ML20199H096: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
' s ecg'o UNITED STATES | |||
/ | |||
j' ' | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j' ' | ||
g ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS U | |||
a wAswisoTou, o. c. aosas | |||
%s.s / | |||
September 5, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: | |||
Jesse Ebersole, Chairman, ACRS David Ward, Chairman, ACRS Human Factors Subcommittee Richard Major, Senior Staff Engineer | |||
Jesse Ebersole, Chairman, ACRS David Ward, Chairman, ACRS | / | ||
Human Factors Subcommittee Richard Major, Senior Staff Engineer | |||
FROM: | FROM: | ||
DIVISION OF HUMAN FACTORS SAFETY, NRR, RESPONSE TO | DIVISION OF HUMAN FACTORS SAFETY, NRR, RESPONSE TO | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
ADDITIONAL REMARKS BY JESSE EBERSOLE ON THE COMMIT-TEE'S AUGUST 14, 1984 LETTER ON ENGINEERING EXPERTISE ON SHIFT, DUAL ROLE (50/STA) OPTION Attached is a copy of a response to Mr. Ebersole's additional comments on the dual role 50/STA option that the Committee reviewed in July and I have also attached a copy of the Committee's August 14, 1984 August. | |||
ADDITIONAL REMARKS BY JESSE EBERSOLE ON THE COMMIT-TEE'S AUGUST 14, 1984 LETTER ON ENGINEERING EXPERTISE ON SHIFT, DUAL ROLE (50/STA) OPTION Attached is a copy of a response to Mr. Ebersole's additional comments on the dual role 50/STA option that the Committee reviewed in July and | letter on the subject. | ||
The Staff has researched the issue of a third person in the cockpit of | The Staff has researched the issue of a third person in the cockpit of Mr. Ebersole drew an analogy between a flight engineer and an airplane. | ||
in the Air Florida /14th Street Bridge crash, a third person was not in | He mentioned that a separate (not dual role) Shift Technical Advisory. | ||
Concerning the dual role 50/STA the Staff is aware | in the Air Florida /14th Street Bridge crash, a third person was not in The Staff talked to the NTSB investigator who concluded the cockpit. | ||
that a third crew member would not have prevented the accident. The Staff also cites a July 2, 1981 report that addressed the question of two vs. three cockpit crew members which concluded that adding a third crew member would not be justified in the interest of safety. | |||
it will be more Concerning the dual role 50/STA the Staff is aware difficult for this individual to have a diverse perspective, however, they feel there are other positive counter-balancing characteristics. | |||
Among these positive aspects are operating knowledge and experience ccmbined with engineering and technical expertise, and a greater accep-tance by the operating crew. | Among these positive aspects are operating knowledge and experience ccmbined with engineering and technical expertise, and a greater accep-tance by the operating crew. | ||
Attachments: | Attachments: | ||
As stated cc: ACRS Members R. F. Fraley M. W. Libarkin J. C. McKinley | As stated cc: ACRS Members R. F. Fraley M. W. Libarkin J. C. McKinley i | ||
G. R. Quittschreiber T. G. McCreless J. Kotra x | |||
[ | 40 5 860213 DELLG4-656, PDR | ||
[ | |||
,}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:24, 10 December 2024
| ML20199H096 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/05/1984 |
| From: | Major R Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Ebersole J Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151H981 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-656 ACRS-GENERAL, NUDOCS 8604090295 | |
| Download: ML20199H096 (1) | |
Text
.
' s ecg'o UNITED STATES
/
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j' '
g ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS U
a wAswisoTou, o. c. aosas
%s.s /
September 5, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Jesse Ebersole, Chairman, ACRS David Ward, Chairman, ACRS Human Factors Subcommittee Richard Major, Senior Staff Engineer
/
FROM:
DIVISION OF HUMAN FACTORS SAFETY, NRR, RESPONSE TO
SUBJECT:
ADDITIONAL REMARKS BY JESSE EBERSOLE ON THE COMMIT-TEE'S AUGUST 14, 1984 LETTER ON ENGINEERING EXPERTISE ON SHIFT, DUAL ROLE (50/STA) OPTION Attached is a copy of a response to Mr. Ebersole's additional comments on the dual role 50/STA option that the Committee reviewed in July and I have also attached a copy of the Committee's August 14, 1984 August.
letter on the subject.
The Staff has researched the issue of a third person in the cockpit of Mr. Ebersole drew an analogy between a flight engineer and an airplane.
He mentioned that a separate (not dual role) Shift Technical Advisory.
in the Air Florida /14th Street Bridge crash, a third person was not in The Staff talked to the NTSB investigator who concluded the cockpit.
that a third crew member would not have prevented the accident. The Staff also cites a July 2, 1981 report that addressed the question of two vs. three cockpit crew members which concluded that adding a third crew member would not be justified in the interest of safety.
it will be more Concerning the dual role 50/STA the Staff is aware difficult for this individual to have a diverse perspective, however, they feel there are other positive counter-balancing characteristics.
Among these positive aspects are operating knowledge and experience ccmbined with engineering and technical expertise, and a greater accep-tance by the operating crew.
Attachments:
As stated cc: ACRS Members R. F. Fraley M. W. Libarkin J. C. McKinley i
G. R. Quittschreiber T. G. McCreless J. Kotra x
40 5 860213 DELLG4-656, PDR
[
,