ML073390239: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 Jonathan Rowley -The question is From: To: Date: | {{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 Jonathan Rowley - The question is From: Jonathan Rowley To: dmannai@entergy.com; hmetell@entergy.com Date: 11/21/2007 11:59 AM | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
The question is Per our discussion today: | |||
file://C :\temp\GW} | Your response to Question 387 in your November 14, 2007,letter states that "In most cases the maximum component stress difference with time matched the maximum stressintensity calculatedby ANSYS. This shows that shearingstresses are negligible for the thermal transientat that location and the maximum component stress difference is the maximum stress intensity." Pleasejustify these statementsbased on qualitative/theoreticalresults or quantitative values for the blend radius locations, with geometrical discontinuities,of the thermal transientsanalyzed? | ||
00004.HTM 12/03/2007 | P.S. | ||
.... ..... ..Ic:\temp\GW}00004.TMP Page]_!I Mail Envelope Properties (47446402.40C: | SIA document QA-2000-102 was referenced to show that stresses are may not be negligible. | ||
12: 35182) | file://C :\temp\GW} 00004.HTM 12/03/2007 | ||
.... | |||
..... | |||
.. | |||
Ic:\temp\GW}00004.TMP Page]_!I Mail Envelope Properties (47446402.40C: 12: 35182) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
The question is Creation Date 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM From: Jonathan Rowley Created By: JGR@nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time entergy.com Transferred 11/21/2007 12:00:22 PM dmannai (dmannai@entergy.com) hmetell (hmetell@entergy.com) | |||
Post Office Delivered Route entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1305 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM TEXT.htm 1042 Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: | |||
Yes Priority: | |||
Standard ReplyRequested: | |||
No Return Notification: | |||
Send Notification when Opened Concealed | Send Notification when Opened Concealed | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
No Security: | No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened}} | ||
Standard To Be Delivered: | |||
Immediate Status Tracking: | |||
Delivered | |||
& Opened}} | |||
Revision as of 00:05, 23 November 2019
| ML073390239 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/21/2007 |
| From: | Rowley J NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR |
| To: | Entergy Corp |
| References | |
| TAC MD2297 | |
| Download: ML073390239 (2) | |
Text
Page 1 of 1 Jonathan Rowley - The question is From: Jonathan Rowley To: dmannai@entergy.com; hmetell@entergy.com Date: 11/21/2007 11:59 AM
Subject:
The question is Per our discussion today:
Your response to Question 387 in your November 14, 2007,letter states that "In most cases the maximum component stress difference with time matched the maximum stressintensity calculatedby ANSYS. This shows that shearingstresses are negligible for the thermal transientat that location and the maximum component stress difference is the maximum stress intensity." Pleasejustify these statementsbased on qualitative/theoreticalresults or quantitative values for the blend radius locations, with geometrical discontinuities,of the thermal transientsanalyzed?
P.S.
SIA document QA-2000-102 was referenced to show that stresses are may not be negligible.
file://C :\temp\GW} 00004.HTM 12/03/2007
....
.....
..
Ic:\temp\GW}00004.TMP Page]_!I Mail Envelope Properties (47446402.40C: 12: 35182)
Subject:
The question is Creation Date 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM From: Jonathan Rowley Created By: JGR@nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time entergy.com Transferred 11/21/2007 12:00:22 PM dmannai (dmannai@entergy.com) hmetell (hmetell@entergy.com)
Post Office Delivered Route entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1305 11/21/2007 11:59:46 AM TEXT.htm 1042 Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification:
Send Notification when Opened Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened