ML23345A036: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Braidwood and Byron ATWS UET December 11, 2023
{{#Wiki_filter:Braidwood and Byron ATWS UET December 11, 2023 Agenda
 
Agenda
* Purpose
* Purpose
* LAR Scope
* LAR Scope
Line 27: Line 25:
* Defense in Depth
* Defense in Depth
* Key Milestones
* Key Milestones
* Summary 2 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023
* Summary


Purpose
2 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Pu r p os e
* Constellation Energy Generation (CEG) proposes to delete Technical Specification (TS) 5.6.5.b.5. This specification is one of the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) references. This Technical Specification is one of many analytical methods and limitations on the parameter Moderator Temperature Coefficient, Technical Specification 3.1.3.
* Constellation Energy Generation (CEG) proposes to delete Technical Specification (TS) 5.6.5.b.5. This specification is one of the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) references. This Technical Specification is one of many analytical methods and limitations on the parameter Moderator Temperature Coefficient, Technical Specification 3.1.3.
* To solicit feedback from the NRC on the information presented and gain insight on NRC's information needs and review schedule considerations.
* To solicit feedback from the NRC on the information presented and gain insight on NRC's information needs and review schedule considerations.
3 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023


License Amendment Request Scope
3 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 License Amendment Request Scope
* CEG proposes only to delete Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.5. This specification limits the most positive / least negative Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) in the fuel cycle. This limit improves Anticipated Transient Without SCRAM (ATWS) Risk.
* CEG proposes only to delete Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.5. This specification limits the most positive / least negative Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) in the fuel cycle. This limit improves Anticipated Transient Without SCRAM (ATWS) Risk.
* After implementing this change, the cycle specific limits and confirmations associated with COLR Reference 5.6.5.b.5 will no longer be applied by CEG. The Moderator Temperature Coefficient will continue to be limited by Technical Specification Figure 3.1.3-1 and will be confirmed to be acceptable with all other COLR references listed in Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.
* After implementing this change, the cycle specific limits and confirmations associated with COLR Reference 5.6.5.b.5 will no longer be applied by CEG. The Moderator Temperature Coefficient will continue to be limited by Technical Specification Figure 3.1.3-1 and will be confirmed to be acceptable with all other COLR references listed in Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.
* After implementing the proposed change, Byron and Braidwood will continue to meet the ATWS Rule, 10 CFR 50.62, and continue to meet all other licensing basis commitments related to ATWS including those from NRC Generic Letter 83-28, Required Actions Based on Generic Implication of Salem ATWS Events.
* After implementing the proposed change, Byron and Braidwood will continue to meet the ATWS Rule, 10 CFR 50.62, and continue to meet all other licensing basis commitments related to ATWS including those from NRC Generic Letter 83-28, Required Actions Based on Generic Implication of Salem ATWS Events.
* The proposed change may result in core designs with higher Hot Full Power Critical Boron concentrations and less negative MTCs. The effects of those changes are within the limits of existing regulations and licensing bases.
* The proposed change may result in core designs with higher Hot Full Power Critical Boron concentrations and less negative MTCs. The effects of those changes are within the limits of existing regulations and licensing bases.
4 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023


Reason for the change Fuel Cycle Length: CEG is evaluating 24 month cycles for Byron and Braidwood. The MTC limits for the longer cycles would significantly affect fuel cycle cost and feasibility.
4 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Reason for the change
 
Fuel Cycle Length: CEG is evaluating 24 month cycles for Byron and Braidwood. The MTC limits for the longer cycles would significantly affect fuel cycle cost and feasibility.
 
Fuel Cycle Analytical Methods: The methodology prescribed by Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.5 is proprietary to Westinghouse, and CEG is pursuing alternative suppliers. The other fuel suppliers do not have this methodology or a practical alternative.
Fuel Cycle Analytical Methods: The methodology prescribed by Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.5 is proprietary to Westinghouse, and CEG is pursuing alternative suppliers. The other fuel suppliers do not have this methodology or a practical alternative.
5 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023


Analyses
5 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 A n a l yse s
* CEG will evaluate the changes in Risk for eliminating this limit using Regulatory Guide 1.174, An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis.
* CEG will evaluate the changes in Risk for eliminating this limit using Regulatory Guide 1.174, An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk -
Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis.
* The CEG Evaluation will consider both CDF and LERF from both the Internal Events and External Events Probabilistic Risk Assessments (PRAs)
* The CEG Evaluation will consider both CDF and LERF from both the Internal Events and External Events Probabilistic Risk Assessments (PRAs)
* The CEG PRA model is technically acceptable for the following applications
* The CEG PRA model is technically acceptable for the following applications
* Risk Informed Completion Times
* Risk Informed Completion Times
* 50.69
* 50.69
* Surveillance Frequency Control Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 6
* Surveillance Frequency Control
 
6 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Preliminary Results
 
C DF / C DF: 5 E-5 / 5 E-7
 
LERF / LERF: 2 E-6 / 2 E-10


Preliminary Results CDF / CDF: 5 E-5 / 5 E-7 LERF / LERF: 2 E-6 / 2 E-10 7 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023
7 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Unfavorable Exposure Time (UET) in PRA


Unfavorable Exposure Time (UET) in PRA UET in Current Licensing Basis (Tech                                             UET in CEG PRA:
UET in Current Licensing Basis (Tech UET in CEG PRA:
Spec 5.6.3.b.5):                                                                 MTC favorable (Y/N) with complex conditions based on MTC Favorable (<-8pcm/&deg;F) (Y/N)                                           o Rod Insertion {y,n}
Spec 5.6.3.b.5): MTC favorable (Y/N) with complex conditions based on MTC Favorable (<-8pcm/&deg;F) (Y/N) o Rod Insertion {y, n }
2 Pressurizer PORVs                                                       o Aux Feedwater Trains {1,2}
2 Pressurizer PORVs o Aux Feedwater Trains {1,2}
2 Trains Auxiliary Feedwater                                             o Pressurizer Safeties {3}
2 Trains Auxiliary Feedwater o Pressurizer Safeties {3}
NO Auto or Manual Control Rod                                             o Pressurizer PORVs {0,1,2}
NO Auto or Manual Control Rod o Pressurizer PORVs {0,1,2}
Insertion The CEG Evaluation will determine The conditions above must                                                       the CDF and LERF between the demonstrate ATWS peak Pressure <                                               current split fractions and 100% UET.
Insertion The CEG Evaluation will determine The conditions above must the CDF and LERF between the demonstrate ATWS peak Pressure < current split fractions and 100% UET.
3200 psi for 95% of the fuel cycle.
3200 psi for 95% of the fuel cycle.
Realistically, the UET is shifting from
Realistically, the UET is shifting from
                                                                                        < 5% to <50%
< 5% to <50%
8 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023


Large Early Release Frequency
8 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Large Early Release Frequency
* Some studies (WCAP-15831-P-A, WOG Risk-Informed ATWS Assessment and Licensing Implementation Process, August, 2007) conservatively assumed that RCS overpressure >3584 psid would lead to a large early release.
* Some studies (WCAP-15831-P-A, WOG Risk -Informed ATWS Assessment and Licensing Implementation Process, August, 2007) conservatively assumed that RCS overpressure >3584 psid would lead to a large early release.
* CEG PRA does not automatically default to Large Early Release
* CEG PRA does not automatically default to Large Early Release
* The high pressure induced steam generator tube rupture results in limited fuel failure (DNB) with significant scrubbing (steam generator secondary water inventory) and plating (steam generator and steam line surfaces) 9 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023
* The high pressure induced steam generator tube rupture results in limited fuel failure (DNB) with significant scrubbing (steam generator secondary water inventory) and plating (steam generator and steam line surfaces)
 
9 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Ini ti ati ng Eve nts Defense In Depth
 
A utomati c SCRA M Trai n A
 
- Hi gh P re ssuri ze r P re ssure A utomati c SCRA M Trai n B - Over Temperature Delta-T
- Low Steam Generator Level
 
Manual SCRA M Trai n A
- Unde rV ol tage Tri p
- Shunt Tri p
 
Manual SCRA M Trai n B
 
Automati c Rod Inse rti on
 
Favorabl e MTC
 
Manual Start Motor Dri v e n FW Pump
 
AMSAC


Initiating Events Defense In Depth Automatic SCRAM Train A
10 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Proprietary
                                                                                                            - High Pressurizer Pressure
                                                                                                            - Over Temperature Delta-T Automatic SCRAM Train B
                                                                                                            - Low Steam Generator Level Manual SCRAM Train A
                                                                                                            - UnderVoltage Trip
                                                                                                            - Shunt Trip Manual SCRAM Train B Automatic Rod Insertion Favorable MTC Manual Start Motor Driven FW Pump AMSAC 10 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023


Proprietary Key Milestones
Key Milestones
* Pre-Submittal Meeting - December 11, 2023
* Pre -Submittal Meeting - December 11, 2023
* Expected Submittal Date - April 30, 2024
* Expected Submittal Date - April 30, 2024
* Requested Approval Date - June 30, 2025 11  Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023
* Requested Approval Date - June 30, 2025


Summary
11 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Summary
* CEG proposes only to delete Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.5. This specification limits the most positive / least negative MTC in the fuel cycle.
* CEG proposes only to delete Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.5. This specification limits the most positive / least negative MTC in the fuel cycle.
* MTC upper and lower limits for all other Design Basis events is unchanged.
* MTC upper and lower limits for all other Design Basis events is unchanged.
* ATWS rule commitments unchanged
* ATWS rule commitments unchanged
* Preliminary results demonstrate Region III in Reg Guide 1.174 evaluation 12 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATWS UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023
* Preliminary results demonstrate Region III in Reg Guide 1.174 evaluation
 
12 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Questions


Questions 13}}
13}}

Revision as of 00:32, 6 October 2024

ATWS Uet December 11, 2023 Pre-submittal Meeting Slides
ML23345A036
Person / Time
Site: Byron, Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/11/2023
From:
Constellation Energy Generation
To: Joel Wiebe
NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL3
Wiebe J
References
EPID L-2023-LRM-0099
Download: ML23345A036 (1)


Text

Braidwood and Byron ATWS UET December 11, 2023 Agenda

  • Purpose
  • Reason for the Change
  • Analyses and Preliminary Results
  • Defense in Depth
  • Key Milestones
  • Summary

2 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Pu r p os e

  • To solicit feedback from the NRC on the information presented and gain insight on NRC's information needs and review schedule considerations.

3 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 License Amendment Request Scope

  • After implementing this change, the cycle specific limits and confirmations associated with COLR Reference 5.6.5.b.5 will no longer be applied by CEG. The Moderator Temperature Coefficient will continue to be limited by Technical Specification Figure 3.1.3-1 and will be confirmed to be acceptable with all other COLR references listed in Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.
  • After implementing the proposed change, Byron and Braidwood will continue to meet the ATWS Rule, 10 CFR 50.62, and continue to meet all other licensing basis commitments related to ATWS including those from NRC Generic Letter 83-28, Required Actions Based on Generic Implication of Salem ATWS Events.
  • The proposed change may result in core designs with higher Hot Full Power Critical Boron concentrations and less negative MTCs. The effects of those changes are within the limits of existing regulations and licensing bases.

4 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Reason for the change

Fuel Cycle Length: CEG is evaluating 24 month cycles for Byron and Braidwood. The MTC limits for the longer cycles would significantly affect fuel cycle cost and feasibility.

Fuel Cycle Analytical Methods: The methodology prescribed by Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.5 is proprietary to Westinghouse, and CEG is pursuing alternative suppliers. The other fuel suppliers do not have this methodology or a practical alternative.

5 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 A n a l yse s

Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis.

  • The CEG PRA model is technically acceptable for the following applications
  • Risk Informed Completion Times
  • 50.69
  • Surveillance Frequency Control

6 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Preliminary Results

C DF / C DF: 5 E-5 / 5 E-7

LERF / LERF: 2 E-6 / 2 E-10

7 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Unfavorable Exposure Time (UET) in PRA

UET in Current Licensing Basis (Tech UET in CEG PRA:

Spec 5.6.3.b.5): MTC favorable (Y/N) with complex conditions based on MTC Favorable (<-8pcm/°F) (Y/N) o Rod Insertion {y, n }

2 Pressurizer PORVs o Aux Feedwater Trains {1,2}

2 Trains Auxiliary Feedwater o Pressurizer Safeties {3}

NO Auto or Manual Control Rod o Pressurizer PORVs {0,1,2}

Insertion The CEG Evaluation will determine The conditions above must the CDF and LERF between the demonstrate ATWS peak Pressure < current split fractions and 100% UET.

3200 psi for 95% of the fuel cycle.

Realistically, the UET is shifting from

< 5% to <50%

8 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Large Early Release Frequency

  • Some studies (WCAP-15831-P-A, WOG Risk -Informed ATWS Assessment and Licensing Implementation Process, August, 2007) conservatively assumed that RCS overpressure >3584 psid would lead to a large early release.
  • CEG PRA does not automatically default to Large Early Release

9 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Ini ti ati ng Eve nts Defense In Depth

A utomati c SCRA M Trai n A

- Hi gh P re ssuri ze r P re ssure A utomati c SCRA M Trai n B - Over Temperature Delta-T

- Low Steam Generator Level

Manual SCRA M Trai n A

- Unde rV ol tage Tri p

- Shunt Tri p

Manual SCRA M Trai n B

Automati c Rod Inse rti on

Favorabl e MTC

Manual Start Motor Dri v e n FW Pump

AMSAC

10 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Proprietary

Key Milestones

  • Pre -Submittal Meeting - December 11, 2023
  • Expected Submittal Date - April 30, 2024
  • Requested Approval Date - June 30, 2025

11 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Summary

  • MTC upper and lower limits for all other Design Basis events is unchanged.
  • ATWS rule commitments unchanged

12 Byron-Braidwood Fuel Transition Project - ATW S UET Pre-submittal Meeting 12/11/2023 Questions

13