ML20153C849: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
-m_, | |||
e | e | ||
#o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y | |||
g W ASHIN GTON, D.C. 20Sf 5 | |||
{ | { | ||
g | |||
Ms. Susan Stanners 2722 Honolulu #11 Montrose, CA 91020 | %,...../ | ||
November 12, 1981 OPFCEOPTHE COMMISSIONER l | |||
Ms. Susan Stanners 2722 Honolulu #11 l | |||
Montrose, CA 91020 | |||
==Dear Ms. Stanners:== | ==Dear Ms. Stanners:== | ||
Tnank you very much for your. letter regarding Diablo Canyon. The recent Cont,sion decision authorizing low-power testing and fuel loading i | |||
is only the first step in Comission review of this plant. Specifically, i | |||
the earthquake-related issues that distinguish Diablo Canyon from most I | |||
other nuclear units have not yet been addressed in detail by the Commission. | |||
1 They will be reviewed before operation above five percent power is authorized. | 1 They will be reviewed before operation above five percent power is authorized. | ||
i | i While it may have some symbolic importance, a decision to authorize low-power testing poses very little danger to the public. The power level is so low that the operators have more than ample time to react to 4 | ||
any problems in the plant, and the amount of radioactivity existing in the core does not begin to build up until the plant has operated for l | |||
i quite a while, i | |||
level is so low that the operators have more than ample time to react to | j Sincerely, h/ | ||
Peter A. Bradford Comissioner 0 | |||
Peter A. Bradford Comissioner | 8805090004 000418 PDR FOIA HAMLIN87-444 PDR I | ||
( | ( | ||
~}} | |||
Latest revision as of 03:00, 11 December 2024
Text
.
-m_,
e
- o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y
g W ASHIN GTON, D.C. 20Sf 5
{
g
%,...../
November 12, 1981 OPFCEOPTHE COMMISSIONER l
Ms. Susan Stanners 2722 Honolulu #11 l
Montrose, CA 91020
Dear Ms. Stanners:
Tnank you very much for your. letter regarding Diablo Canyon. The recent Cont,sion decision authorizing low-power testing and fuel loading i
is only the first step in Comission review of this plant. Specifically, i
the earthquake-related issues that distinguish Diablo Canyon from most I
other nuclear units have not yet been addressed in detail by the Commission.
1 They will be reviewed before operation above five percent power is authorized.
i While it may have some symbolic importance, a decision to authorize low-power testing poses very little danger to the public. The power level is so low that the operators have more than ample time to react to 4
any problems in the plant, and the amount of radioactivity existing in the core does not begin to build up until the plant has operated for l
i quite a while, i
j Sincerely, h/
Peter A. Bradford Comissioner 0
8805090004 000418 PDR FOIA HAMLIN87-444 PDR I
(
~