ML20137M281: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:caics For Secaration Recuirements for Circ:its c,ie No. / 9 - f_d - @ | ||
SA!! GENT h LUNDY connecta$ to Class lE Sources,which are _ | |||
o Date 3 _ 1 _ g-c a.awr se N | |||
. %:%-4 -M M M Amida'-t Sir-1 e, ev | |||
.- % O-C^OO y f Lfetv-Related N on-Lf ety-R elated Page 1 of 2 Cf eat Illi-oie pcwer cc rany Pre :ared hv _.*E-[ fd.,,,[~[ Oste,.*- - '' | |||
Prote:t cli- to - pcwer Station - Unit 1 Rev'ewed by l / / I'~;' [_, [ Oate f-/ /' ~ | |||
Foi No. .:534 n0 E wg No. Approved by hMi[/ V. ~h'M Date 2 - f -St~ | |||
RE:SPCts!B'E DIVISICti: EFED FILE 20. : 1923 V PURPOSE: | |||
The purpose of this analysis is to demonstrate that: | |||
: 1. A cable which is connected to a Class lE power supply,~ feeds Non-Class 1E load (s). and is tripped on an accident signal, does not recuire separation from Class lE and associated or Non-Class lE cables of the same division (e.g. Seg. Code lE, lA, 13) when ph;sical separation is not practical. | |||
: 2. The regregation of the Non-Class lE cables may be designated non-safety related, associated or safety-related. | |||
Non-Class lE loads which are connected to Class lE power supplies that are not tripped on an accident signal are not addressed in this analysis. | |||
UEONir w - | |||
c ogg URE: (E m PLE) | |||
C x S tE ses UNCONTRC! 'r D COfb': - | |||
C O1 - | |||
~ | |||
Breaker Trips on Accident Signal | |||
. C o) e i | |||
~ | |||
3 | |||
. Class lE Cable m cr--Segregation Code: Safety-Related, | |||
' !b M.ini.= Secaration Ncn-Safety Related er Asscciated 3 | |||
* Distance or Pirrier P@ed Divisicn (Also, !b Mini:m:n separation if rot Practical Distance or Barrier P @ ed knong These Cables Khich Can Be Segregated | |||
< = Safety-Pelated, Non-Safety Pelated or | |||
_ _ _. Associated and are Tripped on an Accident Signal). . | |||
C: ASS lE LCAD > | |||
ICN-C ASS lE ICAD | |||
, I | |||
; l I q .. _ | |||
T l | |||
1" ("I 19 $T | |||
%) u f,7 | |||
:.1 J.Iu_iJ . 2. I ;- | |||
9601280231 PDR ADOCK h hPDR61 ~~ | |||
A | |||
~ | |||
Celes. For Seoaration Re:uire ents for Circuits C. c. No. / 9 - N -/8 SARGENT k LUNDY Connecu to a. ass s sources wmen ara | |||
+ - | |||
,,,,, ..... m.~ -s e- -m- e g-m am n em 2-1-e s c .- c *oo X Lf ety-R efered Non-hf ety-R eisted ,Sge 2 of 2 C:ent Illinois Pcwer Company Prepared by Date Proiect Clinton Pcwer Station - Unit 1 Reviewed by - lcm Proi. No. 4536-00 Eame No. Aporeved by | |||
!Oate JUSTIFICATICN: | |||
IEEE-384-1974, Section 4.6 defines separation. requirements of Non-Class lE circuits to Class lE and associated circuits. Sections 1 | |||
4.6.2 and 5.1.1.2 dictate that separation distances can be established by a'nalysis. Regulatory Guide 1.'75, Revision 2 Regulatory. Position C.1 requires that breakers which are used as isolation devices be tripped on the receipt of an accident signal. | |||
All circuits for Non-Class lE loads on the Clinton Project which are tripped on an accident signal become isolated from their respective __ | |||
power sources during accident conditions. When these circuits are isolated, the conductors cannot become energized and therefore, they cannot pose a threat to the essential sources in accordance with | |||
, Regulatory Guide 1.75, Revision 2 requirements. | |||
; Based on the, preceding, cables which are connected to Class lE power . | |||
l sources, feed Non-Class lE loads and are tripped on an accident ' | |||
l signal, do not require separation from Ciass lE, Associated Circuits | |||
,___,or ,Non , Class _ lE Circuits of the same division when physical separation, , | |||
is not practical. The segregation of. these cabl.es may be Class lE, c | |||
i i Non-Class lE or Associated. | |||
i g . | |||
REVIEW METHOD: . | |||
o - | |||
t .,. | |||
~- * | |||
*- ..L....s . . . .. | |||
d Detailed review of entire analysis. | |||
L L _.._ .. .._ .. ... _ .1. .. | |||
i I | |||
I_ | |||
g _ - . . _ . ._ . . ._..e I | |||
. . _ , _ . , _ . . . - . . - ~ . _ | |||
i i g . . _ . _ . . _ . | |||
b/ | |||
p- . | |||
i ' ' | |||
i i | |||
_ _ . = , | |||
! , I | |||
__ . . . . . . . _ . . . . . -_ . . . _ . . . _ _ _ . . . - . -- _ ._ _ _ _1 L. . . | |||
{._.2._____. - | |||
t l . | |||
**********.e.y .........e,e..e. ....a r* . _ee. e s. Je.-ee. e. ....eg. - | |||
g k}} | |||
Revision as of 21:19, 30 June 2020
| ML20137M281 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton |
| Issue date: | 02/01/1985 |
| From: | SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137M160 | List:
|
| References | |
| 19-BD-15, 19-BD-15-R, 19-BD-15-R00, NUDOCS 8601280231 | |
| Download: ML20137M281 (2) | |
Text
caics For Secaration Recuirements for Circ:its c,ie No. / 9 - f_d - @
SA!! GENT h LUNDY connecta$ to Class lE Sources,which are _
o Date 3 _ 1 _ g-c a.awr se N
. %:%-4 -M M M Amida'-t Sir-1 e, ev
.- % O-C^OO y f Lfetv-Related N on-Lf ety-R elated Page 1 of 2 Cf eat Illi-oie pcwer cc rany Pre :ared hv _.*E-[ fd.,,,[~[ Oste,.*- -
Prote:t cli- to - pcwer Station - Unit 1 Rev'ewed by l / / I'~;' [_, [ Oate f-/ /' ~
Foi No. .:534 n0 E wg No. Approved by hMi[/ V. ~h'M Date 2 - f -St~
RE:SPCts!B'E DIVISICti: EFED FILE 20. : 1923 V PURPOSE:
The purpose of this analysis is to demonstrate that:
- 1. A cable which is connected to a Class lE power supply,~ feeds Non-Class 1E load (s). and is tripped on an accident signal, does not recuire separation from Class lE and associated or Non-Class lE cables of the same division (e.g. Seg. Code lE, lA, 13) when ph;sical separation is not practical.
- 2. The regregation of the Non-Class lE cables may be designated non-safety related, associated or safety-related.
Non-Class lE loads which are connected to Class lE power supplies that are not tripped on an accident signal are not addressed in this analysis.
UEONir w -
c ogg URE: (E m PLE)
C x S tE ses UNCONTRC! 'r D COfb': -
C O1 -
~
Breaker Trips on Accident Signal
. C o) e i
~
3
. Class lE Cable m cr--Segregation Code: Safety-Related,
' !b M.ini.= Secaration Ncn-Safety Related er Asscciated 3
- Distance or Pirrier P@ed Divisicn (Also, !b Mini:m:n separation if rot Practical Distance or Barrier P @ ed knong These Cables Khich Can Be Segregated
< = Safety-Pelated, Non-Safety Pelated or
_ _ _. Associated and are Tripped on an Accident Signal). .
C: ASS lE LCAD >
ICN-C ASS lE ICAD
, I
- l I q .. _
T l
1" ("I 19 $T
%) u f,7
- .1 J.Iu_iJ . 2. I ;-
9601280231 PDR ADOCK h hPDR61 ~~
A
~
Celes. For Seoaration Re:uire ents for Circuits C. c. No. / 9 - N -/8 SARGENT k LUNDY Connecu to a. ass s sources wmen ara
+ -
,,,,, ..... m.~ -s e- -m- e g-m am n em 2-1-e s c .- c *oo X Lf ety-R efered Non-hf ety-R eisted ,Sge 2 of 2 C:ent Illinois Pcwer Company Prepared by Date Proiect Clinton Pcwer Station - Unit 1 Reviewed by - lcm Proi. No. 4536-00 Eame No. Aporeved by
!Oate JUSTIFICATICN:
IEEE-384-1974, Section 4.6 defines separation. requirements of Non-Class lE circuits to Class lE and associated circuits. Sections 1
4.6.2 and 5.1.1.2 dictate that separation distances can be established by a'nalysis. Regulatory Guide 1.'75, Revision 2 Regulatory. Position C.1 requires that breakers which are used as isolation devices be tripped on the receipt of an accident signal.
All circuits for Non-Class lE loads on the Clinton Project which are tripped on an accident signal become isolated from their respective __
power sources during accident conditions. When these circuits are isolated, the conductors cannot become energized and therefore, they cannot pose a threat to the essential sources in accordance with
, Regulatory Guide 1.75, Revision 2 requirements.
- Based on the, preceding, cables which are connected to Class lE power .
l sources, feed Non-Class lE loads and are tripped on an accident '
l signal, do not require separation from Ciass lE, Associated Circuits
,___,or ,Non , Class _ lE Circuits of the same division when physical separation, ,
is not practical. The segregation of. these cabl.es may be Class lE, c
i i Non-Class lE or Associated.
i g .
REVIEW METHOD: .
o -
t .,.
~- *
- - ..L....s . . . ..
d Detailed review of entire analysis.
L L _.._ .. .._ .. ... _ .1. ..
i I
I_
g _ - . . _ . ._ . . ._..e I
. . _ , _ . , _ . . . - . . - ~ . _
i i g . . _ . _ . . _ .
b/
p- .
i ' '
i i
_ _ . = ,
! , I
__ . . . . . . . _ . . . . . -_ . . . _ . . . _ _ _ . . . - . -- _ ._ _ _ _1 L. . .
{._.2._____. -
t l .
- .e.y .........e,e..e. ....a r* . _ee. e s. Je.-ee. e. ....eg. -
g k