ML20265A259: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:LAS Operating Test Outline Comments As included in the attached Preliminary Form 301-7 documentation, there were no significant Operating Test Outline Comments. All review comments were provided to the licensee, resolved at the Onsite Validation (OV), and any changes made were documented in file LaSalle 2018 ILE Form ES-301-7.
{{#Wiki_filter:LAS Operating Test Outline Comments As included in the attached Preliminary Form 301-7 documentation, there were no significant Operating Test Outline Comments. All review comments were provided to the licensee, resolved at the Onsite Validation (OV), and any changes made were documented in file LaSalle 2018 ILE Form ES-301-7.  


ES-301                                                     Operating Test Review Worksheet                                                       Form ES-301-7 Facility:       LaSalle                                                           Exam Date: November 2018 1     2                           3                                 4         5                                 6 ADMIN                            Attributes                        Job Content LOD Admin     JPMs       Topic                                                                           U/E/S                         Explanation (1-5)  I/C       Critical Scope             Perf.
ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Exam Date: November 2018 1
and K/A                                                                      Job Cues                    Overlap      Key   Minutia Focus     Steps     (N/B)           Std.                   Link NRC: The Technical Specifications should be listed as COO A-SRO-39                   2                                                                      E    being required for the JPM setup.
2 3
2.1.20                                                                                 Response:
Attributes 4
COO A-SRO-20                    2                                                                      S 2.1.18 NRC: Fire Protection Impairment Permit given to the applicant for review lists MMD as the work group in EC                                                                                  section I. Based on the nature of the work and the A-SRO-68                    2                                                X                    E 2.2.17                                                                                  expected answer key, the work group should be listed as EMD.
Job Content 5
6 Admin JPMs ADMIN Topic and K/A LOD (1-5)
U/E/S Explanation I/C Cues Critical Scope Overlap Perf.
Key Minutia Job Link Focus Steps (N/B)
Std.
A-SRO-39 COO 2.1.20 2
E NRC: The Technical Specifications should be listed as being required for the JPM setup.  


===Response===
===Response===
RC A-SRO-37                    2                                                                        S 2.3.4 NRC: Step 18 indicates the applicant should enter code EP                                                                                  20 when contacting IEMA. It appears that LaSalle is A-SRO-101                    3                                                X                     E 2.4.30                                                                                code 25 based on page 2 of the NARS form.
A-SRO-20 COO 2.1.18 2
S A-SRO-68 EC 2.2.17 2
X E
NRC: Fire Protection Impairment Permit given to the applicant for review lists MMD as the work group in section I. Based on the nature of the work and the expected answer key, the work group should be listed as EMD.  


===Response===
===Response===
NRC: What are the verifiable actions for the critical steps COO                                                                                    where the applicant checks or determines A-RO-1                    3                                           X                           E?
A-SRO-37 RC 2.3.4 2
2.1.25                                                                                something? How is this documented? (GENERIC)
S A-SRO-101 EP 2.4.30 3
X E
NRC: Step 18 indicates the applicant should enter code 20 when contacting IEMA. It appears that LaSalle is code 25 based on page 2 of the NARS form.  


===Response===
===Response===
NRC: What are the verifiable actions for the critical steps COO                                                                                    where the applicant checks or determines A-RO-46                    2                                          X                          E?
A-RO-1 COO 2.1.25 3
2.1.5                                                                                  something? How is this documented? (GENERIC)
X E?
NRC: What are the verifiable actions for the critical steps where the applicant checks or determines something? How is this documented? (GENERIC)  


===Response===
===Response===
NRC: Initial conditions 5th bullet is missing the word be EC A-RO-48                    2     X                                                                  E  preceding 12,500 GPM.
A-RO-46 COO 2.1.5 2
2.2.44                                                                                  Response:
X E?
NRC: Include the limiting LGA-009 conditions in the JPM RC A-RO-47                    2                                                                        E  Standard.
NRC: What are the verifiable actions for the critical steps where the applicant checks or determines something? How is this documented? (GENERIC)


====2.3.5 Response====
===Response===
1 Simulator/In-Plant   Safety Function JPMs          and K/A 4
A-RO-48 EC 2.2.44 2
S-RH-29          203000    3                                                                       S A4.11
X E
NRC: Initial conditions 5th bullet is missing the word be preceding 12,500 GPM.
 
===Response===
A-RO-47 RC 2.3.5 2
E NRC: Include the limiting LGA-009 conditions in the JPM Standard.
 
===Response===
1 Simulator/In-Plant Safety Function and K/A JPMs S-RH-29 4
203000 A4.11 3
S
 
ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 S-MS-06 3
239001 A2.03 2
E NRC: On JPM summary sheet, indicate that this is not an alternate path JPM.
 
===Response===
S-RL-01 2
259002 A1.04 2
X E
NRC: 2nd bullet in initial conditions needs to be corrected as it reads, 1B TDRFP and the Both Feed Reg Valves are in Auto. It should read 1B TDRFP and both Feed Reg Valves are in Auto. Also, consider an earlier exit strategy since all critical steps are completed after Step 6 is performed (OV).
 
===Response===
S-RM-02 1
201002 K1.08 2
X E
NRC: Acknowledging a confirmatory pop-up message does not seem to be a Critical Step - suggest combining with step 8.
 
===Response===
S-AP-08 6
262001 A2.07 2
E NRC: Please clarify within the guide how each method is arrived at and performed (OV).
 
===Response===
S-RH-28 9
272000 A1.01 3
X E
NRC: The LOR given is for the 1B RHR SERV WTR RAD HI. The applicant is shutting down the 1A RHR heat exchanger. The LOR number also does not correspond to step 4 either (B112 vs. B212) and was probably written for the 1A RHR heat exchanger rad monitor.
 
===Response===
S-WR-02 8
400000 A4.01 2
E NRC: JPM Summary indicates that the K/A supported is 400000 A2.01. This is not the correct K/A as recorded on the ES 301-2 operating test outline - K/A 400000 A4.01 was supposed to be tested. The JPM meets both K/As so this issue can be considered an enhancement.
 
===Response===
S-RP-05 7
212000 A4.07 2
X E
NRC: Initial conditions 4th bullet should read, has been checked. Also, this is actually a New (vs. Modified, as the outline indicates) JPM.


ES-301                  Operating Test Review Worksheet                                          Form ES-301-7 3                                            NRC: On JPM summary sheet, indicate that this is not S-MS-06 239001  2                                    E an alternate path JPM.
===Response===
A2.03                                           Response:
P-PC-06 5
NRC: 2nd bullet in initial conditions needs to be corrected as it reads, 1B TDRFP and the Both Feed Reg Valves 2                                            are in Auto. It should read 1B TDRFP and both Feed S-RL-01 259002  2 X                                  E Reg Valves are in Auto. Also, consider an earlier exit A1.04                                          strategy since all critical steps are completed after Step 6 is performed (OV).
223001 A2.07 2
S P-RH-04 4
205000 A2.03 2
X E
NRC: Error message stated with no initial conditions given on paper copy only - possible file error?


===Response===
===Response===
1                                            NRC: Acknowledging a confirmatory pop-up message does not seem to be a Critical Step - suggest combining S-RM-02 201002 2    X                                E with step 8.
P-CY-05 2
K1.08                                           Response:
295031 EA1.08 3
6                                            NRC: Please clarify within the guide how each method is S-AP-08 262001 2                                      E arrived at and performed (OV).
E NRC: If intention is to have some applicants perform the jpm on Unit 2, ensure that Attachment 2B is provided.
A2.07                                          Response:
Not provided with review packet.  
NRC: The LOR given is for the 1B RHR SERV WTR RAD HI. The applicant is shutting down the 1A RHR 9                                            heat exchanger. The LOR number also does not S-RH-28 272000 3                        X            E correspond to step 4 either (B112 vs. B212) and was A1.01                                          probably written for the 1A RHR heat exchanger rad monitor.


===Response===
===Response===
NRC: JPM Summary indicates that the K/A supported is 8                                            400000 A2.01. This is not the correct K/A as recorded on the ES 301-2 operating test outline - K/A 400000 S-WR-02 400000 2                                      E A4.01 was supposed to be tested. The JPM meets both A4.01                                          K/As so this issue can be considered an enhancement.
ES-301 3
Form ES-301-7
 
ES-301 4
Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Scenario: 1 Exam Date: November 2018 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Event Realism/Cred.
Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.
Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1
S 2
S 3
X X
S 4
S 5
E NRC: No event termination criteria established.  


===Response===
===Response===
7                                           NRC: Initial conditions 4th bullet should read, has been checked. Also, this is actually a New (vs. Modified, as S-RP-05 212000 2  X                                   E the outline indicates) JPM.
6 X
A4.07                                          Response:
S 7
5 P-PC-06 223001 2                                      S A2.07 4                                            NRC: Error message stated with no initial conditions P-RH-04 205000 2  X                                   E given on paper copy only - possible file error?
X S
A2.03                                          Response:
8 X
2                                            NRC: If intention is to have some applicants perform the jpm on Unit 2, ensure that Attachment 2B is provided.
S 9
P-CY-05 295031 3                                      E Not provided with review packet.
XX S
EA1.08                                          Response:
10 X
E NRC: In addition to initiate Emergency Depressurization, establish RPV level controlled and in band (provide values) and containment pressure
< (provide value) and being controlled as event termination criteria.  


ES-301 3 Form ES-301-7 ES-301                                                                4                                                            Form ES-301-7 Facility:    LaSalle                              Scenario:        1          Exam Date: November 2018 1          2          3        4      5  6      7      8        9                                      10 Required Verifiable                  Scen.
===Response===
Event  Realism/Cred.                    LOD TS      CTs            U/E/S                                Explanation Actions  actions                    Overlap 1                                                                    S 2                                                                    S 3                                          X              X        S 4                                                                    S NRC: No event termination criteria established.
10 0
E 5                                                                        Response:
0 0
6                                          X                        S 7                                                          X        S 8                                                          X        S 9                                                  XX              S NRC: In addition to initiate Emergency Depressurization, establish RPV level controlled and in band (provide values) and containment pressure X              E  < (provide value) and being controlled as event termination criteria.
0 2
10                                                                       Response:
3 7
10          0         0         0       0  2       3     7       E   NRC: See above comments.
E NRC: See above comments.  


ES-301                                                                 5                                                               Form ES-301-7 Facility:       LaSalle                           Scenario:         2           Exam Date: November 2018 1           2           3       4       5   6       7     8       9                                       10 Required Verifiable                  Scen.
ES-301 5
Event   Realism/Cred.                     LOD TS     CTs           U/E/S                                 Explanation Actions  actions                    Overlap 1                                                                   S 2                                                                   S 3                                           X                       S Note: Verifiable action step for BOP occurs if SRO recognizes ODCM S
Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Scenario: 2 Exam Date: November 2018 1
4                                                                        entry requirement and orders 1 hour action requirement performed.
2 3
5                                                         X             -
4 5
NRC: Based on HPCS initiating on an invalid Level 2 signal, the lo-lo level instrumentation appears that it is indeed inoperable. With the actions taken to shutdown HPCS and prevent its restart, LCOs 3.3.5.1 and 3.5.1 BOTH appear appropriate to be entered. The HPCS DG is X              X        E  not affected by plant conditions, and therefore it would not be appropriate for the SRO to enter or consider LCO 3.8.1 with HPCS inoperable for reasons other than operability of the HPCS DG.
6 7
6                                                                        Response:
8 9
7                                                          X        S 8                                                          X        S NRC: Action for SRO to direct and BOP perform inhibiting ADS not labeled as a Critical Task. Identified as a Critical Task in summary XXXX              E  section of scenario.
10 Event Realism/Cred.
9                                                                        Response:
Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.
9          0          0        0      0  2        4      5        E  NRC: See above comments.
Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1
S 2
S 3
X S
4 S
Note: Verifiable action step for BOP occurs if SRO recognizes ODCM entry requirement and orders 1 hour action requirement performed.
5 X
6 X
X E
NRC: Based on HPCS initiating on an invalid Level 2 signal, the lo-lo level instrumentation appears that it is indeed inoperable. With the actions taken to shutdown HPCS and prevent its restart, LCOs 3.3.5.1 and 3.5.1 BOTH appear appropriate to be entered. The HPCS DG is not affected by plant conditions, and therefore it would not be appropriate for the SRO to enter or consider LCO 3.8.1 with HPCS inoperable for reasons other than operability of the HPCS DG.  


ES-301                                                              6                                                            Form ES-301-7 Facility:      LaSalle                            Scenario:      3            Exam Date: November 2018 1          2          3        4      5  6      7      8     9                                        10 Required Verifiable                  Scen.
===Response===
Event  Realism/Cred.                    LOD TS      CTs          U/E/S                                  Explanation Actions  actions                    Overlap 1                                                                  S 2                                                                  S 3                                                                  S 4                                          X                     S 5                                                          X      S NRC: Consider reordering this event to just before the major event or just before the FRV fails open event as an untimely response to this failure could lead to a procedurally driven manual scram (runback E
7 X
occurs with power > 20%RTP).
S 8
6                                                                      Response:
X S
7                                          X                      S 8                                                                  S 9                                                          X      S 10                                                    X    X      S 11                                                  XX    X      S NRC: Critical task to initiate suppression chamber sprays is not listed in the summary front matter section of the scenario paperwork.
9 XXXX E
E
NRC: Action for SRO to direct and BOP perform inhibiting ADS not labeled as a Critical Task. Identified as a Critical Task in summary section of scenario.  


===Response===
===Response===
9 0
0 0
0 2
4 5
E NRC: See above comments.


ES-301                                                                 7                                                              Form ES-301-7 Facility:         LaSalle                         Scenario:         4            Exam Date: November 2018 1           2           3       4       5   6       7     8       9                                         10 Required Verifiable                   Scen.
ES-301 6
Event   Realism/Cred.                     LOD TS     CTs           U/E/S                                   Explanation Actions  actions                    Overlap 1                                                         X         S 2                                                                   S 3                                                                   S 4                                                                   S NRC: This failure is silent as there is no annunciator that will sound and comprises one valve losing indications lights. It is very likely the applicants may not notice this event has occurred without some form of X  X                        U prompting.
Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Scenario: 3 Exam Date: November 2018 1
5                                                                        Response:
2 3
NRC: More actions should be listed on the D-2 including review PPC for rod positons, LPRM indications, run OD-20, contact QNE, etc.
4 5
X        E 6                                                                        Response:
6 7
7                                           X             X         S 8                                                                   S NRC: ATC will be directed to manually scram the reactor with a primary system discharging into secondary containment. D-2 should include X              E action to scram when directed and those actions taken post reactor 9                                                                        scram IAW LGP 3-2.
8 9
10                                                   X     X         S 10           0         0         0       1 2       2     6       U   NRC: See above comments.
10 Event Realism/Cred.
Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.
Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1
S 2
S 3
S 4
X S
5 X
S 6
E NRC: Consider reordering this event to just before the major event or just before the FRV fails open event as an untimely response to this failure could lead to a procedurally driven manual scram (runback occurs with power > 20%RTP).
 
===Response===
7 X
S 8
S 9
X S
10 X
X S
11 XX X
S E
NRC: Critical task to initiate suppression chamber sprays is not listed in the summary front matter section of the scenario paperwork.
 
===Response===
ES-301 7
Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Scenario: 4 Exam Date: November 2018 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Event Realism/Cred.
Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.
Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1
X S
2 S
3 S
4 S
5 X
X U
NRC: This failure is silent as there is no annunciator that will sound and comprises one valve losing indications lights. It is very likely the applicants may not notice this event has occurred without some form of prompting.  
 
===Response===
6 X
E NRC: More actions should be listed on the D-2 including review PPC for rod positons, LPRM indications, run OD-20, contact QNE, etc.  
 
===Response===
7 X
X S
8 S
9 X
E NRC: ATC will be directed to manually scram the reactor with a primary system discharging into secondary containment. D-2 should include action to scram when directed and those actions taken post reactor scram IAW LGP 3-2.
10 X
X S
10 0
0 0
1 2
2 6
U NRC: See above comments.  


ES-301 8 Form ES-301-7}}
ES-301 8
Form ES-301-7}}

Latest revision as of 00:19, 30 November 2024

Ile Operating Test Outline Comments
ML20265A259
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/11/2018
From: Chuck Zoia
Operations Branch III
To:
Exelon Generation Co, NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Zoia C
Shared Package
ML17164A408 List:
References
50-373/18-301, 50-374/18-301, RA18-100 50-373/OL-18, 50-374/OL-18
Download: ML20265A259 (9)
v • d • e


Text

LAS Operating Test Outline Comments As included in the attached Preliminary Form 301-7 documentation, there were no significant Operating Test Outline Comments. All review comments were provided to the licensee, resolved at the Onsite Validation (OV), and any changes made were documented in file LaSalle 2018 ILE Form ES-301-7.

ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Exam Date: November 2018 1

2 3

Attributes 4

Job Content 5

6 Admin JPMs ADMIN Topic and K/A LOD (1-5)

U/E/S Explanation I/C Cues Critical Scope Overlap Perf.

Key Minutia Job Link Focus Steps (N/B)

Std.

A-SRO-39 COO 2.1.20 2

E NRC: The Technical Specifications should be listed as being required for the JPM setup.

Response

A-SRO-20 COO 2.1.18 2

S A-SRO-68 EC 2.2.17 2

X E

NRC: Fire Protection Impairment Permit given to the applicant for review lists MMD as the work group in section I. Based on the nature of the work and the expected answer key, the work group should be listed as EMD.

Response

A-SRO-37 RC 2.3.4 2

S A-SRO-101 EP 2.4.30 3

X E

NRC: Step 18 indicates the applicant should enter code 20 when contacting IEMA. It appears that LaSalle is code 25 based on page 2 of the NARS form.

Response

A-RO-1 COO 2.1.25 3

X E?

NRC: What are the verifiable actions for the critical steps where the applicant checks or determines something? How is this documented? (GENERIC)

Response

A-RO-46 COO 2.1.5 2

X E?

NRC: What are the verifiable actions for the critical steps where the applicant checks or determines something? How is this documented? (GENERIC)

Response

A-RO-48 EC 2.2.44 2

X E

NRC: Initial conditions 5th bullet is missing the word be preceding 12,500 GPM.

Response

A-RO-47 RC 2.3.5 2

E NRC: Include the limiting LGA-009 conditions in the JPM Standard.

Response

1 Simulator/In-Plant Safety Function and K/A JPMs S-RH-29 4

203000 A4.11 3

S

ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 S-MS-06 3

239001 A2.03 2

E NRC: On JPM summary sheet, indicate that this is not an alternate path JPM.

Response

S-RL-01 2

259002 A1.04 2

X E

NRC: 2nd bullet in initial conditions needs to be corrected as it reads, 1B TDRFP and the Both Feed Reg Valves are in Auto. It should read 1B TDRFP and both Feed Reg Valves are in Auto. Also, consider an earlier exit strategy since all critical steps are completed after Step 6 is performed (OV).

Response

S-RM-02 1

201002 K1.08 2

X E

NRC: Acknowledging a confirmatory pop-up message does not seem to be a Critical Step - suggest combining with step 8.

Response

S-AP-08 6

262001 A2.07 2

E NRC: Please clarify within the guide how each method is arrived at and performed (OV).

Response

S-RH-28 9

272000 A1.01 3

X E

NRC: The LOR given is for the 1B RHR SERV WTR RAD HI. The applicant is shutting down the 1A RHR heat exchanger. The LOR number also does not correspond to step 4 either (B112 vs. B212) and was probably written for the 1A RHR heat exchanger rad monitor.

Response

S-WR-02 8

400000 A4.01 2

E NRC: JPM Summary indicates that the K/A supported is 400000 A2.01. This is not the correct K/A as recorded on the ES 301-2 operating test outline - K/A 400000 A4.01 was supposed to be tested. The JPM meets both K/As so this issue can be considered an enhancement.

Response

S-RP-05 7

212000 A4.07 2

X E

NRC: Initial conditions 4th bullet should read, has been checked. Also, this is actually a New (vs. Modified, as the outline indicates) JPM.

Response

P-PC-06 5

223001 A2.07 2

S P-RH-04 4

205000 A2.03 2

X E

NRC: Error message stated with no initial conditions given on paper copy only - possible file error?

Response

P-CY-05 2

295031 EA1.08 3

E NRC: If intention is to have some applicants perform the jpm on Unit 2, ensure that Attachment 2B is provided.

Not provided with review packet.

Response

ES-301 3

Form ES-301-7

ES-301 4

Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Scenario: 1 Exam Date: November 2018 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 Event Realism/Cred.

Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.

Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1

S 2

S 3

X X

S 4

S 5

E NRC: No event termination criteria established.

Response

6 X

S 7

X S

8 X

S 9

XX S

10 X

E NRC: In addition to initiate Emergency Depressurization, establish RPV level controlled and in band (provide values) and containment pressure

< (provide value) and being controlled as event termination criteria.

Response

10 0

0 0

0 2

3 7

E NRC: See above comments.

ES-301 5

Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Scenario: 2 Exam Date: November 2018 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 Event Realism/Cred.

Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.

Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1

S 2

S 3

X S

4 S

Note: Verifiable action step for BOP occurs if SRO recognizes ODCM entry requirement and orders 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> action requirement performed.

5 X

6 X

X E

NRC: Based on HPCS initiating on an invalid Level 2 signal, the lo-lo level instrumentation appears that it is indeed inoperable. With the actions taken to shutdown HPCS and prevent its restart, LCOs 3.3.5.1 and 3.5.1 BOTH appear appropriate to be entered. The HPCS DG is not affected by plant conditions, and therefore it would not be appropriate for the SRO to enter or consider LCO 3.8.1 with HPCS inoperable for reasons other than operability of the HPCS DG.

Response

7 X

S 8

X S

9 XXXX E

NRC: Action for SRO to direct and BOP perform inhibiting ADS not labeled as a Critical Task. Identified as a Critical Task in summary section of scenario.

Response

9 0

0 0

0 2

4 5

E NRC: See above comments.

ES-301 6

Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Scenario: 3 Exam Date: November 2018 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 Event Realism/Cred.

Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.

Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1

S 2

S 3

S 4

X S

5 X

S 6

E NRC: Consider reordering this event to just before the major event or just before the FRV fails open event as an untimely response to this failure could lead to a procedurally driven manual scram (runback occurs with power > 20%RTP).

Response

7 X

S 8

S 9

X S

10 X

X S

11 XX X

S E

NRC: Critical task to initiate suppression chamber sprays is not listed in the summary front matter section of the scenario paperwork.

Response

ES-301 7

Form ES-301-7 Facility: LaSalle Scenario: 4 Exam Date: November 2018 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 Event Realism/Cred.

Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.

Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1

X S

2 S

3 S

4 S

5 X

X U

NRC: This failure is silent as there is no annunciator that will sound and comprises one valve losing indications lights. It is very likely the applicants may not notice this event has occurred without some form of prompting.

Response

6 X

E NRC: More actions should be listed on the D-2 including review PPC for rod positons, LPRM indications, run OD-20, contact QNE, etc.

Response

7 X

X S

8 S

9 X

E NRC: ATC will be directed to manually scram the reactor with a primary system discharging into secondary containment. D-2 should include action to scram when directed and those actions taken post reactor scram IAW LGP 3-2.

10 X

X S

10 0

0 0

1 2

2 6

U NRC: See above comments.

ES-301 8

Form ES-301-7

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20265A259&oldid=3857131"