NRC Generic Letter 1981-19: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/20/1981
| issue date = 04/20/1981
| title = NRC Generic Letter 1981-019: Thermal Shock to Reactor Pressure Vessels
| title = NRC Generic Letter 1981-019: Thermal Shock to Reactor Pressure Vessels
| author name = Eisenhut D G
| author name = Eisenhut D
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:* 4 -9' h ;UNITED SATENUCLEAR REGULATORY COhWISSIONApril 20, 1981TO ALL LICENSEES OF OPERATING PWR HUCMEAR POWER PLANTS
{{#Wiki_filter:-


SUBJECT: THERMAL SHOCK TO REACTOR PRESSURE VESSELS (GENERIC LETTER 81-19)For a number of years the NRC and industry have been studying the effectsof thermal shock to reactor pressure vessels. Efforts have focused onthe identification and characterization of thermal repressurization transientscenarios and their probabilities and on the development of material prop-erties data and improved analytical tools for assessing vessel integrity.A number of on-going research programs are supportive of this effort andcontinue to provide information intended to quantify actual thennal/vech-anical vessel behavior.In the event of an overcooling system transient resultirfng in a cooldownof the reactor vessel, followed by repre',surization of the pressure boundaryabove a critical level during the cooling period, vessel integrity could bejeopardized. The likelihood of a vessel cracking upon experiencing athermal/repressurlzation transient depends upor. (1) its material properties,which degrade with -increased irradiation; (2) the severity of the thermalshock which is a function of the degree of mixing of primary water in thesystem and relatively cold water injected by the high pressure pumps makingup part of the Emergency Core Cooling System; and (3) the magnitude of thepressure transient occurring during repressurization.Earlier this year a number of analyses sponsored by the Commission researchprogram were completed and results became available to the staff. Theseanalyses were directed at providing a better understanding of the severityof overcooling transients which combine operational experience and expectedreactor vessel material properties. In the same time frame, as a responseto post-THI requirements, the staff initiated its review of thermallmechanicalreports from licensees of Babcock and Wilcox (BW) operating reactors intendedto further evaluate the effect of high-pressure safety injection on vesselintegrity for small-break loss-of-coolant accidents (Item II.K.2.13 ofNUREG-0737, Clarification of THI Action Requirements, Novenber 1980). -itwas as a result of a review of these on-going efforts that the staff decidedto accelerate its evaluation of possible thermal shock to reactor pressurevessels.'On March 31, 1981, the NRC staff met with the PWR Owners G UP and repre-sentatives of NSSS vendors to discuss the effects of potential thermal shockto reactor pressure vessels by overcooling transients and.the potential conssequences of subsequent repressurization at relatively low temperature. Acopy of the minutes of that meeting is enclosed for your information.'810625 00ROA 0.40 ~. I-2 -This letter is to confirmof this concern includingaFoiding repressurizationthe intent of the owners groups to perform a studydeveloping alternatives to protect the vesrel bywith cold water.As indicated in the enclosed minutes of the meeting, we expect to receive aletter report from each of the owners groups summarizing their efforts notlater than May 15, 1981. We expect that you are familiar with the activitiesof the appropriate owners group, actively participating in their discussions, andwill provide a docketed response by May 22, 1981, identifying the specificactions you propose to take for your facility.Division ofLcensingOffice of Nuclear ReactorRegulation
* 4
    9'    h        ;UNITED                    SATE
                              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COhWISSION
                                        April 20, 1981 TO ALL LICENSEES OF OPERATING PWR HUCMEAR POWER PLANTS
                                                                                                  81-19)
    SUBJECT:       THERMAL SHOCK TO REACTOR PRESSURE VESSELS (GENERIC LETTER
                                                                                        the effects For a number of years the NRC and industry have been studying         have focused on of thermal shock to reactor pressure vessels. Efforts             repressurization          transient the identification and characterization of         thermal development         of material       prop- scenarios and their probabilities and on the                           vessel       integrity.


===Enclosure:===
erties data and improved analytical tools        for    assessing A number of on-going research programs are supportive actual        of this effort and to  quantify                  thennal/vech- continue to provide information intended anical vessel behavior.
Minutes of PWR Owners Groups.Meeting With NRC on March 31, 1981cc w/encl:Service Lists}}
 
in a cooldown In the event of an overcooling system transient resultirfng      of  the    pressure boundary of the reactor vessel, followed by repre',surizationvessel integrity could be above a critical level during the cooling        period, jeopardized. The likelihood of a vessel cracking upon                  experiencing a thermal/repressurlzation transient      depends    upor.  (1)  its    material properties, which degrade with -increased irradiation;        (2)  the    severity      of the thermal of  mixing    of  primary      water in the shock which is a function of the degree                              pressure        pumps making system and relatively cold water injected        by  the  high System;    and    (3)  the    magnitude      of the up part of the Emergency Core Cooling pressure transient occurring during      repressurization.
 
Commission research Earlier this year a number of analyses sponsored by the                                  These program were completed and results became available to the staff.            of    the  severity analyses were directed at providing      a  better    understanding and expected of overcooling transients which combine operational experience      frame,      as  a response reactor vessel material properties.      In the    same    time its  review    of    thermallmechanical to post-THI requirements, the staff initiated                                    reactors intended reports from licensees of Babcock and Wilcox (BW) operating          injection        on vessel to further evaluate the effect of high-pressure            safety accidents      (Item    II.K.2.13      of integrity for small-break loss-of-coolant                                          1980).
        NUREG-0737, Clarification of THI Action Requirements,              Novenber                  -it that    the    staff  decided was as a result of a review of these on-going efforts to reactor pressure to accelerate its evaluation of possible thermal shock vessels.'
        On March 31, 1981, the NRC staff met with the PWR Owners G
                                                                                        UP and repre- sentatives of NSSS vendors to discuss the effects              of  potential        thermal shock transients        and.the      potential      cons to reactor pressure vessels by overcooling                            low    temperature.        A
        sequences of subsequent repressurization at        relatively for  your    information.
 
copy of the minutes of that meeting is enclosed
'810625 00ROA
 
0 0 ~.  I
.4
                                              -  2- This letter isto confirm the intent of the owners groups to perform a study of this concern including developing alternatives to protect the vesrel by aFoiding repressurization with cold water.
 
As indicated in the enclosed minutes of the meeting, we expect to receive a letter report from each of the owners groups summarizing their efforts not later than May 15, 1981. We expect that you are familiar with the activities of the appropriate owners group, actively participating in their discussions, and will provide a docketed response by May 22, 1981, identifying the specific actions you propose to take for your facility.
 
Division ofLcensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
          Minutes of PWR Owners Groups.
 
Meeting With NRC on March 31, 1981 cc w/encl:
          Service Lists}}


{{GL-Nav}}
{{GL-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 02:10, 24 November 2019

NRC Generic Letter 1981-019: Thermal Shock to Reactor Pressure Vessels
ML031210463
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/20/1981
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
GL-81-019, NUDOCS 8106250094
Download: ML031210463 (2)


-

  • 4

9' h ;UNITED SATE

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COhWISSION

April 20, 1981 TO ALL LICENSEES OF OPERATING PWR HUCMEAR POWER PLANTS

81-19)

SUBJECT: THERMAL SHOCK TO REACTOR PRESSURE VESSELS (GENERIC LETTER

the effects For a number of years the NRC and industry have been studying have focused on of thermal shock to reactor pressure vessels. Efforts repressurization transient the identification and characterization of thermal development of material prop- scenarios and their probabilities and on the vessel integrity.

erties data and improved analytical tools for assessing A number of on-going research programs are supportive actual of this effort and to quantify thennal/vech- continue to provide information intended anical vessel behavior.

in a cooldown In the event of an overcooling system transient resultirfng of the pressure boundary of the reactor vessel, followed by repre',surizationvessel integrity could be above a critical level during the cooling period, jeopardized. The likelihood of a vessel cracking upon experiencing a thermal/repressurlzation transient depends upor. (1) its material properties, which degrade with -increased irradiation; (2) the severity of the thermal of mixing of primary water in the shock which is a function of the degree pressure pumps making system and relatively cold water injected by the high System; and (3) the magnitude of the up part of the Emergency Core Cooling pressure transient occurring during repressurization.

Commission research Earlier this year a number of analyses sponsored by the These program were completed and results became available to the staff. of the severity analyses were directed at providing a better understanding and expected of overcooling transients which combine operational experience frame, as a response reactor vessel material properties. In the same time its review of thermallmechanical to post-THI requirements, the staff initiated reactors intended reports from licensees of Babcock and Wilcox (BW) operating injection on vessel to further evaluate the effect of high-pressure safety accidents (Item II.K.2.13 of integrity for small-break loss-of-coolant 1980).

NUREG-0737, Clarification of THI Action Requirements, Novenber -it that the staff decided was as a result of a review of these on-going efforts to reactor pressure to accelerate its evaluation of possible thermal shock vessels.'

On March 31, 1981, the NRC staff met with the PWR Owners G

UP and repre- sentatives of NSSS vendors to discuss the effects of potential thermal shock transients and.the potential cons to reactor pressure vessels by overcooling low temperature. A

sequences of subsequent repressurization at relatively for your information.

copy of the minutes of that meeting is enclosed

'810625 00ROA

0 0 ~. I

.4

- 2- This letter isto confirm the intent of the owners groups to perform a study of this concern including developing alternatives to protect the vesrel by aFoiding repressurization with cold water.

As indicated in the enclosed minutes of the meeting, we expect to receive a letter report from each of the owners groups summarizing their efforts not later than May 15, 1981. We expect that you are familiar with the activities of the appropriate owners group, actively participating in their discussions, and will provide a docketed response by May 22, 1981, identifying the specific actions you propose to take for your facility.

Division ofLcensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:

Minutes of PWR Owners Groups.

Meeting With NRC on March 31, 1981 cc w/encl:

Service Lists

Template:GL-Nav