ML22357A076: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REVIEW / COMMENT DOCUMENTATION Reviewer:  NRC-2022-0096 (87 FR 29396)                        Date: 2022
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
 
==Title:==
Draft Modified IEEE Hazard Report Document Number        Review Comments (Print)/Basis for Comment No.                                                                        Proposed Resolution                                Comment Disposition / Resolution Section / Paragraph    Comment (1)
Page xi                COVID is misspelled                          Correct spelling                                  Corrected Spelling ML22165A208 IEEE 1584-2018 Appendix G.7.6 describes the minimum working                                                                  Any model predictions that are less than 12 inches (0.3m) is not included in the report.
distance of 12 inches is due to being                                                          This is noted as N/A in the ZOI tables within the range of the arc plasma                                                              starting on page 4-2. The footnotes for the cloud and metal droplets. No tests were                                                        ZOI tables communicate that the results are not applicable due to the ZOI being less than performed at such short working 0.3 m (12 in). Your comments identify that distances. A minimum working distance                                                          treatment in this manner is a non-of 12 inches was used because the                                                              conservatism and as such, the report has plasma cloud is not considered to have                                                          been corrected to replace N/A with the models limiting distance 0.3 m [12 in]. Your exceeded a radius of 12 in. The plasma      Reevaluate applicability of methodology and comment also identifies that the level of cloud size and effect of direct contact      include clear bounds of use, including non        conservatism / non-conservatism is unknown (2)                                                                                applicability to use in PRAs due to Section 2.2.1          with it should be considered in future                                                          since there isnt sufficient research to ML22165A208 arc-flash model revisions. The arc flash    conservatism.                                      evaluate model prediction capabilities within the plasma region.
boundary is not simply based on the limits for sustaining injury to humans, it While this is a conservative assumption, it is a limitation of the testing. Target does not take into consideration the ensuing response within the plasma cloud could                                                          enclosure fire, which likely encompasses this be substantially different than target                                                          limiting ZOI.
response outside the plasma cloud.
Further justification should be provided                                                        As such, additional text has been added in to apply a model outside the validation                                                        section 2.2.1 to clarify that the ZOI is limited to 0.3 m (12 in.) when the model predicted range (less than the minimum 12 inch                                                            damage is less than 1-ft.
distance).
Page 1 of 5
 
REVIEW / COMMENT DOCUMENTATION Reviewer:    NRC-2022-0096 (87 FR 29396)                          Date: 2022
 
==Title:==
Draft Modified IEEE Hazard Report (3)            Section 2.2.2          There is no clear basis for excluding          Reevaluate applicability of                        The sub-section title (electrode configuration)
ML22165A208                            insulated conditions, and this is              methodology and include clear                      likely caused confusion in the draft report.
therefore not realistic for cases with        bounds of use, including non                        These are terms used in the initial model to insulated bus bars.                            applicability to use in PRAs due                    identify how the electrodes are oriented to the targets and enclosure configuration. There is to conservatism.
no relation to insulated conductors. The insulation referred to the enclosure. As such, wording has been added to clarify the configuration. Based on these clarifications, the comment is not valid since both insulated and non-insulated conductors are applicable.
(4)            Page 3-15              HCB and VCB are not adequately                Include explanation and                            Discussion on configuration is added, along ML22165A208                            explained, and the chosen approach            justification.                                      with justification for using it in the sensitivity was not sufficiently justified.                                                                    study.
(5)            Section 3.4.2          The medium voltage equation on page            Clarify applicability of equation                  Comment is accurate, however, the typical ML22165A208                            3-10 is written such that it is assumed        and reevaluate applicability of                    HEAF involves all three phase. Typical event that all three phases contribute to the        methodology and include clear                      progression involves a single-phase to ground fault. This is therefore not applicable        bounds of use, including non                        or phase-to-phase arc that rapidly propagate to all three phases. This has been observed for cases with two phases, or phase-to        applicability to use in PRAs due in OE, even for events involving insulated ground.                                        to conservatism.                                    buses. There have been a limited number of A single phase-to-ground fault,                                                                    events that do not involve all three phases but for example, would have less energy.                                                              are considered a less common scenario.
The current PRA framework does not provide a means for establishing when a HEAF will not involve all three phases. Because of these reasons, it is common practices to assume all three phases are involved in a HEAF.
(6)            Section 3.6            In the arcing power equation on page 3-        Specify terminal voltage or                        Arc voltage is the voltage across the arc. It is ML22165A208                            13, it is unclear if the arc voltage is the    system voltage.                                    discussed in appendix A. A reference to terminal voltage or system voltage.                                                                appendix A has been added.
Page 2 of 5
 
REVIEW / COMMENT DOCUMENTATION Reviewer:    NRC-2022-0096 (87 FR 29396)                            Date: 2022
 
==Title:==
Draft Modified IEEE Hazard Report (7)            Figure 17              The Total Energy Release is linear with        Revise the figure with an                          The comment identifies a heat flux (power)
ML22165A208                            fault duration, but ZOI due to radiation        appropriate relationship or                        relationship for a black body emission source.
is to the 4th power which would not be          provide justification for the                      That relationship predicts power (heat flux) linear. There is no basis given for a          linear relationship.
based on the temperature of the emitting object. Power (heat flux) can be integrated to linear increase in ZOI.
derive energy.
The Figure presents the zone of influence which has a dependency on energy, distance, target fragility. Figure 17 presents the results of the model which is empirically derived and includes other forms of heat transfer than just radiation. Since the model encompasses all forms of heat transfer registered by the measurement device, it is unclear how this comment as written is relative to the figure.
(8)            Page 4-2                In the ZOI tables, the difference              Specify the ZOI in different                      The model can be used to provide ML22165A208                            between Aluminum and Steel is not              directions.                                        directionally dependent ZOIs by choosing the substantial. It would be useful to have                                                            applicable configuration (HCB or VCB).
the ZOI in different directions specified.
However, this requires detailed knowledge of the equipment lineup. Since this is unique to the equipment and plant configuration, the decision was made to not include this level of complexity and keep the application of the model as a first order approximation.
Page 3 of 5
 
REVIEW / COMMENT DOCUMENTATION Reviewer:  NRC-2022-0096 (87 FR 29396)                      Date:  2022
 
==Title:==
Draft Modified IEEE Hazard Report (9)            Page A-1              Arc voltage is smaller (20% of open            Correct the X/R ratio.
ML22165A208                            circuit voltage) because high fault current generates large voltage drop (80%) through impedance in transformer and cables.
Based on Figure 19, there does not appear to be a phase shift (the phase voltage sinusoids have the same period with no significant offset due the fault)                                                            Changed purely resistive to highly resistive from the open circuit condition to the                                                              The model doesnt require an X/R ratio, and fault condition. The transformer source                                                              as such is not discussed.
is highly inductive (large X/R ratio) and the cable has a moderate X/R ratio. If the arc was purely resistive with no reactance, there would be a phase shift.
The arc fault likely has a similar X/R ratio (reactance to resistance ratio) to the open circuit impedance and is likely not purely resistive.
(10)
Front / PDF page 9    Type in Figure 15 title                        approxiation should be approximation              Corrected in List of Figures ML22165A134 Consider adding a summary table of the bias (11)            Section 3 / PDF page                                                    factor and standard deviation for each model        Added summary table to Section 3.7 and Missing summary table ML22165A134    20                                                                    to the end of this section as a quick reference      made changes to section title.
for the end user.
(12)            Section 3.4 / PDF      Figure 8. Does Arc Duration = Fault Duration                                                        These are the same. Discussion added to Terminology should be consistent/clarified.
ML22165A134    page 26                from section 5 tables?                                                                              clarify what arc duration is.
(13)            Section 3.6 / PDF Typo in Figure 15                              approxiation should be approximation              Corrected in Figure Caption ML22165A134    page 33 Page 4 of 5
 
REVIEW / COMMENT DOCUMENTATION Reviewer:  NRC-2022-0096 (87 FR 29396)                        Date: 2022
 
==Title:==
Draft Modified IEEE Hazard Report It is unclear how the ZOI results can be applied to HEAF modeling. Some brief (14)              Section 4 / PDF page  discussion should be included for picking Add clarification.                              Clarification added ML22165A134      37                    the correct ZOI. For example, should Fault duration be Fault Clearing Time estimated on a per plant basis.
IEEE SA notes that the research information letters are based on NRC research that is dissimilar to that performed as a part of the IEEE/NFPA                                                          All references to the base model and IEEE These new models would not be the IEEE Collaboration Research. The procedures,                                                      1584 have been either removed or replaced.
(15) IEEE SA      General                                                            1584 model, and could not be referred to as configurations, measurements,                                                                The new model is referred to as the final such.
equipment, and tests differ. Of course,                                                      model. Report title has also been changed.
with these differences, it is understood that results, conclusions, and any derived models will also differ.
Page 5 of 5}}

Revision as of 13:19, 15 November 2024

Comment Resolution for Draft Modeling Document Report
ML22357A076
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/31/2022
From: Gabe Taylor
NRC/RES/DRA/FXHAB
To:
References
Download: ML22357A076 (5)
v • d • e


Text

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML22357A076&oldid=3715802"