                             _   _ - - _ -         .   - _ .   _ __   _-.       ._ _ _ __ _ - _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:_._ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
      ,.
_
      ..
_ - - _ -
      '
.
                                                                    O.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- _ .
                                                                                    REGION I
_ __
                                            Report No.   50-245/87-35
_-.
                                            Docket No.   50-245
._ _ _ __
                                            License No. OPR-21             Priority           --
_ - _ _ _ _
                                                                                                    Category     C
,.
                                            Licensee: Northeast Nuclear Energy Company
..
                                                        P.O. Box 270
'
                                                        Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270
O.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                          Facility Name: Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1
REGION I
                                            Inspection At: Waterford, Connecticut
Report No.
                                          Inspection Conducted: December 14-18, 1987
50-245/87-35
                                          Inspector:               h*
Docket No.
                                                          R.-A. McBrearty, Reactor              ineer
50-245
                                                                                                                        4++ . // /9/P
License No. OPR-21
                                                                                                                                dats
Priority
                                          Approved by:                     d'                                             /       [88
--
                                                          J. R. Strosnider, Chief, Materials & Processes                       date
Category
                                                            Section, EB, DRS.
C
                                          Inspection Summary:     Inspection on December 14-18, 1987 (Inspection Report
Licensee: Northeast Nuclear Energy Company
                                          No. 50-245/87-35)
P.O. Box 270
                                        Areas Inspected: A routine announced inspection was conducted by one regional
Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270
                                          based inspector of the licensee's response to Generic Letter 84-11.
Facility Name: Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1
                                    .
Inspection At: Waterford, Connecticut
                                          Results: No violations were identified.
Inspection Conducted: December 14-18, 1987
Inspector:
h*
4++ . // /9/P
R.-A. McBrearty, Reactor
ineer
dats
[88
Approved by:
d'
/
J. R. Strosnider, Chief, Materials & Processes
date
Section, EB, DRS.
Inspection Summary:
Inspection on December 14-18, 1987 (Inspection Report
No. 50-245/87-35)
Areas Inspected: A routine announced inspection was conducted by one regional
based inspector of the licensee's response to Generic Letter 84-11.
.
Results: No violations were identified.
(
(
                                                                  '
'
;                                     8801270062 880114
;
8801270062 880114
i
i
                                      PDR           ADOCK 05000245
PDR
                                      O                       PDR
ADOCK 05000245
O
PDR
!
!
!
!
!
!


    - - _ _ . -   . - _ _ _ _       _
- - _ _ . -
        :. .
. - _ _ _ _
  c
_
        .
:. .
                                                                    DETAILS
c
                1.             Persons Contacted
.
                                  D.-Cleary, Engineer
DETAILS
                                *J. Leason, ISI Coordinator
1.
                                J. Nowell, Shift Supervisor
Persons Contacted
                                *J. Stetz, Station Superintendent
D.-Cleary, Engineer
                                *R. West, ISI Coordinator
*J. Leason, ISI Coordinator
                                  D. Wilkens, Chemistry Supervisor
J. Nowell, Shift Supervisor
                                                          .
*J. Stetz, Station Superintendent
                                U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
*R. West, ISI Coordinator
                                *M. Conner, Project Engineer
D. Wilkens, Chemistry Supervisor
                                * Denotes those present at-the exit meeting.
.
                                          ,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
                2.             Licensee Response to Generic Letter 84-11
*M. Conner, Project Engineer
                              Because of occurrences throughout the industry of intergranular stress
* Denotes those present at-the exit meeting.
                              corrosion _ cracking (IGSCC) of BWR recirculation system and associated
,
                              piping ande.in response to NRC IE Bulletins, the licensee has established
2.
                              an inspection program for early detection of IGSCC at Millstone Unit 1.
Licensee Response to Generic Letter 84-11
                              The licensee's program has been updated periodically to comply with
Because of occurrences throughout the industry of intergranular stress
                                revised examination and _ personnel qualification requirements. The
corrosion _ cracking (IGSCC) of BWR recirculation system and associated
                              . licensee's actions up to and including-the 1987 refueling outage are
piping ande.in response to NRC IE Bulletins, the licensee has established
                              discussed in Inspection Report No. 50-245/87-16.
an inspection program for early detection of IGSCC at Millstone Unit 1.
                              Subsequent to the establishment of'the licensee's 1987 inspection program
The licensee's program has been updated periodically to comply with
!                              a draft NRC Generic Letter associated with NUREG-0313, Revision 2 was
revised examination and _ personnel qualification requirements.
                              proposed to provide revised NRC staff positions on IGSCC in BWR austenitic
The
                                stainless steel piping. When this Generic Letter is issued it will
. licensee's actions up to and including-the 1987 refueling outage are
                              supersede Generic Letter 84-11.
discussed in Inspection Report No. 50-245/87-16.
                              .The inspector reviewed licensee records to ascertain compliance with
Subsequent to the establishment of'the licensee's 1987 inspection program
                              Generic Letter 84-11, and to determine to what extent the licensee has
a draft NRC Generic Letter associated with NUREG-0313, Revision 2 was
                              applied in its program the guidelines of NUREG-0313, Revision 2 and the
!
                              associated draft Generic Letter. The following were included in the-
proposed to provide revised NRC staff positions on IGSCC in BWR austenitic
                                inspector's review:
stainless steel piping. When this Generic Letter is issued it will
                              *      Updated inspection program summary - based on 1987 refueling outage
supersede Generic Letter 84-11.
                                      examination results
.The inspector reviewed licensee records to ascertain compliance with
                              *-      Computer listing of welds - based on updated summary
Generic Letter 84-11, and to determine to what extent the licensee has
                              *       Updated inspection summary - based on draft Generic Letter guidelines
applied in its program the guidelines of NUREG-0313, Revision 2 and the
associated draft Generic Letter.
The following were included in the-
inspector's review:
Updated inspection program summary - based on 1987 refueling outage
*
examination results
Computer listing of welds - based on updated summary
*-
Updated inspection summary - based on draft Generic Letter guidelines
*


    .
  .
'
                                              3
.
.
          *    Computer listing of welds - based on draft Generic Letter
.
          *   Computer listing of welds to which stress improvement and/or overlay
'
              repair was applied
3
          *    Computer listing of welds identifying weld and piping materials and
.
              the associated ISI isometric drawing number
Computer listing of welds - based on draft Generic Letter
          *
*
              Marked up system ISI isometric drawings identifying original and new
Computer listing of welds to which stress improvement and/or overlay
              welds which are in the IGSCC program
*
        The inspector found that the licensee's IGSCC program has been updated to
repair was applied
          incorporate the new guidelines of the draft Generic Letter. The licensee
Computer listing of welds identifying weld and piping materials and
        has included in its program Table 1 of NUREG-0313, Revision 2 which
*
        categorizes welds and provides an inspection schedule based on the type
the associated ISI isometric drawing number
        of material and the various processes to which the welds may have been
Marked up system ISI isometric drawings identifying original and new
        subjected. In some instances the licensee has established subcategories
*
        to accommodate specific plant conditions. The licensee's computer based
welds which are in the IGSCC program
        IGSCC program can be readily updated to reflect revised NRC requirements
The inspector found that the licensee's IGSCC program has been updated to
        and current program status.
incorporate the new guidelines of the draft Generic Letter. The licensee
        The staff position on leak detection, as defined by the NUREG and the
has included in its program Table 1 of NUREG-0313, Revision 2 which
        draft Generic Letter, is incorporated in the facility Technical
categorizes welds and provides an inspection schedule based on the type
        Specification (TS) 6.3, and in operating procedures which are more
of material and the various processes to which the welds may have been
        restrictive than the TS regarding frequency of monitoring.
subjected.
        The water chemistry in use at the facility is based on the guidelines
In some instances the licensee has established subcategories
        established by the BWR Owners Group but is more restrictive. Hydrogen
to accommodate specific plant conditions.
        water chemistry is being considered by the licensee and a short term
The licensee's computer based
        pilot program has been completed at the site. The results are being
IGSCC program can be readily updated to reflect revised NRC requirements
        evaluated at this time.
and current program status.
        No violations were identified.
The staff position on leak detection, as defined by the NUREG and the
      3. Exit Meeting
draft Generic Letter, is incorporated in the facility Technical
        The inspector met with licensee representatives, denoted in paragraph 1,
Specification (TS) 6.3, and in operating procedures which are more
        at the conclusion of the inspection on December 18, 1987. The inspector
restrictive than the TS regarding frequency of monitoring.
        summarized the purpose and the scope of the inspection and the findings.
The water chemistry in use at the facility is based on the guidelines
        At no time during this inspection was written material provided by the
established by the BWR Owners Group but is more restrictive.
        inspector to the licensee.     The licensee representatives did not indicate
Hydrogen
        that this inspection involved any proprietary information.
water chemistry is being considered by the licensee and a short term
pilot program has been completed at the site. The results are being
evaluated at this time.
No violations were identified.
3.
Exit Meeting
The inspector met with licensee representatives, denoted in paragraph 1,
at the conclusion of the inspection on December 18, 1987.
The inspector
summarized the purpose and the scope of the inspection and the findings.
At no time during this inspection was written material provided by the
inspector to the licensee.
The licensee representatives did not indicate
that this inspection involved any proprietary information.
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:36, 11 December 2024

Insp Rept 50-245/87-35 on 871214-18.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Response to Generic Ltr 84-11
ML20148G914
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/12/1988
From: Mcbrearty R, Strosnider J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20148G907 List:
References
50-245-87-35, GL-84-11, NUDOCS 8801270062
Download: ML20148G914 (3)


See also: IR 05000245/1987035

Text

_._ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

_

_ - - _ -

.

- _ .

_ __

_-.

._ _ _ __

_ - _ _ _ _

,.

..

'

O.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report No.

50-245/87-35

Docket No.

50-245

License No. OPR-21

Priority

--

Category

C

Licensee: Northeast Nuclear Energy Company

P.O. Box 270

Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270

Facility Name: Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1

Inspection At: Waterford, Connecticut

Inspection Conducted: December 14-18, 1987

Inspector:

h*

4++ . // /9/P

R.-A. McBrearty, Reactor

ineer

dats

[88

Approved by:

d'

/

J. R. Strosnider, Chief, Materials & Processes

date

Section, EB, DRS.

Inspection Summary:

Inspection on December 14-18, 1987 (Inspection Report

No. 50-245/87-35)

Areas Inspected: A routine announced inspection was conducted by one regional

based inspector of the licensee's response to Generic Letter 84-11.

.

Results: No violations were identified.

(

'

8801270062 880114

i

PDR

ADOCK 05000245

O

PDR

!

!

!

- - _ _ . -

. - _ _ _ _

_

. .

c

.

DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

D.-Cleary, Engineer

  • J. Leason, ISI Coordinator

J. Nowell, Shift Supervisor

  • J. Stetz, Station Superintendent
  • R. West, ISI Coordinator

D. Wilkens, Chemistry Supervisor

.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • M. Conner, Project Engineer
  • Denotes those present at-the exit meeting.

,

2.

Licensee Response to Generic Letter 84-11

Because of occurrences throughout the industry of intergranular stress

corrosion _ cracking (IGSCC) of BWR recirculation system and associated

piping ande.in response to NRC IE Bulletins, the licensee has established

an inspection program for early detection of IGSCC at Millstone Unit 1.

The licensee's program has been updated periodically to comply with

revised examination and _ personnel qualification requirements.

The

. licensee's actions up to and including-the 1987 refueling outage are

discussed in Inspection Report No. 50-245/87-16.

Subsequent to the establishment of'the licensee's 1987 inspection program

a draft NRC Generic Letter associated with NUREG-0313, Revision 2 was

!

proposed to provide revised NRC staff positions on IGSCC in BWR austenitic

stainless steel piping. When this Generic Letter is issued it will

supersede Generic Letter 84-11.

.The inspector reviewed licensee records to ascertain compliance with

Generic Letter 84-11, and to determine to what extent the licensee has

applied in its program the guidelines of NUREG-0313, Revision 2 and the

associated draft Generic Letter.

The following were included in the-

inspector's review:

Updated inspection program summary - based on 1987 refueling outage

examination results

Computer listing of welds - based on updated summary

  • -

Updated inspection summary - based on draft Generic Letter guidelines

.

.

'

3

.

Computer listing of welds - based on draft Generic Letter

Computer listing of welds to which stress improvement and/or overlay

repair was applied

Computer listing of welds identifying weld and piping materials and

the associated ISI isometric drawing number

Marked up system ISI isometric drawings identifying original and new

welds which are in the IGSCC program

The inspector found that the licensee's IGSCC program has been updated to

incorporate the new guidelines of the draft Generic Letter. The licensee

has included in its program Table 1 of NUREG-0313, Revision 2 which

categorizes welds and provides an inspection schedule based on the type

of material and the various processes to which the welds may have been

subjected.

In some instances the licensee has established subcategories

to accommodate specific plant conditions.

The licensee's computer based

IGSCC program can be readily updated to reflect revised NRC requirements

and current program status.

The staff position on leak detection, as defined by the NUREG and the

draft Generic Letter, is incorporated in the facility Technical Specification (TS) 6.3, and in operating procedures which are more

restrictive than the TS regarding frequency of monitoring.

The water chemistry in use at the facility is based on the guidelines

established by the BWR Owners Group but is more restrictive.

Hydrogen

water chemistry is being considered by the licensee and a short term

pilot program has been completed at the site. The results are being

evaluated at this time.

No violations were identified.

3.

Exit Meeting

The inspector met with licensee representatives, denoted in paragraph 1,

at the conclusion of the inspection on December 18, 1987.

The inspector

summarized the purpose and the scope of the inspection and the findings.

At no time during this inspection was written material provided by the

inspector to the licensee.

The licensee representatives did not indicate

that this inspection involved any proprietary information.