ML20213C104: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20213C104
| number = ML20213C104
| issue date = 07/31/2020
| issue date = 07/31/2020
| title = Gao Form Rg 1.187 (Rev 2) - Senate Re Regulatory Guide (Rg) 1.187 (Rev 2) Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments
| title = Gao Form RG 1.187 (Rev 2) - Senate Re Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.187 (Rev 2) Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments
| author name = Dacus E
| author name = Dacus E
| author affiliation = NRC/OCA
| author affiliation = NRC/OCA
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act President of the Senate                        Speaker of the House of Representatives                            GAO Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.
{{#Wiki_filter:Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.
: 1. Name of Department or Agency                                         2. Subdivision or Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                        Research
: 1. Name of Department or Agency
: 3. Rule Title Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.187 (Rev 2) Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments
: 2. Subdivision or Office
: 3. Rule Title
: 4. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)
: 4. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)
: 5.          Major Rule        Non-major Rule
: 7. With respect to this rule, did your agency solict public comments?
: 6.          Final Rule          Other      Issuance of Regulatory Guide
: 7. With respect to this rule, did your agency solict public comments?                           Yes    No          N/A
: 8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)
: 8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)
Economically Significant; or                       Routine and Frequent or Significant; or                                        Informational/Administrative/Other Substantive, Nonsignificant                            (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)
Economically Significant; or Significant; or Substantive, Nonsignificant Routine and Frequent or Informational/Administrative/Other (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)
: 9. Effective Date (if applicable)
: 9. Effective Date (if applicable)
: 10. Concise Summary of Rule (fill in one or both)               attached      stated in rule Submitted by: _____________________________               (signature)
: 10. Concise Summary of Rule (fill in one or both)
Eugene Dacus Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Submitted by: _____________________________ (signature)
Director, Office of Congressional Affairs
Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________


==Title:==
==Title:==
Line 34: Line 33:
Date Received: ________________
Date Received: ________________
Committee of Jurisdiction: ____________________________
Committee of Jurisdiction: ____________________________
3/23/99
3/23/99 5.
Major Rule Non-major Rule attached stated in rule Yes No N/A 6.
Final Rule Other President of the Senate GAO Speaker of the House of Representatives U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Research Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.187 (Rev 2) Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments G
G Issuance of Regulatory Guide G
G G
Eugene Dacus Director, Office of Congressional Affairs


Yes No N/A A. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
A.
B. With respect to this rule, by the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
B.
With respect to this rule, by the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
: 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
: 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
: 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
: 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
C. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under          
C.
    § 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under
D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
D.
F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
E.O. 12612, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 3/23/99}}
E.
Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
F.
Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
Yes No N/A G E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership G E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights G E.O. 12612, Federalism G E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review G E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks G E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform G Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 3/23/99 G
G G
G G
G G
G G
G G
G G}}

Latest revision as of 03:36, 4 December 2024

Gao Form RG 1.187 (Rev 2) - Senate Re Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.187 (Rev 2) Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments
ML20213C104
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/31/2020
From: Eugene Dacus
Office of Congressional Affairs
To:
Roche-Rivera R
Shared Package
ML20125A685 List:
References
Download: ML20213C104 (2)


Text

Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.

1. Name of Department or Agency
2. Subdivision or Office
3. Rule Title
4. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)
7. With respect to this rule, did your agency solict public comments?
8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)

Economically Significant; or Significant; or Substantive, Nonsignificant Routine and Frequent or Informational/Administrative/Other (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)

9. Effective Date (if applicable)
10. Concise Summary of Rule (fill in one or both)

Submitted by: _____________________________ (signature)

Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________

Title:

For Congressional Use Only:

Date Received: ________________

Committee of Jurisdiction: ____________________________

3/23/99 5.

Major Rule Non-major Rule attached stated in rule Yes No N/A 6.

Final Rule Other President of the Senate GAO Speaker of the House of Representatives U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Research Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.187 (Rev 2) Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments G

G Issuance of Regulatory Guide G

G G

Eugene Dacus Director, Office of Congressional Affairs

A.

With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?

B.

With respect to this rule, by the final rulemaking stage, did your agency

1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?

C.

With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under

§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?

D.

With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?

E.

Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?

F.

Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?

Yes No N/A G E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership G E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights G E.O. 12612, Federalism G E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review G E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks G E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform G Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 3/23/99 G

G G

G G

G G

G G

G G

G G