ML070170422: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:January 12, 2007M. A. McBurnett, Vice President Oversight and Regulatory Affairs South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth, TX 77483
{{#Wiki_filter:January 12, 2007 M. A. McBurnett, Vice President Oversight and Regulatory Affairs South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth, TX 77483


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SITE VISIT TO THE SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT SITE TO OBSERVECOMBINED LICENSE PRE-APPLICATION SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES (PROJECT NO. 749)
SITE VISIT TO THE SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT SITE TO OBSERVE COMBINED LICENSE PRE-APPLICATION SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES (PROJECT NO. 749)


==Dear Mr. McBurnett:==
==Dear Mr. McBurnett:==


On December 4-6, 2006, an Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspector from Region IIconducted a visit to the South Texas Project site accompanied by members of the NRC's Office of New Reactors. The purpose of the visit was to observe combined license (COL) pre-application subsurface investigation activities being conducted to obtain geotechnical/seismic data to support a COL application for two new nuclear power plants. These observations will provide background information for NRC's future review of the expected COL application for the South Texas Project site. A summary of the site visit that includes a list of NRC participants and persons with whomdiscussion were held is enclosed. Sincerely,     /RA/Mark S. Lesser, ChiefConstruction Inspection Branch Division of Construction InspectionProject No. 749
On December 4-6, 2006, an Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspector from Region II conducted a visit to the South Texas Project site accompanied by members of the NRCs Office of New Reactors. The purpose of the visit was to observe combined license (COL) pre-application subsurface investigation activities being conducted to obtain geotechnical/seismic data to support a COL application for two new nuclear power plants. These observations will provide background information for NRCs future review of the expected COL application for the South Texas Project site.
A summary of the site visit that includes a list of NRC participants and persons with whom discussion were held is enclosed.
Sincerely,
                                                  /RA/
Mark S. Lesser, Chief Construction Inspection Branch Division of Construction Inspection Project No. 749


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
As stated cc w/encl: (See next page) 2A. McBurenttcc w/encl:Greg T. Gibson, Licensing Manager STP Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 289, Mail Code: N5015 Wadsworth, TX 77483Environmental and National ResourcesPolicy Director P.O. Box 12428 Austin, TX 78711-3189Jon C. WoodCox, Smith & Matthews 112 East Pecan, Suite 1800 San Antonio, TX 78205Director, Division of Compliance &Inspection Bureau of Radiation Control Texas Department of State Health Services 1100 West 49 th StreetAustin, TX 78756Mr. Brian AlmonPublic Utility Commission William B. Travis Building P.O. Box 13326 1701 North Congress Avenue Austin, TX 78701-3326Susan M. JablonskiOffice of Permitting, Remediation and Registration Texas Commission on Environmental Quality MC-122 P.O. Box 13087 Austin, TX 78711-3087INPORecords Center 700 Galleria Parkway Atlanta, GA 30339-3064Regional Administrator, Region IVU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011Mr. Steve WinnTexas Genco, LLP 12301 Kurland Drive Houston, TX 77034Judge, Matagorda CountyMatagorda County Courthouse 1700 Seventh Street Bay City, TX 77414A.H. Gutterman, Esq.Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004Mr. Terry Parks, Chief InspectorTexas Department of Licensing and Regulation Boiler Division P.O. Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711Mr. Ted Enos4200 South Hulen Suite 630 Ft. Worth, TX 76109
As stated cc w/encl: (See next page)


ML070170422OFFICERII:DCINROSIGNATUREMSL via emailMSL via emailNAMEJTapiaGWunderDATE1/11/061/11/06 E-MAIL COPY?    YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO SITE VISIT TO THE SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT SITE TO OBSERVE COMBINED LICENSE PRE-APPLICATIONSUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIESPROJECT NO. 749Purpose of Visit
A. McBurentt                              2 cc w/encl:                                 Regional Administrator, Region IV Greg T. Gibson, Licensing Manager          U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission STP Nuclear Operating Company              611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 P.O. Box 289, Mail Code: N5015              Arlington, TX 76011 Wadsworth, TX 77483 Environmental and National Resources        Mr. Steve Winn Policy Director                            Texas Genco, LLP P.O. Box 12428                              12301 Kurland Drive Austin, TX 78711-3189                      Houston, TX 77034 Jon C. Wood                                Judge, Matagorda County Cox, Smith & Matthews                      Matagorda County Courthouse 112 East Pecan, Suite 1800                  1700 Seventh Street San Antonio, TX 78205                      Bay City, TX 77414 Director, Division of Compliance &          A.H. Gutterman, Esq.
:A site visit was conducted on December 4-6, 2006 by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)Regional and Office of New Reactors (NRO) staff. An NRC inspector observed combined license (COL) pre-application subsurface investigation activities conducted to obtain geotechnical and seismic data at the proposed location of two new nuclear power plants at the South Texas Project site. The visit was an on-site observation and information gathering trip in which the staff used the following inspection manual chapters and procedures as guidance:*NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 2502, "Construction Inspection Program:Pre-Combined License (PRE-COL) Phase"*NRC Inspection Procedure 35004, "Pre-Docketing Early Site Permit QualityAssurance Controls Inspection"*NRC Inspection Procedure 45051, "Geotechnical/Foundation ActivitiesProcedure Review"The visit served to ascertain whether adequate quality assurance controls had been establishedand were being implemented and to assess whether the technical requirements for geotechnical exploration for a COL had been adequately addressed through specifications, drawings, and work procedures. Principal Persons Contacted
Inspection                                  Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Bureau of Radiation Control                1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Texas Department of State Health Services  Washington, DC 20004 1100 West 49th Street Austin, TX 78756                            Mr. Terry Parks, Chief Inspector Texas Department of Licensing Mr. Brian Almon                              and Regulation Public Utility Commission                  Boiler Division William B. Travis Building                  P.O. Box 12157 P.O. Box 13326                              Austin, TX 78711 1701 North Congress Avenue Austin, TX 78701-3326                      Mr. Ted Enos 4200 South Hulen Susan M. Jablonski                          Suite 630 Office of Permitting, Remediation          Ft. Worth, TX 76109 and Registration Texas Commission on Environmental Quality MC-122 P.O. Box 13087 Austin, TX 78711-3087 INPO Records Center 700 Galleria Parkway Atlanta, GA 30339-3064
:N. Barclay, QA Engineer, GE NuclearJ. Conly, Licensing Engineer, STPNOC G. Day, Hydrogeologist, Bechtel G. Ehlert, Civil Engineer, GE Nuclear G. Gibson, Licensing Manager, STPNOC R. Gibson, Assistant Project Engineer, Bechtel R. Jolly, Project QA Manager, Bechtel A. Kottenstette, Quality Assurance Representative, MACTEC B. Orth, Geotechnical Engineer, Bechtel M. Smith, Quality Supervisor, STPNOC J. Stone, CTC, SunTech M. Sufnarski, Project Manager, MACTEC C. Wang, Geotechnical Engineer, Bechtel K. White, Project Principal, MACTEC G. Winebrenner, Nuclear Programs Director, MACTEC R. Wolters, QA Manager, GE Nuclear 2NRC Inspector
:J. Tapia, P.E., Senior Reactor Inspector, Region II NRC Accompanying Personnel
:Y. Li, Geophysicist, Office of New ReactorsK. See, Hydrologist, Office of New Reactors G. Stirewalt, Geologist, Office of New Reactors G. Wunder, Project Manager, Office of New Reactors


===
ML070170422 OFFICE              RII:DCI        NRO SIGNATURE          MSL via email  MSL via email NAME                JTapia        GWunder DATE                    1/11/06     1/11/06 E-MAIL COPY?          YES      NO  YES      NO  YES    NO      YES    NO    YES    NO    YES  NO    YES NO
Background===
:By letter dated June 19, 2006, the South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC)informed the NRC that it had selected the South Texas Project site to be the subject for a COL application, with the intent of submitting the application in late 2007. A COL is a combined construction permit and operating license with conditions for a nuclear power facility pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52 Subpart C. STPNOC contracted Bechtel as the nuclear services provider that will develop the COL application and MACTEC to conduct the site studies and perform the sample accumulation and testing required for the application. Overview of Subsurface Investigation Activities Discussed and/or Observed
:STPNOC planned to use the subsurface investigations described below to provide data todetermine site suitability for an COL. STPNOC's current subsurface investigation activities included areas which would be the site of cooling towers, yard structures and the reactor sites.
The site investigation was expected to last 14 weeks and include 125 borings that will total approximately 15,000 feet of drilling when complete. The site is characterized by inter-bedded clay and sand strata with bedrock at approximately 6000 feet deep. The scope of the site characterization activities included various field and geotechnicallaboratory tests. The following field testing methods were utilized:*Standard Penetration Test Borings (SPT) (ASTM D1586-99, ASTM D4633-05) *Undisturbed Sampling Using Shelby Tube Samplers (ASTM D1587-00)
*Seismic Shear and Compressional Velocity Measurements (P-S Logging)
*Borehole Geophysical Logging (ASTM D5753-05)
*Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) Soundings (ASTM D5778-95)
*Pore Water Pressure Measurements
*Dynamic Shear Wave Measurements
*Pore Pressure Dissipation Tests
*Electrical Resistivity Testing (ASTM G57-95a)
*Field Permeability Testing (ASTM 4044-96, ASTM D4630-96)
*Ground Water Levels (ASTM D4750-87)
*Auger Boring Sampling (ASTM D1452-80)
*Soil Sample Classification (ASTM D2487-06, ASTM D2488-00)
*Preserving/Transporting of Samples (ASTM D4220-95)


3The following laboratory testing standards were scheduled to be implemented at the MACTEClaboratory:*Moisture Content (ASTM D2216-05)
SITE VISIT TO THE SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT SITE TO OBSERVE COMBINED LICENSE PRE-APPLICATION SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES PROJECT NO. 749 Purpose of Visit:
*Unit Weight of Soil (MACTEC TP4)
A site visit was conducted on December 4-6, 2006 by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
*Specific Gravity of Soil (ASTM D854-06)
Regional and Office of New Reactors (NRO) staff. An NRC inspector observed combined license (COL) pre-application subsurface investigation activities conducted to obtain geotechnical and seismic data at the proposed location of two new nuclear power plants at the South Texas Project site. The visit was an on-site observation and information gathering trip in which the staff used the following inspection manual chapters and procedures as guidance:
*Particle-Size Analysis (ASTM D422-63, ASTM D6913-04)
* NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 2502, Construction Inspection Program:
*Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318-05)
Pre-Combined License (PRE-COL) Phase
*Chemical Analysis (EPA Method 300.0 & 150.0)
* NRC Inspection Procedure 35004, Pre-Docketing Early Site Permit Quality Assurance Controls Inspection
*Moisture-Density (ASTM D1557-02)
* NRC Inspection Procedure 45051, Geotechnical/Foundation Activities Procedure Review The visit served to ascertain whether adequate quality assurance controls had been established and were being implemented and to assess whether the technical requirements for geotechnical exploration for a COL had been adequately addressed through specifications, drawings, and work procedures.
*Unconfined Compression Strength (ASTM D2166-00)
Principal Persons Contacted:
*Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression (ASTM D2850-03a)
N. Barclay, QA Engineer, GE Nuclear J. Conly, Licensing Engineer, STPNOC G. Day, Hydrogeologist, Bechtel G. Ehlert, Civil Engineer, GE Nuclear G. Gibson, Licensing Manager, STPNOC R. Gibson, Assistant Project Engineer, Bechtel R. Jolly, Project QA Manager, Bechtel A. Kottenstette, Quality Assurance Representative, MACTEC B. Orth, Geotechnical Engineer, Bechtel M. Smith, Quality Supervisor, STPNOC J. Stone, CTC, SunTech M. Sufnarski, Project Manager, MACTEC C. Wang, Geotechnical Engineer, Bechtel K. White, Project Principal, MACTEC G. Winebrenner, Nuclear Programs Director, MACTEC R. Wolters, QA Manager, GE Nuclear
*Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression (ASTM D4767-04)
 
*Direct-Shear Test (ASTM D3080-04)
2 NRC Inspector:
*Consolidation Test (ASTM D2435-04)
J. Tapia, P.E., Senior Reactor Inspector, Region II NRC Accompanying Personnel:
*Laboratory Compaction (ASTM D698-00a, ASTM D1557-02)
Y. Li, Geophysicist, Office of New Reactors K. See, Hydrologist, Office of New Reactors G. Stirewalt, Geologist, Office of New Reactors G. Wunder, Project Manager, Office of New Reactors
*Specific Gravity of Soil Solids (ASTM D854-06)  
 
*Laboratory California Bearing Ratio (ASTM D1883-05)
==Background:==
*Resonant Column/Torsional Shear Test (University of Texas Procedure) The inspector reviewed appropriate quality control and technical site characterizationprocedures and verified that the following attributes were adequate:*Approved and documented instructions, procedures, and drawings were used forsite characterization activities.*Measures were implemented for test control and control of special processesand engineering direction was readily available.*Measures existed to identify and resolve non-conformances and conditionsadverse to quality.*For site characterization activities performed by vendors, appropriate oversightand procurement controls were implemented.The inspector reviewed and assessed the adequacy of the following:*Bechtel Engineering Specification No. 25293-401-3PS-CY00-00001, Rev. 000, "Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing for STP Units 3 & 4."*MACTEC Quality Assurance Project Document, Rev. 0
 
*MACTEC STP COL Project Geotechnical Work Plan, Rev. 0
By letter dated June 19, 2006, the South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) informed the NRC that it had selected the South Texas Project site to be the subject for a COL application, with the intent of submitting the application in late 2007. A COL is a combined construction permit and operating license with conditions for a nuclear power facility pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52 Subpart C. STPNOC contracted Bechtel as the nuclear services provider that will develop the COL application and MACTEC to conduct the site studies and perform the sample accumulation and testing required for the application.
*MACTEC QA Surveillance Report Nos. ST-1 through ST-7.
Overview of Subsurface Investigation Activities Discussed and/or Observed:
*Bechtel Quality Services Department Procedure No. 2QP-Q01N-181, Rev. 1,"Project Quality Assurance Surveillances."*Bechtel Quality Oversight Plan for Subsurface Investigation and LaboratoryTesting.*Bechtel QA Surveillance Report No. 25293-QSSS-06-001
STPNOC planned to use the subsurface investigations described below to provide data to determine site suitability for an COL. STPNOCs current subsurface investigation activities included areas which would be the site of cooling towers, yard structures and the reactor sites.
*Bechtel QA Surveillance Report No. 25293-QSSS-06-002
The site investigation was expected to last 14 weeks and include 125 borings that will total approximately 15,000 feet of drilling when complete. The site is characterized by inter-bedded clay and sand strata with bedrock at approximately 6000 feet deep.
*General Electric STP Surveillance Report No. 2006-01
The scope of the site characterization activities included various field and geotechnical laboratory tests. The following field testing methods were utilized:
*STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-20300
* Standard Penetration Test Borings (SPT) (ASTM D1586-99, ASTM D4633-05)
*STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-19496
* Undisturbed Sampling Using Shelby Tube Samplers (ASTM D1587-00)
*STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-20280
* Seismic Shear and Compressional Velocity Measurements (P-S Logging)
*STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-19810 4*STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-19776* Selected instrumentation and equipment calibration records.
* Borehole Geophysical Logging (ASTM D5753-05)
* Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) Soundings (ASTM D5778-95)
* Pore Water Pressure Measurements
* Dynamic Shear Wave Measurements
* Pore Pressure Dissipation Tests
* Electrical Resistivity Testing (ASTM G57-95a)
* Field Permeability Testing (ASTM 4044-96, ASTM D4630-96)
* Ground Water Levels (ASTM D4750-87)
* Auger Boring Sampling (ASTM D1452-80)
* Soil Sample Classification (ASTM D2487-06, ASTM D2488-00)
* Preserving/Transporting of Samples (ASTM D4220-95)
 
3 The following laboratory testing standards were scheduled to be implemented at the MACTEC laboratory:
* Moisture Content (ASTM D2216-05)
* Unit Weight of Soil (MACTEC TP4)
* Specific Gravity of Soil (ASTM D854-06)
* Particle-Size Analysis (ASTM D422-63, ASTM D6913-04)
* Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318-05)
* Chemical Analysis (EPA Method 300.0 & 150.0)
* Moisture-Density (ASTM D1557-02)
* Unconfined Compression Strength (ASTM D2166-00)
* Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression (ASTM D2850-03a)
* Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression (ASTM D4767-04)
* Direct-Shear Test (ASTM D3080-04)
* Consolidation Test (ASTM D2435-04)
* Laboratory Compaction (ASTM D698-00a, ASTM D1557-02)
* Specific Gravity of Soil Solids (ASTM D854-06)
* Laboratory California Bearing Ratio (ASTM D1883-05)
* Resonant Column/Torsional Shear Test (University of Texas Procedure)
The inspector reviewed appropriate quality control and technical site characterization procedures and verified that the following attributes were adequate:
* Approved and documented instructions, procedures, and drawings were used for site characterization activities.
* Measures were implemented for test control and control of special processes and engineering direction was readily available.
* Measures existed to identify and resolve non-conformances and conditions adverse to quality.
* For site characterization activities performed by vendors, appropriate oversight and procurement controls were implemented.
The inspector reviewed and assessed the adequacy of the following:
* Bechtel Engineering Specification No. 25293-401-3PS-CY00-00001, Rev. 000, Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing for STP Units 3 & 4.
* MACTEC Quality Assurance Project Document, Rev. 0
* MACTEC STP COL Project Geotechnical Work Plan, Rev. 0
* MACTEC QA Surveillance Report Nos. ST-1 through ST-7.
* Bechtel Quality Services Department Procedure No. 2QP-Q01N-181, Rev. 1, Project Quality Assurance Surveillances.
* Bechtel Quality Oversight Plan for Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing.
* Bechtel QA Surveillance Report No. 25293-QSSS-06-001
* Bechtel QA Surveillance Report No. 25293-QSSS-06-002
* General Electric STP Surveillance Report No. 2006-01
* STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-20300
* STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-19496
* STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-20280
* STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-19810
 
4
* STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-19776
* Selected instrumentation and equipment calibration records.
* Surveying records.
* Surveying records.
*Qualifications of personnel associated with geotechnical activities.
* Qualifications of personnel associated with geotechnical activities.
*Sample storage facilities.
* Sample storage facilities.
*Selected field logs and data sheets.Drilling and Sampling Observed
* Selected field logs and data sheets.
:Observation of work in progress included seismic logging and boring penetration testingactivities. The inspector verified that work was being performed in accordance with appropriate procedures. Nine drilling rigs and one CPT rig were operating during the site visit. Each drilling operation was controlled by a MACTEC rig geologist and each rig worked to an individual work instruction that was generated each day. Interviews were conducted with rig geologists, rig operators and technicians. Personnel were knowledgeable of applicable quality assurance and technical requirements. The inspector observed the following activities:*P-S Logging at boring B-428DH*SPT and Split-Spoon Sampling at boring B-402DH  
Drilling and Sampling Observed:
*SPT and Split-Spoon Sampling at boring B-330
Observation of work in progress included seismic logging and boring penetration testing activities. The inspector verified that work was being performed in accordance with appropriate procedures. Nine drilling rigs and one CPT rig were operating during the site visit. Each drilling operation was controlled by a MACTEC rig geologist and each rig worked to an individual work instruction that was generated each day. Interviews were conducted with rig geologists, rig operators and technicians. Personnel were knowledgeable of applicable quality assurance and technical requirements.
*CPT and Pore Pressure Dissipation Testing at boring C-410The observed testing was in accordance with applicable ASTM standards and procedurerequirements. The MACTEC rig geologist field boring logs were extensive in detail and provided a good record of test results. Samples were collected and stored in accordance with standard practices for preserving and transporting soil samples. The sample storage facility was located in a locked warehouse within the owner controlled area. In addition to jar sample collection, each sample was photographed and each photograph was logged. The preliminary results of P-S logging shear wave measurements indicated that the resultswere below 1000 feet-per-second in some cases. These results will require further analysis or additional testing to ensure that foundation design assumptions are adequate. The QA program implementation was evaluated by reviewing nonconformance reports (NCRs)generated to date. Twenty-five NCRs had been issued by MACTEC. The inspector determined that a low threshold for issuing a NCR was evident, indicating a robust implementation of the QA Program. Geotechnical subsurface investigation activities were being adequately controlled with anappropriate level of supervisory and Quality Assurance oversight and in accordance with procedural requirements and industry standards.}}
The inspector observed the following activities:
* P-S Logging at boring B-428DH
* SPT and Split-Spoon Sampling at boring B-402DH
* SPT and Split-Spoon Sampling at boring B-330
* CPT and Pore Pressure Dissipation Testing at boring C-410 The observed testing was in accordance with applicable ASTM standards and procedure requirements. The MACTEC rig geologist field boring logs were extensive in detail and provided a good record of test results. Samples were collected and stored in accordance with standard practices for preserving and transporting soil samples. The sample storage facility was located in a locked warehouse within the owner controlled area. In addition to jar sample collection, each sample was photographed and each photograph was logged.
The preliminary results of P-S logging shear wave measurements indicated that the results were below 1000 feet-per-second in some cases. These results will require further analysis or additional testing to ensure that foundation design assumptions are adequate.
The QA program implementation was evaluated by reviewing nonconformance reports (NCRs) generated to date. Twenty-five NCRs had been issued by MACTEC. The inspector determined that a low threshold for issuing a NCR was evident, indicating a robust implementation of the QA Program.
Geotechnical subsurface investigation activities were being adequately controlled with an appropriate level of supervisory and Quality Assurance oversight and in accordance with procedural requirements and industry standards.}}

Revision as of 10:29, 23 November 2019

Site Visit to the South Texas Project Site to Observe Combined License Pre-Application Subsurface Investigation Activities
ML070170422
Person / Time
Site: South Texas, PROJ0749  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 01/12/2007
From: Lesser M
NRC/RGN-II/DCI
To: Mcburnett M
South Texas
References
+reviewedgfw
Download: ML070170422 (7)


Text

January 12, 2007 M. A. McBurnett, Vice President Oversight and Regulatory Affairs South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth, TX 77483

SUBJECT:

SITE VISIT TO THE SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT SITE TO OBSERVE COMBINED LICENSE PRE-APPLICATION SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES (PROJECT NO. 749)

Dear Mr. McBurnett:

On December 4-6, 2006, an Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspector from Region II conducted a visit to the South Texas Project site accompanied by members of the NRCs Office of New Reactors. The purpose of the visit was to observe combined license (COL) pre-application subsurface investigation activities being conducted to obtain geotechnical/seismic data to support a COL application for two new nuclear power plants. These observations will provide background information for NRCs future review of the expected COL application for the South Texas Project site.

A summary of the site visit that includes a list of NRC participants and persons with whom discussion were held is enclosed.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mark S. Lesser, Chief Construction Inspection Branch Division of Construction Inspection Project No. 749

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: (See next page)

A. McBurentt 2 cc w/encl: Regional Administrator, Region IV Greg T. Gibson, Licensing Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission STP Nuclear Operating Company 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 P.O. Box 289, Mail Code: N5015 Arlington, TX 76011 Wadsworth, TX 77483 Environmental and National Resources Mr. Steve Winn Policy Director Texas Genco, LLP P.O. Box 12428 12301 Kurland Drive Austin, TX 78711-3189 Houston, TX 77034 Jon C. Wood Judge, Matagorda County Cox, Smith & Matthews Matagorda County Courthouse 112 East Pecan, Suite 1800 1700 Seventh Street San Antonio, TX 78205 Bay City, TX 77414 Director, Division of Compliance & A.H. Gutterman, Esq.

Inspection Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Bureau of Radiation Control 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Texas Department of State Health Services Washington, DC 20004 1100 West 49th Street Austin, TX 78756 Mr. Terry Parks, Chief Inspector Texas Department of Licensing Mr. Brian Almon and Regulation Public Utility Commission Boiler Division William B. Travis Building P.O. Box 12157 P.O. Box 13326 Austin, TX 78711 1701 North Congress Avenue Austin, TX 78701-3326 Mr. Ted Enos 4200 South Hulen Susan M. Jablonski Suite 630 Office of Permitting, Remediation Ft. Worth, TX 76109 and Registration Texas Commission on Environmental Quality MC-122 P.O. Box 13087 Austin, TX 78711-3087 INPO Records Center 700 Galleria Parkway Atlanta, GA 30339-3064

ML070170422 OFFICE RII:DCI NRO SIGNATURE MSL via email MSL via email NAME JTapia GWunder DATE 1/11/06 1/11/06 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

SITE VISIT TO THE SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT SITE TO OBSERVE COMBINED LICENSE PRE-APPLICATION SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES PROJECT NO. 749 Purpose of Visit:

A site visit was conducted on December 4-6, 2006 by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Regional and Office of New Reactors (NRO) staff. An NRC inspector observed combined license (COL) pre-application subsurface investigation activities conducted to obtain geotechnical and seismic data at the proposed location of two new nuclear power plants at the South Texas Project site. The visit was an on-site observation and information gathering trip in which the staff used the following inspection manual chapters and procedures as guidance:

Pre-Combined License (PRE-COL) Phase

  • NRC Inspection Procedure 45051, Geotechnical/Foundation Activities Procedure Review The visit served to ascertain whether adequate quality assurance controls had been established and were being implemented and to assess whether the technical requirements for geotechnical exploration for a COL had been adequately addressed through specifications, drawings, and work procedures.

Principal Persons Contacted:

N. Barclay, QA Engineer, GE Nuclear J. Conly, Licensing Engineer, STPNOC G. Day, Hydrogeologist, Bechtel G. Ehlert, Civil Engineer, GE Nuclear G. Gibson, Licensing Manager, STPNOC R. Gibson, Assistant Project Engineer, Bechtel R. Jolly, Project QA Manager, Bechtel A. Kottenstette, Quality Assurance Representative, MACTEC B. Orth, Geotechnical Engineer, Bechtel M. Smith, Quality Supervisor, STPNOC J. Stone, CTC, SunTech M. Sufnarski, Project Manager, MACTEC C. Wang, Geotechnical Engineer, Bechtel K. White, Project Principal, MACTEC G. Winebrenner, Nuclear Programs Director, MACTEC R. Wolters, QA Manager, GE Nuclear

2 NRC Inspector:

J. Tapia, P.E., Senior Reactor Inspector, Region II NRC Accompanying Personnel:

Y. Li, Geophysicist, Office of New Reactors K. See, Hydrologist, Office of New Reactors G. Stirewalt, Geologist, Office of New Reactors G. Wunder, Project Manager, Office of New Reactors

Background:

By letter dated June 19, 2006, the South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) informed the NRC that it had selected the South Texas Project site to be the subject for a COL application, with the intent of submitting the application in late 2007. A COL is a combined construction permit and operating license with conditions for a nuclear power facility pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52 Subpart C. STPNOC contracted Bechtel as the nuclear services provider that will develop the COL application and MACTEC to conduct the site studies and perform the sample accumulation and testing required for the application.

Overview of Subsurface Investigation Activities Discussed and/or Observed:

STPNOC planned to use the subsurface investigations described below to provide data to determine site suitability for an COL. STPNOCs current subsurface investigation activities included areas which would be the site of cooling towers, yard structures and the reactor sites.

The site investigation was expected to last 14 weeks and include 125 borings that will total approximately 15,000 feet of drilling when complete. The site is characterized by inter-bedded clay and sand strata with bedrock at approximately 6000 feet deep.

The scope of the site characterization activities included various field and geotechnical laboratory tests. The following field testing methods were utilized:

  • Undisturbed Sampling Using Shelby Tube Samplers (ASTM D1587-00)
  • Seismic Shear and Compressional Velocity Measurements (P-S Logging)
  • Borehole Geophysical Logging (ASTM D5753-05)
  • Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) Soundings (ASTM D5778-95)
  • Pore Water Pressure Measurements
  • Dynamic Shear Wave Measurements
  • Pore Pressure Dissipation Tests
  • Electrical Resistivity Testing (ASTM G57-95a)
  • Field Permeability Testing (ASTM 4044-96, ASTM D4630-96)
  • Ground Water Levels (ASTM D4750-87)
  • Auger Boring Sampling (ASTM D1452-80)
  • Soil Sample Classification (ASTM D2487-06, ASTM D2488-00)
  • Preserving/Transporting of Samples (ASTM D4220-95)

3 The following laboratory testing standards were scheduled to be implemented at the MACTEC laboratory:

  • Moisture Content (ASTM D2216-05)
  • Unit Weight of Soil (MACTEC TP4)
  • Particle-Size Analysis (ASTM D422-63, ASTM D6913-04)
  • Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318-05)
  • Chemical Analysis (EPA Method 300.0 & 150.0)
  • Moisture-Density (ASTM D1557-02)
  • Unconfined Compression Strength (ASTM D2166-00)
  • Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression (ASTM D2850-03a)
  • Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression (ASTM D4767-04)
  • Direct-Shear Test (ASTM D3080-04)
  • Consolidation Test (ASTM D2435-04)
  • Laboratory Compaction (ASTM D698-00a, ASTM D1557-02)
  • Resonant Column/Torsional Shear Test (University of Texas Procedure)

The inspector reviewed appropriate quality control and technical site characterization procedures and verified that the following attributes were adequate:

  • Approved and documented instructions, procedures, and drawings were used for site characterization activities.
  • Measures were implemented for test control and control of special processes and engineering direction was readily available.
  • For site characterization activities performed by vendors, appropriate oversight and procurement controls were implemented.

The inspector reviewed and assessed the adequacy of the following:

  • Bechtel Engineering Specification No. 25293-401-3PS-CY00-00001, Rev. 000, Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing for STP Units 3 & 4.
  • MACTEC Quality Assurance Project Document, Rev. 0
  • MACTEC STP COL Project Geotechnical Work Plan, Rev. 0
  • MACTEC QA Surveillance Report Nos. ST-1 through ST-7.
  • Bechtel Quality Services Department Procedure No. 2QP-Q01N-181, Rev. 1, Project Quality Assurance Surveillances.
  • Bechtel Quality Oversight Plan for Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing.
  • Bechtel QA Surveillance Report No. 25293-QSSS-06-001
  • Bechtel QA Surveillance Report No. 25293-QSSS-06-002
  • STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-20300
  • STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-19496
  • STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-20280
  • STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-19810

4

  • STPNOC Quality Monitoring Report MN-06-0-19776
  • Selected instrumentation and equipment calibration records.
  • Surveying records.
  • Qualifications of personnel associated with geotechnical activities.
  • Sample storage facilities.
  • Selected field logs and data sheets.

Drilling and Sampling Observed:

Observation of work in progress included seismic logging and boring penetration testing activities. The inspector verified that work was being performed in accordance with appropriate procedures. Nine drilling rigs and one CPT rig were operating during the site visit. Each drilling operation was controlled by a MACTEC rig geologist and each rig worked to an individual work instruction that was generated each day. Interviews were conducted with rig geologists, rig operators and technicians. Personnel were knowledgeable of applicable quality assurance and technical requirements.

The inspector observed the following activities:

  • P-S Logging at boring B-428DH
  • SPT and Split-Spoon Sampling at boring B-402DH
  • SPT and Split-Spoon Sampling at boring B-330
  • CPT and Pore Pressure Dissipation Testing at boring C-410 The observed testing was in accordance with applicable ASTM standards and procedure requirements. The MACTEC rig geologist field boring logs were extensive in detail and provided a good record of test results. Samples were collected and stored in accordance with standard practices for preserving and transporting soil samples. The sample storage facility was located in a locked warehouse within the owner controlled area. In addition to jar sample collection, each sample was photographed and each photograph was logged.

The preliminary results of P-S logging shear wave measurements indicated that the results were below 1000 feet-per-second in some cases. These results will require further analysis or additional testing to ensure that foundation design assumptions are adequate.

The QA program implementation was evaluated by reviewing nonconformance reports (NCRs) generated to date. Twenty-five NCRs had been issued by MACTEC. The inspector determined that a low threshold for issuing a NCR was evident, indicating a robust implementation of the QA Program.

Geotechnical subsurface investigation activities were being adequately controlled with an appropriate level of supervisory and Quality Assurance oversight and in accordance with procedural requirements and industry standards.